Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Research article

Chebyshev pseudospectral approximation of two dimensional fractional Schrodinger equation on a convex and rectangular domain

  • Received: 14 November 2019 Accepted: 03 February 2020 Published: 10 February 2020
  • MSC : 35C07, 35C11, 35R11

  • In this article, the authors report the Chebyshev pseudospectral method for solving twodimensional nonlinear Schrodinger equation with fractional order derivative in time and space both. The modified Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives are used to define the new fractional derivatives matrix at CGL points. Using the Chebyshev fractional derivatives matrices, the given problem is reduced to a diagonally block system of nonlinear algebraic equations, which will be solved using Newton's Raphson method. The proposed methods have shown error analysis without any dependency on time and space step restrictions. Some model examples of the equations, defined on a convex and rectangular domain, have tested with various values of fractional order α and β. Moreover, numerical solutions are demonstrated to justify the theoretical results.

    Citation: A. K. Mittal, L. K. Balyan. Chebyshev pseudospectral approximation of two dimensional fractional Schrodinger equation on a convex and rectangular domain[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(3): 1642-1662. doi: 10.3934/math.2020111

    Related Papers:

    [1] Haifa Bin Jebreen, Beatriz Hernández-Jiménez . An approach based on the pseudospectral method for fractional telegraph equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 29221-29238. doi: 10.3934/math.20231496
    [2] Haifa Bin Jebreen, Beatriz Hernández-Jiménez . Pseudospectral method for fourth-order fractional Sturm-Liouville problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 26077-26091. doi: 10.3934/math.20241274
    [3] M. Mossa Al-Sawalha, Azzh Saad Alshehry, Kamsing Nonlaopon, Rasool Shah, Osama Y. Ababneh . Fractional view analysis of delay differential equations via numerical method. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(12): 20510-20523. doi: 10.3934/math.20221123
    [4] Iman Ben Othmane, Lamine Nisse, Thabet Abdeljawad . On Cauchy-type problems with weighted R-L fractional derivatives of a function with respect to another function and comparison theorems. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(6): 14106-14129. doi: 10.3934/math.2024686
    [5] Zahra Pirouzeh, Mohammad Hadi Noori Skandari, Kamele Nassiri Pirbazari, Stanford Shateyi . A pseudo-spectral approach for optimal control problems of variable-order fractional integro-differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 23692-23710. doi: 10.3934/math.20241151
    [6] Dina Abdelhamid, Wedad Albalawi, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, A. Abdel-Aty, Suliman Alsaeed, M. Abdelhakem . Mixed Chebyshev and Legendre polynomials differentiation matrices for solving initial-boundary value problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(10): 24609-24631. doi: 10.3934/math.20231255
    [7] Alessandra Jannelli, Maria Paola Speciale . On the numerical solutions of coupled nonlinear time-fractional reaction-diffusion equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(8): 9109-9125. doi: 10.3934/math.2021529
    [8] Md. Asaduzzaman, Md. Zulfikar Ali . Existence of positive solution to the boundary value problems for coupled system of nonlinear fractional differential equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2019, 4(3): 880-895. doi: 10.3934/math.2019.3.880
    [9] Lakhlifa Sadek, Tania A Lazǎr . On Hilfer cotangent fractional derivative and a particular class of fractional problems. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(12): 28334-28352. doi: 10.3934/math.20231450
    [10] Adisorn Kittisopaporn, Pattrawut Chansangiam . Approximate solutions of the $ 2 $D space-time fractional diffusion equation via a gradient-descent iterative algorithm with Grünwald-Letnikov approximation. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(5): 8471-8490. doi: 10.3934/math.2022472
  • In this article, the authors report the Chebyshev pseudospectral method for solving twodimensional nonlinear Schrodinger equation with fractional order derivative in time and space both. The modified Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives are used to define the new fractional derivatives matrix at CGL points. Using the Chebyshev fractional derivatives matrices, the given problem is reduced to a diagonally block system of nonlinear algebraic equations, which will be solved using Newton's Raphson method. The proposed methods have shown error analysis without any dependency on time and space step restrictions. Some model examples of the equations, defined on a convex and rectangular domain, have tested with various values of fractional order α and β. Moreover, numerical solutions are demonstrated to justify the theoretical results.


    The fractional partial differential equation was first developed as a pure mathematical theory in the 19th century [36]. Time- and space- nonlinear fractional Schrodinger equation(NFSE) is the fundamental equation of physics for describing nonrelativistic quantum mechanical behavior. This equation was formulated in late 1925, and published in 1926, by the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrodinger. In past years, the time- and space- NFSE has attracted application of various fields such as, electromagnetic waves, quantitative finance, quantum evolution of complex systems and dielectric polarization [6,9,28,29,35,37].

    Let us consider nonlinear fractional Schrodinger equation

    iαtU+κ(2βxU+2βyU)+G(x,y,t)U+λU2U=F(x,y,t),(x,y)Ω,t[0,T], (1.1)

    with initial condition:

    U(x,y,0)=k1(x,y),(x,y)Ω,

    and boundary conditions:

    U(xL,y,t)=p11(y,t),U(xR,y,t)=p21(y,t),t[0,1],(x,y)Ω,U(x,yL,t)=p31(x,t),U(x,yR,t)=p41(x,t).

    Here, α and β represent the fractional order of derivatives in time and space respectively, with values 0<α1 and 1/2<β1. The convex domain Ω is defined as, Ω=(x,y)[xL,xR]×[yL,yR], κ and λ are constants, G(x,y,t) is a potential function, F(x,y,t) is complex source term. The function U(x,y,t) is assumed to be a complex wave function of time and space.

    In past years, many authors have proposed various numerical methods for the solutions of time- and space- NFSE. These numerical methods are very important for understanding the physical behavior of the equations. Dong [11] has proposed scattering problems for two-dimensional NFSE and further, gives the mathematical expression of the Green's functions. Fan and Qi [14] have introduced the Galerkin finite element method for the solutions of NFSE. Some other authors [15,18,22,23,25,26,42] have used the same methods to studied numerical solutions and error analysis of two-dimensional NFSE. Zhang et al. [43] have proposed Galerkin-Legendre spectral schemes for the numerical solution of space NFSE. Li et al. [17] have discussed the numerical and stability analysis of multi-dimensional time-NFSE using the L1-Galerkin finite element method. Zhao et al. [44] have proposed a fourth-order compact ADI method for the numerical solutions and convergence analysis of two-dimensional space NFSE. In this method, the authors have found fourth-order of accuracy. Li et al. [21] have proposed a fast linearized conservative finite element method for the numerical solution of strongly coupled NFSEs and also prove that the scheme preserved both the mass and energy. Li et al. [24] have used Galerkin finite element method for the unconditional error analysis of NFSE. Cheng et al. [8] has proposed novel compact alternating direction implicit scheme for the numerical analysis of two-dimensional Riesz space fractional nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations. Bhrawy and Zaky [4] have studied a natural generalization of the NFSE, which is changing the variable-order NFSE to fractional quantum phenomena. Chen et al. [7] have introduced symplectic and multi-symplectic methods for the numerical solution of NSE. Further equation (1.1) was solved by several other numerical methods, such as riccati expansion method [1], Legendre-Galerkin spectral method [19], finite element method [13,21], discontinuous Galerkin finite element method [39], momentum representation method [12], compact boundary value method [34], fractional mapping method [40] and finite difference method [20,41].

    Pseudospectral methods have been developed for numerical simulation of related differential equations in many fields because of its high accuracy, especially sufficiently smooth problems. Lanczos showed the power of the Fourier series and Chebyshev polynomials in a number of problems where they had not been used before. Later in the 1970s, Orszag introduced spectral methods again, alongside Kreiss, Oliger, and others, for the purpose of solving partial differential equations in fluid mechanics [38]. Many authors have used spectral method to approximate the solution of such equations [2,27,30,31,32,33]. In this paper, the authors propose a highly accurate pseudospectral method to approximate the NFSE. For the proposed method, we derive the solution of a nonlinear partial differential equation as a sum of basis functions in both space and time directions. The spectral coefficients of the sum are chosen to satisfy the solution of the nonlinear partial differential equation. The fractional derivatives matrix is considered in the modified Riemann-Liouville formula. It is a new approach to study the nonlinear partial differential equations in time and space and the method is equally important in time as it is in the space direction. The great advantage of time-space pseudospectral methods resides in their high-accuracy for a relatively small number of grid points as compared to standard time-stepping methods.

    The structure of the paper is organized as follows. In section 2, we describe some basic definitions and notations. Discretizing and description of the methods are presented in section 3. In section 4, we derive the error analysis for two-dimensional time- and space-NFSE. In section 5, we present numerical solutions and errors by the proposed scheme. In the last section, the conclusion of our work is presented.

    In this section, we present definition of modified Riemann-Liouville formula of the fractional calculus theory and Sobolev space, which will be useful throughout this paper.

    Definition 1: The partial fractional derivatives of order α of a function ϕM(z), with respect to variable z, in the modified Riemann-Liouville formula, is defined as [10,16]

    ϕM(z)=αzϕM(z)={1Γ(α)z0(zξ)α1(ϕM(ξ)ϕM(0))dξ,α<0,1Γ(1α)zz0(zξ)α(ϕM(ξ)ϕM(0))dξ,0<α<1,1Γ(nα)nznz0(zξ)nα1(ϕM(ξ)ϕM(0))dξ,n1α<n.

    Here, z is dummy variable which represents x,y and t as and when required. Γ is the gamma function and n=α+1 with α denoting the upper integer part of α. Some basic properties of modified Riemann-Liouville fractional derivatives are as follows:

    αzC=0,Cis constant,
    αzzυ={0,forυNandυ<α,Γ(υ+1)Γ(υ+1α)zυα,forυNandυα.

    and

    αzβzzυ=βzαzzυ=α+βzzυ.

    Construction of Chebyshev fractional differential matrix is given as

    Q(α)=[ϕ0(z0)ϕ0(zM)ϕM(z0)ϕM(zM)].

    Definition 2: Sobolev space: Let p>0 be an integer and 1q. The set of all function in Lqw[a,b] such that all distribution derivatives upto order p are also in Lqw[a,b] is called sobolev space, which are denoted by Wp,qw[a,b] and defined by

    Wp,qw[a,b]={ULqw[a,b]|Δ(γ)ULqw[a,b],|γ|p},

    where w is a weight function and norm is defined by

    UWp,qw[a,b]=γ∣≤pΔ(γ)ULqw[a,b].

    For q=2, sobolev norm denoted by Hpw[a,b]=Wp,2w[a,b] and L2w[a,b] is a weighted space defined by

    L2w[a,b]={U:Uis measurable andU2w<}.

    Definition 3: Kronecker products of matrices, let P=(pjk)mn and Q=(qjk)rs are two matrices, where, m,n,r,s are nonnegative integers. The Kronecker product PQ is a mr×ns block matrix denoted by

    PQ=[p11Qp12Qp1nQp21Qp22Qp2nQpm1Qp12QpmnQ]mr×ns

    We seek a pseudospectral approximation IMU, as a finite linear combination of a chosen set of Langrange basis functions in both space and time-variable with pseudospectral coefficients.

    IMU=Mi=0Mj=0Mk=0Łi(x)Łj(y)Łk(t)U(xi,yj,tk), (3.1)

    where,

    Łj(z)=Mi=0wj1^hiϕi(zj)ϕi(z)=SM(z)(zzj)[SM(z)/z|z=zj]

    here, ϕi(z) is a Chebyshev polynomial, zj is a CGL points,

    SM(z)=Mi=0(zzi),

    normalization constant

    ^hi={π,i=0andM,π2,0<i<M.

    and Chebyshev Gauss-Lobatto weight quadrature

    wj={π2M,j=0andM,πM,0<j<M.

    The spectral approximation given in (3.1) can be expressed as a direct product

    IMU(x,y,t)=(Ψ[0:M](x)Ψ[0:M](y)Ψ[0:M](t))TU, (3.2)

    where

    U=[U000,,U00MU0M0,,U0MMUMM0,,UMMM]T,Ψ[0:M](z)=[Ł0(z),.......,ŁM(z)]T.

    Now, we can define fractional spatial derivative of equation (3.2) with respect to x is given by

    βIMU(x,y,t)xβ=(Ψ[0:M](x)Ψ[0:M](y)Ψ[0:M](t))T(Q(β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1IM+1)U. (3.3)

    Similarly, we can define fractional derivative of Eq. (3.2) with respect to t is given by

    αIMU(x,y,t)tα=(Ψ[0:M](x)Ψ[0:M](y)Ψ[0:M](t))T(IM+1IM+1Q(α)[0:M,0:M])U. (3.4)

    where IM+1 denotes identity matrix of size ((M+1)×(M+1)).

    Next, we define U(x,y,t) and F(x,y,t) into their real and imaginary parts

    U(x,y,t)=U1(x,y,t)+iU2(x,y,t)andF(x,y,t)=F1(x,y,t)+iF2(x,y,t), (3.5)

    where U1(x,y,t), U2(x,y,t), F1(x,y,t) and F2(x,y,t) are real functions. Using Eq. (3.5) in Eq. (1.1), we obtain the following coupled system of equations

    αtU2+κ(2βxU1+2βyU1)+G(x,y,t)U1+λ(U21+U22)U1=F1(x,y,t),(x,y)Ω,t[0,T], (3.6)
    αtU1+κ(2βxU2+2βyU2)+G(x,y,t)U2+λ(U21+U22)U2=F2(x,y,t),(x,y)Ω,t[0,T]. (3.7)

    Further, we consider the following transformations which are used to transform the two-dimensional space Ω=(x,y)[xL,xR]×[yL,yR] and time [0,T] in to [1,1].

    xxRxL2x+xR+xL2,yyRyL2y+yR+yL2andtT2t+T2.

    We obtain the two dimensional time- and space- NFSE in new space (x,y)[1,1]2 and time interval t[1,1]

    αtU2+κ(2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β2βxU1+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β2βyU1)+Tα2α[G(x,y,t)U1+λ(U21+U22)U1]=Tα2αF1(x,y,t), (3.8)
    αtU1+κ(2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β2βxU2+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β2βyU2)+Tα2α[G(x,y,t)U2+λ(U21+U22)U2]=Tα2αF2(x,y,t), (3.9)

    with initial condition:

    U1(x,y,1)=h1(x,y),U2(x,y,1)=h2(x,y),x[1,1],y[1,1] (3.10)

    and boundary conditions:

    U1(1,y,t)=g11(y,t),U1(1,y,t)=g21(y,t),t[1,1],y[1,1],U2(1,y,t)=g12(y,t),U2(1,y,t)=g22(y,t),t[1,1],y[1,1],U1(x,1,t)=g31(x,t),U1(x,1,t)=g41(x,t),t[1,1],x[1,1],U2(x,1,t)=g32(x,t),U2(x,1,t)=g42(x,t),t[1,1],x[1,1].

    Further, we consider a mapping for converting the non-homogeneous initial and boundary values to homogeneous initial and boundary values [5].

    Ωk(x,y,t)=1t2hk(x,y)+1x4g1k(y,t)+1+x4g2k(y,t)+1y4g3k(x,t)+1+y4g4k(x,t)(1t)(1x)8g1k(y,1)(1t)(1+x)8g2k(y,1)(1t)(1y)8g3k(x,1)(1t)(1+y)8g4k(x,1), (3.11)

    here corner initial and boundary values satisfy,

    g1k(1,1)=g3k(1,1)=hk(1,1),g1k(1,1)=g3k(1,1),g1k(1,1)=g4k(1,1)=hk(1,1),g1k(1,1)=g4k(1,1),g2k(1,1)=g3k(1,1)=hk(1,1),g2k(1,1)=g3k(1,1),g2k(1,1)=g4k(1,1)=hk(1,1),g2k(1,1)=g4k(1,1).

    Define new variable Vk(x,y,t).

    Uk(x,y,t)=Vk(x,y,t)+Ωk(x,y,t),k=1,2, (3.12)

    the above equations, can be modified with new variable and obtain the new equations residuals,

    αt(V2+Ω2)+κ(2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β2βx(V1+Ω1)+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β2βy(V1+Ω1))+Tα2α[G(x,y,t)(V1+Ω1)+λ((V1+Ω1)2+(V2+Ω2)2)(V1+Ω1)]=Tα2αF1(x,y,t), (3.13)
    αt(V1+Ω1)+κ(2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β2βx(V2+Ω2)+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β2βy(V2+Ω2))+Tα2α[G(x,y,t)(V2+Ω2)+λ((V1+Ω1)2+(V2+Ω2)2)(V2+Ω2)]=Tα2αF2(x,y,t). (3.14)

    Applying the pseudospectral method in Eqs. (3.13) and (3.14), we get

    H1(V1,V2)=B(IM+1IM+1Q(α)[0:M,0:M])V2αt(Ω2)+κB[2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β(Q(2β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1IM+1)+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β(IM+1Q(2β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1)]V1+κ[2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β2βx(Ω1)+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β2βy(Ω1)]Tα2αF1(x,y,t)+Tα2α[G(x,y,t)(V1+Ω1)+λ((V1+Ω1)2+(V2+Ω2)2)(V1+Ω1)]=0 (3.15)
    H2(V1,V2)=B(IM+1IM+1Q(α)[0:M,0:M])V1+αt(Ω1)+κB[2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β(Q(2β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1IM+1)+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β(IM+1Q(2β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1)]V2+κ[2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β2βx(Ω2)+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β2βy(Ω2)]Tα2αF2(x,y,t)+Tα2α[G(x,y,t)(V2+Ω2)+λ((V1+Ω1)2+(V2+Ω2)2)(V2+Ω2)]=0 (3.16)

    where B=(Ψ[0:M](x)Ψ[0:M](y)Ψ[0:M](t))T Using the CGL points in Eqs. (3.15) and (3.16) and obtained the algebraic equations

    (IM+1IM+1Q(α)[0:M,0:M])V2(Ω2)αt+κ[2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β(Q(2β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1IM+1)+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β(IM+1Q(2β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1)]V1+κ[2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β(Ω1)2βx+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β(Ω1)2βy]Tα2αF1+Tα2α[ G(V1+Ω1)+λ(I(V1+Ω1))((V1+Ω1)2+(V2+Ω2)2)]=H1, (3.17)
    (IM+1IM+1Q(α)[0:M,0:M])V1(Ω1)αt+κ[2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β(Q(2β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1IM+1)+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β(IM+1Q(2β)[0:M,0:M]IM+1)]V2+κ[2(2βα)Tα(xRxL)2β(Ω2)2βx+2(2βα)Tα(yRyL)2β(Ω2)2βy]Tα2αF2+Tα2α[ G(V2+Ω2)+λ(I(V2+Ω2))((V1+Ω1)2+(V2+Ω2)2)]=H2, (3.18)

    where, I(V1+Ω1) and I(V2+Ω2) are diagonal entry matrix

    V1=[V1,001,,V1,00(M)V1,0(M)1,,V1,0(M)(M)V1,(M)(M)1,,V1,M(M)(M)]T,V2=[V2,001,,V2,00(M)V2,0(M)1,,V2,0(M)(M)V2,(M)(M)1,,V2,M(M)(M)]T,(Ω1)αt=[(Ω1)αt,001,,(Ω1)αt,00(M)(Ω1)αt,0(M)1,,(Ω1)αt,0(M)(M)(Ω1)αt,(M)(M)1,,(Ω1)αt,M(M)(M)]T,(Ω2)αt=[(Ω2)αt,001,,(Ω2)αt,00(M)(Ω2)αt,0(M)1,,(Ω2)αt,0(M)(M)(Ω2)αt,(M)(M)1,,(Ω2)αt,M(M)(M)]T,(Ω1)2βx=[(Ω1)2βx,001,,(Ω1)2βx,00(M)(Ω1)2βx,0(M)1,,(Ω1)2βx,0(M)(M)(Ω1)2βx,(M)(M)1,,(Ω1)2βx,M(M)(M)]T,(Ω1)2βy=[(Ω1)2βy,001,,(Ω1)2βy,00(M)(Ω1)2βy,0(M)1,,(Ω1)2βy,0(M)(M)(Ω1)2βy,(M)(M)1,,(Ω1)2βy,M(M)(M)]T,(Ω2)2βx=[(Ω2)2βx,001,,(Ω2)2βx,00(M)(Ω2)2βx,0(M)1,,(Ω2)2βx,0(M)(M)(Ω2)2βx,(M)(M)1,,(Ω2)2βx,M(M)(M)]T,(Ω2)2βy=[(Ω2)2βy,001,,(Ω2)2βy,00(M)(Ω2)2βy,0(M)1,,(Ω2)2βy,0(M)(M)(Ω2)2βy,(M)(M)1,,(Ω2)2βy,M(M)(M)]T,F1=[F1,001,,F1,00(M)F1,0(M)1,,F1,0(M)(M)F1,(M)(M)1,,F1,M(M)(M)]T,F2=[F2,001,,F2,00(M)F2,0(M)1,,F2,0(M)(M1)F2,(M)(M)1,,F2,M(M)(M)]T,H1=[H1,001,,H1,00(M)H1,0(M)1,,H1,0(M)(M)H1,(M)(M)1,,H1,M(M)(M)]T,H2=[H2,001,,H2,00(M)H2,0(M)1,,H2,0(M)(M1)H2,(M)(M)1,,H2,M(M)(M)]T,G=[G001,,G00(M)G0(M)1,,G0(M)(M1)G(M)(M)1,,GM(M)(M)]T.

    Hence,

     V=[V1|V2],H(V)=[H1|H2]=0. (3.19)

    The system of nonlinear equations (3.19) can be solved by using Newton Raphson method. The Jacobian matrix of this coupled nonlinear algebraic equations are as

    J(V)=[H1,ijkV1,ijkH1,ijkV2,ijkH2,ijkV1,ijkH2,ijkV2,ijk],i,j,k[0,...,M].

    .

    In this section, we derive error estimates for two-dimensional nonlinear fractional Schrodinger equation by using time-space Chebyshev pseudospectral method.

    Theorem 1: Let U(x,y,t)Hpw[1,1], where p>0, there exist a constant C, such that the following estimate holds:

    UIMUL2w[1,1]CMpUHpw[1,1].

    Proof : We approximate the solutions obtained from truncated Chebyshev expansion are defined by

    PMU=Mi=0Mj=0Mk=0ηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)Γijk, (4.1)

    where ηl(z),l(i,j,k) and z(x,y,t) is Chebyshev polynomials, w(z)=(1z2)1 is weight function and expansion coefficients are

    Γijk=1pipjpk111111Uηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)w(x)w(y)w(t)dx dy dt ,=1pipjpk1111ηj(y)w(y)ηk(t)w(t)[11Uηi(x)w(x)dx ]dy dt . (4.2)

    where pll(i,j,k) is normalizing constant of orthogonal Chebyshev polynomials.

    Next, we define the Chebyshev operator

    n2ηn(z)w(z)=Lnηn(z)w(z)=z(1z2z(ηn(z))),n, (4.3)

    Using Eq. (4.3) in Eq. (4.2), we obtain

    Γijk=1pipjpk1111ηj(y)w(y)ηk(t)w(t)111i2U[{x(1x2x(ηi(x)))}dx ]dy dt ,
    Γijk=1pipjpk1111ηj(y)w(y)ηk(t)w(t)[1i2S1]dy dt, (4.4)

    where

    χ1=11U[x(1x2x(ηi(x)))]dx ,

    using integration by parts:

    χ1=U1x2x(ηi(x))x=1x=1+11xU1x2x(ηi(x))dx
    χ1=11xU1x2x(ηi(x))dx

    again applying integration by parts, we obtain

    χ1=xU1x2ηi(x)x=1x=1+11x(1x2xU)ηi(x)dx ,χ1=11x(1x2xU)ηi(x)dx

    here, L1=x(1x2x) is Chebyshev operator,

    χ1=11[L1U]ηi(x)w(x)dx , (4.5)

    putting the value of χ1 in eq(4.4), we get

    Γijk=1pipjpk1111ηj(y)w(y)ηk(t)w(t)[1i211[L1U]ηi(x)w(x)dx ]dy dt,=1pipjpki2111111[L1U]ηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)w(x)w(y)w(t)dx dy dt.

    Similarly integrate for space y and time t and obtain

    Γijk=1pipjpk(ijk)2111111[L1L2L3U]ηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)w(x)w(y)w(t)dx dy dt,=1pipjpk(ijk)2111111[LU]ηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)w(x)w(y)w(t)dx dy dt.

    In this case the order of LU is 6 as L1,L2 and L3 are second order operator.

    Repeatation of procedure for higher order concludes the results i.e.,

    Γijk=1pipjpk(ijk)2m111111[LmU]ηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)w(x)w(y)w(t)dx dy dt. (4.6)

    Then the Cauchy-Schwartz inequality implies

    Γijk2C1(ijk)4mLmU2L2w[1,1], (4.7)

    where C is generic constant. Therefore, from Sobolev norm

    LU2L2w[1,1]U2H6w[1,1].

    By induction,

    LmU2L2w[1,1]U2H6mw[1,1]. (4.8)

    From Eq. 4.7 and Eq. 4.8, we get

    Γijk2C1(ijk)4mU2H6mw[1,1]. (4.9)

    Further, let us consider the discrete approximation

    IMU=Mi=0Mj=0Mk=0Łi(x)Łj(y)Łk(t)V(xi,yj,tk)=Mi=0Mj=0Mk=0ηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)Πijk, (4.10)

    where Πijk is discrete expansion coefficient and defined by

    Πijk=1pipjpkMl=0Mm=0Mn=0ηi(xl)ηj(ym)ηk(tn)wlwmwnU(xl,ym,tn). (4.11)

    Under the assumption for sufficient smoothness functions, the aliasing error is

    Πijk=Γijk+1pipjpkp>Mq>Mr>M[ηi(x),ηp(x)]w[ηj(y),ηq(x)]w[ηk(t),ηr(t)]wΓpqr, (4.12)

    where [.,.]w represents the discrete weighted inner product.

    We know that,

    U=i=0j=0k=0ηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)Γijk. (4.13)

    Using Eq. (4.10), Eq. (4.12) and Eq. (4.13) and we get

    UIMU2L2w[1,1]=UPMU2L2w[1,1]+BMU2L2w[1,1], (4.14)

    where the aliasing error

    BMU=Mi=0Mj=0Mk=01pipjpkp>Mq>Mr>M[ηi(x),ηp(x)]w[ηj(y),ηq(y)]w[ηk(t),ηr(t)]wηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)Γijk,

    to simplify the expression, first interchange the summations

    BMU=p>Mq>Mr>MMi=0Mj=0Mk=01pipjpk[ηi(x),ηp(x)]w[ηj(y),ηq(y)]w[ηk(t),ηr(t)]wηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)Γijk. (4.15)

    Since ηi(x),ηj(y) and ηk(t) are orthogonal, therefore, we observe that the value of Eq. (4.15) is zero due to the range of summations.

    UIMU2L2w[1,1]=UPMU2L2w[1,1]. (4.16)

    Subtract the Eq. (4.13) and Eq. (3.13), we get

    (UPMU)=i>Mj>Mk>Mηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)Γijk,

    taking L2w[1,1] norm both side and we get

    UPMU2L2w[1,1]=i>Mj>Mk>Mηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)Γijk2L2w[1,1],=i>Mj>Mk>Mηi(x)ηj(y)ηk(t)2L2w[1,1]Γijk2,=i>Mj>Mk>M111111η2i(x)η2j(y)η2k(t)w(x)w(y)w(t)dx dy dt Γijk2=i>Mj>Mk>M11η2i(x)w(x)dx 11η2j(y)w(y)dy 11η2k(t)w(t)dt Γijk2=i>Mj>Mk>M[ηi(x),ηi(x)]w[ηj(y),ηj(y)]w[ηk(t),ηk(t)]wΓijk2,

    Finally putting the value of discrete inner product and we get

    UPMU2L2w[1,1]=i>Mj>Mk>MpipjpkΓijk2, (4.17)

    Combining the Eq. (4.9) and Eq. (4.17)and we get

    UPMU2L2w[1,1]CU2H6mw[1,1]i>Mj>Mk>Mpipjpk(ijk)4m,
    UPMU2L2w[1,1]CM12mU2H6mw[1,1],UPMUL2w[1,1]CM6mUH6mw[1,1]. (4.18)

    Take p=6m in Eq. (4.18)

    UPMUL2w[1,1]CMpUHpw[1,1]. (4.19)

    Finally, putting in Eq. (4.2), we obtain

    UIMUL2w[1,1]CMpUHpw[1,1]. (4.20)

    The theorem is complete.

    Further, we discuss the bounds of the given Schrodinger operator. We consider the error function E(x,y,t)=U(x,y,t)IMU(x,y,t), where, IMU(x,y,t) is pseudospectral approximation and U(x,y,t) is exact solution. Moreover, the pseudospectral approximation satisfies the given problem, i.e.,

    R1(x,y,t)=αtIMU2+κ(2βxIMU1+2βyIMU1)+G(x,y,t)IMU1+λ(IMU21+IMU22)IMU1F1(x,y,t),
    R2(x,y,t)=αtIMU1+κ(2βxIMU2+2βyIMU2)+G(x,y,t)IMU2+λ(IMU21+IMU22)IMU2F2(x,y,t),

    Adding both equations, we get

    R(x,y,t)=iαtIMU+κ(2βxIMU+2βyIMU)+G(x,y,t)IMU+λIMU2IMUF(x,y,t). (4.21)

    where R(x,y,t)=R1(x,y,t)+iR2(x,y,t) is the residual function.

    Further, we can define

    R(x,y,t)=iαt(UIMU)+κ(2βx(UIMU)+2βy(UIMU))+G(x,y,t)(UIMU)+λ(UIMU)2(UIMU),R(x,y,t)=iαtE+κ(2βxE+2βyE)+G(x,y,t)E+λE2E, (4.22)

    where E=E1+iE2.

    From theorem 1, we get

    UIMUL2w[1,1]=EL2w[1,1]CMpUHpw[1,1]. (4.23)

    Further, Eq. (4.20) can be written in derivative form.

    kEzkL2w[1,1]CMpkUzkHpw[1,1],z[x,y,t],k0. (4.24)

    Using sobolev norms

    kUzkHpw[1,1]=γ∣≤p(γ)z(γ)kUzkL2w[1,1],=γ∣≤p(γ)+kz(γ)+kUL2w[1,1],=U(x,y,t)Hp+kw[1,1]. (4.25)

    Using Eq. (4.25), we obtain

    kEzkL2w[1,1]CMpUHp+kw[1,1]. (4.26)

    taking L2w[1,1] norm both side in Eq. (4.22) and we get

    R(x,y,t)L2w[1,1]=iαtE+κ(2βxE+2βyE)+G(x,y,t)E+λE2EL2w[1,1],αtEL2w[1,1]+κ(2βxEL2w[1,1]+2βyEL2w[1,1])+G(x,y,t)EL2w[1,1]+λE3L2w[1,1]. (4.27)

    Using Eq. (4.26) in Eq. (4.27), we get

    R(x,y,t)L2w[1,1]CMpUHp+αw[1,1]+κ(2CMpUHp+2βw[1,1])+G(x,y,t)CMpUHpw[1,1]+λ(CMpUHpw[1,1])3,CMpUHp+αw[1,1]+κ(2CMpUHp+2βw[1,1])+G(x,y,t)CMpUHpw[1,1]+λCMp(UHpw[1,1])3,CMpUHp+αw[1,1]+κ(2CMpUHp+2βw[1,1])+G(x,y,t)CMpUHpw[1,1]+λCMp(UHpw[1,1])3. (4.28)

    Thus,

    R(x,y,t)L2w[1,1]CMp[UHp+αw[1,1]+κ(2UHp+2βw[1,1])+G(x,y,t)UHpw[1,1]+λ(UHpw[1,1])3]. (4.29)

    In this section, we present numerical results for two-dimensional time- and space-NFSE using the Chebyshev pseudospectral method. We give three examples in this section. To demonstrate the errors in pseudospectral approximation, we consider the errors in the L2 norms, defined by

    L2=UkU2

    where Uk and U are the modulus of pseudospectral approximation and modulus of analytical solution, respectively.

    Let us consider the time- and space- NFSE on an ellipse convex region Ω={(x,y)|x2a2+y2b21}

    iαUtα+κ{2βUx2β+2βUy2β}+G(x,y,t)U+λU2U=F(x,y,t),(x,y)Ω,t[0,T],

    with λ=κ=1, G(x,y,t)=t(x2a2+y2b21).

    The source term is

    F(x,y,t)=[it1αΓ(2α)2t2αΓ(3α)](x2a2+y2b21)2t+i(t2+1)2cos(βπ)[h(x,a)+h(y,b)]+[t+i(t2+1)]t(x2a2+y2b21)3+[t2+(t2+1)2][t+i(t2+1)](x2a2+y2b21)6.

    With s1(a)=Γ5a4Γ(52β), s2(a)=Γ4a4Γ(42β) and s3(a)=Γ3a4Γ(32β), the function h(x,a),h(y,b) can be given as

    h(x,a)=s1(a)[(xxL)42β+(xRx)42β]+4s2(a)[xL(xxL)32βxR(xRx)32β]+4s3(a)x2L(xxL)22β+4s3(a)x2R(xRx)22β.

    Initial condition

    U(x,y,0)=i(x2a2+y2b21)2,

    boundary conditions

    U(x,y,t)=0,(x,y)Ω,t[0,T],

    and the exact solution is

    U(x,y,t)=[t+i(t2+1)](x2a2+y2b21)2,

    where, xL=abb2y2,xR=abb2y2,yL=baa2x2, yR=baa2x2.

    In this example, numerical solutions of the proposed method have obtained over fractional-order derivative 0<α1 and 1/2<β1. The tabulated results of the proposed method with different fractional-order derivatives α and β are presented in Table 1. The numerical results of the proposed method achieved better accuracy as the number of grid points in both space and time axis is increased. Figure 1 has shown that surface plot of the proposed method at time T=1.0 with a=1/2,b=1/4,α=0.8 and β=0.85. Contour plot also has shown the physical behavior of the equation. Moreover, Figure 2 has also shown that surface plot of the proposed method at time T=1.0 with a=1,b=1,α=0.8 and β=0.85. The numerical results are more accurate and consistent with our theoretical results.

    Table 1.  Numerical solutions of proposed method with different α,β and grids points M for example 1.
    M α=0.2 α=0.4 α=0.6 α=0.8 α=1.0
    L2 L2 L2 L2 L2
    β=0.70
    16 4.5324e-03 2.6634e-03 5.7714e-03 4.3257e-03 7.5687e-05
    32 1.8317e-03 1.1843e-03 2.3455e-03 1.7289e-03 3.0442e-05
    64 8.3699e-04 4.9184e-04 1.1883e-03 7.9882e-04 1.3977e-05
    128 5.7443e-05 3.3756e-05 7.3146e-05 5.4823e-05 9.5925e-07
    256 1.1066e-05 6.5028e-06 1.4091e-05 1.0561e-05 1.8479e-07
    β=0.85
    16 9.5437e-03 8.6147e-03 6.3341e-03 6.1617e-03 5.4673e-05
    32 3.8385e-03 3.4649e-03 2.5476e-03 2.4783e-03 2.1990e-05
    64 1.7624e-04 1.5909e-04 1.1697e-04 1.1379e-04 1.0096e-06
    128 1.2096e-05 1.0918e-05 8.0278e-04 7.8093e-04 6.9292e-06
    256 2.3301e-05 2.1033e-05 1.5465e-05 1.5044e-05 1.3349e-07
    β=1.00
    16 4.9563e-04 3.8725e-04 4.2852e-04 5.8512e-04 8.2624e-05
    32 1.9934e-04 1.5575e-04 1.7235e-04 2.3534e-04 3.3232e-06
    64 9.1527e-04 7.1512e-04 7.9134e-04 1.0805e-04 1.5258e-06
    128 6.2815e-05 4.9080e-05 5.4310e-05 7.4157e-05 1.0472e-07
    256 1.2101e-06 9.4548e-06 1.0462e-06 1.4286e-06 2.0173e-08

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV
    Figure 1.  Numerical solutions of example 1 at time T=1.0 with a=1/2,b=1/4,α=0.8 and β=0.85.
    Figure 2.  Numerical solutions of example 1 at time T=1.0 with a=1,b=1,α=0.8 and β=0.85.

    In this example, let us consider the time- and space- NFSE on a rectangular region Ω=[0,1]×[0,1]

    iαUtα+κ{2βUx2β+2βUy2β}+G(x,y,t)U+λU2U=F(x,y,t),(x,y)Ω,t[0,T],

    with λ=κ=1, G(x,y,t)=txy(1x)(1y).

    The source term is

    F(x,y,t)=[i15t1αΓ(2α)30t1αΓ(2α)30t2αΓ(3α)]x2(1x)2y2(1y)2+3375[t2+(1+t)4][t+i(1+t)2]x6(1x)6y6(1y)6+15[t+i(1+t)2]tx3(1x)3y3(1y)315[t+i(1+t)2]y2(1y)2cos(βπ)[h1(x,β)+h2(x,β)]15[t+i(1+t)2]x2(1x)2cos(βπ)[h1(y,β)+h2(y,β)].

    where,

    h1(x,β)=x22βΓ(32β)[16x32β+12x2(32β)(34β)],h2(x,β)=(1x)22βΓ(32β)[16(1x)32β+12(1x)2(32β)(34β)].

    Initial condition

    U(x,y,0)=15ix2(1x)2y2(1y)2,

    boundary conditions

    U(x,y,t)=0,(x,y)Ω,t[0,T],

    and the exact solution is

    U(x,y,t)=15[t+i(1+t)2]x2(1x)2y2(1y)2.

    For computation purpose we have chosen space interval Ω=[0,1]2 with time T=1. Numerical solutions of the proposed method have been computed with different fractional-order derivative 0<α1 and 1/2<β1. Figure 3 has shown the numerical solution of the proposed method and the contour plot has shown the physical behaviour of the proposed method. In Table 2, the tabulated results of the proposed method with different fractional-order derivatives α and β are presented. The numerical results of the proposed method achieved better accuracy as the number of grid points in both space and time directions are increased. Moreover, it demonstrated that the numerical method is more efficient.

    Figure 3.  Numerical solutions of example 2 at time T=1.0 with α=0.8 and β=0.85.
    Table 2.  Numerical solutions of proposed method with different α,β and grids points M for example 2.
    M α=0.2 α=0.4 α=0.6 α=0.8 α=1.0
    L2 L2 L2 L2 L2
    β=0.70
    16 1.9236e-04 3.2736e-04 4.4412e-04 5.6202e-04 3.5931e-05
    32 7.7368e-04 1.3167e-04 1.7863e-04 2.2605e-04 1.4452e-05
    64 3.5523e-04 6.0453e-04 8.2014e-04 1.0379e-04 6.6353e-05
    128 2.4379e-05 4.1489e-05 5.6287e-05 7.1230e-05 4.5538e-06
    256 4.6965e-05 7.9926e-05 1.0843e-05 1.3722e-05 8.7727e-06
    β=0.85
    16 2.9351e-05 5.4325e-05 3.4143e-05 4.2313e-05 6.5295e-05
    32 1.1805e-05 2.1850e-05 3.4331e-06 4.2546e-06 6.5655e-06
    64 5.4202e-06 1.0032e-05 7.8814e-07 9.7673e-07 1.5072e-06
    128 3.7199e-07 6.8851e-07 1.0818e-07 1.3407e-07 2.0688e-07
    256 7.1661e-07 1.3264e-07 2.0840e-07 2.5827e-07 3.9855e-08
    β=1.00
    16 7.1124e-05 3.5341e-05 2.3774e-05 3.4571e-05 6.6325e-05
    32 5.1516e-06 3.5536e-06 2.3905e-06 3.4762e-06 6.6690e-06
    64 1.6418e-06 8.1579e-07 5.4878e-07 7.9802e-07 1.5310e-06
    128 2.2535e-07 1.1198e-07 7.5327e-08 1.0954e-07 2.1015e-08
    256 4.3413e-08 2.1572e-08 1.4511e-08 2.1102e-08 4.0484e-09

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this example, let us consider the time- NFSE with non-homogeneous boundary value

    iαtαU+0.52x2U+0.52y2UU2U=h(x,y,t),(x,y,t)[0,1]×[0,1]×[0,1], (5.1)

    where h(x,y,t)=t3α(6i(t6+1)Γ(4α)tα)(ei(x+y))Γ(4α),

    with initial condition:

    U(x,y,0)=0,(x,y)[0,1]×[0,1],

    and boundary conditions:

    U(0,y,t)=t3ei(y),U(1,y,t)=t3ei(1+y),t[0,1],(x,y)[0,1]×[0,1],U(x,0,t)=t3ei(x),U(x,1,t)=t3ei(x+1).

    The exact solution of this problem is

    U(x,y,t)=t3ei(x+y). (5.2)

    In this example, error norms for two dimensional nonlinear time fractional Schrodinger equation has been calculated with different values of grids point and different fractional order derivative 0<α1. In Table 3, it can be seen that the accuracy of the numerical results are increased along with the number of grid points and also achieved good order of accuracy. Further, proposed methods have avheived better accuracy as compared to [3] at α=0.50 with different grid points. Moreover, proposed method has obtained 14th order of accuracy.

    Table 3.  Numerical solutions of example 3 for different value of α and grids points M.
    M α=0.25 α=0.50 α=0.75 α=1.00 [3]α=0.50
    L2 L2 L2 L2 MAE
    04 1.8374e-05 2.4281e-05 4.2328e-05 7.6581e-06 1.55e-03
    06 2.1641e-07 1.8207e-07 3.3021e-07 3.2801e-08 3.58e-06
    08 1.2258e-09 3.2740e-09 1.5839e-09 1.4142e-10 4.38e-09
    10 8.9053e-12 3.6506e-12 1.0107e-13 9.7058e-14 1.08e-10

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In this work, we have discussed a highly accurate fully discrete time-space Chebyshev pseudospectral method for the two-dimensional time- and space-NFSE, defined on a convex and rectangular domain. The new fractional derivative matrix has been established using a modified Riemann-Liouville derivative formula at CGL points for a different order of fractional derivatives. We presented the error analysis without any dependency on time and space step restrictions of the schemes. The proposed method supports the theoretical results. To demonstrate the performance, the method has been employed on three different model problems on a convex and rectangular domain and obtained a good order of accuracy. Reported numerical results are highly accurate which shows the efficiency of the proposed method.

    The first author thankfully acknowledges to the Ministry of Human Resource Development, India, for providing financial support for this research.

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.



    [1] E. A. B. Abdel-Salam, E. A. Yousif, M. A. El-Aasser, Analytical solution of the space-time fractional nonlinear schrödinger equation, Rep. Math. Phys., 77 (2016), 19-34. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4877(16)30002-7
    [2] Z. Asgari, S. Hosseini, Efficient numerical schemes for the solution of generalized time fractional burgers type equations, Numer. Algorithms, 77 (2018), 763-792. doi: 10.1007/s11075-017-0339-4
    [3] A. Bhrawy, M. Abdelkawy, A fully spectral collocation approximation for multi-dimensional fractional schrödinger equations, J. Comput. Phys., 294 (2015), 462-483. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2015.03.063
    [4] A. Bhrawy, M. A. Zaky, Highly accurate numerical schemes for multi-dimensional space variable-order fractional schrödinger equations, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 1100-1117. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.11.019
    [5] J. P. Boyd. Chebyshev and Fourier Spectral Methods, Courier Corporation, 2001.
    [6] A. Chechkin, R. Gorenflo, I. Sokolov, Retarding subdiffusion and accelerating superdiffusion governed by distributed-order fractional diffusion equations, Phys. Rev. E, 66 (2002), 046129.
    [7] J. B. Chen, M. Z. Qin, Y. F. Tang, Symplectic and multi-symplectic methods for the nonlinear schrödinger equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 43 (2002), 1095-1106. doi: 10.1016/S0898-1221(02)80015-3
    [8] X. Cheng, J. Duan, D. Li, A novel compact adi scheme for two-dimensional riesz space fractional nonlinear reaction-diffusion equations, Appl. Math. Comput., 346 (2019), 452-464.
    [9] M. Dehghan, A. Taleei, A compact split-step finite difference method for solving the nonlinear schrödinger equations with constant and variable coefficients, Comput. Phys. Commun., 181 (2010), 43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.08.015
    [10] K. Diethelm, The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations: An Application-oriented Exposition Using Differential Operators of Caputo Type, Springer Science and Business Media, 2010.
    [11] J. Dong, Scattering problems in the fractional quantum mechanics governed by the 2d spacefractional schrödinger equation, J. Math. Phys., 55 (2014), 032102.
    [12] J. Dong, M. Xu, Some solutions to the space fractional schrödinger equation using momentum representation method, J. Math. Phys., 48 (2007), 072105.
    [13] W. Fan, F. Liu, A numerical method for solving the two-dimensional distributed order spacefractional diffusion equation on an irregular convex domain, Appl. Math. Lett., 77 (2018), 114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2017.10.005
    [14] W. Fan, H. Qi, An efficient finite element method for the two-dimensional nonlinear time-space fractional schrödinger equation on an irregular convex domain, Appl. Math. Lett., 86 (2018), 103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2018.06.028
    [15] B. Jin, B. Li, Z. Zhou, Subdiffusion with a time-dependent coefficient: Analysis and numerical solution, Math. Comput., 88 (2019), 2157-2186. doi: 10.1090/mcom/3413
    [16] G. Jumarie, An approach to differential geometry of fractional order via modified riemannliouville derivative, Acta Math. Sin., 28 (2012), 1741-1768. doi: 10.1007/s10114-012-0507-3
    [17] D. Li, J. Wang, J. Zhang, Unconditionally convergent l1-galerkin fems for nonlinear timefractional schrodinger equations, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 39 (2017), A3067-A3088.
    [18] D. Li, C. Wu, Z. Zhang, Linearized galerkin fems for nonlinear time fractional parabolic problems with non-smooth solutions in time direction, J. Sci Comput., 80 (2019), 403-419. doi: 10.1007/s10915-019-00943-0
    [19] L. Li, D. Li, Exact solutions and numerical study of time fractional burgers' equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 100 (2020), 106011.
    [20] M. Li, A high-order split-step finite difference method for the system of the space fractional cnls, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 134 (2019), 244.
    [21] M. Li, X. M. Gu, C. Huang, et al. A fast linearized conservative finite element method for the strongly coupled nonlinear fractional schrödinger equations, J. Comput. Phys., 358 (2018), 256-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.12.044
    [22] M. Li, C. Huang, W. Ming, A relaxation-type galerkin fem for nonlinear fractional schrödinger equations. Numer. Algorithms, 83 (2019), 99-124.
    [23] M. Li, C. Huang, P. Wang, Galerkin finite element method for nonlinear fractional schrödinger equations, Numer. Algorithms, 74 (2017), 499-525. doi: 10.1007/s11075-016-0160-5
    [24] M. Li, C. Huang, Z. Zhang, Unconditional error analysis of galerkin fems for nonlinear fractional schrödinger equation, Appl. Anal., 97 (2018), 295-315. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2016.1262947
    [25] M. Li, C. Huang, Y. Zhao, Fast conservative numerical algorithm for the coupled fractional kleingordon-schrödinger equation, Numer. Algorithms, 82 (2019), 1-39. doi: 10.1007/s11075-018-0591-2
    [26] M. Li, D. Shi, J. Wang, et al. Unconditional superconvergence analysis of the conservative linearized galerkin fems for nonlinear klein-gordon-schrödinger equation, Appl. Numer. Math., 142 (2019), 47-63. doi: 10.1016/j.apnum.2019.02.004
    [27] Y. Lin, C. Xu, Finite difference/spectral approximations for the time-fractional diffusion equation, J. Comput. Phys., 225 (2007), 1533-1552. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.02.001
    [28] Y. F. Luchko, M. Rivero, J. J. Trujillo, et al. Fractional models, non-locality, and complex systems, Comput. Math. Appl., 59 (2010), 1048-1056. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2009.05.018
    [29] J. T. Machado, V. Kiryakova, F. Mainardi, Recent history of fractional calculus, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 16 (2011), 1140-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.05.027
    [30] Z. Mao, G. E. Karniadakis, Fractional burgers equation with nonlinear non-locality: Spectral vanishing viscosity and local discontinuous galerkin methods, J. Comput. Phys., 336 (2017), 143-163. doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2017.01.048
    [31] A. K. Mittal, A stable time-space Jacobi pseudospectral method for two-dimensional sine-Gordon equation, J. Appl. Math. Comput., 63 (2020), 1-26.
    [32] A. K. Mittal, L. K. Balyan, A highly accurate time-space pseudospectral approximation and stability analysis of two dimensional brusselator model for chemical systems, Int. J. Appl. Comput. Math., 5 (2019), 140.
    [33] A. Mohebbi, Analysis of a numerical method for the solution of time fractional burgers equation, B. Iran. Math. Soc., 44 (2018), 457-480. doi: 10.1007/s41980-018-0031-z
    [34] A. Mohebbi, M. Dehghan, The use of compact boundary value method for the solution of twodimensional schrödinger equation, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 225 (2009), 124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2008.07.008
    [35] K. Oldham, J. Spanier, The Fractional Calculus Theory and Applications of Differentiation and Integration to Arbitrary Order, Elsevier, 1974.
    [36] B. Ross, The development of fractional calculus, Hist. Math., 4 (1977), 75-89. doi: 10.1016/0315-0860(77)90039-8
    [37] H. Rudolf, Applications of Fractional Calculus in Physics, World Scientific, 2000.
    [38] L. N. Trefethen, Finite Difference and Spectral Methods for Ordinary and Partial Differential Equations, 1996.
    [39] L. Wei, Y. He, X. Zhang, et al. Analysis of an implicit fully discrete local discontinuous galerkin method for the time-fractional schrödinger equation, Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 59 (2012), 28-34. doi: 10.1016/j.finel.2012.03.008
    [40] E. Yousif, E. B. Abdel-Salam, M. El-Aasser, On the solution of the space-time fractional cubic nonlinear schrödinger equation, Results Phys., 8 (2018),702-708. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2017.12.065
    [41] F. Zeng, C. Li, F. Liu, et al. The use of finite difference/element approaches for solving the timefractional subdiffusion equation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 35 (2013), A2976-A3000.
    [42] G. Zhang, C. Huang, M. Li, A mass-energy preserving galerkin fem for the coupled nonlinear fractional schrödinger equations, Eur. Phys. J. Plus, 133 (2018), 155.
    [43] H. Zhang, X. Jiang, C. Wang, et al. Galerkin-legendre spectral schemes for nonlinear space fractional schrödinger equation, Numer. Algorithms, 79 (2018), 337-356. doi: 10.1007/s11075-017-0439-1
    [44] X. Zhao, Z. Z. Sun, Z. P. Hao, A fourth-order compact adi scheme for two-dimensional nonlinear space fractional schrodinger equation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 36 (2014), A2865-A2886.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Avinash K. Mittal, Lokendra K. Balyan, Numerical solutions and stability analysis for solitary waves of complex modified Korteweg–de Vries equation using Chebyshev pseudospectral methods, 2020, 36, 0749-159X, 1662, 10.1002/num.22497
    2. Avinash K. Mittal, Parnika Shrivastava, Manoj K. Panda, Time–space Jacobi pseudospectral simulation of multidimensional Schrödinger equation, 2021, 37, 0749-159X, 1725, 10.1002/num.22605
    3. Avinash K. Mittal, Lokendra K. Balyan, Manoj K. Panda, Parnika Shrivastava, Harvindra Singh, Pseudospectral analysis and approximation of two‐dimensional fractional cable equation, 2021, 0170-4214, 10.1002/mma.7362
    4. M. T. Darvishi, Mohammad Najafi, Lanre Akinyemi, Hadi Rezazadeh, Gaussons of some new nonlinear logarithmic equations, 2023, 32, 0218-8635, 10.1142/S0218863523500133
    5. A. K. Mittal, A spectrally accurate time–space pseudospectral method for reaction–diffusion Malaria infection model, 2022, 41, 2238-3603, 10.1007/s40314-022-02094-9
    6. Waleed Mohamed Abd-Elhameed, Amr Kamel Amin, New Formulas and Connections Involving Euler Polynomials, 2022, 11, 2075-1680, 743, 10.3390/axioms11120743
    7. A. K. Mittal, L. K. Balyan, K. K. Sharma, A spectrally accurate time ‐ space pseudospectral method for viscous Burgers' equation, 2023, 0749-159X, 10.1002/num.23011
    8. A. K. Mittal, Pseudospectral quadrature simulation technique for spatio-temporally parabolic multi-dimensional nonlinear fractional evolution equation, 2024, 32, 0971-3611, 2647, 10.1007/s41478-024-00750-3
    9. A. K. Mittal, Two-dimensional Jacobi pseudospectral quadrature solutions of two-dimensional fractional Volterra integral equations, 2023, 60, 0008-0624, 10.1007/s10092-023-00545-1
    10. A.K. Mittal, A space-time pseudospectral method for solving multi-dimensional quasi-linear parabolic partial differential (Burgers') equations, 2024, 195, 01689274, 39, 10.1016/j.apnum.2023.09.005
    11. Fahir Talay Akyildiz, Kuppalapalle Vajravelu, Cemil Tunç, John Abraham, Chebyshev delta shaped and Chebyshev pseudo-spectral methods for solutions of differential equations, 2025, 236, 03784754, 52, 10.1016/j.matcom.2025.03.034
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(4197) PDF downloads(509) Cited by(11)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog