Review

Sustainable A2BBX6 based lead free perovskite solar cells: The challenges and research roadmap for power conversion efficiency improvement

  • The stability issues in the widely known CH3NH3PbI3, lead to the development of alternative halide double perovskite materials, which has received great attention in recent times. Although the stability issue of double halide perovskite seems promising, their device performance remains far inferior to CH3NH3PbI3 and with challenges for further improvements. Furthermore, the power conversion efficiency of single junction organic-inorganic halide perovskite is now 24.2% and 29.15% for the textured monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell; however, for the all-inorganic halide perovskite solar cell, it is 7.11%, and halide double perovskite solar cells are based on A2BBX6 (A = monocation, B = cation or vacancy, X = halide) such as Cs2AgBiBr6, Cs2TiBr6, Cs2AgTlBr6 and Cs2Ag(Bi1−xInx)Br6, being 2.8% and 3.3%, respectively. This creates big questions and concerns about the performance improvement of A2BBX6-based perovskite solar cells. Not only is this a concern, but there are many other big challenges faced by halide double perovskite solar cells. Such big challenges include: (a) geometric constraints and limited integration with interfacial materials; (b) dynamic disorder, a wide band gap, and a localized conduction band caused by a cubic unit cell that restrains the interactions of orbitals; (c) high processing temperature which may limit the diverse applications; and (d) low electronic dimensionality that makes them less appropriate for single junction solar cell purpose, etc. Moreover, the origin of electronic and optical properties such as the polarizability, the presence of molecular dipoles, and their influence on the dynamics of the photo-excitations remain bottleneck concerns that need to be elucidated. We roadmap performance sustainable improvement, which is suggested with a particular focus on engineering material surface and bulk, band gap, interfacial, composition, doping, device architectural, polar, and domain order. The reason that this review was developed was to forward great contributions to the readers and commercial ventures.

    Citation: Etsana Kiros Ashebir, Berhe Tadese Abay, Taame Abraha Berhe. Sustainable A2BⅠBⅢX6 based lead free perovskite solar cells: The challenges and research roadmap for power conversion efficiency improvement[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2024, 11(4): 712-759. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2024036

    Related Papers:

    [1] Qiang Li, Lili Ma . 1-parameter formal deformations and abelian extensions of Lie color triple systems. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(7): 2524-2539. doi: 10.3934/era.2022129
    [2] Shanshan Liu, Abdenacer Makhlouf, Lina Song . The full cohomology, abelian extensions and formal deformations of Hom-pre-Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(8): 2748-2773. doi: 10.3934/era.2022141
    [3] Yizheng Li, Dingguo Wang . Lie algebras with differential operators of any weights. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1195-1211. doi: 10.3934/era.2023061
    [4] Wen Teng, Xiansheng Dai . Nonabelian embedding tensors on 3-Lie algebras and 3-Leibniz-Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(3): 1367-1383. doi: 10.3934/era.2025063
    [5] Xiuhai Fei, Cuixian Lu, Haifang Zhang . Nonlinear Jordan triple derivable mapping on -type trivial extension algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(3): 1425-1438. doi: 10.3934/era.2024066
    [6] Kailash C. Misra, Sutida Patlertsin, Suchada Pongprasert, Thitarie Rungratgasame . On derivations of Leibniz algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(7): 4715-4722. doi: 10.3934/era.2024214
    [7] Margarida Camarinha . A natural 4th-order generalization of the geodesic problem. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(5): 3396-3412. doi: 10.3934/era.2024157
    [8] Hongliang Chang, Yin Chen, Runxuan Zhang . A generalization on derivations of Lie algebras. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(3): 2457-2473. doi: 10.3934/era.2020124
    [9] Yilin Wu, Guodong Zhou . From short exact sequences of abelian categories to short exact sequences of homotopy categories and derived categories. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(2): 535-564. doi: 10.3934/era.2022028
    [10] Rongmin Zhu, Tiwei Zhao . The construction of tilting cotorsion pairs for hereditary abelian categories. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(5): 2719-2735. doi: 10.3934/era.2025120
  • The stability issues in the widely known CH3NH3PbI3, lead to the development of alternative halide double perovskite materials, which has received great attention in recent times. Although the stability issue of double halide perovskite seems promising, their device performance remains far inferior to CH3NH3PbI3 and with challenges for further improvements. Furthermore, the power conversion efficiency of single junction organic-inorganic halide perovskite is now 24.2% and 29.15% for the textured monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell; however, for the all-inorganic halide perovskite solar cell, it is 7.11%, and halide double perovskite solar cells are based on A2BBX6 (A = monocation, B = cation or vacancy, X = halide) such as Cs2AgBiBr6, Cs2TiBr6, Cs2AgTlBr6 and Cs2Ag(Bi1−xInx)Br6, being 2.8% and 3.3%, respectively. This creates big questions and concerns about the performance improvement of A2BBX6-based perovskite solar cells. Not only is this a concern, but there are many other big challenges faced by halide double perovskite solar cells. Such big challenges include: (a) geometric constraints and limited integration with interfacial materials; (b) dynamic disorder, a wide band gap, and a localized conduction band caused by a cubic unit cell that restrains the interactions of orbitals; (c) high processing temperature which may limit the diverse applications; and (d) low electronic dimensionality that makes them less appropriate for single junction solar cell purpose, etc. Moreover, the origin of electronic and optical properties such as the polarizability, the presence of molecular dipoles, and their influence on the dynamics of the photo-excitations remain bottleneck concerns that need to be elucidated. We roadmap performance sustainable improvement, which is suggested with a particular focus on engineering material surface and bulk, band gap, interfacial, composition, doping, device architectural, polar, and domain order. The reason that this review was developed was to forward great contributions to the readers and commercial ventures.



    According to the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP), neuropathic pain is directly caused by a lesion or disease that affects the peripheral or central somatosensory system. About 20–25% of chronic pain cases are characterized by neuropathic pain, which affects the patient's physical and mental health [1][3]. Neuropathic pain can manifest as spontaneous pain sensations such as paroxysmal pain or superficial pain, an increased response to painful stimuli (hyperalgesia), allodynia (a pain response due to non-noxious stimuli), or temporal summation (a heightened pain sensation due to recognized and repetitive stimuli) [4],[5].

    Neuropathic pain progresses into chronic pain, which is a consequence of psychological, biological, and social factors, and requires a multifactorial approach for evaluation and management. The current management of neuropathic pain primarily focuses on pharmacological therapies. Therefore, it remains a significant challenge, making it crucial to seek new therapy strategies with long-term effects and more optimal outcomes [2],[6],[7].

    Neuropathic pain is induced by various mechanical damages and through a complex cascade because of a nerve injury, which manifests as heterotopic pain, hyperalgesia, burning sensations, tingling, and spontaneous pain. Changes in the activity of various genes due to axon transection can lead to differences in the composition of neurotrophic factors at the injury site, where the sensory axons become generators of pathological ectopic pulsations [2],[8]. An increase in the sodium channel density can alter the nerve sensitivity and increase damage to a number of axon membrane receptors in adrenergic neurons. Due to peripheral nerve injuries, abnormal sympathetic nerve structures form around the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons, resulting in symptoms of sympathetic nerve pain that arise from the peripheral nerve injury [8],[9].

    The second-order neurons in the spinal cord transmit nociceptive impulses to the thalamus via the ascending pathway, known as the spinothalamic tract, where the thalamus serves as a relay station to higher cortical centers. These centers include the anterior cingulate cortex (involved in anxiety, the anticipation of pain, attention to pain, and the motor response), the insular cortex (responsible for discriminative sensory and affective aspects of pain contributing to negative emotional responses and pain-related behaviors), the prefrontal cortex (important for sensory integration, decision-making, memory, and attention processes related to painful stimuli), the primary and secondary somatosensory cortex (involved in localizing and interpreting noxious stimuli), and the amygdala and hippocampus (limbic system), which are involved in forming and storing memories associated with emotional events, affect, arousal, attention to pain, and the learning processes. The limbic system might also be responsible for the fear that accompanies painful sensations. Pain can be understood as a multidimensional experience, where psychosocial factors such as depression, somatization, poor coping abilities, social stressors, and tendencies toward a negative job satisfaction can predict the development of chronic pain after an acute episode [10],[11].

    In normal conditions, the activation of primary afferent neurons occurs upon stimulation. After a nerve injury, this is followed by neuroinflammatory processes and tissue repair, leading to a state of hyperexcitability known as peripheral sensitization. This condition often resolves as part of the healing and subsiding inflammation. Primary afferent neurons undergo long-lasting alterations if nociception is sustained by recurring stimuli from the injury. Several factors contribute to the mechanism of peripheral sensitization. Inflammatory mediators such as calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P, which are released from nociceptive terminals, increase the vascular permeability, causing a local edema and stimulating the release of other substances due to injury, such as prostaglandins, bradykinin, growth factors, and cytokines. These substances induce sensitization and stimulate nociceptors, resulting in a lower firing threshold and ectopic discharge. Ectopic discharge can cause spontaneous pain and may originate from the DRG, other locations along the damaged nerve, or even adjacent normal nerve fibers, which can result in spontaneous pain. The process by which normal and neighboring nerve fibers become excited due to the non-synaptic ephaptic crosstalk is known as ephaptic transmission [11],[12].

    Sensitization within the central nervous system (CNS) refers to functional synaptic plasticity that depends on the activity and leads to a pain hypersensitivity. This plasticity is associated with activity in the dorsal horn neurons, which receive inputs from nociceptive C-fiber neurons. Interestingly, afferent nociceptors that innervate muscles or joints produce a longer-lasting central sensitization than those that innervate the skin. The primary mechanism related to inducing acute activity-dependent central sensitization involves N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors, which are associated with glutamate and its receptors [13].

    Components within the spine that are crucial in neuropathic pain mechanisms includes synaptic plasticity manifested as temporal and spatial summation (enhanced neuron response to repeated and simultaneous noxious stimulation). The other elements involved encompassing the proliferation of nociceptors and second-order neurons, as well as the heightened excitability of neurons in the pain pathway that relay signals to the supraspinal regions. These neuroplasticity alterations occur throughout the nociceptive pathway from the spinal cord to the brain.

    At a cellular level, the transmission of nociceptive signals within the CNS is regulated by cellular and intracellular elements, including ion channels (Na+, Ca++, K+), ionotropic and metabotropic receptors such as glutamatergic, gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), serotonin, adrenergic, neurokinin, and vanilloid receptors, inflammatory cytokines released from activated glial cells, nerve growth factors, and intracellular regulators (protein kinases and transcription factors) [11],[13].

    After a nerve injury, the loss of inhibition occurs due to disruptions in GABA's production and release mechanisms. This disruption leads to intracellular homeostatic imbalances due to the reduced activity of the K+-Cl cotransporters and/or the increased activity of the Na+ K+-Cl- cotransporters, which results in elevated Cl- levels and apoptosis of the spinal inhibitory interneurons. The loss of inhibitory control has been shown to trigger tactile allodynia and hyperalgesia, causing structural changes in Aβ fibers, thereby increasing the transmission of noxious stimuli to second-order neurons in the dorsal horn (under normal conditions, Aβ fibers transmit non-noxious stimuli). Following a nerve injury, the DRG exhibits a decreased expression of the µ-opioid receptors, and second-order spinal neurons become less responsive to opioids. Conversely, the inflammatory process can lead to an increase in the number and affinity of opioid receptors, which enhances the opioid effectiveness. Hence, chronic neuropathic pain requires higher opioid doses compared to acute or chronic nociceptive pain conditions [11],[14].

    Prolonged pain activation triggers the activation of astrocytes and microglia by neuronal signals, including substance P, glutamate, and fractalkine. The activation of glial cells by these substances leads to the release of mediators that subsequently act on both glial cells and other neurons [15].

    Immune system activation is a crucial factor in both central and peripheral neuropathic pain. Neuroimmune interactions in pain mechanisms are bidirectional. Immune cells release various cytokines, lipids, and growth factors that act on nociceptors and neurons in the CNS to sensitize pain signal pathways. Subsequently, nociceptors actively release neuropeptides from peripheral nerve terminals to modulate the activity of innate and adaptive immune cells [18].

    The accumulation of endoneurial neutrophils represents the initial stage in the pathogenesis of hyperalgesia in a peripheral nerve injury. Neuroimmune interactions result from peripheral nerve injuries and are crucial in the development of neuropathic pain. Several studies suggest that macrophages play a role in the pathogenesis of allodynia and hyperalgesia. Macrophages are significantly involved in Wallerian degeneration, which is a characteristic of chronic neuropathic pain marked by the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines during nerve damage. Moreover, Wallerian degeneration is a critical factor in the pathogenesis of hyperalgesia. Following nerve damage, macrophages surround the area of Wallerian degeneration. Besides macrophages, T cells also participate in chronic constriction injury (CCI), demonstrating the involvement of macrophages, lymphocytes, and satellite cells in facilitating the immune response in the DRG [19],[20].

    Various immune cells release mediators that act on nociceptor terminals to induce peripheral sensitization. Within the CNS, microglia, astrocytes, and T-cells modulate neurotransmission and pain circuits in the spinal cord to promote central sensitization. During acute inflammation, the emergence of pain aligns with the immune response activation and tends to heal as the inflammatory process resolves. In chronic conditions, persistent immune cells mediate long-lasting pain [18].

    Pain accompanied by nerve damage can be mediated by cytotoxic natural killer cells. Nerve damage triggers a cascade due to an inflammatory response. After nerve damage occurs, glial cells are activated, releasing cytokines and chemokines, followed by the involvement of neutrophils. Neutrophils are typically the first immune cells to respond in the case of tissue damage. Monocyte-macrophage infiltration into nerve damage occurs over several hours to days. Some studies have indicated a significant increase in the number of T-cells between 7–28 days after nerve cell damage [17],[21].

    The primary signaling molecules in immune interactions are cytokines. Cytokine receptors have been found in the CNS on pseudounipolar neurons, secondary nociceptive neurons, astrocytes, and microglia. The peripheral effects of cytokines on the CNS are restricted by the BBB, while the permeability is controlled by higher parts of the CNS and humoral factors. Activated glial cells are the primary source of cytokines in the CNS. Macrophages that have breached the BBB also play a role in neuroinflammation and serve as a source of cytokines in the CNS [22].

    The inflammatory process is highly crucial in developing neuropathic pain, not only by causing various changes in the extracellular environment, but also by inducing intracellular alterations. Several components play a role in this inflammatory process, including the accumulation and activation of inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and prostaglandins, the modulation of extracellular proteins, changes in transmembrane receptor expression, immune cell infiltration, and alterations in intracellular modulation through ion channel activity and receptor signaling. While the inflammatory response has been observed in most body tissues, certain cell types are explicitly found in the CNS: neurons, microglia, astrocytes, and oligodendrocytes [23].

    Factors such as pro-inflammatory cytokines, oxidative stress, and free radicals induce reactivity in astrocytes. This astrocyte reactivity is initiated through the Nuclear Factor kappa-B (NFκB) pathway. Astrocyte activation and the release of IL-1β trigger hyperalgesia. These cytokines and chemokines induce and sustain persistent pain. Astrocyte activation has been investigated concerning the pathogenesis of pain, which involves the release of various pro-inflammatory and pro-algesic mediators such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. Active astrocytes can initiate and maintain chronic pain events by releasing various components. Moreover, these active astrocytes can regulate emotions in several brain regions, including the primary somatosensory cortex, the anterior cingulate cortex, the hippocampus, prefrontal areas, and the medial cortex, which is associated with emotional changes during chronic pain [25],[29].

    In cases of excessive pain activation, astrocytes and microglia are triggered by neuronal signals, including substance P, glutamate, and fractalkine. The activation of glial cells by these substances leads to the release of mediators that subsequently act on both glial cells and other neurons [15].

    Glial cells make up nearly 70% of all cells in the CNS, and under normal conditions, resting microglia are fewer in number. The CNS is comprise of two types of glial cells: macroglia and microglia, which consists of astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and satellite cells, including Bergmann cells and Müller cells. Recent studies have highlighted the vital role of glial cells in maintaining CNS homeostasis. Meanwhile, glial cells in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) consist of Schwann cells in the peripheral nerves, satellite glial cells (SGCs) in the DRG, and trigeminal ganglion and enteric glial cells. Glial cells do not transmit nerve impulses like neurons, but collectively play a crucial role in neurotransmitter synthesis and release. They play protective roles in forming the BBB, developing the myelin sheath, contributing to neuron nutrition, and are involved in cellular defence mechanisms. Injuries to the peripheral nerves, CNS hypoxia, and neuronal degradation are associated with the activation of Schwann cells around damaged nerves, satellite cells in the DRG, astrocytes and microglia at the spinal level [15]. After a nerve injury, microglial activation occurs in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord within the first 24 hours. In contrast, astrocytes activation is shown to occur later, around the third-day post-injury. Microglial activation lasts no more than 3 months and then decreases in number, which correlates with the onset of neuropathic pain symptoms such as allodynia or hyperalgesia. The role of glial cell activation in synaptic transmission is based on receptors, ion channels, transporters, and similar intracellular signaling pathways found on the surface of neurons and glial cells. Damage to the spinal cord and peripheral nerves triggers the physiological and morphological activation of glial cells, especially astrocytes and microglia [15],[24].

    Astrocytes are the most abundant type of macroglia cells found in the CNS. Through various transport proteins, astrocytes regulate homeostasis in the CNS by controlling the levels of extracellular ions, proteins, and neurotransmitters in their surrounding environment. Astrocytes activation leads to morphological changes, such as hypertrophy and an increased production of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and functionally, it enhances the production of other substances such as pro-inflammatory factors [15]. Through the interaction between astrocytes and microglia, astrocytes can modulate the microglia phenotype and phagocytic activity. Astrocytes play a crucial role in the induction and persistence of pain. When damage or harmful stimuli such as nerve inflammation and ischemia occur, astrocytes undergo morphological and functional changes known as reactive astrogliosis [21],[25].

    The pain syndrome is also associated with glial cell activation, leading to increased glial cell markers such as IBA1 and GFAP, which results in morphological changes. During reactive astrogliosis, naïve astrocytes undergo hypertrophy and increased GFAP levels. Subsequently, reactive astrocytes proliferate, leading to the formation of scar-forming astrocytes. Both forms of astrocytes exhibit higher levels of protein markers, including GFAP, nestin, β-catenin, and N-cadherin. Additionally, this process involves the synthesis and release of glial cell mediators such as growth factors, cytokines, chemokines, and proteases, which can heighten the pain sensitivity. Increased GFAP is a biomarker for reactive astrocytes [25].

    GFAP is a primary intermediate filament of astrocytes that plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity and motility of astrocytes. It contributes to the architecture of the white matter, myelination, and the integrity of the BBB. GFAP is a highly brain-specific protein because the relevant extracerebral sources of this protein have not been identified, even though it is also expressed in the glial cells of the peripheral nervous and enteric systems. It is postulated that GFAP could enter the bloodstream from brain tissue due to two factors: the loss of astrocytic structural integrity through necrosis and/or mechanical disruption and the breakdown of the BBB [30],[31].

    Figure 1.  Neuropathic pain: the involvement of glial cells and neuroinflammation.

    Injuries to the peripheral or central nervous systems generate maladaptive alterations in neurons along the nociceptive pathway, which can lead to neuropathic pain. Microglia are activated after nerve injuries. Microglia become activated by injury released cytokines and proinflammatory factors, which stimulate the activation of astrocytes; this process involves several downstream signaling pathways, such as neuroinflammation.

    Several studies have indicated that the process of neuroinflammation leads to the activation of microglia and astrocytes, which play a crucial role in the mechanism of neuropathic pain. Astrocytes are more involved in chronic pain conditions and synapses after nerve injuries compared to microglia. Microglia play a more significant role of initiating neuropathic pain, whereas astrocytes are more implicated in persistent neuropathic pain conditions. Neuroinflammation begins as a response to various exogenous and endogenous sources, including various pathogens, nerve injuries, and toxic compounds. This condition is characterized by glial cell activation, the release of various inflammatory molecules, and an increased BBB permeability. Neuroinflammation is initiated by the activation of microglia, which are resident immune cells in the CNS. Under steady-state conditions, microglia remain in a resting state through interactions between cell surfaces and soluble factors in their surrounding cells. Microglial activation occurs after exposure to PAMPs and/or endogenous DAMPs and the loss of immune suppression signals. Microglial activation leads to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, which act as pro-inflammatory mediators. Additionally, these chemokines are implicated in inflammatory factors in pain, cancer-related pain, and neuropathic pain. Spinal microglia respond to extracellular stimuli by facilitating signal transduction through intracellular cascades such as mitogen-activated protein kinase, p38, and protein kinases regulated by extracellular signals [15][17].

    Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) is now frequently employed as an alternative for regenerative therapy in promising pain management cases, especially treating osteoarthritis, neuropathic pain, and intractable musculoskeletal pain that does not respond well to conventional therapy. Stem cell therapy has the ability to differentiate into various cell phenotypes. MSCs are a source of totipotent cells that can replace damaged or lost parts of neuronal cells. Furthermore, MSCs possess tropic factors for injured nerves. They have the ability of transdifferentiation, which refers to their capacity to become cells outside of their differentiation pathway. MSCs actively contribute to their surrounding environment by secreting cytokines, growth factors, and extracellular matrix molecules that play crucial roles, both for themselves (autocrine) and for the neighboring cells (paracrine) [5],[32]. MSCs can repair nerve damage, not just to alleviate symptoms caused by neuropathic pain syndrome [33],[34].

    MSCs can enhance the survival of motor and sensory nerves, improve motor function, induce neurogenesis and axonal growth, increase myelin formation, and reduce pain through the regulation of GDNF. Additionally, Al-Massri et al. reported that MSCs can reverse the decreased expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) in patients with nerve injuries and regulate the neuroprotective effects of NGF by enhancing axonal growth and nerve survival [35].

    The main principle behind applying stem cells in neuropathic pain is their ability to provide a cellular source to replace injured nerve cells and release neurotrophic factors, including epidermal growth factor, BDNF, NT-3, Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor (CNTF), basic Fibroblast Growth Factor (bFGF/FGF-2), hepatocyte growth factor, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Currently, various stem cells such as bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, human amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hAFMSCs), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), and GABAergic intermediate neuron progenitor cells have strong therapeutic potentials to manage neuropathic pain with promising outcome [34],[36].

    Adipose-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells (ADMSCs) are multipotent, which means that they can differentiate into various cell types. They can expedite the improvement of allodynia, which is a manifestation of central sensitization, through their multi-differentiation potential, their ability to renew cells by replacing damaged nerve cells, their ability to provide various nutritional factors to lesion sites, and their immunomodulatory capacities. The effectiveness of stem cell administration in neuropathic pain conditions is also associated with the interaction between stem cells and resident cells within the micro-environment. MSCs have the potential to inhibit degenerative processes, impede apoptosis, and enhance the nerve's resilience and repair capabilities in both the peripheral and central nervous systems through the release of various neurotrophic factors.

    There are several studies that have been conducted regarding the role of MSCs. Its unique activities include peripheral and spinal mechanisms. The detail of MSCs' unique properties are further displayed in Table 1.

    Table 1.  The role of MSCs in peripheral mechanism and spinal mechanism.
    Author (Year) Model of Neuropathic Pain Cell Type Peripheral Mechanism
    Chen et al. (2015) [36] CCI (mice) BMSCs Inhibited expression of ATF3 in DRG neurons induced by CCI. Reversed the downregulation of CGRP and IB4 staining in central axon terminals of DRG neurons and spinal dorsal horn caused by CCI.
    Chiang et al. (2016) [37] CCI (rats) AFMSCs Increased the expression of IL-1 β, CD68, and TNF-α, and decreased the expression of S100 and neurofilament in the injured nerve.
    Mert et al. (2017) [38] CCI (rats) ADMSCs Decreased IL-1β and IL-6 in the sciatic nerve and increased IL-10 expression.
    Xie et al. (2019) [39] CCI (mice) BMSCs Inhibited CCI-induced p-ERK1/2 expression in the DRGs, and increased the amount of TGF-β1 protein in the DRGs.
    TGF-β1 attenuated NP through inhibition of p-ERK1/2.
    Al-Massri et al. (2019) [40] Paclitaxel- induced neuropathy BMSCs Increased expression of NGF in the sciatic nerve, reversed the increase of NF-κBp65, TNF-α, and IL-6 caused by CCI.
    Chen et al. (2015) [41] CCI (mice) BMSCs Released TGF-β, regulated the excitatory synaptic transmission of spinal cord neurons, and reduced the increase in neuronal excitability after nerve injury, thus resisting the development of central sensitization.
    Guo et al. (2016) [42] SNL (rats) BMSCs Inhibited the phosphorylation of GluN2A in RVM, reduced the expression of PKCG, inhibited the expression of NMDA receptors, thus resisting the development of central sensitization.
    Forouzanfar et al. (2018) [43] CCI (rats) BMSCs Decreased the increase of GFAP expression in rat spinal cord induced by CCI, reduced the expression of TGF-α, and reduced the apoptosis of tissue cells.
    Huang et al. (2018) [44] Noncompressive disk herniation (rats) BMSCs Decreased the mRNA and protein expression of TNF-α and IL-1β, upregulated the expression of TGF-β, and reduced the activation of microglia in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.
    Romero et al. (2020) [45] CCI (rats) BMSCs Reduced the activation of spinal microglia, apoptosis, and autophagy of spinal cord cells.
    Watanabe et al. (2015) [46] CCI (mice) BMSCs Decreased the activation of p-p38MAPK and pERK1/2 in microglia induced by SCI, and the expression of CREB and PKC-c in injured and surrounding dorsal horn neurons.
    Teng et al. (2019) [47] CCI (rats) BMSCs Inhibited the expression of P2X4R in spinal microglia but did not affect the activation of microglia induced by CCD.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Stem cells are immunosuppressive and play a role in anti-inflammatory mechanisms by regulating and releasing various immunomodulatory, angiogenic, and cell-nutrient factors. They decrease harmful immune responses and inflammation while repairing tissue damage in other microenvironments. Research has shown that stem cells can treat various diseases, such as heart failure and lung fibrosis, through anti-inflammatory effects. Currently, several studies on managing neuropathic pain using stem cells focus on their anti-inflammatory effects. In a study by Mert et al., therapy using adipose stem cells significantly reduced pro-inflammatory factors such as IL-1β and IL-6 induced by chronic constriction nerve injury (CCI) in the Sciatic Nerve and increased IL-10, which is an anti-inflammatory marker. These results might be due to the interaction between stem cells and monocytes/macrophages, as stem cells encourage macrophage polarization into an anti-inflammatory phenotype. Stem cells act as anti-inflammatories through the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. After a nerve injury, signals from the damaged axons activate the extracellular MAPK signal pathway related to signals in Schwann cells, which is one of the initial events that trigger the expression of inflammatory mediators and activate immune cells in the injured nerve [47].

    Nerve damage induces abnormal neuron excitation, leading to nerve fiber degeneration, altering gene expression pathways, and causing ectopic discharge. Spontaneous ectopic activity in nerve endings or axons is crucial in spontaneous pain occurrence and drives abnormal pain responses. Activating Transcription Factor 3 (ATF3) is a marker for nerve injury in the DRG. Chen et al. proved that ATF3 immunoreactivity in the L4-L5 DRG neurons significantly increased by up to 40% in the CCI model; four days after intrathecal BMSC administration, there was a 14% inhibition in ATF3 expression. Additionally, a nerve injury reduces the regulation of neuropeptides, such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in peptidergic neurons and isolectinB4 (IB4) bound by nonpeptidergic neurons in the DRG. Stem cells decrease CGRP and IB4 regulation in CCI-induced DRG neurons and protect against axonal injury, indicating that stem cell therapies reduce persistent nerve damage [48],[49].

    GDNF is a neurotrophic factor that alleviates neuropathic pain in animal models and acts as a neuroprotector. Several studies used GDNF and its receptors as targets to develop new analgesic therapies. Stem cells enhance the survival of motor and sensory nerves, improve motor function, induce neurogenesis and axon growth, increase myelin formation, and reduce pain through GDNF regulation. Additionally, Al-Massri et al. reported that stem cells can reverse the decline in NGF expression in patients with nerve injuries and regulate NGF's neuroprotective effects by enhancing axonal growth and nerve survival [48].

    VEGF is a crucial regulator in nerve regeneration, and is a supporting factor that enhances nerve regeneration through angiogenesis, neuron nutrition, and neuroprotection, thereby restoring nerve function. Stem cell therapy plays a unique balancing role in VEGF regulation; however, the specific interaction between VEGF and stem cells requires further research [48].

    VEGF-A plays a crucial role in the nervous system by enhancing cell endurance, increasing peripheral nerve density, and improving pain conditions. Targeting therapies towards VEGF is expected to reduce pain behaviors in various animal models. Meanwhile, several studies have reported the potential use of VEGF-expressing stem cells as one of the options for pain management [49].

    Marked by increased nerve activation, central sensitization is considered one of the most crucial mechanisms underlying neuropathic pain. After nerve injury, there is an increased release of the amino acid glutamate in the DRG of the spinal cord, and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) continues to be activated to maintain afferent nerve transmission to the brain. Long-term stimulation due to chronic nerve injury leads to the regulation of NMDAR and triggers central sensitization. Studies with animal models have shown that inhibiting NMDAR reduces neuropathic pain. Specific NMDAR antagonists have been intermittently used in managing neuropathic pain. Guo et al. intravenously injected bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) in rats with tendon and spinal nerve ligation; they found that BMSCs could inhibit the expression of NMDA receptors and protect against glutamate excitotoxicity, thereby alleviating mechanical hyperalgesia after spinal cord injury in rats and providing analgesic effects [47],[50].

    Many studies have indicated that stem cells' analgesic and long-term therapeutic effects are closely associated with the role of glial cells. Glial cells constitute about 70% of all cells in the CNS and play a crucial role in maintaining homeostasis in the body.. Literature suggests that microglia are activated within 24 hours after nerve injury; astrocytes are activated immediately after nerve injury, and their activation lasts up to 12 weeks [16],[51]. The subsequent cytokine release from astrocytes and microglia induces a series of cellular responses, such as an increased regulation of glucocorticoid and glutamate receptors, leading to excitation in the spinal cord and neuroplasticity processes. This is closely associated with neuropathic pain symptoms such as pain hypersensitivity [47].

    Stem cells effectively inhibit the activation of glial cells. For instance, there is an increase in GFAP expression in the spinal dorsal ganglion of mice with CCI conditions. In a study by Forouzanfar et al., an intravenous administration of ADMSCs reduced GFAP expression by up to 1.2 times compared to the control [52]. On the other hand, Huang et al. reported that an intrathecal administration of BMSCs reduced the microglial activity in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in rats with non-compressive disc herniation. Moreover, this administration improved the behavior of hyperalgesia associated with radicular pain by reducing the production of inflammatory cytokines generated by spinal microglia activation [53]. Another study found that in post-injury conditions, microglial cells marked with anti-Iba1 antibodies showed an expression of Iba1 ten times stronger in the lesion compared to rats without a spinal cord injury. However, the expression of anti-Iba1 increased only fourfold in the experimental animals given BMSCs, demonstrating the benefits of stem cell administration [54]. The MAPK signaling pathway is directly activated following microglial activation, triggering long-term potentiation and central sensitization in pain mechanisms [47].

    Figure 2.  The role of Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in neuropathic pain mechanism. MSCs can modulate neuroinflammation and immune cell responses, promote angiogenesis, neuroprotective effect, sustain axonal regeneration, remyelination through their paracrine role of secreting exosomes/microvesicles and inhibits glial cell differentiation.

    The problem of unfavorable events requires serious attention. Some of them may be due to infection, despite cell therapies being ineffective. MSCs resulted in side effects in 12% of COVID-19 patients after treatment. COVID-19 treatment with MSCs has been criticized for potentially causing blood clotting issues due to the release of a procoagulant tissue factor [55]. Common complications of severe pneumonia include liver damage, heart failure, and an allergic rash [56]. Overdosing of cell treatments is more likely to cause kidney damage [57]. MSC therapy may cause pneumonic embolism [58]. The risks of thromboembolization and the effectiveness of the cell treatment depend on the beneficiary's medical history and phenotyping highlights [59]. Večerić-Haler et al. described a clinical case of capillary spill disorder mimicking with severe kidney failure after autologous MSCs transplantation in a patient with previous lymphoblastic leukemia [60]. Despite this, we should differentiate these cases from other adverse events that occurred due to the poor control of MSC separation. Recently, a patient with chronic kidney disease experienced interstitial tissue fibrosis and tubular decay after receiving autologous adipose-derived MSCs [61]. In a study, 2372 patients with a degenerative joint disease were treated with autologous MSCs infusions [62]. Most adverse events were mild post-procedure pain or complications of the disease. Despite this, neoplasms and neurological and vascular signs were serious adverse events. Neurologic and vascular events were found in 6 and 5 cases, respectively, representing 0.25% and 0.21% of the population, respectively. The systemic administration of MSCs causes adverse events due to their immunosuppressive properties. Specifically, MSCs treatment increases the risk of pneumonia-related death after HSC transplantation [63]. Additionally, stem cell transplantation is linked to alterations in various lymphocyte populations (CD4+ T-helper cells, CD8+ T-cells, CD19+, and CD20+ B-lymphocytes). The CD4/CD8 ratio and CD19+ and CD20+ cell populations decreased in stem cell-treated patients [64]. Most studies described the safe use of MSCs with minor side effects. The most common example was fever, which occured in 22% of patients following hUC-MSC mixture for COVID-19 treatment [65], in 9.8% of patients after hUC-MSCs treatment for Crohn's disease [66], and in 85% of patients with active multiple sclerosis after autologous BM-MSCs treatment [67]. Using allogeneic MSCs to treat liver failure resulted in fever in 19.2% of patients during 5–24 weeks of follow-up. Fever was linked to the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer. A meta-analysis revealed a connection between MSCs and temporary fever. Intra-articular infusions of MSCs lessened pain in patients within 48–72 hours [68].

    Neuropathic pain is induced by various mechanical damages and through a complex cascade resulting from a nerve injury, and is manifested as heterotopic pain, hyperalgesia, burning sensations, tingling, and spontaneous pain. After a nerve injury, neuroinflammatory processes and tissue repair can lead to a state of hyperexcitability known as peripheral sensitization. This condition often resolves as a part of the healing process and subsiding inflammation. The CNS refers to functional synaptic plasticity that depends on the activity and leads to pain hypersensitivity. MSCs have unique activities, including peripheral and spinal mechanisms, and serves as an inflammation protector by enhancing various anti-inflammatory molecules, thereby suppressing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, particularly reducing various inflammatory mediators. The activation of GFAP and protein induction plays a crucial role in astrogliosis after a nerve injury and axonal degeneration in non-myelinating Schwann cells, as characterized by an increased GFAP expression in an axonal neuropathy. MSCs can suppress astrocytes activation through GFAP expression following damage to the somatosensory system and may enhance GDNF expression. Managing neuropathic pain poses its own challenges due to its complex pathomechanism that involves the entire nervous system, both the CNS and the PNS. However, stem cell therapy has a strong therapeutic potential and is quite promising.



    [1] Xing GH, Mathews N, Lim SS, et al. (2014) Low-temperature solution-processed wavelength-tunable perovskites for lasing. Nature Mater 13: 476–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3911 doi: 10.1038/nmat3911
    [2] Tan ZK, Moghaddam RS, Lai ML, et al. (2014) Bright light-emitting diodes based on organometal halide perovskite. Nature Nanotech 9: 687–692. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2014.149 doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.149
    [3] Chin XY, Cortecchia D, Yin J, et al. (2015) Lead iodide perovskite light-emitting field-effect transistor. Nat Commun 6: 7383. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8383 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8383
    [4] Boix PP, Nonomura K, Mathews N, et al. (2014) Current progress and future perspectives for organic/inorganic perovskite solar cells. Mater Today 17: 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2013.12.002 doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2013.12.002
    [5] Zhao XG, Yang DW, Ren JC, et al. (2018) Rational design of halide double perovskites for optoelectronic applications. Joule 2: 1662–1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.017 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.017
    [6] Li ZZ, Yin WJ (2018) Recent progress in Pb-free stable inorganic double halide perovskites. J Semicond 39: 071003. https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/39/7/071003
    [7] Kumar MH, Dharani S, Leong WL, et al. (2014) Lead-free halide perovskite solar cells with high photocurrents realized through vacancy modulation. Adv Mater 26: 7122–7127. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201401991 doi: 10.1002/adma.201401991
    [8] Hao F, Stoumpos CC, Cao DH, et al. (2014) Lead-free solid-state organic–inorganic halide perovskite solar cells. Nat Photon 8: 489–494. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.82 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2014.82
    [9] Harikesh PC, Mulmudi HK, Ghosh B, et al. (2016) Rb as an alternative cation for templating inorganic lead-free perovskites for solution processed photovoltaics. Chem Mater 28: 7496–7504. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03310 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03310
    [10] Linaburg ETM, Matthew R, Majher Jackson D, et al. (2017) Cs1-xRbxPbCl3 and Cs1-xRbxPbBr3 solid solutions: Understanding octahedral tilting in lead halide perovskites. Chem Mater 29: 3507-3514. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05372 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05372
    [11] Volonakis G, Haghighirad AA, Milot RL (2017) Cs2InAgCl6: A new lead-free halide double perovskite with direct band gap. J Phys Chem Lett 8: 772–778. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02682 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b02682
    [12] Zhao XG, Yang DW, Sun YH, et al. (2017) Cu-In halide perovskite solar absorbers. J Am Chem Soc 139: 6718–6725. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b02120 doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b02120
    [13] Ju MG, Chen M, Zhou YY, et al. (2018) Earth-abundant nontoxic titanium (Ⅳ)-based vacancy-ordered double perovskite halides with tunable 1.0 to 1.8 eV bandgaps for photovoltaic applications. ACS Energy Lett 3: 297-304. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01167 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01167
    [14] Pazoki M, Johansson MB, Zhu HM, et al. (2016) Bismuth iodide perovskite materials for solar cell applications: Electronic structure, optical transitions, and directional charge transport. J Phys Chem C 120: 29039-29046. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11745 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b11745
    [15] Hutter EM, Gelvez-Rueda MC, Bartesaghi D, et al. (2018) Band-like charge transport in Cs2AgBiBr6 and mixed antimony-bismuth Cs2AgBi1-xSbxBr6 halide double perovskites. ACS Omega 3: 11655-11662. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b01705 doi: 10.1021/acsomega.8b01705
    [16] Gray MB, McClure ET, Woodward PM (2019) Cs2AgBiBr6-xClx solid solutions–band gap engineering with halide double perovskites. J Mater Chem C 7: 9686-9689. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC02674F doi: 10.1039/C9TC02674F
    [17] Hong KH, Kim J, Debbichi L, et al. (2017) Band gap engineering of Cs3Bi2I9 perovskites with trivalent atoms using a dual metal cation. J Phys Chem C 121: 969-974. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12426 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b12426
    [18] Karmakar A, Dodd MS, Agnihotri S, et al. (2018) Cu(Ⅱ)-doped Cs2SbAgCl6 double perovskite: A lead-free, low-bandgap material. Chem Mater 30: 8280-8290. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03755
    [19] Zhou J, Xia Z, Molokeev MS, et al. (2017) Composition design, optical gap and stability investigations of lead-free halide double perovskite Cs2AgInCl6. J Mater Chem A 5: 15031-15037. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA04690A doi: 10.1039/C7TA04690A
    [20] Chu L, Ahmad W, Liu W, et al (2019) Lead-free halide double perovskite materials: A new superstar toward green and stable optoelectronic applications. Nanomicro Lett 11: 16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0244-6 doi: 10.1007/s40820-019-0244-6
    [21] Tang Y, Liang M, Chang B, et al. (2019) Lead-free double halide perovskite Cs3BiBr6 with well-defined crystal structure and high thermal stability for optoelectronics. J Mater Chem C 7: 3369-3374. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC05480K doi: 10.1039/C8TC05480K
    [22] Luo J, Wang X, Li S, et al. (2018) Efficient and stable emission of warm-white light from lead-free halide double perovskites. Nature 563: 541-545. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0691-0 doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0691-0
    [23] Filip MR, Liu X, Miglio A, et al. (2018) Phase diagrams and stability of lead-free halide double perovskites Cs2BB'X6: B = Sb and Bi, B' = Cu, Ag, and Au, and X = Cl, Br, and I. J Phys Chem C 122: 158-170. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10370 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10370
    [24] Flerova IN, Goreva MV, Aleksandrova KS, et al. (1998) Phase transitions in elpasolites (ordered perovskites). Mater Sci Eng R 24: 81-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-796X(98)00015-1 doi: 10.1016/S0927-796X(98)00015-1
    [25] Morss LR, Siegal M, Stenger L, et al. (1970) Preparation of cubic chloro complex compounds of trivalent metals: Cs2NaMCl6. Inorg Chem 9: 1771-1775. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic50089a034 doi: 10.1021/ic50089a034
    [26] Khalfin S, Bekenstein Y (2019) Advances in lead-free double perovskite nanocrystals, engineering band-gaps and enhancing stability through composition tunabilty. Nanoscale 11: 8665-8679. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR01031A doi: 10.1039/C9NR01031A
    [27] Igbari F, Wang ZK, Liao LS (2019) Progress of lead-free halide double perovskites. Adv Energy Mater 9: 1803150. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201803150 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201803150
    [28] Meyer E, Mutukwa D, Zingwe N, et al. (2018) Lead-free halide double perovskites: A review of the structural, optical, and stability properties as well as their viability to replace lead halide perovskites. Metals 8: 667. https://doi.org/10.3390/met8090667 doi: 10.3390/met8090667
    [29] Slavney AH, Leppert L, Valdes AS, et al. (2018) Small-bandgap halide double perovskites. Angew Chem Int Ed 57: 12765 https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201807421 doi: 10.1002/anie.201807421
    [30] NREL Efficiency Chart. This Plot Is Courtesy of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO. Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/best-reserch-cell-efficiencies..20190411.pdf (accessed on 14 April 2019).
    [31] Chen B, Yu Z, Liu K, et al. (2019) Grain engineering for perovskite/silicon monolithic tandem solar cells with efficiency of 25.4%. Joule 3: 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.003 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.10.003
    [32] Al-Ashouri A, Köhnen E, Li B, et al. (2020) Monolithic perovskite/silicon tandem solar cell with 29% efficiency by enhanced hole extraction. Science 370: 1300-1309. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abd401 doi: 10.1126/science.abd401
    [33] Chen M, Ju MG, Garces HF, et al. (2019) Highly stable and efficient all-inorganic lead-free perovskite solar cells with native-oxide passivation. Nat Commun 10: 16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07951-y doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07951-y
    [34] Nalianya MA, Awino C, Barasa H, et al. (2021) Numerical study of lead free CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3 perovskite solar cell by SCAPS-1D. Optik 248: 168060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168060 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168060
    [35] Liu X, Li T, Hao L, et al. (2023) Lead free CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3 perovskite solar cell with different layer properties via SCAPS-1D simulation. CJCE 101: 6792-6806. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjce.25009 doi: 10.1002/cjce.25009
    [36] Singh NK, Agarwal A (2023) Performance assessment of sustainable highly efficient CsSn0.5Ge0.5I3/FASnI3 based perovskite solar cell: A numerical modelling approach. Opt Mater 139: 113822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113822 doi: 10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113822
    [37] Aktas E, Rajamanickam N, Pascual J, et al. (2022) Challenges and strategies toward long-term stability of lead-free tin-based perovskite solar cells. Commun Mater 3: 104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-022-00327-2 doi: 10.1038/s43246-022-00327-2
    [38] Saparov B, Sun JP, Meng W, et al. (2016) Thin film deposition and characterization of a Sn-deficient perovskite derivative Cs2SnI6. Chem Mater 28: 2315–2322. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00433 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00433
    [39] López-Fernández I, Valli D, Wang CY, et al. (2024) Lead-free halide perovskite materials and optoelectronic devices: Progress and prospective. Adv Funct Mater 34: 2307896. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202307896 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202307896
    [40] Greul E, Petrus ML, Binek A, et al. (2017) Highly stable, phase pure Cs2AgBiBr6 double perovskite thin films for optoelectronic applications. J Mater Chem A 5: 19972–19981. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA06816F doi: 10.1039/C7TA06816F
    [41] Yang X, Chen Y, Liu P, et al. (2020) Simultaneous power conversion efficiency and stability enhancement of Cs2AgBiBr6 lead-free inorganic perovskite solar cell through adopting a multifunctional dye interlayer. Adv Funct Mater 30: 2001557. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202001557 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202001557
    [42] Zhang Z, Sun Q, Lu Y, et al. (2022) Hydrogenated Cs2AgBiBr6 for significantly improved efficiency of lead-free inorganic double perovskite solar cell. Nat Commun 13: 3397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31016-w doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31016-w
    [43] Chen M, Ju MG, Carl AD, et al. (2018) Cesium titanium(IV) bromide thin films based stable lead-free perovskite solar cells. Joule 2: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.009 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.009
    [44] Ahmed S, Jannat F, Khan MAK, et al. (2021) Numerical development of eco-friendly Cs2TiBr6 based perovskite solar cell with all-inorganic charge transport materials via SCAPS-1D. Optik 225: 165765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165765 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165765
    [45] Mercy PAM, Wilson KSJ (2023) Development of environmental friendly high performance Cs2TiBr6 based perovskite solar cell using numerical simulation. Appl Surf Sci Adv 15: 100394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100394 doi: 10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100394
    [46] Zhang P, Yang J, Wei SH (2018) Manipulation of cation combinations and configurations of halide double perovskites for solar cell absorbers. J Mater Chem A 6: 1809–1815. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA09713A doi: 10.1039/C7TA09713A
    [47] Berhe TA, Su WN, Chen CH, et al. (2016) Organometal halide perovskite solar cells: Degradation and stability. Energy Environ Sci 9: 323–356. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE02733K doi: 10.1039/C5EE02733K
    [48] Dai X, Deng Y, Van BCH, et al. (2019) Meniscus fabrication of halide perovskite thin films at high throughput for large area and low-cost solar panels. IJEM 1: 022004. https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ab263e doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/ab263e
    [49] Tiing TV (2018) Octadecylamine-functionalized single-walled carbon nanotubes for facilitating the formation of a monolithic perovskite layer and stable solar cells. Adv Funct Mater 28: 1705545. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201705545 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201705545
    [50] Wu S, Liu Y (2023) Recent advancements and manipulation strategies of colloidal Cs2BIBⅢX6 lead-free halide double perovskite nanocrystals. Nano Res 16: 5572–5591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-022-5232-3 doi: 10.1007/s12274-022-5232-3
    [51] Volonakis GF, Haghighirad MR, Sakai AA, et al. (2016) Lead-free halide double perovskites via heterovalent substitution of noble metals. J Phys Chem Lett 7: 1254-1259. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00376 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00376
    [52] Roknuzzaman M, Zhang C, Ostrikov K, et al. (2019) Electronic and optical properties of lead-free hybrid double perovskites for photovoltaic and optoelectronic applications. Sci Rep 9: 718. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37132-2 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-37132-2
    [53] Stoumpos CC, Malliakas CD, Kanatzidis MG, et al. (2013) Semiconducting tin and lead iodide perovskites with organic cations: Phase transitions, high mobilities and near-infrared photoluminescent properties. Inorg Chem 52: 9019–9038. https://doi.org/10.1021/ic401215x doi: 10.1021/ic401215x
    [54] Ponseca CS, Savenije TJ, Abdellah M, et al. (2014) Organometal halide perovskite solar cell materials rationalized: Ultrafast charge generation, high and microsecond-long balanced mobilities, and slow recombination. J Am Chem Soc 136: 5189–5192. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja412583t doi: 10.1021/ja412583t
    [55] Pham HQ, Holmes RJ, Aydil ES, et al. (2019) Lead-free double perovskites Cs2InCuCl6 and (CH3NH3)2InCuCl6: Electronic, optical and electrical properties. Nanoscale 11: 11173–11182. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9NR01645G doi: 10.1039/C9NR01645G
    [56] Wei F, Deng Z, Sun S (2017) Synthesis and properties of a lead-free hybrid double perovskite: (CH3NH3)2AgBiBr6. Chem Mater 29: 1089–1094. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03944 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b03944
    [57] Xing G, Mathews N, Sun S, et al. (2013) Long-range balanced electron- and hole-transport lengths in organic-inorganic CH3NH3PbI3. Science 342: 344–347. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.124316 doi: 10.1126/science.124316
    [58] Etgar L, Gao P, Xue Z, et al. (2012) Mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 heterojunction solar cells. J Am Chem Soc 134: 17396–17399. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja307789s doi: 10.1021/ja307789s
    [59] Ball JM, Lee MM, Hey A, et al. (2013) Low-temperature processed meso-superstructured to thin-film perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 6: 1739–1743. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE40810H doi: 10.1039/C3EE40810H
    [60] Jeon NJ, Noh JH, Kim YC, et al. (2014) Solvent engineering for high-performance inorganic–organic hybrid perovskite solar cells. Nat Mater 13: 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4014 doi: 10.1038/nmat4014
    [61] Burschka J, Pellet N, Moon SJ, et al. (2013) Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 499: 316–319. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12340 doi: 10.1038/nature12340
    [62] Liu D, Kelly TL (2014) Perovskite solar cells with a planar heterojunction structure prepared using room-temperature solution processing techniques. Nat Photon 8: 133–138. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.342 doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2013.342
    [63] Eperon GE, Stranks SD, Menelaou C (2014) Formamidinium lead trihalide: A broadly tunable perovskite for efficient planar heterojunction solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 7: 982–988. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3EE43822H doi: 10.1039/C3EE43822H
    [64] Kojima A, Teshima K, Shirai Y, et al. (2009) Organometal halide perovskites as visible-light sensitizers for photovoltaic cells. J Am Chem Soc 131: 6050–6051. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja809598r doi: 10.1021/ja809598r
    [65] Ghanshyam PVB, Kim C, Lookman T (2016) Finding new perovskite halides via machine learning. Front Mater 3: 19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2016.00019 doi: 10.3389/fmats.2016.00019
    [66] Gonzalez-Pedro V, Juarez-Perez EJ, Arsyad WS (2014) General working principles of CH3NH3PbX3 perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett 14: 888–893. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl404252e doi: 10.1021/nl404252e
    [67] Uddin MA, Calabro RL, Kim DY, et al. (2018) Halide exchange and surface modification of metal halide perovskite nanocrystals with alkyltrichlorosilanes. Nanoscale 10: 16919–16927. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR04763D doi: 10.1039/C8NR04763D
    [68] Protesescu L, Yakunin S, Bodnarchuk MI (2015) Nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, and I): Novel optoelectronic materials showing bright emission with wide color gamut. Nano Lett 15: 3692–3696. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl5048779 doi: 10.1021/nl5048779
    [69] Nedelcu G, Protesescu L, Yakunin S (2015) Fast anion-exchange in highly luminescent nanocrystals of cesium lead halide perovskites (CsPbX3, X = Cl, Br, I). Nano Lett 15: 5635–5640. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02404 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b02404
    [70] Jeon JHN, Yang WS, Kim YC, et al. (2015) Compositional engineering of perovskite materials for high-performance solar cells. Nature 517: 476–480. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14133 doi: 10.1038/nature14133
    [71] Lee JW, Kim DH, Kim KS, et al. (2015) Formamidinium and cesium hybridization for photo- and moisture-stable perovskite solar cell. Adv Energy Mater 5: 1501310. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501310 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201501310
    [72] Park YH, Jeong I, Bae S, et al. (2017) Inorganic rubidium cation as an enhancer for photovoltaic performance and moisture stability of HC(NH2)2PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Adv Funct Mater 27: 1605988. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201605988 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201605988
    [73] Locardi F, Cirignano M, Dmitry BZD, et al. (2018) Colloidal synthesis of double perovskite Cs2AgInCl6 and Mn-doped Cs2AgInCl6 nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 140: 12989–12995 https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b07983 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b07983
    [74] Stoumpos CCF, Clark L, Kim DJ, et al. (2015) Hybrid germanium iodide perovskite semiconductors: Active lone pairs, structural distortions, direct and indirect energy gaps, and strong nonlinear optical properties. J Am Chem Soc 137: 6804-6819. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b01025 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b01025
    [75] Berhe TA, Su WN, Hwang BJ (2024) Halide perovskites' multifunctional properties: Coordination engineering, coordination chemistry, electronic interactions and energy applications beyond photovoltaics. Inorganics 12: 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/inorganics12070182 doi: 10.3390/inorganics12070182
    [76] Hua WAE, Johansson MB, Wang J, (2021) Mixed-halide double perovskite Cs2AgBiX6 (X = Br, I) with tunable optical properties via anion exchange. ChemSusChem 14: 4507–4515. https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202101146 doi: 10.1002/cssc.202101146
    [77] Abdulmutta T, Rassamessan A (2024) First-principles study on structural, electronic and optical properties of mixed alloys of Cs2Ag(SbxBi). Comput Mater Sci 239. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA02566G doi: 10.1039/D3RA02566G
    [78] Noel NK, Stranks SD, Abate A, et al. (2014). Lead-free organic–inorganic tin halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Energy Environ Sci 7: 3061–3068. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE01076K doi: 10.1039/C4EE01076K
    [79] Xiao ZY, Shao Y, Wang Y, et al. (2015) Giant switchable photovoltaic effect in organometal trihalide perovskite devices. Nat Mater 14: 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4150 doi: 10.1038/nmat4150
    [80] Bertoluzzi LS, Liu RS, Lee L, et.al. (2015) Cooperative kinetics of depolarization in CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells. Energy Environ Sci 8: 910–915. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE03171G doi: 10.1039/C4EE03171G
    [81] Snaith HJA, Ball A, Eperon JM, et al. (2014) Anomalous hysteresis in perovskite solar cells. J Phys Chem Lett 5: 1511–1515. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz500113x doi: 10.1021/jz500113x
    [82] Tress WM, Moehl N, Zakeeruddin T, et al. (2015) Understanding the rate-dependent J-V hysteresis, slow time component, and aging in CH3NH3PBI3 perovskite solar cells: The role of a compensated electric field. Energy Environ Sci 8: 995–1004. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE03664F doi: 10.1039/C4EE03664F
    [83] Hoke ET, Slotcavage DJ, Dohner ER, et al. (2015) Reversible photo-induced trap formation in mixed-halide hybrid perovskites for photovoltaics. Chem Sci 6: 613–617. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SC03141E doi: 10.1039/C4SC03141E
    [84] Fan ZX, Sun J, Chen K, et al. (2015) Ferroelectricity of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite. J Phys Chem Lett 6: 1155–1161. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00389 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00389
    [85] Rong Y, Hu Y, Ravishankar S, et al. (2017) Tunable hysteresis effect for perovskite solar cells, Energy Environ Sci 10: 2383–2391. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE02048A doi: 10.1039/C7EE02048A
    [86] Balaguera EH, Bisquert J (2024) Accelerating the assessment of hysteresis in perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett 9: 478–486. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02779 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.3c02779
    [87] Singh R, Parashar M (2020) Origin of hysteresis in perovskite solar cells, In: Ren JZ, Kan ZP, Soft-Matter Thin Film Solar Cells: Physical Processes and Device Simulation, New York: AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/9780735422414_001
    [88] Kim HS, Park NG (2014) Parameters affecting Ⅰ–Ⅴ hysteresis of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells: Effects of perovskite crystal size and mesoporous TiO2 layer. J Phys Chem Lett 5: 2927–2934. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz501392m doi: 10.1021/jz501392m
    [89] Leijtens T, Ram SKA, Eperon GE, et al. (2015) Modulating the electron-hole interaction in a hybrid lead halide perovskite with an electric field. J Am Chem Soc 137: 15451–15459. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b09085 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b09085
    [90] Chaves A, Azadani JG, Alsalman H, et al. (2020) Low bandgap engineering of two-dimensional semiconductor materials. npj 2D Mater Appl 4: 29. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41699-020-00162-4 doi: 10.1038/s41699-020-00162-4
    [91] Prasanna R, Gold-Parker A, Leijtens T, et al. (2017) Band gap tuning via lattice contraction and octahedral tilting in perovskite materials for photovoltaics. J Am Chem Soc 139: 11117–11124. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b04981 doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b04981
    [92] Lee JH, Bristowe NC, Lee JH, et al. (2016) Resolving the physical origin of octahedral tilting in halide perovskites. Chem Mater 28: 4259–4266. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00968 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b00968
    [93] Bechtel JS, Van der Ven A (2018) Octahedral tilting instabilities in inorganic halide perovskites. Phys Rev Materials 2: 025401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.025401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.025401
    [94] Yang RX, Skelton JM, Silva EL, et al. (2017) Spontaneous octahedral tilting in the cubic inorganic cesium halide perovskites CsSnX3 and CsPbX3 (X = F, Cl, Br, I). J Phys Chem Lett 8: 4720-4726. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02423 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02423
    [95] Shao Y, Gao W, Yan H, (2022) Unlocking surface octahedral tilt in twodimensional Ruddlesden-Popper perovskites. Nat Commun 13: 138. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27747-x doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27747-x
    [96] Klarbring J (2018) Low energy paths for octahedral tilting in inorganic halide perovskites. Phys Rev B 99: 104105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.104105 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.104105
    [97] Munson KT, Kennehan ER, Doucette GS, et al. (2018) Dynamic disorder dominates delocalization, transport, and recombination in halide perovskites. Chem 4: 2826-2843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.09.00199 doi: 10.1016/j.chempr.2018.09.00199
    [98] Lei H, Hardy D, Gao F (2021) Lead‐free double perovskite Cs2AgBiBr6: Fundamentals, applications and perspectives. Adv Funct Mater 31: 2105898. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202105898 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202105898
    [99] Karunadasa HI, Slavney AH (2022) Alloyed halide double perovskites as solar-cell absorbers. Available from: https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1892693.
    [100] Palmstrom AF, Eperon GE, Leijtens T, et al. (2019) Enabling flexible all-perovskite tandem solar cells. Joule 3: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.009 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2019.05.009
    [101] Zhou L, Xu YF, Chen BX, et al. (2018) Synthesis and photocatalytic application of stable lead free Cs2AgBiBr6 perovskite nanocrystals. Small 14: 1703762. https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201703762 doi: 10.1002/smll.201703762
    [102] Zhang ZZ, Liang Y, Huang H, et al. (2019) Stable and highly efficient photocatalysis with lead-free double-perovskite of Cs2AgBiBr6. Angew Chem Int Ed 58: 7263–7267. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201900658 doi: 10.1002/anie.201900658
    [103] Cho J, DuBose JT, Kamat PV (2020) Charge injection from excited Cs2AgBiBr6 quantum dots into semiconductor oxides. Chem Mater 32: 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04243 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b04243
    [104] Ippili S, Kim JH, Jella V, et al. (2023) Halide double perovskite-based efficient mechanical energy harvester and storage devices for self-charging power unit. Nano Energy 107: 108148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108148 doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.108148
    [105] Wu H, Pi J, Liu Q, et al. (2021) All-inorganic lead free double perovskite li-battery anode material hosting high Li+ ion concentrations. J Phys Chem Lett 12: 4125–4129. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00041 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00041
    [106] Zhang L, Miao J, Li J, et al. (2020) Halide perovskite materials for energy storage applications. Adv Funct Mater 30: 2003653. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202003653 doi: 10.1002/adfm.202003653
    [107] Yang S, Liang Q, Wu H, et al. (2022) Lead-free double perovskite Cs2NaErCl6: Li+ as high-stability anodes for Li-ion batteries. J Phys Chem Lett 13: 4981–4987. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01052 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01052
    [108] Choon SL, Lim HN (2024) Impact of vacancies in halide perovskites for batteries and supercapacitors. Mater Today Energy 43: 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2024.101577 doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2024.101577
    [109] Yadav A, Saini A, Kumar P, et al. (2024) Lead-free halide perovskites for high-performance thin-film flexible supercapacitor applications. J Mater Chem C 12: 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3TC02784H doi: 10.1039/D3TC02784H
    [110] Tan Y, Mu G, Chen M, et al. (2023) X-ray detectors based on halide perovskite materials. Coatings 13: 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings13010211 doi: 10.3390/coatings13010211
    [111] Tailor NK, Ghosh J, Afroz MA, et al. (2022) Self-powered X-ray detection and imaging using Cs2AgBiCl6 lead-free double perovskite single crystal. ACS Appl Electron Mater 4: 4530–4539. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaelm.2c00752 doi: 10.1021/acsaelm.2c00752
    [112] Li Z, Zhou F, Yao H, et al. (2021) Halide perovskites for high-performance X-ray detector. Materials Today 48: 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2021.01.028 doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2021.01.028
    [113] Saparov B, Mitzi DB (2016) Organic–inorganic perovskites: structural versatility for functional materials design. Chem Rev 116: 4558–4596. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00715 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00715
    [114] Best Research-Cell Efficiency Chart. (2019) Available from: https://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html.
    [115] Bhojak V, Bhatia D, Jain PK (2022) Investigation of photocurrent efficiency of Cs2TiBr6 double perovskite solar cell. Mater Today Proc 66: 3692–3697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.443 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.07.443
    [116] Qin X, Zhao Z, Wang Y, et al. (2017) Recent progress in stability of perovskite solar cells. J Semicond 38: 011002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-4926/38/1/011002 doi: 10.1088/1674-4926/38/1/011002
    [117] Berhe TA, Cheng JH, Su WN, et al. (2017) Identification of the physical origin behind disorder, heterogeneity, and reconstruction and their correlation with the photoluminescence lifetime in hybrid perovskite thin films. J Mater Chem A 5: 21002–21015. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TA04615D doi: 10.1039/C7TA04615D
    [118] Xiao Z, Meng W, Wang J, et al. (2017) Searching for promising new perovskite-based photovoltaic absorbers: The importance of electronic dimensionality. Mater Horiz 4: 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6MH00519E doi: 10.1039/C6MH00519E
    [119] Zhang Q, Ting H, Wei S, et al. (2018) Recent progress in lead-free perovskite (-like) solar cells. Mater Today Energy 8: 157–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2018.03.001 doi: 10.1016/j.mtener.2018.03.001
    [120] Kanno S, Imamura Y, Hada M (2019) Alternative materials for perovskite solar cells from materials informatics. Phys Rev Mater 3: 075403. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.075403 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.075403
    [121] Liang L, Gao P (2018) Lead-free hybrid perovskite absorbers for viable application: Can we eat the cake and have it too? Adv Sci (Weinh) 5: 1700331. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700331 doi: 10.1002/advs.201700331
    [122] Abate A (2017) Perovskite solar cells go lead free. Joule 1: 659–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.007 doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.007
    [123] Xu Q, Yang D, Lv J, et al. (2018) Perovskite solar absorbers: Materials by design. Small Methods 2: 1700316. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700316 doi: 10.1002/smtd.201700316
    [124] Volonakis G, Giustino F (2018) Surface properties of lead-free halide double perovskites: Possible visible-light photo-catalysts for water splitting featured. Appl Phys Lett 112: 243901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5035274 doi: 10.1063/1.5035274
    [125] Slavney AH, Hu T, Lindenberg AM, et al. (2016) A bismuth-halide double perovskite with long carrier recombination lifetime for photovoltaic applications. J Am Chem Soc 138: 2138-2141. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b13294 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b13294
    [126] Karunadasa HI, Slavney AH (2017) Halide double perovskite Cs2AgBiBr6 solar-cell absorber having long carrier lifetimes.
    [127] Savory CN, Walsh A, Scanlon DO (2016) Can Pb-free halide double perovskites support high-efficiency solar cells? ACS Energy Lett 1: 949-955. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00471 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00471
    [128] Pecunia V, Occhipinti LG, Chakraborty A (2020) Lead-free halide perovskite photovoltaics: Challenges, open questions, and opportunities. APL Materials 8: 100901. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0022271 doi: 10.1063/5.0022271
    [129] Rühle S (2017) The detailed balance limit of perovskite/silicon and perovskite/CdTe tandem solar cells. Phys Status Solidi A 214: 1600955. https://doi.org/10.1002/pssa.201600955 doi: 10.1002/pssa.201600955
    [130] Sheng R, Ho-Baillie AWY, Huang SJ, et al. (2015) Four-terminal tandem solar cells using CH3NH3PbBr3 by spectrum splitting. J Phys Chem Lett 6: 3931-3934. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01608 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01608
    [131] Sani F, Shafie S, Lim HN (2018) Advancement on lead-free organic-inorganic halide perovskite solar cells: A review. Materials 11: 1008. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma11061008 doi: 10.3390/ma11061008
    [132] Righetto M, Caicedo-Dávila S, Sirtl MT, et al. (2023) Alloying effects on charge-carrier transport in silver–bismuth double perovskites. J Phys Chem Lett 14: 10340–10347 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02750 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c02750
    [133] Bartesaghi D, Slavney AH, Gélvez-Rueda MC, et al. (2018) Charge carrier dynamics in Cs2AgBiBr6 double perovskite. J Phys Chem C 122: 4809–4816. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00572 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b00572
    [134] Joshua-Leveillee GV, Giustino F (2021) Phonon-limited mobility and electronphonon coupling in lead-free halide double perovskites. J Phys Chem Lett 12: 4474–4482. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00841 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00841
    [135] Lin H, Zhou C, Tian Y (2018) Low-dimensional organometal halide perovskites. ACS Energy Lett 3: 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00926 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00926
    [136] Han D, Shi H, Ming W, et al. (2018) Unraveling luminescence mechanisms in zero-dimensional halide perovskites. J Mater Chem C 6: 6398-6405. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC01291A doi: 10.1039/C8TC01291A
    [137] Duan D, Ge C, Rahaman MZ, et al. (2023) Recent progress with one-dimensional metal halide perovskites: from rational synthesis to optoelectronic applications. NPG Asia Mater 15: 8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41427-023-00465-0 doi: 10.1038/s41427-023-00465-0
    [138] Qiu T, Hu Y, Xu F (2018) Recent advances in one-dimensional halide perovskites for optoelectronic applications. Nanoscale 10: 20963-20989. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR05862H doi: 10.1039/C8NR05862H
    [139] Chen X, Zhou H, Wang H (2021) 2D/3D halide perovskites for optoelectronic devices. Front Chem 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2021.715157 doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.715157
    [140] Fiorentino F, Albaqami MD, Poli I, et al. (2022) Thermal- and light-induced evolution of the 2D/3D interface in lead-halide perovskite films. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 14: 34180-34188. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c09695 doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c09695
    [141] Kim EB, Akhtar MS, Shin HS, et al. (2021) A review on two-dimensional (2D) and 2D-3D multidimensional perovskite solar cells: Perovskites structures, stability, and photovoltaic performances. J Photochem Photobiol C 48: 100405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2021.100405 doi: 10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2021.100405
    [142] Etgar L (2018) The merit of perovskite's dimensionality; can this replace the 3D halide perovskite? Energy Environ Sci 11: 234-242. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EE03397D doi: 10.1039/C7EE03397D
    [143] Marongiu D, Saba M, Quochi F (2019) The role of excitons in 3D and 2D lead halide perovskites. J Mater Chem C 7: 12006-12018. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC04292J doi: 10.1039/C9TC04292J
    [144] Moral RF, Perini CAR, Kodalle T, et al. (2024) Anion and cation migration at 2D/3D halide perovskite interfaces. ACS Energy Lett 9: 2703-2716. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.4c00728 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.4c00728
    [145] Filip MR, Hillman S, Haghighirad AA, et al. (2016) Band gaps of the lead-free halide double perovskites: Cs2BiAgCl6 and Cs2BiAgBr6 from theory and experiment. J Phys Chem Lett 7: 2579-2585. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01041 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b01041
    [146] McClure ETB, Windl MR, Woodward PMW (2016) Cs2AgBiX6 (X = Br, Cl): New visible light absorbing, lead-free halide perovskite semiconductors. Chem Mater 28: 1348-1354. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04231 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b04231
    [147] Luo SLJ, Wu H, Zhou Y, et al. (2018) Cs2AgInCl6 double perovskite single crystals: Parity forbidden transitions and their application for sensitive and fast UV photodetectors. ACS Photonics 5: 398. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00837 doi: 10.1021/acsphotonics.7b00837
    [148] Zhou HC, Li Q, Luo G, et al. (2014) Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 345: 542-546. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254050 doi: 10.1126/science.1254050
    [149] De Quilettes DWV, Stranks SM, Nagaoka SD, et al. (2015) Impact of microstructure on local carrier lifetime in perovskite solar cells. Science 348: 683-686. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5333 doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5333
    [150] Rui SHH, Chen T, Gui R, et al. (2023) Extracting energetic disorder in organic solar cells using percolation models. ChemPhysMater 2: 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chphma.2022.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.chphma.2022.03.002
    [151] Wang DD, Li YS, Yang YG, et al. (2024) Energetic disorder dominates optical properties and recombination dynamics in tin-lead perovskite nanocrystals. eScience 100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esci.2024.100279 doi: 10.1016/j.esci.2024.100279
    [152] Yang C, Ma L, Xu Y (2022) Reduced energetic disorder enables over 14% efficiency in organic solar cells based on completely non-fused-ring donors and acceptors. Sci China Chem 65: 2604–2612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-022-1449-4 doi: 10.1007/s11426-022-1449-4
    [153] Diez-Cabanes V, Samuele G, Beljonne D, et al. (2023) On the origin of energetic disorder in mixed halides lead perovskites. Adv Optical Mater 12: 2301105. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202301105 doi: 10.1002/adom.202301105
    [154] Liu Y, Banon JP, Frohna K, et al. (2023) The electronic disorder landscape of mixed halide perovskites. ACS Energy Lett 8: 250-258. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02352 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c02352
    [155] Yin A, Zhang D, Cheung SH, et al. (2018) On the understanding of energetic disorder, charge recombination and voltage losses in all-polymer solar cells. J Mater Chem C 6: 7855–7863. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC02689K doi: 10.1039/C8TC02689K
    [156] Igbari F, Wang R, Wang ZK, et al. (2019) Composition stoichiometry of Cs2AgBiBr6 films for highly efficient lead-free perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett 19: 2066–2073. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00238 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00238
    [157] Bush KA, Frohna K, Prasanna R, et al. (2018) Compositional engineering for efficient wide band gap perovskites with improved stability to photoinduced phase segregation. ACS Energy Lett 3: 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01255 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01255
    [158] Yang J, Zhang P, Wei SH (2018) Band structure engineering of Cs2AgBiBr6 perovskite through order–disordered transition: A first-principle study. J Phys Chem Lett 9: 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02992 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b02992
    [159] Kim J, Kim H, Mahesh C, et al. (2018) Impacts of cation ordering on bandgap dispersion of double perovskites. APL Materials 6: 084903. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5027230 doi: 10.1063/1.5027230
    [160] Liu Z, Li H, Qin C, et al. (2019) Solution-processed inorganic perovskite flexible photodetectors with high performance. Nanoscale Res Lett 14: 284. https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-019-3120-x doi: 10.1186/s11671-019-3120-x
    [161] Chilvery A, Das S, Guggilla P, et al. (2016) A perspective on the recent progress in solution-processed methods for highly efficient perovskite solar cells. STAM 17: 650–658. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2016.1226120
    [162] Seo JW, Noh JH, Seok SI (2016) Rational strategies for efficient perovskite solar cells. Acc Chem Res 49: 562–572. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00444 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.5b00444
    [163] Arain Z, Liu C, Yang Y, et al. (2019) Elucidating the dynamics of solvent engineering for perovskite solar cells. Sci China Mater 62: 161–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-018-9336-1 doi: 10.1007/s40843-018-9336-1
    [164] Li J, Yang R, Que L, et al. (2019) Optimization of anti-solvent engineering toward high performance perovskite solar cells. J Mater Res 34: 2416–2424. https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2019.122 doi: 10.1557/jmr.2019.122
    [165] Duan J, Xu H, Sha W, et al. (2019) Inorganic perovskite solar cells: An emerging member of the photovoltaic community. J Mater Chem A 7: 21036–21068. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA06674H. doi: 10.1039/C9TA06674H
    [166] Li B, Fu L, Li S, et al. (2019) Pathways toward high-performance inorganic perovskite solar cells: Challenges and strategies. J Mater Chem A 7: 20494–20518. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA04114A doi: 10.1039/C9TA04114A
    [167] Wang P, Zhang X, Zhou Y, et al. (2018) Solvent-controlled growth of inorganic perovskite films in dry environment for efficient and stable solar cells. Nat Commun 9: 2225. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04636-4 doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04636-4
    [168] DeHoff RT (1999) Engineering of microstructures. Mater Res 2: 111–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14391999000300002
    [169] Clemens H, Mayer S, Scheu C (2017) Microstructure and properties of engineering materials: From fundamentals to applications, In: Staron P, Schreyer A, Clemens H, Mayer S, In Neutrons and Synchrotron Radiation in Engineering Materials Science, New York: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527684489.ch1
    [170] Szuromi P (1997) Microstructural engineering of materials. Science 277: 1183. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.277.5330.1183 doi: 10.1126/science.277.5330.1183
    [171] Chen L, Paillard C, Zhao HJ, et al. (2018) Tailoring properties of hybrid perovskites by domain-width engineering with charged walls. npj Computat Mater 4: 75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-018-0134-3 doi: 10.1038/s41524-018-0134-3
    [172] Schade L, Wright AD, Johnson RD, et al. (2019) Structural and optical properties of Cs2AgBiBr6 double perovskite. ACS Energy Lett 4: 299–305. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02090 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02090
    [173] Lozhkina OA, Murashkina AA, Elizarov MS, et al. (2018) Microstructural analysis and optical properties of the halide double perovskite Cs2BiAgBr6 single crystals. Chem Phys Lett 694: 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2018.01.031 doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2018.01.031
    [174] Liu W, Liu Y, Wang J, et al. (2018) Twin domains in organometallic halide perovskite thin-films. Crystals 8: 216. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst8050216 doi: 10.3390/cryst8050216
    [175] Liu S, Zheng F, Koocher NZ, et al. (2015) Ferroelectric domain wall induced band gap reduction and charge separation in organometal halide perovskites. J Phys Chem Lett 6: 693-699. https://doi.org/10.1021/jz502666j doi: 10.1021/jz502666j
    [176] You L, Zheng F, Fang L, et al. (2018) Enhancing ferroelectric photovoltaic effect by polar order engineering. Sci Adv 4: eaat3438. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat3438 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aat3438
    [177] Li Y, Fu J, Mao X, et al. (2021) Enhanced bulk photovoltaic effect in two-dimensional ferroelectric CuInP2S6. Nat Commun 12: 5896. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26200-3 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26200-3
    [178] Shockley W, Queisser HJ (1961) Detailed balance limit of efficiency of P-N junction solar cells. J Appl Phys 32: 510–511. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1736034 doi: 10.1063/1.1736034
    [179] Ihtisham ULH, Khan MI, Ullah A, et al. (2024) Bandgap reduction and efficiency enhancement in Cs2AgBiBr6 double perovskite solar cells through gallium substitution. RSC Adv 14: 5440–5448. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3RA08965G doi: 10.1039/D3RA08965G
    [180] Du KZ, Meng W, Wang X, et al. (2017) Bandgap engineering of lead-free double perovskite Cs2AgBiBr6 through trivalent metal alloying. Angew Chem Int Ed 8158–8162. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201703970 doi: 10.1002/anie.201703970
    [181] Yan K, Long M, Zhang T, et al. (2015) Hybrid halide perovskite solar cell precursors: Colloidal chemistry and coordination engineering behind device processing for high efficiency. J Am Chem Soc 137: 4460–4468. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b00321 doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b00321
    [182] Bellakhdar T, Nabi Z, Bouabdallah B, et al. (2022) Ab initio study of structural, electronic, mechanical and optical properties of the tetragonal Cs2AgBiBr6 halide double perovskite. Appl Phys A 128: 155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-05276-8 doi: 10.1007/s00339-022-05276-8
    [183] Merabet B, Alamri H, Djermouni M (2012) Optimal bandgap of double perovskite la-substituted Bi2FeCrO6 for solar cells: An ab initio GGA+U study. Chin Phys Lett 34: 016101. https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/34/1/016101 doi: 10.1088/0256-307X/34/1/016101
    [184] Alotaibi NH, Mustafa GM, Kattan NA (2022) DFT study of double perovskites Cs2AgBiX6 (X = Cl, Br): An alternative of hybrid perovskites. J Solid State Chem 313: 123353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123353 doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2022.123353
    [185] Creutz SE, Crites EN, De-Siena MC, et al. (2018) Colloidal nanocrystals of lead-free double-perovskite (elpasolite) semiconductors: Synthesis and anion exchange to access new materials. Nano Lett 18: 1118–1123. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04659 doi: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04659
    [186] Hou P, Yang W, Wan N, et al. (2021) Precursor engineering for high-quality Cs2AgBiBr6 films toward efficient lead-free double perovskite solar cells. J Mater Chem C 9: 9659–9669. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TC01786A doi: 10.1039/D1TC01786A
    [187] Kangsabanik J, Sugathan V, Yadav A, et al. (2018) Double perovskites overtaking the single perovskites: A set of new solar harvesting materials with much higher stability and efficiency. Phys Rev Mater 2: 055401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.055401 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.055401
    [188] Laporte O (1924) Die struktur des eisenspektrums. Z Physik 23: 135–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01327582 doi: 10.1007/BF01327582
    [189] Nathan R, Wolf BAC, Slavney AH, et al. (2021) Doubling the stakes: The promise of halide double perovskites. Angew Chem Int Ed 60: 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202016185 doi: 10.1002/anie.202016185
    [190] Fridkin VM (2001) Bulk photovoltaic effect in noncentrosymmetric crystals. Crystallogr Rep 46: 654–658. https://doi.org/10.1134/1.1387133 doi: 10.1134/1.1387133
    [191] Gao P, Liu HJ, Huang YL (2016) Atomic mechanism of polarization-controlled surface reconstruction in ferroelectric thin films. Nat Commun 7: 11318. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11318 doi: 10.1038/ncomms11318
    [192] Von Baltz WKR (1981) Theory of the bulk photovoltaic effect in pure crystals. Phys Rev B 23: 5590–5596. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.23.5590 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.5590
    [193] Young SM, Rappe AM (2012) First principles calculation of the shift current photovoltaic effect in ferroelectrics. Phys Rev Lett 109: 116601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.116601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.116601
    [194] Young SM, Zheng F, Rappe AM (2012) First-principles calculation of the bulk photovoltaic effect in bismuth ferrite. Phys Rev Lett 109: 236601. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.236601 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.236601
    [195] Harikesh PC, Wu B, Ghosh B, et al. (2018) Doping and switchable photovoltaic effect in lead-free perovskites enabled by metal cation transmutation. Adv Mater 30: 1802080. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201802080. doi: 10.1002/adma.201802080
    [196] Lee D, Baek SH, Kim TH, et al. (2011) Polarity control of carrier injection at ferroelectric/metal interfaces for electrically switchable diode and photovoltaic effects. Phys Rev B 84: 125305. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.125305 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.125305
    [197] Li H, Li F, Shena Z, et al. (2021) Photoferroelectric perovskite solar cells: Principles, advances and insights. Nano Today 37: 101062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101062 doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101062
    [198] Tsien RY (2009) Constructing and exploiting the fluorescent protein paintbox (nobel lecture). Chem Int Ed 48: 5612–5626. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200901916 doi: 10.1002/anie.200901916
    [199] Liu HY, Zhang HY, Chen XG, et al. (2020) Molecular design principles for ferroelectrics: Ferroelectrochemistry. J Am Chem Soc 142: 15205-15218. https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c07055
    [200] Shi PP, Tang YY, Li PF, et al. (2016) Symmetry breaking in molecular ferroelectrics. Chem Soc Rev 45: 3811-3827. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CS00308C doi: 10.1039/C5CS00308C
    [201] Li K, Li ZG, Lu J, et al. (2022) Origin of ferroelectricity in two prototypical hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites. J Am Chem Soc 144: 816–823. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c10188 doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c10188
    [202] Anderson PW, Blount EI (1965) Symmetry considerations on martensitic transformations: 'Ferroelectric' metals? Phys Rev Lett 14: 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.217 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.14.217
    [203] Shi Y, Guo Y, Wang X, et al. (2013) A ferroelectric-like structural transition in a metal. Nat Mater 12: 1024–1027. https://doi.org/10.1038/NMAT3754 doi: 10.1038/NMAT3754
    [204] Yildirim T (2013) Ferroelectric soft phonons, charge density wave instability, and strong electron-phonon coupling in BiS2 layered superconductors: A first-principles study. Phys Rev B 87: 020506(R). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1210.2418 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1210.2418
    [205] Rakita Y, Bar-Elli O, Meirzadeha E, et al. (2017) Tetragonal CH3NH3PbI3 is ferroelectric. PNAS 114: E5504–E5512. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1702429114 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702429114
    [206] Alexe M, Hasse D (2011) Tip-enhanced photovoltaic effects in bismuth ferrite. Nat Commun 2: 256. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1261 doi: 10.1038/ncomms1261
    [207] Liao WQ, Zhang Y, Hu CL (2015) A lead-halide perovskite molecular ferroelectric semiconductor. Nat Commun 6: 7338. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8338 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8338
    [208] Guyonnet J (2014) Domain walls in ferroelectric materials, In: Guyonnet J, Ferroelectric Domain Walls, Cham: Springer, 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05750-7_2
    [209] Rakita Y (2016) CH3NH3PbBr3 is not pyroelectric, excluding ferroelectricenhanced photovoltaic performance. APL Mater 4: 051101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4949760
    [210] Landau L, Lifshitz E (1935) On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys Z Sowjetunion 8: 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-036364-6.50008-9 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-036364-6.50008-9
    [211] Kittel C (1946) Theory of the structure of ferromagnetic domains in films and small particles. Phys Rev 70: 965–971. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.70.965 doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.70.965
    [212] Guyonnet J (2014) Ferroelectric Domain Walls, Cham: Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-05750-7
    [213] Sherkar TS, Anton KLJ (2016) Can ferroelectric polarization explain the high performance of hybrid halide perovskite solar cells? Phys Chem Chem Phys 18: 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CP07117H doi: 10.1039/C5CP07117H
    [214] Nye JF (1985) Physical Properties of Crystals, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [215] Lines ME, Glass AM (1979) Principles and Applications of Ferroelectrics and Related Materials, Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198507789.001.0001
    [216] Mitsui T, Tatsuzaki I, Nakamura E (1976) An Introduction to the Physics of Ferroelectrics, London: Gordon and Breach.
    [217] Jaffe BC, Jaffe HW (1971) Piezoelectric Ceramics, New York: Academic Press, 313–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89952-9.00005-1
    [218] Ballato A (1995) Piezoelectricity: Old effect, new thrusts. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr 42: 916–926. https://doi.org/10.1109/58.464826 doi: 10.1109/58.464826
    [219] Park H, Ha C, Lee JH (2020) Advances in piezoelectric halide perovskites for energy harvesting applications. J Mater Chem A 8: 24353–24367. https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta08780g doi: 10.1039/d0ta08780g
    [220] Rashkeev S, El-Mellouhi F, Kais S, et al. (2015) Domain walls conductivity in hybrid organometallic perovskites and their essential role in CH3NH3PbI3 solar cell high performance. Sci Rep 5: 11467. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep11467 doi: 10.1038/srep11467
    [221] Ma J, Wang LW (2015) Nanoscale charge localization induced by random ori-entations of organic molecules in hybrid perovskite CH3NH3PbI3. Nano Lett 15: 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl503494y doi: 10.1021/nl503494y
    [222] Liu S, Zheng F, Grinberg I, et al. (2016) Photoferroelectric and photopiezoelectric properties of organometal halide perovskites. J Phys Chem Lett 7: 1460–1465. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00527 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00527
    [223] Damjanovic D (1998) Ferroelectric, dielectric and piezoelectric properties of ferroelectric thin films and ceramics. Rep Prog Phys 61: 1267. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/61/9/002 doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/61/9/002
    [224] Sahoo A, Paul T, Makani NH, et al. (2022) High piezoresponse in low-dimensional inorganic halide perovskite for mechanical energy harvesting. Sustain Energ Fuels 6: 4484–4497. https://doi.org/10.1039/d2se00786j doi: 10.1039/d2se00786j
    [225] Butler KT, Frost JM, Walsh A (2015) Ferroelectric materials for solar energy conversion: Photoferroics revisited. Energy Environ Sci 8: 838–848. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4EE03523B doi: 10.1039/C4EE03523B
    [226] Chelil N, Sahnoun M, Benhalima Z, et al. (2023) Insights into the relationship between ferroelectric and photovoltaic properties in CsGeI3 for solar energy conversion. RSC Adv 13: 1955–1963. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RA06860E doi: 10.1039/D2RA06860E
    [227] Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang ZL (2011) Fundamental theory of piezotronics. Adv Mater 23: 3004–3013. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201100906 doi: 10.1002/adma.201100906
    [228] Hu Y, Chang Y, Fei P, et al. (2010) Designing the electric transport characteristics of zno micro/nanowire devices by coupling piezoelectric and photoexcitation effects. ACS Nano 4: 1234–1240. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn901805g doi: 10.1021/nn901805g
    [229] Hu Y, Zhang Y, Chang Y, et al. (2010) Optimizing the power output of a ZnO photocell by piezopotential. ACS Nano 4: 4220–4224. https://doi.org/10.1021/nn1010045 doi: 10.1021/nn1010045
    [230] He JH, Liu J, Chen LJ, et al (2007) Piezoelectric gated diode of a single ZnO nanowire. Adv Mater 19: 781. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200602918 doi: 10.1002/adma.200602918
    [231] Wang X, Zhou J, Song J, et al. (2006) Piezoelectric field effect transistor and nanoforce sensor based on a single ZnO nanowire. Nano Lett 6: 2768. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl061802g doi: 10.1021/nl061802g
    [232] Lao CS, Kaung Q, Wang ZL, et al (2007) Polymer functionalized piezoelectric-FET as humidity/chemical nanosensors. Appl Phys Lett 90: 262107. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2748097 doi: 10.1063/1.2748097
    [233] Wang ZL, Song J (2006) Piezoelectric nanogenerators based on zinc oxide nanowire arrays. Science 312: 242. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.112400 doi: 10.1126/science.112400
    [234] Wang X, Song J, Liu J, et al. (2007) Direct-current nanogenerator driven by ultrasonic waves. Science 316: 102. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1139366 doi: 10.1126/science.1139366
    [235] Qin Y, Wang X, Wang ZL (2008). Microfibre-nanowire hybrid structure for energy scavenging. Nature 451: 809. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13146 doi: 10.1038/ncomms13146
    [236] Weber ZD (1978) CH3NH3PbX3 ein Pb(Ⅱ)-system mit kubischer perowskitstruktur/CH3NH3PbX3, a Pb(Ⅱ)-system with cubic perovskite structure. Naturforsch 33: 1443. https://doi.org/10.1515/znb-1978-1214 doi: 10.1515/znb-1978-1214
    [237] Poglitsch DWA (1987) Dynamic disorder in methylammoniumtrihalogenoplumbates(Ⅱ) observed by millimeter‐wave spectroscopy. J Chem Phys 87: 6373. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.453467 doi: 10.1063/1.453467
    [238] Frost JM, Butler KT, Brivio F, et al. (2014) Atomistic origins of high-performance in hybrid halide perovskite solar cells. Nano Lett 14: 2584. https://doi.org/10.1021/nl500390f doi: 10.1021/nl500390f
    [239] Frost JM, Butler KT, Walsh A (2014) Molecular ferroelectric contributions to anomalous hysteresis in hybrid perovskite solar cells. APL Mater 2: 081506. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4890246 doi: 10.1063/1.4890246
    [240] Coll AGM, Marza EM, Almora O, et al. (2015) Polarization switching and light-enhanced piezoelectricity in lead halide perovskites. J Phys Chem Lett 6: 140 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00502 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00502
    [241] Kim YJ, Dang TV, Choi HJ, et al. (2016) Piezoelectric properties of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite thin films and their applications in piezoelectric generators. J Mater Chem A 4: 756. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA09662F doi: 10.1039/C5TA09662F
    [242] Shahrokhi S, Gao W, Wang Y, et al. (2020) Emergence of ferroelectricity in halide perovskites. Small Methods 4: 2000149. https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202000149 doi: 10.1002/smtd.202000149
    [243] Ding R, Liu H, Zhang X, et al. (2016) Flexible piezoelectric nanocomposite generators based on formamidinium lead halide perovskite nanoparticles. Adv Funct Mater 26: 7708. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201602634 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201602634
    [244] Mohandes A, Moradi M, Nadgaran H (2021) Numerical simulation of inorganic Cs2AgBiBr6 as a lead-free perovskite using device simulation SCAPS-1D. Opt Quantum Electron 53: 319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-02959-z doi: 10.1007/s11082-021-02959-z
    [245] Slavney AH, Leppert L, Bartesaghi D, et al. (2017) Defect-induced band-edge reconstruction of a bismuth-halide double perovskite for visible-light absorption. J Am Chem Soc 139: 5015–5018. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b01629 doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b01629
    [246] Wang F, Bai S, Tress W, et al. (2018) Defects engineering for high-performance perovskite solar cells. npj Flex Electron 2: 22. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-018-0035-z doi: 10.1038/s41528-018-0035-z
    [247] Han TH, Tan S, Xue J, et al. (2019) Interface and defect engineering for metal halide perovskite optoelectronic devices. Adv Mater 31: e1803515. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201803515 doi: 10.1002/adma.201803515
    [248] Xu J, Liu JB, Liu BX, et al. (2019) Defect engineering of grain boundaries in lead-free halide double perovskites for better optoelectronic performance. Adv Funct Mater 29: 1805870. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201805870 doi: 10.1002/adfm.201805870
    [249] Ramesha R (2018) Defect engineering using crystal symmetry. PNAS 115: 9344–9346 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1812554115 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812554115
    [250] Samanta M, Ahmed SI, Chattopadhyay KK, et al. (2020) Role of various transport layer and electrode materials in enhancing performance of stable environment-friendly Cs2TiBr6 solar cell. Optik 217: 164805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164805 doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164805
    [251] He Y, Xu L, Zheng H, et al. (2021) Numerical exploration of lead-free inorganic perovskite Cs2TiBr6 solar cell. J Phys Conf Ser 2021: 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2021/1/012069 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2021/1/012069
    [252] Jani MR, Islam MT, Al Amin SM, et al. (2020) Exploring solar cell performance of inorganic Cs2TiBr6 halide double perovskite: A numerical study. Superlattices Microstruct 146: 106652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106652 doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106652
    [253] Sultana F, Jannat F, Ahmed S, et al. (2023) A comparative numerical approach between lead-free inorganic Cs2TiBr6 and Cs2PtI6-based perovskite solar cells. Results in Opt 13: 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rio.2023.100567 doi: 10.1016/j.rio.2023.100567
    [254] He Y, Zheng H, Huang S, et.al. (2021) Defect investigation of Ti-based vacancy-ordered double perovskite solar cell using SCAPS-1D. J Phys Conf Ser 2044: 012100. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2044/1/012100 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2044/1/012100
    [255] Hussain I, Tran HP, Jaksik J, et al. (2018) Functional materials, device architecture, and flexibility of perovskite solar cell. Emergent Mater 1: 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42247-018-0013-1 doi: 10.1007/s42247-018-0013-1
    [256] Kopacic I, Friesenbichler B, Hoefler S, et al. (2018) Enhanced performance of germanium halide perovskite solar cells through compositional engineering. ACS Appl Energy Mater 1: 343–347. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b00007 doi: 10.1021/acsaem.8b00007
    [257] Song Z, Watthage SC, Phillips AB, et al. (2016) Pathways toward high-performance perovskite solar cells: Review of recent advances in organo-metal halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications. JPE 6: 022001. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.6.022001 doi: 10.1117/1.JPE.6.022001
    [258] Tran TT, Pennella JR, Chamorro JR, et al. (2017) Designing indirect–direct bandgap transitions in double perovskites. Mater Horiz 4: 688. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7MH00239D doi: 10.1039/C7MH00239D
    [259] Giustino F, Snaith HJ (2016) Toward lead-free perovskite solar cells. ACS Energy Lett 1: 1233. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00499 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.6b00499
    [260] Sun Q, Wang J, Yin JW, et al. (2018) Bandgap engineering of stable lead-free oxide double perovskites for photovoltaics. Adv Mater 30: 1705901. https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201705901 doi: 10.1002/adma.201705901
    [261] Du KZ, Wang X, Han Q, et al. (2017) Heterovalent B-site Co-alloying approach for halide perovskite bandgap engineering. ACS Energy Lett 2: 2486. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00824 doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00824
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Bilal A. Rather, Fawad Ali, Nasim Ullah, Al-Sharef Mohammad, Anwarud Din, , Aα matrix of commuting graphs of non-abelian groups, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 15436, 10.3934/math.2022845
    2. Bilal Ahmad Rather, Fawad Ali, Suliman Alsaeed, Muhammad Naeem, Hosoya Polynomials of Power Graphs of Certain Finite Groups, 2022, 27, 1420-3049, 6081, 10.3390/molecules27186081
    3. Fawad Ali, Bilal A. Rather, Nahid Fatima, Muhammad Sarfraz, Asad Ullah, Khalid Abdulkhaliq M. Alharbi, Rahim Dad, On the Topological Indices of Commuting Graphs for Finite Non-Abelian Groups, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1266, 10.3390/sym14061266
    4. Bilal Ahmad Rather, Fawad Ali, Asad Ullah, Nahid Fatima, Rahim Dad, Aγ Eigenvalues of Zero Divisor Graph of Integer Modulo and Von Neumann Regular Rings, 2022, 14, 2073-8994, 1710, 10.3390/sym14081710
    5. Clement Johnson, Ravi Sankar, Graph energy and topological descriptors of zero divisor graph associated with commutative ring, 2023, 1598-5865, 10.1007/s12190-023-01837-z
    6. Fareeha Jamal, Muhammad Imran, Distance spectrum of some zero divisor graphs, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 23979, 10.3934/math.20241166
    7. R. Sarathy, J. Ravi Sankar, Applications on color (distance) signless laplacian energy of annihilator monic prime graph of commutative rings, 2024, 15, 20904479, 102469, 10.1016/j.asej.2023.102469
    8. Nadeem ur Rehman, Mohd Nazim, Exploring normalized distance Laplacian eigenvalues of the zero-divisor graph of ring
    Zn
    , 2023, 0009-725X, 10.1007/s12215-023-00927-y
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1644) PDF downloads(89) Cited by(4)

Figures and Tables

Figures(12)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog