Stability properties of Radon measure-valued solutions for a class of nonlinear parabolic equations under Neumann boundary conditions

1.   Introduction and preliminaries

Fractional calculus has emerged as one of the most important interdisciplinary subjects. In recent past it experienced rapid development and consequently several new generalizations of classical concepts of fractional calculus have been obtained in the literature, for example, see ^[9].

The classical Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals are defined as:

Definition 1.1 (^[9]). Let ${\mathcal{F}}\in L_{1}[a, b]$. Then the Riemann-Liouville integrals $J_{a^+}^{\alpha}{\mathcal{F}}$ and $J_{b^-}^{\alpha}{\mathcal{F}}$ of order $\alpha > 0$ with $a\geq 0$ are defined by

and

where

is the well known Gamma function.

Diaz et al. ^[8] introduced the notion of generalized $k$-gamma function. The integral form of $\Gamma_{k}$ is given by:

Note that

$k$-Beta function is defined as:

Obviously

Sarikaya et al. ^[18] extended the notion of Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals to $k$-Riemann-Liouville fractional integrals and discussed some of its interesting properties.

To be more precise let ${\mathcal{F}}$ be piecewise continuous on $I^{*} = (0, \infty)$ and integrable on any finite subinterval of $I = [0, \infty]$. Then for $v > 0$, we consider $k$-Riemann-Liouville fractional integral of ${\mathcal{F}}$ of order $\alpha$

It has been observed that $k$-fractional integrals are significant generalizations of classical fractional integrals. For more details, see ^[18].

Ahmad et al. ^[1] defined fractional integral operators with an exponential kernel and obtained corresponding inequalities.

Definition 1.2. Let $\mathcal{F}\in [a, b]$. The fractional left side integral $\, _{k}\mathcal{I}^{\alpha}_{a^{+}}\mathcal{F}$ and right side integral $\, _{k}\mathcal{I}^{\alpha}_{b^{-}}\mathcal{F}$ of order $\alpha\in(0, 1)$ are defined as follows:

and

Using the ideas of ^[1,18], we now introduce the notion of $k$-fractional integral operators with an exponential kernel.

Definition 1.3. Let $\mathcal{F}\in L[a, b]$. The $k$-fractional left side integral $\, _{k}\mathcal{I}^{\alpha}_{a^{+}}\mathcal{F}$ and right side integral $\, _{k}\mathcal{I}^{\alpha}_{b^{-}}\mathcal{F}$ of order $\alpha\in(0, 1)$ for $k > 0$ are defined as follows

and

It is to be noted that by taking $k \to 1$ in Definition 1.3, we recapture Definition 1.2. Fractional analogues of integral inequalities have a great many applications in numerical quadrature, transform theory, probability, statistical problems etc. Therefore, a significant and rapid development in this field has been noticed, for details, see ^{[2,3,20,24,25]}. Sarikaya et al. ^[19] utilized the concepts of fractional integrals and obtained new fractional refinements of trapezium like inequalities. This article motivated many researchers and as a result several new fractional extensions of classical inequalities have been obtained in the literature, for example, see ^{[1,4,6,7,11,14,15,16,17,18,19,22,23]}. Recently Ahmad et al. ^[1] used fractional integral operators with an exponential kernel and obtained corresponding inequalities. Wu et al. ^[23] derived some new identities and bounds pertaining to fractional integrals with the exponential kernel.

The main motivation of this paper is to derive some new fractional refinements of trapezium like inequalities essentially using the new fractional integral operators with an exponential kernel to $k$-fractional integral operators with an exponential kernel and the preinvexity property of the functions. In order to establish the significance of our main results, we offer some applications of our main results to means and $q$-digamma functions. We hope that the ideas and techniques of this paper will inspire interested readers working in the field of inequalities.

Before we proceed further, we now recall some previously known concepts from convex analysis. We first, start with the definition of invex sets.

Definition 1.4 (^[10]). A set $K$ is said to be invex with respect to bifunction $\theta(., .)$, if

The preinvexity of the functions is defined as:

Definition 1.5 (^[21]). A function $\mathcal{F}:K\to\mathbb{R}$ is said to be preinvex with respect to bifunction $\theta(., .)$, if

In order to obtain some of the main results of the paper, we need the famous condition C, which was introduced by Mohan and Neogy ^[13]. This condition played a vital role in the development of several results involving preinvex functions.

Condition C. Let $\theta:K\times K\to\mathbb{R}^{n}$. We say that the bifunction $\theta(., .)$ satisfies the condition C, if for any $x, y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}$

1. $\theta(x, x+v\theta(y, x)) = -v\theta(y, x)$,

2. $\theta(y, x+v\theta(y, x)) = (1-v)\theta(y, x)$,

for all $v\in[0, 1]$.

Note that for any $x, y\in\mathbb{R}^{n}$ and $v_{1}, v_{2}\in[0, 1]$ and from the condition C, we have, see ^[12]

2.   Trapezium type inequalities

In this section, we derive some new fractional trapezium type inequalities involving the functions having preinvexity property. For the sake of simplicity, we set $\rho = \frac{k-\alpha}{\alpha}\theta(b, a)$ and $\rho_1 = \frac{1-\alpha}{\alpha}\theta(b, a)$.

Theorem 2.1. Let $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a positive function with $\theta(b, a) > 0$ and $\mathcal{F}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$. Suppose $\mathcal{F}$ is a preinvex function and $\theta(., .)$ satisfies condition C, then

Proof. By preinvexity of $\mathcal{F}$, we have for every $x, y\in [a, a+\theta(b, a)]$ with $\lambda = \frac{1}{2}$

with $x = a+v\theta(b, a), y = a+(1-v)\theta(b, a)$ and using the condition C, we have

Multiplying both sides of above inequality by $e^{-\rho v}$ and integrating with respect to $v$ over $[0, 1]$, we have

As a result, we get

For the proof of second inequality, we note that $\mathcal{F}$ is a preinvex function, so we have

Multiplying both sides by $e^{-\rho v}$ and integrating with respect to $v$ over $[0, 1]$, we have

Combining (2.3) and (2.5) completes the proof.

Theorem 2.2. Let $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ be a positive and preinvex function with $\theta(b, a) > 0$ and $\mathcal{F}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$. Let $W$ be a non-negative, integrable and symmetric with respect to $\frac{2a+\theta(b, a)}{2}$, then using the condition C, we have

Proof. Since $\mathcal{F}$ is preinvex function on $L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$, so multiplying inequality (2.2) by

and then integrating with respect to $v$ over $[0, 1]$, we get

Thus

Since $\mathcal{W}$ is symmetric with respect to $\frac{2a+\theta(b, a)}{2},$ we have

Thus we get the left side of inequality (2.6).

For the proof of right side of inequality (2.6), we multiply (2.7) and (2.4) and then integrating the resulting inequality with respect to $v$ over $[0, 1],$ we get the required result.

Theorem 2.3. Let $\mathcal{F, W}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ be nonnegative and preinvex function on $L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$ with $\theta(b, a) > 0$. If $\theta(., .)$ satisfies condition C, then the following inequalities for the $k$-fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

and

where

and

Proof. Since $\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{W}$ are preinvex functions on $[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$, then we have

and

Adding above inequalities, we have

Multiplying both sides of above inequality by $e^{-\rho v}$ and integrating with respect to $v$ over $[0, 1]$, we have

So,

For the proof of inequality (2.9), using the preinvexity of $\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{W}$ and condition C, we have

Multiplying both sides of inequality (2.10) by $e^{-\rho v}$ and integrating with respect to $v$ over $[0, 1]$, we get

which completes the proof.

3.   Inequalities involving first and second order differentiable preinvex functions

Lemma 3.1. Assume that $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a differentiable function and $\mathcal{F^{\prime}}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$. Then the following equality for the $k$-fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

where

and

Proof. By simple calculations, we have

similarly

Also note that

Substituting (3.2), (3.3) and (3.4) in (3.1) completes the proof.

Theorem 3.1. Assume that $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a differentiable function and $\mathcal{F^{\prime}}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$ and $|\mathcal{F^{\prime}}|$ is preinvex on $[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$. Then the following inequality for the $k$-fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

Proof. Using Lemma 3.1, preinvexity of $|\mathcal{F^{\prime}}|$ and increasing property of exponential function, we have

which completes the proof.

Lemma 3.2. Assume that $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a differentiable function and $\mathcal{F^{\prime}}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$. Then the following equality for the fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

where

Proof. Using 3.2 and 3.3, we get the required result.

Theorem 3.2. Assume that $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a differentiable function and $\mathcal{F^{\prime}}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$. If $|\mathcal{F^{\prime}}|$ is preinvex function on $[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$, then the following inequality for the $k$-fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

Proof. Using Lemma 3.2, preinvexity of $|\mathcal{F^{\prime}}|$ and increasing property of exponential function, we have

which completes the proof.

Lemma 3.3. Assume that $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is twice differentiable function and $\mathcal{F^{\prime\prime}}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$. Then the following equality for the $k$-fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

Proof. Using (3.5) and integration by parts, we have

similarly

Substituting (3.7) and (3.8) in (3.5), we have

which completes the proof.

Theorem 3.3. Assume that $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is twice differentiable function. If $\mathcal{F^{\prime\prime}}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$ and $|\mathcal{F^{\prime\prime}}|$ is preinvex on $[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$, then the following inequality for the $k$-fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

Proof. It is to be noted that

and

Using (3.6), (3.9), (3.10) and the preinvexity of $|\mathcal{F}^{\prime\prime}|,$ we have

the proof is complete.

Lemma 3.4. Assume that $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is twice differentiable function and $\mathcal{F^{\prime\prime}}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$. Then the following equality for the $k$-fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

where

Proof. Using (3.1), we have

Thus

Substituting (3.7), (3.8) and (3.12) in (3.1), we get the required result.

Theorem 3.4. Assume that $\mathcal{F}:[a, a+\theta(b, a)]\subseteq\mathbb{R}\to\mathbb{R}$ is a twice differentiable function. If $\mathcal{F^{\prime\prime}}\in L[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$ and $|\mathcal{F^{\prime\prime}}|$ is preinvex on $[a, a+\theta(b, a)]$, then the following inequality for the $k$-fractional integrals with exponential kernel holds:

Proof. Using (3.11) and preinvexity of $|\mathcal{F^{\prime\prime}}|$, we have

The proof is complete.

Remark 3.1. We would like to remark here that by taking $k\to1$, new results can be obtained from our results.

Applications

We now discuss some applications of the results obtained in previous section. Before we proceed further let us recall the definition of arithmetic mean.

The arithmetic mean is defined as

Proposition 3.1. Suppose all the assumptions of Theorem 3.1 are satisfied, then

Proof. The proof directly follows from Theorem 3.1 by setting $\theta(b, a) = b-a, k = 1$ and $\mathcal{F}(x) = x^2$.

Proposition 3.2. Suppose all the assumptions of Theorem 3.2 are satisfied, then

Proof. The proof directly follows from Theorem 3.2 by setting $\theta(b, a) = b-a, k = 1$ and $\mathcal{F}(x) = x^2$.

Proposition 3.3. Suppose all the assumptions of Theorem 3.3 are satisfied, then

Proof. The proof directly follows from Theorem 3.3 by setting $\theta(b, a) = b-a, k = 1$ and $\mathcal{F}(x) = x^2$.

Proposition 3.4. Suppose all the assumptions of Theorem 3.4 are satisfied, then

Proof. The proof directly follows from Theorem 3.4 by setting $\theta(b, a) = b-a, k = 1$ and $\mathcal{F}(x) = x^2$. We now discuss applications to $q$-digamma functions, which is defined as:

Suppose $0 < q < 1$, the $q$-digamma function $\chi_q(u)$ is given as

For $q > 1, t > 0$, then $q$-digamma function $\chi_q$ can be given as

From the above definition, it is clear that $\chi'_q$ is completely monotone on $(0, \infty)$ for $q > 0$. This implies that $\chi'_q$ is convex. For more details, see ^[5].

Proposition 3.5. Under the assumption of Theorem 2.1, the following inequality holds:

Proof. The proof is direct consequence of Theorem 2.1, by choosing $\theta(b, a) = b-a, k = 1$ and $\mathcal{F}(v)\rightarrow \chi_q(v)$.

Proposition 3.6. Under the assumption of Theorem 3.1, the following inequality holds:

Proof. The proof is direct consequence of Theorem 3.1, by choosing $\theta(b, a) = b-a, k = 1$ and $\mathcal{F}(v)\rightarrow \chi_q(v)$.

Proposition 3.7. Under the assumption of Theorem 3.1, the following inequality holds:

Proof. The proof is direct consequence of Theorem 3.1, by choosing $\theta(b, a) = b-a, k = 1$ and $\mathcal{F}(v)\rightarrow \chi_q(v)$.

4.   Conclusions

In the article, we have extended the fractional integral operators with an exponential kernel to $k$-fractional integral operators with an exponential kernel and derived several new trapezium type integral inequalities involving the new fractional integral operator essentially using the functions having preinvexity property. We have also discussed some interesting applications of our obtained results, which show the significance of our main results. It is also worth mentioning here that our obtained results are the generalizations of some previously known results and our ideas may lead to a lot of follow-up research.

Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. This research was funded by Dirección de Investigación from Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador in the research project entitled, "Some integrals inequalities and generalized convexity" (Algunas desigualdades integrales para funciones con algún tipo de convexidad generalizada y aplicaciones).