Research article Special Issues

Analyzing fractional PDE system with the Caputo operator and Mohand transform techniques

  • Received: 03 September 2024 Revised: 21 October 2024 Accepted: 31 October 2024 Published: 13 November 2024
  • MSC : 34G20, 35A20, 35A22, 35R11

  • In this paper, we explore advanced methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) and systems of PDEs, particularly those involving fractional-order derivatives. We apply the Mohand transform iterative method (MTIM) and the Mohand residual power series method (MRPSM) to address the complexities associated with fractional-order differential equations. Through several examples, we demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of MTIM and MRPSM in solving fractional PDEs. The results indicate that these methods simplify the solution process and enhance the solutions' precision. Our findings suggest that these approaches can be valuable tools for researchers dealing with complex PDE systems in various scientific and engineering fields.

    Citation: Azzh Saad Alshehry, Humaira Yasmin, Ali M. Mahnashi. Analyzing fractional PDE system with the Caputo operator and Mohand transform techniques[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32157-32181. doi: 10.3934/math.20241544

    Related Papers:

    [1] Yanlin Li, Yuquan Xie, Manish Kumar Gupta, Suman Sharma . On projective Ricci curvature of cubic metrics. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(5): 11305-11315. doi: 10.3934/math.2025513
    [2] Salah G. Elgendi . Parallel one forms on special Finsler manifolds. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34356-34371. doi: 10.3934/math.20241636
    [3] Fangmin Dong, Benling Li . On a class of weakly Landsberg metrics composed by a Riemannian metric and a conformal 1-form. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27328-27346. doi: 10.3934/math.20231398
    [4] Yanlin Li, Aydin Gezer, Erkan Karakaş . Some notes on the tangent bundle with a Ricci quarter-symmetric metric connection. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17335-17353. doi: 10.3934/math.2023886
    [5] Rattanasak Hama, Sorin V. Sabau . Randers metrics on two-spheres of revolution with simple cut locus. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26213-26236. doi: 10.3934/math.20231337
    [6] Yayun Chen, Tongzhu Li . Classification of spacelike conformal Einstein hypersurfaces in Lorentzian space Rn+11. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 23247-23271. doi: 10.3934/math.20231182
    [7] Cagri Karaman . Statistical connections on decomposable Riemann manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4722-4733. doi: 10.3934/math.2020302
    [8] Derya Sağlam, Cumali Sunar . Translation hypersurfaces of semi-Euclidean spaces with constant scalar curvature. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 5036-5048. doi: 10.3934/math.2023252
    [9] Rabia Cakan Akpınar, Esen Kemer Kansu . Metallic deformation on para-Sasaki-like para-Norden manifold. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 19125-19136. doi: 10.3934/math.2024932
    [10] Salah G. Elgendi, Zoltán Muzsnay . The geometry of geodesic invariant functions and applications to Landsberg surfaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23617-23631. doi: 10.3934/math.20241148
  • In this paper, we explore advanced methods for solving partial differential equations (PDEs) and systems of PDEs, particularly those involving fractional-order derivatives. We apply the Mohand transform iterative method (MTIM) and the Mohand residual power series method (MRPSM) to address the complexities associated with fractional-order differential equations. Through several examples, we demonstrate the effectiveness and accuracy of MTIM and MRPSM in solving fractional PDEs. The results indicate that these methods simplify the solution process and enhance the solutions' precision. Our findings suggest that these approaches can be valuable tools for researchers dealing with complex PDE systems in various scientific and engineering fields.



    The Ricci curvature in Finsler geometry naturally generalizes the Ricci curvature in Riemannian geometry. However, in Finsler geometry, there are several versions of the definition of scalar curvature because the Ricci curvature tensor is defined in different forms. Here we adopt the definition of scalar curvature, which was introduced by Akbar–Zadeh [1,see (2.1)]. Tayebi [11] characterized general fourth-root metrics with isotropic scalar curvature. Moreover, he studied Bryant metrics with isotropic scalar curvature. Later, a locally conformally flat (α,β)-metric with weakly isotropic scalar curvature was studied by Chen–Xia [4]. They proved that its scalar curvature must vanish. Recently, Cheng–Gong [5] proved that if a Randers metric is of weakly isotropic scalar curvature, then it must be of isotropic S-curvature. Furthermore, they concluded that when a locally conformally flat Randers metric is of weakly isotropic scalar curvature, it is Minkowskian or Riemannian. Very recently, Ma–Zhang–Zhang [8] showed that the Kropina metric with isotropic scalar curvature is equivalent to an Einstein Kropina metric according to the navigation data.

    Shimada [9] first developed the theory of m-th root metrics as an interesting example of Finsler metrics, immediately following Matsumoto and Numata's theory of cubic metrics [7]. It is applied to biology as an ecological metric by Antonelli [2]. Later, many scholars studied these metrics ([3,6,10,11,12], etc). In [13], cubic Finsler manifolds in dimensions two or three were studied by Wegener. He only abstracted his PhD thesis and barely did all the calculations in that paper. Kim and Park [6] studied the m-th root Finsler metrics which admit (α,β)types. In [12], Tayebi–Razgordani–Najafi showed that if the locally conformally flat cubic metric is of relatively isotropic mean Landsberg curvature on a manifold M of dimension n(3), then it is a Riemannian metric or a locally Minkowski metric. Tripathia–Khanb–Chaubey [10] considered a cubic (α,β)-metric which is a special class of p-power Finsler metric, and obtained the conditions under which the Finsler space with such special metric will be projectively flat. Further, they obtained in which case this Finsler space will be a Berwald space or Douglas space.

    In this paper, we mainly focus on m-th root metrics with weakly isotropic scalar curvature and obtain the following results:

    Theorem 1.1. Let the m(3)-th root metric F be of weakly isotropic scalar curvature. Then its scalar curvature must vanish.

    Let A:=ai1i2im(x)yi1yi2yim. If A=Fm is irreducible, then the further result is obtained as follows:

    Theorem 1.2. Let F=mA be the m(3)-th root metric. Assume that A is irreducible. Then the following are equivalent: (i) F is of weakly isotropic scalar curvature; (ii) its scalar curvature vanishes; (iii) it is Ricci-flat.

    Based on Theorem 1.1, we obtain the result for locally conformally flat cubic Finsler metrics as following:

    Theorem 1.3. Let F be a locally conformally flat cubic Finsler metric on a manifold M of dimension n(3). If F is of weakly isotropic scalar curvature, then F must be locally Minkowskian.

    In this section, we mainly introduce several geometric quantities in Finsler geometry and several results that will be used later.

    Let M be an n(3)-dimensional smooth manifold. The points in the tangent bundle TM are denoted by (x,y), where xM and yTxM. Let (xi,yi) be the local coordinates of TM with y=yixi. A Finsler metric on M is a function F:TM[0,+) such that

    (1) F is smooth in TM{0};

    (2) F(x,λy)=λF(x,y) for any λ>0;

    (3) The fundamental quadratic form g=gij(x,y)dxidxj, where

    gij(x,y)=[12F2(x,y)]yiyj

    is positively definite. We use the notations: Fyi:=Fyi, Fxi:=Fxi,F2yiyj:=2F2yiyj.

    Let F be a Finsler metric on an n-dimensional manifold M, and let Gi be the geodesic coefficients of F, which are defined by

    Gi:=14gij(F2xkyjykF2xj),

    where (gij)=(gij)1. For any xM and yTxM{0}, the Riemann curvature Ry:=Rik(x,y)xidxk is defined by

    Rik:=2GixkGixjykyj+2GjGiyjykGiyjGjyk.

    The Ricci curvature Ric is the trace of the Riemann curvature defined by

    Ric:=Rkk.

    The Ricci tensor is

    Ricij:=12Ricyiyj.

    By the homogeneity of Ric, we have Ric=Ricijyiyj. The scalar curvature r of F is defined as

    r:=gijRicij. (2.1)

    A Finsler metric is said to be of weakly isotropic scalar curvature if there exists a 1-form θ=θi(x)yi and a scalar function χ=χ(x) such that

    r=n(n1)(θF+χ). (2.2)

    An (α,β)-metric is a Finsler metric of the form

    F=αϕ(s),

    where α=aij(x)yiyj is a Riemannian metric, β=bi(x)yi is a 1-form, s:=βα and b:=∥βα<b0. It has been proved that F=αϕ(s) is a positive definite Finsler metric if and only if ϕ=ϕ(s) is a positive C function on (b0,b0) satisfying the following condition:

    ϕ(s)sϕ(s)+(Bs2)ϕ(s)>0,|s|b<b0, (2.3)

    where B:=b2.

    Let F=3aijk(x)yiyjyk be a cubic metric on a manifold M of dimension n3. By choosing a suitable non-degenerate quadratic form α=aij(x)yiyj and one-form β=bi(x)yi, it can be written in the form

    F=3pβα2+qβ3,

    where p and q are real constants such that p+qB0 (see [6]). The above equation can be rewritten as

    F=α(ps+qs3)13,

    which means that F is also an (α,β)-metric with ϕ(s)=(ps+qs3)13. Then, by (2.3), we obtain

    p2B+p(4p+3qB)s2>0. (2.4)

    Two Finsler metrics F and ˜F on a manifold M are said to be conformally related if there is a scalar function κ=κ(x) on M such that F=eκ(x)˜F. Particularly, an (α,β)-metric F=αϕ(βα) is said to be conformally related to a Finsler metric ˜F if F=eκ(x)˜F with ˜F=˜αϕ(˜s)=˜αϕ(˜β˜α). In the following, we always use symbols with a tilde to denote the corresponding quantities of the metric ˜F. Note that α=eκ(x)˜α, β=eκ(x)˜β, thus ˜s=s.

    A Finsler metric that is conformally related to a locally Minkowski metric is said to be locally conformally flat. Thus, a locally conformally flat (α,β)-metric F has the form F=eκ(x)˜F, where ˜F=˜αϕ(˜β˜α) is a locally Minkowski metric.

    Denoting

    rij:=12(bi|j+bj|i),sij:=12(bi|jbj|i),rij:=ailrlj,sij:=ailslj,rj:=birij,r:=biri,sj:=bisij,r00:=rijyiyj,si0:=sijyj,s0:=siyi,

    where bi:=aijbj, bi|j denotes the covariant differentiation with respect to α.

    Let Gi and Giα denote the geodesic coefficients of F and α, respectively. The geodesic coefficients Gi of F=αϕ(βα) are related to Giα by

    Gi=Giα+αQsi0+(2Qαs0+r00)(Ψbi+Θα1yi),

    where

    Q:=ϕϕsϕ,Θ:=ϕϕs(ϕϕ+ϕϕ)2ϕ[(ϕsϕ)+(Bs2)ϕ],Ψ:=ϕ2[(ϕsϕ)+(Bs2)ϕ].

    Assume that F=αϕ(βα) is conformally related to a Finsler metric ˜F=˜αϕ(˜β˜α) on M, i.e., F=eκ(x)˜F. Then

    aij=e2κ(x)˜aij,bi=eκ(x)˜bi,˜b:=∥˜β˜α=˜aij˜bi˜bj=b.

    Further, we have

    bi|j=eκ(x)(˜bij˜bjκi+˜blκl˜aij),αΓlij=˜α˜Γlij+κjδli+κiδljκl˜aij,rij=eκ(x)˜rij+12eκ(x)(˜bjκi˜biκj+2˜blκl˜aij),sij=eκ(x)˜sij+12eκ(x)(˜biκj˜bjκi),ri=˜ri+12(˜blκl˜bib2κi),r=eκ(x)˜r,si=˜si+12(b2κi˜blκl˜bi),rii=eκ(x)˜rii+(n1)eκ(x)˜biκi,sji=eκ(x)˜sji+12eκ(x)(˜bjκi˜biκj).

    Here ˜bij denotes the covariant derivatives of ˜bi with respect to ˜α, αΓmij and ˜α˜Γmij denote Levi–Civita connections with respect to α and ˜α, respectively. In the following, we adopt the notations κi:=κ(x)xi, κij:=2κ(x)xixj, κi:=˜aijκj, ˜bi:=˜aij˜bj, f:=˜biκi, f1:=κij˜biyj, f2:=κij˜bi˜bj, κ0:=κiyi, κ00:=κijyiyj and κ2˜α:=˜aijκiκj.

    Lemma 2.1. ([4]) Let F=eκ(x)˜F, where ˜F=˜αϕ(˜β˜α) is locally Minkowskian. Then the Ricci curvature of F is determined by

    Ric=D1κ2˜α˜α+D2κ20+D3κ0f˜α+D4f2˜α2+D5f1˜α+D6˜α2+D7κ00,

    where Dk(k=1,...,7) is listed in Lemma 3.2 in [4].

    Lemma 2.2. ([4]) Let F=eκ(x)˜F, where ˜F=˜αϕ(˜β˜α) is locally Minkowskian. Then the scalar curvature of F is determined by

    r=12e2κ(x)ρ1[Σ1(τ+ηλ2)Σ2λη˜αΣ3η˜α2Σ4],

    where

    τ:=δ1+δB,η:=μ1+Y2μ,λ:=εδs1+δB,δ:=ρ0ε2ρ2ρ,ε:=ρ1ρ2,μ:=ρ2ρ,Y:=AijYiYj,Aij:=aij+δbibj,ρ:=ϕ(ϕsϕ),ρ0:=ϕϕ+ϕϕ,ρ1:=s(ϕϕ+ϕϕ)+ϕϕ,ρ2:=s[s(ϕϕ+ϕϕ)ϕϕ],

    and Σi(i=1,...,4) are listed in the proof of Lemma 3.3 in [4].

    Lemma 2.3. ([14]) Let m-th root metric F=mai1i2im(x)yi1yi2yim be a Finsler metric on a manifold of dimension n. Then the Ricci curvature of F is a rational function in y.

    In this section, we will prove the main theorems. Firstly, we give the proof of Theorem 1.1.

    The proof of Theorem 1.1. For an m-th root metric F=mai1i2im(x)yi1yi2yim on a manifold M, the inverse of the fundamental tensor of F is given by (see [14])

    gij=1(m1)F2(AAij+(m2)yiyj), (3.1)

    where Aij=1m(m1)2Ayiyj and (Aij)=(Aij)1. Thus, F2gij are rational functions in y.

    By Lemma 2.3, the Ricci curvature Ric of m-th root metric is a rational function in y. Thus, Ricij:=Ricyiyj are rational functions. According to (2.1), we have

    F2r=F2gijRicij. (3.2)

    This means that F2r is a rational function in y.

    On the other hand, if F is of weakly isotropic scalar curvature, according to (2.2), we obtain

    F2r=n(n1)(θF+χF2),

    where θ is a 1-form and χ is a scalar function. The right side of the above equation is an irrational function in y. Comparing it with (3.2), we have r=0.

    In the following, the proof of Theorem 1.2 is given.

    The proof of Theorem 1.2. By Theorem 1.1, we conclude that F is of weakly isotropic scalar curvature if and only if its scalar curvature vanishes. So we just need to prove that (ii) is equivalent to (iii). Assume that the scalar curvature vanishes. Hence, by (3.1), 0=r=gijRicij=1m1F2(AAij+(m2)yiyj)Ricij holds. It means that

    0=(AAij+(m2)yiyj)Ricij=AAijRicij+(m2)Ric.

    Since A is irreducible, Ric must be divided by A. Thus, Ric=0.

    Conversely, if Ric=0, then by the definition of r we have r=0.

    Based on Theorem 1.1, we can prove Theorem 1.3 for locally conformally flat cubic metrics.

    The proof of Theorem 1.3. Assume that the locally conformally flat cubic metric F is of weakly isotropic scalar curvature. Then, by Lemma 2.2 and Theorem 1.1, we obtain the scalar curvature vanishes, i.e.,

    Σ1(τ+ηλ2)Σ2λη˜αΣ3η˜α2Σ4=0.

    Further, by detailed expressions of Σi(i=1,4), the above equation can be rewritten as

    B(4p+3qB)κ204(4p+3qB)˜βκ0f+4p˜α2f2(4p+3qB)8˜α2s2γ7+Tγ6=0, (3.3)

    where γ:=pB˜α2(4p+3qB)˜β2 and T has no γ1.

    Thus, the first term of (3.3) can be divided by γ. It means that there is a function h(x) on M such that

    B(4p+3qB)κ204(4p+3qB)˜βκ0f+4p˜α2f2=h(x)γ.

    The above equation can be rewritten as

    B(4p+3qB)κ204(4p+3qB)˜βκ0f+4p˜α2f2=h(x)[pB˜α2(4p+3qB)˜β2]. (3.4)

    Differentiating (3.4) with yi yields

    B(4p+3qB)κ0κi2(4p+3qB)(˜biκ0+˜βκi)f+4p˜ailylf2=h(x)[pB˜ailyl(4p+3qB)˜β˜bi]. (3.5)

    Differentiating (3.5) with yj yields

    B(4p+3qB)κiκj2(4p+3qB)(˜biκj+˜bjκi)f+4p˜aijf2=h(x)[pB˜aij(4p+3qB)˜bi˜bj].

    Contracting the above with ˜bi˜bj yields

    Bf2(8p+9qB)=3B2h(x)(p+qB).

    Thus, we have

    h(x)=(8p+9qB)f23B(p+qB). (3.6)

    Substituting (3.6) into (3.5) and contracting (3.5) with ˜bi yield

    (4p+3qB)f(f˜βBκ0)=0. (3.7)

    Furthermore, by (2.4) and 4p+3qB0, we have f(f˜βBκ0)=0.

    Case I: f=0. It means h(x)=0 by (3.6). Thus, one has that κi=0 by (3.4), which means

    κ=constant.

    Case II: f0. It implies that f˜βBκ0=0. Substituting it into (3.4), we obtain

    ˜β2=B˜α2,

    which does not exist.

    Above all, we have κ=constant. Thus we conclude that the conformal transformation must be homothetic.

    X. Zhang: Conceptualization, Validation, Formal analysis, Resources, Software, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing-original draft, Writing-review and editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition; C. Ma: Formal analysis, Software, Investigation, Supervision, Writing-review and editing; L. Zhao: Resources, Investigation, Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    Xiaoling Zhang's research is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11961061, 11761069).

    The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.



    [1] J. Fang, M. Nadeem, M. Habib, S. Karim, H. A. Wahash, A new iterative method for the approximate solution of Klein-Gordon and Sine-Gordon equations, J. Funct. Spaces, 2022 (2022), 5365810. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5365810 doi: 10.1155/2022/5365810
    [2] C. Zheng, Y. An, Z. Wang, H. Wu, X. Qin, B. Eynard, et al., Hybrid offline programming method for robotic welding systems, Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf., 73 (2022), 102238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102238 doi: 10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102238
    [3] H. Ahmad, D. U. Ozsahin, U. Farooq, M. A. Fahmy, M. D. Albalwi, H. Abu-Zinadah, Comparative analysis of new approximate analytical method and Mohand variational transform method for the solution of wave-like equations with variable coefficients, Results Phys., 51 (2023), 106623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106623 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106623
    [4] P. Kittipoom, Extracting explicit coefficient formulas: a robust approach to the laplace residual power series method, Alexandria Eng. J., 109 (2024), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.08.091 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.08.091
    [5] C. Zheng, Y. An, Z. Wang, X. Qin, B. Eynard, M. Bricogne, et al., Knowledge-based engineering approach for defining robotic manufacturing system architectures, Int. J. Prod. Res., 61 (2023), 1436–1454. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2037025 doi: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2037025
    [6] A. A. Kilbas, H. M. Srivastava, J. J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, Vol. 204, Elsevier, 2006.
    [7] D. Baleanu, Z. B. Guvenc, J. A. T. Machado, New trends in nanotechnology and fractional calculus applications, Springer Dordrecht, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3293-5
    [8] P. Veeresha D. G. Prakasha, Solution for fractional generalized Zakharov equations with Mittag-Leffler function, Results Eng., 5 (2020), 100085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100085 doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2019.100085
    [9] I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations: an introduction to fractional derivatives, fractional differential equations, to methods of their solution and some of their applications, Vol. 198, Elsevier, 1999.
    [10] K. S. Miller, B. Ross, An introduction to the fractional calculus and fractional differential equations, John Willey & Sons, 1993.
    [11] Y. Kai, S. Chen, K. Zhang, Z. Yin, Exact solutions and dynamic properties of a nonlinear fourth-order time-fractional partial differential equation, Waves Random Complex Media, 2022, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17455030.2022.2044541
    [12] S. Meng, C. Zhang, Q. Shi, Z. Chen, W. Hu, F. Lu, A robust infrared small target detection method jointing multiple information and noise prediction: algorithm and benchmark, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 61 (2023), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3295932 doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3295932
    [13] Y. Z. Zhang, A. M. Yang, Y. Long, Initial boundary value problem for fractal heat equation in the semi-infinite region by Yang-Laplace transform, Therm. Sci., 18 (2014), 677–681. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI130901152Z doi: 10.2298/TSCI130901152Z
    [14] K. Abbaoui, Y. Cherruault, New ideas for proving convergence of decomposition methods, Comput. Math. Appl., 29 (1995), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0898-1221(95)00022-Q doi: 10.1016/0898-1221(95)00022-Q
    [15] Z. Wang, F. Parastesh, H. Natiq, J. Li, X. Xi, M. Mehrabbeik, Synchronization patterns in a network of diffusively delay-coupled memristive Chialvo neuron map, Phys. Lett. A, 514-515 (2024), 129607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2024.129607 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2024.129607
    [16] H. Jafari, C. M. Khalique, M. Nazari, Application of the Laplace decomposition method for solving linear and nonlinear fractional diffusion-wave equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 24 (2011), 1799–1805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.04.037 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.04.037
    [17] X. J. Yang, D. Baleanu, Fractal heat conduction problem solved by local fractional variation iteration method, Therm. Sci., 17 (2013), 625–628. https://doi.org/10.2298/TSCI121124216Y doi: 10.2298/TSCI121124216Y
    [18] X. J. Yang, D. Baleanu, Y. Khan, S. T. Mohyud-Din, Local fractional variational iteration method for diffusion and wave equations on Cantor sets, Rom. J. Phys., 59 (2014), 36–48.
    [19] B. Ghazanfari, A. Ghazanfari, Solving fractional nonlinear Schrodinger equations by fractional complex transform method, Int. J. Math. Modell. Comput., 2 (2012), 277–271.
    [20] S. Kumar, D. Kumar, S. Abbasbandy, M. M. Rashidi, Analytical solution of fractional Navier-Stokes equation by using modified Laplace decomposition method, Ain Shams Eng. J., 5 (2014), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2013.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.asej.2013.11.004
    [21] X. J. Yang, H. M. Srivastava, J. H. He, D. Baleanu, Cantor-type cylindrical-coordinate method for differential equations with local fractional derivatives, Phys. Lett. A, 377 (2013), 1696–1700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2013.04.012 doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2013.04.012
    [22] S. K. Sahoo, F. Jarad, B. Kodamasingh, A. Kashuri, Hermite-Hadamard type inclusions via generalized Atangana-Baleanu fractional operator with application, AIMS Math., 7 (2022), 12303–12321. https://doi.org/10.3934/math.2022683 doi: 10.3934/math.2022683
    [23] T. Botmart, M. Naeem, R. Shah, N. Iqbal, Fractional view analysis of Emden-Fowler equations with the help of analytical method, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 2168. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14102168 doi: 10.3390/sym14102168
    [24] N. Khanna, A. Zothansanga, S. K. Kaushik, D. Kumar, Some properties of fractional Boas transforms of wavelets, J. Math., 2021 (2021), 6689779. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6689779 doi: 10.1155/2021/6689779
    [25] R. Shah, A. S. Alshehry, W. Weera, A semi-analytical method to investigate fractional-order gas dynamics equations by Shehu transform, Symmetry, 14 (2022), 1458. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14071458 doi: 10.3390/sym14071458
    [26] M. M. Al-Sawalha, R. P. Agarwal, R. Shah, O. Y. Ababneh, W. Weera, A reliable way to deal with fractional-order equations that describe the unsteady flow of a polytropic gas, Mathematics, 10 (2022), 2293. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10132293 doi: 10.3390/math10132293
    [27] M. Al-Smadi, Solving initial value problems by residual power series method, Theor. Math. Appl., 3 (2013), 199–210.
    [28] O. A. Arqub, A. El-Ajou, Z. A. Zhour, S. Momani, Multiple solutions of nonlinear boundary value problems of fractional order: a new analytic iterative technique, Entropy, 16 (2014), 471–493. https://doi.org/10.3390/e16010471 doi: 10.3390/e16010471
    [29] A. El-Ajou, O. A. Arqub, S. Momani, Approximate analytical solution of the nonlinear fractional KdV-Burgers equation: a new iterative algorithm, J. Comput. Phys., 293 (2015), 81–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.08.004
    [30] F. Xu, Y. Gao, X. Yang, H. Zhang, Construction of fractional power series solutions to fractional Boussinesq equations using residual power series method, Math. Probl. Eng., 2016 (2016), 5492535. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5492535 doi: 10.1155/2016/5492535
    [31] J. Zhang, Z. Wei, L. Li, C. Zhou, Least-squares residual power series method for the time-fractional differential equations, Complexity, 2019 (2019), 6159024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/6159024 doi: 10.1155/2019/6159024
    [32] I. Jaradat, M. Alquran, R. Abdel-Muhsen, An analytical framework of 2D diffusion, wave-like, telegraph, and Burgers' models with twofold Caputo derivatives ordering, Nonlinear Dyn., 93 (2018), 1911–1922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-018-4297-8 doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4297-8
    [33] I. Jaradat, M. Alquran, K. Al-Khaled, An analytical study of physical models with inherited temporal and spatial memory, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133 (2018), 162. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2018-12007-1 doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2018-12007-1
    [34] M. Alquran, K. Al-Khaled, S. Sivasundaram, H. M. Jaradat, Mathematical and numerical study of existence of bifurcations of the generalized fractional Burgers-Huxley equation, Nonlinear Stud., 24 (2017), 235–244.
    [35] M. Alquran, M. Ali, M. Alsukhour, I. Jaradat, Promoted residual power series technique with Laplace transform to solve some time-fractional problems arising in physics, Results Phys., 19 (2020), 103667. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103667 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103667
    [36] T. Eriqat, A. El-Ajou, N. O. Moa'ath, Z. Al-Zhour, S. Momani, A new attractive analytic approach for solutions of linear and nonlinear neutral fractional pantograph equations, Chaos Soliton. Fract., 138 (2020), 109957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109957 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109957
    [37] M. Alquran, M. Alsukhour, M. Ali, I. Jaradat, Combination of Laplace transform and residual power series techniques to solve autonomous n-dimensional fractional nonlinear systems, Nonlinear Eng., 10 (2021), 282–292. https://doi.org/10.1515/nleng-2021-0022 doi: 10.1515/nleng-2021-0022
    [38] M. Mohand, A. Mahgoub, The new integral transform "Mohand transform", Adv Theor. Appl. Math., 12 (2017), 113–120.
    [39] M. Nadeem, J. H. He, A. Islam, The homotopy perturbation method for fractional differential equations: part 1 Mohand transform, Int. J. Numer. Methods Heat Fluid Flow, 31 (2021), 3490–3504. https://doi.org/10.1108/HFF-11-2020-0703 doi: 10.1108/HFF-11-2020-0703
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(889) PDF downloads(40) Cited by(1)

Figures and Tables

Figures(10)  /  Tables(2)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog