Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
Research article Topical Sections

Embedding CeO2 nanocontainers in a TiO2 coating on glass surfaces

  • Various strategies are being developed for the prevention of implant-related infections. One of them is the encapsulation of antimicrobial drugs in inorganic containers that can be released at the site of the implant. However, the attachment of such containers onto implant surfaces may be a challenge. In this study, it is demonstrated that CeO2 nanocontainers can be added to a TiO2 coating on glass surfaces. The structure, crystal phase and surface properties of the nanocontainers were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), powder X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and a zetasizer. The coatings were analyzed by SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to determine their homogeneity and ensure CeO2 encapsulation. The coatings were stable in air over prolonged time periods (> 6 months) and therefore hold promise for pursuing in biomedical applications.

    Citation: Jacinthe Gagnon, Rachel A. Caruso, Katharina M. Fromm. Embedding CeO2 nanocontainers in a TiO2 coating on glass surfaces[J]. AIMS Bioengineering, 2017, 4(1): 171-178. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2017.1.171

    Related Papers:

    [1] Olatunji Godo, Karen Gaskell, Gunja K. Pathak, Christina R. Kyrtsos, Sheryl H. Ehrman, Sameer B. Shah . Characterization of fluorescent iron nanoparticles—candidates for multimodal tracking of neuronal transport. AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(3): 362-378. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.3.362
    [2] Amin Shakiba, Oussama Zenasni, Maria D. Marquez, T. Randall Lee . Advanced drug delivery via self-assembled monolayer-coated nanoparticles. AIMS Bioengineering, 2017, 4(2): 275-299. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2017.2.275
    [3] Amit Aherwar, Amit K Singh, Amar Patnaik . Current and future biocompatibility aspects of biomaterials for hip prosthesis. AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(1): 23-43. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.1.23
    [4] Tanishka Taori, Anjali Borle, Shefali Maheshwari, Amit Reche . An insight into the biomaterials used in craniofacial tissue engineering inclusive of regenerative dentistry. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(2): 153-174. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023011
    [5] Kathryn A. Whitehead, Christopher M. Liauw, Joels S. T. Wilson-Nieuwenhuis, Anthony J. Slate, Ted Deisenroth, Andrea Preuss, Joanna Verran . The effect of the surface properties of poly(methyl methacrylate) on the attachment, adhesion and retention of fungal conidia. AIMS Bioengineering, 2020, 7(3): 165-178. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2020015
    [6] Chiara Ceresa, Francesco Tessarolo, Devid Maniglio, Iole Caola, Giandomenico Nollo, Maurizio Rinaldi, Letizia Fracchia . Inhibition of Candida albicans biofilm by lipopeptide AC7 coated medical-grade silicone in combination with farnesol. AIMS Bioengineering, 2018, 5(3): 192-208. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2018.3.192
    [7] Chiara Ceresa, Maurizio Rinaldi, Letizia Fracchia . Synergistic activity of antifungal drugs and lipopeptide AC7 against Candida albicans biofilm on silicone. AIMS Bioengineering, 2017, 4(2): 318-334. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2017.2.318
    [8] Daniel Pelaez, John H. Michel, Herman S. Cheung . Growth on elastic silicone substrate elicits a partial myogenic response in periodontal ligament derived stem cells. AIMS Bioengineering, 2016, 3(4): 515-527. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2016.4.515
    [9] José Luis Calvo-Guirado . New biomaterials for bone augmentation in complicated cases. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(3): 362-363. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023021
    [10] Anirudh Gupta, Bhairavi Kale, Deepika Masurkar, Priyanka Jaiswal . Etiology of dental implant complication and failure—an overview. AIMS Bioengineering, 2023, 10(2): 141-152. doi: 10.3934/bioeng.2023010
  • Various strategies are being developed for the prevention of implant-related infections. One of them is the encapsulation of antimicrobial drugs in inorganic containers that can be released at the site of the implant. However, the attachment of such containers onto implant surfaces may be a challenge. In this study, it is demonstrated that CeO2 nanocontainers can be added to a TiO2 coating on glass surfaces. The structure, crystal phase and surface properties of the nanocontainers were characterized by transmission electron microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), powder X-ray diffraction, infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and a zetasizer. The coatings were analyzed by SEM and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to determine their homogeneity and ensure CeO2 encapsulation. The coatings were stable in air over prolonged time periods (> 6 months) and therefore hold promise for pursuing in biomedical applications.


    1. Introduction

    Metallic biomaterials, such as titanium (Ti) and its alloys, are widely used in clinical applications, including in dental implants, artificial hip joints, and bone and external fixator [1,2]. The surface of these devices is often modified to improve biocompatibility [3,4,5]. Surface roughening is particularly effective for improving biocompatibility and inducing osseointegration [6,7]. For example, it has been demonstrated that surfaces treated by sand blasting and alkaline etching (SLA), a major technique for creating a roughened surface improves hard tissue compatibility [8], and micro-arc anodic oxidation, MAO yields a roughened surface for providing good corrosion resistance and biocompatibility [9,10,11]. On the other hand, excessively strong binding between bone and Ti can lead to refracture after remove the devices [12,13]; which can be prevented by inhibiting bone callus formation on the Ti surface [14].

    There are various reports regarding the effect of roughness on cell behaviors such as proliferation and differentiation. Ti with micrometer-scale average surface roughness (Ra) exhibited greater cell attachment than Ti with a smooth surface [15]. Osteoblast proliferation and differentiation were also shown to be increased by micrometer-scale Ra [16,17]. In contrast, Ti with nanometer-scale Ra had no effect on osteoblast function [18]. We previously reported that Ti surfaces with Ra in the order of 100 nm markedly reduced fibroblast attachment and proliferation [19]. Although these cells formed retained their characteristic morphology, there was little spreading. Cell morphology is closely related to cellular function through cell adhesion and membrane tension [20,21,22].

    In the present study, we investigated whether 100 nm-scale surface roughness influences osteoblast function. We prepared roughened Ti surfaces with a range of Ra values using silicon carbide (SiC) paper, which did not influence the chemical composition of the passive film on the Ti surface. Osteoblast were cultured on the surfaces and their adhesion, proliferation, and calcification were evaluated. The results insight into interaction between cells and materials as well as a basis for inhibiting bone callus formation on Ti implants and thus preventing refracture after nail extraction.


    2. Materials and Method


    2.1. Preparation of substrates

    Commercially sourced pure Ti (Rare Metallic Co., Tokyo, Japan) were mirror-polished. To roughen the surface, they were then repolished with SiC paper and rinsed by sonication in acetone, methanol, and Milli-Q water. Before cell culture, the Ti discs were sterilized with 70% ethanol for 1 h under ultraviolet light. The surface of Ti discs was visualized with a scanning probe microscope (SPM-9600; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) using a silicon cantilever (NCHR-20; Nano world AG, Neuchâtel Switzerland). Ra were automatically calculated by examining Z-range images.


    2.2. Protein adsorption

    Bovine serum albumin (BSA; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was dissolved in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) at a concentration of 1 mg/ml. Ti discs were immersed in the protein solution at 37 °C for 1 h. Proteins adsorbed on the Ti were removed by sonication in 5% sodium dodecyl sulfate (Wako pure chemical, Osaka, Japan) and quantified with the micro bicinchoninic acid (micro-BCA) assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Absorbance at 562 nm was measured with a Smartspec Plus spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).


    2.3. Analysis of cell attachment and proliferation

    MC3T3-E1 mouse osteoblasts were obtained from Riken Cell Bank (Tsukuba, Japan) and cultured in a-Minimal Essential Medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Biowest, Nuaillé, France), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan). To evaluate attachment, cells were seeded on substrates at a density of 30,000 cells/cm2. After 1 or 4 h of incubation, non-adherent cells were removed washing with PBS. Attached cells were quantified using Cell Counting Kit (CCK)-8 (Dojin Chemical, Kumamoto, Japan). To assess proliferation, cells were seeded on Ti discs and tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) at a density of 5000 cells/cm2. After 1, 3, 5, and 7 days of culture, the number of cells was quantified with CCK-8.


    2.4. Fluorescence microscopy

    Integrin α5 expression was visualized by immunocytochemistry. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 1 h. Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked with SuperBlock (Thermo Fisher Scientific). For integrin a5 labeling, cells were incubated with rat anti-mouse CD49e IgG as a primary antibody followed by fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated goat anti-rat IgG secondary antibody (both from Sigma-Aldrich), then visualized by fluorescence microscopy (IX-71; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Images were captured with a charge-couple device camera and processed with ImageJ software (http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).


    2.5. Determination of cell spreading analysis

    To facilitate visualization, cells were seeded at a density of 3000 cells/cm2 and cultured in a CO2 incubator. After 4 h, the cells were stained with calcein-AM (Dojin Chemical) and observed with a fluorescence microscope. Cell spreading area was calculated using ImageJ software.


    2.6. Analysis of calcification

    Calcification was induced in MC3T3-E1 cells grown on Ti discs by adding 2 mM b-glycerophosphate (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) and 50 mM ascorbic acid (Wako Pure Chemical) to the culture medium for 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. Calcification level was assessed by Alizarin Red S quantification assay according to following paper [23]. Briefly, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 15 min. After rinse with distilled H2O, the cells were stained with 1% Alizarin Red S solution (adjusted to pH 4.1 with ammonium hydroxide) at room temperature for 30 min. After removing the Alizarin Red S solution, the discs were rinsed twice with distilled H2O. For quantification Ti discs were immersed in 10% acetic acid for 30 min and the mineralized layer was scraped from the surface, yielding a slurry that was heated at 85 °C for 10 min and then transferred to ice for 5 min. After heating, the slurry was centrifuged at 20,000 × g for 15 min and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. Ammonium hydroxide (10% v/v) was added to neutralized the acid and the absorbance of the solution at 405 nm was measured.


    2.7. Statistical analysis

    Five samples (n = 5) were analyzed for each experiment. Differences between groups were evaluated by one-way ANOVA. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.


    3. Results and Discussion

    The surface topology of Ti discs with varying degrees of roughness were examined (Figure 1). Ra was measured with an SPM in 20 mm x 20 mm area. Ra values and water contact angles are listed in Table 1; Ra value were 1.8 ± 1.5 nm, and 118.3 ± 1.9 nm and contact angles were 50.8 ± 8.9°, and 56.2 ± 12.4° for Smooth and rough Ti, respectively. The slight difference in contact angle between the two surface was due to roughness, since their surface chemistry was quite similar. The adsorption of BSA on Ti was determined with the micro-BCA assay and was found to be 14.8 ± 2.0 mg and 13.2 ± 2.0 mg for rough and smooth surfaces, respectively (Figure 2). These results suggest that nanometer-scale roughness has minimal effect on the amount of protein adsorbed.

    Table 1. Ra and water contact angle of rough and smooth Ti
    Rough TiSmooth Ti
    Roughness, Ra (nm) 105.6 ± 1.9 1.8 ± 1.5
    Contact angle (degree) 50.8 ± 8.9 56.2 ± 12.4
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1. AFM topological images of each substrate. (a) rough and (b) smooth Ti in of 20 mm × 20 mm area
    Figure 2. Determination of protein adsorption. Adsorbed bovine serum albumin on rough and smooth were determined by micro-BCA method. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 5)

    Cell attachment to the Ti surface was calculated as a percentage of the value for cells attached to TCPS after 1 and 4 h of incubation (Figure 3). The percentage of cells attached to rough and smooth surfaces was 35.6 ± 5.5% and 67.0 ± 4.2%, respectively, after 1 h and 49.2 ±4.4% and 89.3 ± 5.0%, respectively, after 4 h. More cells were attached to the smooth that to the rough surface. Wettability and protein adsorption data indicated that smooth and the rough Ti had similar chemical composition; hence, the observed difference in cell behavior the two surfaces wasattributable to roughness. Cell adhesion to the smooth surface which had a nanometer-scale Ra and to TCPS was similar (data not shown), consistent with findings that nanometer-scale surface roughness had no effect on cellular function [18]. However, the rough surface which had an Ra value in the order of hundreds of nanometer reduced osteoblast attachment, consistent with our previous observations in fibroblasts [19].

    Figure 3. Cell attachment analysis. Attachment activity of cells cultured on the rough Ti (open bar), and smooth Ti (gray bar) for 1 h and 4 h. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 5)

    Cell spreading area on rough and smooth Ti surfaces after 4 h of culture according to histogram peaks was 1,900 mm2 and 5,000 mm2 for rough and smooth Ti surface, respectively (Figure 4a). Fluorescence micrographs of cells cultured on the two types of surface for 4 h revealed that those on the smooth surface had a spindle-shaped morphology similar to ells grown on TCPS; in contrast, cells on rough Ti had a rounded shape and showed less spreading (Figure 4b). To investigate the potential of Ti discs to act as scaffolds, we visualized integrin a5 expression by fluorescence microscopy (Figure 4c). Cells on the smooth Ti surface showed clear punctae corresponding to integrin a5. Integrin a5 subunit forms heterodimer with β1 subunit and binds Arg-Gly-Asp motif of extracellular matrix (ECM) protein [24]. Thus, the higher degree of cell attachment activity to the smooth Ti surface was achieved via integrin-mediated adhesion. In contrast, there was no distinct integrin a5 expression in cells grown on rough Ti, suggesting that they attach via an integrin independent mechanism, although the rough surface did not induced extensive cell attachment.

    Figure 4. Evaluation of cell adhesion and morphology. (a) Histograms of the cell spreading area of cells cultured on rough Ti (top) and smooth Ti (bottom). (b) Fluorescent microscopic image of cytoplasm stained by calcein-AM of cells cultured on rough Ti (right) and smooth Ti (left). Scale bar = 50 mm. (c) Fluorescent microscopic image of immunostaining of integrin a5 of of cells cultured on rough Ti (right) and smooth Ti (left). Scale bar = 25 mm

    Integrin-ECM complexes generate intracellular signals for cell growth, proliferation, migration, and differentiation [25,26,27,28]. To investigate the effect of Ra on cellular function, we compared the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells grown on rough and smooth Ti surfaces (Figure 5). Cells on the smooth Ti surface showed similar proliferative capacity to those on TCPS; however, proliferation was inhibited by the rough Ti surface. We also examined calcification of extracellular component as a marker of differentiation capacity. The level of calcification was higher in cells on the smooth as compared to the rough Ti (Figure 6). These results suggest that the latter surface inhibits osteoblast proliferation and differentiation.

    Figure 5. Proliferation of cells cultured on rough Ti and smooth Ti for 1 (open bar), 2 (lightgray bar), and 4 (gray bar) days. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 5)
    Figure 6. Determination of calcification activity of the cells cultured on rough Ti (open bar) and smooth Ti (gray bar). The cells were induced calcification by ascorbic acid and b-glycerophosphate during 7 to 28 days after seeding. Data are the mean ± SD (n = 5)

    4. Conclusion

    The results of this study revealed that the rough Ti surface, which had an Ra value in the order of hundreds of nanometers, inhibited cells attachment as well as osteoblast proliferation and differentiation, despite having a similar water contact angle and protein adsorption capacity as the smooth Ti surface. Our findings provide insight into interactions between cells and materials and can be useful for improving the biocompatibility of metallic materials used for medical devices.


    Acknowledgments

    This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists 25820397.


    Conflict of Interest

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper


    [1] Jagur-Grodzinski J (2006) Polymers for tissue engineering, medical devices, and regenerative medicine. Concise general review of recent studies. Polym Advan Technol 17: 395–483.
    [2] Hanawa T (2012) Research and development of metals for medical devices based on clinical needs. Sci Technol Adv Mater 13: 064102–064116. doi: 10.1088/1468-6996/13/6/064102
    [3] Ellingsen JE, Lyngstadaas SP (2003) Bio-implant interface: improving biomaterials and tissue reactions. CRC Press.
    [4] Minagar S, Wang J, Berndt CC, et al. (2013) Cell response of anodized nanotubes on titanium and titanium alloys. J Biomed Mater Res 101A: 2726–2739. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.34575
    [5] Effah EAB, Bianco PD, Ducheyne P (1995) Crystal-structure of the surface oxide layer on titanium and its changes arising from immersion. J Biomed Mater Res 29: 73–80. doi: 10.1002/jbm.820290111
    [6] Eckhardt S, Brunetto PS, Gagnon J, et al. (2013) Nanobio silver: its interactions with peptides and bacteria, and its uses in medicine. Chem Rev 113: 4708–4754. doi: 10.1021/cr300288v
    [7] Gagnon J, Fromm KM (2015) Toxicity and protective effects of cerium oxide nanoparticles (nanoceria) depending on their preparation method, particle size, cell type, and exposure route. Eur J Inorg Chem 2015: 4510–4517.
    [8] Gagnon J, Clift MJD, Vanhecke D, et al. (2015) Integrating silver compounds and nanoparticles into ceria nanocontainers for antimicrobial applications. J Mater Chem B 3: 1760–1768. doi: 10.1039/C4TB02079K
    [9] Gagnon J, Clift MJD, Vanhecke D, et al. (2016) Synthesis, characterization, antibacterial activity and cytotoxicity of hollow TiO2-coated CeO2 nanocontainers encapsulating silver nanoparticles for controlled silver release. J Mater Chem B 4: 1166–1174. doi: 10.1039/C5TB01917F
    [10] Kartsonakis I, Daniilidis I, Kordas G (2008) Encapsulation of the corrosion inhibitor 8-hydroxyquinoline into ceria nanocontainers. J Sol-Gel Sci Techn 48: 24–31. doi: 10.1007/s10971-008-1810-4
    [11] Borisova D, Akçakayıran D, Schenderlein M, et al. (2013) Nanocontainer-based anticorrosive coatings: effect of the container size on the self-healing performance. Adv Funct Mater 23: 3799–3812. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201203715
    [12] Jiang Y, Jia T, Wooley PH, et al. (2013) Current research in the phathogenesis of aseptic implant loosening associated with particulate wear debris. Acta Orthop Belg 79: 1–9.
    [13] Wooley PH, Morren R, Andary S, et al. (2002) Inflammatory responses to orthopaedic biomaterials in the murine air pouch. Biomaterials 23: 517–526. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00134-X
    [14] Das B, Mandal M, Upadhyay A, et al. (2013) Bio-based hyperbranched polyurethane/Fe3O4 nanocomposites: smart antibacterial biomaterials for biomedical devices and implants. Biomed Mater 8: 035003–035014. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/8/3/035003
    [15] Lorenzetti M, Biglino D, Novak S, et al. (2014) Photoinduced properties of nanocrystalline TiO2-anatase coating on Ti-based bone implants. Mater Sci Eng C 37: 390–398. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.01.029
    [16] Song DH, Uhm SH, Kim SE, et al. (2012) Synthesis of titanium oxide thin films containing antibacterial silver nanoparticles by a reactive magnetron co-sputtering system for application in biomedical implants. Mater Res Bull 47: 2994–2998. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.04.085
    [17] Lu Z, Mao C, Meng M, et al. (2014) Fabrication of CeO2 nanoparticle-modified silk for UV protection and antibacterial applications. J Colloid Interf Sci 435: 8–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.08.015
    [18] Brook IM, Hatton PV (1998) Glass-ionomers: bioactive implant materials. Biomaterials 19: 565–571. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00138-0
    [19] Hum JH, Boccaccini AR (2012) Bioactive glasses as carriers for bioactive molecules and therapeutic drugs: a review. J Mater Sci Mater Med 23: 2317–2333. doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4580-z
    [20] Kartsonakis IA, Liatsi P, Daniilidis I, et al. (2008) Synthesis, characterization, and antibacterial action of hollow ceria nanospheres with/without a conductive polymer coating. J Am Ceram Soc 91: 372–378.
    [21] http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/catalog/product/sigma/p7793?lang=fr&region=CA&gclid=Cj0KE QiAnvfDBRCXrabLl6-6t-0BEiQAW4SRUPVOSTgTtcJTSasj1ZiSmi0B0EFT5mldnbgH-N0yw zUaAly38P8HAQ).
    [22] Sun L, Huang C, Gong T, et al. (2010) A biocompatible approach to surface modification: biodegradable polymer functionalized super-paramagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles. Mater Sci Eng C 30: 583–589.
    [23] Zhang ZF, Yu L, Liu W, et al. (2010) Surface modification of ceria nanoparticles and their chemical mechanical polishing behavior on glass substrate. Appl Surf Sci 256: 3856–3861. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.01.040
    [24] Sahu SK, Chakrabarty A, Bhattacharya D, et al. (2011) Single step surface modification of highly stable magnetic nanoparticles for purification of his-tag proteins. J Nanopart Res 13: 2475–2484. doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-0140-y
    [25] Kosacki I, Suzuki T, Anderson HU, et al. (2002) Raman scattering and lattice defects in nanocrystalline CeO2 thin films. Solid State Ionics 149: 99–105.
    [26] Karakoti AS, Tsigkou O, Yue S, et al. (2010) Rare earth oxides as nanoadditives in 3-D nanocomposite scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Mater Chem 20: 8912–8919. doi: 10.1039/c0jm01072c
    [27] Catauro M, Papale F, Bollino F (2015) Characterization and biological properties of TiO2/PCL hybrid layers prepared via sol-gel dip coating for surface modification of titanium implants. J Non-Cryst Solids 415: 9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.12.008
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5361) PDF downloads(1101) Cited by(0)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog