Dynamics of a harvested cyanobacteria-fish model with modified Holling type Ⅳ functional response

Shengyu Huang; Hengguo Yu; Chuanjun Dai; Zengling Ma; Qi Wang; Min Zhao; Shengyu Huang; Hengguo Yu; Chuanjun Dai; Zengling Ma; Qi Wang; Min Zhao

doi:10.3934/mbe.2023561

Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering

2023, Volume 20, Issue 7: 12599-12624. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023561

Previous Article Next Article

Research article Special Issues

Dynamics of a harvested cyanobacteria-fish model with modified Holling type Ⅳ functional response

1.
Key Laboratory for Subtropical Oceans & Lakes Environment and Biological Resource Utilization Technology of Zhejiang, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
2.
School of Mathematics and Physics, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
3.
School of Life and Environmental Science, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China

Academic Editor: Sheldon Wang

Received: 17 February 2023 Revised: 12 April 2023 Accepted: 09 May 2023 Published: 26 May 2023

In this paper, considering the aggregation effect and Allee effect of cyanobacteria populations and the harvesting of both cyanobacteria and fish by human beings, a new cyanobacteria-fish model with two harvesting terms and a modified Holling type Ⅳ functional response function is proposed. The main purpose of this paper is to further elucidate the influence of harvesting terms on the dynamic behavior of a cyanobacteria-fish model. Critical conditions for the existence and stability of several interior equilibria are given. The economic equilibria and the maximum sustainable total yield problem are also studied. The model exhibits several bifurcations, such as transcritical bifurcation, saddle-node bifurcation, Hopf bifurcation and Bogdanov-Takens bifurcation. It is concluded from a biological perspective that the survival mode of cyanobacteria and fish can be determined by the harvesting terms. Finally, concrete examples of our model are given through numerical simulations to verify and enrich the theoretical results.

Keywords:

Citation: Shengyu Huang, Hengguo Yu, Chuanjun Dai, Zengling Ma, Qi Wang, Min Zhao. Dynamics of a harvested cyanobacteria-fish model with modified Holling type Ⅳ functional response[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 12599-12624. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023561

Related Papers:

[1]	Pasquale Marcello Falcone . Editorial to the 'Special Issue—Energy transition in a circular economy perspective' of AIMS Energy. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 582-584. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022029
[2]	Mamdouh El Haj Assad, Siamak Hoseinzadeh . Editorial to the 'Special Issue-Analyzing energy storage systems for the applications of renewable energy sources' of AIMS Energy. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(5): 1074-1076. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022050
[3]	Santi Agatino Rizzo . Editorial to the 'Special Issue—Distribution network reliability in Smart Grids and Microgrids' of AIMS Energy. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(3): 533-534. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022026
[4]	Abshir Ashour, Taib Iskandar Mohamad, Kamaruzzaman Sopian, Norasikin Ahmad Ludin, Khaled Alzahrani, Adnan Ibrahim . Performance optimization of a photovoltaic-diesel hybrid power system for Yanbu, Saudi Arabia. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(6): 1260-1273. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021058
[5]	Jin H. Jo, Kadi Ilves, Tyler Barth, Ellen Leszczynski . Correction: Implementation of a large-scale solar photovoltaic system at a higher education institution in Illinois, USA. AIMS Energy, 2017, 5(2): 313-315. doi: 10.3934/energy.2017.2.313
[6]	Jin H. Jo, Zachary Rose, Jamie Cross, Evan Daebel, Andrew Verderber, John C. Kostelnick . Application of Airborne LiDAR Data and Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to Develop a Distributed Generation System for the Town of Normal, IL. AIMS Energy, 2015, 3(2): 173-183. doi: 10.3934/energy.2015.2.173
[7]	Taihana Paula, Maria de Fatima Marques . Recent advances in polymer structures for organic solar cells: A review. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(1): 149-176. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022009
[8]	Peter Majewski, Rong Deng, Pablo R Dias, Megan Jones . Product stewardship considerations for solar photovoltaic panels. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(1): 140-155. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023008
[9]	Sabir Rustemli, Zeki İlcihan, Gökhan Sahin, Wilfried G. J. H. M. van Sark . A novel design and simulation of a mechanical coordinate based photovoltaic solar tracking system. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(5): 753-773. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023037
[10]	Md. Mehadi Hasan Shamim, Sidratul Montaha Silmee, Md. Mamun Sikder . Optimization and cost-benefit analysis of a grid-connected solar photovoltaic system. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(3): 434-457. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022022

Abstract

In most of the countries, the solar photovoltaic systems have reached to the grid parity. The higher capacity of solar photovoltaic power plants are connecting within the higher and medium voltage networks, and lower capacity photovoltaic units within the low voltage network (i.e., distributed network). There are many technical challenges for integrating the solar PV plants at higher voltage levels as well as lower voltage levels. The key challenging issues, for increasing further penetration of solar photovoltaic systems in the electrical power network, are technology developments for intelligent power conditioning devices, integration of hybrid energy storage for making solar photovoltaic system as dispatchable power source, mitigation of power quality issues, demand side management, technology development of solar photovoltaic based micro-grid, techno-economic operational strategies, etc.

The solar photovoltaic system engineering depends on many factors (e.g., techno-economic sizing, energy management, energy dispatch strategies, resources allocations etc.). Different geographical locations as well as climatic conditions also influence the operation and performance of the solar photovoltaic-based system. The incident solar radiation has significant impact on the solar photovoltaic system energy production. The solar photovoltaic system energy output is influenced by the geometrical configuration of photovoltaic array and the view factor to sky effect. In the recent years, there are many technical innovations, developments have happened for deployments of solar photovoltaic system grid integration with energy storage for participating either as an active generator or operating as a solar photovoltaic based micro-grid. Within the distributed energy network, solar photovoltaic systems can also be used as ‘building integrated photovoltaic systems (BIPV)’ to provide electrical energy locally and make the buildings as ‘zero energy buildings (ZEBs)’. In future, ZEBs are going to play a significant role in the upcoming smart distributed energy network development due to their contribution of on-site electrical generation through solar photovoltaic systems, energy storage, demand side management etc. In order to increase further PV penetration within the distribution network and develop innovative mitigation techniques, there is critical need of further field-oriented research in the above-mentioned topics.

This Special Issue of AIMS Energy Journal comprises peer-review articles on advancement of power dispatching techniques for solar photovoltaic system with energy storage, shading and diffused solar radiation effects on the performance of solar photovoltaic system, intelligent controllers for distributed energy resources allocations, material characterization for heterojunction solar cells. In addition, some articles cover the typical case studies of solar photovoltaic systems in the tropical region.

As the Guest Editor of this Special Issue ‘Solar Photovoltaic System Engineering’ of the AIMS Energy Journal, I express my sincere appreciation to the journal editorial team, authors and reviewers of the manuscripts, journal editorial supporting team, and all those who have contributed and supported in successful fruition and publication.

Professor Mohan Lal Kolhe

Professor in Smart Grid and Renewable Energy

Faculty of Engineering and Science,

University of Agder,

PO Box 422, NO 4604, Kristiansand, Norway

www.uia.no

E-mail: Mohan.L.Kolhe@uia.no

References

[1]	H. W. Paerl, T. G. Otten, Harmful cyanobacterial blooms: Causes, consequences, and controls, Microb. Ecol., 65 (2013), 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-012-0159-y doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0159-y
[2]	A. Serrà, L. Philippe, F. Perreault, S. Garcia-Segura, Photocatalytic treatment of natural waters. reality or hype? the case of cyanotoxins remediation, Water Res., 188 (2021), 116543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.116543 doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2020.116543
[3]	A. Włodarczyk, T. T. Selão, B. Norling, P. J. Nixon, Newly discovered Synechococcus sp. PCC 11901 is a robust cyanobacterial strain for high biomass production, Commun. Biol., 3 (2020), 215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0910-8 doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-0910-8
[4]	A. Shahid, M. Usman, Z. Atta, S. G. Musharraf, S. Malik, A. Elkamel, et al., Impact of wastewater cultivation on pollutant removal, biomass production, metabolite biosynthesis, and carbon dioxide fixation of newly isolated cyanobacteria in a multiproduct biorefinery paradigm, Bioresour. Technol., 333 (2021), 125194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125194 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125194
[5]	K. Chandrasekhar, T. Raj, S. V. Ramanaiah, G. Kumar, J. R. Banu, S. Varjani, et al., Algae biorefinery: A promising approach to promote microalgae industry and waste utilization, J. Biotechnol., 345 (2022), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.12.008 doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2021.12.008
[6]	B. Öğlü, U. Bhele, A. Järvalt, L. Tuvikene, H. Timm, S. Seller, et al., Is fish biomass controlled by abiotic or biotic factors? results of long-term monitoring in a large eutrophic lake, J. Great Lakes Res., 46 (2020), 881–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2019.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jglr.2019.08.004
[7]	R. J. Shen, X. H. Gu, H. H. Chen, Z. G. Mao, Q. F. Zeng, E. Jeppesen, Combining bivalve (Corbicula fluminea) and filter-feeding fish (Aristichthys nobilis) enhances the bioremediation effect of algae: An outdoor mesocosm study, Sci. Total Environ., 727 (2020), 138692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138692 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138692
[8]	C. Arancibia-Ibarra, P. Aguirre, J. Flores, P. V. Heijster, Bifurcation analysis of a predator-prey model with predator intraspecific interactions and ratio-dependent functional response, Appl. Math. Comput., 402 (2021), 126152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126152 doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2021.126152
[9]	X. L. Zou, Q. W. Li, J. L. Lv, Stochastic bifurcations, a necessary and sufficient condition for a stochastic Beddington-DeAngelis predator-prey model, Appl. Math. Lett., 117 (2021), 107069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107069 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107069
[10]	F. Souna, A. Lakmeche, S. Djilali, Spatiotemporal patterns in a diffusive predator-prey model with protection zone and predator harvesting, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 140 (2020), 110180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110180 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110180
[11]	T. T. Liu, L. J. Chen, F. D. Chen, Z. Li, Dynamics of a Leslie–Gower model with weak Allee effect on prey and fear effect on predator, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 33 (2023), 2350008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127423500086 doi: 10.1142/S0218127423500086
[12]	X. B. Zhang, H. Y. Zhao, Bifurcation and optimal harvesting of a diffusive predator-prey system with delays and interval biological parameters, J. Theor. Biol., 363 (2014), 390–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.08.031 doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.08.031
[13]	T. K. Ang, H. M. Safuan, Dynamical behaviors and optimal harvesting of an intraguild prey-predator fishery model with Michaelis-Menten type predator harvesting, Biosystems, 202 (2021), 104357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104357 doi: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2021.104357
[14]	M. El-Shahed, A. M. Al-Dububan, Deterministic and stochastic fractional-order Hastings-Powell food chain model, CMC, 70 (2022), 2277–2296. https://doi.org/10.32604/cmc.2022.019314 doi: 10.32604/cmc.2022.019314
[15]	M. G. Mortuja, M. K. Chaube, S. Kumar, Dynamic analysis of a predator-prey system with nonlinear prey harvesting and square root functional response, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 148 (2021), 111071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111071 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111071
[16]	E. Bellier, B. E. Sæther, S. Engen, Sustainable strategies for harvesting predators and prey in a fluctuating environment, Ecol. Model., 440 (2021), 109350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109350 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109350
[17]	A. Mezouaghi, S. Djilali, S. Bentout, K. Biroud, Bifurcation analysis of a diffusive predator-prey model with prey social behavior and predator harvesting, Math. Method Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 718–731. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7807 doi: 10.1002/mma.7807
[18]	J. Al-Omari, G. Gumah, S. Al-Omari, Dynamics of a harvested stage-structured predator-prey model with distributed maturation delay, Math. Method Appl. Sci., 45 (2022), 761–769. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7810 doi: 10.1002/mma.7810
[19]	B. F. Xie, Z. C. Zhang, N. Zhang, Influence of the fear effect on a Holling type Ⅱ prey-predator system with a Michaelis-Menten type harvesting, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 31 (2021), 2150216. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127421502163 doi: 10.1142/S0218127421502163
[20]	D. Y. Wu, H. Y. Zhao, Y. Yuan, Complex dynamics of a diffusive predator-prey model with strong Allee effect and threshold harvesting, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 469 (2019), 982–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.09.047 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2018.09.047
[21]	S. Li, S. L. Yuan, Z. Jin, H. Wang, Bifurcation analysis in a diffusive predator-prey model with spatial memory of prey, Allee effect and maturation delay of predator, Int. J. Differ. Equation, 357 (2023), 32–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2023.02.009 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2023.02.009
[22]	Y. Y. Lv, L. J. Chen, F. D. Chen, Z. Li, Stability and bifurcation in an SI epidemic model with additive Allee effect and time delay, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 31 (2021), 2150060. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127421500607 doi: 10.1142/S0218127421500607
[23]	D. Y. Wu, H. Y. Zhao, Spatiotemporal dynamics of a diffusive predator-prey system with Allee effect and threshold hunting, Int. J. Nonlinear. Sci, 30 (2020), 1015–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00332-019-09600-0 doi: 10.1007/s00332-019-09600-0
[24]	W. X. Wang, Y. B. Zhang, C. Z. Liu, Analysis of a discrete-time predator-prey system with Allee effect, Ecol. Complex., 8 (2011), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.005
[25]	D. Sen, S. Ghorai, M. Banerjee, Allee effect in prey versus hunting cooperation on predator-enhancement of stable coexistence, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 29 (2019), 1950081. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127419500810 doi: 10.1142/S0218127419500810
[26]	H. Molla, S. Sarwardi, S. R. Smith, M. Haque, Dynamics of adding variable prey refuge and an Allee effect to a predator-prey model, Alex. Eng. J., 61 (2022), 4175–4188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2021.09.039 doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2021.09.039
[27]	D. Barman, J. Roy, H. Alrabaiah, P. Panja, S. P. Mondal, S. Alam, Impact of predator incited fear and prey refuge in a fractional order prey predator model, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 142 (2021), 110420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110420 doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110420
[28]	W. Q. Yin, Z. Li, F. D. Chen, M. X. He, Modeling Allee effect in the Leslie-Gower predator-prey system incorporating a prey refuge, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 32 (2022), 2250086. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127422500869 doi: 10.1142/S0218127422500869
[29]	S. Y. Huang, H. G. Yu, C. J. Dai, Z. L. Ma, Q. Wang, M. Zhao, Dynamic analysis of a modified algae and fish model with aggregation and Allee effect, Math. Biosci. Eng., 19 (2022), 3673–3700. https://doi.org/10.3934/mbe.2022169 doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022169
[30]	G. Bapan, T. Kar, T. Legovic, Sustainability of exploited ecologically interdependent species., Popul. Ecol., 56 (2014), 527–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-014-0436-3 doi: 10.1007/s10144-014-0436-3
[31]	P. Paul, T. K. Kar, Impacts of invasive species on the sustainable use of native exploited species, Ecol. Model., 340 (2016), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.09.002
[32]	X. X. Liu, Q. D. Huang, Analysis of optimal harvesting of a predator-prey model with Holling type Ⅳ functional response, Ecol. Complex., 42 (2020), 100816. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100816 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100816
[33]	Z. C. Shang, Y. H. Qiao, L. J. Duan, J. Miao, Bifurcation analysis in a predator-prey system with an increasing functional response and constant-yield prey harvesting, Math. Comput. Simulat., 190 (2021), 976–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.06.024 doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.06.024
[34]	D. P. Hu, H. J. Cao, Stability and bifurcation analysis in a predator-prey system with Michaelis-Menten type predator harvesting, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 33 (2017), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.05.010 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2016.05.010
[35]	J. C. Huang, S. G. Ruan, J. Song, Bifurcations in a predator-prey system of Leslie type with generalized Holling type Ⅲ functional response, J. Differ. Equations, 257 (2014), 1721–1752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2014.04.024 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2014.04.024

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)