Citation: Yong X. Chen, Brian Cain, Pranav Soman. Gelatin methacrylate-alginate hydrogel with tunable viscoelastic properties[J]. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(2): 363-369. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.2.363
[1] | Kyohei Fujita, Zhonggang Feng, Daisuke Sato, Tadashi Kosawada, Takao Nakamura, Yasuyuki Shiraishi, Mitsuo Umezu . Modulation of the mechanical properties of ventricular extracellular matrix hydrogels with a carbodiimide crosslinker and investigation of their cellular compatibility. AIMS Materials Science, 2018, 5(1): 54-74. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2018.1.54 |
[2] | Mercy Ogbonnaya, Abimbola P.I Popoola . Potential of mucilage-based hydrogel for passive cooling technology: Mucilage extraction techniques and elucidation of thermal, mechanical and physiochemical properties of mucilage-based hydrogel. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(6): 1045-1076. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023056 |
[3] | Vincenzo Guarino, Tania Caputo, Rosaria Altobelli, Luigi Ambrosio . Degradation properties and metabolic activity of alginate and chitosan polyelectrolytes for drug delivery and tissue engineering applications. AIMS Materials Science, 2015, 2(4): 497-502. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2015.4.497 |
[4] | Connor Castro, Zachary R. Brown, Erik Brewer . Self-healing properties of augmented injectable hydrogels over time. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(2): 301-312. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023016 |
[5] | Mona Mohsen, Ehsan Gomaa, Nabila Ahmed Mazaid, Reem Mohammed . Synthesis and characterization of organic montmorillonite-polyvinyl alcohol-co-polyacrylic nanocomposite hydrogel for heavy metal uptake in water. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(5): 1122-1139. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.5.1122 |
[6] | Zhonggang Feng, Tadashi Kosawada, Takao Nakamura, Daisuke Sato, Tatsuo Kitajima, Mitsuo Umezu . Theoretical methods and models for mechanical properties of soft biomaterials. AIMS Materials Science, 2017, 4(3): 680-705. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2017.3.680 |
[7] | Murat Ozdemir, Selda Oterkus, Erkan Oterkus, Islam Amin, Abdel-Hameed El-Aassar, Hosam Shawky . Mechanical analyses of flat sheet water treatment membranes. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(6): 863-883. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022052 |
[8] | Zhenguo Yu, Dong Wang, Zhentan Lu . Nanocomposite hydrogel fibers in the field of diagnosis and treatment. AIMS Materials Science, 2023, 10(6): 1004-1033. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2023054 |
[9] | Rémi G. Tilkin, Ana P. F. Monteiro, Julien G. Mahy, Jérome Hurlet, Nicolas Régibeau, Christian Grandfils, Stéphanie D. Lambert . Hybrid agarose gel for bone substitutes. AIMS Materials Science, 2022, 9(3): 430-445. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2022025 |
[10] | Alaa. K. Khamis, Allal Bakali, A. A. El-Bary, Haitham. M. Atef . The effect of modified Ohm’s and Fourier’s laws in generalized magneto-thermo viscoelastic spherical region. AIMS Materials Science, 2020, 7(4): 381-398. doi: 10.3934/matersci.2020.4.381 |
Living cells are inherently dynamic and continuously adapt and remodel their extracellular matrix (ECM) [1]. Since these cell-ECM interactions play a critical role in several biological processes, several biomaterials have been used to mimic the unique properties of native ECM. For the past two decades, synthetic hydrogel biomaterials have emerged as the ideal biomaterial to investigate cell-ECM interaction as it closely resembles the mechanical properties of native ECM as well as its hydrated state facilitates diffusion of essential nutrients [2,3,4]. Synthetic hydrogels such as polyethylene glycol have therefore, been used to answer basic biologic questions about how cells respond to changes in their environment. However, most synthetic hydrogels exhibit linear elasticity which is in contrast to physiological ECM which demonstrates viscoelastic behavior [5,6]. Since natural proteins such as collagen, fibrin, andvarious tissues exhibit stress relaxation and elastic recovery upon application of strain, new hydrogels with tunable viscoelastic properties continue to be developed [7,8,9,10]. For instance, polyampholytes polymers use a combination of strong permanent crosslinks and weak bonds that could reversibly break and re-form, to generate a viscoelastic response [11]. Hyaluronic acid based dual-crosslinking viscoelastic hydrogels have also been demonstrated to improve outcomes of a myocardial infarct in vivo model [12]. Hydrogels exhibiting tunable rates of stress relaxation have also been demonstrate enhanced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells [13]. Natural viscoelastic hydrogels have also been prepared by physically mixing collagen protein and alginate; adding or removing divalent ions have been used to reversibly modify its mechanical properties [14,15,16]. In this work, we present the synthesis and mechanical characterization of a gelatin methacrylate-alginate (Gel-Alg) composite hydrogel, and demonstrate the dynamic control over its viscoelastic property by adding or chelating calcium ions.
GelMA was synthesized using an established protocol [17,18,19,20]. Briefly porcine skin gelatin (Sigma Aldrich) mixed at 10% (w/v) in PBS was added to methacrylic anhydride and dialyzed against distilled water (12-14 kDa cutoff dialysis tubing) for one week at 40 °C to remove the un-reacted groups from the solution. The addition of methacrylamide moieties to the side groups of natural gelatin enables crosslinking via ultraviolet (UV) light. The dialyzed GelMA solution was subsequently lyophilized in a freeze dryer (Labconco) for 1 week. The degree of methacrylation of GelMA was determinedto be 70% [21]. Gel-Alg solution was prepared by first, preparing 10% (w/v) GelMA solution, using deionized water mixed with 0.5% of Irgacure 2595 photoinitiator, and subsequently mixing alginate (5%, w/v) (Sigma Aldrich) in GelMA solution in varying amounts (0, 20, 35 or 50% (v/v)). Gel-Alg solution was pipetted in a Teflon mold between two glass plates, and was exposed to UV light (OmniCure Series 2000 S2000-XLA) with an intensity of 30 W/cm2 and an exposure time of 10 min to obtain a disc-shaped sample (diameter 5 mm, thickness 3 mm). Ionic crosslinking of the alginate component was performed by immersing the samples in 50 mM solution of calcium chloride for 30 min, followed by immersion in DI water for 2 hours to wash away unbound calcium ions. Ionic de-crosslinking was performed by immersing the samples in a 100 mM sodium citrate dihydrate chelator solution, followed by immersion in DI water. All samples were immersed in DI water at 25 °C for 24 hrs before testing their viscoelastic properties.
A Q800 Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) was used to test the mechanical properties of Gel-Alg samples. Test samples were placed in the compression clamp of the DMA. A preload force of 10 mN and initial displacement 10 µm was used to obtain a stress-strain plot, and the modulus was determined by calculating the slope from 0 to 5% strain. DMA was also used to perform creep tests (preload of 10 mN, stress of 1 kPa) with force-application and recovery duration of 5 min each. Viscoelastic strain (%) and elastic recovery (%) were calculated from this data (Figure 1A).
Creep tests were performed on pure GelMA and GelMA-Alginate composite (2% and 5% alginate was used to make a 50/50 Gel-Alg) under 1 kPa stress. Pure GelMA demonstrates 0.49% viscoelastic strain after 5 min of loading, while addition of alginate exhibits a “fluid” like behavior with increased viscoelastic stain (6.9% and 10%) with increased amount of alginate (2% and 5%). Gel-Alg composite with 5% alginate was used to evaluate the effect of varying the volume (%) of GelMA in the composite. Creep behavior was characterized for four ratios of GelMA: Alginate (50:50, 75:35, 80:20 and 100:0) (Figure 1C). The viscoelastic strain of Gel-Alg composite decreases with decreasing amounts of alginate, with the 50:50 ratio exhibiting the highest (7.33%) values of viscoelastic strain. As depicted in Figure 2A, CaCl2 solution was used to ionically crosslink the alginate component of the UV-crosslinked composite. An increase in the concentration of Ca2+ results in minimal change in the viscoelastic strain values, but leads to a large change in the elastic recovery values. The elastic recovery (%) jumps from 1.2% to 13% with the addition of 100 mmol CaCl2 solution (Figure 2B). This composite (50:50 Gel-Alg; 5% (w/v) alginate; 50 mmol CaCl2) was chosen to evaluate the dynamic response of the elastic recovery using addition and removal of calcium ions.
Gel-Alg composites were evaluated for their reversible viscoelastic properties using two case studies, with Case 1 starting from the ionically crosslinked state, while Case 2 begins with samples in their ionically un-crosslinked state. Please note that the GelMA component for both cases is crosslinked using UV light, as described in the Methods section. In Case 1, crosslinked samples (using 50 mmol CaCl2) were de-crosslinked using a chelator solution (100 mM sodium citrate), and re-crosslinked using a 50 mmol CaCl2 solution. Creep tests were performed during each stage and initial loading strain, viscoelastic recovery strain, and elastic recovery were obtained (Figure 2C). As expected, the elastic recovery increases from 14.7% to 19.5% after removal of Ca2+ ions, and returns back to a lower value of 13.6% when ions are added back again. In Case 2, un-crosslinked samples were crosslinked using CaCl2 solution, and returns de-crosslinked by using sodium citrate solution. The values of crosslinked and re-crosslinked states are close to each other (Figure 3), but not identical due to sample-to-sample experimental variation. As expected, the elastic recovery decreases from 21.8% to 16.8% after the introduction of Ca2+ ions, and return back to a higher value of 20.4% when Ca2+ ions are chelated. The compressive modulus of crosslinked and de-crosslinked samples were also characterized (Figure 3). The modulus switches from lower values (1.02 kPa and 1.67 kPa) to a higher values (3.56 kPa and 3.44 kPa), when samples are switched between the uncrosslinked and crosslinked states.
Purely covalently UV-crosslinked GelMA results in a predominantly elastic material, however addition of alginate within GelMA exhibits varying degrees of viscoelasticity depending upon the amount of alginate in the composite. In Gel-Alg, GelMA acts as a stable structural element while alginate acts as the dynamic modifiable element controlled by ionic non-covalent bonding in the presence of calcium divalent ions. Instead of collagen, we choose GelMA, a denatured derivative of collagen, because GelMA possesses acrylate groups, which allow UV-enabled crosslinking of irreversible bonds to ensure the overall structural integrity of the composite samples. In Gel-Alg, the re-crosslinked states exhibit similar viscoelastic properties to the crosslinked state, confirming that crosslinking is reversible and this process is capable of dynamically controlling the elastic recovery. Lastly, crosslinked and re-crosslinked Gel-Alg samples also demonstrate an increase in compression modulus, indicating a change in the elastic property with ionic crosslinking. Taken together, this work reports an easy-to-use method to dynamically and reversibly control the viscoelastic strain and elastic recovery responses ofan ECM-mimicking hydrogel.
In this work, we present the synthesis and mechanical characterization of a gelatin methacrylate-alginate (Gel-Alg) composite hydrogel, which has the capability of dynamically modulating the viscoelastic properties by simply adding or chelating calcium ions. This work could potentially guide the development of new hydrogels that could mimic the unique viscoelastic properties of native extracellular matrix.
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (CMMI 1634997 and 1547095)
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this manuscript.
[1] |
Tayalia P, Mendonca CR, Baldacchini T, et al. (2008) 3D Cell-Migration Studies using Two-Photon Engineered Polymer Scaffolds. Adv Mater 20: 4494–4498. doi: 10.1002/adma.200801319
![]() |
[2] |
Annabi N, Tamayol A, Uquillas JA, et al. (2014) 25th anniversary article: rational design and applications of hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv Mater 26: 85–124. doi: 10.1002/adma.201303233
![]() |
[3] |
Lee KY, Mooney DJ (2001) Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 101: 1869–1880. doi: 10.1021/cr000108x
![]() |
[4] |
Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS (2009) Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 103: 655–663. doi: 10.1002/bit.22361
![]() |
[5] |
Storm C, Pastore JJ, MacKintosh FC, et al. (2005) Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature 435: 191–194. doi: 10.1038/nature03521
![]() |
[6] |
Wen Q, Janmey PA (2013) Effects of nonlinearity on cell-ECM interactions. Exp Cell Res 319: 2481–2489. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.05.017
![]() |
[7] |
Burdick JA, Murphy WL (2012) Moving from static to dynamic complexity in hydrogel design. Nat Commun 3: 1269. doi: 10.1038/ncomms2271
![]() |
[8] |
McKinnon DD, Domaille DW, Cha JN, et al. (2014) Biophysically defined and cytocompatible covalently adaptable networks as viscoelastic 3D cell culture systems. Adv Mater 26: 865–872. doi: 10.1002/adma.201303680
![]() |
[9] |
Hong X, Stegemann JP, Deng CX (2016) Microscale characterization of the viscoelastic properties of hydrogel biomaterials using dual-mode ultrasound elastography. Biomaterials 88: 12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.02.019
![]() |
[10] |
Wang H, Heilshorn SC (2015) Adaptable hydrogel networks with reversible linkages for tissue engineering. Adv Mater 27: 3717–3736. doi: 10.1002/adma.201501558
![]() |
[11] | Sun TL, Kurokawa T, Kuroda S, et al. (2013) Physical hydrogels composed of polyampholytes demonstrate high toughness and viscoelasticity. Nat Mater 12: 932–937. |
[12] |
Rodell CB, MacArthur JW, Dorsey SM, et al. (2015) Shear-Thinning Supramolecular Hydrogels with Secondary Autonomous Covalent Crosslinking to Modulate Viscoelastic Properties In Vivo. Adv Funct Mater 25: 636–644. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201403550
![]() |
[13] | Chaudhuri O, Gu L, Klumpers D, et al. (2016) Hydrogels with tunable stress relaxation regulate stem cell fate and activity. Nat Mater 15: 326–334. |
[14] |
Gillette BM, Jensen JA, Wang M, et al. (2010) Dynamic Hydrogels: Switching of 3D Microenvironments Using Two-Component Naturally Derived Extracellular Matrices. Adv Mater 22: 686–691. doi: 10.1002/adma.200902265
![]() |
[15] |
Park H, Kang SW, Kim BS, et al. (2009) Shear-reversibly crosslinked alginate hydrogels for tissue engineering. Macromol Biosci 9: 895–901. doi: 10.1002/mabi.200800376
![]() |
[16] | Stowers RS, Allen SC, Suggs LJ (2015) Dynamic phototuning of 3D hydrogel stiffness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112: 1953–1958. |
[17] |
Gonen-Wadmany M, Oss-Ronen L, Seliktar D (2007) Protein-polymer conjugates for forming photopolymerizable biomimetic hydrogels for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 28: 3876–3886. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.005
![]() |
[18] |
Nichol JW, Koshy ST, Bae H, et al. (2010) Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 31: 5536–5544. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.03.064
![]() |
[19] |
Soman P, Chung PH, Zhang AP, et al. (2013) Digital microfabrication of user-defined 3D microstructures in cell-laden hydrogels. Biotechnol Bioeng 110: 3038–3047. doi: 10.1002/bit.24957
![]() |
[20] |
Fairbanks BD, Singh SP, Bowman CN, et al. (2011) Photodegradable, photoadaptable hydrogels via radical-mediated disulfide fragmentation reaction. Macromolecules 44: 2444–2450. doi: 10.1021/ma200202w
![]() |
[21] |
Chen YX, Yang S, Yan J, et al. (2015) A Novel Suspended Hydrogel Membrane Platform for Cell Culture. J Nanotechnol Eng Med 6: 021002. doi: 10.1115/1.4031231
![]() |
1. | Stephen W Sawyer, Shivkumar Vishnempet Shridhar, Kairui Zhang, Lucas D Albrecht, Alex B Filip, Jason A Horton, Pranav Soman, Perfusion directed 3D mineral formation within cell-laden hydrogels, 2018, 10, 1758-5090, 035013, 10.1088/1758-5090/aacb42 | |
2. | Sanika Suvarnapathaki, Rafael Ramos, Stephen W. Sawyer, Shannon McLoughlin, Andrew Ramos, Sarah Venn, Pranav Soman, Generation of cell-laden hydrogel microspheres using 3D printing-enabled microfluidics, 2018, 33, 0884-2914, 2012, 10.1557/jmr.2018.77 | |
3. | Jin Liu, Tatsuaki Tagami, Tetsuya Ozeki, Fabrication of 3D-Printed Fish-Gelatin-Based Polymer Hydrogel Patches for Local Delivery of PEGylated Liposomal Doxorubicin, 2020, 18, 1660-3397, 325, 10.3390/md18060325 | |
4. | Arezoo Dadashzadeh, Rana Imani, Saeid Moghassemi, Kobra Omidfar, Nabiollah Abolfathi, Study of hybrid alginate/gelatin hydrogel-incorporated niosomal Aloe vera capable of sustained release of Aloe vera as potential skin wound dressing, 2020, 77, 0170-0839, 387, 10.1007/s00289-019-02753-8 | |
5. | Greeshma Ratheesh, Cedryck Vaquette, Yin Xiao, Patient‐Specific Bone Particles Bioprinting for Bone Tissue Engineering, 2020, 9, 2192-2640, 2001323, 10.1002/adhm.202001323 | |
6. | Iman Akbarzadeh, Mona Shayan, Mahsa Bourbour, Maryam Moghtaderi, Hassan Noorbazargan, Faten Eshrati Yeganeh, Samaneh Saffar, Mohammadreza Tahriri, Preparation, Optimization and In-Vitro Evaluation of Curcumin-Loaded Niosome@calcium Alginate Nanocarrier as a New Approach for Breast Cancer Treatment, 2021, 10, 2079-7737, 173, 10.3390/biology10030173 | |
7. | Ninna S. Rossen, Priya N. Anandakumaran, Rafael zur Nieden, Kahmun Lo, Wenjie Luo, Christian Park, Chuqiao Huyan, Qinyouen Fu, Ziwei Song, Rajinder P. Singh-Moon, Janice Chung, Jennifer E. Goldenberg, Nirali Sampat, Tetsuhiro Harimoto, Danielle R. Bajakian, Brian M. Gillette, Samuel K. Sia, Injectable Therapeutic Organoids Using Sacrificial Hydrogels, 2020, 23, 25890042, 101052, 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101052 | |
8. | Andrea García-Lizarribar, Xiomara Fernández-Garibay, Ferran Velasco-Mallorquí, Albert G. Castaño, Josep Samitier, Javier Ramon-Azcon, Composite Biomaterials as Long-Lasting Scaffolds for 3D Bioprinting of Highly Aligned Muscle Tissue, 2018, 18, 16165187, 1800167, 10.1002/mabi.201800167 | |
9. | Zheng Xiong, Haiyan Li, Puskal Kunwar, Yin Zhu, Rafael Ramos, Shannon Mcloughlin, Tackla Winston, Zhen Ma, Pranav Soman, Femtosecond laser induced densification within cell-laden hydrogels results in cellular alignment, 2019, 11, 1758-5090, 035005, 10.1088/1758-5090/ab0f8b | |
10. | Mehdi Khanmohammadi, Shinji Sakai, Masahito Taya, Characterization of encapsulated cells within hyaluronic acid and alginate microcapsules produced via horseradish peroxidase-catalyzed crosslinking, 2019, 30, 0920-5063, 295, 10.1080/09205063.2018.1562637 | |
11. | Alexandra I. Cernencu, Adriana Lungu, Diana M. Dragusin, Izabela C. Stancu, Sorina Dinescu, Liliana R. Balahura, Paul Mereuta, Marieta Costache, Horia Iovu, 3D Bioprinting of Biosynthetic Nanocellulose-Filled GelMA Inks Highly Reliable for Soft Tissue-Oriented Constructs, 2021, 14, 1996-1944, 4891, 10.3390/ma14174891 | |
12. | Jiannan Li, Seyedsina Moeinzadeh, Carolyn Kim, Chi-Chun Pan, George Weale, Sungwoo Kim, Geoffrey Abrams, Aaron W. James, HyeRan Choo, Charles Chan, Yunzhi Peter Yang, Development and systematic characterization of GelMA/alginate/PEGDMA/xanthan gum hydrogel bioink system for extrusion bioprinting, 2023, 293, 01429612, 121969, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121969 | |
13. | Allison N. Ramey-Ward, Yixiao Dong, Jin Yang, Hiroaki Ogasawara, Elizabeth C. Bremer-Sai, Olga Brazhkina, Christian Franck, Michael Davis, Khalid Salaita, Optomechanically Actuated Hydrogel Platform for Cell Stimulation with Spatial and Temporal Resolution, 2023, 2373-9878, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.3c00516 | |
14. | Andrea Marfoglia, Fahd Tibourtine, Ludovic Pilloux, Sophie Cazalbou, Tunable Double-Network GelMA/Alginate Hydrogels for Platelet Lysate-Derived Protein Delivery, 2023, 10, 2306-5354, 1044, 10.3390/bioengineering10091044 | |
15. | Mohamad Orabi, Joe F. Lo, Emerging Advances in Microfluidic Hydrogel Droplets for Tissue Engineering and STEM Cell Mechanobiology, 2023, 9, 2310-2861, 790, 10.3390/gels9100790 | |
16. | Gulistan Tansik, Ryan Stowers, Viscoelastic and phototunable GelMA-alginate hydrogels for 3D cell culture, 2024, 2059-8521, 10.1557/s43580-024-00815-2 | |
17. | Mahshid Hafezi, Saied Nouri Khorasani, Shahla Khalili, Mehdi Sattari-Najafabadi, Mahsa Najarzadegan, Rasoul Esmaeely Neisiany, Shear thinning and self-healing behavior of an IPN nanocomposite based on gelatin methacryloyl/alginate/nano-clay for cartilage tissue engineering application, 2025, 226, 00143057, 113761, 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2025.113761 |