Citation: Kumari Anjali, YSC Khuman, Jaswant Sokhi. A Review of the interrelations of terrestrial carbon sequestration and urban forests[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2020, 7(6): 464-485. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2020030
[1] | Kai Gao . Global boundedness of classical solutions to a Keller-Segel-Navier-Stokes system involving saturated sensitivity and indirect signal production in two dimensions. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(3): 1710-1736. doi: 10.3934/era.2023089 |
[2] | Chun Huang . Global boundedness for a chemotaxis-competition system with signal dependent sensitivity and loop. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(5): 3261-3279. doi: 10.3934/era.2021037 |
[3] | Ya Tian, Jing Luo . Boundedness and large time behavior of a signal-dependent motility system with nonlinear indirect signal production. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6301-6319. doi: 10.3934/era.2024293 |
[4] | Chang-Jian Wang, Yu-Tao Yang . Boundedness criteria for the quasilinear attraction-repulsion chemotaxis system with nonlinear signal production and logistic source. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(1): 299-318. doi: 10.3934/era.2023015 |
[5] | Chang-Jian Wang, Yuan-Hao Zang . Boundedness of solutions in a two-species chemotaxis system. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(5): 2862-2880. doi: 10.3934/era.2025126 |
[6] | Rong Zhang, Liangchen Wang . Global dynamics in a competitive two-species and two-stimuli chemotaxis system with chemical signalling loop. Electronic Research Archive, 2021, 29(6): 4297-4314. doi: 10.3934/era.2021086 |
[7] | Bin Wang . Random periodic sequence of globally mean-square exponentially stable discrete-time stochastic genetic regulatory networks with discrete spatial diffusions. Electronic Research Archive, 2023, 31(6): 3097-3122. doi: 10.3934/era.2023157 |
[8] | Lijun Miao, Jingwei Yu, Linlin Qiu . On global existence for the stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equation with time-dependent linear loss/gain. Electronic Research Archive, 2025, 33(6): 3571-3583. doi: 10.3934/era.2025159 |
[9] | Yan Xia, Songhua Wang . Global convergence in a modified RMIL-type conjugate gradient algorithm for nonlinear systems of equations and signal recovery. Electronic Research Archive, 2024, 32(11): 6153-6174. doi: 10.3934/era.2024286 |
[10] | Xueyong Zhou, Xiangyun Shi . Stability analysis and backward bifurcation on an SEIQR epidemic model with nonlinear innate immunity. Electronic Research Archive, 2022, 30(9): 3481-3508. doi: 10.3934/era.2022178 |
As we all know, Keller and Segel [1] first proposed the classical chemotaxis model (hereafter called K-S model), which has been widely applied in biology and medicine. The model can be given by the following:
{v1t=Δv1−χ∇⋅(v1∇v2)+f(v1), x∈Ω, t>0,τv2t=Δv2−v2+v1, x∈Ω, t>0, | (1.1) |
where v1 is the cell density, v2 is the concentration of the chemical signal, and f(v1) is the logistic source function. For the case of τ=1 and f(v1)=0, it has been proven that the classical solutions to system (1.1) always remain globally bounded when n=1 [2]. A critical mass phenomenon of system (1.1) has been shown in a two-dimensional space. Namely, if the initial data v10 satisfies ‖v10‖L1(Ω)<4πχ, then the solution (v1,v2) is globally bounded [3]. Alternatively, if the initial data v10 satisfies ‖v10‖L1(Ω)>4πχ, then the solution (v1,v2) is unbounded in finite or infinite time, provided Ω is simply connected [4,5]. In particular, for a framework of radially symmetric solutions in a planar disk, the solutions blow up in finite time if ‖v10‖L1(Ω)>8πχ [6]. When f(v1)=0, Liu and Tao [7] changed τv2t=Δv2−v2+v1 to v2t=Δv2−v2+g(v1) with 0≤g(v1)≤Kvα1 for K,α>0, and obtained the global well-posedness of model (1.1) provided that 0<α<2n. Later on, the equation τv2t=Δv2−v2+v1 was changed to 0=Δv2−ϖ(t)+g(v1) with ϖ(t)=1|Ω|∫Ωg(v1(⋅,t)) for g(v1)=vα1. Winkler [8] deduced that for any v10, the model (1.1) is globally and classical solvable if α<2n; conversely, if α>2n, then the solutions are unbounded in a finite-time for any ∫Ωv10=m>0. For τ=0, when f(v1)≤v1(c−dv1) with c,d>0, Tello and Winkler [9] deduced the global well-posedness of model (1.1) provided that d>n−2nχ. Afterwards, when f(v1)=cv1−dvϵ1 with ϵ>1,c≥0,d>0, Winkler [10] defined a concept of very weak solutions and observed that these solutions are globally bounded under some conditions. For more results on (1.1), the readers can refer to [11,12,13,14].
Considering the volume filling effect [15], the self-diffusion functions and chemotactic sensitivity functions may have nonlinear forms of the cell density. The general model can be written as follows:
{v1t=∇⋅(ψ(v1)∇v1−ϕ(v1)∇v2)+f(v1), x∈Ω, t>0,τv2t=Δv2−v2+v1, x∈Ω, t>0. | (1.2) |
Here, ψ(v1) and ϕ(v1) are nonlinear functions. When τ=1 and f(v1)=0, for any ∫Ωv10=M>0, Winkler [16] derived that the solution (v1,v2) is unbounded in either finite or infinite time if ϕ(v1)ψ(v1)≥cvα1 with α>2n,n≥2 and some constant c>0 for all v1>1. Later on, Tao and Winkler [17] deduced the global well-posedness of model (1.5) provided that ϕ(v1)ψ(v1)≤cvα1 with α<2n,n≥1 and some constant c>0 for all v1>1. Furthermore, in a high-dimensional space where n≥5, Lin et al. [18] changed the equation τv2t=Δv2−v2+v1 to 0=Δv2−ϖ(t)+v1 with ϖ(t)=1|Ω|∫Ωv1(x,t)dx, and showed that the solution (v1,v2) is unbounded in a finite time.
Next, we introduce the chemotaxis model that involves an indirect signal mechanism. The model can be given by the following:
{v1t=∇⋅(ψ(v1)∇v1−ϕ(v1)∇v2)+f(v1), x∈Ω, t>0,τv2t=Δv2−v2+w, x∈Ω, t>0,τwt=Δw−w+v1, x∈Ω, t>0. | (1.3) |
For τ=1, when ψ(v1)=1,ϕ(v1)=v1 and f(v1)=λ(v1−vα1), the conclusion in [19] implied that the system is globally classical solvable if α>n4+12 with n≥2. Furthermore, the authors in [20,21,22] extended the boundedness result to a quasilinear system. Ren [23] derived the global well-posedness of system (1.3) and provided the qualitative analysis of such solutions. For τ=0, when ψ(s)≥c(s+1)θ and |ϕ(s)|≤ds(s+1)κ−1 with s≥0,c,d>0 and θ,κ∈R, Li and Li [24] obtained that the model (1.3) is globally classical solvable. Meanwhile, they also provided the qualitative analysis of such solutions. More results of the system with an indirect signal mechanism can be found in [25,26,27,28].
Considering that the cell or bacteria populations have a tendency to move towards a degraded nutrient, the authors obtain another well-known chemotaxis-consumption system:
{v1t=Δv1−χ∇⋅(v1∇v2), x∈Ω, t>0,v2t=Δv2−v1v2, x∈Ω, t>0, | (1.4) |
where v1 denotes the cell density, and v2 denotes the concentration of oxygen. If 0<χ≤16(n+1)‖v20‖L∞(Ω) with n≥2, then the results of [29] showed that the system (1.4) is globally classical solvable. Thereafter, Zhang and Li [30] deduced the global well-posedness of model (1.4) provided that n≤2 or 0<χ≤16(n+1)‖v20‖L∞(Ω),n≥3. In addition, for a sufficiently large v10 and v20, Tao and Winkler [31] showed that the defined weak solutions globally exist when n=3. Meanwhile, they also analyzed the qualitative properties of these weak solutions.
Based on the model (1.4), some researchers have considered the model that involves an indirect signal consumption:
{v1t=Δv1−χ∇⋅(v1∇v2), x∈Ω, t>0,v2t=Δv2−v1v2, x∈Ω, t>0,wt=−δw+v1, x∈Ω, t>0, | (1.5) |
where w represents the indirect signaling substance produced by cells for degrading oxygen. Fuest [32] obtained the global well-posedness of model (1.5) provided that n≤2 or ‖v20‖L∞(Ω)≤13n, and studied the convergence rate of the solution. Subsequently, the authors in [33] extended the boundedness conclusion of model (1.5) using conditions n≥3 and 0<‖v20‖L∞(Ω)≤π√n. For more results on model (1.5), the readers can refer to [34,35,36,37,38,39].
Inspired by the work mentioned above, we find that there are few papers on the quasilinear chemotaxis model that involve the nonlinear indirect consumption mechanism. In view of the complexity of the biological environment, this signal mechanism may be more realistic. In this manuscript, we are interested in the following system:
{v1t=∇⋅(ψ(v1)∇v1−χϕ(v1)∇v2)+λ1v1−λ2vβ1, x∈Ω, t>0,v2t=Δv2−wθv2, x∈Ω, t>0,0=Δw−w+vα1, x∈Ω, t>0,∂v1∂ν=∂v2∂ν=∂w∂ν=0, x∈∂Ω, t>0,v1(x,0)=v10(x),v2(x,0)=v20(x), x∈Ω, | (1.6) |
where Ω⊂Rn(n≥1) is a bounded and smooth domain, ν denotes the outward unit normal vector on ∂Ω, and χ,λ1,λ2,θ>0,0<α≤1θ,β≥2. Here, v1 is the cell density, v2 is the concentration of oxygen, and w is the indirect chemical signal produced by v1 to degrade v2. The diffusion functions ψ,ϕ∈C2[0,∞) are assumed to satisfy
ψ(s)≥a0(s+1)r1 and 0≤ϕ(s)≤b0s(s+1)r2, | (1.7) |
for all s≥0 with a0,b0>0 and r1,r2∈R. In addition, the initial data v10 and v20 fulfill the following:
v10,v20∈W1,∞(Ω) with v10,v20≥0,≢0 in Ω. | (1.8) |
Theorem 1.1. Assume that χ,λ1,λ2,θ>0,0<α≤1θ, and β≥2, and that Ω⊂Rn(n≥1) is a smooth bounded domain. Let ψ,ϕ∈C2[0,∞) satisfy (1.7). Suppose that the initial data v10 and v20 fulfill (1.8). It has been proven that if r1>2r2+1, then the problem (1.6) has a nonnegative classical solution
(v1,v2,w)∈(C0(ˉΩ×[0,∞))∩C2,1(ˉΩ×(0,∞)))2×C2,0(ˉΩ×(0,∞)), |
which is globally bounded in the sense that
‖v1(⋅,t)‖L∞(Ω)+‖v2(⋅,t)‖W1,∞(Ω)+‖w(⋅,t)‖W1,∞(Ω)≤C, |
for all t>0, with C>0.
Remark 1.2. Our main ideas are as follows. First, we obtain the L∞ bound for v2 by the maximum principle of the parabolic equation. Next, we establish an estimate for the functional y(t):=1p∫Ω(v1+1)p+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p for any p>1 and t>0. Finally, we can derive the global solvability of model (1.6).
Remark 1.3. Theorem 1.1 shows that self-diffusion and logical source are advantageous for the boundedness of the solutions. In this manuscript, due to the indirect signal substance w that consumes oxygen, the aggregation of cells or bacterial is almost impossible when self-diffusion is stronger than cross-diffusion, namely r1>2r2+1. We can control the logical source to ensure the global boundedness of the solution for model (1.6). Thus, we can study the effects of the logistic source, the diffusion functions, and the nonlinear consumption mechanism on the boundedness of the solutions.
In this section, we first state a lemma on the local existence of classical solutions. The proof can be proven by the fixed point theory. The readers can refer to [40,41] for more details.
Lemma 2.1. Let the assumptions in Theorem 1.1 hold. Then, there exists Tmax∈(0,∞] such that the problem (1.6) has a nonnegative classical solution (v1,v2,w) that satisfies the following:
(v1,v2,w)∈(C0(ˉΩ×[0,Tmax))∩C2,1(ˉΩ×(0,Tmax)))2×C2,0(ˉΩ×(0,Tmax)). |
Furthermore, if Tmax<∞, then
lim supt↗Tmax(‖v1(⋅,t)‖L∞(Ω)+‖v2(⋅,t)‖W1,∞(Ω))=∞. |
Lemma 2.2. (cf. [42]) Let Ω⊂Rn(n≥1) be a smooth bounded domain. For any s≥1 and ϵ>0, one can obtain
∫∂Ω|∇z|2s−2∂|∇z|2∂ν≤ϵ∫Ω|∇z|2s−2|D2z|2+Cϵ∫Ω|∇z|2s, |
for all z∈C2(ˉΩ) fulfilling ∂z∂ν|∂Ω=0, with Cϵ=C(ϵ,s,Ω)>0.
Lemma 2.3. (cf. [43]) Let Ω⊂Rn(n≥1) be a bounded and smooth domain. For s≥1, we have
∫Ω|∇z|2s+2≤2(4s2+n)‖z‖2L∞(Ω)∫Ω|∇z|2s−2|D2z|2, |
for all z∈C2(ˉΩ) fulfilling ∂z∂ν|∂Ω=0.
Lemma 2.4. Let Ω⊂Rn(n≥1) be a bounded and smooth domain. For any z∈C2(Ω), one has the following:
(Δz)2≤n|D2z|2, |
where D2z represents the Hessian matrix of z and |D2z|2=∑ni,j=1z2xixj.
Proof. The proof can be found in [41, Lemma 3.1].
Lemma 2.5. (cf. [44,45]) Let a1,a2>0. The non-negative functions f∈C([0,T))∩C1((0,T)) and y∈L1loc([0,T)) fulfill
f′(t)+a1f(t)≤y(t), t∈(0,T), |
and
∫t+τty(s)ds≤a2, t∈(0,T−τ), |
where τ=min{1,T2} and T∈(0,∞]. Then, one deduces the following:
f(t)≤f(0)+2a2+a2a1, t∈(0,T). |
In this section, we provide some useful Lemmas to prove Theorem 1.1.
Lemma 3.1. Let β>1, then, there exist M,M1,M2>0 such that
‖v2(⋅,t)‖L∞(Ω)≤M for all t∈(0,Tmax), | (3.1) |
and
∫Ωv1≤M1 for all t∈(0,Tmax). | (3.2) |
Proof. By the parabolic comparison principle for v2t=Δv2−wθ1v2, we can derive (3.1). Invoking the integration for the first equation of (1.6), one has the following:
ddt∫Ωv1=λ1∫Ωv1−λ2∫Ωvβ1 for all t∈(0,Tmax). | (3.3) |
Invoking the Hölder inequality, we obtain the following:
ddt∫Ωv1≤λ1∫Ωv1−λ2|Ω|β−1(∫Ωv1)β. | (3.4) |
We can apply the comparison principle to deduce the following:
∫Ωv1≤max{∫Ωv10,(λ1λ2)1β−1|Ω|}=M1. | (3.5) |
Thereupon, we complete the proof.
Lemma 3.2. For any γ>1, we have the following:
∫Ωwγ≤C0∫Ωvαγ1 for all t∈(0,Tmax), | (3.6) |
where C0=2γ1+γ>0.
Proof. For γ>1, multiplying equation 0=Δw−w+vα1 by wγ−1, one obtain the following:
0=−(γ−1)∫Ωwγ−2|∇w|2−∫Ωwγ+∫Ωvα1wγ−1≤∫Ωvα1wγ−1−∫Ωwγ for all t∈(0,Tmax). | (3.7) |
By Young's inequality, it is easy to deduce the following:
∫Ωvα1wγ−1≤γ−12γ∫Ωwγ+2γ−1⋅1γ∫Ωvαγ1. | (3.8) |
Thus, we arrive at (3.6) by combining (3.7) with (3.8).
Lemma 3.3. Let the assumptions in Lemma 2.1 hold. For any p>max{1,1θ−1}, there exists C>0 such that
12pddt∫Ω|∇v2|2p+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p+14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2≤C∫Ωvθα(p+1)1+C, | (3.9) |
for all t∈(0,Tmax).
Proof. Using the equation v2t=Δv2−wθ1v2, we obtain the following:
∇v2⋅∇v2t=∇v2⋅∇Δv2−∇v2⋅∇(wθv2)=12Δ|∇v2|2−|D2v2|2−∇v2⋅∇(wθv2), | (3.10) |
where we used the equality ∇v2⋅∇Δv2=12Δ|∇v2|2−|D2v2|2. Testing (3.10) by |∇v2|2p−2 and integrating by parts, we derive the following:
12pddt∫Ω|∇v2|2p+∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p=12∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2Δ|∇v2|2+∫Ω|∇v2|2p−∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2∇v2⋅∇(wθv2)=I1+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p+I2. | (3.11) |
Using Lemma 2.3 and (3.1), one has the following:
∫Ω|∇v2|2p+2≤C1∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2 for all t∈(0,Tmax), | (3.12) |
where C1=2(4p2+n)M2. In virtue of Lemma 2.2, Young's inequality, and (3.12), an integration by parts produces the following:
I1+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p=12∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2Δ|∇v2|2+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p=12∫∂Ω|∇v2|2p−2∂|∇v2|2∂ν−12∫Ω∇|∇v2|2p−2⋅∇|∇v2|2+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p≤14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+C2∫Ω|∇v2|2p−p−12∫Ω|∇v2|2p−4|∇|∇v2|2|2≤14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+14C1∫Ω|∇v2|2p+2+C3≤12∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+C3 for all t∈(0,Tmax), | (3.13) |
with C2,C3>0. Due to |Δv2|≤√n|D2v2|, we can conclude from (3.1) and the integration by parts that
I2=−∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2∇v2⋅∇(wθv2)=∫Ωwθv2∇⋅(∇v2|∇v2|2p−2)≤∫Ωwθv2(Δv2|∇v2|2p−2+(2p−2)|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|)≤∫Ω(√n+2(p−2))Mwθ|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|=C4∫Ωwθ|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2| for all t∈(0,Tmax), | (3.14) |
with C4=(√n+2(p−2))M>0. Due to p>max{1,1θ−1}, we have θ(p+1)>1. With applications of Young's inequality, (3.12), and Lemma 3.2, we obtain the following from (3.14):
C4∫Ωwθ|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|≤18∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+C5∫Ωw2θ|∇v2|2p−2≤18∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+18C1∫Ω|∇v2|2p+2+C6∫Ωwθ(p+1)≤14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+C7∫Ωwθ(p+1)≤14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+C8∫Ωvθα(p+1)1, | (3.15) |
with C5,C6,C7,C8>0. Substituting (3.13) and (3.15) into (3.11), we derive the following:
12pddt∫Ω|∇v2|2p+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p+14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2≤C8∫Ωvθα(p+1)1+C3, | (3.16) |
for all t∈(0,Tmax). Thereupon, we complete the proof.
Lemma 3.4. Let the assumptions in Lemma 2.1 hold. If r1>2r2+1, then for any p>1, we obtain the following:
1pddt∫Ω(v1+1)p+1p∫Ω(v1+1)p≤14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+(C+λ1+1p)∫Ω(v1+1)p−λ2∫Ωvp+β−11+C, | (3.17) |
for all t∈(0,Tmax), with C>0.
Proof. Testing the first equation of problem (1.6) by (v1+1)p−1, one can obtain the following:
1pddt∫Ω(v1+1)p+1p∫Ω(v1+1)p=−(p−1)∫Ω(v1+1)p−2ψ(v1)|∇v1|2+1p∫Ω(v1+1)p+χ(p−1)∫Ω(v1+1)p−2ϕ(v1)∇v1⋅∇v2+λ1∫Ωv1(v1+1)p−1−λ2∫Ωvβ1(v1+1)p−1, | (3.18) |
for all t∈(0,Tmax). In view of (1.7), the first term on the right-hand side of (3.18) can be estimated as follows:
−(p−1)∫Ω(v1+1)p−2ψ(v1)|∇v1|2≤−(p−1)a0∫Ω(v1+1)p+r1−2|∇v1|2. | (3.19) |
For the second term on the right-hand side of (3.18), we can see that
χ(p−1)∫Ω(v1+1)p−2ϕ(v1)∇v1⋅∇v2≤χ(p−1)b0∫Ωv1(v1+1)p+r2−2∇v1⋅∇v2. | (3.20) |
We can obtain the following from Young's inequality:
χ(p−1)b0∫Ωv1(v1+1)p+r2−2∇v1⋅∇v2≤χ(p−1)b0∫Ω(v1+1)p+r2−1∇v1⋅∇v2≤(p−1)a0∫Ω(v1+1)p+r1−2|∇v1|2+C1∫Ω(v1+1)p+2r2−r1|∇v2|2, | (3.21) |
with C1>0. Utilizing Young's inequality and (3.12), one has the following:
C1∫Ω(v1+1)p+2r2−r1|∇v2|2≤18(4p2+n)M2∫Ω|∇v2|2(p+1)+C2∫Ω(v1+1)(p+1)(p+2r2−r1)p≤14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+C2∫Ω(v1+1)(p+1)(p+2r2−r1)p, | (3.22) |
where C2>0. Due to r1>2r2+1, for any p>1>r1−2r22r2−r1+1, we can obtain (p+1)(p+2r2−r1)p<p. Applying Young's inequality, we obtain the following:
C2∫Ω(v1+1)(p+1)(p+2r2−r1)p≤C3∫Ω(v1+1)p+C3, | (3.23) |
where C3>0. Hence, substituting (3.19)–(3.23) into (3.18), one obtains the following:
1pddt∫Ω(v1+1)p+1p∫Ω(v1+1)p≤14∫Ω|∇v2|2p−2|D2v2|2+(C3+λ1+1p)∫Ω(v1+1)p−λ2∫Ωvp+β−11+C4, | (3.24) |
for all t∈(0,Tmax), where C4>0.
Lemma 3.5. Let the assumptions in Lemma 2.1 hold. If r1>2r2+1, then for any p>max{1,1θ−1}, we obtain the following:
∫Ω(v1+1)p+∫Ω|∇v2|2p≤C, | (3.25) |
where C>0.
Proof. We can combine Lemma 3.3 with Lemma 3.4 to infer the following:
ddt(1p∫Ω(v1+1)p+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p)+1p∫Ω(v1+1)p+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p≤C1∫Ωvθα(p+1)1+(C1+λ1+1p)∫Ω(v1+1)p−λ2∫Ωvp+β−11+C1, | (3.26) |
where C1>0. Due to 0<α≤1θ and β≥2, we can obtain θα(p+1)≤p+1≤p+β−1. Using Young's inequality, we can obtain the following:
C1∫Ωvθα(p+1)1≤λ22∫Ωvp+β−11+C2, | (3.27) |
where C2>0. By the inequality (w+s)κ≤2κ(wκ+sκ) with w,s>0 and κ>1, we deduce the following:
(C1+λ1+1p)∫Ω(v1+1)p≤λ22∫Ωvp+β−11+C3, | (3.28) |
where C3>0, where we have applied Young's inequality. Thus, we obtain the following:
ddt(1p∫Ω(v1+1)p+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p)+1p∫Ω(v1+1)p+12p∫Ω|∇v2|2p≤C4, | (3.29) |
where C4>0. Therefore, we can obtain (3.25) by Lemma 2.5. Thereupon, we complete the proof.
The proof of Theorem 1.1. Recalling Lemma 3.5, for any p>max{1,1θ−1}, and applying the Lp−estimates of elliptic equation, there exists C1>0 such that
supt∈(0,Tmax)‖w(⋅,t)‖W2,pα(Ω)≤C1 for all t∈(0,Tmax). | (3.30) |
The Sobolev imbedding theorem enables us to obtain the following:
supt∈(0,Tmax)‖w(⋅,t)‖W1,∞(Ω)≤C2 for all t∈(0,Tmax), | (3.31) |
with C2>0. Besides, using the well-known heat semigroup theory to the second equation in system (1.6), we can find C3>0 such that
‖v2(⋅,t)‖W1,∞(Ω)≤C3 for all t∈(0,Tmax). | (3.32) |
Therefore, using the Moser-iteration[17], we can find C4>0 such that
‖v1(⋅,t)‖L∞(Ω)≤C4 for all t∈(0,Tmax). | (3.33) |
Based on (3.31)–(3.33), we can find C5>0 that fulfills the following:
‖v1(⋅,t)‖L∞(Ω)+‖v2(⋅,t)‖W1,∞(Ω)+‖w(⋅,t)‖W1,∞(Ω)≤C5, | (3.34) |
for all t∈(0,Tmax). According to Lemma 2.1, we obtain Tmax=∞. Thereupon, we complete the proof of Theorem 1.1.
In this manuscript, based on the model established in [35], we further considered that self-diffusion and cross-diffusion are nonlinear functions, as well as the mechanism of nonlinear generation and consumption of the indirect signal substance w. We mainly studied the effects of diffusion functions, the logical source, and the nonlinear consumption mechanism on the boundedness of solutions, which enriches the existing results of chemotaxis consumption systems. Compared with previous results [29,32], the novelty of this manuscript is that our boundedness conditions are more generalized and do not depend on spatial dimension or the sizes of ‖v20‖L∞(Ω) established in [32], which may be more in line with the real biological environment. In addition, we will further explore interesting problems related to system (1.6) in our future work, such as the qualitative analysis of system (1.6), the global classical solvability for full parabolic of system (1.6), and so on.
The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.
This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12271466, 11871415).
The authors declare there is no conflict of interest.
[1] | Marzluff JM (2008) Urban ecology: an international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature, Springer. |
[2] | Kant N, Anjali K (2020) Climate Strategy Proactivity (CSP): A Stakeholders-Centric Concept, In: Filho WL, Azul AM, Brandli L, et al. (Eds.), Partnerships for the Goals, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (Living Reference), Switzerland AG, Springer Nature, 1-16. |
[3] | Gruber N, Friedlingstein P, Field C, et al. (2004) The vulnerability of the carbon cycle in the 21st century: An assessment of carbon-climate-human interactions, In: Gruber N, Friedlingstein P, Field CB, et al. (Eds.), The Global Carbon Cycle: Integrating Humans, Climate, and the Natural World, Washington, D.C.; London: Island Press, 45-76. |
[4] | Lal M, Singh R (2000) Carbon Sequestration Potential of Indian Forests. Environ Monit Assess 60: 315-327. |
[5] | Ravindranath N, Ostwald M (2008) Methods for estimating above ground biomass, In: Ravindranath N, Ostwald M (Eds.), Carbon inventory methods: handbook for greenhouse gas inventory, carbon mitigation and round wood production projects, Netherlands, Springer Science + Business Media B.V. |
[6] | IPCC (2000) A special report of the IPCC: Land use, Land-use change and Forestry, UK, Cambridge University Press. |
[7] | Cox HM (2012) A Sustainability Initiative to Quantify Carbon Sequestration by Campus Trees. J Geog 111: 173-183. |
[8] | United Nations (2016) Urbanization and Development: World Cities Report 2016. Nairobi, United Nations Human Settlements Programme, 2016. |
[9] | Nowak DJ (2016) Urban Forests, Assessing the Sustainability of Agricultural and Urban Forests in the United States, 37-52. |
[10] | Fang J, Yu G, Liu L, et al. (2018) Climate change, human impacts, and carbon sequestration in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115: 4015-4020. |
[11] | Yeshaneh E, Wagner W, Exner-Kittridge M, et al. (2013) Identifying land use/cover dynamics in the Koga catchment, Ethiopia, from multi-scale data, and implications for environmental change. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 302-323. |
[12] | Schwela D (2000) Air Pollution and health in urban areas. Rev Environ Health 15: 13-42. |
[13] | Mcpherson EG, Rowntree RA (1993) Energy conservation potential of urban tree. J Aboriculture 321-331. |
[14] | McPherson EG (1998) Atmospheric carbon dioxide reduction by Sacramento's urban forest. J Aboriculture 215-223. |
[15] | Nowak DJ, Crane DE (2002) Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA. Environ Pollut 116: 381-389. |
[16] | Yang J, McBride J, Zhou J, et al. (2005) The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For Urban Green 3: 65-78. |
[17] | Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For Urban Green 4: 115-123. |
[18] | Zhao X, Lynch JG, Chen Q (2010) Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis. J Consum Res 37: 197-206. |
[19] | Nowak DJ, Hirabayashi S, Bodine A, et al. (2014) Tree and Forest Effects on Air Quality and Human Health in the United States. Environ Pollut 119-129. |
[20] | Skofronick-Jackson G, Petersen WA, Berg W, et al. (2016) The Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) Mission for Science and Society. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 98: 1679-1695. |
[21] | Livesley SJ, McPherson EG, Calfapietra C (2016) The Urban Forest and Ecosystem Services: Impacts on Urban Water, Heat, and Pollution Cycles at the Tree, Street, and City Scale. J Environ Qual 45: 119-124. |
[22] | McCarthy MP, Best M, Betts R (2010) Climate change in cities due to global warming and urban effects. Geophys Res Lett 37. |
[23] | Borelli S, Conigliaro M, Pineda F (2018) Urban forests in the global context. Unasylva 250 69: 3-10. |
[24] | Konijnendijk CC, Randrup TB (2004) Urban Forestry, LANDSCAPE AND PLANNING, 471-478. |
[25] | BATJES NH, SOMBROEK WG (1997) Possibilities for carbon sequestration in tropical and subtropical soils. Glob Chang Biol 3: 161-173. |
[26] | Canadell JG, Kirschbaum MUF, Kurz WA, et al. (2007) Factoring out natural and indirect human effects on terrestrial carbon sources and sinks. Environ Sci Policy 10: 370-384. |
[27] | Lal R (2008) Carbon sequestration. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 363: 815-830. |
[28] | IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Synthesis report summary for policymakers. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. |
[29] | Salunkhe O, Khare PK, Kumari R, et al. (2018) A systematic review on the aboveground biomass and carbon stocks of Indian forest ecosystems. Ecol Process 7-17. |
[30] | Afzal M, Akhtar AM (2013) Factors affecting carbon sequestration in trees. J Agric Res 51: 61-69. |
[31] | Sahu C, Sahu KS (2015) Air Pollution Tolerance Index (APTI), Anticipated Performance Index (API), Carbon Sequestration and Dust Collection Potential of Indian Tree Species: A Review. Emerg Res Manag & Technology 4-11. |
[32] | Stern NS (2007) The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press. |
[33] | Stephson NL, Das AJ, Condit R, et al. (2014) Rate of tree carbon accumulation increases continuously with tree size. Nature 507: 90-93. |
[34] | WMO (2017) Statement on the state of the global climate change. |
[35] | Raupach MR, Canadell JG (2010) Carbon and the Anthropocene. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 210-218. |
[36] | Akbari H (2002) Shade trees reduce building energy use and CO2 emissions from power plants. Environ Pollut 116: 119-126. |
[37] | McHale MR, McPherson EG, Burke IC (2007) The potential of urban tree plantings to be cost effective in carbon credit markets. Urban For Urban Green 49-60. |
[38] | Hartmann F, Perego P, Young A (2013) Carbon Accounting: Challenges for Research in Management Control and Performance Measurement. Abacus 49: 539-563. |
[39] | Cairns RD, Lasserre P (2006) Implementing carbon credits for forests based on green accounting. Ecol Econ 56: 610-621. |
[40] | Gazioğlu C, Okutan V (2016) Underwater Noise Pollution at the Strait of Istanbul (Bosphorus). Int J Environ Geoinformatics 3: 26-39. |
[41] | Sasaki N, Kim S (2009) Biomass carbon sinks in Japanese forests: 1966-2012. Forestry 82: 105-115. |
[42] | Suryawanshi M, Patel A, Kale T, et al. (2014) Carbon sequestration potential of tree species in the environment of North Maharashtra University Campus, Jalgaon (MS) India. Biosci Discov 5: 175-179. |
[43] | Jha KK (2015) Carbon storage and sequestration rate assessment and allometric model development in young teak plantations of tropical moist deciduous forest, India. J For Res 26: 589-604. |
[44] | Das M, Mukherjee A (2015) Carbon sequestration potential with height and girth of selected trees in the Golapbag Campus, Burdwan, West Bengal(India). Indian J Sci Res 10: 53-57. |
[45] | Guarna B (2012) An Analysis of Carbon Sequestration on Clarkson University 's Campus. B.S. ES & P '12. 2011-2012 Capstone. |
[46] | IPCC (2007) Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. |
[47] | Paustian K, Lehmann J, Ogle S, et al. (2016) Climate-Smart Soils. Nature 532: 49-57. |
[48] | Sedjo R, Sohngen B, Jagger P (1998) Carbon Sinks in the Post-Kyoto World. RRF Clim Issue 895-908. |
[49] | Khurana P (2012) A study on carbon sequestration in natural forests of India. J Appl Nat Sci 4: 132-136. |
[50] | Melkania N (2009) Carbon Sequestration in Indian Natural and Planted Forests. Indian For 380-387. |
[51] | Brown S (1996) Tropical forests and the global carbon cycle: estimating state and change in biomass density BT-Forest Ecosystems, Forest Management and the Global Carbon Cycle, In: Apps MJ, Price DT (Eds.), Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 135-144. |
[52] | Kiran GS, Kinnary S (2011) Carbon Sequatration by urban trees on roadside of Vadodara city. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3: 3066-3070. |
[53] | Chavan BL, Rasal GB (2010) Sequestered standing carbon stock in selective tree species grown in University campus at Aurangabad. Int J Eng Sci Technol 12: 3003-3007. |
[54] | Yunusa A, Linatoc A (2018) Inventory of Vegetation and Assessment of Carbon Storage Capacity towards a Low Carbon Campus: a Case Study of Universiti Tun Husein. Traektoria Nauk = Path Sci 4: 3001-3006. |
[55] | Ramachandran A, Jayakumar S, Haroon R, et al. (2007) Carbon sequestration: estimation of carbon stock in natural Forestsusing Geospatial technology in the Eastern Ghats of TN, India. Curr Sci 323-331. |
[56] | Singh R, Pal D, Tripathi N (2018) Land use/Land cover change detection analysis using remote sensing and GIS of Dhanbad District. India. Eurasian J For Sci 6: 1-12. |
[57] | Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science (80-) 304: 1623-1627. |
[58] | Kumar BM (2006) Carbon sequestration potential of tropical garden, In: Kumar BM, Nair P (Eds.), Tropical Home garden: a time tested example of sustainable agroforstry, Netherlands, Springer, 185-204. |
[59] | Sheikh M, Kumar M (2010) Carbon sequestration potential of trees on two aspects in sub tropical forest. Int J Conserv Sci 1143-1148. |
[60] | Marak T, Khare N (2017) Carbon Sequestration Potential of Selected Tree Species in the Campus of SHUATS. Int J Sci Res Dev 5: 63-66. |
[61] | Keenan TF, Williams CA (2018) The Terrestrial Carbon Sink. Annu Rev Environ Resour 43: 219-243. |
[62] | Chavan BL, Rasal GB (2009) Carbon Storage in Selective Tree Species in University campus at Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India, International Conference and Exhibition on RAEP, Agra, india., 119-130. |
[63] | Yirdaw M (2018) Carbon Stock Sequestered by Selected Tree Species Plantation in Wondo Genet College, Ethiopia. J Earth Sci Clim Chang 9: 1-5. |
[64] | Kongsager R, Napier J, Mertz O (2013) The carbon sequestration potential of tree crop plantations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18: 1197-1213. |
[65] | Verchot L, Noordwijk M, Kandii S, et al. (2007) Climate change: Linking adaptation and mitigation through agroforestry. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 12: 901-918. |
[66] | Soto-Pinto L, Anzueto M, Mendoza J, et al. (2010) Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigineous community of chiapas, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 78: 1-39. |
[67] | Nowak DJ (1993) Atmospheric carbon reduction by urban trees. J EnvironManagement 37: 207-217. |
[68] | Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: An un- derexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agro- for Syst 61: 281-295. |
[69] | Brack CL (2002) Pollution mitigation and carbon sequestration by an urban forest. Environ Pollut 116: 195-200. |
[70] | Churkina G (2012) Carbon cycle in urban ecosystem, In: Lal R, Augustin B (Eds.), Carbon Sequestration in urban ecosystems, Netherlands, Springer. |
[71] | Joshi RK, Dhyani S (2019) Biomass, carbon density and diversity of tree species in tropical dry deciduous forests in Central India. Acta Ecol Sin 39: 289-299. |
[72] | Flora G, Athista GM, Derisha L, et al. (2018) Estimation of Carbon Storage in the Tree Growth of St. Mary's College (Autonomous) Campus, Thoothukudi, Tamilnadu, India. Int J Emerg Technol Innov Res 5: 260-266. |
[73] | Ketterings QM, Coe R, van Noordwijk M, et al. (2001) Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. For Ecol Manage 146: 199-209. |
[74] | ANAMIKA A, PRADEEP C (2016) Urban Vegetation and Air Pollution Mitigation: Some Issues from India. Chinese J Urban Environ Stud 04: 1-10. |
[75] | Salazar S, Sanchez L, Galiendo P, et al. (2010) AG tree biomass equation and nutrient pool for a para climax chestnut stand and for a climax oak stand. Sci Res Essays 1294-1301. |
[76] | Parresol B (1999) Assessing tree and stand biomass: A review with examples and critical comparisions. For Sci 45: 573-593. |
[77] | Pragasan L (2014) Carbon Stock Assessment in the Vegetation of the Chitteri Reserve Forest of the Eastern Ghats in India Based on Non-Destructive Method Using Tree Inventory Data. J Earth Sci Clim Chang 11-21. |
[78] | Brown S, Lugo AE (1982) The Storage and Production of Organic Matter in Tropical Forests and Their Role in the Global Carbon Cycle. Biotropica 14: 161-187. |
[79] | Haripriya GS (2000) Estimates of biomass in Indian forests. Biomass and Bioenergy 19: 245-258. |
[80] | Haghparast H, Delbari AS, Kulkarni D (2013) Carbon sequestration in Pune University Campus with special reference to Geographical information system. J Ann Biol Res 2013, 4 4: 169-175. |
[81] | Vashum KT, Jayakumar S (2012) Methods to Estimate Above-Ground Biomass and Carbon Stock in Natural Forests: A Review. J Ecosyst Ecogr 2-4. |
[82] | Nowak DJ (2012) Contrasting natural regeneration and tree planting in 14 North American cities. Urban For Urban Green 11: 374-382. |
[83] | Nowak DJ, Dwyer JF (2007) Understanding the benefits and costs of urban forest ecosystems, In: Kuser J (Ed.), Urban and community forestry in the Northeast, New York: Springer, 25-46. |
[84] | Patel J, Vasava A, Patel N (2017) Occurence of the Forest Owlet Heteroglaux blewitti in Navsari and Valsad Districts of Gujrat, India. Indian Birds 13: 78-79. |
[85] | Yang J, Yu Q, Gong P (2008) Quantifying air pollution removal by green roofs in Chicago. Atmos Environ 42: 7266-7273. |
[86] | Chiesura A (2004) The role of urban parks for the sustainable city. Landsc Urban Plan 68: 129-138. |
[87] | Vailshery LS, Jaganmohan M, Nagendra H (2013) Effect of street trees on microclimate and air pollution. Urban For Urban Green 12: 408-415. |
[88] | Dhadse S, Gajghate DG, Chaudhari PR, et al. (2011) Interaction of urban vegetation cover to sequester air pollution from ambient air environment, In: Moldovennu AM (Ed.), Air pollution: new developments, Rijeka, Croatia, InTech. |
[89] | Dhyani SK, Ram A, Dev I (2016) Potential of agroforestry systems in carbon sequestration in India. Indian J Agric Sci 86: 1103-1112. |
[90] | Chaudhry P (2016) Urban greening: a review of some Indian studies. Brazilian J Biol Sci 3: 425-432. |
[91] | Jim CY, Chen WY (2006) Recreation amenity use and contingent valuation of urban green spaces in Guangzhou, China. Landsc Urban Plan 52: 117-133. |
[92] | Stoner T, Rapp C (2008) Open Spaces Sacred Places. |
[93] | Tripathi M, Joshi H (2015) Carbon flow in Delhi urban forest ecosystems. Ann Biol Res 6: 13-17. |
[94] | Nowak DJ, Crane D, Stevens J, et al. (2008) A ground-based method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services. Arboric Urban For 34: 347-358. |
[95] | Peper PJ, McPherson EG (2003) Evaluation of four methods for estimating leaf area of isolated trees. Urban For Urban Green 2: 19-29. |
[96] | Dobbs C, Martinez-Harms M, Kendal D (2017) Ecosystem services, In: Ferrini F, Bosch CK van den, A. Fini (Eds.), Routledge handbook of urban forestry, Abingdon, UK, Routledge. |
[97] | Ramaiah M, Avtar R (2019) Urban Green Spaces and Their Need in Cities of Rapidly Urbanizing India: A Review. Urban Sci 3. |
[98] | Arnold A V, Edward D (2014) A model for Low Carbon Campus in Kerala. Int J Sci Eng Res 5: 95-99. |
[99] | Jim CY (2018) Protecting heritage trees in urban and peri-urban environments. Unasylva 250 69: 1. |
[100] | Arya A, Shalini Negi S, Kathota JC, et al. (2017) Carbon Sequestration Analysis of dominant tree species using Geo-informatics Technology in Gujarat State (INDIA). Int J Environ Geoinformatics 4: 79-93. |
[101] | Narayana J, Savinaya MS, Manjunath S, et al. (2017) Distribution and diversity of flora and fauna in and around Kuvempu University campus, Bhadra Wildlife Sanctuary range, Karnataka. Int J Plant Anim Env Sci 7: 89-99. |
[102] | Khera N, Mehta V, Sabata BC (2009) Interrelationship of birds and habitat features in urban green spaces in Delhi, India. Urban For Urban Green 8: 187-196. |
[103] | Nath A jyothi, Das A kumar (2011) Carbon storage and sequestration in bamboo-based smallholder homegardens of Barak Valley, Assam. Curr Sci 100: 229-233. |
[104] | Roy S, Byrne J, Pickering C (2012) A systematic quantitative review of urban tree benefits, costs, and assessment methods across cities in different climatic zones. Urban For Urban Green 11: 351-363. |
[105] | Song XP, Tan PY, Edwards P, et al. (2017) The economic benefits and costs of trees in urban forest stewardship: A systematic review. Urban For Urban Greening2. |
[106] | Nowak DJ (2010) Urban Biodiversity and Climate Change, In: Muller N, Warner P, Kelcey J (Eds.), Urban Biodiversity and Design, Hoboken, NJ, Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, 101-117. |
[107] | IGNOU (2020) IGNOU Profile 2020, Indira Gandhi National Open University, New Delhi, India. |
[108] | Silver WL, Ostertag R, Lugo AE (2000) The potential for carbon sequestration through reforestation of abandoned tropical agricultural and pasture lands. Restor Ecol 394-407. |
[109] | Nero BF, Conche DC, Anning A, et al. (2017) Urban Green Spaces Enhance Climate Change Mitigation in Cities of the Global South: the case of kumasi Ghana. Procedia Eng 68-83. |
[110] | Abdollahi KK, Ning ZH, Appeaning A (2000) Global climate change & the urban forest, GCRCC/Franklin Press, Baton Rouge, LA. |
[111] | Wilby R, Perry G (2006) Climate change, biodiversity and the Urban Environment: A critical review based on London, UK. Prog Phys Geogr 30: 73-98. |
[112] | Gill S., Handley J., Ennos A., et al. (2007) Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The Role of the Green Infrastructure. Built Environ 33: 115-133. |
[113] | Uddin S, Al Ghadban A, Dousari AA, et al. (2010) A remote sensing classification for Land cover changes and micro climate in Kuwait. Int J Sustain Dev Plan 5: 367-377. |
[114] | Chaudhry P, Tewari VP (2011) Urban forestry in India: development and research scenario. Interdiscip Environ Rev 12: 80. |
[115] | Bolund P, Hunhammar S (1999) Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol Econ 29: 293-301. |
[116] | Ferrini F, Fini A (2011) Sustainable management techniques for trees in the urban areas. J Biodivers Ecol Sci 1: 1-20. |
[117] | Tripathi M (2016) Carbon Management with Urban Trees. Indian J Fundam Appl Life Sci 6: 40-46. |
[118] | Chaudhry P, Dollo M, Bagra K, et al. (2011) Traditional biodiversity conservation and natural resource management system of some tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Interdiscip Environ Rev 12: 338. |
[119] | Ugle P, Rao S, Ramachandra TV (2010) Carbon sequestration potential of Urban trees, Wetlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change Conference at IISc, Bengaluru, Bengaluru, India, 1-12. |
[120] | Ren Z, Zhal C, Shen G, et al. (2015) Effects of forest type and urbanization on carbon storage of urban forest in changchun, NE. China, Springer. |
[121] | Potadar VR, Patil SS (2017) Potential of carbon sequestration and storage by trees in and around B. A. M. University campus of Aurangabad city in Maharashtra, India. Int J Sci Dev Res 2: 28-33. |
[122] | Velasco E, Roth M, Norford L, et al. (2016) Does urban vegetation enhance carbon sequestration? Landsc Urban Plan 148: 99-107. |