Review Special Issues

The Earth We are Creating

  • Over the past decade, a number of Earth System scientists have advocated that we need a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene, to describe the changes to Earth that have occurred since the 1800s. The preceding epoch, the Holocene (the period from the end of Earth's last glaciation about 12 millennia ago), has offered an unusually stable physical environment for human civilisations. In the new Anthropocene epoch, however, we can no longer count on this climate stability which we have long taken for granted. Paradoxically, it is our own actions that are undermining this stability—for the first time in history, human civilisation is now capable of decisively influencing the energy and material flows of our planet. Particularly since the 1950s, under the twin drivers of growth in population and per capita income, we have seen unprecedented growth in oil use and energy use overall, vehicle numbers, air travel and so on. This unprecedented growth has resulted in us heading toward physical thresholds or tipping points in a number of areas, points that once crossed could irreversibly lead to structural change in vital Earth systems such as climate or ecosystems. We may have already passed three limits: climate change; rate of biodiversity loss; and alterations to the global nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. The solutions usually proposed for our predicament are yet more technical fixes, often relying on greater use of the Earth's ecosystems, biomass for bioenergy being one example of this, and one we explore in this paper. We argue that these are unlikely to work, and will merely replace one set of problems by another. We conclude that an important approach for achieving a more sustainable and equitable world is to reorient our future toward satisfying the basic human needs of all humanity, and at the same time minimising both our use of non-renewable resources and pollution of the Earth's soil, air and water.

    Citation: Patrick Moriarty, Damon Honnery. The Earth We are Creating[J]. AIMS Energy, 2014, 2(2): 158-171. doi: 10.3934/energy.2014.2.158

    Related Papers:

    [1] Thomas Torku, Abdul Khaliq, Fathalla Rihan . SEINN: A deep learning algorithm for the stochastic epidemic model. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(9): 16330-16361. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023729
    [2] Giorgos Minas, David A Rand . Parameter sensitivity analysis for biochemical reaction networks. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(5): 3965-3987. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019196
    [3] Tianfang Hou, Guijie Lan, Sanling Yuan, Tonghua Zhang . Threshold dynamics of a stochastic SIHR epidemic model of COVID-19 with general population-size dependent contact rate. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(4): 4217-4236. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022195
    [4] Linda J. S. Allen, P. van den Driessche . Stochastic epidemic models with a backward bifurcation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2006, 3(3): 445-458. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.445
    [5] Sheng-I Chen, Chia-Yuan Wu . A stochastic programming model of vaccine preparation and administration for seasonal influenza interventions. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(4): 2984-2997. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020169
    [6] Shengnan Zhao, Sanling Yuan . A coral reef benthic system with grazing intensity and immigrated macroalgae in deterministic and stochastic environments. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(4): 3449-3471. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022159
    [7] David F. Anderson, Tung D. Nguyen . Results on stochastic reaction networks with non-mass action kinetics. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 2118-2140. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019103
    [8] Yangjun Ma, Maoxing Liu, Qiang Hou, Jinqing Zhao . Modelling seasonal HFMD with the recessive infection in Shandong, China. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(4): 1159-1171. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.1159
    [9] Damilola Olabode, Jordan Culp, Allison Fisher, Angela Tower, Dylan Hull-Nye, Xueying Wang . Deterministic and stochastic models for the epidemic dynamics of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(1): 950-967. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021050
    [10] Hermann Mena, Lena-Maria Pfurtscheller, Jhoana P. Romero-Leiton . Random perturbations in a mathematical model of bacterial resistance: Analysis and optimal control. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(5): 4477-4499. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020247
  • Over the past decade, a number of Earth System scientists have advocated that we need a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene, to describe the changes to Earth that have occurred since the 1800s. The preceding epoch, the Holocene (the period from the end of Earth's last glaciation about 12 millennia ago), has offered an unusually stable physical environment for human civilisations. In the new Anthropocene epoch, however, we can no longer count on this climate stability which we have long taken for granted. Paradoxically, it is our own actions that are undermining this stability—for the first time in history, human civilisation is now capable of decisively influencing the energy and material flows of our planet. Particularly since the 1950s, under the twin drivers of growth in population and per capita income, we have seen unprecedented growth in oil use and energy use overall, vehicle numbers, air travel and so on. This unprecedented growth has resulted in us heading toward physical thresholds or tipping points in a number of areas, points that once crossed could irreversibly lead to structural change in vital Earth systems such as climate or ecosystems. We may have already passed three limits: climate change; rate of biodiversity loss; and alterations to the global nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. The solutions usually proposed for our predicament are yet more technical fixes, often relying on greater use of the Earth's ecosystems, biomass for bioenergy being one example of this, and one we explore in this paper. We argue that these are unlikely to work, and will merely replace one set of problems by another. We conclude that an important approach for achieving a more sustainable and equitable world is to reorient our future toward satisfying the basic human needs of all humanity, and at the same time minimising both our use of non-renewable resources and pollution of the Earth's soil, air and water.


    [1] Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, et al. (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472-475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
    [2] Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, et al. (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil Trans Roy Soc A 369: 842-867. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
    [3] BP (2013) BP Statistical Review Of World Energy London: BP.
    [4] United Nations (UN) (2012) World Population Prospects: The 2012 Revision. Accessed on 20 March 2014 at (http://esa.un.org/unpd/wpp/Excel-Data/population.htm).
    [5] Energy Information Administration (EIA) (2011) International Energy Outlook 2011. US Dept. of Energy. Available at (http://www.eia.gov/forecasts/ieo/pdf/0484(2011).pdf).
    [6] Moriarty P, Honnery D (2011) Rise and Fall of the Carbon Civilisation. London: Springer.
    [7] Moriarty P, Honnery D (2014) Reconnecting technology with human welfare. Futures 55: 32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2013.12.003
    [8] Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner GK, et al. (eds) Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
    [9] Maddison A (2010) Statistics on world population, GDP and per capita GDP, 1-2006 AD. Accessed on 22 March 2014 at (http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/).
    [10] Smil V (2002) The Earth’s Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics and Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [11] Nicol S (2011) Givers of life. New Sci 9 July: 36-39.
    [12] Barnosky AD, Matzke N, Tomiya1 S (2011) Has the Earth’s sixth mass extinction already arrived? Nature 471: 51-57. doi: 10.1038/nature09678
    [13] Heinberg R (2007) Peak Everything: Waking up to the Century of Decline in Earth’s Resources. Forest Row, UK: Clairview.
    [14] Campbell CJ (2013) Recognising the second half of the oil age. Environ Innovation Soc Transitions 9: 13-17. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2013.08.004
    [15] Wikipedia (2014) Catastrophism. Accessed on 20 March 2014 at (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catastrophists).
    [16] Gould SJ, Eldridge N (1993) Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. Nature 366: 223-226. doi: 10.1038/366223a0
    [17] Velders GJM, Fahey DW, Daniel JS et al. (2009) The large contribution of projected HFC emissions to future climate forcing. Proc Nat Acad Sci 106: 10949-10954. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0902817106
    [18] Laurance W (2008) Tipping the balance. The Ecologist 38(6): 37-41.
    [19] Ditlevsen PD, Johnsen SJ (2010) Tipping points: Early warning and wishful thinking. Geophys Res Lett 37: 19703.
    [20] Tierney K (2008) Hurricane in New Orleans? Who knew? Anticipating Katrina and its devastation. Sociol Inquiry 78(2): 179-183.
    [21] Brulle RJ (2014) Institutionalizing delay: Foundation funding and the creation of U.S. climate change counter-movement organizations. Clim Change DOI 10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
    [22] Moriarty P, Honnery D (2010) A human needs approach to reducing atmospheric carbon. Energy Policy 38(2): 695-700.
    [23] Moriarty P, Honnery D (2011) Is there an optimum level for renewable energy? Energy Policy 39: 2748-2753. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.02.044
    [24] Van Vuuren DP, Stehfest E, den Elzen MGJ, et al. (2011) RCP2.6: Exploring the possibility to keep global mean temperature increase below 2 ℃. Clim Change 109: 95-116.
    [25] Dittmar M (2013) The end of cheap uranium. Sci Total Environ 461: 792-798.
    [26] Searle SY, Malins CJ (2014) Will energy crop yields meet expectations? Biomass Bioenergy Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.001.
    [27] Keller DP, Feng EY, Oschlies A (2014) Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario. Nature Comm 5: 1-11
    [28] Van Vuuren DP, Edmonds J, Kainuma M, et al. (2011) The representative concentration pathways: An overview. Clim Change 109: 5-31. doi: 10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z
    [29] Moriarty P, Honnery D (2007) Bioenergy: problems and prospects. Int J Global Energy Issues 27: 231-249. doi: 10.1504/IJGEI.2007.013657
    [30] Moriarty P, Honnery D (2009) What energy levels can the Earth sustain? Energy Policy 37: 2469–2474.
    [31] Van Vuuren DP, Sebastiaan D, van Ruijven BJ, et al (2013) The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 ℃—insights from integrated assessment modelling. Clim Change 118: 15-27. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0680-5
    [32] Krausmann F, Erb KH, Gringrich S, et al. (2013) Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. PNAS 110: 10324-10329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211349110
    [33] Moriarty P, Honnery D (2012) What is the global potential for renewable energy? Renew Sus Energy Rev 16: 244-252. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.151
    [34] Moriarty P, Honnery D (2012) Preparing for a low-energy future. Futures 44: 883-892. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2012.08.002
    [35] Hansen J, Sato M, Kharecha P, et al. (2011) Earth's energy imbalance and implications. Available at: http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1105/1105.1140.pdf.
    [36] Roe G (2010) Knowability and no ability in climate projections. Available at: http://earthweb.ess.washington.edu/roe/GerardWeb/Publications_files/Roe_Knowability_EPA.pdf.
    [37] Kitzes J, Wackernagel M, Loh J, et al. (2008) Shrink and share: Humanity's present and future Ecological Footprint. Phil Trans Roy Soc B 363: 467-475. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2164
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Amy D. Hagerman, Bruce A. McCarl, Jianhong Mu, 2010, 9780471761303, 10.1002/9780470087923.hhs696
    2. Jose Faro, Bernardo von Haeften, Rui Gardner, Emilio Faro, A Sensitivity Analysis Comparison of Three Models for the Dynamics of Germinal Centers, 2019, 10, 1664-3224, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02038
    3. S. Pant, B. Fabrèges, J-F. Gerbeau, I. E. Vignon-Clementel, A methodological paradigm for patient-specific multi-scale CFD simulations: from clinical measurements to parameter estimates for individual analysis, 2014, 30, 20407939, 1614, 10.1002/cnm.2692
    4. H. T. Banks, Sava Dediu, Stacey L. Ernstberger, Franz Kappel, Generalized sensitivities and optimal experimental design, 2010, 18, 0928-0219, 10.1515/jiip.2010.002
    5. H.T. Banks, Kathleen Holm, Nathan C. Wanner, Ariel Cintrón-Arias, Grace M. Kepler, Jeffrey D. Wetherington, A mathematical model for the first-pass dynamics of antibiotics acting on the cardiovascular system, 2009, 50, 08957177, 959, 10.1016/j.mcm.2009.02.007
    6. H. T. Banks, S. Dediu, S. L. Ernstberger, Sensitivity functions and their uses in inverse problems, 2007, 15, 0928-0219, 10.1515/jiip.2007.038
    7. H.T. Banks, Jared Catenacci, Shuhua Hu, Stochastic vs. Deterministic Models for Systems with Delays, 2013, 46, 14746670, 61, 10.3182/20130925-3-FR-4043.00022
    8. H. Thomas Banks, Marie Davidian, John R. Samuels, Karyn L. Sutton, 2009, Chapter 11, 978-90-481-2312-4, 249, 10.1007/978-90-481-2313-1_11
    9. Chloe Audebert, Petru Bucur, Mohamed Bekheit, Eric Vibert, Irene E. Vignon-Clementel, Jean-Frédéric Gerbeau, Kinetic scheme for arterial and venous blood flow, and application to partial hepatectomy modeling, 2017, 314, 00457825, 102, 10.1016/j.cma.2016.07.009
    10. Sanjay Pant, Information sensitivity functions to assess parameter information gain and identifiability of dynamical systems, 2018, 15, 1742-5689, 20170871, 10.1098/rsif.2017.0871
    11. Chloe Audebert, Irene E. Vignon-Clementel, Model and methods to assess hepatic function from indocyanine green fluorescence dynamical measurements of liver tissue, 2018, 115, 09280987, 304, 10.1016/j.ejps.2018.01.008
    12. A comparison of computational efficiencies of stochastic algorithms in terms of two infection models, 2012, 9, 1551-0018, 487, 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.487
    13. H. T. Banks, M. Davidian, Shuhua Hu, Grace M. Kepler, E. S. Rosenberg, Modelling HIV immune response and validation with clinical data, 2008, 2, 1751-3758, 357, 10.1080/17513750701813184
    14. Tejas Ghadiyali, Kalpesh Lad, Jayesh Dhodiya, 2018, Chapter 6, 978-981-10-6601-6, 51, 10.1007/978-981-10-6602-3_6
    15. Multiple endemic states in age-structured $SIR$ epidemic models, 2012, 9, 1551-0018, 577, 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.577
    16. H. T. Banks, Jared Catenacci, Shuhua Hu, A Comparison of Stochastic Systems with Different Types of Delays, 2013, 31, 0736-2994, 913, 10.1080/07362994.2013.806217
    17. Nonlinear stochastic Markov processes and modeling uncertainty in populations, 2012, 9, 1551-0018, 1, 10.3934/mbe.2012.9.1
    18. Mohammad Munir, Generalized sensitivity analysis of the minimal model of the intravenous glucose tolerance test, 2018, 300, 00255564, 14, 10.1016/j.mbs.2018.03.014
    19. Angelie Reandelar Ferrolino, Victoria May Paguio Mendoza, 2019, 2192, 0094-243X, 060008, 10.1063/1.5139154
    20. D. F. Yusupov, G. Abdullayeva, O. Aliev, S. Hamrayeva, 2021, 2402, 0094-243X, 050002, 10.1063/5.0071987
    21. José Faro, Emilio Faro, 2022, Chapter 10, 978-1-0716-1735-9, 111, 10.1007/978-1-0716-1736-6_10
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2014 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6669) PDF downloads(1459) Cited by(3)

Article outline

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog