Boars, being one of the most widely spread ungulates worldwide, have a widely recognized important role in the balance of natural environment and forests. Since large boar populations severely damage crops and cause serious traffic accidents, they are widely hunted, thereby also representing a relevant economic resource. In the model presented here, the species is at times considered ravaging, enabling it to be kept in check, while on the other hand, it must be preserved from extinction as a protected species. We considered an idealized, relatively simple situation in which rangers of the park where the boars are hosted manage this animal population size when they extrude into the surrounding areas through the woods perimeter. Modeling this situation involves considering not the whole boar population, but only those that are involved in the spillover, i.e., those living in proximity of the woods edge. The theoretical investigation and the simulations revealed the existence of a transcritical bifurcation relating the two viable equilibria, coexistence, and the ranger-free point. Also, the possible onset of persistent oscillations via a Hopf bifurcation is shown, leading to periodic recalling of rangers to contain the spillovers. On the other hand, a better regime was obtained by reducing the environment's resources for the wild boars, which stabilized the the boar population at constant level, with a reduced presence of the rangers, reducing the costs of their periodic recalling.
Citation: Youcef Belgaid, Mohamed Helal, Abdelkader Lakmeche, Ezio Venturino. A model for the interactions of wild boars and park rangers[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(11): 2780-2806. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025102
Boars, being one of the most widely spread ungulates worldwide, have a widely recognized important role in the balance of natural environment and forests. Since large boar populations severely damage crops and cause serious traffic accidents, they are widely hunted, thereby also representing a relevant economic resource. In the model presented here, the species is at times considered ravaging, enabling it to be kept in check, while on the other hand, it must be preserved from extinction as a protected species. We considered an idealized, relatively simple situation in which rangers of the park where the boars are hosted manage this animal population size when they extrude into the surrounding areas through the woods perimeter. Modeling this situation involves considering not the whole boar population, but only those that are involved in the spillover, i.e., those living in proximity of the woods edge. The theoretical investigation and the simulations revealed the existence of a transcritical bifurcation relating the two viable equilibria, coexistence, and the ranger-free point. Also, the possible onset of persistent oscillations via a Hopf bifurcation is shown, leading to periodic recalling of rangers to contain the spillovers. On the other hand, a better regime was obtained by reducing the environment's resources for the wild boars, which stabilized the the boar population at constant level, with a reduced presence of the rangers, reducing the costs of their periodic recalling.
| [1] |
J. Bosch, F. Mardones, A. Pérez, A. Torre, M. J. Muñoz, A maximum entropy model for predicting wild boar distribution in Spain, Span. J. Agric. Res., 12 (2014), 984–999. http://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2014124-5717 doi: 10.5424/sjar/2014124-5717
|
| [2] |
G. Massei, S. Roy, R. Bunting, Too many hogs? A review of methods to mitigate impact by wild boar and feral hogs, Human-Wildlife Interact., 5 (2011), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.26077/aeda-p853 doi: 10.26077/aeda-p853
|
| [3] |
J. Herrero Cortés, A. García-Serrano, S. C. Couto, V. M. Ortuño, R. García-González, Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem, Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 52 (2006), 245–250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-006-0045-3 doi: 10.1007/s10344-006-0045-3
|
| [4] |
T. Podgórski, G. Baś, B. Jȩdrzejewska, L. Sönnichsen, S. Śnieżko, W. Jȩdrzejewski, et al., Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: Primeval forest and metropolitan area, J. Mammal., 94 (2013), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1644/12-MAMM-A-038.1 doi: 10.1644/12-MAMM-A-038.1
|
| [5] |
M. N. Barrios-Garcia, S. A. Ballari, Impact of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in its introduced and native range: A review, Biol. Invasions, 14 (2012), 2283–2300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6 doi: 10.1007/s10530-012-0229-6
|
| [6] |
M. Stillfried, P. Gras, K. Börner, F. Göritz, J. Painer, K. Röllig, et al., Secrets of success in a landscape of fear: Urban wild boar adjust risk perception and tolerate disturbance, Front. Ecol. Evol., 5 (2017), 157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2017.00157 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2017.00157
|
| [7] | F. Jori, G. Massei, A. Licoppe, F. Ruiz-Fons, A. Linden, P. Václavek, et al., Management of wild boar populations in the European Union before and during the ASF crisis, in Understanding and Combatting African Swine Fever, Wageningen Academic, (2021), 197–228. https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-910-7_8 |
| [8] |
Y. G. Magar, B. Pant, S. Regmi, H. B. Katuwal, J. L. Belant, H. P. Sharma, Economic effects of wild boar damage to crops in protected areas of Nepal, Global Ecol. Conserv., 56 (2024), e03301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03301 doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03301
|
| [9] |
L. Schley, M. Dufrêne, A. Krier, A. C. Frantz, Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period, Eur. J. Wildl. Res., 54 (2008), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-008-0183-x doi: 10.1007/s10344-008-0183-x
|
| [10] | ISPRA–Italian Institute for Environmental Protection and Research, The results of the ISPRA national survey on the management of wild boar in Italy in the period 2015–2021 were presented at a Confagricoltura event, 2023. Available from: https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/en/archive/news-and-other-events/ispra-news/files2023/area-stampa/comunicati-stampa/comunicatocinghiali-1.pdf. |
| [11] |
T. Wang, Y. Sun, H. J. Qiu, African swine fever: An unprecedented disaster and challenge to China, Infect. Dis. Poverty, 7 (2018), 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-018-0495-3 doi: 10.1186/s40249-018-0495-3
|
| [12] |
V. Ajraldi, M. Pittavino, d E. Venturino, Modelling herd behavior in population systems, Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl., 12 (2011), 2319–2338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.02.002 doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2011.02.002
|
| [13] |
E. Venturino, S. Petrovskii, Spatiotemporal behavior of a prey-predator system with a group defense for prey, Ecol. Complex., 14 (2013), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.01.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.01.004
|
| [14] | C. Kuehn, Moment closure—A brief review, in Control of Self-Organizing Complex Systems, Springer, (2016), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28028-8_13 |
| [15] | C. M. Bender, S. A. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers I: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3069-2 |
| [16] | L. Perko, Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems, Springer, New York, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0003-8 |
| [17] | Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory, 3rd edition, 4th edition, Springer, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-22007-4 |
| [18] | S. J. Waller, K. Morelle, I. V. Seryodkin, A. N. Rybin, S. V. Soutyrina, A. Licoppe, et al., Resource-driven changes in wild boar movement and their consequences for the spread of African Swine Fever in the Russian Far East, Wildl. Bio., (2024), e01276. https://doi.org/10.1002/wlb3.01276 |
| [19] | M. L. Rosenzweig, Paradox of enrichment: Destabilization of exploitation ecosystems in ecological time, Science, 171 (1971) 3969,385–387. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3969.385 |
| [20] |
P. A. Stephens, W. J. Sutherland, R. P. Freckleton, What is the Allee effect?, Oikos, 87 (1999), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/3547011 doi: 10.2307/3547011
|
| [21] | F. Courchamp, L. Berec, J. Gascoigne, Allee Effects in Ecology and Conservation, Oxford Univ. Press, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780198570301.001.0001 |
| [22] | J. M. Drake, L. Berec, A. M. Kramer, Allee effects, Encyopedia Ecol. 3 (2019), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10587-1 |
| [23] |
J. C. Gascoigne, R. N. Lipcius, Allee effects driven by predation, J. Appli. Ecol., 41 (2004), 801–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00944.x doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00944.x
|
| [24] |
M. M. Turcotte, D. N. Reznick, J. D. Hare, The impact of rapid evolution on population dynamics in the wild: experimental test of eco-evolutionary dynamics, Ecol. Lett., 14 (2011), 1084–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01676.x doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01676.x
|
| [25] |
A. P. Hendry, K. M. Gotanda, E. I. Svensson, Human influences on evolution, and the ecological and societal consequences, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 372 (2017), 20160028. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0028 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0028
|
| [26] |
A. R. Kanarek, C. T. Webb, M. Barfield, R. D. Holt, Overcoming Allee effects through evolutionary, genetic, and demographic rescue, J. Biol. Dyn., 9 (2015), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/17513758.2014.978399 doi: 10.1080/17513758.2014.978399
|
Figures(9) / Tables(2)
Youcef Belgaid, Mohamed Helal, Abdelkader Lakmeche, Ezio Venturino. A model for the interactions of wild boars and park rangers[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(11): 2780-2806. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025102
DownLoad: