Citation: Simone Göttlich, Stephan Knapp. Modeling random traffic accidents by conservation laws[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1677-1701. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020088
[1] | Angel Valverde, María González-Tirante, Marisol Medina-Sierra, Raúl Rivas, Ignacio Santa-Regina, José M. Igual . Culturable bacterial diversity from the chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) phyllosphere and antagonism against the fungi causing the chestnut blight and ink diseases. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(2): 293-314. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.293 |
[2] | Caroline L. Marden, Ryan McDonald, Harold J. Schreier, Joy E.M. Watts . Investigation into the fungal diversity within different regions of the gastrointestinal tract of Panaque nigrolineatus, a wood-eating fish. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 749-761. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.749 |
[3] | Manjusha Lekshmi, Parvathi Ammini, Jones Adjei, Leslie M. Sanford, Ugina Shrestha, Sanath Kumar, Manuel F. Varela . Modulation of antimicrobial efflux pumps of the major facilitator superfamily in Staphylococcus aureus. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.1.1 |
[4] | Ángeles Hidalgo, Francisco-Javier López-Baena, José-Enrique Ruiz-Sainz, José-María Vinardell . Studies of rhizobial competitiveness for nodulation in soybean using a non-destructive split-root system. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(2): 323-334. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.2.323 |
[5] | Lorena Carro, Imen Nouioui . Taxonomy and systematics of plant probiotic bacteria in the genomic era. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 383-412. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.383 |
[6] | Yunfeng Xu, Attila Nagy, Gary R. Bauchan, Xiaodong Xia, Xiangwu Nou . Enhanced biofilm formation in dual-species culture of Listeria monocytogenes and Ralstonia insidiosa. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 774-783. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.774 |
[7] | Liliana Aranha Caetano, Tiago Faria, Ana Crespo Batista, Susana Viegas, Carla Viegas . Assessment of occupational exposure to azole resistant fungi in 10 Portuguese bakeries. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(4): 960-975. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.4.960 |
[8] | Larissa Y. Waré, Augustini P. Nikièma, Jean C. Meile, Saïdou Kaboré, Angélique Fontana, Noël Durand, Didier Montet, Nicolas Barro . Microbiological safety of flours used in follow up for infant formulas produced in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(2): 347-361. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.2.347 |
[9] | Su In Lee, Gyeongjun Cho, Su-Hyeon Kim, Da-Ran Kim, Youn-Sig Kwak . Mycobiota community and fungal species response to development stage and fire blight disease in apples. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(3): 554-569. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023029 |
[10] | Alexandra Díez-Méndez, Raul Rivas . Improvement of saffron production using Curtobacterium herbarum as a bioinoculant under greenhouse conditions. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 354-364. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.354 |
Plant and fungal interactions drive successional trajectories and community assembly within reforestation. Mycorrhizal fungi create symbiotic relationships with tree roots and facilitate the transfer of water and nutrients in exchange for photosynthates [1]. Plant co-existence may be facilitated by various mycorrhizal associations, with specific symbionts providing access to limiting resources as succession progresses [2,3]. The development of common mycorrhizal networks (CMN) can facilitate seedling recruitment by shared nutrient transfer from plant to plant via source to sink, aiding in co-existence within guilds [2,4,5]. Fungal pathogens also contribute to structuring plant communities by driving species above-and belowground turnover as plant succession progresses [6,7]. Numerous studies have documented increased enhanced stability with diversity and increased community productivity and biomass due to density dependent pathogen mortality [8,9,10]. As natural disturbances, root and wood rots maintain gap dynamics in forests contributing to resource availability, productivity and forest structure [11,12].
Large-scale canopy shifts have been demonstrated with the introduction of chestnut blight (Cryphonectria parasitica [Murr.] Barr), a non-native and invasive fungal pathogen introduced in late 1800's from nursery stock of Japanese and Chinese chestnut [13]. The fungus enters through wounds in bark and produces cankers that kill cells within the tree's cambium region through the action of enzymes produced by the invading mycelial fans [14]. This fungal pathogen is highly specific to the American chestnut (Castanea dentata [Marsh.] Borkh), which has no natural resistance. This highly virulent pathogen and prolific tree host led to rapid disease spread and complete extirpation of a keystone tree species resulting in a significant canopy shift [15]. Culturally, this species represented an important agro-ecological role that cultivated both timber, nut crops and tannin production in the Appalachian region, while providing a habitat for biodiversity throughout North American forests [16]. Chestnut's historical relevance and once ecological stature has inspired breeding programs that eventually led to backcrossing methodology initiated in the 1980s, which have produced American chestnut hybrids with putative resistance to chestnut blight [16,17]. Experimental plantings in forests [18,19,20,21,22] and afforestation projects on reclamation lands [23,24,25,26,27] have facilitated the introduction of backcrossed chestnut hybrids into the native range of American chestnut in North American forests [28].
However, the native soil community can be a limiting factor in the restoration and establishment of native trees [2]. American chestnut is an ectomycorrhizal (ECM) host [29,30,31] and its return to North American forests can be facilitated by soils that harbor locally adapted and chestnut compatible ECM species associated with the oak forests [32]. However, on mine reclamation sites, drastic soil disturbances led to significant changes in ECM community composition [33,34,35]. To overcome this, seedlings used in reclamation projects are usually pre-inoculated with selected ECM fungi in field nurseries or in greenhouses prior to tree plantings, which may bypass some soil limitations and accelerate the establishment of mid to late successional species in initial plantings [36,37]. Further, planting methods that maximize ECM root colonization also report greater chestnut growth and survival in the early years of chestnut restoration [38,39].
Appalachian forest and mine reclamation projects re-introducing American chestnut and chestnut hybrids will inevitably document the return of chestnut blight [21,25]. Cankers resulting in branch dieback and loss of photosynthetic tissue may deter the host's ability to maintain root colonization by ECM fungi. Similar to herbivory, the loss of photosynthetic tissue may reduce ECM root colonization [40,41] and cause changes in fungal species composition [42]. However, not all studies documented a change in ECM colonization after artificial herbivory [43,44] or a shift in ECM community composition due to tissue loss [45]. Further, the influence of Phytophthora root pathogens resulting in defoliation of forest trees has also reported mixed results from significant reduction in ECM associated with Eucalyptus crown [46], to no change in ECM community as a response to defoliation on Quercus [47]. Blom et al. [48] reported no relationship between a declining sweet chestnut (C. sativa) due to Phytophthora and ECM colonization, however, they reported significantly finer ECM hyphal morphologies in healthy plots, presumably due to reduced photosynthetic capacity of its host. Therefore, ECM had a more robust morphotype when associated with healthy trees, which was similar to significant shifts in fungal morphotypes with tissue loss favoring thin hyphal mantles [49,50].
American chestnut trees can be hypothesized to display a similar pattern; the presence of chestnut blight in restoration stands would decrease ECM colonization on roots and shift ECM morphologies, with healthy trees selecting fungal species that display thicker mantels and radiating hyphal cords, and trees with dieback selecting fungi that display thinner hyphal morphologies. The objective of this current study is to document ECM root colonization and community composition on healthy and declining chestnut trees caused by chestnut blight, document inoculum potential of a neighboring chestnut tree in various stages of disease, and identify beneficial attributes of fungal species with regard to nitrogen acquisition. To test this, American chestnuts were categorized based on three various stages of health: (1) Chestnut trees free of chestnut blight cankers and exhibiting vigorous growth; (2) chestnut trees with chestnut blight cankers caused by C. parasitica and exhibiting approximately 50% dieback; (3) seedlings that were recorded as dead in the field after three growing seasons. We hypothesized that loss of photosynthetic tissue will have an influence on ECM root colonization and the availability of reservoir inoculum available for new seedlings sown as nuts in the field. Further, we predict that plant die-back will drive the selection of finer hyphal species as well as decrease the amount of inoculum available to introduced, germinating chestnut seedlings.
The field site is located in the Tri-Valley Wildlife Management Area (TVWMA), Muskingum County, Ohio, USA (40° 6' 44'' N, –81° 58' 23'' W). This coal surface mine site was excavated in the 1960–70s and reclaimed in 1978. Reclamation included reconstructing and compacting slopes (6%–20%) using rock overburden and coal mine spoil. Slopes where then covered with the original soil that had been excavated and stockpiled prior to surface mine operations to a depth of 45 cm and regraded to match contour. To prevent soil erosion after grading, slopes were seeded with birdsfoot-trefoil (Lotus corniculatus), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea), orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata), alfalfa (Medicago sativa), red clover (Trifolium pratense), rye grass (Lolium perenne), timothy grass (Phleum pratense), Kentucky blue grass (Poa pratensis) and Chinese lespedeza (Lespedeza cuneata).
For this study, chestnut seeds were sown in March 2006 at the State Nursery in Marietta, Ohio by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources. Seedlings were germinated in seed beds with soils that were injected with spores of mycorrhizal fungus, Pisolithus tinctorius, were field nursery grown for one year, and then lifted as bare root seedlings and planted in the field site in March of 2007. The study site was prepared for planting by the installation of three experimental plots, each 18 × 36 m, and cross-ripped to a 1 m depth on 2.15 × 2.15 m grid, followed by plow and disking to 30 cm. At the time of planting soil pH ranged from 5.4 to 5.7 and the soil texture averaged 61% sand, 23% silt and 16% clay. Mean values for soil nutrients were: Aluminium, 3.5 ppm; calcium, 720 ppm; potassium, 78 ppm; magnesium, 182 ppm; manganese, 3.75 ppm; nitrogen, 2 ppm; phosphorus, 8 ppm [38]. When trees were sampled for ECM, surrounding vegetation was primarily tall fescue (F. arundinacea; 29%), Chinese lespedeza (L. cuneata; 16%), Canada golden rod (Solidago Canadensis; 11%) and black-eye Susan (Rudbeckia hirta; 11%).
In each of the three plots, 100 chestnut seedlings were planted at 2.15 m spacing as bare-root seedlings within 48 hours after seedlings were lifted from the field nursery (300 chestnut bare rooted seedlings total). Genetic seedling lines represented pure American chestnuts (C. dentata) and two C. dentata and C. mollissima backcrossed chestnuts (BC1F3 and BC2F3) predicted to average 75% and 88% inheritance from the American chestnut parent, respectively [17]. To buffer against root desiccation, the root system of each seedling was dipped in TerraSorb gel prior to planting. Two fertilizer pellets (20-10-5) were put in each hole and the seedling was backfilled with original soil. A 1 m × 1 m weed mat was used around each seedling to prevent competition from regenerating herbaceous plant species. Also, a 1.5-m tall chicken wire cage was installed to prevent browse.
To assess the influence disease die-back has on seedling recruitment, 75 seven-year-old, established chestnut trees representing three distinct parent trees were designated: (1) Seven-year-old, were considered healthy chestnut parent trees with no sign of disease and averaging 240 cm in height and 4.0 cm in basal diameter (Table 2); (2) seven-year-old chestnut tree exhibiting dieback (over 50%) and signs of canker caused by C. parasitica with average heights of 132 cm with basal diameters averaging 2.4 cm (Table 2); (3) a chestnut seedling with complete main stem mortality. These seedlings were recorded as dead after five field seasons with no re-sprouting. Dead trees averaged 62 cm in height with 0.9 cm basal diameters. The cause of mortality could not be determined. These designations formed the basis of the three treatment groups referred to as "parent trees" (healthy, diseased, dead), each with 25 replications of each treatment group.
ECM Matched | NMDS | Parent Tree | 5-month-seedling | Accession # |
Unknown 1 | N/A | 0.1 | 0 | N/A |
Cenococcum geophilum | CEN | 23.4 | 7.0 | GU246995* |
Cortinarius subbalaustinus | COR1 | 41.0 | 38.6 | GU246986* |
Cortinarius decipiens | COR2 | 3.4 | 9.8 | GU246987* |
Cortinarius parvannulatus | COR3 | 8.1 | 1.2 | MG674533 |
Cortinarius diasemospermus | COR4 | 2.1 | 0 | MG674534 |
Hebeloma sp. | HEB | 0 | 6.0 | MG674535 |
Helotiales | HEL | 0 | 0.5 | MG674536 |
Inocybe rufoalba | INO | 1.6 | 10.2 | MG674537 |
Laccaria bicolor | LAC | 0.5 | 0.1 | GU246994* |
Lactarius chrysorrheus | N/A | 0.3 | 0 | MG674538 |
Oidiodendron maius | N/A | 0 | 0.4 | MG674540 |
Russula pectinatoides | RUS1 | 3.7 | 3.7 | MG674541 |
Russula cerolens | RUS2 | 2.3 | 0 | MG674542 |
Scleroderma areolatum | SCL1 | 10.0 | 12.8 | GU246989* |
Scleroderma citrinum | SCL2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | GU246990* |
Thelephora terrestris | THEL | 1.5 | 9.6 | GU246993* |
Parent Tree | Height (cm) | Basal Dia (cm) | % ECM | ECM Richness | ECM Diversity |
Diseased | 131.8 ± 7.8a | 2.4 ± 0.2a | 52 ± 4.9a | 4.3 ± 1.9a | 1.4 ± 0.3a |
Healthy | 239.8 ± 3.2b | 4.0 ± 0.2b | 72 ± 3.9b | 6.0 ± 0.6a | 1.4 ± 0.1a |
To test the influence that the health of a neighboring tree has on establishing seedlings, a nut was planted at the base of each parent tree. The chestnut seeds were provided to us by the American Chestnut Foundation. Nuts were surfaced sterilized using 10% bleach solution for 10 minutes, rinsed with DI water, and allowed to air dry prior to being cold-stratified in peat at 2 ℃ for 6 weeks. At the time of planting in March, vegetation was cut-back, and a hole approximately 12 × 12 cm was prepared, due south of the dripline of each established tree (approximately 35–45 cm from the trunk). Nuts were field germinated, allowed to grow for 5 months, and harvested (described below). These seedlings will be herein referred to as "five-month seedlings".
At the time of planting, soils were sampled by extracting soil cores using a soil probe to a depth of 18 cm. Three cores were sampled from the rhizosphere per parent tree. Soil samples were oven dried for 72 hours at 105 ℃ and sent to Spectrum Analytic Inc., Washington Court House, Ohio, for Mehlich 3 extract analysis. Soil parameters analyzed included: pH, cation exchange capacity (CEC), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), boron (B), zinc (Zn), iron (Fe), copper (Cu) and manganese (Mn).
All surviving five-month-old seedlings, representing each parent tree disease status (n = 64), were carefully removed from the soil as whole seedlings and returned to the laboratory where root systems were washed with DI water and cut into approximately 3 cm segments. One hundred root tips per seedling, where applicable, were randomly selected from each seedling, viewed under a dissecting microscope for the presence of a fungal sheath and irradiating hyphae. Using a grid template as a guide, the number of ECM root tips was divided by the total number if roots sampled to calculate percent ECM. ECM was morphotyped based on their color and texture of sheath, emanating hyphae and presence of rhizomorphs [38]. Authors did not specify dead verses living root tips and only scored root tips as ECM or non-ECM. At the time of sampling in 2013, all seedling recruits were measured for height (cm), basal diameter (mm) and volume by dry weight (g).
Leaves from all 5-month-old seedlings were removed, oven-dried at 80 ℃ for 72 hours and then homogenized using a mortar and pestle. Nitrogen (N) was analyzed using a Thermo Electron NC Soil Analyzer Flash EA 1112 Series (Western Washington University, Department of Environmental Science). Dried leaf tissue weighing approximately 20 mg were placed in tin capsules and compressed to remove any air prior to carbon-nitrogen analysis. The Eager 300 Software (Thermo Electron S.p.a., Milan, Italy) provided a chromatogram graph and percent composition of total carbon and nitrogen.
All parent trees (25 healthy and 25 diseased) were selected for non-destructive sampling for ECM fungi at this time. To sample for ECM fungi, three soil cores (10 cm × 10 cm) were collected from the drip line of each 7-years old chestnut tree. Samples were pooled among cores, per seedling, stored on ice, and returned to the laboratory within 24 hours. In the laboratory, soil cores were sifted using mesh screen, roots were washed with DI water, and transferred into a Petri dish containing sterile water. One hundred root tips per tree were randomly selected from each tree and viewed under a dissecting microscope for the presence of a fungal sheath (Table 1). Each ECM tip was sorted into one of the nine morphotypes based on their surface color, texture, emanating hyphae, and rhizomorphs based on morphologies illustrated in Bauman et al. [38]. ECM root tips that did not match previous morphologies were described, designated as new morphotypes, and assigned a new NCBI accession number.
Presence and type of ECM species on the root tip was determined by DNA extraction followed by PCR amplification and DNA sequencing of the ITS region of the fungal genome. For each seedling, a 3-mm segment of root tip was removed, transferred to a microcentrifuge tube, and stored at –70 ℃ until DNA was extracted. Two samples per morphotype were selected. Root tips were homogenized using a bead beater and DNA was extracted using Qiagen's DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) per manufacturers protocol. About 10 ng of this DNA was used in PCR reactions using primers ITS1-F (5'-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3') and ITS4 (5'-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3'), which amplify the highly variable internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of ECM fungal ribosomal DNA (rDNA). The PCR products were purified using Wizard® SV 96 Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). DNA was sequenced by capillary Sanger sequencing at the Plant-Microbe Genomics Facility of The Ohio State University (Columbus, OH, USA). The DNA sequences were edited by trimming low quality reads off and visually inspecting and editing chromatograms from contigs using Sequencher 4.2 software (Gene Codes, Ann Arbor, Michigan). By comparing these sequences to those present in the GenBank and UNITE database, identity of the ECM fungus was determined [51,52]. To be conservative, we only reported the sequences that did match > 95% of the data base. Therefore, authors acknowledge that other species of genera reported may have been sampled, however, lacked the similarity match to be considered an additional species within the genera reported in this paper. For those sequences that matched authors previously reported ECM morphotypes on chestnut (>98% similarity), the original accession is reported (Table 1). For new ECM taxon, authors deposited sequences into GenBank and reported the new accession numbers.
ECM colonization per treatment was assessed by taking the percentage (#ECM tips/100) of ECM colonized root tips from parent trees and neighboring five-month seedlings. Description of ECM per site was quantified by species richness and Shannon-Weiner diversity index based on ECM tip counts for each morphotype. Two sample t-tests were used to detect significant differences between healthy and diseased chestnuts with regard to ECM root colonization, species richness and diversity. An ANCOVA followed by Tukey's HSD post hoc was used to assess differences among parent trees (main effect) to seedling ECM colonization, number of fungal species and seedling height (dependent variables). Means are reported ± standard error (SE). Arcsine and log transformations were used, when needed, to meet the assumption of similar variance and normal distribution. To compare seedling survival among parent trees, a Pearson's Chi-Square (X2) was used. Pearson correlation analysis was used to compare the strength of relationships between foliar nitrogen concentrations and two ECM root colonization groups: (1) those that were colonized by Cortinarius spp.; (2) those colonized by non-Cortinarius species such as Inocybe, Scleroderma, Hebeloma and Cenococcum. All statistical tests were performed using R v2.91 [53].
All following community statistics were analyzed using Vegan: Community Ecology Package, version 2.3.0. Overall species richness of the ECM community was estimated using two common incidence based richness estimators, Chao Ⅱ and a bootstrap population estimator by the "specpool" function. A non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination and a Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix was used to describe ECM species composition based on root tip counts between parent trees and five month seedlings, and ECM composition among the disease classifications (healthy, diseased and dead) using "metaMDS" function. To improve the NMDS ordination, rare species that scored < 0.5% based on root tip counts were removed from the data set and data were square-root transformed and standardized using Wisconsin double standardization. The analysis ran for 100 random starts until the best solution, decided by the lowest stress value, was reached.
A two-way permutational multivariate analysis of variance as used to test for significant differences among the parent trees, five month seedlings, disease classifications (healthy, diseased, dead), and their interaction using the "adonis" function in Vegan. This method partitions variation in dissimilarity or distance matrices using a "pseudo-F" statistic analogous to MANOVA [54]. The correlation of soil chemistry (CEC, pH, P, K, Mg, Ca, CEC, S, B, Cu, Fe, Mn, Zn), organic matter, tree basal diameter (cm) and tree height with NMDS axes (cm) were analyzed using Mantel tests, which are used to test for correlations between two matrices [54]. Soil variables were standardized and fit onto the NMDS and squared correlation coefficients and P-values were determined by the "envfit" function in R [53,54].
Through DNA sequencing, 17 fungal species were documented in ectomycorrhizal association with 7-year-old chestnut trees and 5-month-old chestnut seedlings (Table 1). Sampling efficacy was verified using Chao Ⅱ and bootstrap richness estimators, which reported 19 ± 3.3 and 18 ± 1.2 ECM species, respectively. A two-way permutational ANOVA on the ECM community matrices showed that differences in ECM communities existed between the two chestnut types (parent trees verses five-month seedlings; F(1, 10) = 2.33, P = 0.03). Differences in ECM community composition did not exist by disease status of the chestnut trees or seedlings. Further, no interactions between tree age and disease status existed. Therefore, ECM species are presented by chestnut type (parent tree verses five-month seedlings) in Table 1.
Both the trees and seedlings shared the most abundant species Cortinarius subbalaustinus (COR1). This species was strongly associated with the first NMDS1 axis of the ordination, and was significantly correlated to seedling height (r = 0.50, P = 0.01) and basal diameter (r = 0.52, P = 0.009; Figure 1). Scleroderma areolatum (SCL1) and Russula pectinatoides (RUS1) were also shared between both the 7-year-old parent trees and 5-month-old seedlings (Table 1). However, certain ECM species such as Cenococcum sp. (CEN), C. parvannulatus (COR3), R. cerolens (RUS2) and S. citrinum (SCL2) were highly associated with the parent trees, which appeared in the ordination negatively correlated with sulfur (S) concentrations in the soil (r = 0.39, P = 0.04; Figure 1). In contrast, species such as C. decipiens (COR2), Hebeloma sp. (HEB), Inocybe rufoalba (INO) and Thelephora terrestris (THEL) were associated with the five-month seedlings and positively correlated to soil concentrations of boron (B; r = 0.39, P = 0.04). Species such as C. diasemospermus (COR4) and Laccaria sp. (LAC) were not commonly sampled and therefore, difficult to determine with regard to the preference of host age. Other ECM included an unknown species as well as matching sequences in the order Helotiales, Lactarius sp. and Oidiodendron sp. were sampled in trace amounts (<0.5%) and therefore were not included in the NMDS (Table 1).
Seven-year-old healthy parent trees had significantly more root colonization (72%) than parent trees experiencing tissue loss associated with chestnut blight (52%; t = 3.23, df = 23, P = 0.002). However, no differences existed when species richness was assessed; both tree categories averaged approximately three species (Table 2), which was similar to the NMDS community composition.
Differences were significant with regard to ECM root colonization on the five-month-old seedling recruits among the healthy, diseased and dead neighboring trees (F = 6.67, df = 2, P = 0.002), with apparent benefits associated with healthy established trees (Figure 2). Seedling recruits growing next to healthy parent chestnut trees had the greatest ECM root colonization (58%), colonization of seedlings growing next to diseased trees was similar (44%). Both healthy and diseased trees had significantly more ECM than seedlings growing adjacent to dead trees (28%; Figure 2A). Though seedling recruits neighboring healthy trees had a greater number of ECM species, this was not significant (Figure 2B). Seedling recruits growing next to healthy trees were significantly taller (19.2 cm) than those growing at the base of diseased (13.3 cm) and dead trees (14.1 cm; F = 6.24, df = 2, P = 0.003; Figure 2C). Survival of the five-month-old recruits also differed among the treatments with greater survival of seedlings next to healthy trees (98%) followed by seedlings next to dead trees (80%), with poorest survival when seedling recruits were neighboring diseased trees (42%; X2 = 25.9, P < 0.0001; Figure 2D).
Nitrogen acquisition of five month ECM seedlings was analyzed between two distinct groups: those that were colonized by Cortinarius spp. and those colonized by non-Cortinarius species such as Inocybe, Scleroderma, Hebeloma and Cenococcum. A positive correlation existed between Cortinarius ECM colonization and foliar N in seedling tissue (r = 0.45, t = 2.07, df = 17, P = 0.05; Figure 3). However, the non-Cortinarius ECM species illustrated a negative trend, but this was not statistically significant (r = –0.31, t = –1.17, df = 13, P = 0.26). A significant correlation did not exist when five-month-old seedling height or biomass was compared.
Healthier seven-year-old chestnuts trees had significantly more ECM root tips than those trees infected with chestnut blight cankers. The decrease in ECM on diseased roots was similar to herbivory studies that documented the loss of photosynthetic tissue associated with loss of ECM colonization [41,42], which supports the hypothesis that ECM colonization is driven, and maintained by carbon available from American chestnut trees. However, disease die-back on chestnut did not have an influence on community composition between the established trees, or seem to drive the selection of fungal species that were more tolerant of reduced carbon. Luoma and Eberhart [55] noted a decrease in mycorrhizal root tip density and ECM species richness correlated with defoliation due to Swiss needle cast. Other studies report a change in fungal community after herbivory [54], root disease [48] and canopy decline [46,56]. Blom et al. [48] documented an increase in ECM species richness from chestnuts infected with root rot and speculated that healthy trees are more selective than the diseased trees and diseased trees may allocate more carbon belowground due to root mortality. In our study, to compensate for loss of photosynthetic tissue, it is likely that the tree would re-allocate carbon resources to aboveground growth. Also, our study was conducted on a restoration site with disturbed soils with a small, early-seral ECM community, which are likely to have characteristics such as lower carbon demand and prolific spore dispersal. Therefore, if the same study was done in a mature forest, with many dozens of ECM species, and a larger sample size, the effect of disease may have been more apparent.
Healthy neighboring chestnut trees were also associated with an increase in ECM inoculum available to five-month-old seedlings. Additionally, seedlings neighboring healthy trees grew larger and had the highest survival. Approximately half of the seedlings were inoculated by three Cortinarius species, with C. subbalaustinus the most abundant on both trees and seedlings, presumably modeling mycelia dispersal from existing roots to germinating seedlings [57,58]. Inoculation from roots of existing plants is an efficient mechanism for root colonization to an establishing seedling [30,57]. Also, it has been documented that establishing seedlings can root into a common mycorrhizal network [1], which will allow for carbon and nutrient transfer from healthy parent trees (carbon source) to the newly establishing seedlings (carbon sink) [4].
Although diseased trees were statistically comparable to healthy trees regarding inoculum potential, seedling recruits neighboring diseased trees were significantly smaller and had the lowest survival (56%). In contrast, there was a significant decrease in ECM root colonization on seedlings neighboring dead chestnut trees and adequate survival (80%). However, there was also a significant reduction in height, which may be linked to inadequate root colonization (<50%) that would be required for a significant increase in biomass, as seen from seedlings neighboring healthy trees. Therefore, it appears that radial fungal hyphae and ECM roots surrounding a healthy tree provide immediate and effective inoculum for colonization of a neighboring seedling. Although the seeds planted around dead trees had similar ECM communities, the slight decline in survival and reduction in growth may reflect delayed ECM establishment and diminished benefits to the seedling.
C. subbalaustinus was the most abundant species sampled on both parent trees and five-month seedlings. Three additional Cortinarius species were also sampled at this time. Members of this genus are medium distance fringe exploring basidiomycetes that form extensive soil mycelia characterized by dense hydrophobic hyphal cords and rhizomorphs, assumed to be efficient in moving materials over relatively large distances [59,60,61,62]. Cortinarius ECM colonization was positively associated with increased levels of foliar nitrogen in five-month-old seedlings. This species has been reported to produce oxidative exoenzymes that mobilize organic N, such as lignin and humic acids in response to low N availability [61,62,63,64,65]. Similar conditions are prevalent in mine reclamation sites, which may select for ECM fungi that are better nutrient scavengers; ecological filtering or natural selection favors physiological adaptations that allow mycorrhizal symbionts to utilize limiting nitrogen from organic resources [66].
Cenococcum was also very abundant on the parent trees, and sparse on the 5-month-old seedlings. This genera has short-ranging dark mycelia with thick, melanized cell walls [67], which may not be as quick to disperse via mycelia from established trees. This ECM has been reported to colonize weakened trees associated with declining oak forests [68,69] and has been shown to increase in abundance in the absence of better competitors [70]. However, in this study, Cenococcum was not exclusive to declining trees and coexisted with Cortinarius on established trees. Further, seven-year-old chestnut trees colonized by either Cenococcum or Cortinarius were similar in height, and significantly taller than trees colonized with less than 25% ECM [39]. Corcobado et al. [47] also reported that C. geophilum was not associated with tree decline or root disease, but rather corresponded to dry soil conditions, which complements Pigott's [71] characterization of Cenococcum as having superior tolerance to water stress. Therefore, its presence may have been selected by drought conditions that were identified within Ohio throughout the time of this survey [72]. Cenococcum's melanized morphology is thought to protect roots against desiccation and fluctuating temperatures [73], which may aid in mitigating UV radiation, heavy metals and water stress [74,75,76].
Other ECM species such as S. areolatum and R. pectinatoides were evenly shared between both chestnut parent trees and seedlings representing other important inoculum sources to incoming seedlings. Previous work on abandoned coal mine soils also showed that chestnut seedlings growing among established pines (Pinus virginiana) shared root colonization by Scleroderma, which were also documented with higher growth and survival [30]. Although disease did not influence ECM community differences, the age of the chestnut host did. For example, species such as Cenococcum, C. parvannulatus, R. cerolens were not as common on the five-month-old seedlings, yet prevalent on the parent trees. In contrast, species such Hebeloma sp., Inocybe sp. and Thelephora sp. were primarily associated with the five-month-old seedlings. In comparison, these species are not cord forming and may come with a lower carbon cost to the establishing seedling, which may have been an efficient strategy in terms of carbon expenditure than longer distance, thick hyphal forming morphologies [57]. Species such as Cortinarius sp. 4, Helotiales, Laccaria sp., Lactarius sp., Oidiodendron sp. were rare in our sampling, therefore, the preferential age of host could not be determined.
Despite the initial inoculation of Pisolithus tinctorius in the field nursery, this fungus was not sampled in this study. Though this fungus readily forms ECM with chestnut [30], this species tends to be a poor competitor and quickly becomes displaced after field planting [38]. Bauman et al. [77] found that ECM species such as Hebeloma crustuliniforme, Laccaria bicolor, Scleroderma polyrhizum, Amanita rubescens, Suillus luteus also did not maintain their mycorrhizal association with chestnut seedlings after 12 months in the field. However when compared to non-inoculated control seedlings, this initial inoculation contributed significantly to the survival of chestnut after outplanting. Further, these species did not interfere with colonization from ECM species present in field soils. Therefore, ecological specificity can be a significant driving factor determining host specificity and the beneficial status of ECM colonization in the field [78]. However, despite the short-term persistence of fungal inoculum, these species play an important role in mitigating seedling transplant shock during the first few months of establishment.
In summary, early successional habitats are dynamic; ECM colonization is influenced by tree development and may facilitate the survival of other native hardwoods like oak, that associate with chestnut mycorrhiza as this stand develops [32,79]. ECM colonization and inoculum potential were negatively impacted by disease dieback, but blight had no effect on ECM community composition or select for species more tolerant to reduced photosynthate. Further, diseased trees did provide inoculum, however, did not confer benefits such as greater survival and larger seedlings as did healthy neighbors. Tree mortality in the restoration plots caused a decrease in inoculum potential, however, may still contribute ecological benefits such as organic input, decomposition and nutrient cycling [80,81], which may aid in soil development in mined and reclaimed sites. Further, mortality caused by blight may help diversify the stand and encourage the establishment of other hardwood species that may recruit into the site. Chestnut seedlings that were colonized by the most abundant ECM genus, Cortinarius, displayed an increased in nitrogen acquisition. We hypothesize that Cenococcum, also abundant on trees, may play a role in water relations while increasing soil carbon stored as recalcitrant fungal litter [82]. Differing plant-fungal pairings can result in significant variations in host response [83] with the selection of symbionts driven by both the soil environment and limiting resources, which, in turn, drives the succession of fungal communities within recovering soils.
Authors thank journal editors and reviewers for their helpful feedback on this manuscript. This work was supported by National Technology and Transfer funds from the US Department of Interior (Office of Surface Mining), The American Chestnut Foundation Research Support Grant, The Muskingum University Muskie Fellows Program, The Muskingum University Carolyn, Glenn Hodges Student Research Fund, Research and Sponsored Program Grant from Western Washington University.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this article.
[1] | M. Garavello, K. Han, B. Piccoli, Models for vehicular traffic on networks, vol. 9 of AIMS Series on Applied Mathematics, American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS), Springfield, MO, 2016. |
[2] | M. Garavello, B. Piccoli, Traffic flow on networks, vol. 1 of AIMS Series on Applied Mathematics, American Institute of Mathematical Sciences (AIMS), Springfield, MO, 2006, Conservation laws models. |
[3] | S. Blandin, P. Goatin, Well-posedness of a conservation law with non-local flux arising in traffic flow modeling, Numer. Math., 132 (2016), 217-241. |
[4] | R. M. Colombo, Hyperbolic phase transitions in traffic flow, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 63 (2002), 708-721. |
[5] | H. Holden, N. H. Risebro, A mathematical model of traffic flow on a network of unidirectional roads, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 26 (1995), 999-1017. |
[6] | M. Gugat, M. Herty, A. Klar, G. Leugering, Optimal control for traffic flow networks, J. Optim. Theory Appl., 126 (2005), 589-616. |
[7] | S. Fan, M. Herty, B. Seibold, Comparative model accuracy of a data-fitted generalized Aw-RascleZhang model, Netw. Heterog. Media, 9 (2014), 239-268. |
[8] | S. E. Jabari, H. X. Liu, A stochastic model of traffic flow: Gaussian approximation and estimation, Transport. Res. B-Meth., 47 (2013), 15-41. |
[9] | A. Sopasakis, M. A. Katsoulakis, Stochastic modeling and simulation of traffic flow: asymmetric single exclusion process with Arrhenius look-ahead dynamics, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 66 (2006), 921-944. |
[10] | M. Herty, V. Schleper, Traffic flow with unobservant drivers, ZAMM Z. Angew. Math. Mech., 91 (2011), 763-776. |
[11] | S. Moutari, M. Herty, A Lagrangian approach for modeling road collisions using second-order models of traffic flow, Commun. Math. Sci., 12 (2014), 1239-1256. |
[12] | S. Moutari, M. Herty, A. Klein, M. Oeser, B. Steinauer, V. Schleper, Modelling road traffic accidents using macroscopic second-order models of traffic flow, IMA J. Appl. Math., 78 (2013), 1087-1108. |
[13] | L. Jin, S. Amin, Analysis of a stochastic switching model of freeway traffic incidents, IEEE Trans. Automat. Control, 64 (2019), 1093-1108. |
[14] | M. Baykal-Gürsoy, W. Xiao, K. Ozbay, Modeling traffic flow interrupted by incidents, Eur. J. Oper. Res., 195 (2009), 127-138. |
[15] | P. Freguglia, A. Tosin, Proposal of a risk model for vehicular traffic: a Boltzmann-type kinetic approach, Commun. Math. Sci., 15 (2017), 213-236. |
[16] | M. J. Lighthill, G. B. Whitham, On kinematic waves. II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads, Proc. Roy. Soc. London. Ser. A., 229 (1955), 317-345. |
[17] | M. H. A. Davis, Piecewise-deterministic Markov processes: a general class of nondiffusion stochastic models, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, 46 (1984), 353-388. |
[18] | M. Jacobsen, Point Process Theory and Applications, Probability and its Applications, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2006, Marked point and piecewise deterministic processes. |
[19] | S. Göttlich, S. Knapp, Load-Dependent Machine Failures in Production Network Models, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 79 (2019), 1197-1217. |
[20] | A. Barth, F. G. Fuchs, Uncertainty quantification for hyperbolic conservation laws with flux coefficients given by spatiotemporal random fields, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 38 (2016), A2209-A2231. |
[21] | S. Mishra, N. H. Risebro, C. Schwab, S. Tokareva, Numerical solution of scalar conservation laws with random flux functions, SIAM/ASA J. Uncertain. Quan., 4 (2016), 552-591. |
[22] | U. S. Fjordholm, S. Lanthaler, S. Mishra, Statistical solutions of hyperbolic conservation laws: foundations, Arch. Ration. Mech. An., 226 (2017), 809-849. |
[23] | G. M. Coclite, N. H. Risebro, Conservation laws with time dependent discontinuous coefficients, SIAM J. Math. Anal., 36 (2005), 1293-1309. |
[24] | H. Holden, N. H. Risebro, Front Tracking for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws, vol. 152 of AMS, 2nd edition, Springer, Heidelberg, 2015. |
[25] | K. H. Karlsen, J. D. Towers, Convergence of the Lax-Friedrichs scheme and stability for conservation laws with a discontinuous space-time dependent flux, Chinese Ann. Math., 25 (2004), 287-318. |
[26] | J. D. Towers, Convergence of a difference scheme for conservation laws with a discontinuous flux, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 38 (2000), 681-698. |
[27] | J. D. Towers, Convergence via OSLC of the Godunov scheme for a scalar conservation law with time and space flux discontinuities, Numer. Math., 139 (2018), 939-969. |
[28] | H. Bauer, Measure and Integration Theory, vol. 26 of De Gruyter Studies in Mathematics, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2001. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110866209, Translated from the German by Robert B. Burckel. |
[29] | L. C. Evans, R. F. Gariepy, Measure theory and fine properties of functions, Revised edition, Textbooks in Mathematics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015. |
[30] | P. R. Halmos, Measure Theory, Springer New York, 1978. Available from: https://www.ebook.de/de/product/3686564/paul_r_halmos_measure_theory.html. |
[31] | W. Rudin, Real and Complex Analysis, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1987. |
[32] | V. Lemaire, M. Thieullen, N. Thomas, Exact simulation of the jump times of a class of piecewise deterministic Markov processes, J. Sci. Comput., 75 (2018), 1776-1807. |
[33] | P. Degond, C. Ringhofer, Stochastic dynamics of long supply chains with random breakdowns, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 68 (2007), 59-79. |
1. | Christopher Reazin, Richard Baird, Stacy Clark, Ari Jumpponen, Chestnuts bred for blight resistance depart nursery with distinct fungal rhizobiomes, 2019, 29, 0940-6360, 313, 10.1007/s00572-019-00897-z | |
2. | Rosario Nicoletti, Gabriele Loris Beccaro, Agnieszka Sekara, Chiara Cirillo, Claudio Di Vaio, Endophytic Fungi and Ecological Fitness of Chestnuts, 2021, 10, 2223-7747, 542, 10.3390/plants10030542 | |
3. | Shawn P. Brown, Stacy L. Clark, Emerald Ford, Ari Jumpponen, Arnold M. Saxton, Scott E. Schlarbaum, Richard Baird, Comparisons of interspecies field performance of Fagaceae (Castanea and Quercus) planted in the southeastern United States with attention to soil fungal impacts on plant performance, 2022, 525, 03781127, 120569, 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120569 | |
4. | Matteo Garbelotto, Paolo Gonthier, 2022, 9780323850421, 107, 10.1016/B978-0-323-85042-1.00040-9 | |
5. | Yanpeng Wang, Cuiyu Liu, Zhou Fang, Qiang Wu, Yang Xu, Bangchu Gong, Xibing Jiang, Junsheng Lai, Jingen Fan, A Review of the Stress Resistance, Molecular Breeding, Health Benefits, Potential Food Products, and Ecological Value of Castanea mollissima, 2022, 11, 2223-7747, 2111, 10.3390/plants11162111 | |
6. | Ignacio Sanz-Benito, Tim Stadler, Olaya Mediavilla, María Hernández-Rodríguez, Juan Andrés Oria-de-Rueda, Tatek Dejene, József Geml, Pablo Martín-Pinto, Into the void: ECM fungal communities involved in the succession from rockroses to oak stands, 2023, 13, 2045-2322, 10.1038/s41598-023-37107-y | |
7. | Huan Xiong, Si-Yuan Yu, Feng Zou, De-Yi Yuan, 2025, 9780443248634, 9, 10.1016/B978-0-443-24863-4.00002-9 |
ECM Matched | NMDS | Parent Tree | 5-month-seedling | Accession # |
Unknown 1 | N/A | 0.1 | 0 | N/A |
Cenococcum geophilum | CEN | 23.4 | 7.0 | GU246995* |
Cortinarius subbalaustinus | COR1 | 41.0 | 38.6 | GU246986* |
Cortinarius decipiens | COR2 | 3.4 | 9.8 | GU246987* |
Cortinarius parvannulatus | COR3 | 8.1 | 1.2 | MG674533 |
Cortinarius diasemospermus | COR4 | 2.1 | 0 | MG674534 |
Hebeloma sp. | HEB | 0 | 6.0 | MG674535 |
Helotiales | HEL | 0 | 0.5 | MG674536 |
Inocybe rufoalba | INO | 1.6 | 10.2 | MG674537 |
Laccaria bicolor | LAC | 0.5 | 0.1 | GU246994* |
Lactarius chrysorrheus | N/A | 0.3 | 0 | MG674538 |
Oidiodendron maius | N/A | 0 | 0.4 | MG674540 |
Russula pectinatoides | RUS1 | 3.7 | 3.7 | MG674541 |
Russula cerolens | RUS2 | 2.3 | 0 | MG674542 |
Scleroderma areolatum | SCL1 | 10.0 | 12.8 | GU246989* |
Scleroderma citrinum | SCL2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | GU246990* |
Thelephora terrestris | THEL | 1.5 | 9.6 | GU246993* |
Parent Tree | Height (cm) | Basal Dia (cm) | % ECM | ECM Richness | ECM Diversity |
Diseased | 131.8 ± 7.8a | 2.4 ± 0.2a | 52 ± 4.9a | 4.3 ± 1.9a | 1.4 ± 0.3a |
Healthy | 239.8 ± 3.2b | 4.0 ± 0.2b | 72 ± 3.9b | 6.0 ± 0.6a | 1.4 ± 0.1a |
ECM Matched | NMDS | Parent Tree | 5-month-seedling | Accession # |
Unknown 1 | N/A | 0.1 | 0 | N/A |
Cenococcum geophilum | CEN | 23.4 | 7.0 | GU246995* |
Cortinarius subbalaustinus | COR1 | 41.0 | 38.6 | GU246986* |
Cortinarius decipiens | COR2 | 3.4 | 9.8 | GU246987* |
Cortinarius parvannulatus | COR3 | 8.1 | 1.2 | MG674533 |
Cortinarius diasemospermus | COR4 | 2.1 | 0 | MG674534 |
Hebeloma sp. | HEB | 0 | 6.0 | MG674535 |
Helotiales | HEL | 0 | 0.5 | MG674536 |
Inocybe rufoalba | INO | 1.6 | 10.2 | MG674537 |
Laccaria bicolor | LAC | 0.5 | 0.1 | GU246994* |
Lactarius chrysorrheus | N/A | 0.3 | 0 | MG674538 |
Oidiodendron maius | N/A | 0 | 0.4 | MG674540 |
Russula pectinatoides | RUS1 | 3.7 | 3.7 | MG674541 |
Russula cerolens | RUS2 | 2.3 | 0 | MG674542 |
Scleroderma areolatum | SCL1 | 10.0 | 12.8 | GU246989* |
Scleroderma citrinum | SCL2 | 2.2 | 0.2 | GU246990* |
Thelephora terrestris | THEL | 1.5 | 9.6 | GU246993* |
Parent Tree | Height (cm) | Basal Dia (cm) | % ECM | ECM Richness | ECM Diversity |
Diseased | 131.8 ± 7.8a | 2.4 ± 0.2a | 52 ± 4.9a | 4.3 ± 1.9a | 1.4 ± 0.3a |
Healthy | 239.8 ± 3.2b | 4.0 ± 0.2b | 72 ± 3.9b | 6.0 ± 0.6a | 1.4 ± 0.1a |