Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article Special Issues

Safeguarding nurses' mental health: The critical role of psychosocial safety climate in mitigating relational stressors and exhaustion

  • Received: 12 April 2024 Revised: 09 June 2024 Accepted: 01 July 2024 Published: 16 July 2024
  • Burnout among nurses is a pervasive concern in healthcare, with profound implications for patient care and nurse well-being. While research has highlighted the detrimental effects of burnout on many aspects of nursing, including patient safety and quality of care, the underlying mechanisms driving burnout warrant further investigation. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed 196 nurses from diverse Italian hospitals using an online questionnaire via Qualtrics. Our findings revealed significant negative correlations between psychological safety climate and both relational stressors and emotional exhaustion. Conversely, relational stressors positively correlated with emotional exhaustion, and a significant negative indirect effect of psychological safety climate was found for emotional exhaustion through relational stressors, emphasizing the pivotal role of psychological safety climate in mitigating nurse burnout. Our study underscores the potential effectiveness of interventions targeting psychological safety climate and relational stressors in alleviating emotional exhaustion and burnout among nurses. Theoretical implications underscore the importance of deepening the role of psychological safety climate in mitigating emotional exhaustion, while practical implications emphasize the need for fostering a positive psychological safety climate and implementing targeted interventions to support nurses' well-being.

    Citation: Teresa Galanti, Michela Cortini, Giuseppe Filippo Giudice, Salvatore Zappalà, Ferdinando Toscano. Safeguarding nurses' mental health: The critical role of psychosocial safety climate in mitigating relational stressors and exhaustion[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 905-917. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024046

    Related Papers:

    [1] Khadim Ndiaye, Stéphane Ginestet, Martin Cyr . Thermal energy storage based on cementitious materials: A review. AIMS Energy, 2018, 6(1): 97-120. doi: 10.3934/energy.2018.1.97
    [2] D.M. Reddy Prasad, R. Senthilkumar, Govindarajan Lakshmanarao, Saravanakumar Krishnan, B.S. Naveen Prasad . A critical review on thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar applications. AIMS Energy, 2019, 7(4): 507-526. doi: 10.3934/energy.2019.4.507
    [3] Jialin Song, Haoyi Zhang, Yanming Zhang, Zhongjiao Ma, Mingfei He . Research progress on industrial waste heat recycling and seasonal energy storage. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(1): 147-187. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025006
    [4] Surender Reddy Salkuti . Sustainable energy technologies for emerging renewable energy and electric vehicles. AIMS Energy, 2024, 12(6): 1264-1270. doi: 10.3934/energy.2024057
    [5] Eugene Freeman, Davide Occello, Frank Barnes . Energy storage for electrical systems in the USA. AIMS Energy, 2016, 4(6): 856-875. doi: 10.3934/energy.2016.6.856
    [6] Solomon A. A., Michel Child, Upeksha Caldera, Christian Breyer . Exploiting wind-solar resource complementarity to reduce energy storage need. AIMS Energy, 2020, 8(5): 749-770. doi: 10.3934/energy.2020.5.749
    [7] Khuthadzo Kgopana, Olawale Popoola . Improved utilization of hybrid energy for low-income houses based on energy consumption pattern. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(1): 79-109. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023005
    [8] Thomas Wetzel, Julio Pacio, Luca Marocco, Alfons Weisenburger, Annette Heinzel, Wolfgang Hering, Carsten Schroer, Georg Muller, Jurgen Konys, Robert Stieglitz, Joachim Fuchs, Joachim Knebel, Concetta Fazio, Markus Daubner, Frank Fellmoser . Liquid metal technology for concentrated solar power systems: Contributions by the German research program. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(1): 89-98. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.1.89
    [9] María P. Pablo-Romero, Antonio Sánchez-Braza, Manuel González-Pablo Romero . Renewable energy in Latin America. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(4): 695-717. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022033
    [10] Mingfei He, Akbar Halimov, Mingting Wu, Huanhuan Wang, Jingyun Li, Lijiao Gong, Lixin Zhang, Cong Wang . Insulated top cover of a large-scale water pit for heat storage: A structure, materials, and performance review. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(3): 756-780. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025027
  • Burnout among nurses is a pervasive concern in healthcare, with profound implications for patient care and nurse well-being. While research has highlighted the detrimental effects of burnout on many aspects of nursing, including patient safety and quality of care, the underlying mechanisms driving burnout warrant further investigation. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed 196 nurses from diverse Italian hospitals using an online questionnaire via Qualtrics. Our findings revealed significant negative correlations between psychological safety climate and both relational stressors and emotional exhaustion. Conversely, relational stressors positively correlated with emotional exhaustion, and a significant negative indirect effect of psychological safety climate was found for emotional exhaustion through relational stressors, emphasizing the pivotal role of psychological safety climate in mitigating nurse burnout. Our study underscores the potential effectiveness of interventions targeting psychological safety climate and relational stressors in alleviating emotional exhaustion and burnout among nurses. Theoretical implications underscore the importance of deepening the role of psychological safety climate in mitigating emotional exhaustion, while practical implications emphasize the need for fostering a positive psychological safety climate and implementing targeted interventions to support nurses' well-being.



    1. Introduction

    A publication of Goldstein [1] marks the beginning of the renewed interest in salt hydrates, i.e. salts that contain a definite number of water molecules in the crystal lattice. Besides water, salts can also include solvents like ammonia, i.e., the so called ammoniates, and methanol, i.e., methanol solvates. The general equation for gas-solid equilibrium reactions will look like [2]:

    MXnL(s)MXmL(s)+(nm)L(g). (1)

    where MXnL(s) is a solid salt complex formed from a salt MX(m)L(s) and (nm) mol solvent, which is present as vapor. The amount of L inside product MX is called the loading of the salt. The decomposition reaction of MXnL is endothermic, i.e. it consumes energy (-ΔrHmn), whereas in the exothermic formation reaction of MXnL energy (ΔrHmn) is produced. Hence, this system is ideal for storing heat loss-free: an ideal "heat battery". The operational parameters for this equilibrium reaction are the vapor pressure of solvate L and the stored chemical energy inside the salt complex. By applying a high vapor pressure complexes with a higher loading of solvate will be formed and heat is generated. In contrast, upon applying energy to the salt complex by increasing the temperature, the salt complex will decompose.

    The possibility to control the heat release and storage just by two parameters, i.e., temperature and vapor pressure, makes gas-solid reactions a promising system for heat storage applications. For a particular heat storage system in the build environment, the solvent should be selected based on the vapor pressure at the desired working conditions. This vapor pressure is preferably around 0.1--10 MPa at the temperature range where the system is operational. A high vapor pressure increases the rate of reaction of the solvent with the ammoniates [6], but in general at high vapor pressures additional safety precautions are needed. Three main solvents [2,7] can be identified as options for heat storage by thermochemical reactions: water, ammonia and methanol. Each solvent has a specific set of working conditions, as decomposition temperature and solvent pressure, in combination with a certain type of salt. Also the toxicity and explosive limits have to be taken into account in choosing a salt and a solvent for a certain application. In Table 1 the main characteristics of the pure solvents are given. It shows that by increasing the working pressure respectively ammonia, methanol and water have to be selected.

    Table 1. The main characteristics of three solvents for heat storage in solvent complexes [3,4,5].
    Solvent NH3 CH3OH H2O
    Vapor pressure at 300 K (MPa) 1.2 0.05 0.012
    Boiling temperature (K) 240 337 373
    Melting temperature (K) 196 176 273.2
    Flammability (%) 15-25 6-36 -
    Toxicity (ppm) (US PEL) 50 200 -
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Advantages of heat storage based on a solid-gas reaction (Thermochemical materials TCM's) are the relatively high energy density of 0.5--2 GJ/m3, storage without loss of heat and relatively low costs of storage materials [8]. The current application of the TCM is foreseen on heat storage for domestic environment. By using materials like ammonia and methanol, heat storage is probably decentralized stored at district level, as the safety regulation with ammonia and methanol are strict. In case the reaction is with water, the heat storage system can be stored in houses. The high energy density and no loss of heat during storage period make this system favorable above a more simplified system like sensible heat storage.

    In general, salts in combination with water are well described and information about crystal structures, thermochemical characteristics and densities can be found in extensive compilations of chemical data like the Gmelin ([9]). In contrast, salt complexes in combination with methanol and ammonia are rarely mentioned in literature. Indeed, about methanol complexes literature is hardly available [7]. Ammonia salt complexes have been well studied in the past.

    In this paper our goal is to summarize this large set of thermodynamic data of salt complexes with ammonia to be able to identify the most suitable ammoniates for a heat storage system in domestic environment. In the first section, we will give a flavor of the large history in ammonia research and an overview of the ammoniates. The next section we will summarize the observations and these will be discussed afterwards.


    2. Ammoniates

    In the second half of the 19th century, the first articles were published about the dissociation pressures of ammoniates at constant temperature. The first articles published dealt with chloride complexes [10,11]. After the development of the heat theorem of Nernst [12], as first published in 1906, more research was performed on ammoniates. In this research the focus was mainly on the decomposition schemes of the ammoniates by varying the ammonia partial pressure at constant temperature [13,14,15,16].

    The most detailed investigations were done by two research groups in the beginning of the 20th century. These two groups studied a large number of salt complexes, using similar procedures as mentioned above. Firstly, they grew highly loaded ammoniates, which were decomposed by changing the ammonia pressure at constant temperature. Examples of the isotherms are given in Figure 1, showing the decomposition of MgI26NH3 at two temperatures, i.e. 488 K and 503 K. As can be seen, in case the system is equilibrated at a higher temperature, the decomposition starts at a higher vapor pressure. After recording these curves, ΔrH0 was calculated. This is called the enthalpy of reaction, which is defined by the energy necessary to decompose an ammoniakate into a lower ammoniated salt and ammonia (MXnNH3(s) + ΔrH0mn MXmNH3(s)(s) + (nm)NH3(g)). The basic thermodynamic equation for the equilibrium between a condensed phase (solid or liquid) and the vapor phase of a pure substance, under conditions of low pressure, is used for this [18]:

    lnpp0=ΔH0mnRTΔS0mnR, (2)

    where p is the decomposition vapor pressure in Pa, p0 is the reference vapor pressure of 105 Pa, ΔrH0mn is the standard enthalpy of a salt in J/mol, T is the temperature in Kelvin. For the reaction of MgI26NH3 into MgI22NH3 the ΔrH0mn = (74±3)101 kJ/mol ΔrH0 at a vapor pressure of 0.9 MPa and a temperature of 613 K [17].

    Figure 1. The dissociation pressure curve of MgI2•6NH3 at two different temperatures (488 and 503K, respectively) [17].

    This equation allows to calculate with know decomposition temperatures and pressures the corresponding enthalpy and entropy of reaction ΔrH0mn of a salt.


    2.1. Literature of ammoniates

    We can group the literature about ammoniates:

    General literature: [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28].

    Halogenides: Cl[20,15,29,10,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,11,27,1,37,38,39,40,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,17,50,51,52,13,2,16,53,54,55,56,57,58], Br[20,33,29,32,35,36,27,37,38,59,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,17,50,51,52,14,54,55,57,60,58], I [20,33,29,34,32,35,36,27,37,59,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,17,50,51,52,54,55,57,58] and F [61,14].

    Alkali metals: Li [49,20,13,16,57,27]; Na[49,20,27,34]; K [49,20,34]; Rb [49,20,34] and Cs [49,20].

    Alkaline earth metals: [20,50,51,62,30]; Mg [20,17,50,54]; Ca [20,63,2,1,27,35,10,31]; Sr [20,63,50,64,33] and Ba [20,63,50,1,27,36].

    Transition metals (3d): Cr [38,37,15]; Mn [20,45,50,54,62,39,27]; Fe [20,45,50,54,62,39,37,27]; Co [20,45,50,14,54,62,39,59]; Ni [20,47,50,54,55,62,40,39,59,27]; Cu[20,50,54,57,58,62,43,40,64,27,65,29] and Zn [20,54,44,62,42,40,39,64,10].

    Other metals: Pt [37]; Ag [20,52,56,62,64,11,10]; Au [46,60]; Cd [50,54,62,40,64]; Hg[50,61,62]; Al [53,37,32]; In [32]; Tl [20,37,29]; Sb [61]; Sn [20,48,62] and Pb [20].

    Sulphates [62,43,42,59,37,65];

    • NiXO4 (X=S; Se; Cr; W or Mo) [66];

    Double salts [48,60,67,65]


    2.2. Thermodynamic overview of ammoniates

    The pT data from the literature gives the possibility to determine the enthalpy of reaction of various ammoniates, (ΔrH+=ΔrH0(mn)), as a function of the decomposition temperature, T, which is plotted in Figures 2. As can be seen for various loadings of the ammoniates an approximately linear relationship between enthalpy of reaction and dissociation temperature is found for each specific loading and charge combination. Also, a higher loading corresponds to a higher enthalpy of reaction and a lower dissociation temperature. In this graph some reactions have a reaction temperature below the 294 K, the equilibrium temperature of NH3 at 0.9 MPa. These reactions seems unrealistic and will be indicated as such in Appendix 1.

    Figure 2. The dissociation temperatures against the calculated enthalpy of reaction (ΔrH+) for different loadings with NH3 equilibrated at an ammonia pressure of 0.9 MPa. The symbols of the data points are ordered by the number of moles of ammonia per mole salt and the released number of moles of ammonia in the reaction. The lines are first order guides to the eyes.

    2.2.1. Selection of salts

    Selection of the most suitable salt complex for heat storage from the point of view of energy density, is based on the amount of heat that is stored in the system by removing one ammonia molecule from the salt crystal. In Figure 3, we plotted the enthalpy of reaction stored in a complex divided by the amount of ammonia molecules from a structure ΔrH0) plotted against the decomposition temperature for the ammonia pressures at 0.9 MPa (equal to an equilibrium vapor pressure of ammonia at 294 K). The symbols of the data points refer to specific loading and release of ammonia during the reaction. As can be seen a linear trend exists at constant pressure. In the inset, the average enthalpy of reaction is plotted for the four groups, indicating that the alkali metals have the lowest energy stored per added mole ammonia and the transition metals (3d) have the highest amount of energy stored per added mole ammonia. As the difference in average enthalpy of reaction between the metals is smaller than the error bars, no conclusions can be drawn.

    Figure 3. The dissociation temperature of a complex plotted against the enthalpy of reaction stored in a complex divided by the number of ammonia molecules. The ammonia pressure is 0.9 MPa. In the inset the average enthalpy of reaction of the four different groups are plotted, whereby only complexes with maximum loading of 6 are used in this average. The labels correspond to the number of complexes in the data set.

    In Figure 4, the enthalpy of reaction stored in a complex divided by the number of ammonia molecules is plotted against the number of moles ammonia in a complex. The pressure used for this graph is 0.9 MPa. The averaged ΔrH0 decreases from 70 kJ/mol (mono ammoniate) to 30 kJ/mol (octa ammoniate). It is harder to release the last ammonia molecule of a complex than to release one ammonia molecule at higher loadings. We can understand this by the fact that, relatively, the crystal structure is changing more in case of smaller loadings. At the higher loadings (above six NH3 molecules per mole salt) the enthalpy of reaction falls down to almost the level of the enthalpy of reactions of decomposition of ammonia. In general, from the point of view of heat storage, therefore, it will be of interest to select a complex, which totally decomposes at the applied temperature and pressure, with a maximum loading of six ammonia molecules per complex, based on Figure 4.

    Figure 4. The enthalpy of reaction stored in a complex divided by the number of ammonia molecules plotted against the number of moles ammonia in a complex. The ammonia pressure is 0.9 MPa. The enthalpy of reaction is the average of all groups and the error bar is the standard deviation. The labels correspond to the number of complexes in the data set. The dashed line indicates the heat of sublimation of an ammonia molecule.

    2.3. Discussion

    The operation conditions are a first criteria for selection an ammoniate as TCM. For example in the case of a heating system in houses, the turnover temperature should be between 343 K and 393 K for sufficient charging power with help of solar collectors [68]. In addition, secondly the amount of ammonia per mol salt refines the selection. With a larger loading number, less salt is needed to store all heat, but as already mentioned, a loading above six is not favorable. The final selection criteria is the amount of ammonia, which is lost at the applied temperature. Moreover, thirdly, the equilibrium ammonia pressure of the reaction at temperature of 343--393 K should be in the order of 0.6--1 MPa, what are the equilibrium vapor pressures of ammonia between 283--298 K. This is necessary as the TCM is connected with a storage vessel of ammonia. In case the equilibrium pressure of ammonia of the storage vessel is higher than of the equilibrium pressure of the reaction, the salt will not deammoniate. Or the other way around, in case the equilibrium pressure of the storage vessel is lower that the equilibrium pressure of the reaction, the salt will not ammoniate. As the storage vessel can be kept at a temperature of 283 K in the winter and 298 K in the summer the working pressures are chosen between 0.6--1 MPa.

    As in the literature not all decomposition reactions are fully given, only the enthalpy per released mole NH3 is plotted against the equilibrium temperature between 330--410 K in figure 5. As can be seen a large range of materials fits the demands. As currently not sufficient data is available a single choice of material can not be made. Based on prices of the future heat storage systems, materials like silver, copper, cesium and lithium are not considered. Based on this data sheet, the most common materials are indicated with a solid sphere (MgCl26NH3, CaCl28-4NH3, and ZnCl26NH3). In further research other material properties like melting points, densities, deliquescence points and costs should be considered as well. These parameters should be considered before a heat storage system for domestic households based on ammoniates can be designed.

    Figure 5. The enthalpy of reaction stored in a complex divided by the number of ammonia molecules plotted against the equilibrium temperature of the complex. The ammonia pressure is 0.9 MPa. The temperature is limited between 330-410 K.

    2.4. Concluding remarks

    We analyzed a large set of thermodynamic data of ammoniates. For various loadings of ammoniates, the dissociation temperature shows an approximate linear relationship with the enthalpy of reaction. Indeed, by dividing the enthalpy of reaction by the loading, all data points fall on one master curve, which can be divided by the periodic groups. Lower loadings have a large heat storage capacity per molecule of complex, implying that complexes with loading of six or lower are more favorable for heat storage application. With the help of this data set, appropriate ammoniates can be selected as heat storage material for a given temperature and ammonia partial pressure. In the future, before heat storage in domestic environment is feasible, additional research should be performed on melting temperature of certain complexes, deliquescence of the complex, density of the complexes and combined transitions.


    2.5. Appendix 1

    Salt is the basic salt in the reaction; Initial is the highest loading in the reaction; Final the lowest loading in the reaction; ΔH0 is the enthalpy of the reaction; ΔS the entropy of the reaction; Tp=9bar is the maximum ammoniation temperature by 9 bar ammonia vapor pressure. The used type of thermodynamic data and source is given in column pT/H and in case of pT data is used the minimum and maximum temperature of the used pT data is given in columns Tmin and Tmax and the number of data points used in the next column. If the final loading is unknown, this is indicated with a question mark(?). In case doubts about the reliability of the data is raised, they are indicated with an asterisk .

    Appendix 1.
    Salt
    Salt
    Initial
    loading
    (n)
    Final
    loading
    (m)
    H0
    (kJ/mol)
    S
    (J/(mol·K))
    Tp=0.9MPa
    (K)
    pT/H Tmin(K) Tmax(K) Data points Ref
    AgBr 3 1.5 -36.5 132 322 pT 250 276.5 5 [52]
    AgBr 1.5 1 -45.1 146 352 pT 273 307 11 [52]
    AgBr 1 0 -45.9 142 372 pT 273 324.5 6 [52]
    AgBrO3 3 ? -33.9 124 322 pT 252 274.5 4 [56]
    AgCl 3 1.5 -38.2 131 339 pT 248 290.8 11 [56,52]
    AgCl 1.5 1 -46.4 145 365 pT 273 305.8 6 [52]
    AgCl 1 0 -46.1 136 391 pT 273 336 7 [52]
    AgClO3 3 ? -74.6 226 360 pT 284 324.5 3 [56]
    AgClO4 3 ? -37.2 105 427 pT 282 352 7 [56]
    AgI 3 2 -24.5 100 302 pT 194 314.5 4 [52]
    AgI∗ 2 1.5 -28.9 117 292 pT 194 215.7 2 [52]
    AgI 1.5 1 -27.0 105 310 pT 215.7 253 4 [52]
    AgI 1 0.5 -38.8 140 317 pT 241 276.5 5 [52]
    AgI 0.5 0 -60.8 181 375 pT 292 316.5 3 [52]
    AgMnO4 3 ? -36.6 128 334 pT 252 285 5 [56]
    AgNO2 3 ? -33.1 96 426 pT 253 341 8 [56]
    AgNO3 3 ? -40.0 119 396 pT 273 336 8 [56]
    AlBr3 6 ? -48.9 96 627 pT 421 502 5 [37]
    AlCl3 6 ? -50.0 123 476 pT 320 401 5 [37]
    AlI3 6 ? -45.9 130 413 pT 292.5 353.5 3 [37]
    AuBr 6 4 -34.0 132 298 pT 203 233 6 [46]
    AuBr 4 3 -34.9 136 297 pT 194.5 233 8 [46]
    AuBr 3 2 -35.7 138 298 pT 194.5 233 8 [46]
    AuBr 2 1 -57.1 159 405 pT 307 338 5 [46]
    AuCl 6 2 -33.4 138 278 pT 194.5 233 7 [46]
    AuCl 2 1 -62.9 161 440 pT 307 372.5 7 [46]
    AuI∗ 6 3 -34.7 136 293 pT 194.5 228 7 [46]
    AuI 3 2 -38.3 138 321 pT 213 263 10 [46]
    AuI 2 1 -38.0 134 329 pT 213 273 9 [46]
    BaBr2 8 4 -43.0 138 358 H [20]
    BaBr2 4 2 -43.9 139 363 H [20]
    BaBr2 2 1 -45.6 138 382 H [20]
    BaBr2 1 0 -50.7 132 445 H [20]
    BaCl2 8 ? -38.7 135 330 H [20]
    BaI2 10 9 -33.1 132 292 H [20]
    BaI2 9 8 -43.0 143 345 H [20]
    BaI2 8 6 -46.0 140 379 H [20]
    BaI2 6 4 -47.7 140 392 H [20]
    BaI2 4 2 -48.6 139 403 H [20]
    BaI2 2 0 -57.6 144 460 H [20]
    BeBr2 10 6 -13.5 41 586 pT 194.5 268 5 [51]
    BeBr2 6 4 -39.2 144 312 pT 228 243 4 [51]
    BeCl2 12 6 -34.6 142 279 pT 194.5 228 5 [51]
    BeCl2 6 4 -35.1 140 289 pT 213 238 6 [51]
    BeCl2 4 2 -75.6 136 643 pT 383.7 428.8 3 [51]
    BeI2 13 6 -33.1 132 291 pT 194.5 208 3 [51]
    BeI2 6 4 -36.7 131 325 pT 223 243 3 [51]
    CaBr2 8 6 -42.1 99 525 H [20]
    CaBr2 6 2 -50.3 139 417 H [20]
    CaBr2 2 1 -73.5 147 572 H [20]
    CaBr2 1 0 -80.0 148 618 H [20]
    CaCl2 8 4 -42.1 139 350 H [20]
    CaCl2 4 2 -43.4 138 362 H [20]
    CaCl2 2 1 -64.9 146 509 H [20]
    CaCl2 1 0 -70.9 143 571 H [20]
    CaI2 8 6 -37.0 138 309 H [20]
    CaI2 6 2 -60.2 139 497 H [20]
    CaI2 2 1 -81.7 148 629 H [20]
    CaI2 1 0 -83.8 148 647 H [20]
    Cd(ClO3 )2 6 4 -44.7 113 474 pT 342 395 6 [40]
    Cd(ClO3 )2 4 ? -71.7 168 478 pT 389.5 409 3 [40]
    Cd(IO3 )2 4 ? -37.6 97 476 pT 364 383 3 [40]
    CdBr2 6 ? -48.3 135 412 pT 318 357.3 8 [54]
    CdCl2 6 -44.0 132 386 pT 306.5 330.5 2 [54]
    CdI2 6 ? -51.0 134 441 pT 339 381.5 8 [54]
    Salt
    Salt
    Initial
    loading
    (n)
    Final
    loading
    (m)
    H0
    (kJ/mol)
    S
    (J/(mol·K))
    Tp=0.9MPa
    (K)
    pT/H Tmin(K) Tmax(K) Data points Ref
    Co(H2 PO2 )2 6 ? -46.9 145 371 pT 293 324 6 [59]
    Co(HCO2 )2 6 4 -35.1 119 350 pT 258 294.5 7 [59]
    Co(HCO2 )2 4 ? -44.7 122 432 pT 297 365 7 [59]
    Co(NO3 )2 6 ? -29.5 65 631 pT 294 433 8 [59]
    CoBr2 6 2 -52.2 116 536 pT 409.8 448.5 3 [24]
    CoBr2 2 1 -83.8 135 718 pT 425 454.8 3 [24]
    CoBr2 1 0 -91.0 144 723 pT 434.4 481.4 4 [24]
    CoC4 H6 Ø4 6 ? -34.2 107 384 pT 273 319 9 [59]
    CoCl2 10 6 -30.3 127 277 pT 194.5 218 5 [24]
    CoCl2 6 2 -60.1 147 468 pT 380.5 410 3 [45]
    CoCl2 2 1 -29.0 39 1390 pT 503 509 3 [24]
    CoCl2 1 0 -96.0 153 713 pT 481 503 3 [24]
    CoF2 ·H2 O 5 1 -44.2 136 376 pT 262 299 5 [61]
    CoF2 ·H2 O 1 0 -53.2 140 437 pT 307 334.5 3 [61]
    CoI2 6 2 -63.2 136 538 H [24]
    CoI2 2 1 -146.2 287 544 pT 409.5 426.5 2 [24]
    CoS2 O6 5 ? -51.7 120 509 pT 373.5 430.5 8 [59]
    Cr[NH3]6 Br 6 ? -89.8 184 541 pT 439 450 2 [37]
    Cr[NH3]6 I 6 ? -51.3 117 518 pT 345.5 415 3 [37]
    Cr[NH3]6 NO3 Br2 6 ? -75.2 163 519 pT 411.7 459 4 [37]
    Cr[NH3]6 SO4 6 ? -31.3 68 624 pT 343 444.5 5 [37]
    CrCl3 6 3 -33.0 104 384 pT 273 316.5 6 [37]
    CrCl3 3 ? -53.7 145 424 pT 317 368 6 [37]
    Cu(ClO3 )2 6 ? -16.3 52 485 pT 258 304 5 [40]
    Cu(ClO4 )2 6 ? -31.3 88 447 pT 293 356 9 [43]
    Cu(HCOO)2 4 ? -37.9 109 417 pT 260 335 11 [43]
    Cu(IO3 )2 5 4 -46.6 130 419 pT 323.5 357.5 5 [40]
    Cu(NO3 )2 4 ? -64.9 136 552 pT 416 448.5 4 [43]
    Cu(NO3 )2 6 4 -35.1 128 321 pT 255 286 7 [43]
    Cu(SCN)2 6 4 -19.5 75 345 pT 254 261 3 [43]
    Cu(SCN)2 4 ? -56.6 148 436 pT 290.5 383 10 [43]
    CuBr 3 1.5 -38.5 119 382 pT 285 322 7 [57,17]
    CuBr 1.5 1 -58.9 157 426 pT 306 371 4 [17]
    CuBr 1 0 -71.3 177 448 pT 317 349.8 3 [17]
    CuC2 O4 5 ? -64.1 206 341 pT 254 311 8 [43]
    CuC7 H5 O7 5 4 -31.6 117 320 pT 257 270.5 4 [43]
    CuCl 1.5 1 -56.6 157 409 pT 305.7 349.3 3 [29]
    CuCl 1 0 -74.7 161 522 pT 305.7 349.3 3 [29]
    CuCl 6 3 -43.3 114 452 pT 346 378 4 [54]
    CuCl 3 1.5 -39.4 123 375 pT 288 320 7 [57]
    CuI 3 2 -43.8 136 372 pT 263 322 7 [57,17]
    CuI 2 1 -50.2 151 378 pT 281 317 4 [17]
    CuI 1 0.5 -59.7 144 476 pT 349.6 382 3 [17]
    CuI 0.5 0 -69.5 161 486 pT 371 409 3 [17]
    CuS2 O6 5 4 -34.0 114 354 pT 253 299 9 [43]
    CuS2 O6 4 ? -20.3 23 3991 pT 385 457 4 [43]
    CuS4 O6 4 ? -57.0 154 420 pT 293.5 366 6 [43]
    FeBr 6 2 -57.4 136 485 H [20]
    FeBr 2 1 -85.4 140 699 pT 488 550 3 [24]
    FeBr 1 0 -86.7 137 733 pT 488 550 3 [24]
    FeBr3 6 ? -32.9 101 398 pT 273 326 6 [37]
    FeCl2 10 6 -31.0 130 278 pT 194.5 218 5 [45]
    FeCl2 6 2 -49.7 128 455 pT 344 387 5 [54,24]
    FeCl2 2 1 -74.6 133 650 pT 503 550 2 [24]
    FeCl2 1 0 -79.6 123 761 pT 487.5 550 3 [24]
    FeCl3 6 ? -36.8 107 416 pT 300.5 343.5 6 [37]
    FeF2 ·H2 O 5 1 -42.3 139 351 pT 252 273 3 [61]
    FeF2 ·H2 O 1 0 -53.2 142 430 pT 298 334 4 [61]
    FeI2 6 2 -62.3 136 530 H [20]
    FeI2 2 0 -94.2 153 701 pT 488 551 3 [24]
    FeSO4 12 ? -43.4 140 358 pT 273 310 7 [37]
    InBr3 15 ? -38.7 153 287 pT 194.5 231.4 4 [69]
    InCl3 15 7 -36.9 146 289 pT 194.5 235.2 5 [69]
    InI3 21 13 -36.3 149 278 pT 194.5 223.4 4 [69]
    InI3 13 9 -36.0 142 290 pT 215.5 233.5 3 [69]
    InI3 9 ? -56.6 207 300 pT 244.5 253.1 3 [69]
    KBr∗ 4 ? -29.6 125 278 pT 194.5 213 3 [49]
    KI 6 4 -27.2 107 306 pT 194.5 203 2 [49]
    KI 4 ? -29.5 113 311 pT 194.5 218 5 [49]
    LiBr∗ 6.5 5 -27.5 116 282 pT 194.5 213 2 [49]
    LiBr 5 1 -36.0 139 298 pT 213 253 4 [49]
    LiBr 5 4 -34.6 112 370 H [20]
    LiBr 4 3 -43.9 133 383 H [20]
    LiBr 3 2 -47.7 139 395 H [20]
    LiBr 2 1 -50.7 141 413 H [20]
    LiBr 1 0 -58.5 139 484 H [20]
    LiBr 1 ? -57.1 136 487 pT 334 384 5 [49]
    LiCl∗ 5 4 -38.5 151 290 pT 214.5 228 3 [49]
    LiCl 4 3 -37.8 133 330 H [20]
    Salt
    Salt
    Initial
    loading
    (n)
    Final
    loading
    (m)
    H0
    (kJ/mol)
    S
    (J/(mol·K))
    Tp=0.9MPa
    (K)
    pT/H Tmin(K) Tmax(K) Data points Ref
    LiCl 3 2 -46.0 138 383 H [20]
    LiCl 2 1 -49.4 139 409 H [20]
    LiCl 1 0 -53.3 139 443 H [20]
    LiI∗ 7 5.5 -30.4 129 274 pT 194.5 213 3 [49]
    LiI∗ 5.5 5 -29.0 121 283 pT 194.5 213 3 [49]
    LiI 5 4 -36.6 141 297 pT 203 253 5 [49]
    LiI 4 3 -54.7 149 419 pT 288 363.5 12 [49,57]
    LiI 3 2 -53.1 141 433 pT 291 337.8 5 [49]
    LiI 2 1 -54.5 126 508 pT 337.8 373 5 [49]
    LiI 1 0 -66.7 135 573 pT 388 408 3 [49]
    MgBr2 2 1 -81.9 129 736 pT 488 573 4 [17]
    MgBr2 1 0 -84.9 123 811 pT 503 573 3 [17]
    MgCl2 2 1 -93.8 174 604 pT 458 502 3 [17]
    MgCl2 1 0 -93.7 146 732 pT 502 572 3 [17]
    MgCl2 6 2 -44.0 144 349 pT 283 303.5 4 [54]
    MgI2 6 2 -74.0 136 825 H [20]
    MgI2 2 0 -56.6 57 1450 pT 488 503 2 [17]
    MnBr2 10 6 -30.8 131 274 pT 194.5 218 5 [45]
    MnBr2 2 1 -78.3 139 650 pT 455 503 3 [24]
    MnBr2 1 0 -78.6 127 724 pT 488 551 3 [24]
    MnBr2 6 2 -54.5 137 460 H [24]
    MnCl2 12 10 -29.8 126 276 pT 194.5 208 2 [45]
    MnCl2 10 6 -30.3 126 282 pT 194.5 223 5 [45]
    MnCl2 6 2 -41.1 113 435 pT 332 362 7 [24,54]
    MnCl2 2 1 -71.4 137 601 pT 454 503 3 [24]
    MnCl2 1 0 -77.0 123 735 pT 488 551 3 [24]
    MnF2 ·H2 O 5 1 -40.5 136 344 pT 252 273 3 [61]
    MnF2 ·H2 O 1 ? -53.7 144 426 pT 298 334 4 [61]
    MnI2 2 0 -76.5 124 725 pT 481 488 2 [24]
    MnI2 6 2 -60.9 136 518 H [24]
    NaBr∗ 5.75 5.25 -26.0 108 289 pT 194.5 213 3 [49]
    NaBr 5.25 ? -38.5 143 309 pT 213 243 4 [49]
    NaCl∗ 5 ? -34.9 140 286 pT 194.5 249 4 [49]
    NaI∗ 6 4.5 -31.3 125 292 pT 194.5 218 6 [49]
    NaI 4.5 ? -39.0 127 358 pT 233 273 5 [49]
    Ni(C7 H5 O2 )2 8 6 -48.6 179 303 pT 257 271.5 6 [26]
    Ni(C7 H5 O2 )2 6 ? -10.7 31 829 pT 288 362 6 [26]
    Ni(ClO3 )2 6 ? -44.9 90 629 pT 399 432 3 [55]
    Ni(CNS)2 6 ? -48.7 136 413 pT 318 357 6 [55]
    Ni(H2 PO2 )2 6 ? -50.1 137 422 pT 313 368 5 [55]
    Ni(HCO2 )2 6 4 -35.7 116 366 pT 273 308 8 [55]
    Ni(HCO2 )2 4 ? -61.1 145 483 pT 333 413 5 [55]
    Ni(IO3 )2 5 ? -56.5 161 396 pT 326 352 4 [40]
    Ni(NO2 )2 5 ? -37.6 97 479 pT 320.5 388 9 [55]
    Ni(NO3 )2 6 ? -47.4 101 569 pT 388 464 13 [55]
    NiBr2 6 2 -66.4 144 530 pT 429 460 2 [54]
    NiBr2 2 1 -86.6 138 725 pT 491 629 22 [24]
    NiBr2 1 0 -86.2 136 734 pT 549 609 3 [24]
    NiC4 H6 O4 6 ? -38.2 125 358 pT 273 306 7 [59]
    NiCl2 6 2 -59.3 132 522 pT 403 448 5 [54,47]
    NiCl2 2 1 -100.1 172 651 pT 488 584 7 [47]
    NiCl2 1 0 -93.8 144 747 pT 538 646 7 [47]
    NiF2 ·H2 O 5 1 -45.1 120 442 pT 273 334.5 5 [61]
    NiF2 ·H2 O 1 ? -55.0 143 442 pT 307.5 334 3 [61]
    NiI2 6 2 -63.1 123 601 pT 447 491 3 [47]
    NiI2 2 0 -80.5 132 705 pT 452 595.5 12 [47]
    NiS2 O3 5 ? -55.9 134 482 pT 364.5 415 6 [55]
    NiS2 O6 6 ? -47.2 102 562 pT 389 455.5 7 [55]
    NiS4 O6 6 ? -52.8 130 472 pT 349 404.5 7 [55]
    PbCl2 8 3.25 -35.3 132 310 H [20]
    PbCl2 3.25 2 -40.4 139 336 H [20]
    PbCl2 2 1.5 -47.3 139 391 H [20]
    PbCl2 1.5 1 -48.6 141 396 H [20]
    PbCl2 1 0 -57.2 139 472 H [20]
    PbI2 8 5 -33.5 135 288 H [20]
    PbI2 5 2 -41.7 138 349 H [20]
    PbI2 2 1 -48.6 142 393 H [20]
    PbI2 1 0.5 -56.8 140 465 H [20]
    PbI2 0.5 0 -61.9 138 516 H [20]
    PBr2 8 5.5 -35.3 133 307 H [20]
    PBr2 5.5 3 -38.7 138 323 H [20]
    PBr2 3 2 -40.8 138 342 H [20]
    PBr2 2 1 -49.0 138 408 H [20]
    PBr2 1 0 -67.1 144 534 H [20]
    PtCl3 5 4 -24.2 77 410 pT 259 314.5 9 [37]
    PtI3 6 4 -40.5 150 307 pT 265 267.5 3 [37]
    PtI3 4 ? -59.0 133 514 pT 399 436 2 [37]
    RbBr 3 ? -22.4 89 315 pT 194.5 203 2 [49]
    RbI∗ 6 ? -33.6 139 279 pT 194.5 203 2 [49]
    Salt
    Salt
    Initial
    loading
    (n)
    Final
    loading
    (m)
    H0
    (kJ/mol)
    S
    (J/(mol·K))
    Tp=0.9MPa
    (K)
    pT/H Tmin(K) Tmax(K) Data points Ref
    SbF3 6 4 -31.7 129 286 pT 194.5 223 5 [61]
    SbF3 4 3 -31.9 127 292 pT 213 223 3 [61]
    SbF3 3 2 -38.8 130 348 pT 252 273 3 [61]
    SbF3 2 1 -59.6 163 412 pT 290 335 4 [61]
    SbF3 1 ? -59.7 140 489 pT 334.5 383 5 [61]
    SnBr2 9 5 -31.4 128 286 pT 194.5 233.3 3 [?]
    SnBr2 5 3 -52.4 175 334 pT 251.7 290.6 3 [?]
    SnBr2 3 2 -99.9 278 384 pT 328.9 337.6 3 [?]
    SnBr2 2 1 -62.2 150 474 pT 353 383.5 3 [?]
    SnBr2 1 0 -85.1 141 692 H [20]
    SnCl2 9 4 -36.5 149 280 pT 194.5 236.4 3 [?]
    SnCl2 4 ? -42.5 148 328 pT 237 283.6 3 [?]
    SnI2 10 5 -35.9 143 288 pT 194.5 227 3 [?]
    SnI2 5 3 -45.8 146 359 pT 250 289.5 3 [?]
    SnI2 3 2 -58.6 161 411 pT 307.8 353 3 [?]
    SnI2 2 1 -51.5 123 490 pT 334 370 3 [?]
    SnI2 1 0 -63.3 129 570 pT 370 412 3 [?]
    SrBr2 8 2 -46.9 138 392 H [20]
    SrBr2 2 1 -55.0 145 436 H [20]
    SrBr2 1 0 -72.2 156 526 H [20]
    SrCl2 8 1 -42.1 136 359 H [20]
    SrCl2 1 0 -49.4 158 354 H [20]
    SrI2 8 6 -47.3 139 393 H [20]
    SrI2 6 2 -54.2 139 449 H [20]
    SrI2 2 1 -66.6 147 518 H [20]
    SrI2 1 0 -78.7 148 606 H [20]
    Tl(SO4 )3 10 ? -38.6 104 453 pT 333 373 3 [37]
    TlBr 3 0 -24.4 101 296 pT 213 223 2 [17]
    TlCl∗ 3 0 -27.9 116 286 pT 194 223 3 [17]
    TlCl3 6 ? -36.9 97 469 pT 294.5 374 5 [37]
    TlI∗ 3 0 -29.0 121 282 pT 194 223 3 [17]
    Zn(ClO3 )2 6 ? -36.7 63 829 pT 387 450 4 [54]
    Zn(ClO3 )2 6 4 -27.5 96 354 pT 258 284 13 [40]
    Zn(ClO4 )2 4 ? -37.6 120 372 pT 265 315 9 [40]
    Zn(CNS)2 4 ? -57.7 158 414 pT 304 361 9 [42]
    Zn(CNS)2 6 4 -28.9 105 332 pT 252 273 3 [42]
    Zn(HCO2 )2 5 ? -44.6 138 374 pT 281 324 9 [42]
    Zn(IO3 )2 4 ? -46.4 109 513 pT 350 403 5 [40]
    Zn(NO2 )2 1 0 -29.1 68 583 pT 298 401 15 [42]
    Zn(NO3 )2 6 4 -12.5 36 722 pT 273 356 8 [42]
    Zn(NO3 )2 4 ? -54.5 110 593 pT 380 481 12 [42]
    ZnBr2 6 ? -47.2 140 389 pT 285 339.5 13 [54]
    ZnBr2 6 4 -47.4 138 394 H [20]
    ZnBr2 4 2 -58.3 139 483 H [20]
    ZnBr2 2 1 -85.6 138 715 H [20]
    ZnBr2 1 0 -103.2 135 881 H [20]
    ZnC2 H2 O4 5 ? -49.2 169 327 pT 256 288 9 [42]
    ZnC7 H6 O2 6 4 -35.3 130 317 pT 253 270 4 [42]
    ZnCH3 OOH 2 ? -98.2 232 459 pT 377 421 10 [42]
    ZnCl2 10 6 -30.4 127 279 H [20]
    ZnCl2 6 4 -46.0 139 382 H [20]
    ZnCl2 4 2 -50.8 139 423 H [20]
    ZnCl2 2 1 -82.6 138 689 H [20]
    ZnCl2 1 0 -107.5 136 913 H [20]
    ZnI2 6 ? -49.1 145 387 pT 284 340 20 [54,42]
    ZnI2 6 4 -46.9 138 390 H [20]
    ZnI2 4 2 -66.2 139 547 H [20]
    ZnI2 2 1 -83.4 138 697 H [20]
    ZnI2 1 0 -94.6 137 794 H [20]
    ZnS2 O3 5 3 -60.0 182 367 pT 288 332 6 [42]
    ZnS2 O3 3 ? -32.8 70 631 pT 337 445 10 [42]
    ZnS2 O6 5 ? -62.6 182 381 pT 297 342 8 [42]
    ZnS4 O6 5 3 -78.2 172 510 pT 382 450 6 [42]
    ZnS4 O6 3 ? -50.6 152 377 pT 275 333 12 [42]
    ZnSO3 3 ? -42.6 108 476 pT 325 387 7 [42]
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Acknowledgements

    This research was carried out under project number M75.7.11421 in the framework of the Research Program of the Materials innovation institute (M2i) (www.m2i.nl)


    Conflict of Interest

    All authors declare no conflict of interest in this paper.



    Acknowledgments



    This study has not been funded by any agency and was conducted by the authors independently.

    Author contributions



    Teresa Galanti, Michela Cortini, and Ferdinando Toscano designed and supervised the study; Giuseppe Filippo Giudice and Teresa Galanti collected the data; Ferdinando Toscano and Salvatore Zappalà carried out the statistical analyses; Ferdinando Toscano and Teresa Galanti drafted the manuscript; Ferdinando Toscano, Teresa Galanti, Michela Cortini, Salvatore Zappalà, and Giuseppe Filippo Giudice reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    Conflict of interest



    The authors state that there is no conflict of interest in this document.

    [1] Lele ECB, Ndongo JM, Ashu-akoh AV, et al. (2023) Burnout syndrome among healthcare professionals in the Fako division, Cameroon: Impact of physical activity and sleep quality. AIMS Public Health 10: 814-827. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023054
    [2] Toscano F, Tommasi F, Giusino D (2022) Burnout in intensive care nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review on its prevalence and risk and protective factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 12914. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912914
    [3] Ershad Sarabi R, Javanmard R, Mangolian Shahrbabaki P (2020) Study of burnout syndrome, job satisfaction and related factors among health care workers in rural areas of Southeastern Iran. AIMS Public Health 7: 158-168. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2020014
    [4] Edú-valsania S, Laguía A, Moriano JA (2022) Burnout: A review of theory and measurement. Int J Environ Res Public Health 19: 1780. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031780
    [5] Maslach C, Jackson SE (1981) The measurement of experienced burnout. J Organ Behav 2: 99-113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
    [6] Maslach C., Leiter M.P. (2016) George FinkBurnout. Stress Concepts, Cogn Emot Behav . New York: Academic Press 351-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800951-2.00044-3
    [7] Salanova M, Llorens S, García-Renedo M, et al. (2005) Toward a four-dimensional model of burnout: A multigroup factor-analytic study including depersonalization and cynicism. Educ Psychol Meas 65: 901-913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405275662
    [8] Te Brake H, Smits N, Wicherts JM, et al. (2008) Burnout development among dentists: A longitudinal study. Eur J Oral Sci 116: 545-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00584.x
    [9] Alarcon GM (2011) A meta-analysis of burnout with job demands, resources, and attitudes. J Vocat Behav 79: 549-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.03.007
    [10] Jun J, Ojemeni MM, Kalamani R, et al. (2021) Relationship between nurse burnout, patient and organizational outcomes: Systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 119: 103933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103933
    [11] Day G, Robert G, Rafferty AM (2020) Gratitude in health care: A meta-narrative review. Qual Health Res 30: 2303-2315. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320951145
    [12] Cortini M, Converso D, Galanti T, et al. (2019) Gratitude at work works! A mix-method study on different dimensions of gratitude, job satisfaction, and job performance. Sustain 11: 3902. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11143902
    [13] Lim MC, Jeffree MS, Saupin SS, et al. (2022) Workplace violence in healthcare settings: The risk factors, implications and collaborative preventive measures. Ann Med Surg 78: 103727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103727
    [14] Nashwan AJ, Mathew RG, Anil R, et al. (2023) The safety, health, and well-being of healthcare workers during COVID-19: A scoping review. AIMS Public Health 10: 593-609. https://doi.org/10.3934/publichealth.2023042
    [15] Lanza ML, Schmidt S, Mcmillan F, et al. (2011) Support our staff-a unique program to help deal with patient assault. erspect Psychiatr Care 47: 131-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6163.2010.00282.x
    [16] Kvas A, Seljak J (2014) Unreported workplace violence in nursing. Int Nurs Rev 61: 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/inr.12106
    [17] Van Bogaert P, Clarke S, Willems R, et al. (2013) Nurse practice environment, workload, burnout, job outcomes, and quality of care in psychiatric hospitals: A structural equation model approach. J Adv Nurs 69: 1515-1524. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12010
    [18] Diehl E, Rieger S, Letzel S, et al. (2021) The relationship between workload and burnout among nurses: The buffering role of personal, social and organisational resources. PLoS One 16: 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245798
    [19] Dall'ora C, Ejebu OZ, Ball J, et al. (2023) Shift work characteristics and burnout among nurses: Cross-sectional survey. Occup Med (Chic Ill) 73: 199-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqad046
    [20] Dollard MF, Tuckey MR, Dormann C (2012) Psychosocial safety climate moderates the job demand-resource interaction in predicting workgroup distress. Accid Anal Prev 45: 694-704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.042
    [21] Baltes BB, Zhdanova LS, Parker CP (2009) Psychological climate: A comparison of organizational and individual level referents. Hum Relations 62: 669-700. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709103454
    [22] Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP, Hofmann DA (2011) Safety at work: A meta-analytic investigation of the link between job demands, job resources, burnout, engagement, and safety outcomes. J Appl Psychol 96: 71-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021484
    [23] Clarke S (2010) An integrative model of safety climate: Linking psychological climate and work attitudes to individual safety outcomes using meta-analysis. J Occup Organ Psychol 83: 553-578. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X452122
    [24] Abdi F, Jahangiri M, Kamalinia M, et al. (2023) Developing a model for predicting safety performance of nurses based on psychosocial safety climate and role of job demands and resources, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion as mediators. BMC Psychol 11: 187. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01223-1
    [25] Vévoda J, Vévodová, Nakládalová M, et al. (2016) The relationship between psychological safety and burnout among nurses. Prac Lek 68: 40-46.
    [26] Dormann C, Zapf D (2004) Customer-related social stressors and burnout. J Occup Health Psychol 9: 61-82. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.9.1.61
    [27] Oyama Y, Fukahori H (2015) A literature review of factors related to hospital nurses' health-related quality of life. J Nurs Manag 23: 661-673. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12194
    [28] Dormann C, Zapf D (2002) Social stressors at work, irritation, and depressive symptoms: Accounting for unmeasured third variables in a multi-wave study. J Occup Organ Psychol 75: 33-58. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317902167630
    [29] Adamis D, Minihan E, Hannan N, et al. (2023) Burnout in mental health services in Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic. BJPsych Open 9: e177. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2023.552
    [30] Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2017) Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol 22: 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
    [31] Neal A, Griffin MA (2006) A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, safety behavior, and accidents at the individual and group levels. J Appl Psychol 91: 946-953. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.946
    [32] Gil-Monte PR, Figueiredo-Ferraz H (2013) Psychometric properties of the ‘Spanish Burnout Inventory’ among employees working with people with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res 57: 959-968. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2012.01591.x
    [33] Toscano F, Zappalà S (2024) Volunteers' satisfaction with the voluntary association: exploring the role of service climate, organizational identification, and understanding motivation. Curr Psychol 43: 15471-15483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05475-3
    [34] Fairchild AJ, MacKinnon DP, Taborga MP, et al. (2009) R2 effect-size measures for mediation analysis. Behav Res Methods 41: 486-498. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.2.486
    [35] Zeinhom M, Higazee A, Rayan A, et al. (2016) Relationship between job stressors and organizational support among Jordanian nurses. Am J Nurs Res 4: 51-55.
    [36] Labrague LJ, McEnroe Petitte DM, Leocadio MC, et al. (2018) Perceptions of organizational support and its impact on nurses' job outcomes. Nurs Forum 53: 339-347. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12260
    [37] Robaee N, Atashzadeh-Shoorideh F, Ashktorab T, et al. (2018) Perceived organizational support and moral distress among nurses. BMC Nurs 17: 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-017-0270-y
    [38] Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD, Johnson PO, et al. (2019) A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between burnout, absenteeism, and job performance among American nurses. BMC Nurs 18: 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-019-0382-7
    [39] Babapour A-R, Gahassab-Mozaffari N, Fathnezhad-Kazemi A (2022) Nurses' job stress and its impact on quality of life and caring behaviors: A cross-sectional study. BMC Nurs 21: 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-022-00852-y
    [40] Khamisa N, Oldenburg B, Peltzer K, et al. (2015) Work related stress, burnout, job satisfaction and general health of nurses. Int J Environ Res Public Health 12: 652-666. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120100652
    [41] Bautista JR, Lauria PAS, Contreras MCS, et al. (2020) Specific stressors relate to nurses' job satisfaction, perceived quality of care, and turnover intention. Int J Nurs Pract 26. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12774
    [42] Dollard MF, Bakker AB (2010) Psychosocial safety climate as a precursor to conducive work environments, psychological health problems, and employee engagement. J Occup Organ Psychol 83: 579-599. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X470690
    [43] Zappalà S, Toscano F, Polevaya M V, et al. (2021) Personal initiative, passive-avoidant leadership and support for innovation as antecedents of nurses' idea generation and idea implementation. J Nurs Scholarsh 53: 96-105. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12615
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Deepak K. Ojha, Matthew J. Kale, Paul J. Dauenhauer, Alon McCormick, E. L. Cussler, Desorption in Ammonia Manufacture from Stranded Wind Energy, 2020, 8, 2168-0485, 15475, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c03154
    2. Tengfei Zhang, Hikaru Miyaoka, Hiroki Miyaoka, Takayuki Ichikawa, Yoshitsugu Kojima, Review on Ammonia Absorption Materials: Metal Hydrides, Halides, and Borohydrides, 2018, 1, 2574-0962, 232, 10.1021/acsaem.7b00111
    3. Zhiwei Ma, Huashan Bao, Anthony P. Roskilly, Electricity-assisted thermochemical sorption system for seasonal solar energy storage, 2020, 209, 01968904, 112659, 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112659
    4. Larisa G. Gordeeva, Alexandr I. Shkatulov, Yuri I. Aristov, 2020, 9780124095489, 10.1016/B978-0-12-819723-3.00014-7
    5. Matthew J. Kale, Deepak K. Ojha, Sayandeep Biswas, Joshua I. Militti, Alon V. McCormick, Jeffrey H. Schott, Paul J. Dauenhauer, E. L. Cussler, Optimizing Ammonia Separation via Reactive Absorption for Sustainable Ammonia Synthesis, 2020, 3, 2574-0962, 2576, 10.1021/acsaem.9b02278
    6. Pim Donkers, Kun Gao, Jelle Houben, Henk Huinink, Bart Erich, Olaf Adan, Effect of Non-Condensable Gasses on the Performance of a Vacuum Thermochemical Reactor, 2020, 13, 1996-1073, 362, 10.3390/en13020362
    7. Huashan Bao, Zhiwei Ma, 2022, 9780128245101, 651, 10.1016/B978-0-12-824510-1.00028-3
    8. Natalia Mazur, Melian A.R. Blijlevens, Rick Ruliaman, Hartmut Fischer, Pim Donkers, Hugo Meekes, Elias Vlieg, Olaf Adan, Henk Huinink, Revisiting salt hydrate selection for domestic heat storage applications, 2023, 218, 09601481, 119331, 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119331
    9. Chengsheng Ni, Wenxuan Lu, Xuemei Yuan, Heba G.R. Younis, Jiupai Ni, Ambient plasma treatment in aqueous solution to produce a polymer used in packaging, 2023, 01418130, 128511, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.128511
    10. Hyojin Kim, Jong Hyeak Choe, Hongryeol Yun, Jintu Francis Kurisigal, Sumin Yu, Yong Hoon Lee, Jung-Hoon Lee, Chang Seop Hong, High ammonia storage capacity in LiCl Nanoparticle-Embedded Metal-Organic framework composites, 2024, 13858947, 151319, 10.1016/j.cej.2024.151319
    11. Aastha Arya, Jorge Martinez-Garcia, Philipp Schuetz, Amirhoushang Mahmoudi, Gerrit Brem, Pim A. J. Donkers, Mina Shahi, Characterizing Changes in a Salt Hydrate Bed Using Micro X-Ray Computed Tomography, 2024, 43, 0195-9298, 10.1007/s10921-024-01092-7
    12. J.A. Locke, G.H. Atkinson, G.S.F. Shire, S.J. Metcalf, R.E. Critoph, Experimental evaluation of barium bromide-ammonia equilibrium lines, 2024, 13594311, 124879, 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2024.124879
    13. Ahmad Najjaran, Zhiwei Ma, Huashan Bao, Tony Roskilly, Kinetic of desorption in chemisorption heat pump technology for solar thermal energy storage, 2025, 326, 03605442, 136197, 10.1016/j.energy.2025.136197
    14. G.H. Atkinson, R.E. Critoph, A review of experimental works using ammonia-salt adsorption reactions, 2025, 01407007, 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2025.04.024
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2416) PDF downloads(105) Cited by(2)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(1)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog