
This manuscript involves the new exact solitary wave solutions of fractional reaction-diffusion model using the exp (− φ(η))-expansion method. The spatial model of fractional form is applied in modeling super-diffusive systems in the field of engineering, biology, physics (neutron diffusion theory), ecology, finance, and chemistry. The findings of miscellaneous studies showed that presented method is efficient for exploring new exact solutions to solve the complexities arising in mathematical physics and applied sciences. The new solutions which are obtained in the form of the rational, exponential, hyperbolic and trigonometric functions have a wide range in physics and engineering fields. Several results would be obtained under various parameters which shows good agreement with the previous published results of different papers. The proposed method can be extended to solve further problems arising in the engineering fields. My main contribution is programming and comparisons.
Citation: Ayyaz Ali, Zafar Ullah, Irfan Waheed, Moin-ud-Din Junjua, Muhammad Mohsen Saleem, Gulnaz Atta, Maimoona Karim, Ather Qayyum. New exact solitary wave solutions for fractional model[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(10): 18587-18602. doi: 10.3934/math.20221022
[1] | Jalil Manafian, Onur Alp Ilhan, Sizar Abid Mohammed . Forming localized waves of the nonlinearity of the DNA dynamics arising in oscillator-chain of Peyrard-Bishop model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 2461-2483. doi: 10.3934/math.2020163 |
[2] | Harivan R. Nabi, Hajar F. Ismael, Nehad Ali Shah, Wajaree Weera . W-shaped soliton solutions to the modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation of ion-acoustic waves in (3+1)-dimensions arise in a magnetized plasma. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4467-4486. doi: 10.3934/math.2023222 |
[3] | M. TarikulIslam, M. AliAkbar, M. Abul Kalam Azad . Traveling wave solutions in closed form for some nonlinear fractional evolution equations related to conformable fractional derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2018, 3(4): 625-646. doi: 10.3934/Math.2018.4.625 |
[4] | M. Hafiz Uddin, M. Ali Akbar, Md. Ashrafuzzaman Khan, Md. Abdul Haque . New exact solitary wave solutions to the space-time fractional differential equations with conformable derivative. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(2): 199-214. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.2.199 |
[5] | Bin Fan . Efficient numerical method for multi-term time-fractional diffusion equations with Caputo-Fabrizio derivatives. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(3): 7293-7320. doi: 10.3934/math.2024354 |
[6] | Maysaa Al-Qurashi, Saima Rashid, Fahd Jarad, Madeeha Tahir, Abdullah M. Alsharif . New computations for the two-mode version of the fractional Zakharov-Kuznetsov model in plasma fluid by means of the Shehu decomposition method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(2): 2044-2060. doi: 10.3934/math.2022117 |
[7] | Umair Ali, Sanaullah Mastoi, Wan Ainun Mior Othman, Mostafa M. A Khater, Muhammad Sohail . Computation of traveling wave solution for nonlinear variable-order fractional model of modified equal width equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(9): 10055-10069. doi: 10.3934/math.2021584 |
[8] | Ghazala Akram, Maasoomah Sadaf, Mirfa Dawood, Muhammad Abbas, Dumitru Baleanu . Solitary wave solutions to Gardner equation using improved tan(Ω(Υ)2)-expansion method. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 4390-4406. doi: 10.3934/math.2023219 |
[9] | Yunmei Zhao, Yinghui He, Huizhang Yang . The two variable (φ/φ, 1/φ)-expansion method for solving the time-fractional partial differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4121-4135. doi: 10.3934/math.2020264 |
[10] | Mustafa Inc, Hadi Rezazadeh, Javad Vahidi, Mostafa Eslami, Mehmet Ali Akinlar, Muhammad Nasir Ali, Yu-Ming Chu . New solitary wave solutions for the conformable Klein-Gordon equation with quantic nonlinearity. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(6): 6972-6984. doi: 10.3934/math.2020447 |
This manuscript involves the new exact solitary wave solutions of fractional reaction-diffusion model using the exp (− φ(η))-expansion method. The spatial model of fractional form is applied in modeling super-diffusive systems in the field of engineering, biology, physics (neutron diffusion theory), ecology, finance, and chemistry. The findings of miscellaneous studies showed that presented method is efficient for exploring new exact solutions to solve the complexities arising in mathematical physics and applied sciences. The new solutions which are obtained in the form of the rational, exponential, hyperbolic and trigonometric functions have a wide range in physics and engineering fields. Several results would be obtained under various parameters which shows good agreement with the previous published results of different papers. The proposed method can be extended to solve further problems arising in the engineering fields. My main contribution is programming and comparisons.
In the last few decades, an outstanding advancement has been witnessed in nonlinear sciences and engineering fields. Many scientists showed keen interest in finding the exact and numerical solutions for the nonlinear PDEs. Numerous techniques were devised in this regard which includes the GERFM method [1], modified variational iteration algorithm-II [3], enhanced (G′G)-expansion method [4], the direct algebraic method [5], the extended trial equation method [6], the generalized fractional integral conditions method [7], the modified simple equation method [8], the Monch's theorem method [9], the extended modified mapping method [10], the reductive perturbation method [11], the new probability transformation method [12] and the differential transformation method [13]. In future work for more related extensions or generalizations of the results these references may be very helpful [2,32,33,34,35,36].
The time fractional derivatives in the fractional reaction-diffusion model describes the process relating to the physical phenomena, physically known as the historical dependence. The space fractional derivative explains the path dependence and global correlation properties of physical processes, that is, the global dependence. The reaction diffusion equation has a dynamic role in dissipative dynamical systems as studied by various biologists [38], scientists and engineers [14]. The nonlinear form of this model has found a number of applications in numerous branches of biology, physics and chemistry [14,15]. This model has also been useful for other areas of science and effectively generalized by employing the theory of fractional calculus, for instance see [15,16]. Diffusion-wave equations involving Caputo's derivative [17,18], Riemann-Liouville derivatives [19] have been discussed by various researchers. Anomalous dispersion equations can be explained by fractional derivative [20]. An extensive variety of exact methods which have been applied for exact solutions of the fractional nonlinear reaction diffusion equation, for example see [14,15,16,17,18,19,20] and references there in.
To interpret numerous physical phenomena in some special fields of science and engineering, nonlinear evolution equations are extensively used as models especially in solid-state physics and plasma physics. Finding the exact solutions of NLEEs is a key role in the study of these physical phenomena [39]. A lot of research work has been carried out during the past decades for evaluating the exact and numerical solutions of many nonlinear evolution equations. Among them are homotopy analysis method [21], modified exp-function method [22], (G′G)-expansion method [23], exp-function method [24], homotopy perturbation method [25], Jacobi elliptic function method [26], sub equation function method [27], kudryashov method [28], and so on.We can be expressed the exact solutions of FPDE via exp (−φ(η)).
(φ′(η))=exp(−φ(η))+μ exp(φ(η))+λ | (1.1) |
The article is arranged as follows: Section 1 represents the introduction of the article. In section 2, we have explained the Caputo's fractional derivative. In section 3, we have interpreted the exp (−φ(η))-expansion method. In section 4, we use this method to explore the reaction-diffusion model. In section 5 and 6, graphical representation and physical interpretation are explained. In section 7 and 8, we have interpreted the results, discussions and conclusion.
Property 1: [29] A function f(x,t),where x>0 is considered as Cα. Here α∈R, if ∃ a R and (p>α), such that
f(x)=xpf1(x) | (1.2) |
f1(x)∈C[0,∞).Where f1(x)∈C[0,∞) |
Property2: [29] A function f(x,t), where x>0 is considered to be in space Cmα. Here m∈N∪{0}, if f(m)∈Cα.
Iμtf(x,t)=1Γ(μ)∫t0(t−T)μ−1f(x,T)dT, t>0. | (1.3) |
Property3: [29] Suppose f∈Cα and α≥−1, then the Riemann Liouville integral μ, where μ>0 is given by
Property4: [29] A fractional Caputo derivative of f with respect to t, where f∈Cm−1, m∈N∪{0},is given as
Dμtf(x,t)=∂m∂tmf(x,t), μ=m | (1.4) |
=Im−μt∂m∂tmf(x,t),m−1≤μ<m | (1.5) |
Note that
IμtDμtf(x,t)=f(x,t)−m−1∑k=0∂k f∂tk(x,0)tkk!, m−1<μ≤m, m∈N | (1.6) |
Iμttν=Γ(ν+1)Γ(μ+ν+1)tμ+ν. | (1.7) |
Consider the fractional partial differential equation,
φ(u,Dαtu,ux,uxx,D2αtu,Dαtux,…)=0,t>0,x∈R,0≤α≤1, | (1.8) |
where Dαtu, Dαxu, Dαxxu are derivatives, u(η)=u(x,t). For solving Eq 1.8, we follow:
Step 1: Using a transformation, we get,
η=x±VtαΓ(1+α),u=u(η), | (1.9) |
where constant V is a nonzero. By substituting Eq 1.9 in Eq 1.8 yields ODE:
φ(u,±Vu′,ku′,V2u′′,k2u′′,…)=0. | (1.10) |
Step 2: Assuming the traveling wave solution
u(η)=M∑n=0an(e−φ(η))n, | (1.11) |
where φ(η) satisfies the following equation:
φ′(η)=e−φ(η)+λ+μeφ(η) | (1.12) |
φ′′(η)=−λe−φ(η)−e−2φ(η)+μλeφ(η)+μ2e2φ(η), |
where prime indicates derivative w.r.t.η. The solutions of Eq 1.12 are written in the form of different cases.
Class1: when μ≠0 and λ2−4μ>0, we have
φ(η)=ln{12μ(−λ−λtanh(λ2(c1+η)))}. | (1.13) |
where λ=√(−4μ+λ2)
Class 2: when, μ≠0 and λ2−4μ<0, we have
φ(η)=ln{12μ(−λ+λtan(λ2(c1+η)))}. | (1.14) |
where, λ=√(−4μ+λ2)
Class 3: when, λ≠0,μ=0 and λ2−4μ>0, we have
φ(η)=−ln{λ−1+exp(λ(k+η)) } |
φ(η)=−ln{λ−1+exp(λ(k+η)) }.
Class 4: when, λ,μ≠0 and λ2−4μ=0, we have
φ(η)=ln{2(2+λ(k+η))(λ2(η+k))}. |
Class 5: when, λ,μ=0 and λ2−4μ=0, we have
φ(η)=[ln{η+k}], | (1.15) |
Step 3: Using the homogeneous balancing principal, in (10), we attain M. In view of Eq (11), Eq (10) and Eq (12), we obtain a system of equations with these parameters, a_n, λ,μ. We substitute the values in Eq (11) and Eq (12) and obtained the results of Eq (8).
Suppose the reaction-diffusion equation is,
D2αtu+δuxx+βu+γu3=0,0<α≤1, | (2.1) |
where δ, β and γ are parameters without zero, setting, δ=a, β=b and γ=c and changing Eq 2.1 into an ODE.
V2u′′+au′′+bu+cu3=0, | (2.2) |
where prime represents the derivative w. r. t. η.With the help of balancing principal, u′′ and u3, we attain, M=1.
Rewriting the solution of Eq 2.2 we get,
u(η)=[a0+a1(exp(−φ(η)))], | (2.3) |
where a0, a1≠0 are constants, while λ,μ are some constants.
Substituting u,u′′ and u3 in Eq 2.2, we get the solution sets as.
Solution set 1
λ=0, C=C,V=−12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)μ,a0=0, a1=√cbμc |
Substituting in Eq 2.3, we get,
u(η)=a1(exp(−φ(η))), | (2.4) |
Substituting all the five classes in Eq 2.4, we get the solutions.
Class 1: When, λ2−4μ>0 and μ≠0,
v1=−12√cbμ tanh(12(12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)tαμΓ(α+1)+x)√−4μ)√−4μcμ |
Class 2: When, λ2−4μ<0 and μ≠0,
v2=12√cbμ tan(12(12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)tαμΓ(α+1)+x)√4√μ)√4c√μ | (2.5) |
Solution set 2:
{λ=0,C=C, V=12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)μ,a0=0, a1=−√cbμc} |
Substituting in Eq 2.3, we get,
u(η)=a1(exp(−φ(η))), | (2.6) |
Substituting equations 1.13 and 1.14 in Eq 2.6, we get the solutions.
Class 1: When, μ≠0 and λ2−4μ>0,
v3=12√cbμ tanh(12(−12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)tαμΓ(α+1)+x)√−4μ)√−4μcμ | (2.7) |
Class 2: When, μ≠0 and λ2−4μ<0,
v4=−12√cbμ tan(12(−12√2√−μ(2aμ+b)tαμΓ(α+1)+x)√4√μ)√4c√μ | (2.8) |
Solution Set 3
{λ=λ, C=C, V=√−(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)λ2−4μ, a0=bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b, a1=−2√−c(λ2−4μ)b μc(λ2−4μ)} |
Substituting in Eq 2.3, we get,
u(η)=a1(exp(−φ(η)))+a0, | (2.9) |
Substituting equations 1.13 to 1.15 in Eq 2.9, we get the solutions.
Class 1: When, μ≠0 and−4μ+λ2>0,
v5=−bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b−1c(λ2−4μ)(√c(λ2−4μ)b(−λ−tanh(12(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)√λ2−4μ)√λ2−4μ)) | (2.10) |
Class 2: When, μ≠0 and−4μ+λ2<0,
v6=−bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b−(√c(λ2−4μ)b(−λ+tan(12(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)√−λ2+4μ)√−λ2+4μ)) | (2.11) |
Class 3: When λ≠0, −4μ+λ2>0 and μ=0,
v7=−bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b−2√c(λ2−4μ)bμ(eλ(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)−1)c(λ2−4μ)λ | (2.12) |
Class 4: When, λ≠0, μ=0 and −4μ+λ2=0,
v8=−bλ√c(λ2−4μ)b+2√c(λ2−4μ)bμ(2λ(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)+2)c(λ2−4μ)λ2(−√(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x) | (2.13) |
Case 5: When, λ=0, μ=0 and −4μ+λ2=0,
v9=bλ√−c(λ2−4μ)b−2c(λ2−4μ)(√−c(λ2−4μ)b μ(−√−(λ2−4μ)(aλ2−4aμ−2b)tα(λ2−4μ)Γ(α+1)+x)) | (2.14) |
Physical interpretation
With some free parameters the proposed technique provides solitary wave solutions. By setting the specific parameters we have explained the miscellaneous wave solutions. In this study, we would explain the physical interpretation of the solutions for reaction-diffusion equation taking solution v1 for μ=20λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c=−11α=1, shows the solitary wave solution in Figure 1. Figure 2 shows Soliton wave solution with paremeters μ=910λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c=−11α=.5. Figures 3, 4 and 7 interprets the singular kink solution of v3,v4, v7 for μ=.010λ=1b=.11a=10a1= 12 c=−11α=.1,μ=.0010λ=−991b=11a=10a1=102c=−1α= .1, μ=20λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c=−11α=.25. Finally kink wave results have been obtained from v5,v6, v8 by setting the parameters, μ=3.0λ=1b=11a=10a1= 12 c=−11α=0.001,μ=2.0λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c= -11 α=0.001,μ=20λ=1b=11a=10a1=12c=−11α=0.01, which is presented in Figures 5, 6 and 8. The solutions gained in this article have been checked by putting them back into the original equation and found correct. From the above obtained results we have many potential applications in fluid mechanics, quantum field theory, plasma physics and nonlinear optics.
When
μ=20, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=1 |
When
μ=910, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=1 |
When
μ=.010, λ=1, b=.11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.1 |
When
μ=.0010, λ=−991, b=11, a=10,a1=102,c=−11,α=.1 |
When
μ=3.0, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.001 |
When
μ=2.0, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.001 |
When
μ=20, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.25 |
When
μ=20, λ=1, b=11, a=10,a1=12,c=−11,α=.01 |
If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ in the obtaining solution v2 and v3 in this article is equal to u5 and u1 for case 5 respectively found in [31] see Table 1.
Attained Results | [31] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) | (i) The solution u1 is as u1=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√rξ) | (ii) The solution u5 is as u5=√βγtan(√rξ) |
If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ, in the obtaining solution v2 and v4 in this article is equal to u and u for c1≠0,c2=0,λ=0 and μ>0 in [23] see Table 2.
Attained Results | [23] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μξ) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μξ) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
If we set b=β,c=γ in the obtaining solution v2 and v4 are equal to v9 and v9 for λ=0 and μ is positive in v9 found in [32] see Table 3.
Attained Results | [32] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μη) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v4 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μη) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
If we set b=−β,c=γ and η=ξ in the obtaining solution v2 and v4 in this article are equal to u2 and u2 for k>0,β>0 and our v1 and v3 are equal to u4 and u4 for k<0,β<0 respectively founded in [30] see Table 4.
Attained Results | [30] results |
(i) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√−βγtan(√kξ) | (i) The solution u2 is as u1=±√−βγtan(√kξ) |
(ii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v2=−√βγtan(√kξ) | (ii) The solution u2 is as u2=±√βγtan(√kξ) |
(iii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v1 becomes v1=−√−βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iii) The solution u4 is as u4=±√−βγtanh(√−kξ) |
(iv) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v4=−√βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iv) The solution u4 is as u4=±√βγtanh(√−kξ) |
In the current paper, we explore that the proposed method is effective and capable to find exact solutions of reaction-diffusion equation. The obtained solutions indicate that the suggested method is direct, constructive and simple. The proposed technique can be implemented to the other NLPDEs of fractional order to establish new reliable solutions. The exact solutions are different and new along with different values of parameters. The reduction in the magnitude of computational part and the consistency of the technique give a broader applicability to the technique. The reaction diffusion equation has a dynamic role in dissipative dynamical systems as studied by various biologists, scientists and engineers. This model has found a number of applications in biology, physics (neutron diffusi0n theory), ecology and chemistry. It has also been claimed that reaction-diffusion processes have crucial basis for procedures associated to morphogenesis in biology and may even be connected to skin pigmentation and animal coats. Other applications of this model contain spread of epidemics, ecological invasions, wound healing and tumors growth. Another aim for the consideration in reaction-diffusion systems is that although they are nonlinear partial differential equations, there are often visions for an analytical treatment. My main contribution is programming and comparisons.
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
[1] |
B. Ghanbari, J. Liu, Exact solitary wave solutions to the (2+1)-dimensional generalised Camassa-Holm-Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, Pramana, 94 (2020), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-019-1893-1 doi: 10.1007/s12043-019-1893-1
![]() |
[2] |
L. Akinyemi, M. Mirzazadeh, K. Hosseini, Solitons and other solutions of perturbed nonlinear Biswas–Milovic equation with Kudryashov's law of refractive index, Nonlinear Anal-Model., 27 (2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.15388/namc.2022.27.26374 doi: 10.15388/namc.2022.27.26374
![]() |
[3] |
H. Ahmad, A. Seadawy, T. Khan, P. Thounthong, Analytic approximate solutions for some nonlinear Parabolic dynamical wave equations, J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 14 (2020), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2020.1741943 doi: 10.1080/16583655.2020.1741943
![]() |
[4] |
A. Hossain, M. Akbar, M. Azad, The closed form solutions of simplified MCH equation and third extended fifth order nonlinear equation, Propuls. Power Res., 8 (2019), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jppr.2019.01.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jppr.2019.01.006
![]() |
[5] |
A. Seadawy, D. Lu, C. Yue, Travelling wave solutions of the generalized nonlinear fifth-order KdV water wave equations and its stability, J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 11 (2017), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.06.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jtusci.2016.06.002
![]() |
[6] |
A. Seadawy, Manafian, Jalil, New soliton solution to the longitudinal wave equation in a magneto-electro-elastic circular rod, Results Phys., 8 (2018), 1158–1167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.062 doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.01.062
![]() |
[7] |
S. Belmor, C. Ravichandran, F. Jarad, Nonlinear generalized fractional differential equations with generalized fractional integral conditions, J. Taibah Univ. Sci., 14 (2020), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2019.1709265 doi: 10.1080/16583655.2019.1709265
![]() |
[8] |
M. N. Islam, M. Asaduzzaman, M. S. Ali, Exact wave solutions to the simplified modified Camassa-Holm equation in mathematical physics, AIMS Math., 5 (2019), 26–41. http://DOI:10.3934/math.202000 doi: 10.3934/math.202000
![]() |
[9] |
K. Jothimani, K. Kaliraj, Z. Hammouch, C. Ravichandran, New results on controllability in the framework of fractional integrodifferential equations with nondense domain, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 441. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12858-8 doi: 10.1140/epjp/i2019-12858-8
![]() |
[10] |
A. R. Seadawy, Three-dimensional weakly nonlinear shallow water waves regime and its traveling wave solutions, Int. J. Comput. Meth., 15 (2018), 1850017. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219876218500172 doi: 10.1142/S0219876218500172
![]() |
[11] |
A. R. Seadawy, Solitary wave solutions of two-dimensional nonlinear Kadomtsev–Petviashvili dynamic equation in dust-acoustic plasmas, Pramana, 89 (2017), 1–11. http://DOI10.1007/s12043-017-1446-4 doi: 10.1007/s12043-017-1446-4
![]() |
[12] |
W. Jiang, C. Huang, X. Deng, A new probability transformation method based on a correlation coefficient of belief functions, Int. J. Intell. Syst., 34 (2019), 1337–1347. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.22098 doi: 10.1002/int.22098
![]() |
[13] |
M. H. Ifeyinwa, Mathematical modeling of the transmission dynamics of syphilis disease using differential transformation method, Math. Model. Appl., 5 (2020), 47–54. http://doi:10.11648/j.mma.20200502.1 doi: 10.11648/j.mma.20200502.1
![]() |
[14] | P. Polacik, Propagating Terraces and the Dynamics of Front-Like Solutions of Reaction-Diffusion Equations on R, American Mathematical Society, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1090/memo/1278 |
[15] |
J. Wang, J. Wang, Analysis of a reaction–diffusion cholera model with distinct dispersal rates in the human population, J. Dyn. Differ. Equ., 33 (2021), 549–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10884-019-09820-8 doi: 10.1007/s10884-019-09820-8
![]() |
[16] |
K. Mustapha, An L1 approximation for a fractional reaction-diffusion equation, a second-order error analysis over time-graded meshes, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 58 (2020), 11319–1338. https://doi.org/10.1137/19M1260475 doi: 10.1137/19M1260475
![]() |
[17] |
W. R. Schneider, W. Wyss, Fractional diffusion and wave equations, J. Math. Phys., 30 (1989), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.528578 doi: 10.1063/1.528578
![]() |
[18] | O. P. Agrawal, Solution for a fractional diffusion-wave equation defined in a bounded domain, Nonlinear Dynam., 29 (2002), 145–155. |
[19] | Y. Fujita, Cauchy problems of fractional order and stable processes, Jan. J. Appl. Math., 7 (1990), 459–476. |
[20] |
R. Schumer, D. A. Benson, M. M. Meerschaert, S. W. Wheatcraft, Eulerian derivation of the fractional advection-dispersion equation, J. Contam. Hydrol., 48 (2001), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00170-4 doi: 10.1016/S0169-7722(00)00170-4
![]() |
[21] | M. Matinfar, M. Saeidy, Application of Homotopy analysis method to fourth-order parabolic partial differential equations, AAM, 5 (2010), 6. https://digitalcommons.pvamu.edu/aam/vol5/iss1/6 |
[22] | Y. He, S. Li, Y. Long, AExact solutions of the Klein-Gordon equation by modified Exp-function method, Int. Math. Forum, 7 (2012), 175–182. |
[23] |
E. Zayed, K. A. Gepreel, The G′G-expansion method for finding traveling wave solutions of nonlinear partial differential equations in mathematical physics, J. Math. Phys., 50 (2009), 013502. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3033750 doi: 10.1063/1.3033750
![]() |
[24] |
E. Misirli, Y. Gurefe, Exp-function method for solving nonlinear evolution equations, Math. Comput. Appl., 16 (2011), 258–266. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca16010258 doi: 10.3390/mca16010258
![]() |
[25] | A. Golbabai, K. Sayevand, The homotopy perturbation method for multi-order time fractional differential equations, Nonlinear Sci. Lett. A, 1 (2010), 147–154. |
[26] |
A. T. Ali, New generalized Jacobi elliptic function rational expansion method, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 235 (2011), 4117–4127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2011.03.002 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2011.03.002
![]() |
[27] |
V. Ala, U. Demirbilek, K. R. Mamedov, An application of improved Bernoulli sub-equation function method to the nonlinear conformable time-fractional SRLW equation, AIMS Math., 5 (2020), 3751–3761. http://DOI:10.3934/math.2020243 doi: 10.3934/math.2020243
![]() |
[28] | A. Hyder, M. Barakat, General improved Kudryashov method for exact solutions of nonlinear evolution equations in mathematical physics, Phys. Scripta, 95 (220), 045212. http://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab6526 |
[29] | C. Li, D. Qian, Y. Chen, On Riemann-Liouville and caputo derivatives, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc., 2011 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/562494 |
[30] | C. A. Sierra, Salas, Á. H. S. Salas, Exact solutions for a reaction diffusion equation by using the generalized tanh method, Scientia et Technica, 1 (2007), 35. https://doi.org/10.22517/23447214.5487 |
[31] | J. Mei, H. Zhang, D. Jiang, New exact solutions for a Reaction-Diffusion equation and a Quasi-Camassa-Holm Equation, Appl. Math. E-Notes, 4 (2004), 85–91. http://www.math.nthu.edu |
[32] | H. Naher, F. A. Abdullah, Some new traveling wave solutions of the nonlinear reaction diffusion equation by using the improved G′G-expansion method, Math. Probl. Eng., 2012 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/871724 |
[33] | M. K. Kaabar, M. Kaplan, Z. Siri, New exact soliton solutions of the ()-dimensional conformable Wazwaz-Benjamin-Bona-Mahony equation via two novel techniques, J. Funct. Space., 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4659905 |
[34] | X. Wang, X. Yue, M. K. Kaabar, A. Akbulut, M. Kaplan, A unique computational investigation of the exact traveling wave solutions for the fractional-order Kaup-Boussinesq and generalized Hirota Satsuma coupled KdV systems arising from water waves and interaction of long waves, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.03.012 |
[35] |
H. Younas, S. Iqbal, I. Siddique, M. K. Kaabar, M. Kaplan, Dynamical investigation of time-fractional order Phi-4 equations, Opt. Quant. Electron., 54 (2022), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-03562-6 doi: 10.1007/s11082-022-03562-6
![]() |
[36] |
M. K. Kaabar, F. Martínez, J. F. Gómez-Aguilar, B. Ghanbari, M. Kaplan, H. Günerhan, New approximate analytical solutions for the nonlinear fractional Schrödinger equation with second-order spatio-temporal dispersion via double Laplace transform method, Math. Meth. Appl. Sci., 44 (2021), 11138–11156. https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.7476 doi: 10.1002/mma.7476
![]() |
[37] | X. Yue, Z. Zhang, A. Akbulut, M. K. Kaabar, M. Kaplan, A new computational approach to the fractional-order Liouville equation arising from mechanics of water waves and meteorological forecasts, J. Ocean Eng. Sci., (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joes.2022.04.001http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/S0894-0347-1992-1124979-1 |
[38] |
Y. Bi, Z. Zhang, Q. Liu, T. Liu, Research on nonlinear waves of blood flow in arterial vessels, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 102 (2021), 105918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105918 doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105918
![]() |
[39] |
Y. Yang, J. Song, On the generalized eigenvalue problem of Rossby waves vertical velocity under the condition of zonal mean flow and topography, Appl. Math. Lett., 121 (2021), 107485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2021.107485 doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2021.107485
![]() |
Attained Results | [31] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) | (i) The solution u1 is as u1=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√rξ) | (ii) The solution u5 is as u5=√βγtan(√rξ) |
Attained Results | [23] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μξ) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μξ) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
Attained Results | [32] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μη) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v4 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μη) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
Attained Results | [30] results |
(i) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√−βγtan(√kξ) | (i) The solution u2 is as u1=±√−βγtan(√kξ) |
(ii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v2=−√βγtan(√kξ) | (ii) The solution u2 is as u2=±√βγtan(√kξ) |
(iii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v1 becomes v1=−√−βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iii) The solution u4 is as u4=±√−βγtanh(√−kξ) |
(iv) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v4=−√βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iv) The solution u4 is as u4=±√βγtanh(√−kξ) |
Attained Results | [31] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) | (i) The solution u1 is as u1=√−βγtanh(√−rξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=r and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√rξ) | (ii) The solution u5 is as u5=√βγtan(√rξ) |
Attained Results | [23] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μξ) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ and η=ξ then our solution v3 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μξ) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μξ) |
Attained Results | [32] results |
(i) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√βγtan(√μη) | (i) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
(ii) If we set b=β,c=γ then our solution v4 becomes v3=−√βγtan(√μη) | (ii) The solution u is as u(ξ)=±√βγtan(√μη) |
Attained Results | [30] results |
(i) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v2 becomes v2=√−βγtan(√kξ) | (i) The solution u2 is as u1=±√−βγtan(√kξ) |
(ii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v2=−√βγtan(√kξ) | (ii) The solution u2 is as u2=±√βγtan(√kξ) |
(iii) If we set b=−β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v1 becomes v1=−√−βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iii) The solution u4 is as u4=±√−βγtanh(√−kξ) |
(iv) If we set b=β,c=γ,μ=−k and η=ξ then our solution v4 becomes v4=−√βγtanh(√−kξ) | (iv) The solution u4 is as u4=±√βγtanh(√−kξ) |