The Molecular Basis of Neural Memory. Part 7:  Neural Intelligence (NI) versus Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Gerard Marx; Chaim Gilon; Gerard Marx; Chaim Gilon

doi:10.3934/medsci.2017.3.241

AIMS Medical Science

2017, Volume 4, Issue 3: 241-260. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2017.3.241

Previous Article Next Article

Review

The Molecular Basis of Neural Memory. Part 7: Neural Intelligence (NI) versus Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Gerard Marx ^{1
,
,},
Chaim Gilon ²

1.
MX Biotech Ltd., Jerusalem, Israel
2.
Institute of Chemistry, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel

Received: 30 April 2017 Accepted: 03 July 2017 Published: 15 July 2017

The link of memory to intelligence is incontestable, though the development of electronic artifacts with memory has confounded cognitive and computer scientists’ conception of memory and its relevance to “intelligence”. We propose two categories of “Intelligence”: (1) Logical (objective) — mathematics, numbers, pattern recognition, games, programmable in binary format. (2) Emotive (subjective) — sensations, feelings, perceptions, goals desires, sociability, sex, food, love. The 1^st has been reduced to computational algorithms of which we are well versed, witness global technology and the internet. The 2^nd relates to the mysterious process whereby (psychic) emotive states are achieved by neural beings sensing, comprehending, remembering and dealing with their surroundings.
Many theories and philosophies have been forwarded to rationalize this process, but as neuroscientists, we remain dissatisfied. Our own musings on universal neural memory, suggest a tripartite mechanism involving neurons interacting with their surroundings, notably the neural extracellular matrix (nECM) with dopants [trace metals and neurotransmitters (NTs)]. In particular, the NTs are the molecular encoders of emotive states. We have developed a chemographic representation of such a molecular code.
To quote Longuet-Higgins, “Perhaps it is time for the term ‘artificial intelligence’ to be replaced by something more modest and less provisional”. We suggest “artifact intelligence” (ARTI) or “machine intelligence” (MI), neither of which imply emulation of emotive neural processes, but simply refer to the ‘demotive’ (lacking emotive quality) capability of electronic artifacts that employ a recall function, to calculate algorithms.

Keywords:

cognitive information; emotions; mentation; memory; metal complex; neurotransmitter

Citation: Gerard Marx, Chaim Gilon. The Molecular Basis of Neural Memory. Part 7: Neural Intelligence (NI) versus Artificial Intelligence (AI)[J]. AIMS Medical Science, 2017, 4(3): 241-260. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2017.3.241

Related Papers:

[1]	Boyu Wang . A splitting lattice Boltzmann scheme for (2+1)-dimensional soliton solutions of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 28071-28089. doi: 10.3934/math.20231436
[2]	Amna Mumtaz, Muhammad Shakeel, Abdul Manan, Marouan Kouki, Nehad Ali Shah . Bifurcation and chaos analysis of the Kadomtsev Petviashvili-modified equal width equation using a novel analytical method: describing ocean waves. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(4): 9516-9538. doi: 10.3934/math.2025439
[3]	Jalil Manafian, Onur Alp Ilhan, Sizar Abid Mohammed . Forming localized waves of the nonlinearity of the DNA dynamics arising in oscillator-chain of Peyrard-Bishop model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2461-2483. doi: 10.3934/math.2020163
[4]	Cheng Chen . Hyperbolic function solutions of time-fractional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with variable-coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10378-10386. doi: 10.3934/math.2022578
[5]	Abeer S. Khalifa, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Niveen M. Badra, Jalil Manafian, Khaled H. Mahmoud, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Wafaa B. Rabie . Derivation of some solitary wave solutions for the (3+1)- dimensional pKP-BKP equation via the IME tanh function method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27704-27720. doi: 10.3934/math.20241345
[6]	Wafaa B. Rabie, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Taher A. Nofal, Soliman Alkhatib . Wave solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional fractional Boussinesq-KP-type equation using the modified extended direct algebraic method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31882-31897. doi: 10.3934/math.20241532
[7]	Gulnur Yel, Haci Mehmet Baskonus, Wei Gao . New dark-bright soliton in the shallow water wave model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 4027-4044. doi: 10.3934/math.2020259
[8]	Jamilu Sabi'u, Sekson Sirisubtawee, Surattana Sungnul, Mustafa Inc . Wave dynamics for the new generalized (3+1)-D Painlevé-type nonlinear evolution equation using efficient techniques. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32366-32398. doi: 10.3934/math.20241552
[9]	Xiaoli Wang, Lizhen Wang . Traveling wave solutions of conformable time fractional Burgers type equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7266-7284. doi: 10.3934/math.2021426
[10]	Zhe Ji, Yifan Nie, Lingfei Li, Yingying Xie, Mancang Wang . Rational solutions of an extended (2+1)-dimensional Camassa-Holm- Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in liquid drop. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3163-3184. doi: 10.3934/math.2023162

Abstract

1. Introduction

Nonlinear evolution equations (NLEEs) play an important part in the study of nonlinear science, particular in plasma physics, quantum field theory, nonlinear wave propagation and nonlinear optical fibers so that it attracted the attention of a large number of scholars. The extended auxiliary equation technique ^[1], the Bernoulli's equation approach ^[2], the Exp-function technique ^[3], the homotopy analysis technique ^[4], the homotopy perturbation technique ^[5], the improved $tan(\phi/2)$ -expansion technique (^[6,7]), the Hirota's bilinear technique ^{[8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]}, the He's variational principle ^[16,17], the binary Darboux transformation ^[18], the Lie group analysis ^[19,20], the Bäcklund transformation method ^[21], optimal galerkin-homotopy asymptotic method applied ^[22], and the multiple rogue waves method (^[23,24]) have been proposed to solve NLEEs. By using these approaches, various exact solutions including soliton solution, lump solution, rogue wave solution, periodic solution, interaction solution, rational solution and high-order rational solution were obtained (^[25,26]).

In this paper, we mainly consider the following dynamical model, which can be used to describe some interesting (3+1)-dimensional waves of physics, namely, the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (gKP) equation ^[27]. That is

$\begin{equation} (\Psi_{t}+6\Psi\Psi_x+\Psi_{xxx})_x +a\Phi_{yy} = 0, \end{equation}$

(1.1)

and also above equation is integrable. Author of ^[28] introduced the modification of KP (mKP) equation ^[29] given

$\begin{equation} 4\Psi_{t}-6\Psi^2\Psi_x+\Psi_{xxx}+6\Psi_x\partial_{x}^{-1}\Psi_y +\Psi_{x}^{-1}\Phi_{yy} = 0. \end{equation}$

(1.2)

The generalized KP (gKP) equation has been researched by some scholars ^[30,31,32] in which is given as

$\begin{equation} (\Psi_{t}+\alpha\Psi_x +\beta\Psi\Psi_x+\gamma\Psi\Psi_{xxt})_x+\Psi_{yy} = 0. \end{equation}$

(1.3)

The another type of gKP equation is given in ^[33] as below

$\begin{equation} \Psi_{xxxy}+3(\Psi_x\Psi_y)_x+\Psi_{tx}+\Psi_{ty}+\Psi_{tz}-\Psi_{zz} = 0. \end{equation}$

(1.4)

We first present the bilinear form for Eq (1.4), by taking the following first-order logarithmic transformation

$\begin{equation} \Psi = 2(\ln f)_{x}, \end{equation}$

(1.5)

then, Eq (1.4) is turned into the bilinear form

$\begin{equation} \left(D_x^3 D_y+D_xD_t+D_yD_t+D_zD_t-D_z^2\right)\mathfrak{f}. \mathfrak{f} = 0, \end{equation}$

(1.6)

in which $D_t, D_x, D_y$ and $D_z$ are Hirota's bilinear frames. Cao ^[34] investigated the generalized B-type KP equation as follows

$\begin{equation} \Psi_{xxxy}+3(\Psi_x\Psi_y)_x-3\Psi_{xz}-\Psi_{ty} = 0. \end{equation}$

(1.7)

Guan et al. ^[35] derived a (3+1)-dimensional gKP equation in below form

$\begin{equation} \Psi_{xxxy}+3(\Psi_x \Psi_{y})_x+\alpha\Psi_{xxxz}+3\alpha(\Psi_x \Psi_{z})_x+\lambda_1\Psi_{xt}+\lambda_2\Phi_{yt}+\lambda_3\Phi_{zt}+ \omega_1\Phi_{xz} +\omega_2\Phi_{yz}+\omega_3\Phi_{zz} = 0, \end{equation}$

(1.8)

and some lump soliton solutions have been constructed using the Hirota bilinear method in ^[36]. Via transformation $\Psi = 2(\ln f)_{x},$ the bilinear form of equation (1.8) reads:

$\begin{equation} \left(D_x^3 D_y+\alpha D_x^3 D_z+\lambda_1D_xD_t+\lambda_2D_yD_t+\lambda_3D_zD_t+\omega_1D_xD_z+ \omega_2D_yD_z+\omega_3D_z^2\right)\mathfrak{f}. \mathfrak{f} = 0. \end{equation}$

(1.9)

Most classical test functions for solving NLPDEs by using the several particular functions can be constructed via Hirota bilinear technique. In other words, Hirota operator covers most of the classical hypothesis function method. For example, the fractional generalized CBS-BK equation ^[37], the generalized Bogoyavlensky-Konopelchenko equation ^[38], the (2+1)-dimensional asymmetrical Nizhnik-Novikov-Veselov equation ^[39], and the (2+1)-dimensional generalized variable-coefficient KP-Burgers-type equation ^[40]. Diverse kinds of studies on solve NLPDEs were perused via mighty authors in which some of them can be stated, for instance, multivariate rogue wave to some PDEs ^[41], interaction lump solutions the gKP equation ^[42], the (1+1)-dimensional coupled integrable dispersionless equations ^[43]. Therefore, we embark on the new research topic of constructing the analytic solutions of nonlinear PDEs by exploring the bilinear method. According to recent studies, we can obtain some of the new exact analytic solutions of nonlinear PDEs by way of constructing their corresponding bilinear differential equations in ^{[44,45,46,47]}. Here, we will study the multiple Exp-function method (MEFM) for determining the multiple soliton solutions (MSSs). The MEFM employed by some of powerful authors for various nonlinear equations have been surveyed in more studies in ^{[31,48,49,50]}. Authors of ^[51] utilized the reduced differential transform method for solving partial differential equations. Also, Yu and Sun ^[52] studied the dimensionally reduced generalized KP equations by help of Hirita bilinear method and obtained of lump solutions.

The outline of our paper is as follows: the multiple Exp-function scheme has been summarized in section 2. In sections 3, the KP equation, will investigate to finding 1-wave, 2-wave, and three-wave solutions. The Sections 4-6 devote to determined the periodic, cross-kink, and solitary wave solutions. Moreover, in Section 7, the modulation instability analysis is investigated. Finally in Section 8, the SIVP technique is considered with four cases for finding the solitary, bright, dark and singular wave solutions. A few of conclusions and outlook will be given in the final section.

2. Multiple Exp-function method

This method was summarized and improved for achieving the analytic solutions of NLPDEs:

Step 1. Assume a nonlinear PDE is given in general frame as follows

$\begin{equation} \mathcal{N}(x, y, t, \Psi , \Psi _{x}, \Psi _{y}, \Psi _{z}, \Psi _{t}, \Psi _{xx}, \Psi _{tt}, ...) = 0. \end{equation}$

(2.1)

Take the novel variables $\xi _{i} = \xi _{i}(x, y, z, t), 1\leq i\leq n$ , by differentiable frames:

$\begin{equation} \xi _{i, x} = \alpha _{i}\xi _{i}, \ \ \xi _{i, y} = \beta _{i}\xi _{i}, \ \ \xi _{i, z} = \gamma _{i}\xi _{i}, \ \ \xi _{i, t} = -\delta _{i}\xi _{i}, \ \ 1\leq i\leq n, \end{equation}$

(2.2)

where $\alpha _{i}, \beta _{i}, \gamma _{i}, 1\leq i\leq n$ , are unfound amounts. It noted that one can get as the following function

$\begin{equation} \xi _{i} = \varpi _{i}e^{\theta _{i}}, \ \ \theta _{i} = \alpha _{i}x+\beta _{i}y+\gamma _{i}z-\delta _{i}t, \ \ 1\leq i\leq n, \end{equation}$

(2.3)

where $\varpi _{i}, 1\leq i\leq n$ , unspecified amounts.

Step 2. Assuming the solution of the Eq (2.1) is function of variables $\xi _{i}, 1\leq i\leq n$ :

$\begin{equation} \Psi = \frac{\Delta (\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, ..., \xi _{n})}{\Omega (\xi _{1}, \xi _{2}, ..., \xi _{n})}, \ \ \Delta = \sum\limits_{r, s = 1}^{n}\sum\limits_{i, j = 0}^{M}\Delta _{rs, ij}\xi _{r}^{i}\xi _{s}^{j}, \ \ \Omega = \sum\limits_{r, s = 1}^{n}\sum\limits_{i, j = 0}^{N}\Omega _{rs, ij}\xi _{r}^{i}\xi _{s}^{j}, \ \ \end{equation}$

(2.4)

in which $\Delta _{rs, ij}$ and $\Omega _{rs, ij}$ are amounts to be remained. Replacing Eq (2.4) into Eq (2.1) can be achieved the below form as:

$\begin{equation} \Psi = \frac{\Delta (\varpi _{1}e^{\alpha _{1}x+\beta _{1}y+\gamma _{1}z-\delta _{1}t}, ..., \varpi _{n}e^{\alpha _{n}x+\beta _{n}y+\gamma _{n}z-\delta _{n}t})}{\Omega (\varpi _{1}e^{\alpha _{1}x+\beta _{1}y+\gamma _{1}z-\delta _{1}t}, ..., \varpi _{n}e^{\alpha _{n}x+\beta _{n}y+\gamma _{n}z-\delta _{n}t})}, \end{equation}$

(2.5)

and also we have

$\begin{eqnarray} \Delta _{t} & = &\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Delta _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, t}, \ \ \Omega _{t} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Omega _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, t}, \ \ \Delta _{x} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Delta _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, x}, \ \ \Omega _{x} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Omega _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, x}, \ \ \Delta _{y} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Delta _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, y}, \ \\ \ \Delta _{z} & = &\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Delta _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, z}, \rm{ \ }\Omega _{y} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Omega _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, y}, \ \ \Omega _{z} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Omega _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, z}, \ \end{eqnarray}$

(2.6)

$\ \ \ \Psi _{t} = \frac{\Omega \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Delta _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, t}-\Delta \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Omega _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, t}}{\Omega ^{2}}, \ \ \Psi _{x} = \frac{\Omega \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Delta _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, x}-\Delta \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Omega _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, x}}{\Omega ^{2}},$

$\Psi _{y} = \frac{\Omega \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Delta _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, y}-\Delta \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Omega _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, y}}{\Omega ^{2}}, \ \ \Psi _{z} = \frac{ \Omega \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Delta _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, z}-\Delta \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\Omega _{\xi _{i}}\xi _{i, z}}{\Omega ^{2}}.$

3. MSSs for the (3+1) gKP equation

3.1. Option I: 1-wave solution

The one-wave function of the solution will be reduced as below form

$\begin{equation} \Psi = \frac{2\Delta _{1}}{\Omega _{1}}, \ \ \Omega _{1} = 1+\rho _{1}+\rho _{2}\ e^{\alpha _{1}x+\beta _{1}y+\gamma _{1}z-\delta _{1}t}, \ \ \Delta _{1} = \sigma _{1}+\sigma _{2}\ e^{\alpha _{1}x+\beta _{1}y+\gamma _{1}z-\delta _{1}t}, \end{equation}$

(3.1)

in which $\rho _{1}, \rho _{2}, \sigma _{1}$ and $\sigma _{2}$ are unspecified amounts. Substituting (3.1) into Eq (1.8), the below cases will be concluded as:

Case I:

$\begin{equation} \alpha _{1} = \alpha _{1}, \ \ \beta _{1} = \beta _{1}, \ \ \rho _{1} = \rho _{1}, \ \ \rho _{2} = \ \ {\frac{\sigma _{{2}}\left( \rho _{{1}}+1\right) }{\sigma _{{1}}} \ \ } , \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{{2}} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1} } = \delta _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}. \end{equation}$

(3.2)

Case II:

$\begin{equation} \alpha _{1} = \alpha _{1}, \ \ \beta _{1} = - \ \ {\frac{\alpha \, {\alpha _{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}\gamma _{{1}}-\alpha _{{1}}\delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{1}}+\alpha _{{1} }\gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{1}}-\delta _{{1}}\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}+{\gamma _{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {{\alpha _{{1}}} ^{3}-\delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{2} }+\gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}} }, \ \ \rho _{1} = -1, \ \ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \ \ \end{equation}$

(3.3)

$\sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{{2}} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1} } = \delta _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}.$

Case III:

$\begin{equation} \alpha _{1} = \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{1}}\left( \alpha \, \delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{2} }-\alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}-\delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}+\gamma _{{1 }}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{1 }}} }, \ \ \beta _{1} = -\alpha \gamma _{1}, \ \ \rho _{1} = \rho _{1}, \ \ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \ \ \end{equation}$

(3.4)

$\sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{{2}} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1} } = \delta _{1}, \ \ \ \ \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}.$

Case IV:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &\vartheta , \ \ \beta _{1} = \beta _{1}, \ or\ \ \beta _{1} = -\alpha \gamma _{1}, \ \ \ \rho _{1} = -1, \ \ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \\ \sigma _{{2}} & = &\sigma _{2}, \ \delta _{{1}} = \frac{\vartheta ^{3}+\gamma _{1}\omega _{2}}{\lambda _{2}}, \ \ \gamma_1 = \gamma_1, \ \ \gamma_2 = \gamma_2, \ \end{eqnarray}$

(3.5)

in which $\vartheta$ , solves the equation $\lambda_1\vartheta ^4+(\gamma _1\lambda _3-\alpha \gamma _1\lambda_2) {\vartheta }^{3}+(\gamma _1\lambda _1\omega _2-\gamma_1\lambda _2\omega _1) \vartheta -\gamma _1 ^2\omega _3\lambda _2+\gamma_1^2\lambda _3\omega_2 = 0.$

For example, the 1-wave solution for Case III will be considered as

$\begin{equation} \Psi = 2\frac{\sigma _{1}+\sigma _{2}e^{ \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{1}}\left( \alpha \, \delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}-\delta _{{1 }}\lambda _{{3}}+\gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{ 1}}-\gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{1}}} \ \ }x-\alpha \gamma _{1}y+\gamma _{1}z-\delta _{1}t}}{1+\rho _{1}+\rho _{2}e^{ \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{1}}\left( \alpha \, \delta _{ {1}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}-\delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}+\gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\delta _{{1}}\lambda _{{1} }-\gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{1}}} \ \ }\ \ x-\alpha \gamma _{1}y+\gamma _{1}z-\delta _{1}t}}. \end{equation}$

(3.6)

3.2. Option II: 2-wave solutions

The two-wave function of the solution will be reduced as below form

$\begin{equation} \Psi = \frac{2\Delta _{2}}{\Omega _{2}}, \end{equation}$

(3.7)

$\begin{equation} \Omega _{2} = 1+\sigma _{1}e^{\alpha _{1}x+\beta _{1}y+\gamma _{1}z-\delta _{1}t}+\sigma _{2}e^{\alpha _{2}x+\beta _{2}y+\gamma _{2}z-\delta _{2}t}+\sigma _{1}\sigma _{2}\sigma _{12}e^{(\alpha _{1}+\alpha _{2})x+(\beta _{1}+\beta _{2})y+(\gamma _{1}+\gamma _{2})z-(\delta _{1}+\delta _{2})t}, \ \ \end{equation}$

(3.8)

$\Delta _{2} = \rho _{1}e^{\alpha _{1}x+\beta _{1}y+\gamma _{1}z-\delta _{1}t}+\rho _{2}e^{\alpha _{2}x+\beta _{2}y+\gamma _{2}z-\delta _{2}t}+\rho _{1}\rho _{2}\rho _{12}e^{(\alpha _{1}+\alpha _{2})x+(\beta _{1}+\beta _{2})y+(\gamma _{1}+\gamma _{2})z-(\delta _{1}+\delta _{2})t}.$

Substituting (3.7) in terms of (3.8) into Eq (1.8), the below cases will be resulted as:

Case I:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &0, \ \ \alpha _{2} = \alpha _{2}, \ \ \beta _{1} = \beta _{1}, \ \ \beta _{2} = -\alpha \gamma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1}} = \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{1}}\left( \beta _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{1}}\right) }{\beta _{{1} }\lambda _{{2}}+\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} }, \ \ \\ \delta _{{2}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{ \ 2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}, \ \ \rho _{1} = 0, \ \ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.9)

$\ \ \rho _{12} = \rho _{12}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{2} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{12} = 1.$

Case II:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &\alpha _{1}, \ \ \alpha _{2} = 0, \ \ \beta _{1} = -\alpha \gamma _{1}, \ \ \beta _{2} = \beta _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1}} = \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{1}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{\ 2}}-\alpha _{{1}}\omega _{{1}}-\omega _{{3} }\gamma _{{1}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{1} }\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} }, \\ \ \ \delta _{{2}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \beta _{{2}}\omega _{{2} }+\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\beta _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}+\gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}, \ \ \rho _{1} = 0, \ \end{eqnarray}$

(3.10)

$\ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \ \ \rho _{12} = \rho _{12}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{2} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{12} = 1.$

Case III:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &\alpha _{1}, \ \ \alpha _{2} = \alpha _{2}, \ \ \beta _{1} = -\alpha \gamma _{1}, \ \ \beta _{2} = -\alpha \gamma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1} } = \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{1}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{\ 2}}-\alpha _{{ 1}}\omega _{{1}}-\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{1}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{1} }\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{1}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} }, \ \\ \ \delta _{{2}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{ {\ 2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}, \ \ \rho _{1} = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.11)

$\ \ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \ \ \rho _{12} = \rho _{12}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{2} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{12} = 1.$

Case IV:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &0, \ \ \alpha _{2} = \alpha _{2}, \ \ \beta _{1} = \beta _{1}, \ \ \beta _{2} = -\alpha \gamma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1}} = \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{1}}\left( \beta _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{1}}\right) }{\beta _{{1} }\lambda _{{2}}+\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} }, \ \\ \ \delta _{{2}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{ {\ 2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}, \ \ \rho _{1} = \rho _{1}, \ \ \rho _{2} = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.12)

$\ \ \rho _{12} = \rho _{12}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{2} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{12} = 1.$

Case V:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &\alpha _{1}, \ \ \alpha _{2} = \alpha _{2}, \ \ \beta _{1} = -\alpha \gamma _{1}, \ \ \beta _{2} = -\alpha \gamma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1} } = \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{1}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{\ 2}}-\alpha _{{ 1}}\omega _{{1}}-\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{1}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{1} }\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{1}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} }, \\ \ \ \delta _{{2}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{\ 2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{ \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}, \ \ \rho _{1} = \rho _{1}, \ \ \rho _{2} = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.13)

$\ \ \rho _{12} = \rho _{12}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{2} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{12} = 1.$

Case VI:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &\alpha _{1}, \ \ \alpha _{2} = \alpha _{2}, \ \ \beta _{1} = -{ \frac{\alpha \, \alpha _{{1}}\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ {\alpha _{{2}}} }, \ \ \beta _{2} = -\alpha \gamma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1}} = \ \ {\frac{\alpha _{{1}}\gamma _{{2} }\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{\ 2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1} }-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{ 2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3} }\right) }}, \ \\ \ \delta _{{2}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{ {\ 2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \gamma _{1} = \gamma _{1}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}, \ \ \rho _{1} = \rho _{1}, \ \ \rho _{2} = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.14)

$\ \ \rho _{12} = \rho _{12}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{2} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{12} = \sigma _{12}.$

Case VII:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &\alpha _{1}, \ \ \alpha _{2} = \alpha _{2}, \ \ \beta _{1} = -{ \frac{\alpha \, \alpha _{{1}}\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ {\alpha _{{2}}} }, \ \ \beta _{2} = -\alpha \gamma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1}} = \ \ {\frac{\alpha _{{1}}\gamma _{{2} }\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{\ 2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1} }-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{ 2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3} }\right) }}, \\ \ \ \delta _{{2}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{\ 2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{ \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \gamma _{1} = \ \ {\frac{\alpha _{{1}}\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ {\alpha _{{2} }}} \ \ , \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}, \ \ \rho _{1} = \rho _{1}, \ \ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \end{eqnarray}$

(3.15)

$\ \ \rho _{12} = \rho _{12}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = 0, \ \ \sigma _{2} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{12} = \sigma _{12}.$

Case VIII:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{1} & = &\frac{1}{2}\alpha _{2}, \ \ \alpha _{2} = \alpha _{2}, \ \ \beta _{1} = -\frac{1}{2}\, \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}, \ \ \beta _{2} = -\alpha \gamma _{2}, \ \ \delta _{{1}} = \frac{1}{2}\, \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{ 1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} }, \ \\ \ \delta _{{2}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{ {\ 2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \gamma _{1} = \frac{1}{2}\gamma _{2}, \ \ \gamma _{2} = \gamma _{2}, \ \ \rho _{1} = \rho _{1}, \ \end{eqnarray}$

(3.16)

$\ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \ \ \rho _{12} = \rho _{12}, \ \ \sigma _{1} = \sigma _{1}, \ \ \sigma _{2} = \sigma _{2}, \ \ \sigma _{12} = 0.$

For instance, the 2-wave solution for Case I will be taken as

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{1} = \left. 2\, \rho _{{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{\ 2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2} }\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+x\alpha _{{2}}-y\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}+z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ }\right/ \left( 1+\sigma _{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{-{ \frac{t\gamma _{{1}}\left( \beta _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{1 }}\right) }{\beta _{{1}}\lambda _{{2}}+\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+y\beta _{{1}}+z\gamma _{{1}}} \ \ }+\right. \end{equation}$

(3.17)

$\left. \sigma _{{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{ 1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+x\alpha _{{2}}-y\alpha \, \gamma _{{2} }+z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ }+\sigma _{{1}}\sigma _{{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{ 1}}\left( \beta _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{1}}\right) }{ \beta _{{1}}\lambda _{{2}}+\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2} }\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1} }-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2} }-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+x\alpha _{{2} }+y\beta _{{1}}-y\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}+z\gamma _{{1}}+z\gamma _{{2}}} } \right) .$

Also, the 2-wave solution for Case III will be considered as

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{2} = \left. 2\, \rho _{{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{\ 2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2} }\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+x\alpha _{{2}}-y\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}+z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ }\right/ \left( 1+\sigma _{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{-{ \frac{t\gamma _{{1}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{1} }\omega _{{1}}-\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{1}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{1} }\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{1}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ } +x\alpha _{{1}}-y\alpha \, \gamma _{{1}}+z\gamma _{{1}}} \ \ }+\right. \end{equation}$

(3.18)

$\left. \sigma _{{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3} }\right) }{\alpha \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1} }-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+x\alpha _{{2}}-y\alpha \gamma _{{2}}+z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ }+\sigma _{{1}}\sigma _{{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{1}}\left( \alpha \gamma _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{1}}\omega _{{1}}-\omega _{{3} }\gamma _{{1}}\right) }{\alpha \gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{1} }\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{1}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2} }\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2} }\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+x\alpha _{{1}}+x\alpha _{{2} }-y\alpha \gamma _{{1}}-y\alpha \gamma _{{2}}+z\gamma _{{1}}+z\gamma _{{2}}} } \right) .$

And finally, the resulting two-wave solution for Case VIII will be read as

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{3}(x, y, z, t) = 2\left( \rho _{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{-\frac{1}{2} \ \ {\frac{ t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2 }}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+\frac{1}{2} x\alpha _{{2}}-\frac{1}{2}y\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}+\frac{1}{2}z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ } +\rho _{{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2} }\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{ 2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+x\alpha _{{2}}-y\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}+z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ } +\right. \end{equation}$

(3.19)

$\left. \left. \rho _{{1}}\rho _{{2}}\rho _{{12}}{\ \mathrm{e}^{-\frac{3}{2}{ \frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2} }\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+ \frac{3}{2}x\alpha _{{2}}-\frac{3}{2}y\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}+\frac{3}{2} z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ }\right) \right/ \left( 1+\sigma _{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{-\frac{1}{ 2} \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2 }}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2} }\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+ \frac{1}{2}x\alpha _{{2}}-\frac{1}{2}y\alpha \gamma _{{2}}+\frac{1}{2} z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ }\right.$

$\left. +\sigma _{{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{t\gamma _{{2}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\omega _{{1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{2}}\lambda _{{ 1}}-\gamma _{{2}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ }+x\alpha _{{2}}-y\alpha \, \gamma _{{2} }+z\gamma _{{2}}} \ \ }\right) .$

3.3. Option III: Triple-wave solutions

The triple-wave function of the solution will be reduced as below form

$\begin{equation} \Psi = \frac{\Delta _{3}}{\Omega _{3}}, \end{equation}$

(3.20)

$\begin{equation} \Omega _{3} = 1+\rho _{1}e^{\Lambda _{1}}+\rho _{2}e^{\Lambda _{2}}+\rho _{3}e^{\Lambda _{3}}+\rho _{1}\rho _{2}\rho _{12}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{2}}+\rho _{1}\rho _{3}\rho _{13}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{3}}+\rho _{2}\rho _{3}\rho _{23}e^{\Lambda _{2}+\Lambda _{3}}+\rho _{1}\rho _{2}\rho _{3}\rho _{12}\rho _{13}\rho _{23}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{2}+\Lambda _{3}}, \ \ \end{equation}$

(3.21)

$\Delta _{3} = 2\sigma _{1}e^{\Lambda _{1}}+2\sigma _{2}e^{\Lambda _{2}}+2\sigma _{1}\sigma _{2}\sigma _{12}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{2}}+2\sigma _{1}\sigma _{3}\sigma _{13}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{3}}+2\sigma _{2}\sigma _{3}\sigma _{23}e^{\Lambda _{2}+\Lambda _{3}}+$

$2\sigma _{1}\sigma _{2}\sigma _{3}\sigma _{12}\sigma _{13}\sigma _{23}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{2}+\Lambda _{3}},$

in which $\Lambda _{i} = \alpha _{i}x+\beta _{i}y+\gamma _{i}x-\delta _{i}t, i = 1, 2, 3$ . Inserting (3.20) in terms of (3.21) into Eq (1.8), the below case will be reached:

$\begin{eqnarray} \alpha _{i} & = &\alpha _{i}, \ \ \gamma _{i} = \gamma _{i}, \ \ \sigma _{i} = \sigma _{i}, \ \ \rho _{1} = 0, \ \ \rho _{2} = \rho _{2}, \ \ \rho _{3} = \rho _{3}, \ \ \beta _{{i}} = -\alpha \, \gamma _{{i}}, \ \ \\ \delta _{{i}} & = & \ \ {\frac{\gamma _{{i}}\left( \alpha \, \gamma _{{i}}\omega _{{ \ 2}}-\alpha _{{i}}\omega _{{1}}-\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{i}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{i}}\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{i}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{i} }\lambda _{{3}}} }, \ \ i = 1, 2, 3, \ \ \rho _{ij} = \rho _{ij}, \ \ \sigma _{ij} = 1, \ \ i, j = 1, 2, 3, \ i\neq j. \end{eqnarray}$

(3.22)

Then, the solution is

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{1} = \frac{2\sigma _{1}e^{\Lambda _{1}}+2\sigma _{2}e^{\Lambda _{2}}+2\sigma _{1}\sigma _{2}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{2}}+2\sigma _{1}\sigma _{3}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{3}}+2\sigma _{2}\sigma _{3}e^{\Lambda _{2}+\Lambda _{3}}+2\sigma _{1}\sigma _{2}\sigma _{3}e^{\Lambda _{1}+\Lambda _{2}+\Lambda _{3}}} \ \ {1+\rho _{2}e^{\Lambda _{2}}+\rho _{3}e^{\Lambda _{3}}+\rho _{2}\rho _{3}\rho _{23}e^{\Lambda _{2}+\Lambda _{3}}} \ \ , \end{equation}$

(3.23)

in which $\Lambda _{i} = \alpha _{i}x-\alpha \, \gamma _{{i}}y+\gamma _{i}x-{ \frac{\gamma _{{i}}\left(\alpha \, \gamma _{{i}}\omega _{{\ 2}}-\alpha _{{i} }\omega _{{1}}-\omega _{{3}}\gamma _{{i}}\right) }{\alpha \, \gamma _{{i} }\lambda _{{2}}-\alpha _{{i}}\lambda _{{1}}-\gamma _{{i}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ } t, i = 1, 2, 3$ and $\Psi = \Psi (x, y, z, t)$ .

4. Novel periodic wave solutions

The triangular periodic waves for Eq (1.8) can be assumed as below:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = \exp (\tau _{1})+a_{16}\exp (-\tau _{1})+\cosh (\tau _{2})+\cos (\tau _{3})+a_{17}, \ \ \ \tau _{1} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{4}a_{i}x_{i}+a_{5}, \ \ \ \tau _{2} = \sum\limits_{i = 6}^{9}a_{i}x_{i-5}+a_{10}, \ \ \ \end{equation}$

(4.1)

$\begin{equation} \tau _{3} = \sum\limits_{i = 11}^{14}a_{i}x_{i-10}+a_{15}, \ \ (x_{1}, x_{2}, x_{3}, x_{4}) = (\mathbf{x}, t) = (x, y, z, t), \ \ \ \Psi (\mathbf{x} , t) = v_{0}+2\ln (\mathbf{f})_{x}, \end{equation}$

(4.2)

in which $a_{i}, i = 1, ..., 17$ are unfound values. Substituting (4.1) and (4.2) into Eq (1.8) the below consequences will be gained:

Case I:

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{f} & = &{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{y\left( a_{{3}}a_{{14} }\omega _{{3}}-a_{{4}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{3} }\right) }{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\cosh \left( a_{{9}}t-{ \frac{y\left( a_{{8}}a_{{14}}\omega _{{3}}-a_{{9}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{ \ 9}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{8}}z+a_{{\ 10 }}\right) \\ &&+\cos \left( ta_{{14}}+ya_{{12}}+za_{{13}}+a_{{15}}\right) . \end{eqnarray}$

(4.3)

Appending (4.3) into (4.1) and (4.2), the soliton-periodic wave solution of Eq (1.8) as below will be achieved:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{1} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{ y\left( a_{{3}}a_{{14}}\omega _{{3}}-a_{{4}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{4}}a_{{ 13}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{ \mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(4.4)

By selecting the suitable values of parameters including

$\begin{eqnarray*} a_{1} & = &1, a_{3} = 1.5, a_{4} = 2, a_{5} = 1.5, a_{8} = 2, a_{9} = 1.5, a_{10} = 1, \\ a_{12} & = &2, a_{13} = 2.5, a_{14} = 1, a_{15} = 3.2, \omega _{2} = 1.5, \omega _{3} = 1.2, \end{eqnarray*}$

the graphical display of soliton-periodic wave solution is offered in Figure 1 such as 3D plot and density plot.

Figure 1. The soliton-periodic solution (4.4) at (f1, f2)

$x = -2, y = -2$ , (f3, f4)

$x = 0, y = 0$ , and (f5, f6)

$x = 2, y = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case II:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+ya_{{2}}- \ \ {\frac { \left( {a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}a_{{\ 14}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega_{{2}} \right) z}{a_{{14}}\omega_{{2}}} \ \ } +a_{ {5}}} \ \ }+\cosh \left( a_{{9}}t+ya_{{7}}+ \ \ {\frac {a_{{9}}a_{{13}}z}{a_{{14 } }}} \ \ +a_{{10}} \right) +\cos \left( ta_{{14}}+ya_{{12}}+za_{{13}}+a_{{\ 15}} \right). \end{equation}$

(4.5)

Plugging (4.5) into (4.1) and (4.2), obtain a soliton-periodic wave solution of Eq (1.8) as below case:

$\begin{equation} \Psi_2 = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+ya_{{2}}- \ \ {\frac { \left( {a_{{1}}} ^ {3}a_{{14}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega_{{2}} \right) z}{a_{{14} }\omega_{{2} }}} \ \ +a_{{5}}} \ \ } }{\mathbf{f}} . \end{equation}$

(4.6)

Case III:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac {y \left( a_{{3}}\omega_{{3} }+a_{{4 }}\lambda_{{3}} \right) }{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\cosh \left( a_{{9}}t- \ \ {\frac {y \left( a_{{8}}\omega_{{3}}+a_{{9}}\lambda_{ {3}} \right) }{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10}} \right) +\cos \left( - \ \ {\frac { a_{ {13}}\omega_{{3}}y}{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{13}}+a_{{15}} \right). \end{equation}$

(4.7)

Incorporating (4.7) into (4.1) and (4.2), the soliton-periodic wave solution of Eq (1.8) will be gained as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi_3 = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac {y \left( a_{{3}}\omega_{{3} }+a_{{4}}\lambda_{{3}} \right) }{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3} }z+a_{{5}}} \ \ } }{\mathbf{f}} . \end{equation}$

(4.8)

Case IV:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t- \ \ {\frac {y \left( a_{{3}}a_{{9}}\omega_{{3} }-a_{{4}} a_{{7}}\omega_{{2}}-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\omega_{{3}} \right) }{a_{{9} }\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\cosh \left( a_{{9}}t+ya_{{7}}+a_{{8} }z+a_ {{10}} \right) +\cos \left( xa_{{11}}+a_{{15}} \right) . \end{equation}$

(4.9)

Plugging (4.9) into (4.1) and (4.2), the soliton-periodic wave solution of Eq (1.8) will be achieved as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi_4 = v_{{0}}-\frac{2\sin \left( xa_{{11}}+a_{{15}} \right) a_{{11}} }{ \mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(4.10)

Case V:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+ya_{{2}}+ \ \ {\frac {a_{{4}}a_{{8}}z}{a_{{9}}} \ \ } +a_{{5}} }}+\cosh \left( a_{{9}}t+ya_{{7}}+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10}} \right) +\cos \left( xa_{{11}}- \ \ {\frac { \left( {a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega_{{3}}+\omega_{{\ 1} }\omega_{{2}} \right) a_{{11}}y}{{\omega_{{2}}} ^{2}}} \ \ + \ \ {\frac {{a_{{\ 11}}} \ \ ^{3}z}{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}} \right). \end{equation}$

(4.11)

Incorporating (4.11) into (4.1) and (4.2), we capture a soliton-periodic wave solution of Eq (1.8) as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi_5 = v_{{0}}-\frac{2\sin \left( xa_{{11}}- \ \ {\frac { \left( {a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{2}\omega_{{3}}+ \omega_{{1}}\omega_{{2}} \right) a_{{11}}y}{{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ ^{2}}} \ \ +{\ \frac {{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z}{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}} \right) a_{{11}} }{ \mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(4.12)

Case VI:

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{f} & = &{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+ \ \ {\frac{\omega _{{2}}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9} }-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) x}{a_{{9}}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}}} \ \ -\frac{1}{3}\, \ \ {\frac{ y\left( -2\, \alpha \, a_{{9}}{a_{{11}}} ^{6}\omega _{{2}}+2\, a_{{9}}{a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{6}\omega _{{3}}+3\, \alpha \, {a_{{3}}} ^{2}a_{{9}}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ ^{3}-3\, \alpha \, a_{{3}}a_{{4}}a_{{8}}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{3}+2\, a_{{9}}{a_{{11}} }^{4}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) }{{\omega _{{2}}} ^{3}\left( a_{{3}}a_{ {9}}-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) }} \ \ +a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} }+ \\ &&\cosh \left( a_{{9}}t-\frac{1}{3} \ \ {\frac{y\Omega }{a_{{4}}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ ^{3}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9}}-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) \left( {a_{{9}}} ^{2}{a_{{11}} }^{6}+{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9}}-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) ^{2}\right) }}+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10}}\right) \\ &&+\cos \left( xa_{{11}}- \ \ {\frac{\alpha {a_{{11}}} ^{3}y}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+{ \frac{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}}\right) , \end{eqnarray}$

(4.13)

$\begin{eqnarray*} \Omega & = &3\, \alpha \, a_{{4}}a_{{8}}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{5}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9} }-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) ^{3}+\alpha \, {a_{{9}}} ^{2}{a_{{11}}} ^{6}{\omega _{{2 }}} ^{3}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9}}+2\, a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) \left( a_{{3}}a_{{9} }-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) \\ &&-{a_{{9}}} ^{2}{a_{{11}}} ^{4}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9}}-a_{{4} }a_{{8}}\right) ^{2}\left( {a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}+\omega _{{1}}\omega _{ {2}}\right) -{a_{{9}}} ^{2}{a_{{11}}} ^{12}\left( 3\, {a_{{4}}} ^{2}-{a_{{9}}} \ \ ^{2}\right) \left( \alpha \, \omega _{{2}}-\omega _{{3}}\right) . \end{eqnarray*}$

Appending (4.13) into (4.1) and (4.2), the soliton-periodic wave solution of Eq (1.8) will be obtained as below:

$\begin{eqnarray} \Psi _{5} & = &v_{{0}}+\frac{2}{\mathbf{f}}\left[ \ \ {\frac{\omega _{{2}}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9}}-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) }{a_{{9}}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{ {4}}t+ \ \ {\frac{\omega _{{2}}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9}}-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) x}{a_{{ 9}}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}}} \ \ -\frac{1}{3}\, \ \ {\frac{y\left( -2\, \alpha \, a_{{9}}{a_{{11}} }^{6}\omega _{{2}}+2\, a_{{9}}{a_{{11}}} ^{6}\omega _{{3}}+3\, \alpha \, {a_{{3}} }^{2}a_{{9}}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{3}-3\, \alpha \, a_{{3}}a_{{4}}a_{{8}}{\omega _{{2 }}} ^{3}+2\, a_{{9}}{a_{{11}}} ^{4}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) }{{\omega _{{2}}} ^{3}\left( a_{{3}}a_{{9}}-a_{{4}}a_{{8}}\right) }}+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }} \right. \\ &&\left. +\sin \left( -xa_{{11}}+ \ \ {\frac{\alpha \, {a_{{11}}} ^{3}y}{\omega _{{2 }}} \ \ }- \ \ {\frac{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }-a_{{15}}\right) a_{{11}}\right] . \end{eqnarray}$

(4.14)

By selecting suitable values of parameters including

$\begin{eqnarray*} \alpha & = &0.5, a_{3} = 1, a_{4} = 1.5, a_{5} = 2, a_{8} = 2, a_{9} = 1.5, a_{10} = 1, a_{11} = 2, a_{13} = 2.5, a_{14} = 1, \\ a_{15} & = &3.2, \omega _{1} = 1.5, \omega _{2} = 1.2, \omega _{3} = 1.5, \end{eqnarray*}$

the graphical display of soliton-periodic wave solution is offered in Figure 2 such as 3D chart and density chart.

Figure 2. The soliton-periodic solution (4.14) at (f1, f2)

$x = -2, y = -2$ , (f3, f4)

$x = 0, y = 0$ , and (f5, f6)

$x = 2, y = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case VII:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{ \ \ {\frac{\Omega \, a_{{9}}t}{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}}} \ \ +a_{{1}}x- \frac{1}{6}\, \ \ {\frac{y\left( -6\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{5}\omega _{{3}}-3\, { a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{3}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+2\, {a_{{11}}} ^{7}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+6\, \Omega \, a_{{1}}a_{{8}}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{2} }\omega _{{3}}+3\, \Omega \, a_{{1}}a_{{8}}\omega _{{1}}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ ^{2}\right) }{{a_{{11}}} ^{5}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}a_{{1}}} \ \ }+ \ \ {\frac{\left( -{a_{{ 1}}} ^{3}{a_{{11}}} ^{3}+\Omega \, a_{{8}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{{a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{3}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+ \end{equation}$

(4.15)

$\cosh \left( a_{{9}}t+ya_{{7}}+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10}}\right) +\cos \left( xa_{{11} }-\frac{1}{2}\, \ \ {\frac{\left( 2\, {a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}+\omega _{{1} }\omega _{{2}}\right) a_{{11}}y}{{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}}} \ \ + \ \ {\frac{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z }{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}}\right) ,$

$\Omega = \sqrt{-{a_{{1}}} ^{6}-2\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}+{a_{{11}}} ^{6}}.$

Incorporating (4.15) into (4.1) and (4.2), the soliton-periodic wave solution of Eq (1.8) will be received as below:

$\begin{eqnarray} \Psi _{5} & = &v_{{0}}+\frac{2}{\mathbf{f}}\left[ a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{ \ \ {\frac{ \Omega \, a_{{9}}t}{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}}} \ \ +a_{{1}}x-\frac{1}{6}\, \ \ {\frac{y\left( -6\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{5}\omega _{{3}}-3\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{3}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+2\, {a_{{11}}} ^{7}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2} }+6\, \Omega \, a_{{1}}a_{{8}}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{2}}\omega _{{3} }+3\, \Omega \, a_{{1}}a_{{8}}\omega _{{1}}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}\right) }{{a_{{11 }}} ^{5}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}a_{{1}}} \ \ }+ \ \ {\frac{\left( -{a_{{1}}} ^{3}{a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{3}+\Omega \, a_{{8}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ } +a_{{5}}} \ \ }\right. \\ &&\left. -\sin \left( xa_{{11}}-\frac{1}{2}\, \ \ {\frac{\left( 2\, {a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{2}\omega _{{3}}+\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) a_{{11}}y}{{\omega _{{2}} }^{2}}} \ \ + \ \ {\frac{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}}\right) a_{{11}} \right] . \end{eqnarray}$

(4.16)

By selecting the specific amounts of parameters including

$\begin{eqnarray*} \alpha & = &0.5, a_{1} = 1, a_{4} = a_{9} = \omega _{1} = \omega _{3} = 1.5, , a_{5} = 2, a_{7} = 1.5, a_{8} = 2, \\ a_{10} & = &1, a_{11} = 2, a_{13} = 2.5, a_{14} = 1, a_{15} = 3.2, \omega _{2} = 1.2, \end{eqnarray*}$

the graphical display of soliton-periodic wave solution is offered in Figure 3 such as 3D chart, density chart, and 2D chart and below cases:

$(f3)\ y = 1, 2, 3, \ \ (f6)\ y = 1, 2, 3, \ and\ \ (f9)\ y = -1, -2, -3.$

Figure 3. The soliton-periodic solution (4.16) at (f1, f2)

$z = -2, t = -2$ , (f4, f5)

$z = 0, t = 0$ , and (f7, f8)

$z = 2, t = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

5. Novel cross-kink wave solutions

Three function containing exponential, hyperbolic, and triangular periodic waves for Eq (1.8) can be assumed as the following:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = \exp(\tau_1)+a_{16}\exp(-\tau_1)+\sinh(\tau_2)+\sin( \tau_3)+a_{17}, \ \ \ \tau_1 = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{4}a_ix_i+a_5, \ \ \ \tau_2 = \sum\limits_{i = 6}^{9}a_ix_{i-5}+a_{10}, \end{equation}$

(5.1)

$\begin{equation} \tau_3 = \sum\limits_{i = 11}^{14}a_ix_{i-10}+a_{15}, \ \ (x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4) = (\mathbf{x} , t) = (x, y, z, t), \ \ \ \Psi(\mathbf{x}, t) = v_0+2\ln(\mathbf{f})_{x}, \end{equation}$

(5.2)

in which $a_{i}, i = 1, ..., 17$ are unfound values. Substituting (5.2) into Eq (1.8) the below consequences will be gained:

Case I:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{\left( a_{{3}}a_{{14} }\omega _{{3}}-a_{{4}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{3} }\right) y}{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\sinh \left( a_{{9}}t- \ \ {\frac{\left( a_{{8}}a_{{14}}\omega _{{3}}-a_{{9}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{9 }}a_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}\right) y}{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10} }\right) \end{equation}$

(5.3)

$+\sin \left( ta_{{14}}+ya_{{12}}+za_{{13}}+a_{{15}}\right) .$

Substituting (5.3) into (5.1) and (5.2), the cross-kink solution of Eq (1.8) will be gained as the following:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{1} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{\left( a_{{3}}a_{{14}}\omega _{{3}}-a_{{4}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13} }\omega _{{3}}\right) y}{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{ f}}. \end{equation}$

(5.4)

By selecting the suitable values of parameters including

$\begin{eqnarray*} a_{1} & = &1, a_{3} = 3, a_{4} = 2, a_{5} = 1.5, a_{8} = 1.7, a_{9} = 1.5, a_{10} = 1.5, \\ a_{12} & = &2.5, a_{13} = 1.1, a_{14} = 2.1, a_{15} = 3.2, \omega _{2} = 1, \omega _{3} = 1.5, \end{eqnarray*}$

the graphical representation of cross-kink wave solution is offered in Figure 4 such 3D plot and density plot.

Figure 4. The cross-kink wave solution (5.4) at (f1, f2)

$x = 3, y = 2$ , (f3, f4)

$x = 0, y = 2$ , and (f5, f6)

$x = -3, y = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case II:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y- \ \ {\frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}a_{{14}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ } +a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\sinh \left( a_{{9}}t+a_{{7}}y+ \ \ {\frac{a_{{9}}a_{{13}}z}{a_{{14}}} \ \ } +a_{{10}}\right) +\sin \left( ta_{{14}}+ya_{{12}}+za_{{13}}+a_{{15}}\right) . \end{equation}$

(5.5)

Putting (5.5) into (5.1) and (5.2), the cross-kink solution of Eq (1.8) will be received as the following:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{2} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y-{ \frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} ^{3}a_{{14}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{a_{ {14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(5.6)

By selecting the suitable values of parameters including

the graphical exhibition of cross-kink solution is offered in Figure 5 such as 3D chart and density chart.

Figure 5. The cross-kink wave solution (5.6) at (f1, f2)

$x = 3, y = 2$ , (f3, f4)

$x = 0, y = 2$ , and (f5, f6)

$x = -3, y = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case III:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac { \left( a_{{3}}\omega_{{3} }+a_{{4} }\lambda_{{3}} \right) y}{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\sinh \left( a_{{9}}t- \ \ {\frac { \left( a_{{8}}\omega_{{3}}+a_{{9}}\lambda_{{\ 3}} \right) y}{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10}} \right) +\sin \left( - \ \ {\frac { a_{{13}}\omega_{{3}}y}{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{13}}z+a_{{15}} \right). \end{equation}$

(5.7)

Plugging (5.7) into (5.1) and (5.2), the cross-kink solution of Eq (1.8) will be obtained as the following:

$\begin{equation} \Psi_3 = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac { \left( a_{{3}}\omega_{{3}} +a_{{4}}\lambda_{{3}} \right) y}{\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3} }z+a_{{5}}} \ \ } }{\mathbf{f}} . \end{equation}$

(5.8)

Case IV:

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{f} & = &{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{a_{{9}}\left( {a_{{11}}} ^{2}\left( \omega _{{3}}{a_{{1}}} ^{2}-\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) \left( {a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}+a_{{3}}\omega _{{2}}\right) -{a_{{1}}} ^{5}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2} }\right) t}{{a_{{1}}} ^{2}a_{{7}}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}}} \ \ +a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{a_{{3}}\left( \omega _{{3}}{a_{{1}}} ^{2}-\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2} }\right) y}{{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\sin \left( xa_{{ 11}}+a_{{15}}\right) \\ &&+\sinh \left( a_{{9}}t+a_{{7}}y- \ \ {\frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} ^{3}+a_{{3}}\omega _{{2}}\right) {a_{{1}}} ^{2}a_{{7}}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{2}}z}{{a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{2}\left( \omega _{{3}}{a_{{1}}} ^{2}-\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) \left( {a_{{1}}} ^{3}+a_{{3}}\omega _{{2}}\right) -{a_{{1}}} ^{5}\omega _{{1} }\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{10}}\right) . \end{eqnarray}$

(5.9)

Inserting (5.9) into (5.1) and (5.2), the cross-kink solution of Eq (1.8) will be gained as the following:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{4} = v_{{0}}+2\frac{a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{- \ \ {\frac{a_{{9}}\left( {a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{2}\left( \omega _{{3}}{a_{{1}}} ^{2}-\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) \left( {a_{{1}}} ^{3}+a_{{3}}\omega _{{2}}\right) -{a_{{1}}} ^{5}\omega _{{1} }\omega _{{2}}\right) t}{{a_{{1}}} ^{2}a_{{7}}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ ^{2}}} \ \ +a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{a_{{3}}\left( \omega _{{3}}{a_{{1}}} ^{2}-\omega _{{1} }\omega _{{2}}\right) y}{{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ } +\cos \left( xa_{{11}}+a_{{15}}\right) a_{{11}}} \ \ {\mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(5.10)

Case V:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{2}}y+ \ \ {\frac{a_{{4}}a_{{8}}z}{a_{{9}}} \ \ } +a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\sinh \left( a_{{9}}t+a_{{7}}y+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10}}\right) +\sin \left( xa_{{11}}- \ \ {\frac{a_{{11}}\left( {a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}+\omega _{{ 1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) y}{{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}}} \ \ + \ \ {\frac{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z}{ \omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}}\right) . \end{equation}$

(5.11)

Substituting (5.11) into (5.1) and (5.2), the cross-kink solution of Eq (1.8) will be received as the following:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{5} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\cos \left( xa_{{11}}- \ \ {\frac{a_{{11}}\left( {a_{{11} }}^{2}\omega _{{3}}+\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) y}{{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}} }+ \ \ {\frac{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}}\right) a_{{11}}} \ \ {\mathbf{f }}. \end{equation}$

(5.12)

By selecting the suitable values of parameters including

the graphical exhibition of cross-kink solution is offered in Figure 6 such as 3D chart and density chart.

Figure 6. The cross-kink wave solution (5.6) at (f1, f2)

$x = 3, y = 2$ , (f3, f4)

$x = 0, y = 2$ , and (f5, f6)

$x = -3, y = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case VI:

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{f} & = &{\mathrm{e}^{ \ \ {\frac{\Omega \, a_{{9}}t}{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}}} \ \ +a_{{1} }x-\frac{1}{12} \ \ {\frac{\left( 3\, \Omega \, a_{{1}}a_{{8}}\omega _{{2}}\left( 4\, {a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}+3\, \omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) -12\, {a_{ {1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{5}\omega _{{3}}-{a_{{11}}} ^{3}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2} }\left( 9\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}-2\, {a_{{11}}} ^{2}{a_{{1}}} ^{2}-2\, {a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{4}\right) \right) y}{{a_{{11}}} ^{5}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}a_{{1}}} \ \ } + \ \ {\frac{ \left( -{a_{{1}}} ^{3}{a_{{11}}} ^{3}+\Omega \, a_{{8}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{ \omega _{{2}}{a_{{11}}} ^{3}}} \ \ +a_{{5}}} \ \ } \\ &&\sinh \left( a_{{9}}t+a_7y+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10}}\right) +\sin \left( xa_{{ 11}} \! - \! \frac{1}{12} \ \ {\frac{a_{11}\left( 12{a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3} } \! + \! 7\, \omega _1\omega _2\right) y}{{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}}} \ \ + \ \ {\frac{a_{11}^3z}\omega _2} \! + \! a_{15}\right), \end{eqnarray}$

(5.13)

$\Omega = \sqrt{-3\, {a_{{1}}} ^{6}-4\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}+{a_{{11}}} ^{6} }.$

Putting (5.13) into (5.1) and (5.2), the cross-kink solution of Eq (1.8) will be concluded as the following:

$\begin{eqnarray} \Psi _{5} & = &v_{{0}}+\frac{2}{\mathbf{f}}\left[ a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{ \ \ {\frac{ \Omega \, a_{{9}}t}{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}}} \ \ +a_{{1}}x-\frac{1}{12} \ \ {\frac{\left( 3\, \Omega \, a_{{1}}a_{{8}}\omega _{{2}}\left( 4\, {a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3} }+3\, \omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) -12\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{5}\omega _{{3}}-{a_{{11}}} ^{3}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\left( 9\, {a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{4}-2\, {a_{{11}}} ^{2}{a_{{1}}} ^{2}-2\, {a_{{11}}} ^{4}\right) \right) y}{{a_{{ 11}}} ^{5}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}a_{{1}}} \ \ }+ \ \ {\frac{\left( -{a_{{1}}} ^{3}{a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{3}+\Omega \, a_{{8}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{\omega _{{2}}{a_{{11}}} ^{3}}} \ \ +a_{{5}}} \ \ }\right. \\ &&+\left. \cos \left( xa_{{11}}-\frac{1}{12} \ \ {\frac{a_{{11}}\left( 12\, {a_{{11} }}^{2}\omega _{{3}}+7\, \omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}\right) y}{{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ ^{2}}} \ \ + \ \ {\frac{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}}\right) a_{{11}} \right] . \end{eqnarray}$

(5.14)

By selecting suitable values of parameters including

$\begin{eqnarray*} \alpha & = &0.5, a_{3} = 1, a_{4} = a_{9} = \omega _{1} = \omega _{3} = 1.5, a_{5} = 2, a_{8} = 2, \\ a_{10} & = &1, a_{11} = 2, a_{13} = 2.5, a_{14} = 1, a_{15} = 3.2, \omega _{2} = 1.2, \end{eqnarray*}$

the graphical representation of cross-kink solution is offered in Figure 7 such as 3D chart and density chart.

Figure 7. The cross-kink wave solution (5.14) at (f1, f2)

$x = -2, y = -2$ , (f3, f4)

$x = 0, y = 0$ , and (f5, f6)

$x = 2, y = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case VII:

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{f} & = &{\mathrm{e}^{ \ \ {\frac{\Omega a_{{9}}t}{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}}} \ \ +a_{{1} }x-\frac{1}{6}{\ \frac{y\left( -6{a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{5}\omega _{{3} }-3\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{3}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+2\, {a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{7}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}+6\, \Omega a_{{1}}a_{{8}}{a_{{11}}} \ \ ^{2}\omega _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}+3\, \Omega \, a_{{1}}a_{{8}}\omega _{{1}}{\ \omega _{{2}}} ^{2}\right) }{{a_{{11}}} ^{5}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}a_{{1}}} \ \ }+{\ \frac{\left( -{a_{{1}}} ^{3}{a_{{11}}} ^{3}+\Omega a_{{8}}\omega _{{2} }\right) z}{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+ \\ &&\cosh \left( a_{{9}}t+ya_{{7}}+a_{{8}}z+a_{{10}}\right) + \cos \left( xa_{{\ 11}}-\frac{1}{2} \ \ {\frac{\left( 2{a_{{11}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}+\omega _{{1} }\omega _{{2}}\right) a_{{11}}y}{{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}}} \ \ + \ \ {\frac{{a_{{11}}} ^{3}z }{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{15}}\right), \end{eqnarray}$

(5.15)

$\Omega = \sqrt{-{a_{{1}}} ^{6}-2\, {a_{{1}}} ^{4}{a_{{11}}} ^{2}+{a_{{11}}} ^{6}}.$

Inserting (5.15) into (5.1) and (5.2), the cross-kink solution of Eq (1.8) will be gained as the following:

(5.16)

By selecting suitable values of parameters including

$\alpha = 0.5, a_1 = 1, a_5 = 1.5, a_8 = 2, a_9 = 0.5, a_{10} = 1.5, a_{15} = 3.2, \omega_1 = 1.5, \omega_2 = 1.2, \omega_3 = 1.5,$

the graphical representation of cross-kink solution is offered in Figure 8 such as 3D chart and density chart.

Figure 8. The lump-periodic solution (5.16) at (f1, f2)

$z = -2$ , (f4, f5)

$z = 0$ , and (f7, f8)

$z = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

6. Novel solitary wave solutions

Three function containing exponential, hyperbolic, and triangular periodic waves for Eq (1.8) can be assumed as the following:

$\begin{equation} \textbf{f} = \exp (\tau _{1})+a_{16}\exp (-\tau _{1})+\tanh (\tau _{2})+\tan (\tau _{3})+a_{17}, \ \ \ \tau _{1} = \sum\limits_{i = 1}^{4}a_{i}x_{i}+a_{5}, \ \ \ \tau _{2} = \sum\limits_{i = 6}^{9}a_{i}x_{i-5}+a_{10}, \ \ \ \end{equation}$

(6.1)

(6.2)

in which $a_{i}, i = 1, ..., 17$ are unfound values. Substituting (6.2) into Eq (1.8) the below consequences will be gained:

Case I:

$\begin{equation} \textbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y- \ \ {\frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}+a_{{4}}\lambda _{{2}}\right) z}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( ya_{{7}}+a_{{10}}\right) +\tan \left( ya_{{12}}+a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.3)

Substituting (6.3) into (6.1) and (6.2), we can capture a solitary wave solution of Eq (1.8) as the following:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{1} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y-{ \frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} ^{3}+a_{{4}}\lambda _{{2}}\right) z}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ } +a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(6.4)

Case II:

$\begin{equation} \textbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y- \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{3}z}{\omega _{{2} }}} \ \ +a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( ya_{{7}}+a_{{10}}\right) +\tan \left( ya_{{12} }+a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.5)

Inserting (6.5) into (6.1) and (6.2), we can capture a solitary wave solution of Eq (1.8) as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{2} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y- \ \ {\frac{{a_{{ 1}}} ^{3}z}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(6.6)

Case III:

$\begin{equation} \textbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y- \ \ {\frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}\omega _{{3}}+a_{{4}}\lambda _{{3}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{\omega _{{2} }\omega _{{3}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( ta_{{9}}+ya_{{7}}- \ \ {\frac{za_{{9} }\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ {\omega _{{3}}} \ \ }+a_{{10}}\right) +\tan \left( ya_{{12}}+a_{{ 15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.7)

Putting (6.7) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary wave solution of Eq (1.8) can be indicated as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{3} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y-{ \frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} ^{3}\omega _{{3}}+a_{{4}}\lambda _{{3}}\omega _{{2} }\right) z}{\omega _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(6.8)

Case IV:

$\begin{equation} \textbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y+za_{{3}}+a_{{5}}} \ \ }-\tanh \left( \ \ {\frac{ya_{{8}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }-za_{{8}}-a_{{10} }\right) -\tan \left( \ \ {\frac{ya_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }-a_{{13} }z-a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.9)

Putting (6.9) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary wave of Eq (1.8) can be stated as the following:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{4} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2} }y+za_{{3}}+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}. \end{equation}$

(6.10)

By selecting the suitable values of parameters including

$\begin{eqnarray*} a_{1} & = &1, a_{2} = 1.5, a_{3} = 2, a_{4} = 2, a_{5} = 1.5, a_{8} = 2, a_{9} = 1.5, a_{10} = 1.5, \\ a_{13} & = &2, a_{13} = 1.1, a_{15} = 3.2, a_{17} = 2, \omega _{2} = -1.5, \end{eqnarray*}$

$\omega _{3} = 1.2, \lambda _{2} = 1, \lambda _{3} = 1.5, x = -2, t = 2,$

with the following components

$\begin{eqnarray*} \alpha & = & \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{3}\omega _{{3}}-a_{{1}}\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2} }-a_{{2}}{\omega _{{2}}} ^{2}-a_{{3}}\omega _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}+a_{{4} }\lambda _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}-a_{{4}}\lambda _{{3}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {\omega _{{2} }{a_{{1}}} ^{3}}} \ \ , \ \ \\ \lambda _{{1}} & = &- \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{3}a_{{2}}\omega _{{2}}+{a_{{1}}} ^{3}a_{{ 3}}\omega _{{3}}+a_{{2}}a_{{4}}\lambda _{{2}}\omega _{{2}}+a_{{3}}a_{{4} }\lambda _{{2}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {a_{{1}}a_{{4}}\omega _{{2}}} }, \end{eqnarray*}$

the graphical representation of rational solitary solution is offered in Figure 9 such as 3D chart and density chart.

Figure 9. The rational solitary wave solution (6.10) at (f1)

$z = 0$ , (f2)

$z = 1$ , and (f3)

$z = 3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case V:

$\begin{equation} \ f = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{a_{{3}}\omega _{{3}}y}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{3}}+a_{{5}}} \ \ }-\tanh \left( \ \ {\frac{ya_{{8}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {\omega _{{2}} }}-za_{{8}}-a_{{10}}\right) -\tan \left( \ \ {\frac{ya_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ { \omega _{{2}}} \ \ }-a_{{13}}z-a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.11)

Incorporating (6.11) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary solution of Eq (1.8) will be gained as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{5} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{a_{{3}}\omega _{{3}}y}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{3}}+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}, \ \ \alpha = \ \ {\frac{{ a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{ 2}}} \ \ }. \end{equation}$

(6.12)

Case VI:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{\left( a_{{3}}\omega _{{3} }+a_{{4}}\lambda _{{3}}\right) y}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{3}}+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( ta_{{9}}- \ \ {\frac{y\left( a_{{8}}\omega _{{3}}+a_{{9}}\lambda _{{3} }\right) }{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{8}}+a_{{10}}\right) -\tan \left( {\ \frac{ ya_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }-a_{{13}}z-a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.13)

Appending (6.13) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary solution of Eq (1.8) can be written as the following:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{6} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{ \left( a_{{3}}\omega _{{\ 3}}+a_{{4}}\lambda _{{3}}\right) y}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ } +za_{{3}}+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}, \ \ \alpha = \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3} }-\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }. \end{equation}$

(6.14)

Case VII:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{a_{{3}}\omega _{{3}}y}{ \omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{3}}+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( ta_{{9}}- \ \ {\frac{ya_{{8} }\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{8}}+a_{{10}}\right) -\tan \left( \ \ {\frac{ ya_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }-a_{{13}}z-a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.15)

Appending (6.15) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary solution of Eq (1.8) will be obtained as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{7} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{a_{{3 }}\omega _{{3}}y}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{3}}+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}, \ \ \alpha = \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {{a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{2}\omega _{{2}}} }, \ \ \lambda _{{2}} = \ \ {\frac{\lambda _{{3}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ { \omega _{{3}}} \ \ }. \end{equation}$

(6.16)

By choosing the specific amounts of parameters including

$\begin{eqnarray*} a_{1} & = &1, a_{2} = 1.5, a_{3} = 2, a_{4} = 2, a_{5} = 1.5, a_{8} = 2, a_{9} = 1.3, a_{10} = 1.5, \\ a_{13} & = &2, a_{13} = 2, a_{15} = 3.2, a_{17} = 2, \omega _{2} = -1.5, \\ \omega _{3} & = &1.2, \lambda _{2} = 1, \lambda _{3} = 1.5, x = -2, t = 2, \end{eqnarray*}$

the graphical representation of rational solitary solution is offered in Figure 10 such as 3D chart and density chart.

Figure 10. The rational solitary wave solution (6.16) at (f1)

$z = 0$ , (f2)

$z = 1$ , and (f3)

$z = 3$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case VIII:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y- \ \ {\frac { \left( {a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}a_{{\ 14}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega_{{2}} \right) z}{a_{{14}}\omega_{{2}}} \ \ } +a_{ {5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( ta_{{9}}+ya_{{7}}+ \ \ {\frac {za_{{9}}a_{{13}}} \ \ {a_{{14 } }}} \ \ +a_{{10}} \right) +\tan \left( ta_{{14}}+ya_{{12}}+a_{{13}}z+a_{{\ 15}} \right) +a_{{17}} . \end{equation}$

(6.17)

Incorporating (6.17) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary solution of Eq (1.8) will be received as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi_8 = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y-{ \frac { \left( {a_{{1} }}^{3}a_{{14}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega_{{2}} \right) z}{ a_{{14}}\omega_{ {2}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ } }{\mathbf{f}}, \ \ \alpha = \ \ {\frac {{a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{2}\omega_{{3}}-\omega_{{1}}\omega_{{2}}} \ \ {{a_ {{1}}} ^{2}\omega_{{2}}} }, \ \ \lambda_{{2}} = - \ \ {\frac {a_{{13}}\omega_{{2}}} \ \ {a_{{14}}} }, \ \ \lambda_{{3}} = -{ \frac {a_{{13}}\omega_{{3}}} \ \ {a_{{14}}} \ \ }. \end{equation}$

(6.18)

Case IX:

$\begin{eqnarray} \mathbf{f} & = &{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{\left( a_{{3}}a_{{14} }\omega _{{3}}-a_{{4}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{3} }\right) y}{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ } \end{eqnarray}$

(6.19)

$\begin{eqnarray} &&+\tanh \left( ta_{{9}}- \ \ {\frac{y\left( a_{{8}}a_{{14}}\omega _{{3}}-a_{{9}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{ \ 9}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}\right) }{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{8}}+a_{{\ 10 }}\right) \end{eqnarray}$

(6.20)

$\begin{eqnarray} &&+\tan \left( ta_{{14}}+ya_{{12}}+za_{{13}}+a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{eqnarray}$

(6.21)

Appending (6.21) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary solution of Eq (1.8) can be reached as below:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{9} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{\left( a_{{3}}a_{{14}}\omega _{{3}}-a_{{4}}a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13} }\omega _{{3}}\right) y}{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{ f}}, \ \alpha = \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-\omega _{{1}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {{ a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega _{{2}}} }, \ \end{equation}$

(6.22)

$\lambda _{{1}} = - \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\left( a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}+a_{{\ 13} }\omega _{{3}}\right) }{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} }, \ \lambda _{{3}} = - \ \ {\frac{a_{{ 12}}\omega _{{2}}+a_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {a_{{\ 14}}} \ \ }.$

Case X:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac {a_{{3}}\omega_{{3}}y}{ \omega_{{2}} }}+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( - \ \ {\frac {ya_{{8}}\omega_{{3}} }{ \omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{8}}+a_{{10}} \right) +\tan \left( ta_{{14}}-{\ \frac { ya_{{13}}\omega_{{3}}} \ \ {\omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{13}}+a_{{15}} \right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.23)

Inserting (6.21) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary solution of Eq (1.8) will be gained as below form:

$\begin{equation} \Psi_{10} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2\, a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac {a_{{ 3}}\omega_{{3}}y}{ \omega_{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ } }{\mathbf{f}}, \ \alpha = { \frac {{a_{{1}}} ^{2}\omega_{{3}}-\omega_{{1}}\omega_{{2}}} \ \ {{a_ {{1}}} \ \ ^{2}\omega_{{2}}} \ \ } , \ \lambda_{{2}} = \ \ {\frac {\lambda_{{3}}\omega_{{2}}} \ \ { \omega_{{3}}} \ \ }. \end{equation}$

(6.24)

By choosing the specific amounts of parameters including

$\begin{eqnarray*} a_{1} & = &1, a_{3} = 1.5, a_{4} = 2, a_{5} = 1.5, a_{7} = 2, a_{8} = 2, a_{9} = 2.1, \\ a_{10} & = &1.5, a_{13} = 2, a_{13} = 2, a_{14} = 2.5, a_{15} = 3.2, \\ a_{17} & = &2, \omega _{2} = -1.5, \omega _{3} = 1.2, \lambda _{3} = 1.5, x = -2, t = 2, \end{eqnarray*}$

the graphical representation of rational solitary solution is offered in Figure 11 such as 3D chart and density chart.

Figure 11. The rational solitary wave solution (6.24) at (f1)

$z = -2$ , (f2)

$z = 0$ , and (f3)

$z = 2$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Case XI:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y- \ \ {\frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}a_{{\ 14}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{a_{{14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ } +a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( \ \ {\frac{ta_{{14}}a_{{8}}} \ \ {a_{{13}}} \ \ }+ya_{{7}}+za_{{8} }+a_{{10}}\right) +\tan \left( ta_{{14}}+za_{{13}}+a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.25)

Inserting (6.25) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary solution of Eq (1.8) can be stated as below case:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{11} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x+a_{{2}}y-{ \frac{\left( {a_{{1}}} ^{3}a_{{14}}-a_{{4}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{2}}\right) z}{a_{ {14}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}, \ \alpha = - \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}a_{{2}}+a_{{1}}a_{{3}}\omega _{{1}}+a_{{2}}a_{{3}}\omega _{{2}}+{a_{{3}}} \ \ ^{2}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {{a_{{1}}} ^{3}a_{{3}}} }, \end{equation}$

(6.26)

$\begin{eqnarray*} \lambda _{{1}} & = & \ \ {\frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{3}a_{{2}}a_{{12}}a_{{13}}-{a_{{1}}} \ \ ^{3}a_{{3}}{a_{{12}}} ^{2}+a_{{2}}a_{{3}}a_{{12}}a_{{13}}\omega _{{2}}+a_{{2} }a_{{3}}{a_{{13}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}+a_{{2}}a_{{3}}a_{{13}}a_{{14}}\lambda _{{ 3}}} \ \ {a_{{3}}a_{{12}}a_{{1}}a_{{14}}} \ \ } \\ &&+\frac{-{a_{{3}}} ^{2}{a_{{12}}} ^{2}\omega _{{2}}-{a_{{3}}} ^{2}a_{{12}}a_{{ 13}}\omega _{{3}}-{a_{{3}}} ^{2}a_{{12}}a_{{14}}\lambda _{{3}}} \ \ {a_{{3}}a_{{12} }a_{{1}}a_{{14}}} \ \ , \end{eqnarray*}$

$\lambda _{{2}} = - \ \ {\frac{a_{{13}}\left( a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}+a_{{13}}\omega _{ {3}}+a_{{14}}\lambda _{{3}}\right) }{a_{{12}}a_{{14}}} \ \ }.$

Case XII:

$\begin{equation} \mathbf{f} = {\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{a_{{3}}\omega _{{3}}y}{ \omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }+\tanh \left( ta_{{9}}+ya_{{7}}- \ \ {\frac{za_{ {7}}\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {\omega _{{3}}} \ \ }+a_{{10}}\right) +\tan \left( ta_{{14}}-{\ \frac{ya_{{13}}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+za_{{13}}+a_{{15}}\right) +a_{{ 17}}. \end{equation}$

(6.27)

Inserting (6.27) into (6.1) and (6.2), the solitary solution of Eq (1.8) will be gained as below form:

$\begin{equation} \Psi _{12} = v_{{0}}+\frac{2a_{{1}}{\mathrm{e}^{a_{{4}}t+a_{{1}}x- \ \ {\frac{a_{{3} }\omega _{{3}}y}{\omega _{{2}}} \ \ }+a_{{3}}z+a_{{5}}} \ \ }}{\mathbf{f}}, \ \alpha = -{ \frac{{a_{{1}}} ^{3}a_{{2}}+a_{{1}}a_{{3}}\omega _{{1}}+a_{{2}}a_{{3}}\omega _{{2}}+{a_{{3}}} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {{a_{{1}}} ^{3}a_{{3}}} }, \end{equation}$

(6.28)

$\lambda _{{2}} = - \ \ {\frac{a_{{13}}\left( a_{{12}}\omega _{{2}}+a_{{13}}\omega _{ {3}}+a_{{14}}\lambda _{{3}}\right) }{a_{{12}}a_{{14}}} \ \ }.$

7. Stability analysis of Eq (1.8)

In the current section, we will analyze the continuous modulational instability of the nonlinear generalized KP equation. In addition, the feasibility of the localized waves in the present system is certified by linear stability analysis. First, we search the perturbed solution for the giving Eq (1.8) of the form

$\begin{equation} \Psi(x, y, z, t) = \zeta+\delta\ \Theta, \end{equation}$

(7.1)

where $\Theta = \Theta(x, y, z, t)$ and $\zeta$ is a steady state solution. Inserting (7.1) into Eq (1.8), become

$\begin{equation} \delta\, \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{4}}{\partial {x}^{3}\partial y}}\Theta +\alpha\, \delta\, \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{4}}{\partial {x}^{3} \partial z}}\Theta +3\, {\delta}^{2} \left( \ \ {\frac { \partial ^{2}}{\partial {x}^{2}}} \ \ \Theta \right) {\ \frac {\partial }{\partial y}}\Theta + 3\, {\delta}^{2 } \left( { \frac {\partial }{\partial x}}\Theta \right) \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x\partial y}}\Theta +3\, \alpha\, {\delta}^{2} \left( \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{ \partial {x}^{2}}} \ \ \Theta \right) \ \ {\frac {\partial } {\partial z}}\Theta + \end{equation}$

(7.2)

$3\, \alpha\, {\delta}^{2} \left( \ \ {\frac {\partial }{\partial x}}\Theta \right) {\ \frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x\partial z}}\Theta + \lambda_{{1}}\delta\, \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t\partial x}}\Theta +\lambda_{{2}}\delta\, { \frac {\partial ^{2}}{ \partial t\partial y}}\Theta + \lambda_{{3}}\delta\, { \ \frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t\partial z}}\Theta + \omega_{{1}}\delta\, { \frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial x\partial z}}\Theta +\omega_{{2}}\delta\, { \frac {\partial ^{2}}{ \partial y\partial z}}\Theta +\omega_{{3}}\delta\, {\ \frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial {z}^{2}}} \ \ \Theta = 0,$

by linerization Eq (7.2), one gets

$\begin{equation} \delta \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{4}}{\partial {x}^{3}\partial y}}\Theta +\alpha\delta \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{4}}{\partial {x}^{3} \partial z}}\Theta +\lambda_{{1} }\delta \ \ {\frac { \partial ^{2}}{\partial t\partial x}}\Theta + \lambda _{{2} }\delta \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t\partial y}}\Theta +\lambda_{{3} }\delta \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial t \partial z}}\Theta +\omega_{{1} }\delta \ \ {\frac { \partial ^{2}}{\partial x\partial z}}\Theta +\omega_ {{2} }\delta \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial y\partial z}}\Theta +\omega_{{3} }\delta \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial {z}^ {2}}} \ \ \Theta = 0. \end{equation}$

(7.3)

Theorem 7.1. Assume that the solution of Eq (7.3) has the following case as

$\begin{equation} \Theta(x, y, z, t) = \rho_1\ e^{i(Mx+Ny+Pz+Bt)}, \end{equation}$

(7.4)

in which $M, N, P$ are the normalized wave numbers, by plugging (7.4) into Eq (7.3), separation the coefficients of $e^{i(Mx+Ny+Pz+Wt)}$ one gets

$\begin{equation} B(M, N, P) = \ \ {\frac {{M}^{3}P\alpha+{M}^{3}N-MP\omega_{{1}}-NP\omega_{{2}}-{P} ^{2} \omega_{{3}}} \ \ {M\lambda_{{1}}+N\lambda_{{2}}+P\lambda_{{3}}} \ \ }. \end{equation}$

(7.5)

Proof. By putting (7.4) into (7.3), becomes

$\begin{equation} \delta\, \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{4}}{\partial {x}^{3}\partial y}}\overline{\Theta} +\alpha\, \delta\, \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{4}}{\partial {x}^{3} \partial z}} \overline{\Theta} +\lambda_{{1}}\delta\, \ \ {\frac { \partial ^{2}}{\partial t\partial x}}\overline{\Theta} + \lambda _{{2}}\delta\, \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2} }{\partial t\partial y}}\overline{\Phi} +\lambda_{{3}}\delta\, \ \ {\frac { \partial ^{2}}{\partial t \partial z}}\overline{\Theta} +\omega_{{1}}\delta\, \ \ {\frac { \partial ^{2}}{\partial x\partial z}}\overline{\Theta} +\omega_ {{2} }\delta\, \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial y\partial z}}\overline{\Theta} +\omega_{{3}}\delta\, \ \ {\frac {\partial ^{2}}{\partial {z}^ {2}}} \ \ \overline{ \Theta} \end{equation}$

(7.6)

$= {\mathrm{e}^{i \left( Mx+Ny+Pz+Bt \right) }}\delta\, \rho_{{1}} \left( {M} ^{3}P\alpha+{M}^{3}N-MP\omega_{{1}}-MB\lambda_{{1}}-NP\omega_{{2}}-NB \lambda_{{2}}-{P}^{2}\omega_{{3}}-PB\lambda_{{3}} \right),$

in which $\overline{\Theta} = \Theta(x, y, z, t)$ . By solving and simplifying we can determine the function of $B(M, N, P)$ as the following

$\begin{equation} B(M, N, P) = \ \ {\frac {{M}^{3}P\alpha+{M}^{3}N-MP\omega_{{1}}-NP\omega_{{2}}-{P} ^{2} \omega_{{3}}} \ \ {M\lambda_{{1}}+N\lambda_{{2}}+P\lambda_{{3}}} \ \ }. \end{equation}$

(7.7)

Accordingly, the considered solution was obtained. Thereupon the proof is perfect.

It is easy to notice that modulation stability occurs when $M\lambda_{{1} }+N\lambda_{{2}}+P\lambda_{{3}}\neq0$ . So, the modulation stability achieve spectrum $\Upsilon(B)$ will be as below form:

$\begin{equation} \Upsilon(B) = \ \ {\frac {{M}^{3}P\alpha+{M}^{3}N-MP\omega_{{1}}-NP\omega_{{2}}-{P} ^{2} \omega_{{3}}} \ \ {M\lambda_{{1}}+N\lambda_{{2}}+P\lambda_{{3}}} \ \ }. \end{equation}$

(7.8)

In - can be discovered that while the sign of $B(M, N, P)$ is positive for all quantity of $M$ . Furthermore, in can be observed if the $B(M, N, P)$ is positive or negative for some quantities of $M$ . Finally, in and can be perceived that while the sign of $B(M, N, P)$ is positive for all quantity of $M$ .

Figure 12. The graphic representation

$\Upsilon(B)$ for the wave number

$M$ via considering the diverse quantities

$\lambda_1 = 1, \lambda_2 = 1.5, \lambda_3 = 2, \omega_1 = 2.2, \omega_2 = -2, \omega_3 = 3, \alpha = 0.5$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 13. The graphic representation

$\Upsilon(B)$ for the wave number

$M$ via considering the diverse quantities

$\lambda_1 = 1, \lambda_2 = 1.5, \lambda_3 = 2, \omega_1 = 2.2, \omega_2 = -2, \omega_3 = 3, \alpha = 0.5$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Figure 14. The graphic representation

$\Upsilon(B)$ for the wave number

$M$ via considering the diverse quantities

$\lambda_1 = 1, \lambda_2 = 1.5, \lambda_3 = 2, \omega_1 = 2.2, \omega_2 = -2, \omega_3 = 3, \alpha = 0.5$ .

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

8. Usage of SIVP for Eq (1.8)

Via employing the wave alteration $\xi = k(x+ay+bz-ct)$ in Eq (1.8) once can gain to the below ODE as

$\begin{equation} k^2(\alpha b+a)\Psi^{\prime \prime \prime \prime }+6k(\alpha b+a)\Psi^{\prime }\Psi^{\prime \prime }+(ab\omega_{{2}}-ac\lambda_{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega_{{3}}-bc\lambda_{{3}}+b \omega_{{1}}-c\lambda_{{1}} )\Psi^{\prime \prime } = 0, \end{equation}$

(8.1)

in which $\Psi = \Psi(\xi)$ and $\Psi^{\prime } = \frac{d\Psi}{d \xi}$ . According to the SIVP ^[16,17] and by multiplying Eq (8.1) with $\Psi^{\prime }$ and integrating once respect to $\xi$ , the following stationary integral will be arises

$\begin{equation} J = \int_{0}^{\infty}\left[A_1\left(\Psi^{\prime }\Psi^{\prime \prime \prime }- \frac{1}{2}(\Psi^{\prime \prime 2}\right)+\frac{1}{3}A_2(\Psi^{\prime 3}+ \frac{1}{2}A_3(\Psi^{\prime 2}\right]d\xi, \end{equation}$

(8.2)

in which

$A_1 = k^2(\alpha b+a), \ \ \ A_2 = 6k(\alpha b+a), \ \ \ A_3 = ab\omega_{{2} }-ac\lambda_{{2}}+{b}^{2}\omega_{{3}}-bc\lambda_{{3}}+b \omega_{{1} }-c\lambda_{{1}}.$

8.1. Case I

We utilize the solitary wave function as the following

$\begin{equation} u(\xi ) = \delta \ sech(\mu \xi ). \end{equation}$

(8.3)

Hence, the stationary integral transforms to

$\begin{eqnarray} J & = &\frac{1}{30}{k}^{2}{\delta }^{2}\mu \, -21\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}{\mu } ^{2}-21\, a{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-8\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu -8\, a\delta \, k\mu +5\, ab\omega _{{2}} \\ &&-5\, ac\lambda _{{2}}+5\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-5\, bc\lambda _{{\ 3} }+5\, b\omega _{{1}}-5\, c\lambda _{{1}}). \end{eqnarray}$

(8.4)

Based on the SIVP and using derivative $J$ respect to $A$ and $B$ , one get

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial J}{\partial A} & = &\frac{1}{15}{k}^{2}\delta \, \mu \, -21\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-21\, a{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-8\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu -8\, a\delta \, k\mu +5\, ab\omega _{{2}}-5\, ac\lambda _{{2}} \\ &&+5\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-5\, bc\lambda _{{3}}+5\, b\omega _{{1}}-5\, c\lambda _{{1}})+\frac{1}{30}{k}^{2}{\delta }^{2}\mu \, \left( -8\, \alpha \, bk\mu -8\, ak\mu \right) = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(8.5)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial J}{\partial B} & = &\frac{1}{30}{k}^{2}{\delta }^{2}-21\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-21\, a{\ k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-8\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu -8\, a\delta \, k\mu +5\, ab\omega _{{2}}-5\, ac\lambda _{{2}}+5\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}} \\ &&-5\, bc\lambda _{{3}}+5\, b\omega _{{1}}-5\, c\lambda _{{1}})+\frac{1}{30}{k} ^{2}{\delta }^{2}\mu \, \left( -42\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}\mu -42\, a{k}^{2}\mu -8\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k-8\, a\delta \, k\right) = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(8.6)

Solve the Eqs (8.5) and (8.6), become

$\begin{equation} \delta = \pm \frac{21}{2} \ \ {\frac{ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}} \ \ {\sqrt{ -\left( 21\, \alpha \, b+21\, a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{ b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) }} }, \ \ \ \end{equation}$

(8.7)

$\mu = \pm \frac{1}{21} \ \ {\frac{\sqrt{-\left( 21\, \alpha \, b+21\, a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3} }+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) }}{\left( \alpha \, b+a\right) k}}.$

The condition can be obtained as below

$\begin{equation} \left( \alpha \, b+a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) < 0. \end{equation}$

(8.8)

Finally, the solitary solution received by utilizing of SIVP can be reached as

$\begin{equation} \Psi (x, y, z, t) = \delta \ \mathrm{sech}\left[ k\mu (x+ay+bz-ct)\right] . \end{equation}$

(8.9)

8.2. Case II

We utilize the bright wave function as the following

$\begin{equation} u(\xi ) = \delta \ \mathrm{sech}^{2}(\mu \xi ). \end{equation}$

(8.10)

Hence, the stationary integral transforms to

$\begin{eqnarray} J & = &- \ \ {\frac{2\, {\delta }^{2}\mu (120\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}+120\, a{k} ^{2}{\mu }^{2}+35\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu +35\, a\delta \, k\mu -14\, ab\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {105}} \\ &&+\frac{14\, ac\lambda _{{2}}-14\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}+14\, bc\lambda _{{3} }-14\, b\omega _{{1}}+14\, c\lambda _{{1}})}{105}. \end{eqnarray}$

(8.11)

Based on the SIVP and using derivative $J$ respect to $A$ and $B$ , one get

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial J}{\partial A} & = &- \ \ {\frac{4\, \delta \, \mu (120\, \alpha \, b{k} ^{2}{\mu }^{2}+120\, a{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}+35\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu +35\, a\delta \, k\mu -14\, ab\omega _{{2}}+14\, ac\lambda _{{2}}} \ \ {105}} \\ &&+\frac{-14\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}+14\, bc\lambda _{{3}}-14\, b\omega _{{1} }+14\, c\lambda _{{1}})-2\, {\delta }^{2}\mu \, \left( 35\, \alpha \, bk\mu +35\, ak\mu \right) }{105} = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(8.12)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial J}{\partial B} & = &- \ \ {\frac{2\, {\delta }^{2}(120\, \alpha \, b{k} ^{2}{\mu }^{2}+120\, a{\ k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}+35\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu +35\, a\delta \, k\mu -14\, ab\omega _{{2}}+14\, ac\lambda _{{2}}-14\, {b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {105}} \\ &&+\frac{+14\, bc\lambda _{{3}}-14\, b\omega _{{1}}+14\, c\lambda _{{1}})-2\, { \delta }^{2}\mu \, \left( 240\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}\mu +240\, a{k}^{2}\mu +35\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k+35\, a\delta \, k\right) }{105} = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(8.13)

Solve the Eqs (8.12) and (8.13), become

$\begin{equation} \delta = \pm \frac{48}{5} \ \ {\frac{ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}} \ \ {\sqrt{ -\left( 21\, \alpha \, b+21\, a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{ b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) }} }, \ \ \ \end{equation}$

(8.14)

$\mu = \pm \frac{1}{30} \ \ {\frac{\sqrt{-\left( 21\, \alpha \, b+21\, a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3} }+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) }}{\left( \alpha \, b+a\right) k}}.$

The condition of definition of the above relations can be expressed as

$\begin{equation} \left( \alpha \, b+a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) < 0. \end{equation}$

(8.15)

Finally, the solitary solution gained by utilizing of SIVP will be as

$\begin{equation} \Psi (x, y, z, t) = \delta \ \mathrm{sech}^{2}\left[ k\mu (x+ay+bz-ct)\right] . \end{equation}$

(8.16)

8.3. Case III

Assume the dark soliton wave solution be as the below case as

$\begin{equation} u(\xi ) = \delta \ \tanh ^{2}(\mu \xi ). \end{equation}$

(8.17)

Hence, the stationary integral transforms to

$\begin{eqnarray} J & = & \ \ {\frac{2\, {\delta }^{2}\mu (-120\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-120\, a{k} ^{2}{\mu }^{2}+35\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu +35\, a\delta \, k\mu +14\, ab\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {105}} \\ &&+\frac{-14\, ac\lambda _{{2}}+14\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-14\, bc\lambda _{{3} }+14\, b\omega _{{1}}-14\, c\lambda _{{1}})}{105}. \end{eqnarray}$

(8.18)

Based on the SIVP and using derivative $J$ respect to $A$ and $B$ , one get

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial J}{\partial \delta } & = & \ \ {\frac{4\, \delta \, \mu (-120\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-120\, a{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}+35\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu +35\, a\delta \, k\mu +14\, ab\omega _{{2}}-14\, ac\lambda _{{2}}} \ \ {105}} \\ &&+\frac{+14\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-14\, bc\lambda _{{3}}+14\, b\omega _{{1} }-14\, c\lambda _{{1}})+2\, {\delta }^{2}\mu \, \left( 35\, \alpha \, bk\mu +35\, ak\mu \right) }{105} = 0, \end{eqnarray}$

(8.19)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial J}{\partial \mu } & = & \ \ {\frac{2\, {\delta }^{2}(-120\, \alpha \, b{k }^{2}{\mu }^{2}-120\, a{\ k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}+35\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu +35\, a\delta \, k\mu +14\, ab\omega _{{2}}-14\, ac\lambda _{{2}}+}{105}} \\ &&+\frac{14\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-14\, bc\lambda _{{3}}+14\, b\omega _{{1} }-14\, c\lambda _{{1}})+2\, {\delta }^{2}\mu \, \left( -240\, \alpha \, b{k} ^{2}\mu -240\, a{k}^{2}\mu +35\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k+35\, a\delta \, k\right) }{ 105} = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(8.20)

Solve the Eqs (8.19) and (8.20), one get

$\begin{equation} \delta = \mp \frac{48}{5} \ \ {\frac{ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}} \ \ {\sqrt{ -\left( 21\, \alpha \, b+21\, a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{ b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) }} }, \ \ \ \end{equation}$

(8.21)

The condition of definition of the above relations can be presented the following form

$\begin{equation} \left( \alpha \, b+a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) < 0. \end{equation}$

(8.22)

Finally, the dark solution acquired by utilizing of SIVP will be as

$\begin{equation} \Psi (x, y, z, t) = \delta \ \mathrm{tanh}^{2}\left[ k\mu (x+ay+bz-ct)\right] . \end{equation}$

(8.23)

8.4. Case IV

Let the singular soliton wave solution be as the below case as

$\begin{equation} u(\xi ) = \delta \ csch^{2}(\mu \xi ). \end{equation}$

(8.24)

Then, the stationary integral transforms to

$\begin{eqnarray} J & = &- \ \ {\frac{2\, {\delta }^{2}\mu (-120\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-120\, a{k }^{2}{\mu }^{2}-70\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu -70\, a\delta \, k\mu +14\, ab\omega _{{2}}} \ \ {105}} \\ &&+\frac{-14\, ac\lambda _{{2}}+14\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-14\, bc\lambda _{{3} }+14\, b\omega _{{1}}-14\, c\lambda _{{1}})}{105}. \end{eqnarray}$

(8.25)

Based on the SIVP and using derivative $J$ respect to $A$ and $B$ , become

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial J}{\partial \delta } & = &- \ \ {\frac{4\, \delta \, \mu (-120\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-120\, a{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-70\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu -70\, a\delta \, k\mu +14\, ab\omega _{{2}}-14\, ac\lambda _{{2} }}{105}} \\ &&+\frac{+14\, {b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-14\, bc\lambda _{{3}}+14\, b\omega _{{1} }-14\, c\lambda _{{1}})-2\, {\delta }^{2}\mu \, \left( -70\, \alpha \, bk\mu -70\, ak\mu \right) }{105} = 0 \end{eqnarray}$

(8.26)

and

$\begin{eqnarray} \frac{\partial J}{\partial \mu } & = &- \ \ {\frac{2\, {\delta }^{2}(-120\, \alpha \, b{ k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-120\, a{k}^{2}{\mu }^{2}-70\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k\mu -70\, a\delta \, k\mu +14\, ab\omega _{{2}}-14\, ac\lambda _{{2}}+14\, {b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}} \ \ {105}} \\ &&+\frac{-14\, bc\lambda _{{3}}+14\, b\omega _{{1}}-14\, c\lambda _{{1}})-2\, { \delta }^{2}\mu \, \left( -240\, \alpha \, b{k}^{2}\mu -240\, a{k}^{2}\mu -70\, \alpha \, b\delta \, k-70\, a\delta \, k\right) }{105} = 0. \end{eqnarray}$

(8.27)

Solve the Eqs (8.26) and (8.27), one get

$\begin{equation} \delta = \pm \frac{24}{5} \ \ {\frac{ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}} \ \ {\sqrt{ -\left( 21\, \alpha \, b+21\, a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{ b}^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) }} }, \ \ \ \end{equation}$

(8.28)

The condition of definition of the above relations can be presented as the below form as

$\begin{equation} \left( \alpha \, b+a\right) \left( ab\omega _{{2}}-ac\lambda _{{2}}+{b} ^{2}\omega _{{3}}-bc\lambda _{{3}}+b\omega _{{1}}-c\lambda _{{1}}\right) < 0. \end{equation}$

(8.29)

Finally, the singular solution acquired by utilizing of SIVP will be as

$\begin{equation} \Psi (x, y, z, t) = \delta \ \mathrm{csch}^{2}\left[ k\mu (x+ay+bz-ct)\right] . \end{equation}$

(8.30)

9. Conclusion

In this article, the MEFM employed for searching the MSSs for the gKP equation, which contains 1-wave, 2-wave, and 3-wave solutions. The periodic wave, cross-kink, and solitary wave solutions have been obtained. In continuing, the modulation instability applied to discuss the stability of earned solutions. It is quite visible that these novel schemes have plenty of family solutions containing rational exponential, hyperbolic, and periodic functions with selecting particular parameters. Also, the semi-inverse variational principle will be used for the gKP equation. Four major cases containing the solitary, bright, dark and singular wave solutions were studied from four different ansatzes.

By means of symbolic computation, these analytical solutions and corresponding rogue waves are obtained. Via various curve plots, density plot and three-dimensional plots, dynamical characteristics of these rouge waves are exhibited. Because of the strong nonlinear characteristic of Hirota bilinear method, the test function constructed by the Hirota operator, which can be regarded as the test function constructed by considered model. The results are beneficial to the study of the plasma, optics, acoustics, fluid dynamics and fluid mechanics. All computations in this paper have been employed quickly with the help of the Maple 18. Moreover, the method applied in this paper provides an effective tool to obtain exact solutions of nonlinear system and can in common use for other NLEEs.

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the Education and scientific research project for young and middle-aged teachers of Fujian Province (No. JAT.190666-No.JAT200469)

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

[1]	Boole G (1853) The Laws of Thought. In: The Mathematical Theories of Logic and Probabilities. Project Gutenberg (EBook #15114).
[2]	Calderone J (2014) 10 Big Ideas in 10 Years of Brain Science. Scientific American MIND, November 6.
[3]	Chalmers DJ (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search for a Fundamental Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
[4]	Dehaene S (2014) Consciousness and the Brain. In: Deciphering How the Brain Codes Our Thoughts. New York: Penguin Publishers.
[5]	Edelman G, Tononi G (2000) A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. Basic books.
[6]	LeDoux JE (2003) Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. New York: Penguin Publishers.
[7]	LeDoux JE (2012) Evolution of human emotion: A view through fear. Prog Brain Res 195:431-442. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53860-4.00021-0
[8]	Penrose R (1989) The Emperor's New Mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
[9]	Shiffman D, Fry S, Marsh Z (2012) The nature of code. D. Shiffman.
[10]	Bostrom N (2014) Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. OUP Oxford.
[11]	Zimme (2014) The New Science of the Brain. National Geographic.
[12]	McCulloch WS, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. B Math Biol 5: 115-133.
[13]	Turing AM (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind 59: 433-460.
[14]	Graves A, Wayne G, Danihelka I (2014) Neural turing machines. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.5401
[15]	Von Neumann J (2012) The computer and the brain. 3rd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press: 66.
[16]	Jeffress LA (1951) Cerebral mechanisms in behavior; the Hixon Symposium. a. von Neumann J. The general and logical theory of automata: 1-41. b. McCullogh WS. Why the mind is in the head: 42-57.
[17]	Arbib MA (1987) Brains, Machines and Mathematics. In: Neural Nets and Finite Automata. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer US: 15-29.
[18]	Franklin S (1995) Artificial Minds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[19]	Longuet-Higgins HC (1981) Artificial intelligence-a new theoretical psychology? Cognition 10: 197-201.
[20]	Neisser U (1963) The imitation of man by machine. Science 139: 193-197. doi: 10.1126/science.139.3551.193
[21]	Sloman A (1979) Epistemology and Artificial Intelligence: Expert Systems in the Microelectronic Age. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
[22]	Gardner H (1985) The Mind's New Science. New York: Basic Books.
[23]	Garland A (2015) Ex Machina – Movie.
[24]	Sejnowski TJ, Koch C, Churchland PS (1988) Computational neuroscience. Science 24: 1299-1330.
[25]	Russel S, Norvig P (2009) Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 3rd ed. NY: Pearson Publishers.
[26]	Aho AV (2012) Computation and computational thinking. Comput J 55: 832-835.
[27]	Guidolin D, Albertin G, Guescini M, et al. (2011) Central nervous system and computation. Quart Rev Biol 86: 265-85 doi: 10.1086/662456
[28]	Howard N (2012) Brain Language: The fundamental code unit. Brain Sci 1: 6-34.
[29]	Howard N, Guidere M (2012) LXIO: The mood detection Robopsych Brain Sci 1: 71-77.
[30]	Pockett S (2014) Problems with theories of consciousness. Front Syst Neurosci: 225.
[31]	Hirschberg J, Manning CD (2015) Advances in natural language processing. Science 349: 261-266. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8685
[32]	Parkes DC, Wellman MP (2015) Economic reasoning and artificial intelligence. Science 349: 267-272. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8403
[33]	Gershman SJ, Horvitz EJ, Tenenbaum JB (2015) Computational rationality: A converging paradigm for intelligence in brains, minds, and machines. Science 349: 273-278. doi: 10.1126/science.aac6076
[34]	Jordan M, Mitchell TM (2015) Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349: 255-260. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8415
[35]	Wu Y, Schuster M, Chen Z, et al. (2016) Google's neural machine translation system: Bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv 1609.08144.
[36]	y Cajal SR (1995) Histology of the nervous system of man and vertebrates. USA: Oxford University Press.
[37]	Garcia-Lopez P, Garcia-Marin V, FreireM (2010) The histological slides and drawing s of Cajal. Front Neuroanat 4: 9
[38]	Hebb DO (1949). The Organization of Behavior. New York: Wiley.
[39]	Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessell TM, et al. (2013) Principles of Neural Science. New York: MacGraw-Hill.
[40]	Arshavsky YI (2006) "The seven sins" of the Hebbian synapse: can the hypothesis of synaptic plasticity explain long-term memory consolidation?. Prog Neurobiol 80: 99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2006.09.004
[41]	Gallistel CR, KingA (2009) Memory and the Computational Brain. New York: Wiley Blackwell.
[42]	Hawkins J, Blakeslee S (2005) On Intelligence. New York: St Martin's Press.
[43]	Zador A, Koch C, Brown TH (1990) Biophysical model of a Hebbian synapse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87: 6718-6722. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.17.6718
[44]	Vizi ES, Fekete A, Karoly R, et al (2010) Non-synaptic receptors and transporters involved in brain functions and targets of drug treatment. Br J Pharmacol 160: 785-809. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00624.x
[45]	Vizi E (2013) Role of high-affinity receptors and membrane transporters in non-synaptic communication and drug action in the central nervous system. Pharmacol Rev 52: 63-89.
[46]	Schmitt FO, Samson FE, Irwin LN, et al. (1969) Brain cell micro-environment. NRP Bulletin: 7.
[47]	Cserr HF (1986) The Neuronal Environment. Ann NY Acad Sci: 481.
[48]	Juliano RI, Haskill S (1993) Signal transduction from extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 120: 577-585. doi: 10.1083/jcb.120.3.577
[49]	Vargova L, Sykova E (2014) Astrocytes and extracellular matrix in extrasynaptic volume transmission. Phil Trans R Soc B 369: 20130608. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0608
[50]	Giaume C, Oliet S (2016) Introduction to the special issue: Dynamic and metabolic interactions between astrocytes and neurons. Neuroscience 323: 1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.02.062
[51]	Hrabětová S, Nicholson C (2007) Biophysical properties of brain extracellular space explored with ion-selective microelectrodes, integrative optical imaging and related techniques. In: Michael AC, Borland LM, editors. Electrochemical Methods for Neuroscience. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press: chapter 10.
[52]	Kuhn TS (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
[53]	Landauer R (1996) The physical nature of information. Physics Letters A 217: 188-193. doi: 10.1016/0375-9601(96)00453-7
[54]	Chua LO (2011) Resistance switching memories are memristors. Applied Physics A 102: 765-783.
[55]	Di Ventra M, Pershin YY (2011) Memory materials: A unifying description. Mater Today 14: 584-591. doi: 10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70299-1
[56]	Kamalanathan D, Akhavan A, Kozicki MN (2011) Low voltage cycling of programmable metallization cell memory devices. Nanotechnology 22: 254017.
[57]	Tian F, Jiao D, Biedermann F, et al. (2012) Orthogonal switching of a single supramolecular complex. Nat Commun 3: 1207. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2198
[58]	Sakata Y, Furukawa S, Kondo M, et al. (2013) Shape-memory nanopores induced in coordination frameworks by crystal downsizing. Science 339: 193-196. doi: 10.1126/science.1231451
[59]	Lin WP, Liu S, Gong T, et al. (2014) Polymer-based resistive memory materials and devices. Adv Mater 26: 570-606. doi: 10.1002/adma.201302637
[60]	Zhou X, Xia M, Rao F, et al. (2014) Understanding phase-change behaviors of carbon-doped Ge₂Sb₂Te₅ for phase-change memory application. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6: 14207-14214. doi: 10.1021/am503502q
[61]	Agnati LF, Fuxe K (2014) Extracellular-vesicle type of volume transmission and tunnelling-nanotube type of wiring transmission add a new dimension to brain neuro-glial networks. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 369: pii: 20130505.
[62]	Fuxe K, Borroto-Escuela DO, Romero-Fernandez W, et al. (2013) Volume transmission and its different forms in the central nervous system. Chin J Integr Med 19: 323-329. doi: 10.1007/s11655-013-1455-1
[63]	Fuxe L, Borroto-Escuela DO (2016) Volume transmission and receptor-receptor interactions in heteroreceptor complexes: Understanding the role of new concepts for brain communication. Neural Regen Res 11: 1220-1223. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.189168
[64]	Fodor JA (1975) The Language of Thought. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
[65]	Sloman A, Croucher M (1981) Why robots will have emotions. Sussex University.
[66]	Mayer JD (1986) How mood influences cognition. Advances in Cognitive Science 1: 290-314.
[67]	Salovey P, Mayer JD (1990) Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality 9: 285-311.
[68]	Goleman D (1995) Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam Books.
[69]	Valverdu J, Casacuberta D (2009) Handbook of Research on Synthetic Emotions and Sociable Robotics: New Applications in Affective Computing and Artificial Intelligence. Information Science Reference. New York: Hershey.
[70]	Meyer JJ, Dastani MM (2010) The logical structure of emotions. Dutch Companion project grant nr: IS053013. SIKS Dissertation Series No. 2010-2.
[71]	Hasson C (2011) Modelisation des mecanismes emotionnels pour un robot autonome: perspective developpementale et sociale. PhD Thesis, Universite de Cergy Pontoise, France.
[72]	Meshulam M, Winter E, Ben-Shakhar G, et al. (2011). Rational emotions. Soc Neurosci 1: 1-7.
[73]	Steunebrink BR. The Logical structure of emotions. Utrecht University, 2010.
[74]	Steunebrink BR, Dastani M, Meyer JJC (2012) A formal model of emotion triggers: an approach for BDI agents. Synthese 185: 83-129. doi: 10.1007/s11229-011-0004-8
[75]	Bosse T, Broekens J, Dias J, et al. (2014) Emotion Modeling. Towards Pragmatic Computational Models of Affective Processes. New York: Springer.
[76]	a. Hudlicka E. From habits to standards: Towards systematic design of emotion models and affective architecture: 3-23.
[77]	b. Dastani M, Floor C. Meyer JJ. Programming agents with emotions: 57-75.
[78]	c. Lowe R, Kiryazov K, Utilizing emotions in autonomous robots: An enactive approach: 76-98.
[79]	76. Smailes D, Moseley P, Wilkinson S (2015) A commentary on: Affective coding: the emotional dimension of agency. Front Hum Neurosci 9: 142.
[80]	77. Lewis M (2016) The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds. New York:W.W. Norton & Co.
[81]	78. Binet A, Simon T (1916) The Intelligence of the Feeble Minded. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
[82]	79. Griffin D (2001) Animal Minds: Beyond Cognition to Consciousness. Chicago, IL: University Chicago Press.
[83]	80. Albuquerque N, Guo K, Wilkinson A, et al. (2016) Dogs recognize dog and human emotions. Biol Lett 12: 201508 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0883
[84]	81. Andics A, Gábor A, Gácsi M, et al. (2016) Neural mechanisms for lexical processing in dogs. Science 353:1030-1032. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3777
[85]	82. De Waal F (2016) Are We Smart Enough To Know How Smart Animals Are? New York: WW Norton & Co.
[86]	83. Kekecs Z, Szollosi A, Palfi B, et al. (2016). Commentary: Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bond. Front Neurosci 10:155.
[87]	84. Kovács K, Kis A, Kanizsár O, et al. (2016) The effect of oxytocin on biological motion perception in dogs (Canis familiaris). Animal Cogn 19: 513-522. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0951-4
[88]	85. Wasserman EA (2016). Thinking abstractly like a duck(ling). Science 353: 222-223.
[89]	86. Wynne CDL (2004) Do Animals Think? New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
[90]	87. Levy S (1993) Artificial Life. New York: Random House.
[91]	88. Marx G, Gilon C (2012) The molecular basis of memory. ACS Chem Neurosci 3: 633-642. doi: 10.1021/cn300097b
[92]	89. Marx G, Gilon C (2013) The molecular basis of memory. MBM Pt 2: The chemistry of the tripartite mechanism. ACS Chem Neurosci 4: 983–993.
[93]	90. Marx G, Gilon C (2014) The molecular basis of memory. MBM Pt 3: Tagging with neurotransmitters (NTs). Front Neurosci 3: 58.
[94]	91. Marx G, Gilon C (2016) The molecular basis of neural memory. MBM Pt 4: The brain is not a computer. "Binary" computation versus "multinary" mentation. Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering 4: 14-24.
[95]	92. Marx G, Gilon C (2016) The Molecular Basis of Neural Memory Part 5: Chemograhic notations from alchemy to psycho-chemistry. In Press.
[96]	93. Marx G, Gilon C (2016) The molecular basis of neural memory. MBM Pt 6: Chemical coding of logical and emotive modes. Int J Neurology Res 2: 259-268.
[97]	94. Asimov I (1950) I, Robot. New York: Gnome Press.
[98]	95. Waldrop MM (1992) Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos. New York: Viking Penguin Group.
[99]	96. Freedman DH (1) Brainmakers. New York: Touchstone Press.
[100]	97. Maass W, Joshi P, Sontag ED (2007) Computational aspects of feedback in neural circuits. PLoS Comput Biol 3: e165.
[101]	98. Picard RW, Vyzas E, Healey J (2001) Toward machine emotional intelligence: Analysis of affective physiological state. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 23: 1175-1191. doi: 10.1109/34.954607
[102]	99. Hirschberg J, Manning CD (2015) Advances in natural language processing. Science 349: 261-266.
[103]	100. Critique of Pure Reason (1781) Translated by Norman Kemp Smith. London Macmillan 1934.
[104]	101. Sloman A (2008) Kantian philosophy of mathematics and young robots. In: Proceedings 7th International Conference on Mathematical Knowledge Management Birmingham, UK, July 28-30. Available from: http://events.cs.bham.ac.uk/cicm08/mkm08/.
[105]	102. Berto F (2010). There's Something about Gödel: The Complete Guide to the Incompleteness Theorem. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
[106]	103. Ryle G (1949) The Concept of Mind. UK: Penguin Books.

This article has been cited by:

1.	Chaudry Masood Khalique, Oke Davies Adeyemo, Kentse Maefo, Symmetry solutions and conservation laws of a new generalized 2D Bogoyavlensky-Konopelchenko equation of plasma physics, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 9767, 10.3934/math.2022544
2.	K. Hosseini, D. Baleanu, S. Rezapour, S. Salahshour, M. Mirzazadeh, M. Samavat, Multi-complexiton and positive multi-complexiton structures to a generalized B-type Kadomtsev−Petviashvili equation, 2022, 24680133, 10.1016/j.joes.2022.06.020
3.	Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Naisa S. Alatawi, Wedad Albalawi, S. A. El-Tantawy, Painlevé analysis for a new (3 +1 )-dimensional KP equation: Multiple-soliton and lump solutions, 2022, 140, 0295-5075, 52002, 10.1209/0295-5075/aca49f
4.	Yan Zhu, Chuyu Huang, Junjie Li, Runfa Zhang, Lump solitions, fractal soliton solutions, superposed periodic wave solutions and bright-dark soliton solutions of the generalized (3+1)-dimensional KP equation via BNNM, 2024, 112, 0924-090X, 17345, 10.1007/s11071-024-09911-2
5.	Adisie Fenta Agmas, Fasika Wondimu Gelu, Meselech Chima Fino, A robust, exponentially fitted higher-order numerical method for a two-parameter singularly perturbed boundary value problem, 2025, 10, 2297-4687, 10.3389/fams.2024.1501271

Reader Comments

Your name:*

Email:*
© 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

AIMS Medical Science

0.4

Metrics

Article views(5880) PDF downloads(1310) Cited by(1)

Preview PDF

Download XML

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(6) / Tables(1)

AIMS Medical Science

The Molecular Basis of Neural Memory. Part 7: Neural Intelligence (NI) versus Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Multiple Exp-function method

3. MSSs for the (3+1) gKP equation

3.1. Option I: 1-wave solution

3.2. Option II: 2-wave solutions

3.3. Option III: Triple-wave solutions

4. Novel periodic wave solutions

5. Novel cross-kink wave solutions

6. Novel solitary wave solutions

7. Stability analysis of Eq (1.8)

8. Usage of SIVP for Eq (1.8)

8.1. Case I

8.2. Case II

8.3. Case III

8.4. Case IV

9. Conclusion

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Catalog

AIMS Medical Science

The Molecular Basis of Neural Memory. Part 7: Neural Intelligence (NI) versus Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Related Papers:

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Multiple Exp-function method

3. MSSs for the (3+1) gKP equation

3.1. Option I: 1-wave solution

3.2. Option II: 2-wave solutions

3.3. Option III: Triple-wave solutions

4. Novel periodic wave solutions

5. Novel cross-kink wave solutions

6. Novel solitary wave solutions

7. Stability analysis of Eq (1.8)

8. Usage of SIVP for Eq (1.8)

8.1. Case I

8.2. Case II

8.3. Case III

8.4. Case IV

9. Conclusion

Acknowledgments

Conflict of interest

References

This article has been cited by:

Reader Comments

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Metrics

Figures and Tables

Other Articles By Authors

Related pages

Tools

Export File

Citation

Format

Content

Catalog