Preface Special Issues

Special issue: Spatial dynamics for epidemic models with dispersal of organisms and heterogenity of environment

  • Received: 25 March 2020 Accepted: 25 March 2020 Published: 27 March 2020
  • Citation: Arnaud Ducrot, Shigui Ruan, Zhi-Cheng Wang. 2020: Special issue: Spatial dynamics for epidemic models with dispersal of organisms and heterogenity of environment, Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 17(4): 2862-2863. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020160

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xuelian Jin . Exponential stability analysis and control design for nonlinear system with time-varying delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(1): 102-113. doi: 10.3934/math.2021008
    [2] Naveed Iqbal, Meshari Alesemi . Soliton dynamics in the (2+1)-dimensional Nizhnik-Novikov-Veselov system via the Riccati modified extended simple equation method. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3306-3333. doi: 10.3934/math.2025154
    [3] Zaihua Xu, Jian Li . Adaptive prescribed performance control for wave equations with dynamic boundary and multiple parametric uncertainties. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3019-3034. doi: 10.3934/math.2024148
    [4] Cheng Chen . Hyperbolic function solutions of time-fractional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with variable-coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10378-10386. doi: 10.3934/math.2022578
    [5] Jingjing Yang, Jianqiu Lu . Stabilization in distribution of hybrid stochastic differential delay equations with Lévy noise by discrete-time state feedback controls. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3457-3483. doi: 10.3934/math.2025160
    [6] Naseem Abbas, Amjad Hussain, Mohsen Bakouri, Thoraya N. Alharthi, Ilyas Khan . A study of dynamical features and novel soliton structures of complex-coupled Maccari's system. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(2): 3025-3040. doi: 10.3934/math.2025141
    [7] Chantapish Zamart, Thongchai Botmart, Wajaree Weera, Prem Junsawang . Finite-time decentralized event-triggered feedback control for generalized neural networks with mixed interval time-varying delays and cyber-attacks. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 22274-22300. doi: 10.3934/math.20231136
    [8] Dehao Ruan, Yao Lu . Generalized exponential stability of stochastic Hopfield neural networks with variable coefficients and infinite delay. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 22910-22926. doi: 10.3934/math.20241114
    [9] Omar Kahouli, Amina Turki, Mohamed Ksantini, Mohamed Ali Hammami, Ali Aloui . On the boundedness of solutions of some fuzzy dynamical control systems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 5330-5348. doi: 10.3934/math.2024257
    [10] Ravi P. Agarwal, Snezhana Hristova . Stability of delay Hopfield neural networks with generalized proportional Riemann-Liouville fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26801-26820. doi: 10.3934/math.20231372


  • Freeway traffic modeling and management have been intensively investigated in recent decades. It is of great importance to reduce stop-and-go oscillations in traffic control. The traffic flow can be represented by the typical Aw-Rascle-Zhang(ARZ) model [1,2], consisting of a set of nonlinear hyperbolic PDEs that describe the evolution of traffic density and velocity evolution.

    In 1984, in the framework of the C1 solution, the stability of homogeneous nonlinear 2×2 systems was obtained using the characteristic method in [3]. In 1999, another method was introduced: the quadratic Lyapunov function. This function was first used to analyze the exponential stability of linear hyperbolic equations in [4]. Then, it was extended to the stability analysis of a nonlinear hyperbolic system under the C1 norms in [5], and sufficient conditions for system stability had been obtained. Prieur et al. studied a class of hyperbolic balance law systems and proved its well-posedness under boundary feedback control; then a sufficient exponential stability condition was derived using operator theory in [6].

    Also, for the hyperbolic balance law system, Wang et al. constructed a suitable Lyapunov function in [7], which led to the exponential stability of the equilibrium of the H2 solution. This method was applied to the ARZ traffic flow equation in [8]. In [9], asymptotic spectral analysis was conducted on a 1-D 2×2 constant-coefficients linear hyperbolic equation with proportional feedback control, the spectrum determined the growth condition held, and then the exponential stability of the system was established. For the case of variable coefficients, the exponential stability of the system under the H2 norm was obtained by constructing the weighted Lyapunov function in [10]. Hayat et al. proposed proportional-integral (PI) control and used the Lyapunov method to study the exponential stability and output regulation of closed-loop systems in [11]. In [12], the input delay compensation design of the ARZ traffic flow model based on first-order 2×2 nonlinear hyperbolic systems was studied, and the exponential stability of the closed-loop system under the L2 norm was proved.

    The most basic control objective of freeway traffic is to maintain the stability of traffic volume, speed, and density at a steady value and to suppress the oscillation as much as possible. A multi-value cellular automata model under Lagrange coordinates was proposed, and the traffic flow was simulated on the basis of the evolution equation of the model. And it is concluded that the lower the density, the more lanes there are, and the greater the traffic flow in [13].

    The common control measures include on-ramp metering, which means that the vehicles entering the expressway are regulated by the traffic lights on the on-ramp, and the variable speed limits (VSL), that is, through variable message sign (VMS), which controls the speed limit of passing vehicles [14]. In [17], the influence of ramp metering control strategy on single-segment road traffic flow was analyzed. Based on the backstepping method, the results showed that this method reduces the stop-and-go waves in congested traffic and shortens the adjustment time. Then, in [18] and [19], the ramp metering strategy was used to design the output feedback controller to ensure that the traffic flow on the two connected roads was stable simultaneously to suppress traffic oscillations. In [20], the variable speed limit control strategy was used to design the controller combined with the backstepping transformation, and the exponential stability of the traffic flow of a single section is achieved using the Lyapunov function. For the problem of traffic congestion on a one-way, two-lane freeway, two different VSLs were applied at the exit boundary, and finally converged to the equilibrium point in finite time [21]. To the authors' knowledge, the latest research progress on the ARZ model indicates that the current control strategies for ARZ traffic flow remain ramp metering [22], variable speed limits [23], or a combination of both [24]. Zhang et al. studied a system of linear hyperbolic equations with constant coefficients, which was derived from the ARZ traffic flow model, with ramp metering and variable speed control as boundary conditions. The proportional control and PI control are designed in [24] and [25], respectively. Based on the Lyapunov function, sufficient conditions for exponential stability under the L2 norm and sufficient conditions for parameters are obtained.

    However, to the authors' knowledge, there has been limited research on the exponential stability of variable-coefficient hyperbolic systems under varying steady states concerning the spatial domain x when linearizing the ARZ model, with ramp metering and variable speed limit control serving as boundary conditions. In this paper, the exponential stability of the ARZ traffic flow model based on a 2×2 variable-coefficient hyperbolic system under proportional control is studied.

    The contribution is as follows: first, considering that the steady-state values of state quantity density and speed in ARZ traffic flow are variables related to position x, combining ramp metering and variable speed limit as boundary control, a variable-coefficient one-dimensional 2×2 hyperbolic system is obtained. Second, a new Lyapunov function is chosen, where the coefficients of the Lyapunov function are constructed from the solution of a partial differential equation. It is derived that when the feedback parameters satisfy the constraint conditions, the system achieves exponential stability. Third, through numerical simulations, we concluded that the velocity value v(L,t) on the right-hand side of the system converges to the steady-state value v(L).

    The outline is as follows: In Section 2, the linearized ARZ model and boundary conditions are introduced. First, the Riemann coordinate transformation is defined, and after considering that the system steady-state is variable concerning position x, we obtain a hyperbolic system of equations with variable coefficients in the free/congestion region. For congestion, a proportional feedback controller combining on-ramp metering and variable speed limits is proposed, which is rewritten as an abstract evolution equation. In Section 3, the well-posedness of the closed-loop system is proved using the operator semigroup theory and Sobolev embedding theorem. In Section 4, a strict Lyapunov function is constructed to prove the exponential stability of the system in the L2 norm, and the stability region for the feedback gain value is given. Finally, the numerical simulation is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the developed boundary feedback control.

    The macroscopic traffic flow dynamics of the freeway is generally described by the ARZ model:

    {tρ+x(ρv)=0,tv+(vρp(ρ))xv=V(ρ)vτ0, (2.1)

    where the state variable ρ(x,t) is the density of the traffic, and v(x,t) is the speed of the traffic; (x,t)[0,L]×[0,), x and t represent the position and time, respectively, and τ0 is the relaxation time related to driving behavior. The variable p(ρ) is defined as the traffic pressure, an increasing function of density,

    p(ρ)=vf(ρρm)γ, (2.2)

    and V(ρ) represents the equilibrium speed curve and satisfies

    V(ρ)=vfp(ρ)=vf(1(ρρm)γ), (2.3)

    where vf is the free flow velocity, ρm is the maximum density, and γ>0 is generally a constant of about 1 (see [2] and its references for a detailed description of the model).

    We define new variables (w,z) in Riemann coordinates, let

    {w=v+vf(ρρm)γ,z=v. (2.4)

    Then the ARZ model (2.1) can be described under the Riemann coordinate as

    {tw+zxw=vfwτ0,tz+[(1+γ)zγw]xz=vfwτ0. (2.5)

    To obtain the linearized ARZ model, assume (ρ(x),v(x)) and (w(x),z(x)) are respectively steady states of system (2.1) and system (2.4), and satisfy z(x)=v(x),w(x)=v(x)+vf(ρ(x)ρm)γ. Furthermore, (w(x),z(x)) satisfy the system (2.5) such that we have

    {z(x)xw(x)=vfw(x)τ0,[(1+γ)z(x)γw(x)]xz(x)=vfw(x)τ0. (2.6)

    Define the deviations of the state (w,z) with respect to the steady state (w(x),z(x)) as:

    {˜w=ww(x),˜z=zz(x), (2.7)

    therefore, the linearized ARZ model can be obtained from a 2×2 hyperbolic system with variable coefficients:

    {t˜w+λ1(x)x˜w+δ˜w=0,t˜zλ2(x)x˜z+δ˜w=0, (2.8)

    where

    λ1(x)=z(x)=v(x)>0,λ2(x)=(1+γ)z(x)+γw(x),δ=1τ0>0. (2.9)

    Moreover, by (2.4) and (2.9), it has

    λ2(x)=(1+γ)z(x)+γw(x)=v(x)+γvf(ρ(x)ρm)γ. (2.10)

    It is obvious that λ2(x) can be positive or negative. Therefore, the speed-density relationship diagram can be divided into two parts:

    Free-flow regime: λ2(x)<0, that is, v(x)>γvf(ρ(x)ρm)γ. The speed information of the linearized ARZ model of (2.8) is transmitted from the left boundary x=0 to the right boundary x=L.

    Congested regime: λ2(x)>0, that is, v(x)<γvf(ρ(x)ρm)γ. The speed information of the linearized ARZ model of (2.8) is transmitted from the right boundary x=L to the left boundary x=0. So, the hetero-directional propagations of traffic flow might lead to the shock waves of stop-and-go traffic.

    In this paper, we focus on the controller design for the congested regime.

    To regulate freeway traffic, we designed the on-ramp metering controller r(t) and the variable speed limit controller v(L,t), based on the regimes in which traffic lies, as shown in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Boundary control strategies of freeway traffic flow under congestion.

    On-ramp metering: we should regulate the upstream on-ramp flow rate r(t) based on the measurements collected from the downstream boundary x=L:

    r(t)=r+kρ(ρ(L,t)ρ(L)). (2.11)

    Variable speed limit: As the traffic lies in the congestion regime, the characteristic velocity of speed propagating is from downstream to upstream, we should regulate the downstream speed v(L,t) based on the measurement v(0,t) at the upstream boundary, i.e.,

    v(L,t)=v(L)+kv(v(0,t)v(0)), (2.12)

    where kρ,kv are the feedback gains, and r is the normal regulation rate of the on-ramp.

    Let ˜ρ=ρρ(x),˜v=vv(x); then (2.11) and (2.12) become

    {r(t)=r+kρ˜ρ(L,t),˜v(L,t)=kv˜v(0,t). (2.13)

    Assume that the conservation conditions satisfied by the traffic flow at the upstream entrance boundary and the conservation conditions at the steady state of the traffic flow are, respectively,

    pin+r(t)=ρ(0,t)v(0,t), (2.14)
    pin+r=ρ(0)v(0), (2.15)

    where pin is the traffic demand of the mainline.

    Combining (2.13)–(2.15), we have

    kρ˜ρ(L,t)=ρ(0,t)v(0,t)ρ(0)v(0),

    and linearizing by the first-order Taylor formula of a binary function, we have the following linearized boundary condition:

    kρ˜ρ(L,t)=v(0)˜ρ(0,t)+ρ(0)˜v(0,t). (2.16)

    Furthermore, assume that γ=1 and let α=vfρm; we could rewrite the boundary conditions for system (2.8) in the Riemann coordinates as:

    ˜w(0,t)=˜v(0,t)+α˜ρ(0,t)=(1αρ(0)v(0))˜v(0,t)+αkρv(0)˜ρ(L,t)=kρv(0)˜w(L,t)+(1αρ(0)v(0)kρkvv(0))˜z(0,t)=k1˜w(L,t)+k2˜z(0,t), (2.17)

    and

    ˜z(L,t)=k3˜z(0,t), (2.18)

    where

    k1=kρv(0),k2=1αρ(0)v(0)kρkvv(0),k3=kv. (2.19)

    Therefore, we have a PDE system under a proportional controller

    {t˜w+λ1(x)x˜w+δ˜w=0,t˜zλ2(x)x˜z+δ˜w=0,˜w(0,t)=k1˜w(L,t)+k2˜z(0,t),˜z(L,t)=k3˜z(0,t). (2.20)

    Without loss of generality, let L=1 for convenience. Assume that the Hilbert state space

    H=L2(0,1)×L2(0,1), (2.21)

    equipped with the following inner product

    X1,X2=10[f1(x)¯f2(x)+g1(x)¯g2(x)]dx, (2.22)

    where Xi=(fi,gi)H(i=1,2), and ˉf is the conjugate of f. Moreover, the norm of Xi is induced by the inner product

    Xi2=10[|fi(x)|2+|gi(x)|2]dx,i=1,2. (2.23)

    Define linear operator A:D(A)HH by

    AX=(λ1(x)xδ0δλ2(x)x)(fg), (2.24)
    D(A)={(f,g)(H1(0,1))2f(0)=k1f(1)+k2g(0),g(1)=k3g(0)}. (2.25)

    Then system (2.20) can be written as an abstract evolution equation in H

    {˙X(t)=AX(t),t>0,X(0)=X0, (2.26)

    where X(t)=(w(,t),z(,t)).

    Theorem 3.1. Let A be given by (2.24) and (2.25). Then A1 exists and is compact, if the feedback parameters k1, k2, and k3 satisfy

    (k31)(1k1e10δλ1(s)ds)k210δλ2(s)es0δλ1(σ)dσds0.

    Hence, σ(A), the spectrum of A, consists of isolated eigenvalues of finite algebraic multiplicity only.

    Proof. For X1=(f1,g1)H, solve

    AX=X1,X=(f,g)D(A), (3.1)

    we can obtain

    A(fg)=(λ1(x)fδfλ2(x)gδf)=(f1g1), (3.2)

    i.e.,

    {λ1(x)f+δf+f1=0,λ2(x)gδfg1=0,f(0)=k1f(1)+k2g(0),g(1)=k3g(0). (3.3)

    Solving the first differential equation of (3.3), we have

    f(x)=ex0δλ1(s)ds[x0f1(s)λ1(s)es0δλ1(σ)dσds+f(0)]. (3.4)

    Let F(x)=ex0δλ1(s)dsx0f1(s)λ1(s)es0δλ1(σ)dσds, we can get

    f(x)=F(x)+ex0δλ1(s)dsf(0). (3.5)

    Combining with the second equation of (3.3), we have

    g(x)=δλ2(x)f(x)+g1(x)λ2(x). (3.6)

    Integrating both sides of (3.6) yields the following

    g(x)=g(0)+x0δλ2(s)f(s)ds+x0g1(s)λ2(s)ds=g(0)+x0δλ2(s)[F(s)+es0δλ1(σ)dσf(0)]ds+x0g1(s)λ2(s)ds=g(0)+x0δλ2(s)F(s)ds+f(0)x0δλ2(s)es0δλ1(σ)dσds+x0g1(s)λ2(s)ds. (3.7)

    According to the third equation of (3.3), (3.5), and (3.7), we have

    (1k1e10δλ1(s)ds)f(0)=k2g(0)+k1F(1). (3.8)

    Similarly, according to the fourth equation of (3.3), (3.5), and (3.7), we have

    10δλ2(s)es0δλ1(σ)dσdsf(0)=(k31)g(0)10δλ2(s)F(s)ds10g1(s)λ2(s)ds. (3.9)

    Combining (3.8) and (3.9), we obtain

    ((k31)(1k1e10δλ1(s)ds)k210δλ2(s)es0δλ1(σ)dσds)f(0)=k1(k31)F(1)+k2[10δλ2(s)F(s)ds+10g1(s)λ2(s)ds]. (3.10)

    Let

    {M1=k1(k31)F(1)+k2[10δλ2(s)F(s)ds+10g1(s)λ2(s)ds],M2=(k31)(1k1e10δλ1(s)ds)k210δλ2(s)es0δλ1(σ)dσds, (3.11)

    where M20. We can obtain f(0)=M1M2,g(0)=1k2M1M2k1k2f(1). So, we have the expressions of f(x) and g(x):

    {f(x)=ex0δλ1(s)dsx0f1(s)λ1(s)es0δλ1(σ)dσds+M1M2ex0δλ1(s)ds,g(x)=1k2M1M2k1k2f(1)+x0δλ2(s)f(s)ds+x0g1(s)λ2(s)ds. (3.12)

    Hence, A1 exists and is compact by the Sobolev embedding theorem. Therefore, σ(A) consists only of isolated eigenvalues of finite algebraic multiplicity.

    In this section, we focus on constructing an appropriate Lyapunov function to analyze the exponential stability of system (2.20).

    Definition 4.1. The closed-loop system (2.20) is exponentially stable (in L2 norm) if there exist ϑ>0 and C>0 such that, for every initial condition (˜w0(x),˜z0(x))L2((0,L);R2), the system solution to the Cauchy problem (2.20) satisfies

    ˜w(,t),˜z(,t)L2((0,L);R2)Ceϑt˜w0,˜z0L2((0,L);R2).

    Lemma 4.2. The function η(x) defined by

    η(x)=1x0δλ2(s)ds+1+10δλ2(s)ds (4.1)

    is a solution of the differential equation

    η(x)=δλ2(x)η2(x), (4.2)

    where λ2(x),δ are given by (2.9), respectively.

    Remark 1. It is obvious that the function η(x) satisfies η(x)>0,η(x)>0,x[0,1], and η(x) is bounded on [0,1].

    Theorem 4.3. The nonlinear ARZ systems (2.1), (2.11), and (2.12) are exponentially stable for the L2-norm provided that the boundary conditions satisfy

    k2112b,2k22b+k231b, (4.3)

    where k1,k2, and k3 are feedback parameters,

    b=1+10δλ2(s)ds. (4.4)

    Proof. We construct the following candidate Lyapunov function:

    V(t)=10[p1(x)˜w2(x,t)+p2(x)˜z2(x,t)]dx, (4.5)

    where functions p1(x)C1([0,L];(0,+)) and p2(x)C1([0,L];(0,+)) are to be determined. Along the solution of (2.20), combining the integral formula of the distribution, the derivative of time of V(t) can be obtained:

    ˙V(t)=210[p1(x)˜wt˜w+p2(x)˜zt˜z]dx=210[p1(x)(λ1(x)x˜wδ˜w)˜w+p2(x)(λ2(x)x˜zδ˜w)˜z]dx=210[p1(x)λ1(x)˜wx˜w+p2(x)λ2(x)˜zx˜z]dx210[δp1(x)˜w2+δp2(x)˜w˜z]dx=10p1(x)λ1(x)d˜w2+10p2(x)λ2(x)d˜z2210[δp1(x)˜w2+δp2(x)˜w˜z]dx=p1(1)λ1(1)˜w2(1,t)+p2(1)λ2(1)˜z2(1,t)+p1(0)λ1(0)˜w2(0,t)p2(0)λ2(0)˜z2(0,t)+10(p1(x)λ1(x))x˜w2dx10(p2(x)λ2(x))x˜z2dx210[δp1(x)˜w2+δp2(x)˜w˜z]dxV1V2, (4.6)

    where

    V1=10(˜w,˜z)Λ(˜w˜z)dx,Λ=((p1(x)λ1(x))x+2δp1(x)δp2(x)δp2(x)p2(x)λ2(x)), (4.7)
    V2=p1(1)λ1(1)˜w2(1,t)p2(1)λ2(1)˜z2(1,t)p1(0)λ1(0)˜w2(0,t)+p2(0)λ2(0)˜z2(0,t). (4.8)

    It is obvious that the exponential stability is guaranteed if V1 and V2 are positive definite quadratic forms.

    For x[0,1], we assume

    p1(x)=1λ1(x)η(x),p2(x)=η(x)λ2(x). (4.9)

    It is easy to verify that

    (p1(x)λ1(x))x+2δp1(x)=η(x)η2(x)+2δλ1(x)η(x)>0,(p2(x)λ2(x))x=η(x)>0,[(p1(x)λ1(x))x+2δp1(x)](p2(x)λ2(x))xδ2p22(x)=2δη(x)λ1(x)η(x)>0. (4.10)

    Then in this case, by continuity, V1 is positive.

    Next, we consider the boundary term V2. Substituting the boundary conditions ˜w(0,t)=k1˜w(1,t)+k2˜z(0,t),˜z(1,t)=k3˜z(0,t) into V2, we have

    V2=(p1(1)λ1(1)2k21p1(0)λ1(0))˜w2(1,t)+(p2(0)λ2(0)k23p2(1)λ2(1)2k22p1(0)λ1(0))˜z2(0,t)=(1η(1)2k211η(0))˜w2(1,t)+(η(0)k23η(1)2k221η(0))˜z2(0,t)=(12(1+10δλ2(s)ds)k21)˜w2(1,t)+(11+10δλ2(s)dsk232(1+10δλ2(s)ds)k22)˜z2(0,t)=(12bk21)˜w2(1,t)+(1bk232bk22)˜z2(0,t), (4.11)

    where b is defined in (4.4). If the system parameters satisfy condition (4.3), we have V2>0.

    Therefore, there must exist a positive constant c such that ˙V(t)<cV(t).

    Remark 2. Combining Eq (2.19), it can be concluded that when the feedback gains kρ and kv in controllers (2.11) and (2.12) satisfy the following conditions, the nonlinear ARZ systems (2.1), (2.11), and (2.12) are exponentially stable for the L2-norm

    k2ρv2(0)2b,2(βkρkvv(0))2b+k2v1b, (4.12)

    where b is defined in (4.4), β=1αρ(0)v(0).

    In this section, we illustrate Theorem 4.3 using MATLAB numerical simulations. Without loss of generality and for computational convenience. The road parameters are shown in Table 1.

    Table 1.  Road traffic parameters.
    Road length Relaxation time Maximum density Free flow velocity
    L=1km τ0=120h ρm=150Vehicle/km vf=150km/h

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The steady-state is chosen with initial conditions prescribed as v(0)=60km/h, ρ(0)=90Vehicle/km, and the non-uniform steady-state is v(x)=60+5x, ρ(x)=9010x. Based on Table 1, the initial steady-state and the constraint condition (4.3) of Theorem 4.3, we can obtain the values of the control parameters as follows: k1=0.5, k2=0.3, k3=0.4. Combined with equation (4.11), we take the feedback gain kρ=30, kv=0.4.

    In Figure 2, Figures 2(a) and 2(b) respectively represent the changes of disturbance state variables ˜w and ˜z over time and space, where the initial conditions are ˜w(x,0)=cos(2πx)+2sin(2πx) and ˜z(x,0)=5cos(2πx)+sin(2πx)3x. It is evident from Figure 2(a) that the state variable ˜w exhibits significant fluctuations above and below zero at the initial moment but eventually converges to zero. Similarly, Figure 2(b) shows that the state variable ˜z also initially exhibits significant fluctuations above and below zero but similarly converges to zero. Figure 3 shows that the velocity value v(L,t) at the right boundary (represented by the red line) experiences large fluctuations at the initial moment but ultimately converges to its steady-state value v(L) (represented by the blue line).

    Figure 2.  The evolution process of the state ˜w(x,t),˜z(x,t) of the system (2.20) with respect to time and space.
    Figure 3.  Convergence of v(L,t) at x=L to the value v(L).

    This paper considers the stability of the linearized variable-coefficient ARZ equation with boundary control. The proportional boundary feedback controller that combined ramp metering and variable speed limits was designed to regulate stop-and-go traffic flow oscillations caused by congestion. Constructing a suitable Lyapunov function, it has been proven that the system is exponentially stable when the feedback parameters satisfy certain constraints. Numerical simulations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed boundary control and the feasibility of the selected parameters. In future work, we attempt to study the eigenvalue problem AX=μX and obtain the distribution of eigenvalues. The spectrum-determined growth condition and Riesz basis property are also of interest.

    All authors contributed equally to this work. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript for publication.

    The authors declare that they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.12001343.

    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.



  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4102) PDF downloads(329) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog