Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

Stability of conductivities in an inverse problem in the reaction-diffusion system in electrocardiology

  • In this paper, we study the stability result for the conductivities diffusion coefficients to a strongly reaction-diffusion system modeling electrical activity in the heart. To study the problem, we establish a Carleman estimate for our system. The proof is based on the combination of a Carleman estimate and certain weight energy estimates for parabolic systems.

    Citation: Bedr'Eddine Ainseba, Mostafa Bendahmane, Yuan He. Stability of conductivities in an inverse problem in the reaction-diffusion system in electrocardiology[J]. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2015, 10(2): 369-385. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2015.10.369

    Related Papers:

    [1] Hayder S. Al-Madhhachi, Ahmed M. Ajeena, Nihad A. Al-Bughaebi . Dynamic simulation and energy analysis of forced circulation solar thermal system in two various climate cities in Iraq. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(1): 138-149. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021008
    [2] Laveet Kumar, Jahanzaib Soomro, Hafeez Khoharo, Mamdouh El Haj Assad . A comprehensive review of solar thermal desalination technologies for freshwater production. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(2): 293-318. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023016
    [3] Joanna McFarlane, Jason Richard Bell, David K. Felde, Robert A. Joseph III, A. Lou Qualls, Samuel Paul Weaver . Performance and Thermal Stability of a Polyaromatic Hydrocarbon in a Simulated Concentrating Solar Power Loop. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(1): 41-70. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.1.41
    [4] Akthem Mohi Al-Abdali, Handri Ammari . Thermal energy storage using phase-change material in evacuated-tubes solar collector. AIMS Energy, 2022, 10(3): 486-505. doi: 10.3934/energy.2022024
    [5] Chao-Jen Li, Peiwen Li, Kai Wang, Edgar Emir Molina . Survey of Properties of Key Single and Mixture Halide Salts for Potential Application as High Temperature Heat Transfer Fluids for Concentrated Solar Thermal Power Systems. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(2): 133-157. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.2.133
    [6] Daniel Chuquin-Vasco, Cristina Calderón-Tapia, Nelson Chuquin-Vasco, María Núñez-Moreno, Diana Aguirre-Ruiz, Vanesa G. Lo-Iacono-Ferreira . Mathematical modeling of a binary ORC operated with solar collectors. Case study—Ecuador. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(6): 1153-1178. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023053
    [7] Thiago M. Vieira, Ézio C. Santana, Luiz F. S. Souza, Renan O. Silva, Tarso V. Ferreira, Douglas B. Riffel . A novel experimental procedure for lock-in thermography on solar cells. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(3): 503-521. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023026
    [8] Xian-long Meng, Cun-liang Liu, Xiao-hui Bai, De-hai Kong, Kun Du . Improvement of the performance of parabolic trough solar concentrator using freeform optics and CPV/T design. AIMS Energy, 2021, 9(2): 286-304. doi: 10.3934/energy.2021015
    [9] Van Duong Nguyen, Duy Duc Ha, Thi Hoai Thu Nguyen, Duc Huy Nguyen . Generation expansion planning toward Net Zero target considering co-firing green fuel, CCUS installation and early decommissioning in thermal power plants: A case study of Vietnam. AIMS Energy, 2025, 13(3): 540-568. doi: 10.3934/energy.2025021
    [10] Nassir D. Mokhlif, Muhammad Asmail Eleiwi, Tadahmun A. Yassen . Experimental evaluation of a solar water heater integrated with a corrugated absorber plate and insulated flat reflectors. AIMS Energy, 2023, 11(3): 522-539. doi: 10.3934/energy.2023027
  • In this paper, we study the stability result for the conductivities diffusion coefficients to a strongly reaction-diffusion system modeling electrical activity in the heart. To study the problem, we establish a Carleman estimate for our system. The proof is based on the combination of a Carleman estimate and certain weight energy estimates for parabolic systems.


    This project aims to study solar thermal energy applications in Nordic Countries. An analysis of the current solar plants Danish market is conducted, aiming at extrapolating the results to other Nordic Countries (Finland and Norway). Background research took place in order to understand the current situation of solar thermal energy around the world, its purpose and deficiencies and its current use in Denmark.

    Climate change is one of the most urgent problems of this generation. Based on scientific evidence, human-induced global warming reached 1 ℃ above pre-industrial levels already, and it is increasing at 0.2 ℃ per decade [1].

    An active approach to this problem has already been taken by many countries, trying to both reduce their emissions and control the production of greenhouse gasses [2]. One of the keys to stopping climate change and all its consequences is to produce energy in a more sustainable way [3]. After the oil crisis in the early 70s the focus was placed on the cost of energy, but during the past decades the reality of environmental degradation and its risk has changed the way of looking at electricity generation [4]. Renewable energy sources, such as wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, and biomass produce electricity and heating by using natural resources and in some cases, they can even be produced for heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning [5], solar water heating [6], and lighting [7]. These renewable energy technologies have been changing in promising ways in the last decades, dominating the global market for new power generation capacity. In many markets, solar PV and wind are increasingly the cheapest sources of electricity [8]. Moreover, most renewable power sources will become the dominating electricity and heating generating way within the next decade [9]. Nowadays, renewable power generation is growing faster than power demand. In 2019 a huge milestone was reached, when renewable electricity generation increase was higher than that of electricity demand, while fossil-fuel electricity decreased. This was the first time in years when there was a reduction of fossil-fuel based generation while the overall electricity generation increased [9].

    The European Commission has set a long-term strategy to lead European countries in global climate action with the main goal of "achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 through a socially-fair transition in a cost-efficient manner" [1]. In 2016, the Paris Agreement was signed by 181 parties, requiring strong global action to reduce greenhouse emissions in order to stop the global temperature increase. It is with this aim that countries have started developing their policies and strategies around renewable energy [1].

    Only three renewable energy sources can be used to produce enough heat energy to power the whole world's demand: solar, geothermal and biomass [10]. Out of these three, solar energy is the one that presents the highest global potential, since geothermal energy is limited to a few locations and biomass is not naturally present in nature. This has created a lot of interest in solar energy and the study of how to make the most out of it.

    Solar energy technologies have a long history. From 1860 until the First World War an assortment of technologies was developed to create steam using the sun's heat in order to run engines and irrigation pumps. In 1954, solar PV cells were invented at Bell Labs, United States [11]. The years immediately following the oil-shock in the seventies saw much interest in the commercialization of solar energy [12]. Later on, the sharp decline in oil prices and a lack of policy support stopped this increasing interest in the solar industry. It is since early 2000 when solar energy markets have gained momentum, showing phenomenal growth recently. Both technological improvements resulting in cost reductions and government policies in favour of renewable energies have made the future of solar energy promising [10].

    There are two main types of solar panels: PV solar panels and solar thermal collectors. Whilst the first ones convert sunlight into electricity, the latest use the same solar energy to generate heat, converting it into the thermal energy of a fluid.

    Solar PVs have become the world's fastest-growing energy sector, with new markets. Demand for solar energy is expanding and it has become the most competitive option for electricity generation in a number of markets (for residential and commercial applications). In Figure 1, the solar PV global capacity from 2008 to 2018 can be found. It can be seen that each year the PV capacity is higher than the previous one, proving the expanding trend of this energy source.

    Figure 1.  Solar PV global capacity from 2008 until 2020, with the annual additions shown in orange. Data extracted from [13].

    The annual global market for PV surpassed the 100 GW level in 2018 for the first time. Large demands were found in new markets and in Europe due to ongoing price reductions. By the end of 2018, a total of 32 countries presented a cumulative capacity of 1 GB. The top five national markets, which are China, India, United States, Japan and Australia, accounted for about three-quarters of newly installed capacity in 2018. The next five markets were Germany, Mexico, the Republic of Korea, Turkey and the Netherlands [13].

    Solar thermal collectors are practically behaving as heat exchangers, absorbing solar radiation and turning it into internal energy (heat) of a fluid, usually either air, water or other fluid. This heat carried by the fluid can be used for domestic purposes, such as water heating. Otherwise the heat can be saved on a thermal storage tank for later use. The global capacity of solar water heating from 2008 to 2018 can be seen in Figure 2.

    Figure 2.  Global capacity of solar water heating collectors from 2008 to 2020. Data extracted from [13].

    By the end of 2018, residential, commercial, and industrial clients from 130 different countries had implemented solar thermal heating. Heating and cooling systems provided around 369 TWh of heat annually, which is equivalent to the energy content of 233 million barrels of oil. The cumulative global operating capacity at the end of the year reached an estimated 480 GW [13].

    The rapid electrification worldwide and the massive usage of heat pumps resulted in a decline in sales of solar hot water systems. On top of that, weak demand since in several countries the national support scheme for solar heat projects was not there anymore—as it was for several years—contributed that the collector capacity went down worldwide.

    A number of factors such as latitude, diurnal variation, climate and geographic variation are highly responsible for determining the solar intensity in a specific site. For instance, high winds could be proven beneficial for the panels' efficiency [14]. Lately, the floating PVs have gained some space in industrial large-scale applications [15]. The sunniest place on Earth receives about 2,500 kWh/m2. On the other hand, the Nordic Region annual density varies between 1.100 kWh/m2 (in the south of the region) and 700 kWh/m2 (in the North). A sunny day in summer will give about 8 kWh/m2 and a cloudy winter day only gives about 0.002 kWh/m2 [16]. These numbers make one question if Nordic conditions are not apt for solar production. If we look at the case of Finland, it is located between parallels of latitude 60° and 70°. If we take into account that only about 19 million people in the world live above the latitude of 60°, the Finnish population represents about 28% of that [17]. This shows how Finland is one of the most Nordic countries, making it hard to believe solar energy could be used there.

    The influence of climate change on solar energy production is mostly based on changes in irradiation, for example, the cloud cover lever, and temperature. For solar energy in the Nordic Region, the ground reflection effect during winter is of high significance due to reflection from the snow [18].

    In the last years, an increase in the use of solar energy has been found in the Nordic Region, especially in Denmark. It has become a leading country on solar thermal systems, having the biggest large-scale solar district heating application. By the end of 2018, there was a total of 118 active plants with a total capacity of 970 MW, which makes up 63% of the capacity worldwide [17]. By 2019, the milestone of surpassing 1 GW of solar district heating in Denmark was achieved.

    The installed capacity in large-scale solar systems in Denmark between 2010 and 2018 can be seen in Figure 3. The record is in 2016, with 348 MW installed capacity.

    Figure 3.  Cumulative solar thermal installations in Denmark from 1996 until 2021. Data from [17,19].

    The Danish government started using investment subsides during the 1990s to support combined heat power plants, energy efficiency measures and renewable energy generation. Most of these grants are no longer available for new district heating investments. Nonetheless, decentralised combined heat and power operating in the electricity market will receive a premium tariff over the market price. Since the end of 2018, this is only available for combined heat and power plants using renewable energy. An indirect incentive to the solar district heating development in Denmark is the requirement for all district heating utilities to collect a certain amount of energy savings every year. If a plant cannot fulfil these required savings, it has to purchase credits from another utility, which has a surplus of energy savings [17].

    Prior agreements between the energy distributors and the Danish Energy Agency allowed some district heating networks to count the first year of solar heat production as energy savings, therefore creating a surplus of valuable credits for the utility allowing to pay back part of the investment. By the end of 2016, this agreement expired and a new one was not released [17]. This caused a general refrain to invest in new solar thermal systems, which is reflected in Figure 3 as a sharp market decline in 2017 and 2018. In 2019, a new agreement was reached in order to help the market recover.

    Additionally, a ban on the installation of oil and gas boilers in new buildings was implemented in 2013, and since 2016 oil-fried boilers, installation is prohibited in existing buildings, making more favourable the conditions for solar thermal technologies [20].

    Regarding the large-scale solar thermal system, Denmark has a mature commercial market with distinct characteristics. Almost all systems supply heat to district heating networks, with no significant industrial applications. Most combined heat and power plants in Denmark sell electricity at a market price in the Nordic power market. Denmark has very favourable conditions for solar thermal integration into district heating networks, since the country has a long-standing tradition of it. A total of 63% of Danish households are connected to district heating networks [17]. District heating is regulated by the Heat Supply Act regulation. The idea behind it is that the end-users can benefit from this system. This allows the installations to have a long-term investment horizon, which favours solar thermal technologies.

    Denmark is also known for having a strong solar thermal industry. Arcon-Sunmark A/S, the main manufacturer of plate collectors in Denmark, has installed over 80% of the large-scale heating plants in Europe [17].

    Four solar thermal plants from Denmark are studied in this project: Silkeborg, Vollerup and Gråsten. The technical details of each plant are given in the following subsections. The goal of this project is to conduct in-depth research on the Danish approach to solar thermal energy. To do so, the main country solar thermal plants were studied.

    Silkeborg is a Danish town with a population of 46,179. It is located in the middle of the Jutland, slightly west of the geographical centre of Denmark. In 2018, Silkeborg Supply (a municipality-owned utility supplying heat in the area) constructed a solar thermal plant at Sejling Hede, near Silkeborg [21]. The plant has a minimum estimated lifetime of 25 years and it consists of 12,436 solar collectors, making it the biggest solar thermal plant in the world. Its cost was approximately 250 million DKK and it reduces CO2 emissions by 15.000 tons per year. Solar collectors have been the most cost-effective technology in Silkeborg, supplying 22.000 households with renewable heating and helping the town reach its goal of being 100% carbon neutral by 2030 [22].

    This solar plant supplies around 20% of Silkeborg's district heating annual demand via the district heating network, counting the cold winter months. This equals the yearly district heating demands for 4,400 one-family houses. Up to 100% of the demand has been supplied by the plant on sunny days, with 2.7 litres of water per hour circulating through the system. Extra heat can be stored in tanks for later use [23].

    In April 2020, 12,842 MWh were produced in the plant, representing 38.5% of the town's heat consumption. The best day was the 23rd of April when 88.5% of the heat demand was met by the solar plant. The heat production for the first four months of 2020 has been around 25% higher than expected [24].

    Vollerup is Sønderborg's easternmost district. Sønderborg is a city and municipality in Southern Jutland, on both sides of Alssund. The majority of the city is located on the island of Als.

    The solar thermal park in Vollerup includes solar panels that provide more than 50% of the heat demand for the local area of almost 1,000 households. The fluid in the solar heating installation is water mixed with eco-friendly glycol. If there is an excess of heating, it can be stored in the storage tank, which has a capacity of 4,000 m3. In addition to the thermal solar collectors, there is an array of PV solar cells that also supply the facility's pumps' and instruments' needs [25].

    Gråsten is a town on the southeast coast of the Jutland Peninsula, Denmark. It belongs to the Sønderborg municipality in the Region of Southern Denmark. In 2012, a solar thermal plant was built close to Gråsten by Arcon Solar. It consists of 1,519 solar modules with an estimated maximum heat production of 9,700 MWhth. The reduction of CO2 per year caused by the solar heating is 2,800 tons [26].

    The other Nordic Countries have yet not taken such a strong approach to solar thermal applications as Denmark has. Some installations can be found, but they are mostly for industrial or private use. The biggest solar thermal projects in Norway and Finland are described in this section.

    In 2011, a heating park, Akershus EnergiPark, was built outside Lillestrøm. Lillestrøm is a town in the municipality of Lillestrom in Viken country. The city is located in the Oslo region, in the southeast of Norway. Akershus EnergiPark is based on a close collaboration between Akerhus Energi, business and research and educational institutions in the region.

    The main source of heat production of the park is forest wood chips. In addition, it also uses biogas that comes in a 5km long pipeline from the Bøhler landfill and heat pumps. It also includes a solar heating plant that alone supplies 4 Gigawatt-hour thermal (GWhth) annually. The plant is equipped with an accumulator tank of 1,200 m3 for energy storage [27].

    The plant provides 150 GWhth annually, which corresponds to the heating demand of 15,000 households, reducing CO2 emissions by over 30,000 T per year [28].

    The biggest solar thermal installation in Finland is found in Hämeelinna. Hämeelinna is a city of around 68,200 inhabitants, located in the heart of Häme, in the south of Finland. In 2017, Saco-Solar installed a solar thermal system for the swimming hall in the city. The heat from the panels meets part of the building needs (such as space heating and hot water). If there is any surplus energy, for example in the days when the building is closed to the public, it is distributed to the local district heating network. A total of 124 KW can be obtained from the renewable source in this installation [29].

    The goal of this project was to study solar thermal energy in the northern countries and compare its usage in Denmark with Finland and Norway. Three different Danish plants are going to be studied: Silkeborg, Vollerup and Gråsten, chosen mostly due to the abundance of information. For each of these plants, different types of data were collected and analysed [30]. An analysis of the current solar thermal market in Denmark was conducted in order to understand how the country came into the use of this renewable energy source [31] ending up with an educated guess about the future of solar thermal energy in the Nordic Countries. Different national policies in the Nordics were taken into account, since their policies have a huge impact on the use of solar thermal in each country [32].

    Two different data sets were used for the project: satellite images and numerical data. The data studied focused on different solar parks - considered in terms of research design as secondary data – defined as "written sources that interpret or record primary data" [33], as they were obtained from free to access governmental sources. The collection of this data was done through the program Google Earth Pro. The online option of "Wayback imagery" was also used to properly validate the data [34]. It is with these tools that images of the solar plants were searched. Then, using the "historical images" option, time is reversed to see how the plant was constructed, paying special interest in large extensions of the plants throughout time. Once the different phases of construction were identified, the "polygon" option is used to draw polygons through the plants' area, allowing one to obtain the total area (in square-meters) of each plant before and after the extensions. This same process was repeated for each of the selected solar plants.

    The second type of data collection consisted of numerical data representing the solar heat production of each plant. These were considered secondary data since they were not directly taken by the researcher of this project, but they were extracted by a validated source [35]. It should be noted that not enough data on the Vollerup solar plant were available to conduct a proper analysis, so only the other two plants were studied. Daily and weekly data were retrieved from 2017, 2018 and 2019. Additionally to the data analysis, a short market study of Denmark solar thermal energy status was conducted. To do so, background research was done and presented in section 1.4., from which some conclusions and further discussions were also extracted. Finally, an extrapolation of all the previous analyses will be made to try to predict the future of solar thermal applications in Denmark and other Nordic Countries.

    The objective of this venture is to conduct in-depth inquire about the Danish approach to solar thermal plants. To do so, most nation solar-powered thermal facilities were examined. To ensure internal validity, which is "the degree to which we can appropriately conclude that the changes in X caused the changes in Y" [36], a triangulation of the data is conducted whilst comparing data from different sources and, at the same time, checking the results with the experience of experts on the area. Nevertheless, since the samples taken are also those with higher influence on the outcome, an inductive statement extracted from this paper should be correct for all cases. The reliability of the project is assured with a good explanation of every step taken in the making of it, allowing others to repeat the analysis and assuring they will obtain the same results. In this project, actual data from the solar plants could provide an insight complementing the satellite data. The results from this report will show the potential of solar thermal energy for Nordic Countries, using Denmark as the main example.

    There is a specific way solar plants are developed in Denmark in comparison to the other Nordic countries. In Denmark, all the studied plants are built in two phases: first, some panels are implemented and if the result is as predicted, the plant is then extended to its optimal size. In the other Scandinavian countries, a one-stage construction phase is followed for the plants.

    If we look at the Silkeborg Plant, the first phase consisted of around 172,000 m2 (two polygons of 45,929 m2 and 125,611 m2). This is then expanded with a 20,360 m2 big area and a small part of 9,077 m2. The total final area of the plant is then around 334,000 m2. This means that the extension of the plant consists of adding a 99.86% of its first size. In other words, the plant size was almost doubled in size. The plant construction phases are shown in Figure 4.

    Figure 4.  Satellite images of the Silkeborg plant from Google Earth Pro. On the top (A), the first phase of construction is shown. On the bottom, the final plant size is shown (C). On the right (B & D), the used polygons to calculate the area are painted in white.

    The building process of the Vollerup solar thermal plant follows the same pattern. First, a total of around 12,700 m2 are built (consisting of 4 polygons of 2,128 m2 the top one, 3.167 m2 the left one, 3,606 m2 the right one and 3,816 the bottom one). Later on, two extra polygons of area 1,274 m2 and 1,752 m2 were added, making the total plant area around 15,700 m2. The added area was a 23.62% of the original installation. The plant construction phases and the polygons used to measure it are shown in Figure 5.

    Figure 5.  Satellite images of the Vollerup plant from Google Earth Pro. On the top (A), the first phase of construction is shown. On the bottom, the final plant size is shown (C). On the right (B & D), the used polygons to calculate the area are painted in white.

    The Gråsten solar thermal-plant had an original size of around 39.350 m2, divided into 3 areas of 3,524 m2, 15,082 m2 and 20,750 m2 from left to right. An extra polygon of 24,717 m2 was added later on, making the total plant area about 67,000 m2. The added area is a 70.3% of the original one. The polygons used to measure the plant and its phases of construction are shown in Figure 6.

    Figure 6.  Satellite images of the Gråsten plant from Google Earth Pro. On the top (A), the first phase of construction is shown. On the bottom, the final plant size is shown (C). On the right (B & D), the used polygons to calculate the area are painted in white.

    If the different areas are compared, Silkeborg is 5 times larger than Gråsten and 23 times larger than Vollerup. It is also this plant the one that had the higher percentage of added area. A summary of each plant area can be seen in Table 1. It is noticed that all the plants were constructed until their optimal size using a second construction phase. It should also be pointed out that all the solar plants studied are large-scale plants.

    Table 1.  Study of the areas of the different Danish solar thermal plants, with the % of added area calculated from the initial area.
    Silkeborg Vollerup Gråsten
    Initial area [m2] 171,540 12,700 39,350
    Added area [m2] 17, 1305 3,000 27,650
    Total area [m2] 342,845 15,700 67,000
    % of added area 99.8 23.6 70.3

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    On the other hand, if the area of Akershus (Norway) and Hämeenlinna (Finland) installations are analysed, it can be seen that only one construction phase was used.

    As for the Akershus, the total measured area is 28,550 m2, consisting of two polygons of 8,725 m2 and 19,825 m2, as shown in Figure 7.

    Figure 7.  Satellite images of the Akershus plant from Google Earth Pro. On the right, the used polygons to calculate the area are painted in white.

    The Hämeenlinna total area is 515 m2 and it is situated on the roof of a building (the swimming pool hall), as shown in Figure 8. This is a small installation since its only purpose is to supply heat to one building.

    Figure 8.  Satellite images of the Hämeenlinna plant from Google Earth Pro. On the left, the final plant size is shown. On the right, the used polygon to calculate the area is marked in red.

    Both the Norwegian and Finnish plans have not been taken to their maximum production level, with only one construction phase. These installations are considered small-scale, consisting of a small area if compared with the Danish plants. This is due to the approach to solar energy made by the countries, decided to entrust small-scale applications and industrial utilities instead of large-scale plants. For a higher increase of solar energy use in these countries, the policies prioritising small installations should be revised.

    The results of the study of solar heat production of two Danish solar thermal plants (Silkeborg and Gråsten) are now presented. The monthly solar heat production from 2017 until 2019 is shown in Figure 9A, C for Silkeborg and Gråsten respectively. If both graphs are observed it can be seen that they follow a similar sinusoidal pattern, with high heat production during the summer months and low during the winter months. This is a pattern that is repeated every year, indifferently from the plant position or value of solar heat production.

    Figure 9.  i) Weekly solar heat production [MWh] from 2017 to 2019 (left), for the Silkeborg plant (A) and for the Gråsten plant (C) and ii) Daily solar heat production [MWh] in 2019 (right), for the Silkeborg plant (B) and the Gråsten plant (D).

    A closer inspection of the last year can be seen in Figure 9B, D. The daily solar heat production is represented for each plant (Silkeborg and Gråsten). It is observed that, whilst the followed pattern is quite similar, the amount of solar heat production in Silkeborg is quite higher than that of Gråsten. This is also related to the size of the solar plants, since the Silkeborg plant is 4 times larger than the one in Gråsten. Silkeborg highest solar heat production is around 4,500 MWh whilst Gråsten's is around 700 MWh.

    Once the solar thermal plants have been studied, it is important to know the context in which these are found. A quick study of the Danish market is done. As shown in section 1.4., the Danish solar thermal market has seen a huge increase in the last years, placing it amongst the top countries using this energy source. The main reasons behind this market expansion are summarised below.

    Denmark presents a high market penetration of district heating networks, specifically for the heat of households. In most Scandinavian countries, the share of district heating systems is above 60%. Only Finland has a share of lower than 40% [37]. Moreover, there is high compatibility of solar thermal heat with these district heating loads. Some examples of this compatibility would be the high heat demand and density of the networks and the opportunity of obtaining cheap land for collectors near the supply points. Another important aspect that encourages the use of thermal energy in Denmark is the high taxes on fossil fuels, making coal and natural gas plants less profitable. The situation regarding the cost of natural gas becomes even more complicated for all Europe under the Russo-Ukrainian War and the overall availability and costs for all European countries including, of course, the Nordics [38]. Since this conflict goes if not back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union, definitely back to 2014—where hundreds maybe thousands of enmities took (and still continue to take) place in the borders of the two countries, it is therefore, imperative to focus on other alternatives for district heating apart from natural gas. Furthermore, the presence of market-based subsidies for large-scale thermal systems encourages the use of this energy source. These incentives are focused on district heating facilities instead of small-scale applications or industrial utilities—such as solar air-conditioning [39]—an effective strategy to promote large-scale plants. Finally, the country non-profit orientation regulations regarding heat supply allow a long-term investment horizon and facilitate the availability of easily accessible bank loans for the utilities.

    These conditions seem to outweigh the lacking solar resources, making a country like Denmark with a low irradiance levels, competent in the solar thermal market world. Whilst the other countries have a higher rate of solar radiation, Denmark unique policies and market strategy for this energy source allow it to be competent.

    Solar thermal energy is an energy source that has gained a lot of importance in the last few years, but there are still improvements to be done. It is believed that its use will grow even more in the following years, since solar costs—including solar thermal applications—have dropped more than 80% over the past decade [40]. Denmark is a pioneer in the large-scale use of solar thermal plants, expanding its utilities until its optimal dimension in order to get as much solar energy as possible. Nowadays, a clear increase in the cumulative amount of annual solar heat production of Danish solar plants is noted, indicating an increase in solar radiation in the Nordic Region over the last years. These climate transformations that we are living in nowadays are a key component in the future development of solar energy in the Nordic Countries. Solar energy may not have been considered a profitable source in the past in these countries, but with climate change, this should be reconsidered [41].

    The main difference between Denmark and the other Nordic Countries analysed is the marketplace of solar thermal heat. Whilst Denmark has decided to include it in their district heating, the other countries are using it only still for small-scale installations and industrial purposes. This is mainly due to each country's legislative framework and its approach to renewable energies. Denmark has decided to approach the heat market in a smart way that allows the profitable existence of large-scale solar plants. The other Nordic Countries may change their approach to this energy source in the following years, since it has been proven that it is a profitable renewable energy even for a Nordic country such as Denmark.

    In this project, the solar thermal energy in the Nordic countries was studied, mainly though focused on Denmark. In the last years, solar energy has been gaining popularity all around the world as one of the two most dominating renewable energy sources with several innovative applications, and the Nordic Countries are not falling behind in this trend. Whilst it is true that the weather conditions in these countries are not the most favourable for solar energy, Climate Change is giving the Nordic Region a chance. Denmark is one of the pioneers of solar thermal energy. Even if it does not have the highest solar radiation, it is due to its smart approach to this energy source that the country has a big impact on the solar thermal market. Their main use is in large-scale plants connected to district heating distribution, which is possible thanks to the country regulations and favourable agreements. This makes them able to use this energy to its maximum potential whilst other countries are still struggling to integrate it into their energy system.

    Other Nordic Countries are yet not as developed in this energy source as Denmark is. In this project, the case of Norway and Finland have been studied. The main difference that has been found between these countries and Denmark is their solar thermal plants' size. Whilst Denmark is betting for large-scale plants with a two-phase system to bring them to their optimal point, the other countries are still using small-scale facilities. They focus mostly on private and self-consuming (running under a net metering contract) installations, not having integrated this energy source into their energy system yet. It has been shown in this project that the amount of solar heat production of Danish plants and, therefore, the solar radiation in this country has had a noticeable increment in the last years. It is also believed that for other Nordic Countries to have a profitable use of solar thermal energy, a change in their approach to it should be made. Taking Denmark as an example, expanding the size of their solar thermal installations should be considered, using solar thermal energy not only for private use but also as one of their main heat energy sources. Policies as those used in Denmark could be used to boost the solar market, offering agreements favourable to the large-scale use of the energy source.

    All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

    [1] to appear in SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, arXiv:1106.1788.
    [2] M. Bendahmane and K. H. Karlsen, Analysis of a class of degenerate reaction-diffusion systems and the bidomain model of cardiac tissue, Netw. Heterog. Media, 1 (2006), 185-218. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.185
    [3] M. Bendahmane and K. H. Karlsen, Convergence of a finite volume scheme for the bidomain model of cardiac tissue, Appl. Numer. Math., 59 (2009), 2266-2284. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2008.12.016
    [4] M. Bendahmane, R. Bürger and R. Ruiz Baier, A finite volume scheme for cardiac propagation in media with isotropic conductivities, Math. Comp. Simul., 80 (2010), 1821-1840. doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2009.12.010
    [5] H. Brezis, Functional Analysis, Sobolev Spaces and Partial Differential Equations, Springer, New York, 2011.
    [6] A. L. Bukhgeĭm, Carleman estimates for Volterra operators and uniqueness of inverse problems, in Non-classical Problems of Mathematical Physics, Computing Center of Siberian Branch of Soviet Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 1981, 56-64.
    [7] A. L. Bukhgeim, Introduction to the Theory of Inverse Problems, VSP, Utrecht, 2000.
    [8] A. L. Bukhgeim and M. V. Klibanov, Uniqueness in the large class of multidimensional inverse problems, (Russian) Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 260 (1981), 269-272.
    [9] K. C. Chang, Methods in Nonlinear Analysis, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Netherlands, 2005.
    [10] P. Colli Franzone and G. Savaré, Degenerate evolution systems modeling the cardiac electric field at micro- and macroscopic level, in Evolution Equations, Semigroups and Functional Analysis (Milano, 2000), Progr. Nonlinear Differential Equations Appl., 50, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2002, 49-78.
    [11] M. Cristofol, P. Gaitan and H. Ramoul, Inverse problems for a $2 \times 2$ reaction-diffusion system using a Carleman estimate with one observation, Inverse Problems, 22 (2006), 1561-1573. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/22/5/003
    [12] A. V. Fursikov and O. Yu. Imanuvilov, Controllability of Evolution Equations, Lecture Notes Series, 34, RIM Seoul National University, Korea, 1996.
    [13] O.Yu. Imanuvilov, M. Yamamoto, Lipschitz stability in inverse problems by Carleman estimates, Inverse Problems, 14 (1998), 1229-1245. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/14/5/009
    [14] O. Yu. Imanuvilov and M. Yamamoto, Carleman estimates for the non-stationary Lamé system and the application to an inverse problem, ESAIM, COCV, 11 (2005), 1-56. doi: 10.1051/cocv:2004030
    [15] V. Isakov, Carleman estimates and applications to inverse problems, Milan J. Math., 72 (2004), 249-271. doi: 10.1007/s00032-004-0033-6
    [16] M. V. Klibanov, Carleman estimates and inverse problems in the lasrt two decades, in Surveys on Solution Methods for Inverse Problems, Springer, Vienna, 2000, 119-146.
    [17] M. V. Klibanov and M. Yamamoto, Lipschitz stability of an inverse problem for an acoustic equation, Appl. Anal., 85 (2006), 515-538. doi: 10.1080/00036810500474788
    [18] M. A. Krasnoselskii, Positive Solutions of Operator Equations, Noordhoff, Groningen, 1964.
    [19] G. Lebeau and L. Robbiano, Contrôle exact de l'equation de la chaleur, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 20 (1995), 335-356. doi: 10.1080/03605309508821097
    [20] J.-P. Puel and M. Yamamoto, On a global estimate in a linear inverse hyperbolic problem, Inverse Problems, 12 (1996), 995-1002. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/12/6/013
    [21] K. Sakthivel, N. Baranibalan, J.-H. Kim and K. Balachandran, Stability of diffusion coefficients in an inverse problem for the Lotka-Volterra competition system, Acta Appl. Math., 111 (2010), 129-147. doi: 10.1007/s10440-009-9455-z
    [22] Z. Q. Wu, J. X. Yin and C. P. Wang, Elliptic and Parabolic Equations, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd, 2003. doi: 10.1142/6238
    [23] M. Yamamoto, Uniqueness and stability in multidimensional hyperbolic inverse problems, J. Math. Pures Appl., 78 (1999), 65-98. doi: 10.1016/S0021-7824(99)80010-5
    [24] G. Yuan and M. Yamamoto, Lipshitz stability in the determination of the principal part of a parabolic equation, ESAIM: Control Optim. Calc. Var., 15 (2009), 525-554. doi: 10.1051/cocv:2008043
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ioan Sarbu, Matei Mirza, Daniel Muntean, Integration of Renewable Energy Sources into Low-Temperature District Heating Systems: A Review, 2022, 15, 1996-1073, 6523, 10.3390/en15186523
    2. Ioan Sarbu, Alexandru Dorca, Matei Mirza, Exhaustive overview of advances in integrating renewable energy sources into district heating systems, 2024, 116, 22106707, 105897, 10.1016/j.scs.2024.105897
    3. Kristian Emil Schrøder Hansen, George Xydis, Long-term heat storage opportunities of renewable energy for district heating networks, 2024, 1751-4223, 1, 10.1680/jener.23.00023
    4. Qianyun Wen, Axel Lindfors, Yang Liu, How should you heat your home in the green energy transition? A scenario-based multi-criteria decision-making approach, 2023, 421, 09596526, 138398, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138398
    5. Georgios Martinopoulos, Domestic hot water solar thermal systems as an energy-security alternative in the EU: A parametric analysis, 2024, 69, 22131388, 103921, 10.1016/j.seta.2024.103921
    6. Arvin Sohrabi, Shuli Liu, Erdem Cuce, Yongliang Shen, Sheher Yar Khan, Mahesh Kumar, Utilization of low-grade thermal energy for residential applications: A review of the existing and potential technologies, 2025, 219, 13640321, 115832, 10.1016/j.rser.2025.115832
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4721) PDF downloads(54) Cited by(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog