Research article Special Issues

Invariant measures for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo delay lattice systems with long-range interactions in weighted space

  • Received: 31 January 2024 Revised: 06 May 2024 Accepted: 21 May 2024 Published: 05 June 2024
  • MSC : 35B40, 35B41, 37L30

  • The focus of this paper lies in exploring the limiting dynamics of stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo delay lattice systems with long-range interactions and nonlinear noise in weighted space. To begin, we established the well-posedness of solutions to these stochastic delay lattice systems and subsequently proved the existence and uniqueness of invariant measures.

    Citation: Xintao Li, Lianbing She, Rongrui Lin. Invariant measures for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo delay lattice systems with long-range interactions in weighted space[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 18860-18896. doi: 10.3934/math.2024918

    Related Papers:

    [1] Xin Zhao, Xin Liu, Jian Li . Convergence analysis and error estimate of finite element method of a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5240-5260. doi: 10.3934/math.2020337
    [2] Yuwen He, Jun Li, Lingsheng Meng . Three effective preconditioners for double saddle point problem. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6933-6947. doi: 10.3934/math.2021406
    [3] Jin-Song Xiong . Generalized accelerated AOR splitting iterative method for generalized saddle point problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 7625-7641. doi: 10.3934/math.2022428
    [4] Zhuo-Hong Huang . A generalized Shift-HSS splitting method for nonsingular saddle point problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 13508-13536. doi: 10.3934/math.2022747
    [5] Yasir Nadeem Anjam . Singularities and regularity of stationary Stokes and Navier-Stokes equations on polygonal domains and their treatments. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 440-466. doi: 10.3934/math.2020030
    [6] Luigi Accardi, El Gheted Soueidi, Abdessatar Souissi, Mohamed Rhaima, Farrukh Mukhamedov, Farzona Mukhamedova . Structure of backward quantum Markov chains. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 28044-28057. doi: 10.3934/math.20241360
    [7] Danxia Wang, Ni Miao, Jing Liu . A second-order numerical scheme for the Ericksen-Leslie equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 15834-15853. doi: 10.3934/math.2022867
    [8] Tiantian Zhang, Wenwen Xu, Xindong Li, Yan Wang . Multipoint flux mixed finite element method for parabolic optimal control problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(9): 17461-17474. doi: 10.3934/math.2022962
    [9] Salman Zeb, Muhammad Yousaf, Aziz Khan, Bahaaeldin Abdalla, Thabet Abdeljawad . Updating QR factorization technique for solution of saddle point problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1672-1681. doi: 10.3934/math.2023085
    [10] Shu-Xin Miao, Jing Zhang . On Uzawa-SSI method for non-Hermitian saddle point problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 7301-7315. doi: 10.3934/math.2020467
  • The focus of this paper lies in exploring the limiting dynamics of stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo delay lattice systems with long-range interactions and nonlinear noise in weighted space. To begin, we established the well-posedness of solutions to these stochastic delay lattice systems and subsequently proved the existence and uniqueness of invariant measures.



    It is known to us all that tumor growth has attracted considerable attention over the past few decades. In order to study the importance of tumor growth and better understand the disease itself, it is critical to find a model that may help to treat the tumor. For this purpose, some basic relations between mathematical modeling and tumor model have been presented in [1]. With the diffusion process about cell and nutrient proliferation as a basis, many mathematical models [2,3,4,5,6,7,8] have been used to discuss these growth phenomena, such as the fractional mathematical model of tumor invasion and metastasis [2], tumor spheroid models [3,4], the androgen-deprivation prostate cancer treatment model [5], the foundations of cancer modeling [6] and hepatitis C evolution models [7,8].

    In this paper, we will discuss the following reaction-diffusion model for cancer invasion [9,10]:

    ut=u(1u)auw,vt=d[(1u)vx]x+bv(1v),wt=wxx+c(vw), (1.1)

    where u(x,t),v(x,t) and w(x,t) stand for dimensionless and rescaled versions of healthy tissue, tumor tissue and excess H+ ions, respectively. The subscripts represent the partial derivatives relative to the corresponding variables. a,b,c and d are all constant functions. a indicates the destructive effect of H+ ions on the healthy tissue, b is the productivity of neoplastic tissue which pumps H+ ions at a rate c and d is displayed in the form d=D2/D3 where D2 and D3 are the diffusion coefficients of malignant tissue and H+ ions, respectively. The phenomenon in many instances of tumor propagation of an interstitial gap has been discussed in [9]. Some wave propagation dynamics were considered in [11].

    As everyone knows, the Lie group method plays an important role in studying the exact significant solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations [12,13,14,15]. The main aims of the symmetry method are to construct invariance conditions and obtain reductions to differential equations [16,17,18]. Once the reduced equations are given, a large number of corresponding exact solutions can be obtained. Utilizing Lie group analysis, we are going to get some fascinating special solutions of Eq (1.1) and identify the analysis stability behaviors of the model.

    The remainder of the paper is arranged as follows. Symmetries of the acid-mediated cancer invasion model are analyzed in Section 2; Section 3 considers the symmetry reductions through the use of similar variables; in Section 4, some new explicit solutions are provided with help of the power-series method, and the convergence of the solutions of the power-series is presented; also, we will investigate the properties of different solutions via imaging analysis; the last section summarizes the results of the study.

    In this paper, we demonstrate the Lie symmetry technique for Eq (1.1). First of all, let us think about a vector field of infinitesimal transformations of Eq (1.1) with the form

    X=ξx+τt+ϕu+φv+ηw, (2.1)

    where ξ,τ,ϕ,φ and η are functions of x,t,u,v,w respectively and are called infinitesimals of the symmetry group.

    Based on the transformation (2.1), applying the invariance conditions to Eq (1.1), we get [16,19]

    pr(1)X(utu(1u)+auw)=0,pr(2)X(vtd((1u)vx)xbv(1v))=0,pr(2)X(wtwxxc(vw))=0,

    where pr(i)X,i=1,2 is the ith-order prolongation of X [16,19]. For Eq (1.1),

    pr(1)X=X+ϕ(1)tut,pr(2)X=X+ϕ(1)xux+φ(1)xvx+φ(1)tvt+η(1)twt+φ(2)xxvxx+η(2)xxwxx,

    where

    ϕ(1)x=DxϕuxDxξutDxτ,ϕ(1)t=DtϕuxDtξutDtτ,φ(1)x=DxφvxDxξvtDxτ,φ(1)t=DtφvxDtξvtDtτ,η(1)t=DtηwxDtξwtDtτ,φ(2)xx=D2x(φξvxτvt)+ξvxxx+τvxxt,η(2)xx=D2x(ηξwxτwt)+ξwxxx+τwxxt,

    and Dx and Dt represent the total differential operators; for example,

    Dt=t+utu+vtv+wtw+utxux+vtxvx+uttut+wttwt+.

    Next, we get an overdetermined system of equations for ξ,τ,ϕ,φ and η

    ξx=ξt=ξu=ξv=ξw=0,τx=τt=τu=τv=τw=0,ϕ=φ=η=0.

    Solving the above equations, one gets

    ξ=c1,τ=c2,ϕ=φ=η=0,

    where c1 and c2 are arbitrary constants. Therefore, Lie algebra L2 of the transformations of Eq (1.1) is spanned by the following vector fields

    X1=x,X2=t.

    To obtain the symmetry groups, we solve the initial problems of the following ordinary differential equations

    d˜xdϵ=ξ(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜x|ϵ=0=x,d˜tdϵ=τ(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜t|ϵ=0=t,d˜udϵ=ϕ(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜u|ϵ=0=u,d˜vdϵ=φ(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜v|ϵ=0=v,d˜wdϵ=η(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w),˜w|ϵ=0=w;

    then we get the one-parameter symmetry groups Gi:(x,t,u,v,w)(˜x,˜t,˜u,˜v,˜w) of the infinitesimal generators Xi(i=1,2) as follows:

    G1:(x,t,u,v,w)(x+ϵ,t,u,v,w),G2:(x,t,u,v,w)(x,t+ϵ,u,v,w).

    Based on the above discussion, we obtain the following theorem.

    Theorem 2.1. If u=f(x,t),v=g(x,t) and w=h(x,t), constitute a solution of Eq (1.1), then by applying the above-mentioned groups Gi(i=1,2), the corresponding new solutions ui,vi,wi(i=1,2) can be presented respectively as follows:

    u1=f(xϵ,t),v1=g(xϵ,t),w1=h(xϵ,t),u2=f(x,tϵ),v2=g(x,tϵ),w2=h(x,tϵ).

    In this section, we are going to cope with the similarity reductions of Eq (1.1).

    Case 3.1. For the generator X1+X2, the invariants are z=xt,u=f(z),v=g(z) and w=h(z), Eq (1.1) becomes

    f=ff2afh,g=d(fg+gfg)+bgbg2,h=h+c(gh), (3.1)

    where f=dfdz,g=dgdz and h=dhdz.

    Case 3.2. For the generator X1, the invariants are z=t,u=f(z),v=g(z) and w=h(z), Eq (1.1) can be reduced to

    f=ff2afh,g=bgbg2,h=c(gh), (3.2)

    where f=dfdz,g=dgdz and h=dhdz. The invariant solution of Eq (1.1) is as follows: u(x,t)=f(t),v(x,t)=g(t),w(x,t)=h(t). Obviously, in this case, the variable x has no effect on the solution of Eq (1.1).

    Case 3.3. For the generator X2, analogously, we have z=x,u=f(z),v=g(z) and w=h(z). The reduction of Eq (1.1) is

    ff2afh=0,d(fg+gfg)+bgbg2=0,h+c(gh)=0, (3.3)

    where f=dfdz,g=dgdz and h=dhdz. The invariant solution of Eq (1.1) is as follows: u(x,t)=f(x),v(x,t)=g(x),w(x,t)=h(x). In this case, the variable t has no effect on the solution of Eq (1.1).

    Next, by way of the power-series method which is a very useful technique for treating partial differential equations [20], we will discuss cases 3.1–3.3.

    For Case 3.1, we assume that the power-series solution to Eq (3.1) is as follows

    f(z)=n=0pnzn,g(z)=n=0qnzn,h(z)=n=0lnzn, (4.1)

    where the coefficients pn,qn and ln are constants to be resolved.

    Putting Eq (4.1) into Eq (3.1), we obtain

    n=0(n+1)pn+1zn=n=0pnznn=0nk=0pkpnkznan=0nk=0pklnkzn,n=0(n+1)qn+1zn=d[n=0nk=0(k+1)(nk+1)pk+1qnk+1zn+n=0(n+1)(n+2)qn+2znn=0nk=0(nk+1)(nk+2)pkqnk+2zn]+bn=0qnznbn=0nk=0qkqnkzn,n=0(n+1)ln+1zn=n=0(n+1)(n+2)ln+2zn+c(n=0qnznn=0lnzn). (4.2)

    Comparing the coefficients for Eq (4.2), we get

    p1=p0(1+p0+al0),q2=bq0(q01)+q1(dp11)2d(1p0),l2=12[c(l0q0)l1]. (4.3)

    Generally, for n1, we have

    pn+1=1n+1[pnnk=0pk(pnk+alnk)],qn+2=1(n+1)(n+2)d(1p0){(dp11)(n+1)qn+1bqn+bnk=0qkqnk+nk=1d(nk+1)[(k+1)pk+1qnk+1+(nk+2)pkqnk+2]},ln+2=1(n+1)(n+2)[c(lnqn)(n+1)ln+1]. (4.4)

    Given Eq (4.4), the coefficients pi(i2),qj and lj(j3) of (4.1) can be obtained, i.e.,

    p2=12[p12p0p1a(p0l1+p1l0)],q3=16d(1p0)(4dp1q2+2bq0q1+2dp2q12q2bq1),l3=16[c(l1q1)2l2].

    Therefore, for the arbitrary constants p01,q0,l0,q1 and l1, the other terms of the sequences {pn,qn,ln}n=0, according to Eqs (4.3) and (4.4), can be determined. This implies that there is a power-series solution, i.e., Eq (4.1) which has coefficients that are composed of Eqs (4.3) and (4.4).

    Furthermore, for Eq (3.1), we confirm the convergence of Eq (4.1). In fact, from Eq (4.4), we get

    |pn+1|M[|pn|+nk=0|pk|(|pnk|+|lnk|)],|qn+2|N[|qn+1|+|qn|+nk=0|qk||qnk|+nk=1(|pk+1||qnk+1|+|pk||qnk+2|)],|ln+2|L(|ln|+|qn|+|ln+1|),

    where M=max{1,a},N=max{|dp11d(1p0)|,|bd(1p0)|,|11p0|} and L=max{1,c}.

    Next, we construct three power-series R=R(z)=n=0rnzn, S=S(z)=n=0snzn and T=T(z)=n=0tnzn by using

    ri=|pi|,i=0,1,sj=|qj|,tj=|lj|,i=0,1,2,

    and

    rn+1=M[rn+nk=0rk(rnk+tnk)],sn+2=N[sn+1+sn+nk=0sksnk+nk=1(rk+1snk+1+rksnk+2)],tn+2=L(tn+sn+tn+1),

    where n=1,2,. It is easily seen that

    |pn|rn,|qn|sn,|ln|tn,n=0,1,2,.

    Therefore, R=R(z)=n=0rnzn, S=S(z)=n=0snzn and T=T(z)=n=0tnzn are majorant series of Eq (4.1) respectively. Next, we prove that R=R(z),S=S(z) and T=T(z) have a positive radius of convergence.

    R(z)=r0+r1z+n=1rn+1zn+1=r0+r1z+M[n=1rnzn+1+n=1nk=0rk(rnk+tnk)zn+1]=r0+r1z+M[(Rr0)+(R2r20)+r0(Tt0)+T(Rr0)]z,S(z)=s0+s1z+s2z2+n=1sn+2zn+2=s0+s1z+s2z2+N[n=1sn+1zn+2+n=1snzn+2+n=1nk=0sksnkzn+2+n=1nk=1rk+1snk+1zn+2+n=1nk=1rksnk+2zn+2]=s0+s1z+s2z2+N[z(Ss0s1z)+z2(Ss0)+z2(S2s20)+(Ss0)(Rr0r1z)+(Rr0)(Ss0s1z)],

    and

    T(z)=t0+t1z+t2z2+n=1tn+2zn+2=t0+t1z+t2z2+L[n=1tnzn+2+n=1snzn+2+n=1tn+1zn+2]=t0+t1z+t2z2+L[z2(Tt0)+z2(Ss0)+z(Tt0t1z)].

    Then, we discuss the implicit functional system with the independent variable z:

    F1(z,R,S,T)=Rr0r1zM[(Rr0)+(R2r20)+r0(Tt0)+T(Rr0)]z,F2(z,R,S,T)=Ss0s1zs2z2N[z(Ss0s1z)+z2(Ss0)+z2(S2s20)+(Ss0)(Rr0r1z)+(Rr0)(Ss0s1z)],F3(z,R,S,T)=Tt0t1zt2z2L[z2(Tt0)+z2(Ss0)+z(Tt0t1z)].

    Based on the implicit function theorem [21], because F1,F2 and F3 are analytic in the neighborhood of (0,r0,s0,t0) and F1(0,r0,s0,t0)=F2(0,r0,s0,t0)=F3(0,r0,s0,t0)=0, and given the Jacobian determinant

    (F1,F2,F3)(R,S,T)(0,r0,s0,t0)=10,

    we reach that R=R(z),S=S(z) and T=T(z) are analytic in a neighborhood of the point (0,r0,s0,t0) and have a positive radius. This shows that Eq (4.1) converges in a neighborhood of the point (0,r0,s0,t0). The proof is completed.

    Thus the power-series solution given by Eq (4.1) for Eq (3.1) is analytic and can be described as

    f(z)=p0+p1z+n=1pn+1zn+1=p0+p0(1+p0+al0)zn=11n+1[pnnk=0pk(pnk+alnk)]zn+1,g(z)=q0+q1z+q2z2+n=1qn+2zn+2=q0+q1z+bq0(q01)+q1(dp11)2d(1p0)z2+n=11(n+1)(n+2)d(1p0){(dp11)(n+1)qn+1bqn+bnk=0qkqnk+nk=1d(nk+1)[(k+1)pk+1qnk+1+(nk+2)pkqnk+2]}zn+2,h(z)=l0+l1z+l2z2+n=1ln+2zn+2=l0+l1z+12[c(l0q0)l1]z2+n=11(n+1)(n+2)[c(lnqn)(n+1)ln+1]zn+2.

    Moreover, the power-series solution of Eq (1.1) is

    u(x,t)=p0+p1(xt)+n=1pn+1(xt)n+1=p0+p0(1+p0+al0)(xt)n=11n+1[pnnk=0pk(pnk+alnk)](xt)n+1,v(x,t)=q0+q1(xt)+q2(xt)2+n=1qn+2(xt)n+2=q0+q1(xt)+bq0(q01)+q1(dp11)2d(1p0)(xt)2+n=11(n+1)(n+2)d(1p0){(dp11)(n+1)qn+1bqn+bnk=0qkqnk+nk=1d(nk+1)[(k+1)pk+1qnk+1+(nk+2)pkqnk+2]}(xt)n+2,w(x,t)=l0+l1(xt)+l2(xt)2+n=1ln+2(xt)n+2=l0+l1(xt)+12[c(l0q0)l1](xt)2+n=11(n+1)(n+2)[c(lnqn)(n+1)ln+1](xt)n+2, (4.5)

    where p01,q0,l0,q1 and l1 are arbitrary constants; the other terms pn,qn and ln(n2) can be provided according to Eqs (4.3) and (4.4).

    We take the first six terms of Eq (4.5) as approximate to u,v and w for a=1.5,b=1,c=2,d=4×1010,p0=0.5,q0=3,l0=5,q1=4 and l1=6. Then the approximation is depicted in Figure 1.

    Figure 1.  Power series-solution of Eq (4.5).

    Figure 1 shows that the values of u,v and w tend to be stable when x(0,1) and t(0,1). However, when x0 and t1 or x1 and t0, u and w change suddenly in one direction and v changes sharply in the other direction. The rate of change of v is faster than that of u, and that of w is between them. This shows that healthy tissue may be destroyed before malignant cells arrive. Tumor progression is mediated by the acidification of surrounding tissues. Due to anaerobic glycolysis and metabolism, tumor cells produce excessive H+ ions. This leads to local acidification, which then destroys the surrounding healthy tissue and promotes tumor invasion.

    For Case 3.2, similarly, we can also obtain the following power-series solution to Eq (1.1):

    u(x,t)=p0+n=0pn+1tn+1=p0+n=01n+1[pnnk=0pk(pnk+alnk)]tn+1,v(x,t)=q0+n=0qn+1tn+1=q0+n=0bn+1(qnnk=0qkqnk)tn+1,w(x,t)=l0+n=0ln+1tn+1=l0+n=0cn+1(qnln)tn+1, (4.6)

    where p0,q0 and l0 are arbitrary constants.

    We get the first six terms of the power-series solutions of (4.6) as approximate to u,v and w for a=1.5,b=1,c=2,d=4×1010,p0=0.5,q0=3 and l0=5 respectively, then, the approximations of u,v and w are illustrated in Figure 2.

    Figure 2.  Power-series solution of Eq (4.6).

    Figure 2 illustrates that, when t(0,1), the values of u,v and w are stable first and mutate over time. When u and v decrease at the same time, w increases. The rate of change of u is the same as that of v, and the rate of change of w is slightly slower than them. This indicates that when healthy cells and cancer cells decrease at the same time, H+ ions will increase. We find that H+ ions are sensitive to changes in healthy cells and cancer cells.

    For Case 3.3, the power-series solution to Eq (1.1) is described as follows:

    u(x,t)=p0+p1x+n=2pnxn=p0+ap0l112p0al0x+n=2ap0ln+n1k=1pk(pnk+alnk)12p0al0xn,v(x,t)=q0+q1x+q2x2+n=1qn+2xn+2=q0+q1x+dp1q1bq0(1q0)2d(1p0)x2+n=11(n+1)(n+2)d(1p0){d[(n+1)p1qn+1+nk=1(nk+1)((k+1)pk+1qnk+1+(nk+2)pkqnk+2)]b(qnnk=0qkqnk)}xn+2,w(x,t)=l0+l1x+n=0ln+2xn+2=l0+l1x+n=0c(lnqn)(n+1)(n+2)xn+2, (4.7)

    where p0,l0,q0,q1 and l1 are arbitrary constants and that satisfy 12p0al00 and 1p00.

    We acquire the first six terms of the power-series solutions of Eq (4.7) as approximate to u,v and w for a=0.1,b=1,c=2,d=4×1010,p0=0.5,q0=3,l0=5,q1=4 and l1=6 respectively; then, the approximations of u,v and w are portrayed in Figure 3.

    Figure 3.  Power-series solution of Eq (4.7).

    Figure 3 shows that, when x(0,1), the values of u,v and w are initially stable and mutate in the same direction. The rate of change of v is the fastest, and the rates of change of u and w are basically the same. It describes that cancer cells decline faster than healthy cells. This shows a process of complete destruction of healthy tissue after tumor tissue invasion.

    Remark 4.1. For Case 3.2 and Case 3.3, the proofs of convergence of the power series solutions are similar to that for Case 3.1. The details have been omitted here.

    In this study, we applied the Lie group analysis method to an acid-mediated cancer invasion model. An important feature of this model is that tumor progression is mediated by acidification of the surrounding tissue. Especially, the model presumes that an excess of H+ ions is produced by tumor cells as a consequence of their anaerobic, glycolytic metabolism. Based on this method, the symmetries and reduced equations of Eq (1.1) were derived. Furthermore, explicit solutions of the reduced equations were obtained using the power-series method. Finally, this paper also demonstrates the stability behavior of the model for different parameters as achieved through the use of graphical analysis. In this way, we have found that H+ is decreased ahead of the advancing tumor front. Moreover, for certain parameter values, healthy tissue could be destroyed prior to the arrival of malignant cells. In the future, we can use this method to solve more tumor-related mathematical problems.

    This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi (No. 202103021224068).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.



    [1] S. F. Mingaleev, P. L. Christiansen, Y. B. Gaidideiet, M. Johansson, K. Ø. Rasmussen, Models for energy and charge transport and storage in biomolecules, J. Biol. Phys., 25 (1999), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005152704984 doi: 10.1023/A:1005152704984
    [2] J. M. Pereira, Global attractor for a generalized discrete nonlinear Schrödinger Equation, Acta. Appl. Math., 134 (2014), 173–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10440-014-9877-0 doi: 10.1007/s10440-014-9877-0
    [3] J. M. Pereira, Pullback attractor for a nonlocal discrete nonlinear Schrödinger equation with delays, Electron. J. Qual. Theo., 93 (2021), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14232/ejqtde.2021.1.93 doi: 10.14232/ejqtde.2021.1.93
    [4] Y. Chen, X. Wang, Random attractors for stochastic discrete complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with long-range interactions, J. Math. Phys., 63 (2022), 032701. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0077971 doi: 10.1063/5.0077971
    [5] Y. Chen, X. Wang, K. Wu, Wong-Zakai approximations of stochastic lattice systems driven by long-range interactions and multiplicative white noises, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 28 (2023), 1092–1115. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2022113 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022113
    [6] C. K. R. T. Jones, Stability of the traveling wave solution of the FitzHugh-Nagumo system, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 286 (1984), 431–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/1999806 doi: 10.2307/1999806
    [7] B. Wang, Pullback attractors for the non-autonomous FitzHugh-Nagumo system on unbounded domains, Nonlinear Anal-Theor., 70 (2009), 3799–3815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2008.07.011 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2008.07.011
    [8] A. Adili, B. Wang, Random attractors for non-autonomous stochasitic FitzHugh-Nagumo systems with multiplicative noise, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Special, (2013), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3934/proc.2013.2013.1
    [9] A. Adili, B. Wang, Random attractors for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo systems driven by deterministic non-autonomous forcing, Discrete Contin, Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 18 (2013), 643–666. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.643 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.643
    [10] A. Gu, B. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of random FitzHugh-Nagumo systems driven by colored noise, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 23 (2018), 1689–1720. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2018072 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2018072
    [11] Z. Wang, S. Zhou, Random attractors for non-autonomous stochastic lattice FitzHugh-Nagumo systems with random coupled coefficients, Taiwan. J. Math., 20 (2016), 589–616. https://doi.org/10.11650/tjm.20.2016.6699 doi: 10.11650/tjm.20.2016.6699
    [12] S. Yang, Y. Li, T. Caraballo, Dynamical stability of random delayed FitzHugh-Nagumo lattice systems driven by nonlinear Wong-Zakai noise, J. Math. Phys., 63 (2022), 111512. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0125383 doi: 10.1063/5.0125383
    [13] C. E. Elmer, E. S. Van Vleck, Spatially discrete FitzHugh-Nagumo equations, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 65 (2005), 1153–1174. https://doi.org/10.1137/S003613990343687 doi: 10.1137/S003613990343687
    [14] E. Van Vleck, B. Wang, Attractors for lattice FitzHugh-Nagumo systems, Phys. D, 212 (2005), 317–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2005.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.physd.2005.10.006
    [15] Z. Chen, D. Yang, S. Zhong, Limiting dynamics for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo lattice systems in weighted spaces, J. Dyn. Diff. Equ., 2022, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-022-10145-2
    [16] A. Gu, Y. R. Li, Singleton sets random attractor for stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo lattice equations driven by fractional Brownian motions, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 19 (2014), 3929–3937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.04.005 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2014.04.005
    [17] A. Gu, Y. Li, J. Li, Random attractors on lattice of stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo systems driven by α-stable Lévy noises, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos, 24 (2014), 1450123. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127414501235 doi: 10.1142/S0218127414501235
    [18] L. Xu, W. Yan, Stochastic FitzHugh-Nagumo systems with delay, Taiwan. J. Math., 16 (2012), 1079–1103. https://doi.org/10.11650/twjm/1500406680 doi: 10.11650/twjm/1500406680
    [19] Z. Chen, X. Li, B. Wang, Invariant measures of stochastic delay lattice systems, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 26 (2021), 3235–3269. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2020226 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020226
    [20] D. Li, B. Wang, X. Wang, Limiting behavior of invariant measures of stochastic delay lattice systems, J. Dyn. Differ. Equ., 34 (2022), 1453–1487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-021-10011-7 doi: 10.1007/s10884-021-10011-7
    [21] Y. Lin, D. Li, Limiting behavior of invariant measures of highly nonlinear stochastic retarded lattice systems, Discrete Contin. Dynam. Syst. Ser. B, 27 (2022), 7561–7590. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2022054 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022054
    [22] W. Yan, Y. Li, S. Ji, Random attractors for first order stochastic retarded lattice dynamical systems, J. Math. Phys., 51 (2010), 032702. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3319566 doi: 10.1063/1.3319566
    [23] D. Li, L. Shi, Upper semicontinuity of random attractors of stochastic discrete complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with time-varying delays in the delay, J. Differ. Equ. Appl., 24 (2018), 872–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236198.2018.1437913 doi: 10.1080/10236198.2018.1437913
    [24] D. Li, L. Shi, X. Wang, Long term behavior of stochastic discrete complex Ginzburg-Landau equations with time delays in weighted spaces, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 24 (2019), 5121–5148. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2019046 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2019046
    [25] F. Wang, T. Caraballo, Y. Li, R. Wang, Periodic measures for the stochastic delay modified Swift-Hohenberg lattice systems, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 125 (2023), 107341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107341 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2023.107341
    [26] P. E. Kloeden, T. Lorenz, Mean-quare random dynamical systems, J. Differ. Equations, 253 (2012), 1422–1438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2012.05.016 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2012.05.016
    [27] B. Wang, Dynamics of stochastic reaction difusion lattice system driven by nonlinear noise, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 477 (2019), 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.04.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2019.04.015
    [28] B. Wang, Weak pullback attractors for mean random dynamical systems in Bochner spacs, J. Dyn. Differ. Equ., 31 (2019), 277–2204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-018-9696-5 doi: 10.1007/s10884-018-9696-5
    [29] S. Yang, Y. Li, Dynamics and invariant measures of multi-stochastic sine-Gordon lattices with random viscosity and nonlinear noise, J. Math. Phys., 62 (2021), 051510. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037929 doi: 10.1063/5.0037929
    [30] A. Gu, Weak pullback mean random attractors for stochastic evolution equations and applications, Stoch. Dynam., 22 (2022), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219493722400019 doi: 10.1142/S0219493722400019
    [31] A. Gu, Weak pullback mean random attractors for non-autonomous p-Laplacian equations, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 26 (2021), 3863–3878. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2020266 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020266
    [32] R. Liang, P. Chen, Existence of weak pullback mean random attractors for stochastic Schrödinger lattice systems driven by superlinear noise, Discrete Contin. Dynam. Syst. Ser. B, 28 (2023), 4993–5011. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2023050 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2023050
    [33] B. Wang, R. Wang, Asymptotic behavior of stochastic Schrödinger lattice systems driven by nonlinear noise, Stoch. Anal. Appl., 38 (2020), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/07362994.2019.1679646 doi: 10.1080/07362994.2019.1679646
    [34] J. Shu, L. Zhang, X. Huang, J. Zhang, Dynamics of stochastic Ginzburg-Landau equations driven by nonlinear noise, Dynam. Syst., 37 (2022), 382–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/14689367.2022.2060066 doi: 10.1080/14689367.2022.2060066
    [35] R. Wang, B. Wang, Random dynamics of p-Laplacian lattice systems driven by infinite-dimensional nonlinear noise, Stoch. Proc. Appl., 130 (2020), 7431–7462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spa.2020.08.002 doi: 10.1016/j.spa.2020.08.002
    [36] R. Wang, B. Wang, Random dynamics of lattice wave equations driven by infinite-dimensional nonlinear noise, Discrete Contin. Dynam. Syst. Ser. B, 25 (2020), 2461–2493. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2020019 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020019
    [37] R. Wang, Long-time dynamics of stochastic lattice plate equations with nonlinear noise and damping, J. Dynam. Differ. Equ., 33 (2021), 767–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-020-09830-x doi: 10.1007/s10884-020-09830-x
    [38] X. Wang, P. E. Kloeden, X. Han, Stochastic dynamics of a neural field lattice model with state dependent nonlinear noise, Nodea Nonlinear Differ., 28 (2021), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00030-021-00705-8 doi: 10.1007/s00030-021-00705-8
    [39] J. Kim, On the stochastic Burgers equation with polynomial nonlinearity in the real line, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B, 6 (2006), 835–866. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.835 doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2006.6.835
    [40] J. Kim, On the stochastic Benjamin-Ono equation, J. Differ. Equations, 228 (2006), 737–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2005.11.005 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2005.11.005
    [41] Z. Brzeźniak, E. Motyl, M. Ondrejat, Invariant measure for the stochastic Navier-Stokes equations in unbounded 2D domains, Ann. Probab., 45 (2017), 3145–3201. https://doi.org/10.1214/16-AOP1133 doi: 10.1214/16-AOP1133
    [42] Z. Brzeźniak, M. Ondrejat, J. Seidler, Invariant measures for stochastic nonlinear beam and wave equations, J. Differ. Equations, 260 (2016), 4157–4179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2015.11.007 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2015.11.007
    [43] J. Kim, Invariant measures for a stochastic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Indiana Univ. Math. J., 55 (2006), 687–717. https://doi.org/10.1512/iumj.2006.55.2701 doi: 10.1512/iumj.2006.55.2701
    [44] J. Kim, Periodic and invariant measures for stochastic wave equations, Electron. J. Differ. Eq., 5 (2004), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:DISC.0000005011.93152.d8 doi: 10.1023/B:DISC.0000005011.93152.d8
    [45] C. Sun, C. Zhong, Attractors for the semilinear reaction-diffusion equation with distribution derivatives in unbounded domains, Nonlinear Anal-Theor., 63 (2005), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2005.04.034 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2005.04.034
    [46] B. Wang, Attractors for reaction-diffusion equations in unbounded domains, Phys. D, 128 (1999), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00304-2 doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(98)00304-2
    [47] P. W. Bates, K. Lu, B. Wang, Random attractors for stochastic reaction-diffusion equations on unbounded domains, J. Differ. Equations, 246 (2009), 845–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2008.05.017 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2008.05.017
    [48] H. Lu, J. Qi, B. Wang, M. Zhang, Random attractors for non-autonomous fractional stochastic parabolic equations on unbounded domains, Discrete Contin. Dynam. Syst. Ser. A, 39 (2019), 683–706. https://doi.org/10.3934/dcds.2019028 doi: 10.3934/dcds.2019028
    [49] G. Da Prato, J. Zabczyk, Stochastic equations in infinite dimensions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511666223
    [50] F. Wu, G. Yin, H. Mei, Stochastic functional differential equations with infinite delay: Existence and uniqueness of solutions, solution maps, Markov properties, and ergodicity, J. Differ. Equations, 262 (2017), 1226–1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jde.2016.10.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2016.10.006
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Bing Tan, Wei Ma, Structured backward errors for block three-by-three saddle point systems with Hermitian and sparsity block matrices, 2025, 25, 25900374, 100546, 10.1016/j.rinam.2025.100546
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2024 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1114) PDF downloads(56) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog