Modeling exchange rate volatility: application of GARCH models with a Normal Tempered Stable distribution

Sahar Charfi; Farouk Mselmi; Sahar Charfi; Farouk Mselmi

doi:10.3934/QFE.2022009

Quantitative Finance and Economics

2022, Volume 6, Issue 2: 206-222. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2022009

Previous Article Next Article

Research article

Modeling exchange rate volatility: application of GARCH models with a Normal Tempered Stable distribution

Sahar Charfi ^{1
,
,},
Farouk Mselmi ²

1.
Departement of Finance, Faculty of economics and management Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia
2.
Euromed Research Center, Euromed University of Fes (UEMF), Fes, Morocco

Received: 14 March 2022 Revised: 04 May 2022 Accepted: 10 May 2022 Published: 12 May 2022
JEL Codes: C52, C580, E44, E47

The aim of this paper is to examine exchange rate volatility using GARCH models with a new innovation distribution, the Normal Tempered Stable. We estimated daily exchange rate volatility using different distributions (Normal, Student, NIG) in order to specify the performed model. In addition, a forecasting analysis is performed to check which distribution reveals the best out-of-sample results. We found that the estimated parameters of GARCH-NTS model outperform the GARCH-N and GARCH-t ones for all currencies. Besides, we asserted that GARCH-NTS and EGARCH-NTS are the preferred models in terms of out-of sample forecasting accuracy. Our results indicating the performance of GARCH models with NTS distribution contribute to increase the accuracy of risk measures which is very important for international traders and investors.
- GARCH,
- Normal Tempered Stable distribution,
- exchange rate volatility
Citation: Sahar Charfi, Farouk Mselmi. Modeling exchange rate volatility: application of GARCH models with a Normal Tempered Stable distribution[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2022, 6(2): 206-222. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2022009

Related Papers:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to examine exchange rate volatility using GARCH models with a new innovation distribution, the Normal Tempered Stable. We estimated daily exchange rate volatility using different distributions (Normal, Student, NIG) in order to specify the performed model. In addition, a forecasting analysis is performed to check which distribution reveals the best out-of-sample results. We found that the estimated parameters of GARCH-NTS model outperform the GARCH-N and GARCH-t ones for all currencies. Besides, we asserted that GARCH-NTS and EGARCH-NTS are the preferred models in terms of out-of sample forecasting accuracy. Our results indicating the performance of GARCH models with NTS distribution contribute to increase the accuracy of risk measures which is very important for international traders and investors.

References

[1]	Abdullah SM, Siddiqua S, Siddiquee MSH, et al. (2017) Modeling and forecasting exchange rate volatility in Bangladesh using GARCH models: a comparison based on normal and Student's t-error distribution. Financ Innov 3: 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-017-0071-z doi: 10.1186/s40854-017-0071-z
[2]	Abounoori A, Elmi ZM, Nademi Y (2016) Forecasting Tehran stock exchange volatility; Markov switching GARCH approach. Phys A 445: 264–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2015.10.024 doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.10.024
[3]	Atabani Adi A (2019) Modeling exchange rate return volatility of RMB/USD using GARCH family models. J Chinese Econ Bus Stud 17: 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2019.1600933 doi: 10.1080/14765284.2019.1600933
[4]	Baillie R, Bollerslev T (2002) The message in daily exchange rates: a conditional-variance tale. J Bus Econ Stat 20–1: 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500102753410390 doi: 10.1198/073500102753410390
[5]	Barndorff-Nielsen OE (1997) Normal inverse Gaussian distributions and stochastic volatility modeling. Scand J Stat 24: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9469.t01-1-00045 doi: 10.1111/1467-9469.t01-1-00045
[6]	Barndorff-Nielsen OE, Levendorskii SZ (2001) Feller processes of normal inverse Gaussian type. Quant Financ 1: 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1088/1469-7688/1/3/303 doi: 10.1088/1469-7688/1/3/303
[7]	Barndorff-Nielsen OE, Schmiegel J (2008) Time change, volatility, and turbulence. Math Control Theory Financ, 29–53.
[8]	Barndorff-Nielsen OE, Shephard N (2001) Normal Modified Stable Processes. Oxford: Department of Economics, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0197-7
[9]	Black F (1976) Studies of Stock Price Volatility Changes. Proceedings of the Business and Economics Section of the American Statistical Association, 177–181.
[10]	Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. J Econ 31–3: 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1 doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1
[11]	Calzolari G, Halbleib R, Parrini L (2014) Estimating GARCH-type models with symmetric stable innovations: Indirect inference versus maximum likelihood. Comput Stat Data Anal 76: 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.028 doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2013.07.028
[12]	Cont R (2001) Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantit Financ 1: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/713665670 doi: 10.1080/713665670
[13]	Danielsson J, De Vries CG (2000) Value-at-risk and extreme returns. Ann Econ Stat 60: 239–270. https://doi.org/10.2307/20076262 doi: 10.2307/20076262
[14]	Engle RF (1982) Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of United Kingdom Inflation. Econometrica 50–4: 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912773 doi: 10.2307/1912773
[15]	Feng L, Shi Y (2017) Fractionally integrated GARCH model with tempered stable distribution: a simulation study. J Appl Stat 44–16: 2837–2857. https://doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2016.1266310 doi: 10.1080/02664763.2016.1266310
[16]	Fiorani F, Luciano E, Semeraro P (2010) Single and joint default in a structural model with purely discountinuous asset prices. Quantit Financ 10: 249–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697680902991965 doi: 10.1080/14697680902991965
[17]	Hamilton JD (1994) Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691218632
[18]	Hirsa A, Madan DB (2003) Pricing american options under variance gamma. J Comput Financ 7: 63–80. https://doi.org/10.21314/JCF.2003.112 doi: 10.21314/JCF.2003.112
[19]	Ho KY, Shi Y, Zhang Z (2013) How does news sentiment impact asset volatility? Evidence from long memory and regime-switching approaches. N Am J Econ Financ 26: 436–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2013.02.015 doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2013.02.015
[20]	Kim YS, Rachev ST, Bianchi L, et al. (2010) Tempered stable and tempered infinitely divisible GARCH models. J Bank Financ 34: 2096–2109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.01.015 doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.01.015
[21]	Letac G, Seshadri V (2005) Exponential stopping and drifted stable processes. Stat Prob Lett 72: 137–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2004.12.007 doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2004.12.007
[22]	Lopez JA (2001) Evaluating the predictive accuracy of volatility models. J Forecast 20: 87–109.
[23]	Louati M, Masmoudi A, Mselmi F (2020) The normal tempered stable regression model. Commun Stat-Theor M 49: 500–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2018.1554121 doi: 10.1080/03610926.2018.1554121
[24]	Madan DB, Carr P, Chang E (1998) The variance gamma process and option pricing. Eur Financ Rev 2: 79–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009703431535 doi: 10.1023/A:1009703431535
[25]	Madan DB, Seneta E (1990) The Variance Gamma (V.G.) model for share market returns. J Bus 63: 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1086/296519 doi: 10.1086/296519
[26]	Marinelli C, Rachev ST, Roll R (2001) Subordinated exchange rate models: Evidence for heavy tailed distributions and long-range dependence. Math Comput Model 34: 955–1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(01)00113-3 doi: 10.1016/S0895-7177(01)00113-3
[27]	Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica 59: 347–370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938260 doi: 10.2307/2938260
[28]	Nolan J (2007) Stable Distributions: Models for Heavy Tailed Data. Brikhauser, Boston.
[29]	Podobnik B, Horvatic D, Petersen AM, et al. (2009) Cross-correlations between volume change and price change. Proc Natl Aca 106: 22079–22084. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0911983106 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911983106
[30]	Rodriguez MJ, Ruiz E (2012) Revisiting Several Popular GARCH Models with Leverage Effect: Differences and Similarities. J Financ Econometrics 10: 637–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjfinec/nbs003 doi: 10.1093/jjfinec/nbs003
[31]	Shi Y, Feng L (2016) A discussion on the innovation distribution of the Markov regime-switching GARCH model. Econ Model 53: 278–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.018 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2015.11.018
[32]	Tserakh U, Trusz M (2019) GARCH(1, 1) models with stable residuals. Stud Inf Syst Inf Tech 22: 47–57.
[33]	Zhu D, Galbraith JW (2011) Modeling and forecasting expected shortfall with the generalized asymmetric student-t and asymmetric exponential power distributions. J Emp Fin 18: 765–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.006 doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2011.05.006

Reader Comments

your name:*

Email:*
© 2022 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)