A model for phenotype change in a stochastic framework
-
1.
National Research Centre for Growth and Development & Institute of Information and Mathematical Sciences, Massey University, Private Bag 102904, Albany, Auckland
-
2.
National Research Centre for Growth and Development & AgResearch Limited, Ruakura Research Centre, Private Bag 3123, Hamilton
-
3.
National Research Centre for Growth and Development & Liggins Institute, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland
-
Received:
01 April 2009
Accepted:
29 June 2018
Published:
01 June 2010
-
-
MSC :
Primary: 92D15, 60G15, 65K10; Secondary: 60G40, 60K40.
-
-
In some species, an inducible secondary phenotype will develop some
time after the environmental change that evokes it. Nishimura (2006)
[4] showed how an individual organism should optimize
the time it takes to respond to an environmental change ("waiting
time''). If the optimal waiting time is considered to act over the
population, there are implications for the expected value of the
mean fitness in that population. A stochastic predator-prey model is
proposed in which the prey have a fixed initial energy budget.
Fitness is the product of survival probability and the energy
remaining for non-defensive purposes. The model is placed in the
stochastic domain by assuming that the waiting time in the
population is a normally distributed random variable because of
biological variance inherent in mounting the response. It is found
that the value of the mean waiting time that maximises fitness
depends linearly on the variance of the waiting time.
Citation: Graeme Wake, Anthony Pleasants, Alan Beedle, Peter Gluckman. A model for phenotype change in a stochastic framework[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2010, 7(3): 719-728. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2010.7.719
Related Papers:
[1] |
Jiang Li, Xiaohui Liu, Chunjin Wei .
The impact of fear factor and self-defence on the dynamics of predator-prey model with digestion delay. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(5): 5478-5504.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021277
|
[2] |
Jiajun Zhang, Tianshou Zhou .
Stationary moments, distribution conjugation and phenotypic regions in stochastic gene transcription. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 6134-6166.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019307
|
[3] |
Jian Zu, Wendi Wang, Bo Zu .
Evolutionary dynamics of prey-predator systems with Holling type II functional response. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2007, 4(2): 221-237.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.221
|
[4] |
A. Swierniak, M. Krzeslak, D. Borys, M. Kimmel .
The role of interventions in the cancer evolution–an evolutionary games approach. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(1): 265-291.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019014
|
[5] |
Andrei Korobeinikov, Conor Dempsey .
A continuous phenotype space model of RNA virus evolution within a host. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(4): 919-927.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.919
|
[6] |
Thanh Nam Nguyen, Jean Clairambault, Thierry Jaffredo, Benoît Perthame, Delphine Salort .
Adaptive dynamics of hematopoietic stem cells and their supporting stroma: a model and mathematical analysis. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 4818-4845.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019243
|
[7] |
Farinaz Forouzannia, Sivabal Sivaloganathan, Mohammad Kohandel .
A mathematical study of the impact of cell plasticity on tumour control probability. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 5250-5266.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020284
|
[8] |
Kazunori Sato .
Effects of cyclic allele dominance rules and spatial structure on the dynamics of cyclic competition models. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(2): 1479-1494.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020076
|
[9] |
Thomas Imbert, Jean-Christophe Poggiale, Mathias Gauduchon .
Intra-specific diversity and adaptation modify regime shifts dynamics under environmental change. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(12): 7783-7804.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024342
|
[10] |
Dongmei Wu, Hao Wang, Sanling Yuan .
Stochastic sensitivity analysis of noise-induced transitions in a predator-prey model with environmental toxins. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 2141-2153.
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019104
|
-
Abstract
In some species, an inducible secondary phenotype will develop some
time after the environmental change that evokes it. Nishimura (2006)
[4] showed how an individual organism should optimize
the time it takes to respond to an environmental change ("waiting
time''). If the optimal waiting time is considered to act over the
population, there are implications for the expected value of the
mean fitness in that population. A stochastic predator-prey model is
proposed in which the prey have a fixed initial energy budget.
Fitness is the product of survival probability and the energy
remaining for non-defensive purposes. The model is placed in the
stochastic domain by assuming that the waiting time in the
population is a normally distributed random variable because of
biological variance inherent in mounting the response. It is found
that the value of the mean waiting time that maximises fitness
depends linearly on the variance of the waiting time.
-
-
This article has been cited by:
1.
|
Hamish G. Spencer, Anthony B. Pleasants, Peter D. Gluckman, Graeme C. Wake,
A model of optimal timing for a predictive adaptive response,
2021,
2040-1744,
1,
10.1017/S2040174420001361
|
|
2.
|
Graeme Wake,
2015,
Chapter 27,
978-3-319-22128-1,
155,
10.1007/978-3-319-22129-8_27
|
|
-
-