A model for phenotype change in a stochastic framework

  • Received: 01 April 2009 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 June 2010
  • MSC : Primary: 92D15, 60G15, 65K10; Secondary: 60G40, 60K40.

  • In some species, an inducible secondary phenotype will develop some time after the environmental change that evokes it. Nishimura (2006) [4] showed how an individual organism should optimize the time it takes to respond to an environmental change ("waiting time''). If the optimal waiting time is considered to act over the population, there are implications for the expected value of the mean fitness in that population. A stochastic predator-prey model is proposed in which the prey have a fixed initial energy budget. Fitness is the product of survival probability and the energy remaining for non-defensive purposes. The model is placed in the stochastic domain by assuming that the waiting time in the population is a normally distributed random variable because of biological variance inherent in mounting the response. It is found that the value of the mean waiting time that maximises fitness depends linearly on the variance of the waiting time.

    Citation: Graeme Wake, Anthony Pleasants, Alan Beedle, Peter Gluckman. A model for phenotype change in a stochastic framework[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2010, 7(3): 719-728. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.719

    Related Papers:

    [1] Jiang Li, Xiaohui Liu, Chunjin Wei . The impact of fear factor and self-defence on the dynamics of predator-prey model with digestion delay. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 5478-5504. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021277
    [2] Jiajun Zhang, Tianshou Zhou . Stationary moments, distribution conjugation and phenotypic regions in stochastic gene transcription. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 6134-6166. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019307
    [3] Jian Zu, Wendi Wang, Bo Zu . Evolutionary dynamics of prey-predator systems with Holling type II functional response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2007, 4(2): 221-237. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.221
    [4] A. Swierniak, M. Krzeslak, D. Borys, M. Kimmel . The role of interventions in the cancer evolution–an evolutionary games approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(1): 265-291. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019014
    [5] Andrei Korobeinikov, Conor Dempsey . A continuous phenotype space model of RNA virus evolution within a host. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(4): 919-927. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.919
    [6] Thanh Nam Nguyen, Jean Clairambault, Thierry Jaffredo, Benoît Perthame, Delphine Salort . Adaptive dynamics of hematopoietic stem cells and their supporting stroma: a model and mathematical analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 4818-4845. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019243
    [7] Farinaz Forouzannia, Sivabal Sivaloganathan, Mohammad Kohandel . A mathematical study of the impact of cell plasticity on tumour control probability. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 5250-5266. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020284
    [8] Kazunori Sato . Effects of cyclic allele dominance rules and spatial structure on the dynamics of cyclic competition models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1479-1494. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020076
    [9] Thomas Imbert, Jean-Christophe Poggiale, Mathias Gauduchon . Intra-specific diversity and adaptation modify regime shifts dynamics under environmental change. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(12): 7783-7804. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024342
    [10] Dongmei Wu, Hao Wang, Sanling Yuan . Stochastic sensitivity analysis of noise-induced transitions in a predator-prey model with environmental toxins. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 2141-2153. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019104
  • In some species, an inducible secondary phenotype will develop some time after the environmental change that evokes it. Nishimura (2006) [4] showed how an individual organism should optimize the time it takes to respond to an environmental change ("waiting time''). If the optimal waiting time is considered to act over the population, there are implications for the expected value of the mean fitness in that population. A stochastic predator-prey model is proposed in which the prey have a fixed initial energy budget. Fitness is the product of survival probability and the energy remaining for non-defensive purposes. The model is placed in the stochastic domain by assuming that the waiting time in the population is a normally distributed random variable because of biological variance inherent in mounting the response. It is found that the value of the mean waiting time that maximises fitness depends linearly on the variance of the waiting time.


  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Hamish G. Spencer, Anthony B. Pleasants, Peter D. Gluckman, Graeme C. Wake, A model of optimal timing for a predictive adaptive response, 2021, 2040-1744, 1, 10.1017/S2040174420001361
    2. Graeme Wake, 2015, Chapter 27, 978-3-319-22128-1, 155, 10.1007/978-3-319-22129-8_27
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2010 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(2443) PDF downloads(420) Cited by(2)

Article outline

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog