Citation: Minette Herrera, Aaron Miller, Joel Nishimura. Altruistic aging: The evolutionary dynamics balancing longevity and evolvability[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(2): 455-465. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017028
[1] | Andrea Guazzini, Enrico Imbimbo, Federica Stefanelli, Franco Bagnoli, Ezio Venturino . Quantifying fairness to overcome selfishness: A behavioural model to describe the evolution and stabilization of inter-group bias using the Ultimatum Game. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 3718-3733. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019184 |
[2] | Hebing Zhang, Xiaojing Zheng . Invariable distribution of co-evolutionary complex adaptive systems with agent's behavior and local topological configuration. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(2): 3229-3261. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024143 |
[3] | Dana Paquin, David Kato, Peter Kim . A mathematical model for the effects of grandmothering on human longevity. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 3175-3189. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020180 |
[4] | Rujing Zhao, Xiulan Lai . Evolutionary analysis of replicator dynamics about anti-cancer combination therapy. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 656-682. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023030 |
[5] | Minus van Baalen, Atsushi Yamauchi . Competition for resources may reinforce the evolution of altruism in spatially structured populations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 3694-3717. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019183 |
[6] | Max-Olivier Hongler, Roger Filliger, Olivier Gallay . Local versus nonlocal barycentric interactions in 1D agent dynamics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(2): 303-315. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.303 |
[7] | John D. Nagy, Dieter Armbruster . Evolution of uncontrolled proliferation and the angiogenic switch in cancer. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2012, 9(4): 843-876. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.843 |
[8] | Jim M. Cushing . A Darwinian version of the Leslie logistic model for age-structured populations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2025, 22(6): 1263-1279. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2025047 |
[9] | Wenqiang Zhang, Xiaoxiao Zhang, Xinchang Hao, Mitsuo Gen, Guohui Zhang, Weidong Yang . Multi-stage hybrid evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective distributed fuzzy flow-shop scheduling problem. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(3): 4838-4864. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023224 |
[10] | Jiande Zhang, Chenrong Huang, Ying Huo, Zhan Shi, Tinghuai Ma . Multi-population cooperative evolution-based image segmentation algorithm for complex helical surface image. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 7544-7561. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020385 |
In an evolutionary context, for a trait to be altruistic it must be both beneficial to others and costly to the altruist. Senescence, the deterioration associated with aging, easily fits the second test: dying from age-related causes is clearly more costly than not dying. This paper investigates situations where senescence might also satisfy the first criteria, where one organism's age-related deterioration aids the overall population. While from a classical viewpoint, altruism and cooperative behaviors more generally, seem as though they should be maladaptive, their prevalence across the biome has motivated significant research into scenarios which can select for cooperative behavior [9,5,3,20,16,17,21]. A portion of the prevalence of senescence may be attributable to the sort of structured populations that can stabilize cooperation.
There are several species that have negligible, or seemingly negligible aging, and at least one jellyfish, Turritopsis nutricula, which is believed to be functionally immortal [4]. There are theoretical reasons to believe that in some situations death rates should decrease with age, especially in species where greater sizes is especially competitive [22]. Nonetheless, senescence is widespread, and there are several well-established and non-contradicting evolutionary theories that attempt to explain why [15,24,13,1,18,14].
The mutation accumulation theory of senescence states that selection pressure against mutations harmful in youth is typically greater than that of mutations harmful in old age. It thus stands to reason that genetic drift coupled with this difference in selection pressure can concentrate harmful mutations into being harmful in old age [15]. Another theory of senescence, the antagonistic pleiotropy theory, hypothesizes that senescence is the result of mutations which trade fitness in old age for fitness in youth [24]. The theory of the disposable soma presents senescence as the optimal balance between investing resources into maintaining an organism and investing in its future offspring [13].
While these theories have managed to make multiple, verified predictions, there are several empirical facts that present challenges to these theories. First, the existence of extremely long-lived organisms is counter to the predicted universality of these theories [6]. Second, the mutation accumulation and antagonistic pleiotropy theories suggest that extending organism life spans should require significant changes to many genes, but several simple single-gene knock-out experiments have been shown to drastically increase lifespans in some organisms [14]. On the other hand, it can be difficult to make simple predictions from these theories, as some of the processes associated with senescence have complex interactions with external mortality causes and population density [1].
Previous theories predict senescence because they assume that retaining youth is in some way expensive to the individual or its offspring. In contrast to previous evolutionary models of senescence, we do not assume any developmental trade-offs, or differing developmental trajectories and yet we nonetheless still predict senescence. Instead, we are interested in a different mechanism, slightly related to the fundamental but largely abandoned theory of August Weismann [23], namely: how dominance of older organisms in a rapidly changing environment can tether a population to a previously, but no longer, advantageous phenotype. Mechanistically: in a rapidly changing environment with limited resources, old age can become indicative of a misfit phenotype, death by old age can free up resources for fitter organisms, and if those fitter organisms are sufficiently related then age related death can be evolutionary advantageous.
To investigate this mechanism, we create an agent-based model where each organism tracks a numerical phenotype, their age, and the terminal age before which it dies of an age-related cause. These agents are simulated in discrete time, and undergo an age dependent and a phenotypic dependent mortality step, and a population dependent reproduction step. While the vast majority of parameters result in either a stable population or rapid extinction, along the critical boundary between these parameter regimes, populations with a finite terminal age survive longer than populations without a terminal age. However, in a mixed population, a subpopulation without a terminal age outcompetes its mortal rivals. Thus, it appears that in some parameter regimes senescence, as described by a terminal age, acts like an altruistic behavior: harmful to the altruistic individual but beneficial to the population.
Despite being empirically abundant, cooperative behaviors are notorious for requiring additional modeling assumptions to stabilize [9,16]. In particular, there is an abundance of research into organisms engaged in explicit games such as prisoner's dilemma in the regime of weak selection pressure [21] and in structured populations such as stepping-stone populations [12] and stochastic island-migration models [7]. We extended our model from a well-mixed population to a set of islands where organisms can occasionally migrate from one island to another. On such an island model and with select parameter choices, we find that lower terminal age subpopulations can outcompete senescence-free subpopulations if migration is sufficiently slow--as to be expected of a cooperative behavior.
A somewhat similar result has been shown in other numerical studies, where stress related death, though costly to an individual, can be beneficial to a structured population [8] as can suicidal altruism [19]. However, in contrast to these papers, the proposed mechanism in this paper depends upon rapid change in the environment and population crashes and the results have implications for the senescence of otherwise successful organisms.
To investigate the tradeoff between adaptability and longevity, we constructed a simple agent-based model. In our model, each agent
While age-related death is ultimately stochastic and largely indistinguishable from other mortality causes [1], to investigate the effect of age-related deterioration, we explicitly model mortality causes separately, breaking overall mortality into three parts: developmental/youth related causes, phenotype/environment fitness, and death by terminal age. First, we assume young agents have a reduced probability of survival
At each time step, the number of offspring is determined by the logistic equation with carrying capacity
The five stages in a single discrete time step are thus:
1. Age advancement and terminal age check: Each agent advances one year in age,
2. Environmental change: With probability
3. Age and environmental dependent mortality: Each agent survives with probability equal to
4. Reproduction: The logistic equation is used to determine the number of new agents each of which has its sole parent chosen uniformly at random from the current alive population.
5. Mutation: Newly created agents undergo mutation, where
Unless otherwise mentioned,
The key ingredients to our model are: agents that age, have a maximum terminal age, and which must evolve against a changing external environment in a population that can go extinct. Aside from these key ingredients, we have consciously avoided including elements of the model that would make longevity costly. For instance, it is not assumed that past some age agents cease reproducing. In fact, in comparison with agents with a lower terminal age, agents with a larger terminal age necessarily have a lower death rate and a higher number of expected offspring, and thus in a fixed environment, out-compete their lower terminal age competition.
We also consider a meta-population or 'island' version of the above model, where
In order to investigate whether senescence can function as an altruistic behavior, we ran our agent-based model under a variety of different parameter regimes and initial conditions. As seen in figure 2, with the appropriate choices in parameters, the stochastic change in the environment drives the population to undergo frequent and extreme population crashes. Principally, when
Eventually, a particularly bad population crash will result in extinction, but the expected time until an extinction depends on the particular choice of parameters. For these parameters in a critical regime, the average percent chance of a population going extinct as a function of the initial terminal age
Thus, it appears that at the right parameter values, having a shorter terminal age can act analogously to an altruistic behavior, increasing the overall probability of the population surviving but at an individual loss of competitiveness relative to having a larger terminal age.
However, while larger terminal ages are selected for in a single population, the opposite can be observed when similar agents are placed in an island model. Indeed, island models have been established as one setting which can stabilize cooperative behaviors. In this case, when the inter-island migration rate is appropriately set, the increased extinction probability for islands of agents with a larger terminal age can overcome the rate at which larger terminal aged agents invade and colonize other islands. For instance, in figure 7, sufficiently small migration rates
Thus, under the appropriate parameter regime, having a terminal age acts as a cooperative behavior, both in how it behaves in a single population and how it can become selected for in an island setting.
The cooperative aspect of senescence is sensitive to parameters, with the majority of parameter space resulting in either extinction, or stable populations. However, given that the external environment variable,
In terms of modeling assumptions, there are several worth mentioning. Our use of a strict deterministic terminal age may seem less natural than a stochastic mechanism, where the probability of older agents dying from age-related causes is a function of both
In the island model, the two competing forces were the propensity of longer terminal aged populations to locally go extinct and the ability of larger terminal aged agents to invade shorter terminal aged populations. It is possible that a stronger effect might be seen on a lattice model, or some other structured model. Similarly, adaptive migration may also favor senescence [10]. However, general comparisons of our island model to other migration based models of cooperation is complicated by the importance of local extinction events in our model. Indeed, having a large number of empty sites may lead to slightly different overall dynamics than migration models with fixed population sizes [10,7].
The monotonicity of the changing environmental variable
In contrast to other theories, cooperative senescence suggests a reason to expect traits explicitly designed to age an organism. For instance, the mechanisms of human aging that roughly resemble the programmed, biological clock mechanisms [11], may be partly explained by cooperative aspects of aging. However, there is no particular reason to restrict the cooperative argument to aspects of senescence that appear programmed, since in our model agents with any form of senescent traits have a group selection advantage. There may be aspects of senescence which have not only been selected for, but have further evolved into compact, modular genetic levers and thus appear programmed, but our model is not designed to make such predictions.
In contrast to previous studies of senescence, we do not assume that there is any individual benefit to traits linked to senescence. Instead, we have shown in numerical simulations that in a critical regime of rapid environmental or exogenous change which threatens the entire population, having a terminal age at which an otherwise healthy agent dies is cooperative. For modelers, this work presents many possible extensions, as well as encourages a more theoretical treatment of the bifurcations associated with cooperative senescence as well as models which justify the critical parameter regime. For biologists, this suggests another possible explanation for some of the plethora of different patterns of senescence.
[1] | [ P. A. Abrams, Does increased mortality favor the evolution of more rapid senescence?, Evolution, 47 (1993): 877-887. |
[2] | [ P. Bak,K. Sneppen, Punctuated equilibrium and criticality in a simple model of evolution, Physical Review Letters, 71 (1993): 4083. |
[3] | [ S. Balshine-Earn,F. C. Neat,H. Reid,M. Taborsky, Paying to stay or paying to breed? field evidence for direct benefits of helping behavior in a cooperatively breeding fish, Behavioral Ecology, 9 (1998): 432-438. |
[4] | [ G. Bavestrello,C. Sommer,M. Sarà, Bi-directional conversion in turritopsis nutricula (hydrozoa), Scientia Marina, 56 (1992): 137-140. |
[5] | [ J. Bendor,P. Swistak, Types of evolutionary stability and the problem of cooperation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 92 (1995): 3596-3600. |
[6] | [ J. D. Congdon,R. D. Nagle,O. M. Kinney,R. C. van Loben Sels,T. Quinter,D. W. Tinkle, Testing hypotheses of aging in long-lived painted turtles (chrysemys picta), Experimental Gerontology, 38 (2003): 765-772. |
[7] | [ F. Fu,M. A. Nowak, Global migration can lead to stronger spatial selection than local migration, Journal of Statistical Physics, 151 (2013): 637-653. |
[8] | [ L. Hadany,T. Beker,I. Eshel,M. W. Feldman, Why is stress so deadly? an evolutionary perspective, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273 (2006): 881-885. |
[9] | [ W. Hamilton, The genetical evolution of social behaviour. Ⅰ, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7 (1964): 1-16. |
[10] | [ G. Ichinose,M. Saito,H. Sayama,D.S. Wilson, Adaptive long-range migration promotes cooperation under tempting conditions, Scientific Reports, 3 (2013): p2509. |
[11] | [ K. Jin, Modern biological theories of aging, Aging and Disease, 1 (2010): p72. |
[12] | [ M. Kimura,G.H. Weiss, The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance, Genetics, 49 (1964): p561. |
[13] | [ T. B. Kirkwood, Evolution of ageing, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development, 123 (2002): 737-745. |
[14] | [ P. Ljubuncic,A. Z. Reznick, The evolutionary theories of aging revisited-a mini-review, Gerontology, 55 (2009): 205-216. |
[15] | [ P. B. Medawar, An Unsolved Problem of Biology, College, 1952. |
[16] | [ M. A. Nowak, Five rules for the evolution of cooperation, Science, 314 (2006): 1560-1563. |
[17] | [ H. Ohtsuki,P. Bordalo,M. A. Nowak, The one-third law of evolutionary dynamics, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249 (2007): 289-295. |
[18] | [ L. Partridge,N. H. Barton, Optimality, mutation and the evolution of ageing, Nature: International Weekly Journal of Science, 362 (1993): 305-311. |
[19] | [ G. B. Pollock,A. Cabrales, Suicidal altruism under random assortment, Evolutionary Ecology Research, 10 (2008): 1077-1086. |
[20] | [ A. Traulsen,M. A. Nowak, Evolution of cooperation by multilevel selection, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103 (2006): 10952-10955. |
[21] | [ J. Van Cleve, Social evolution and genetic interactions in the short and long term, Theoretical Population Biology, 103 (2015): 2-26. |
[22] | [ J. W. Vaupel, A. Baudisch, M. Dölling, D. A. Roach and J. Gampe, The case for negative senescence, Theoretical Population Biology, 65 (2004), 339-351, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004058090400022X, Demography in the 21st Century. |
[23] | [ A. Weismann, E. B. Poulton, S. Schönland and A. E. Shipley, Essays Upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems, vol. 1, Clarendon press, 1891. |
[24] | [ G. C. Williams, Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence, Evolution, 11 (1957): 398-411. |
1. | Changbai Xi, Yao Chi, Tianlu Qian, Wenhan Zhang, Jiechen Wang, Simulation of Human Activity Intensity and Its Influence on Mammal Diversity in Sanjiangyuan National Park, China, 2020, 12, 2071-1050, 4601, 10.3390/su12114601 |