
Citation: Yong X. Gan. A review of electrohydrodynamic casting energy conversion polymer composites[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(2): 206-225. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.2.206
[1] | Leticia Martinez, Den Palessonga, Philippe Roquefort, Alexis Chevalier, Azar Maalouf, Julien Ville, Vincent Laur . Development of a high temperature printable composite for microwave absorption applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2021, 8(5): 739-747. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2021044 |
[2] | Ajitanshu Vedrtnam, Kishor Kalauni, Sunil Dubey, Aman Kumar . A comprehensive study on structure, properties, synthesis and characterization of ferrites. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(6): 800-835. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.6.800 |
[3] | Bindusri Nair, B. Geetha Priyadarshini . Process, structure, property and applications of metallic glasses. AIMS Materials Science, 2016, 3(3): 1022-1053. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2016.3.1022 |
[4] | Dao Viet Thang, Nguyen Manh Hung, Nguyen Cao Khang, Le Thi Mai Oanh . Structural and multiferroic properties of (Sm, Mn) co-doped BiFeO3 materials. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(2): 160-169. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.2.160 |
[5] | Yong X. Gan, Yongping Zhang, Jeremy B. Gan . Nanoporous metals processed by dealloying and their applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(6): 1141-1183. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1141 |
[6] | Sekhar Chandra Ray . Application of graphene/graphene-oxide: A comprehensive review. AIMS Materials Science, 2025, 12(3): 453-513. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2025023 |
[7] | Timothy K. Mulenga, Albert U. Ude, Chinnasamy Vivekanandhan . Concise review on the mechanical characteristics of hybrid natural fibres with filler content. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(5): 650-664. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.5.650 |
[8] | Mulugeta H. Woldemariam, Giovanni Belingardi, Ermias G. Koricho, Daniel T. Reda . Effects of nanomaterials and particles on mechanical properties and fracture toughness of composite materials: a short review. AIMS Materials Science, 2019, 6(6): 1191-1212. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2019.6.1191 |
[9] | Raffaele Conte, Anna Di Salle, Francesco Riccitiello, Orsolina Petillo, Gianfranco Peluso, Anna Calarco . Biodegradable polymers in dental tissue engineering and regeneration. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(6): 1073-1101. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.6.1073 |
[10] | Qinghua Qin . Applications of piezoelectric and biomedical metamaterials: A review. AIMS Materials Science, 2025, 12(3): 562-609. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2025025 |
Abbreviations: µr: relative permeability (µ = magnetic permeability); εr: relative permittivity; ρ: density, in g·cm−3; B: applied magnetic field (flux density), in SI units of T; dB: decibel, a logarithmic unit; EM: electromagnetic; FMR: ferromagnetic resonance; TEM: transmission electron microscope; Me: metal cation; Mr: remnant magnetisation; Ms: saturation magnetisation; MW: microwave Oe: oersted, CGS unit of magnetic strength; SEM: Scanning electron microscope; TEM: Transmission electron microscope; H: magnetic field strength, SI unit is Am−1; Hc: coercivity; VSM: vibrating sample magnetometer; XRD: X-ray diffraction; Y: Ba2Me2Fe12O22; UHF: Ultra high frequency.
An iron-based iron (Ⅲ) oxide known by magnetite (Fe3O4) called ferrites, with combination of divalent cation Me, called Spinel having composition MeFe2O4. There are different types of hexagonal ferrites which are also famous as hexaferrites have their long journey since their discovery [1,2]. These hexaferrites are: M-type ferrites-Barium ferrite or BaM (BaFe12O19), Strontium ferrites or SrM (SrFe12O19) and cobalt-titanium substituted M ferrite or BaFe12−2xCoxTixO19; X-type ferrites—Ba2Me2Fe28O46, such as Ba2Co2Fe28O46 or Co2X; Y-type ferrites—Ba2Me2Fe 12O22, such as Ba2Co2Fe12O22 or Co2Y; Z-type ferrites-Ba2Me2Fe24O41, such as Ba2Co2Fe24O41 or Co2Z. W-type ferrites—BaMe2Fe16O27, such as BaCo2Fe16O27 or Co2W. U-type ferrites—Ba4Me2Fe36O60, such as BaCo2Fe36O60 or Co2U.
With the development of modern electronic technology, creates a great demand for the devices operating in high frequency range, which need the magnetic materials with excellent electromagnetic properties. The spinel ferrites have lower cut-off frequency as compared to the soft magnetic hexagonal ferrites, including Y-type and Z-type hexaferrites as the requirement for low temperature cofired ceramics (LTCC) technology is hard Z-type hexagonal ferrites which can be achieved at high sintering temperature (1300 ℃) [3,4,5,6]. Hence, Y-type hexagonal ferrites have the best use because they acquire good magnetic properties in hyper frequency range at low sintering temperature (1150 ℃) [7,8,9]. A huge amount of magnetic materials is produced by using these hexaferrites world widely [10]. Recent developments in Y-type hexaferrites are expressed in detail in the review of literature related to Y-type hexaferrites. This review is focused on various types of divalent cation substitution in and its effects on the properties of substituted hexaferrites. The excellent review on EM properties and calculated parameters for the evaluation of materials in antenna applications done by Charalampos A. Stergiou et al. [11]. Trukhanov et al. synthesized aluminium doped barium M-type hexaferrite for reporting the crystal structure and magnetic properties of synthesized specimens. In the present investigation, the atomic and lattice parameters are refined with the help of rietveld software [12]. Trukhanov et al. synthesized barium M-type hexaferrite with Al, In substitutions by solid state reaction technique for controlling the electromagnetic characteristics in these nanohexaferrites. It has been found that the external magnetic fields extensively effect the electromagnetic properties of barium M-type hexaferrites. This will occur due to the increase of magnetocrystalline anisotropy [13]. Y-type hexaferrites belong to a category of soft ferrites having high values of dielectric permittivity along with low values of dielectric losses which make it suitable for the microwave application. Jasrotia et al. reported the dielectric measurements of sol-gel synthesized Cd and In substituted barium M-type nanohexaferrites for microwave devices application in which very high values of dielectric constant at high 30 MHz frequency with minute values of losses have been found. Many more authors and researchers have been taken various steps for improving the magnetic and electric properties of Y-type nanohexaferrites in order to make it suitable for microwave application such as dielectric permittivity, dielectric losses, saturation magnetization, coercivity, etc. [14]. Trukhanov et al. synthesized Ga3+ doped barium M-type hexaferrite by conventional solid-state reaction technique for reporting the microstructural and magnetic properties and in aspect of this, these materials make it suitable for microwave absorption applications [15]. Vinnik et al. prepared titanium doped barium M-type hexaferrite by standard solid-state sintering method for investigating the microstructural, electrical and magnetic studies. The rietveld refinement of prepared specimens indicates the preference of Ti3+ ions at the interstitial sites of the hexagonal structure. In addition to this, the dc resistivity of all the specimens shows an increasing trend whereas the ac conductivity indicates an inverse phenomenon in aspect of increase in dc resistivity making it suitable for microwave absorption application [16]. The microwave-absorbing materials must have large electric and magnetic loss in a certain frequency range and the microwave absorbing characteristics are influenced by the complex values of permeability and permittivity. Also, the special EM features of ferrites may satisfy the condition of miniaturization in antenna technology without affecting the performance of the antenna. The matching of permeability (µ) and permittivity (ɛ) values in large possible frequency range and sufficiently low dielectric and magnetic losses are the basic needs to enhance the efficiency of antenna by reducing its size [17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Moreover, some researchers are also working in improving the polarization and multiferroic properties of metal doped M-type hexaferrites. Trukhanov et al. reported the microstructural and multiferroic properties of aluminium doped barium M-type nanohexaferrites. In the present research work, they reported about the spontaneous polarization and co-relation between the magnetic and dielectric environments in which the magnetoelectric effect was found to be increasing along with the increase in Al content [24]. Trukhanov et al. reported the polarization origin and iron positions in the hexagonal crystal structure of indium doped barium M-type hexaferrite. It has been found that the z-component of spontaneous polarization has been found due to the Fe3+ and In3+ cations displacement at the Fe5-12k position towards the oxygen ion and non-zero dipole moment [25]. The main aim of this review paper is to provide a detailed study on the synthesis of Y-type hexaferrite by different techniques such as sol-gel, co-precipitation, citrate precursor, hydrothermal and many more. In addition, we are also reporting about the microstructural, electric and magnetic characteristics of Y-type hexaferrite for Antenna and Microwave absorbing applications.
The hexagonal crystal structure was found in 1938 having composition PbFe7.5Mn3.5Al0.5Ti0.5O19 [26]. The compound BaM was confirmed in 1936 with a melting point of 1390 ℃ [27]. Y-type hexaferrites with formula Ba2Me2Fe12O22 were discovered firstly, further first two Zn2Y and Co2Y with molecular mass 1410 g and density equal to 5.40 g·cm−3 with planar magnetic anisotropy were discovered at room temperature. They ferrites with a preferred plane of magnetisation perpendicular to the c-axis at room temperature are called ferroxplana but Cu2Y hexaferrite has a preferred uniaxial direction of magnetisation. Oxygen excess and deficit can increase and decrease the oxidation degree of 3d-metalls. The changing of charge state of 3d-metalls as a consequence of changing of oxygen content changes such magnetic parameters as Curie point and spontaneous magnetic moment and such electrical parameters as resistivity and band gap. An increase in the unit cell parameter may be also due to oxygen deficiency [28,29]. Moreover, oxygen vacancies effect on exchange interactions. Intensity of exchange interactions decreases with increasing the oxygen vacancy concentration. In complex oxides there is only indirect exchange. Exchange near the oxygen vacancies is negative according to Goodenough-Kanamori empirical rules. Oxygen vacancies should lead to the formation of a weak magnetic state such as spin glass [30,31]. Jonker in 1956 discovered the hexagonal ferrite Ba2Me2Fe12O22 (Zn2Y) [32]. In all hexagonal ferrites, the cobalt substituted barium Y-type hexaferrites possess the highest magnetocrystalline anisotropy. Zn2Y-type hexagonal ferrites are applicable in microwave devices due to magnetocrystalline planar anisotropy and high permeability. Replacement of Zn ion by divalent ions of Cu2+, Ni2+, Co2+, etc. will change the magnetic properties [33]. By the proper choice of anisotropy field and resonance linewidth, Zn2Y ferrite can be controlled for suitable applications like microwave device at higher frequencies (>10) GHz [34]. Similarly, at room temperature, addition of Ni2+ retains the easy magnetization on the basal plane and weakens the anisotropy. Hexagonal crystal structure with height of the crystal and width of hexagonal plane as shown in Figure 1 [35].
The crystal structure of a ferrite is an interlocked network of positively-charged metal ions (Fe3+, Me2+) and negatively charged divalent oxygen ions (O2–) form. Crystal structure-based classification of ferrites is named as: spinel, garnet, magnetoplumbite or hexaferrite and orthoferrite [23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. One-unit cell of spinel with general formula MeFe2O4, where Me is the divalent metal ion contains 32 octahedral (B) sites, in which trivalent metal ions occupy 16 positions and 64 tetrahedral (A) sites, in which 8 are occupied by divalent metal ions [24,26]. Distribution of the divalent ions on A and B sites further divided spinel ferrites into two types. Garnet ferrite has general formula R3Fe5O12. It is a polyhedral combination. There exist 16 octahedral, 24 tetrahedral and 16 dodecahedral sites in a unit cell of garnet. One formula unit is distributed as follows: 3M2O3-dodecahedral, 3Fe3O3-tetrahedral and 2Fe3O3-octahedral [30,31,32]. The spinel ferrite structure and the garnet ferrite are shown in Figure 2a and Figure 2b, respectively [36,37].
The divalent and trivalent metal ions are located in the interstitial sites of the structure. Figure 3 shows the compositional diagram of hexagonal ferrites [35]. Types of hexaferrites are listed in Table 1 [36]. All the hexaferrites having highly complex crystal structure are closely related to each other [37] as W ferrite = M + 2S, X ferrite = W + M = 2M + 2S, Z ferrite = M + Y, and U ferrite = Z + M = 2M + Y, where S is Spinel (MeFe2O4), M is BaFe12O19 and Y is Ba2Me2Fe12O22 by Sudakar et al. [38]. The crystal structure of the M-type hexaferrites may be described by two space groups. One of them is classical P63/mmc (No. 194) space group. Second of them is P63mc (No. 186) space group. Second space group has been used for describing of crystal structure to explain the existence of non-zero spontaneous polarization. This is a polar no centrosymmetric space group [38,39]. Four Miller Indices h, j, k, l is essential to describe hexagonal crystal. Two lattice parameters, c (length) and a (width) are required to define the dimensions of the crystal [40]. Y-type hexagonal ferrites have molecular formula Ba2Co2Fe12O22 with preferred plane of magnetization normal to c-axis. They contain only B2 layer in which two B2 layers are sandwiched between four Spinel layers means Y6 = B2S4. B2 layer is shown in Figure 4 [40]. B2 layer is equivalent to two hexagonal close-packed layers between two spinel plates and in each layer one oxygen atom is replaced by one barium atom. The barium atom of one layer is in contact with three oxygen atoms of other layer and octahedral sites lying in between the oxygen atoms are occupied by small metal ions.
Symbol | Composition | Crystallographic arrangement | No. of molecules/unit cell | c (A0) |
M | BaFe12O19 | RSR*S* (MM*) | 2M | 23.2 |
U | Ba4Me2Fe36O60 | MM*Y* | MeU | 38.1 |
W | BaMe2F136O27 | MSM*S* | 2MeW | 32.8 |
X | Ba2Me2Fe28O46 | MM*S | 3MeX | 84.0 |
Y | Ba2Me2Fe12O22 | 3ST | 3MeY | 43.5 |
Z | Ba3Me2Fe24O41 | MYMY | 2MeZ | 52.3 |
Y-type is the member of space group R3m consisting of three ST blocks with total of six layers consisting of total 10 octahedral and 4 tetrahedral sites (S block = 4 octahedral + 2 tetrahedral and T block = 6 octahedral + 2 tetrahedral) having c = 43.56 Å in one molecular unit [40]. M-type ferrite structure in cross sectional view looks like as in Figure 5 [41]. S block has composition of either [Me2+Fe43+O8]0(S0) or [Fe63+O8]2+(S2+), each layer of which consists of four oxygen atoms with three metal atoms, the cation is surrounded by four O2– ions in two tetrahedral sites and by six O2– ions in four octahedral sites. In one S block, there are two-unit cells of spinel with four octahedral and two tetrahedral sites. R block comprise of three hexagonally packed layers with four oxygen atoms in each layer, in which one oxygen atom in the central layer is replaced by barium atom of same size resulting in unit compositional formula [Me2+Fe63+O11]2– or BaFe6O11 and it is similar to M5 unit formed by removing top and bottom layers. In R block, on adding Ba atom, four octahedral and two tetrahedral sites are replaced by five octahedral sites and no tetrahedral site and a new trigonal bipyramidal site is created surrounded by five oxygen anions. This is a unique position found in R block. In T block, there are four oxygen layers, replacing oxygen in middle two layers by barium atoms and is similar to Y6 by removing top and bottom layers. Unit formula for T block is Ba2Fe8O14 and has composition [Ba22+Fe83+O14] [42,43,44,9]. The repulsion in two Ba2+ ions reduces the five-coordinate trigonal bipyramidal sites to four-coordinate tetragonal sites resulting in two tetrahedral and six octahedral sites, i.e., a total of eight sites. S, R and T block structures are as shown in Figure 6 [41].
Y-type hexagonal ferrites are synthesized by different methods like coprecipitation, salt-melt, ion exchange, sol-gel, citrate, hydrothermal, combustion, microemulsions, etc. [45,46,47,48,49]. In spite of these synthesis methods, there are other combined synthesis techniques such as sol gel-citrate method, sol gel-hydrothermal technique and many more. Many researchers use these types of combined methods for synthesizing the hexagonal ferrites. Almessiere et al. synthesized Sr0.3Ba0.4Pb0.3Fe12O19/CuFe2O4 (x = 2, 3, 4, 5) nanoferrites with the usage of combined citrate-sol gel technique for reporting the co-relation between the chemical composition and electrodynamics characteristics [50]. Kozlovskiy et al. synthesized Ce(FeTi)Ox perovskite ferrite with the usage of combined solid-phase technique for reporting the microstructural and magnetic characteristics of prepared specimens [51]. The physical properties of hexaferrites are influenced significantly by the processing techniques which have further great impact on magnetic properties. The block diagram of synthesis methods of nanomaterials is shown in Figure 7. In this review paper, some of the chemical methods are discussed as shown in Figure 8.
In this method, a mixture of barium carbonate powders and oxides is heated to synthesize the hexagonal ferrites. The ceramic powder is then milled to get the finer material. We can get the nanosize after long milling. The single-phase ferrites formation is not possible by this method. Picking of impurity or material loss occur during the processing. High temperature and long duration are required for processing due to low reactivity of the starting materials [52]. To convert ferrites into ultrafine nano agglomerates, “allows nanoparticles to participate in the thermal motion and provides for the possibility of their self-assembly into superstructures by eventually finding the thermodynamic optimum [53].
This method involves the mixing of hydroxide, oxide, carbonate, or sulphate raw materials treated on higher temperature at about 1100 ℃ for a long duration which yield inhomogeneous microstructures, abnormal grain growth, poor sintering behaviour, and uncontrolled cation stoichiometry [54]. In this method, a mixture of barium carbonate and iron oxide is fired at very high temperatures (1150–1250 ℃). The resulting powder is then grounded which can cause impurities in powder and stains in crystal lattices and can affect the magnetic properties [55,34].
The chemical coprecipitation of salts is done with base (NaOH). This method is being used since early 1960s [56,57]. Magnetic stirring and heating at about 70 ℃ are done. Then particles are washed with deionized water by centrifugation. At the last particles are dried. The schematic chart is shown in Figure 9.
In sol-gel synthesis, homogeneous solution of metal salts is made and poured in the solution of citric acid. An organic coordinating agent ethylene glycol is added to the solution to produce a sol which forms a gel structure upon evaporation of the water. pH is maintained by adding ammonia solution. This method is used to make more complex hexaferrites at nano scale [58]. Sol-gel technique have number of advantages such as low annealing temperature and excellent ability for controlling microstructure [59]. Flow sheet of this method is shown in Figure 10.
The solution of salts, ammonia and citric acid along with setting the pH equal to 7 is then evaporated to a dry powder on a hot plate. The citric acid get polymerised and evolved carbon dioxide and cations are completely converted into iron oxide and barium carbonate. The material so obtained possess poor magnetic properties because of small grain size [60]. This process can either proceed via aqueous combustion synthesis (ACS) or via low temperature combustion synthesis (LCS) [61]. The mixture is then auto combusted in microwave oven to get nano powder [62]. The scheme is shown in Figure 11.
In hydrothermal synthesis a solution of metal salts and base are made under pressure to give the product. The unreactive precursors are washed away with dilute HCl. Ataie et al. studied the effects of many bases such as NaOH, KOH and NH4OH in the synthesis of hexaferrites [63]. Figure 12 is showing the scheme of this method.
In comparison to ceramic method, wet chemical method is more efficient for the preparation of hexaferrites. In this method, homogeneous mixture is formed of the raw materials. It requires low temperature for processing and long duration for sintering. No material loss occurs during the process. Good thing is that there is greater possibility of single-phase formation [52].
Form nanoparticles with mixing of two immiscible liquids stabilized by an artificial film of surface-active agents. Morphology can be controlled in this method [64]. The precipitates are then separated, washed and dried. The method scheme is shown in Figure 13.
Literature related to Y-type hexaferrites was reviewed for the last fifteen years (2005–2019) and enlisted the structural, electrical and magnetic studies in tabular form studied by different researchers with different compositions fabricated with different techniques.
In the structural properties, we analyse lattice parameters (c and a), cell volume (Ⅴ), crystal size (D), bulk density, X-ray density and porosity from XRD patterns. And calculate lattice parameters (c and a), cell volume (Ⅴ), crystal size (D) by using the Eqs 1, 2, and 3 respectively given below [65]:
sin2θ=λ23a2(h2+hk+k2)+(λ24c2)l2 | (1) |
Here “λ” is the wavelength, a and c are the lattice constants and h, k, l are the corresponding indices.
V=a2csin1200 | (2) |
The crystalline size (D) is calculated from XRD patterns by using well-known Scherrer formula
D=kλβcosθ | (3) |
where “λ” is the wavelength of the Cu-Kα source (1.5418 A˚), “β” is the full width at half maxima, “θ” is the Bragg’s angle and “k” is the shape factor (0.89) for hexagonal ferrite-based nanomaterials system. The crystallite size plays an important role in affecting the electromagnetic properties of Y-type hexaferrites. There are actually three parameters such as permittivity (∈), permeability (μ) and conductivity (σ) which are quantified for describing the effect of nanohexaferrite in calculating an electromagnetic quantity in regards with a source. With the decreasing crystallite size of synthesized Y-type nanohexaferrites, the value of permittivity as well as permeability shows an anomalous behaviour whereas the conductivity as well as dielectric loss tangent (tanδ) decreases as a function of crystallites size. The crystallite size of transition metal oxides also influenced the magnetization and curie point i.e. with the decrease in crystallite size, the saturation magnetization (Ms) of prepared samples were found to be decreasing as they are inversely proportional to each other. In addition to this, the average crystallite size distribution also critically affects the electromagnetic characteristics in the region of several GHz through the resonance of domain walls [66].
The X-ray density (dx), bulk density (db) and porosity (P) are calculated by the Eqs 4, 5 and 6, respectively:
dx−ray=ZMNAVcell | (4) |
db=mπr2h | (5) |
P=1−dbdx | (6) |
where M is the molar mass, m is the mass and r are the radius and h are the thickness of the pellet, NA is the Avogadro’s number, Z = 3 is the number of molecules per unit cell. Microstructure is imaged with the help of FESEM and HRTEM techniques. This structural study was confirmed with the usage of Raman spectroscopic analysis as reported in Ba–Nd–Cd–In and Mg–Ag–Mn hexagonal and spinel ferrite by Jasrotia et al, (2020) [67]. The structural parameters of the literature reviewed are listed in Table 2.
Sr. No. | Composition | a (Å) | c (Å) | Density | D (nm) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Zn1.2–xCoxCu0.8Fe12O22(x = 0.0–1.2) | 5.875–5.865 | 43.689–43.506 | - | - | [68] |
2. | Ba2Cd2(Zr Co)xFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 5.88–5.98 | 43.61–44.14 | - | 59–46 | [69] |
3. | Sr2Ni2Fe12–yCryO22(y = 0.0–1.5) | 5.88–5.90 | 43.48–43.36 | 5.03–4.99 | 44–14 | [70] |
4. | Sr2Me2Fe11(SnCo)0.5O22(Me–Cu and Zn) | 5.855.90 | 43.6943.50 | 2.853.72 | 8.7–11 | [71] |
5. | Ba2Co2–x–yZnxCuyFe12O22(x = 0–2, y = 0–0.8) | 5.862–5.870 | 43.518–43.520 | 5.12–5.20 | - | [72] |
6. | Sr2Cu2–xCoxFe12O22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 5.88–6.45 | 43.52–43.62 | - | - | [73] |
7. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 5.88–5.91 | 43.45–43.15 | 4.71–3.48 | - | [74] |
8. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22b + xY2O3(x = 0–5) | 5.90–5.88 | 43.49–43.50 | - | 22–70 | [75] |
9. | Sr2NixCo2–xEuyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | c/a=7.37–7.30 | - | 4.92–4.69 | - | [76] |
10. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22 | 5.908 | 43.155 | - | 29 | [77] |
11. | Ba2Zn2TbxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 5.85–5.91 | 43.45–44.31 | - | 20–36 | [78] |
12. | Ba2Co2Fe12O22Ba2CoCrFe12O22Ba2Co2Fe11GaO22Ba2CoMgFe11GaO22 | 5.865.865.865.89 | 43.5243.4943.4943.49 | - | - | [79] |
13. | Sr2Co2Fe12–x/2Aly/2O22(y = 0.0–3.0) | 5.848–5.821 | 43.507–43.509 | - | - | [80] |
14. | Sr2Ni2Alx/2Crx/2Fe12–xO22(x = 0.0–3.0) | 5.858–5.875 | 43.304–43.423 | - | - | [81] |
15. | Sr2Ni2–xCoxFe12O22 (x = 0.5) | 5.8979 | 44.45 | - | - | [82] |
16. | Sr2Co2NixTixFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 5.89–5.95 | 43.59–43.69 | 5.04–4.95 | 5–45 | [83] |
17. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 5.89–5.96 | 43.35–43.44 | 5.04–4.89 | 60–26 | [84] |
In the electrical properties, we calculate dc resistivity (ρdc) from Ⅴ-Ⅰ characteristics of the pellets made of the synthesized samples. Resistivity is calculated by using Eq 7 and the variation of electrical resistivity with temperature follows Eq 8. Other parameters like activation energy (Ea) is calculated from 1000/T vs dc resistivity plots by getting slopes of two regions, one is ferromagnetic region (below Curie temperature) and other is paramagnetic region (above Curie temperature) and Eq 9 is used to calculate the activation energy. Drift mobility (µdc) at different temperatures is calculated by using the relation given in Eq 10 [70]:
ρ=RAh | (7) |
where ρ is the resistivity, R is resistance, A is area and h is thickness of the pellet.
ρ=ρ0exp(EakBT) | (8) |
where ρ is the dc electrical resistivity at temperature T, ρ0 is the resistivity at1/T = 0, Ea is the activation energy and kB is the Boltzmann’s constant.
Ea=8.6×10−5× slope | (9) |
μd=1neρdc=σdcne | (10) |
where σdc is the electrical conductivity, e is the charge of electron, n is the concentration of charge carriers and can be calculated from the well-known Eq 11:
n=NAdbNFeM | (11) |
where NFe is the number of iron atoms and M is the molecular weight of the samples. Some calculated electrical parameter values are listed in Table 3. In Table 3, we are studying the effect of various substitutions on the electrical properties of Y-type hexaferrites such as resistivity, activation energy and drift mobility. It was observed that the change in these parameters depends on the type of substituents. Moreover, with the substitution of rare earth and transition elements, room temperature dc resistivity was found to be increasing whereas drift mobility decreases. The change in electrical resistivity can be explained due to influence of cationic distribution at the specific interstitial sites i.e. Tetrahedral and octahedral. The activation energy is showing the same trend as that of resistivity. In contrast to other complex iron oxides, i.e. perovskites and spinels, the real part of the dielectric constant for the doped M-type hexaferrites decreases more slowly at low frequencies and almost monotonically with diamagnetic substitution. In addition to this, the real and imaginary parts of the permeability have a peak near 50 GHz, which is determined by the level of diamagnetic substitution. The increase of the resonant frequency approximately to 1.5 GHz at the 1 KOe bias field is observed since the internal anisotropy field increases [85,86].
Sr. No | Composition | ρ (ohm-cm) | Ea (eV) | µd (cm2·v−1·s−1) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Cd2(ZrCo)xFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 1.47 × 108–3.25 × 108 | 0.45–0.52 | 2.54 × 10−13–1.11 × 10−13 | [69] |
2. | Sr2Ni2Fe12–yCryO22(y = 0.0–1.5) | 60.6 × 108–1.5 × 108 | - | 0.68 × 10−13–0.13 × 10−13 | [70] |
3. | Sr2MnxCo2–xTbyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | 0.12 × 108–0.15 × 1010 | - | 3.3 × 10−12–2.5 × 10−15 | [87] |
4. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 6.09 × 106–7.52 × 106 | 0.35–0.50 | - | [74] |
5. | Sr2NixCo2–xEuyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | 1.23 × 106–3.07 × 109 | 0.16–0.22 | - | [76] |
6. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22 | 1.01 × 105 | - | - | [77] |
7. | Ba2Zn2TbxFe12−xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 1.47 × 108–3.25 × 108 | 0.26–0.39 | - | [78] |
8. | Ba1.5Sr0.5CoZnFe12–xAlxO22 (x = 0–1) | 4.72 × 107–30.34 × 107 | - | - | [88] |
9. | Sr2Co2NixTixFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 1.8 × 106–4.9 × 109 | 0.17–0.44 | - | [83] |
10. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 2.86 × 107–7.47 × 107 | - | - | [84] |
Most of the hexaferrites have axis of magnetization along c-axis. The large size of metal ion is responsible for the magnetocrystalline anisotropy in hexaferrites. In magnetic studies, we calculate coercivity (Hc), magnetic saturation (Ms), remanence (Mr), squareness ratio (S) are calculated from M–H loops and magnetic moment (nB) by using the following Eq 12:
nB=MwMs5585 | (12) |
As Y-type hexaferrites are made up of S and T blocks, so S block consists of four octahedral and two opposing tetrahedral magnetic moments, a net of two moments whereas T block consists of six octahedral and two tetrahedral moments out of which two octahedral moments are aligned with the tetrahedral, giving a net of zero moment [27].
S block = 4↑ octahedral and 2↓ tetrahedral = 2↑
T block = 4↑ 2↓ octahedral + 2↓ tetrahedral = 0
Y = 8↑ 2↓ octahedral + 4↓ tetrahedral = 2↑
The opposing spins of T block in Y-type hexaferrites cause low values of magnetic saturation as compared to other hexaferrites and coercivity is the main characteristic to make them useful in potential applications. It depends upon particle size which further depends upon the preparation techniques [89]. The magnetic properties depend on the nature of substitution and their preference to specific interstitial sites such as tetrahedral and octahedral. If the substituents prefer to occupy tetrahedral site (A-site), then the saturation magnetization (Ms) is supposed to enhance whereas if the substituents prefer to occupy octahedral site (B-site), then saturation magnetization (Ms) is supposed to decline but there can be some exceptions. The super exchange interactions also play a critical role in deciding the magnetic properties of Y-type hexaferrite [90,91]. The magnetic parameters of the reviewed literature are listed in Table 4.
Sr. No. | Composition | Hc (Oe) | Ms (emu/g) | Mr (emu/g) | S = Mr/Ms | nB (μB) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Zn1.2–xCoxCu0.8Fe12O22 (x = 0.0–1.2) | 48.99–204.22 | 33.84–27.19 | 3.81–9.03 | 0.11–0.12 | - | [92] |
2. | Sr2Me2Fe11(SnCo)0.5O22(Me–Cu and Zn) | Zn-769Cu-1210 | 13.44–25.45 | 5.2–13.3 | 0.39–0.52 | - | [71] |
3. | Sr2Cu2–xCoxFe12O22(x = 0.0–1.0) | - | 60.10–18.03 | 27.50–8.90 | 0.46–0.49 | - | [73] |
4. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 555.44–276.06 | 40.34–32.84 | 16.68–10.65 | 0.41–0.32 | 9.94–7.63 | [74] |
5. | Sr2MnxCo2–xTbyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | - | 77.11–16.95 | - | 0.41–0.65 | 15.27–3.68 | [87] |
6. | Sr2Ni2Fe12O22 | 945–207 | 49.4–52.6 | 23.9–15.6 | 0.48–0.30 | - | [93] |
7. | Ba2Co2Fe12O22Ba2CoCrFe12O22Ba2Co2Fe11GaO22Ba2CoMgFe11GaO22 | 123238881 | 33.937.534.926.6 | 7.901.586.885.81 | 0.230.040.200.21 | - | [79] |
8. | Sr2Ni2Alx/2Crx/2Fe12–xO22(x = 0.0–3.0) | 840–1160 | 39.61–30.11 | 17.51–14.62 | 0.44–0.49 | - | [81] |
9. | Sr2Nix/2Co2–xMgx/2Fe12O22 (x = 0–0.6) | 1140–250 | 30–50.06 | 13.30–10.62 | 0.44–0.21 | - | [94] |
10. | Ba2Co1–xZnxFe12O22(x = 0.0–2.0) | 255–45 | 31.1–35.2 | 14.3–5.0 | 0.46–0.14 | - | [95] |
11. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 549–1630 | 51.42–18.12 | 13.5–8 | 0.26–0.44 | - | [84] |
Know et al. [96] observed two types of resonances, one is at lower frequency due to domain wall resonance and other is at higher frequency due to spin rotational resonance in the microwave absorption characteristic studies of rubber composites. No variation was observed in domain wall resonance with increasing Zn content but the spin rotational resonance was shifted towards lower frequency. It was analysed that only spin rotational resonance influenced the microwave absorbing characteristics not the domain wall resonance. Xu et al. [97] reported composition Ba2Co1.8Cu0.2Fe12O22 (Y-type hexaferrite rod) as high absorbent material. FMR frequency was reported to be tuned by the rod dimension because the use of ferrite rods reduced the weight of microwave absorber instead of ferrite slabs. Stergiou et al. [11] examined the potential of the Y-type hexagonal ferrites BaSrCo2–xNixFe12O22 as passive microwave absorbing materials and magneto-dielectric antenna substrates and the composition, microstructure and static characteristics along with EM properties upto range of 18 GHz of the fabricated samples were in conjunction with. It was analysed that Ni2+ substitution resulted in the enhancement of permeability and permittivity. The persistence of high refractive index upto 1 GHz enables these hexagonal ferrites useful in UHF antenna designs with small dimensions as given in Table 5.
f | Ni | µ | tan δm | ɛ | tan δe | N(Re√μ∗ɛ*) | A(√μ′/ε′) | B (tanδm + tanδe) | C (A/B) |
500 MHz | 0 | 2.1 | 0.02 | 16.2 | 0.25 | 5.9 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 1.34 |
0.5 | 2.5 | 0.08 | 17.8 | 0.31 | 6.6 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.97 | |
1.0 | 2.7 | 0.13 | 26.1 | 0.40 | 8.4 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 0.60 | |
1.5 | 3.2 | 0.18 | 26.6 | 0.42 | 9.3 | 0.35 | 0.59 | 0.58 | |
2.0 | 5.4 | 0.36 | 30.0 | 0.45 | 12.7 | 0.42 | 0.81 | 0.52 | |
1 GHz | 0.5 | 2.3 | 0.19 | 15.9 | 0.27 | 6.1 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.83 |
1.0 | 2.5 | 0.27 | 22.1 | 0.38 | 7.4 | 0.33 | 0.64 | 0.52 | |
1.5 | 2.7 | 0.39 | 22.6 | 0.38 | 7.8 | 0.35 | 0.77 | 0.45 | |
2.0 | 3.7 | 0.82 | 24.9 | 0.43 | 9.7 | 0.39 | 1.24 | 0.31 |
Song et al. [88] examined the electromagnetic and microwave absorbing properties of polycrystalline with composition Ba1.5Sr0.5CoZnFe12–xAlxO22 (x = 0–1) over microwave range. observed the maximum absorption of −19 dB at 11.5 GHz with bandwidth (RL < −10 dB) more than at 6 GHz for x = 0.3. Liu et al. [98] studied the microwave absorbing properties of sol-gel synthesized strontium ferrites and sintered them at 1200 ℃ temperature for different holding time (2h, 4h, 6h, 8h) and observed a shift in the absorption frequency peak of ferrites towards low-frequency region with increase in holding time. It was concluded that the ferrite holding at temperature 1200 ℃ for 4 h had the best microwave absorbing property as shown in Figure.
Although except antenna and microwave absorbing applications, there are many other applications of hexaferrites e.g. in information storage, motors, generators, transformers, sensors, mobile communications, transport, security, aerospace, defence, medical field and mostly used magnetic materials are ferromagnetic ceramics. In permanent magnets, hard ferrites are used in all applications made up of either as sintered magnets or bonded magnets are cheaper. Although permanent magnets made from of rare earth metal alloys are the best but they are costly to manufacture because of unavailability of raw materials. M-type ferrites have mostly use in it [99]. Hard ferrites have high value of coercivity used in permanent magnets. Barium hexaferrites are applicable in focussing magnets of TV tubes and transformer core. Due to low coercivity, low eddy and dielectric losses, high resistivity, low remanent flux density and high permeability, soft ferrites are used in transformers and inductors. In electrical and microwave devices, mostly use hexagonal ferrites due to high operating frequency, elimination of conductor losses [100], high electrical resistivity and rapid realignment of domains to minimise the energy losses [10]. Currently, large capacity data storage media are required. In storage and recording, low saturation magnetisation and coercivity are required to overwrite the data [101]. In plastoferrites, bonded magnets powder is injected into a resin or thermoplastic matrix and the products so formed are hard to break [94]. In medical field, hexaferrites have many applications in drug targeting, hyperthermia, nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and magnetomotive biomedical implants but toxic nature of barium restricts the use of them in human body [102]. In environmental science, they are used in treating polluted waste water. They have other applications in sensors, catalyst, high density information storage, etc. [103]. The applications of hexaferrites are illustrated in Figure 15.
This paper is focused on the historical developments of y-type hexagonal ferrites and their structure, synthesis methods, various types of properties and applications in different fields, especially in antenna applications. In the literature review, we discussed the various types of properties like structural, electrical and magnetic. From the data, a single-phase formation was observed in many doped Y-type hexaferrites with particle size in nano range. SEM and TEM images confirmed the nanosize. Electrical studies revealed the increment in room temperature resistivity and activation energy with the substitution of different types of dopants and decrease in resistivity with rise in temperature is confirming the semiconducting behaviour. Dielectric properties revealed the decrease in dielectric constant, tangent loss factor and dielectric loss with the applied frequency. This increase in resistivity and decrease in dielectric properties make them useful in the microwave devices and the devices operating at higher frequency. Magnetic properties revealed the increase in coercivity make them useful in perpendicular recording media and decrease in coercivity, magnetic moment and magnetic saturation affirm the use of these materials in multilayer chip inductors and beads as high resistivity and low coercivity are basic requirement of these applications. The study of different methods of synthetization of Y-type hexaferrites confirmed that the results of sol-gel technique and wet chemical method are better than other methods. There are many applications in computers, radio and television, telecommunication, medical, filters, chemical reactions, etc.
The author would firstly like to thank the editor and reviewers for giving valuable suggestions which helps us in improving our review paper.
There are no conflicts of interest between the authors for publishing this review article.
[1] |
Ho WJ, Hsiao KY, Hu CH, et al. (2017) Characterized plasmonic effects of various metallic nanoparticles on silicon solar cells using the same anodic aluminum oxide mask for film deposition. Thin Solid Films 631: 64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2017.04.016
![]() |
[2] |
Starowicz Z, Kędra A, Berent K, et al. (2017) Influence of Ag nanoparticles microstructure on their optical and plasmonic properties for photovoltaic applications. Sol Energy 158: 610–616. doi: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.10.020
![]() |
[3] | Taylor G (1969) Electrically Driven Jets. Proc R Soc Lond A 313: 453–475. |
[4] | Melcher JR (1963) Field-Couple Surface Waves: A Comparative Study of Surface Coupled Electrohydrodynamic and Magnetohydrodynamic Systems, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 1–63. |
[5] |
VillaVelázquez-Mendoza CI, Mendoza-Barraza SS, Rodriguez JL, et al. (2016) Simultaneous synthesis of β-Si3N4 nanofibers and pea-pods and hand-fan like Si2N2O nanostructures by the CVD method. Mater Lett 175: 139–142. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.04.028
![]() |
[6] |
Maldonado JR, Peckerar M (2016) X-Ray lithography: Some history, current status and future prospects. Microelectron Eng 161: 87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2016.03.052
![]() |
[7] |
Stoychev GV, Okhrimenko DV, Appelhans D, et al. (2016) Electron beam-induced formation of crystalline nanoparticle chains from amorphous cadmium hydroxide nanofibers. J Colloid Interf Sci 461: 122–127. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.09.023
![]() |
[8] |
Subbiah T, Bhat GS, Tock RW, et al. (2005) Electrospinning of nanofibers. J Appl Polym Sci 96: 557–559. doi: 10.1002/app.21481
![]() |
[9] |
Gan YX, Chen AD, Gan RN, et al. (2017) Energy conversion behaviors of antimony telluride particle loaded partially carbonized nanofiber composite mat manufactured by electrohydrodynamic casting. Microelectron Eng 181: 16–21. doi: 10.1016/j.mee.2017.06.009
![]() |
[10] |
Gan YX, Draper CW, Gan JB (2017) Carbon nanofiber network made by electrohydrodynamic casting immiscible fluids. Mater Today Commun 13: 248–254. doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2017.10.008
![]() |
[11] |
Han Y, Wei C, Dong J (2015) Droplet formation and settlement of phase-change ink in high resolution electrohydrodynamic (EHD) 3D printing. J Manuf Process 20: 485–491. doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2015.06.019
![]() |
[12] |
Han Y, Dong J (2017) High-resolution electrohydrodynamic (EHD) direct printing of molten metal. Procedia Manuf 10: 845–850. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.070
![]() |
[13] |
Zhang Y, Huang ZM, Xu X, et al. (2004) Preparation of core-shell structured PCL-r-gelatin bi-component nanofibers by coaxial electrospinning. Chem Mater 16: 3406–3409. doi: 10.1021/cm049580f
![]() |
[14] |
Loscertales IG, Barrero A, Guerrero I, et al. (2002) Micro/nano encapsulation via electrified coaxial liquid jets. Science 295: 1695–1698. doi: 10.1126/science.1067595
![]() |
[15] |
Kurban Z, Lovell A, Bennington SM, et al. (2010) A solution selection model for coaxial electrospinning and its application to nanostructured hydrogen storage materials. J Phys Chem C 114: 21201–21213. doi: 10.1021/jp107871v
![]() |
[16] |
Wang C, Yan KW, Lin YD, et al. (2010) Biodegradable core/shell fibers by coaxial electrospinning: Processing, fiber characterization, and its application in sustained drug release. Macromolecules 43: 6389–6397. doi: 10.1021/ma100423x
![]() |
[17] |
Zhang YZ, Wang X, Feng Y, et al. (2006) Coaxial electrospinning of (fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated bovine serum albumin)-encapsulated poly(ɛ-caprolactone) nanofibers for sustained release. Biomacromolecules 7: 1049–1057. doi: 10.1021/bm050743i
![]() |
[18] |
Zhang H, Zhao CG, Zhao YH, et al. (2010) Electrospinning of ultrafine core/shell fibers for biomedical applications. Sci China Chem 53: 1246–1254. doi: 10.1007/s11426-010-3180-3
![]() |
[19] | Li F, Zhao Y, Song Y (2010) Core-shell nanofibers: Nano channel and capsule by coaxial electrospinning, In: Kumar A, Nanofibers, Croatia: InTech, 419–438. |
[20] |
Chan KHK, Kotaki M (2009) Fabrication and morphology control of poly(methyl methacrylate) hollow structures via coaxial electrospinning. J Appl Polym Sci 111: 408–416. doi: 10.1002/app.28994
![]() |
[21] |
Chen H, Wang N, Di J, et al. (2010) Nanowire-in-microtube structured core/shell fibers via multifluidic coaxial electrospinning. Langmuir 26: 11291–11296. doi: 10.1021/la100611f
![]() |
[22] |
Yu JH, Fridrikh SV, Rutledge GC (2004) Production of submicron diameter fibers by two-fluids electrospinning. Adv Mater 16: 1562–1566. doi: 10.1002/adma.200306644
![]() |
[23] | Gan YX, Chen AD, Gan JB, et al. (2018) Electrohydrodynamic casting bismuth telluride micro particle loaded carbon nanofiber composite material with multiple sensing functions. J Micro Nano-Manuf 6: 011005. |
[24] |
Sun B, Long YZ, Zhang HD, et al. (2014) Advances in three-dimensional nanofibrous macrostructures via electrospinning. Prog Polym Sci 39: 862–890. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2013.06.002
![]() |
[25] | Zhang Y, Tse C, Rouholamin D, et al. (2012) Scaffolds for tissue engineering produced by inkjet printing. Cent Eur J Eng 2: 325–335. |
[26] |
Park TH, Shuler ML (2003) Integration of cell culture and microfabrication technology. Biotechnol Progr 19: 243–253. doi: 10.1021/bp020143k
![]() |
[27] |
Lee M, Kim HY (2014) Toward nanoscale three-dimensional printing: Nanowalls built of electrospun nanofibers. Langmuir 30: 1210–1214. doi: 10.1021/la404704z
![]() |
[28] |
Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, et al. (2016) 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv 34: 422–434. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011
![]() |
[29] |
Huang C, Jian G, DeLisio JB, et al. (2015) Electrospray deposition of energetic polymer nanocomposites with high mass particle loadings: A prelude to 3D printing of rocket motors. Adv Eng Mater 17: 95–101. doi: 10.1002/adem.201400151
![]() |
[30] | Liu Y, Pollaor S, Wu Y (2015) Electrohydrodynamic processing of p-type transparent conducting oxides. J Nanomater 2015: 423157. |
[31] |
Sun J, Zhou W, Huang D, et al. (2015) An overview of 3D printing technologies for food fabrication. Food Bioprocess Tech 8: 1605–1615. doi: 10.1007/s11947-015-1528-6
![]() |
[32] |
Mironov V, Trusk T, Kasyanov V, et al. (2009) Biofabrication: A 21st century manufacturing paradigm. Biofabrication 1: 022001. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/1/2/022001
![]() |
[33] |
Visser J, Peters B, Burger TJ, et al. (2013) Biofabrication of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs. Biofabrication 5: 035007. doi: 10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035007
![]() |
[34] |
Mittal A, Negi P, Garkhal K, et al. (2010) Integration of porosity and bio-functionalization to form a 3D scaffold: Cell culture studies and in Vitro degradation. Biomed Mater 5: 045001. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/5/4/045001
![]() |
[35] |
Ozbolat I, Yu Y (2013) Bioprinting towards organ fabrication: Challenges and future trends. IEEE T Biomed Eng 60: 691–699. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2243912
![]() |
[36] |
Mironov V, Rels N, Derby B (2006) Bioprinting: A beginning. Tissue Eng 12: 631–634. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.12.631
![]() |
[37] | Catros S, Guillemot F, Nandakumar A, et al. (2011) Layer-by-layer tissue microfabrication supports cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Tissue Eng 18: 1–9. |
[38] | Vozzi G, Tirella A, Ahluwalia A (2012) Rapid prototyping composite and complex scaffolds with PAM2, In: Liebschner M, Computer-Aided Tissue Engineering. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols), Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 868: 59–70. |
[39] |
Shim JH, Yoon MC, Jeong CM, et al. (2014) Efficacy of rhBMP-2 loaded PCL/PLGA/β-TCP guided bone regeneration membrane fabricated by 3D printing technology for reconstruction of calvaria defects in rabbit. Biomed Mater 9: 065006. doi: 10.1088/1748-6041/9/6/065006
![]() |
[40] | Laudenslager MJ, Sigmund WM (2011) Developments in electrohydrodynamic forming: Fabricating nanomaterials from charged liquids via electrospinning and electrospraying. Am Ceram Soc Bull 90: 23–27. |
[41] |
Martins A, Chung S, Pedro AJ, et al. (2009) Hierarchical starch-based fibrous scaffold for bone tissue engineering applications. J Tissue Eng Regen M 3: 37–42. doi: 10.1002/term.132
![]() |
[42] |
Zhu W, Masood F, O'Brien J, et al. (2015) Highly aligned nanocomposite scaffolds by electrospinning and electrospraying for neural tissue regeneration. Nanomed-Nanotechnol 11: 693–704. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2014.12.001
![]() |
[43] |
Erisken C, Kalyon DM, Wang H (2008) Functionally graded electrospun polycaprolactone and b-tricalcium phosphate nanocomposites for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 29: 4065–4073. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.06.022
![]() |
[44] |
Giannitelli SM, Mozetic P, Trombetta M, et al. (2015) Combined additive manufacturing approaches in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater 24: 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.06.032
![]() |
[45] | Xu T, Binder KW, Albanna MZ, et al. (2013) Hybrid printing of mechanically and biologically improved constructs for cartilage tissue engineering applications. Biofabrication 5: 015001. |
[46] |
Nam J, Huang Y, Agarwal S, et al. (2007) Improved cellular infiltration in electrospun fiber via engineered porosity. Tissue Eng 13: 2249–2257. doi: 10.1089/ten.2006.0306
![]() |
[47] |
Abdelaal OAM, Darwish SMH (2013) Review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering scaffolds fabrication, In: Öchsner A, da Silva L, Altenbach H, Characterization and Development of Biosystems and Biomaterials. Advanced Structured Materials, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 29: 33–54. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-31470-4_3
![]() |
[48] |
Zhu W, O'Brien C, O'Brien JR, et al. (2014) 3D nano/microfabrication techniques and nanobiomaterials for neural tissue regeneration. Nanomedicine 9: 859–875. doi: 10.2217/nnm.14.36
![]() |
[49] |
Karande TS, Ong JL, Agrawal CM (2004) Diffusion in musculoskeletal tissue engineering scaffolds: Design issues related to porosity, permeability, architecture, and nutrient mixing. Ann Biomed Eng 32: 1728–1743. doi: 10.1007/s10439-004-7825-2
![]() |
[50] |
Jung JW, Lee H, Hong JM, et al. (2015) A new method of fabricating a blend scaffold using an indirect three dimensional printing technique. Biofabrication 7: 045003. doi: 10.1088/1758-5090/7/4/045003
![]() |
[51] |
Kim JT, Seol SK, Pyo J, et al. (2011) Three-dimensional writing of conducting polymer nanowire arrays by meniscus-guided polymerization. Adv Mater 23: 1968–1970. doi: 10.1002/adma.201004528
![]() |
[52] | Pham QP, Sharma U, Mikos AG (2006) Electrospinning of polymeric nanofibers for tissue engineering applications: A review. Tissue Eng 12: 2249–2257. |
[53] |
Rosenthal T, Welzmiller S, Neudert L, et al. (2014) Novel superstructure of the rock salt type and element distribution in germanium tin antimony tellurides. J Solid State Chem 219: 108–117. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2014.07.014
![]() |
[54] |
Kitagawa H, Takimura K, Ido S, et al. (2017) Thermoelectric properties of crystal-aligned bismuth antimony tellurides prepared by pulse-current sintering under cyclic uniaxial pressure. J Alloy Compd 692: 388–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.09.054
![]() |
[55] |
Hatsuta N, Takemori D, Takashiri M (2016) Effect of thermal annealing on the structural and thermoelectric properties of electrodeposited antimony telluride thin films. J Alloy Compd 685: 147–152. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.268
![]() |
[56] |
Sasaki Y, Takashiri M (2016) Effects of Cr interlayer thickness on adhesive, structural, and thermoelectric properties of antimony telluride thin films deposited by radio-frequency magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Films 619: 195–201. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.10.069
![]() |
[57] |
Takashiri M, Hamada J (2016) Bismuth antimony telluride thin films with unique crystal orientation by two-step method. J Alloy Compd 683: 276–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.05.058
![]() |
[58] |
Catrangiu AS, Sin I, Prioteasa P, et al. (2016) Studies of antimony telluride and copper telluride films electrodeposition from choline chloride containing ionic liquids. Thin Solid Films 611: 88–100. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2016.04.030
![]() |
[59] |
Masayuki K, Takashiri M (2015) Investigation of the effects of compressive and tensile strain on n-type bismuth telluride and p-type antimony telluride nanocrystalline thin films for use in flexible thermoelectric generators. J Alloy Compd 653: 480–485. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.09.039
![]() |
[60] |
Catlin GC, Tripathi R, Nunes G, et al. (2017) An additive approach to low temperature zero pressure sintering of bismuth antimony telluride thermoelectric materials. J Power Sources 343: 316–321. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.12.092
![]() |
[61] |
Urban P, Schneider MN, Oeckler O (2015) Temperature dependent ordering phenomena in single crystals of germanium antimony tellurides. J Solid State Chem 227: 223–231. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2015.04.007
![]() |
[62] |
Hu LP, Zhu TJ, Yue XQ, et al. (2015) Enhanced figure of merit in antimony telluride thermoelectric materials by In–Ag Co-alloying for mid-temperature power generation. Acta Mater 85: 270–278. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.11.023
![]() |
[63] |
Lee WY, Park NW, Hong JE, et al. (2015) Effect of electronic contribution on temperature-dependent thermal transport of antimony telluride thin film. J Alloy Compd 620: 120–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.09.053
![]() |
[64] |
Rosalbino F, Carlini R, Zanicchi G, et al. (2013) Microstructural characterization and corrosion behavior of lead, bismuth and antimony tellurides prepared by melting. J Alloy Compd 567: 26–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.03.071
![]() |
[65] |
Kim DH, Kwon IH, Kim C, et al. (2013) Tellurium-evaporation-annealing for p-type bismuth-antimony-telluride thermoelectric materials. J Alloy Compd 548: 126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.08.130
![]() |
[66] |
Bochentyn B, Miruszewski T, Karczewski J, et al. (2016) Thermoelectric properties of bismuth-antimony-telluride alloys obtained by reduction of oxide reagents. Mater Chem Phys 177: 353–359. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2016.04.039
![]() |
[67] |
Qiu W, Yang S, Zhao X (2011) Effect of hot-press treatment on electrochemically deposited antimony telluride film. Thin Solid Films 519: 6399–6402. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.04.106
![]() |
[68] |
Takashiri M, Tanaka S, Miyazaki K (2010) Improved thermoelectric performance of highly-oriented nanocrystalline bismuth antimony telluride thin films. Thin Solid Films 519: 619–624. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.08.013
![]() |
[69] |
Takashiri M, Tanaka S, Hagino H, et al. (2014) Strain and grain size effects on thermal transport in highly-oriented nanocrystalline bismuth antimony telluride thin films. Int J Heat Mass Tran 76: 376–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2014.04.048
![]() |
[70] |
Lim SK, Kim MY, Oh TS (2009) Thermoelectric properties of the bismuth-antimony-telluride and the antimony-telluride films processed by electrodeposition for micro-device applications. Thin Solid Films 517: 4199–4203. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2009.02.005
![]() |
[71] |
Jung H, Myung NV (2011) Electrodeposition of antimony telluride thin films from acidic nitrate-tartrate baths. Electrochim Acta 56: 5611–5615. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.04.010
![]() |
[72] |
Fan P, Chen T, Zheng Z, et al. (2013) The influence of Bi doping in the thermoelectric properties of Co-sputtering deposited bismuth antimony telluride thin films. Mater Res Bull 48: 333–336. doi: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2012.10.026
![]() |
[73] |
Lensch-Falk JL, Banga D, Hopkins PE, et al. (2012) Electrodeposition and characterization of nano-crystalline antimony telluride thin films. Thin Solid Films 520: 6109–6117. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2012.05.078
![]() |
[74] |
Takashiri M, Tanaka S, Miyazaki K (2013) Growth of single-crystalline bismuth antimony telluride nanoplates on the surface of nanoparticle thin films. J Cryst Growth 372: 199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2013.03.028
![]() |
[75] |
Kim BG, Choi SM, Lee MH, et al. (2015) Facile fabrication of silicon and aluminum oxide nanotubes using antimony telluride nanowires as templates. Ceram Int 41: 12246–12252. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.06.047
![]() |
[76] |
Ganguly S, Zhou C, Morelli D, et al. (2011) Synthesis and evaluation of lead telluride/bismuth antimony telluride nanocomposites for thermoelectric applications. J Solid State Chem 184: 3195–3201. doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2011.09.031
![]() |
[77] | Li J, Chen Z, Wang X, et al. (1997) A novel two-dimensional mercury antimony telluride: Low temperature synthesis and characterization of RbHgSbTe3. J Alloy Compd 262–263: 28–33. |
[78] | Baba S, Sato H, Huang L, et al. (2014) Formation and characterization of polyethylene terephthalate-based (Bi0.15Sb0.85)2Te3 thermoelectric modules with CoSb3 adhesion layer by aerosol deposition. J Alloy Compd 589: 56–60. |
[79] |
Bark H, Kim JS, Kim H, et al. (2013) Effect of multiwalled carbon nanotubes on the thermoelectric properties of a bismuth telluride matrix. Curr Appl Phys 13: S111–S114. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2013.01.019
![]() |
[80] |
Zhang HT, Luo XG, Wang CH, et al. (2004) Characterization of nanocrystalline bismuth telluride (Bi2Te3) synthesized by a hydrothermal method. J Cryst Growth 265: 558–562. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.02.097
![]() |
[81] |
Sun Y, Cheng H, Gao S, et al. (2012) Atomically thick bismuth selenide freestanding single layers achieving enhanced thermoelectric energy harvesting. J Am Chem Soc 134: 20294–20297. doi: 10.1021/ja3102049
![]() |
[82] |
Prieto AL, Sander MS, Martin-Gonzalez MS, et al. (2001) Electrodeposition of ordered Bi2Te3 nanowire arrays. J Am Chem Soc 123: 7160–7161. doi: 10.1021/ja015989j
![]() |
[83] |
Borca-Tasciuc DA, Chen G, Prieto A, et al. (2004) Thermal properties of electrodeposited bismuth telluride nanowires embedded in amorphous alumina. Appl Phys Lett 85: 6001–6003. doi: 10.1063/1.1834991
![]() |
[84] |
Pang H, Piao YY, Tan YQ, et al. (2013) Thermoelectric behavior of segregated conductive polymer composites with hybrid fillers of carbon nanotube and bismuth telluride. Mater Lett 107: 150–153. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.06.008
![]() |
[85] |
Chatterjee K, Suresh A, Ganguly S, et al. (2009) Synthesis and characterization of an electro-deposited polyaniline-bismuth telluride nanocomposite-A novel thermoelectric material. Mater Charact 60: 1597–1601. doi: 10.1016/j.matchar.2009.09.012
![]() |
[86] |
Li JF, Liu J (2006) Effect of nano-SiC dispersion on thermoelectric properties of Bi2Te3 polycrystals. Phys Status Solidi A 203: 3768–3773. doi: 10.1002/pssa.200622011
![]() |
[87] |
Kim KT, Choi SY, Shin EH, et al. (2013) The influence of CNTs on the thermoelectric properties of a CNT/Bi2Te3 composite. Carbon 52: 541–549. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2012.10.008
![]() |
[88] |
Lu W, Ding Y, Chen Y, et al. (2005) Bismuth telluride hexagonal nanoplatelets and their two-step epitaxial growth. J Am Chem Soc 127: 10112–10116. doi: 10.1021/ja052286j
![]() |
[89] | Sumithra S, Takas NJ, Misra DK, et al. (2011) Enhancement in thermoelectric figure of merit in nanostructured Bi2Te3 with semimetal nanoinclusions. Adv Energy Mater 1: 1–7. |
[90] |
Zhao XB, Ji XH, Zhang YH, et al. (2005) Bismuth telluride nanotubes and the effects on the thermoelectric properties of nanotube-containing nanocomposites. Appl Phys Lett 86: 062111. doi: 10.1063/1.1863440
![]() |
[91] |
Chen CL, Chen YY, Lin SJ, et al. (2010) Fabrication and characterization of electrodeposited bismuth telluride films and nanowires. J Phys Chem C 114: 3385–3389. doi: 10.1021/jp909926z
![]() |
[92] |
Toprak M, Zhang Y, Muhammed M (2003) Chemical alloying and characterization of nanocrystalline bismuth telluride. Mater Lett 57: 3976–3982. doi: 10.1016/S0167-577X(03)00250-7
![]() |
[93] |
Kim KT, Koo HY, Lee GG, et al. (2012) Synthesis of alumina nanoparticle-embedded-bismuth telluride matrix thermoelectric composite powders. Mater Lett 82: 141–144. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2012.05.053
![]() |
[94] |
Chávez-Ángel E, Reparaz JS, Gomis-Bresco J, et al. (2014) Reduction of the thermal conductivity in free-standing silicon nano-membranes investigated by non-invasive Raman thermometry. APL Mater 2: 012113. doi: 10.1063/1.4861796
![]() |
[95] | Liang B, Song Z, Wang M, et al. (2013) Fabrication and thermoelectric properties of graphene/Bi2Te3 composite materials. J Nanomater 2013: 210767. |
[96] | Goldsmid HJ (2014) Bismuth telluride and its alloys as materials for thermoelectric generation. Materials 2014: 2577–2592. |
[97] |
Keshavarz MK, Vasilevskiy D, Masut RA, et al. (2013) p-Type bismuth telluride-based composite thermoelectric materials produced by mechanical alloying and hot extrusion. J Electron Mater 42: 1429–1435. doi: 10.1007/s11664-012-2284-2
![]() |
[98] | Chang HC, Chen CH (2011) Self-assembled bismuth telluride films with well-aligned zero-to three-dimensional nanoblocks for thermoelectric applications. CrystEngComm 13: 5956–5962. |
[99] |
Deng Y, Nan CW, Wei GD, et al. (2003) Organic-assisted growth of bismuth telluride nanocrystals. Chem Phys Lett 374: 410–415. doi: 10.1016/S0009-2614(03)00783-8
![]() |
[100] |
Liao CN, She TH (2007) Preparation of bismuth telluride thin films through interfacial reaction. Thin Solid Films 515: 8059–8064. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2007.03.086
![]() |
[101] |
Sokolova OB, Skipidarova SY, Duvankova NI, et al. (2004) Chemical reactions on the Bi2Te3-Bi2Se3 section in the process of crystal growth. J Cryst Growth 262: 442–448. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.10.073
![]() |
[102] | Kim KT, Ha GH (2013) Fabrication and enhanced thermoelectric properties of alumina nanoparticle-dispersed Bi0.5Sb1.5Te3 matrix composites. J Nanomater 2013: 821657. |
[103] |
Gothard N, Wilks G, Tritt TM, et al. (2010) Effect of processing route on the microstructure and thermoelectric properties of bismuth telluride-based alloys. J Electron Mater 39: 1909–1913. doi: 10.1007/s11664-009-1051-5
![]() |
[104] |
Thiebaud L, Legeai S, Ghanbaja J, et al. (2018) Synthesis of Te-Bi core-shell nanowires by two-step electrodeposition in ionic liquids. Electrochem Commun 86: 30–33. doi: 10.1016/j.elecom.2017.11.010
![]() |
[105] |
Kim J, Lee JY, Lim JH, et al. (2016) Optimization of thermoelectric properties of p-type AgSbTe2 thin films via electrochemical synthesis. Electrochim Acta 196: 579–586. doi: 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.02.206
![]() |
[106] | Suzuki M, Tsuchiya T, Akedo J (2017) Effect of starting powder morphology on film texture for bismuth layer-structured ferroelectrics prepared by aerosol deposition method. Jpn J Appl Phys 56: 06GH02. |
[107] |
Chu F, Zhang Q, Zhou Z, et al. (2018) Enhanced thermoelectric and mechanical properties of Na-doped polycrystalline SnSe thermoelectric materials via CNTs dispersion. J Alloy Compd 741: 756–764. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.01.178
![]() |
[108] |
Chung DDL (2017) Processing-structure-property relationships of continuous carbon fiber polymer-matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng R 113: 1–29. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2017.01.002
![]() |
[109] |
Mahmoud L, Alhwarai M, Samad YA, et al. (2015) Characterization of a graphene-based thermoelectric generator using a cost-effective fabrication process. Energy Procedia 75: 615–620. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.466
![]() |
[110] |
Lee S, Kim J, Ku BC, et al. (2012) Structural evolution of polyacrylonitrile fibers in stabilization and carbonization. Adv Chem Eng Sci 2: 275–282. doi: 10.4236/aces.2012.22032
![]() |
[111] |
Saha B, Schatz GC (2012) Carbonization in polyacrylonitrile (PAN) based carbon fibers studied by ReaxFF molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem B 116: 4684–4692. doi: 10.1021/jp300581b
![]() |
[112] |
Ma Q, Gao A, Tong Y, et al. (2016) The densification mechanism of polyacrylonitrile carbon fibers during carbonization. New Carbon Mater 31: 550–554. doi: 10.1016/S1872-5805(16)60031-8
![]() |
[113] |
Hameed N, Sharp J, Nunna S, et al. (2016) Structural transformation of polyacrylonitrile fibers during stabilization and low temperature carbonization. Polym Degrad Stabil 128: 39–45. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.02.029
![]() |
[114] |
Liu J, Wang PH, Li RY (1994) Continuous carbonization of polyacrylonitrile-based oxidized fibers: Aspects on mechanical properties and morphological structure. J Appl Polym Sci 52: 945–950. doi: 10.1002/app.1994.070520712
![]() |
[115] | Wang H, Zhang X, Zhang Y, et al. (2016) Study of carbonization behavior of polyacrylonitrile/tin salt as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Appl Polym Sci 2016: 43914. |
[116] |
Sun J, Wu G, Wang Q (2005) The effects of carbonization temperature on the properties and structure of PAN-based activated carbon hollow fiber. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 2155–2160. doi: 10.1002/app.21955
![]() |
[117] |
Rahaman MSA, Ismail AF, Mustafa A (2007) A review of heat treatment on polyacrylonitrile fiber. Polym Degrad Stabil 92: 1421–1432. doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.03.023
![]() |
[118] |
Zhao LR, Jang BZ, Zhou JN (1998) Effect of polymeric precursors on properties of semiconducting carbon/carbon composites. J Mater Sci 33: 1809–1817. doi: 10.1023/A:1004392919018
![]() |
1. | Rohit Jasrotia, Pooja Puri, Virender Pratap Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Sol–gel synthesized Mg–Ag–Mn nanoferrites for Power Applications, 2021, 97, 0928-0707, 205, 10.1007/s10971-020-05428-3 | |
2. | Monika Chandel, Virender Pratap Singh, Rohit Jasrotia, Kirti Singha, M. Singh, Pankaj Thakur, Susheel Kalia, Fabrication of Ni2+ and Dy3+ substituted Y-Type nanohexaferrites: A study of structural and magnetic properties, 2020, 595, 09214526, 412378, 10.1016/j.physb.2020.412378 | |
3. | Satvinder Kour, Rohit Jasrotia, Pooja Puri, Ankit Verma, Bhawna Sharma, Virender Pratap Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Susheel Kalia, Improving photocatalytic efficiency of MnFe2O4 ferrites via doping with Zn2+/La3+ ions: photocatalytic dye degradation for water remediation, 2021, 0944-1344, 10.1007/s11356-021-13147-7 | |
4. | Ibrahim Mohammed, J. Mohammed, A.K. Srivastava, Study of structural, morphological, optical bandgap and Urbach's tail of Ni2+ substituted Co2Y-type strontium hexaferrite, 2022, 62, 22147853, 6634, 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.620 | |
5. | S. Kakati, M. K. Rendale, S. N. Mathad, Synthesis, Characterization, and Applications of CoFe2O4 and M-CoFe2O4 (M = Ni, Zn, Mg, Cd, Cu, RE) Ferrites: A Review, 2021, 30, 1061-3862, 189, 10.3103/S1061386221040038 | |
6. | Rohit Jasrotia, Rohit Khargotra, Ankit Verma, Indu Sharma, Ritesh Verma, 2021, Chapter 12, 978-981-16-7453-2, 195, 10.1007/978-981-16-7454-9_12 | |
7. | Mukesh Suthar, P.K. Roy, Evaluation of magnetic & humidity-dielectric response of tungsten substituted Y-type barium hexaferrite (Ba2Co2WxFe12−xO22, 0.0 ≤ x ≤ 2.0) synthesized by solid-state reaction route, 2023, 150, 13877003, 110554, 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.110554 | |
8. | Anand Sharma, Rohit Jasrotia, Nisha Kumari, Sanjay Kumar, Ankit Verma, Sachin Kumar Godara, Jahangeer Ahmed, Saad M. Alshehri, Asiya M. Tamboli, Susheel Kalia, Khalid M. Batoo, Rajesh Kumar, Tailoring the structural and magnetic traits of copper modified BaFe12O19 nanostructured hexaferrites for recording media application, 2022, 564, 03048853, 170124, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170124 | |
9. | K Srilatha, B T P Madhav, S S Mohan Reddy, Shaik Shakeel Ahamad, Sudipta Das, J Lakshmi Narayana, Instrumentation based material characterization of a split square ring metamaterial and its analytical study as cloak for microwave communication applications, 2022, 4, 2631-8695, 045027, 10.1088/2631-8695/aca379 | |
10. | Sidra Younus, G. Murtaza, Nuriyah Mohammed Aloufi, H.H. Somaily, Structural, dielectric, and magnetic properties of Pr–Cr co-doped PrxBa1-xCryFe12-yO19 barium hexaferrites, 2022, 48, 02728842, 31041, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.07.065 | |
11. | Huaiwu Zhang, Qinghui Yang, Qiye Wen, Yingli Liu, Vincent G. Harris, 2022, 9781118971468, 413, 10.1002/9781118971499.ch11 | |
12. | Mallika Chugh, Shaweta Sharma, Deepak Basandrai, Synthesis and Characterization of Praseodymium substituted Y-type hexaferrites, 2022, 2267, 1742-6588, 012037, 10.1088/1742-6596/2267/1/012037 | |
13. | Ibrahim Mohammed, Jibrin Mohammed, Ajeet Kumar Srivastava, Recent Progress in Hexagonal Ferrites Based Composites for Microwave Absorption, 2023, 58, 0232-1300, 2200200, 10.1002/crat.202200200 | |
14. | Jia Chen, Zihao Wang, Zhenzhi Cheng, Zhiwen Shi, Xi Deng, Yijing Chen, Yaohui Zou, Guangsheng Luo, Weiping Zhou, Investigation on the structural, magnetic, and dielectric properties of Ni2+–Zr4+ co-doped Y-type hexaferrite Ba2Ni2Fe12O22, 2022, 33, 0957-4522, 16889, 10.1007/s10854-022-08568-0 | |
15. | Chuankun Wang, Chao Xu, Haiyang Chen, Xiaoxuan Ma, Yunke Chen, Fei Chen, Baojuan Kang, Jun-Yi Ge, Wei Ren, Shixun Cao, Magnetoelectric phase diagram and magnetic field-induced reversal of electric polarization in Ba0.5Sr1.5Mg1.6Co0.4Fe12O22 single crystal, 2021, 886, 09258388, 161266, 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.161266 | |
16. | Victor A. Zhuravlev, Dmitry V. Wagner, Olga A. Dotsenko, Katerina V. Kareva, Elena V. Zhuravlyova, Anna S. Chervinskaya, Grigoriy E. Kuleshov, Alexander S. Suraev, Static and Dynamic Magnetic Properties of Polycrystalline Hexaferrites of the Ba2Ni2-xCuxFe12O22 System, 2022, 11, 2079-9292, 2759, 10.3390/electronics11172759 | |
17. | Sanjay Kumar, Jyoti Prakash, Ankit Verma, Rohit Jasrotia, A comprehensive review of synthesis, properties, and applications of BaFe12O19 hexaferrites, 2023, 22147853, 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.346 | |
18. | Ibrahim Mohammed, J. Mohammed, Anjori Sharma, Hamnesh Mahajan, Amarjeet Kaur, A.K. Srivastava, Influence of Mn2+-substitution on the structural, morphological and magnetic properties of Co2Y strontium hexaferrites, 2022, 61, 22147853, 1158, 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.514 | |
19. | Hem Raj Sharma, Khalid Mujasam Batoo, Pankaj Sharma, Sumit Bhardwaj, Piyush Kuchhal, Rohit Jasrotia, Indu Sharma, Gagan Kumar, Structural, electrical, and magnetic studies of Cu2+ substituted MnFe2O4 nanoferrites synthesized via solution combustion technique, 2022, 33, 0957-4522, 7528, 10.1007/s10854-022-07897-4 | |
20. | Mukesh Suthar, Avinash K. Srivastava, Charu Sharma, Raj K. Joshi, P.K. Roy, Nano-sized Ce-substituted hexagonal Co2–Y ferrite; a valuable catalyst for heterogeneous reduction of toxic nitro-organic pollutants, 2022, 48, 02728842, 37370, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.333 | |
21. | Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Azhar Khan, Raqiqa Tur Rasool, Muhammad Imran Arshad, Hind Albalawi, Hisham S.M. Abd-Rabboh, Jolly Jacob, H.M. Noor ul Huda Khan Asghar, Investigation of crystal structure, electrical and dielectric response of Ga3+ substituted Sr–Ni Y-type hexaferrites as a suitable material for high frequency applications, 2023, 02728842, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.03.239 | |
22. | Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Azhar Khan, Raqiqa Tur Rasool, Muhammad Imran Arshad, M. Irfan, Enhanced electrical transport properties of Cr-substituted Mg2–Y-type hexaferrites for power applications, 2023, 49, 02728842, 32588, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.07.225 | |
23. | Kirti Singha, Rohit Jasrotia, Jahangeer Ahmed, Saad M. Alshehri, Abhishek Kandwal, Monika Chandel, Pankaj Sharma, Comparative study of electrical and dielectric properties of Ho/Y ions modified Ba-Co-Sr Z-type nanohexaferrites, 2024, 0928-0707, 10.1007/s10971-024-06562-y | |
24. | Nabil Hamdi, Wahid Belam, Structural, Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Copper-Substituted Co0.8−XNi0.2 Ferrites Synthesized by Sol–Gel Autocombustion Process, 2023, 52, 0361-5235, 5996, 10.1007/s11664-023-10519-2 | |
25. | Yanli Deng, Lutong Li, Long Wang, Na Wu, Huihui Jin, Feng Gao, Zhihui Zeng, Rare earth Ce-doped W-type barium ferrites for tunable electromagnetic waves absorption performance, 2024, 176, 00255408, 112792, 10.1016/j.materresbull.2024.112792 | |
26. | Jyoti Prakash, Nisha Kumari, Pankaj Sharma, Sachin Kumar Godara, Gagan Kumar, 2023, 9780323961158, 141, 10.1016/B978-0-323-96115-8.00005-2 | |
27. | Allah D. Jara, Jyoti Prakash, Ankit Verma, Sachin Kumar Godara, Woubshet B. Siamregn, 2023, 9780323961158, 37, 10.1016/B978-0-323-96115-8.00009-X | |
28. | Kanika Raj, Avi Kumar Sharma, Susheel Kalia, 2024, 9780443185373, 135, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00005-5 | |
29. | Rohit Jasrotia, Jyoti Prakash, Jagpreet Singh, M.A. Majeed Khan, Saad M. Alshehri, Jahangeer Ahmed, 2024, 9780443185373, 213, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00001-8 | |
30. | Ritesh Verma, Ankush Chauhan, Deepak Sharma, Rajesh Kumar, Khalid Mujasam Batoo, 2024, 9780443185373, 275, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00016-X | |
31. | Muhammad Arshad, Muhammad Azhar Khan, Raqiqa Tur Rasool, Muhammad Imran Arshad, Zeshan Javed, Sikandar Hayat, Syed Zafar Ilyas, Structural, physicochemical and electrical properties of Co2Y-type barium hexaferrites, 2024, 50, 02728842, 23047, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.027 | |
32. | Allwin Sudhakaran, Ashwin Sudhakaran, E. Sivasenthil, Comprehensive Analysis of Optical, Dielectric, and Electrical Properties in Al- and Cu-Doped Barium Hexaferrite/Cobalt–Zinc Ferrite Hybrid Nanocomposites, 2024, 53, 0361-5235, 4622, 10.1007/s11664-024-11197-4 | |
33. | Kirti Singha, Rohit Jasrotia, Louis WY. Liu, Jyoti Prakash, Ankit Verma, Pawan Kumar, Sachin Kumar Godara, Monika Chandel, Virender Pratap Singh, Sourbh Thakur, Ranjan Das, Abhishek Kandwal, H.H. Hegazy, Pankaj Sharma, A review of Z-type hexaferrite based magnetic nanomaterials: Structure, synthesis, properties, and potential applications, 2023, 70, 00796786, 100404, 10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2023.100404 | |
34. | Ibrahim Mohammed, A.K. Srivastava, 2024, 9780443185373, 99, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00007-9 | |
35. | Ibrahim Mohammed, J. Mohammed, Atiku Usman Kende, Aliyu Mohammed Wara, Yahaya Abubakar Aliero, U.Z. Magawata, Abdullah Bello Umar, A.K. Srivastava, Review on Y-type hexaferrite: Synthesis, characterization and properties, 2023, 16, 26665239, 100416, 10.1016/j.apsadv.2023.100416 | |
36. | Muhammad Zain Ul Abidin, Muhammad Ikram, Sawaira Moeen, Ghazanfar Nazir, Mohammed Benali Kanoun, Souraya Goumri-Said, A comprehensive review on the synthesis of ferrite nanomaterials via bottom-up and top-down approaches advantages, disadvantages, characterizations and computational insights, 2024, 520, 00108545, 216158, 10.1016/j.ccr.2024.216158 | |
37. | Amrendra Kumar, Kousik Polley, Sourabh Sanjeev Hiremath, Japes Bera, Synthesis and characterizations of (Ba2Zn2Fe12O22)1-x(CoFe2O4)x ferrites composite for the high frequency applications, 2023, 34, 0957-4522, 10.1007/s10854-023-11117-y | |
38. | Pawan Kumar, Nikhil Thakur, Monika Chandel, 2024, 9780443185373, 183, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00002-X | |
39. | Ihab A. Abdel-Latif, S.A. Gad, A.M. Moustafa, 2024, 9780443185373, 253, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00017-1 | |
40. | Rohit Khargotra, Kovács András, Rahul Kalia, Jyoti Prakash, Ankit Verma, 2023, 9780323961158, 15, 10.1016/B978-0-323-96115-8.00011-8 | |
41. | Rohit Jasrotia, Gaurav Katoch, Jyoti Prakash, 2024, 9780443185373, 71, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00013-4 | |
42. | Rohit Jasrotia, Jagpreet Singh, Saad M. Alshehri, Tansir Ahamad, 2024, 9780443185373, 117, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00009-2 | |
43. | Monika Chandel, Rohit Jasrotia, Jahangeer Ahmed, Saad M. Alshehri, Kirti Singha, Virender Pratap Singh, Effect of Ni and Dy co-doping on the structural, electrical, and dielectric properties of Strontium Y-type hexaferrite, 2024, 0928-0707, 10.1007/s10971-024-06576-6 | |
44. | Prianka Sharma, Sarabjeet Kaur, Manish Taunk, 2024, 9780443185373, 159, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00003-1 | |
45. | Mahrous R Ahmed, E M M Ibrahim, Adel Hamazaoui, Abdalrahman M Rayan, A A Azab, A M Abdel Hakeem, Impact of Al3+ substitution in M-type hexaferrite on structural, magnetic, and dielectric properties, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 115905, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad7d42 | |
46. | Vahid Salehi Moghaddam, Ahmad Gholizadeh, Synthesis and investigation of polyvinylpyrrolidone-polymer content on magnetic and electromagnetic properties of electrospun BiFeO3, SrFe12O19, α-Fe2O3 nanostructures, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 095961, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad6d14 | |
47. | Parteek Mandyal, Rohit Sharma, Shabnam Sambyal, Baizeng Fang, Mika Sillanpää, Vineet Kumar, Susheel Kalia, Pooja Shandilya, 2023, 9780323961158, 257, 10.1016/B978-0-323-96115-8.00001-5 | |
48. | Y E Gunanto, M P Izaak, H Sitompul, Y Taryana, A Mulyawan, J Setiawan, Y Yunasfi, W A Adi, A Taufiq, R Ramlan, Improvement of microwave absorbing capability on the soft magnetic/hard magnetic/perovskite composites, 2024, 99, 0031-8949, 125940, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad8d86 | |
49. | Jihui Sun, Haifeng Li, Yijian Liu, Xutao Yan, Jiabao Zang, Xiang Luo, Li Sun, Meijie Zhang, Hollow porous magnetic/magnetic heterostructured CoFe/defective spinel microspheres template-free synthesis and effective modulation of microwave absorption performance, 2023, 49, 02728842, 31364, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.07.084 | |
50. | Ritesh Verma, Ankush Chauhan, Rahul Kalia, Khalid Mujasam Batoo, Rajesh Kumar, 2023, 9780323961158, 237, 10.1016/B978-0-323-96115-8.00013-1 | |
51. | Muhammad Azhar Khan, Structural, electrical, dielectric, magnetic, and microwave absorption properties of Cr substituted BaSrCo2Fe12O22 hexaferrites for high-frequency applications, 2024, 50, 02728842, 25068, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.234 | |
52. | Swati Verma, Sachin Kumar Godara, Mandeep Singh, 2024, 9780443185373, 1, 10.1016/B978-0-443-18537-3.00010-9 | |
53. | Muhammad Asif, Rehan Saeed, Usman Ahmad, M. A. K. Yousaf Shah, Muhammad Abdullah Amin, Zahid Shoukat, Alanoud T. Alfagham, Abdallah M. Elgorban, Mehar Un Nisa, Synthesis, Dielectric and Magnetic Properties of Mn+2-Substituted Y-Type Hexagonal Ferrites: Prospects for Microwave Absorption Applications, 2024, 0361-5235, 10.1007/s11664-024-11581-0 | |
54. | Sidra Younus, G Murtaza, Haya Alhummiany, M Hassan, Murefah Mana Al-Anazy, Q Mahmood, El Sayed Yousef, Ali S Alshomrany, Investigation of structural, magnetic, and dielectric properties of BaFe12O19/Pr1−xSrxCoyMn1−yO3 composites; an emerging aspirant for high frequency applications, 2025, 100, 0031-8949, 015925, 10.1088/1402-4896/ad95ca | |
55. | Xingyu Huo, Zelai Cheng, Yuanxun Li, Yulan Jing, Xiuling Yang, Mingshan Qu, Hua Su, Investigation of Zn2+-Mn3+ co-substituted Z-type hexaferrite for patch antenna application, 2025, 09552219, 117468, 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2025.117468 | |
56. | I.A. Hrekau, D.B. Migas, Xiaoxu Zhao, D.S. Klygach, V.A. Turchenko, V.G. Kostishin, S.V. Trukhanov, A.V. Trukhanov, Effect of the large ion substitution on structural and microwave characteristics of the M-type Ba-hexaferrites, 2025, 02728842, 10.1016/j.ceramint.2025.06.118 |
Symbol | Composition | Crystallographic arrangement | No. of molecules/unit cell | c (A0) |
M | BaFe12O19 | RSR*S* (MM*) | 2M | 23.2 |
U | Ba4Me2Fe36O60 | MM*Y* | MeU | 38.1 |
W | BaMe2F136O27 | MSM*S* | 2MeW | 32.8 |
X | Ba2Me2Fe28O46 | MM*S | 3MeX | 84.0 |
Y | Ba2Me2Fe12O22 | 3ST | 3MeY | 43.5 |
Z | Ba3Me2Fe24O41 | MYMY | 2MeZ | 52.3 |
Sr. No. | Composition | a (Å) | c (Å) | Density | D (nm) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Zn1.2–xCoxCu0.8Fe12O22(x = 0.0–1.2) | 5.875–5.865 | 43.689–43.506 | - | - | [68] |
2. | Ba2Cd2(Zr Co)xFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 5.88–5.98 | 43.61–44.14 | - | 59–46 | [69] |
3. | Sr2Ni2Fe12–yCryO22(y = 0.0–1.5) | 5.88–5.90 | 43.48–43.36 | 5.03–4.99 | 44–14 | [70] |
4. | Sr2Me2Fe11(SnCo)0.5O22(Me–Cu and Zn) | 5.855.90 | 43.6943.50 | 2.853.72 | 8.7–11 | [71] |
5. | Ba2Co2–x–yZnxCuyFe12O22(x = 0–2, y = 0–0.8) | 5.862–5.870 | 43.518–43.520 | 5.12–5.20 | - | [72] |
6. | Sr2Cu2–xCoxFe12O22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 5.88–6.45 | 43.52–43.62 | - | - | [73] |
7. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 5.88–5.91 | 43.45–43.15 | 4.71–3.48 | - | [74] |
8. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22b + xY2O3(x = 0–5) | 5.90–5.88 | 43.49–43.50 | - | 22–70 | [75] |
9. | Sr2NixCo2–xEuyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | c/a=7.37–7.30 | - | 4.92–4.69 | - | [76] |
10. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22 | 5.908 | 43.155 | - | 29 | [77] |
11. | Ba2Zn2TbxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 5.85–5.91 | 43.45–44.31 | - | 20–36 | [78] |
12. | Ba2Co2Fe12O22Ba2CoCrFe12O22Ba2Co2Fe11GaO22Ba2CoMgFe11GaO22 | 5.865.865.865.89 | 43.5243.4943.4943.49 | - | - | [79] |
13. | Sr2Co2Fe12–x/2Aly/2O22(y = 0.0–3.0) | 5.848–5.821 | 43.507–43.509 | - | - | [80] |
14. | Sr2Ni2Alx/2Crx/2Fe12–xO22(x = 0.0–3.0) | 5.858–5.875 | 43.304–43.423 | - | - | [81] |
15. | Sr2Ni2–xCoxFe12O22 (x = 0.5) | 5.8979 | 44.45 | - | - | [82] |
16. | Sr2Co2NixTixFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 5.89–5.95 | 43.59–43.69 | 5.04–4.95 | 5–45 | [83] |
17. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 5.89–5.96 | 43.35–43.44 | 5.04–4.89 | 60–26 | [84] |
Sr. No | Composition | ρ (ohm-cm) | Ea (eV) | µd (cm2·v−1·s−1) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Cd2(ZrCo)xFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 1.47 × 108–3.25 × 108 | 0.45–0.52 | 2.54 × 10−13–1.11 × 10−13 | [69] |
2. | Sr2Ni2Fe12–yCryO22(y = 0.0–1.5) | 60.6 × 108–1.5 × 108 | - | 0.68 × 10−13–0.13 × 10−13 | [70] |
3. | Sr2MnxCo2–xTbyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | 0.12 × 108–0.15 × 1010 | - | 3.3 × 10−12–2.5 × 10−15 | [87] |
4. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 6.09 × 106–7.52 × 106 | 0.35–0.50 | - | [74] |
5. | Sr2NixCo2–xEuyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | 1.23 × 106–3.07 × 109 | 0.16–0.22 | - | [76] |
6. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22 | 1.01 × 105 | - | - | [77] |
7. | Ba2Zn2TbxFe12−xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 1.47 × 108–3.25 × 108 | 0.26–0.39 | - | [78] |
8. | Ba1.5Sr0.5CoZnFe12–xAlxO22 (x = 0–1) | 4.72 × 107–30.34 × 107 | - | - | [88] |
9. | Sr2Co2NixTixFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 1.8 × 106–4.9 × 109 | 0.17–0.44 | - | [83] |
10. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 2.86 × 107–7.47 × 107 | - | - | [84] |
Sr. No. | Composition | Hc (Oe) | Ms (emu/g) | Mr (emu/g) | S = Mr/Ms | nB (μB) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Zn1.2–xCoxCu0.8Fe12O22 (x = 0.0–1.2) | 48.99–204.22 | 33.84–27.19 | 3.81–9.03 | 0.11–0.12 | - | [92] |
2. | Sr2Me2Fe11(SnCo)0.5O22(Me–Cu and Zn) | Zn-769Cu-1210 | 13.44–25.45 | 5.2–13.3 | 0.39–0.52 | - | [71] |
3. | Sr2Cu2–xCoxFe12O22(x = 0.0–1.0) | - | 60.10–18.03 | 27.50–8.90 | 0.46–0.49 | - | [73] |
4. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 555.44–276.06 | 40.34–32.84 | 16.68–10.65 | 0.41–0.32 | 9.94–7.63 | [74] |
5. | Sr2MnxCo2–xTbyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | - | 77.11–16.95 | - | 0.41–0.65 | 15.27–3.68 | [87] |
6. | Sr2Ni2Fe12O22 | 945–207 | 49.4–52.6 | 23.9–15.6 | 0.48–0.30 | - | [93] |
7. | Ba2Co2Fe12O22Ba2CoCrFe12O22Ba2Co2Fe11GaO22Ba2CoMgFe11GaO22 | 123238881 | 33.937.534.926.6 | 7.901.586.885.81 | 0.230.040.200.21 | - | [79] |
8. | Sr2Ni2Alx/2Crx/2Fe12–xO22(x = 0.0–3.0) | 840–1160 | 39.61–30.11 | 17.51–14.62 | 0.44–0.49 | - | [81] |
9. | Sr2Nix/2Co2–xMgx/2Fe12O22 (x = 0–0.6) | 1140–250 | 30–50.06 | 13.30–10.62 | 0.44–0.21 | - | [94] |
10. | Ba2Co1–xZnxFe12O22(x = 0.0–2.0) | 255–45 | 31.1–35.2 | 14.3–5.0 | 0.46–0.14 | - | [95] |
11. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 549–1630 | 51.42–18.12 | 13.5–8 | 0.26–0.44 | - | [84] |
f | Ni | µ | tan δm | ɛ | tan δe | N(Re√μ∗ɛ*) | A(√μ′/ε′) | B (tanδm + tanδe) | C (A/B) |
500 MHz | 0 | 2.1 | 0.02 | 16.2 | 0.25 | 5.9 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 1.34 |
0.5 | 2.5 | 0.08 | 17.8 | 0.31 | 6.6 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.97 | |
1.0 | 2.7 | 0.13 | 26.1 | 0.40 | 8.4 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 0.60 | |
1.5 | 3.2 | 0.18 | 26.6 | 0.42 | 9.3 | 0.35 | 0.59 | 0.58 | |
2.0 | 5.4 | 0.36 | 30.0 | 0.45 | 12.7 | 0.42 | 0.81 | 0.52 | |
1 GHz | 0.5 | 2.3 | 0.19 | 15.9 | 0.27 | 6.1 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.83 |
1.0 | 2.5 | 0.27 | 22.1 | 0.38 | 7.4 | 0.33 | 0.64 | 0.52 | |
1.5 | 2.7 | 0.39 | 22.6 | 0.38 | 7.8 | 0.35 | 0.77 | 0.45 | |
2.0 | 3.7 | 0.82 | 24.9 | 0.43 | 9.7 | 0.39 | 1.24 | 0.31 |
Symbol | Composition | Crystallographic arrangement | No. of molecules/unit cell | c (A0) |
M | BaFe12O19 | RSR*S* (MM*) | 2M | 23.2 |
U | Ba4Me2Fe36O60 | MM*Y* | MeU | 38.1 |
W | BaMe2F136O27 | MSM*S* | 2MeW | 32.8 |
X | Ba2Me2Fe28O46 | MM*S | 3MeX | 84.0 |
Y | Ba2Me2Fe12O22 | 3ST | 3MeY | 43.5 |
Z | Ba3Me2Fe24O41 | MYMY | 2MeZ | 52.3 |
Sr. No. | Composition | a (Å) | c (Å) | Density | D (nm) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Zn1.2–xCoxCu0.8Fe12O22(x = 0.0–1.2) | 5.875–5.865 | 43.689–43.506 | - | - | [68] |
2. | Ba2Cd2(Zr Co)xFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 5.88–5.98 | 43.61–44.14 | - | 59–46 | [69] |
3. | Sr2Ni2Fe12–yCryO22(y = 0.0–1.5) | 5.88–5.90 | 43.48–43.36 | 5.03–4.99 | 44–14 | [70] |
4. | Sr2Me2Fe11(SnCo)0.5O22(Me–Cu and Zn) | 5.855.90 | 43.6943.50 | 2.853.72 | 8.7–11 | [71] |
5. | Ba2Co2–x–yZnxCuyFe12O22(x = 0–2, y = 0–0.8) | 5.862–5.870 | 43.518–43.520 | 5.12–5.20 | - | [72] |
6. | Sr2Cu2–xCoxFe12O22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 5.88–6.45 | 43.52–43.62 | - | - | [73] |
7. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 5.88–5.91 | 43.45–43.15 | 4.71–3.48 | - | [74] |
8. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22b + xY2O3(x = 0–5) | 5.90–5.88 | 43.49–43.50 | - | 22–70 | [75] |
9. | Sr2NixCo2–xEuyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | c/a=7.37–7.30 | - | 4.92–4.69 | - | [76] |
10. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22 | 5.908 | 43.155 | - | 29 | [77] |
11. | Ba2Zn2TbxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 5.85–5.91 | 43.45–44.31 | - | 20–36 | [78] |
12. | Ba2Co2Fe12O22Ba2CoCrFe12O22Ba2Co2Fe11GaO22Ba2CoMgFe11GaO22 | 5.865.865.865.89 | 43.5243.4943.4943.49 | - | - | [79] |
13. | Sr2Co2Fe12–x/2Aly/2O22(y = 0.0–3.0) | 5.848–5.821 | 43.507–43.509 | - | - | [80] |
14. | Sr2Ni2Alx/2Crx/2Fe12–xO22(x = 0.0–3.0) | 5.858–5.875 | 43.304–43.423 | - | - | [81] |
15. | Sr2Ni2–xCoxFe12O22 (x = 0.5) | 5.8979 | 44.45 | - | - | [82] |
16. | Sr2Co2NixTixFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 5.89–5.95 | 43.59–43.69 | 5.04–4.95 | 5–45 | [83] |
17. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 5.89–5.96 | 43.35–43.44 | 5.04–4.89 | 60–26 | [84] |
Sr. No | Composition | ρ (ohm-cm) | Ea (eV) | µd (cm2·v−1·s−1) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Cd2(ZrCo)xFe12–2xO22(x = 0.0–1.0) | 1.47 × 108–3.25 × 108 | 0.45–0.52 | 2.54 × 10−13–1.11 × 10−13 | [69] |
2. | Sr2Ni2Fe12–yCryO22(y = 0.0–1.5) | 60.6 × 108–1.5 × 108 | - | 0.68 × 10−13–0.13 × 10−13 | [70] |
3. | Sr2MnxCo2–xTbyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | 0.12 × 108–0.15 × 1010 | - | 3.3 × 10−12–2.5 × 10−15 | [87] |
4. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 6.09 × 106–7.52 × 106 | 0.35–0.50 | - | [74] |
5. | Sr2NixCo2–xEuyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | 1.23 × 106–3.07 × 109 | 0.16–0.22 | - | [76] |
6. | Sr2MnNiFe12O22 | 1.01 × 105 | - | - | [77] |
7. | Ba2Zn2TbxFe12−xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 1.47 × 108–3.25 × 108 | 0.26–0.39 | - | [78] |
8. | Ba1.5Sr0.5CoZnFe12–xAlxO22 (x = 0–1) | 4.72 × 107–30.34 × 107 | - | - | [88] |
9. | Sr2Co2NixTixFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 1.8 × 106–4.9 × 109 | 0.17–0.44 | - | [83] |
10. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 2.86 × 107–7.47 × 107 | - | - | [84] |
Sr. No. | Composition | Hc (Oe) | Ms (emu/g) | Mr (emu/g) | S = Mr/Ms | nB (μB) | Refs. |
1. | Ba2Zn1.2–xCoxCu0.8Fe12O22 (x = 0.0–1.2) | 48.99–204.22 | 33.84–27.19 | 3.81–9.03 | 0.11–0.12 | - | [92] |
2. | Sr2Me2Fe11(SnCo)0.5O22(Me–Cu and Zn) | Zn-769Cu-1210 | 13.44–25.45 | 5.2–13.3 | 0.39–0.52 | - | [71] |
3. | Sr2Cu2–xCoxFe12O22(x = 0.0–1.0) | - | 60.10–18.03 | 27.50–8.90 | 0.46–0.49 | - | [73] |
4. | Sr2Ni2–xMgxFe12O22(x = 0.0–0.5) | 555.44–276.06 | 40.34–32.84 | 16.68–10.65 | 0.41–0.32 | 9.94–7.63 | [74] |
5. | Sr2MnxCo2–xTbyFe12O22(x = 0–1, y = 0–0.1) | - | 77.11–16.95 | - | 0.41–0.65 | 15.27–3.68 | [87] |
6. | Sr2Ni2Fe12O22 | 945–207 | 49.4–52.6 | 23.9–15.6 | 0.48–0.30 | - | [93] |
7. | Ba2Co2Fe12O22Ba2CoCrFe12O22Ba2Co2Fe11GaO22Ba2CoMgFe11GaO22 | 123238881 | 33.937.534.926.6 | 7.901.586.885.81 | 0.230.040.200.21 | - | [79] |
8. | Sr2Ni2Alx/2Crx/2Fe12–xO22(x = 0.0–3.0) | 840–1160 | 39.61–30.11 | 17.51–14.62 | 0.44–0.49 | - | [81] |
9. | Sr2Nix/2Co2–xMgx/2Fe12O22 (x = 0–0.6) | 1140–250 | 30–50.06 | 13.30–10.62 | 0.44–0.21 | - | [94] |
10. | Ba2Co1–xZnxFe12O22(x = 0.0–2.0) | 255–45 | 31.1–35.2 | 14.3–5.0 | 0.46–0.14 | - | [95] |
11. | Sr2Co2MnxPrxFe12–xO22(x = 0.0–0.1) | 549–1630 | 51.42–18.12 | 13.5–8 | 0.26–0.44 | - | [84] |
f | Ni | µ | tan δm | ɛ | tan δe | N(Re√μ∗ɛ*) | A(√μ′/ε′) | B (tanδm + tanδe) | C (A/B) |
500 MHz | 0 | 2.1 | 0.02 | 16.2 | 0.25 | 5.9 | 0.36 | 0.27 | 1.34 |
0.5 | 2.5 | 0.08 | 17.8 | 0.31 | 6.6 | 0.37 | 0.38 | 0.97 | |
1.0 | 2.7 | 0.13 | 26.1 | 0.40 | 8.4 | 0.32 | 0.53 | 0.60 | |
1.5 | 3.2 | 0.18 | 26.6 | 0.42 | 9.3 | 0.35 | 0.59 | 0.58 | |
2.0 | 5.4 | 0.36 | 30.0 | 0.45 | 12.7 | 0.42 | 0.81 | 0.52 | |
1 GHz | 0.5 | 2.3 | 0.19 | 15.9 | 0.27 | 6.1 | 0.38 | 0.46 | 0.83 |
1.0 | 2.5 | 0.27 | 22.1 | 0.38 | 7.4 | 0.33 | 0.64 | 0.52 | |
1.5 | 2.7 | 0.39 | 22.6 | 0.38 | 7.8 | 0.35 | 0.77 | 0.45 | |
2.0 | 3.7 | 0.82 | 24.9 | 0.43 | 9.7 | 0.39 | 1.24 | 0.31 |