Citation: Katarzyna Gościnna, Elżbieta Wszelaczyńska, Jarosław Pobereżny. Potential of a new beetroot cultivar ‘Śnieżna kula’ (Beta vulgaris L. ssp.)[J]. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 2020, 5(4): 563-577. doi: 10.3934/agrfood.2020.4.563
[1] | Tran Thi Tuyet-Hanh, Tran Khanh Long, Hoang Van Minh, Le Thi Thanh Huong . Longitudinal Household Trends in Access to Improved Water Sources and Sanitation in Chi Linh Town, Hai Duong Province, Viet Nam and Associated Factors. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(4): 880-890. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.880 |
[2] | Duong Minh Duc, Le Thi Vui, Hoang Ngoc Son, Hoang Van Minh . Smoking Initiation and Cessation among Youths in Vietnam: A Longitudinal Study Using the Chi Linh Demographic—Epidemiological Surveillance System (CHILILAB DESS). AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(1): 1-18. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.1.1 |
[3] | Nguyen Duc Thanh, Bui Tu Quyen, Truong Quang Tien . Validation of a Brief CES-D Scale for Measuring Depression and Its Associated Predictors among Adolescents in Chi Linh, Hai Duong, Vietnam. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(3): 448-459. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.3.448 |
[4] | Tran Thi Hai, Saptawati Bardosono, Luh Ade Ari Wiradnyani, Le Thi Hop, Hoang T. Duc Ngan, Huynh Nam Phuong . The optimal mid-upper-arm circumference cutoffs to screen severe acute malnutrition in Vietnamese children. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(1): 188-196. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020016 |
[5] | Meghan Fondow, Nancy Pandhi, Jason Ricco, Elizabeth Zeidler Schreiter, Lauren Fahey, Neftali Serrano, Marguerite Burns, Elizabeth A. Jacobs . Visit Patterns for Severe Mental Illness with Implementation of Integrated Care: A Pilot Retrospective Cohort Study. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(4): 821-831. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.821 |
[6] | Le Thi Diem Phuong, Tran Thi Tuyet Hanh, Vu Sinh Nam . Climate Variability and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever in Ba Tri District, Ben Tre Province, Vietnam during 2004–2014. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(4): 769-780. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.769 |
[7] | Germán Sánchez-Díaz, Greta Arias-Merino, Elisa Gallego, Rodrigo Sarmiento-Suárez, Verónica Alonso-Ferreira . Silicosis mortality in Spain (1999–2020): A temporal and geographical approach. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 715-728. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024036 |
[8] | Shima Nazari, Pouya Farokhnezhad Afshar, Leila Sadeghmoghadam, Alireza Namazi Shabestari, Akram Farhadi . Developing the perceived social support scale for older adults: A mixed-method study. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(1): 66-80. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020007 |
[9] | Le Thi Thanh Huong, Tran Thi Tuyet Hanh, Luu Quoc Toan, Do Thi Hanh Trang, Nguyen Thuy Quynh, Nguyen Quynh Anh, Tran Khanh Long, Stanley Fenwick, Nguyen Thanh Ha, Bruce H Alexander . Training need assessment for a master training program in Environmental Health program in Vietnam. AIMS Public Health, 2020, 7(1): 197-212. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2020017 |
[10] | Domenico Giuffrè, Angelo Maria Giuffrè . Mediterranean diet and health in the elderly. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(3): 568-576. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023040 |
Population aging is one important demographic trend in the 21st century and increased rapidly in developed countries where the population aged 60 years old or over has experienced the fastest pace ever: growing at 3.7 per cent annually between 2010 and 2015 and is estimated to go up by 2.9 per cent annually before 2050 and 0.9 per cent annually between 2050 and 2100, increasing from 554 million people in 2013 to 1.6 billion people in 2050 [1]. However, in developing countries, population aged 60 or over rose at 1 per cent annually before 2050 and 0.11 per cent from 2050 to 2100. The rate of ageing population is associated with various health problems in elderly people. Therefore, research and policies should be enhanced in order to improve the care and quality of life of the elderly [1].
The age-specific mortality rates in developed countries indicated that the mortality rates reduced dramatically in young age groups thanks to medical advancements, higher quality of life and mortality rates increased in old age groups due to aging and the increased proportion of the elderly. The mortality in all age groups in the world during 1970-2010 experienced a gradual reduction [2,3].
The mortality rate of the elderly aged 60-79 declined by about 40%-43% while that of those aged 80 years old or over climbed down by 25% in this period. In all age groups, the reduction rate among the male elderly was lower than that among the female elderly [2,3]. The world’s average life expectancy extended from 48 years old (1950-1955) to 68 years old (2005-2010), 76 years old (2045-2050) and 82 years old (2095-2100), and was higher in developed countries than in developing ones [1,4]. The life expectancy has changed over time, by geographical region and nation. According to the World Bank’s statistics, the highest life expectancy in 2013 belonged to Japan (83 years old) as opposed to 79 years old in the USA and 76 years old in Vietnam, and Botswana had the lowest life expectancy (47 years old) [5].
Mortality rates exert profound effects on the population scope and structure. A great variety of factors that may affect these rates include age, gender, residence, marital status, living conditions and genetic traits [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Research on mortality rates helps policy makers offer socio-economic resolutions and public health programs in order to reduce mortality rates, prolong life expectancy and lay the foundation for social insurance policies. Vietnam is facing the challenge of population aging in the coming years. According to statistical calculations Vietnam will enter " population aging" from 2017. There is limited knowledge the factors associated with mortality in older people living in Vietnam. Therefore, this study was taken to have scientific evidences for making appropriate recommendations to improve health care for elderly people in the locality. In this article, we used secondary data from the epidemiological population surveillance system in a town of Hai Duong province, Vietnam, with the aim to (1) Analyze the patterns of mortality among the elderly in Chi Linh, Hai Duong during the 2004-2012 period and (2) Identifying some factors associated with the mortality in the elderly.
The study used the secondary date from DESS-Chililab dataset. Besides, the indicators relating to mortality rates of reference groups employed for indirect standardizations were extracted from (1) the sample mortality surveillance system in Vietnam, 2009; (2) the age-specific and gender-specific Canadian mortality data 2009 and (3) The age-specific and gender-specific mortality data in the USA in 2009.
The epidemiological and population surveillance system was established by Hanoi school of Public Health in 2004 in seven communes/towns of Chi Linh rural district, Hai Duong province. Data were collected through this system consisted of basic demographic ones including birth, rate, migration, economic conditions, or marital status.
The sample-based mortality surveillance system in Vietnam 2009 was conducted on 2.6 million people from 668, 142 households residing in 192 communes/towns, Vietnam (accounting for 3% of the national population). Data collection and primary findings of the survey were described in detail elsewhere [12]. The dataset of the survey is in the public domain and can be accessed via the GSO’s website.
Canada’s mortality rates in 2009 [13], the age-specific mortality rates of Canada population by age group and sex, 2009 can be accessed via the Statistics Canada website.
United State of America’s mortality rates in 2009 [14], is in the public domain and can be accessed via the CDC’s website.
This was a longitudinal study; the dataset from DESS of Chililab was used. Main surveys are conducted every two years, while additional ones are carried out every six months for the sake of information update. Data are managed in Structured Query Language (SQL) server and stored in Hanoi school of Public Health.
Time to event: the time from the start of following till the occurrence of an event (death) or, for those who remained alive, till the end of the study (2012). For elderly people moving out of the study site, the end of follow-up period is the point of time when they move out of the study site. Two points of time when the elderly were followed are: the year 2004 (elderly aged 60 or over at this time) and any year after when a person turned 60 years old. Time to event is calculated in months.
Event/death: a binomial variable indicating whether a study subject (an elderly person) died or remained alive during the follow-up period.
Basic demographic variables of the elderly people in the DESS-dataset consist of age, gender, education, marital status and economic conditions.
The ages of the studied elderly people were calculated by subtracting the last follow-up dates (or dates of death) from their dates of birth and then dividing the differences by 365. We assigned participants to 5-year age groups.
Education of participants was categorized into 4 groups: (1) Primary school and under; (2) secondary school; (3) high school and (4) higher than high school.
Union status was categorized into 3 groups: (1) never married; (2) Currently married/ living as married and (3) were separated/divorced/windowed.
Socioeconomic status (SES): A household wealth status variable captured underlying long-term wealth based on ownership of consumer goods, dwelling characteristics, and water and sanitation. Principal component analysis was used to derive wealth scores, which were used to rank households into wealth quintiles from the poorest to the wealthiest.
The indicators used for indirect standardization were extracted from Vietnam’s death-related data in (1) the sample mortality surveillance system in Vietnam, 2009; (2) the age-specific and gender-specific Canadian mortality data 2009 and (3) The age-specific and gender-specific mortality data in the USA in 2009.
We extracted data from DESS database and exported to STATA 13.0 for analysis. Descriptive analyses were employed to produce mean values, deviations, frequencies and percentages relevant to variables.
Kaplan-Meier Survival analyses and Cox proportional-hazards regression models with Cox Hazard Ratios (CHR) were used to describe the tendencies and mortality patterns as well as analyze some factors associated with mortality. Cox regressions described crude and adjusted association between time to event and some explanatory variables.
In indirect standardization, reference groups were used to compare the mortality in Chililab with that in other groups. Indirect standardization is a method in which small-size samples were used, thereby not ensuring the accuracy of the age-specific and gender-specific ratios. Data important for indirect standardization entail: (1) age-and gender-specific distribution + the number of deaths; (2) age-and gender-specific ratios and death ratios. With this method, we applied standard population ratios to the study sample (Chililab population) to obtain standardized mortality rate and the age-and gender-specific ratios.
The study was approved by Hanoi school of Public Health (HSPH). Besides, the use of the secondary dataset was permitted by HSPH—the institution responsible for keeping the copyright of Chililab’s data during 2004-2014. This manuscript has been based on secondary datasets with all identifying information removed
The mortality rate (MR) of the elderly in this study was inclined to drop between 2005 and 2012; the highest rate was found in 2007 (28/1, 000 elderly people) and lowest in 2012 with 22/1, 000 elderly people (Figure 1). During the period, the MR in the male elderly group exceeded that in the female one.
In both the male and female elderly groups, the age-specific mortality rates increased by age group, which means the higher the age group the higher the mortality rate (Figure 2 & 3). In particular, the mortality rate of male elderly people aged 85 years old or reached up to 140/1, 000 compared to a lower rate of 50/1, 000 among female ones. The increase in the age-specific mortality rate among male elderly people (Figure 2) surpassed that among female ones (Figure 3).
The indirect standardization was employed with Vietnam’s data on elderly mortality in 2009 [12], Canada’s mortality data in 2009 [13] and that of the USA in 2009 [14]. Table 1 presents the current status of mortality among the elderly group in Chililab in comparison with the mortality rates in Vietnam, Canada and the USA.
Gender- age group | Mortality rate among Vietnam elderly people 20092 | Mortality rate among Canada elderly people 20093 | Mortality rate among America elderly people 20094 | Mortality in Chi Linh 2009 | Estimated number of death based on Vietnam MR | Estimated number of death based on Canada MR | Estimated number of death based on America MR 5 | ||
Elderly population | Number of death | Mortality rate | |||||||
Male | |||||||||
Age 60–64 | 21.84 | 9.6 | – | 835 | 8 | 9.58 | 45.69 | 8.02 | – |
Age 65–69 | 15.7 | 22.73 | 668 | 13 | 19.46 | 10.49 | 28.57 | ||
Age 70–74 | 24.5 | 589 | 17 | 28.86 | 14.43 | ||||
Age 75–79 | 81.79 | 41.6 | 56.88 | 448 | 13 | 29.02 | 69.76 | 18.64 | 39.08 |
Age 80–84 | 70.0 | 239 | 15 | 62.76 | 16.73 | ||||
Age 85 + | 164.5 | 153.96 | 166 | 11 | 66.27 | 27.30 | 25.56 | ||
Female | |||||||||
Age 60–64 | 11.88 | 6.2 | – | 1,069 | 6 | 5.61 | 29.74 | 6.63 | – |
Age 65–69 | 9.4 | 15.26 | 776 | 3 | 3.87 | 7.29 | 21.90 | ||
Age 70–74 | 15.8 | 659 | 11 | 16.69 | 10.41 | ||||
Age 75–79 | 57.45 | 26.3 | 41.34 | 651 | 17 | 26.11 | 84.166 | 17.12 | 43.8 |
Age 80–84 | 47.4 | 409 | 19 | 46.45 | 19.39 | ||||
Age 85 + | 131.8 | 132.04 | 405 | 40 | 98.77 | 53.36 | 59.42 | ||
Total | 32.43 | – | – | 6,914 | 173 | 229.356 | 209.80 | 218.33 1,2 | |
Standardized Mortality Ratio-SMR | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.73 | ||||||
1 Applying indirect standardization to compare death-related data in Chililab with those in some reference populations, including Vietnamese national and Canadian elderly people in 2009. 2 Sources: Vietnam’s sample-based mortality surveillance system in, 2009. 3 Canadian age- and gender-specific death rates in 2009: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-209-x/2013001/article/11785/tbl/tbl02-eng.htm. 4 American age- and gender-specific death rates in 2009: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_04.pdf. 5 Age group of 60-64 years old is excluded. |
The gender-standardized number and mortality rate of elderly deaths in Chililab were smaller than the national figures. The standardized mortality rates stood at 0.75%—the mortality rate among the elderly people in Chililab was 75% of the national one.
Table 1 shows the mortality rate among male elderly people in Chililab standardized by the Canadian mortality rate of 0.82; hence, the MR of male elderly people in Chililab is also lower (82% as much as) that of the Canadian MR. However, in the under 75 age group, the MR among the male elderly people in Chililab is in excess of the Canadian MR, while in the group aged 75 or over, it is lower. With regard to the female elderly, the MR in Chililab equated to the Canadian figure in all but the group aged 85 or over. Compared to the MR among elderly people aged 65 or over in the USA in 2009, that among those in Chililab is lower. It is only equal to 73% of the American figure.
In the multivariate analysis using Cox proportional-hazards regression, the female elderly people faced a risk of mortality 69% lower than their male counterparts (p < 0.01) when other factors remained the same. Apart from age, marital status and occupation, elderly people with high school education or higher had a higher risk of death (2.4 times) than those with lower education.
Table 2 indicates that as an elderly person lived one more year, his or her risk of death was 10 per cent higher. Separated/widowed/divorced elderly people had a risk of death 1.18 times higher than those living with their spouses and those who were single had a risk of death 1.73 times higher than those living with their spouses when all other variables were adjusted to be the same. Retired elderly people had a lower risk of death than those who engaged in farming (p < 0.01), and those from near-poor households faced a 0.85 per cent risk of death when compared to those from poor ones (p < 0.05) when all of the other variables were adjusted to be the same.
Factors | Crude HR (95% CI) | Adjusted HR (95% CI)** |
Gender (Reference group: Male) | ||
Female | 0.69 (0.62–0.75) | 0.69 (0.61–0.78) |
Age | 1.12 (1.11–1.12) | 1.10 (1.09–1.11) |
Education (Reference group: primary school and under) | ||
Secondary school | 0.93 (0.79–1.09) | 0.89 (0.76–1.06) |
High school | 0.91 (0.76–1.06) | 0.98 (0.80–1.21) |
Higher than high school | 1.80 (1.53–2.12) | 2.39 (1.93–2.97) |
Married (Reference group: Currently married/ living as married) | ||
Separated/ divorced/ windowed | 1.33 (1.19–1.49) | 1.18 (1.03–1.33)) |
Never married | 1.30 (0.78–2.17) | 1.73 (1.03–2.90) |
Occupation (Reference group: Famer) | ||
Retired | 0.93 (0.74–1.16) | 0.58 (0.45–0.74) |
Business | 0.80 (0.51–1.24) | 0.77 (0.49–1.20) |
Others | 1.09 (0.88–1.35) | 1.16 (0.94–1.45) |
Economy (Reference group: poorest) | ||
Near-poor (the second) | 0.83 (0.72–0.97) | 0.85 (0.73–0.99) |
Average (the third) | 0.95 (0.82–1.10) | 1.00 (0.85–1.16) |
Middle income (the fourth) | 0.92 (0.79–1.08) | 0.96 (0.81–1.13) |
Wealthy | 0.86 (0.74–1.01) | 0.89 (0.75–1.11) |
Similar to the world’s tendencies [2,3,7,15], the age-specific MR among the elderly people in Chi Linh had a proclivity to go down over the past time. The MR in almost all of the age groups were inclined to decrease thanks to improved health services, technological advancements, as well as the launch of more preventive and interventional programs with promising results. Besides, life expectancy has increased and age-specific mortality rates have reduced as a result of better economic conditions.
Reduction in the crude death rate is never an easy task due to such factors as environmental, economic, cultural, social and technological conditions. Over the past time, the investment in medical care and public health care originated from the national budget as well as other organizations and financial aids have significantly reduced the mortality rate in Vietnam and therefore Vietnam’s average life expectancy has increased.
In order to compare mortality rates across countries or regions with similar population size and socio-economic conditions, researchers employ direct and indirect standardization methods. In our study, we used the latter method with data on Vietnamese mortality rates of elderly people in 2009 [12], Canada’s mortality rates in 2009 [13] and the USA’s mortality rates in 2009 [14]. Vietnamese, American and Canadian figures were used as those of standard populations. Compared to the number of deaths among Vietnamese elderly people, that among Chililab’s elderly group was lower (the mortality rate in Chililab was also lower) when standardizing for both the male and female groups. The standardized mortality rate was 0.75—the MR among elderly people in Chililab was 75 per cent of Vietnamese MR. Chi Linh is a semi-mountainous, well-off town with good living conditions and economy. It is located in Hai Duong—a province on the top list of cities and provinces with fast economic growth and high living standard in Vietnam [16].
The research team employed the Survival analysis technique and presented results of Cox regression analyses on some factors attributable to the mortality of the elderly people in Chililab through calculation of Cox Hazard Ratios (CHR).
Age: In elderly people, the leading cause of death refers to age; as an elderly person lived one more year, his or her risk of death was 10 per cent higher which noticeably rapidly increased in the group aged 75 or over. The older an age group, the higher its MR. The increase in the age-specific MR of the male elderly people was higher than that of female ones. This is also the overall trend of mortality in the elderly throughout the world [6,7,13,14,17] as well as those in Vietnam [12]. As a person grows older, he or she tends to have compromised immune systems, low resilience, poor health and higher susceptibility to diseases. Even in the case of a person without a specific disease, his or her body parts will age sooner or later, leading to dis-function and eventually fatality (due to ageing). Generally, as the population ages, we will have to confront with numerous challenges, including the“double burden of diseases”[18] as do developing countries: for one thing, we have to keep on coping with infectious diseases, malnutrition and pregnancy complications; and for the other thing, we are challenged by the rapid growth of non-communicable diseases as the health care system is still of poor quality.
Gender: In all age groups, the MR of male elderly people was always higher than that of female ones, which resembles the results of other studies [2]. The difference between two gender groups in terms of MR results from the fact that men and women have different lifestyles. For example, men consume harmful and addictive products such as tobacco, alcohol/beer or illicit drugs more than women, thus suffering from detrimental health impacts as a consequence. That causes men to face a higher risk of diseases than women, which was also indicated in the results of analyzing disease-specific MR in the population and housing census 2009 [19]; the rate in men was 6.6/1, 000 people as opposed to 4.6/1, 000 people in women. Some studies also proved that the MR among the elderly smokers was higher than elderly non-smokers [6,20] and in Vietnam a great majority of elderly smokers were men.
Marital status: Marital status is also associated with the risk of death. Separated/divorced/widowed elderly people had the lower probability of survival over time compared to those living alone or with their spouses. In general, living with spouses exerted beneficial impacts on health in the elderly people because it provides with support and social security. Those living with their spouses rarely become stressed and have healthier lifestyles and reduced stress, thereby lessening the stimulation of endocrinal systems and slowing down the progression of atherosclerosis and other diseases [21]. Evidence from a prior retrospective study shows that loosen social relationships and loneliness have associations with the increased risk of death for both men and women [21]. Besides, elderly people who did not live with their spouses were more likely to take up harmful habits (e.g. smoking, alcohol consumption, or physical inactivity) than those living with their spouses [9]; these harmful habits make primary contributions to death in the elderly people.
Education: Elderly people’s education was related to their risk of death. Accordingly, those with high levels of education had lower risk than those with lower education. Those with higher education had certain social statuses, succeeded in their careers, and had better jobs and social relationships. They often had a higher income than those with lower education. Therefore, they had better quality of life and lower risk of death. Besides, those with high education had better knowledge and better awareness of their health. They leaded a healthier life and avoided bad health habits; thus, their risk of death was lower. This is not the result of changes when they get older, but a long-term process during which they practiced a healthy lifestyle.
Household economy: Elderly people from well-off households had lower risk of death than those from poor or near-poor households when adjusting for the differences by age, gender and other factors. Those from good economic conditions experienced better daily life and had better opportunity to take care of their own health. Furthermore, they had better access to health care of high quality as they had better economic conditions, i.e. they had better and more suitable choices of health services.
Living areas: Elderly living in urban areas had lower risk of death than those in rural areas. Indeed, many rural residents aged 60 or older still had to work hard on farms and do not have time for relaxation and self-care. Elderly people in urban areas are primarily civil servants or used to do jobs that allowed them to have more free time to relax and take care of their health and had better income. Apart from that, services and facilities for health care in urban areas are of better quality than in the rural areas, and nutritional status of elderly people here are also higher.
The study used secondary data, resulting in certain inevitable limitations. Firstly, factors considered as the causes of death such as health services, health care, supporting services and social security were not mentioned in the study because of data deficiency. Besides, information about the situation of diseases among elderly people is not available. That is the reason why it was not mentioned in this study.
We were not able to access age-specific and gender-specific mortality data of more updated reference groups, but only compared the data in 2009 with those in some populations.
The study results show that the age-specific mortality rates among elderly people living in Chi Linh had an inclination to decline over time. The MR among male elderly people has always been higher than that among female ones in all age groups. Mortality among elderly people in Chililab in 2009 was lower than Vietnamese, Canadian and American figures after applying the indirect standardization method based on reference groups. Some factors relating to mortality among elderly people included education, economic conditions and living with a spouse and age.
The study results suggested Elderly people supporting programs be focused on elderly people who lived alone, had low education or lived in low-income households. Elderly people are considered a vulnerable group in terms of access to health care programs or services, i.e. they had limited access to such programs or services.
All authors designed and conceptualized the study. QTB and PVC analyzed the data, interpreted the results. All authors contributed to critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content and read and approved the final manuscript.
All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper. The authors have not received any funding or benefits from industry or elsewhere to write this paper because we have used secondary data for writing the manuscript.
[1] |
Szaefer H, Krajka‐Kuźniak V, Ignatowicz, et al. (2014) Evaluation of the effect of beetroot juice on DMBA‐induced damage in liver and mammary gland of female Sprague-dawley rats. Phytother Res 28: 55-61. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4951
![]() |
[2] |
Clifford T, Howatson G, West D, et al. (2015) The potential benefits of red beetroot supplementation in health and disease. Nutrients 7: 2801-2822. doi: 10.3390/nu7042801
![]() |
[3] | Czapski J, Mikołajczyk K. Kaczmarek M (2009) Relationship between antioxidant capacity of red beet juice and contents of its betalain pigments. Pol J Food and Nutr Sci 59: 119-122. |
[4] |
Betancourt C, Cejudo-Bastante MJ, Heredia FJ, et al. (2017) Pigment composition and antioxidant capacity of betacyanins and betaxanthins fractions of Opuntia dillenii (Ker Gawl) Haw cactus fruit. Food Res Inter 101: 173-179. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.09.007
![]() |
[5] | Indumathi D, Sujithra K, Srinivasan S, et al. (2017) Protective effect of betanin against streptozotocin-nicotinamide induced liver, kidney and pancreas damage by attenuating lipid byproducts and improving renal biomarkers in Wistar rats. Int J Adv Res Biol Sci 4: 160-170. |
[6] | EFSA (2016) Journal Safety of the proposed extension of use of beetroot red (E 162) in foods for special medical purposes in young children. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS). EFSA Journal 14: 4487. |
[7] |
Cui Y, Li X, Xu L, et al. (2017) Nitrite contents in fresh vegetables of different families and genus. In: IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering 275: 012015. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/275/1/012015
![]() |
[8] |
Bryan NS, Alexander DD, Coughlin JR, et al. (2012) Ingested nitrate and nitrite and stomach cancer risk: An updated review. Food Chem Toxicol 50: 3646-3665. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.07.062
![]() |
[9] |
Lundberg JO, Weitzberg E (2013) Biology of nitrogen oxides in the gastrointestinal tract. Gut 62: 616-629. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301649
![]() |
[10] | Nemzer B, Pietrzkowski Z, Spórna A, et al. (2011) Betalainic and nutritional profiles of pigment-enriched red beet root (Beta vulgaris L.) dried extracts. Original Research Article. Food Chem 127: 42-53. |
[11] | Mereddy R, Chan A, Fanning K, et al. (2017) Betalain rich functional extract with reduced salts and nitrate content from red beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) using membrane separation technology. Food Chem 215: 311-317. |
[12] |
Guine RP, Goncalves F, Lerat C, et al. (2018) Extraction of Phenolic Compounds with Antioxidant Activity from Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.). Curr Nutr Food Sci 14: 350-357. doi: 10.2174/1573401313666170609102336
![]() |
[13] |
Sentkowska A, Pyrzyńska K (2018) Zwitterionic hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry for analysis of beetroot juice and antioxidant interactions between its bioactive compounds. LWT 93: 641-648. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.04.023
![]() |
[14] | Kazimierczak R, Hallmann E, Treščinska V, et al. (2011) Estimation of the nutritive value of two red beet (Beta vulgaris L.) varieties from organic and conventional cultivation. J Res Appl Agric Eng 56: 206-210. |
[15] |
Kujala TS, Loponen JM, Klika KD, et al. (2000) Phenolics and betacyanins in red beetroot (Beta vulgaris) root: Distribution and effect of cold storage on the content of total phenolics and three individual compounds. J Agric Food Chem 48: 5338-5342. doi: 10.1021/jf000523q
![]() |
[16] |
Wootton-Beard PC, Ryan L (2011) A beetroot juice shot is a significant and convenient source of bioaccessible antioxidants. J Funct Foods 3: 329-334. doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2011.05.007
![]() |
[17] | Latorre ME, de Escalada Plá MF, Rojas AM, et al. (2013) Blanching of red beet (Beta vulgaris L. var. conditiva) root. Effect of hot water or microwave radiation on cell wall characteristics. Food Sci Techno 50: 193-203. |
[18] | Gościnna K, Czapski J (2017) Effect on the size and parts of beetroot roots on health promoting compounds and antioxidant capacity juice. Zeszyty Problemowe Postępów Nauk Rolniczych 588: 149-157. (in Polish) |
[19] | Nilsson T (1970) Studies into the pigments in beetroot (Beta vulgaris L. ssp. vulgaris var rubra L). Lantbrukshogskolans Annaler 36: 179-197. |
[20] |
Fang Z, Zhang M, Su Y, et al. (2006) How to improve bayberry (Myrica rubra Sieb et Zucc) juice color quality: Effect of juice processing on bayberry anthocyanins and polyphenolics. J Agricul Food Chem 54: 99-106. doi: 10.1021/jf051943o
![]() |
[21] |
Griffiths DW, Bain H, Dale MFB (1992) Development of rapid colorimetric method for the determination of chlorogenic acid in freeze-dried potato tubers. J Sci Food Agricul 58: 41-48. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.2740580108
![]() |
[22] | Talburt W, Smith O (1987) Potato processing 1987, (No 6648 T3 1987) New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1-796. |
[23] | Baker WH, Thompson TL (1992) Determination of nitrate-nitrogen in plant samples by selective ion electrode. Southern cooperative series bulletin #368. Plant analysis reference procedures for the southern region of the United States 5: 23-26. |
[24] |
Benzie IF, Strain JJ (1996) The Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) as a measure of "antioxidant power": The FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239: 70-76. doi: 10.1006/abio.1996.0292
![]() |
[25] |
Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, et al. (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26: 1231-1237. doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3
![]() |
[26] | Biegańska-Marecik R, Czapski J, Błaszczyk P (2007) Determination of cultivar and technological process effect on the occurrence of bitter taste in red beet. Food Sci Technol Qual 14: 62-70. (in Polish) |
[27] |
Bean A, Sunnadeniya R, Akhavan N, et al. (2018) Gain‐of‐function mutations in beet DODA 2 identify key residues for betalain pigment evolution. New Phytologist 219: 287-296. doi: 10.1111/nph.15159
![]() |
[28] | Czapski J, Gościnna K, Kidoń M, et al. (2011) Beetroot juice. Influence of the weight and part of the beet root on the juice characteristics. Food Industry 65: 50-52. (in Polish) |
[29] | Gościnna K, Czapski J, Mikołajczyk-Bator K, et al. (2012) Content betalain pigments, nitrates and antioxidant capacity of beetroot juices depending on cultivars and the size of beetroot roots. Aparatura Badawcza i Dydaktyczna 17: 85-90. (in Polish) |
[30] | Jabłońska-Ceglarek R, Rosa R (2003) Influence of green manures on the quantity and quality of the yield of red beet. Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus 2: 21-30. (in Polish) |
[31] |
Wruss J, Waldenberger G, Huemer S, et al. (2015) Compositional characteristics of commercial beetroot products and beetroot juice prepared from seven beetroot varieties grown in Upper. Austria J Food Comp Anal 42: 46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2015.03.005
![]() |
[32] | Kazimierczak R, Hallmann E, Lipowski J, et al. (2014) Beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) and naturally fermented beetroot juices from organic and conventional production: metabolomics, antioxidant levels and anticancer activity. J Sci Food Agricul 94: 2618-2629. |
[33] | Bach V, Mikkelsen L, Kidmose U, et al. (2015) Culinary preparation of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.): The impact on sensory quality and appropriateness. J Sci Food Agr 95: 1852-1859. |
[34] |
Van Die J (1962) The distribution of carbohydrates. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 11: 418-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1438-8677.1962.tb00096.x
![]() |
[35] |
Vasconcellos J, Conte-Junior C, Silva D, et al. (2016) Comparison of total antioxidant potential, and total phenolic, nitrate, sugar, and organic acid contents in beetroot juice, chips, powder, and cooked beetroot. Food Sci Biotechnol 25: 79-84. doi: 10.1007/s10068-016-0011-0
![]() |
[36] |
Tamme T, reinik M, roasto M, et al. (2006) Nitrates and nitrites in vegetables and vegetable-based products and their intakes by the Estonian population. Food Addit Contam 23: 355-361. doi: 10.1080/02652030500482363
![]() |
[37] | Ziarati P, Arbabi-Bidgoli S (2014) Investigation of cooking method on nitrate and nitrite contents in crops and vegetables and assess the associatied health risk J Plant Anim Environ Sci 4: 46-50. |
[38] | Bahadoran Z, Mirmiran P, Ghasemi A, et al. (2015) Is dietary nitrate/nitrite exposure a risk factor for development of thyroid abnormality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nitric Oxide 47: 65-76. |
[39] | Raczuk J, Wadas W, Głozak K (2014) Nitrates and nitrites in selected vegetables purchased at supermarkets in Siedlce. Poland Annals Nat Inst Hyg 65: 15-20. |
[40] | Carrillo C, Wilches-Pérez D, Hallmann E, et al. (2019) Organic versus conventional beetroot. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant properties. LWT 116: 108-552. |
1. | Hong Thi Tran, Hoa Phuong Nguyen, Sue M. Walker, Peter S. Hill, Chalapati Rao, Validation of verbal autopsy methods using hospital medical records: a case study in Vietnam, 2018, 18, 1471-2288, 10.1186/s12874-018-0497-7 | |
2. | Shafeeq Ur Rahman, Jing-Cheng Han, Muhammad Ahmad, Shuai Gao, Khalid Ali Khan, Bing Li, Yang Zhou, Xu Zhao, Yuefei Huang, Toxic effects of lead (Pb), cadmium (Cd) and tetracycline (TC) on the growth and development of Triticum aestivum: A meta-analysis, 2023, 904, 00489697, 166677, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166677 |
Gender- age group | Mortality rate among Vietnam elderly people 20092 | Mortality rate among Canada elderly people 20093 | Mortality rate among America elderly people 20094 | Mortality in Chi Linh 2009 | Estimated number of death based on Vietnam MR | Estimated number of death based on Canada MR | Estimated number of death based on America MR 5 | ||
Elderly population | Number of death | Mortality rate | |||||||
Male | |||||||||
Age 60–64 | 21.84 | 9.6 | – | 835 | 8 | 9.58 | 45.69 | 8.02 | – |
Age 65–69 | 15.7 | 22.73 | 668 | 13 | 19.46 | 10.49 | 28.57 | ||
Age 70–74 | 24.5 | 589 | 17 | 28.86 | 14.43 | ||||
Age 75–79 | 81.79 | 41.6 | 56.88 | 448 | 13 | 29.02 | 69.76 | 18.64 | 39.08 |
Age 80–84 | 70.0 | 239 | 15 | 62.76 | 16.73 | ||||
Age 85 + | 164.5 | 153.96 | 166 | 11 | 66.27 | 27.30 | 25.56 | ||
Female | |||||||||
Age 60–64 | 11.88 | 6.2 | – | 1,069 | 6 | 5.61 | 29.74 | 6.63 | – |
Age 65–69 | 9.4 | 15.26 | 776 | 3 | 3.87 | 7.29 | 21.90 | ||
Age 70–74 | 15.8 | 659 | 11 | 16.69 | 10.41 | ||||
Age 75–79 | 57.45 | 26.3 | 41.34 | 651 | 17 | 26.11 | 84.166 | 17.12 | 43.8 |
Age 80–84 | 47.4 | 409 | 19 | 46.45 | 19.39 | ||||
Age 85 + | 131.8 | 132.04 | 405 | 40 | 98.77 | 53.36 | 59.42 | ||
Total | 32.43 | – | – | 6,914 | 173 | 229.356 | 209.80 | 218.33 1,2 | |
Standardized Mortality Ratio-SMR | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.73 | ||||||
1 Applying indirect standardization to compare death-related data in Chililab with those in some reference populations, including Vietnamese national and Canadian elderly people in 2009. 2 Sources: Vietnam’s sample-based mortality surveillance system in, 2009. 3 Canadian age- and gender-specific death rates in 2009: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-209-x/2013001/article/11785/tbl/tbl02-eng.htm. 4 American age- and gender-specific death rates in 2009: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_04.pdf. 5 Age group of 60-64 years old is excluded. |
Factors | Crude HR (95% CI) | Adjusted HR (95% CI)** |
Gender (Reference group: Male) | ||
Female | 0.69 (0.62–0.75) | 0.69 (0.61–0.78) |
Age | 1.12 (1.11–1.12) | 1.10 (1.09–1.11) |
Education (Reference group: primary school and under) | ||
Secondary school | 0.93 (0.79–1.09) | 0.89 (0.76–1.06) |
High school | 0.91 (0.76–1.06) | 0.98 (0.80–1.21) |
Higher than high school | 1.80 (1.53–2.12) | 2.39 (1.93–2.97) |
Married (Reference group: Currently married/ living as married) | ||
Separated/ divorced/ windowed | 1.33 (1.19–1.49) | 1.18 (1.03–1.33)) |
Never married | 1.30 (0.78–2.17) | 1.73 (1.03–2.90) |
Occupation (Reference group: Famer) | ||
Retired | 0.93 (0.74–1.16) | 0.58 (0.45–0.74) |
Business | 0.80 (0.51–1.24) | 0.77 (0.49–1.20) |
Others | 1.09 (0.88–1.35) | 1.16 (0.94–1.45) |
Economy (Reference group: poorest) | ||
Near-poor (the second) | 0.83 (0.72–0.97) | 0.85 (0.73–0.99) |
Average (the third) | 0.95 (0.82–1.10) | 1.00 (0.85–1.16) |
Middle income (the fourth) | 0.92 (0.79–1.08) | 0.96 (0.81–1.13) |
Wealthy | 0.86 (0.74–1.01) | 0.89 (0.75–1.11) |
Gender- age group | Mortality rate among Vietnam elderly people 20092 | Mortality rate among Canada elderly people 20093 | Mortality rate among America elderly people 20094 | Mortality in Chi Linh 2009 | Estimated number of death based on Vietnam MR | Estimated number of death based on Canada MR | Estimated number of death based on America MR 5 | ||
Elderly population | Number of death | Mortality rate | |||||||
Male | |||||||||
Age 60–64 | 21.84 | 9.6 | – | 835 | 8 | 9.58 | 45.69 | 8.02 | – |
Age 65–69 | 15.7 | 22.73 | 668 | 13 | 19.46 | 10.49 | 28.57 | ||
Age 70–74 | 24.5 | 589 | 17 | 28.86 | 14.43 | ||||
Age 75–79 | 81.79 | 41.6 | 56.88 | 448 | 13 | 29.02 | 69.76 | 18.64 | 39.08 |
Age 80–84 | 70.0 | 239 | 15 | 62.76 | 16.73 | ||||
Age 85 + | 164.5 | 153.96 | 166 | 11 | 66.27 | 27.30 | 25.56 | ||
Female | |||||||||
Age 60–64 | 11.88 | 6.2 | – | 1,069 | 6 | 5.61 | 29.74 | 6.63 | – |
Age 65–69 | 9.4 | 15.26 | 776 | 3 | 3.87 | 7.29 | 21.90 | ||
Age 70–74 | 15.8 | 659 | 11 | 16.69 | 10.41 | ||||
Age 75–79 | 57.45 | 26.3 | 41.34 | 651 | 17 | 26.11 | 84.166 | 17.12 | 43.8 |
Age 80–84 | 47.4 | 409 | 19 | 46.45 | 19.39 | ||||
Age 85 + | 131.8 | 132.04 | 405 | 40 | 98.77 | 53.36 | 59.42 | ||
Total | 32.43 | – | – | 6,914 | 173 | 229.356 | 209.80 | 218.33 1,2 | |
Standardized Mortality Ratio-SMR | 0.75 | 0.82 | 0.73 | ||||||
1 Applying indirect standardization to compare death-related data in Chililab with those in some reference populations, including Vietnamese national and Canadian elderly people in 2009. 2 Sources: Vietnam’s sample-based mortality surveillance system in, 2009. 3 Canadian age- and gender-specific death rates in 2009: http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/91-209-x/2013001/article/11785/tbl/tbl02-eng.htm. 4 American age- and gender-specific death rates in 2009: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr60/nvsr60_04.pdf. 5 Age group of 60-64 years old is excluded. |
Factors | Crude HR (95% CI) | Adjusted HR (95% CI)** |
Gender (Reference group: Male) | ||
Female | 0.69 (0.62–0.75) | 0.69 (0.61–0.78) |
Age | 1.12 (1.11–1.12) | 1.10 (1.09–1.11) |
Education (Reference group: primary school and under) | ||
Secondary school | 0.93 (0.79–1.09) | 0.89 (0.76–1.06) |
High school | 0.91 (0.76–1.06) | 0.98 (0.80–1.21) |
Higher than high school | 1.80 (1.53–2.12) | 2.39 (1.93–2.97) |
Married (Reference group: Currently married/ living as married) | ||
Separated/ divorced/ windowed | 1.33 (1.19–1.49) | 1.18 (1.03–1.33)) |
Never married | 1.30 (0.78–2.17) | 1.73 (1.03–2.90) |
Occupation (Reference group: Famer) | ||
Retired | 0.93 (0.74–1.16) | 0.58 (0.45–0.74) |
Business | 0.80 (0.51–1.24) | 0.77 (0.49–1.20) |
Others | 1.09 (0.88–1.35) | 1.16 (0.94–1.45) |
Economy (Reference group: poorest) | ||
Near-poor (the second) | 0.83 (0.72–0.97) | 0.85 (0.73–0.99) |
Average (the third) | 0.95 (0.82–1.10) | 1.00 (0.85–1.16) |
Middle income (the fourth) | 0.92 (0.79–1.08) | 0.96 (0.81–1.13) |
Wealthy | 0.86 (0.74–1.01) | 0.89 (0.75–1.11) |