Rice is one of the most important staple foods for 70 percent of the population of the world. It is among the main cereal crops grown in different regions of Pakistan as food crop. Pakistan has very much potentials for growing the crop and the potential rice production sown area is estimated to be about 2724 thousand hectares. The purpose of this study is to examine the linkage between fertilizer consumption and rice production in Pakistan from 1984 to 2014. For checking the stationarity of the data, this study incorporated Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) and Phillips Perron (PP) unit root tests. Furthermore, the Johenson Co-integration test is used to detect the long-term relationship among the series. Likewise, on the basis of annual time series data the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model is employed to evaluate the impact of fertilizer consumption on the production of rice in Pakistan up to now. The results of ADF and PP unit root tests reveal that fertilizer consumption and water availability are integrated at I(0) whereas area and rice production are integrated at I(1). The empirical findings of Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model indicate that area and fertilizer consumption for rice has a significant effect on the rice production in both short-run and long-run. In contrast, water availability has a significant effect on the rice production in the long-run but it was statistically insignificant in the short-run. The estimated equation remains stable from the period of 1984 to 2014 as showed by stability tests.
Citation: Abbas Ali Chandio, Yuansheng Jiang, Abdul Rehman, Rahman Dunya. The linkage between fertilizer consumption and rice production: Empirical evidence from Pakistan[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(3): 295-305. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.3.295
Related Papers:
[1]
Raulston Derrick Gillette, Norio Sakai, Godfrid Erasme Ibikoule .
Role and impact of contract farming under various pricing standards: A case of Guyana's rice sector. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(1): 336-355.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024020
[2]
Florencia G. Palis, R. M. Lampayan, R.J. Flor, E. Sibayan .
A multi-stakeholder partnership for the dissemination of alternate wetting and drying water-saving technology for rice farmers in the Philippines. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(3): 290-309.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.3.290
[3]
Christos Dramalis, Demetrios Katsantonis, Spyridon D. Koutroubas .
Rice growth, assimilate translocation, and grain quality in response to salinity under Mediterranean conditions. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 255-272.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021017
[4]
Widowati, Sutoyo, Hidayati Karamina, Wahyu Fikrinda .
Soil amendment impact to soil organic matter and physical properties on the three soil types after second corn cultivation. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(1): 150-168.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.150
[5]
Fernando Arias, Maytee Zambrano, Kathia Broce, Carlos Medina, Hazel Pacheco, Yerenis Nunez .
Hyperspectral imaging for rice cultivation: Applications, methods and challenges. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 273-307.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021018
[6]
J.M.A. Duncan, J. Dash, E.L. Tompkins .
Observing adaptive capacity in Indian rice production systems. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2017, 2(2): 165-182.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2017.2.165
[7]
Tayyaba Khalil, Saeed A. Asad, Nusaiba Khubaib, Ayesha Baig, Salman Atif, Muhammad Umar, Jürgen P. Kropp, Prajal Pradhan, Sofia Baig .
Climate change and potential distribution of potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop cultivation in Pakistan using Maxent. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(2): 663-676.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021039
[8]
Fitri Damayanti, Salprima Yudha S, Aswin Falahudin .
Oil palm leaf ash's effect on the growth and yield of Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa L.). AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 553-565.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023030
[9]
Thamires Monteiro Silva Maués, Rafael Rodrigo da Silva Costa, Marcos Antônio Souza dos Santos, Gisele Barata da Silva .
Agroeconomic performance of banana tree under nutritional management with Trichoderma asperellum, in a family production system. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2022, 7(2): 297-311.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2022019
[10]
Syajariah Sanusi, Huck Ywih Ch’ng, Suhaimi Othman .
Effects of incubation period and Christmas Island rock phosphate with different rate of rice straw compost on phosphorus availability in acid soil. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(4): 384-396.
doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.4.384
Abstract
Rice is one of the most important staple foods for 70 percent of the population of the world. It is among the main cereal crops grown in different regions of Pakistan as food crop. Pakistan has very much potentials for growing the crop and the potential rice production sown area is estimated to be about 2724 thousand hectares. The purpose of this study is to examine the linkage between fertilizer consumption and rice production in Pakistan from 1984 to 2014. For checking the stationarity of the data, this study incorporated Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) and Phillips Perron (PP) unit root tests. Furthermore, the Johenson Co-integration test is used to detect the long-term relationship among the series. Likewise, on the basis of annual time series data the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model is employed to evaluate the impact of fertilizer consumption on the production of rice in Pakistan up to now. The results of ADF and PP unit root tests reveal that fertilizer consumption and water availability are integrated at I(0) whereas area and rice production are integrated at I(1). The empirical findings of Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) model indicate that area and fertilizer consumption for rice has a significant effect on the rice production in both short-run and long-run. In contrast, water availability has a significant effect on the rice production in the long-run but it was statistically insignificant in the short-run. The estimated equation remains stable from the period of 1984 to 2014 as showed by stability tests.
1. Introduction
Fertilizer is the key instrument for the crop production. Unlike in developing economies, chemical fertilizers are underutilized and often subsidized by the government [1]. In developed countries, chemical fertilizers are usually used more than others and are sometimes taxed. The main issue with over usage of chemical fertilizers is that they are the main cause of water pollution. Nutrient leaching to the Baltic Sea has created one of the largest marine hypoxic regions in the world, and for Sweden, about 40 percent of this leaching comes from farmland [2]. The use of fertilizers has been key to the green revolution in many countries around the world [3]. Christoplos research conceptualizes an effective agricultural extension service that includes all the various activities to provide the information and advice needed and required by the food system and rural farmers and other actors [4]. Agricultural extension has strengthened peasants' ability to innovate by providing access to knowledge and information. An important feature of Pakistani agriculture is the advantage of small holdings. Smallholders, defined as five hectares of land, make up 74% of the country's total peasant population; though only 34% of the total arable land is in the area they command [5]. Asia, almost half of the world's population and 90% of the world's rice production are growing and consuming [6]. Ansari [7] stated that by introducing and promoting innovative agricultural technologies, crop productivity can be increased. Agriculture, as a pillar of the Pakistani economy, needs more attention to increasing productivity. According to him, peasants have been looking for sources of finance to lend in convenient terms to increase their agricultural productivity. Similarly, Fazal [8] reported that production loans to buy seeds and fertilizers remained below 50% between 1980 and 1981, after which it improved and extended 63.9% in 2002–2003. Junejo [9] pointed out that the potential of agriculture should be exploited by increasing the yield of crops. Increasing yield of crops is the only way to decrease costs of production. Modern agricultural technology is also playing a vital role for the development of agriculture and advocate farmers and give largely access to new technology and information [10]. However, it is clear that smallholders have low access to agricultural extension in the country [11]. Some empirical studies have done on the use of fertilizers [12]. However, little is known about the influence of agricultural extension services on the usage of fertilizers and hence their effect on rice production. Although some researchers include an extension as an explanatory variable in the adoption model norms [13,14], the impact of promotion in these studies varied and did not expand on the soil and the actual impact of improved technology to reach a consensus. Rice is cash and the main food crop; a second staple food of Pakistan after wheat crop and it is also a main exportable item after cotton of the country [15,16]. The rice has shared in the sector of Pakistan's agriculture at 0.7% in the GDP and accounts 3.2% of Pakistan's agriculture value-added product. Pakistan has planted enough high-quality rice to meet both domestic demand and exports. Pakistan's economy earned foreign exchange of US 1.53$ billion from the export of rice in 2014–2015. According to the Economic Survey of Pakistan [17], rice was cultivated on an area of 2891 (000 Hectares) indicating a 3.6 percent improve over the previous year of 2789 (000 Hectares). Regarding the production of rice in 2014–2015 was 7005 (000 tonnes), this showing the highest production compares to last year's production of rice 6798 (000 tonnes). The increase in rice production is mainly based on the achievements of regional targets in Punjab and Sindh provinces of Pakistan. In Punjab province of Pakistan, the area exceeded the target by 12.1%, resulting in output exceeding the target of 14.7%. Similarly, in Sindh province of Pakistan, production exceeded the target of 22.2% and the area exceeded 23.2%. In Punjab province of Pakistan, the sugarcane area was moved to rice crops as growers discouraged by sugar mills paying their dues on time. On the other hand, production of rice also increased due to more area brought for sowing, healthy fertilizer off taking, timely availability of water and more area cultivated under improved rice varieties [17]. In Pakistan several researchers [16,18,19,20,21] have worked on technical efficiency and the effect of agricultural credit on rice production, however, this empirical study is different from earlier studies. This empirical study is endeavoring to find out the association between area under rice cultivation, usage of fertilizer, water availability and the dependent variable that is rice production in Pakistan. It is likely to direct the policymaker to select where upcoming main agricultural inputs and factors of production ought to be distributed to enhance rice production. The main aims of this paper is to determine the factors that affect the rice production in Pakistan over the period of 1984–2014 by using ARDL bound testing approach for cointegration.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Data source
In this paper time series data was used from 1984–2014 and it was collected from Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Rice production is dependent variable and measure in thousand ton kilogram. As an independent variable, we used crop-wise fertilizer in thousand nutrient tons. Beside fertilizer variable this study also considered other explanatory variables such as area under rice cultivation in thousand hectares and water availability in million acre-feet (MAF).
2.2. Empirical model
In order to analyze the linkage between rice production, area under rice cultivation, usage of fertilizer and water availability this study employed multivariate regression model specified as:
RP=γ0+γ1AR+γ2FER+γ3WA+εt
(1)
Where RP represents rice production, AR represents area under rice crop, FER represents fertilizer consumption for rice cultivation, WA represents water availability and εt represents the error term.
By using natural logarithm to Eq 1, a log-linear model is expressed as follows:
LnRP=γ0+γ1LnAR+γ2LnFER+γ3LnWA+εt
(2)
2.3. Co-integration with Auto Regressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach
In this paper the ARDL bounds testing approach developed by [22,23], was used to assess the long-run and short-run linkage between rice production, area under cultivation, usage of chemical fertilizer and water availability in Pakistan over the period of 1984–2014. The relationship of the long-run and short-run is examined the ARDL representation of the unrestricted error correction model (UECM) of (Eq 2) as expressed in (Eq 3):
Where, Δ represents the difference operator, ψ represents the coefficients of short-run, δ denotes the coefficients of the long run and εt represents the error term. The long-run co-movement among the variables of interest is ascertained on the basis of the estimated F-Statistic.
3. Results and discussions
3.1. Descriptive statistics and analysis of unit root
Table 1 displays the descriptive statistics of the important variables used in the empirical analysis. The descriptive statistics show that the area under cultivation for rice crop has a substantial contribution to the rice production in Pakistan. Similarly, other agricultural inputs like as fertilizer and water availability are the main components for the rice productivity. Trends of the study variables are displayed in the Figure 1. All the study variables have an increasing trend. The variation in the study variables definitely affects the rice production. Therefore, this research paper aims to assess the effect of such policy variables on the rice production over the period 1984–2014.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics.
Rice Production in Pakistan (000 tonnes)
Area Under Rice Crop in Pakistan (000 Hectares)
Fertilizer Consumption for Rice in Pakistan (000, N/T)
It is essential to check the order of integration of the said study variables of the present study. In such, situation, analysis of unit root tests ensures that none of the study variables are integrated of order two to keep away from spurious results. Ouattara [24] reported that if any variable is integrated of order two then computed F-test for co-integration becomes senseless. According to [23], critical bonds are based on an assumption for instance variables should be integrated of order 1 or order 2. Consequently, analysis of unit root test is still very important to ensure that no variable of this study is integrated of order 2. In this study, the Augmented Dicky Fuller (ADF) and Phillips-Perron (P-P) unit root tests are used to find out the order of integration. The results of the order of integration for the variables at levels and at first difference are presented in Tables 2 and 3. The results display that rice production (RP) and area under rice cultivation (AR) are integrated at I(1) while usage of chemical fertilizer (FER) and water availability (WA) are integrated at I(0). It means the order of integration suggests to apply the ARDL bounds testing technique for cointegration.
Table 2. ADF unit root test results.
Variables
Level
First differences
Conclusion
C
C & T
C
C & T
lnRP
−0.640484
−4.066696
−5.834146***
−5.842757***
I(1)
lnAR
−1.017329
−3.197836
−6.621573***
−6.579079***
I(1)
lnFER
−5.042759***
−5.363736***
−7.391924***
−7.256624***
I(0)
lnWA
−5.303667***
−4.810838***
−4.272148***
−4.529719***
I(0)
*Note: C represents constant, C & T represents constant and trend and *** shows rejection of the null hypothesis of the presence of unit root at 1%.
With the purpose of analyze the cointegration linkage between the study variables, the ARDL bounds test is used. Table 4 displays that there is a long-run linkage between the study variables when RP represented rice production in logarithmic form is the dependent variable and the rest of the variables are independent variables. The computed F-statistic 4.2461 is greater than the upper bound at a 90% confidence level. Hence the null hypothesis of no cointegration is rejected. These results display that there is robust association amongst the variables such as rice production, area under cultivation, usage of chemical fertilizer and water availability.
Table 4. ARDL bounds test for co-integration results.
F-Statistic
95% Lower Bound
95% Upper Bound
90% Lower Bound
90% Upper Bound
Decision
4.2461
3.6509
4.9397
2.9994
4.1196
Cointegration
W-Statistic
16.9843
14.6037
19.7502
11.9976
16.4785
Cointegration
*Note: Calculated and generated from Microfit 5.01 software.
For robustness check, this empirical study also used the Johansen cointegration test and the results are presented in Table 5. We find one cointegration vector; this means that the long-run association between the study variables is valid and robust and the null hypothesis of no cointegrating vector is rejected against the null of at most one cointegrating vector under the Trace Statistic and Maximum eigenvalue at 1% significance level.
Table 5. Results of the Johansen cointegration test.
Trace Statistic
Null Hypothesis
Alternative Hypothesis
Test Statistic
5% Critical value
Prob. value
H0: r ≤ 0
H1: r > 0
63.03390***
47.85613
0.0010
H0: r ≤ 1
H2: r > 1
29.13188
29.79707
0.0595
H0: r ≤ 2
H3: r > 2
11.90703
15.49471
0.1614
H0: r ≤ 3
H4: r > 3
0.001290
3.841466
0.9705
Maximum Eigenvalue Statistic
Null Hypothesis
Alternative Hypothesis
Test Statistic
5% Critical value
Prob. value
H0: r ≤ 0
H1: r > 0
33.90202***
27.58434
0.0067
H0: r ≤ 1
H2: r > 1
17.22485
21.13162
0.1617
H0: r ≤ 2
H3: r > 2
11.90574
14.26460
0.1142
H0: r ≤ 3
H4: r > 3
0.001290
3.841466
0.9705
*Note: *** means rejection of the hypothesis at 1% of significance level.
Table 6 presents the results for long-run linkage between dependent and three explanatory variables of the study. It was found that area under rice cultivation is significant (p < 0.01) and indicating to increase the rice production. The land is the main input in production system reveal its coefficient is 0.82527. This result implies that 1per cent increase in area under cultivation will increase the rice production almost by 0.82527 per cent. Similarly, the coefficient of chemical fertilizer is 0.10375 also elastic and statistically significant (p < 0.05). This implies that 1 per cent increase in usage of chemical fertilizer will increase rice production at 0.10375 per cent. In other words, chemical fertilizer plays a very much important role in increasing the rice production. Additionally, the estimated long-run coefficient of water availability is statistically significant (p < 0.05). This implies that 1 per cent increase in availability of water rice production will enhance at 0.091630 per cent. The findings of this study are contradicted by the findings of most of the previous studies such as [16,19,21,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Most of these past studies were based on survey data and used OLS regression method and Stochastic Frontier Approach (SFA) but the present study followed ARDL bounds testing approach to cointegration in order to assess the long-run and short-run relationship between rice production, area under cultivation, usage of chemical fertilizer and water availability in Pakistan over the period of 1984–2014.
The Error Correction Model (ECM) was estimated to identify the short run dynamics between rice production (the dependent variable) and its respective exogenous variables. It was observed from Table 7 that area under rice cultivation was positively and statistically significant (p < 0.01) related to the rice production in the both long and short-run. The coefficient of the area under cultivation is 0.53533. This implies that 1 per cent increase in area under cultivation rice production will rise at 0.53 per cent in short-run. The chemical fertilizer has a significant (p < 0.01) influence on rice production in both short-run and long-run. The estimated short-run coefficient of chemical fertilizer is 0.03622, this means 1 per cent increase in usage of chemical fertilizer will lead to increase in rice production almost by 0.03 per cent. Whereas, water availability was found positively linked to the rice production in both the long and short-run. Nonetheless, it was statistically insignificant with a coefficient of 0.00537 in the short run. The value of R2 is 0.80195, which means 80 per cent variation in the rice production is due to these three independent explanatory variables. The ECM term is −0.34918 and highly significant (p < 0.01); which show that adjustment takes place 34.918 percent per year towards the long run equilibrium. The computed F-statistic is 25.3081 (p < 0.01) displays the fitness of the empirical model is good.
It can be viewed from (Table 8 and Figure 2) that the ARDL model has passed all diagnostic tests. The results of diagnostic tests suggest the absence of model serial correlation, non-normality and heteroskedasticity errors in the residuals. Additionally, the CUSUM and CUSUMQ from [31] also show the stability of the model at the 5 percent of significance level (Figures 3 and 4).
Table 8. Results of diagnostic tests of ARDL model.
Rice is main staple food crop after wheat and as well as a cash crop of Pakistan. It is also considered the staple food crop after wheat and as well as a cash crop of Pakistan. This empirically study assessed the effect of fertilizer and other control variables like as area under rice cultivation and water availability on rice production in Pakistan by using the ARDL bounds testing approach based on the annual data covering 1984–2014 period. The results reveal that in the long run the rice production positively and significantly influenced by land area under cultivation, usage of fertilizer and water availability. It may be concluded that increase in land area under cultivation, usage of fertilizer and water availability will lead to increase the rice production. The estimated short-run results reveal that the rice production in Pakistan is positively and significantly influenced by changes in area under cultivation and usage of fertilizer. In contrast, the insignificant short-run coefficient of water availability suggests that policymakers may ensure that the funds for irrigation are not being misallocated and also not misappropriated. The findings of the both long-run and short-run conclude that a better agricultural management, increase in sowing area, balanced use of fertilizer, changes in cropping patterns and timely availability of water might contribute to a higher level of rice production in Pakistan. The ECM is 0.34918 with correct negative sing and it is significant (p < 0.01); which show that adjustment takes place 34.918% per year towards the long run equilibrium. This show that speed of adjustment is high. The ARDL model passed all the diagnostics tests and suggest that there is no serial correlation no heteroskedasticity and no normality problem.
5. Conflict of interest
The authors declares no conflict of interest.
References
[1]
Duflo E, Kremer M, Robinson J (2008) How high are rates of return to fertilizer? Evidence from field experiments in Kenya. Am Econ Rev 98: 482–488.
[2]
Brandt M, Ejhed H (2002) Transport–Retention–Kallfordelning. Belastning pa havet. Swedish Environl Prot A.
[3]
Kelly V, Adesina AA, Gordon A (2003) Gordon, Expanding access to agricultural inputs in Africa: A review of recent market development experience. Food Policy 28: 379–404. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2003.08.006
[4]
Christoplos I (2010) Mobilizing the potential of rural and agricultural extension. Food Agric Organ.
[5]
Khan RA, Azhar BA (1991) Some operational issues and institutional constraints in lending to small farmers [with Comments]. Pakistan Dev Rev 30: 1029–1037.
[6]
Said A, Zada A, Tahir M (2000) Improved cultural practices for profitable rice production in North West Frontier Province. TASRAN Computer Associate, Mingora, Swat, Pakistan.
[7]
Ansari F (2007) ADBP to promote innovative technology. House J ADBP 7.
[8]
Fazal N (2006) The impact of institutional credit on agricultural production: A case study of Punjab, unpublished thesis. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad.
[9]
Junejo KM (2002) House Journal of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan 8: 1.
[10]
Rehman A, Jingdong L, Khatoon R, et al. (2016) Modern agricultural technology adoption its importance, role and usage for the improvement of griculture. Am-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 16: 284–288.
[11]
Ragasa C, Dankyi A, Acheampong P, et al. (2013) Patterns of adoption of improved rice technologies in Ghana. Int Food Policy Res Inst Work Pap 35: 27.
[12]
Abdoulaye T, Sanders JH (2005) Stages and determinants of fertilizer use in semiarid African agriculture: The Niger experience. Agric Econ 32: 167–179.
[13]
Croppenstedt A, Demeke M, Meschi MM (2003) Technology adoption in the presence of constraints: The case of fertilizer demand in Ethiopia. Rev Dev Econ 7: 58–70. doi: 10.1111/1467-9361.00175
[14]
Nata JT, Mjelde JW, Boadu FO (2014) Household adoption of soil-improving practices and food insecurity in Ghana. Agric Food Secur 3: 1–17. doi: 10.1186/2048-7010-3-1
[15]
Rehman A, Jingdong L, Chandio AA, et al. (2017) Economic outlook of rice crops in Pakistan: A time series analysis (1970–2015). Financ Innovation 3: 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s40854-016-0051-8
[16]
Chandio AA, Jiang Y, Gessesse AT, et al. (2017) The nexus of agricultural credit, farm size and technical efficiency in Sindh, Pakistan: A stochastic production frontier approach. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci.
[17]
GOP (2014) Economic survey of Pakistan 2014–2015. Agricultural statistics of Pakistan. Ministry of Food Agriculture and Livestock Division, Islamabad.
[18]
Bashir MK, Gill ZA, Hassan S, et al. (2007) Impact of credit disbursed by commercial banks on the productivity of sugarcane in Faisalabad district. Pak J Agri Sci 44: 361–363.
[19]
Buriro A, Khooharo AA, Ghulam T (2015) Technical efficiency of rice production Sindh, Pakistan: A statistical analysis. Sci Int 27: 6225–6230.
[20]
Chandio AA, Jiang J (2018) Determinants of adoption of improved rice varieties in Northern Sindh, Pakistan. Rice Sci 25: 103–110.
[21]
Bashir MK, Mehmood Y (2010) Institutional credit and rice productivity: A case study of District Lahore, Pakistan. China Agri Econ Rev 2: 412–419.
[22]
Pesaran MH, Shin Y (1998) An autoregressive distributed-lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Econ Soc Monogr 31: 371–413.
[23]
Pesaran MH, Shin Y, Smith RJ (2001) Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. J Appl Econ 16: 289–326. doi: 10.1002/jae.616
[24]
Ouattara B (2004) Foreign aid and fiscal policy in Senegal. Mimeo University of Manchester Manchester.
[25]
Hasnain MN, Hossain ME, Islam MK (2015) Technical efficiency of Boro rice production in Meherpur district of Bangladesh: A stochastic frontier approach. Am J Agric For 3: 31–37.
[26]
Muhammad SD, Zafar S (2016) Factors influencing yield of rice in Balochistan Province. Maarif Res J: 97–104.
[27]
Tijani A (2006) Analysis of the technical efficiency of rice farms in Ijesha Land of Osun State, Nigeria. Agrekon 45: 126–135. doi: 10.1080/03031853.2006.9523738
[28]
Kea S, Li H, Pich L (2016) Technical efficiency and its determinants of rice production in Cambodia. Econo 4: 1–22.
[29]
Khai HV, Yabe M (2011) Technical efficiency analysis of rice production in Vietnam. J ISSAAS 17: 135–146.
[30]
Brown RL, Durbin J, Evans JM (1975) Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. J R Stat Soc: 149–192.
This article has been cited by:
1.
Abbas Ali Chandio, Yuansheng Jiang, Abdul Rehman, Abdul Rauf,
Short and long-run impacts of climate change on agriculture: an empirical evidence from China,
2020,
12,
1756-8692,
201,
10.1108/IJCCSM-05-2019-0026
2.
Abbas Ali Chandio, Ilhan Ozturk, Waqar Akram, Fayyaz Ahmad, Aamir Ali Mirani,
Empirical analysis of climate change factors affecting cereal yield: evidence from Turkey,
2020,
27,
0944-1344,
11944,
10.1007/s11356-020-07739-y
3.
Abbas Ali CHANDIO, Habibullah MAGSI, Ilhan OZTURK,
Examining the effects of climate change on rice production: case study of Pakistan,
2020,
27,
0944-1344,
7812,
10.1007/s11356-019-07486-9
4.
Faiza Ahsan, Abbas Ali Chandio, Wang Fang,
Climate change impacts on cereal crops production in Pakistan,
2020,
12,
1756-8692,
257,
10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2019-0020
5.
Amber Gul, Abbas Ali Chandio, Sajid Ali Siyal, Abdul Rehman, Wu Xiumin,
How climate change is impacting the major yield crops of Pakistan? an exploration from long- and short-run estimation,
2022,
29,
0944-1344,
26660,
10.1007/s11356-021-17579-z
6.
Abbas Ali Chandio, Fayyaz Ahmad, Ghulam Raza Sargani, Asad Amin, Martinson Ankrah Twumasi,
Analyzing the effective role of formal credit and technological development for rice cultivation,
2022,
6,
2509-7946,
683,
10.1007/s41685-022-00240-z
7.
Abbas Ali Chandio, Yuansheng Jiang, Waqar Akram, Ilhan Ozturk, Abdul Rauf, Aamir Ali Mirani, Huaquan Zhang,
The impact of R&D investment on grain crops production in China: Analysing the role of agricultural credit and
CO
2
emissions
,
2022,
1076-9307,
10.1002/ijfe.2638
8.
Xincai Gao, Lin Ji, Abbas Ali Chandio, Amber Gul, Martinson Ankrah Twumasi, Fayyaz Ahmad,
Towards Sustainable Agriculture in China: Assessing the Robust Role of Green Public Investment,
2022,
14,
2071-1050,
3613,
10.3390/su14063613
9.
Chukwuemeka Chinonso Emenekwe, Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke, Chinedum Uzoma Nwajiuba,
Assessing the combined effects of temperature, precipitation, total ecological footprint, and carbon footprint on rice production in Nigeria: a dynamic ARDL simulations approach,
2022,
29,
0944-1344,
85005,
10.1007/s11356-022-21656-2
10.
Robert Ugochukwu Onyeneke, Roseline Daberechi Ejike, Emeka Emmanuel Osuji, Nneka Maris Chidiebere-Mark,
Does climate change affect crops differently? New evidence from Nigeria,
2022,
1387-585X,
10.1007/s10668-022-02714-8
11.
Pushp Kumar, Naresh Chandra Sahu, Mohd Arshad Ansari, Siddharth Kumar,
Climate change and rice production in India: role of ecological and carbon footprint,
2021,
2044-0839,
10.1108/JADEE-06-2021-0152
12.
Robert Becker Pickson, Ge He, Elliot Boateng,
Impacts of climate change on rice production: evidence from 30 Chinese provinces,
2022,
24,
1387-585X,
3907,
10.1007/s10668-021-01594-8
13.
Abdul Rehman, Hengyun Ma, Ilhan Ozturk, Muhammad Irshad Ahmad,
Examining the carbon emissions and climate impacts on main agricultural crops production and land use: updated evidence from Pakistan,
2022,
29,
0944-1344,
868,
10.1007/s11356-021-15481-2
14.
Robert Becker Pickson, Ge He, Elliot Boateng,
The impacts of climate change and smallholder farmers’ adaptive capacities on rice production in Chengdu, China: macro-micro analysis,
2022,
4,
2515-7620,
075011,
10.1088/2515-7620/ac7949
15.
Bekir PAKDEMİRLİ,
CO2 emisyon değerlerinin tarım üzerindeki etkileri: Türkiye örneği,
2020,
37,
1300-3496,
33,
10.16882/derim.2020.700482
16.
Umra Waris, Salman Tariq, Usman Mehmood, Zia ul-Haq,
Exploring potential impacts of climatic variability on production of maize in Pakistan using ARDL approach,
2023,
1895-7455,
10.1007/s11600-023-01118-0
17.
Dewa Ketut Sadra Swastika, Atien Priyanti, Abdul Muis Hasibuan, Dewi Sahara, Nyoman Ngurah Arya, Afrizal Malik, Nyak Ilham, Apri Laila Sayekti, Joko Triastono, Robet Asnawi, Dedi Sugandi, Nur Qomariah Hayati, Atman Atman,
Pursuing circular economics through the integrated crop-livestock systems: An integrative review on practices, strategies and challenges post Green Revolution in Indonesia,
2024,
18,
26661543,
101269,
10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101269
18.
Md. Mamun Miah, Md. Golam Kibria, Nazhat Nury Aspy, Kabir Hossain,
Asymmetric behavior of average temperature and rainfall on rice production in Bangladesh,
2025,
18,
27724271,
100429,
10.1016/j.nexus.2025.100429
19.
Syed Rashid Ali, Nooreen Mujahid,
Agricultural productivity under climate change vulnerability: does carbon reduction paths matter for sustainable agriculture?,
2025,
1573-2975,
10.1007/s10668-025-06076-9
Abbas Ali Chandio, Yuansheng Jiang, Abdul Rehman, Rahman Dunya. The linkage between fertilizer consumption and rice production: Empirical evidence from Pakistan[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(3): 295-305. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.3.295
Abbas Ali Chandio, Yuansheng Jiang, Abdul Rehman, Rahman Dunya. The linkage between fertilizer consumption and rice production: Empirical evidence from Pakistan[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2018, 3(3): 295-305. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2018.3.295