Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js

Rumor spreading dynamics with an online reservoir and its asymptotic stability

  • The spread of rumors is a phenomenon that has heavily impacted society for a long time. Recently, there has been a huge change in rumor dynamics, through the advent of the Internet. Today, online communication has become as common as using a phone. At present, getting information from the Internet does not require much effort or time. In this paper, the impact of the Internet on rumor spreading will be considered through a simple SIR type ordinary differential equation. Rumors spreading through the Internet are similar to the spread of infectious diseases through water and air. From these observations, we study a model with the additional principle that spreaders lose interest and stop spreading, based on the SIWR model. We derive the basic reproduction number for this model and demonstrate the existence and global stability of rumor-free and endemic equilibriums.

    Citation: Sun-Ho Choi, Hyowon Seo. Rumor spreading dynamics with an online reservoir and its asymptotic stability[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(4): 535-552. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021016

    Related Papers:

    [1] Sun-Ho Choi, Hyowon Seo . Rumor spreading dynamics with an online reservoir and its asymptotic stability. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(4): 535-552. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021016
    [2] Bum Il Hong, Nahmwoo Hahm, Sun-Ho Choi . SIR Rumor spreading model with trust rate distribution. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(3): 515-530. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018023
    [3] Lili Jia, Changyou Wang, Zongxin Lei . Synchronization of nonautonomous neural networks with Caputo derivative and time delay. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(1): 341-358. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023013
    [4] Steinar Evje, Kenneth H. Karlsen . Hyperbolic-elliptic models for well-reservoir flow. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1(4): 639-673. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.639
    [5] Simone Göttlich, Sebastian Kühn, Jan Peter Ohst, Stefan Ruzika, Markus Thiemann . Evacuation dynamics influenced by spreading hazardous material. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6(3): 443-464. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.443
    [6] Meng Zhao, Jiancheng Liu, Yindi Zhang . Influence of environmental pollution and bacterial hyper-infectivity on dynamics of a waterborne pathogen model with free boundaries. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(3): 940-969. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024042
    [7] Liping Yu, Hans Kleppe, Terje Kaarstad, Svein M. Skjaeveland, Steinar Evje, Ingebret Fjelde . Modelling of wettability alteration processes in carbonate oil reservoirs. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2008, 3(1): 149-183. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2008.3.149
    [8] Richard Carney, Monique Chyba, Taylor Klotz . Using hybrid automata to model mitigation of global disease spread via travel restriction. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(1): 324-354. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024015
    [9] Rosa M. Benito, Regino Criado, Juan C. Losada, Miguel Romance . Preface: "New trends, models and applications in complex and multiplex networks". Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(1): i-iii. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.1i
    [10] Benjamin Contri . Fisher-KPP equations and applications to a model in medical sciences. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2018, 13(1): 119-153. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2018006
  • The spread of rumors is a phenomenon that has heavily impacted society for a long time. Recently, there has been a huge change in rumor dynamics, through the advent of the Internet. Today, online communication has become as common as using a phone. At present, getting information from the Internet does not require much effort or time. In this paper, the impact of the Internet on rumor spreading will be considered through a simple SIR type ordinary differential equation. Rumors spreading through the Internet are similar to the spread of infectious diseases through water and air. From these observations, we study a model with the additional principle that spreaders lose interest and stop spreading, based on the SIWR model. We derive the basic reproduction number for this model and demonstrate the existence and global stability of rumor-free and endemic equilibriums.



    There are different patterns of rumor spreading depending on the presence or absence of online media [7], for example, the emergence of influential spreaders [2]. Before the development of online media, rumors were transmitted from person to person. With the development of online media such as social network service (SNS), personal broadcasting, blog, and group chatting, rumors can now spread in a variety of ways. In the past, offline media was the starting point and an important means of information delivery. Recently, it has become a social problem that offline media reproduces and delivers rumors from online media. This is a sign that information in online is rapidly being accepted by various social classes. In this paper, we study how the combination of classical interpersonal rumor spreading and online media influences rumor outbreak.

    In order to consider the influence of online media, we denote by I the density of people who do not know the rumor but are susceptible, S is the density of people who spread the rumor, and W is the amount of rumor in online generated by the group S, and R is the density of people who know the rumor but are not interested in it or do not believe it. The process of rumor spreading is based on the following assumptions. (1) The group I has an influx rate of b and a natural decay rate of δi. (2) Suppose the group I meets S, then I is converted to S with an incidence rate of λs, and when the group I encounters the rumor in online media, I is also converted to S with a rate of λw. (3) We assume that S occurs only from I and if S encounters someone who knows the rumor, then they lose interest or do not believe in the rumor. In this case, let σs and σr denote the contact rates at which S meets S and R, respectively. (4) S decreases with a natural decay rate of δs and becomes R with the transmission rate μ. (5) We assume that an online medium has its own natural decay rate of δw and is generated in proportion to the size of S in offline. From the above assumptions, we can derive the following mean field equation.

    dIdt=bλsISλwIWδiI,dSdt=λsIS+λwIWσsSSσrSRμSδsS,dWdt=ξSδwW,dRdt=σsSS+σrSR+μSδrR. (1)

    Remark 1. (1) This rumor spreading process is a relatively short time process. Thus, we do not consider vertical transmission. See [8].

    (2) If we take b=δi=δs=δr and (I+S+R)(0)=1, then the total population density I+S+R is conserved. Thus our model is a generalization of the model in [15].

    Since the Daley-Kendall model [3], various studies on rumor spreading have been conducted. We briefly state the history of rumor spreading models associated with online media. See [12] for a general rumor spread, and [14] for threshold phenomena for general epidemic models. Since information transmission via online media developed in the late 1990s, intensive researches on rumors and online media began mainly in the early 2000s. In [1], the authors focused on the spread of computer-based rumors and analyzed the spread of rumors via computer-based communication in terms of information transmission. The authors in [7] noted the difference between online-based media and offline media. The study in [17] considered the spread of rumors through online networks by using the SIR model. The fast speed and unprofessional communication of online media is considered in [13]. See also [9]. In [11], a statistical rumor diffusion model is considered for online networks and it contained positive and negative bipolar reinforcement factors. [4,6,18] studied a rumor propagation model similar to the European fox rabies SIR model for the situation of changing online community number. In [10], the authors studied the rumor propagation phenomena for a model with two layers: online and offline. See also [19] for the SEIR type online rumor model.

    This paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we present the nonnegativity property of the solution to (1) and the stability of the rumor-free equilibrium. The basic reproduction number R0 is calculated by using a next-generation matrix. In Section 3, we provide the existence and uniqueness of endemic equilibrium and its global stability. In Section 4, we perform several numerical simulations to verify our analytical results.

    In this section, we consider the conservation of nonnegativity of the densities I, S, W, R and the stability for a rumor-free equilibrium E0.

    Lemma 2.1. Let (I,S,W,R) be the unique global solution to (1). Assume that σs and σr are nonnegative constants and the rest of the coefficients are positive. If the initial data (I(0),S(0),W(0),R(0)) has only nonnegative components and satisfies

    S(0)2+W(0)2>0,

    then the solution is nonnegative for all t>0 and S(t),W(t)>0 for t>0.

    Proof. We take any positive T>0. By the continuity of the solution, there is C(T)>0 such that

    |I(t)|,|S(t)|,|W(t)|,|R(t)|<C(T).

    By the first equation in (1) and the boundedness, if I(0)0, then for 0<t<T,

    I(t)=I(0)et0(λsS(s)+λwW(s)+δi)ds+bt0etu(λsS(s)+λwW(s)+δi)dsdu>0.

    We first prove that S is nonnegative for 0<t<T. Assume not, i.e., there is ts(0,T) such that

    S(ts)<0.

    Let t0(0,ts) be an entering time for S into the negative region such that S(t)0 on [0,t0] and S(t)<0 on (t0,t0+ϵ), where ϵ>0 is a small constant. Note that by the second equation in (1),

    S(t)=S(0)et0(λsI(s)σsS(s)σrR(s)μδs)ds+t0λwI(u)W(u)etu(λsI(s)σsS(s)σrR(s)μδs)dsdu. (2)

    This and the positivity of I imply that if W(t)0 on (0,s], S(t) is nonnegative on (0,s]. Therefore, there is an entering time t0(0,ts) for W into the negative region such that W(t)0 on [0,t0] and W(t)<0 on (t0,t0+ϵ), where ϵ>0 is a small constant. If t0<t0, then S(t)0 and W(t)<0 on (t0,t0)(t0,t0+ϵ). Similarly, by the third equation in (1),

    W(t)=W(0)eδwt+t0ξS(u)eδw(tu)du. (3)

    Thus, W(t) is nonnegative on (0,s] if S0 on (0,s]. This is a contradiction and we conclude that t0t0. Similarly, we can obtain that t0t0. Thus, t0=t0.

    However, on t[t0,),

    (I(t),S(t),W(t),R(t))=(I(t0)eδi(tt0)+b(1eδi(tt0))δi,0,0,R(t0)eδr(tt0))

    is a solution to (1). By uniqueness of the solution, there is no ts>0 such that S(ts)<0. Therefore, we prove that S is nonnegative.

    Similarly, we can also easily obtain that there is no tw>0 such that W(tw)<0. Thus, for all t>0, I,S,W0. By the fourth equation in (1) and nonnegativity of I, S, W, we have that R is also nonnegative on (0,). Therefore, we prove that the solution is nonnegative for all t>0.

    Moreover, if S(0)>0, then for all t>0, S(t)>0 by (2). From (3), W(t)>0 on (0,). Similarly, if W(0)>0, then for all t>0, W(t)>0 by (3). By the virtue of the positivity of I and (2), S(t)>0 on (0,). Thus, we conclude that if S(0)>0 or W(0)>0, then S(t)>0 and W(t)>0, t(0,).

    In this part, we calculate the basic reproduction number using a next-generation matrix. To consider the asymptotic behavior of the dynamics in (1), we determine the equilibrium point such that

    ˙I=˙S=˙W=˙R=0. (4)

    If we assume that there is no rumor (S=0) in system (1) with (4), then the equilibrium point is unique and

    E0=(Irf,Srf,Wrf,Rrf)=(bδi,0,0,0).

    The basic reproduction number R0 is generally a measure of the transmission of disease. This is usually expressed in terms of the rate of secondary transmission (or infection) and no transmission. R0 for more complex systems was calculated in [5,16] using the next-generation matrix methodology. Here, we follow the method of [16].

    For the infected compartments, the next generation matrices at the rumor-free state E0=(b/δi,0,0,0) are given by

    F=1δi(bλsbλw00)andV=(μ+δs0ξδw),

    and hence

    V1=1(μ+δs)δw(δw0ξμ+δs).

    Here, F and V are related to the rate of new infections and transfer individuals, respectively. This yields

    FV1=(bλs(μ+δs)δi+bλwξ(μ+δs)δiδwbλwδiδw00).

    Therefore, we obtain the following formula for the basic reproduction number:

    R0=ρ(FV1)=bδi(λsμ+δs+λwξ(μ+δs)δw).

    Here, ρ(A) is the spectral radius of a matrix A.

    For the linear stability, we consider the Jacobian matrix as follows.

    J=(λsSλwWδiλsIλwI0λsS+λwWλsI2σsSσrRμδsλwIσrS0ξδw002σsS+σrR+μ0σrSδr).

    Since the rumor-free equilibrium is

    E0=(bδi,0,0,0),

    the Jacobian matrix at the rumor-free equilibrium is given by

    JE0=(δiλsbδiλwbδi00λsbδiμδsλwbδi00ξδw00μ0δr).

    Therefore, the corresponding characteristic equation is

    p(x)=(x+δr)(x+δi)×(x2(bλsδiμδsδw)xbδwλsδi+μδw+δsδwbλwξδi).

    Assume that R0<1. Then by the definition of R0,

    bδiλsμ+δs<bδi(λsμ+δs+λwξ(μ+δs)δw)<1.

    Thus,

    c1:=(bλsδiμδsδw)>δw>0.

    Note that

    c2:=bδwλsδi+(μ+δs)δwbλwξδi=δw(μ+δs)(bλsδi(μ+δs)bλwξδiδw(μ+δs)+1)=δw(μ+δs)(1R0)>0.

    Clearly, δr and δi are the eigenvalues of JE0 and are negative. The rest of the eigenvalues are zeros of the following polynomial.

    p0(x)=x2(bλsδiμδsδw)xbδwλsδi+(μ+δs)δwbλwξδi=x2+c1x+c2.

    Since c1>0 and c2>0, zeros of p0(x) have only negative real part. Therefore, E0=(b/δi,0,0,0) is locally asymptotically stable if R0<1.

    Clearly, if R0=1, then one of the eigenvalues has a zero real part. Thus, E0 is locally stable but not asymptotically stable for the linearized system. Furthermore, if R0>1, then c2<0. Therefore, E0 is linearly unstable. We summarize the above argument to

    Theorem 2.2. The rumor-free equilibrium E0 of the system in (1) is linearly stable if R01 and linearly unstable if if R0>1. Moreover, E0 is linearly asymptotically stable if R0<1.

    The rumor-free equilibrium E0 is also a global attractive basin. We can use the standard methodology to obtain the global asymptotical behavior of the solution to (1).

    Theorem 2.3. If R0<1, the rumor-free equilibrium E0 is globally asymptotically stable on

    {(I,S,R,W):S>0orW>0}{(I,S,W,R):I,S,W,R0}.

    Proof. Let

    V0(I,S,W)=[IIrfIrflogIIrf]+S+IrfλsδwW,

    where Irf=b/δi. Since

    IIrfIrflogIIrf>0,forIIrf,

    and

    IIrfIrflogIIrf=0,forI=Irf,

    we note that V0 is nonnegative and radially unbounded. Then by elementary calculation,

    dV0dt=(bλsISλwIWδiI)bδi(bIλsSλsWδi)+λsIS+λwIWσsSSσrSR(μ+δs)S+bλsδiδw(ξSδwW)=bδiIσsSSσrSR(μ+δs)S+bλsδiδw(ξSδwW)bδi(bIλsSλsWδi)=b(bδiI+δiIb2)σsSSσrSR(μ+δs)S+bλsδiδw(ξSδwW)+bδi(λsS+λsW)=b(bδiI+δiIb2)σsSSσrSR(μ+δs)S(1bλs(μ+δs)δibλsξ(μ+δs)δiδw).

    Therefore, we have

    dV0dt=b(bδiI+δiIb2)σsSSσrSR(μ+δs)S(1R0). (5)

    Note that by Lemma 2.1 in Section 2, I,S,R0 and S(t)>0 for all t>0. This nonnegativity and (5) imply that if (I(t),S(t))(Irf,0) and R0<1, then

    dV0dt<0.

    Therefore, (I(t),S(t)) converges to (Irf,0) as t goes to by Lyapunov stability theorem. By the third equation in (1), W(t) converges to zero as t goes to . Similarly, by the fourth equation in (1), R(t) converges to zero as t goes to .

    Therefore, the rumor-free equilibrium E0 is globally asymptotically stable.

    In this section, we present the existence and stability of endemic steady states for the rumor spreading model with an online reservoir. Endemic state refers to a nonzero steady state of S, i.e., the rumor is sustained. Since there is an influx b for ignorant I, we can show that the unique endemic state exists as follows.

    To obtain the endemic equilibrium

    E=(I,S,W,R),

    we consider the following steady state equation:

    dIdt=dSdt=dWdt=dRdt=0.

    Then the endemic equilibrium E=(I,S,W,R) satisfies

    0=bλsISλwIWδiI,0=λsIS+λwIWσsSSσrSRμSδsS,0=ξSδwW,0=σsSS+σrSR+μSδrR.

    We set

    U=δwξW,˜I=δiI,˜S=δsS,˜R=δrR,

    and

    ˜μ=μδs,˜λs=λsδw+λwξδiδsδw,˜σs=σsδ2s,˜σr=σrδsδr.

    Then U=S and

    0=b˜λs˜I˜S˜I,0=˜λs˜I˜S˜σs˜S˜S˜σr˜S˜R˜μ˜S˜S,0=˜σs˜S˜S+˜σr˜S˜R+˜μ˜S˜R. (6)

    Note that the basic reproduction number satisfies

    R0=b˜λs˜μ+1.

    To find endemic equilibrium E, we set

    ˜S>0.

    The sum of all equations in (6) implies that

    ˜R=(b˜I˜S). (7)

    From the second equation in (6),

    (˜λs˜S+˜σr˜S)˜I=˜σs˜S˜S˜σr˜S˜S+(˜μ+1)˜S+˜σrb˜S. (8)

    By (7)-(8),

    ˜I=˜σs˜σr˜λs+˜σr˜S+˜μ+1+˜σrb˜λs+˜σr:=β˜S+γ.

    Substituting ˜I into the first equation in (6) gives

    b˜λs(β˜S+γ)˜S(β˜S+γ)=0.

    Therefore, we have

    β˜λs˜S2+(˜λsγ+β)˜S+γb=0. (9)

    If we obtain positive S, then by the first and third equations, we can derive I and R such that

    ˜I=b˜λs˜S+1

    and

    ˜R=˜σs˜S˜S+˜μ˜S1˜σr˜S.

    Thus, if all components are nonnegative,

    S<1˜σr. (10)

    Theorem 3.1. If R0>1, then a unique positive endemic state E exists, but if R01, then there is no positive endemic state.

    Proof. Assume that R0>1. Then there are three cases as follows.

    ● Case 1 (˜σs˜σr=0): Since β=0, we have

    ˜S=bγ˜λsγ=bb˜σr+˜μ+1R01R0<1˜σr.

    Condition (10) holds, which implies that a positive endemic state E exists and is unique.

    ● Case 2 (˜σs˜σr>0): The equation (9) can be written as

    ˜S2+(b˜σr+˜μ+1˜σs˜σr+1˜λs)˜S+b˜σs˜σr1R0R0=0.

    Since R01>0 and ˜σs˜σr>0,

    b˜σs˜σr1R0R0<0.

    Therefore, there is a unique positive real root of the equation. To check the condition in (10), let

    f(x)=x2+(b˜σr+˜μ+1˜σs˜σr+1˜λs)x+b˜σs˜σr1R0R0. (11)

    By elementary calculation,

    f(1/˜σr)=(˜λs+˜σr)(˜μ˜σr+˜σs)˜λs˜σ2r(˜σs˜σr). (12)

    Thus, f(1/˜σr)>0 and it follows that (10) holds, proving that there is a unique positive endemic equilibrium E.

    ● Case 3 (˜σs˜σr<0): Clearly, ˜S is a positive root of f(x) in (11). The discriminant is

    D=(b˜σr+˜μ+1˜σs˜σr+1˜λs)24b˜σs˜σr1R0R0.

    Since we assume that ˜σs˜σr<0, we need further analytical calculations to obtain D>0.

    Let

    g(x)=(x˜σr+˜λs(1+˜μ+b˜σr))24˜λs(1˜μ+b˜λs)(˜σrx).

    Then the discriminant is represented as for 0˜σs<˜σr,

    D=g(˜σs)(˜λs+˜σr)2.

    Note that g is a quadratic function, therefore, g has global minimum value at

    x=b˜σr˜λs+˜σr2b˜λ2s+˜μ˜λs+˜λs.

    Since we assume that R0>1,

    b˜σr˜λs+˜σr2b˜λ2s+˜μ˜λs+˜λs<(˜μ+1)˜σr+˜σr2b˜λ2s+˜μ˜λs+˜λs=˜μ˜σr+˜λs(2b˜λs+˜μ+1)<0.

    Therefore, the minimum value of g on [0,˜σr) occurs at x=0, thus, for ˜σs[0,˜σr),

    g(˜σs)g(0)=(˜λs(b˜σr+˜μ+1)˜σr)2+4˜σr˜λs(b˜λs+˜μ+1)=:h(˜σr).

    We consider g(0) as a function of ˜σr, say h(˜σr). Then h(˜σr) is also a quadratic function of ˜σr. Thus, h(˜σr) has a global minimum as follows:

    h(˜σr)4b˜μ˜λ3s(b˜λs˜μ1)(b˜λs1)2>0.

    Therefore, D>0 and f has two distinct real roots. Note that

    b˜σs˜σr1R0R0>0.

    Thus, f has two distinct positive roots or two distinct negative roots.

    By (12) and ˜σs˜σr<0,

    f(1/˜σr)=(˜λs+˜σr)(˜μ˜σr+˜σs)˜λs˜σ2r(˜σs˜σr)<0.

    Therefore, f has two distinct positive roots and one is less than 1/˜σr and one is greater than 1/˜σr. For small root, ˜R is positive and for large root, ˜R is negative.

    For any case, we conclude that if R0>1, then a unique positive endemic state E exists.

    For the remaining part, we assume that R01. Similar to the previous proof, we have three cases.

    ● Case 1 (˜σs˜σr=0): From β=0 and (9), it follows that

    ˜S=bγ˜λsγ=bb˜σr+˜μ+1R01R00.

    Thus there is no positive endemic state E.

    ● Case 2 (˜σs˜σr>0): Note that ˜S is a positive root of f(x) in (11). For 0˜σr<˜σs, the discriminant is

    D=g(˜σs)(˜λs+˜σr)2

    and g has a global minimum value of 4bλ2s(λs+σs)(bλs+μ+1).

    Since we assume that R0<1, the minimum value is positive, which yields that D>0. Moreover,

    b˜σs˜σr1R0R00,

    this implies that if R0<1, f has two distinct positive roots or two distinct negative roots, and if R0=1, 0 is a root of f.

    Note that f has a global minimum value at

    x=bσrλs+μλs+λs+(σsσr)2λs(σsσr)<0.

    Thus, f has no positive root and there is no positive endemic equilibrium E.

    ● Case 3 (˜σs˜σr<0): Note that

    ˜S2+(b˜σr+˜μ+1˜σs˜σr+1˜λs)˜S+b˜σs˜σr1R0R0=0.

    Since R010 and ˜σs˜σr<0, we have

    b˜σs˜σr1R0R00.

    Therefore, there is at most one positive real root of the equation. However,

    f(1/˜σr)=(˜λs+˜σr)(˜μ˜σr+˜σs)˜λs˜σ2r(˜σs˜σr)<0.

    Thus, (10) does not hold. This implies that there is no positive endemic equilibrium E.

    Therefore, we conclude that if R01, then there is no positive endemic state.

    In this part, we consider asymptotic stability for the endemic state E. Since the endemic state E exists only for R0>1, we consider the case of R0>1.

    Theorem 3.2. If R0>1, then the endemic equilibrium E is globally asymptotically stable on

    {(I,S,R,W):S>0orW>0}{(I,S,W,R):I,S,W,R0}.

    Proof. Let

    V(I,S,W,R)=[IIIlogII]+[SSSlogSS]+λwδwI[WWWlogWW]+Rσrμ+Rσr[RRRlogRR]=:J1+J2+J3+J4.

    In the same manner as Theorem 2.3, note that V is nonnegative and radially unbounded.

    We claim that if (I(t),S(t),W(t),R(t))(I,S,W,R) and S(t)>0, then

    dVdt<0.

    Since (I,S,W,R) is the steady state of (1),

    (bλsISλwIWδiI)=0.

    Therefore,

    dJ1dt=(bλsISλwIWδiI)(1II)+(bλsISλwIWδiI)(1II)=b(2IIII)λs(II)(SS)λw(II)(WW).

    Similarly,

    (λsIS+λwIWσsSSσrSRμS)=0.

    This implies that

    dJ2dt=(λsIS+λwIWσsSSσrSR(μ+δs)S)(1SS)+(λsIS+λwIWσsSSσrSR(μ+δs)S)(1SS)=λs(II)(SS)σs(SS)(SS)σr(RR)(SS)+λwIW(1SS)+λwIW(1SS).

    Note that

    dJ3dt=λwδwI(ξSδwW)(1WW).

    We add the derivatives of J1,J2, and J3 to obtain

    d(J1+J2+J3)dtb(2IIII)+σs(SS)(SS)+σr(RR)(SS)=λw(II)(WW)+λwIW(1SS)+λwIW(1SS)+λwδwI(ξSδwW)(1WW)=λwIW+λwIWλwISSWλwISSW+λwδwI(ξSδwW)(1WW).

    Using δwW=ξS,

    d(J1+J2+J3)dtb(2IIII)+σs(SS)(SS)+σr(RR)(SS)=λw(IWISSWξδwIWWS+IW). (13)

    Using δwW=ξS again,

    IWISSWξδwIWWS+IW=(IW+IIIW2IW)(ξδwISWW+ISSW+IIIW3IW)=IW(II+II2)ξδwIW(SW+δ2wξ2IWIS+δwξII3δwξ). (14)

    Combining (13) and (14) with δwW=ξS,

    d(J1+J2+J3)dt=(λwξδwISb)(II+II2)λwξ2δ2wIS(SW+δ2wξ2IWIS+δwξII3δwξ)σs(SS+SS2SS)σr(SR+SRSRRS).

    Since

    σsSS+σrSR+μSδrR=0,

    we have

    μ+RσrRσrdJ4dt=dRdt(1RR)=(σsSS+σrSR+μSδrR)(1RR)+(σsSS+σrSR+μSδrR)(1RR)=σs(SS+SSRRSSRRSS)+σr(SR+SRRRRSRRRS)+μ(S+SRRSRRS).

    Then we have

    dVdt=(λwξδwISb)(II+II2)λwξ2δ2wIS(SW+δ2wξ2IWIS+δwξII3δwξ)σs(SS+SS2SS)σr(SR+SRSRRS)+Rσrμ+Rσrσs(SS+SSRRSSRRSS)+Rσrμ+Rσrσr(SR+SRRRRSRRRS)
    +Rσrμ+Rσrμ(S+SRRSRRS).

    Note that

    σs(SS+SS2SS)+Rσrμ+Rσrσs(SS+SSRRSSRRSS)=μμ+Rσrσs(SS+SS2SS)Rσrμ+RσrσsSS(RRSS+RRSS2)

    and

    σr(SR+SRSRRS)+Rσrμ+Rσrσr(SR+SRRRRSRRRS)+Rσrμ+Rσrμ(S+SRRSRRS)=Rσrμ+RσrμS(RR+RR2).

    In conclusion, we have

    dVdt=(λwξδwISb)(II+II2)λwξ2δ2wIS(SW+δ2wξ2IWIS+δwξII3δwξ)μμ+Rσrσs(SS+SS2SS)Rσrμ+RσrσsSS(RRSS+RRSS2)Rσrμ+RσrμS(RR+RR2).

    From the first equation in (1), it follows that

    b=λsIS+λwIW+δiI=λsIS+λwξδwIS+δiI.

    This implies that

    λwξδwISb=λsISδiI<0.

    By the relationship between arithmetic and geometric means, if

    (I(t),S(t),W(t),R(t))(I,S,W,R)andS(t)>0,

    then

    dVdt<0.

    If we assume that S(0)>0 or W(0)>0, then by the result in Section 2, S(t)>0 for t>0. Therefore, by Lyapunov stability theorem, we conclude that if S(0)>0 or W(0)>0, then (I(t),S(t),W(t),R(t)) converges to E as t goes to and this implies that the endemic equilibrium E is globally asymptotically stable on

    {(I,S,R,W):S>0orW>0}{(I,S,W,R):I,S,W,R0}.

    In this section, we carry out some numerical simulations to verify the theoretical results. We use the fourth-order Runge-Kutta method with time step size Δt=0.01. We assume that the initial condition is (I(0),S(0),W(0),R(0))=(1,1,0,0).

    As shown before, the basic reproduction number is

    R0=ρ(FV1)=bδi(λsμ+δs+λwξ(μ+δs)δw).

    We assume that the influx b is 1. Since the parameters σs, σr, and δr are not involved in the basic reproduction number R0, we fix these parameters as σs=σr=δr=0.5. If we take λs=λw=ξ=0.5 and δi=δs=δw=μ=1, then R0=0.375. In this case, as we proved in Theorem 2.3, the rumor-free equilibrium is b/δi=1 and is globally asymptotically stable. As seen in Figure 1(A), the population density of ignorants I(t) converges to 1 and the other densities S(t), W(t), and R(t) converge to zero. On the other hand, if we set δi=δs=δw=μ=0.5 and λs=λw=ξ=1, then R0=6. As we proved in Theorem 3.2, the endemic equilibrium exists and is asymptotically stable. See Figure 1(B).

    Figure 1.  Numerical simulations when b=1, σs=0.5, and σr=0.5.

    Now, we investigate the influence of an online reservoir. We change ξ from 0 to 2 and all other parameters are fixed as λs=λw=σs=σr=δi=δw=δr=μ=0.5 and δi=1. The final densities I(T), S(T), W(T), and R(T) when the final time T=103 are given in Figure 2(A). We observe the phase transition when R0=1. That is, ξ=0.5. We change λw from 0 to 2 and all the other parameters are the same as the previous case. If we set ξ=0.5, then we observe the effect of the trust rate λw in Figure 2(B). In this case, the densities S(t) and R(t) are the same since ξ=δw. As ξ and λw increase, the densities of the spreaders and stiflers also increase. Therefore, as online reservoirs become more active, rumors are more expansively spread.

    Figure 2.  Final densities I(T), S(T), W(T), and R(T) with T=103.

    Even though the contact rates σs and σr are not involved in R0, they affect the behavior of the solutions. See Figure 3. We choose σs and σr between 0.1 and 2. All other parameters are fixed to 0.5. That is, λs=λw=δi=δs=μ=ξ=δw=δr=0.5 and hence R0=2. Since R0>1, the final time T=30 is large enough. The bigger contact rates lead to a sharp reduction in the density of spreaders in a short time. Therefore, the final densities of the spreaders and stiflers are low if the contact rates are high. Furthermore, we confirm that the aggressive activity of the stiflers has an immense influence on the spread of a rumor. In Figure 4, we change (σs,σr) on [0,1]×[0,1] and display the final densities I(T), S(T), W(T), and R(T) with T=30.

    Figure 3.  Evolution of the solution with different parameters σs and σr.
    Figure 4.  Final densities I(T), S(T), W(T), and R(T) with T=30.

    We next compare the SIR and SIWR models. Without online an reservoir, the basic reproduction number of the SIR model is given by

    RSIR0=bλs(μ+δs)δi.

    If we fix the parameters such as σs=σr=δr=0.5 and λs=δi=δs=μ=1, then RSIR0=0.5. However, we introduce an online reservoir with δw=0.5 and λw=ξ=1, then R0=1.5. Therefore, we conclude that an online reservoir promotes the spread of a rumor. The comparison of SIR and SIWR is given in Figure 5.

    Figure 5.  Comparison of the SIR and SIWR models.

    In this paper, we consider a rumor spreading model with an online reservoir. By using a next-generation matrix, we calculated the basic reproduction number R0. We proved that a unique rumor-free equilibrium E0 exists and if R01, then E0 is linearly stable and if R0>1, then E0 is linearly unstable. For the asymptotic behavior, E0 is globally asymptotically stable if R0<1. For the endemic equilibrium, if R0>1, then there is a unique positive endemic state E and if R01, then there is no positive endemic state. Moreover, for a rumor spreading dynamics with an online reservoir, the endemic equilibrium E is globally asymptotically stable if R0>1. The presence of σs and σr does not affect the basic reproduction number and the asymptotic behaviors of steady states. We also investigated that the reproduction number R0 increases by the effect of the online reservoir. Thus, the development of online media promotes rumor propagation.

    S.-H. Choi and H. Seo are partially supported by National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea (no. 2017R1E1A1A03070692). H. Seo is partially supported by NRF of Korea (no. 2020R1I1A1A01069585).



    [1] Rumor rest stops on the information highway transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain. Human Communication Research (1998) 25: 163-179.
    [2] Emergence of influential spreaders in modified rumor models. Journal of Statistical Physics (2013) 151: 383-393.
    [3] D. J. Daley and D. G. Kendall, Epidemics and rumours, Nature, 204 (1964), 1118. doi: 10.1038/2041118a0
    [4] J. Dhar, A. Jain and V. K. Gupta, A mathematical model of news propagation on online social network and a control strategy for rumor spreading, Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6 (2016), 57. doi: 10.1007/s13278-016-0366-5
    [5] On the definition and the computation of the basic reproduction ratio R0 in models for infectious diseases in heterogeneous populations. Journal of Mathematical Biology (1990) 28: 365-382.
    [6] Studies on the population dynamics of a rumor-spreading model in online social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2018) 492: 10-20.
    [7] K. Kenney, A. Gorelik and S. Mwangi, Interactive features of online newspapers, First Monday, 5 (2000). doi: 10.5210/fm.v5i1.720
    [8] Lyapunov functions and global properties for SEIR and SEIS epidemic models. Mathematical Medicine and Biology: A Journal of the IMA (2004) 21: 75-83.
    [9] S. Kwon, M. Cha, K. Jung, W. Chen and Y. Wang, Prominent features of rumor propagation in online social media, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining, (2013) 1103–1108. doi: 10.1109/ICDM.2013.61
    [10] J. Ma and D. Li, Rumor Spreading in Online-Offline Social Networks, PACIS 2016 Proceedings, 173 (2016).
    [11] Rumor spreading in online social networks by considering the bipolar social reinforcement. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2016) 447: 108-115.
    [12] Y. Moreno, M. Nekovee and A. F. Pacheco, Dynamics of rumor spreading in complex networks, Physical Review E, 69 (2004), 066130. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.066130
    [13] An Exploration of Social Media in Extreme Events: Rumor Theory and Twitter during the Haiti Earthquake 2010. Icis (2010) 231: 7332-7336.
    [14] R. Pastor-Satorras, C. Castellano, P. Van Mieghem and A. Vespignani, Epidemic processes in complex networks, Reviews of Modern Physics, 87 (2015), 925. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.87.925
    [15] Multiple transmission pathways and disease dynamics in a waterborne pathogen model. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology (2010) 72: 1506-1533.
    [16] Reproduction numbers and sub-threshold endemic equilibria for compartmental models of disease transmission. Mathematical Biosciences (2002) 180: 29-48.
    [17] Rumor spreading model with consideration of forgetting mechanism: A case of online blogging LiveJournal. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2011) 390: 2619-2625.
    [18] The dynamics analysis of a rumor propagation model in online social networks. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications (2019) 520: 118-137.
    [19] L. Zhu, X. Zhou and Y. Li, Global dynamics analysis and control of a rumor spreading model in online social networks, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 526 (2019), 120903, 15 pp. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.04.139
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. J. Franceschi, L. Pareschi, M. Zanella, From agent-based models to the macroscopic description of fake-news spread: the role of competence in data-driven applications, 2022, 3, 2662-2963, 10.1007/s42985-022-00194-z
    2. Youjun Lu, Sen Wu, Jiayin Wei, Yanjun Liang, Li Deng, 2024, Dynamic Analysis and Optimal Control of SIWCR Rumor Propagation Model with Rumor Countering and Whistleblowing Mechanism, 979-8-3503-5359-4, 911, 10.1109/EEI63073.2024.10696185
    3. Xiaohuan Wang, Xinyao Wang, Wanli Yang, Finite‐time extinction of a fractional rumor model, 2024, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.10414
    4. Sen Wu, Youjun Lu, Congli Chen, Shichen Liu, 2024, Dynamic analysis of SICDR rumor propagation model with time delay and psychological factors, 979-8-3503-7510-7, 746, 10.1109/CISAT62382.2024.10695275
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2021 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2491) PDF downloads(298) Cited by(4)

Figures and Tables

Figures(5)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog