Citation: Thomas C. Chiang. Economic policy uncertainty and stock returns—evidence from the Japanese market[J]. Quantitative Finance and Economics, 2020, 4(3): 430-458. doi: 10.3934/QFE.2020020
[1] | Jiang Zhao, Dan Wu . The risk assessment on the security of industrial internet infrastructure under intelligent convergence with the case of G.E.'s intellectual transformation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(3): 2896-2912. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022133 |
[2] | Roman Gumzej . Intelligent logistics systems in E-commerce and transportation. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 2348-2363. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023110 |
[3] | Dawei Li, Enzhun Zhang, Ming Lei, Chunxiao Song . Zero trust in edge computing environment: a blockchain based practical scheme. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(4): 4196-4216. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022194 |
[4] | Xiang Nan, Kayo kanato . Role of information security-based tourism management system in the intelligent recommendation of tourism resources. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2021, 18(6): 7955-7964. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2021394 |
[5] | Yanxu Zhu, Hong Wen, Jinsong Wu, Runhui Zhao . Online data poisoning attack against edge AI paradigm for IoT-enabled smart city. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(10): 17726-17746. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023788 |
[6] | Li Yang, Kai Zou, Kai Gao, Zhiyi Jiang . A fuzzy DRBFNN-based information security risk assessment method in improving the efficiency of urban development. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(12): 14232-14250. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022662 |
[7] | Xiaodong Qian . Evaluation on sustainable development of fire safety management policies in smart cities based on big data. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(9): 17003-17017. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023758 |
[8] | Ridha Ouni, Kashif Saleem . Secure smart home architecture for ambient-assisted living using a multimedia Internet of Things based system in smart cities. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2024, 21(3): 3473-3497. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2024153 |
[9] | Shitharth Selvarajan, Hariprasath Manoharan, Celestine Iwendi, Taher Al-Shehari, Muna Al-Razgan, Taha Alfakih . SCBC: Smart city monitoring with blockchain using Internet of Things for and neuro fuzzy procedures. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(12): 20828-20851. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023922 |
[10] | Roman Gumzej, Bojan Rosi . Open interoperability model for Society 5.0's infrastructure and services. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(9): 17096-17115. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023762 |
The rapid advancement of Smart Cities is crucial for the economic growth and sustainable development of urban areas. These cities rely on a vast network of sensors that collect enormous amounts of data, posing significant challenges in secure data collection, management, and storage. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful computational model, demonstrating notable success in processing large datasets, particularly in unsupervised settings. Deep Learning models provide efficient learning representations, enabling systems to learn features from data automatically.
However, the rise in cyberattacks presents ongoing threats to data privacy and integrity in Smart Cities. Unauthorized access and data breaches are growing concerns, exacerbated by various network vulnerabilities and risks. This highlights the necessity for further research to address security issues, ensuring that Smart City operations remain secure, resilient, and dependable.
The main aim of this Special Issue is to gather high-quality research papers and reviews focusing on AI-based solutions, incorporating other enabling technologies such as Blockchain and Edge Intelligence. These technologies address the challenges of data security, privacy, and network authentication in IoT-based Smart Cities. After a rigorous review process, 14 papers were accepted. These papers cover a broad scope of topics and offer valuable contributions to the field of AI-based security applications in Smart Cities. They provide innovative solutions for secure data management, advanced algorithms for threat detection and prevention, and techniques for ensuring data privacy and integrity.
All accepted papers are categorized into six different dimensions: 1) Prediction and forecasting models, 2) Security and encryption techniques, 3) Edge computing and IoT, 4) Automotive and transportation systems, 5) Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications, and 6) 3D printing and object identification. The brief contributions of these papers are discussed as follows:
In the prediction and forecasting models dimension, Tang et al. [1] proposed a ride-hailing demand prediction model named the spatiotemporal information-enhanced graph convolution network. This model addresses issues of inaccurate predictions and difficulty in capturing external spatiotemporal factors. By utilizing gated recurrent units and graph convolutional networks, the model enhances its perceptiveness to external factors. Experimental results on a dataset from Chengdu City show that the model performs better than baseline models and demonstrates robustness in different environments. Similarly, Chen et al. [2] constructed a novel BILSTM-SimAM network model for short-term power load forecasting. The model uses Variational Mode Decomposition (VMD) to preprocess raw data and reduce noise. It combines Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BILSTM) with a simple attention mechanism (SimAM) to enhance feature extraction from load data. The results indicate an R² of 97.8%, surpassing mainstream models like Transformer, MLP, and Prophet, confirming the method's validity and feasibility
In the security and encryption techniques dimension, Bao et al. [3] developed a Fibonacci-Diffie-Hellman (FIB-DH) encryption scheme for network printer data transmissions. This scheme uses third-order Fibonacci matrices combined with the Diffie-Hellman key exchange to secure data. Experiments demonstrate the scheme's effectiveness in improving transmission security against common attacks, reducing vulnerabilities to data leakage and tampering. Cai et al. [4] introduced a robust and reversible database watermarking technique to protect shared relational databases. The method uses hash functions for grouping, firefly and simulated annealing algorithms for efficient watermark location, and differential expansion for embedding the watermark. Experimental results show that this method maintains data quality while providing robustness against malicious attacks. Yu et al. [11] investigated Transport Layer Security (TLS) fingerprinting techniques for analyzing and classifying encrypted traffic without decryption. The study discusses various fingerprint collection and AI-based techniques, highlighting their pros and cons. The need for step-by-step analysis and control of cryptographic traffic is emphasized to use each technique effectively. Salim et al. [14] proposed a lightweight authentication scheme for securing IoT devices from rogue base stations during handover processes. The scheme uses SHA256 and modulo operations to enable quick authentication, significantly reducing communication overhead and enhancing security compared to existing methods.
In the edge computing and IoT dimension, Yu et al. [5] proposed an edge computing-based intelligent monitoring system for manhole covers (EC-MCIMS). The system uses sensors, LoRa communication, and a lightweight machine learning model to detect and alert about unusual states of manhole covers, ensuring safety and timely maintenance. Tests demonstrate higher responsiveness and lower power consumption compared to cloud computing models. Zhu et al. [7] introduced an online poisoning attack framework for edge AI in IoT-enabled smart cities. The framework includes a rehearsal-based buffer mechanism and a maximum-gradient-based sample selection strategy to manipulate model training by incrementally polluting data streams. The proposed method outperforms existing baseline methods in both attack effectiveness and storage management. Firdaus et al. [10] discussed personalized federated learning (PFL) with a blockchain-enabled distributed edge cluster (BPFL). Combining blockchain and edge computing technologies enhances client privacy, security, and real-time services. The study addresses the issue of non-independent and identically distributed data and statistical heterogeneity, aiming to achieve personalized models with rapid convergence.
In the automotive and transportation systems dimension, Douss et al. [6] presented a survey on security threats and protection mechanisms for Automotive Ethernet (AE). The paper introduces and compares different in-vehicle network protocols, analyzes potential threats targeting AE, and discusses current security solutions. Recommendations are proposed to enhance AE protocol security. Yang et al. [13] proposed a lightweight fuzzy decision blockchain scheme for vehicle intelligent transportation systems. The scheme uses MQTT for communication, DH and Fibonacci transformation for security, and the F-PBFT consensus algorithm to improve fault tolerance, security, and system reliability. Experimental results show significant improvements in fault tolerance and system sustainability.
In the artificial intelligence and machine learning applications dimension, Pan et al. [8] focused on aerial image target detection using a cross-scale multi-feature fusion method (CMF-YOLOv5s). The method enhances detection accuracy and real-time performance for small targets in complex backgrounds by using a bidirectional cross-scale feature fusion sub-network and optimized anchor boxes. Wang et al. [9] reviewed various AI techniques for ground fault line selection in modern power systems. The review discusses artificial neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithms, and other emerging methods. It highlights future trends like deep learning, big data analytics, and edge computing to improve fault line selection efficiency and reliability.
In the 3D printing and object identification dimension, Shin et al. [12] presented an all-in-one encoder/decoder approach for the non-destructive identification of 3D-printed objects using terahertz (THz) waves. The method involves 3D code insertion into the object's STL file, THz-based detection, and code extraction. Experimental results indicate that this approach enhances the identification efficiency and practicality of 3D-printed objects.
In conclusion, 14 excellent full-length research articles have been provided in this special issue on "Artificial Intelligence-based Security Applications and Services for Smart Cities." These papers offer valuable contributions to secure data management, threat detection, and data privacy in IoT-based Smart Cities. We would like to thank all the researchers for their contributions, the MBE editorial assistance, and all the referees for their support in making this issue possible.
[1] |
Antonakakis N, Chatziantoniou I, Filis G (2013) Dynamic co-movements of stock market returns, implied volatility and policy uncertainty. Econ Lett 120: 87-92. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2013.04.004
![]() |
[2] |
Aono K, Iwaisako T (2010) On the Predictability of Japanese stock returns using dividend yield. Asia-Pac Financ Mark 17: 141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10690-009-9105-5
![]() |
[3] | Arbatli EC, Davis SJ, Ito A, et al. (2017) Policy uncertainty in Japan. IMF Working Papers 17/128, International Monetary Fund. |
[4] |
Arouri M, Estay C, Rault C, et al. (2016) Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: Long run evidence from the US. Financ Res Lett 18: 136-141. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.04.011
![]() |
[5] | Bahmani-Oskooee M, Saha S (2019a) On the effects of policy uncertainty on stock prices. J Econ Financ 43: 764-778. |
[6] | Bahmani-Oskooee M, Saha S (2019b) On the effects of policy uncertainty on stock prices: An asymmetric analysis. Quant Financ Econ 3: 412-424. |
[7] |
Bae K, Karolyi G, Stulz R (2003). A New Approach to Measuring Financial Contagion. Rev Financ Stud 16: 717-763. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhg012
![]() |
[8] |
Baker SR, Bloom N, Davis S (2016) Measuring economic policy uncertainty. Q J Econ 131: 1593-1636. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjw024
![]() |
[9] |
Bali TG, Brown SJ, Tang Y (2017) Is economic uncertainty priced in the cross-section of stock returns? J Financ Econ 126: 471-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.09.005
![]() |
[10] |
Bali TG, Cakici N (2010) World market risk, country-specific risk and expected returns in international stock markets. J Bank Financ 34: 1152-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.11.012
![]() |
[11] |
Bali TG, Demirtas KO, Levy H (2009) Is there an intertemporal relation between downside risk and expected returns? J Financ Quant Anal 44: 883-909. doi: 10.1017/S0022109009990159
![]() |
[12] |
Bali TG, Engle RF (2010) The intertemporal capital asset pricing model with dynamic conditional correlations. J Monetary Econ 57: 377-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.03.002
![]() |
[13] | Bali TG, Peng L (2006) Is there a risk-return tradeoff? Evidence from high frequency data. J Appl Econometrics 21: 1169-1198. |
[14] |
Balli F, Uddin GS, Mudassar H, et al. (2017) Cross-country determinants of economic policy uncertainty spillovers. Econ Lett 156: 179-183. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2017.05.016
![]() |
[15] |
Bekaert G, Harvey CR (1995) Time-varying world market integration. J Financ 50: 403-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1995.tb04790.x
![]() |
[16] |
Bekaert G, Hoerova M (2016) What do asset prices have to say about risk appetite and uncertainty? J Bank Financ 67: 103-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.06.015
![]() |
[17] |
Bloom N (2009) The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica 77: 623-685. doi: 10.3982/ECTA6248
![]() |
[18] |
Bloom N (2014) Fluctuations in uncertainty. J Econ Perspect 28: 153-176. doi: 10.1257/jep.28.2.153
![]() |
[19] | Bollerslev T (2010) Glossary to ARCH (GARCH), in Volatility and Time Series Econometrics: Essays in Honor of Robert Engle, edited by Tim Bollerslev, Jeffrey Russell, and Mark Watson, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. |
[20] |
Bollerslev T, Chou RY, Kroner KF (1992) ARCH modeling in finance: a review of the theory and empirical evidence. J Econometrics 52: 5-59. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(92)90064-X
![]() |
[21] |
Brogaard J, Detzel A (2015) The asset pricing implications of government economic policy uncertainty. Manage Sci 61: 3-18. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2044
![]() |
[22] |
Caggiano G, Castelnuovo E, Groshenny N (2014) Uncertainty shocks and unemployment dynamics in U.S. recessions. J Monetary Econ 67: 78-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.006
![]() |
[23] |
Campbell JY, Hamao Y (1992) Predictable stock returns in the United States and Japan: A study of long‐term capital market integration. J Financ 47: 43-69. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1992.tb03978.x
![]() |
[24] | Campbell JY, Lo AW, MacKinlay AC (1997) The Econometrics of Financial Markets, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997. |
[25] |
Carleton RN, Norton MA, Asmundson GJ (2007) Fearing the unknown: a short version of the intolerance of uncertainty scale. J Anxiety Disord 21: 105-117. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2006.03.014
![]() |
[26] |
Chen CWS, Chiang TC, So MKP (2003) Asymmetrical reaction to US stock-return news: Evidence from major stock markets based on a double-threshold model. J Econ Bus 55: 487-502. doi: 10.1016/S0148-6195(03)00051-1
![]() |
[27] |
Chen CYH, Chiang TC (2016) Empirical analysis of the intertemporal relation between downside risk and expected returns: Evidence from time-varying transition probability models. Eur Financ Manage 22: 749-796. doi: 10.1111/eufm.12079
![]() |
[28] |
Chen CYH, Chiang TC, Härdle WK (2018) Downside risk and stock returns in the G7 countries: An empirical analysis of their long-run and short-run dynamics. J Bank Financ 93: 21-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.05.012
![]() |
[29] |
Chen J, Jiang F, Tong G (2017) Economic policy uncertainty in China and stock market expected returns. Account Financ 57: 1265-1286. doi: 10.1111/acfi.12338
![]() |
[30] | Chiang TC (2019a) Economic policy uncertainty, risk and stock returns: Evidence from G7 stock markets. Financ Res Lett 29: 41-49. |
[31] | Chiang TC (2019b) Financial risk, uncertainty and expected returns: evidence from Chinese equity markets. China Financ Rev Int 9: 425-454. |
[32] |
Chiang TC, Li H, Zheng D (2015) The Intertemporal Return-Risk Relationship: Evidence from international Markets. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 39: 156-180. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2015.06.003
![]() |
[33] |
Chiang TC, Jeon BN, Li H (2007) Dynamic correlation analysis of financial contagion: Evidence from Asian markets. J Int Money Financ 26: 1206-1228. doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2007.06.005
![]() |
[34] |
Chong TTL, Wong YC, Yan IKM (2008) Linkages of the Japanese stock market. Japan World Economy 20: 601-662. doi: 10.1016/j.japwor.2007.06.004
![]() |
[35] |
Christou C, Cunado J, Gupta R, et al. (2017) Economic policy uncertainty and stock market returns in Pacific-Rim countries: Evidence based on a Bayesian panel VAR model. J Multinal Financ Manage 40: 92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.mulfin.2017.03.001
![]() |
[36] |
Connolly R, Stivers C, Sun L (2005) Stock market uncertainty and the stock-bond return relation. J Financ Quant Anal 40: 161-194. doi: 10.1017/S0022109000001782
![]() |
[37] | Cornell B (1983) The money supply announcements puzzle: Review and interpretation. Am Econ Rev 73: 644-657. |
[38] | Connolly RA, Wang FA (1999) Economic news and stock market linkages: Evidence from the U.S., U.K., and Japan. Proceedings of the Second Joint Central Bank Research Conference on Risk Management and Systemic Risk. Available from: https://www.imes.boj.or.jp/cbrc/cbrc-11.pdf. |
[39] |
Cornish EA, Fisher RA (1937) Moments and cumulants in the specification of distribution. Rev Int Stat Institute 5: 307-320. doi: 10.2307/1400905
![]() |
[40] | Davis S (2016) An index of global economic policy uncertainty. NBER Working Paper 22740. Available from: http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/steven.davis/pdf/GlobalEconomic.pdf. |
[41] |
Demir E, Gozgor G, Lau CKM, et al. (2018) Does economic policy uncertainty predict the Bitcoin returns? An empirical investigation. Financ Res Lett 26: 145-149. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2018.01.005
![]() |
[42] |
Diebold FX, Yilmaz K (2009) Measuring financial asset return and volatility spillovers, with application to global equity markets. Econ J 119: 158-171. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02208.x
![]() |
[43] |
Dugas MJ, Ladouceur R (2000) Treatment of Gad: Targeting Intolerance of Uncertainty in Two Types of Worry. Behav Modif 24: 635-657. doi: 10.1177/0145445500245002
![]() |
[44] |
Edwards S (1982) Exchange rates and 'news': A multi-currency approach. J Int Money Financ 1: 211-224. doi: 10.1016/0261-5606(82)90016-X
![]() |
[45] | Engle RF (2009) Anticipating correlations: A new paradigm for risk management, Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
[46] |
Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica 55: 251-276. doi: 10.2307/1913236
![]() |
[47] |
Fernandez-Villaverde J, Guerron-Quintana P, Kuester K, et al. (2015) Fiscal volatility shocks and economic activity. Am Econ Rev 105: 3352-3384. doi: 10.1257/aer.20121236
![]() |
[48] | Forbes K, Kristin F (2012) The "Big C": Identifying and mitigating contagion. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City. Proc-Econ Policy Symposium-Jackson Hole, 23-87. |
[49] |
French K, Schwert W, Stambaugh R (1987) Expected stock returns and volatility. J Financ Econ 19: 3-29. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(87)90026-2
![]() |
[50] |
Ghysels E, Santa-Clara R, Valkanov R (2005) There is a risk-return tradeoff after all. J Financ Econ 76: 509-548. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.03.008
![]() |
[51] |
Glosten L, Jagannathan R, Runkle D (1993) On the relation between the expected value and volatility of the nominal excess return on stocks. J Financ 48: 1779-1801. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1993.tb05128.x
![]() |
[52] | Gu M, Sun M, Wu Y, et al. (2018) Economic policy uncertainty and momentum, presented at the 26th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting, and Management Conference, September 6-7, 2018, Rutgers University, USA. |
[53] |
Guo H, Whitelaw R (2006) Uncovering the risk-return relation in the stock market. J Financ 61: 1433-1463. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00877.x
![]() |
[54] |
Hamao Y (2018) Japanese financial market research: A survey. Asia-Pac J Financ Stud 47: 361-380. doi: 10.1111/ajfs.12214
![]() |
[55] |
Hamao Y, Masulis RW, Ng V (1990) Correlations in price changes and volatility across international stock markets. Rev Financ Stud 3: 281-307. doi: 10.1093/rfs/3.2.281
![]() |
[56] | Hakkio CS, Keeton WR (2009) Financial stress: What is it, how can it be measured, and why does it matter? Econ Rev 94: 5-50. |
[57] |
Hansen LP, Sargent TJ, Tallarini TD (1999) Robust permanent income and pricing. Rev Econ Stud 66: 873- 907. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00112
![]() |
[58] |
Harvey CR, Liechty JC, Liechty MW, et al. (2010) Portfolio selection with higher moments. Quant Financ 10: 469-485. doi: 10.1080/14697681003756877
![]() |
[59] |
Hillen MA, Gutheil CM, Strout TD, et al. (2017) Tolerance of uncertainty: Conceptual analysis, integrative model, and implications for healthcare. Social Sci Med 180: 62-75. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.03.024
![]() |
[60] |
Izadi S, Hassan MK (2018) Portfolio and hedging effectiveness of financial assets of the G7 countries. Eurasian Econ Rev 8: 183-213. doi: 10.1007/s40822-017-0090-0
![]() |
[61] | Johannsen BK (2014) When are the Effects of Fiscal Policy Uncertainty Large? Finance and Economics Discussion Series 2014-40, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, US. |
[62] | Karolyi GA, Stulz RM (1996) Why do markets move together? An investigation of US-Japanese stock return comovements. J Financ 51: 951-986. |
[63] | Kirange DK, Deshmukh RR (2016) Sentiment Analysis of news headlines for stock price prediction. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299536363_Sentiment_Analysis_of_ |
[64] | News_Headlines_for_Stock_Price_Prediction. |
[65] | 64. Kennedy P (2008) A Guide to Econometrics, 6th ed., Oxford, U.K., Blackwell Publishing. |
[66] |
65. Klößner S, Sekkel R (2014) International spillovers of policy uncertainty. Econ Lett 124: 508-512. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.07.015
![]() |
[67] | 66. Knight F (1921) Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, 5th ed., New York, Dover Publications. |
[68] |
67. Koutmos G (2014) Positive feedback trading: A review. Rev Behav Financ 6: 155-162. doi: 10.1108/RBF-08-2014-0043
![]() |
[69] | 68. Lettau M, Ludvigson SC (2010) Measuring and modeling variation in the risk-return trade-off, In: Aït-Sahalia, Y., Hansen, L., Scheinkman, J.A (Eds.), Handbook of Financial Econometrics, North Holland, Amsterdam. |
[70] |
69. Li Q, Yang J, Hsiao C, et al. (2005) The relationship between stock returns and volatility in international stock markets. J Empir Financ 12: 650-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2005.03.001
![]() |
[71] |
70. Li X (2017) New evidence on economic policy uncertainty and equity premium. Pacific-Basin Financ J 46: 41-56. doi: 10.1016/j.pacfin.2017.08.005
![]() |
[72] |
71. Li X, Balcilar M, Gupta R, et al. (2015) The causal relationship between economic policy uncertainty and stock returns in China and India: evidence from a bootstrap rolling-window approach. Emerg Mark Financ Trade 52: 674-689. doi: 10.1080/1540496X.2014.998564
![]() |
[73] | 72. Li Z, Zhong J (2019) Impact of economic policy uncertainty shocks on China's financial conditions. Financ Res Lett. |
[74] |
73. Liu L, Zhang T (2015) Economic policy uncertainty and stock market volatility. Financ Res Lett 15: 99-105. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2015.08.009
![]() |
[75] |
74. Menzly L, Santos T, Veronesi P (2004) Understanding predictability. J Political Economy 112: 1-47. doi: 10.1086/379934
![]() |
[76] |
75. Merton RC (1980) On estimating the expected return on the market: An exploratory investigation. J Financ Econ 8: 323-361. doi: 10.1016/0304-405X(80)90007-0
![]() |
[77] | 76. Mishkin FS (1982) Monetary policy and short‐term interest Rates: An efficient markets‐rational expectations approach. J Financ 37: 63-72. |
[78] |
77. Nelson D (1991) Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica 59: 347-370. doi: 10.2307/2938260
![]() |
[79] |
78. Newey W, West KD (1987) A simple, positive definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703-708. doi: 10.2307/1913610
![]() |
[80] |
79. Ozoguz A (2009) Good times or bad times? Investors' uncertainty and stock returns. Rev Financ Stud 22: 4377-4422. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhn097
![]() |
[81] |
80. Pastor L, Veronesi P (2013) Political uncertainty and risk premia. J Financ Econ 110: 520-545. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.08.007
![]() |
[82] |
81. Pearce DK, Roley VV (1983) The reaction of stock prices to unanticipated changes in money: A note. J Financ 38: 1323-1333. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1983.tb02303.x
![]() |
[83] |
82. Peng L, Xiong W (2006) Investor attention, overconfidence and category learning. J Financ Econ 80: 563-602. doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.05.003
![]() |
[84] |
83. Phan DHB, Sharma SS, Tran VT (2018) Can economic policy uncertainty predict stock returns? Global evidence. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 55: 134-150. doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2018.04.004
![]() |
[85] |
84. Rapach DE, Strauss JK, Zhou G (2013) International stock return predictability: What is the role of the United States? J Financ 68: 1633-1622. doi: 10.1111/jofi.12041
![]() |
[86] |
85. Roy AD (1952) Safety first and the holding of assets. Econometrica 20: 431-449. doi: 10.2307/1907413
![]() |
[87] |
86. Scruggs JF (1998) Resolving the puzzling intertemporal relation between the market risk premium and conditional market variance: A two-factor approach. J Financ 53: 575-603. doi: 10.1111/0022-1082.235793
![]() |
[88] | 87. Sum V (2012) How do stock markets in China and Japan respond to economic policy uncertainty in the United States? Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2092346. |
[89] |
88. Tetlock P, Saar-Tsechansky M, Macskassy S (2008) More than words: quantifying language to measure firms' fundamentals. J Financ 63: 1437-1467. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01362.x
![]() |
[90] |
89. Trung NB (2019) The spillover effect of the US uncertainty on emerging economies: A Panel VAR Approach. Appl Econ Lett 26: 210-216. doi: 10.1080/13504851.2018.1458183
![]() |
[91] |
90. Tsai IC (2017) The source of global stock market risk: A viewpoint of economic policy uncertainty. Econ Model 60: 122-131. doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.09.002
![]() |
[92] | 91. Wang GJ, Xie C, Wen D, et al. (2019) When Bitcoin meets economic policy uncertainty (EPU): Measuring risk spillover effect from EPU to Bitcoin. Financ Res Lett 31(C). |
[93] |
92. Whaley RE (2009) Understanding the VIX. J Portf Manage 35: 98-105. doi: 10.3905/JPM.2009.35.3.098
![]() |
[94] |
93. Zhang Y (2018) China, Japan and the US stock markets and global financial crisis. Asia-Pac Financ Mark 25 23-45. doi: 10.1007/s10690-018-9237-6
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |