The individual features, temporality, and analysis goals of the random variables determine the distinct challenges that statistical modeling with combined datasets frequently entails. When it comes to areas like stress testing and preventative maintenance, where knowing how reliable a system is and when it will fail is vital, these problems become much more complex. More flexible statistical tools are required in these situations because traditional methods may not work. To deal with the complexities of binary data, especially in cases of imbalance, overdispersion, and changing risk patterns, this study presented two novel bivariate probability models. The Marshall-Olkin shock framework provides the basis for one model, while the Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern technique is the basis for the other. Both are mathematically sound and have practical uses since they provide exact analytical formulas for important functions including quantiles, hazard rates, survival functions, and joint probabilities. We focused on two versions that show how these two model families evolved theoretically and how they might be applied in specific cases. Systems where success or failure is represented by binary outcomes across time are practical examples, as are instances where stress levels directly effect the probability of failure. Utilizing comprehensive simulation experiments as support, we employed maximum likelihood estimation to derive the parameters of the models. We then tested the models on three real-world binary datasets, demonstrating their robustness and adaptability in situations where more conventional approaches may fail to do justice to the complexities of the data.
Citation: Mohamed S. Eliwa, Hend S. Shahen, Mohamed El-Dawoody, Mahmoud El-Morshedy. A flexible bivariate skewed odd-G family of distributions for various Hazard rate profiles in dispersed trends: Theory-driven interdisciplinary joint data analysis[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(10): 23025-23066. doi: 10.3934/math.20251023
The individual features, temporality, and analysis goals of the random variables determine the distinct challenges that statistical modeling with combined datasets frequently entails. When it comes to areas like stress testing and preventative maintenance, where knowing how reliable a system is and when it will fail is vital, these problems become much more complex. More flexible statistical tools are required in these situations because traditional methods may not work. To deal with the complexities of binary data, especially in cases of imbalance, overdispersion, and changing risk patterns, this study presented two novel bivariate probability models. The Marshall-Olkin shock framework provides the basis for one model, while the Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern technique is the basis for the other. Both are mathematically sound and have practical uses since they provide exact analytical formulas for important functions including quantiles, hazard rates, survival functions, and joint probabilities. We focused on two versions that show how these two model families evolved theoretically and how they might be applied in specific cases. Systems where success or failure is represented by binary outcomes across time are practical examples, as are instances where stress levels directly effect the probability of failure. Utilizing comprehensive simulation experiments as support, we employed maximum likelihood estimation to derive the parameters of the models. We then tested the models on three real-world binary datasets, demonstrating their robustness and adaptability in situations where more conventional approaches may fail to do justice to the complexities of the data.
| [1] | S. M. Sunoj, N. Unnikrishnan Nair, Bivariate distributions with weighted marginals and reliability modelling, Metron, 57 (1999), 118–126. |
| [2] |
S. M. Sunoj, P. G. Sankaran, Bivariate weighted distributions in the context of reliability modelling, Calcutta Stat. Assoc. Bull., 57 (2005), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008068320050303 doi: 10.1177/0008068320050303
|
| [3] |
D. Kundu, R. D. Gupta, A class of bivariate models with proportional reversed hazard marginals, Sankhya B, 72 (2010), 236–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13571-011-0012-1 doi: 10.1007/s13571-011-0012-1
|
| [4] |
T. Dimitrakopoulou, K. Adamidis, S. Loukas, Bivariate extended exponential-geometric distributions, Commun. Stat. Theor. M., 41 (2012), 1129–1150. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2010.535628 doi: 10.1080/03610926.2010.535628
|
| [5] | H. Bidram, A bivariate compound class of geometric-Poisson and lifetime distributions, J. Stat. Appl. Pro., 2 (2013), 21–25. |
| [6] |
A. Jamalizadeh, D. Kundu, Weighted Marshall-Olkin bivariate exponential distribution, Statistics, 47 (2013), 917–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331888.2012.670640 doi: 10.1080/02331888.2012.670640
|
| [7] |
D. Kundu, A. K. Gupta, On bivariate Weibull-geometric distribution, J. Multivar. Anal., 123 (2014), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmva.2013.08.004 doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2013.08.004
|
| [8] |
R. Roozegar, A. A. Jafari, On bivariate generalized linear failure rate-power series class of distributions, Iran. J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Sci., 41 (2017), 693–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-017-0297-7 doi: 10.1007/s40995-017-0297-7
|
| [9] |
B. C. Arnold, I. Ghosh, A. Alzaatreh, Construction of bivariate and multivariate weighted distributions via conditioning, Commun. Stat. Theor. M., 46 (2017), 8897–8912. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2016.1197256 doi: 10.1080/03610926.2016.1197256
|
| [10] |
M. S. Eliwa, M. El-Morshedy, Bivariate Gumbel-G family of distributions: Statistical properties, Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimation with application, Ann. Data Sci., 6 (2019), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-018-00190-4 doi: 10.1007/s40745-018-00190-4
|
| [11] |
M. S. Eliwa, M. El-Morshedy, Bivariate odd Weibull-G family of distributions: Properties, Bayesian and non-Bayesian estimation with bootstrap confidence intervals and application, J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 14 (2020), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2020.1741919 doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1741919
|
| [12] |
M. El-Morshedy, M. S. Eliwa, A bivariate probability generator for the odd generalized exponential model: Mathematical structure and data fitting, Filomat, 38 (2024), 1109–1133. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL2403109E doi: 10.2298/FIL2403109E
|
| [13] |
H. S. Shahen, M. El-Morshedy, M. S. Eliwa, M. F. Abouelenein, Copula-based analysis of asymmetrically distributed joint data under a risk profile using the discrete Type-I extreme value distribution, Electron. Res. Arch., 33 (2025), 4468–4494. https://doi.org/10.3934/era.2025203 doi: 10.3934/era.2025203
|
| [14] |
J. K. Adu-Ntim, A. Y. Omari-Sasu, M. A. Boateng, I. A. Mensah, A novel bivariate regression model derived from the Clayton copula and the Odd Dagum-G family and its application, Sci. Afr., 28 (2025), e02761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02761 doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02761
|
| [15] |
A. W. Marshall, I. Olkin, A generalized bivariate exponential distribution, J. Appl. Probab., 4 (1967), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/3212024 doi: 10.2307/3212024
|
| [16] | T. P. S. Babu, Generalized Marshall-Olkin bivariate exponential distribution and its application in constant-stress accelerated life test, Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-025-02871-9 |
| [17] |
Y. Sun, R. Mendoza-Arriaga, V. Linetsky, Marshall-Olkin distributions, subordinators, efficient simulation, and applications to credit risk, Adv. Appl. Probab., 49 (2017), 481–514. https://doi.org/10.1017/apr.2017.10 doi: 10.1017/apr.2017.10
|
| [18] |
F. Gobbi, N. Kolev, S. Mulinacci, Ryu-type extended Marshall-Olkin model with implicit shocks and joint life insurance applications, Insur. Math. Econ., 101 (2021), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.08.007 doi: 10.1016/j.insmatheco.2021.08.007
|
| [19] |
D. J. Farlie, The performance of some correlation coefficients for a general bivariate distribution, Biometrika, 47 (1960), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.2307/2333302 doi: 10.2307/2333302
|
| [20] |
M. Fischer, I. Klein, Constructing generalized FGM copulas by means of certain univariate distributions, Metrika, 65 (2007), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00184-006-0075-6 doi: 10.1007/s00184-006-0075-6
|
| [21] | A. S. Alghamdi, H. Alghamdi, A. Fayomi, The new Dagum-X family of distributions: Properties and applications, Int. J. Anal. Appl., 21 (2023), 45. https://doi.org/10.28924/2291-8639-21-2023-45 |
| [22] | A. Z. Afify, M. Alizadeh, The odd Dagum family of distributions: Properties and applications, J. Appl. Probab. Stat., 15 (2020), 45–72. |
| [23] |
E. C. Biazatti, G. M. Cordeiro, M. D. C. S. de Lima, The dual-Dagum family of distributions: Properties, regression and applications to COVID-19 data, Model Assist. Stat. Appl., 17 (2022), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.3233/MAS-221354 doi: 10.3233/MAS-221354
|
| [24] |
F. Domma, Some properties of the bivariate Burr type III distribution, Statistics, 44 (2010), 203–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02331880902986547 doi: 10.1080/02331880902986547
|
| [25] |
S. G. Meintanis, Test of fit for Marshall-Olkin distributions with applications, J. Stat. Plan. Infer., 137 (2007), 3954–3963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2007.04.013 doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.04.013
|