Research article

Physicochemical characteristics of an alcohol hangover relief drink containing persimmon vinegar

  • Received: 26 August 2022 Revised: 09 December 2022 Accepted: 02 January 2023 Published: 03 March 2023
  • The development of alcohol hangover relief drinks by adding persimmon vinegar was investigated in this study. This study aimed to develop and investigate the physicochemical characteristics of a hangover relief drink, derived from persimmon vinegar, that may have health benefits. Persimmon vinegar was added at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5%. The higher the concentration of persimmon vinegar, the lower the pH, °Brix and reducing sugar content of the product. In contrast, higher titratable acidity, turbidity and tannin values were obtained with increasing concentrations of persimmon vinegar. The addition of 12.5% persimmon vinegar induced the highest alcohol dehydrogenase and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase activities at 160.91 and 117.14%, respectively. The L value also decreased as persimmon vinegar concentration increased. The addition of persimmon vinegar at high concentrations decreased fructose, glucose and maltose content but increased the sucrose content of the drink. Ca, K and Na were the most abundant minerals in the drink. Some organic acids, such as oxalic, malic, lactic, acetic, citric and succinic acids, were also detected in the developed alcohol hangover relief drink. This study suggests that adding 7.5% of persimmon vinegar improves the physicochemical characteristics, especially the Alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase activities. This finding indicates that this formulated drink with 75% persimmon vinegar may be beneficial against oxidative stress.

    Citation: Soo Won Lee, Hey Kyung Moon, Seul Lee, Yong Deuk Yun, Jong Kuk Kim. Physicochemical characteristics of an alcohol hangover relief drink containing persimmon vinegar[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 292-304. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023016

    Related Papers:

    [1] Irene Dini, Antonello Senatore, Daniele Coppola, Andrea Mancusi . Validation of a rapid test to dose SO2 in vinegar. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(1): 1-24. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023001
    [2] Joana Simões, Carolina Marmota, Lisa Moreira, Daniela V. T. A. Costa, Helena E. Correia, António Pinto, Dulcineia Wessel, Fernanda Delgado, João P. Carneiro, Carmo Horta, Kiril Bahcevandziev, Maria M. B. Vidal, Olga M. S. Filipe, Cristina Amaro da Costa . Biostimulants in organic vegetable nurseries: Study case in lettuce. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(3): 842-855. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024045
    [3] Alexandros Tsoupras, Eirini A. Panagopoulou, George Z. Kyzas . Anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic and anti-oxidant bioactives of beer and brewery by-products, as ingredients of bio-functional foods, nutraceuticals, cosmetics, cosmeceuticals and pharmaceuticals with health promoting properties. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2024, 9(2): 568-606. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2024032
    [4] Konrad Wojciech Nowak, Paweł Mielnik, Monika Sięda, Izabela Staniszewska, Anna Bieniek . The effect of ultrasound treatment on the extraction of lycopene and β-carotene from cherry silverberry fruits. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(1): 247-254. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021016
    [5] Namfon Samsalee, Rungsinee Sothornvit . Physicochemical, functional properties and antioxidant activity of protein extract from spent coffee grounds using ultrasonic-assisted extraction. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2021, 6(3): 864-878. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2021052
    [6] Anna Chizhayeva, Yelena Oleinikova, Margarita Saubenova, Amankeldy Sadanov, Alma Amangeldi, Aida Aitzhanova, Aigul Alybaeva, Makpal Yelubaeva . Impact of probiotics and their metabolites in enhancement the functional properties of whey-based beverages. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(3): 521-542. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.3.521
    [7] Seyi Olalekan Olawuyi, Abbyssinia Mushunje . Access to special COVID-19 relief from distress grant and livelihood outcome of livestock farming households in Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(2): 598-614. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023033
    [8] Febiani Dwi Utari, Dessy Agustina Sari, Laeli Kurniasari, Andri Cahyo Kumoro, Mohamad Djaeni, Ching-Lik Hii . The enhancement of sappanwood extract drying with foaming agent under different temperature. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(1): 214-235. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023012
    [9] Francesco Sottile, Stefano Massaglia, Valentina Maria Merlino, Cristiana Peano, Giulia Mastromonaco, Ferdinando Fornara, Danielle Borra, Oriana Mosca . Consumption vs. non-consumption of plant-based beverages: A case study on factors influencing consumers' choices. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2023, 8(3): 889-913. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2023047
    [10] Marcelo Augusto de Carvalho, Cíntia Sorane Good Kitzberger, Altamara Viviane de Souza Sartori, Marta de Toledo Benassi, Maria Brígida dos Santos Scholz, Clandio Medeiros da Silva . Free choice profiling sensory analysis and principal component analysis as tools to support an apple breeding program. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 769-784. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.769
  • The development of alcohol hangover relief drinks by adding persimmon vinegar was investigated in this study. This study aimed to develop and investigate the physicochemical characteristics of a hangover relief drink, derived from persimmon vinegar, that may have health benefits. Persimmon vinegar was added at concentrations of 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5%. The higher the concentration of persimmon vinegar, the lower the pH, °Brix and reducing sugar content of the product. In contrast, higher titratable acidity, turbidity and tannin values were obtained with increasing concentrations of persimmon vinegar. The addition of 12.5% persimmon vinegar induced the highest alcohol dehydrogenase and acetaldehyde dehydrogenase activities at 160.91 and 117.14%, respectively. The L value also decreased as persimmon vinegar concentration increased. The addition of persimmon vinegar at high concentrations decreased fructose, glucose and maltose content but increased the sucrose content of the drink. Ca, K and Na were the most abundant minerals in the drink. Some organic acids, such as oxalic, malic, lactic, acetic, citric and succinic acids, were also detected in the developed alcohol hangover relief drink. This study suggests that adding 7.5% of persimmon vinegar improves the physicochemical characteristics, especially the Alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase activities. This finding indicates that this formulated drink with 75% persimmon vinegar may be beneficial against oxidative stress.



    Vinegar can easily be found in the market. Commercially, the two types of vinegar are cider and regular vinegar. Cider vinegar is made from fruit juices [1], whereas regular vinegar is made from raw plant materials, such as grains, apples, grapes or sugar cane [2]. Alcoholic fermentation (in the presence of yeast, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae) and acetous fermentation (in the presence of acetic acid bacteria) are the two main biotechnological processes in vinegar production [3]. Alcoholic fermentation converts sugar to alcohol, whereas acetous fermentation converts it to acetic acid. The FDA recommends that natural vinegars should contain over 4 g of acetic acid per 100 mL. The nutritional constituents of vinegar include amino acids, sugars, vitamins and microelements [4]. Among the domestic standards of vinegar, persimmon vinegar contains > 2.6% acetic acid compared to other vinegars that contain 2.0–4.0% acetic acid. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration standards require vinegar to contain at least 4% acetic acid. Persimmon vinegar is known to have various effects, including those related to fatigue recovery by activation of metabolic functions in the body, prevention of osteoporosis and obesity, and elimination of hangovers by activation of alcohol decomposition.

    Chronic alcohol consumption can cause liver cell disorders that affect metabolism and have adverse effects on primary organs, as well as the gastrointestinal, nervous, endocrine, hematopoietic and immune systems. Alcoholism can also cause fatty liver disease, which results in alcoholic hepatitis and cirrhosis. However, the pathogenesis of ethanol-based liver diseases remains unclear. In addition to the toxic effects of alcohol, various factors contribute to its pathogenesis, such as direct or indirect nutritional disorders, genetics and immunological mechanisms.

    Several drugs have been developed to reduce or eliminate hangovers after drinking, in response to recent social trends in drinking culture. However, their toxicity and side effects necessitate the development of healthy beverages containing safe natural products. In Korea, persimmon vinegar is prepared using Acetobacter sp. It has been reported that persimmon vinegar with a titratable acidity content of 7% can be produced by acetic acid fermentation for 10–12 days after alcohol fermentation of persimmon pulp for five days, as a two-step process of alcohol and acetic acid fermentation [5]. This study aimed to develop a hangover relief drink with health benefits by producing vinegar through a traditional fermentation method, selecting herbal medicines that aid in fatigue recovery, establishing optimal extraction conditions, adding vinegar to the extract and investigating the chemical characteristics of the drink.

    The ingredients used in this experiment, such as Hovenia dulcis, Alnus japonica, Sorbus commixta, Schisandra chinensis, Pueraria Root, persimmon vinegar and jujube, were purchased from Jecheon Pharmaceutical Micro Farming Corporation, Korea. The mixture was prepared by combining all ingredients with tap water (30 times the total weight of the plant materials) in an extractor (KSNP-B1180-240L, Hanyang Industrial, Korea). The mixture is then heated to 50 ℃ for 8 hours. Once the heating process is complete, we added 8% honey, 2% pear concentrate, 4% xylitol and 0.01% refined salt to the extracts, and stirred in persimmon vinegar at six different concentrations (0%, 2.5%, 5%, 7.5%, 10% and 12.5%).

    A pH meter (Metrohm 691, Switzerland) was used to determine the pH of samples during fermentation. The titratable acidity content was measured using a titratable acidity method. A 1 mL sample of persimmon vinegar was added to 1% phenolphthalein, and used as the indicator. The prepared sample was then added to 0.1 N NaOH, which was used as a neutralizing agent. The titratable acidity content was calculated from the amount of NaOH consumed until a color change occurred in the sample.

    The sugar content of vinegar samples was measured using a refractometer (IT, Atago Co., Japan).

    The color of the sample was measured using a spectrophotometer (UV-1201, Shimadzu Co., Japan), and expressed in terms of Hunter color values, such as L value, redness (a) and yellowness (b). The values of L, a and b on standard white plates were 99.22, −0.25 and −0.29, respectively.

    Turbidity was measured by filtering vinegar (Whatman No. 1) using a spectrophotometer (UV-1201, Shimadzu Co., Japan) at 660 nm.

    The reducing sugar content was measured using the dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) method [6]. The samples (1 mL) were mixed with 1 mL of DNS solution, and 3 mL of distilled water was added to the mixture in a test tube. The mixture was heated in boiling water (100 ℃) for 15 min and cooled to 25 ± 2 ℃. A spectrophotometer (UV-1201, Shimadzu Co., Japan) was used to measure the absorbance at 546 nm. A standard glucose solution was prepared to obtain the standard curve. The R-value of the standard curve was 0.9957.

    The total tannin content was measured using a colorimetric method according to the AOAC method [7]. Folin-Denis reagent (5 mL) was mixed with 1 mL of the sample and added to 5 mL of saturated Na2CO3 solution. The mixture was then incubated at 25 ± 2 ℃ for 30 min, and the absorbance was measured at 760 nm. The total tannin content was calculated using a standard curve.

    Mineral analysis was performed using the method described by Martins et al. (2020) [8]. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP; Iris Intrepid, Thermo Elemental Co., UK) and iTEVA were used to measure axial pressure. The parameters for the analysis were set as follows: 1.15 kW of power; 12 L min−1 plasma flow rate; 0.5 L min−1 auxiliary gas flow rate; 0.5 L min−1 nebulizer flow rate; 30 s sample flush time; 2.0 mm torch injector tube i.d.; 3.0 mL min−1 sample uptake rate; 35 rpm average speed of the pump; 1 s replicate reading time; and 15 s instrument stabilization delay. The experiments were performed in triplicate. Elemental determination was performed by selecting high-intensity and minimum interference of the corresponding wavelengths. The analytical lines of measurement were as follows: Ca 393.366(85) nm; Cu 324.754(103) nm; K 766.491(44) nm; Mg 285.313(117) nm; Mo 202.030(166) nm; Na 588.995(57) nm; and Zn 223.856(157) nm.

    A high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to a refraction index detector (HPLC-RI) with a water Sugar-Pak 1 column (300 × 6.5 mm, 10 μm) was used to determine the sugar content of the samples. The flow rate was set at 0.60 mL min−1, the injection volume was 20 μL and the column temperature was 90 ℃. An isocratic solvent system consisting of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid calcium disodium salt (EDTA; 50 mg L−1) was used for 15 min. Calibration curves were constructed for each sugar standard (dissolved in water) for quantification. Each sample was aliquoted into a centrifuge tube, filtered with a 0.45-μM filter, and then injected into the HPLC-RI analyzer. All samples were analyzed three times.

    Organic content analysis was performed using the methods described by Pande and Akoh (2010) and Chen et al. (2006) [9,10]. Briefly, 2 ml of the sample was mixed with 10 mL of 1 M HCl, and the final volume was made up to 20 mL with 1 M HCl. The samples were flushed with nitrogen and centrifuged for 15 min (2000 rpm), heated for 30 min in a water bath at 90 ℃, and then cooled to 25 ℃. The supernatant was collected and filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane filter. HPCL (Water 2414, Water Co., USA) was used to analyze and identify the organic acid content. The injection volume was set to 20 μm, and the column temperature was maintained at 40 ℃. An Agilent Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C18 column (3.5 µm, 4.6 × 150 mm) was used for the chromatographic analysis. An isocratic mobile phase of 0.5% ammonium phosphate (pH adjusted to 2.8 with phosphoric acid) was used at a flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1. The detection was performed at 214 nm.

    This study used the method described by Choi et al. (1995) [11] with some modifications to determine ADH and ALDH activity. The in vitro activity of ADH was measured by NADH formation, and was determined spectrophotometrically at 340 nm using a UV/Vis spectrophotometer (UV-1201, Shimadzu Co., Japan). The first reaction was completed with the addition of 0.1 mL alcohol, 0.5 mL NAD aqueous solution (2 mg mL−1), 0.1 mL persimmon vinegar and 0.01 M glycine-NaOH. Subsequently, the buffer solution (pH 8.8) was adjusted to a final volume of 1.8 mL. The mixture was allowed to react in a water bath at 25 ℃ for 10 min, and then 0.25 mL of ADH (10 units mL−1) was added, and the absorbance at 340 nm was measured. Distilled water was added instead of the sample in the control reaction system. Hepos, which was used as a positive control, was purchased from a pharmacy. It was diluted 1:1, according to the prescription, before use. The ADH activity was defined as the maximum absorbance at the end of the reaction and was compared with the maximum absorbance of the control. It is expressed as a ratio and was calculated as follows:

    ADHactivity=(B/A)×100, (1)

    where:

    A: the maximum absorbance of the control;

    B: the maximum absorbance of the experimental group.

    The ALDH activity was measured based on NADH production. This method was modified from that of Koivula and Koivusalo (1975) [12]. ALDH analysis was performed by preparing a solution containing 2.1 mL of distilled water, 0.3 mL of 1 M Tris HCl, 0.1 mL of 3 M KCl, the specified concentration of persimmon vinegar (0.1 mL), 0.1 mL of 20 mM NAD, 0.1 mL of 0.33 M 2-mercaptoethanol, and 0.1 M acetaldehyde (0.1 mL). The mixture was allowed to react in a water bath at 25 ℃ for 10 min with ALDH (1-unit mL−1) (0.1 mL), and the absorbance was measured. ALDH activity was measured according to the formula used to calculate the ADH activity:

    ALDHactivity=(B/A)×100, (2)

    where:

    A: the maximum absorbance of the control;

    B: the maximum absorbance of the experimental group.

    SAS (Statistical Analysis System, version 12.0) was used for all statistical data and variance analyses, and Duncan's multiple range tests were used to determine significant differences.

    Table 1 shows the pH and titratable acidity content of the hangover relief drinks containing persimmon vinegar. The hangover relief drink without persimmon vinegar addition (0%) had the highest pH value (3.91 ± 0.01), and the lowest pH value (3.69 ± 0.01) was obtained with 12.5% persimmon vinegar addition. The pH decreased with increasing persimmon vinegar concentration. Another study found that the pH of persimmon peel vinegar was 3.64 [13]. In another study, pineapple waste vinegar attained a pH of 3 at the end of a 30-day acidification process [14].

    Table 1.  Effects of persimmon vinegar addition on pH, titratable acidity content, °Brix, turbidity, reducing sugar content and total tannin content of alcohol relief drink.
    Concentration of added persimmon vingar (%) pH Titratable acidity (%) °Brix (%) Turbidity (%) Reducing sugar (mg/mL) Total tannin (mg/100mL)
    0 3.91 ± 0.01d 1) 1.03 ± 0.01a 11.1 ± 0.06c 1) 0.060 ± 0.003a 1) 12.54 ± 0.38e 1) 0.091 ± 0.001a 1)
    2.5 3.74 ± 0.01ca 1.33 ± 0.01b 10.8 ± 0.06b 0.073 ± 0.004b 12.82 ± 0.43e 0.105 ± 0.004b
    5 3.71 ± 0.01b 1.60 ± 0.01c 10.8 ± 0.06b 0.080 ± 0.004c 12.06 ± 0.17cd 0.116 ± 0.001c
    7.5 3.72 ± 0.01b 1.83 ± 0.02d 10.7 ± 0.06b 0.091 ± 0.003d 11.77 ± 0.21bc 0.146 ± 0.004d
    10 3.71 ± 0.01b 2.17 ± 0.01d 10.5 ± 0.00a 0.097 ± 0.002e 11.31 ± 0.11b 0.170 ± 0.006e
    12.5 3.69 ± 0.01a 2.47 ± 0.00e 10.5 ± 0.06a 0.102 ± 0.002e 9.92 ± 0.43a 0.190 ± 0.004f
    1) Values are mean±standard deviation; a–f) Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Regular beverages sold on the market are measured at approximately 10 to 12% of °Brix, which is the most acceptable sugar concentration, and hangover-relieving drinks have similar °Brix values. The sugar content tended to decrease with the addition of persimmon vinegar. Similar to the result obtained in this study, it was found that the physicochemical properties of persimmon vinegar have been determined during fermentation; the titratable acidity content increased from 1.03 ± 0.01 to 2.47 ± 0.00 %, while °Brix values decreased from 11.1 ± 0.06 to 10.5 ± 0.06 %. These results indicate that persimmon fermentation is complete [15].

    Turbidity is a critical quality attribute of liquid foods because consumers prefer less turbid products. The presence of suspended solids results in turbidity of the liquid medium [16]. Table 1 shows the chromaticity of the hangover relief drinks containing persimmon vinegar. The turbidity of the persimmon vinegar drinks increased as the quantity of persimmon vinegar increased. Chromaticity was highest (0.102 ± 0.002 %) when 12.5% vinegar was added, and lowest (0.060 ± 0.003 %) when no vinegar was added.

    The reducing sugar content of the drinks prepared using varying concentrations of persimmon vinegar decreased with increasing persimmon vinegar concentration, a trend similar to that of the pH values. The highest reducing sugar content was 12.54 ± 0.38 mg/mL, obtained with the addition of 0% persimmon vinegar, and the lowest was 9.92 ± 0.43 mg/mL, obtained with the addition of 12.5% persimmon vinegar. In their study of balsamic vinegar, Laluo et al. [17] found that, among all samples, the total reducing sugar content decreased at the same time as the pH values decreased. Another study found that the reducing sugar content decreased from 7.68 ± 0.02 g 100 mL−1 to 2.64 ± 0.01 g 100 mL−1, and that the decline occurred slowly during alcohol fermentation of Zhenjiang aromatic vinegar [18].

    The total tannin content of persimmon vinegar drinks tended to increase with the addition of persimmon vinegar; the highest value was 0.190 ± 0.004 mg/100 mL, and the lowest value was 0.091 ± 0.001 mg/100 mL. This result was supported by a previous study that reported that persimmon is rich in polyphenols, such as tannin, gallic acid and flavin-3-ols [19]. Zou et al. [15] also reported that acetic and alcoholic fermentation increased the bioactive properties and tannin concentration of persimmons. Therefore, the greater the amount of persimmon vinegar added, the higher the total tannin obtained.

    Table 2 shows the chromaticity measurement results of L (lightness), a (redness) and b (yellowness) values for the hangover relief drinks. The highest L value was 24.64 ± 0.02, obtained for 0% persimmon vinegar addition; the lowest value was 23.49 ± 0.05 obtained for 12.5% persimmon vinegar addition. The L value decreased as persimmon vinegar concentration increased. Different trends were observed for these values. The lowest and highest a values were 0.30 ± 0.06 and 0.62 ± 0.05, respectively, obtained from the addition of 0 and 12.5% persimmon vinegar. In contrast, the b value was similar in all six treatments, within the range of 2.65 ± 0.01 and 2.60 ± 0.06. Color is an essential factor related to the sensory properties of a product [20]. The color change, especially on L values, depends on the persimmon vinegar concentration, which influences the tannin content.

    Table 2.  Effects of persimmon vinegar addition on color of alcohol relief drink.
    Concentration of added persimmon vinegar (%) L a b
    0 24.64 ± 0.02f 1) 0.30 ± 0.06a 2.65 ± 0.01
    2.5 24.34 ± 0.02e 0.36 ± 0.06b 2.63 ± 0.06
    5 24.04 ± 0.04d 0.46 ± 0.02c 2.60 ± 0.04
    7.5 23.82 ± 0.01c 0.53 ± 0.02c 2.63 ± 0.03
    10 23.61 ± 0.02b 0.62 ± 0.04d 2.61 ± 0.06
    12.5 23.49 ± 0.05a 0.62 ± 0.05d 2.60 ± 0.06
    1) Values are mean±standard deviation; a–f) Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 3 shows the results of inorganic substances in hangover-relieving beverages containing persimmon vinegar. The lowest measured value of Ca was 14.74 ± 0.23 ml/L, and the addition of 12.5% vinegar resulted in the highest value for Ca (21.37 ± 2.15 ml/L). The Cu content increased with the addition of 7.5% persimmon vinegar, whereas the addition of 7.5% or more vinegar resulted in a decrease in Cu content, with the addition of 10% vinegar showing the lowest value (0.098 ± 0.039 ml/L). The K content increased as the amount of persimmon vinegar increased. The 12.5% addition showed the highest value of 208.60 ± 3.42 ml/L. Mg and Zn content also showed trends similar to K content, with the 12.5% addition showing the highest value of Mg (17.21 ± 0.74 ml/L) and Zn (0.386 ± 0.102 ml/L). The lowest values for these two minerals were found for 0% persimmon vinegar addition at 8.03 ± 0.25 ml/L and 0.274 ± 0.005 ml/L, respectively. For Mo and Na, the 0% treatment resulted in values of 0.0110 ± 0.002 ml/L and 116.16 ± 0.94 ml/L, respectively. According to the above results, the mineral content of the hangover relief drink with added persimmon vinegar showed increasing mineral content for Ca, K, Mg and Zn as the amount of persimmon vinegar, liquid rich in inorganic content, increased. The results also showed that the most abundant minerals in persimmon vinegar were Ca, K and Na. Similarly, Na, K and Ca are the most abundant minerals present in vinegar [16]. Alcohol can interfere with the absorption and metabolism of nutrients in the body, including minerals, such as magnesium, potassium and sodium. These minerals are important for maintaining electrolyte balance and hydration, and their deficiency can contribute to hangover symptoms. Therefore, it is possible that beverages with higher mineral content may help to alleviate hangover symptoms by replacing some of the minerals that are lost during alcohol metabolism.

    Table 3.  Effects of persimmon vinegar addition on mineral content of alcohol relief drink.
    Mineral content
    mg/L
    Persimmon vinegar (%)
    0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5
    Ca 14.740 ± 0.230b 1) 15.390 ± 0.33a 15.410 ± 0.69a 16.760 ± 0.620b 17.780 ± 0.74b 21.370 ± 2.150c
    Cu 0.122 ± 0.092 0.127 ± 0.056 0.132 ± 0.025 0.289 ± 0.317 0.098 ± 0.039 0.112 ± 0.054
    K 49.860 ± 1.45a 90.610 ± 1.41b 114.130 ± 2.76d 145.500 ± 7.020d 183.910 ± 7.070e 208.600 ± 3.420f
    Mg 8.030 ± 0.250a 8.740 ± 0.180a 9.900 ± 0.28c 11.300 ± 0.620c 13.830 ± 0.620d 17.210 ± 0.740e
    Mo 0.011 ± 0.002c 0.008 ± 0.002b 0.007 ± 0.000ab 0.006 ± 0.002ab 0.006 ± 0.001ab 0.006 ± 0.002a
    Na 116.15 ± 0.940c 104.38 ± 2.03a 104.290 ± 3.02ab 106.660 ± 4.06ab 109.300 ± 2.430b 103.380 ± 1.490a
    Zn 0.274 ± 0.005a 0.285 ± 0.000a 0.300 ± 0.001ab 0.329 ± 0.001ab 0.367 ± 0.003bc 0.386 ± 0.102c
    1) Values are mean±standard deviation; a–f) Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (P < 0.05).

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 4 shows results of the free sugar content of hangover relief drinks containing persimmon vinegar. The free sugar content of the hangover relief drink showed a significant increase in the order of fructose, glucose and maltose. The 0% persimmon addition treatment showed the highest value of Fructose (334.60 mg/100 mL), whereas the 12.5% addition treatment showed the lowest value. Xylose and lactose were not detected. For sucrose, the lowest value in the control was 3.86 mg/100 mL, and the highest value was obtained at the 12.5% addition (8.43 mg/100 mL). The free sugar content tended to decrease as the amount of vinegar added increased; however, sucrose tended to increase slightly. The sucrose content may increase because of the fermentation process of persimmon vinegar production due to the conversion of the sucrose into other compounds. This can occur because persimmons are a source of sucrose, and the microorganisms present in the fermentation process may consume and convert some of this sucrose into other compounds. Thus, the more persimmon vinegar added, the higher the sucrose content.

    Table 4.  Effects of persimmon vinegar addition on free sugar of alcohol relief drink.
    Free sugar content (mg/100 mL) Concentration of added persimmon vinegar (%)
    0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5
    Xylose ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Fructose 334.6 319.93 318.2 315.29 311.29 276.17
    Glucose 299.73 280.58 273.41 272.9 268.62 242.37
    Sucrose 3.86 6.67 7.8 8.12 8.34 8.43
    Maltose 40.96 34.96 34.34 33.7 33.23 32.4
    Lactose ND ND ND ND ND ND
    ND: Not detected.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Table 5 shows content of organic acids in hangover relief drinks supplemented with persimmon vinegar. The drink had organic acid contents in the order of acetic, lactic and oxalic acid, with acetic acid found to be the most abundant. In the case of acetic acid, as the amount of vinegar added increased, a significant increase was observed. For the drink without persimmon vinegar, acetic acid concentration was 49.09 mg/100 mL, and the addition of 12.5% persimmon vinegar resulted in an increase in acetic acid concentration to 217.01 mg/100 mL. As previously reported, ingestion of persimmon vinegar, in which the main ingredients are acetic acid and other organic acids, promotes appetite and hinders glycolysis [21].

    Table 5.  Effects of persimmon vinegar addition on organic acid of alcohol relief drink.
    Organic acid content (mg/100 mL) Concentration of added persimmon vinegar (%)
    0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5
    Oxalic acid 41.18 42.07 41.61 44.23 44.57 45.82
    Tartaric acid ND ND ND ND ND ND
    Malic acid 25.84 25.85 26.63 27.34 28.52 29.24
    Lactic acid 42.79 43.12 43.52 49.71 54.91 55.94
    Acetic acid 49.09 86.35 127.45 164.39 203.76 217.01
    Citric acid 29.65 29.28 30.21 28 30.4 29.45
    Succinic acid 11.6 11.12 11.14 11.15 11.29 11.42
    ND: Not detected.

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    In the case of oxalic acid and lactic acid, the values gradually increased as the amount of vinegar added increased, whereas in the case of malic, citric and succinic acids, similar values were observed in each treatment, indicating no significant difference. Malic acid is characterized by its taste and acts as a flavor blender to create a smoother and more natural flavor [22]. Liu et al. [23] reported that malic acid significantly increased to 29.94% during persimmon wine production. Tartaric acid was not present in any of the tested samples. Overall, as the amount of vinegar was increased, the organic acid content gradually increased. Ren et al. [24] detected acetic, lactic, quinic, tartaric, propanedioic, malic, succinic and citric acids as the organic acids in persimmon vinegar. The highest succinic acid content was 11.60% when persimmon vinegar was not used. Succinic acid is a common metabolite produced by yeast during fermentation [23].

    Figure 1 shows the results of measuring the activities of ADH and ALDH in hangover relief drinks containing persimmon vinegar. The relative ADH activity increased as vinegar concentration increased. For 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5% persimmon vinegar, the values were 124.07,130.86,138.27,147.53,152.88 and 160.91%, respectively. The ALDH activity increased as the percentage of added vinegar increased (96.97, 98.66,101.51,106.72,113.78 and 117.14% for 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 and 12.5% persimmon vinegar addition, respectively).

    Figure 1.  Effects of persimmon vinegar addition on alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) and aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activities in the alcohol relief drink.

    Kim et al. [25,26,27] reported that consuming a sports drink containing persimmon vinegar resulted in the activation of oxygen transport during exercise, and improved recovery from exercise-induced fatigue. The drink with the highest ADH and ALDH activities was 12.5% persimmon vinegar. The same sample also contained the highest amount of acetic acid. Studies have shown that acetic acid can increase the activity of ADH and ALDH in animals and in cell cultures. For example, a study in rats found that acetic acid increased the activity of ADH in the liver, leading to a reduction in blood alcohol levels [28]. In addition, ALDH was strongly correlated with the average acidification rate. Furthermore, alcohol metabolism is accelerated by increasing the activity of alcohol-metabolizing enzymes, activating the anti-oxidative enzyme system against oxidative stress, and decreasing fat accumulation [29]. Therefore, persimmon fruit and leaf extracts might have the ability to improve alcohol metabolism and liver lipid profiles because they contain antioxidant components, such as flavones and phenolics. A study of the antioxidant activity of persimmon vinegar found that the highest activity in this test and inhibition rate was 89.7% [30]. In addition, the total antioxidant capacity of the total flavonoid extract of persimmon leaves is close to that of rutin, at a dose of 400 mg/mL [31].

    Preparing alcoholic beverages with persimmon vinegar affected the physical aspects of the alcohol relief drink. Higher persimmon vinegar resulted in a lower pH, °Brix and reducing sugar, but higher titratable acidity, turbidity and total tannin content in the product. However, adding more than 7.5% persimmon vinegar did not yield substantially different pH, °Brix and reducing sugar values. The pH, °Brix and reducing sugar values of 7.5% persimmon addition were 3.72 ± 0.01, 10.7 ± 0.00 and 11.77 ± 0.21, respectively. The 7.5% persimmon vinegar addition-product had a titratable acidity content of 1.83 ± 0.02, turbidity of 0.091 ± 0.003 and total tannin of 0.146 ± 0.004. There was no significant difference in the titratable acidity content between the 7.5 and 10% persimmon addition-products. The results also showed that the L value decreased drastically with the addition of 7.5% persimmon vinegar. Additionally, high concentrations of persimmon vinegar reduced fructose, glucose and maltose content. However, the sucrose content of the products increased significantly when 7.5% persimmon vinegar was added. Generally, Ca, K and Na have the highest mineral contents in drinks containing persimmon vinegar. In addition, the amounts of oxalic, malic, lactic, acetic and succinic acids increased. However, 7.5% persimmon vinegar had the lowest citric acid content, and increased ADH and ALDH activities were observed as the percentage of persimmon vinegar increased. Based on these results, we can conclude that the addition of 7.5% persimmon vinegar to alcohol hangover relief drinks had a greater impact on the physicochemical characteristics of the product. This finding indicates that the optimization usage of local food ingredients, such as persimmon vinegar and herbals selected ingredients in the formulation of alcohol hangover relief drinks, is worth studying further.

    We declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.



    [1] Madrera RR, Lobo AP, Alonso JJM (2010) Effect of cider maturation on the chemical and sensory characteristics of fresh cider spirits. Food Res Int 43: 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2009.08.014 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2009.08.014
    [2] Junior MM, Silva LO, Leão DJ, et al. (2014). Analytical strategies for determination of cadmium in Brazilian vinegar samples using ET AAS. Food Chem 160: 209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.090 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.090
    [3] Budak NH, Aykin E, Seydim AC, et al. (2014) Functional properties of vinegar. J Food Sci 79: 757–764. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12434 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.12434
    [4] Chou CH, Liu CW, Yang DJ, et al. (2015) Amino acid, mineral, and polyphenolic profiles of black vinegar, and its lipid lowering and antioxidant effects in vivo. Food Chem 168: 63–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.035 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.07.035
    [5] Seok TJ, Ji GK, Hyun SC, et al. (1996) Optimum condition of acetic acid fermentation for persimmon vinegar preparation and quality evaluation of persimmon vinegar. Korean J Food Preserv 3: 171–178.
    [6] Miller GL (1959) Use of dinitrosalicylic acid reagent for determination of reducing sugar. Anal Chem 31: 426–428. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60147a030 doi: 10.1021/ac60147a030
    [7] AOAC, Official method of analysis of AOAC international (2006) 18t Ed., AOAC INETRNATIONAL, Gaitersburg, MD, USA.
    [8] Martins AS, Junior JBP, de Araújo Gomes A, et al. (2020) Mineral composition evaluation in energy drinks using ICP OES and chemometric tools. Biol Trace Elem Res 194: 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-019-01770-y doi: 10.1007/s12011-019-01770-y
    [9] Pande G, Akoh CC (2010) Organic acids, antioxidant capacity, phenolic content and lipid characterisation of Georgia-grown underutilized fruit crops. Food Chem 120: 1067–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.11.054 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.11.054
    [10] Chen ZG, En BT, Zhang ZQ (2006) Simultaneous determination of eight organic acids in Fructus mume by RP-HPLC. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 31: 1783–1786.
    [11] Choi JT, Joo HK, Lee SK (1995) Physiochemical Properties, and Antioxidative and Alcohol-metabolizing Enzyme Activities of Nectarine Vinegar. Agri Chem Biotech 38: 278–282. https://doi.org/10.5352/JLS.2018.28.10.1193 doi: 10.5352/JLS.2018.28.10.1193
    [12] Koivula T, Koivusalo M (1975). Different from of rat liver aldehyde dehydrogenase and their subcellular distribution. Biochim Biophys Acta 397: 9–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-2744(75)90174-6 doi: 10.1016/0005-2744(75)90174-6
    [13] Bayram Y, Ozkan K, Sagdic O (2021) Bioactivity, physicochemical and antimicrobial properties of vinegar made from persimmon (Diospyros kaki) peels. Sigma J Eng & Nat Sci 38: 1643–1652.
    [14] Roda A, Lucini L, Torchio F, et al. (2017) Metabolite profiling and volatiles of pineapple wine and vinegar obtained from pineapple waste. Food Chem 229: 734–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.111 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.02.111
    [15] Zou B, Wu J, Yu Y, et al. (2017) Evolution of the antioxidant capacity and phenolic contents of persimmon during fermentation. Food Sci Biotechnol 26: 563–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0099-x doi: 10.1007/s10068-017-0099-x
    [16] Ozturk I, Caliskan O, Tornuk F, et al. (2015) Antioxidant, antimicrobial, mineral, volatile, physicochemical and microbiological characteristics of traditional home-made Turkish vinegars. LWT-Food Sci Technol 63: 144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.003 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.03.003
    [17] Lalou S, Hatzidimitriou E, Papadopoulou M, et al. (2015) Beyond traditional balsamic vinegar: Compositional and sensorial characteristics of industrial balsamic vinegars and regulatory requirements. J Food Compost Anal 43: 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.07.001 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.07.001
    [18] Duan W, Xia T, Zhang B, et al. (2019) Changes of physicochemical, bioactive compounds and antioxidant capacity during the brewing process of Zhenjiang aromatic vinegar. Molecules 24: 3935. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24213935 doi: 10.3390/molecules24213935
    [19] Jiménez-Sánchez C, Lozano-Sánchez J, Marti N, et al. (2015) Characterization of polyphenols, sugars, and other polar compounds in persimmon juices produced under different technologies and their assessment in terms of compositional variations. Food Chem 182: 282–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.008 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.03.008
    [20] Lopez F, Pescador P, Güell C, et al. (2005) Industrial vinegar clarification by cross-flow microfiltration: effect on colour and polyphenol content. J Food Eng 68: 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.05.021 doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.05.021
    [21] Fushimi T, Tayama K, Fukaya M, et al. (2001) Acetic acid feeding enhances glycogen repletion in liver and skeletal muscle of rats. J Nutr 131: 1973–1977. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/131.7.1973 doi: 10.1093/jn/131.7.1973
    [22] Zhuang H, Du J, Wang Y (2011) Antioxidant capacity changes of 3 cultivar Chinese pomegranate (Punica granatum L) juices and corresponding wines. J Food Sci 76: C606–C611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02149.x doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02149.x
    [23] Liu M, Yang K, Qi Y, et al. (2017) Physicochemical characteristics and antioxidant activity of persimmon wine by technology of pectinase addition and different pre-macerations. J Food Process Preserv 42: e13452. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.13452 doi: 10.1111/jfpp.13452
    [24] Ren M, Wang X, Tian C, et al. (2017) Characterization of organic acids and phenolic compounds of cereal vinegars and fruit vinegars in China. J Food Process Preserv 41: e12937. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpp.12937 doi: 10.1111/jfpp.12937
    [25] Kim KJ, Bae YS, Lee SC, et al. (1997) Influence of vinegar-drink with persimmon on oxygen transport function and recovery capacity in exercise. Korean J Phys Education 36: 102–113.
    [26] Kim KJ, Bae YS, Lee SC, et al. (1997) Effects of sport-drink with vinegar on the activation of lipid metabolism during exercise in obese men. J Korean Soc Aerobic Exerc 1: 48–58.
    [27] Kim KJ (1999) Effects of sport-drink with persimmon vinegar on ethanol oxidation and recovery of physiological function. Exerc Sci 8: 495–505.
    [28] Yim HJ, et al. (2008) The effect of vinegar on alcohol metabolism and hangover severity. Alcohol, Clin Exp Res 32: 1390–1397.
    [29] Song YS, Kim MJ, Ma J (2007) Protective effects of persimmon leaf and fruit extracts against acute alcohol-induced hepatotoxicity. Prev Nutr Food Sci 12: 202–208. https://doi.org/10.3746/jfn.2007.12.4.202 doi: 10.3746/jfn.2007.12.4.202
    [30] Sakanaka S, IshiharaY (2008) Comparison of antioxidant properties of persimmon vinegar and some other commercial vinegars in radical-scavenging assays and on lipid oxidation in tuna homogenates. Food Chem 107: 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.080 doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.08.080
    [31] Sun L, Zhang J, Lu X, et al. (2011) Evaluation to the antioxidant activity of total flavonoids extract from persimmon (Diospyros kaki L.) leaves. Food Chem Toxicol 49: 2689–2696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.042 doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.07.042
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2023 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3946) PDF downloads(300) Cited by(0)

Figures and Tables

Figures(1)  /  Tables(5)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog