Processing math: 100%
Research article

International cooperation on climate research and green technologies in the face of sanctions: The case of Russia

  • Received: 07 March 2023 Revised: 04 May 2023 Accepted: 15 May 2023 Published: 25 May 2023
  • JEL Codes: Q56

  • The purpose of this study was to develop the theoretical model for the regime of anti-Russian sanctions against the climate R&D sector, as well as the related green finance sector. Achieving this purpose was carried out on the basis of using the system of the following methods. 1) A method of discursive analysis was applied to texts and statements that occur in scientific articles, analytical reviews and notes in electronic media and discussion pages on the Internet. 2) Meta-analysis was applied to both original works and to primary materials of an empirical nature containing statistical data, which are sometimes of a variable nature. 3) The methodology of stochastic factor analysis served as the basis for considering sanctions as factors that probabilistically determine various changes in Russian science and technology policies and science legislation. 4) The use of the foresight method was aimed at identifying options for the medium- and long-term development of Russia's participation in international cooperation in the field of climate R&D while under sanctions. According to the developed model, the regime of scientific sanctions against Russia is aimed at breaking cooperation with Russian participation at the level of programs and projects. The institutionalization of scientific ruptures has several aspects, such as the freezing of personal contacts, the suspension of funding, as well as the supply of equipment and the provision of services for its maintenance. The peculiarity of scientific sanctions against Russia lies in the unprecedented combination of the national and global scales of their consequences. The study concludes that, due to Russia's significant contribution to climate change, the consequences of scientific, economic and financial sanctions have a negative cumulative effect on the implementation of the global climate agenda. This means the emergence of problems in reducing greenhouse gas emissions due to the partial abandonment of previously formulated climate goals. The model proposed in this study reveals Russia's response to sanction challenges, which means that Russia continues to follow the trend in the development of climate science and improve the institution of green finance.

    Citation: Mark Shugurov. International cooperation on climate research and green technologies in the face of sanctions: The case of Russia[J]. Green Finance, 2023, 5(2): 102-153. doi: 10.3934/GF.2023006

    Related Papers:

    [1] Wenjun Xia, Jinzhi Lei . Formulation of the protein synthesis rate with sequence information. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2018, 15(2): 507-522. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2018023
    [2] Chaudry Masood Khalique, Kentse Maefo . A study on the (2+1)–dimensional first extended Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii- Schiff equation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 5816-5835. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021293
    [3] Sixing Tao . Lie symmetry analysis, particular solutions and conservation laws of a (2+1)-dimensional KdV4 equation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(7): 11978-11997. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023532
    [4] Alexander N. Gorban, Annick Harel-Bellan, Nadya Morozova, Andrei Zinovyev . Basic, simple and extendable kinetic model of protein synthesis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(6): 6602-6622. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019329
    [5] Mahmoud El-Morshedy, Zubair Ahmad, Elsayed tag-Eldin, Zahra Almaspoor, Mohamed S. Eliwa, Zahoor Iqbal . A new statistical approach for modeling the bladder cancer and leukemia patients data sets: Case studies in the medical sector. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 10474-10492. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022490
    [6] Lan Huang, Shuyu Guo, Ye Wang, Shang Wang, Qiubo Chu, Lu Li, Tian Bai . Attention based residual network for medicinal fungi near infrared spectroscopy analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 3003-3017. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019149
    [7] Luis L. Bonilla, Vincenzo Capasso, Mariano Alvaro, Manuel Carretero, Filippo Terragni . On the mathematical modelling of tumor-induced angiogenesis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(1): 45-66. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017004
    [8] J. A. Méndez-Bermúdez, José M. Rodríguez, José L. Sánchez, José M. Sigarreta . Analytical and computational properties of the variable symmetric division deg index. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(9): 8908-8922. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022413
    [9] Pu Yang, Zhenbo Li, Yaguang Yu, Jiahui Shi, Ming Sun . Studies on fault diagnosis of dissolved oxygen sensor based on GA-SVM. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(1): 386-399. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021021
    [10] Micaela Morettini, Christian Göbl, Alexandra Kautzky-Willer, Giovanni Pacini, Andrea Tura, Laura Burattini . Former gestational diabetes: Mathematical modeling of intravenous glucose tolerance test for the assessment of insulin clearance and its determinants. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1604-1615. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020084
  • The purpose of this study was to develop the theoretical model for the regime of anti-Russian sanctions against the climate R&D sector, as well as the related green finance sector. Achieving this purpose was carried out on the basis of using the system of the following methods. 1) A method of discursive analysis was applied to texts and statements that occur in scientific articles, analytical reviews and notes in electronic media and discussion pages on the Internet. 2) Meta-analysis was applied to both original works and to primary materials of an empirical nature containing statistical data, which are sometimes of a variable nature. 3) The methodology of stochastic factor analysis served as the basis for considering sanctions as factors that probabilistically determine various changes in Russian science and technology policies and science legislation. 4) The use of the foresight method was aimed at identifying options for the medium- and long-term development of Russia's participation in international cooperation in the field of climate R&D while under sanctions. According to the developed model, the regime of scientific sanctions against Russia is aimed at breaking cooperation with Russian participation at the level of programs and projects. The institutionalization of scientific ruptures has several aspects, such as the freezing of personal contacts, the suspension of funding, as well as the supply of equipment and the provision of services for its maintenance. The peculiarity of scientific sanctions against Russia lies in the unprecedented combination of the national and global scales of their consequences. The study concludes that, due to Russia's significant contribution to climate change, the consequences of scientific, economic and financial sanctions have a negative cumulative effect on the implementation of the global climate agenda. This means the emergence of problems in reducing greenhouse gas emissions due to the partial abandonment of previously formulated climate goals. The model proposed in this study reveals Russia's response to sanction challenges, which means that Russia continues to follow the trend in the development of climate science and improve the institution of green finance.



    G-quadruplex or G-tetrad (G4), is a thermodynamically stable structural element that is formed between clusters/stretches/tracts of Guanine (G) residues (|x|≥3) and is intra- or inter-molecular [1,2,3]. The intervening loops whence applicable are composed of one or more nucleotide(s) (N∈{A, U, T, G, C}) (Figure 1). G4 is found in DNA (telomeres, double-strand break sites, transcription start sites) and in the untranslated region(s) (5'-, 3'-UTR, introns) of mRNA [4,5]. In vivo, G4 may function to preserve the telomeric ends of chromosomes, repress or promote transcription and regulate translation [4,5]. The generic representation of an intra-strand G4 may be described as follows:

    (((Gt,k)t3(Nh,k)h1)k=3((Gt,k)t3)k=1)m=1 (Def. 1)

    𝑡 ≔ 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝐺𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑠 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝐺 − 𝑟𝑖𝑐ℎ 𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟

    ℎ ≔ 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑙𝑜𝑜𝑝 − 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑠

    𝑘 ≔ 𝐶𝑙𝑢𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑥

    𝑚 ≔ 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑠

    𝐺 ≔ 𝐺𝑢𝑎𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑒

    𝐴 ≔ 𝐴𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑒

    𝑇 ≔ 𝑇ℎ𝑦𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑒

    𝐶 ≔ 𝐶𝑦𝑡𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑛𝑒

    𝑁 ≔ 𝐴𝑛𝑦 𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑒

    The high melting temperature (Tm~600C) of G4 implies that the mature quadruplex is stable and refractory to unfolding. This is partly due to stabilizing Hoogsteen (N7gu1-N2gu2; O6gu1-N1gu2) and reverse Hoogsteen (N7gu1-N1gu2; O6gu1-N2gu2) hydrogen bonding as well as π-orbital stacking between the purine rings of non-contiguous guanine pairs (gu1, gu2) (Figure 1) [6,7]. Additionally, the presence of Adenine residues in the intervening loops, variable loop length (h~1-30 Mer) and permutation have all been shown to contribute to the stability and thence persistence of the mature quadruplex [8,9,10,11].

    Figure 1.  Definition, delineation and identity of a short translatable G-quadruplex. G-quadruplexes are stable structural elements in DNA/RNA and are characterized by Hoogsteen and reverse Hoogsteen pairing along with π-bond purine stacking of non-contiguous Guanine residues. Here, a short intra-strand G-quadruplex (20≤N≤60;N∈{A, U, G, C}) is modeled in the PCS of the mRNA of a hypothetical gene and is translatable (TG4). The modeled TG4 is represented as a sequence of codons ((CODq)LqN;CODCOD). Whilst, an arbitrary Guanine-rich cluster/stretch/tract is represented by suitably scored Guanine containing codon(s), the selection of codons for the intervening loops is without constraint. Abbreviations: COD, set of vertebrate codons; L, total number of codons used to model the translatable G-quadruplex; N, Any generic ribonucleotide; PCS, protein coding segment; TG4, translatable G-quadruplex; q, numerical index of codon.
    Tm(#Adenine/h)=τ.(#Adenine/h)Tm:=Melting temperatureτ:=constant of proportionalityh:=Length of intervening loops (1)

    Despite the wide range of methods available that can predict G4 formation in DNA/RNA, there is poor agreement between sequence-based motif locators and empirically derived biophysical data [12,13,14,15]. Motif-independent methods such as those that directly measure the GC-content or the GC-/AT-skew of a query sequence and utilize this data to train machine learning algorithms may address some of these discrepancies [16,17,18].

    Investigations into transcribed RNA suggests that secondary and tertiary forms (5'- and 3'-UTRs) may not only coexist with stretches of unfolded ribonucleotides, but can also be read by the ribosomal machinery. Non-canonical translation is described as: a) translation from atypical start sites AUG→{CUG, GUG} or b) peptides (≤100 aa) of short open reading frames (sORF)-encoded polypeptides (SEPs) and upstream open reading frames (uORFs) [19,20,21,22]. The latter are rarely silent and can function as modulators of metabolism (S-Adenosylmethionine decarboxylase, AMD1) or transcription (activating transcription factor, ATF4, H19; yeast AP-1 like, YAP1) and as generic transcription factors (general control protein, GCN4) [19]. G4 has also been observed in one or more exons of the prion protein (PRNP, exon 2), zinc finger protein (ZNF669, exon 1), β-amyloid secretase (BACE1, exon 3) and the estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1, exon 4) among several others [16,23,24,25,26,27,28,29].

    Whilst the presence of segments of folded mRNA may have a significant influence on the yield of the protein product(s), the effect on sequence whence part of the protein coding segment (PCS) is largely unknown [4,5,30,31,32,33]. Proteopathies are diseases that result directly from agammaegates of truncated and misfolded proteins. These may occur secondary to a faulty translation machinery such as a ribosome that has stalled on encountering a secondary or tertiay folded mRNA sub segment. Recent data suggests ~45% of the human genome may code for proteins that are either intrinsically disordered (IDPs) or comprise one or more sub-segments that are disordered (IDRs) [34]. The absence of delineable structural features notwithstanding, disordered regions are characterized by short linear motifs (SLiMS) and/or molecular recognition features (MoRFs) [34,35]. The improper folding and heightened degradation rates could lead to perturbed proteostasis and thence contribute to the pathogenesis of proteopathies [34,35]. Primary proteopathies are likely to result directly from mutations (point, chromosomal translocations) in the PCS of a gene. These include sickle cell disease (βE6→V6-mediated defective polymerization), amylin-based type Ⅱ Diabetes Mellitus, Cystic Fibrosis (cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator), Alzheimer's disease (Amyloid β-peptide) and Parkinson's disease (α-synuclein) [36,37]. Secondary proteopathies, in contrast, result from motif or molecular mimicry of a host protein(s) by a pathogen. These are further classified into acute and chronic variants depending on the onset, genesis and/or resolution of the resultant infection or infestation [34,35].

    G4 is known to stall the ribosome during translation and the resultant protein is truncated and/or degraded at an accelerated rate. The manuscript subsumes ribosomal read-through of mRNA with a G-quadruplex and assesses influence of the translated product to proteostasis. Here, I present a mathematical model of a short G4 (20–60 Mer) in the PCS, i.e., translatable G-quadruplex (TG4), in the mRNA of a hypothetical gene. The mapping uses several novel indices to annotate, classify and select suitable Guanine-containing codons (α) and amino acids (β). A generic algorithm then computes and validates, as proof-of-principle, possible peptides (pTG4ij) that correspond to the modeled TG4 (pTG4ijPTG4~TG4). Co-occurrence, homology and the distribution of overlapping/shared amino acids between PTG4 and the disorder promoting SLiMS are used to infer probable mechanisms of TG4~PTG4 facilitated misfolding. Standard bioinformatics indices (accuracy, precision, recall, p-value) are used to arrive at these conclusions.

    The objective of this investigation is to model a short G4 in an arbitrary PCS (TG4) which when translated will result in a set of peptides (PTG4) with an average length that is less than 100 amino acids. The hypothesis explored in this manuscript is that in the event of a ribosomal read-through, the translated mRNA, with its G4 will result in a modified protein product. This protein will then exhibit considerable propensity to misfold on account of the presence of one or more members of the PTG4.

    2.1.1 Model of a translatable G-quadruplex (TG4)

    SEPs-derived peptides with the lowest molecular weight (~2.5 KDa) and with lengths varying from ~7–20 aa were identified and used to define the boundaries of the peptides that comprise PTG4 [20,21]. The TG4 (m = 1) is therefore, modeled as an intra-strand sub sequence of the mRNA of a hypothetical gene and has a length of ~20–60 Mer. This is represented (with symbols and variable names as explained in Def. 1) as follows:

    TG4:=(((Gt,k)3t9(Nh,k)2h7)k=3((Gt,k)3t9)k=1)m=1 (Def. 2)

    Since the Guanine-rich clusters and loops are contiguous, the aforementioned model (Def.2) of the TG4 may be approximated with a sequence of codons and is as under:

    TG4:=(CODq)LqN|CODCOD (Def. 3)

    The algorithm to compute L, which is the number of codons needed to model TG4 is presented and is as follows:

    1:N{u[20,60)}2:rN mod 33:eN((N mod 3)/3)4:If e<(e+e)/2 then5:L=e/36:else If e(e+e)/2 then7:L=e/38:end If

    𝑁 ≔ 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑟𝑖𝑏𝑜𝑛𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑇𝐺4

    𝐿 : = 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑛𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑒𝑑 𝑡𝑜 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑇𝐺4 (7 ≤ 𝐿 < 21)

    𝑞 ≔ 𝑞𝑡ℎ 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑛

    𝑟 ≔ 𝑅𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟 = {0, 1, 2}

    𝑒, 𝑢 : = 𝐺𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠

    𝑪𝑶𝑫 ≔ 𝑆𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑒𝑏𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑠

    The codons selected for modelling TG4 (Def. 3) comprised suitably scored Guanine-containing vertebrate codons (gCOD+nCOD) for the Guanine-rich clusters/stretches/tracks (3≤t≤9;Defs. 1 and 2) and generic/no-stop codons for the intervening loops (Figures 2 and 3). Briefly, a Guanine-containing codon (gCODn) is scored by considering its association with two similar flanking codons, i.e., gCODn-1, gCODn, gCODn+1 such that there is at least one occurrence of 'GGGG' (δ≥1.0) (Figures 2 and 3). This non-trivial case (4≤t≤9) is chosen since its trivial equivalent t = 3, is already subsumed (Defs. 1 and 2). Numerically,

    Figure 2.  Algorithm to delineate and assess relevance of the peptidome of the modeled translatable G-quadruplex. Sub sections 2.1.1–4 are devoted to constructing the model of a short translatable G-quadruplex in the PCS of the mRNA of a hypothetical gene. Briefly, Guanine-containing vertebrate codons are scored and selected using codon association as the underlying model. An amino acid is then scored on the basis of the proportion of the G4 favoring codons it possesses. This schema is deployed iteratively and results in the complete set of peptides for the modeled translatable G-quadruplex. Sub section 2.1.5 and 2.1.6 are used to assess the relevance of the predicted peptidome to the genesis of misfolding induced proteostasis. This is done by examining the co-occurrence, homology and distribution of overlapping/shared amino acids of members of this peptidome with one or more short linear motifs. The sequences utilized are length adjusted empirically determined disordered regions, full length protein sequences with disordered segments and taxonomically diverse generic protein sequences. Abbreviations: G4, G-quadruplex; mRNA, messenger ribonucleic acid; PCS, protein coding segment; PTG4, hypothetical peptidome of the modeled short translatable G-quadruplex; SLiMS, short linear motifs.
    Figure 3.  Schema to characterize a short translatable G-quadruplex (TG4) and its associated peptidome (PTG4). The TG4 is modeled as a short sequence (L = 20) of Guanine-containing codons ((CODq)q=20q=7;CODCOD). Guanine-containing vertebrate codons (COD) are scored (αcodonamino>0.00) and selected (gCOD+aminoCOD) using codon association as the underlying model. This partitions vertebrate codons into permissive (xGG,Gxx,xGG,GGG,GGx,GxG;αcodonamino>0.0000;n=28) and non-permissive (xGx,xxx;αcodonamino=0.0000;n=36) codons. Interestingly, the amber stop codon (UAG; α = 1.0022) is also selected by these criteria. An amino acid is then scored on the basis of the proportion of the G4 favouring codons amongst all the codons that code it (βamino=|gCOD+amino|/|CODamino|). An interesting subset of these amino acids (β = 1.00) are those which are encoded entirely by codons which may favour G4 formation. These include Valine, Alanine, Aspartic- and Glutamic-acids, Methionine and Glycine. Abbreviations: COD, set of vertebrate codons; L, Length of codon model of TG4; q, numerical indices; x, generic ribonucleotide.
    αaminocodon=γ.θ.δ+Ω (2)

    𝛾 : = 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 (𝛾 = 1/64 ≈ 0.02)

    𝜃 ≔ 𝑃𝑟𝑜𝑏𝑎𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑖𝑛 𝑎 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑝 (𝜃 = {0.04, 0.11, 0.33, 1})

    𝛿 ≔ 𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑡 𝑜𝑐𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 ′𝐺𝐺𝐺𝐺′(𝛿 = {0, 1, 2, 6})

    Ω ≔ 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑑𝑗𝑎𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑑𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝛿 (Ω = {0, 1, 2})

    Since the genetic code is degenerate, amino acids mapped from the selected codons are further scored and grouped (g1, g2, g3) (Figures 3 and 4).

    Figure 4.  Dissecting the peptidome of the modeled short translatable G-quadruplex. The schema (α, β) outlined in this work is used to construct a peptidome of the modeled short translatable G-quadruplex (PTG4). This peptidome is the finite union of several peptides (pTG4ijPTG4|7≤i≤20, 1≤jJ). Each such peptide has a subset of amino acids that corresponds to an arbitrary Guanine-rich cluster/stretch/tract and another for the intervening loops. Whilst, the former has a restricted composition of amino acids (β > 0;yY), the latter is generic (β≥0;zZ). The manner in which this predicted peptidome may influence the genesis of primary and secondary misfolding induced proteostasis is next investigated. This is done by examining the co-occurrence of pTG4ij with one or more SLiMSw (1≤w≤3) in empirically determined disordered regions and full length protein sequences with disordered segments. These studies are complemented by investigating the distribution of sequences with shared amino acids ((zn)n≥2|zpTG4ijSLiMSw, pTG4ijPTG4; SLiMSwSLiMS) across taxa. Interestingly, most of the amino acids that comprise PTG4 include those that favour hyperphosphorylation (Serine, Threonine) and non-covalent complex formation (Alanine, Valine, Leucine, Isoleucine, Lysine, Arginine, Aspartic- and Glutamic-acids) and proteolytic cleavage. Abbreviations: g1, g2, g2, classification of amino acids used in this study, PTG4, hypothetical peptidome of the modeled short translatable G-quadruplex; SLiMS; short linear motifs; Y, Z; sets of amino acids.
    βamino=|gCOD+amino|/|CODamino| (6)

    gCOD+amino:= set of optimal codons for each amino acid (αaminocodon>0.0000)

    CODamino:= Set of codons for each amino acid

    Whilst amino acids from groups 1 and 2 (β > 0.00) (3) can represent the modeled G-rich clusters (yg1g2 = Y), no constraint was imposed on the amino acids (z) used to model the loops (zg1g2g3 = Z) (Figures 3 and 4). The peptidome (PTG4) evaluated by this study is a combinatorial association of peptides such that the molecular weight is ~0.8–2.3 KDa and length of any arbitrary member is ~7–20 aa (Figure 4). This may be represented as follows:

    pTG4ij=((((yi,k)1i3(zi,k)1i2)k=3(yi)1i3)(zi)1i2)j (Def. 4)
    PTG4=i=20i=7j=Jj=1|pTG4ij| (Def. 5)

    𝑷𝑻𝑮𝟒 : = 𝑃𝑒𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑑𝑜𝑚𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑟𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑝𝑜𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡𝑜 𝑇𝐺4

    𝑝𝑇𝐺4𝑖𝑗 : = 𝑗𝑡ℎ 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑃𝑇𝐺4 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ "i" 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑠

    𝑖 : = 𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑚𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑑 𝑷𝑻𝑮𝟒

    𝐽 : = 𝑀𝑎𝑥𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑝𝑇𝐺4 𝑓𝑜𝑟 "𝑖" 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑠

    A dataset that comprises experimentally validated G4-forming mRNA segments of several genes (n = 99) was downloaded (http://scottgroup.med.usherbrooke.ca/G4RNA/) and used to investigate the distribution of G4 [16]. Genes which possess non-redundant RNA (R) sub sequences in the PCS are translated in 6 reading frames using an online tool (http://web.expasy.org/translate). The peptides generated are classified as those: ⅰ) with one or more uninterrupted stretch of N-terminal amino acids of length ≥7 aa (~A), ⅱ) with an in-frame termination signal designated as 'STOP' (~B) and ⅲ) without any termination signal, i.e., absence of a 'STOP' in their sequence (~C). The translated peptides are classified as "VALID" ((BA)∪(CA)) and then queried for matches with pTG4ij(7i20,jN). The PERL scripts that are required to parse and process the resulting data files have been developed in house and the pseudocode for the same is presented as additional information (Pseudocode, PS1: Supplementary Text 1).

    This is done by examining the occurrence of PTG4 in amino acid/protein sequences of disordered regions (IDRs) and full-length proteins with disordered regions (IDPs). DisProt 7.0 (http://disprot.org), is a database of experimentally validated and non-redundant sequences of IDRs and IDPs [38]. The sequences (|IDR| = 1445;|IDP| = 800) that comprise these are queried for occurrences of pTG4ij(7i20,jN) (Supplementary Texts 2 and 3). A preliminary partitioning schema divides these datasets into two distinct subsets, i.e., #pTG4ij≥1 (PT+PPOS⊂{IDR, IDP}; (Def.6)) and #pTG4ij = 0 (PT-PNEG⊂{IDR, IDP}; (Def. 7)). The extent of co-occurrence of one or more SLiMSwSL (w = {1, 2, 3}) with pTG4ij (SL±∈{PPOS, PNEG}) (Defs.8 and 9) is then evaluated to infer relevance of PTG4 to misfolding induced proteostasis. The distribution of overlapping/shared sequences of amino acids ((zn)n≥2∈(pTG4ijSLiMSw); znZ; ) (Def.10), is examined in protein sequences from taxonomically diverse organisms with ScanProsite (https://prosite.expasy.org/scanprosite). The proof behind this rationale is presented:

    (zn)n2             (pTG4ijSLiMSw)=((zn)n2pTG4ij)((zn)n2SLiMSw)Let zn=zn and zn=zn.Rewriting                        =((zn)n2pTG4ij)((zn)n2SLiMSw)=((zn)n2,(zn)n2)=pTG4ij×SLiMSw

    𝒁 : = 𝑆𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑𝑠 (𝑧𝑛 ∈ 𝒁)

    𝑝𝑇𝐺4𝑖𝑗 : = 𝐶𝑎𝑛𝑜𝑛𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑜 𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑑 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚 𝑜𝑓 𝑷𝑻𝑮𝟒

    𝑺𝑳𝒊𝑴𝑺 : = 𝑆𝑒𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑠ℎ𝑜𝑟𝑡 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑚𝑜𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑠 (𝑆𝐿𝑖𝑀𝑆𝑤 ∈ 𝑺𝑳𝒊𝑴𝑺)

    𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑛, 𝑤 : = 𝐼𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑐𝑒𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑒𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝒁, 𝑷𝑻𝑮𝟒, 𝑺𝑳𝒊𝑴𝑺

    The indices utilized by this study to establish relevance of matched instances of various motifs/co-motifs in the peptide/protein sequences of interest include the accuracy (A), precision (P), recall (R) and the p-value. A 2X2 table which represents the categorized data (2.1.4) is constructed and used to compute various bioinformatics indices. This is outlined as under:

    𝑇𝑁 ≔ 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 (|𝒔𝑵𝑬𝑮 ∩ 𝑷𝑵𝑬𝑮| = |𝒔𝑵𝑬𝑮|) ≡ 𝑆𝐿𝑃𝑇 (𝐷𝑒𝑓. 11)

    𝐹𝑃 ≔ 𝐹𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 (|𝑺𝑵𝑬𝑮 ∩ 𝑷𝑷𝑶𝑺| = |𝑺𝑵𝑬𝑮|) ≡ 𝑆𝐿𝑃𝑇+ (𝐷𝑒𝑓. 12)

    𝐹𝑁 ≔ 𝐹𝑎𝑙𝑠𝑒 𝑛𝑒𝑔𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 (|𝒔𝑷𝑶𝑺 ∩ 𝑷𝑵𝑬𝑮| = |𝒔𝑷𝑶𝑺|) ≡ 𝑆𝐿+𝑃𝑇 (𝐷𝑒𝑓. 13)

    𝑇𝑃 ≔ 𝑇𝑟𝑢𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 (|𝑺𝑷𝑶𝑺 ∩ 𝑷𝑷𝑶𝑺| = |𝑺𝑷𝑶𝑺|) ≡ 𝑆𝐿+𝑃𝑇+ (𝐷𝑒𝑓. 14)

    The equations may then be written as:

    (A)=(TN+TP/TN+FP+FN+TP)X100 (4)
    (P)=(TP/FP+TP)X100 (5)
    (R)=(TP/FN+TP)X100 (6)

    The p-values for these analyses are computed by comparing the frequency of occurrence of all pTG4ij in a test sequence (ϕpTG4ij) with the same in randomly-generated (vV) sequences of similar lengths (ϕpTG4vij), i.e., 7-50 aa (1≤v≤10000) and > 50 aa (1≤v≤100000) (Pseudocode, PS2: Supplementary Text 1):

    pvalue=ϕpTG4vij/ϕpTG4ij=(v=|V|v=1i=21i=7j=Jj=1pTG4vij)/(i=21i=7j=Jj=1pTG4ij)=(v=|V|v=1i=21i=7j=Jj=1pTG4vij/i=21i=7j=Jj=1pTG4ij) (7)

    The frequency of occurrence of overlapping sequences of amino acids ((zn)n≥2∈(pTG4ijSLiMSw); znZ) in pre-compiled and curated protein sequences (ϕ(zn)) across taxa is compared with randomly chosen sequences of comparable lengths (ϕ(vzn); n = 5000). These are used to estimate statistical significance, i.e., p-value = ϕ(vzn)/ϕ(zn) (8).

    The data presented discusses implementation of a model of short intra-strand TG4 for various values of α and β, populates PTG4 and establishes the equivalence TG4~PTG4. Co-occurrence and homology studies between PTG4 and the SLiMS in IDRs/IDPs and generic protein sequences across taxa are used to infer probable mechanisms of TG4~PTG4 facilitated misfolding-induced proteostasis.

    An association-competent codon not only takes into account the presence of a Guanine residue, but also gives weightage to its position (Figures 13, Table 1). This schema partitions standard vertebrate codons into those with a high- (Ranks 1-4;α > 0.0000) or low- (Rank 5;α = 0.0000) propensity to form a contiguous cluster of Guanine residues (Figures 3 and 4, Table 1). Whilst, 'GGG' (Rank 1;α = 2.12) can associate with ({GGG, GxG, xGG, GGx, Gxx, xxG}) bilaterally (δ = 6;Ω = 2), 'GxG' (Rank 2; α = 2.0066) can do so only with 'GGG' (δ = 1;Ω = 2). On the other hand, the codon subsets 'GGx' and 'xGG' (Rank 3;α = 1.0132) can form two clusters of contiguous Guanine residues with 'GGG' and 'xGG'/ 'GGx' unilaterally (δ = 2;Ω = 1). Similarly, the subsets 'xxG' or 'Gxx' (Rank 4;α = 1.0022), can form contiguous Guanines with a single occurrence of 'GGG' (δ = 1;Ω = 1) (Figures 3 and 4, Table 1). Conversely, codons with either a single occurrence of a central Guanine residue 'xGx' or no Guanine residues 'xxx' (Rank 5;α = 0.0000) are unable to form the 'GGGG' and are excluded from this study (Figures 3 and 4, Table 1).

    Table 1.  Rank wise arrangement of codon scores for the non-trivial (4≤|G|≤9) TG4.
    Rank Codon set, Cardinality Codon γ θ δ Ω α=γ.θ.δ aa
    1 GGG, 1 GGG 0.02 1.00 6 2 2.1200 Gly
    2 GxG, 3 GUG 0.02 0.33 1 2 2.0066 Val
    GCG 0.02 0.33 1 2 2.0066 Ala
    GAG 0.02 0.33 1 2 2.0066 Glu
    3 xGG, 3 UGG 0.02 0.33 2 1 1.0132 Trp
    CGG 0.02 0.33 2 1 1.0132 Arg
    AGG 0.02 0.33 2 1 1.0132 Arg
    3 GGx, 3 GGU 0.02 0.33 2 1 1.0132 Gly
    GGC 0.02 0.33 2 1 1.0132 Gly
    GGA 0.02 0.33 2 1 1.0132 Gly
    4 xxG, 9 UUG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Leu
    UCG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Ser
    UAG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Ter
    CUG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Leu
    CCG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Pro
    CAG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Gln
    AUG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Met
    ACG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Thr
    AAG 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Lys
    4 Gxx, 9 GUU 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Val
    GCU 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Ala
    GAU 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Asp
    GUC 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Val
    GCC 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Ala
    GAC 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Asp
    GUA 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Val
    GCA 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Ala
    GAA 0.02 0.11 1 1 1.0022 Glu
    5 xGx, 9 UGU 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Cys
    UGC 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Cys
    UGA 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Ter
    CGU 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Arg
    CGC 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Arg
    CGA 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Arg
    AGU 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Ser
    AGC 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Ser
    AGA 0.02 0.11 0 0 0.0000 Arg
    5 xxx, 27 UUU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Phe
    UCU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Ser
    UAU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Tyr
    UUC 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Phe
    UCC 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Ser
    UUA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Leu
    UCA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Ser
    UAA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Ter
    CUU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Leu
    CCU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Pro
    CAU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 His
    CUC 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Leu
    CCC 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Pro
    CAC 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 His
    CUA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Leu
    CCA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Pro
    CAA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Gln
    AUU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Ile
    ACU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Thr
    AAU 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Asn
    AUC 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Ile
    ACC 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Thr
    AAC 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Asn
    AUA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Ile
    ACA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Thr
    AAA 0.02 0.04 0 0 0.0000 Lys

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Abbreviations

        𝛾: General probability of a codon (𝛾 = 1/64 ≅ 0.02)

        𝜃: Probability of codon within a group (𝜃 = {0.04, 0.33, 0.11, 1.00})

        𝛿: Number of distinct codon sets that could complete 'GGGG' (𝛿 = {0, 1, 2, 6})

        Ω: Number of adjacent positions that contain 𝛿 (Ω = {0, 1, 2})

        𝛼: Threshold for selecting codons that may favour G-quadruplex formation

        x: Codon specific generic ribonucleotide {𝐴, 𝐺, 𝑈, 𝐶}

        aa: Amino acid

        Ter: Stop codons {𝑈𝐴𝐺, 𝑈𝐺𝐴, 𝑈𝐴𝐴}

    An estimate of the possible combinations of the simplest peptide (i=7j=Jj=1pTG4ij = 8.00E+03;GlyzGlyzGlyzGly; J = (20)3; i = lengthp(TG4ij) = 7 aa; zZ) (Figures 3 and 4, Table 2). This justifies usage of PTG4 (pTG4ijPTG4) as a generic representation of the putative peptidome encoded by the TG4 (PTG4). Approximately ~12% (n = 11) of in silico translated amino acid sequences from exon-derived TG4 possesses one of more "STOP" signals and include ESR1, longer RNA variants of PRNP (85 nt) and BCL2 (29 n t, 33 nt, 34 nt) (Table 3; Table 1, Supplementary Text 2). With the exceptions of KCNH2/ZNF669 and the shorter variants of PRNP (14 nt, 15 nt, 20 nt, 24 nt), "VALID" sub sequences are found for BACE1, BCL2, ESR1, PRNP (long) and TERF2 (Table 3; Tables 1A and 1C). Interestingly, all the genes considered possessed at least one occurrence of PTG4 (P = 100%, n = 6) (Table 3; Table 1B). This finding, despite the small sample size is proof-of-principal that the TG4 can be mapped to definite peptide sequences, i.e., TG4~PTG4. Since this can occur only after a ribosomal read through of the G4 containing mRNA, it raises the intriguing possibility that PTG4 whence part of a larger protein may increase its propensity to undergo misfolding. This notion is investigated in non-redundant sequences of IDRs (PTG4~10%, n = 145;0.00≤p-value≤0.20) and IDPs (PTG4~34%, n = 269;0.00≤p-value < 0.5) (Table 4; Tables 2 and 3).

    Table 2.  Codon-based classification of amino acids.
    aa CODamino gCOD+amino β
    Group 1 (n=7) Ala 4 4 1.00
    Val 4 4 1.00
    Asp 2 2 1.00
    Glu 2 2 1.00
    Trp 1 1 1.00
    Met 1 1 1.00
    Gly 4 4 1.00
    Group 2 (n=7) Leu 6 2 0.3333
    Gln 2 1 0.5
    Arg 6 2 0.3333
    Lys 2 1 0.5
    Ser 6 1 0.1667
    Thr 4 1 0.25
    Pro 4 1 0.25
    Group 3 (n=6) Cys 2 0 0.00
    Asn 2 0 0.00
    Ile 3 0 0.00
    His 2 0 0.00
    Phe 2 0 0.00
    Tyr 2 0 0.00

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Abbreviations

        gCOD+amino : Guanine-containing optimal codons excluding STOP (UAG) (𝛼 > 0.000)

        CODamino : Non-optimal codon excluding STOP (UGA, UAA) (𝛼 = 0.000)

    𝑪𝑶𝑫𝒂𝒎𝒊𝒏𝒐 = gCOD+amino + CODamino : All codons for an amino acid

    Table 3.  Genes (Homo sapiens) with G-quadruplex forming mRNA segments derived from one or more exons (Ex).
    GENE NAME G4 (nt) Ex STOP(n=11) VALID(n=59) |PTG4|
    BACE1 Beta-secretase 1 33 3 n=0 n=6 n=2
    BCL2 B-cell lymphoma 2 33 2 n=1 n=6 n=1
    23 n=0 n=6
    28 n=0 n=6
    29 n=1 n=5
    34 n=1 n=5
    33 3 n=2 n=5
    ESR1 Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) 36 4 n=1 n=5 n=2
    KCNH2 Potassium Voltage-Gated Channel sub family H 18 12 n=0 n=0 NA
    ZNF669 Member 2
    Zinc Finger Protein 669
    1
    PRNP Prion protein 14 2 n=0 n=0 n=1
    15 n=0 n=0
    20 n=0 n=0
    24 n=0 n=6
    85 n=6 n=3
    TERF2 Telomeric repeat-binding factor 2 55 1 n=0 n=6 n=1

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Table 4.  Co-occurrence data for PTG4 and known SLiMS.
    Disordered regions (IDRs; n=1445;0.00≤p-value < 0.05)
    SL-PT- SL-PT+ SL+PT- SL+PT+ R1T R2T C1T C2T A (%) P (%) R (%)
    SLiMS1 1078 64 58 9 1142 67 1136 73 89.90 12.32 13.43
    SLiMS2 749 18 121 29 767 150 870 47 84.84 61.70 19.33
    SLiMS3 1212 108 34 9 1320 43 1246 117 89.58 7.69 20.93
    Proteins with disordered segments (IDPs; n=800;0.00≤p-value < 0.05)
    SL-PT- SL-PT+ SL+PT- SL+PT+ R1T R2T C1T C2T A (%) P (%) R (%)
    SLiMS1 86 12 28 18 98 46 114 30 72.22 60.00 39.10
    SLiMS2 1 1 96 66 2 162 97 67 40.85 98.50 40.74
    SLiMS3 250 57 26 25 307 51 276 82 76.81 30.48 49.01

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Abbreviations

        𝐼𝐷𝑅𝑠: Intrinsically disordered regions

        𝐼𝐷𝑃s: Intrinsically disordered proteins

        𝑧:     Any amino acid

        𝑆𝐿𝑖𝑀𝑆1:     [𝑆𝑇]𝑃𝑧𝑅

        𝑆𝐿𝑖𝑀𝑆2:     [𝐸𝐷]𝑧𝑧[𝐷𝐸][𝐴𝐺𝑆]

        𝑆𝐿𝑖𝑀𝑆3:     [𝐾𝑅]𝑧𝑃𝑧𝑧𝑃

        𝑆𝐿𝑃𝑇: |𝑺𝑵𝑬𝑮 ∩ 𝑷𝑵𝑬𝑮|

        𝑆𝐿𝑃𝑇+:     |𝑺𝑵𝑬𝑮 ∩ 𝑷𝑷𝑶𝑺|

        𝑆𝐿+𝑃𝑇:     |𝑺𝑷𝑶𝑺 ∩ 𝑷𝑵𝑬𝑮|

        𝑆𝐿+𝑃𝑇+:     |𝑺𝑷𝑶𝑺 ∩ 𝑷𝑷𝑶𝑺|

        𝑅1𝑇:     𝑆𝐿𝑃𝑇 + 𝑆𝐿𝑃𝑇+

        𝑅2𝑇:     𝑆𝐿+𝑃𝑇 + 𝑆𝐿+𝑃𝑇+

        𝐶1𝑇:     𝑆𝐿𝑃𝑇+ 𝑆𝐿+𝑃𝑇

        𝐶2𝑇:     𝑆𝐿𝑃𝑇+ + 𝑆𝐿+𝑃𝑇+

        𝐴:     Accuracy

        𝑃:     Precision

        𝑅:     Recall

    The amino acids that comprise the peptide members of PTG4 and the short linear motifs (g1, g2 vs SLiMS) are well conserved. The co-occurrence of PTG4 with SLiMS in the IDRs (A~85-89%;0.00 < p-value≤0.05) suggests that this association is non-trivial and may favor all purported mechanisms of misfolding (hyperphosphorylation, proteolytic cleavage, complex formation) (Table 4; Tables 2 and 3). However, the higher precision of PTG4 with the proteolytic-SLiMS suggests that this may predominate (Table 4; Tables 2 and 3). The data with the IDPs suggests a similar predilection for proteolytic cleavage (A~40-77%;P~99%;0.00 < p-value < 0.05, although hyperphosphorylation (P~60%;0.00 < p-value < 0.05) and complex-promotion (P~30%;0.00 < p-value < 0.05) may constitute viable alternatives to the genesis of misfolding (Table 4; Tables 2 and 3). The presence of overlapping sequences of amino acids between PTG4 and the SLiMS when examined in protein sequences from taxonomically diverse organisms is degenerate for SLiMS1 (number of matches = 6251) and SLiMS3 (number of matches = 1480) (Table 5; Table 4). In contrast, the corresponding data for SLiMS2 (number ofmatches = 3759;0.00 < p-value < 0.05) is statistically significant (Table 5). The taxonomic spread includes archaea (n = 150), bacteria (n = 1735), viruses (n = 84), green land plants (n = 199), fungi (n = 182), eukaryotic invertebrates (n = 43) and vertebrates (n = 700) (Table 4).

    Table 5.  Occurrence of overlapping amino acids of PTG4 and known SLiMS in curated full length protein sequences.
    SLiMS Sample (zn)n≥2pTG4ijSLiMSw (p-value)
    SLiMS1=[ST]PzR Pz PG (n=1) PG (Degenerate)
    SLiMS2=[ED]zzD[AGS] z[DE] G[DE] (n=2) [WGRVAELMKQSTP][AG][DE]z2EG[VADE](p-value=0.00069)
    [DE]z [DE]G (n=1)
    zz[DE] [LMKQSTP]G[DE] (n=14)
    [VAE]G[DE] (n=6)
    [WGR][AG][DE] (n=6)
    [DE]zz[DE] [VAE]G[DE]zzEG[VADE] (n=28)
    [WGR][AG][DE]zzEG[VADE] (n=24)
    [WGR][AG][DE]zzEG (n=6)
    GEzzEG[VADE] (n=4)
    GEzzEG (n=1)
    SLiMS3=[KR]zPzzP Pzz PG[VADE] (n=4) PGV (Degenerate)
    PGA (Degenerate)
    PGD (Degenerate)
    PGE (Degenerate)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Abbreviations

    𝑝𝑇𝐺4𝑖𝑗:     Members of putative peptidome (𝑝𝑇𝐺4𝑖𝑗 ∈ 𝑷𝑻𝑮𝟒)

    𝑆𝐿𝑖𝑀𝑆𝑤:     Short linear motifs (𝑆𝐿𝑖𝑀𝑆𝑤 ∈ 𝑺𝑳𝒊𝑴𝑺)

    𝑧𝑛:     Shared sequence(s) of amino acids between 𝑷𝑻𝑮𝟒 and 𝑺𝑳𝒊𝑴𝑺

    𝑖, 𝑗, 𝑤, 𝑛:     Indices to characterize members of 𝑷𝑻𝑮𝟒, 𝑺𝑳𝒊𝑴𝑺, 𝒁

    The significant association and homology between PTG4 and the SLiMS along with the equivalence data (PTG4~TG4) suggest that TG4 may influence proteostasis in a multitude of ways (Tables 15; Tables 1–4, Supplementary Text 2–4).

    The short TG4 modeled in this study has an average loop length (h~2 Mer) which may contribute to thermodynamic stability by restricting the mobility of the participating strands (1) [8,9,10,11]. The physical presence of TG4 will result in a stalled ribosome and translation which is prolonged, inefficient and incomplete [31,32,33]. Interestingly, this analysis also includes UAG (Amber; α > 0.0000), which when present in-frame will prematurely terminate translation and result in a truncated protein (Table 1) [39]. Whilst nonsense-mediated mRNA decay may be triggered if the stop codon is within ±50 Mer of the exon-junction complex (EJC), a read-through may occur nonetheless. The resulting protein sequences may be modified which in tandem with one or more occurrences of PTG4 and/or SLiMS would predispose the same to agammaegate and result in a proteopathy [39,40].

    Whilst the preponderance of Glycine (Gly) might impart heightened flexibility and limit the formation of stabilizing secondary structural elements in the hypothetical protein, Proline (Pro) confers rigidity and may retard proper folding. There is also remarkable conservation between the amino acids that comprise PTG4 and the SLiMS. These include the complex-promoting hydrophobic (Ala, Val, Met, Trp) and ionic (Asp, Glu, Lys, Arg) residues, along with nucleophile-favoring Serine and Threonine (Figures 3 and 4, Tables 25). Whilst, the former may favor agammaegation by non-covalent interactions, the latter may promote phosphorylation-mediated charge imbalance and thence misfolding. Interestingly, the loops of G4 whence modeled by Adenine-containing codons (Axx) are translated to Lysine (K), Arginine (R), Serine (S), Threonine (T) and Isoleucine (I); all of which may also promote misfolding (Figures 3 and 4, Tables 2-5) [8,9,10,11,34,35]. The distribution of PTG4 amongst physiologically relevant proteins further suggests that the peptide-mediated misfolding may influence/regulate signal transduction, cytoskeleton organization, metabolism, synaptic transmission and transcription/translation (Table 6; Table 5).

    Table 6.  Proteins encompassing PTG4 as candidates for motif mimicry. *.
    Cellular function Disordered regions of proteins
    1. Signal transduction DP00274, DP00224, DP00141, DP00332,
    DP01063, DP00506, DP00418, DP00341,
    DP00435, DP00613, DP00463, DP00954,
    DP00959, DP01104, DP00611, DP00519,
    DP00086, DP00707, DP00712
    2. Endocytosis DP01073, DP01065, DP01066, DP00225
    3. Calcium-calmodulin DP00092, DP00132, DP00561, DP00118, DP00253
    4. Myofibril assembly DP01090
    5. Cytoskeleton DP01056 DP00240, DP01022, DP00169, DP00716, DP00717, DP01100, DP00122
    6. Nuclear pore DP01075, DP01077, DP01079
    7. Phototransduction DP00768, DP00347
    8. Targeting DP00893, DP00609, DP00610, DP01058
    9. Transcription DP00062, DP00177, DP00633, DP00348,
    DP00786, DP00049, DP00231, DP00873,
    DP00720, DP00217, DP00081
    10. Translation DP00082, DP00164, DP00229
    DP00949, DP00134
    11. Synaptic transmission DP00943
    12. Supercoiling DP00076
    13. Binding DP00539, DP00854, DP01052, DP00659,
    DP00656
    14. Peptide bond formation DP00944
    15. Enzymes DP00557, DP00032, DP00095, DP00337,
    DP00379, DP00787, DP00427, DP00429
    16. Bacterial/parasitic virulence
    Secreted toxins DP00345, DP00591
    Cytoadherence DP00025, DP00065, DP01096
    17. Viral infectivity
    Cyclophilin interaction DP00615, DP01031
    Chaperones DP00699, DP00700, DP00674
    Capsid assembly DP00133, DP00876
    Membrane fusion DP01043
    Latency DP01060
    18. Unknown DP00119

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Note: DPDisProt ID

    The distribution of overlapping/shared amino acids in protein sequences of non-vertebrates suggests that PTG4 is either completely degenerate with the SLiMS or present in proportions that is statistically significant (Tables 5 and 6; Tables 4 and 5). These data imply that motif-mimicry too, might constitute a probable cause (tropism, oncogenic potential, virulence) of infection/infestation-mediated acute/chronic proteopathies [34,35,41,42]. The contribution(s) of misfolding to the pathogenesis of secondary proteopathies is however, debatable. Whilst, there is evidence that mislocalization of proteins can precipitate misfolding, mimicry itself may result in exonuclease-mediated proteolytic cleavage and thence trigger an infective proteopathy [43,44]. Additionally, the presence of sequences of amino acids such as Proline and Threonine in viral or fungal proteins may be responsible for creating and/or maintaining a milieu conducive to the genesis of infective/transmissible proteopathies, viz., a high charge density and imbalance of electrostatic interactions [43,44].

    The coexistence of potentially translatable G-quadruplexes (TG4) with unfolded ribonucleotides in the PCS of an mRNA transcript may have important consequences for protein homeostasis. Here, I have investigated the contribution of a short intra-strand translatable G-quadruplex and its associated peptidome (TG4~PTG4) to the genesis of misfolding-induced proteostasis. The co-occurrence, homology and distribution of overlapping/shared amino acids of PTG4 with the SLiMS suggests that this may occur by truncation, complex formation, increased charge density and/or accelerated degradation. An additional mechanism that is also supported is motif-mimicry by pathogens which may trigger the development of infective proteopathies. The putative peptidome (~7–20 aa) that corresponds to the short translatable G-quadruplex delineated by this investigation may be utilized as novel markers of both the primary and secondary proteopathies.

    SK outlined and designed the study, designed and conceptualized the algorithm(s) and formulae for prediction, wrote mathematical proofs to establish rigor, collated the data, constructed the models, formulated the filters, carried out the computational analysis, wrote all necessary code and the manuscript.

    The author declares no conflict of interest.



    [1] Afesorghor SK, Mahadevan R (2016) The impact of economy sanctions on income inequality of target states. World Dev 83: 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.015 doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.03.015
    [2] Belousov AL (2022) Legal and organizational aspects of introducing ESG-standards in the Russian banking sector. Russ J Econ Law 16: 577–586. (In Russian)
    [3] Bergeijk PAG van (eds.) (2021) Research Handbook on Economic Sanctions Cheltenham, Northampton, Edward Elgar.
    [4] Berger A, Brandi C, Bruhn D (2017) Environmental provisions in trade agreements: promises at the trade and environment interface (No. 16/2017). Briefing Paper.
    [5] Bezuidenhout L, Karrar O, Lezaun J, et al. (2019) Correction: economic sanctions and academia: Overlooked impact and long-term consequences. PLOS ONE 14: e0225277 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225277 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225277
    [6] Bobylev SN, Kiryushkin PA, Koshkina NR (2021) New priorities for the economy and green financing. Econ Revival Russia 1: 152–166. https://doi.org/10.37930/1990-9780-2021-1-67-152-166 (In Russian). doi: 10.37930/1990-9780-2021-1-67-152-166
    [7] Brewer T (2008) Climate change technology transfer: a new paradigm and policy agenda. Climate Policy 8: 516–526. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2007.0451 doi: 10.3763/cpol.2007.0451
    [8] Bub L (2020) Should the fight against climate change include taking international action (such as exclusion from international institutions, sanctions, etc.) against sovereign countries, which allow environmental abuse through direct action or negligence? Available from: https://www.suedwind.at/fileadmin/user_upload/suedwind/Regionalstelle_Salzburg/5-Debatier_S9-10.pdf.
    [9] Butler D (2019) How US sanctions are crippling science in Iran. Nature 574: 13–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02795-y doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02795-y
    [10] Carucci A (2000). Environmental effects of economic sanctions: the Cuban experience. Honors Theses, Paper 49, Colby College. Available from: https://digitalcommons.colby.edu/honorstheses/49.
    [11] Caruso R (2021) Shifting from negative to positive sanctions, In: Bergeijk P.A.G. van (eds.), Research Handbook on Economic Sanctions, Cheltenham, Northampton, Edward Elgar, 124–145. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839102721.00024
    [12] Chan S, Drury A (eds.) (2000) Sanctions as economic statecraft: theory and practice. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230596979
    [13] Cirone AE, Urpelainen J (2013) Trade sanctions in international environmental policy: Deterring or encouraging free riding? Conflict Manag Peace 30: 309–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/0738894213491182 doi: 10.1177/0738894213491182
    [14] Davis L, Engerman S (2003) History lessons sanctions—neither war nor peace. J Econ Perspect 17: 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533003765888502 doi: 10.1257/089533003765888502
    [15] Davydova A (2023) How Russia's War Is Impacting the Global Environmental Agenda. Available from: https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/88773.
    [16] DeConnick H, Haake F, Van Der Linden N (2007) Technology transformation in the Clean Development Mechanism. Climate Policy 7: 44–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2007.9685667 doi: 10.1080/14693062.2007.9685667
    [17] Delardas O, Kechagias KS., Katsikas Triantafyllidis K, et al. (2022) Concerns about academic freedom caused by the Russia-Ukraine War. EMBO Reports 23: e55079 https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202255079 doi: 10.15252/embr.202255079
    [18] Dricoll DD (2010) Economic sanctions and culture. Defense Peace Econ 22: 423–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2010.500826 doi: 10.1080/10242694.2010.500826
    [19] Dudin MN, Shkodinskiy SV, Kushnir AM (2022) Prerequisites for expanding green financing and ESG practices in the Russian banking sector. Econ Entrep Law 12: 1301–1322. https://doi.org/10.18334/epp.12.4.114551 (In Russian) doi: 10.18334/epp.12.4.114551
    [20] Early BR (2020) Economic sanctions in flux: Enduring challenges, new policies, and defining the future research agenda. Int Stud Perspect 21: 438–477. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekaa002 doi: 10.1093/isp/ekaa002
    [21] Eriksson M (2009) Rethinking targeted sanctions. European University Institute.
    [22] Esmaeili H, Ataie-Ashtiani B (2021) The autonomy of science as a civilian casualty of economic warfare: inadvertent censorship of science resulting from unilateral economic sanctions. Sci Eng Ethics 27: 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00321-w doi: 10.1007/s11948-021-00321-w
    [23] Fotourehchi Z (2020) Are UN and US economic sanctions a cause or cure for the environment: empirical evidence from Iran. Environ Dev Sustain 22: 5483–5501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668‐019‐00434‐0 doi: 10.1007/s10668‐019‐00434‐0
    [24] Fu Q, Chen YE, Jang CL, et al. (2020). The impact of international sanctions on environmental performance. Sci Total Environ745: 141007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141007 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141007
    [25] Galiana I, Green Ch (2010) Technology-led climate policy, In: Lomborg B (eds.), Smart solutions to climate change: comparing costs and benefits, New York, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779015.008
    [26] Ghaleigh NS (2016) Science and climate law—the role of the IPCC in international decision-making, In: KR Gray, CP Carlame and R Tarasofsky (eds.), The Oxford handbook of international climate change law, Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199684601.003.0003
    [27] Ghoddousi A, Egli L, Soofi M, et al. (2017) After sanctions: the urge to upgrade and integrate conservation in Iran. Front Ecol Environ 15: 9–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1452 doi: 10.1002/fee.1452
    [28] Giumelli F (2016) The success of sanctions: lessons learned from the EU experience, New York, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315552446
    [29] Gordin MD (2022) A century of science boycotts. Nature 606(7912): 27–29. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01475-8. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01475-8
    [30] Grimalda G, Belianin A, Hennig-Schmidt H, et al. (2022) Sanctions and international interaction improve cooperation to avert climate change. Proc R Soc B 289: 20212174. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.2174 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2174
    [31] Habibzadeh F (2018) Economic sanction: A weapon of mass destruction. Lancet 392(10150): 816–817. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140‐6736(18)31944‐5 doi: 10.1016/S0140‐6736(18)31944‐5
    [32] Hagen A, Schneider J (2021) Trade sanctions and the stability of climate coalitions. J Environ Econ Manag 109: e102504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102504 doi: 10.1016/j.jeem.2021.102504
    [33] Haites E (2012) Technology transfer and the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), In: D Ockwell, A Mallet (eds.), Low-carbon technology transfer: from rhetoric to reality, London, New York.
    [34] Hayes DR (1997) The effectiveness of international economic sanctions. New York.
    [35] Hedger M (2012) Stagnation or regeneration: technology transfer in the UNFCCC. In: D. Ockwell, A. Mallet (eds.), Low-carbon technology transfer: from rhetoric to reality, London, New York.
    [36] Hwami M (2021) A comparative scoping review of the impact of international economic sanctions on education. Compare 11: 17–32.
    [37] Jones I, Portela C (2020) Evaluating the success of international sanctions. A new research agenda. Revista CIDOB'Afers Int 125: 39–60. https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2020.125.2.39/en doi: 10.24241/rcai.2020.125.2.39/en
    [38] Jowkar H, Ostrowski S, Tahbaz M, et al. (2016) The conservation of biodiversity in Iran: threats, challenges and hopes. Iranian Stud 49: 1065–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/00210862.2016.1241602 doi: 10.1080/00210862.2016.1241602
    [39] Koivurova T, Heikkilä M, Ikavalko J, et al (2022) Arctic cooperation in a new situation: Analysis on the impacts of the Russian war of aggression (2022-12-21). Available from: https://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/164521/VN_Selvitys_2022_3.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
    [40] Kokabisaghi F, Miller AC, Bashar FR, et al. (2019) Impact of United States political sanctions on international collaborations and research in Iran. BMJ Glob Health 4: e001692. https://doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001692 doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001692
    [41] Koonin EV (2022) Science in times of war: oppose Russian aggression but support Russian scientists. EMBO Reports 23: e54988 https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202254988 doi: 10.15252/embr.202254988
    [42] Koshkina NR (2020) State policy of the Russian Federation in the field of combating climate change. Ars Administrandi (Art of Management) 12: 441– 454. https://doi.org/10.17072/2218-9173-2020-3-441-454 (In Russian) doi: 10.17072/2218-9173-2020-3-441-454
    [43] Lewis T, Madani K (2016) End of sanctions may help Iran face an accelerating environmental crisis. The Guardian (January 20, 2016). Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/iran‐blog/2016/jan/20/iran‐end‐of‐sanctions‐prompt‐environmental‐crisis.
    [44] Lyubarskaya MA, Merkusheva VS, Zinovieva OS (2019) Participation of Russia in international cooperation in the field of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by energy companies. Bull Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: International relations 19: 377–391. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-3-377-391 (In Russian) doi: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-3-377-391
    [45] Madani K (2020) How International Economic Sanctions Harm the Environment. Earth's Future. 8: e2020EF001829. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001829 doi: 10.1029/2020EF001829
    [46] Madani K (2021) Have international sanctions impacted Iran's environment? World 2: 231–252. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2020015 doi: 10.3390/world2020015
    [47] Madani K, Hakim S (2016) Iran: reversing the environmental damages of sanctions. Tehran Times Available from: https://www.tehrantimes.com/news/404354/Iran‐Reversing‐the‐environmental‐damages‐of‐sanctions
    [48] Maembe K (2012) UNFCCC technology transfer framework. Saarbrücken.
    [49] Mallapaty S, Padma TV, Emiliano RM, et al. (2022) The countries maintain research ties with Russia. Nature 604: 227–228. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00945-3 doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00945-3
    [50] Mansouri R (2018) Impact of sanctions regime on science and scientists. Available from: http://rmansouri.ir/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/SSPME-_Qatar_2018.pdf.
    [51] Moon DV, Popeta VV (2022) International cooperation of Russia in the field of adaptation to climate change. Inf Innov 17: 5–16. https://doi.org/10.31432/1994-2443-2022-17-4-5-16 (In Russian) doi: 10.31432/1994-2443-2022-17-4-5-16
    [52] Mousavi S, Jokar F, Mohammadi A (2015) US unilateral sanctions against Iran; contradiction in slogan and conduct, extreme politicization of human rights. Public Law Res16: 149–173.
    [53] Newnham RE (2002) Deutsche mark diplomacy: Positive economic sanctions in German-Russian relations. University Park, Pennsylvania state university press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780271031323
    [54] Nikitina EN (2019) Climate change in the Arctic: adaptation to new challenges. Outlines Global Transformations: politics, economics, law 12: 177–200. https://doi.org/10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-177-200 (in Russian) doi: 10.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-5-177-200
    [55] Nordhaus W (2015) Climate clubs: overcoming freeriding in international climate policy. Am Ecol Rev 105: 1339–1370. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.15000001 doi: 10.1257/aer.15000001
    [56] Okonkwo Th (2017) How international law can deal with lack of sanctions and binding targets in the Paris Agreement. J Sust Dev 10: 225–233. https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v10n5p225 doi: 10.5539/jsd.v10n5p225
    [57] Peksen D (2009) Better or worse? The effect of economic sanctions on human rights. J Peace Res 46: 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343308098404 doi: 10.1177/0022343308098404
    [58] Placket B (2022) The future of research collaborations involving Russia. As sanctions take effect following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia risks its standing in the research world. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-00761-9 doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-00761-9
    [59] Porfiriev BN (eds.) (2022) Climate change and the Russian economy: trends, scenarios, forecasts. Moscow (In Russian).
    [60] Portela C (2016). Are European Union sanctions "targeted"? Camb Rev Int Aff 29: 912–929. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2016.1231660 doi: 10.1080/09557571.2016.1231660
    [61] Roginko SA (2022) Climate agenda in the current situation: advices for the Russian Economy. Climate agenda in current situation: advices for the Russian Economy. Sci Works Free Econ Society 236: 447–465. https://doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2022-236-4-447-465 (In Russian) doi: 10.38197/2072-2060-2022-236-4-447-465
    [62] Roshydromet (Federal Service for Hydrometeorology and Environmental Monitoring Results of climate change research for sustainable development strategies of the Russian Federation (omet, 2005) Available from: https://www.meteorf.gov.ru/upload/iblock/e5b/3380-Verstka-19-may-2006-A4-compr.pdf.
    [63] Sansom C (2004) The ghost of Saddam and UN sanctions. Lancet Oncology 5: 143–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01406-8 doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(04)01406-8
    [64] Shugurov MV (2018а) Development of international legal regulation of scientific and technical states in the climate sphere, In: Tikhomirov YuA (eds.), Law and climate of the planet, Moscow: Yustitsiya. (In Russian)
    [65] Shugurov MV (2018b) Global mechanism in the sphere of development and transfer of climate technologies: legal basis and directions of activity. Legal Sci 2: 56–66 (In Russian).
    [66] Shugurov MV (2019a) Green climate fund: supporting the technology development and transfer. In: Proceedings of the roundtables discussion of XVII Blischenko Congress. Moscow.
    [67] Shugurov MV (2019b) Activities of the Global Environment Facility to promote the international transfer of climate technologies: legal and policy frameworks. Int Law Int Organ 4: 16–23. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0633.2019.4.3180 (In Russian) doi: 10.7256/2454-0633.2019.4.3180
    [68] Slack K (2021) It's time to use sanctions to stop climate destruction. Available from: https://earthrights.org/blog/its-time-to-use-sanctions-to-stop-climate-destruction/.
    [69] Soroosh N, Madani K (2014) Every breath you take: the environmental consequences of Iran sanctions. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/world/iran‐blog/2014/nov/21/iran‐environmental‐consequences‐of‐sanctions, Accessed: September 1, 2020.
    [70] Tarikhi P (2020) Sanctions and the scientific community of Iran. Soc Islam 8: 225–264. https://doi.org/10.1163/22131418-00802005 doi: 10.1163/22131418-00802005
    [71] Vasilyeva EY, Bakrunov YO (2022) Prospects for the development of ESG-financing as an innovative approach to raising resources by Russian companies. Manag Account 4–5: 544–551. (In Russian)
    [72] Veselova DN (2021) Climate policy of the Russian Federation: legislative and institutional aspects. Sci J "Discourse-Pi" 18: 96–111. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.17506/18179568_2021_18_3_96 doi: 10.17506/18179568_2021_18_3_96
    [73] Yakovlev IA, Kabir LS (2019) Climate finance in the context of sustainable development. Econ Taxes Law 2: 44–51. https://doi.org/10.26794/1999-849x (In Russian) doi: 10.26794/1999-849x
    [74] Yakovlev IA, Kabir LS, Nikulina SI (2020) Climate policy of the Russian Federation: international cooperation and national approach. Financ J 12: 26–36. https://doi.org/10.31107/2075-1990-2020-4-26-36 (In Russian) doi: 10.31107/2075-1990-2020-4-26-36
    [75] Zarghami M (2013) Illogical and unethical scientific sanctions against Iranian authors. Iran J Psych Behav Sci 7: 1–4.
    [76] Zimina OS, Finogenova YY (2021) ESG impact on the banking sector: new opportunities. Bull Moscow Univ Ministry Int Affairs Russia, 324‒330. https://doi.org/10.24412/2073-0454-2021-6-324-330 (In Russian) doi: 10.24412/2073-0454-2021-6-324-330
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Siddhartha Kundu, Modeling ligand-macromolecular interactions as eigenvalue-based transition-state dissociation constants may offer insights into biochemical function of the resulting complexes, 2022, 19, 1551-0018, 13252, 10.3934/mbe.2022620
    2. Siddhartha Kundu, ProTG4: A Web Server to Approximate the Sequence of a Generic Protein From an in Silico Library of Translatable G-Quadruplex (TG4)-Mapped Peptides, 2021, 15, 1177-9322, 117793222110458, 10.1177/11779322211045878
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4787) PDF downloads(196) Cited by(8)

Figures and Tables

Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog