Modeling eating behaviors: The role of environment and positive food association learning via a Ratatouille effect

  • Received: 01 December 2015 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 May 2016
  • MSC : Primary: 97M10, 92D25; Secondary: 92B99.

  • Eating behaviors among a large population of children are studied as a dynamic process driven by nonlinear interactions in the sociocultural school environment. The impact of food association learning on diet dynamics, inspired by a pilot study conducted among Arizona children in Pre-Kindergarten to 8th grades, is used to build simple population-level learning models. Qualitatively, mathematical studies are used to highlight the possible ramifications of instruction, learning in nutrition, and health at the community level. Model results suggest that nutrition education programs at the population-level have minimal impact on improving eating behaviors, findings that agree with prior field studies. Hence, the incorporation of food association learning may be a better strategy for creating resilient communities of healthy and non-healthy eaters. A Ratatouille effect can be observed when food association learners become food preference learners, a potential sustainable behavioral change, which in turn, may impact the overall distribution of healthy eaters. In short, this work evaluates the effectiveness of population-level intervention strategies and the importance of institutionalizing nutrition programs that factor in economical, social, cultural, and environmental elements that mesh well with the norms and values in the community.

    Citation: Anarina L. Murillo, Muntaser Safan, Carlos Castillo-Chavez, Elizabeth D. Capaldi Phillips, Devina Wadhera. Modeling eating behaviors: The role of environment and positive food association learning via a Ratatouille effect[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2016, 13(4): 841-855. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2016020

    Related Papers:

  • Eating behaviors among a large population of children are studied as a dynamic process driven by nonlinear interactions in the sociocultural school environment. The impact of food association learning on diet dynamics, inspired by a pilot study conducted among Arizona children in Pre-Kindergarten to 8th grades, is used to build simple population-level learning models. Qualitatively, mathematical studies are used to highlight the possible ramifications of instruction, learning in nutrition, and health at the community level. Model results suggest that nutrition education programs at the population-level have minimal impact on improving eating behaviors, findings that agree with prior field studies. Hence, the incorporation of food association learning may be a better strategy for creating resilient communities of healthy and non-healthy eaters. A Ratatouille effect can be observed when food association learners become food preference learners, a potential sustainable behavioral change, which in turn, may impact the overall distribution of healthy eaters. In short, this work evaluates the effectiveness of population-level intervention strategies and the importance of institutionalizing nutrition programs that factor in economical, social, cultural, and environmental elements that mesh well with the norms and values in the community.


    加载中
    [1] Washington, DC: USDA, Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services, 1999.
    [2] website: http://www.azdhs.gov/, [Last Revised 25-Jun-2014], 2012.
    [3] Preventive medicine, 35 (2002), 25-41.
    [4] Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 87 (1987), 36-40.
    [5] Journal of Nutrition Education, 11 (1979), 189-192.
    [6] Child development, (1980), 856-861.
    [7] Health Education & Behavior, 29 (2002), 427-443.
    [8] Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 18 (2005), 431-443.
    [9] Nutrition and cancer, 18 (1992), 1-29.
    [10] European journal of nutrition, 51 (2012), 637-663.
    [11] website: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/04000.html, [Last Revised: Tuesday, 31-Mar-2015], 2015.
    [12] American Psychological Association, 1996.
    [13] Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 114 (2014), 1236-1241.
    [14] website: http://www.cdc.gov/vitalsigns/pdf/2014-08-vitalsigns.pdf, 2014.
    [15] Journal of human nutrition and dietetics, 20 (2007), 294-301.
    [16] Health Education & Behavior, 30 (2003), 615-626.
    [17] Journal of behavioral medicine, 21 (1998), 241-254.
    [18] Preventive medicine, 22 (1993), 866-879.
    [19] Appetite, 50 (2008), 181-193.
    [20] Los Alamos National Laboratory, 2004.
    [21] Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 100 (2000), 1474-1481.
    [22] Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 112 (2012), 235-245.
    [23] Food Assistance and Nutrition Research Report, 2004.
    [24] PloS one, 8 (2013), e82887.
    [25] Mathematica Policy Research, 2001.
    [26] Mathematical Population Studies, 17 (2010), 1-11.
    [27] Appetite, 59 (2012), 818-825.
    [28] Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 56 (2008), 679-689.
    [29] The Future of Children, 16 (2006), 109-142.
    [30] Annual review of public health, 30 (2009), 253-272.
    [31] Physiology & behavior, 83 (2004), 421-429.
    [32] Annual review of nutrition, 19 (1999), 545-586.
    [33] European journal of clinical nutrition, 58 (2004), 510-522.
    [34] Journal of Nutrition Education, 27 (1995), 250-260.
    [35] Health Education & Behavior, 15 (1988), 351-377.
    [36] International Journal of epidemiology, 26 (1997), 1-13.
    [37] Trends 1963-1965 Through 2007-2008 (US Centers for Disease Control, National Center for Health Statistics, 2010),
    [38] Jama, 311 (2014), 806-814.
    [39] Public Health Nutrition, 4 (2001), 131-139.
    [40] European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 57 (2003), S82-S85.
    [41] Health education & behavior, 31 (2004), 65-76.
    [42] Psychology in the Schools, 43 (2006), 361-376.
    [43] International journal of obesity, 35 (2011), 891-898.
    [44] Journal of mathematical biology, 53 (2006), 703-718.
    [45] Annu. Rev. Public Health, 29 (2008), 253-272.
    [46] Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102 (2002), S40-S51.
    [47] Developmental psychology, 26 (1990), 546-551.
    [48] website: http://www.fns.usda.gov/~fns/, 2014.
    [49] website: http://www.choosemyplate.gov/vegetables, 2015.
    [50] Health education research, 22 (2007), 203-226.
    [51] Appetite, 93 (2015), 75-84.
    [52] Appetite, 89 (2015), 22-32.
    [53] manuscript in progress.
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2016 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(72) PDF downloads(464) Cited by(1)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog