
We construct new solitary structures for time fractional Phi-4 and space-time fractional simplified modified Camassa-Holm (MCH) equations, utilizing the unified solver technique. The time (space-time) fractional derivatives are defined via sense of the new conformable fractional derivative. The unified solver technique extract vital solutions in explicit way. The obtained solutions may be beneficial for explaining many complex phenomena arising in fluid mechanics, nuclear, plasma and particle physics. The unified solver method is a vital tool for handling further models arising in applied science and new physics. For detailed physical dynamical representation of our results, 3D and 2D profiles to some of the gained solutions are also illustrated using Matlab software.
Citation: Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, S. Z. Hassan, R. A. Alomair, D. M. Alsaleh. Fundamental solutions for the conformable time fractional Phi-4 and space-time fractional simplified MCH equations[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(6): 6555-6568. doi: 10.3934/math.2021386
[1] | Ikram Ullah, Muhammad Bilal, Aditi Sharma, Hasim Khan, Shivam Bhardwaj, Sunil Kumar Sharma . A novel approach is proposed for obtaining exact travelling wave solutions to the space-time fractional Phi-4 equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32674-32695. doi: 10.3934/math.20241564 |
[2] | Khudhayr A. Rashedi, Musawa Yahya Almusawa, Hassan Almusawa, Tariq S. Alshammari, Adel Almarashi . Lump-type kink wave phenomena of the space-time fractional phi-four equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 34372-34386. doi: 10.3934/math.20241637 |
[3] | Omar Barkat, Awatif Muflih Alqahtani . Analytical solutions for fractional Navier–Stokes equation using residual power series with ϕ-Caputo generalized fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(7): 15476-15496. doi: 10.3934/math.2025694 |
[4] | Y. Massoun, C. Cesarano, A. K Alomari, A. Said . Numerical study of fractional phi-4 equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 8630-8640. doi: 10.3934/math.2024418 |
[5] | Muhammad Imran Liaqat, Fahim Ud Din, Wedad Albalawi, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty . Analysis of stochastic delay differential equations in the framework of conformable fractional derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 11194-11211. doi: 10.3934/math.2024549 |
[6] | Naher Mohammed A. Alsafri . Solitonic behaviors in the coupled Drinfeld-Sokolov-Wilson system with fractional dynamics. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(3): 4747-4774. doi: 10.3934/math.2025218 |
[7] | Tareq Eriqat, Rania Saadeh, Ahmad El-Ajou, Ahmad Qazza, Moa'ath N. Oqielat, Ahmad Ghazal . A new analytical algorithm for uncertain fractional differential equations in the fuzzy conformable sense. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(4): 9641-9681. doi: 10.3934/math.2024472 |
[8] | Tingting Guan, Guotao Wang, Haiyong Xu . Initial boundary value problems for space-time fractional conformable differential equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5275-5291. doi: 10.3934/math.2021312 |
[9] | Mohammad Alqudah, Safyan Mukhtar, Albandari W. Alrowaily, Sherif. M. E. Ismaeel, S. A. El-Tantawy, Fazal Ghani . Breather patterns and other soliton dynamics in (2+1)-dimensional conformable Broer-Kaup-Kupershmit system. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 13712-13749. doi: 10.3934/math.2024669 |
[10] | Volkan ALA, Ulviye DEMİRBİLEK, Khanlar R. MAMEDOV . An application of improved Bernoulli sub-equation function method to the nonlinear conformable time-fractional SRLW equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 3751-3761. doi: 10.3934/math.2020243 |
We construct new solitary structures for time fractional Phi-4 and space-time fractional simplified modified Camassa-Holm (MCH) equations, utilizing the unified solver technique. The time (space-time) fractional derivatives are defined via sense of the new conformable fractional derivative. The unified solver technique extract vital solutions in explicit way. The obtained solutions may be beneficial for explaining many complex phenomena arising in fluid mechanics, nuclear, plasma and particle physics. The unified solver method is a vital tool for handling further models arising in applied science and new physics. For detailed physical dynamical representation of our results, 3D and 2D profiles to some of the gained solutions are also illustrated using Matlab software.
Fractional calculus plays a vital rule in many modern research problems in the field of nonlinear optics, plasma physics, solid state physics, biology, signal processing, economy, super-fluids and chemical engineering [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Nonlinear fractional partial differential equations (NFPDEs) are generalizations of classical differential equations of integer order. In particular, many complex physical phenomena in natural sciences can be analysed utilizing fractional differential equations (NFPDEs). As a result, studying the existence of exact solutions for NFPDEs is of interest to many researchers. Accordingly, many different approaches proposed and developed to gain analytical and numerical solutions of NFPDEs such as, sub-equation approach [9], first integral approach [10], modified Kudryashov approach [11], exponential function approach [12], (G′G)− expansion approach [13], variational iteration approach [14], fractional sub-equation approach [15] and tanh-sech approach [16].
There are various definitions of FPDEs, like, Grunwald-Letnikov, Caputo's fractional derivatives and Riemann-Liouville [17]. Khalil et al. [18] introduced a new unpretentious conformable fractional derivative. This definition is easier to take into account several traditional features that cannot be satisfied by the known fractional derivatives, such as, chain rule [19]. Recently, this new definition has gained significant attention because of its simplicity, thus various works has been done on it by many scientists. We recall the definition conformable derivative and some basic notions [18]:
Given a function q:(0,∞)→R, hence the conformable fraction derivative of q of order α is
Tα(q)(t)=limϵ→0q(t+ϵt1−α)−q(t)ϵ,t>0,0<α≤1. |
The conformable fractional derivative satisfies:
(i) Tα(au+bq)=aTα(u)+bTα(q),a,b∈R,
(ii) Tα(tn)=ntn−α,n∈R,
(iii) Tα(uq)=uTα(q)+qTα(u),
(vi) Tα(uq)=qTα(u)−uTα(q)q2,
(v) if q is differentiable, thus Tα(q)(t)=t1−αdqdt.
Theorem 1.1. [18] Let u,q:(0,∞)→R be differentiable and also α-differentiable, then the following rule holds:
Tα(u∘q)(t)=t1−αq′(t)u′(q(t)). | (1.1) |
Recently, the conformable fractional calculus topic is widely used in defining many various fractal problems in fractal-media [11].
We concerned with the following time fractional Phi-4 equation [20,21]:
Dαtu−Dαxxu+ε2u+σu3=0,ε,σ∈R. | (1.2) |
The Klein-Gordon (KG) model admits many vital applications in applied science [22]. Eq (1.2) is a special case of KG model that depicts complex phenomenon in particle physics in which kink and anti-kinksolitary waves interact [23]. Eq (1.2) plays a crucial role in particle and nuclear physics [23]. Rezazadeh et al. [20] introduced new solutions for Eq (1.2) utilizing extended direct algebraic method. Tariq and Akram [24] implemented tanh method to establish various solutions to Eq (1.2). Korpinar [21] applied different types of mapping methods to extract different solutions to Eq (1.2) by process of conformable fractional derivative operator.
We also consider space-time fractional MCH equation [25] given as follows
Dαtψ+λDαtψ−D3αxxtψ+μDαxψ3=0,λ,(μ>0)∈R. | (1.3) |
Rezazadeh et al., [25] applied new extended direct algebraic technique to establish new solutions of Eq (1.3). Shakeel et al. [26] introduced some solutions via modified Riemann-Liouville derivative by Jumarie.
Consider NFPDEs as follows
Łambda(Ξ,DαtΞ,DαxΞ,DαtDαxΞ,DαxDαxΞ,...)=0,0<α≤1. | (1.4) |
Using the wave transformation:
Ξ(x,t)=Ξ(ξ), ξ=xαα−γtαα, | (1.5) |
converts Eq (1.4) to the following ODE:
Γ(Ξ,Ξ′,Ξ″,Ξ‴,...)=0. | (1.6) |
It can be seen that in applied science and new physics, various models in form of Eq (1.4) are converted to the ODE:
LΞ′′+MΞ3+NΞ=0, | (1.7) |
see for example [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34]. In [35], we introduced a unified solver method to solve NFPDE (1.4). Specifically, this solver presents the complete wave structure of different types of NFPDEs. This solver will be utilized as a box solver for considering various models in many natural and physical sciences. In contrast with other approaches, the presented unified solver admits many advantages, like, it averts complex and tedious computations, and supplies us exact solutions in an explicit way. The proposed unified solver is direct, sturdy, efficacious and adequate. Indeed, the proposed solver will be very significant for mathematicians, physicists and engineers.
Our study is motivated to grasp new solutions for time fractional Phi-4 and space-time fractional simplified modified Camassa-Holm (MCH) equations by utilizing the unified solver technique. This method presents some families of solutions with free physical parameters. These solutions may be applicable to understand various interesting phenomena in natural sciences, such as nuclear physics, plasma physics, particle physics, modeling of deep water and superfluid. Our study will show that the proposed unified solver can be applied for many other nonlinear fractional partial differential equations arising in natural sciences.
The rest of this article is organized as follows: Section 2 introduces the unified solver method. In Section 3, this solver is implemented to establish new solutions for time fractional Phi-4 and space-time fractional simplified MCH models. The physical interpretation for some obtained solutions is reported to illustrate the dynamical of waves structures in Section 4. The summary of the work is reported in Section 5.
We introduce the unified solver for equation
LΞ′′+MΞ3+NΞ=0. | (2.1) |
As in [36,37], balancing Ξ′′ and Ξ3, yields the solution of Eq (2.1) in the form :
Ξ=A0+A1sn(ζ,m)+B1cn(ζ,m). | (2.2) |
From Eq (2.2) we get:
Ξ′=A1cn(ζ,m)dn(ζ,m)−B1sn(ζ,m)dn(ζ,m), | (2.3) |
Ξ″=−m2sn(ζ,m,m)A1+2A1sn(ζ,m)3m2+2m2sn(ζ,m)2cn(ζ,m)B1−A1sn(ζ,m)−B1cn(ζ,m). | (2.4) |
Superseding Eq (2.2) & Eq (2.4) into Eq (2.1) and equating the coefficients of sn3, sn2cn, sn2, sncn, sn, cn, sn0 with zero, yields some algebraic equations. Solving these equations for A0,A1 and B1, gives two main cases:
(1) For m=0 (or L=0) a constant solution will appears and given in the form:
Ξ0(ζ)=±√−NM | (2.5) |
(2) For 0<m<1 we get four families of solutions :
Family I.
A0=0,A1=±√2(L−N)M,B1=0,m=√NL−1. |
The first family of solutions takes the form:
Ξ1(ζ)=±√2(L−N)Msn(ζ,√NL−1), | (2.6) |
where 1<NL<2.
Family II.
A0=0,A1=0,B1=±√L−NM,m=√12(1−NL). |
The second family of solutions takes the form:
Ξ2(ζ)=±√L−NMcn(ζ,√12(1−NL)), | (2.7) |
where 0<NL<2.
Family III.
A0=0,A1=±√N−LM,B1=−√L−NM,m=√2(1−NL). |
The third family of solutions is
Ξ3(ζ)=±√N−LMsn(ζ,√2(1−NL)−√L−NMcn(ζ,√2(1−NL), | (2.8) |
where 12<NL<1.
Family IV.
A0=0,A1=±√N−LM,B1=√Ł−NM,m=√2(1−NL). |
The fourth family of solutions is
Ξ4(ζ)=±√N−LMsn(ζ,√2(1−NL))+√L−NMcn(ζ,√2(1−NL)), | (2.9) |
where 12<NL<1.
Hyperbolic functions solutions
From the previous families of elliptic functions solutions we find that hyperbolic functions solutions can appear for certain values of NL corresponding to m=1 as follows:
- For N=2L Eq (2.6) transformed to:
Ξ1(ζ)=±√−2LMtanh(ζ). | (2.10) |
- For N=−L, Eq (2.7) turns into
Ξ2(ζ)=±√2LMsech(ζ). | (2.11) |
- For N=L/2, Eq (2.8) and Eq. (2.9) turn into the forms
Ξ3(ζ)=±√−L2Mtanh(ζ)−√L2Msech(ζ), | (2.12) |
Ξ4(ζ)=±√−L2Mtanh(ζ)+√L2Msech(ζ), | (2.13) |
respectively.
We implemented the unified solver to extract solutions for time fractional Phi-4 and space-time fractional MCH models. It can be seen from the construction of solutions the importance and convenience of the solver.
Utilizing the wave transformation [21]:
u(x,t)=U(ζ),ζ=xα−δtαα. | (3.1) |
Superseding Eq (3.1) into Eq (1.3), gives
U″+MU3+NU=0, | (3.2) |
where L=δ2−1,M=σ and N=ε2. In light of the unified solver method, the solutions of Eq (1.2) given as:
(1) For m=0 in that case δ=±1 and ζ=xα∓tαα. The solution of Eqs (3.2) and (1.6) respectively are given by:
u(x,t)=±√−ε2σ. | (3.3) |
(2) For 0<m<1 we get four families of solutions :
Family I.
The first family of solutions is
u1(x,t)=±√2(δ2−ε2−1)σsn(xα−δαtα,√ε2δ2−1−1), | (3.4) |
where ε2>δ2>ε22.
Family II.
The second family of solutions is
u2(x,t)=±√δ2−ε2−1σcn(xα−δαtα,√12(1−ε2δ2−1)), | (3.5) |
where δ2≥1+ε2 or δ2≤1−ε2.
Family III.
The third family of solutions is
u3(x,t)=±√ε2−δ2+1σsn(xα−δαtα,√2(1−ε2δ2−1))−√δ2−ε2−1σcn(xα−δαtα,√2(1−ε2δ2−1)), | (3.6) |
where ε2<δ2<2ε2.
Family IV.
The fourth family of solutions is
u4(x,t)=±√ε2−δ2+1βsn(xα−δαtα,√2(1−ε2δ2−1))+√δ2−ε2−1σcn(xα−δαtα,√2(1−ε2δ2−1)), | (3.7) |
where ε2<δ2<2ε2.
Hyperbolic functions solutions
These solutions are given as follows:
- For δ=±√ε2+22 Eq (3.4) transformed to:
u1(x,t)=±√−ε2σtanh(xα∓√ε2+22αtα). | (3.8) |
-For δ=±√1−ε2 Eq (3.5) turns into
u2(x,t)=±√−2ε2σsech(xα∓√1−ε2αtα). | (3.9) |
- For δ2=2ε2+1 Eq (3.6) and Eq (3.7) turn into the forms
u3(x,t)=±√−ε2βtanh(xα∓√2ε2+1αtα)−√ε2σsech(xα∓√2ε2+1αtα), | (3.10) |
u4(x,t)=±√−ε2βtanh(xα∓√2ε2+1αtα)+√ε2σsech(xα∓√2ε2+1αtα). | (3.11) |
Using the wave transformation [25]:
ψ(x,t)=Ψ(ζ),ζ=xαα−γtαα. | (3.12) |
Superseding Eq (1.5) into Eq (1.3), gives
LΨ″+MΨ3+NΨ=0, | (3.13) |
L=γ,M=μ and N=λ−γ. In light of the unified solver, the solutions of Eq (1.3) gives as:
(1) For m=0 (or γ=0) a constant solution will appears and given in the form:
ψ0(x,t)=±√−λμ. | (3.14) |
(2) For 0<m<1 we get four families of solutions :
Family I.
ψ1(x,t)=±√2γ−λμsn(xαα−γtαα,√λγ−2), | (3.15) |
where λ3<γ<λ2.
Family II.
The second family of solutions is
ψ2(x,t)=±√2γ−λμcn(xαα−γtαα,√12(2−λγ)), | (3.16) |
where λ3<γ<λ.
Family III.
The third family of solutions is
ψ3(x,t)=±√λ−2γμsn(xαα−γtαα,√2(2−λγ))−√2γ−λμcn(xαα−γtαα,√2(2−λγ)), | (3.17) |
where λ2<γ<2λ3.
Family IV.
The fourth family of solutions is
ψ4(x,t)=±√λ−2γμsn(xαα−γtαα,√2(2−λγ))+√2γ−λμcn(xαα−γtαα,√2(2−λγ)), | (3.18) |
where λ3<γ<λ2.
Hyperbolic functions solutions
For certain values of γ the hyperbolic functions solutions are given as:
- For γ=λ/3 Eq (2.6) transformed to:
ψ1,2(x,t)=±√−2λ3μtanh(xαα−λ3αtα). | (3.19) |
- For λ=0, Eq (2.7) turns into
ψ3,4(x,t)=±√2γμsech(xαα−γtαα). | (3.20) |
- For γ=2λ/3, Eq (2.8) and Eq (2.9) turn into the forms
ψ5,6(x,t)=±√−λ3μtanh(xαα−2λ3αtα)−√λ3μsech(xαα−2λ3αtα), | (3.21) |
ψ7,8(x,t)=±√−λ3μtanh(xαα−2λ3αtα)+√λ3μsech(xαα−2λ3αtα). | (3.22) |
Remark 1. The proposed unified solver technique in the work can be applied for a large class of nonlinear fractional partial differential equations, see for example [38,39]. In future works, we will try to modify this solver to solve delay partial differential equations [40,41].
We introduce some profile pictures for some solutions of time fractional Phi-4 and space-time fractional MCH. The new solitary structures for these equations are reported in the explicit way. Namely, we presented some new hyperbolic function solutions. The way of behaving of the gained solutions; solitons, localized, explosive, rough, periodic, dissipative, etc., is based on the values of physical parameters. For example, the behaviour of wave varies from compressive to rarefactive at critical points and stability regions changed to unstable regions at critical values of wave number see for example [42,43]. These presented solutions realize very important fact for realization the qualitative interpretations for various phenomena in our nature.
The hyperbolic function solutions depict the ranges and altitudes of seismic sea waves as illustrated in Figure 3. The waves would be more grave to the nature if the amplitudes of the wave are high. To reduce the calamitous power of these massive natural disasters or to turn them into beneficial energy sources, we should consider the mathematical configuration of such natural troubles. Based on presented analysis in this work, we can applied the proposed unified solver for further NFPDEs arising in new physics and applied sciences.
Here, we illustrate some 2-D and 3-D profile pictures for some selected solutions of Eqs (1.2) and (1.3). Namely, these figures prescribe the dynamical behaviour of some selected solutions with certain values of physical parameters. Figures 1–6 show respectively, the evolution of kink-solitary wave structures of Eqs (3.8) & (3.19) with α=0.5,α=0.75 & α=1.
In this work, we applied the unified solver technique to extract new solutions for time fractional Phi-4 and space-time fractional MCH models. The solutions are presented in explicit way. These solutions have vital applications in superfluid, particle and nuclear physics. The presented solver is very simple, direct, powerful, concise and efficient. It is quite capable and almost well suited for using this solver to construct solutions for other models of NFPDEs arising in applied sciences. Finally, we have presented some graphs in order to illustrate the dynamics behaviour of presented solutions.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
M. K. Kaplan, A. E. Bekir, A novel analytical method for time-fractional differential equations, Optik, 127 (2016), 8209–8214. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.05.152
![]() |
[2] | F. Tchier, M. Inc, Z. S. Korpinar, D. Baleanu, Solution of the time fractional reaction-diffusion equations with residual power series method, Adv. Mech. Eng., 8 (2016), 1–10. |
[3] |
A. Zafar, Rational exponential solutions of conformable spacetime fractional equal width equations, Nonlinear Eng., 8 (2019), 350–355. doi: 10.1515/nleng-2018-0076
![]() |
[4] |
D. Foukrach, Approximate solution to a Bürgers system with time and space fractional derivatives using Adomian decomposition method, J. Interdisciplinary Math., 21 (2018), 111–125. doi: 10.1080/09720502.2014.986914
![]() |
[5] |
S. S. Ray, New analytical exact solutions of time fractional kdv-KZK equation by Kudryashov methods, Chinese Phys. B, 25 (2016), 040204. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/25/4/046105
![]() |
[6] |
S. Sarwar, S. Iqbal, Stability analysis, dynamical behavior and analytical solutions of nonlinear fractional differential system arising in chemical reaction, Chinese J. Phys., 56 (2018), 374–384. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2017.11.009
![]() |
[7] | K. Hosseini, F. Samadani, D. Kumar, M. Faridi, New optical solitons of cubic-quartic nonlinear Schrzödinger equation, Optik., 157 (2018), 1101–1105. |
[8] |
Q. Zhou, A. Sonmezoglu, M. Ekici, M. Mirzazadeh, Optical solitons of some fractional differential equations in nonlinear optics, J. Mod. Optic., 64 (2017), 2345–2349. doi: 10.1080/09500340.2017.1357856
![]() |
[9] |
F. S. Khodadad, F. Nazari, M. Eslami, H. Rezazadeh, Soliton solutions of the conformable fractional Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation with dual-power law nonlinearity, Opt. Quant. Electron., 49 (2017), 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11082-016-0848-8
![]() |
[10] |
B. Lu, The first integral method for some time fractional differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 395 (2012), 684–693. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.05.066
![]() |
[11] |
K. Hosseini, P. Mayeli, R. Ansari, Modified Kudryashov method for solving the conformable time fractional Klein-Gordon equations with quadratic and cubic nonlinearities, Optik, 130 (2017), 737–742. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.10.136
![]() |
[12] | S. Zhang, Q-A. Zong, D. Liu, Q. Gao, A generalized exp-function method for fractional riccati differential equations, Communications in Fractional Calculus, 1 (2010), 48–51. |
[13] |
M. Younis, S. T. R. Rizvi, Dispersive dark optical soliton in (2+1)-dimensions by (G′G)-expansion with dual-power law nonlinearity, Optik, 126 (2015), 5812–5814. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2015.08.233
![]() |
[14] |
N. Faraz, Y. Khan, H. Jafari, A. Yildirim, M. Madani, Fractional variational iteration method via modified Riemann- Liouville derivative, J. King Saud Univ. Sci., 23 (2011), 413–417. doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2010.07.025
![]() |
[15] |
B. Tong, Y. He, L. Wei, X. Zhang, A generalized fractional sub-equation method for fractional differential equations with variable coefficients, Phys. Lett. A, 376 (2012), 2588–2590. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2012.07.018
![]() |
[16] |
S. S. Ray, S. Sahoo, A novel analytical method with fractional complex transform for new exact solutions of time-fractional fifth-order Sawada-Kotera equation, Rep. Math. Phys., 75 (2015), 63–72. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4877(15)60024-6
![]() |
[17] | I. Podlubny, Fractional differential equations, Academic Press, 1998. |
[18] |
R. Khalil, M. Al Horani, A. Yousef, M. Sababheh, A new definition of fractional derivative, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 264 (2014), 65–70. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.01.002
![]() |
[19] |
T. Abdeljawad, On conformable fractional calculus, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 279 (2015), 57–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2014.10.016
![]() |
[20] |
H. Rezazadeh, H. Tariq, M. Eslami, M. Mirzazadeh, Q. Zhou, New exact solutions of nonlinear conformable time-fractional Phi-4 equation, Chinese J. Phys., 56 (2018), 2805–2816. doi: 10.1016/j.cjph.2018.08.001
![]() |
[21] |
K. Zeliha, Some analytical solutions by mapping methods for non-linear conformable time-fractional Phi-4 equation, Therm. Sci., 23 (2019), 1815–1822. doi: 10.2298/TSCI190108341K
![]() |
[22] |
M. M. Khader, S. Kumar, An accurate numerical method for solving the linear fractional Klein-Gordon equation, Math. Method. Appl. Sci., 37 (2014), 2972–2979. doi: 10.1002/mma.3035
![]() |
[23] |
X. Deng, M. Zhao, X. Li, Travelling wave solutions for a nonlinear variant of the PHI-four equation, Math. Comput. Model., 49 (2009), 617–622. doi: 10.1016/j.mcm.2008.03.011
![]() |
[24] |
H. Tariq, G. Akram, New approach for exact solutions of time fractional Cahn-Allen equation and time fractional Phi-4 equation, Physica A, 473 (2017), 352–362. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.12.081
![]() |
[25] |
H. Rezazadeh, K. K. Ali, M. Eslami, M. Mirzazadeh, H. Yépez-Martínez, On the soliton solutions to the space-time fractional simplified MCH equation, J. Interdisciplinary Math., 22 (2019), 149–165. doi: 10.1080/09720502.2019.1597431
![]() |
[26] | M. Shakeel, Q. M. Ul-Hassan, J. Ahmad, Applications of the novel (G′G)− expansion method for a time fractional simplified modified MCH equation, Abstr. Appl. Anal., 2014 (2014), 601961. |
[27] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, A note on Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method combined with complex transform method applied to fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Engineering Modeling and Application, 7 (2018), 279–285. doi: 10.1515/nleng-2017-0145
![]() |
[28] |
S. Z. Hassan, M. A. E. Abdelrahman, Solitary wave solutions for some nonlinear time fractional partial differential equations, Pramana, 91 (2018), 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s12043-018-1574-5
![]() |
[29] |
X. F. Yang, Z. C. Deng, Y. Wei, A Riccati-Bernoulli sub-ODE method for nonlinear partial differential equations and its application, Adv. Differ. Equ, 2015 (2015), 1–17. doi: 10.1186/s13662-014-0331-4
![]() |
[30] |
S. Sahoo, S. S. Ray, Improved fractional sub-equation method for (3+1)-dimensional generalized fractional KdV-Zakharov-Kuznetsov equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 70 (2015), 158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2015.05.002
![]() |
[31] |
S. Arbabi, M. Najafi, Exact solitary wave solutions of the complex nonlinear Schrödinger equations, Optik, 127 (2016), 4682–4688. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.02.008
![]() |
[32] |
H. Bulut, T. A. Sulaiman, H. M. Baskonus, Dark, bright optical and other solitons with conformable space-time fractional second-order spatiotemporal dispersion, Optik, 163 (2018), 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijleo.2018.02.086
![]() |
[33] |
M. Inc, A. I. Aliyu, A. Yusuf, D. Baleanu, Soliton solutions and stability analysis for some conformable nonlinear partial differential equations in mathematical physics, Opt. Quant. Electron, 50 (2018), 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s11082-017-1266-2
![]() |
[34] | T. A. Sulaiman, H. Bulut, H. M. Baskonus, Optical solitons to the fractional perturbed NLSE in nano-fibers, Discrete Cont. Dyn. S, 13 (2020), 925–936. |
[35] |
M. A. E. Abdelrahman, H. AlKhidhr, Closed-form solutions to the conformable space-time fractional simplified MCH equation and time fractional Phi-4 equation, Results Phys., 18 (2020), 103294. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103294
![]() |
[36] | C. Q. Dai, J. F. Zhang, Jacobian elliptic function method for nonlinear differential difference equations, Chaos Solution. Fract., 27 (2006) 1042–1047. |
[37] | Q. Wanga, Y. Chen, H. Zhang, An extended Jacobi elliptic function rational expansion method and its application to (2+1)-dimensional dispersive long wave equation, Phys. Lett. A, 289 (2005), 411–426. |
[38] |
Q. Zhang, X. Li, K. Pan, Y. Ren, Linearized ADI schemes for two-dimensional space-fractional nonlinear Ginzburg–Landau equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 80 (2020), 1201–1220. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2020.05.027
![]() |
[39] |
Q. Zhang, L. Zhang, H. W. Sun, A three-level finite difference method with preconditioning technique for two-dimensional nonlinear fractional complex Ginzburg–Landau equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 389 (2021), 113355. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2020.113355
![]() |
[40] | Q. Zhang, M. Chen, Y. Xu, D. Xu, Compact θ-method for the generalized delay diffusion equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 316 (2018), 357–369. |
[41] |
Q. Zhang, T. Li, Asymptotic stability of compact and linear θ-methods for space fractional delay generalized diffusion equation, J. Sci. Comput., 81 (2019), 2413–2446. doi: 10.1007/s10915-019-01091-1
![]() |
[42] |
V. E. Zakharov, L. A. Ostrovsky, Modulation instability: The beginning, Physica D, 238 (2009), 540–548. doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2008.12.002
![]() |
[43] |
M. Arshad, A. R. Seadawy, D. Lu, W. Jun, Modulation instability analysis of modify unstable nonlinear Schrödinger dynamical equation and its optical soliton solutions, Results in Phys., 7 (2017), 4153–4161. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.10.029
![]() |
1. | Yousef F Alharbi, Emad K El-Shewy, Mahmoud AE Abdelrahman, Effects of Brownian noise strength on new chiral solitary structures, 2022, 1461-3484, 146134842211349, 10.1177/14613484221134994 | |
2. | Abeer Al Elaiw, Muath Awadalla, Murugesan Manigandan, Kinda Abuasbeh, A Novel Implementation of Mönch’s Fixed Point Theorem to a System of Nonlinear Hadamard Fractional Differential Equations, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 586, 10.3390/fractalfract6100586 | |
3. | Abdulwahab Almutairi, Fractional Biswas–Milovic Equation in Random Case Study, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 687, 10.3390/fractalfract6110687 | |
4. | Fidel Meléndez-Vázquez, Guillermo Fernández-Anaya, Aldo Jonathan Muñóz-Vázquez, Eduardo Gamaliel Hernández-Martínez, Generalized conformable operators: Application to the design of nonlinear observers, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 12952, 10.3934/math.2021749 | |
5. | Xing Hu, Yongkun Li, Left Riemann–Liouville Fractional Sobolev Space on Time Scales and Its Application to a Fractional Boundary Value Problem on Time Scales, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 268, 10.3390/fractalfract6050268 | |
6. | Imran Siddique, Arshad M. Mirza, Kausar Shahzadi, M. Ali Akbar, Fahd Jarad, Yusuf Gurefe, Diverse Precise Traveling Wave Solutions Possessing Beta Derivative of the Fractional Differential Equations Arising in Mathematical Physics, 2022, 2022, 2314-8888, 1, 10.1155/2022/5613708 | |
7. | H. G. Abdelwahed, E. K. El-Shewy, S. Alghanim, Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, On the Physical Fractional Modulations on Langmuir Plasma Structures, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 430, 10.3390/fractalfract6080430 | |
8. | Ghazala Akram, Saima Arshed, Maasoomah Sadaf, Maham Maqbool, Comparison of fractional effects for Phi-4 equation using beta and M-truncated derivatives, 2023, 55, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-023-04549-7 | |
9. | Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, S. Z. Hassan, R. A. Alomair, D. M. Alsaleh, The New Wave Structures to the Fractional Ion Sound and Langmuir Waves Equation in Plasma Physics, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 227, 10.3390/fractalfract6050227 | |
10. | Zi-Qiang Wang, Qin Liu, Jun-Ying Cao, A Higher-Order Numerical Scheme for Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Fractional Volterra Integral Equations with Uniform Accuracy, 2022, 6, 2504-3110, 314, 10.3390/fractalfract6060314 | |
11. | Maged A. Azzam, H. G. Abdelwahed, E. K. El-Shewy, Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, On the super solitonic structures for the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, 2024, 56, 1572-817X, 10.1007/s11082-023-06128-2 | |
12. | H. G. Abdelwahed, A. F. Alsarhan, E. K. El-Shewy, Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, Mubashir Qayyum, Novel Explosive and Super Fractional Nonlinear Schrödinger Structures, 2023, 2023, 2314-4785, 1, 10.1155/2023/9996773 | |
13. | Mutlu Akar, Erdoğan Mehmet Özkan, On exact solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional time conformable Maccari system, 2023, 37, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979223502193 | |
14. | Hanan A. Alkhidhr, An insight into the solitonic structure of two distinct fractional nonlinear Schrödinger models in optical fiber using conformable fractional derivative, 2024, 14, 2158-3226, 10.1063/5.0187732 | |
15. | Mahmoud AE Abdelrahman, Mohammed B Almatrafi, A reliable technique for nonlinear evolution equations with applications in mathematical physics, 2024, 1461-3484, 10.1177/14613484241301478 | |
16. | Ayesha Farooq, Tooba Shafique, Muhammad Abbas, Asnake Birhanu, Y. S. Hamed, Explicit travelling wave solutions to the time fractional Phi-four equation and their applications in mathematical physics, 2025, 15, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-025-86177-7 | |
17. | Mahmoud A. E. Abdelrahman, M. A. Sohaly, Yousef F. Alharbi, Optical random soliton solutions to conformable fractional NLSE via statistical distributions, 2025, 34, 0218-8635, 10.1142/S0218863523500911 |