Review Special Issues

Organic amendments for soil restoration in arid and semiarid areas: a review

  • Received: 10 May 2017 Accepted: 25 August 2017 Published: 24 October 2017
  • The use of organic amendments produced from organic waste has been widely studied. Not much is known, however, about the use of such amendments for restoring abandoned or degraded soils in arid and semiarid areas that could serve as good carbon sinks. Such soils have scarce vegetation and organic matter but contain a variety of microorganisms adapted to different types of stress. The characteristics of “organic amendments” depend on their origin (urban: domestic organic waste and sludges from urban wastewater treatments; other: animal (manure), agricultural or agroindustrial) and determine in part their potential positive or negative effects on the soils they are applied to. The way amendments have been treated (e.g., composting) also determines how they will behave in the soil. This review covers the last 15 years of published research concerning the use of organic amendments on degraded soils in arid and semiarid environments for restoration purposes.

    Citation: Carlos Garcia, Teresa Hernandez, Maria D Coll, Sara Ondoño. Organic amendments for soil restoration in arid and semiarid areas: a review[J]. AIMS Environmental Science, 2017, 4(5): 640-676. doi: 10.3934/environsci.2017.5.640

    Related Papers:

    [1] Chris Cadonic, Benedict C. Albensi . Oscillations and NMDA Receptors: Their Interplay Create Memories. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(1): 52-64. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.52
    [2] Robert A. Moss . A Theory on the Singular Function of the Hippocampus: Facilitating the Binding of New Circuits of Cortical Columns. AIMS Neuroscience, 2016, 3(3): 264-305. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2016.3.264
    [3] Suresh D Muthukumaraswamy . Introduction to AIMS Special Issue “How do Gamma Frequency Oscillations and NMDA Receptors Contribute to Normal and Dysfunctional Cognitive Performance”. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(2): 183-184. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.2.183
    [4] Ziphozethu Ndlazi, Oualid Abboussi, Musa Mabandla, Willie Daniels . Memantine increases NMDA receptor level in the prefrontal cortex but fails to reverse apomorphine-induced conditioned place preference in rats. AIMS Neuroscience, 2018, 5(4): 211-220. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2018.4.211
    [5] mgr Natalia Białoń, dr hab. n. o zdr. Dariusz Górka, mgr Mikołaj Górka . The brain-gut axis: communication mechanisms and the role of the microbiome as a neuroprotective factor in the development of neurodegenerative diseases: A literature overview. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(3): 289-311. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024019
    [6] O. J. Onaolapo, A. Y. Onaolapo . The 21st Century Cerebellum: An Evolution of Cognitive Functions, Connections, Disorders, and Pharmacotherapeutic Modulation. AIMS Neuroscience, 2017, 4(4): 189-222. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2017.4.189
    [7] Dimitris Pinotsis, Karl Friston . Gamma Oscillations and Neural Field DCMs Can Reveal Cortical Excitability and Microstructure. AIMS Neuroscience, 2014, 1(1): 18-38. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.1.18
    [8] Zarina Greenberg, Hayley Ramshaw, Quenten Schwarz . Time Windows of Interneuron Development: Implications to Our Understanding of the Aetiology and Treatment of Schizophrenia. AIMS Neuroscience, 2015, 2(4): 294-321. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2015.4.294
    [9] Ubaid Ansari, Vincent Chen, Romteen Sedighi, Burhaan Syed, Zohaer Muttalib, Khadija Ansari, Fatima Ansari, Denise Nadora, Daniel Razick, Forshing Lui . Role of the UNC13 family in human diseases: A literature review. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(4): 388-400. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023029
    [10] Fabrizio Turiaco, Fiammetta Iannuzzo, Giovanni Genovese, Clara Lombardo, Maria Catena Silvestri, Laura Celebre, Maria Rosaria Anna Muscatello, Antonio Bruno . Cognitive effects of brief and intensive neurofeedback treatment in schizophrenia: a single center pilot study. AIMS Neuroscience, 2024, 11(3): 341-351. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2024021
  • The use of organic amendments produced from organic waste has been widely studied. Not much is known, however, about the use of such amendments for restoring abandoned or degraded soils in arid and semiarid areas that could serve as good carbon sinks. Such soils have scarce vegetation and organic matter but contain a variety of microorganisms adapted to different types of stress. The characteristics of “organic amendments” depend on their origin (urban: domestic organic waste and sludges from urban wastewater treatments; other: animal (manure), agricultural or agroindustrial) and determine in part their potential positive or negative effects on the soils they are applied to. The way amendments have been treated (e.g., composting) also determines how they will behave in the soil. This review covers the last 15 years of published research concerning the use of organic amendments on degraded soils in arid and semiarid environments for restoration purposes.


    Abbreviations

    AMPAR α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor

    Bit binary unit

    BOLD blood oxygenation level-dependent

    CaMKII calcium-calmodulin kinase II-alpha

    EGO early gamma oscillation

    FS fast spiking

    fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging

    GABA gamma-aminobutyric acid

    IPSCs inhibitory postsynaptic currents

    ING interneuron gamma

    LFP local field potential

    MC Matinotti cell

    NGC neurogliaform cell

    NMDAR N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor

    PV parvalbumin-expressing

    PC pyramidal cell

    PING pyramidal interneuron gamma

    RS regular spiking

    SBC single-bouquet cells

    SOM somatostatin-expressing

    SRR synaptic reentry reinforcement

    VIP vasoactive intestinal polypeptide-expressing

    1. Introduction

    Since gamma-band synchronization was observed in the primary visual cortex neurons of cats in response to moving light bars in 1989 [1], there has been extensive research into the role that such synchronization plays in neural processing. Not only has gamma synchronization been reported to occur in a functional column, it is also observed that neurons in spatially separate columns can synchronize their oscillatory responses [1,2,3]. These findings led to the hypothesis that synchronization of oscillatory responses may have a general function in cortical processing as a powerful mechanism to establish assemblies of cells with coherent phase and frequency oscillations [1].

    Singer [4] reviewed the neural synchrony literature and hypothesized that neural networks encode information about the association of responses using both conjunction-specific neurons and by temporal coordination of distributed responses. By adjusting the temporal relations among distributed neuron discharges, represented information can be selected with high temporal resolution for further joint processing. This mechanism was seen as a way to establish temporary bonds in a highly dynamic and flexible way. Fries [5] subsequently expanded upon this “binding-by-synchronization” hypothesis by suggesting an interaction between gamma-band synchronized networks and the influence of low-frequency rhythm. Within this framework, there is selection of only one segment of input at a given moment, with the remaining input being sampled segmentally at a low frequency rhythm.

    There have been criticisms of the binding-by-synchrony hypothesis. Ray and Maunsell [6] evaluated the effect of stimulus contrast on gamma frequency in the V1 cortex of macaques, concluding gamma rhythm was not likely involved with binding or communication. Similar conclusions were reached by examining gamma power and peak frequency or strength of spiking activity in macaque V1 [7]. Moreover, Burns et al. [8] found no evidence that V1 local field potential (LFP) contains any clock-like gamma-band signals. Reviewing these and other findings, Merker [9] concluded that there are no compelling reasons to accept any functional role for gamma-band synchrony beyond its more generic function at the level of infrastructural neural control. However, the exact neuronal infrastructure that may be controlled has not been elaborated. If the infrastructure is identified, it seems reasonable that there can be an alternative view of the binding-by-synchrony hypothesis.

    Some studies have noted that the synchrony occurs within cortical columns [3,10], but there has not been a detailed discussion of the manner in which cortical columns may be involved. Mountcastle [11] was the first to theorize that the vertical grouping of cells across all cellular layers in the somatosensory cortex is an elementary unit. He named this unit a “column.” He later proposed that the column is formed by many “minicolumns” via horizontal connections [12]. Despite its endurance as a fundamental principle of cortical organization, Horton and Adams [13] reviewed 50 years of research on the cortical column and concluded that extensive research has failed to provide a comprehensive explanation of exactly how this functional unit is involved in information processing and memory storage. They noted the variability of definitions used to define columns, with a lack of support in how minicolumns and columns are interconnected. They cited studies that failed to demonstrate clear boundaries of minicolumns and that there was no consensus on the number of minicolumns present in a functional column. They discussed that it is hard to reconcile species variations in columnar structure with the functional importance of columns. In conclusion, they suggested the column might have no actual function.

    If cortical columns do indeed have a function within the architecture of the cortex, the challenge for any theory is to explain these conflicting findings. Moss [14] theorized that the column is the binary unit (i.e., bit) involved in all cortical cognitive processing and memory storage. This theory provides one explanation for some of the conflicting results in the literature. For example, the theory provides an explanation of the relationship between columns and minicolumns by suggesting that columns overlap so that they share a number of common minicolumns. In an updated review and revision of the theory, the relationship of columns to gamma-band synchrony is explained in a manner consistent with much of the literature [15]. This columnar model (the Dimensional Systems Model) has been discussed in detail in relation to cortical processing patterns [14,15] in addition to its applications to psychotherapy [16]. However, there have been only brief discussions of the involvement of columnar microcircuitry and synchronization to this point in time [14,15,17]. The current article extends this theory by incorporating a more detailed analysis of the mechanisms that can lead to dynamic column formation based on gamma frequency oscillations. The first section briefly discusses aspects of the Dimensional Systems Model (DSM). Next, the theorized mechanisms involved in dynamic column formation are presented followed by a discussion on how synchronization applies to cognitive functioning based on the columnar model. Then the microcircuitry underlying this synchronization is discussed, and finally, implications for cognitive dysfunction in disorders such as schizophrenia, autism, and Alzheimer’s disease are presented.

    Overview of the dimensional systems model

    Although the model emphasizes cortical mechanisms involved in learning and memory, it necessarily includes the manner in which sensory input and subcortical functions interact with these cortical mechanisms. All nervous system functions are considered to exist for the purposes of survival. The manner in which received information is processed and encoded is viewed as being directed toward an accurate representation of all salient aspects of external and internal stimuli. There is a corresponding mechanism to make use of this encoded representation to allow specific response patterns to be evoked based on specific characteristics of the representation. Given the need for accurate details in a reliable fashion, a discrete system of coding tied to processing and response appears most logical. If that assumption is accurate, then probabilistic, complex, and continuous signaling patterns of cortical coding would not be expected to evolve based on the simple assumption that such complex processing would be a major disadvantage for species’ survival. This assumption does not deny the fact that individual neurons encode information in variable rate spike trains. However, the argument is that the representation of groups of neurons organized in a columnar fashion is best conceived of as implementing a single discrete piece of information (i.e., a bit).

    Moss [14] provided the first detailed description of the DSM, followed by a later update with revisions [15]. The influence of Luria [18] is obvious in the relation to the view that higher mental functions involve the whole brain, not just the cerebral cortex. An understanding of cortical activity necessarily involves the reciprocal interactions with numerous subcortical areas. However, understanding the manner in which the cortex processes and stores information is crucial.

    To assist in understanding cortical processing, two points will be helpful. First, everything works in circuits. Second, the components in the circuit determine what functions occur. For example, a simple electrical circuit involves a power supply, a component or device (e.g., light bulb, buzzer), and the wires connecting these. Usually there is a switch that serves to activate and deactivate the circuit. If a light bulb is in the circuit, it glows when the switch is in the on position. If there is a separate circuit with a buzzer, the buzzer does not activate when the light bulb circuit’s switch is on because it is not connected to that switch. If both the buzzer and light bulb are connected in series in the same circuit, there is both light and sound when the circuit is activated. Alternately, the light and buzzer can be in two separate circuits but connect to a common switch that activates both circuits simultaneously, thus being in parallel. When the common switch is activated, both the light and the buzzer activate. The distinction between components being in series versus parallel will be used to explain multisensory and association memories respectfully. Therefore, it is easy to see that if components or devices are not connected to a given circuit then there is no expectation they will activate.

    The concept of disconnection syndromes is one familiar to neuropsychologists [19]. In such a case, if the neural connection, or wiring, is severed between two brain areas, then functions that depend on those areas working in concert are disrupted. Within the context of the DSM, circuits of columns that do not interconnect have no means to access one another even though each circuit may have the capability of processing incoming information and initiating a response.

    The basis of the DSM is that the cortical information binary unit (bit) is the cortical column. This simply means that each cortical column represents specific and discrete information. Briefly, a column is comprised of several hundred minicolumns each of which may contain approximately 100 to 200 neurons [20]. The diameter may vary from approximately 0.4 to 1.0 mm, depending upon the cortical location and species. Because information stored in the cortex is important to preserve, the large size fits well with the need for structural stability and resistance to damage of an information unit involved in processing. However, an obvious criticism is that the information capacity of the cortex is enormous and the surface area does not appear sufficient for the required number of such large columns. To explain how this is possible, Moss [14] suggested that columns overlap such that some minicolumns are shared. Moss et al. [15] added the propositions that only the outer minicolumns comprised the actual columnar bit and that minicolumns may also overlap.

    In relation to the DSM, five systems are identified. The sensory input system focuses primarily on tactile, auditory, and visual input as being the most influential in higher functions and related to the manner by which processing occurs in specific cortical areas. The arousal system involves the power supply to the cortex necessary for processing and memory storage which can be selectively enhanced based upon ongoing biological needs and emotions. The attention-memory system involves the structures and mechanisms by which incoming sensory information is selected and subsequently stored in memory at the cortical level. The cortical system involves the means by which the columns interact to provide processing, analyses, and responses. Finally, the motor system describes the output level of the system by which environmental manipulations occur.

    Moss et al. [15] provided a physiological definition of memory which involves the strengthening of synaptic connections in any given circuit of cortical columns that are used in information processing. The strengthening occurs due to ongoing reactivation of all the columns in the circuit. The ongoing activity initially impacts neurochemical factors (e.g., ionic concentrations, neurotransmitter stores), followed by gradual synaptic structural growth (i.e., increased axonal boutons and dendritic spines). Forgetting is the result of weakened synaptic connections which means the downstream columns in the circuit fail to activate. In this case, the column’s activation by one or more other columns fails to be maintained. However, with structural changes, such as axonal sprouting and increased dendritic spines between neurons of columns, then the likelihood of “forgetting” is greatly reduced because the connections are resistant to disruption and damage.

    There are several important aspects tied to this definition of memory. First, all memory tied to higher functions occurs at the cortical level and all memory involves the same mechanisms. The perceived quality of a memory is a function of the information represented by the columns involved, in the same manner that the previously discussed light bulb and buzzer determine the output of simple electrical circuits. Thus, columns in the temporal cortex that code for spoken words are perceived as spoken words, while those in the parietal lobe that code for body sensations are perceived as sensations when activated. This view of memory is consistent with the idea of contextual reinstatement for memory retrieval [21] that has been supported by a number of neuroimaging studies showing cortical reinstatement of encoding activation during retrieval [e.g., 22, 23]. In the case that both sound and touch are simultaneously activated, the convergence zone in the parieto-temporal area would have a common column that codes for the multisensory experience and memory (i.e., in “series”). If the processing of stimulus information involves multiple circuits in which the direction of processing does not converge, then columns in the medial temporal lobe become the common projection point for all those circuits (i.e., in “parallel”).

    Similarly, explicit (i.e., declarative) memory and implicit memory are both circuits of columns, with the qualitative distinction being whether the “interpreter” [24] has direct access to the memory. It has been proposed that for the majority of humans the left (as opposed to the right) lateral ventral frontal area (i.e., frontal operculum) is the theorized location of self-talk, or internal verbal dialogue, and is what defines declarative memory (i.e., being able to verbally explain what is being remembered) [14,25].

    Subcortical enhancement of memory occurs as a function of the activation of the cortical circuit which in turn strengthens the synaptic connections of the involved columns. Increased general arousal via the reticular activating system and increased selective arousal, such as occurs with amygdala involvement, increase cortical arousal which strengthens the synaptic connections among the columns involved in processing and memory of related stimuli. The hippocampus serves to maintain a hippocampal-thalamus-cortical-hippocampal circuit with the goal being strengthening of the synaptic connection among columns.

    In sensory cortex, input leads to the activation of columns in the primary receiving areas. The downstream location where efferent activity from the activated upstream (called “lower-order” or “less organized”) columns cross becomes entrained as a new higher-order column. Additionally, it was posited that for each posterior lobe receptive column that forms, there is a corresponding action column that forms in the frontal lobe [15,16]. In contrast to the binding-by-synchronization hypothesis, the column theory views gamma-band synchronization as a necessary mechanism allowing the formation of these higher-order columns that are the actual discrete information units. Consistent with the conclusions of Merker [9], the generic function is related to infrastructural neural control in relation to column formation and duration of feed-forward signaling.

    Because environmental factors vary, there must be a mechanism to allow plasticity in determining the salient stimuli at the cortical level. Thus, stimulus input received cortically programs the primary receiving areas. As will be discussed later, gamma-band synchronization provides a mechanism for programming. In addition to discrete stimulus coding (e.g., sound frequency activating tonotopic columns), there are frequently repeated combinations (e.g., phonemes and syllables in spoken language) of those discrete stimuli that are salient as well.

    The nature of sensory stimuli appears to have determined the processing mode of cortical regions. Sound is a sequential pressure sense leading to a sequential processing mode in the temporal lobes. Somatosensory input involves simultaneous (i.e., multiple locations) pressure stimulation leading to a simultaneous processing mode in the parietal lobes. Vision involves both sequential and simultaneous processing, involving a ventral stream if sequential aspects are most relevant versus a dorsal stream if simultaneous aspects are involved.

    Moss et al. [15] suggested several cortical dimensions in relation to the information being coded in a particular column that are summarized in Table 1. Another aspect of the model is that for each column involved with receptive processing in the posterior lobes, there needs to be a corresponding action column to allow the information to be used by the organism. In reference to the location of columns, there is an expected topographical arrangement. For example, the ventral columns involved with sequential information connect to ventral action columns, while simultaneous dorsal receptive columns connect to dorsal action columns. Primary somatosensory columns connect to primary motor columns, while secondary somatosensory columns connect to premotor frontal columns. The receptive auditory phoneme and syllabic columns connect to the phoneme and syllabic action (i.e., motor planning) columns involved with speech production in lateral cortex. Visual receptive columns connect to action columns in the area of the frontal eye field. Tasks that require both simultaneous and sequential processing, such as visual tracking of an object, involve areas intermediate to the dorsal and ventral streams.

    Table 1. Dimensions of Cortical Column Organization in the Dimensional Systems Model
    Dimension NameDescription of Dimension
    Internal-external The medial cortical columns code stimulus information that is internal and self-referential while the lateral cortex codes for external stimuli. Intermediate or transitional zones code for combinations of both.
    Proximal-distal In relation to proximal versus distal to the body stimulus coding, the central sulcus is considered the most proximal cortical location. The post-central sulcus parietal cortical area would code for somatosensory (i.e., body sensation) stimuli. Both vision (occipital lobe) and audition (temporal lobe) involve distal sensory information. The pre-central sulcus primary motor strip involves the body directly while anterior prefrontal processing involves information manipulation largely independent of the body.
    Simultaneous-sequential Ventral cortex processes in a sequential manner and dorsal cortex in a simultaneous manner, with intermediate areas using both modes of processing
    Reception-action The parietal, temporal, and occipital lobes contain all receptive, or sensory, information while the frontal lobes code for all action-related information.
    Unorganized-organized Receptive information progresses from less-organized, or lower-order, information to more-organized, or higher-order, information (i.e., coding) as the stream moves away from the primary sensory receiving areas (i.e., bottom-up processing). On the other hand, the frontal action columns progress in a rostral to caudal more-organized, or higher-order information to less-organized, or lower order information (i.e., decoding) as the stream goes toward the premotor and primary motor areas. The frontal action columns’ control of posterior lobe receptive columns is also present (i.e., top-down processing).
    Analytical-Global Each cortical hemisphere acts as a separate, albeit interconnected, processing unit which means that each of the aforementioned dimensions is contained within each hemisphere. However, there are fewer columns from the time of sensory input to the response level in the right hemisphere. This means that the right cortex can process information faster, but with fewer details (i.e., global processing). The greater number of interconnected columns in the left hemisphere allows more detailed processing and memory storage (i.e., analytical processing)
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    As indicated, cortical processing and memory involve circuits of columns. Therefore, all factors leading to enhanced memory formation have the common denominator of increasing the strength of synapses among the columns of that particular memory. Increased arousal, whether tied to emotions, biological needs, or both, would lead to enhanced memory formation via increased synaptic activity and therefore strengthening among columns. Similarly, enhanced memory consolidation tied to sleep is the result of increased activity and synaptic strengthening in the columnar circuit. Reciprocal connections of individual columns to one another and to the thalamus allow reentrant signaling. In relation to association memories involving parallel circuits of columns in distant cortical areas, the hippocampus serves a starter and pacemaker role in a cortical-hippocampal-thalamic-cortical network that has its primary role being the strengthening of synapses in the columnar circuit. Therefore, memory formation is the same throughout the cortex regardless of type of memory. The perceived quality of a memory is a function of the information represented by the columns involved.

    The original Dimensional Systems Model articles provide a more detailed discussion of other aspects of the model and its use in psychotherapy [14,15]. The foregoing description provides an illustration of the role of columns in the model in order to provide a basis for the following discussion about the circuitry that comprises columns and provides a mechanism for the necessary columnar circuits to form.

    Column microcircuitry design

    There are two key ideas in the model that are consistent with the organization of the cortex while also helping to resolve apparent conflicting findings regarding the role of cortical columns and the function of gamma oscillations. First, the dynamic organization of columns from minicolumns is consistent with recent findings and helps to explain why others [13] have concluded that there is no function for columns. Such a design means that there would not be structural indications of a static column; instead, there should be a design that allows the dynamic formation of the column. The second idea is that the role of gamma oscillations is related to the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) inhibition necessary for the formation of dynamically organized columns and limiting the duration of feed-forward signaling from a column.

    In terms of dynamically-formed columns, there have to be mechanisms that allow for stability of the dynamic columns, and several relevant findings support this idea. These mechanisms have to rely on the local microcircuitry of minicolumns. Notably, there are several studies that suggest the formation of columns occurs with the involvement of only a few pyramidal cells PCs. Although this has been interpreted as “sparse coding” by some authors [26], the current proposal is that only a few PCs activate initially which results in column formation. Thus, when columns in the cortical circuit activate, only a few PCs in each of the involved columns are activated prior to the strong inhibition that immediately follows.

    Non-random features of synaptic connectivity have been reported in layer 5 PCs in the rat visual and somatosensory cortex [27,28]. Perin and colleagues speculated that elementary neuronal groups they identified in the somatosensory cortex of neonatal rats were “Lego-like” building blocks of perception [28]. Based on layer 5 pyramidal cell (PC) recordings, they identified cell assemblies in microcircuits arranged as small world networks without hubs. These kinds of networks would enable the self-organization necessary for dynamic columns. The assemblies were interlaced with other assemblies in the same space, and synaptic clusters were separated by a mean distance of 100 to 125 μm that extended beyond individual minicolumns. These clusters extended across distances equivalent to the diameter of a functional cortical column. In their view it was possible that acquired memory involved combining these elementary assemblies into unique superassemblies. They also identified three- and four-neuron motifs consistent with other findings of similar motifs in rat visual cortex [27]. In this work on rat visual cortex, strongly connected neurons were more likely to be connected reciprocally than those with weaker interconnections. These interconnected networks were found to occur more often in three-cell motifs than would be expected in a randomly connected network. Thus, these authors considered this to be a skeleton of stronger connections in a sea of weaker ones, and suggested this sparse skeleton may drive the dynamics of the neural network [27].

    Despite evidence that barrel cortex neuronal spatial organization across layers is on a columnar scale [see 29 for an excellent review of barrel cortex function], there is only sparse activation of layer 2/3 PCs within barrel columns [30,31,32,33,34,35]. Lefort et al. [33] reported their network simulations indicated that synchronous action potentials in a few neurons may be sufficient to propagate neural activity. Avermann et al. [30] combined optogenetic stimulation and whole cell recordings with computational modeling tied to layer 2/3 of mouse barrel cortex. They concluded that fast spiking (FS) GABAergic neurons might contribute to driving the sparse coding in the excitatory neurons. This evidence indicates that even in regions with a clear columnar organization, there is relatively sparse activity. Therefore, similarly sparse levels of activity might be sufficient for more dynamically-organized columns to form, represent information, and propagate that information.

    If this hypothesis about dynamically-organized columns is true, then the degree to which there is a clear anatomical columnar organization in a specific cortical region in a specific species could be related to the nature of processing needed in that region on both developmental and evolutionary timescales. For example, dynamic columns that form repeatedly due to environmental pressures and that impart a survival advantage would be expected to develop clearer anatomical connections that are indicative of a stable columnar organization. Interestingly, in rat visual cortex, there does not appear to be a discernable local columnar structure as is observed in barrel cortex based on layer 2/3 neuronal responses. For example, Ohki, et al. [36] found that in rat primary visual cortex neurons had robust orientation selectivity, but neighboring neurons often responded to different orientations. This is in contrast to cat visual cortex in which functional maps were organized at a fine scale, with columnar borders one to two cells wide. They suggested that well-ordered cortical maps in the cat might have an advantage in sharpening visual responses. If that is accurate and the concept of overlapping columns is applied, then it may be that there are actually dynamic columns in the rat primary visual cortex that overlap (accounting for different orientations in neighboring neurons) because segregated columns may hold no evolutionary advantage. The evolutionary advantage of sharp responses in completely segregated barrel columns may explain why columns may overlap in one primary sensory cortical area and not in another in the rat. However, there is also some suggestion of possible overlapping columns in barrel columns because it has been shown that there is orientation specificity of only some PCs in a given barrel column [37]. In other species, such as the cat, discrete columns may exist in both visual [36] and somatosensory [38] primary receiving areas because both provide an advantage.

    Another aspect contributing to apparent size differences in columns based on location maybe related to simultaneous versus sequential processing. The simultaneous nature of processing in the parietal lobe means that multiple columns in the primary somatosensory receiving area activate together. If this co-activation represents a repeated pattern there are horizontal connections among the individual columns. Those columns involving adjacent areas in the cortex then give the appearance of a larger column despite this apparent large column actually being multiple columns. The connections of these columns to the primary motor columns also means that repeated coordinated movements involves multiple motor columns that activate simultaneously. Again, despite there being individual action (i.e., primary motor) columns activated, the simultaneous activation of these columns may give an appearance of a larger column. In contrast, auditory columns are sequential in nature which means only one is activated at a time. The result is that an auditory column may appear smaller because it has no other simultaneously active horizontally connected columns in close proximity.

    Up to this point in the discussion, the focus has been on evidence for overlapping dynamic columns without regard to the mechanisms that would enable such columns to form dynamically. One potential mechanism is the role of gamma oscillations related to GABAergic inhibition. Two classes of cortical inhibitory interneurons show a pattern of connectivity consistent with dynamic as opposed to static structural column formation. These are the parvalbumin-expressing (PV) and somatostatin-expressing (SOM) interneurons. Packer and Yuste [39] examined layers 2/3 and 5 mouse somatosensory and frontal neocortex. There was locally dense connectivity from PV interneurons across cortical layers onto PCs. In some cases all nearby PV interneurons contacted every local PC examined. There was no evidence of connection specificity. The authors concluded that the results support a blanket of inhibition onto local PCs as a canonical feature in neocortical microcircuits. In a similar study examining SOM interneurons, Fino and Yuste [40] found that in layer 2/3 of mouse frontal cortex most SOM interneurons are locally connected to every sampled pyramidal cell. Moreover, inhibitory connections to neighboring PCs were similar, regardless of the connectivity amongst the PCs themselves. The authors noted that this connectivity pattern suggests that these interneurons serve to locally control PCs without any computational function. In this case, neighboring excitatory and inhibitory neurons have overlapping but not identical connectivity patterns. As in the Packer and Yuste [39] study, the effect is that the SOM and PV interneurons extend a blanket of inhibition throughout the local circuit. In this case, each neuron defines its own circuit based on its distinct efferent and afferent connections.

    The purpose of this blanket inhibition in terms of dynamic columns is to initiate the synchronization of a column’s pyramidal network. The most common SOM cortical interneuron, the Matinotti cell (MC), has been shown to respond to respond to simultaneous brief bursts of action potentials in as few as four PCs. The MC’s response to this activity was sufficient to exert inhibition on all neighboring PCs within a column [41]. This inhibition provides a mechanism for the initiation of synchronization of the column’s PC network via a mechanism such as that found in pyramidal interneuron gamma (PING) models [42,43] and described in a later section.

    Insight into the purpose of this synchronization mechanism comes from studies of gamma frequency stimulation (40 Hz). Externally applied gamma frequency stimulation has been shown to activate a restricted area approximately the width of a cortical column while low frequency (10 Hz) activates a larger cortical area [41]. Additionally, Hirata and Sawaguchi [44] noted stimulation to the middle layer of macaque prefrontal cortex resulted in activity organized into columns. Importantly, different columnar activities with only slight overlaps were induced by stimulation of different sites in the same brain slice. This evidence suggests that gamma frequency oscillations are necessary for the formation of dynamic columns.

    If gamma oscillations serve to dynamically organize the column, then these oscillations should also occur whenever a column is formed and strengthened. In their review of early gamma oscillation (EGO) studies, Khazipov et al. [45] suggested gamma oscillations guide barrel map formation during the critical developmental period. This suggestion was supported by Yang et al. [2] in an in vivo study using voltage-sensitive dye imaging and extracellular recordings of newborn rats. Both spontaneously occurring and stimulation-induced gamma bursts followed by longer spindle bursts were topographically organized in functional cortical columns. Simultaneous activation of the ventral posterior medial nucleus of the thalamus occurred along with activation in cortical columns. Minlebaev et al. [46] found that EGOs allowed vertical synchronization between topographically aligned thalamic and cortical neurons, and at the end of the second postnatal week adult gamma oscillations emerge to allow horizontal synchronization in the cortex. This evidence indicates that gamma oscillations serve to form and synchronize not only columns but also circuits of columns.

    Furthermore, there is some evidence that the formation of columns occurs through the synchronization of only the outer cells. A modeling study of the dynamics of interacting neuronal populations provides insight into self-organized near zero-lag synchronicity. In their investigation on the influence of long conduction delays, Vicente et al. [47] employed simulations with networks of Hodgkins-Huxley neurons in integrate and fire models. In these simulations, two outer neurons (or populations) were connected to a common neuron (or population). Both with three cell circuits and three network population circuits, synchrony developed for only the outer neurons and populations, while the inner neurons were asynchronous. In relation to the studies showing three- or four-neuron motifs in which the clusters extend the diameter of a functional column [27,28], activation of the network is expected to lead to the synchronization of only the outermost clusters [41]. In other words, the outermost populations connect to the inner populations but only the outer populations synchronize. In fact, with repeated activation, the inner populations would become more asynchronous [48].

    In total, the foregoing studies support the proposition that sparsely distributed small networks of pyramidal cells initiate synchronization of the outermost minicolumns in dynamically formed columns. As will be discussed in more detail, this process requires the type of inhibitory interneuron connectivity within minicolumns that is characteristic of the cortex. To summarize, local excitatory and inhibitory neuronal interactions are designed to control dynamic cortical column formation which is associated with gamma frequency synchronization. Because the column is a discrete bit, there is no information processing that occurs within the column. The activation of the column itself is the key bit of processing with more complex information processing occurring via the circuits of columns in a coding (lower-order to higher-order) and decoding (higher-order to lower-order) fashion. Thus, GABA inhibition in the cortex has local effects directed toward column formation, and columns form in order to form synchronized circuits responsible for reception, processing, and responses. The next section discussed the evidence for discrete, gamma oscillation-induced dynamic columns as the bits in cortical circuits.

    Circuits of synchronized columns

    As has been noted in literature reviews, there have been studies indicating that gamma-band synchronization is involved in cortical circuits [49,50,51]. There have been frequent discussions of local field potential (LFP) and recruitment of neuronal groups, although there is only rare mention that these signals may correspond to the column. If the column is the cortical information bit involved in multiple column circuits, then three properties should hold. First, there should be evidence of gamma-based synchrony in columns. Second, there should be evidence of discrete activation based on gamma frequency synchronization. Third, there should also be evidence for consistent activation of downstream columns based on that same frequency. In relation to this latter point, initial phase locking of distributed columns occurs at the gamma frequency, although subsequent phase locking is expected in all frequency ranges due to the strengthening synaptic interconnections.

    In terms of evidence for gamma-based synchrony in columnar units, an early study that demonstrated localized gamma-band synchrony in vertical columns in the suprasylvian gyrus of cats was done by Steriade and Amzica [52]. Using brief pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus stimulation, synchronized gamma oscillations occurred in phase from the surface to the deepest layers within the columns. In relation to mouse auditory cortex, Guo et al. [10] provided evidence that in the core region there is precise tonotopic organization based on multiple unit recordings. This organization was found in the auditory cortex in all states of consciousness and based upon synchronized electrical activity observed across all cortical layers and in a columnar fashion. It was noted that in the superficial and deep layers that a substantial minority of recording sites were driven by pure tones but showed no discernible tonotopic organization which the authors suggested might be a function of cross-columnar connections outside the thalamic input layers.

    There is also evidence that this column-based activity is encoding information in a discrete fashion. Similar to the current paper’s proposal that the column is the bit of cortical processing, Loebel et al. [53] proposed a model in which each iso-frequency column involves a recurrent neural network. The networks are proposed to emit population spikes in which the majority of neurons synchronously fire for a brief period with subsequent short-term depression. In response to auditory stimuli, the population spikes involve lateral connections along primary auditory cortex, or core region. This involves high speed, temporally precise synchronized population spikes from the involved columns.

    In a separate study of mouse auditory cortex employing two-photon calcium imaging, Bathellier et al. [54] provided evidence of discrete dynamics in auditory processing. Neurons in layer 2/3 were recorded. A characteristic finding was that a large fraction of neurons fired synchronously in short population events both spontaneously and in sound evoked response. The authors found that the auditory cortex is comprised of partially overlapping subnetworks with discrete local response patterns. Their observations were consistent with a columnar organization, noting the possibility the discrete response modes might be specific to the supragranular layers. In their discussion, the authors suggest that the discrete network dynamics may act in a binary manner of categorization such that higher-order categories are built on a hierarchy of lower-order categories. They further note the lower-order categories arise in primary sensory areas and that discrete representations (e.g., phonemes as discrete sound categories) might be essential for cognitive functions such as language processing.

    Finally, there is also evidence that the synchronized activity enables the formation of multiple column circuits. In a recent study of gamma oscillatory activity between V1 and V2 in the macaque, there is support for feed-forward and layer-specific connectivity [55]. In response to gratings of varying contrasts, gamma frequency increased with stimulus contrast with coherence maintained between the neural populations in these regions. Thus, it was shown that gamma coherence can occur across regions despite large stimulus-induced and time-dependent changes in gamma frequency.

    In another study, Ince et al. [56] evaluated neural responses to natural sounds in the Macaque. Their results supported the view that a small population of neurons communicates considerable information and that high temporal precision within circuits of such populations is important. In a study analyzing zero lag gamma events in freely moving rats, the events were associated with local modules (based on spacing of 1.5 mm separation of microelectrodes) [57]. They found that gamma events recorded in different brain regions occurred with zero-time lag, as well as within an event time window during the resting state. This finding was considered to indicate coherence-based connectivity. These are just a sample of studies showing temporally precise communication among small groups of neurons consistent with gamma-based synchronization of circuits of columns.

    Based on the weak PING model only a few excitatory neurons can initiate gamma synchronization [42,43]. Thus, the overlapping subnetworks involved in discrete local response patterns [54], the three- and four-neuron motifs [27,28] in layer 2/3, and the dense interneuron to pyramidal cell connections [39,40] provide a picture of how overlapping columns can operate. The discussion now turns to the details of how gamma synchronization occurs within columns in order to enable the formation of dynamic circuits of columns.

    Receptors, neurons, and gamma-band synchronization

    There have been recent detailed reviews on the biological processes involved in gamma oscillations in the cerebral cortex [58,59]. As noted in these papers, there are competing models and a number of questions remain. For the purposes of the current paper, general information will be presented with the goal of explaining how the column model fits with a weak PING model in which gamma oscillations are based on PC driven activation of interneurons that then inhibit the PC population [42,43]. PING models differ from models that rely on interneurons alone such as the interneuron gamma (ING) model.

    There are several aspects involved in the posited column circuitry. Pyramidal neurons in layer 2/3 provide intra-areal horizontal activation, while layer 5 pyramidal neurons provide long range connections and can enhance layer 2/3 activity [60]. The three main classes of inhibitory cortical neurons are PV-expressing, SOM-expressing, and vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP)-expressing interneurons. The two glutamate receptors are the α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor (AMPAR) type and the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR).

    Moss [14] discussed a general columnar design based on the six cortical layers for heuristic purposes. It was acknowledged that there were no definitive works of the afferent and efferent connections of the cellular structure of the cortical layers. However, the design was such that the discrete column was activated and then inhibited once its afferent information was sent to downstream columns. In relation to the model, there are two important aspects. First, a column sends the primary signal to activate downstream columns. The proposed idea described in this section is that AMPARs are associated with this initial propagation to downstream columns. Second, there are continued processes to allow for strengthening (i.e., memory consolidation) of synaptic connections among the newly created column circuit. Thus, there should be evidence of immediate column activation allowing immediate information transfer, followed by inhibition to prevent further transmission, but local signs in the column of continued activation involved with the consolidation process. The second part of the proposed idea described here is that NMDARs are more involved in the synaptic strengthening, or memory, process. Figure 1 provides an overview of the cells and processes involved in the formation and strengthening of columns, and Table 2 provides a more detailed summary of the function of each cell type in this process.

    Figure 1. Diagram showing dynamic formation of frontal column in DSM model along with role of different neuron types in the process of dynamic column formation from minicolumns and column strengthening.
    Table 2. Neuron/Receptor Function in Dynamic Cortical Column Formation
    Cell/Receptor TypeFunction in Column Formation and Strengthening
    Column and Columnar Circuit Formation
    AMPARsAMPARs of the PCs are associated with initial propagation of activation to downstream columns providing the activation of PCs that drives the inhibitory interneurons that lead to gamma oscillations via a PING model.
    PVPV interneurons are involved in the synchronization of the column “signal” by promoting gamma oscillations via inhibitory connections with PCs (as in PING models).
    SOMSOM interneurons influence the horizontal spread of inhibition to surrounding columns. Inhibition around a newly formed column enhances strengthening of the memory. The columnar coherence (the “signal”) would be enhanced through the inhibition of overlapping and adjacent columns (“noise”).
    SBCsSBC interneurons establish the column boundary via disinhibitory control of layer 5 PCs via inhibitory connections to layers 2/3 interneurons would otherwise inhibit layer 5 PCs. Leads to activation of NMDARs and strengthening of columns as detailed below.
    Column Strengthening/Consolidation
    NMDARsNMDARs of the PCs are involved in the synaptic strengthening, or memory consolidation processes. NMDAR calcium permeability means that the NMDAR-mediated currents provide longer excitability durations necessary for synaptic strengthening.
    VIPVIP interneurons control both SOM and PV cells by inhibition of other inhibitory interneurons (i.e., disinhibitory control). VIP interneurons inhibit some of the PV interneurons for a short duration and a larger percentage of the SOM interneurons for a slightly longer duration, allowing disinhibition of the longer duration NMDARs to serve as the strengthening connections of the proposed peripheral minicolumn PCs to their targets.
    NGCElongated neurogliaform cells provide complete inhibition of all neuronal activity in the projection area of their axonal field. Via inhibition of all other interior minicolumns and minicolumns from overlapping columns, they increase the signal-to-noise ratio allowing newly formed columns to strengthen.
     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Signal propagation enabled by AMPARs

    There appears to be consensus on several points in models of gamma oscillations. First is that gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor-mediated inhibition is necessary for gamma oscillations [58]. The hypothesis that fast spiking (FS), PV basket cells promote gamma oscillations has substantial support. ING models have shown that only mutually connected inhibitory interneurons are required for the emergence of gamma oscillations, provided there is sufficient drive to induce spiking in the interneurons and a time constant provided by GABA [61]. PING models are based on the reciprocal connections between groups of regular spiking (RS) pyramidal excitatory neurons and inhibitory neurons. In PING models, the fast excitation alternates with the delayed feedback inhibition. Whereas strong PING models involve a large population of excitatory neurons, the weak PING model is based on sparse activation of pyramidal cells [42,43].

    A recent study [62] has shown that interactions between supragranular and infragranular layers are required for activity propagation in the cortex. It was found that thalamic sensory input leads to a sequence of activation of layer 4 to layer 2/3 to layer 5 followed by horizontal propagation. Layer 2/3 had an upstate in 20 to 30 ms, with layer 5 activating 10 ms later. This in vitro study found activation of an adjacent column in 75 ms, indicating a propagation velocity of 20 mm/s. They noted much faster speeds (100 mm/s) have been reported in vitro [63].

    This transmission model provides an indication that the initial discrete “bit” is formed in less than 50 ms with it conveying its information immediately. This time frame is consistent with one model of synchronization speed based on 20 to 50 ms for typical membrane constants [64]. Thus, a logical conclusion is that continued activity in newly formed columns beyond the primary signal conductance is directed toward consolidation of the new column, in conjunction with its cortical and subcortical connections. If accurate, this can provide insight into the various roles of receptor and cell types within the column, as well as in the spontaneous neocortical activity patterns.

    This proposal is consistent with the duration of currents in AMPARs. As noted by Gonzalez-Burgos and Lewis [65], AMPARs appear to provide the necessary phasic excitation that drives the PV neurons. This conclusion is based on the fact that NMDARs have voltage-dependent magnesium blocks that make them unlikely to initiate the required neuronal excitation. Moreover, there are two other important characteristic differences between NMDARs and AMPARs. NMDARs generate significantly longer duration currents (100-400 ms) than AMPARs (2-10 ms). This difference in duration suggests the AMPARs are likely responsible for the initial conductance of the information bit signal due to fast but brief activation. A second point is that in contrast to most AMPAR channel subtypes, NMDAR channels are highly permeable to calcium. This permeability is important in the NMDAR-dependent changes in synaptic strength because the high calcium influx activates calcium-calmodulin kinase II-alpha (CaMKII). Overall, this calcium permeability means that the NMDAR-mediated currents provide longer excitability durations necessary for synaptic strengthening. In terms of the DSM, NMDARs therefore allow for the posited consolidation process to strengthen column boundaries and associated connections.

    Column consolidation enabled by NMDARs

    There is some support in the literature for this consolidation-enabling role of NMDARs. Wang et al. [66] discussed the research supporting the requirements of post-learning NMDARs and CaMKII reactivations in systems-level memories. They felt that this reactivation may lead to synaptic reentry reinforcement (SRR) in which multiple rounds of NMDAR-mediated synaptic modifications occur [67]. The SRR hypothesis indicated the hippocampus goes through reactivation during consolidation and can act as a coincidence regenerator. This leads to the simultaneous reactivation and strengthening of connections of cortical neurons in the different sensory modules involved in the original cortical processing.

    The DSM view of consolidation deviates from that hypothesis in a couple of important ways. First, it clarifies that the hippocampus is not the source of new memories later transferred to the cortex. The same columns involved in the original cortical processing are both the short-term and long-term memory with the hippocampus merely providing the cyclic activity to the various columns comprising the memory. In the case of information streams in different cortical areas leading to the single highest-order column in each of those streams, then those highest-order columns project to and form the new temporal lobe cortical column that associates those different information streams. The hippocampus, via its involvement of only a few cells capable of long term potentiation and depression, is best capable of supplying the thalamic and cortical circuit reactivation which in turn leads to the synaptic strengthening at the cortical level. Notably, because the single hippocampus neurons are in the circuit line, they activate any time the cortical columns tied to a given memory activate. This gives the appearance via stimulus-induced activation that single hippocampal neurons have encoded the memory (e.g., a Jennifer Anniston cell, place cells) even though the memory has always been stored in the cortical circuit.

    Therefore the NMDARs are critical to the strengthening of the circuits of cortical columns that are the key feature of neural information processing in the DSM. There is also research that links NMDARs to strengthening of circuits. Luczak and MacLean [68] provided a review of studies on the similar sequential order of neuronal activation in the neocortex spontaneously and in response to stimulus input. They suggested that the similarity of evoked and spontaneous activity results from both evoked and spontaneous activity playing out on the same cortical architecture. Similarly, Bermudez Contreras and colleagues [69] found that repeated tactile and auditory stimulation evoked unique sequential neural firing patterns in the somatosensory and auditory cortices in urethane-anesthetized rats. The same pattern recurred during subsequent spontaneous activity. Notably, an NMDAR antagonist blocked the patterns suggesting the role of synaptic plasticity and again demonstrating the importance of NMDARs in memory consolidation. Fukushima et al. [70] found that spontaneous activity closely follows functional organization in Macaque auditory cortex. Moreover, in vivo two-photon imaging of mouse auditory cortex demonstrated that NMDAR-dependent spine calcium signals occurring in spontaneous up states are the same as those associated with sensory stimulation [71]. Chen et al. [71] suggest that such “patterned” calcium activity may control consolidation following the stimulation.

    Based on the foregoing reviews and research studies, there is an association between NMDARs and memory consolidation. If the column is the discrete bit involved in cortical processing, then there would necessarily be a mechanism for feed-forward output to other columns and subcortical targets, followed by a separate consolidation mechanism. Based on the assumption that the outermost minicolumns are those that are the dynamic column, these are the ones that first convey the critical AMPA-regulated efferent activity and this conveyance is then followed by gamma oscillatory activity. Because it is the intersection of multiple lower-order columns’ activity that leads to the formation of a new column, then where this efferent stream of all the minicolumns of one column coincides with that of another column’s outer minicolumns, there will be the activation of the outer minicolumns of the newly formed higher-order column. This new column’s outer minicolumns immediately convey their efferent signal followed by gamma-band synchrony to stabilize the newly formed dynamic column. The stabilization process includes the rapid spread of the gamma oscillations to surrounding tissue, including the internal minicolumns of each column. To allow only the consolidation of connections of outer minicolumns to other targets, there must be mechanisms to control the horizontal spread of initial AMPAR-based activity. This mechanism is consistent with the quick PC-PV neuron gamma-based feed-forward inhibition found in PING models. In addition, there must be subsequent reactivation of the outer minicolumns with inhibition of all other neurons located both internally and externally to allow synaptic strengthening to occur only in the outer minicolumns. The evidence for these two mechanisms (PC-PV inhibition and outer minicolumns strengthening) is now presented.

    SOM interneurons appear to largely influence the horizontal spread of inhibition [72]. This group of interneurons may serve to determine the spread of inhibition to surrounding columns. Interestingly, in human intracranial recordings the inhibitory network activity was been shown to occur over distances beyond a column (>4 mm) in comparison to local excitatory interactions (around 1 mm) [73]. Moss [14] suggested that inhibition around a newly formed column enhances strengthening of the memory. In this case, the columnar coherence (the “signal”) would be enhanced through the inhibition of overlapping and adjacent columns (“noise”).

    While the SOMs are providing this signal enhancement, the PV interneurons are involved in the synchronization of the column “signal” and the VIP interneurons control both sets. Recently, it has been shown that VIP interneurons specialize in the inhibition of other inhibitory interneurons (i.e., disinhibitory control). Pi et al. [74] found in mouse auditory cortex and medial prefrontal cortex that brief light stimulation of VIP interneurons had broad effects in firing rate changes of two other neuron groups. In the first group many, but not all, of the inhibited neurons were consistent with PV interneuron activity patterns. There was also a subgroup of these neurons that were initially suppressed and later activated by the VIP stimulation. Many cells in the latter group had patterns consistent with pyramidal neurons. This demonstrated an excitation-inhibition-excitation sequence in the two functionally distinct cortical regions in vivo. In a second condition, in vitro slice analysis provided information on SOM versus PV interneurons targeted by the VIP interneurons. Inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) occurred in a large fraction of SOM interneurons at 40Hz (gamma frequency) with short-term synaptic depression. VIP activation resulted in IPSCs in a smaller fraction of PV interneurons and these decayed faster with stronger short-term synaptic depression than those in the SOM interneurons. These results show that the control signal from VIP interneurons lead to distinct effects on SOM and PV interneurons, supporting a distinction in function for PV and SOM interneurons. Notably, only a small fraction of pyramidal neurons responded to VIP activation, and this pattern is consistent with the sparse pyramidal neuron small networks being involved in the dynamic column being formed (the bit). Other analyses revealed that the delayed activated population consists mainly of pyramidal neurons. Although not evaluated, the longer duration of NMDAR excitation would make these the most likely candidate receptors to be involved with delayed activation.

    In the absence of definitive information on all connections among all the types of cells, it is not possible to provide conclusive information on exactly how columns are formed and consolidated. However, based on the foregoing information, a possible manner of dynamic column formation will be proposed. It appears that stimulus input to layer 4 in a column leads to the targeted activation of the strongly connected motifs of a few pyramidal neurons in layers 5 and 2/3. The pyramidal neurons’ axonal firing provides feed-forward extracolumnar target stimulation and activates AMPA receptors of the PV interneurons resulting in gamma oscillations associated with further feed-forward inhibition. The RS SOM interneurons establish the horizontal limits of the gamma oscillations around a column while layer 1 single-bouquet cells (SBCs) provide the column boundary. Moss [14] proposed that layer 1 cells determine the boundary of a given column, and in the description of two novel cortical interneuron circuits, Jiang et al. [75] found that layer 1 SBC provide unidirectional inhibitory connections to layer 2/3 interneurons which affect layer 5 PCs. Notably, the only layer 5 PCs inhibited were within its own column and did not influence those in any neighboring columns. NMDARs are activated during this process. VIP interneurons inhibit some of the PV interneurons for a short duration and a larger percentage of the SOM interneurons for a slightly longer duration, allowing disinhibition of the longer duration NMDARs to serve as the primary ones involved with strengthening connections of the proposed peripheral minicolumn PCs to their targets. The latter aspect is based on the expectation that only the outermost neurons are the ones that maintain zero-lag synchronization [47].

    The continued strengthening of the column would also require a longer duration inhibition mechanism. A possible candidate for longer duration inhibition in and around the column is the neurogliaform cell (NGC). These provide complete inhibition of all neuronal activity in the projection area of their axonal field, being < 200 μm [76]. This spread activated from the location of peripheral minicolumns would affect all the neurons within the column and the majority of any overlapping column’s neurons. Additionally, there would be inhibition of about half the neurons in any adjacent column’s neurons. Consistent with this NGC inhibitory mechanism, Jiang et al. [75] described a layer 1 circuit from the elongated NGCs that formed mutual electric and inhibitory connections with layer 2/3, and these interneuorns provided inhibition to a majority of layer 5 PCs. As opposed to the SBC intracolumnar connections, the elongated NGCs provided inhibition across multiple columns. They concluded that the suppression of the dendritic complex could effectively increase the signal-to-noise ratio by sharpening the receptive field via suppression of surrounding activity. This increased signal-to-noise ratio is exactly what is required to continue to strengthen newly formed columns.

    A final note is that the PC-PV interneuron connections role appear to be a constant in quick gamma-band oscillatory activity and are unlikely to show any plasticity, being ubiquitous across the neocortex. This appears to be important because the quick feed-forward inhibition provided by this circuit is necessary for each of the overlapping columns, as would the longer duration inhibition from NGCs. In contrast, the PC-MC and PC-PC are the ones involved with synaptic plasticity of newly formed columns and responsible for the memory consolidation NMDAR-related process in conjunction with the SBCs and VIP interneurons. Support for this plasticity distinction is provided by a study [77] showing presynaptic NMDARs in neocortical microcircuits. Whereas PC-MC and PC-PC connections possess presynaptic NMDARs, these were absent in PC connections with the PV basket cells.

    This section has focused on the potential role of NMDARs and AMPARs along with different interneuron types in producing the kind of dynamic column formation and strengthening proposed in the Dimensional Systems Model. There has been a detailed discussion of how this column-based model relates to the development of psychological problems, such as depression and anxiety disorders [16,25,78]. However, this kind of discussion has not been done in relation to the more serious and disabling neuropsychiatric disorders of schizophrenia and autistic spectrum disorders. Additionally, there has not been significant discussion of Alzheimer’s disease. This newly developed understanding of the role of NMDARs and minicolumns in the model provides the basis for a discussion of how these serious disorders are related to disrupted column formation.

    Disorders of disrupted cortical column formation

    Briefly summarizing a few points will assist in understanding the implications of the current theory for schizophrenia, autism, and Alzheimer’s disease. The consolidation of new cortical memories requires both formation of new columns and their interconnections. A possible manner for these dynamics was discussed, emphasizing the coordination of PCs and inhibitory interneurons. Based on the need for each component to occur for both new learning and forming memories, it is possible to see why there is evidence for the influence of each factor. In other words, it is possible that the disruption of any one of these components may lead to dysfunction. Additionally, connections to and from the hippocampus and thalamus are necessary for the system circuitry that allows the strengthening of individual dynamic columns and their connections.

    Neural synchronicity abnormalities, NMDARs, and amyloid-β’s effect on synaptic plasticity/loss, have been implicated as playing a role in Alzheimer’s disease [51,79,80,81]. In relation to autism, neural oscillatory patterns [82] and NMDARs [83] have received attention. Schizophrenia research has noted involvement of NMDARs, PV interneurons, and gamma oscillations [65]. In addition to each of these, it seems likely that the other factors influencing posited dynamic column formation may play a role in one or more of these disorders.

    The current theory suggests outer minicolumns are critical for column integrity. However, there has been no discussion as to how size and spacing of minicolumns may interact with dynamic column formation. To the knowledge of the current authors, there are no data available due to the novelty of the concept. However, altered or abnormal spacing of minicolumns have been mentioned in relation to schizophrenia [84,85], autism [86,87], and Alzheimer’s disease [88,89]. In addition to possible dynamic column formation problems, size and spacing of minicolumns may also have an effect on the ability to form long range inter-column connections. For example, there may not be the needed volume or size matching in more distal projection targets to allow a new column to form or be consolidated (e.g., reentrant processes). Thus, minicolumns spacing difference could explain the impaired connectivity between frontal and posterior cortical regions in autism [90], as well as the frontal lobe-related cognitive problems in schizophrenia [91]. In the case of Alzheimer’s disease, the thinning of minicolumns [89] may contribute to early loss of new column formation and the late loss of the integrity of dynamic columns that have existed for years. Briefly summarizing a few points will assist in understanding the implications of the current theory for schizophrenia, autism, and Alzheimer’s disease. The consolidation of new cortical memories requires both formation of new columns and their interconnections. A possible manner for these dynamics was discussed, emphasizing the coordination of PCs and inhibitory interneurons. Based on the need for each component to occur for both new learning and forming memories, it is possible to see why there is evidence for the influence of each factor. In other words, it is possible that the disruption of any one of these components may lead to dysfunction. Additionally, connections to and from the hippocampus and thalamus are necessary for the system circuitry that allows the strengthening of individual dynamic columns and their connections.

    2. Conclusions

    The current paper has provided a description of the microcircuitry processes that support the overlapping column aspects of the Dimensional Systems Model and the applied Clinical Biopsychology Model [14,15,16]. There are obviously a number of areas in which further clarifications are needed and confirmatory evidence is required. It is believed that at the macro and micro levels the models have now been described, a priori research hypotheses and associated studies can be designed at all levels. As when any grand theory is proposed in the presence of so much that is unknown, it is impossible to know how much will survive once it has been subjected to the test by fire involving the scrutiny of researchers with access to all the current and developing technologies. However, it appears the field of neuroscience is ripe for a different way of organizing the data in anticipation of the day that the human brain will finally understand the human brain.

    Conflict of interest

    No conflicts exist.

    [1] Mol G, Keesstra SD (2012) Soil science in a changing world. Curr Opin Environ Sust 4: 473-477.
    [2] Keesstra SD, Bouma J, Wallinga J, et al. (2016) The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, SOIL 2: 111-128.
    [3] Bastida F, Moreno JL, Hernández T, et al. (2006) Microbiological degradation index of soils in a semiarid climate. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 3463-3473. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.06.001
    [4] Adhikari K, Hartemink AE (2016) Linking soils to ecosystem services-A global review. Geoderma 262: 101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.08.009
    [5] Rasmussen C, Southard RJ, Howarth WR (2006) Mineral control of organic carbon mineralization in a range of temperate conifer forest soils. Global Change Biol 12: 834-847. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01132.x
    [6] Lal R, Follett RF, Kimble JM, et al. (2003) Achieving soil carbon sequestration in the United States: a challenge to the policy makers. Soil Sci 168: 827-845. doi: 10.1097/01.ss.0000106407.84926.6b
    [7] Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change. Geoderma 123: 1-22. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.01.032
    [8] Bai ZG, Dent DL, Olsson L, et al. (2008) Proxy global assessment of land degradation. Soil Use Manage 24: 223-234. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-2743.2008.00169.x
    [9] COM 2002, 179. Communication from the Commission to the Council and European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a thematic strategy for soil protection. Available from: http:// Europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/com/pdf/2002/com2002_0170en01.pdf.
    [10] Council Directive 2004/35/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on environmental liability with regard to the prevention and remedying of environmental damage.
    [11] Bastida F, Kandeler E, Moreno JL, et al. (2008) Application of fresh and composted organic wastes modifies structure, size and activity XE "activity" of soil microbial community under semiarid climate. Appl Soil Ecol 40: 318-329. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.05.007
    [12] Lal R (2011) Sequestering carbon in soils of agro-ecosystems. Food Policy 36: 33-39. doi: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.12.001
    [13] Kaiser K, Guggenberger G (2003) Mineral surfaces and soil organic matter. Eur J Soil Sci 54: 219-236. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2389.2003.00544.x
    [14] Kalbitz K, Schwesiga D, Rethemeyerb J, et al. (2005) Stabilization of dissolved organic matter by sorption to the mineral soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37: 1319-1331. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.028
    [15] Six J, Jastrow, JD (2002) Organic matter turnover. Encyclopedia of Soil Science. Marcel Dekker, Inc.
    [16] Pulleman MM, Marinissen JCY (2004) Physical protection of mineralizable C in aggregates from long-term pasture and arable soil. Geoderma 120: 273-282. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.09.009
    [17] García C, Hernández T, Roldán A, et al. (2000) Organic amendment and mycorrhizal inoculation as a practice in afforestation of soils with Pinus halepensis Miller: effect on their microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1173-1181. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00033-X
    [18] Tejada M, García C, Gonzalez JL, et al. (2006) Use of organic amendment as a strategy for saline soil remediation: Influence on the physical, Chemical and biological properties of the soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 1413-1421.
    [19] Garcia C, Hernandez T (1996) Organic matter in bare soils of the Mediterranean region with semi-arid climate. Arid Soil Res Rehab 10: 31-41. doi: 10.1080/15324989609381418
    [20] Zdruli P, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2004) Organic matter in the soils of Southern Europe. European Soil Bureau Research Report Nº 15. OOP EC, EUR 21083 EN Luxembourg.
    [21] Hernández MT, García E, García C (2015) A strategy for marginal semiarid degraded soil restoration: A sole addition of compost at a high rate. A five-year field experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 89: 61-71.
    [22] Zalidis G, Stamatiadis S, Takavaoglou V, et al. (2002) Impacts of agricultural practices on soil and water quality in the Mediterranean region and proposed assessment methodology. Agric Ecosyt Environ 88: 137-146. doi: 10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00249-3
    [23] Dunjó G, Pardini G, Gispert M (2003) Land use change effects on abandoned terraced soils in a Mediterranean catchment, NE Spain. Catena 52: 23-37. doi: 10.1016/S0341-8162(02)00148-0
    [24] Komatsuzaki M, Ohta H (2007) Soil management practices for sustainable agro-ecosystems. Sustain Sci 2: 103-120. doi: 10.1007/s11625-006-0014-5
    [25] Steenwerth KL, Hodson AK, Bloom AJ, et al. (2014) Climate-smart agriculture global research agenda: scientific basis for action. Agric Food Sec 3:11. doi: 10.1186/2048-7010-3-11
    [26] Calleja-Cervantes ME, Fernández-González AJ, Irigoyen I, et al. (2015) Thirteen years of continued application of composted organic wastes in a vineyard modify soil quality characteristics. Soil Biol Biochem 90: 241-259. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.002
    [27] Diacono M, Montemurro F (2010) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30: 401-422. doi: 10.1051/agro/2009040
    [28] Bastida F, Selevsek N, Torres IF, et al. (2015) Soil restoration with organic amendments: linking cellular functionality and ecosystem processes. Sci Rep 5: 15550. doi: 10.1038/srep15550
    [29] Nkoa K (2014) Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34: 473-492. doi: 10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z
    [30] Antolin MC, Pascaul I, Garcia C, et al. (2005) Growth, yield and solute content of barley in soils treated with sewage sludge under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. Field Crops Res 94: 224-237. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.009
    [31] Debiase G, Montemurro F, Fioreb A, et al. (2016) Organic amendment and minimum tillage in winter wheat grown in Mediterranean conditions: Effects on yield performance, soil fertility and environmental impact. Eur J Agron 75: 149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2015.12.009
    [32] Marron N (2015) Agronomic and environmental effects of land application of residues in short-rotation tree plantations: a literature review. Biomass Bioenerg 81: 378-400. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.07.025
    [33] Scotti R, Bonanomi G, Scelza R, et al. (2015) Organic amendments as sustainable tool to recovery fertility in intensive agricultural systems. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 15: 333-352.
    [34] Scotti R, Pane C, Spaccini R, et al. (2016) On-farm compost: a useful tool to improve soil quality under intensive farming systems. Appl Soil Ecol 107: 13-23. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.05.004
    [35] Hernandez MT, Mataix-Solera J, Lichner L, et al. (2007) Assessing the microbiological, biochemical, soil-physical and hydrological effects of amelioration of degraded soils in semiarid Spain. Biologia, 62: 542-546.
    [36] Zhang P, Wei T, Jia Z, et al. (2014) Effects of straw incorporation on soil organic matter and soil water-stable aggregates content in semiarid regions of Northwest China, PLoS ONE, 9: e92839.
    [37] Plaza C, Hernández D, García-Gil JC, et al. (2004) Microbial activity in pig slurry-amended soils under semiarid conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 36: 1577-1585. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.017
    [38] Tejada M, Hernández T, García C (2009) Soil restoration using composted plant residues: Effects on soil properties. Soil Till Res 102: 109-117. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2008.08.004
    [39] Ros M, García C, Hernández MT (2007) Pig slurry composts as substitute for mineral fertlizers in horticultural crops. effects on soil characteristics. Renew Agric Food Syst 22: 1-9. doi: 10.1017/S1742170507001500
    [40] Garcia-Ruiz R, Gomez-Munoz B, Hatch DJ, et al. (2012) Soil mineral N retention and N2O emissions following combined application of 15N-labelled fertiliser and weed residues. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 26: 2379-2385.
    [41] Hernández MT, Chocano C, Moreno JL, et al. (2014) Towards a more sustainable fertilization: Combined use of compost and inorganic fertilization for tomato cultivation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 196: 178-184. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.07.006
    [42] Baldi E, Toselli M, Marangoni B (2010) Organic fertilization leads to increased peach root production and lifespan. Tree Physiol 11: 1373-1382.
    [43] Eghball B (2000) Nitrogen mineralization from field-applied beef cattle feedlot manure or compost. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64: 2024-2030. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.6462024x
    [44] Basso B, Ritchie JT (2005) Impact of compost, manure and inorganic fertilizer on nitrate leaching and yield for a 6-year maize–alfalfa rotation in Michigan. Agric Ecosyst Environ 108: 329-341. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.01.011
    [45] Rathod DD, Rathod PH, Patel KP (2013) Integrated use of organic and inorganic inputs in wheat-fodder maize cropping sequence to improve crop yields and soil properties. Arch Agron Soil Sci 59: 1439-1455. doi: 10.1080/03650340.2012.724171
    [46] Hirzel J, Salazar F (2011) Uso de enmiendas orgánicas como Fuente de fertilización en cultivos. Fertilización de cultivos en Chile. In: Hirzel, J., Ed., Colección libros INIA, Nº 28. Chillán 2011.
    [47] Perez-Romero LF, Arroyo F, Santamaria C, et al. (2014) Growth, phenology and fruit set of Prunus armeniaca L. (cv. Ninfa) grafted on two rootstocks in organic and conventional management. Hort Sci 41: 101-106.
    [48] Lal R (2003) Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int 29: 437-450. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00192-7
    [49] Kizilkaya K, Bayrakli B (2005) Effects of N-enriched sewage sludge on soil enzyme activities. Appl Soil Ecol 30: 192-202.
    [50] Carlson J, Saxena J, Basta N, et al. (2015) Application of organic amendments to restore degraded soil: effects on soil microbial properties. Environ Monit Assess 187: 109. doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4293-0
    [51] US EPA (2007) The use of soil amendments for remediation, revitalization and reuse. Available form: http://www.epa.gov.
    [52] O'Connor GA, Elliott NT, Basta RK, et al. (2005) Sustainable Land Application. J Environ Qual 34: 7-17. doi: 10.2134/jeq2005.0007
    [53] Pascual JA, Garcia C, Hernandez T (1999) Lasting microbiological and biochemical effects of the addition of municipal solid waste on an arid soil. Biol Fert Soils 30: 1-6. doi: 10.1007/s003740050579
    [54] Otten L (2001) Wet-dry composting of organic municipal solid waste: current status in Canada. Can J Civil Eng 28: 124-130.
    [55] Wolkowski RP (2003) Nitrogen management considerations for land spreading municipal solid waste compost. J Environ Qual 32: 1844-1850. doi: 10.2134/jeq2003.1844
    [56] Khalil AI, Hassouna MS, El-Ashqar HMA, et al. (2011) Changes in physical, chemical and microbial parameters during the composting of municipal sewage sludge. World J Microb Biot 26: 2117-2122.
    [57] Wu D, Liu P, Luo Y, et al. (2010) Nitrogen transformations during co-composting of herbal residues, spent mushrooms, and sludge. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B Biomed Biotechnol 11: 497-505.
    [58] Soumaré M, FMG Tack, MG Verloo (2003) Effects of a municipal solid waste compost and mineral fertilization on plant growth in two tropical agricultural soils of Mali. Bioresour Technol 86: 15-20.
    [59] García-Gil JC, Plaza C, Soler-Rovira P, et al. (2000) Long-term effects of municipal solid waste compost application on soil enzyme activities and microbial biomass. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1907-1913. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00165-6
    [60] Tejada M, Gonzalez JL, García-Martínez AM, et al. (2008) Application of a green manure and green manure composted with beet vinasse on soil restoration: Effects on soil properties. Bioresour Technol 99: 4949-4957. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.026
    [61] García-Martínez AM, Diaz A, Tejada M, et al. (2010) Enzymatic production of an organic soil biostimulant from wheat-condensed distiller solubles: Effects on soil biochemistry and biodiversity. Process Biochem 45: 1127-1133. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2010.04.005
    [62] Parrado J, Bautista J, Romero EJ, et al. (2008) Production of a carob enzymatic extract: potential use as a biofertilizer. Bioresour Technol 99: 2312-2318. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.029
    [63] Parrado J, Escudero ML, Friaza V (2007) Enzymatic vegetable extract with bio-active components: influence of fertiliser on the color and anthocyanins of red grapes. J Sci Food Agric 87: 2310-2318. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2989
    [64] Tejada M, Benítez C, Gómez I, et al. (2011) Use of biostimulants on soil restoration: Effects on soil biochemical properties and microbial community. App Soil Ecol 49: 11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.07.009
    [65] García C, Hernández T, Costa F (1994) Microbial activity in soils under Mediterranean environmental conditions. Soil Biol Biochem 26: 1185-1191. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90142-2
    [66] Prayogo C, Jones JE, Baeyens J, et al. (2014) Impact of biochar on mineralisation of C and N from soil and willow litter and its relationship with microbial community biomass and structure. Biol Fert Soils 50: 695-702. doi: 10.1007/s00374-013-0884-5
    [67] Mankasingh U, Choi PC, Ragnarsdottir V (2009) Biochar application in Tamil Nadu and the global food crisis. In Goldschmitdt Conference-Challenges to our Volatile Planet, in Davos (Switzerland), Jun 21-26.
    [68] Singh R, Babu JN, Kumar R, et al. (2015) Multifaceted application of crop residue biochar as a tool for sustainable agricultura: en ecological perspective. Ecol Eng 77: 324-347. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.01.011
    [69] Uchimiya M, Lima IM, Thomas Klasson K, et al. (2010) Immobilization of heavy metal ions (Cu II, Cd II, Ni II, and Pb II) by broiler litter-derived biochars in water and soil. J Agric Food Chem 58: 5538-5544.
    [70] Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Megharaj M, et al. (2016) Agronomic and remedial benefits and risks of applying biochar to soil: Current knowledge and future research directions. Environ Int 87: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.018
    [71] Novak J, Lima I, Xing B (2009) Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals Environ Sci 3: 195-206.
    [72] Laird D, Fleming P, Wang B, et al. (2010) Biochar impact on nutrient leaching from a Midwestern agricultural soil. Geoderma 158: 436-442. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.012
    [73] Chen J, Liu X, Zheng J, et al. (2013) Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China. Appl Soil Ecol 71: 33-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.05.003
    [74] Jindo K, Sánchez-Monedero MA, Hernández T, et al. (2012) Biochar influences the microbial community structure during manure composting with agricultural wastes. Sci Total Environ 416: 476-481. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.12.009
    [75] Khodadad CL, Zimmerman AR, Green SJ, et al. (2011) Taxa-specific changes in soil microbial community composition induced by pyrogenic carbon amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 385-392. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.11.005
    [76] Grossman JM, O´Neil BE, Tsai SM, et al. (2010) Amazonian anthrosols support similar microbial communities that differ distinctly from those extant in adjacent, unmodified soils of the same mineralogy. Microb Ecol 60: 192-205. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9689-3
    [77] Nicolás C, Hernández T, García C (2012) Organic amendments as strategy to increase organic matter in particle-size fractions of a semi-arid soil. Appl Soil Ecol 57: 50-58. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2012.02.018
    [78] Lal R (2003) Soil erosion and the global carbon budget. Environ Int 29: 337-450. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00166-6
    [79] Krull ES, Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA (2004) Functions of soil organic matter and the effect on soil properties. In Residue, Soil Organic Carbon and Crop Performance, CSIRO Land and Water, PMB2, Glen Osmond SA 5064. GRDC Project No CSO 00029.
    [80] Zimmerman M, Leifeld J, Smchmidt MWI, et al. (2007) Measured soil organic matter fractions can be related to pools in the Roth C model. Eur J Soil Sci 58: 658-667. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2006.00855.x
    [81] García-Franco N, Martínez-Mena M, Goberna, M, et al. (2015) Changes in soil aggregation and microbial community structure control carbon sequestration after afforestation of semiarid shrublands. Soil Biol Biochem 87: 110-121. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.04.012
    [82] García C, Hernández T, Roldán A, et al. (2002) Effect of plant cover decline on chemical microbiological parameters under Mediterranean climate. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 635-642. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00225-5
    [83] Cerdà A, González-Pelayo O, Giménez-Morera A, et al. (2016) The use of barley straw residues to avoid high erosion and runoff rates on persimmon plantations in Eastern Spain under low frequency-high magnitude simulated rainfall events. Soil Res 54: 154-165.
    [84] Garcia C, Hernandez T, Costa F (1992) Variation in some chemical parameters and organic matter in soils regenerated by the addition of municipal solid-waste. Environ Manag 16: 763-768. doi: 10.1007/BF02645666
    [85] Pascual JA, García C, Hernández T, et al. (1997) Changes in the microbial activity of an arid soil amended with urban organic wastes. Biol Fertil Soils 24: 429-434. doi: 10.1007/s003740050268
    [86] Bastida F, Moreno JL, Garcia C, et al. (2007) Addition of urban waste to semiarid degraded soil: Long-term effect. Pedosphere 17: 557-567. doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(07)60066-6
    [87] García-Díaz A, Allas RB, Gristina L, et al. (2016) Carbon input threshold for soil carbon budget optimization in eroding vineyards. Geoderma 271: 144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.02.020
    [88] Bastida F, Hernandez T, Albaladejo J, et al. (2013) Phylogenetic and functional changes in the microbial community of long-term restored soils under semiarid climate. Soil Biol Biochem 65, 12-21.
    [89] Council Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 concerning integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC).
    [90] Agnello AC, Huguenot D, Van Hullebusch ED, et al. (2014) Enhanced phytoremediation: A review of low molecular weight organic acids and surfactants used as amendments. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 44: 2531-2576. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2013.829764
    [91] Wilcke W (2007) Global patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil. Geoderma 141: 157-166. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.007
    [92] Boitsov S, Jensen HKB, Klungsøyr J (2009) Natural background and anthropogenic inputs of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in sediments of South-Western Barents Sea Mar. Environ Res 68: 236-245.
    [93] Joner EJ, Johansen A, Loibner AP, et al. (2001) Rhizosphere effects on microbial community structure and dissipation and toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in spiked soil. Environ Sci Technol 35: 2773-2777. doi: 10.1021/es000288s
    [94] Haritash AK, Kaushik CP (2009) Biodegradation aspects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): A review. J Hazard Mater 169: 1-15.
    [95] Thapa B, Kumar KCA, Ghimire A (2012) A review on bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants in soil. Kathmandu Univ. J Sci Eng Technol 8: 164-170.
    [96] Kanaly RA, Harayama S (2010) Advances in the field of high-molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation by bacteria. Microb Biotechnol 3: 136-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7915.2009.00130.x
    [97] Loick N, Hobbs PJ, Hale MCD, et al. (2012) Bioremediation of poly-aromatic hyrdocarbon (PAH)-contaminated Soil by Composting. Crit Rev Env Sci Tec 39: 271-332.
    [98] García-Delgado C, D'Annibale A, Pesciaroli L, et al. (2015) Implications of polluted soil biostimulation and bioaugmentation with spent mushroom substrate (Agaricus bisporus) on the microbial community and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons biodegradation. Sci Tot Environ 508: 20-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.11.046
    [99] Kästner M, Miltner A (2016) Application of compost for effective bioremediation of organic contaminants and pollutants in soil. Appl Microbiol Biot 100: 3433-3449. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7378-y
    [100] Gan S, Lau EV, Ng HK (2009) Remediation of soils contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). J Hazar Mater 172: 532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.07.118
    [101] Samantha L Clay (2014) Identifying the fate of petroleum hydrocarbons released into the environment and their potential biodegradation using stable carbon isotopes and microbial lipid analysis. (Thesis) Master, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
    [102] Ros M, Rodríguez I, García C, et al. (2010) Microbial communities involved in the bioremediation of an aged recalcitrant hydrocarbon polluted soil by using organic amendments. Bioresour Technol 101:6916-6923.
    [103] Said-Pullicino D, Gigliotti G, Vella AJ (2004) Environmental fate of triasulfuron in soils amended with municipal waste compost. J Environ Qual 33: 1743-1751.
    [104] Purnomo AS, Mori T, KameiI N, et al. (2010) Application of mushroom waste medium from Pleurotus ostreatusfor bioremediation of DDT-contaminated soil. Int Biodeter Biodegr 64: 397-402.
    [105] Jaspers CJ, Ewbank G, McCarthy AJ, et al. (2002) Successive rapid reductive dehalogenation and mineralization of pentachlorophenol by the indigenous microflora of farmyard manure compost. J Appl Microb 92: 127-133. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01520.x
    [106] Wang H, Brown SL, Magesan GN, et al. (2008) Technological options for the management of biosolids. Environ Sci Pollut Res 15: 308-317. doi: 10.1007/s11356-008-0012-5
    [107] Guerrero C, Gomez I, Moral P, et al. (2001) Reclamation of a burned forest soil with municipal waste compost: macronutrient dynamic and improved vegetation cover recovery. Bioresour Technol 76: 221-227. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00125-5
    [108] Juwarkar AA, Jambhulkar HP (2008) Phytoremediation of coal mine spoil dump through integrated biotechnological approach. Bioresour Technol 99: 4732-4741. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.060
    [109] Kumar GP, Yadav SK, Thawle PR, et al. (2008). Growth of Jatropha curcas onmetal contaminated soil amended with industrial wastes and Azotobacter-a greenhouse study. Bioresour Technol 99: 2078-2082. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.032
    [110] Chiochetta CG, Cotelle S, Masfaraud JF, et al. (2016) Use of agro-industrial organic sludge amendment to remediate degraded soil: chemical and eco(geno)toxicological differences between fresh and stabilized sludge and establishment of application rates. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 23: 3018-3025.
    [111] Bianchi V, Masciandaro G, Giraldi D, et al. (2008) Enhanced heavy metal phytoextraction from marine dredged sediments comparing conventional chelating agents (Citric Acid and EDTA) with Humic Substances. Water Air Soil Pollut 193: 323-333. doi: 10.1007/s11270-008-9693-0
    [112] EEA environmental statement (2007) EMAS (with data from 2006). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. ISSN 1725-9851, ISBN 978-92-9167-936-2.
    [113] Jiménez-Cárceles FJ, Egea C, Rodríguez-Caparrós AB, et al. (2006) Contents of nitrogen, ammonium, phosphorus, pesticides and heavy metals, in a salt marsh in the coast of the Mar Menor lagoon (SE Spain). Fresenius Environ Bull 15: 370-378.
    [114] Hseu Z, Su SW, Yu HY, et al. (2010) Remediation techniques and heavy metal uptake by different rice varieties in metal‐contaminated soils of Taiwan: New aspects for food safety regulation and sustainable agriculture. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 5: 31-52.
    [115] Pardo Martínez-Fernández D, Clemente R, Walker DJ, et al. (2013) The use of olive-mill waste compost to promote the plant vegetation cover in a trace-element-contaminated soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21: 1029-1038.
    [116] He Z, Shentu J, Yang X, et al. (2015) Heavy metal contamination of soils: sources, indicators, and assessment. J Environ Indic 9:17-18.
    [117] Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin L (1998) Phytoremediation. Ann Rev Plant Phys Plant Mol Biol 49: 643-668.
    [118] Doni S, Macci C, Peruzzi E, et al. (2015) Heavy metal distribution in a sediment phytoremediation system at pilot scale. Ecol Eng 81: 146-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.049
    [119] Hueso-González P, Martínez-Murillo JF, Ruiz-Sinoga JDM (2014) The impact of organic amendments on forest soil properties under Mediterranean climatic conditions. Land Degrad Dev 25: 604-612. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2296
    [120] Paz-Ferreiro J, Lu H, Fu S, et al. (2013) Use of phytoremediation and biochar to remediate heavy metal polluted soils: a review. Solid Earth Discuss 5: 2155-2179.
    [121] Luna L, Pastorelli R, Bastida F, et al. (2016) The combination of quarry restoration strategies in semiarid climate induces different responses in biochemical and microbiological soil properties. Appl Soil Ecol 107: 33-47. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.05.006
    [122] Lakhdar A, Rabhi M, Ghnaya T, et al. (2009) Effectiveness of compost use in salt-affected soil. J Hazar Mater 171: 29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.05.132
    [123] Bhattacharyya R, Kundu S, Prakash V, et al. (2008) Sustainability under combined application of mineral and organic fertilizers in a rainfed soybean-wheat system of the Indian Himalayas. Eur J Agron 28: 33-46. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.04.006
    [124] Manna MC, Swarup A, Wanjari RH, et al. (2005) Long-term effect of fertilizer and manure application on soil organic carbon storage, soil quality and yield sustainability under sub-humid and semi-arid tropical India. Field Crops Res 93: 264-280. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.10.006
    [125] Ros M, Hernández MT, García C (2003) Soil microbial activity after restoration of a semiarid soil by organic amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 35: 463-469. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00298-5
    [126] Garg RN, Pathak H, Das DK, et al. (2005) Use of fly ash and biogas slurry for improving wheat yield and physical properties of the soil. Environ Monit Assess 107: 1-9. doi: 10.1007/s10661-005-2021-x
    [127] Ramulu US (2001) Reuse of municipal sewage and sludge in agriculture. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, India.
    [128] Parkpain PS, Sirisukhodom AA, Carbonell‐Barrachina (1998) Heavy metals and nutrients chemistry in sewage sludge amended Thai soils. Toxic/Hazar Subst Environ Eng 33: 4573-597.
    [129] Albiach R, Canet R, Pomares F, et al. (2001) Organic matter components and aggregate stability after the application of different amendments to a horticultural soil. Bioresour Technol 76: 125-129. doi: 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00090-0
    [130] Annabi M, Houot S, Francou C, et al. (2006) Improvement of aggregate stability after urban compost addition in a silty soil, in: Kraft E, Bidlingmaier W, de Bertoldi M, et al. Author, Biological Waste Management, From Local to Global, Proceedings of the International Conference ORBIT2006 /Eckhard Kraft.(Hrsg.) Weimar: Verlag ORBITe.V
    [131] Blanchet G, Gavazov K, Bragazza L, et al. (2016) Responses of soil properties and crop yields to different inorganic and organic amendments in a Swiss conventional farming system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230: 116-126. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.032
    [132] Jiang MB, Wang XH, Liusui YH, et al. (2017) Variation of soil aggregation and intra-aggregate carbon by long-term fertilization with aggregate formation in a grey desert soil. Catena 149: 437-445. doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.10.021
    [133] Peikert B, Schaumann GE, Bibus D, et al. (2017) Effects of olive oil mill wastewater on chemical, microbiological, and physical properties of soil incubated under four different climatic conditions. Biol Fert Soils: 53, 89-102.
    [134] Van-Camp L, Bujarrabal B, Gentile AR, et al. (2004) Reports of the Technical Working Groups Established under the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg.
    [135] Garcia C, Hernandez T, Albaladejo J (1998) Revegetation in semiarid zones: influence of terracing and organic refuse on microbial activity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 62: 670-76. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1998.03615995006200030018x
    [136] Bastida F, Torres IF, Hernández T, et al. (2013) Can the labile carbon contribute to carbon immobilization in semiarid soils? Priming effects and microbial community dynamics. Soil Biol Biochem 57: 892-902.
    [137] Tejada M, Moreno JL, Hernández MT, et al. (2007) Application of two beet vinasse forms in soil restoration: Effects on soil properties in and environment in southern Spain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119: 289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.07.019
    [138] Kiem R, Kögel-Knabner I (2003) Contribution of lignin and polysaccharides to the refractory carbon pool in C-depleted arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 35: 101-118. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00242-0
    [139] Abiven S, Menasseri S, Chenu C (2009) The effects of organic inputs over time on soil aggregate stability-A literature analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 41: 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.09.015
    [140] Gentile R, Vanlauwe B, Six J (2011) Litter quality impacts short-but not long-term soil carbon dynamics in soil aggregate fractions. Ecol Appl 21: 695-703. doi: 10.1890/09-2325.1
    [141] García E, García C, Hernández T (2012) Evaluation of the suitability of using large amounts of urban wastes for degraded arid soil restoration and C fixation. Eur J Soil Sci 63: 650-658. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2012.01472.x
    [142] Bhattacharya SS, Ki-Hyun K, Das S, et al. (2016) A review on the role of organic inputs in maintaining the soil carbon pool of the terrestrial ecosystem. J Environ Manage 167: 214-227. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.042
    [143] Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Bernal MP (2011) Improvement of soil quality after "alperujo" compost application to two contaminated soils characterised by differing heavy metal solubility. J Environ Manage 92: 733-741. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.018
    [144] Heidari G, Mohammadi K, Sohrabi Y (2016) Responses of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities to tillage and fertilization systems in soybean (Glycine max L.) Production. Front Plant Sci 7: 1730.
    [145] Fontaine S, Mariotti A, Abbadie L (2003) The priming effect of organic matter: a question of microbial competition? Soil Biol Biochem 35: 837-843. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(03)00123-8
    [146] Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanism and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1485-1498. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00084-5
    [147] Blagodatskaya E, Kuzyakov Y (2008) Mechanisms of real and apparent priming effects and their dependence on soil microbial biomass and community structure: critical review. Biol Fert Soils 45: 115-131. doi: 10.1007/s00374-008-0334-y
    [148] Saison C, Degrange V, Oliver R, et al. (2006) Alteration and resilience of the soil microbial community following compost amendment: effects of compost level and compost-borne microbial community. Environ Microb 8: 247-257. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00892.x
    [149] Ondoño S, Bastida F, Moreno JL (2014) Microbiological and biochemical properties of artificial substrates: A preliminary study of its application as Technosols or as a basis in Green Roof Systems. Ecol Eng 70: 189-199. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.05.003
    [150] Kandeler E, Tscherko D, Bruce KD, et al. (2000) Structure and function of the soil microbial community in microhabitats of a heavy metal polluted soil. Biol Fertil Soils 32: 390-400. doi: 10.1007/s003740000268
    [151] Pascual JA, García C, Hernández T, et al, (2000) Soil microbial activity as a biomarker of degradation and remediation processes. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 1877-1883. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00161-9
    [152] Alguacil MM, Díaz-Pereira E, Caravaca F, et al. (2009) Increased diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a long-term field experiment via application of organic amendments to a semiarid degraded soil. Appl Environ Microb 75: 4254-4263.
    [153] Fierer N, Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. P Nat Acad Sci USA 103: 626-631. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507535103
    [154] Acosta-Martínez V, Dowd S, Sun Y, et al. (2008) Tag-encoded pyrosequencing analysis of bacterial diversity in a single soil type as affected by management and land use. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2762-2770.
    [155] Oren A, Steinberger Y (2008) Catabolic profiles of soil fungal communities along a geographic climatic gradient in Israel. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2578-2587. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.024
    [156] Goberna M, Navarro-Cano JA, Valiente-Nauet A, et al. (2014) Abiotic stress tolerance and competition-related traits underlie phylogenetic clustering in soil bacterial communities. Ecol Lett 17: 1191-1201. doi: 10.1111/ele.12341
    [157] Chaudhry V, Rehman A, Mishra A, et al. (2012) Changes in bacterial community structure of agricultural land due to long-term organic and chemical amendments. Microb Ecol 64: 450-460. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0025-y
    [158] Ben-David EA, Zaady E, Sher Y, et al. (2011) Assessment of the spatial distribution of soil microbial communities in patchy arid and semi-arid landscapes of the Negev Desert using combined PLFA and DGGE analyses. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 76: 492-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01075.x
    [159] Kuske CR, Ticknor LO, Miller ME, et al. (2002) Comparison of soil bacteria communities in rizhospheres of three plant species and the interspaces in an arid grassland. Appl Environ Microbiol 68: 1854-1863.
    [160] Hortal S, Bastida F, Armas C, et al. (2013) Soil microbial community under a nurse-plant species changes in composition, biomass and activity as the nurse grows. Soil Biol Biochem 64: 139-146. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.04.018
    [161] Angel R, Soares MIM, Ungar E, et al. (2010) Biogeography of soil archaea and bacteria along a steep precipitation gradient. The ISME Journal 4: 553-563.
    [162] Neilson JW, Quade J, Ortiz M, et al. (2012) Life at the hyperarid margin: novel bacterial diversity in arid soils of the Atacama Desert, Chile. Extremophiles 16: 553. doi: 10.1007/s00792-012-0454-z
    [163] Connon SA, Lester ED, Shafaat HS, et al. (2007). Bacterial diversity in hyperarid Atacama desert soils. J Geophys Res: Biogeosciences 112.
    [164] Drees KP, Nielson JW, Betancourt JL, et al. (2006) Bacterial community structure in the hyperarid core of the Atacama Desert, Chile. Appl Environ Microb 72: 7902-7908. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01305-06
    [165] Fontaine S, Bardoux G, Abbadie L, et al. (2004) Carbon input to soil may decrease soil carbon content. Ecol Lett 7: 314-320. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00579.x
    [166] Senesi N, Plaza C (2007) Role of humification processes in recycling organic wastes of various nature and sources as organic amendments. Clean 35: 26-41.
    [167] Schnitzer M, Monreal CM (2011) Quo vadis soil organic matter research? A biological link to the chemistry of humification. In: Sparks DL Author, Advances in Agronomy, Burlington: Academic Press, 139-213.
    [168] Singh J, Kalamdhad AS (2012) Reduction of heavy metals during composting-A review. Int J Environ Protect 2: 36-43.
    [169] Plaza C, Senesi N (2009) The effect of organic matter amendment on native soil humic substances. In: Senesi PM, Huang XB Author, Biophysico-Chemical Processes Involving Natural Nonliving Organic Matter in Environmental System. Hoboken: Wiley & Sons, 147-181.
    [170] Bernal MP, Alburquerque JM, Moral R (2009) Composting of animal manures and chemical criteria for compost maturity assessment-a review. Bioresour Technol 100: 5444-5453. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.11.027
    [171] Larney FJ, Hao X (2007) A review of composting as a management alternative for beef cattle feedlot manure in southern Alberta, Canada. Bioresour Technol 98: 3221-3227. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2006.07.005
    [172] Medina J, Monreal C, Barea JM, et al. (2015) Crop residue stabilization and application to agricultural and degraded soils: A review. Waste Manage 42: 41-54. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.04.002
    [173] Lynch DH, Voroney RP, Warman PR (2006) Use of 13C and 15N natural abundance techniques to characterize carbon and nitrogen dynamics in composting and in compost-amended soils. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 103-114. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.022
    [174] Walter I, Martinez F, Cuevas G (2006) Plant and soil responses to the application of composted MSW in a degraded, semiarid shrubland in central Spain. Compost Sci Util 14: 147-154. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2006.10702276
    [175] Tittarelli F, Petruzzelli G, Pezzarossa B, et al. (2007) Quality and agronomic use of compost, in: Diaz LF, de Bertoldi M, Bidlingmaier W, et al. Author, Compost science and technology, Waste management, Elsevier Ltd., 119-145.
    [176] Zhang M, Heaney D, Henriquez B, et al. (2006) A four year study on influence of biosolids/MSW compost application in less productive soils in Alberta: nutrient dynamics. Compost Sci Util 14: 68-80. doi: 10.1080/1065657X.2006.10702265
    [177] Fernández-Getino AP, Pérez J, Albarrán MM, et al. (2012) Restoration of abandoned, degraded agricultural soil using composted biosolid: Influence on selected soil properties. Arid Land Res Manage 26: 200-210.
    [178] Fabrizio A, Tambone F, Genevini P (2009) Effect of compost application rate on carbon degradation and retention in soils. Waste Manage 29: 174-179. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2008.02.010
    [179] Ryals R, Silver WL (2013) Effects of organic matter amendments on net primary productivity and greenhouse gas emissions in annual grasslands. Ecol Appl 23: 46-69. doi: 10.1890/12-0620.1
    [180] Kätterer T, Börjesson G, Kirchmann H (2014) Changes in organic carbon in topsoil and subsoil and microbial community composition caused by repeated additions of organic amendments and N fertilisation in a long-term field experiment in Sweden. Agric Ecosyst Environ 189:110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.03.025
    [181] Macías F, Camps-Arbestain M (2010) Soil carbon sequestration in a changing global environment. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 15: 511-529. doi: 10.1007/s11027-010-9231-4
    [182] Rovira P, Vallejo VR (2002) Mineralization of carbon and nitrogen from plant debris, as affected by debris size and depth of burial. Soil Biol Biochem 34: 327-339. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(01)00186-9
    [183] Don A, Roedenbeck C, Gleixner G (2013) Unexpected control of soil carbon turnover by soil carbon concentration. Environ Chem Letters 11: 407-413. doi: 10.1007/s10311-013-0433-3
    [184] Odlare M, Pell M, Svensson K (2008) Changes in soil chemical and microbiological properties during 4 years of application of various organic residues. Waste Manage 28: 1246-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.06.005
    [185] Wienhold BJ, Andrews SS, Karlen DL (2004) Soil quality: a review of the science and experiences in the USA. Environ Geochem Health 26: 89-95. doi: 10.1023/B:EGAH.0000039571.59640.3c
    [186] Ge Y, Changrong C, Zhihong X, et al. (2010) Carbon/nitrogen ratio as a major factor for predicting the effects of organic wastes on soil bacterial communities assessed by DNA-based molecular techniques. Environ Sci Pollut R 17: 807-815. doi: 10.1007/s11356-009-0185-6
    [187] Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Ferre-Costa A, et al. (2012) Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agro-industrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy 40: 181-189. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.018
    [188] Watcharasukarn M, Kaparaju P, Steyer JP, et al. (2009) Screening Escherichia coli, Enteroccocus faecalis, and Clostridium perfringens as indicator organisms in evaluating pathogen-reducing capacity in biogas plants. Microb Ecol 58: 221-230. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9497-9
    [189] Boydston RA, Collins HP, Vaughn SF (2008) Response of weeds and ornamental plants to potting soil amended with dried distillers grains. Hort Sci 43: 191-195.
    [190] Kulling D, Stadelmann F, Herter U (2001) Sewage Sludge-Fertilizer or Waste? UKWIR Conference, Brussels.
    [191] Lopez-Mosquera ME, Moiron C, Carral E (2000) Use of dairy industry sludge as fertilizer for grassland in northwest Spain: heavy metal levels in the soil and plants. Resour Conserv Recy 30: 95-109. doi: 10.1016/S0921-3449(00)00058-6
    [192] Spencer JL, Guan J (2004) Public health implications related to spread of pathogens in manure from livestock and poultry operations. In: Spencer JFT, Ragout de Spencer AL Author, Public health microbiology: methods and protocols. Humana, Totowa, 503-515.
    [193] Hutchison ML, Walters LD, Avery SM, et al. (2005) Analysis of livestock production, waste storage, and pathogen levels and prevalences in farm manures. Appl Environ Microb 71: 1231-1236.
    [194] Bicudo JR, Goyal SM (2003) Pathogens and manure management systems: a review. Environ Technol 24: 115-130. doi: 10.1080/09593330309385542
    [195] Masse D, Gilbert Y, Topp E (2011) Pathogen removal in farm-scale psychrophilic anaerobic digesters processing swine manure. Bioresour Technol 102: 641-646. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.08.020
    [196] Angelidaki I, Ellegaard L, Ahring BK (2003) Applications of the anaerobic digestion process. In: Ahring BK Author, Biomethanation II. Berlin: Springer, 1-33.
    [197] Slana I, Pribylova R, Kralova A, et al. (2011) Persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratubercolosis at a farm-scale biogas plant supplied with manure from paratuberculosis-affected dairy cattle. Appl Environ Microb 77: 3115-3119.
    [198] Schnurer A, Schnurer J (2006) Fungal survival during anaerobic digestion of organic household waste. Waste Manage 26: 1205-1211. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.09.007
    [199] Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the protection of the environment, and in particular of the soil, when sewage sludge is used in agriculture.
    [200] Eldridge SM, Chan KY, Barchia I, et al. (2009) A comparison of surface applied granulated biosolids and poultry litter in terms of risk to runoff water quality on turf farms in Western Sydney, Australia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 134: 243-250. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.07.007
    [201] Navarro-Pedreño J, Almendro-Candel MB, Jordán-Vidal MM, et al. (2004) Risk areas in the application of sewage sludge on degraded soils in Alicante province (Spain). In: Martin JF, Brebbia CA, Godfrey AE, et al. Author, Geo-Environment. Southampton: WIT Press, 293-302.
    [202] Lag-Brotons AJ, Soriano-Disla JM, Gómez I, et al. (2013) Saline irrigation effects on Cynara cardunculus L. plants grown in Mediterranean soils. Hort Sci 48: 762-767.
    [203] Cai H, Chen T, Liu H, et al. (2010) The effect of salinity and porosity of sewage sludge compost on the growth of vegetable seedlings. Sci Hortic 124: 381-386. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.01.009
    [204] Pérez-Gimeno A, Navarro-Pedreño J, Almendro-Candel MB, et al. (2016) Environmental consequences of the use of sewage sludge compost and limestone outcrop residue for soil restoration: salinity and trace elements pollution. J Soil Sediment 16: 1012-1021. doi: 10.1007/s11368-015-1288-y
    [205] Young I, Crawford J (2004) Interactions and self-organisation in the soil-microbe complex. Science 304: 1634-1637. doi: 10.1126/science.1097394
    [206] Dominati E, Mackay A, Green S, et al. (2014) A soil change-based methodology for the quantification and valuation of ecosystem services from agro-ecosystems: a case study of pastoral agriculture in New Zealand. Ecol Econ 100: 119-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.02.008
    [207] Hewitt A, Dominati E, Webb T, et al. (2015) Soil natural capital quantification by the stock adequacy method. Geoderma 241-242: 107-114.
    [208] Mc Bratney A, Field DJ, Koch A (2014) The dimensions of soil security. Geoderma 213: 203-213. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.013
    [209] Robinson DA, Hockley N, Dominati EJ, et al. (2012) Natural capital, ecosystem services and soil change: why soil science must embrace an ecosystems approach. Vadose Zone J 11: 1-21.
    [210] Bouma J (2015) Reaching out from the soil-box in pursuit of soil security. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 61: 556-565.
    [211] Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, et al. (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812-818. doi: 10.1126/science.1185383
    [212] Montgomery, HL (2010) How is soil made? Crabtree Publishing, New York.
    [213] Zhou P, Sheng H, Lia Y, et al. (2016) Lower C sequestration and N use efficiency by straw incorporation than manure amendment on paddy soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 219: 93-100. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2015.12.012
    [214] Smith P, Fang C, Dawson JJC, et al. (2008) Impact of global warming on soil organic carbon. Adv Agron:97: 1-43.
    [215] Houghton RA (2007) Balancing the global carbon budget. Annu Rev Earth Pl Sc. Book Series. 35: 313-347. doi: 10.1146/annurev.earth.35.031306.140057
    [216] Six J, Frey SD, Thiet RK, et al. (2006) Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70: 555-569. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2004.0347
    [217] Powlson D, Whitmore A, Goulding K (2011) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. Eur J Soil Sci 62: 42-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x
    [218] Trasar-Ccepeda C, Leirós MC, Gil-Sotres F (2008) Hydrolytic enzyme activities in agricultural and forest soils. Some implications for their use as indicators of soil quality. Soil Biol Biochem 40: 2146-2155.
    [219] Shaw LJ, Burns RG (2006) Enzyme activity profiles and soil quality. In: Bloem J, Hopkins DW, Benedetti A Author, Microbiological Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. CABI, Oxfordshire, IK, 158-182.
    [220] Davidson EA, Janssens IA (2006) Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change. Nature 440: 165-173. doi: 10.1038/nature04514
    [221] Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, et al. (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota-A review. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 1812-1836. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022
    [222] Montiel-Rozas MM, Panettieri M, Madejón, P, et al. (2016) Carbon sequestration in restored soils by applying organic amendments. Land Degrad Dev 27: 620-629. doi: 10.1002/ldr.2466
    [223] Yazdanpanah N, Mahmoodabadi M, Cerdá A (2016) The impact of organic amendments on soil hydrology, structure and microbial respiration in semiarid lands. Geoderma 266: 58-65.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Robert A. Moss, Psychotherapy in pain management: New viewpoints and treatment targets based on a brain theory, 2020, 7, 2373-7972, 194, 10.3934/Neuroscience.2020013
    2. Oscar Hernández, Eduardo Zurek, John Barbosa, Minaya Villasana, Fabio Rapallo, A comparative study of the cortical function during the interpretation of algorithms in pseudocode and the solution of first-order algebraic equations, 2023, 18, 1932-6203, e0274713, 10.1371/journal.pone.0274713
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2017 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(10934) PDF downloads(2395) Cited by(34)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(3)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog