Citation: Harish Garg, Nancy. Algorithms for single-valued neutrosophic decision making based on TOPSIS and clustering methods with new distance measure[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2671-2693. doi: 10.3934/math.2020173
[1] | Vittoria Raimondi, Alessandro Grinzato . A basic introduction to single particles cryo-electron microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2022, 9(1): 5-20. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2022002 |
[2] | Joshua Holcomb, Nicholas Spellmon, Yingxue Zhang, Maysaa Doughan, Chunying Li, Zhe Yang . Protein crystallization: Eluding the bottleneck of X-ray crystallography. AIMS Biophysics, 2017, 4(4): 557-575. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2017.4.557 |
[3] | Stephanie H. DeLuca, Samuel L. DeLuca, Andrew Leaver-Fay, Jens Meiler . RosettaTMH: a method for membrane protein structure elucidation combining EPR distance restraints with assembly of transmembrane helices. AIMS Biophysics, 2016, 3(1): 1-26. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2016.1.1 |
[4] | Adam Redzej, Gabriel Waksman, Elena V Orlova . Structural studies of T4S systems by electron microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 184-199. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.184 |
[5] | Riyaz A. Mir, Jeff Lovelace, Nicholas P. Schafer, Peter D. Simone, Admir Kellezi, Carol Kolar, Gaelle Spagnol, Paul L. Sorgen, Hamid Band, Vimla Band, Gloria E. O. Borgstahl . Biophysical characterization and modeling of human Ecdysoneless (ECD) protein supports a scaffolding function. AIMS Biophysics, 2016, 3(1): 195-210. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2016.1.195 |
[6] | Angel Rivera-Calzada, Andrés López-Perrote, Roberto Melero, Jasminka Boskovic, Hugo Muñoz-Hernández, Fabrizio Martino, Oscar Llorca . Structure and Assembly of the PI3K-like Protein Kinases (PIKKs) Revealed by Electron Microscopy. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(2): 36-57. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.2.36 |
[7] | Wei Zhang, Sheng Cao, Jessica L. Martin, Joachim D. Mueller, Louis M. Mansky . Morphology and ultrastructure of retrovirus particles. AIMS Biophysics, 2015, 2(3): 343-369. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2015.3.343 |
[8] | Jany Dandurand, Angela Ostuni, Maria Francesca Armentano, Maria Antonietta Crudele, Vincenza Dolce, Federica Marra, Valérie Samouillan, Faustino Bisaccia . Calorimetry and FTIR reveal the ability of URG7 protein to modify the aggregation state of both cell lysate and amylogenic α-synuclein. AIMS Biophysics, 2020, 7(3): 189-203. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2020015 |
[9] | Ta-Chou Huang, Wolfgang B. Fischer . Sequence–function correlation of the transmembrane domains in NS4B of HCV using a computational approach. AIMS Biophysics, 2021, 8(2): 165-181. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2021013 |
[10] | Davide Sala, Andrea Giachetti, Antonio Rosato . Molecular dynamics simulations of metalloproteins: A folding study of rubredoxin from Pyrococcus furiosus. AIMS Biophysics, 2018, 5(1): 77-96. doi: 10.3934/biophy.2018.1.77 |
Means of different types play significant role in different fields of sciences through their applications. For instance it has been observed harmonic means have applications in electrical circuits theory. To be more precise, the total resistance of a set of parallel resistors is just half of harmonic means of the total resistors, for details, see [3]. Recently many researchers have extensively utilized different types of means in theory of convexity. Consequently a number of new and novel extensions of classical convexity have been proposed in the literature. For some recent studies, see [4,5,21,22]. We now recall some preliminary concepts and results pertaining to convexity and for its other extensions.
Definition 1.1 ([18]). (AA-convex functions) A function X:C⊆R→R is said to be AA-convex, if
(1−μ)X(x)+μX(y)≥X((1−μ)x+ty),∀x,y∈C,μ∈[0,1], |
where C is a convex set.
Definition 1.2 ([18]). (GG-convex functions) A function X:G⊆R+→R+ is said to be GG-convex, if
X1−μ(x)Xμ(y)≥X(x1−μyμ),∀x,y∈G,μ∈[0,1], |
where G is a geometric convex set.
Definition 1.3 ([13]). (HH-convex functions) A function X:H⊆R+→R is said to be HH-convex, if
X(x)X(y)μX(x)+(1−μ)X(y)≥X(xy(1−μ)x+ty),∀x,y∈H,μ∈[0,1], |
where H is a harmonic convex set.
For some other useful details, see [18]. Convexity theory also played significant role in the development of theory of inequalities. Many known results are obtained directly using the functions having convexity property. Hermite and Hadamard presented independently a result which now a days known as Hermite-Hadamard's inequality. This result is very simple in nature but very powerful, as it provides us a necessary and sufficient condition for a function to be convex. It reads as: Let X:I⊆R→R be a convex function, then
X(c+d2)≤1d−cd∫cX(x)dx≤X(c)+X(d)2. |
Dragomir et al. [8] written a very interesting detailed monograph on Hermite-Hadamard's inequality and its applications. Interested readers may find useful details in it. In recent years several famously known researchers from all over the world have studied the result of Hermite and Hadamard intensively. For more details, see [4,6,7,9,10,17,20]. This result has also been generalized for other classes of convex functions, for instance, see [8,11,12,14,18,22].
Fractional calculus [15,16] has played an important role in various scientific fields since it is a good tool to describe long-memory processes. Sarikaya et al. [24] used the concepts of fractional calculus and obtained new refinements of fractional Hermite-Hadamard like inequalities. This article of Sarikaya et al. opened a new venue of research. Consequently several new generalizations of Hermite-Hadamard's inequality have been obtained using the fractional calculus concepts.
Recently many authors have shown their special interest in utilizing the concepts of quantum calculus for obtaining q-analogues of different integral inequalities. For some basic definitions and recent studies, see [1,2,19,23,25,26]. The main objective of this article is to introduce the notion of M-convex functions. This class can be viewed as novel extension of the classical definition of convexity. We link this class with Hermite-Hadamard's inequality and obtain several new variants of this famous result. We also obtain the fractional and quantum analogues of the obtained results. We expect that the results of this paper may stimulate further research in this direction.
In this section, we introduce the notions of M-convex functions, log-M-convex and quasi M-convex functions. First of all for the sake of simplicity, we take G=√cd and A=c+d2.
Definition 2.1. A function X:D⊆R+→R+ is said to be M-convex function, if
X((1−μ)G+μA)≤(1−μ)X(G)+tX(A),∀c,d∈D,μ∈[0,1]. |
Definition 2.2. A function X:D⊆R+→R+ is said to be log-M-convex function, if
X((1−μ)G+μA)≤X1−μ(G)Xμ(A),∀c,d∈D,μ∈[0,1]. |
Definition 2.3. A function X:D⊆R+→R+ is said to be quasi M-convex function, if
X((1−μ)G+μA)≤max{X(G),X(A)},∀c,d∈D,μ∈[0,1]. |
We now derive a new auxiliary result which play a key role in the development of our coming results.
Lemma 3.1. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a differentiable function on I∘, c,d∈I∘ with c<d. If X′∈L[c,d], then
X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx=(√d−√c)241∫0(1−2μ)X′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ. |
Proof. It suffices to show that
1∫0(1−2μ)X′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ=2X(G)+X(A)(√d−√c)2−8(√d−√c)4A∫GX(x)dx. |
This implies
(√d−√c)241∫0(1−2μ)X′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ=X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx. |
This completes the proof.
Now utilizing Lemma 3.1, we derive our next results.
Theorem 3.2. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a differentiable function on I∘, c,d∈I∘ with c<d and X′∈L[c,d]. If |X′| is M-convex function, then
|X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx|≤(√d−√c)216[|X′(G)|+|X′(A)|]. |
Proof. Using Lemma 3.1, property of the modulus and the fact that |X′| is M-convex function, we have
|X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx|≤(√d−√c)241∫0|1−2μ||X′(μG+(1−μ)A)|dμ≤(√d−√c)241∫0|1−2μ|[μ|X′(G)|+(1−μ)|X′(A)|]dμ=(√d−√c)216[|X′(G)|+|X′(A)|]. |
This completes the proof.
If we apply Theorem 3.2 for log-M-convex functions, then
Theorem 3.3. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a differentiable function on I∘, c,d∈I∘ with c<d and X′∈L[c,d], If |X′| is decreasing and log-M-convex function, then
|X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx|≤(√d−√c)24[−2+4√w−2w−logw+wlogwlogw2], |
where w=|X′(G)||X′(A)|.
Theorem 3.4. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a differentiable function on I∘, c,d∈I∘ with c<d and X′∈L[c,d]. If |X′|q, where 1p+1q=1 is M-convex function, then
|X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx|≤(√d−√c)24(1p+1)1p(|X′(G)|q+|X′(A)|q2)1q. |
Proof. Using Lemma 3.1, Holder's inequality and the fact that |X′|q is M-convex functions, we have
|X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx|≤(√d−√c)24(1∫0|1−2μ|pdμ)1p(1∫0|X′(μG+(1−μ)A)|dμ)1q≤(√d−√c)24(1p+1)1p(1∫0[μ|X′(G)|q+(1−μ)|X′(A)|q]dμ)1q=(√d−√c)24(1p+1)1p(|X′(G)|q+|X′(A)|q2)1q. |
This completes the proof.
Theorem 3.5. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a differentiable function on I∘, c,d∈I∘ with c<d and X′∈L[c,d]. If |X′|q, where q≥1 is M-convex function, then
|X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx|≤(√d−√c)28(|X′(G)|q+|X′(A)|q2)1q. |
Proof. Using Lemma 3.1, power mean inequality and the fact that |X′| is M-convex functions, we have
|X(G)+X(A)2−2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(x)dx|≤(√d−√c)24(1∫0|1−2μ|dμ)1−1q(1∫0|1−2μ||X′(μG+(1−μ)A)|dμ)1q≤(√d−√c)24(12)1−1q(1∫0|1−2μ|[μ|X′(G)|q+(1−μ)|X′(A)|q]dμ)1q=(√d−√c)28(|X′(G)|q+|X′(A)|q2)1q. |
This completes the proof.
In this section, we derive some fractional estimates of Hermite-Hadamard like inequalities using M-convex functions. Before that we recall basic definition of Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals.
Definition 4.1 ([15]). Let X∈L[c,d], where c≥0. The Riemann-Liouville integrals Jνc+X and Jνd−X, of order ν>0, are defined by
Jνc+X(x)=1Γ(ν)∫xc(x−μ)ν−1X(μ)dμ, for x>c |
and
Jνd−X(x)=1Γ(ν)∫dx(μ−x)ν−1X(μ)dμ, for x<d, |
respectively. Here, Γ(ν)=∫∞0e−μμν−1dμ is the Gamma function. We also make the convention
J0c+X(x)=J0d−X(x)=X(x). |
We now derive a new auxiliary result utilizing the definition of Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals.
Lemma 4.1. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a differentiable function. If X′∈L[c,d], then
X(G)+X(A)2−2α−1Γ(α+1)(√d−√c)2[Jα(A)−X(G)+Jα(G)+X(A)]=(√d−√c)241∫0[(1−μ)α−μα]X′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ. |
Proof. It suffices to show that
I=1∫0[(1−μ)α−μα]X′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ=1∫0(1−μ)αX′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ−1∫0μαX′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ=I1−I2. | (4.1) |
Now using change of variable technique and definition of Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals, we have
I1=1∫0(1−μ)αX′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ=2(√d−√c)2X(A)−2α+1Γ(α+1)(√d−√c)2(α+1)1Γ(α)A∫G(x−G)α−1X(x)dx=2(√d−√c)2X(A)−2α+1Γ(α+1)(√d−√c)2(α+1)Jα(A)−X(G). | (4.2) |
Similarly
I2=1∫0μαX′(μG+(1−μ)A)dμ=−2(√d−√c)2X(G)+2α+1Γ(α+1)(√d−√c)2(α+1)Jα(G)+X(A). | (4.3) |
Combining (4.1), (4.2) and (4.3) completes the proof. Now using Lemma 4.1, we derive our next results.
Theorem 4.2. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a differentiable function and X′∈L[c,d]. If |X′| is M-convex function, then
|X(G)+X(A)2−2α−1Γ(α+1)(√d−√c)2[Jα(A)−X(G)+Jα(G)+X(A)]|≤(√d−√c)24(α+1)(1−12α)[|X′(a)|+|X′(b)|]. |
Proof. Using Lemma 4.1 and the property of modulus, we have
|X(G)+X(A)2−2α−1Γ(α+1)(√d−√c)2[Jα(A)−X(G)+Jα(G)+X(A)]|≤1∫0(√d−√c)24|(1−μ)α−μα||X′(μG+(1−μ)A)|dμ. |
Since it is given that |X′| is M-convex function, so we have
|X(G)+X(A)2−2α−1Γ(α+1)(√d−√c)2[Jα(A)−X(G)+Jα(G)+X(A)]|≤1∫0(√d−√c)24|(1−μ)α−μα|[μ|X′(G)|+(1−μ)|X′(A)|]dμ=(√d−√c)24[|X′(G)|1∫0μ|(1−μ)α−μα|dμ+|X′(A)|1∫0(1−μ)|(1−μ)α−μα|dμ]=(√d−√c)24(α+1)(1−12α)[|X′(a)|+|X′(b)|]. |
This completes the proof.
In this section, we derive some quantum analogues of Hermite-Hadamard like inequalities using M-convex functions. Before proceeding, let us recall some basics of quantum calculus. Tariboon et al. [25] defined the q-integral as follows:
Definition 5.1 ([25]). Let X:I⊂R→R be a continuous function. Then q-integral on I is defined as:
∫xaX(μ)adqμ=(1−q)(x−a)∞∑n=0qnX(qnx+(1−qn)a), | (5.1) |
for x∈J.
The following result will play significant role in main results of the section.
Lemma 5.1 ([25]). Let α∈R∖{−1}, then
x∫a(μ−a)αadqμ=(1−q1−qα+1)(x−a)α+1. |
Lemma 5.2. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a q-differentiable function on I∘, c,d∈I∘ with c<d. If DqX is an integrable function with 0<q<1, then
2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(μ)dqμ−qf(G)+X(A)1+q=q(√d−√c)22(1+q)1∫0(1−(1+q)μ)Dq((1−μ)G+μA)dqμ. |
Proof. It suffices to show that
1∫0(1−(1+q)μ)Dq((1−μ)G+μA)dqμ=2(√d−√c)21∫0(X((1−μ)G+μA)−X((1−qμ)G+qμA)(1−q)μ)dqμ−2(1+q)(√d−√c)21∫0μ(X((1−μ)G+μA)−X((1−qμ)G+qμA)(1−q)μ)dqμ=2(√d−√c)2[∞∑n=0X((1−qn)G+qnA)−∞∑n=0X((1−qn+1)G+qn+1A)]−2(1+q)(√d−√c)2[∞∑n=0qnX((1−qn)G+qnA)−∞∑n=0qnX((1−qn+1)G+qn+1A)]=2(√d−√c)2[X(A)−X(G)]−2(1+q)(√d−√c)2∞∑n=0qnX((1−qn)G+qnA)+2(1+q)q(√d−√c)2∞∑n=1qnX((1−qn)G+qnA)=2(√d−√c)2[X(A)−X(G)]−2(1+q)(√d−√c)2∞∑n=0qnX((1−qn)G+qnA)+2(1+q)q(√d−√c)2[X(A)−X(A)+∞∑n=1qnX((1−qn)G+qnA)]=−2q(√d−√c)2[qf(G)+X(A)]+4(1+q)q(√d−√c)4A∫GX(μ)dqμ. |
This completes the proof.
Now using Lemma 5.2, we derive our next results.
Theorem 5.3. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a q-differentiable function on I∘, c,d∈I∘ with c<d and DqX is an integrable function with 0<q<1. If |DqX| is M-convex, then
|2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(μ)dqμ−qf(G)+X(A)1+q|≤q(√d−√c)22(1+q)4(1+q+q2){(1+3q2+2q3)|DqX(G)|+(1+4q+q2)|DqX(A)|}. |
Proof. Using Lemma 5.2 and the given hypothesis of the theorem, we have
|2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(μ)dqμ−qf(G)+X(A)1+q|=|q(√d−√c)22(1+q)1∫0(1−(1+q)μ)DqX((1−μ)G+μA)dqμ|≤q(√d−√c)22(1+q)1∫0|1−(1+q)μ|[(1−μ)|DqX(G)|+μDq|DqX(A)|]dqμ=q(√d−√c)22(1+q){|DqX(G)|1∫0(1−μ)|1−(1+q)μ|dqμ+|DqX(A)|1∫0μ|1−(1+q)μ|dqμ}=q(√d−√c)22(1+q)4(1+q+q2){(1+3q2+2q3)|DqX(G)|+(1+4q+q2)|DqX(A)|}. |
This completes the proof.
Theorem 5.4. Let X:I∘⊆R+→R+ be a q-differentiable function on I∘, c,d∈I∘ with c<d and DqX is an integrable function with 0<q<1. If |DqX|r is M-convex, where r>1, then
|2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(μ)dqμ−qf(G)+X(A)1+q|≤q(√d−√c)22(1+q)(2q(1+q)2)1−1r(q(1+3q2+2q3)(1+q)3(1+q+q2)|DqX(G)|r+q(1+4q+q2)(1+q)3(1+q+q2)|DqX(A)|r)1r. |
Proof. Using Lemma 5.2, power-mean inequality and the given hypothesis of the theorem, we have
|2(√d−√c)2A∫GX(μ)dqμ−qf(G)+X(A)1+q|=|q(√d−√c)22(1+q)1∫0(1−(1+q)μ)DqX((1−μ)G+μA)dqμ|≤q(√d−√c)22(1+q)(1∫0|1−(1+q)μ|dqμ)1−1r×(1∫0|1−(1+q)μ|[(1−μ)|DqX(G)|r+μ|DqX(A)|r]dqμ)1r=q(√d−√c)22(1+q)(2q(1+q)2)1−1r(q(1+3q2+2q3)(1+q)3(1+q+q2)|DqX(G)|r+q(1+4q+q2)(1+q)3(1+q+q2)|DqX(A)|r)1r. |
This completes the proof.
In this article, we have introduced the notions of M-convex functions, log-M-convex functions and quasi M-convex functions. We have discussed these classes in context with integral inequalities of Hermite-Hadamard type. We have also obtained some new fractional and quantum versions of these results. It is worth to mention here that essentially using the techniques of this article one can easily obtain extensions of Iynger type inequalities using the class of quasi M-convex functions. We hope that the ideas and techniques of this paper will inspire interested readers working in the field.
Authors are thankful to the editor and anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. First and second authors are thankful for the support of HEC project (No. 8081/Punjab/NRPU/R&D/HEC/2017).
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
[1] |
L. A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control, 8 (1965), 338-353. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
![]() |
[2] |
K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Set. Syst., 20 (1986), 87-96. doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
![]() |
[3] | F. Smarandache, Neutrosophy. Neutrosophic Probability, Set, and Logic, ProQuest Information & Learning, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, 1998. |
[4] | H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y. Q. Zhang, et al. Single valued neutrosophic sets, Multispace Multistructure, 4 (2010), 410-413. |
[5] |
J. Ye, A multicriteria decision-making method using aggregation operators for simplified neutrosophic sets, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 26 (2014), 2459-2466. doi: 10.3233/IFS-130916
![]() |
[6] |
J. J. Peng, J. Q. Wang, J. Wang, et al. Simplified neutrosophic sets and their applications in multicriteria group decision-making problems, International Journal of System Science, 47 (2016), 2342-2358. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2014.994050
![]() |
[7] |
Nancy, H. Garg, An improved score function for ranking neutrosophic sets and its application to decision-making process, International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 6 (2016), 377-385. doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2016018441
![]() |
[8] |
D. Rani, H. Garg, Some modified results of the subtraction and division operations on interval neutrosophic sets, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. In., 31 (2019), 677-698. doi: 10.1080/0952813X.2019.1592236
![]() |
[9] | P. Liu, Y. Chu, Y. Li, et al. Some generalized neutrosophic number hamacher aggregation operators and their application to group decision making, Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., 16 (2014), 242-255. |
[10] |
Nancy, H. Garg, Novel single-valued neutrosophic decision making operators under Frank norm operations and its application, Int. J. Uncertain. Quan., 6 (2016), 361-375. doi: 10.1615/Int.J.UncertaintyQuantification.2016018603
![]() |
[11] |
H. Garg, Nancy, New logarithmic operational laws and their applications to multiattribute decision making for single-valued neutrosophic numbers, Cogn. Syst. Res., 52 (2018), 931-946. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.09.001
![]() |
[12] |
G. Wei, Z. Zhang, Some single-valued neutrosophic Bonferroni power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 10 (2019), 863-882. doi: 10.1007/s12652-018-0738-y
![]() |
[13] | L. Yang, B. Li, A multi-criteria decision-making method using power aggregation operators for single-valued neutrosophic sets, International Journal of Database and Theory and Application, 9 (2016), 23-32. |
[14] | H. Garg, Nancy, Linguistic single-valued neutrosophic power aggregation operators and their applications to group decision-making problems, IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatic Sinica, 7 (2020), 546-558. |
[15] |
P. Ji, J. Q. Wang, H. Y. Zhang, Frank prioritized Bonferroni mean operator with single-valued neutrosophic sets and its application in selecting third-party logistics providers, Neural Comput. Appl., 30 (2018), 799-823. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2660-6
![]() |
[16] | H. Garg, Novel neutrality aggregation operators-based multiattribute group decision making method for single-valued neutrosophic numbers, Soft Comput., 2019, 1-23. |
[17] | H. Garg, Nancy, Multiple criteria decision making based on frank choquet heronian mean operator for single-valued neutrosophic sets, Applied and Computational Mathematics, 18, (2019), 163-188. |
[18] | P. Majumdar, Neutrosophic Sets and Its Applications to Decision Making, Computational Intelligence for Big Data Analysis, Springer, Cham, 2015. |
[19] |
H. L. Huang, New distance measure of single-valued neutrosophic sets and its application, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 31 (2016), 1021-1032. doi: 10.1002/int.21815
![]() |
[20] | C. Liu, Y. Luo, The weighted distance measure based method to neutrosophic multiattribute group decision making, Math. Probl. Eng., 2016 (2016), 3145341. |
[21] | H. Garg, Nancy, Some new biparametric distance measures on single-valued neutrosophic sets with applications to pattern recognition and medical diagnosis, Information 8 (2017), 162. |
[22] |
X. H. Wu, J. Q. Wang, J. J. Peng, et al. Cross - entropy and prioritized aggregation operator with simplified neutrosophic sets and their application in multi-criteria decision-making problems, International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 18 (2016), 1104-1116. doi: 10.1007/s40815-016-0180-2
![]() |
[23] | H. Garg, Nancy, On single-valued neutrosophic entropy of order α, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 14 (2016), 21-28. |
[24] | K. Mondal, S. Pramanik, Neutrosophic tangent similarity measure and its application to multiple attribute decision making, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 9 (2015), 80-87. |
[25] | K. Mondal, S. Pramanik, B. C. Giri, Hybrid binary logarithm similarity measure for MAGDM problems under SVNS assessments, Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 20 (2018), 12-25. |
[26] |
F. Liu, G. Aiwu, V. Lukovac, et al. A multicriteria model for the selection of the transport service provider: A single valued neutrosophic DEMATEL multicriteria model, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1 (2018), 121-130. doi: 10.31181/dmame1801121r
![]() |
[27] |
Nancy, H. Garg, A novel divergence measure and its based TOPSIS method for multi criteria decision - making under single - valued neutrosophic environment, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 36 (2019), 101-115. doi: 10.3233/JIFS-18040
![]() |
[28] | C. L. Hwang, K. Yoon, Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications A State-ofthe-Art Survey, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1981. |
[29] |
P. Biswas, S. Pramanik, B. C. Giri, TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making under single-valued neutrosophic environment, Neural Computing and Applications, 27 (2016), 727-737. doi: 10.1007/s00521-015-1891-2
![]() |
[30] |
H. Pouresmaeil, E. Shivanian, E. Khorram, et al. An extended method using TOPSIS and VIKOR for multiple attribute decision making with multiple decision makers and single valued neutrosophic numbers, Advances and Applications in Statistics, 50 (2017), 261-292. doi: 10.17654/AS050040261
![]() |
[31] | G. Selvachandran, S. Quek, F. Smarandache, et al. An extended technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) with maximizing deviation method based on integrated weight measure for single-valued neutrosophic sets, Symmetry, 10 (2018), 236. |
[32] |
X. D. Peng, J. G. Dai, Approaches to single-valued neutrosophic MADM based on MABAC, TOPSIS and new similarity measure with score function, Neural Computing and Applications, 29 (2018), 939-954. doi: 10.1007/s00521-016-2607-y
![]() |
[33] |
I. Mukhametzyanov, D. Pamucar, A sensitivity analysis in MCDM problems: A statistical approach, Decision making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1 (2018), 51-80. doi: 10.31181/dmame180151b
![]() |
[34] |
E. H. Ruspini, A new approach to clustering, Information and control, 15 (1969), 22-32. doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(69)90591-9
![]() |
[35] | J. Ye, Single-valued neutrosophic minimum spanning tree and its clustering method, Journal of intelligent Systems, 23 (2014), 311-324. |
[36] | J. Ye, Clustering methods using distance-based similarity measures of single-valued neutrosophic sets, Journal of Intelligent Systems, 23 (2014), 379-389. |
[37] |
Y. Guo, A. Şengür, A novel image segmentation algorithm based on neutrosophic similarity clustering, Applied Soft Computing, 25 (2014), 391-398. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.08.066
![]() |
[38] | J. Ye, A netting method for clustering-simplified neutrosophic information, Soft Computing, 21 (2016), 7571-7577. |
[39] |
N. D. Thanh, M. Ali, L. H. Son, A novel clustering algorithm in a neutrosophic recommender system for medical diagnosis, Cognitive Computation, 9 (2017), 526-544. doi: 10.1007/s12559-017-9462-8
![]() |
[40] |
A. S. Ashour, Y. Guo, E. Kucukkulahli, et ai. A hybrid dermoscopy images segmentation approach based on neutrosophic clustering and histogram estimation, Applied Soft Computing, 69 (2018), 426-434. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.05.003
![]() |
[41] |
X. Wang, E. Triantaphyllou, Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods, Omega - International Journal of Management Science, 36 (2008), 45-63. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2005.12.003
![]() |
[42] |
Z. S. Xu, J. Chen, J. J. Wu, Cluster algorithm for intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Information Sciences, 178 (2008), 3775-3790. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2008.06.008
![]() |
[43] |
M. Noureddine, M. Ristic, Route planning for hazardous materials transportation: Multicriteria decision making approach, Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2 (2019), 66-85. doi: 10.31181/dmame1901066n
![]() |
[44] | H. Garg, G. Kaur, Quantifying gesture information in brain hemorrhage patients using probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets with unknown probability information, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 140 (2020), 106211. |
[45] | H. Garg, G. Kaur, A robust correlation coefficient for probabilistic dual hesitant fuzzy sets and its applications, Neural Computing & Applications, 2019 (2019), 1-20. |
[46] |
H. Garg, Nancy, Algorithms for possibility linguistic single-valued neutrosophic decision-making based on COPRAS and aggregation operators with new information measures, Measurement, 138 (2019), 278-290. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.031
![]() |
[47] |
H. Garg, Nancy, Non-linear programming method for multi-criteria decision making problems under interval neutrosophic set environment, Applied Intelligence, 48 (2018), 2199-2213. doi: 10.1007/s10489-017-1070-5
![]() |
1. | Xuekui Yu, Jonathan Jih, Jiansen Jiang, Z. Hong Zhou, Atomic structure of the human cytomegalovirus capsid with its securing tegument layer of pp150, 2017, 356, 0036-8075, eaam6892, 10.1126/science.aam6892 | |
2. | Hua Jin, Yong-Liang Jiang, Feng Yang, Jun-Tao Zhang, Wei-Fang Li, Ke Zhou, Jue Ju, Yuxing Chen, Cong-Zhao Zhou, Capsid Structure of a Freshwater Cyanophage Siphoviridae Mic1, 2019, 27, 09692126, 1508, 10.1016/j.str.2019.07.003 | |
3. | Joshua M. Hardy, Rhys A. Dunstan, Rhys Grinter, Matthew J. Belousoff, Jiawei Wang, Derek Pickard, Hariprasad Venugopal, Gordon Dougan, Trevor Lithgow, Fasséli Coulibaly, The architecture and stabilisation of flagellotropic tailed bacteriophages, 2020, 11, 2041-1723, 10.1038/s41467-020-17505-w | |
4. | Yanting Tang, An Mu, Yuying Zhang, Shan Zhou, Weiwei Wang, Yuezheng Lai, Xiaoting Zhou, Fengjiang Liu, Xiuna Yang, Hongri Gong, Quan Wang, Zihe Rao, Cryo-EM structure of Mycobacterium smegmatis DyP-loaded encapsulin, 2021, 118, 0027-8424, e2025658118, 10.1073/pnas.2025658118 | |
5. | James M. Polson, Edgar J. Garcia, Alexander R. Klotz, Flatness and intrinsic curvature of linked-ring membranes, 2021, 17, 1744-683X, 10505, 10.1039/D1SM01307F | |
6. | Ning Cui, Feng Yang, Jun-Tao Zhang, Hui Sun, Yu Chen, Rong-Cheng Yu, Zhi-Peng Chen, Yong-Liang Jiang, Shu-Jing Han, Xudong Xu, Qiong Li, Cong-Zhao Zhou, Rebecca Ellis Dutch, Capsid Structure of Anabaena Cyanophage A-1(L) , 2021, 95, 0022-538X, 10.1128/JVI.01356-21 | |
7. | Jing Zheng, Wenyuan Chen, Hao Xiao, Fan Yang, Xiaowu Li, Jingdong Song, Lingpeng Cheng, Hongrong Liu, A Capsid Structure of Ralstonia solanacearum podoviridae GP4 with a Triangulation Number T = 9, 2022, 14, 1999-4915, 2431, 10.3390/v14112431 | |
8. | Jennifer M. Podgorski, Krista Freeman, Sophia Gosselin, Alexis Huet, James F. Conway, Mary Bird, John Grecco, Shreya Patel, Deborah Jacobs-Sera, Graham Hatfull, Johann Peter Gogarten, Janne Ravantti, Simon J. White, A structural dendrogram of the actinobacteriophage major capsid proteins provides important structural insights into the evolution of capsid stability, 2023, 31, 09692126, 282, 10.1016/j.str.2022.12.012 | |
9. | Hao Pang, Fenxia Fan, Jing Zheng, Hao Xiao, Zhixue Tan, Jingdong Song, Biao Kan, Hongrong Liu, Three-dimensional structures of Vibrio cholerae typing podophage VP1 in two states, 2024, 09692126, 10.1016/j.str.2024.10.005 | |
10. | Michael Woodson, Nikolai S. Prokhorov, Seth D. Scott, Wei Zhao, Wei Zhang, Kyung H. Choi, Paul J. Jardine, Marc C. Morais, Phi29 assembly intermediates reveal how scaffold interactions with capsid protein drive capsid construction and maturation, 2025, 11, 2375-2548, 10.1126/sciadv.adk8779 |