Plastics have quickly become an integral part of modern life. Due to excessive production and improper waste disposal, they are recognized as contaminants present in practically all habitat types. Although there are several polymers, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is of particular concern due to its abundance in the environment. There is a need for a solution that is both cost-effective and ecologically friendly to address this pollutant. The use of microbial depolymerizing enzymes could offer a biological avenue for plastic degradation, though the full potential of these enzymes is yet to be uncovered. The purpose of this study was to use (1) plate-based screening methods to investigate the plastic degradation potential of marine bacteria from the order Enterobacterales collected from various organismal and environmental sources, and (2) perform genome-based analysis to identify polyesterases potentially related to PET degradation. 126 bacterial isolates were obtained from the strain collection of RD3, Research Unit Marine Symbioses-GEOMAR-and sequentially tested for esterase and polyesterase activity, in combination here referred to as PETase–like activity. The results show that members of the microbial families Alteromonadaceae, Shewanellaceae, and Vibrionaceae, derived from marine sponges and bryozoans, are the most promising candidates within the order Enterobacterales. Furthermore, 389 putative hydrolases from the α/β superfamily were identified in 23 analyzed genomes, of which 22 were sequenced for this study. Several candidates showed similarities with known PETases, indicating underlying enzymatic potential within the order Enterobacterales for PET degradation.
Citation: Denisse Galarza–Verkovitch, Onur Turak, Jutta Wiese, Tanja Rahn, Ute Hentschel, Erik Borchert. Bioprospecting for polyesterase activity relevant for PET degradation in marine Enterobacterales isolates[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(3): 518-539. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023027
[1] | Leda Bucciantini, Angiolo Farina, Antonio Fasano . Flows in porous media with erosion of the solid matrix. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5(1): 63-95. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.63 |
[2] | Alexei Heintz, Andrey Piatnitski . Osmosis for non-electrolyte solvents in permeable periodic porous media. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11(3): 471-499. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016005 |
[3] | Jinhu Zhao . Boundary layer flow and heat transfer of viscoelastic fluid embedded in a non-Darcy porous medium with double fractional Maxwell model. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2025, 20(3): 885-902. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2025038 |
[4] | Mohamed Belhadj, Eric Cancès, Jean-Frédéric Gerbeau, Andro Mikelić . Homogenization approach to filtration through a fibrous medium. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2007, 2(3): 529-550. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.529 |
[5] | Brahim Amaziane, Leonid Pankratov, Andrey Piatnitski . An improved homogenization result for immiscible compressible two-phase flow in porous media. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(1): 147-171. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017006 |
[6] | María Anguiano, Renata Bunoiu . Homogenization of Bingham flow in thin porous media. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2020, 15(1): 87-110. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020004 |
[7] | Martin Gugat, Alexander Keimer, Günter Leugering, Zhiqiang Wang . Analysis of a system of nonlocal conservation laws for multi-commodity flow on networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(4): 749-785. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.749 |
[8] | Frederike Kissling, Christian Rohde . The computation of nonclassical shock waves with a heterogeneous multiscale method. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2010, 5(3): 661-674. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.661 |
[9] | Jinhu Zhao . Natural convection flow and heat transfer of generalized Maxwell fluid with distributed order time fractional derivatives embedded in the porous medium. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2024, 19(2): 753-770. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2024034 |
[10] | Pedro Aceves-Sanchez, Benjamin Aymard, Diane Peurichard, Pol Kennel, Anne Lorsignol, Franck Plouraboué, Louis Casteilla, Pierre Degond . A new model for the emergence of blood capillary networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16(1): 91-138. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2021001 |
Plastics have quickly become an integral part of modern life. Due to excessive production and improper waste disposal, they are recognized as contaminants present in practically all habitat types. Although there are several polymers, polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is of particular concern due to its abundance in the environment. There is a need for a solution that is both cost-effective and ecologically friendly to address this pollutant. The use of microbial depolymerizing enzymes could offer a biological avenue for plastic degradation, though the full potential of these enzymes is yet to be uncovered. The purpose of this study was to use (1) plate-based screening methods to investigate the plastic degradation potential of marine bacteria from the order Enterobacterales collected from various organismal and environmental sources, and (2) perform genome-based analysis to identify polyesterases potentially related to PET degradation. 126 bacterial isolates were obtained from the strain collection of RD3, Research Unit Marine Symbioses-GEOMAR-and sequentially tested for esterase and polyesterase activity, in combination here referred to as PETase–like activity. The results show that members of the microbial families Alteromonadaceae, Shewanellaceae, and Vibrionaceae, derived from marine sponges and bryozoans, are the most promising candidates within the order Enterobacterales. Furthermore, 389 putative hydrolases from the α/β superfamily were identified in 23 analyzed genomes, of which 22 were sequenced for this study. Several candidates showed similarities with known PETases, indicating underlying enzymatic potential within the order Enterobacterales for PET degradation.
The Atlantic Forest is a megadiverse biome which forest cover was strongly reduced as a function of historical crop expansion and urbanization [1]. Originally, the Atlantic Forest was one of the largest rainforests of the Americas, covering around 1.5 million km2. Today, only 11.7% of its original forest cover remains [2]. In order to promote the biodiversity conservation and re-establish environmental services, several restoration projects have been carried out [3]. Nevertheless, the technical basis of the restoration methods is still controversial, especially as to the selection of species to be reintroduced [4,5].
Seedling planting and direct seeding of tree species are methods employed for tropical and subtropical forest restoration. Seedling planting could significantly increase the success of forest recovery in abandoned pastures when compared to spontaneous regeneration or direct seeding [6], in spite of higher costs [7]. For long-term viability of these processes, species selection is a critical issue [3,5,7,8,9]. In addition, previous intensive land use tends to impose greater difficulty for forest restoration [6,10], with an emphasis in abandoned pastures in which exotic grass species are the main obstacle to overcome [11,12]. In order to reinstate the original diversity and allow the formation of self-perpetuating forests, many restoration initiatives have utilized a great diversity of tree species (usually more than 15) from different successional groups [6,12,13]. Additionally, high-diversity plantings with different successional guilds have been highly recommended for areas with reduced capacity for self-regeneration, such as abandoned pastures and intensive crop fields [5]. An additional argument for high-diversity restoration models is the inhibition of secondary succession and forest recovery promoted by monospecific plantings of fast-growing pioneer tree species [14,15,16]. However, the effectiveness of the high-diversity model for seedling planting has been scarcely studied. In some cases the observed diversity has been considered low even after 10 years of planting [17].
Species differ in their ability to occupy areas in different successional stages, according to physiological, morphological and ontogenetic traits [18]. Pioneer species are able to occupy disturbed areas such as forest gaps but have reduced ability to germinate and establish in late successional stages of the forest. In turn, late successional species (or non-pioneer) can regenerate in mature areas, with low recruitment in disturbed areas [19]. Budowski [20] identified four successional stages, outlining the features expected for the species of each phase. However, the number of guilds is controversial, given that it is always a relatively arbitrary generalization. Denslow [21] admitted three categories (large-gap, small-gaps specialists, and understory specialists) while Swaine and Whitmore [19] point out only two categories: pioneer and non-pioneer. In the Atlantic Forest context, the authors are divided adopting between two [22] and four categories [23,24]. Although there is a certain degree of divergence among authors regarding the criteria and number of guilds, the classification of the species in these groups allows for a generalization which is usually applied in forest restoration plans. Notwithstanding, if plantings should be restricted to early successional species in order to obtain fast colonization and biomass increment [25,26] or include all the guilds as a way to recompose the diversity of late successional stages of the forest more quickly [5,27] still remains a question to be clarified.
Seed mass is positively correlated with early survival and has been indicated as a standard for species selection [28,29]. In general, species with a large mass of nutritional reserves tend to present higher survival in seedling phase, particularly in environments with restricted nutrients, light, or water. They also overcome better defoliation (herbivory) and litter inhibition [30]. Large seeds originate large seedlings [31,32] which decrease the mortality caused by herbivores [33]. Moreover, resprouting capability at seedling stage is directly correlated with seed size [32]. At seedling stage, the amount of reserves is positively correlated with tolerance to shading and inversely correlated with growth rate [34]. Insofar seeds size increases seedling sizes, survival expectancy in forest environments is enlarged, in spite of low growth rates [35]. However, adult trees in forest environments (DBH > 10 cm) present growth and survival rates negatively correlated with seed sizes [36]. In addition, survival of species with large seeds is higher in more advanced successional stages than in recently abandoned pastures [37]. Degraded areas with a history of intensive land use are very distinct environments in relation to mature forests, in which natural selection promotes the evolution of ecophysiological traits. Succession in these sites has unique characteristics, and for this reason, it has been called anthropic succession [27]. Large seeds could be related to late-successional species, with seedlings of higher survival in shaded conditions in mature or advanced secondary forests, at the same time as they present low tolerance to open sites in early successional stages, such as in abandoned croplands or pastures.
Our investigation was aimed at measuring growth and survival of seedlings in a high-diversity planting of tree species. In addition, differences among successional guilds were evaluated as well as a correlation between seed mass, growth, and survival. Experiment sites were highly degraded croplands, in a region previously covered by Semideciduous Atlantic Forest similar to those described by Benvenuti-Ferreira et al. [38].
A total of 36 native tree species from the Atlantic Forest biome were included in the study, from different successional groups and seed size classes as described in Table 1. Seed mass values were obtained from the specialized literature or the authors. The successional classification was based on three categories according to two criteria: growth rate (following the specialized literature, when available) and occurrence in different successional stages on the forests within the region (Table 2). Our classification was verified with reference literature, particularly Carvalho et al. [39]. Considering divergences on its classification, Inga marginata Willd was excluded from the analysis.
Species | Family | Successional group | Seed mass (mg) |
Trema micrantha (L.) Blüme | Cannabaceae | Pioneer | 4.6 |
Heliocarpus americanus L. | Malvaceae | Pioneer | 7.0 |
Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi | Anacardiaceae | Pioneer | 10.5 |
Mimosa scabrella Bentham | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 14.7 |
Schinus molle L. | Anacardiaceae | Pioneer | 30.4 |
Vasconcellea quercifolia A. St.-Hilaire | Caricaceae | Pioneer | 43.4 |
Ateleia glazioveana Baill. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 44.5 |
Sesbania virgata (Cav.) Pers. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 72.3 |
Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Vell.) Mor. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 180.2 |
Luehea divaricata Mart. | Malvaceae | Secondary | 4.0 |
Jacaranda micrantha Cham. | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 8.0 |
Tabebuia alba (Cham.) Sandwith | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 10.8 |
Patagonula americana L. | Boraginaceae | Secondary | 27.2 |
Cedrela fissilis Vellozo | Meliaceae | Secondary | 27.5 |
Cordia trichotoma (Vell.) Arrab. & Steud. | Boraginaceae | Secondary | 30.8 |
Parapiptadenia rigida (Benth.) Brenan | Fabaceae | Secondary | 33.4 |
Tabebuia heptaphylla (Vell.) Toledo | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 41.2 |
Erythroxylum deciduum A.St.-Hilaire | Erythroxylaceae | Secondary | 51.4 |
Rupretchia laxiflora Meissner | Polygonaceae | Secondary | 66.7 |
Machaerium stipitatum Vogel | Fabaceae | Secondary | 158.7 |
Pelthophorum dubium (Spreng.) Taubert | Fabaceae | Secondary | 189.4 |
Inga sessilis (Vellozo) Martius | Fabaceae | Secondary | 250.0 |
Eugenia uniflora L. | Myrtaceae | Secondary | 353.3 |
Ilex paraguariensis A.St.-Hilaire | Aquifoliaceae | late successional | 6.7 |
Campomanesia xanthocarpa Berg | Myrtaceae | late successional | 33.0 |
Myrocarpus frondosus Freire Allemão | Fabaceae | late successional | 101.0 |
Myrcianthes gigantea (Legr.) Legr. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 114.0 |
Allophylus edulis (A.St.-Hilaire) Radlk. | Sapindaceae | late successional | 125.0 |
Pliniaperuviana (Poir.) Govaert | Myrtaceae | late successional | 215.0 |
Myrcianthes pungens (Berg.) Legr. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 230.0 |
Cabralea canjerana (Vellozo) Mart. | Meliaceae | late successional | 271.8 |
Eugenia pyriformis Camb. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 305.0 |
Eugenia involucrata DC. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 403.0 |
Chrysophyllum gonocarpum (Mart.& Eichler) Engler | Sapotaceae | late successional | 410.0 |
Balfourodendron riedelianum (Engler) Engler | Rutaceae | late successional | 416.7 |
Plinia rivularis (Camb.) Rotman | Myrtaceae | late successional | 1250.0 |
Growth | Predominant occurrence | |
Pioneer | Fast, reaching height >1.0 m in the first year; high volumetric increments (>15m3 ha−1 year−1) in monocultures | Forest clearings, borders, spontaneous regeneration in open areas |
Secondary | Moderate, reaching height >0.7 m in the first year; medium volumetric increments (5-15 m3 ha−1 year−1). | Juveniles at early secondary forests and emergent or in intermediary strata within old-growth forests |
Late successional | Slow growing, volumetric increments lower than 5 m3 ha−1 year−1 | Intermediary strata or understory of advanced secondary forests or old-growth forests |
The study was performed in the Guarita Indigenous Area (230 km2), in Rio Grande do Sul state, Brazil (Figure 1). The outermost coordinates of the Guarita Indian Area are 27°20’ N, 27°35’ S, 53°44’ W and 53°32’E. Planting sites (n = 14; Table 3) present low-fertility soils [38] mainly of the Oxisols class, with some transition to Mollisols (Lithic Hapludoll). The climate presents yearly average temperatures between 18-19 °C and average yearly rainfall between 1700 and 1900 mm. The coldest month (July) has average temperatures close to 10 °C and the average temperatures of the warmest month (January) reaches 22 °C.
As a function of latitudinal and altitudinal amplitude, climatic conditions along the Atlantic Forest Biome is highly variable. Average yearly temperatures range between 12-25 °C and average yearly rainfall ranges between 1300 and 2800 mm [40]. Thus, the experimental sites correspond to a typical and median climate condition within the range of the Atlantic Forest Biome.
Seedlings were grown in a nursery using conical containers, being planted in the field with 3-4months of age. Planting was carried out between July and August 2004 with a density of 1475seedlings·ha−1. Three hectares were planted on each site. All species were planted on every site, and the composition included the same number of seedlings of each species on each site. The assemblage was composed by 67% of pioneer, 21% of secondary, and 12% of late successional species. The density of each species was considered according to nursery availability, ranging between 17 and 1477 ha−1 (Appendix 1). All measurements were obtained after seedling planting, therefore excluding the early stage of development in the nursery.
Planting time (August 2014) was considered as t = 0. Survival was calculated as the proportion of individuals remaining after 8 and 15 months since seedling planting, expressed as a mean percentage of sites (n = 14) for each species. Height was measured after 8 months for two individuals of each species on each site (n = 28). These individuals were evaluated after 15 months for height measurements and to calculate Relative Growth Rate between 8-15 months (RGR8-15). Relative Growth Rate between t = 0 and 8 months (RGR0-8) was calculated from height at t = 0 and 8 months after planting. RGR values were thus obtained with the equation RGR = (ht+1 − ht)/ ht。
Since mortality was high at 15 months, several plants measured at 8 months died. Therefore, the number of replications at 15 months was variable among species and local factors were not considered for the analysis of RGR8−15.
Prior to planting, the terrain subsoil was plowed and 5000 kg of dolomitic lime were added at 20cm depth using a grid of disk plows. A fertilizer (NPK-04-14-08) was applied at 100 g for each seedling and mixed to the soil in each planting furrow.
In order to allow for comparison among successional groups, survival percentage data was transformed according to the arcsin of the square root of x + 0.5. The Bonferroni test was applied for pairwise tests (P < 0.05). Statistics were carried out using the software Prism 3.0 (GraphPad Software Inc. 1999).
Site code | Area sector | Coordinates |
DS | Bananeira | 27°29’56” S, 53°38’59” W |
AM | Estiva | 27°33’39” S, 53°38’46” W |
JG | Estiva | 27°33’50” S, 53°38’33” W |
PA | Estiva | 27°33’57” S, 53°38’17” W |
AF | Irapuá | 27°31’22” S, 53°38’31” W |
LM | Irapuá | 27°32’04” S, 53°39’16” W |
PKE | Irapuá | 27°32’01” S, 53°39’26” W |
DC | Km 10 | 27°25’57” S, 53°42’06” W |
Os | Missão | 27°28’42” S, 53°38’45” W |
PAm | Missão | 27°28’50” S, 53°37’12” W |
RC | Missão | 27°29’46” S, 53°37’37” W |
VR | Pedra Lisa | 27°23’04” S, 53°43’44” W |
FFF | Três Soitas | 27°24’12” S, 53°42’07” W |
JR | Três Soitas | 27°24’50” S, 53°42’17” W |
Average survival for all species after 15 months was 32.5%. However, the number of individuals was 40.9% as a function of disparity in the initial number of seedlings among the species, with a predominance of pioneers. The late successional species had a mean survival rate of 12.0% after 15 months. Survival was lower for the late successional species in the first period (8 months) than in the second period (8-15 months) (Figure 2A, B). Three late successional species showed 100% of mortality after 15 months: Pliniaperuviana (Poir.) Govaert, P. rivularis (Camb.) Rotman and Balfourodendron riedelianum (Engler) Engler.
The seed mass of late successional species was higher than the seed mass of pioneers and secondary species (Figure 2C). For all species, survival at 8 months was inversely correlated to the log of seed mass (Figure 3). The general average seed mass was 153.9 mg. Every species with seeds weighing more than 200 mg each presented a mean survival rate ≤30%. Among these, 8 out of 11 were late successional species (Figure 3A). On the other hand, among the 12 species with survival rates higher than 50% at 8 months, 9 of them are secondary and 3 are pioneer (Figure 3A). Among them, only 2 presented seed masses higher than 50 mg. Height at 8 months and RGR0-8 were also inversely correlated with the log of seed mass (Table 3).
The successional guilds were significantly different in respect to the height at 8 months and RGR0-8: pioneers presented the highest values and the late successional species presented the lowest (Figure 2D, E). Notwithstanding, the successional groups did not differ as to RGR8-15 (Figure 2F). In addition, RGR 8-15 did not correlate with any of the other variables (Table 3).
height 8 months | RGR (0-8) | RGR (8-15) | Survival after 8 months | Survival between 8-15 months | |
log seed mass | −0.430* | −0.536** | −0.044 | −0.595** | −0.601** |
height 8 months | 0.798** | −0.185 | 0.529** | 0.335** | |
RGR (0-8) | −0.037 | 0.580** | 0.362** | ||
RGR (8-15) | −0.080 | 0.215 | |||
Survival 8 months | 0.545** | ||||
* P< 0.01; ** P< 0.001 |
The contribution of Myrtaceae, which comprises 50% of the late successional species, could have been determining the difference between the seed mass of this group in relation to the others; however, the average seed mass of late successional Myrtaceae (364 ± 409 mg, n= 7) did not differ from the value of other late successional species (222 ± 171 mg, n= 6; P = 0.46, t-test).
As expected, the successional guilds differed with regard to growth. Pioneers achieved greater height and growth rate in the initial period. In turn, late successional species exhibited the lowest height and RGR0-8. The guilds did not differ in respect to the RGR8-15, possibly because that period corresponds to the colder season, during which growth tends to be reduced. Meanwhile, the survival in the first period was correlated with survival in the later period, indicating that survival continued to be affected independently of growth rate.
Survival in the first period was positively correlated to RGR0-8. However, the secondary species exhibited an equivalent survival rate in spite of having lower growth than the pioneers. Nevertheless, survival of the late successional species was 5 times lower than for the other two guilds. Similar results were achieved by Ramírez-Marcial et al. [41] who observed equivalent survival for pioneers and secondary species, and lower survival rates for the late successional species in a restoration experiment.
Growth rates correlate positively with survival in secondary succession [42]. For restoration efforts, higher growth and survival rates promote more effective colonization as competition with exotic grasses remains even after several years [12,17]. On the other hand, greater growth tends to correspond to higher litter production [38], which contributes effectively to the recovery of the nutrient cycle, highlighting contributions from the Fabaceae with biological fixation of nitrogen [43]. In the face of these aspects, planting late successional species is more reasonable after pioneer and secondary species are established, in later stages of succession [37]. Planting of late successional species is fundamental in hard landscape conditions in which the sources of propagules are insufficient for spontaneous regeneration [5,17].
Survival was negatively correlated with seed mass both in the initial period (0-8 months) and in the later period (8-15 months). Our results corroborate findings of Martínez-Garza et al. [44], who observed that growth and survival rates were negatively correlated with seed mass after 30 months of tree seedling planting.
Other studies [36,46] that included early seedling stages tended to indicate a positive correlation between seed mass and survival. In contrast, the influence of early stages is removed when the seedlings were first in nurseries [44]. Higher seed mass is an advantage in light-restricted environments for seedlings [34,35] and for juveniles in a forest environment [45]. Additionally, Tunjai & Elliot [46] reported higher survival of larger-seeded species after 12 months in a direct seed experiment. However, these authors measured survival as the ratio between surviving plants and the number of planted seeds. Therefore, small-seed species which usually present high mortality in the transition between seed germination and seedling [44] tend to exhibit lower values of survival. In nature, low probability of survival for individual seeds tends to be compensated by higher seed production [44]. In the present study, the positive effect of larger seed mass in the survival of the seedlings and in the growth of early phases of the seedling stage was minimized by the use of seedlings grown in a nursery. Theoretically, the main effects of seed mass took place during the nursery period. After that, the effect of seed reserves no longer interferes directly.
Our findings indicate that survival in the juvenile phase is negatively correlated with seed mass, at least in a highly degraded environment context. Similarly, a negative correlation between recruitment of tree species and seed mass was observed in forest areas after severe perturbation caused by logging operations [47]. In forest borders of the Atlantic Forest remnants, recruitment of large-seeded species was at least one degree of magnitude lower than in the forest interior [48]. However, it could be emphasized that the influence of seed sizes in the juvenile and adult phases is more probably indirect. Small seeds are associated with a suite of ecophysiological traits, such as high specific leaf area and high nutrient content [49], which can favor the juvenile recruitment in early secondary phases [47]. Beyond the classification of species in successional categories, which has been a key concept for the planning of forest restoration in the Atlantic Forest and other tropical biomes, seed mass could be complementary information for guide restorationists and researchers.
Successional classification could be a controversial matter [19,23]. Other objective parameters could be useful to guide the selection of species in megadiverse biomes. The Atlantic Forest has more than 13,700 angiosperm species [50]. The southern sector of the Atlantic Forest has more than 1500 tree species [51], and higher tree diversity could be expected for the southeast and northeast sectors. Ecophysiological and silvicultural information are lacking for a majority of these species. Seed mass is information that can be easily obtained by restorationists and nursery managers. Moreover, the data presented here serves as a warning for the technical staff of tree nurseries, who may be tempted to prioritize large-seeded species due to their easy handling.
The growth and survival rates of pioneer and secondary species were higher than for late successional species. The survival of late successional species was so low that their inclusion in early phases of forest restoration is considered questionable.
In addition to guild classification, seed mass proved to be a strong indicator of long-term survival in the context of restoration sites with a history of intense degradation. Although large seed mass is an advantage for early seedling phases, such functional trait is related to lower survival and growth rates in the later stages, at least in the conditions evaluated in this study. The use of seedlings grown in nurseries cancels the positive influence of seed mass on survival and growth of trees in the field.
To FAPERGS (ProCoredes 04/0556.3) and CNPq (477.973 2012-4) for research grants; To the Guarita Indigenous Community for the permission to perform the study; To UNIJU—Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul for research support; To Jorge Thiesen and Rosângela Pöersh for logistical support and assistance in the field work; To Meggie Fornazari for the English review.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
Carr C, de Oliveira B, Jackson S, et al. (2022) Identification of BgP, a cutinase-like polyesterase from a deep-sea sponge-derived Actinobacterium. Front Microbiol 13: 888343. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.888343 ![]() |
[2] |
Dalmaso G, Ferreira D, Vermelho A (2015) Marine extremophiles: a source of hydrolases for biotechnological applications. Mar Drugs 13: 1925-1965. https://doi.org/10.3390/md13041925 ![]() |
[3] |
Rosenberg E, Zilber-Rosenberg I (2018) The hologenome concept of evolution after 10 years. Microbiome 6: 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-018-0457-9 ![]() |
[4] |
de Oliveira B, Carr C, Dobson A, et al. (2020) Harnessing the sponge microbiome for industrial biocatalysts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 10: 8131-8154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10817-3 ![]() |
[5] |
Arnosti C, Bell C, Moorhead D, et al. (2014) Extracellular enzymes in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine environments: perspectives on system variability and common research needs. Biogeochemistry 117: 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-013-9906-5 ![]() |
[6] | PlasticsEuropePlastics–The Facts 2022: An Analysis of European plastics production, demand, and waste (2023). Available from: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/. |
[7] |
Jambeck J, Geyer R, Wilcox C, et al. (2015) Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science 347: 768-771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352 ![]() |
[8] |
Oberbeckmann S, Osborn A, Duhaime M (2016) Microbes on a bottle: substrate, season and geography influence community composition of microbes colonizing marine plastic debris. PLoS One 11: e0159289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159289 ![]() |
[9] |
Cox K, Covernton G, Davies H, et al. (2019) Human consumption of microplastics. Environ Sci Technol 53: 7068-7074. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01517 ![]() |
[10] |
Gregory M (2009) Environmental implications of plastic debris in marine settings entanglement, ingestion, smothering, hangers-on, hitch-hiking and alien invasions. Phil Trans R Soc B 364: 2013-2025. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0265 ![]() |
[11] |
Worm B, Lotze H, Jubinville I, et al. (2017) Plastic as a persistent marine pollutant. Annu Rev Environ Resour 42: 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060700 ![]() |
[12] |
Carlton J, Fowler A (2018) Ocean rafting and marine debris: A broader vector menu requires a greater appetite for invasion biology research support. Aquat Invasions 13: 11-15. https://doi.org/10.3391/ai.2018.13.1.02 ![]() |
[13] |
Tetu S, Sarker I, Moore L (2020) How will marine plastic pollution affect bacterial primary producers?. Commun Biol 3: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0789-4 ![]() |
[14] |
Bowley J, Baker–Austin C, Porter A, et al. (2021) Oceanic hitchhikers–assessing pathogen risks from marine microplastic. Trends Microbiol 29: 107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2020.06.011 ![]() |
[15] |
Pirillo V, Pollegioni L, Molla G (2021) Analytical methods for the investigation of enzyme–catalyzed degradation of polyethylene terephthalate. FEBS J 288: 4730-4745. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15850 ![]() |
[16] |
Koshti R, Mehta L, Samarth N (2018) Biological recycling of polyethylene terephthalate: A mini–review. J Polym Environ 26: 3520-3529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-018-1214-7 ![]() |
[17] | Zimmermann W (2019) Biocatalytic recycling of polyethylene terephthalate plastic. Philos Trans R Soc A: 378. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0273 |
[18] |
Dissanayake L, Jayakody L (2021) Engineering microbes to bio-upcycle Polyethylene Terephthalate. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 9: 656465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.656465 ![]() |
[19] |
Tiso T, Narancic T, Wei R, et al. (2021) Towards bio-upcycling of polyethylene terephthalate. Metab Eng 66: 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymben.2021.03.011 ![]() |
[20] |
Danso D, Chow J, Streit W (2019) Plastics: Environmental and biotechnological perspectives on microbial degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol 85: 01019-010195. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01095-19 ![]() |
[21] |
Schmidt J, Wei R, Oeser T (2017) Degradation of polyester polyurethane by bacterial polyester hydrolases. Polymers 9: 65. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9020065 ![]() |
[22] |
Carr C, Clarke D, Dobson A (2020) Microbial polyethylene terephthalate hydrolases: current and future perspectives. Front Microbiol 11: 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.571265 ![]() |
[23] |
Mohanan N, Montazer Z, Sharma P, et al. (2020) Microbial and enzymatic degradation of synthetic plastics. Front Microbiol 11: 580709. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.580709 ![]() |
[24] |
Ru J, Huo Y, Yang Y (2020) Microbial degradation and valorization of plastic wastes. Front Microbiol 11: 442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00442 ![]() |
[25] |
Kawai F, Kawabata T, Oda M (2019) Current knowledge on enzymatic PET degradation and its possible application to waste stream management and other fields. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103: 4253-4268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09717-y ![]() |
[26] |
Danso D, Schmeisser C, Chow J, et al. (2018) New insights into the function and global distribution of polyethylene terephthalate (PET)-degrading bacteria and enzymes in marine and terrestrial metagenomes. Appl Environ Microbiol 84: e02773-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02773-17 ![]() |
[27] |
Müller R, Schrader H, Profe J, et al. (2005) Enzymatic degradation of poly (ethylene terephthalate): Rapid Hydrolysis using a hydrolase from T. fusca. Macromol Rapid Commun 26: 1400-1405. https://doi.org/10.1002/marc.200500410 ![]() |
[28] |
Yoshida S, Hiraga K, Takehana T, et al. (2016) A bacterium that degrades and assimilates poly (ethylene terephthalate). Science 351: 1196-1199. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad6359 ![]() |
[29] |
Ekanayaka A, Tibpromma S, Dai D, et al. (2022) A review of the fungi that degrade plastic. J Fungi 8: 772. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof8080772 ![]() |
[30] |
Roth C, Wei R, Oeser T, et al. (2014) Structural and functional studies on a thermostable polyethylene terephthalate degrading hydrolase from Thermobifida fusca. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98: 7815-7823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-014-5672-0 ![]() |
[31] |
Sulaiman S, Yamato S, Kanaya E, et al. (2012) Isolation of a novel cutinase homolog with polyethylene terephthalate–degrading activity from leaf–branch compost by using a metagenomic approach. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 1556-1562. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06725-11 ![]() |
[32] |
Then J, Wei R, Oeser T, et al. (2016) A disulfide bridge in the calcium binding site of a polyester hydrolase increases its thermal stability and activity against polyethylene terephthalate. FEBS Open Bio 6: 425-432. https://doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12053 ![]() |
[33] |
Gambarini V, Pantos O, Kingsbury J, et al. (2021) Phylogenetic distribution of plastic-degrading microorganisms. mSystems 6: e01112-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01112-20 ![]() |
[34] |
Imhoff J (2005) Enterobacteriales. Bergey's manual® of systematic bacteriology . Springer 587-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28022-7_13 ![]() |
[35] | Brenner D, Farmer J (2005) III. Family Enterobacteriaceae. Bergey's manual® of systematic bacteriology . Springer 587-606. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118960608.fbm00222 |
[36] |
Janda J, Abbott S (2021) The changing face of the family Enterobacteriaceae (Order: “Enterobacterales”): New members, taxonomic issues, geographic expansion, and new diseases and disease syndromes. Clin Microbiol Rev 34: 1-45. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00174-20 ![]() |
[37] |
Kato C, Honma A, Sato S, et al. (2019) Poly 3-hydroxybutyrate-co- 3-hydroxyhexanoate films can be degraded by the deep-sea microbes at high pressure and low temperature conditions. High Press Res 39: 248-257. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2019.1584196 ![]() |
[38] |
Borchert E, García-Moyano A, Sanchez-Carrillo S, et al. (2021) Deciphering a marine bone-degrading microbiome reveals a complex community effort. mSystems 6: 1218-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.01218-20 ![]() |
[39] |
Yang J, Yang Y, Wu W, et al. (2014) Evidence of polyethylene biodegradation by bacterial strains from the guts of plastic-eating waxworms. Environ Sci Technol 48: 13776-13784. https://doi.org/10.1021/es504038a ![]() |
[40] |
Mallakuntla M, Vaikuntapu P, Bhuvanachandra B, et al. (2017) Transglycosylation by a chitinase from Enterobacter cloacae subsp. cloacae generates longer chitin oligosaccharides. Sci Rep 7: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05140-3 ![]() |
[41] |
Volova T, Boyandin A, Vasil'ev A, et al. (2011) Biodegradation of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) in the South China Sea and identification of PHA-degrading bacteria. Microbiology 80: 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026261711020184 ![]() |
[42] |
Dashti N, Ali N, Eliyas M, et al. (2015) Most hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria in the total environment are diazotrophic, which highlights their value in the bioremediation of hydrocarbon contaminants. Microbes Environ 30: 70-75. https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME14090 ![]() |
[43] |
Wang X, Isbrandt T, Strube M, et al. (2021) Chitin degradation machinery and secondary metabolite profiles in the marine bacterium Pseudoalteromonas rubra S4059. Mar Drugs 19: 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020108 ![]() |
[44] |
Caruso G (2020) Microbial colonization in marine environments: overview of current knowledge and emerging research topics. J Mar Sci Eng 8: 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8020078 ![]() |
[45] |
Sekiguchi T, Saika A, Nomura K, et al. (2011) Biodegradation of aliphatic polyesters soaked in deep seawaters and isolation of poly(ϵ-caprolactone)-degrading bacteria. Poly. Degrad Stabil 96: 1397-1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2011.03.004 ![]() |
[46] |
Ohta Y, Hatada Y, Miyazaki M, et al. (2005) Purification and characterization of a novel α-agarase from a Thalassomonas sp. Curr Microbiol 50: 212-216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-004-4435-z ![]() |
[47] |
Yakimov M, Bargiela R, Golyshin P (2022) Calm and Frenzy: marine obligate hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria sustain ocean wellness. Curr Opin Biotechnol 73: 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.09.015 ![]() |
[48] |
Molitor R, Bollinger A, Kubicki S, et al. (2020) Agar platebased screening methods for the identification of polyester hydrolysis by Pseudomonas species. Microb Biotechnol 13: 274-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13418 ![]() |
[49] |
Pérez-García P, Danso D, Zhang H, et al. (2021) Exploring the global metagenome for plastic-degrading enzymes. Methods Enzymol 648: 137-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.mie.2020.12.022 ![]() |
[50] | Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB)University of Queensland (2023). Available from: https://gtdb.ecogenomic.org/. |
[51] | R Studio Team (2020). Available from: https://support--rstudio-com.netlify.app/. |
[52] |
Noda T, Sagara H, Yen A, et al. (2006) Architecture of ribonucleoprotein complexes in influenza A virus particles. Nature 439: 490-492. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04378 ![]() |
[53] |
Reysenbach A, Longnecker K, Kirshtein J (2000) Novel bacterial and archaeal lineages from an in situ growth chamber deployed at a mid-atlantic ridge hydrothermal vent. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 3798-3806. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.9.3798-3806.2000 ![]() |
[54] |
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, et al. (2018) MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35: 1547-1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096 ![]() |
[55] |
Larkin M, Blackshields G, Brown N, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947-2948. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 ![]() |
[56] |
Price M, Dehal P, Arkin A (2009) Fasttree: Computing large minimum evolution trees with profiles instead of a distance matrix. Mol Biol Evol 26: 1641-1650. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp077 ![]() |
[57] |
Price M, Dehal P, Arkin A (2010) FastTree 2-Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5: e9490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009490 ![]() |
[58] | ITOL, Interactive Tree Of Life. Available from: https://itol.embl.de. |
[59] |
Letunic I, Bork P (2021) Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 49: 293-296. https://doi.org/1093/nar/gkab301 ![]() |
[60] | Desjardins P, Conklin D (2010) NanoDrop microvolume quantitation of nucleic acids. J Vis Exp 45: e2565. https://doi.org/10.3791/2565 |
[61] |
Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, et al. (2019) Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37: 540-546. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8 ![]() |
[62] |
Parks D, Chuvochina M, Waite D, et al. (2018) A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life. Nat Biotechnol 36: 996-1004. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4229 ![]() |
[63] |
Chaumeil P, Mussig A, Hugenholtz P, et al. (2019) GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36: 1925-1927. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 ![]() |
[64] |
Hyatt D (2010) Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 119-119. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-119 ![]() |
[65] |
Eddy S (2011) Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1002195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002195 ![]() |
[66] |
Matsen F, Kodner R, Armbrust E (2010) pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree. BMC Bioinformatics 11: 538. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-11-538 ![]() |
[67] |
Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Heller D, et al. (2019) Eggnog 5.0: a hierarchical, functionally and phylogenetically annotated orthology resource based on 5090 organisms and 2502 viruses. Nucleic Acids Res 47: 309-314. https://doi.org/nar/gky1085 ![]() |
[68] |
Almeida E, Carrillo Rincón A, Jackson S, et al. (2019) In silico screening and heterologous expression of a polyethylene terephthalate hydrolase (PETase)-like enzyme (SM14est) with polycaprolactone (PCL)-degrading activity, from the marine sponge-derived strain Streptomyces sp. SM14. Front Microbiol 10: 2187. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02187 ![]() |
[69] |
Buchholz P, Feuerriegel G, Zhang H, et al. (2022) Plastics degradation by hydrolytic enzymes: The plastics-active enzymes database—PAZy. Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics. Proteins 90: 1443-1456. https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.26325 ![]() |
[70] |
Di Tommaso P, Moretti S, Xenarios I, et al. (2011) T-Coffee: a web server for the multiple sequence alignment of protein and RNA sequences using structural information and homology extension. Nucleic Acids Res 39: 13-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr245 ![]() |
[71] |
Gouet P, Courcelle E, Stuart D, et al. (1999) Espript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in Postscript. Bioinformatics 15: 305-308. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/15.4.305 ![]() |
[72] | The Lipase Engineering Database (LED) version4.1.0. Germany: University of Stuttgart. Available from: https://led.biocatnet.de/. |
[73] |
Armenteros J, Tsirigos K, Sønderby C, et al. (2019) SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat Biotechnol 37: 420-423. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0036-z ![]() |
[74] |
Baek M, DiMaio F, Anishchenko I, et al. (2021) Accurate prediction of protein structures and interactions using a three-track neural network. Science 373: 871-876. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj8754 ![]() |
[75] |
Blázquez-Sánchez P, Engelberger F, Cifuentes-Anticevic J, et al. (2022) Antarctic polyester hydrolases degrade aliphatic and aromatic polyesters at moderate temperatures. Appl Environ Microbiol 88: e0184221. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01842-21 ![]() |
[76] |
Bollinger A, Thies S, Knieps-Grünhagen E, et al. (2020) A novel polyester hydrolase from the marine bacterium Pseudomonas aestusnigri–structural and functional insights. Front Microbiol 11: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00114 ![]() |
[77] |
Ronkvist Å, Xie W, Lu W, et al. (2009) Cutinase-catalyzed hydrolysis of poly (ethylene terephthalate). Macromolecules 42: 5128-5138. https://doi.org/10.1021/ma9005318 ![]() |
[78] | Eiamthong B, Meesawat P, Wongsatit T, et al. (2022) Discovery and genetic code expansion of a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) hydrolase from the human saliva metagenome for the degradation and bio-functionalization of PET. Angew Chem 61: e202203061. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202203061 |
[79] |
Wallace P, Haernvall K, Ribitsch D, et al. (2017) PpEst is a novel PBAT degrading polyesterase identified by proteomic screening of Pseudomonas pseudoalcaligenes. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101: 2291-2303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-016-7992-8 ![]() |
[80] |
Martínez-Tobón D, Gul M, Elias A, et al. (2018) Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) biodegradation using bacterial strains with demonstrated and predicted PHB depolymerase activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102: 8049-8067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9153-8 ![]() |
[81] |
Liu X, Hille P, Zheng M, et al. (2019) Diversity of polyester degrading bacteria in surface sediments from Yangtze River Estuary. AIP Conf Proc 2122: 020063. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5116502 ![]() |
[82] |
Qiu L, Yin X, Liu T, et al. (2020) Biodegradation of bis (2-hydroxyethyl) terephthalate by a newly isolated Enterobacter sp. HY1 and characterization of its esterase properties. J Basic Microbiol 60: 699-711. https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.202000053 ![]() |
[83] |
Gaino E, Pronzato R (1989) Ultrastructural evidence of bacterial damage to Spongia officinalis fibres (Porifera, Demospongiae). Dis Aquat Organ 6: 67-74. https://www.int-res.com/articles/dao/6/d006p067.pdf ![]() |
[84] |
Reisser J, Shaw J, Hallegraeff G, et al. (2014) Millimeter-sized marine plastics: a new pelagic habitat for microorganisms and invertebrates. PloS One 9: e100289. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100289 ![]() |
[85] |
Bryant J, Clemente T, Viviani D, et al. (2016) Diversity and activity of communities inhabiting plastic debris in the North Pacific Gyre. mSystems 1: 024-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00024-16 ![]() |
[86] |
Kiessling T, Gutow L, Thiel M (2015) Marine litter as habitat and dispersal vector. Marine anthropogenic litter . Cham: Springer Open Elsevier 141-181. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16510-3_6 ![]() |
[87] |
Zelezniak A, Andrejev S, Ponomarova O, et al. (2015) Metabolic dependencies drive species co-occurrence in diverse microbial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112: 6449-6454. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1421834112 ![]() |
[88] |
Borchert E, Hammerschmidt K, Hentschel U, et al. (2021) Enhancing microbial pollutant degradation by integrating eco-evolutionary principles with environmental biotechnology. Trends Microbiol 29: 908-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2021.03.002 ![]() |
[89] |
Tournier V, Topham C, Gilles A, et al. (2020) An engineered PET depolymerase to break down and recycle plastic bottles. Nature 580: 216-219. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2149-4 ![]() |
[90] |
Lenfant N, Hotelier T, Bourne Y, et al. (2013) Proteins with an alpha/beta hydrolase fold: relationships between subfamilies in an ever-growing superfamily. Chem Biol Interact 203: 266-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbi.2012.09.003 ![]() |
[91] |
Gricajeva A, Nadda A, Gudiukaite R (2021) Insights into polyester plastic biodegradation by carboxyl ester hydrolases. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 97: 359-380. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.6745 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1. | Q. Xu, T.S. Zhao, Fundamental models for flow batteries, 2015, 49, 03601285, 40, 10.1016/j.pecs.2015.02.001 |
Species | Family | Successional group | Seed mass (mg) |
Trema micrantha (L.) Blüme | Cannabaceae | Pioneer | 4.6 |
Heliocarpus americanus L. | Malvaceae | Pioneer | 7.0 |
Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi | Anacardiaceae | Pioneer | 10.5 |
Mimosa scabrella Bentham | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 14.7 |
Schinus molle L. | Anacardiaceae | Pioneer | 30.4 |
Vasconcellea quercifolia A. St.-Hilaire | Caricaceae | Pioneer | 43.4 |
Ateleia glazioveana Baill. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 44.5 |
Sesbania virgata (Cav.) Pers. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 72.3 |
Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Vell.) Mor. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 180.2 |
Luehea divaricata Mart. | Malvaceae | Secondary | 4.0 |
Jacaranda micrantha Cham. | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 8.0 |
Tabebuia alba (Cham.) Sandwith | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 10.8 |
Patagonula americana L. | Boraginaceae | Secondary | 27.2 |
Cedrela fissilis Vellozo | Meliaceae | Secondary | 27.5 |
Cordia trichotoma (Vell.) Arrab. & Steud. | Boraginaceae | Secondary | 30.8 |
Parapiptadenia rigida (Benth.) Brenan | Fabaceae | Secondary | 33.4 |
Tabebuia heptaphylla (Vell.) Toledo | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 41.2 |
Erythroxylum deciduum A.St.-Hilaire | Erythroxylaceae | Secondary | 51.4 |
Rupretchia laxiflora Meissner | Polygonaceae | Secondary | 66.7 |
Machaerium stipitatum Vogel | Fabaceae | Secondary | 158.7 |
Pelthophorum dubium (Spreng.) Taubert | Fabaceae | Secondary | 189.4 |
Inga sessilis (Vellozo) Martius | Fabaceae | Secondary | 250.0 |
Eugenia uniflora L. | Myrtaceae | Secondary | 353.3 |
Ilex paraguariensis A.St.-Hilaire | Aquifoliaceae | late successional | 6.7 |
Campomanesia xanthocarpa Berg | Myrtaceae | late successional | 33.0 |
Myrocarpus frondosus Freire Allemão | Fabaceae | late successional | 101.0 |
Myrcianthes gigantea (Legr.) Legr. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 114.0 |
Allophylus edulis (A.St.-Hilaire) Radlk. | Sapindaceae | late successional | 125.0 |
Pliniaperuviana (Poir.) Govaert | Myrtaceae | late successional | 215.0 |
Myrcianthes pungens (Berg.) Legr. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 230.0 |
Cabralea canjerana (Vellozo) Mart. | Meliaceae | late successional | 271.8 |
Eugenia pyriformis Camb. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 305.0 |
Eugenia involucrata DC. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 403.0 |
Chrysophyllum gonocarpum (Mart.& Eichler) Engler | Sapotaceae | late successional | 410.0 |
Balfourodendron riedelianum (Engler) Engler | Rutaceae | late successional | 416.7 |
Plinia rivularis (Camb.) Rotman | Myrtaceae | late successional | 1250.0 |
Growth | Predominant occurrence | |
Pioneer | Fast, reaching height >1.0 m in the first year; high volumetric increments (>15m3 ha−1 year−1) in monocultures | Forest clearings, borders, spontaneous regeneration in open areas |
Secondary | Moderate, reaching height >0.7 m in the first year; medium volumetric increments (5-15 m3 ha−1 year−1). | Juveniles at early secondary forests and emergent or in intermediary strata within old-growth forests |
Late successional | Slow growing, volumetric increments lower than 5 m3 ha−1 year−1 | Intermediary strata or understory of advanced secondary forests or old-growth forests |
Site code | Area sector | Coordinates |
DS | Bananeira | 27°29’56” S, 53°38’59” W |
AM | Estiva | 27°33’39” S, 53°38’46” W |
JG | Estiva | 27°33’50” S, 53°38’33” W |
PA | Estiva | 27°33’57” S, 53°38’17” W |
AF | Irapuá | 27°31’22” S, 53°38’31” W |
LM | Irapuá | 27°32’04” S, 53°39’16” W |
PKE | Irapuá | 27°32’01” S, 53°39’26” W |
DC | Km 10 | 27°25’57” S, 53°42’06” W |
Os | Missão | 27°28’42” S, 53°38’45” W |
PAm | Missão | 27°28’50” S, 53°37’12” W |
RC | Missão | 27°29’46” S, 53°37’37” W |
VR | Pedra Lisa | 27°23’04” S, 53°43’44” W |
FFF | Três Soitas | 27°24’12” S, 53°42’07” W |
JR | Três Soitas | 27°24’50” S, 53°42’17” W |
height 8 months | RGR (0-8) | RGR (8-15) | Survival after 8 months | Survival between 8-15 months | |
log seed mass | −0.430* | −0.536** | −0.044 | −0.595** | −0.601** |
height 8 months | 0.798** | −0.185 | 0.529** | 0.335** | |
RGR (0-8) | −0.037 | 0.580** | 0.362** | ||
RGR (8-15) | −0.080 | 0.215 | |||
Survival 8 months | 0.545** | ||||
* P< 0.01; ** P< 0.001 |
Species | Family | Successional group | Seed mass (mg) |
Trema micrantha (L.) Blüme | Cannabaceae | Pioneer | 4.6 |
Heliocarpus americanus L. | Malvaceae | Pioneer | 7.0 |
Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi | Anacardiaceae | Pioneer | 10.5 |
Mimosa scabrella Bentham | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 14.7 |
Schinus molle L. | Anacardiaceae | Pioneer | 30.4 |
Vasconcellea quercifolia A. St.-Hilaire | Caricaceae | Pioneer | 43.4 |
Ateleia glazioveana Baill. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 44.5 |
Sesbania virgata (Cav.) Pers. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 72.3 |
Enterolobium contortisiliquum (Vell.) Mor. | Fabaceae | Pioneer | 180.2 |
Luehea divaricata Mart. | Malvaceae | Secondary | 4.0 |
Jacaranda micrantha Cham. | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 8.0 |
Tabebuia alba (Cham.) Sandwith | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 10.8 |
Patagonula americana L. | Boraginaceae | Secondary | 27.2 |
Cedrela fissilis Vellozo | Meliaceae | Secondary | 27.5 |
Cordia trichotoma (Vell.) Arrab. & Steud. | Boraginaceae | Secondary | 30.8 |
Parapiptadenia rigida (Benth.) Brenan | Fabaceae | Secondary | 33.4 |
Tabebuia heptaphylla (Vell.) Toledo | Bignoniaceae | Secondary | 41.2 |
Erythroxylum deciduum A.St.-Hilaire | Erythroxylaceae | Secondary | 51.4 |
Rupretchia laxiflora Meissner | Polygonaceae | Secondary | 66.7 |
Machaerium stipitatum Vogel | Fabaceae | Secondary | 158.7 |
Pelthophorum dubium (Spreng.) Taubert | Fabaceae | Secondary | 189.4 |
Inga sessilis (Vellozo) Martius | Fabaceae | Secondary | 250.0 |
Eugenia uniflora L. | Myrtaceae | Secondary | 353.3 |
Ilex paraguariensis A.St.-Hilaire | Aquifoliaceae | late successional | 6.7 |
Campomanesia xanthocarpa Berg | Myrtaceae | late successional | 33.0 |
Myrocarpus frondosus Freire Allemão | Fabaceae | late successional | 101.0 |
Myrcianthes gigantea (Legr.) Legr. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 114.0 |
Allophylus edulis (A.St.-Hilaire) Radlk. | Sapindaceae | late successional | 125.0 |
Pliniaperuviana (Poir.) Govaert | Myrtaceae | late successional | 215.0 |
Myrcianthes pungens (Berg.) Legr. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 230.0 |
Cabralea canjerana (Vellozo) Mart. | Meliaceae | late successional | 271.8 |
Eugenia pyriformis Camb. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 305.0 |
Eugenia involucrata DC. | Myrtaceae | late successional | 403.0 |
Chrysophyllum gonocarpum (Mart.& Eichler) Engler | Sapotaceae | late successional | 410.0 |
Balfourodendron riedelianum (Engler) Engler | Rutaceae | late successional | 416.7 |
Plinia rivularis (Camb.) Rotman | Myrtaceae | late successional | 1250.0 |
Growth | Predominant occurrence | |
Pioneer | Fast, reaching height >1.0 m in the first year; high volumetric increments (>15m3 ha−1 year−1) in monocultures | Forest clearings, borders, spontaneous regeneration in open areas |
Secondary | Moderate, reaching height >0.7 m in the first year; medium volumetric increments (5-15 m3 ha−1 year−1). | Juveniles at early secondary forests and emergent or in intermediary strata within old-growth forests |
Late successional | Slow growing, volumetric increments lower than 5 m3 ha−1 year−1 | Intermediary strata or understory of advanced secondary forests or old-growth forests |
Site code | Area sector | Coordinates |
DS | Bananeira | 27°29’56” S, 53°38’59” W |
AM | Estiva | 27°33’39” S, 53°38’46” W |
JG | Estiva | 27°33’50” S, 53°38’33” W |
PA | Estiva | 27°33’57” S, 53°38’17” W |
AF | Irapuá | 27°31’22” S, 53°38’31” W |
LM | Irapuá | 27°32’04” S, 53°39’16” W |
PKE | Irapuá | 27°32’01” S, 53°39’26” W |
DC | Km 10 | 27°25’57” S, 53°42’06” W |
Os | Missão | 27°28’42” S, 53°38’45” W |
PAm | Missão | 27°28’50” S, 53°37’12” W |
RC | Missão | 27°29’46” S, 53°37’37” W |
VR | Pedra Lisa | 27°23’04” S, 53°43’44” W |
FFF | Três Soitas | 27°24’12” S, 53°42’07” W |
JR | Três Soitas | 27°24’50” S, 53°42’17” W |
height 8 months | RGR (0-8) | RGR (8-15) | Survival after 8 months | Survival between 8-15 months | |
log seed mass | −0.430* | −0.536** | −0.044 | −0.595** | −0.601** |
height 8 months | 0.798** | −0.185 | 0.529** | 0.335** | |
RGR (0-8) | −0.037 | 0.580** | 0.362** | ||
RGR (8-15) | −0.080 | 0.215 | |||
Survival 8 months | 0.545** | ||||
* P< 0.01; ** P< 0.001 |