
The Riemann waves in two spatial dimensions are described by the fractional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, which has been used to explain numerous physical phenomena including magneto-sound waves in plasmas, tsunamis, and flows in rivers and internal oceans. This work concerned itself with obtaining new analytic soliton solutions for the fractional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff model based on the fractional conformable. By solving the model equation with the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE technique in association with the Bäcklund transformation, the solution was found in terms of trigonometric, hyperbolic, and rational functions. To analyze the detailed features of the wave structures as well as the pattern of dynamics of these solutions, 3D and contour diagrams were plotted by using Wolfram Mathematica. A great advantage of these types of visualizations is that they demonstrate amplitude, shape, and propagation characteristics of the selected soliton solutions. The results reveal that the proposed approach is accurate, universal, and fast for the investigation of the different aspects of the Riemann problem and the related phenomena concerning the propagation of waves.
Citation: Hussain Gissy, Abdullah Ali H. Ahmadini, Ali H. Hakami. The solitary wave phenomena of the fractional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 420-437. doi: 10.3934/math.2025020
[1] | Avner Friedman, Chuan Xue . A mathematical model for chronic wounds. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2011, 8(2): 253-261. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2011.8.253 |
[2] | Pedro José Gutiérrez-Diez, Jose Russo . Design of personalized cancer treatments by use of optimal control problems: The case of chronic myeloid leukemia. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 4773-4800. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020261 |
[3] | Laurenz Göllmann, Helmut Maurer . Optimal control problems with time delays: Two case studies in biomedicine. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(5): 1137-1154. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018051 |
[4] | Jerzy Klamka, Helmut Maurer, Andrzej Swierniak . Local controllability and optimal control for\newline a model of combined anticancer therapy with control delays. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(1): 195-216. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017013 |
[5] | Glenn Webb . The force of cell-cell adhesion in determining the outcome in a nonlocal advection diffusion model of wound healing. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 8689-8704. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022403 |
[6] | Elamin H. Elbasha . Model for hepatitis C virus transmissions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(4): 1045-1065. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1045 |
[7] | B. M. Adams, H. T. Banks, Hee-Dae Kwon, Hien T. Tran . Dynamic Multidrug Therapies for HIV: Optimal and STI Control Approaches. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2004, 1(2): 223-241. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2004.1.223 |
[8] | Heping Ma, Hui Jian, Yu Shi . A sufficient maximum principle for backward stochastic systems with mixed delays. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(12): 21211-21228. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023938 |
[9] | Minseok Kim, Yeongjong Kim, Yeoneung Kim . Physics-informed neural networks for optimal vaccination plan in SIR epidemic models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(7): 1598-1633. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025059 |
[10] | Taeyong Lee, Adrianne L. Jenner, Peter S. Kim, Jeehyun Lee . Application of control theory in a delayed-infection and immune-evading oncolytic virotherapy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(3): 2361-2383. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020126 |
The Riemann waves in two spatial dimensions are described by the fractional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, which has been used to explain numerous physical phenomena including magneto-sound waves in plasmas, tsunamis, and flows in rivers and internal oceans. This work concerned itself with obtaining new analytic soliton solutions for the fractional Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff model based on the fractional conformable. By solving the model equation with the Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE technique in association with the Bäcklund transformation, the solution was found in terms of trigonometric, hyperbolic, and rational functions. To analyze the detailed features of the wave structures as well as the pattern of dynamics of these solutions, 3D and contour diagrams were plotted by using Wolfram Mathematica. A great advantage of these types of visualizations is that they demonstrate amplitude, shape, and propagation characteristics of the selected soliton solutions. The results reveal that the proposed approach is accurate, universal, and fast for the investigation of the different aspects of the Riemann problem and the related phenomena concerning the propagation of waves.
Chronic wounds, which fail to heal through the normally orderly process of stages and remain in a chronic inflammatory state, are a major burden for health care systems and a significant socioeconomic problem worldwide [1,2]. For example, 2.4–4.5 million people are believed to suffer from the chronic lower extremity ulcers (a typical chronic wound disease) per year in the United States [3]. These ulcers last on average 12 months and recur up to 60% to 70% of patients. In a Dutch nursing-home population, a recent study shows a 4.2% prevalence rate of chronic wounds [4]. Chronic wounds lead to loss of basic functions of human body and decrease quality of life tremendously. Along with other diseases such as diabetes, 24% of these wounds will ultimately result in amputation of the lower limb. Thus, effective treatment for chronic wounds is urgently needed.
The dynamic evolution process of the chronic wound mainly consists the oxygen, neutrophils, invasive bacteria, and chemoattractant (a chemical that attracts neutrophils to the bacteria). There are many useful mathematical models that address these four physical and chemical phenomenon. McDougall et al. model the dermal wound healing by a weighted average of cells' previous motion direction [5]. Cumming et al. use a cell-based discrete approach to describe the delicate interaction between elements that vary widely in nature and size scales [6]. Gaffney et al. use standard form of the conservation equation for the tip concentration and the endothelial cell density [7]. Thackham et al. consider advection-dominated wound healing models with a source term and obtain an analytic solution under some simplification [8]. Vermolen has developed a system of two dimensional nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations, in which oxygen, growth factors, epidermal cells are considered [9]. Essentially, the dynamic evolution process of the chronic wound is spatiotemporal evolution, which is generally modeled by coupled partial differential equations (PDEs). For example, continuum reaction-diffusion models, one of typical PDEs, are the most commonly theoretical approach to study the angiogenesis process [10].
Wound healing is a highly regulated and undeniably complex process, which can be divided into four interconnected and overlapping stages: haemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and remodelling [11,12]. Among these processes, hyperbaric oxygen therapy is a critical means for healing the wound and has been shown to improve the healing of chronic wounds in clinical trials [13]. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is breathing 100% oxygen under increased atmospheric pressure. The primary mechanism behind the use of this therapy for wound healing is to correct the amount of oxygen delivered to the wound site. The positive effects stem from increased tissue oxygen tension and pressure within the wound site, such as increased collagen synthesis, modulation of the immune system response, inhibition of bacterial propagation, prevention of leukocyte activation and so on [14]. Kalliainen et al. conclude that topical oxygen has no bad effects on chronic wounds and show the beneficial indications in promoting wound healing [15]. Gajendrareddy et al. demonstrate that systemic oxygen therapy ameliorates stress-impaired dermal wound healing [16]. Eisenbud gives the correction of wound hypoxia and clarifies that oxygen is beneficial to many aspects of healing but it does not necessarily follow that the more is better [17]. These work described above greatly promotes the hyperbaric oxygen therapy and provides guidance for the medical staff. However, these results are from a large number of repeated experiments and feel weak for individual difference treatment. Moreover, Gill et al. discuss the application, mechanisms and outcomes of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy but also mention that the therapy is expensive [18]. Thus, this paper considers the hyperbaric oxygen therapy for a chronic wound from the perspective of control synthesis and economic cost.
To our best knowledge, there are few literature studies in the control of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy for a chronic wound. The time and amount of oxygenation applied during the hyperbaric oxygen therapy provide the regulatory mechanism for the advanced control strategy study to improve wound healing [19,20]. Recently, Guffey demonstrates the existence of the state solutions for a bacterial infection model with modified boundary conditions [21] and establishes some theoretical foundations of optimal control in a chronic wound. However, the convergence of the state system forward and the adjoint system backward is not solved and the implementation of optimal control is blocked. In this paper, we complement the optimal switching time control of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy for a chronic wound based on the sensitivity analysis and have a great prospect in the application and guidance of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
The paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, the dimensionless oxygen concentration, dimensionless neutrophil concentration, dimensionless bacterial concentration and dimensionless chemoattractant concentration with corresponding boundary conditions and initial conditions in a chronic wound are modeled. Then, the optimal control problem for inhibiting the growth of bacterial concentration through the hyperbaric oxygen therapy is proposed. In Section 3, The method of lines, which only discretizes the space while keeps the time continuous, is used to reduce the PDE optimization problem into an ODE optimization problem. In Section 4, the control design problem of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy is the parameter selection problem of the optimal time switching points essentially. However, the switching time problem is difficult to solve. Thus, the time-scaling transformation approach which turns the original problem into a new problem with fixed switching time is applied and the gradient of the cost functional corresponding to the time intervals is derived based on the sensitivity analysis. In Section 5, computational numerical analysis is carried out to show the effectiveness of the optimal switching time control for bacterial concentration suppression under different discretization numbers of the time intervals. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper with comments and suggestions for future research.
We consider the situation, where the chronic wound is considered to be one-dimensional with the spatial distance x=0 located at the center of the radial wound site and x=1 located at the edge of the chronic wound nearest healthy dermis. This paper mainly uses oxygen, neutrophils, bacteria and chemoattractants to describe the dynamic evolution process of a chronic wound. Moreover, the relationship of these variables' interaction is shown in Figure 1.
The movement process of the dimensionless oxygen concentration O(x,t) in a chronic wound is governed by the following PDE model [22,23]
∂O(x,t)∂t=∂2O(x,t)∂x2+η+κu(t)−λNON(x,t)O(x,t)−λBOB(x,t)O(x,t)−λOO(x,t),t∈[0,T],x∈[0,1], | (2.1) |
where t is the time variable; η is a constant input of external oxygen; κ is the oxygen coefficient of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy; λNO is per unit neutrophil; λBO is per unit bacteria; N(x,t) is the dimensionless neutrophil concentration; B(x,t) is the dimensionless bacterial concentration; λO is the natural decay rate of oxygen. Oxygen lost in any other way, unrelated to the neutrophils and bacteria, occurs at a constant rate of λO. For example, other leukocytes need to consume oxygen. Oxygen naturally decay is also described in [24]. Moreover, during the hyperbaric oxygen therapy, we can only choose the oxygen tank on or off. Thus, u(t), a time-dependent oxygen therapy, is given as
u(t)={1,if oxygen is imposed,0,otherwise. | (2.2) |
Since the oxygen concentration satisfies the natural boundary condition at the center of the chronic wound and is enough at the edge of the chronic wound nearest healthy dermis, the boundary conditions for (2.1) are:
∂O(0,t)∂x=0,O(1,t)=1,t∈[0,T]. | (2.3) |
We assume the initial state of the oxygen concentration is enough and then obtain the following initial condition for (2.1)
O(x,0)=1,x∈[0,1]. | (2.4) |
The movement process of the dimensionless neutrophil concentration in a chronic wound is governed by [25,26]
∂N(x,t)∂t=DN∂2N(x,t)∂x2−κN∂(∂N(x,t)∂C(x,t)∂x)∂x+αBNB(x,t)N(x,t)GN(O(x,t))(1−N(x,t))−λNN(x,t)(1+HN(O(x,t)))1+eB(x,t),t∈[0,T],x∈[0,1], | (2.5) |
where DN is the diffusion coefficient of neutrophils; κN is the attraction coefficient of neutrophils via chemoattractant gradient released by the bacteria; C(x,t) is the dimensionless chemoattractant concentration; αBN is the proliferation coefficient of neutrophils corresponding to the bacteria and oxygen; λN is the decay coefficient of neutrophils dependent on the presence of bacteria and oxygen, e is the relative coefficient of neutrophils corresponding to the bacteria. As bacteria proliferate in the wound, neutrophils are recruited into the chronic wound site to destroy the bacteria. This direct correlation between the amount of bacteria in the wound and the neutrophil concentration also affects the reduction of neutrophils from the chronic wound. The fraction (the last item on the right side of (2.5)), which is also mentioned in [26], describes this process. Moreover, two bounded smooth functions GN(O(x,t)) and HN(O(x,t)) are defined as
GN(O(x,t))={2O3(x,t)−3O2(x,t)+2, 0≤O(x,t)<1,1,O(x,t)>1, | (2.6) |
and
HN(O(x,t))={2, 0≤O(x,t)<0.15,4000O3(x,t)−2400O2(x,t)+450O(x,t)−25, 0.15≤O(x,t)<0.25,0, 0.25≤O(x,t)<2.95,−4000O3(x,t)+36000O2(x,t)−107970O(x,t)−107911, 2.95≤O(x,t)<3.05,2,O(x,t)>3.05. | (2.7) |
In according with (2.3), the boundary conditions for (2.5) are
∂N(0,t)∂x=0,N(1,t)=1,t∈[0,T]. | (2.8) |
The neutrophils are assumed to be originally concentrated heavily near the edge of the chronic wound, the initial condition for (2.5) is
N(x,0)=x2e−(1−xϵ)2,x∈[0,1], | (2.9) |
where ϵ is the distribution coefficient.
The movement process of the dimensionless bacterial concentration in a chronic wound is governed by the following PDE model [26]
∂B(x,t)∂t=DB∂2B(x,t)∂x2+αBB(x,t)(1−B(x,t))−B(x,t)O(x,t)KO+O(x,t)θ+KNRN(x,t)λRBB(x,t)+1−λBB(x,t),t∈[0,T],x∈[0,1], | (2.10) |
where DB is the diffusion coefficient of bacteria; αB is the proliferation coefficient of bacteria; KO is the influence coefficient of oxygen; θ is the influence coefficient of other leukocytes; KNR is the influence coefficient of neutrophils; λRB is the attenuation coefficient of neutrophils' influence; λB is the natural death rate of bacteria. Bacteria are removed by neutrophils. An increase in the neutrophil concentration within the wound site will lead to the destruction of bacteria. Thus, KNR denotes the influence coefficient of neutrophils for bacterial destruction while λRB denotes the attenuation coefficient of neutrophils' influence caused by bacteria. Since the bacterial concentration satisfies the natural boundary condition (a zero flux condition) at x=0 and x=1, the boundary conditions for (2.10) are
∂B(0,t)∂x=0,∂B(1,t)∂x=0,t∈[0,T]. | (2.11) |
Meanwhile, the bacteria are assumed to be initially concentrated densely in the center of the chronic wound within [0,ϵ] and nonexistent elsewhere. It is corresponding to the neutrophils, which are assumed to be initially concentrated heavily near the edge of the chronic wound. Then, neutrophils are chemically attracted by the chemoattractant to destroy bacteria. Moreover, the assumption that bacteria are initially concentrated in the center of the chronic wound is mentioned in [26]. In practice, the process of bacteria slowly moving from a central area of a wound to the outer edge is reasonable. Thus, the initial condition for (2.10) is
B(x,0)=(1−x)2e−(xϵ)2,x∈[0,1]. | (2.12) |
where ϵ is the distribution coefficient like in (2.9).
The movement process of the dimensionless chemoattractant concentration in a chronic wound is governed by [27]
∂C(x,t)∂t=DC∂2C(x,t)∂x2+αCB(x,t)−λCC(x,t),t∈[0,T],x∈[0,1], | (2.13) |
where DC is the diffusion coefficient of chemoattractant; αC is the proliferation coefficient of chemoattractant produced by the bacteria; λC is natural death rate of chemoattractant. In accordance with (2.11), the boundary conditions for (2.13) are
∂C(0,t)∂x=0,∂C(1,t)∂x=0,t∈[0,T]. | (2.14) |
In accordance with (2.12), the initial condition for (2.13) is
C(x,0)=(1−x)2e−(xϵ)2,x∈[0,1]. | (2.15) |
where ϵ is the distribution coefficient like in (2.9).
Since bacterial concentration causes a serious threat to health cure, the hyperbaric oxygen therapy u(t) must be manipulated carefully to inhibit the growth of bacterial concentration and even eliminate bacteria at fixed treatment time t=T. Gill et al. mention that hyperbaric oxygen therapy is expensive. The cost of this therapy depends on the amount of time it takes to use oxygen. We hope to achieve better therapeutic results at a lower economic cost, which has important socioeconomic significance. The cost functional is designed to minimize the bacterial infection as well as the amount of time spent in the hyperbaric oxygen therapy. To this end, we consider the following cost functional
J(u(t))=∫10B(x,T)dx+ω∫T0u2(t)dt, | (2.16) |
where ω is the weight coefficient, which depends on the treatment cost. The first term of cost functional (2.16) denotes the bacterial concentration at fixed treatment time t=T and the second term denotes the economic cost by hyperbaric oxygen therapy. This paper considers the inhibition of bacterial propagation and even completes the elimination of bacteria to achieve a smooth healing of a chronic wound through the hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Thus, bacterial concentration is the most direct variable and an objective evaluation criterion for therapeutic effects. Other variables, including oxygen, neutrophils and chemoattractants, are coupled with bacteria through PDEs. It is difficult to obtain the direct quantitative relationship between bacteria and indirect variables and then hard to include these indirect variables in the cost functional to obtain an objective evaluation criterion. For example, chemoattractant attracts neutrophils to destroy bacteria while chemoattractant is produced by bacteria. Thus, the chemoattractant concentration is difficult to be quantified in the cost functional. Moreover, the proposed objective function is also used in [21].
Thus, we obtain the following PDE optimization problem: given the dimensionless oxygen concentration model (2.1), dimensionless neutrophil concentration model (2.5), dimensionless bacterial concentration model (2.10) and dimensionless chemoattractant concentration model (2.13) with corresponding boundary conditions and initial conditions, choose the control u(t), in accordance with (2.2), to minimize the cost functional (2.16). We refer to this problem as Problem P0.
Problem P0 is a PDE optimization problem. In order to simplify the optimal control design, we apply the method of lines, which only discretizes the space while keeps the time continuous, to reduce the PDEs (2.1), (2.5), (2.10) and (2.13) into ODEs [28]. First, we decompose the whole space [0,1] into equally-spaced intervals xi−xi−1=1/M, i=1,...,M, where M is an integer of spatial discretization, x0=0,xM=1 and define
O(xi,t)=Oi(t),N(xi,t)=Ni(t),B(xi,t)=Bi(t),C(xi,t)=Ci(t),i=0,...,M. | (3.1) |
Then, based on the (3.1), we obtain the following finite difference approximations by center difference
∂2O(xi,t)∂x2=M2[Oi+1(t)−2Oi(t)+Oi−1(t)],∂2N(xi,t)∂x2=M2[Ni+1(t)−2Ni(t)+Ni−1(t)],∂2B(xi,t)∂x2=M2[Bi+1(t)−2Bi(t)+Bi−1(t)],∂2C(xi,t)∂x2=M2[Ci+1(t)−2Ci(t)+Ci−1(t)],i=1,...,M−1, | (3.2) |
and
∂(∂N(x,t)∂C(x,t)∂x)∂x=M24[Ni+1(t)−Ni−1(t)][Ci+1(t)−Ci−1(t)]+M2Ni(t)[Ci+1(t)−2Ci(t)+Ci−1(t)],i=1,...,M−1. | (3.3) |
Thus, based on the (3.2) and (3.3), the dimensionless oxygen concentration model (2.1), dimensionless neutrophil concentration model (2.5), dimensionless bacterial concentration model (2.10) and dimensionless chemoattractant concentration model (2.13) become
dOi(t)dt=M2[Oi+1(t)−2Oi(t)+Oi−1(t)]+η+κu(t)−λNONi(t)Oi(t)−λBOBi(t)Oi(t)−λOOi(t), | (3.4a) |
dNi(t)dt=DNM2[Ni+1(t)−2Ni(t)+Ni−1(t)]−κN{M24[Ni+1(t)−Ni−1(t)][Ci+1(t)−Ci−1(t)]+M2Ni(t)[Ci+1(t)−2Ci(t)+Ci−1(t)]}+αBNBi(t)Ni(t)GN(Oi(t))(1−Ni(t))−λNNi(t)(1+HN(Oi(t)))1+eBi(t), | (3.4b) |
dBi(t)dt=DBM2[Bi+1(t)−2Bi(t)+Bi−1(t)]+αBBi(t)(1−Bi(t))−Bi(t)Oi(t)KO+Oi(t)θ+KNRNi(t)λRBBi(t)+1−λBBi(t), | (3.4c) |
dCi(t)dt=DCM2[Ci+1(t)−2Ci(t)+Ci−1(t)]+αCBi(t)−λCCi(t),i=1,...,M−1. | (3.4d) |
Under the spatial discretization (3.1), the boundary conditions (2.3) and (2.8) become
O0(t)=O2(t),OM+1(t)=1,N0(t)=N2(t),NM+1(t)=1. | (3.5) |
The boundary conditions (2.11) and (2.14) become
B0(t)=B2(t),BM+1(t)=BM−1(t),C0(t)=C2(t),CM+1(t)=CM−1(t). | (3.6) |
The initial conditions (2.4) and (2.9) become
Oi(0)=1,Ni(0)=x2ie−(1−xiϵ)2,i=0,...,M. | (3.7) |
The initial conditions (2.12) and (2.15) become
Bi(0)=(1−xi)2e−(xiϵ)2,Ci(0)=(1−xi)2e−(xiϵ)2,i=0,...,M. | (3.8) |
Moreover, the cost functional (2.16) becomes
J(u(t))=M−1∑i=0Bi(T)M+ω∫T0u2(t)dt. | (3.9) |
Now, we state our approximate problem as follows: given the ODEs (3.4) with the initial conditions (3.7) and (3.8), choose the control u(t), in accordance with (2.2), to minimize the cost functional (3.9). We refer to this problem as Problem P1.
Problem P1 is an ODE optimization problem, where the control u(t) is limited to 0 or 1. In the hyperbaric oxygen therapy, we should choose the optimal time intervals applied by the oxygen. Note that the time of oxygen inhalation should not be too long, no more than three times a day, no more than 120 minutes (2 hours) each time, otherwise, it is easy to cause oxygen toxicity for a human [29]. First, the whole time horizon [0,T] is divided into γ time intervals [30]
0=t0<t1<⋯<tγ−1<tγ=T. | (4.1) |
where tk,k=1,…,γ−1, are time switching points. However, unequal time intervals [tk−1,tk], k=1,...,γ make the ODE optimization problem difficult to deal with, where the optimized decision variables are the time intervals. Thus, we apply the time-scaling transformation approach to transform the ODE optimization problem with changed switching time into a new optimization problem with fixed switching time [31,32]. The relationship between t (changed switching time) and s (fixed switching time) shown in Figure 2 can be also defined as
dt(s)ds=ζk,s∈[k−1,k),k=1,...,γ, | (4.2) |
where t(0)=0 and t(γ)=T; ζk, k=1,...,γ, are time interval variables, which should be optimized. Let ζ=[ζ1,ζ2,...,ζγ]⊤, where ζk=tk−tk−1,k=1,...,γ and
0≤ζk≤T,γ∑k=1ζk=T, | (4.3) |
and when u(t)=1, 0≤ζk≤Th, where Th denotes 2 hours.
Integrating (4.2) over [0,s], we can obtain the time-scaling function as
t(s)={⌊s⌋∑k=1ζk+ζ⌊s⌋+1(s−⌊s⌋),if s∈[0,γ),T,s=γ, | (4.4) |
where ⌊s⌋ donates an integer which is not larger than s. Accordingly, we should change the Problem P1 with time variable "t" into a new optimization problem with auxiliary variable "s". Let denote
˜Oi(s)=Oi(t(s)),˜Ni(s)=Ni(t(s)),˜Bi(s)=Bi(t(s)),˜Ci(s)=Ci(t(s)),i=0,...,M. | (4.5) |
Combined with the chain rule, the reduced dimensionless oxygen concentration model (3.4) becomes
d˜Oi(s)ds=dOi(t(s))dtdt(s)ds=ζkdOi(t(s))dt,s∈(k−1,k),k=1,…,γ,i=1,...,M−1. | (4.6) |
Based on the (4.6), (3.4) becomes
d˜Oi(s)ds=ζk{M2[˜Oi+1(s)−2˜Oi(s)+˜Oi−1(s)]+η+κu(s)−λNO˜Ni(s)˜Oi(s)−λBO˜Bi(s)˜Oi(s)−λO˜Oi(s)}, | (4.7a) |
d˜Ni(s)ds=ζk{DNM2[˜Ni+1(s)−2˜Ni(s)+˜Ni−1(s)]−κN{M24[˜Ni+1(s)−˜Ni−1(s)][˜Ci+1(s)−˜Ci−1(s)]+˜Ni(s)M2[˜Ci+1(s)−2˜Ci(s)+˜Ci−1(s)]}+αBN˜Bi(s)˜Ni(s)GN(˜Oi(s))(1−˜Ni(s))−λN˜Ni(s)(1+HN(˜Oi(s)))1+e˜Bi(s)}, | (4.7b) |
d˜Bi(s)ds=ζk{DBM2[˜Bi+1(s)−2˜Bi(s)+˜Bi−1(s)]+αB˜Bi(s)(1−˜Bi(s))−˜Bi(s)˜Oi(s)KO+˜Oi(s)θ+˜KNR˜Ni(s)λRB˜Bi(s)+1−λB˜Bi(s)}, | (4.7c) |
d˜Ci(s)ds=ζk{DCM2[˜Ci+1(s)−2˜Ci(s)+˜Ci−1(s)]+αC˜Bi(s)−λC˜Ci(s)},i=1,...,M−1, | (4.7d) |
where s∈(k−1,k),k=1,…,γ. The initial conditions (3.7) and (3.8) become
˜Oi(0)=Oi(0),˜Ni(0)=Ni(0),˜Bi(0)=Bi(0),˜Bi(0)=Bi(0). | (4.8) |
After the time-scaling transformation approach (4.2), the cost functional (3.9) becomes
J(ζ)=M−1∑i=0˜Bi(γ)M+ωγ∑k=1∫kk−1ζku2(s)ds. | (4.9) |
Finally, the optimal parameter selection problem is stated as: given the ODEs (4.7) with the initial conditions (4.8), choose the optimal switching time points tk,k=1,…,γ−1 combined with the control u(t) to minimize the cost functional (4.9). We refer to this problem as Problem Pγ.
Problem Pγ is a nonlinear programming problem. Thus, we should compute the gradient of the cost functional (4.9) corresponding to the time interval variables ζk,k=1,...,γ. However, computing its gradient is a non-trivial task since (4.9) is an implicit, rather than an explicit function.
For each μ=1,2,…,γ and i=1,...,M−1, we apply the integration and obtain
˜Oi(s)=˜Oi(μ−1)+∫sμ−1ζμ{M2[˜Oi+1(β)−2˜Oi(β)+˜Oi−1(β)]+η+κu(β)−λNO˜Ni(β)˜Oi(β)−λBO˜Bi(β)˜Oi(β)−λO˜Oi(β)}dβ,s∈[μ−1,μ). | (4.10) |
If k≤μ, we differentiate (4.10) corresponding to ζk and obtain
∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk=∂˜Oi(μ−1)∂ζk+∫sμ−1ζμ{M2[∂˜Oi+1(β)∂ζk−2∂˜Oi(β)∂ζk+∂˜Oi−1(β)∂ζk]−λNO∂[˜Ni(β)˜Oi(β)]∂ζk−λBO∂[˜Bi(β)˜Oi(β)]∂ζk−λO∂˜Oi(β)∂ζk}+δkμ{M2[˜Oi+1(β)−2˜Oi(β)+˜Oi−1(β)]+η+κu(β)−λNO˜Ni(β)˜Oi(β)−λBO˜Bi(β)˜Oi(β)−λO˜Oi(β)}dβ,s∈[μ−1,μ), | (4.11) |
where δkμ denotes the Kronecker delta function. If k>μ, ζk does not affect the ˜Oi(s) during s∈[μ−1,μ), thus we have
∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk=0,s∈[μ−1,μ). | (4.12) |
Then, we differentiate (4.11) corresponding to s and obtain
dds{∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk}=ζμ{M2[∂˜Oi+1(s)∂ζk−2∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk+∂˜Oi−1(s)∂ζk]−λNO∂[˜Ni(s)˜Oi(s)]∂ζk−λBO∂[˜Bi(s)˜Oi(s)]∂ζk−λO∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk}+δkμ{M2[˜Oi+1(s)−2˜Oi(s)+˜Oi−1(s)]+η+κu(s)−λNO˜Ni(s)˜Oi(s)−λBO˜Bi(s)˜Oi(s)−λO˜Oi(s)},s∈[μ−1,μ). | (4.13) |
From (4.10)–(4.13), we can obtain the state variations ∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk for each k=1,2,…,γ, i=1,...,M−1
dds{∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk}=ζμ{M2[∂˜Oi+1(s)∂ζk−2∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk+∂˜Oi−1(s)∂ζk]−λNO∂[˜Ni(s)˜Oi(s)]∂ζk−λBO∂[˜Bi(s)˜Oi(s)]∂ζk−λO∂˜Oi(s)∂ζk}+δkμ{M2[˜Oi+1(s)−2˜Oi(s)+˜Oi−1(s)]+η+κu(s)−λNO˜Ni(s)˜Oi(s)−λBO˜Bi(s)˜Oi(s)−λO˜Oi(s)}, | (4.14) |
where s∈[μ−1,μ), μ=k,k+1,...,γ.
For the initial condition (4.8), we have
∂˜Oi(0)∂ζk=0,k=1,2,…,γ. | (4.15) |
Similarly, we can obtain the state variations ∂˜Ni(s)∂ζk, ∂˜Bi(s)∂ζk and ∂˜Ci(s)∂ζk,k=1,2,…,γ, i=1,...,M−1.
Moreover, for the cost functional (4.9), the gradient formulas corresponding to ζk,k=1,2,…,γ can be obtained using the chain rule of differentiation
∂J(ζ)∂ζk=1MM−1∑i=0∂˜Bi(γ)∂ζk+ω∫kk−1u2(s)ds,k=1,2,…,γ. | (4.16) |
Based on the gradient formulas (4.16), the existing nonlinear programming algorithm, such as Sequential Quadratic Program (SQP) algorithm [33], can be applied to solve the Problem Pγ. The flow chart is shown in Figure 3.
For the computational numerical analysis, the proposed method in Section 4 is implemented in MATLAB software, which uses ODE15s to solve the reduced ODEs (4.7) for the cost functional and gradient formulas and then apply the SQP algorithm to perform the optimization steps. The parameter values for the dimensionless oxygen concentration model and dimensionless neutrophil concentration model are set as: η=0.2284, κ=5.4, λNO=37, λBO=22.7872, λO=2.4667, DN=0.02, κN=10, αBN=14.28, λN=5 and e=30. Meanwhile, the parameter values for dimensionless bacterial concentration model and dimensionless chemoattractant concentration model are set as: DB=0.0001, αB=1.26, KO=0.75, KNR=2, λRB=3.73, λB=5, DC=1.5, αC=20 and λC=0.9, which are consistent with [21]. Moreover, the distribution coefficient ϵ is set as 0.01 and the whole time horizon T is set as 0.432, which corresponds to 24 hours.
The spatial discretization number N is set as 61 and the weight coefficient ω is set as 0.07. Our computational numerical analysis is carried out on a personal computer with the following configuration: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6820HQ CPU, 2.70GHz CPU, 16.00GB RAM, 64-bit Windows 10 Operating System.
We divide the whole time horizon into γ=5 time intervals and set corresponding control sequences u(s) as 0, 1, 0, 1, 0. The initial guess for ζk,k=1,...,γ is T/γ, which denotes the equal time intervals. The optimal switching time control sequences under γ=5 are shown in Figure 4a and the dimensionless bacterial concentration at x=0 under γ=5 is shown in Figure 4b. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is not required due to the high concentration of oxygen at the initial time. Then, it is applied when the oxygen concentration is reduced but the bacterial concentration is still relatively high. Finally, our normal human immune system completely replaces expensive treatments to inhibit or even destroy these bacteria when the bacterial concentration is low. The distribution of the dimensionless oxygen concentration, dimensionless neutrophil concentration, dimensionless bacterial concentration and dimensionless chemoattractant concentration is shown in Figure 5a, 5b, 5c and 5d, respectively. The oxygen concentration (shown in Figure 5a) decreases first, then increases and then decreases due to the optimal switching time control sequences (shown in Figure 4a). The neutrophils (shown in Figure 5b) remain dense near the edge of the chronic wound and are chemically attracted to the center of the chronic wound very slowly. Since the chemoattractant (shown in Figure 5d) does not reach the edge of the chronic wound, neutrophils are lack of movement. Through the regulation of oxygen, the bacterial concentration approaches to 0. Correspondingly, the chemoattractant concentration drops to 0 due to the quick loss of the bacteria.
We extend the number of time intervals into γ=7 and set corresponding control sequences u(s) as 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0. The optimal switching time control sequences are shown in Figure 6a and the dimensionless bacterial concentration at x=0 is shown in Figure 6b. The distribution of the dimensionless oxygen concentration and dimensionless bacterial concentration is shown in Figure 7a and 7b, respectively. Since the optimal switching time control sequences (γ=7) are similar to the case of γ=5, the dynamics of oxygen, neutrophils, bacteria and chemoattractants are almost identical to those of γ=5. However, note that increasing γ from 5 to 7 does not lead to any significant change in the inhibition of bacteria. Thus, choosing γ=5 for the time intervals is sufficient.
The results also provide protocols for switching treatment on/off in practice and their meaning in terms of bacterial suppression. From Figures 5a, 5c, 7a and 7b, we can see that when the dimensionless oxygen concentration is less than about 0.75 and the dimensionless bacterial concentration is more than about 0.45, the hyperbaric oxygen therapy is applied effectively. Otherwise, our normal human immune system can inhibit or even destroy these bacteria and the hyperbaric oxygen therapy is not necessary. Note that there are much uncertainty and complex coupling relationship between variables in practice, which will influence the optimal therapeutic effect. Moreover, [31] presents the convergence proof that the optimized control sequences after the time-scaling transformation can approach the theoretic optimal control as γ→+∞. When the number of time intervals is increased to a certain extent, the optimal results are similar and not sensitive to γ. However, we cannot choose γ too large due to consideration of human safety and the limitations of medical conditions. We choose γ=5 (twice a day) and γ=7 (three times a day) in the computational numerical analysis. Our numerical results show that the optimal switching time control sequences are similar when γ is increased from 5 to 7, which means the results are not very sensitive to γ.
Different from traditional empirical strategies, this paper's work can accurately give better protocols for switching treatment on/off at a lower economic cost. Through precise hyperbaric oxygen regulation, bacterial propagation is effectively inhibited, thereby the wound healing is improved. The results of the proposed method can provide some guidance for the medical staff by use of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy for wound healing in practice. Moreover, combined with image recognition technology, our proposed method can be easily extended to the intelligent medical field.
In this paper, we propose the optimal switching time control of the hyperbaric oxygen therapy for bacterial concentration suppression. The bacterial concentration is coupled with the oxygen concentration, neutrophil concentration and chemoattractant concentration governed by PDEs. The method of lines is first used to reduce the PDE optimization problem into an ODE optimization problem. Then, the time-scaling transformation approach is applied and the gradient formulas of the cost functional corresponding to the time intervals are derived based on the sensitivity analysis. Finally, a new effective computational method is proposed and computational numerical analysis shows the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. In the future, we will work on the experiments to further verify the feasibility of the proposed strategy. Moreover, the iterative learning control [34], control parameterization with optimized control values [35,36] and adaptive control [37] for the hyperbaric oxygen therapy can be considered.
This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China 61473253, the Medical Science and Technology Project, Zhejiang Province (2016154240, 2017192644).
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
W. Gao, H. Rezazadeh, Z. Pinar, H. M. Baskonus, S. Sarwar, G. Yel, Novel explicit solutions for the nonlinear Zoomeron equation by using newly extended direct algebraic technique, Opt. Quant. Electron., 52 (2020), 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-019-2162-8 doi: 10.1007/s11082-019-2162-8
![]() |
[2] |
C. Zhu, M. Al-Dossari, S. Rezapour, B. Gunay, On the exact soliton solutions and different wave structures to the (2+1)-dimensional Chaffee-Infante equation, Results Phys., 57 (2024), 107431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107431 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2024.107431
![]() |
[3] |
M. Ghasemi, High order approximations using spline-based differential quadrature method: implementation to the multi-dimensional PDEs, Appl. Math. Model., 46 (2017), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.052 doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2017.01.052
![]() |
[4] |
N. Perrone, R. Kao, A general finite difference method for arbitrary meshes, Comput. Struct., 5 (1975), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(75)90018-8 doi: 10.1016/0045-7949(75)90018-8
![]() |
[5] |
S. Mahmood, R. Shah, H. Khan, M. Arif, Laplace Adomian decomposition method for multi-dimensional time fractional model of Navier-Stokes equation, Symmetry, 11 (2019), 149. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym11020149 doi: 10.3390/sym11020149
![]() |
[6] |
M. A. Abdou, A. A. Soliman, New applications of variational iteration method, Phys. D, 211 (2005), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2005.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2005.08.002
![]() |
[7] |
E. Yusufoglu, A. Bekir, Solitons and periodic solutions of coupled nonlinear evolution equations by using the sine-cosine method, Int. J. Comput. Math., 83 (2006), 915–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160601138756 doi: 10.1080/00207160601138756
![]() |
[8] | M. Kaplan, A. Bekir, A. Akbulut, E. Aksoy, The modified simple equation method for nonlinear fractional differential equations, Rom. J. Phys., 60 (2015), 1374–1383. |
[9] |
S. Meng, F. Meng, F. Zhang, Q. Li, Y. Zhang, A. Zemouche, Observer design method for nonlinear generalized systems with nonlinear algebraic constraints with applications, Automatica, 162 (2024), 111512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111512 doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2024.111512
![]() |
[10] |
I. Ahmad, H. Seno, An epidemic dynamics model with limited isolation capacity, Theory Biosci., 142 (2023), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-023-00399-9 doi: 10.1007/s12064-023-00399-9
![]() |
[11] |
S. Mukhtar, M. Sohaib, I. Ahmad, A numerical approach to solve volume-based batch crystallization model with fines dissolution unit, Processes, 7 (2019), 453. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7070453 doi: 10.3390/pr7070453
![]() |
[12] |
A. A. Alderremy, N. Iqbal, S. Aly, K. Nonlaopon, Fractional series solution construction for nonlinear fractional reaction-diffusion Brusselator model utilizing Laplace residual power series, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1944. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14091944 doi: 10.3390/sym14091944
![]() |
[13] |
H. Yasmin, A. S. Alshehry, A. H. Ganie, A. M. Mahnashi, Perturbed Gerdjikov-Ivanov equation: soliton solutions via Backlund transformation, Optik, 298 (2024), 171576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171576 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171576
![]() |
[14] |
M. M. Al-Sawalha, A. Khan, O. Y. Ababneh, T. Botmart, Fractional view analysis of Kersten-Krasil'shchik coupled KdV-mKdV systems with non-singular kernel derivatives, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 18334–18359. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.20221010 doi: 10.3934/math.20221010
![]() |
[15] |
E. M. Elsayed, R. Shah, K. Nonlaopon, The analysis of the fractional-order Navier-Stokes equations by a novel approach, J. Funct. Spaces, 2022 (2022), 8979447. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8979447 doi: 10.1155/2022/8979447
![]() |
[16] |
M. Naeem, H. Rezazadeh, A. A. Khammash, R. Shah, S. Zaland, Analysis of the fuzzy fractional-order solitary wave solutions for the KdV equation in the sense of Caputo-Fabrizio derivative, J. Math., 2022 (2022), 3688916. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3688916 doi: 10.1155/2022/3688916
![]() |
[17] |
Y. Xie, I. Ahmad, T. I. Ikpe, E. F. Sofia, H. Seno, What influence could the acceptance of visitors cause on the epidemic dynamics of a Reinfectious disease?: a mathematical model, Acta Biotheor., 72 (2024), 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10441-024-09478-w doi: 10.1007/s10441-024-09478-w
![]() |
[18] |
K. Hosseini, M. Mirzazadeh, J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, Soliton solutions of the Sasa-Satsuma equation in the monomode optical fibers including the beta-derivatives, Optik, 224 (2020), 165425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165425 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165425
![]() |
[19] |
R. Khalil, M. Al Horani, A. Yousef, M. Sababheh, A new definition of fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 264 (2014), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002
![]() |
[20] |
K. A. Abro, A. Atangana, J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, Role of bi-order Atangana-Aguilar fractional differentiation on Drude model: an analytic study for distinct sources, Opt. Quantum Electron., 53 (2021), 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-02804-3 doi: 10.1007/s11082-021-02804-3
![]() |
[21] |
J. F. Gomez-Aguilar, D. Baleanu, Schrödinger equation involving fractional operators with non-singular kernel, J. Electromagn. Waves Appl., 31 (2017), 752–761. https://doi.org/10.1080/09205071.2017.1312556 doi: 10.1080/09205071.2017.1312556
![]() |
[22] |
B. Ghanbari, M. S. Osman, D. Baleanu, Generalized exponential rational function method for extended Zakharov-Kuzetsov equation with conformable derivative, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 34 (2019), 1950155. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732319501554 doi: 10.1142/S0217732319501554
![]() |
[23] |
A. Akbulut, F. Tascan, E. Ozel, Trivial conservation laws and solitary wave solution of the fifth-order Lax equation, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math., 4 (2021), 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100101 doi: 10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100101
![]() |
[24] |
H. Khatri, M. S. Gautam, A. Malik, Localized and complex soliton solutions to the integrable (4+1)-dimensional Fokas equation, SN Appl. Sci., 1 (2019), 1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1094-z doi: 10.1007/s42452-019-1094-z
![]() |
[25] |
M. N. Alam, O. A. Ilhan, M. S. Uddin, M. A. Rahim, Regarding on the results for the fractional Clannish Random Walker's parabolic equation and the nonlinear fractional Cahn-Allen equation, Adv. Math. Phys., 2022 (2022), 5635514. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5635514 doi: 10.1155/2022/5635514
![]() |
[26] |
M. N. Alam, S. Islam, O. A. Ilhan, H. Bulut, Some new results of nonlinear model arising in incompressible visco-elastic Kelvin-Voigt fluid, Math. Methods Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 10347–10362. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.8372 doi: 10.1002/mma.8372
![]() |
[27] |
U. Younas, A. R. Seadawy, M. Younis, S. T. R. Rizvi, Optical solitons and closed-form solutions to the (3+1)-dimensional resonant Schrödinger dynamical wave equation, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 34 (2020), 2050291. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979220502914 doi: 10.1142/S0217979220502914
![]() |
[28] |
M. Arshad, A. Seadawy, D. Lu, J. Wang, Travelling wave solutions of generalized coupled Zakharov-Kuznetsov and dispersive long wave equations, Results Phys., 6 (2016), 1136–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2016.11.043 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2016.11.043
![]() |
[29] |
S. Kumar, K. S. Nisar, M. Niwas, On the dynamics of exact solutions to a (3+1)-dimensional YTSF equation emerging in shallow sea waves: Lie symmetry analysis and generalized Kudryashov method, Results Phys., 48 (2023), 106432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106432 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106432
![]() |
[30] |
A. Irshad, N. Ahmed, A. Nazir, U. Khan, S. T. Mohyud-Din, Novel exact double periodic soliton solutions to strain wave equation in micro structured solids, Phys. A, 550 (2020), 124077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.124077 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2019.124077
![]() |
[31] |
S. Bibi, S. T. Mohyud-Din, U. Khan, N. Ahmed, Khater method for nonlinear Sharma-Tasso-Olever (STO) equation of fractional order, Results Phys., 7 (2017), 4440–4450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2017.11.008 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.11.008
![]() |
[32] |
M. N. Alam, An analytical method for finding exact solutions of a nonlinear partial differential equation arising in electrical engineering, Open J. Math. Sci., 7 (2023), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.30538/oms2023.0195 doi: 10.30538/oms2023.0195
![]() |
[33] |
M. Alqhtani, K. M. Saad, R. Shah, W. M. Hamanah, Discovering novel soliton solutions for (3+1)-modified fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in electrical engineering through an analytical approach, Opt. Quant. Electron., 55 (2023), 1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-023-05407-2 doi: 10.1007/s11082-023-05407-2
![]() |
[34] |
M. Alqhtani, K. M. Saad, R. Shah, W. Weera, W. M. Hamanah, Analysis of the fractional-order local Poisson equation in fractal porous media, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1323. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071323 doi: 10.3390/sym14071323
![]() |
[35] |
S. A. El-Tantawy, R. T. Matoog, R. Shah, A. W. Alrowaily, S. M. E. Ismaeel, On the shock wave approximation to fractional generalized Burger-Fisher equations using the residual power series transform method, Phys. Fluids, 36 (2024), 023105. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0187127 doi: 10.1063/5.0187127
![]() |
[36] |
H. Yasmin, A. S. Alshehry, A. H. Ganie, A. Shafee, R. Shah, Noise effect on soliton phenomena in fractional stochastic Kraenkel-Manna-Merle system arising in ferromagnetic materials, Sci. Rep., 14 (2024), 1810. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52211-3 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52211-3
![]() |
[37] |
S. Noor, W. Albalawi, R. Shah, M. M. Al-Sawalha, S. M. Ismaeel, S. A. El-Tantawy, On the approximations to fractional nonlinear damped Burger's-type equations that arise in fluids and plasmas using Aboodh residual power series and Aboodh transform iteration methods, Front. Phys., 12 (2024), 1374481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2024.1374481 doi: 10.3389/fphy.2024.1374481
![]() |
[38] |
H. Tian, M. Zhao, J. Liu, Q. Wang, X. Yu, Z. Wang, Dynamic analysis and sliding mode synchronization control of chaotic systems with conditional symmetric fractional-order memristors, Fractal Fract., 8 (2024), 307. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8060307 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract8060307
![]() |
[39] |
L. Liu, S. Zhang, L. Zhang, G. Pan, J. Yu, Multi-UUV maneuvering counter-game for dynamic target scenario based on fractional-order recurrent neural network, IEEE Trans. Cybernetics, 53 (2023), 4015–4028. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2022.3225106 doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2022.3225106
![]() |
[40] |
M. Li, T. Wang, F. Chu, Q. Han, Z. Qin, M. J. Zuo, Scaling-basis chirplet transform, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 68 (2021), 8777–8788. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2020.3013537 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2020.3013537
![]() |
[41] | A. Iftikhar, A. Ghafoor, T. Zubair, S. Firdous, S. T. Mohyud-Din, Solutions of (2+1)-dimensional generalized KdV, Sin-Gordon, and Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equations, Sci. Res. Essays, 8 (2013), 1349–1359. |
[42] |
J. H. He, X. H. Wu, Exp-function method for nonlinear wave equations, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 30 (2006), 700–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.020 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2006.03.020
![]() |
[43] |
M. Cinar, A. Secer, M. Ozisik, M. Bayram, Derivation of optical solitons of dimensionless Fokas-Lenells equation with perturbation term using Sardar sub-equation method, Opt. Quant. Electron., 54 (2022), 402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-03819-0 doi: 10.1007/s11082-022-03819-0
![]() |
[44] |
M. M. Al-Sawalha, H. Yasmin, R. Shah, A. H. Ganie, K. Moaddy, Unraveling the dynamics of singular stochastic solitons in stochastic fractional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, Fractal Fract., 7 (2023), 753. https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract7100753 doi: 10.3390/fractalfract7100753
![]() |
[45] |
K. J. Wang, F. Shi, Multi-soliton solutions and soliton molecules of the (2+1)-dimensional Boiti-Leon-Manna-Pempinelli equation for incompressible fluid, Europhys. Lett., 145 (2024), 42001. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ad219d doi: 10.1209/0295-5075/ad219d
![]() |
[46] |
P. F. Han, Y. Zhang, Investigation of shallow water waves near the coast or in lake environments via the KdV-Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 184 (2024), 115008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115008 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115008
![]() |
[47] |
X. F. Yang, Z. C. Deng, Y. Wei, A Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method for nonlinear partial differential equations and its application, Adv. Differ. Equ., 2015 (2015), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13662-015-0452-4 doi: 10.1186/s13662-015-0452-4
![]() |
[48] |
P. F. Han, T. Bao, Bilinear auto-Bäcklund transformations and higher-order breather solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional generalized KdV-type equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 110 (2022), 1709–1721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-07658-2 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-07658-2
![]() |
[49] |
P. F. Han, T. Bao, Dynamical behavior of multiwave interaction solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili-Bogoyavlensky-Konopelchenko equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 111 (2023), 4753–4768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-022-08097-9 doi: 10.1007/s11071-022-08097-9
![]() |
[50] | D. Lu, Q. Shi, New Jacobi elliptic functions solutions for the combined KdV-mKdV equation, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci., 10 (2010), 320–325. |
[51] | S. M. Mabrouk, Traveling wave solutions of the extended Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiff equation, Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 2019. |
[52] |
D. Baldwin, W. Hereman, A symbolic algorithm for computing recursion operators of nonlinear partial differential equations, Int. J. Comput. Math., 87 (2010), 1094–1119. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207160903111592 doi: 10.1080/00207160903111592
![]() |
[53] |
H. Rezazadeh, A. Korkmaz, M. Eslami, J. Vahidi, R. Asghari, Traveling wave solution of conformable fractional generalized reaction Duffing model by generalized projective Riccati equation method, Opt. Quant. Electron., 50 (2018), 150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-018-1416-1 doi: 10.1007/s11082-018-1416-1
![]() |
[54] |
L. M. B. Alam, X. Jiang, A. A. Mamun, Exact and explicit traveling wave solution to the time-fractional phi-four and (2+1)-dimensional CBS equations using the modified extended tanh-function method in mathematical physics, Partial Differ. Equ. Appl. Math., 2021 (2021), 100039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100039 doi: 10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100039
![]() |
1. | Siyi Chen, Jing Lu, Tianhui You, Duanping Sun, Metal-organic frameworks for improving wound healing, 2021, 439, 00108545, 213929, 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213929 | |
2. | Mohammad A Alghamdi, Metal-Organic Frameworks for Diabetic Wound Healing, 2023, 2168-8184, 10.7759/cureus.39557 | |
3. | Fereshte Hassanzadeh Afruzi, Majid Abdouss, Ehsan Nazarzadeh Zare, Erfan Rezvani Ghomi, Shima Mahmoudi, Rasoul Esmaeely Neisiany, Metal-organic framework-hydrogel composites as emerging platforms for enhanced wound healing applications: Material design, therapeutic strategies, and future prospects, 2025, 524, 00108545, 216330, 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216330 |