Processing math: 94%
Research article

Vector valued bilinear Calderón-Zygmund operators with kernels of Dini's type in variable exponents Herz-Morrey spaces

  • Received: 15 June 2023 Revised: 14 August 2023 Accepted: 21 August 2023 Published: 05 September 2023
  • MSC : 42B20, 42B25, 42B35

  • The main purpose of this paper is to establish the weighted boundedness result of vector valued bilinear ϖ(t)-type Calderón-Zygmund operators in variable exponents Herz-Morrey spaces, where ϖ being nondecreasing and ϖDini(1).

    Citation: Yanqi Yang, Qi Wu. Vector valued bilinear Calderón-Zygmund operators with kernels of Dini's type in variable exponents Herz-Morrey spaces[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 25688-25713. doi: 10.3934/math.20231310

    Related Papers:

    [1] Bo Xu . Bilinear $ \theta $-type Calderón-Zygmund operators and its commutators on generalized variable exponent Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12123-12143. doi: 10.3934/math.2022674
    [2] Yueping Zhu, Yan Tang, Lixin Jiang . Boundedness of multilinear Calderón-Zygmund singular operators on weighted Lebesgue spaces and Morrey-Herz spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(10): 11246-11262. doi: 10.3934/math.2021652
    [3] Babar Sultan, Mehvish Sultan, Aziz Khan, Thabet Abdeljawad . Boundedness of an intrinsic square function on grand $ p $-adic Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 26484-26497. doi: 10.3934/math.20231352
    [4] Kieu Huu Dung, Do Lu Cong Minh, Pham Thi Kim Thuy . Commutators of Hardy-Cesàro operators on Morrey-Herz spaces with variable exponents. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 19147-19166. doi: 10.3934/math.20221051
    [5] Suixin He, Shuangping Tao . Boundedness of some operators on grand generalized Morrey spaces over non-homogeneous spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(1): 1000-1014. doi: 10.3934/math.2022060
    [6] Jing Liu, Kui Li . Compactness for commutators of Calderón-Zygmund singular integral on weighted Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(2): 3483-3504. doi: 10.3934/math.2024171
    [7] Ming Liu, Bin Zhang, Xiaobin Yao . Weighted variable Morrey-Herz space estimates for $ m $th order commutators of $ n- $dimensional fractional Hardy operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(9): 20063-20079. doi: 10.3934/math.20231022
    [8] Muhammad Asim, Ghada AlNemer . Boundedness on variable exponent Morrey-Herz space for fractional multilinear Hardy operators. AIMS Mathematics, 2025, 10(1): 117-136. doi: 10.3934/math.2025007
    [9] Javeria Younas, Amjad Hussain, Hadil Alhazmi, A. F. Aljohani, Ilyas Khan . BMO estimates for commutators of the rough fractional Hausdorff operator on grand-variable-Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23434-23448. doi: 10.3934/math.20241139
    [10] Wanjing Zhang, Suixin He, Jing Zhang . Boundedness of sublinear operators on weighted grand Herz-Morrey spaces. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17381-17401. doi: 10.3934/math.2023888
  • The main purpose of this paper is to establish the weighted boundedness result of vector valued bilinear ϖ(t)-type Calderón-Zygmund operators in variable exponents Herz-Morrey spaces, where ϖ being nondecreasing and ϖDini(1).



    In 1985, Yabuta [1] proposed the definitions of ϖ(t)-type Calderón-Zygmund operators, he introduced certain ϖ(t)-type Calderón-Zygmund operators to facilitate his study of certain classes of pseudodifferential operators. After that, Maldonado and Naibo [2] established the weighted norm inequalities for the bilinear Calderón-Zygmund operators of type ϖ(t), and applied them to the study of para-products and bilinear pseudo-differential operators with mild regularity. In 2009, Lu and Zhang [3] established the a number of results concerning boundedness of multi-linear ϖ(t)-type Calderón-Zygmund operators. we recall the so-called ϖ(t)-type Calderón-Zygmund operators.

    Let ϖ(t): [0,)[0,) be a nondecreasing function with 0<ϖ(1)<. For α>0, we say that ϖDini(a) if

    |ϖ|Dini(α)=10ϖα(t)tdt<. (1.1)

    It is evident that for 0<α1<α2, there is Dini(α1)<Dini(α2). If ϖDini(1), then

    0ϖ(2j)10ϖ(t)tdt<,

    here and in what follows, for any quantities A and B, if there exists a constant C>0 such that ACB, we write AB. If AB and BA, we write AB.

    A measurable function K(,,) on Rn×Rn×Rn{(x,y1,y2):x=y1=y2} is said to be a bilinear ϖ(t)-type Calderón-Zygmund kernel if it satisfies: for all (x,y1,y2)Rn with xyi,i=1,2, if there exists a constant A>0 such that

    |K(x,y1,y2)|Aϖ(2i=1|xyi|)2n, (1.2)

    and for (x,y1,y2)(Rn)3 with xy1,y2, and

    |K(x,y1,y2)K(z,,y1,y2)|Aω(|xz|2i=1|xyi|)[2i=1|xyi|]2n. (1.3)

    whenever 2|xz|<max{|xy1|,|xy2|}.

    Definition 1.1. ([2]) Let ϖDini(1). One can say that Tϖ is a bilinear ϖ(t)-type operator with the kernel K satisfying (1.2) and (1.3), for all f1, f2Cc(Rn),

    Tϖ(f1,f2)(x)=RnRnK(x,y1,y2)f1(y1)f2(y2)dy1dy2,xsuppf1suppf2. (1.4)

    In the following, for each kZ, we define Bk={xRn:|x|2k}, Dk=BkBk1, χk=χDk, m1, ˜χ0=χB0.

    Given a function p(x)P(Rn), the space Lp(x)(Rn) is now defined by

    fLp()(Rn)=inf{η>0:Rn(|f(x)|η)p(x)dx1}.

    Denote P(Rn) to be the set of the all measurable functions p(x) with

    p=:essinfxRnp(x)>1

    and

    p+=:esssupxRnp(x)<,

    and B(Rn) to be the set of all functions p()P(Rn) satisfying the condition that the Hardy-littlewood maximal operator M is bounded on Lp()(Rn), P0(Rn) the set of all measurable functions p(x) with p>0 and p+<.

    The space Lp()loc(Rn) is defined by

    Lp()loc(Rn)={f:fχKLp()loc(Rn) for all compact subsets KRn},

    where and what follows, χS denotes the characteristic function of a measurable set SRn.

    Let p()P(Rn) and ω be a nonnegative measurable function on Rn. Then the weighted variable exponent Lebesgue space Lp()(ω) is the set of all complex-valued measurable functions f such that fωLp(). The space Lp()(ω) is a Banach space equipped with the norm

    fLp()(ω)=fωLp().

    Let fL1loc(Rn). Then the standard Hardy-Littlewood maximal function of f is defined by

    Mf(x)=supxB1|B|Bf(y)dy,xRn,

    where the supremum is taken over all balls containing x in Rn.

    Definition 1.2. ([4]) Let α() be a real-valued function on Rn.

    (ⅰ) For any x,yRn, |xy|<1/2, if

    |α(x)α(y)|1log(e+1/|xy|),

    then α() is said local log-Hölder continuous on Rn.

    (ⅱ) For all xRn, if

    |α(x)α(0)|1log(e+1/|x|),

    then α() is said log-Hölder continuous functions at origin, denote by Plog0(Rn) the set of all log-Hölder continuous at origin.

    (ⅲ) If there exists αR, for xRn, if

    |α(x)α|1log(e+|x|),

    then α() is said log-Hölder continuous at infinity, denote by Plog(Rn) the set of all log-Hölder continuous functions at infinity.

    (ⅳ) The function α() is global log-Hölder continuous if α() are both locally log-Hölder continuous and log-Hölder continuous at infinity. Denote by Plog(Rn) the set of all global log-Hölder continuous functions.

    Let ω be a weighted function on Rn, that is, ω is real-valued, non-negative and locally integrable. ω is said to be a Muckenhoupt A1 weight if

    Mω(x)ω(x)a.e.,xRn.

    For 1<p<, we say that ω is an Ap weight if

    supB(1|B|Bω(x)dx)(1|B|Bω(x)1pdx)p1<.

    Definition 1.3. ([5]) Let p()P(Rn). For some constant C, a weight ω is said to be an Ap() weight, if for all balls B in Rn such that

    1|B|ωχBLp()(Rn)ω1χBLp()(Rn)C.

    Lemma 1.1. ([5]) If p()Plog(Rn)P(Rn) and ωAp(), then for each fLp()(ω),

    (Mf)ωLp()fωLp(),

    Before give the definitions of the weighted Herz space and Herz-Morrey space with variable exponents, we also need the notation of the variable mixed sequence space q(Lp()), which was firstly defined in [6]. Let ω be a nonnegative measurable function. Given a sequence of functions {fj}jZ, we define the modular

    ρq(Lp()(ω))((fj)j)=jZinf{λj:Rn(|fj(x)ω(x)|λ1q(x)j)p(x)dx1},

    where λ1=1. If q+< or q()p(), the above can be written as

    ρq(Lp()(ω))((fj)j)=jZfjω|q()Lp()q().

    The norm is

    (fj)jρq(Lp()(ω))=inf{μ>0:ρq(Lp()(ω))((fjμ)j)1}.

    Definition 1.4. ([7]) Let p()P(Rn), qP0(Rn). Let α() be a bounded real-valued measurable function on Rn. The homogeneous weighted Herz space ˙Kα(),q()p()(ω) are defined by

    ˙Kα(),q()p()(ω)={fLp()loc(Rn{0},ω):f˙Kα(),q()p()(ω)<},

    where

    f˙Kα(),q()p()(ω)=(2jα()fχj)jρq(Lp()(ω)).

    Lemma 1.2. ([7]) Let α()L(Rn), p(),q()P0(Rn) and ω be a weight. If α() and q() are log-Hölder continuous at the origin, then T

    f˙Kα(),q()p()(ω)=f˙Kα,qp()(ω).

    Additionally, if α() and q() are log-Hölder continuous at the origin, then

    f˙Kα(),q()p()(ω)(k02kα(0)fχkq(0)Lp())1q(0)+(k>02kαfχkq(0)Lp())1q.

    Definition 1.5. ([8]) Let p(),q()P0(Rn), λ[0,1). Let α() be a bounded real-valued measurable function on Rn. The homogeneous weighted Herz-Morrey space M˙Kα(),q()p(),λ(ω) are defined by

    M˙Kα(),q()p(),λ(ω)={fLp()loc(Rn{0},ω):fM˙Kα(),q()p(),λ(ω)<},

    where

    fM˙Kα(),q()p(),λ(ω)=supLZ2Lλ(2kα()kfχk)kLρq(Lp()(ω)).

    Lemma 1.3. ([8]) Let p(),q()P0(Rn), ω be a weight, λ[0,) and αL(Rn). If α(), q()Plog0(Rn)Plog(Rn), then for any fLp()loc(Rn{0},ω),

    fM˙Kα(),q()p(),λ(ω)max{supL0,LZ2Lλ(2kα(0)fχk)kLlq0(Lp()(ω)),supL>0,LZ[2Lλ(2kα(0)fχk)kLρq0(Lp()(ω))+2Lλ(2kαfχk)Lk=0ρq0(Lp()(ω))]},

    where and hereafter, q0=q(0).

    Lemma 1.4. ([8]) If p()Plog(Rn)P(Rn) and ωAp(), then there exist constants δ1,δ2(0,1), such that for all balls B in Rn and all measurable subsets SB,

    χSLp()(ω)χBLp()(ω)(|S||B|)δ1,χSLp()(ω1)χBLp()(ω1)(|S||B|)δ2.

    Before proving the main results, we need the following lemmas.

    For δ>0, we denote [M(|f|δ)]1δ by Mδ. Let fL1loc(Rn). Then the sharp maximal function is defined by

    M#f(x)=supQ1QQ|f(y)fQ|dy,

    where the supremum is taken over all the cubes Q containing the point x, and where as usual fQ denotes the average of f on Q. we denote [M#(|f|δ)]1δ by M#δ.

    Lemma 2.1. ([3]) Let Tω be a bilinear ω(t)-type Calderón-Zygmund operator with ϖDini(1) and let 0<δ<12. Then, for any vector function f=(f1,f2), where each component is smooth and with compact support, the following inequality holds

    M#δ(Tω(f1,f2))(x)M(f1)(x)M(f2)(x).

    Lemma 2.2. ([9]) Let 0<p,δ< and ωA. There exists a positive constant C such that

    Rn[Mδf(x)]pω(x)dxRn[M#δf(x)]pω(x)dx

    for every function f such that the left hand side is finite.

    Lemma 2.3. ([10]) Let p(),p1(),p2()P0(Rn) such that 1p(x)=1p1(x)+1p2(x). Then for every fLp1()(Rn) and gLp2()(Rn), there exists

    fgLp()fLp1()gLp2()

    If pP(Rn), ω is a weight with ω=ω1×ω2, there exists

    fgLp()(ω)fLp1()(ω1)gLp2()(ω2).

    Lemma 2.4. ([11]) Let 0<p, δ>0. Then for non-negative sequence {aj}j=, there exists

    (j=(k=2|kj|δak)p)1p(j=apj)1p,

    when p=, above inequality stands for

    k=(2|kj|δak)supjZaj.

    Lemma 2.5. ([12]) Assume that for some p0(0,) and every ω0A, let F be a family of pairs of non-negative functions such that

    Rnf(x)p0ω0(x)dxRng0(x)p0ω0(x)dx,(f,g)F. (2.1)

    Then for all 0<p< and ω0A,

    Rnf(x)pω0(x)dxRng0(x)pω0(x)dx,(f,g)F.

    Furthermore, for every p,q(0,), ω0A, and sequences {(fj,gj)}F,

    (j=1(fj))qLp(ω0)(j=1(gj))qLp(ω0). (2.2)

    Lemma 2.6. ([8]) Assume that for some p0 and let F be a family of pairs of non-negative functions such that (2.1) holds. Let p()P0(Rn). If there exists sp such that ωsAp()s and M is bounded on L(p()s)(ωs). Then for every q(1,) and sequence {(fj,gj)}jNF

    (j=1(fj))qLp()(ω)(j=1(gj))qLp()(ω).

    Lemma 2.7. ([13]) Let p()P(Rn), and ω be a weight. If the maximal operator M is bounded both on Lp()(ω) and Lp()(ω1), q(1.), then

    (j=1(Mfj)q)1qLp()(ω)(j=1|fj|q)1qLp()(ω).

    Lemma 2.8. Let Tϖ be a bilinear Calderón-Zygmund operator with ϖDini(1) and p()P0 such that there exists sp such that ωsAp()s and M is bounded on L(p()s)(ωs). Suppose that ω=ω1×ω2 and ωiApi(),i=1,2. If piPlog(Rn)P(Rn)(i=1,2) satisfying

    1p(x)=1p1(x)+1p2(x)

    for xRn. Then for compactly supported bounded functions fj1,fj2Lp0(Rn), jN such that

    (j=1|Tϖ(fj1,fj2)|q)1qLp()(ω)2i=1(j=1|fji|qi)1qiLpi()(ωi),

    where qi(1,) for i=1,2 and

    1q=1q1+1q2.

    Proof of Lemma 2.8. Since fj1,fj2 are bounded functions with compact support, Tϖ(fj1,fj2)Lp(Rn) for every 0<p<. With Lemmas 2.1 and 2.2, Lu and Zhang [3] showed that for all ωA,

    Rn|Tϖ(f1,f2)(x)|pω(x)dxRn(Mf1(x)Mf2(x))pω(x)dx.

    Therefore, by Lemmas 2.5 and 2.6, we have

    (j=1|Tϖ(fj1,fj2)|q)1qLp()(ω)(j=1|Mfj1(x)Mfj2(x)|q)1qLp()(ω).

    Since

    1q=1q1+1q2,    1p=1p1+1p2

    and ω=ω1ω2, together with Hölders inequality, Lemmas 2.3 and 2.7, we have

    (j=1|Mfj1(x)Mfj2(x)|q)1qLp()(ω)2i=1(j=1|Mfji|qi)1qiLpi()(ωi)2i=1(j=1|fji|qi)1qiLpi()(ωi).

    We complete the proof of Lemma 2.8.

    Theorem 3.1. Let Tϖ be a bilinear ϖ-type Calderón-Zygmund operator with ϖDini(1), p1 and p2Plog(Rn)Plog(Rn) santisfying

    1p(x)=1p1(x)+1p2(x)

    and p()P0 such that there exists sp such that ωsAp()s and M is bounded on L(p()s)(ωs), where ω=ω1ω2 and ωiApi(), i=1,2. Suppose that

    α()L(Rn)Plog0(Rn)Plog(Rn),α(0)=α1(0)+α2(0),
    α=α1+α2,q()Plog0(Rn)Plog(Rn),
    1q(0)=1q1(0)+1q2(0),1q=1q1+1q2,
    λ=λ1+λ2,0λi<,δi1,δi2(0,1)

    are the constants in Lemma 1.4 for exponents pi() and weights ωi(i=1,2). Let ri(1,) and

    1r=1r1+1r2.

    If λinδi1<αi, αi(0)nδi2, then

    (j=1|Tϖ(fj1,fj2)|r)1rM˙Kα(),q()p(),λ(ω)2i=1(j=1|(fji)|ri)1riM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(ωi)

    for all fjiM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(ωi), jN, i=1,2.

    Proof of Theorem 3.1. We only consider bounded compact supported functions for the set of all bounded compactly supported functions is dense in weighted variable Lebesgue spaces (see [13]). Let fv1 and fv2 be bounded functions with compact support for vN and write

    fvi=l=fvilχl=l=fvil,i=1,2,vN.

    By Lemma 1.3, we have

    (v=1|Tϖ(fv1,fv2)|r)1rM˙Kα(),q()p(),λ(w)max{supL0,LZ2Lλ(2kα(0)(v=1|Tϖ(fv1,fv2)|r)1rχk)kLq0(Lp()(w))    supL>0,LZ[2Lλ(2kα(0)(v=1|Tϖ(fv1,fv2)|r)1rχk)k<0q0(Lp()(w))     +2Lλ(2kα(v=1|Tϖ(fv1,fv2)|r)1rχk)Lk=0q(Lp()(w))]}=max{E,F},

    where

    E=supL0,LZ2Lλ(2kα(0)(v=1|Tϖ(fv1,fv2)|r)1rχk)kLq0(Lp()(w)),F=supL>0,LZ{G+H},G=2Lλ(2kα(0)(v=1|Tϖ(fv1,fv2)|r)1rχk)k<0q0(Lp()(w)),H=2Lλ(2kα(v=1|Tϖ(fv1,fv2)|r)1rχk)Lk=0q(Lp()(w)).

    Since to estimate G is essentially similar to estimate E, it is suffice to obtain that E and H are bounded in Herz-Morrey space with variable exponents. It is easy to see that

    E9i=iEi,H9i=iHi,

    where

    E1=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1|k2l=k2j=Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),E2=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1|k2l=k+1j=k1Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),E3=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1|k2l=j=k+2Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),E4=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1|k+1l=k1k2j=Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),E5=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1|k+1l=k1k+1j=k1Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),E6=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1|k+1l=k1j=k+2Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),E7=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1l=k+2k2j=Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),E8=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1|l=k+2k+1j=k1Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),E9=supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)(v=1|l=k+2j=k+2Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0),
    H1=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|k2l=k2j=Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q,H2=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|k2l=k+1j=k1Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q,H3=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|k2l=j=k+2Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q,H4=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|k+1l=k1k2j=Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q,H5=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|k+1l=k1k+1j=k1Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q,H6=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|k+1l=k1j=k+2Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q,H7:=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|l=k+2k2j=Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q,H8:=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|l=k+2k+1j=k1Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q,H9:=2Lλ(Lk=02kαq(v=1|l=k+2j=k+2Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkqLp()(w))1q.

    We will use the following estimates. If lk1, by Hölder's inequality, Lemma 1.4 and Definition 1.3, we have

    2knRn(v=1|fvil|ri)1ridyiχkLpi()(wi)C2knχBkLpi()(wi)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riwiχlLpi()χlw1iLpi()C2kn|Bk|χBk1Lpi()(w1i)χBlLpi()(w1i)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)C2(lk)nδ2i(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi). (3.1)

    If l=k, then

    2knRn(v=1|fvil|ri)1ridyiχkLpi()(wiC2knχBkLpi()(wi)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riwiχlLpi()χlw1iLpi()C2knχBkLpi()(wi)χBlLpi()(w1i)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi). (3.2)

    If lk+1, then

    2knRn(v=1|fvil|ri)1ridyiχkLpi()(wi)C2knχBkLpi()(wi)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riwiχlLpi()χlw1iLpi()C2knχBkLpi()(wi)χBlLpi()(wi)χBl1Lpi()(wi)×χBlLpi()(w1i)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)C2(lk)n(1δ1i)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi). (3.3)

    Reverse the order of f1 and f2, it is obviously that the estimates of E2, E3 and E6 are similar to those of E4, E7 and E8, respectively. Thus We just need to estimate E1E3,E5,E6 and E9.

    For E1, since l, jk2, then for i=1,2,

    |xyi||x||yi|>2k12min{l,j}2k2,xDk, y1Dl, y2Dj.

    Therefore, for xDk, we have

    |K(x,y1,y2)|C(|xy1|+|xy2|)2nC22kn.

    Thus, for any xDkandl,jk2, we have

    |T(fv1l,fv2j)(x)|RnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|(|xy1|+|xy2|)2ndy1dy222knRnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|dy1dy2.

    Hence, together with the Hölder's and Minkowski's inequality, we have

    (v=1|k2l=k2j=Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(k2l=2knRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1k2j=2knRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(k2l=2knRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1)r1)1r1χkLp1()(w1)×(v=1(k2j=2knRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r2)1r2χkLp2()(w2)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkLp1()(w1)×k2j=2knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkLp2()(w2). (3.4)

    Since

    1q(0)=1q1(0)+1q2(0)andλ=λ1+λ2,

    by Hölder's inequality, we have

    E1supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq(0)Lp1()(w1)×k2j=2knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq(0)Lp2()(w2))1q(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ1×(Lk=2kα1(0)q1(0)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq1(0)Lp1()(w1))1q1(0)×supL0,LZ2Lλ2×(Lk=2kα2(0)q2(0)k2j=2knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)=E1,1×E1,2.

    For convenience's sake, we write

    E1,i=supL0,LZ2Lλi×{Lk=2kαi(0)qi(0)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fil(yi)|ri)1ridyiχkqi(0)Lpi()(wi)}1qi(0).

    For nδi2αi(0)>0, by (3.1) and Lemma 2.4 we have

    E1,isupL0,LZ2Lλi{Lk=2kαi(0)qi(0)Big.×(k2l=2(lk)nδi2(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi))qi(0)}1qi(0)=supL0,LZ2Lλi×{Lk=(k2l=2lαi(0)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)2(lk)(nδi2αi(0)))qi(0)}1qi(0)supL0,LZ2Lλi(L2l=2lαi(0)qi(0)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlqi(0)Lpi()(wi))1qi(0)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(wi),

    where we write 2|kl|(nδi2αi(0))=2|kl|εi for εi=nδi2αi(0)>0, then we have

    E1(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    To estimate E2, since lk2, k1jk+1, then we have

    |xy2||xy1||x||y1|2k2,xDk, y1Dl, y2Dj.

    Therefore, for xDk, we have

    |K(x,y1,y2)|C(|xy1|+|xy2|)2nC22kn.

    Thus, for any xDk,lk2,k1jk+1, we have

    |T(fv1l,fv2j)(x)|RnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|(|xy1|+|xy2|)2ndy1dy222knRnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|dy1dy2.

    Combining the Hölder's with and Minkowski's inequality, hence we obtain

    (v=1|k2l=k+1j=k1Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(k2l=2knRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1k+1j=k12knRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(k2l=2knRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1)r)1rχkLp1()(w1)×(v=1(k+1j=k12knRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r)1rχkLp2()(w2)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r)1rdy1χkLp1()(w1)×k+1j=k12knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r)1rdy2χkLp2()(w2). (3.5)

    Since

    1q(0)=1q1(0)+1q2(0)andλ=λ1+λ2,

    by Hölder's inequality, we have

    E2supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r)1rdy1χkq(0)Lp1()(w1)×k+1j=k12knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r)1rdy2χkq(0)Lp2()(w2))1q(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ1×(Lk=2kα1(0)q1(0)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r)1rdy1χkq1(0)Lp1()(w1))1q1(0)×supL0,LZ2Lλ2(Lk=2kα2(0)q2(0)k+1j=k12knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r)1rdy2χkq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)=E2,1×E2,2.

    It is obvious that

    E2,1=E1,1(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1).

    Now we turn to estimate E2,2. By (3.1)–(3.3), we have

    E2,2supL0,LZ2Lλ2(Lk=2kα2(0)q2(0)k+1j=k12(jk)n(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ2(L+1k=2kα2(0)q2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χkq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2),

    where we use 2nδ22<1 and 2(jk)n(1δ12)<2(jk)n<22n,j{k1,k,k+1} for (3.1) and (3.3) respectively. Thus, we obtain

    E2(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    To estimate E3, since lk2 and jk+2, we have

    |xy1||x||y1|2k2,|xy2||y2||x|>2j2,xDk,y1Dl,y2Dj.

    Therefore, for any xDk,lk2,jk+2, we get

    |Tϖ(f1l,f2j)(x)|RnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|(|xy1|+|xy2|)2ndy1dy22kn2jnRnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|dy1dy2.

    Thus, by Hölder's inequality and Minkowski's inequality, we have

    (v=1|k2l=j=k+2T(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(k2l=2knRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1j=k+22jnRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(k2l=2knRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1)r1)1r1χkLp1()(w1)×(v=1(j=k+22jnRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r2)1r2χkLp2()(w2)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkLp1()(w1)×j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkLp2()(w2). (3.6)

    Since

    1q(0)=1q1(0)+1q2(0)andλ=λ1+λ2,

    by Hölder's inequality, we have

    E3supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq(0)Lp1()(w1)×j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq(0)Lp2()(w2))1q(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ1×(Lk=2kα1(0)q1(0)k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq1(0)Lp1()(w1))1q1(0)×supL0,LZ2Lλ2×(Lk=2kα2(0)q2(0)j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)=E3,1×E3,2.

    It is obvious that

    E3,1=E1,1(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1).

    Since nδ21+α2(0)>0, by (3.3), we obtain

    E3,2supL0,LZ2Lλ2(Lk=2kα2(0)q2(0)×(j=k+22(kj)nδ21(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2))q2(0))1q2(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ2×(Lk=(Lj=k+22jα2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)2(kj)(nδ21+α2(0)))q2(0))1q2(0)+supL0,LZ2Lλ2×(Lk=(2kα2(0)0j=L+1(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)2(kj)nδ21)q2(0))1q2(0)+supL0,LZ2Lλ2×(Lk=(2kα2(0)j=1(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)2(kj)nδ21)q2(0))1q2(0)=I1+I2+I3.

    First, we consider I1. By Lemma 2.4, we have

    I1supL0,LZ2Lλ2×(Lk=(Lj=k+22jα2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)2(kj)(nδ21+α2(0)))q2(0))1q2(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ2(L+2j=2jα2(0)q2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2),

    where we write 2|kj|(nδ21+α2(0))=2|kj|η2 for η2=nδ21+α2(0)>0. Next, we consider I2. Since nδ21+α2(0)λ2>0, we obtain

    I2supL0,LZ2Lλ2(Lk=(2k(nδ21+α2(0))0j=L+12jα2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)×2j(nδ21+α2(0)))q2(0))1q2(0)×2Lλ2(Lk=(2k(nδ21+α2(0))0j=L+12j(nδ21+α2(0)λ2))q2(0))1q2(0)supL0,LZsupj02jλ22jα2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2)supL0,LZ2L(nδ21α2(0))(Lk=2k(nδ21+α2(0))q2(0))1q2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    Then, we consider I3. Since δ21+α2(0)λ2>0, we obtain

    I3supL0,LZ2Lλ2(Lk=(2k(nδ21+α2(0))×j=12jα2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)2j(nδ21+α2))q2(0))1q2(0)supL0,LZsupj12jλ22jα(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)×2Lλ2(Lk=(2k(nδ21+α2(0))j=12j(nδ21+α2λ2))q2(0))1q2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2)supL0,LZ2Lλ2(Lk=2k(nδ21+α2(0))q2(0))1q2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2)supL0,LZ2L(λ2+nδ21+α2(0))(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    Thus, we have

    E3(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    To estimate E5, using Hölder's inequality and Lemma 2.8, we have

    E5supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)k+1l=k1k+1j=k1(v=1|Tϖ(f1l,f2j)|r)1rχkq(0)Lp()(w))1q(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)((v=1|fv1l|r1)1r1Lp1()(w1)×(v=1|fv2j|r2)1r2Lp2()(w2))q(0))1q(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ1(Lk=2kα1(0)q1(0)(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1χkq1(0)Lp1()(w1))1q1(0)×2Lλ2(Lk=2kα2(0)q2(0)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χkq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    To estimate E6, since k1lk+1 and jk+2, we obtain

    |xy1|>2k2,|xy2|>2j2,xDk,y1Dl,y2Dj.

    Thus, for any xDk,k1lk+1 and jk+2, we obtain

    |T(fv1l,fv2j)(x)|RnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|(|xy1|+|xy2|)2ndy1dy22kn2jnRnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|dy1dy2.

    Therefore, by Hölder's inequality and Minkowski's inequality, we obtain

    (v=1|k+1l=k1j=k+2T(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(k+1l=k12knRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1j=k+22jnRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(k+1l=k12knRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1)r1)1r1χkLp1()(w1)×(v=1(j=k+22jnRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r2)1r2χkLp2()(w2)k+1l=k12knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkLp1()(w1)×j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkLp2()(w2). (3.7)

    Since

    1q(0)=1q1(0)+1q2(0)andλ=λ1+λ2,

    by Hölder's inequality, we have

    E6supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)k+1l=k12knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq(0)Lp1()(w1)×j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq(0)Lp2()(w2))1q(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ1×(Lk=2kα1(0)q1(0)k+1l=k12knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq1(0)Lp1()(w1))1q1(0)×supL0,LZ2Lλ2×(Lk=2kα2(0)q2(0)j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)=E6,1×E6,2.

    By the interchange of f1 and f2, we find the estimateof E6,1 and E2,2 are similar, and E6,2=E3,2. To estimate E9, since l,jk+2, we get

    |xyi|>2k2,xDk,y1Dl,y2Dj.

    Therefore, for any xDk, l,jk+2, we have

    |Tϖ(fv1l,fv2j)(x)|RnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|(|xy1|+|xy2|)2ndy1dy22ln2jnRnRn|fv1l(y1)||fv2j(y2)|dy1dy2.

    Thus, by Hölder's inequality and Minkowski's inequality, we have

    (v=1|l=k+2j=k+2T(fv1l,fv2j)|r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(l=k+22lnRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1j=k+22jnRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r)1rχkLp()(w)(v=1(l=k+22lnRn|fv1l(y1)|dy1)r1)1r1χkLp1()(w1)×(v=1(j=k+22jnRn|fv2j(y2)|dy2)r2)1r2χkLp2()(w2)l=k+22lnRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkLp1()(w1)×j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkLp2()(w2). (3.8)

    Since

    1q(0)=1q1(0)+1q2(0)andλ=λ1+λ2,

    by Hölder's inequality, we have

    E9supL0,LZ2Lλ(Lk=2kα(0)q(0)l=k+22lnRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq(0)Lp1()(w1)×j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq(0)Lp2()(w2))1q(0)supL0,LZ2Lλ1×(Lk=2kα1(0)q1(0)l=k+22lnRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq1(0)Lp1()(w1))1q1(0)×supL0,LZ2Lλ2×(Lk=2kα2(0)q2(0)j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq2(0)Lp2()(w2))1q2(0)=E9,1×E9,2.

    Obviously, the estimates of E9,i are similar to those of E3,2(i=1,2).

    All estimates for Ei i=1,2,,9 considered, we have

    E(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    Finally, we estimate H. By the interchange of f1 and f2, we see that the estimates of H2,H3 and H6 are similar to those of H4,H7 and H8, respectively. Thus we just need to estimate H1H3, H5,H6 and H9.

    For the subsequent proof process, we need following further preparation. If l<0, by Lemma 1.3, we have

    (v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)=2lαi(0)(2lαi(0)qi(0)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlqi(0)Lpi()(wi))1qi(0)2lαi(0)(lt=2tαi(0)qi(0)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχtqi(0)Lpi()(wi))1qi(0)2l(λαi(0))2lλ(lt=2tαi(0)(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχtqi(0)Lpi()(wi))1qi(0)2l(λαi(0))(v=1|fvi|ri)1riM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(wi). (3.9)

    To estimate H1, since

    l,jk2,    1q=1q1+1q2

    and λ=λ1+λ2, by (3.4) and Hölder's inequality, we have

    H12Lλ(Lk=02kαqk2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkqLp1()(w1)×k2j=2knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkqLp2()(w2))1q2Lλ1(Lk=02kα1q1k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq1Lp1()(w1))1q1×2Lλ2(Lk=02kα2q2k2j=2knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq2Lp2()(w2))1q2=H1,1×H1,2,

    where

    H1,i=2Lλi{Lk=02kαiqik2l=2knRn(v=1|fil(yi)|ri)1ridyiχkqiLpi()(wi)}1qi.

    By (3.1), we obtain

    H1,i2Lλi{Lk=02kαiqi(k2l=2(lk)nδi2(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi))qi}1qi2Lλi{Lk=02kαiqi(1l=(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)2(lk)nδi2+kl=0(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)2(lk)nδi2)qi}1qi2Lλi{Lk=02kαiqi(1l=(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)2(lk)nδi2)qi}1qi+2Lλi{Lk=02kαiqi(kl=0(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)2(lk)nδi2)qi}1qi=I4+I5.

    If qi1, since nδi2αi>0 and nδi2αi(0)>0, by the Minkowski's inequality and (3.9), we obtain

    I4=2Lλi{Lk=02kαiqi(1l=(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)2(lk)nδi2)qi}1qi2Lλi1l=(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi){Lk=0(2kαi2(lk)nδi2)qi}1qi2Lλi1l=2lnδi2(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi){Lk=02k(nδi2αi)qi}1qi(v=1|fvi|ri)1riM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(wi)2Lλi1l=2l(nδi2+λiαi(0))(v=1|fvi|ri)1riM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(wi).

    If qi<1, since nδi2αi>0 and nδi2αi(0)>0, by (3.9), we have

    I42Lλi(Lk=02kαiqi1l=(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlqiLpi()(wi)2(lk)nδi2qi)1qi=2Lλi(1l=(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlqiLpi()(wi)2lnδi2qiLk=02kαiqi2knδi2qi)1qi=2Lλi(1l=(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlqiLpi()(wi)2lnδi2qiLk=02k(nδi2αi)qi)1qi2Lλi(1l=(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlqiLpi()(wi)2lnδi2qi)1qi(v=1|fvi|ri)1riM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(wi)2Lλi(1l=2l(nδi2+λiαi(0))qi)1qi(v=1|fvi|ri)1riM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(wi).

    We consider I5. Since nδi2αi>0, by Lemma 2.4, we have

    I5=2Lλi{Lk=02kαiqi(kl=0(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)2(lk)nδi2)qi}1qi=2Lλi{Lk=0(kl=02lαi(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlLpi()(wi)2(lk)(nδi2αi))qi}1qi2Lλi(kl=02lαiqi(v=1|fvi|ri)1riχlqiLpi()(wi))1qi(v=1|fvi|ri)1riM˙Kαi(),qi()pi(),λi(wi),

    where we write 2|kl|(nδi2αi)2|kl|ηi for ηi=nδi2αi.

    Thus, we get

    H1(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    To estimate H2, since

    lk2,    k1jk+1,    1q=1q1+1q2

    and λ=λ1+λ2, by (3.6) and Hölder's inequality, we have

    H22Lλ(Lk=02kαqk2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r)1rdy1χkqLp1()(w1)×k+1j=k12knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r)1rdy2χkqLp2()(w2))1q2Lλ1(Lk=02kα1q1k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r)1rdy1χkq1Lp1()(w1))1q1×2Lλ2(Lk=02kα2q2k+1j=k12knRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r)1rdy2χkq2Lp2()(w2))1q2=H2,1×H2,2.

    It isobvious that

    H2,1=H1,1(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1).

    Now we estimate H2,2. Combining (3.1)–(3.3), we have

    H2,22Lλ2(Lk=02kα2q2k+1j=k12(jk)n(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjq2Lp2()(w2))1q22Lλ2(L+1k=12kα2q2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χkq2Lp2()(w2))1q2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2),

    where we use 2nδ22<1 and 2(jk)n(1δ21)<2(jk)n for (3.6) and (3.8), respectively. Thus, we obtain

    H2(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    To estimate H3, since

    lk2,    jk+2,    1q=1q1+1q2

    and λ=λ1+λ2, together (3.6) with the Hölder's inequality, we have

    H32Lλ(Lk=02kαqk2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkqLp1()(w1)×j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkqρLp2()(w2))1q2Lλ1(Lk=02kα1q1k2l=2knRn(v=1|fv1l(y1)|r1)1r1dy1χkq1Lp1()(w1))1q1×2Lλ2(Lk=02kα2q2j=k+22jnRn(v=1|fv2j(y2)|r2)1r2dy2χkq2Lp2()(w2))1q2=H3,1×H3,2.

    It is easy to see that

    H3,1=H1,1(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1).

    Since nδ21+α2>0, by (3.3), we obtain

    H3,22Lλ2(Lk=02kα2q2(j=k+22(kj)nδ21(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2))q2)1q22Lλ2(Lk=0(L+2j=k+22jα2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)2(kj)(nδ21+α2))q2)1q2+2Lλ2(Lk=0(2kα2j=L+3(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)2(kj)nδ21)q2)1q2=I6+I7.

    For I6, by Lemma 2.4, we obtain

    I62Lλ2(Lk=0(L+2j=k+22jα2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)2(kj)(nδ21+α2))q2)1q22Lλ2(L+2j=02jα2q2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjq2Lp2()(w2))1q2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2),

    where we write 2|kj|(nδ21+α2)=2|kj|ϑ2 for ϑ2=nδ21+α2>0.

    For I7, since nδ21+α2λ2>0, we have

    I72Lλ2(Lk=0(2k(nδ21+α2)j=L+32jα2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)×2j(nδ21+α2))q2)1q2supj12jλ22jα2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2χjLp2()(w2)×2Lλ2(Lk=0(2k(nδ21+α2)j=L+32j(nδ21+α2λ2))q2)1q2(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2)2Lλ2+(nδ21+α2)LL(nδ21+α2λ2)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    Thus, we get

    H3(v=1|fv1|r1)1r1M˙Kα1(),q1()p1(),λ1(w1)(v=1|fv2|r2)1r2M˙Kα2(),q2()p2(),λ2(w2).

    To estimate {H}_{5} , using Hölder's inequality and Lemma 2.8, we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} H_{5}&\lesssim&2^{-L\lambda}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{\infty}q_{\infty}}\sum\limits_{l = k-1}^{k+1}\sum\limits_{j = k-1}^{k+1}\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}\Big|T(f_{1l},f_{2j})\Big|^{r}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r}}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p(\cdot)}(w)}^{q_{\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{\infty}}}\\ &\lesssim&2^{-L\lambda}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{\infty}q_{\infty}}\Big(\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{1l}^{v}|^{r_{1}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{1}}}\Big\|\|_{L^{p_{1}(\cdot)}(w_{1})} \Big.\Big.\times\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{2j}^{v}|^{r_{2}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{2}}}\Big\|_{L^{p_{2}(\cdot)}(w_{2})}\Big)^{q_{\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{\infty}}}\\ &\lesssim&2^{-L\lambda_{1}}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{1\infty}q_{1\infty}}\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{1}^{v}|^{r_{1}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{1}}}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{1}(\cdot)}(w_{1})}^{q_{1\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{1\infty}}}\\ &&\times2^{-L\lambda_{2}}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{2\infty}q_{2\infty}}\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{2}^{v}|^{r_{2}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{2}}}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{2}(\cdot)}(w_{2})}^{q_{2\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{2\infty}}}\\ &\lesssim&\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{1}^{v}|^{r_{1}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{1}}}\Big\|\Big\|_{M\dot{K}_{p_{1}(\cdot),\lambda_{1}}^{\alpha_{1}(\cdot),q_{1}(\cdot)}(w_{1})}\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{2}^{v}|^{r_{2}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{2}}}\|_{M\dot{K}_{p_{2}(\cdot),\lambda_{2}}^{\alpha_{2}(\cdot),q_{2}(\cdot)}(w_{2})}. \end{eqnarray*}

    To estimate H_{6} , since

    k-1\leq l\leq k+1,\ \ \ \ j\geq k+2,\ \ \ \ \frac{1}{q_{\infty}} = \frac{1}{q_{1\infty}}+\frac{1}{q_{2\infty}}

    and \lambda = \lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2} , by (3.7) and Hölder's sinequality, we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} H_{6}&\lesssim&2^{-L\lambda}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{\infty}q_{\infty}}\Big\|\sum\limits_{l = k-1}^{k+1}2^{-kn}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{1l}^{v}(y_{1})|^{r_{1}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{1}}}\mathrm{d}y_{1}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{1}(\cdot)}(w_{1})}^{q_{\infty}}\Big.\\ &&\Big.\times\Big\|\sum\limits_{j = k+2}^{\infty}2^{-jn}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{2j}^{v}(y_{2})|^{r_{2}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{2}}}\mathrm{d}y_{2}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{2}(\cdot)}(w_{2})}^{q_{\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{\infty}}}\\ &\lesssim&2^{-L\lambda_{1}}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{1\infty}q_{1\infty}}\Big\|\sum\limits_{l = k-1}^{k+1}2^{-kn}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{1l}^{v}(y_{1})|^{r_{1}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{1}}}\mathrm{d}y_{1}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{1}(\cdot)}(w_{1})}^{q_{1\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{1\infty}}}\\ &&\times2^{-L\lambda_{2}}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{2\infty}q_{2\infty}}\Big\|\sum\limits_{j = k+2}^{\infty}2^{-jn}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{2j}^{v}(y_{2})|^{r_{2}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{2}}}\mathrm{d}y_{2}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{2}(\cdot)}(w_{2})}^{q_{2\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{2\infty}}}\\ & = &H_{6,1}\times H_{6,2}. \end{eqnarray*}

    By the interchange of f_{1} and f_{2} , we see that that of H_{6, 1} is similar to the estimate of H_{2, 2} and H_{6, 2} = H_{3, 2}.

    To estimate H_{9} , since

    l,j\geq k+2,\ \ \ \ \frac{1}{q_{\infty}} = \frac{1}{q_{1\infty}}+\frac{1}{q_{2\infty}}

    and \lambda = \lambda_{1}+\lambda_{2} , by (3.8) and Hölder's inequality, we have

    \begin{eqnarray*} H_{9}&\lesssim&2^{-L\lambda}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{\infty}q_{\infty}}\Big\|\sum\limits_{l = k+2}^{\infty}2^{-ln}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{1l}^{v}(y_{1})|^{r_{1}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{1}}}\mathrm{d}y_{1}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{1}(\cdot)}(w_{1})}^{q_{\infty}}\Big.\\ &&\Big.\times\Big\|\sum\limits_{j = k+2}^{\infty}2^{-jn}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{2j}^{v}(y_{2})|^{r_{2}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{2}}}\mathrm{d}y_{2}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{2}(\cdot)}(w_{2})}^{q_{\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{\infty}}}\\ &\lesssim&2^{-L\lambda_{1}}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{1\infty}q_{1\infty}}\Big\|\sum\limits_{l = k+2}^{\infty}2^{-ln}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{1l}^{v}(y_{1})|^{r_{1}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{1}}}\mathrm{d}y_{1}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{1}(\cdot)}(w_{1})}^{q_{1\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{1\infty}}}\\ &&\times2^{-L\lambda_{2}}\Big(\sum\limits_{k = 0}^{L}2^{k\alpha_{2\infty}q_{2\infty}}\Big\|\sum\limits_{j = k+2}^{\infty}2^{-jn}\int_{\mathbb{R}^{n}}\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{2j}^{v}(y_{2})|^{r_{2}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{2}}}\mathrm{d}y_{2}\chi_{k}\Big\|_{L^{p_{2}(\cdot)}(w_{2})}^{q_{2\infty}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{q_{2\infty}}}\\ & = &H_{9,1}\times H_{9,2}. \end{eqnarray*}

    Obviously, the estimates of H_{9, i} are similar to those of H_{3, 2} for i = 1, 2 , respectively.

    Taking all estimates for H_{i} together, i = 1, 2, \cdots, 9 , we obtain

    H\lesssim\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{1}^{v}|^{r_{1}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{1}}}\Big\|_{M\dot{K}_{p_{1}(\cdot),\lambda_{1}}^{\alpha_{1}(\cdot),(\cdot)}(w_{1})}\Big\|\Big(\sum\limits_{v = 1}^{\infty}|f_{2}^{v}|^{r_{2}}\Big)^{\frac{1}{r_{2}}}\Big\|_{M\dot{K}_{p_{2}(\cdot),\lambda_{2}}^{\alpha_{2}(\cdot),q_{2}(\cdot)}(w_{2})}.

    This completes the proof.

    On the basis of vector valued bilinear Calderón-Zygmund operators with kernels of Dini's type are bounded on variable Lebesgue spaces, with the help of properties of the \varpi(t) and space decomposition methods for variable exponents Herz-Morrey spaces. We establish the weighted boundedness result of vector valued bilinear \varpi(t) -type Calderón-Zygmund operators in variable exponents Herz-Morrey spaces, this is a new and meaningful result.

    The authors declare they have not used Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools in the creation of this article.

    This work is supported by the Doctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Northwest Normal University (202003101203), Young Teachers Scientific Research Ability Promotion Project of Northwest Normal University (NWNU-LKQN2021-03) and Open Foundation of Hubei Key Laboratory of Applied Mathematics (Hubei University) (HBAM202205).

    The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.



    [1] K. Yabuta, Generalizations of Calderón-Zygmund operators, Stud. Math., 82 (1985), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.4064/SM-82-1-17-31 doi: 10.4064/SM-82-1-17-31
    [2] D. Maldonado, V. Naibo, Weighted norm inequalities for paraproducts and bilinear pseudodifferential operators with mild regularity, J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 15 (2009), 218–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00041-008-9029-x doi: 10.1007/s00041-008-9029-x
    [3] G. Lu, P. Zhang, Multilinear Calderón-Zygmund operators with kernels of Dini's type and applications, Nonlinear Anal., 107 (2014), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.na.2014.05.005 doi: 10.1016/j.na.2014.05.005
    [4] A. Nekvinda, Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator on L^{p(x)}(\mathbb{R}^{n}), Math. Inequal. Appl., 7 (2004), 255–265.
    [5] D. Cruz-Uribe, A. Fiorenza, C. J. Neugebauer, Weighted norm inequalities for the maximal operator on variable Lebesgue spaces, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 394 (2012), 744–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.04.044 doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2012.04.044
    [6] A. Almeida, P. Hästö, Besov spaces with variable smoothness and integrability, J. Funct. Anal., 258 (2010), 1628–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2009.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2009.09.012
    [7] M. Izuki, T. Noi, Two weighted Herz spaces with variable exponents, Bull. Malays. Math. Sci. Soc., 43 (2020), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40840-018-0671-4 doi: 10.1007/s40840-018-0671-4
    [8] S. Wang, J. Xu, Boundedness of vector valued bilinear Calderón-Zygmund operators on products of weighted Herz-Morrey spaces with variable exponents, Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B, 42 (2021), 693–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11401-021-0286-1 doi: 10.1007/s11401-021-0286-1
    [9] C. Pérez, R. Trujillo-González, Sharp weighted estimates for vector-valued singular integral operators and commutators, Tohoku Math. J., 55 (2003), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.2748/TMJ/1113247449 doi: 10.2748/TMJ/1113247449
    [10] A. Huang, J. Xu, Multilinear singular integral and commutators in variable exponent Lebesgue space, Appl. Math., 25 (2010), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11766-010-2167-3 doi: 10.1007/s11766-010-2167-3
    [11] Y. Sawano, Theory of Besov spaces, Springer Verlag, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0836-9
    [12] D. Cruz-Uribe, J. M. Martell, C. Pérez, Extrapolation from A_{\infty} weights and applications, J. Funct. Anal., 213 (2004), 412–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfa.2003.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2003.09.002
    [13] D. Cruz-Uribe, L. A. D. Wang, Extrapolation and weighted norm inequalities in the variable Lebesgue spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 369 (2017), 1205–1235. https://doi.org/10.1090/TRAN/6730 doi: 10.1090/TRAN/6730
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(1589) PDF downloads(71) Cited by(0)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog