
The spread of rumors is a phenomenon that has heavily impacted society for a long time. Recently, there has been a huge change in rumor dynamics, through the advent of the Internet. Today, online communication has become as common as using a phone. At present, getting information from the Internet does not require much effort or time. In this paper, the impact of the Internet on rumor spreading will be considered through a simple SIR type ordinary differential equation. Rumors spreading through the Internet are similar to the spread of infectious diseases through water and air. From these observations, we study a model with the additional principle that spreaders lose interest and stop spreading, based on the SIWR model. We derive the basic reproduction number for this model and demonstrate the existence and global stability of rumor-free and endemic equilibriums.
Citation: Sun-Ho Choi, Hyowon Seo. Rumor spreading dynamics with an online reservoir and its asymptotic stability[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(4): 535-552. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021016
[1] | Sun-Ho Choi, Hyowon Seo . Rumor spreading dynamics with an online reservoir and its asymptotic stability. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(4): 535-552. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021016 |
[2] | Bum Il Hong, Nahmwoo Hahm, Sun-Ho Choi . SIR Rumor spreading model with trust rate distribution. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(3): 515-530. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018023 |
[3] | Lili Jia, Changyou Wang, Zongxin Lei . Synchronization of nonautonomous neural networks with Caputo derivative and time delay. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(1): 341-358. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023013 |
[4] | Steinar Evje, Kenneth H. Karlsen . Hyperbolic-elliptic models for well-reservoir flow. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1(4): 639-673. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.639 |
[5] | Simone Göttlich, Sebastian Kühn, Jan Peter Ohst, Stefan Ruzika, Markus Thiemann . Evacuation dynamics influenced by spreading hazardous material. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6(3): 443-464. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.443 |
[6] | Meng Zhao, Jiancheng Liu, Yindi Zhang . Influence of environmental pollution and bacterial hyper-infectivity on dynamics of a waterborne pathogen model with free boundaries. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(3): 940-969. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024042 |
[7] | Liping Yu, Hans Kleppe, Terje Kaarstad, Svein M. Skjaeveland, Steinar Evje, Ingebret Fjelde . Modelling of wettability alteration processes in carbonate oil reservoirs. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3(1): 149-183. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.149 |
[8] | Richard Carney, Monique Chyba, Taylor Klotz . Using hybrid automata to model mitigation of global disease spread via travel restriction. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(1): 324-354. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024015 |
[9] | Rosa M. Benito, Regino Criado, Juan C. Losada, Miguel Romance . Preface: "New trends, models and applications in complex and multiplex networks". Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(1): i-iii. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.1i |
[10] | Benjamin Contri . Fisher-KPP equations and applications to a model in medical sciences. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(1): 119-153. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018006 |
The spread of rumors is a phenomenon that has heavily impacted society for a long time. Recently, there has been a huge change in rumor dynamics, through the advent of the Internet. Today, online communication has become as common as using a phone. At present, getting information from the Internet does not require much effort or time. In this paper, the impact of the Internet on rumor spreading will be considered through a simple SIR type ordinary differential equation. Rumors spreading through the Internet are similar to the spread of infectious diseases through water and air. From these observations, we study a model with the additional principle that spreaders lose interest and stop spreading, based on the SIWR model. We derive the basic reproduction number for this model and demonstrate the existence and global stability of rumor-free and endemic equilibriums.
There are different patterns of rumor spreading depending on the presence or absence of online media [7], for example, the emergence of influential spreaders [2]. Before the development of online media, rumors were transmitted from person to person. With the development of online media such as social network service (SNS), personal broadcasting, blog, and group chatting, rumors can now spread in a variety of ways. In the past, offline media was the starting point and an important means of information delivery. Recently, it has become a social problem that offline media reproduces and delivers rumors from online media. This is a sign that information in online is rapidly being accepted by various social classes. In this paper, we study how the combination of classical interpersonal rumor spreading and online media influences rumor outbreak.
In order to consider the influence of online media, we denote by
dIdt=b−λsIS−λwIW−δiI,dSdt=λsIS+λwIW−σsSS−σrSR−μS−δsS,dWdt=ξS−δwW,dRdt=σsSS+σrSR+μS−δrR. | (1) |
Remark 1. (1) This rumor spreading process is a relatively short time process. Thus, we do not consider vertical transmission. See [8].
(2) If we take
Since the Daley-Kendall model [3], various studies on rumor spreading have been conducted. We briefly state the history of rumor spreading models associated with online media. See [12] for a general rumor spread, and [14] for threshold phenomena for general epidemic models. Since information transmission via online media developed in the late 1990s, intensive researches on rumors and online media began mainly in the early 2000s. In [1], the authors focused on the spread of computer-based rumors and analyzed the spread of rumors via computer-based communication in terms of information transmission. The authors in [7] noted the difference between online-based media and offline media. The study in [17] considered the spread of rumors through online networks by using the SIR model. The fast speed and unprofessional communication of online media is considered in [13]. See also [9]. In [11], a statistical rumor diffusion model is considered for online networks and it contained positive and negative bipolar reinforcement factors. [4,6,18] studied a rumor propagation model similar to the European fox rabies SIR model for the situation of changing online community number. In [10], the authors studied the rumor propagation phenomena for a model with two layers: online and offline. See also [19] for the SEIR type online rumor model.
This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the nonnegativity property of the solution to (1) and the stability of the rumor-free equilibrium. The basic reproduction number
In this section, we consider the conservation of nonnegativity of the densities
Lemma 2.1. Let
S(0)2+W(0)2>0, |
then the solution is nonnegative for all
Proof. We take any positive
|I(t)|,|S(t)|,|W(t)|,|R(t)|<C(T). |
By the first equation in (1) and the boundedness, if
I(t)=I(0)e−∫t0(λsS(s)+λwW(s)+δi)ds+b∫t0e−∫tu(λsS(s)+λwW(s)+δi)dsdu>0. |
We first prove that
S(t−s)<0. |
Let
S(t)=S(0)e∫t0(λsI(s)−σsS(s)−σrR(s)−μ−δs)ds+∫t0λwI(u)W(u)e∫tu(λsI(s)−σsS(s)−σrR(s)−μ−δs)dsdu. | (2) |
This and the positivity of
W(t)=W(0)e−δwt+∫t0ξS(u)e−δw(t−u)du. | (3) |
Thus,
However, on
(I(t),S(t),W(t),R(t))=(I(t0)e−δi(t−t0)+b(1−e−δi(t−t0))δi,0,0,R(t0)e−δr(t−t0)) |
is a solution to (1). By uniqueness of the solution, there is no
Similarly, we can also easily obtain that there is no
Moreover, if
In this part, we calculate the basic reproduction number using a next-generation matrix. To consider the asymptotic behavior of the dynamics in (1), we determine the equilibrium point such that
˙I=˙S=˙W=˙R=0. | (4) |
If we assume that there is no rumor
E0=(Irf,Srf,Wrf,Rrf)=(bδi,0,0,0). |
The basic reproduction number
For the infected compartments, the next generation matrices at the rumor-free state
F=1δi(bλsbλw00)andV=(μ+δs0−ξδw), |
and hence
V−1=1(μ+δs)δw(δw0ξμ+δs). |
Here,
FV−1=(bλs(μ+δs)δi+bλwξ(μ+δs)δiδwbλwδiδw00). |
Therefore, we obtain the following formula for the basic reproduction number:
R0=ρ(FV−1)=bδi(λsμ+δs+λwξ(μ+δs)δw). |
Here,
For the linear stability, we consider the Jacobian matrix as follows.
J=(−λsS−λwW−δi−λsI−λwI0λsS+λwWλsI−2σsS−σrR−μ−δsλwI−σrS0ξ−δw002σsS+σrR+μ0σrS−δr). |
Since the rumor-free equilibrium is
E0=(bδi,0,0,0), |
the Jacobian matrix at the rumor-free equilibrium is given by
JE0=(−δi−λsbδi−λwbδi00λsbδi−μ−δsλwbδi00ξ−δw00μ0−δr). |
Therefore, the corresponding characteristic equation is
p(x)=(x+δr)(x+δi)×(x2−(bλsδi−μ−δs−δw)x−bδwλsδi+μδw+δsδw−bλwξδi). |
Assume that
bδiλsμ+δs<bδi(λsμ+δs+λwξ(μ+δs)δw)<1. |
Thus,
c1:=−(bλsδi−μ−δs−δw)>δw>0. |
Note that
c2:=−bδwλsδi+(μ+δs)δw−bλwξδi=δw(μ+δs)(−bλsδi(μ+δs)−bλwξδiδw(μ+δs)+1)=δw(μ+δs)(1−R0)>0. |
Clearly,
p0(x)=x2−(bλsδi−μ−δs−δw)x−bδwλsδi+(μ+δs)δw−bλwξδi=x2+c1x+c2. |
Since
Clearly, if
Theorem 2.2. The rumor-free equilibrium
The rumor-free equilibrium
Theorem 2.3. If
{(I,S,R,W):S>0orW>0}∩{(I,S,W,R):I,S,W,R≥0}. |
Proof. Let
V0(I,S,W)=[I−Irf−IrflogIIrf]+S+IrfλsδwW, |
where
I−Irf−IrflogIIrf>0,forI≠Irf, |
and
I−Irf−IrflogIIrf=0,forI=Irf, |
we note that
dV0dt=(b−λsIS−λwIW−δiI)−bδi(bI−λsS−λsW−δi)+λsIS+λwIW−σsSS−σrSR−(μ+δs)S+bλsδiδw(ξS−δwW)=b−δiI−σsSS−σrSR−(μ+δs)S+bλsδiδw(ξS−δwW)−bδi(bI−λsS−λsW−δi)=−b(bδiI+δiIb−2)−σsSS−σrSR−(μ+δs)S+bλsδiδw(ξS−δwW)+bδi(λsS+λsW)=−b(bδiI+δiIb−2)−σsSS−σrSR−(μ+δs)S(1−bλs(μ+δs)δi−bλsξ(μ+δs)δiδw). |
Therefore, we have
dV0dt=−b(bδiI+δiIb−2)−σsSS−σrSR−(μ+δs)S(1−R0). | (5) |
Note that by Lemma 2.1 in Section 2,
dV0dt<0. |
Therefore,
Therefore, the rumor-free equilibrium
In this section, we present the existence and stability of endemic steady states for the rumor spreading model with an online reservoir. Endemic state refers to a nonzero steady state of
To obtain the endemic equilibrium
E∗=(I∗,S∗,W∗,R∗), |
we consider the following steady state equation:
dIdt=dSdt=dWdt=dRdt=0. |
Then the endemic equilibrium
0=b−λsI∗S∗−λwI∗W∗−δiI∗,0=λsI∗S∗+λwI∗W∗−σsS∗S∗−σrS∗R∗−μS∗−δsS∗,0=ξS∗−δwW∗,0=σsS∗S∗+σrS∗R∗+μS∗−δrR∗. |
We set
U∗=δwξW∗,˜I∗=δiI∗,˜S∗=δsS∗,˜R∗=δrR∗, |
and
˜μ=μδs,˜λs=λsδw+λwξδiδsδw,˜σs=σsδ2s,˜σr=σrδsδr. |
Then
0=b−˜λs˜I∗˜S∗−˜I∗,0=˜λs˜I∗˜S∗−˜σs˜S∗˜S∗−˜σr˜S∗˜R∗−˜μ˜S∗−˜S∗,0=˜σs˜S∗˜S∗+˜σr˜S∗˜R∗+˜μ˜S∗−˜R∗. | (6) |
Note that the basic reproduction number satisfies
R0=b˜λs˜μ+1. |
To find endemic equilibrium
˜S∗>0. |
The sum of all equations in (6) implies that
˜R∗=(b−˜I∗−˜S∗). | (7) |
From the second equation in (6),
(˜λs˜S∗+˜σr˜S∗)˜I∗=˜σs˜S∗˜S∗−˜σr˜S∗˜S∗+(˜μ+1)˜S∗+˜σrb˜S∗. | (8) |
By (7)-(8),
˜I∗=˜σs−˜σr˜λs+˜σr˜S∗+˜μ+1+˜σrb˜λs+˜σr:=β˜S∗+γ. |
Substituting
b−˜λs(β˜S∗+γ)˜S∗−(β˜S∗+γ)=0. |
Therefore, we have
β˜λs˜S2∗+(˜λsγ+β)˜S∗+γ−b=0. | (9) |
If we obtain positive
˜I∗=b˜λs˜S∗+1 |
and
˜R∗=˜σs˜S∗˜S∗+˜μ˜S∗1−˜σr˜S∗. |
Thus, if all components are nonnegative,
S∗<1˜σr. | (10) |
Theorem 3.1. If
Proof. Assume that
● Case 1
˜S∗=b−γ˜λsγ=bb˜σr+˜μ+1R0−1R0<1˜σr. |
Condition (10) holds, which implies that a positive endemic state
● Case 2
˜S2∗+(b˜σr+˜μ+1˜σs−˜σr+1˜λs)˜S∗+b˜σs−˜σr1−R0R0=0. |
Since
b˜σs−˜σr1−R0R0<0. |
Therefore, there is a unique positive real root of the equation. To check the condition in (10), let
f(x)=x2+(b˜σr+˜μ+1˜σs−˜σr+1˜λs)x+b˜σs−˜σr1−R0R0. | (11) |
By elementary calculation,
f(1/˜σr)=(˜λs+˜σr)(˜μ˜σr+˜σs)˜λs˜σ2r(˜σs−˜σr). | (12) |
Thus,
● Case 3
D=(b˜σr+˜μ+1˜σs−˜σr+1˜λs)2−4b˜σs−˜σr1−R0R0. |
Since we assume that
Let
g(x)=(x−˜σr+˜λs(1+˜μ+b˜σr))2−4˜λs(−1−˜μ+b˜λs)(˜σr−x). |
Then the discriminant is represented as for
D=g(˜σs)(˜λs+˜σr)2. |
Note that
x=−b˜σr˜λs+˜σr−2b˜λ2s+˜μ˜λs+˜λs. |
Since we assume that
−b˜σr˜λs+˜σr−2b˜λ2s+˜μ˜λs+˜λs<−(˜μ+1)˜σr+˜σr−2b˜λ2s+˜μ˜λs+˜λs=−˜μ˜σr+˜λs(−2b˜λs+˜μ+1)<0. |
Therefore, the minimum value of
g(˜σs)≥g(0)=(˜λs(b˜σr+˜μ+1)−˜σr)2+4˜σr˜λs(−b˜λs+˜μ+1)=:h(˜σr). |
We consider
h(˜σr)≥4b˜μ˜λ3s(b˜λs−˜μ−1)(b˜λs−1)2>0. |
Therefore,
b˜σs−˜σr1−R0R0>0. |
Thus,
By (12) and
f(1/˜σr)=(˜λs+˜σr)(˜μ˜σr+˜σs)˜λs˜σ2r(˜σs−˜σr)<0. |
Therefore,
For any case, we conclude that if
For the remaining part, we assume that
● Case 1
˜S∗=b−γ˜λsγ=bb˜σr+˜μ+1R0−1R0≤0. |
Thus there is no positive endemic state
● Case 2
D=g(˜σs)(˜λs+˜σr)2 |
and
Since we assume that
b˜σs−˜σr1−R0R0≥0, |
this implies that if
Note that
x=−bσrλs+μλs+λs+(σs−σr)2λs(σs−σr)<0. |
Thus,
● Case 3
˜S2∗+(b˜σr+˜μ+1˜σs−˜σr+1˜λs)˜S∗+b˜σs−˜σr1−R0R0=0. |
Since
b˜σs−˜σr1−R0R0≥0. |
Therefore, there is at most one positive real root of the equation. However,
f(1/˜σr)=(˜λs+˜σr)(˜μ˜σr+˜σs)˜λs˜σ2r(˜σs−˜σr)<0. |
Thus, (10) does not hold. This implies that there is no positive endemic equilibrium
Therefore, we conclude that if
In this part, we consider asymptotic stability for the endemic state
Theorem 3.2. If
{(I,S,R,W):S>0orW>0}∩{(I,S,W,R):I,S,W,R≥0}. |
Proof. Let
V∗(I,S,W,R)=[I−I∗−I∗logII∗]+[S−S∗−S∗logSS∗]+λwδwI∗[W−W∗−W∗logWW∗]+R∗σrμ+R∗σr[R−R∗−R∗logRR∗]=:J1+J2+J3+J4. |
In the same manner as Theorem 2.3, note that
We claim that if
dV∗dt<0. |
Since
(b−λsI∗S∗−λwI∗W∗−δiI∗)=0. |
Therefore,
dJ1dt=(b−λsIS−λwIW−δiI)(1−I∗I)+(b−λsI∗S∗−λwI∗W∗−δiI∗)(1−II∗)=b(2−I∗I−II∗)−λs(I∗−I)(S∗−S)−λw(I∗−I)(W∗−W). |
Similarly,
(λsI∗S∗+λwI∗W∗−σsS∗S∗−σrS∗R∗−μS∗)=0. |
This implies that
dJ2dt=(λsIS+λwIW−σsSS−σrSR−(μ+δs)S)(1−S∗S)+(λsI∗S∗+λwI∗W∗−σsS∗S∗−σrS∗R∗−(μ+δs)S∗)(1−SS∗)=λs(I∗−I)(S∗−S)−σs(S∗−S)(S∗−S)−σr(R∗−R)(S∗−S)+λwIW(1−S∗S)+λwI∗W∗(1−SS∗). |
Note that
dJ3dt=λwδwI∗(ξS−δwW)(1−W∗W). |
We add the derivatives of
d(J1+J2+J3)dt−b(2−I∗I−II∗)+σs(S∗−S)(S∗−S)+σr(R∗−R)(S∗−S)=−λw(I∗−I)(W∗−W)+λwIW(1−S∗S)+λwI∗W∗(1−SS∗)+λwδwI∗(ξS−δwW)(1−W∗W)=λwI∗W+λwIW∗−λwIS∗SW−λwI∗SS∗W∗+λwδwI∗(ξS−δwW)(1−W∗W). |
Using
d(J1+J2+J3)dt−b(2−I∗I−II∗)+σs(S∗−S)(S∗−S)+σr(R∗−R)(S∗−S)=λw(IW∗−IS∗SW−ξδwI∗W∗WS+I∗W∗). | (13) |
Using
IW∗−IS∗SW−ξδwI∗W∗WS+I∗W∗=(IW∗+I∗I∗IW∗−2I∗W∗)−(ξδwI∗SW∗W+IS∗SW+I∗I∗IW∗−3I∗W∗)=I∗W∗(II∗+I∗I−2)−ξδwI∗W∗(SW+δ2wξ2IWI∗S+δwξI∗I−3δwξ). | (14) |
Combining (13) and (14) with
d(J1+J2+J3)dt=(λwξδwI∗S∗−b)(II∗+I∗I−2)−λwξ2δ2wI∗S∗(SW+δ2wξ2IWI∗S+δwξI∗I−3δwξ)−σs(SS+S∗S∗−2SS∗)−σr(SR+S∗R∗−S∗R−R∗S). |
Since
σsS∗S∗+σrS∗R∗+μS∗−δrR∗=0, |
we have
μ+R∗σrR∗σrdJ4dt=dRdt(1−R∗R)=(σsSS+σrSR+μS−δrR)(1−R∗R)+(σsS∗S∗+σrS∗R∗+μS∗−δrR∗)(1−RR∗)=σs(SS+S∗S∗−R∗RSS−RR∗S∗S∗)+σr(SR+S∗R∗−R∗RRS−RR∗R∗S∗)+μ(S+S∗−R∗RS−RR∗S∗). |
Then we have
dV∗dt=(λwξδwI∗S∗−b)(II∗+I∗I−2)−λwξ2δ2wI∗S∗(SW+δ2wξ2IWI∗S+δwξI∗I−3δwξ)−σs(SS+S∗S∗−2SS∗)−σr(SR+S∗R∗−S∗R−R∗S)+R∗σrμ+R∗σrσs(SS+S∗S∗−R∗RSS−RR∗S∗S∗)+R∗σrμ+R∗σrσr(SR+S∗R∗−R∗RRS−RR∗R∗S∗) |
+R∗σrμ+R∗σrμ(S+S∗−R∗RS−RR∗S∗). |
Note that
−σs(SS+S∗S∗−2SS∗)+R∗σrμ+R∗σrσs(SS+S∗S∗−R∗RSS−RR∗S∗S∗)=−μμ+R∗σrσs(SS+S∗S∗−2SS∗)−R∗σrμ+R∗σrσsS∗S(R∗RSS∗+RR∗S∗S−2) |
and
−σr(SR+S∗R∗−S∗R−R∗S)+R∗σrμ+R∗σrσr(SR+S∗R∗−R∗RRS−RR∗R∗S∗)+R∗σrμ+R∗σrμ(S+S∗−R∗RS−RR∗S∗)=−R∗σrμ+R∗σrμS(RR∗+R∗R−2). |
In conclusion, we have
dV∗dt=(λwξδwI∗S∗−b)(II∗+I∗I−2)−λwξ2δ2wI∗S∗(SW+δ2wξ2IWI∗S+δwξI∗I−3δwξ)−μμ+R∗σrσs(SS+S∗S∗−2SS∗)−R∗σrμ+R∗σrσsS∗S(R∗RSS∗+RR∗S∗S−2)−R∗σrμ+R∗σrμS(RR∗+R∗R−2). |
From the first equation in (1), it follows that
b=λsI∗S∗+λwI∗W∗+δiI∗=λsI∗S∗+λwξδwI∗S∗+δiI∗. |
This implies that
λwξδwI∗S∗−b=−λsI∗S∗−δiI∗<0. |
By the relationship between arithmetic and geometric means, if
(I(t),S(t),W(t),R(t))≠(I∗,S∗,W∗,R∗)andS(t)>0, |
then
dV∗dt<0. |
If we assume that
{(I,S,R,W):S>0orW>0}∩{(I,S,W,R):I,S,W,R≥0}. |
In this section, we carry out some numerical simulations to verify the theoretical results. We use the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with time step size
As shown before, the basic reproduction number is
R0=ρ(FV−1)=bδi(λsμ+δs+λwξ(μ+δs)δw). |
We assume that the influx
Now, we investigate the influence of an online reservoir. We change
Even though the contact rates
We next compare the SIR and SIWR models. Without online an reservoir, the basic reproduction number of the SIR model is given by
RSIR0=bλs(μ+δs)δi. |
If we fix the parameters such as
In this paper, we consider a rumor spreading model with an online reservoir. By using a next-generation matrix, we calculated the basic reproduction number
S.-H. Choi and H. Seo are partially supported by National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (no. 2017R1E1A1A03070692). H. Seo is partially supported by NRF of Korea (no. 2020R1I1A1A01069585).
[1] |
Rumor rest stops on the information highway transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain. Human Communication Research (1998) 25: 163-179. ![]() |
[2] |
Emergence of influential spreaders in modified rumor models. Journal of Statistical Physics (2013) 151: 383-393. ![]() |
[3] |
D. J. Daley and D. G. Kendall, Epidemics and rumours, Nature, 204 (1964), 1118. doi: 10.1038/2041118a0
![]() |
[4] |
J. Dhar, A. Jain and V. K. Gupta, A mathematical model of news propagation on online social network and a control strategy for rumor spreading, Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6 (2016), 57. doi: 10.1007/s13278-016-0366-5
![]() |
[5] |
On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology (1990) 28: 365-382. ![]() |
[6] |
Studies on the population dynamics of a rumor-spreading model in online social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2018) 492: 10-20. ![]() |
[7] |
K. Kenney, A. Gorelik and S. Mwangi, Interactive features of online newspapers, First Monday, 5 (2000). doi: 10.5210/fm.v5i1.720
![]() |
[8] |
Lyapunov functions and global properties for SEIR and SEIS epidemic models. Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA (2004) 21: 75-83. ![]() |
[9] |
S. Kwon, M. Cha, K. Jung, W. Chen and Y. Wang, Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, (2013) 1103–1108. doi: 10.1109/ICDM.2013.61
![]() |
[10] | J. Ma and D. Li, Rumor Spreading in Online-Offline Social Networks, PACIS 2016 Proceedings, 173 (2016). |
[11] |
Rumor spreading in online social networks by considering the bipolar social reinforcement. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2016) 447: 108-115. ![]() |
[12] |
Y. Moreno, M. Nekovee and A. F. Pacheco, Dynamics of rumor spreading in complex networks, Physical Review E, 69 (2004), 066130. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066130
![]() |
[13] | An Exploration of Social Media in Extreme Events: Rumor Theory and Twitter during the Haiti Earthquake 2010. Icis (2010) 231: 7332-7336. |
[14] |
R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. Van Mieghem and A. Vespignani, Epidemic processes in complex networks, Reviews of Modern Physics, 87 (2015), 925. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.925
![]() |
[15] |
Multiple transmission pathways and disease dynamics in a waterborne pathogen model. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (2010) 72: 1506-1533. ![]() |
[16] |
Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Mathematical Biosciences (2002) 180: 29-48. ![]() |
[17] |
Rumor spreading model with consideration of forgetting mechanism: A case of online blogging LiveJournal. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2011) 390: 2619-2625. ![]() |
[18] |
The dynamics analysis of a rumor propagation model in online social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2019) 520: 118-137. ![]() |
[19] |
L. Zhu, X. Zhou and Y. Li, Global dynamics analysis and control of a rumor spreading model in online social networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 526 (2019), 120903, 15 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.139
![]() |
1. | J. Franceschi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella, From agent-based models to the macroscopic description of fake-news spread: the role of competence in data-driven applications, 2022, 3, 2662-2963, 10.1007/s42985-022-00194-z | |
2. | Youjun Lu, Sen Wu, Jiayin Wei, Yanjun Liang, Li Deng, 2024, Dynamic Analysis and Optimal Control of SIWCR Rumor Propagation Model with Rumor Countering and Whistleblowing Mechanism, 979-8-3503-5359-4, 911, 10.1109/EEI63073.2024.10696185 | |
3. | Xiaohuan Wang, Xinyao Wang, Wanli Yang, Finite‐time extinction of a fractional rumor model, 2024, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.10414 | |
4. | Sen Wu, Youjun Lu, Congli Chen, Shichen Liu, 2024, Dynamic analysis of SICDR rumor propagation model with time delay and psychological factors, 979-8-3503-7510-7, 746, 10.1109/CISAT62382.2024.10695275 |