
Seven tesla magnetic resonance imaging (7T MRI) is known to offer a superior spatial resolution and a signal-to-noise ratio relative to any other non-invasive imaging technique and provides the possibility for neuroimaging researchers to observe disease-related structural changes, which were previously only apparent on post-mortem tissue analyses. Alzheimer's disease is a natural and widely used subject for this technology since the 7T MRI allows for the anticipation of disease progression, the evaluation of secondary prevention measures thought to modify the disease trajectory, and the identification of surrogate markers for treatment outcome. In this editorial, we discuss the various neuroimaging biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease that have been studied using 7T MRI, which include morphological alterations, molecular characterization of cerebral T2*-weighted hypointensities, the evaluation of cerebral microbleeds and microinfarcts, biochemical changes studied with MR spectroscopy, as well as some other approaches. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the 7T MRI regarding imaging Alzheimer's disease and we provide our outlook for the future.
Citation: Arosh S. Perera Molligoda Arachchige, Anton Kristoffer Garner. Seven Tesla MRI in Alzheimer's disease research: State of the art and future directions: A narrative review[J]. AIMS Neuroscience, 2023, 10(4): 401-422. doi: 10.3934/Neuroscience.2023030
[1] | María Ángeles García-Ferrero, Angkana Rüland . Strong unique continuation for the higher order fractional Laplacian. Mathematics in Engineering, 2019, 1(4): 715-774. doi: 10.3934/mine.2019.4.715 |
[2] | Alessia E. Kogoj, Ermanno Lanconelli, Enrico Priola . Harnack inequality and Liouville-type theorems for Ornstein-Uhlenbeck and Kolmogorov operators. Mathematics in Engineering, 2020, 2(4): 680-697. doi: 10.3934/mine.2020031 |
[3] | Luigi Provenzano, Alessandro Savo . Isoparametric foliations and the Pompeiu property. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(2): 1-27. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023031 |
[4] | Nicola Abatangelo, Sven Jarohs, Alberto Saldaña . Fractional Laplacians on ellipsoids. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(5): 1-34. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021038 |
[5] | Giacomo Ascione, Daniele Castorina, Giovanni Catino, Carlo Mantegazza . A matrix Harnack inequality for semilinear heat equations. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(1): 1-15. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023003 |
[6] | Dario Bambusi, Beatrice Langella . A C∞ Nekhoroshev theorem. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(2): 1-17. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021019 |
[7] | Hitoshi Ishii . The vanishing discount problem for monotone systems of Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Part 1: linear coupling. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(4): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021032 |
[8] | Virginia Agostiniani, Lorenzo Mazzieri, Francesca Oronzio . A geometric capacitary inequality for sub-static manifolds with harmonic potentials. Mathematics in Engineering, 2022, 4(2): 1-40. doi: 10.3934/mine.2022013 |
[9] | Bruno Bianchini, Giulio Colombo, Marco Magliaro, Luciano Mari, Patrizia Pucci, Marco Rigoli . Recent rigidity results for graphs with prescribed mean curvature. Mathematics in Engineering, 2021, 3(5): 1-48. doi: 10.3934/mine.2021039 |
[10] | Petteri Harjulehto, Peter Hästö, Jonne Juusti . Bloch estimates in non-doubling generalized Orlicz spaces. Mathematics in Engineering, 2023, 5(3): 1-21. doi: 10.3934/mine.2023052 |
Seven tesla magnetic resonance imaging (7T MRI) is known to offer a superior spatial resolution and a signal-to-noise ratio relative to any other non-invasive imaging technique and provides the possibility for neuroimaging researchers to observe disease-related structural changes, which were previously only apparent on post-mortem tissue analyses. Alzheimer's disease is a natural and widely used subject for this technology since the 7T MRI allows for the anticipation of disease progression, the evaluation of secondary prevention measures thought to modify the disease trajectory, and the identification of surrogate markers for treatment outcome. In this editorial, we discuss the various neuroimaging biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease that have been studied using 7T MRI, which include morphological alterations, molecular characterization of cerebral T2*-weighted hypointensities, the evaluation of cerebral microbleeds and microinfarcts, biochemical changes studied with MR spectroscopy, as well as some other approaches. Finally, we discuss the limitations of the 7T MRI regarding imaging Alzheimer's disease and we provide our outlook for the future.
beta-amyloid;
Alzheimer's disease;
Arterial Spin Labelling;
blood oxygenation level-dependent;
Cornus Ammonis;
stratum radiatum and lacunosum-moleculare of the Cornu Ammonis' field 1;
cerebral blood flow;
chemical exchange saturation transfer;
cerebral microinfarcts;
contrast-to-noise ratio;
cerebrospinal fluid;
diffusion kurtosis imaging;
diffusion tensor imaging;
electroencephalography;
fluid attenuated inversion recovery;
functional MRI;
glutamine;
glutamate;
Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer of glutamate;
γ-Aminobutyric acid;
gradient recalled echo;
locus coeruleus;
mild cognitive impairment;
myo-inositol;
magnetization transfer;
MR Spectroscopy;
Positron Emission Tomography;
perivascular spaces;
Pittsburgh compound B;
radiofrequency;
signal-to-noise ratio;
susceptibility-weighted imaging;
turbo spin echo;
ultra-high field
In much of the literature, time fractional models are defined using the Caputo definition [32,33,34,35,36], in which time fractional models are models described by fractional differential equations or pseudo state space descriptions. The Caputo definition is widely acclaimed because it makes it possible to define initial conditions that relate to the integer derivatives of the derived functions in the models considered. However, this paper shows that this definition does not take initial conditions properly into account if used to define a time fractional model.
The problem was analysed for the first time by Lorenzo and Hartley [1,2]. To take the past of the model into account in a convenient way in a finite interval, they introduced an initialization function. The idea of replacing the commonly used initial values by an initial function was further developed in [3]. In [4], the need to consider the "prehistories" before the initial instant of the derivate functions was shown, making it possible to address the initialisation of fractional visco-elastic equations to reach a unique solution. In [5,6], a counter example was used to demonstrate that initial conditions cannot be correctly taken into account in a dynamical model whether by Caputo or Riemann-Liouville definitions. This led to the conclusion in [7] that fractional derivative and time fractional model initializations are two distinct problems. Still using an initial time shifting method, counter examples were proposed in [8] to show similar initialisation problems with the Caputo definition for partial differential equations. A time shifting technique was also recently used in [9] to analyse a groundwater flow model with time Caputo or Riemann-Liouville fractional partial derivatives. The non-objectivity of these models was demonstrated in this paper. The authors in [9] did not address the problem of initialization, but this objectivity can be restored by also introducing an initialization function (instead of initial conditions).
As previously mentioned, several studies and several solutions have already been published on initialisation of fractional models, but many papers in which the initial conditions are taken into account incorrectly are also still published. Thus the novelties and the contributions of the paper are new demonstrations and new simulations that highlight how initialisations must be done with a time fractional model. Thus, in this paper, two examples are used to show that the Caputo definition does not enable initial conditions to be correctly handled when this definition is used to define a time fractional model. In the first example, the response of a simple model, assumed to be at rest, is calculated analytically on a given time interval. Then inside this interval, a second response is computed by considering initial conditions resulting from the first simulation, and ignoring the model past before the considered initial time. This is the initialisation currently found in the literature and this example shows that it is unable to ensure the correct model trajectories. In the second example, two different histories are generated that produce the same initial conditions for the model. This example shows that in spite of equal initial conditions, the model response is different, thus showing that all the model past must be taken into account to define its future. A similar analysis is also carried out with the Riemann-Liouville and the Grünwald-Letnikov's definitions, suggesting that other definitions should also be problematic. Note that all the analyzes carried out and conclusions obtained in this paper relate to models involving only time fractional derivatives and not space fractional derivatives as in [29,30,31].
The fractional integral of order ν, 0<ν<1, of a function y(t) is defined by [10]:
Iνt0y(t)=1Γ(ν)∫tt0y(τ)(t−τ)1−νdτ. | (1) |
Γ(.) being Euler's gamma function. From this definition, the Caputo derivative definition of order ν, 0<ν<1, of a function y(t) is defined by [11]:
CDνt0y(t)=I1−νt0(ddty(t))=1Γ(1−ν)∫tt01(t−τ)νdy(τ)dτdτ. | (2) |
Laplace transform applied to relation (2) reveals how initial conditions are associated to this definition:
L{CDνt0y(t)}=1s1−ν(sY(s)−y(t0)) = sνY(s)−y(t0). | (3) |
To demonstrate that Caputo definition is not able to take initial conditions correctly into account when used to define a time fractional model (a fractional differential equation or a pseudo state space description), the following model is considered
Dνy(t)=−ay(t)+u(t) 0<ν<1 a>0. | (4) |
In relation (4), Dν denotes the Caputo definition in this section but denotes the Riemann-Liouville or Grünwald-Letnikov definitions in the next section. Then, the following algorithm is used to study model (4).
Algorithm 1
1-Simulation on the time interval [0,t1] of the time fractional model (for instance model (4)) with null initial conditions (for t∈]−∞,0]). Let S1 denote this simulation.
2-Record the model output y(t) and the integer derivatives of y(t) (denoted y'(t), y''(t), ….) at time t0 such that 0<t0<t1.
3-Simulate the model again on [t0,t1], using y(t0), y'(t0), y''(t0) … as initial conditions. Let S2 denote this simulation.
4-Compare S1 and S2 on [t0,t1] and notice if they are different.
Algorithm 1 is now applied to model (4) with a=0. The model is assumed to be at rest before t=0, and the input u(t) is assumed to be a Heaviside function H(t). In such conditions, relation (4) is equivalent to [11]
y(t)=y(t0)+Iνt0{H(t)} 0<ν<1. | (5) |
As a consequence, the simulation defined in Algorithm 1 provides the following solutions:
S1:y(t)=tνΓ(ν+1) 0<t<t1 | (6) |
S2:y(t)=(t−t0)νΓ(ν+1)+y(t0) t0<t<t1. | (7) |
Figure 1 proposes a comparison of S1 and S2 and reveals a difference, thus demonstrating that the Caputo definition does not correctly take initial conditions into account.
Another way to illustrate this result is to consider two different input signals u1(t) and u2(t) that create two different histories with:
ui(t)=AiH(t+ti)−AiH(t) with ti>0, i={1,2}. | (8) |
The model is assumed to be at rest on t∈]−∞,ti]. A constraint is also imposed on these signals so that at t=0, the two resulting model outputs coincide:
y1(0)=y2(0). | (9) |
The output yi(t) is thus defined by:
yi(t)=Aia(1−E1ν,1(−a(t+ti)ν))H(t+ti)−Aia(1−E1ν,1(−atν))H(t). | (10) |
where Eγα,β(z) is the Mittag-Leffler function defined by [12]:
Eγα,β(z)=∑∞k=0Γ(γ+k)Γ(αk+β)Γ(γ)zkk!. | (11) |
Condition (9) thus leads to
A1a[(1−E1ν,1(−a(t1)ν))−(1−E1ν,1(0))]=A2a[(1−E1ν,1(−a(t2)ν))−(1−E1ν,1(0))] | (12) |
thus leading to the condition:
A1=A21−E1ν,1(−a(t2)ν)1−E1ν,1(−a(t1)ν). | (13) |
With ν=0.4, a=1, t1=−8s, t2=−2s, A2=5 and thus A1≈4.17, Figure 2 shows the signal inputs u1(t) and u2(t) used for the analysis and proposes a comparison of the resulting outputs. This figure shows that the two responses have the same values at t=0, but that the evolutions for t>0 are not the same. The information at t=0 is thus not enough to predict the future of the model. All the past must be taken into account to predict the future of the model, which confirms that initialization as defined by the Caputo definition is not acceptable if used to define a time fractional model such as (4).
The previous section showed that the Caputo definition should no longer be used to define time fractional models such as (4). What about other definitions?
The Riemann-Liouville derivative of order ν, 0<ν<1, of a function y(t) is defined by [11]:
RLDνt0y(t)=1Γ(1−ν)ddt∫tt0y(τ)(t−τ)νdτ. | (14) |
Laplace transform applied to relation (14) reveals how initial conditions are associated to this definition:
L{RLDνt0y(t)}=L{ddt(1Γ(1−ν)∫tt0y(τ)(t−τ)νdτ)}=s1s1−νY(s)−[I1−νt0y(t)]t=t0. | (15) |
As a consequence, in [11,13], the initialisation of relation (4) is defined by
dνdtνy(t)=−ay(t)+u(t) I1−νt0{y(t)}|t=t0=y0 | (16) |
and thus the initialisation problem of relation (4) is equivalent to the integral equation
y(t)=y0Γ(ν)(t−t0)ν−1+Iνt0{−ay(t)+u(t)}. | (17) |
Algorithm 1 is applied again to model (4) with a=0. The model is assumed to be at rest before t=0, and the input u(t) is assumed to be a Heaviside function H(t). Algorithm 1 provides the following solutions:
S1:y(t)=tνΓ(ν+1) 0<t<t1 | (18) |
S2:y(t)=(t−t0)νΓ(ν+1) + y0Γ(ν)(t−t0)ν−1 t0<t<t1. | (19) |
Relation (19) seems to say that any value of y0 can be chosen, but whatever the value selected, for S2 y(t) tends toward infinity as t tends toward t0 if y0≠0 whereas y(t)=t0ν/Γ(ν+1) for S1. The two simulations thus give different results. This is illustrated by Figure 3 for various values of y0.
The Grünwald-Letnikov derivative of order ν, 0<ν<1, of a function y(t) is defined by:
GLDνt0y(t)=h→0_lim1hν∑0≤m<∞(−1)m(νm)f(t−mh) t>t0 | (20) |
with (νm)=Γ(ν+1)m!Γ(ν−m+1)=ν(ν−1)(ν−2)…(ν−m+1)m(m−1)(m−2)…(m−m+1).
This definition is often used in the literature as it provides a simple numerical scheme for fractional derivative implementation. In some research [14,15,16], these numerical schemes are used to solve the initialisation problem:
Dvt0y(t)=−ay(t)+u(t)0<v<1a>0 for t0<v<T, | (21) |
y(t0)=y0. |
In this case, it is not the Grünwald-Letnikov derivative definition which is questionable, but the idea that a time fractional model can be initialized solely with information on the initial moment. From relation (20), it is possible to observe that variable m goes from 0 to infinity, and thus this definition is able to take into account the past of the derivative function, prior to t0. In (21), the problem is the way the initial conditions are defined.
To illustrate this problem, Algorithm 1 is applied to model (4) with a=1. The model is assumed to be at rest before t=0, and the input u(t) is assumed to be a Heaviside function H(t). In such conditions, the simulation S1 defined in Algorithm 1 provides the following solution:
S1:y(t)=tνΓ(ν+1) 0<t<t1. | (22) |
Simulation S2 is done using the Grünwald-Letnikov formula (20) and provides
S2:y(t)=1hν∑1≤m<∞(−1)m(νm)y(t−mh)+H(t)1hν+1 t>t0. | (23) |
This simulation is done under two conditions:
- S21: by taking into account all the past of the model (all the values of y(t) on t∈[0,t0], provided by S1)
- S22: by considering only an initial condition at t0 (value of y(t) at t0 provided by S1).
The comparison of the three simulations is done in Figure 4 and reveals that the Grünwald-Letnikov definition produces an exact solution provided that all the past of the model is taken into account.
Relation (23) is particularly interesting because it shows that a time fractional model (here a fractional integrator) is represented by an infinite difference equation, and therefore an initialization of all its terms is necessary for a prediction of the output y(t).
This remark could also apply to the Caputo and Riemann-Liouville definitions which would lead to their reformulations with integrals on the interval ]−∞,t] as suggested in [27],
The need to take into account the all past of a time fractional model and not just the knowledge of its pseudo state at a single point in the past can be demonstrated quite simply on relation (4) (a particular case of fractional differential equation or of pseudo state space description). Contrary to what relation (4) might suggest, Figure 5 highlights that the implementation of fractional differential equations does not explicitly involve the fractional differentiation operator but the fractional order integration operator Iν. Thus in practice, it is not necessary to specify which particular definition is used for Dν in equation (4). Moreover, even if the system is assumed to have zero initial conditions at t=0, namely if the system is supposed at rest (u(t)=y(t)=0, ∀t<0), it is important to note that y(t) cannot be considered as a state for the time fractional model and that all the past of y(t) is required to compute the model evolution.
To better illustrate such a concept, a simple time fractional model is used: a fractional integrator supposed at rest at t=0. The corresponding block diagram is shown in Figure 6.
For an integer integrator, ν=1, relation (4) is really a state space description. At t1>0, state y(t) can be computed if the input between 0 and t1 is known:
y(t1)=∫t10x_(τ)dτ=y1=cst. | (24) |
Values of y(t) at later times than t1 are given by:
y(t)=∫t0x_(τ)dτ=∫t10x_(τ)dτ⏟y1=cst+∫tt1x_(τ)dτ,t>t1. | (25) |
Thus, y(t) can be computed if x_(t) is known within t1 and t. Integrator output at time t1 thus summarizes the whole model past. y(t) is really the state of the dynamic model, in agreement with the definition given in [26].
Let us apply the same reasoning to the fractional integrator case of order ν. From the definition of fractional integration, value of y(t) at t1>0 can be computed if the input between t=0 and t1 is known:
y(t1)=1Γ(ν)∫t10(t1−τ)ν−1x_(τ)dτ=y1=cst. | (26) |
Variable y(t), ∀t>t1, is thus given by:
y(t1)=1Γ(v)∫t0(t−τ)v−1x_(τ)dτ=1Γ(v)∫t10(t−τ)v−1x_(τ)dτ⏟α(t)≠y1+1Γ(v)∫tt1(t−τ)v−1x_(τ)dτ. | (27) |
Two notable differences can be highlighted with respect to the integer case. First, term α(t) in equation (27) is not a constant but depends on the considered time t. Moreover, even if y1=y(t1) is known, it is not enough to compute α(t). Output y(t) of the fractional integrator is thus not a state. The same analysis can be held for the general case of a pseudo state description or a fractional differential equation.
Beyond discussions on the concept of state, computation of α(t) in relation (27) whatever time t, requires to know y(t) ∀t∈[0..t1], thus all the model past. This clearly shows that knowledge of y(t) at a unique point of the past is not enough.
Fractional operators and the resulting time fractional models are known for their memory property. However, for the following two reasons, many studies proposed in the literature seem to ignore this property when the model initialization problem is considered:
-they use the Caputo definition that involves only integer derivatives of the derivate function at the initial time,
-they use other definitions but initialization is done by taking only an initial value for the initial time into consideration.
This kind of initialization means that the operator or model memory exists everywhere on the time axis, except at the initial time. This is not consistent. Memory is an intrinsic property that exists all the time and that is proved in this paper with very simple examples. If from a mathematical point of view, most of the fractional derivative definitions encountered in the literature [17] are not problematic, this paper shows that the Caputo and Riemann-Liouville definitions are not able to ensure a proper initialization when used in a model definition. The paper also shows that this problem is not encountered with the Grünwald-Letnikov definition, provided that all the past of the model (from t→−∞) is taken into account. And this is precisely one of the drawbacks of time fractional models that induces a physical inconsistency and many analysis problems [17].
What are the possible solutions? One solution can be to add an initialization function to the definition of the model. This is what was proposed by Lorenzo and Hartley [1,2]. Yet again however, it requires the knowledge of all the model past (from t→−∞). Another solution consists in introducing new kernels for the definition of fractional integration as in [19]. But the goal would not be to solve only a singularity problem as in [19], but to reach a finite memory length as was done for instance in [20]. Note that while it was claimed in [21] that this class of kernels was too restrictive, it is linked to the problem analyzed in this paper: the inability of the Caputo definition to take into account initial conditions properly if used to define a time fractional model [22]. The other solution is to introduce new solutions for fractional behavior modeling, without the drawbacks associated to time fractional models [18]:
-distributed time delay models [23];
-non-linear models [24];
-partial differential equation with spatially varying coefficients [25].
All the conclusions presented in this paper can they be extended to models involving space fractional derivatives as in [29,30,31]? As shown in [28], whatever the variable on which the derivative relates, a fractional model remains a doubly infinite dimensional model and as such requires an infinite amount of information for its initialization. The question remains open, however, the authors will seek to answer it in their future work.
[1] |
Masters CL, Bateman R, Blennow K, et al. (2015) Alzheimer's disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.56 ![]() |
[2] |
Prince M, Bryce R, Albanese E, et al. (2013) The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alzheimers Dement 9: 63-75.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007 ![]() |
[3] |
Jack CR, Knopman DS, Jagust WJ, et al. (2010) Hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade. Lancet Neurol 9: 119-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70299-6 ![]() |
[4] |
Lee BC, Mintun M, Buckner RL, et al. (2003) Imaging of Alzheimer's disease. J Neuroimaging 13: 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2003.tb00179.x ![]() |
[5] |
McKhann GM, Knopman DS, Chertkow H, et al. (2011) The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer's disease: recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 7: 263-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 ![]() |
[6] |
Knopman DS, Amieva H, Petersen RC, et al. (2021) Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 7: 33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-021-00269-y ![]() |
[7] |
Arachchige ASPM (2022) 7-Tesla PET/MRI: A promising tool for multimodal brain imaging?. AIMS Neurosci 9: 516-518. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2022029 ![]() |
[8] |
Okada T, Fujimoto K, Fushimi Y, et al. (2022) Neuroimaging at 7 Tesla: a pictorial narrative review. Quant Imag Med Surg 12: 3406-3435. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-969 ![]() |
[9] |
Zwanenburg JJ, van der Kolk AG, Luijten PR (2013) Ultra-High-Field MR Imaging: Research Tool or Clinical Need?. PET Clin 8: 311-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpet.2013.03.004 ![]() |
[10] |
Apostolova LG, Zarow C, Biado K (2015) Relationship between hippocampal atrophy and neuropathology markers: a 7T MRI validation study of the EADC-ADNI Harmonized Hippocampal Segmentation Protocol. Alzheimers Dement 11: 139-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2015.01.00 ![]() |
[11] |
Düzel E, Costagli M, Donatelli G, et al. (2021) Studying Alzheimer disease, Parkinson disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with 7-T magnetic resonance. Eur Radiol Exp 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-021-00221-5 ![]() |
[12] |
Theysohn JM, Kraff O, Maderwald S, et al. (2009) The human hippocampus at 7 T--in vivo MRI. Hippocampus 19: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20487 ![]() |
[13] |
Kerchner GA, Hess CP, Hammond-Rosenbluth KE, et al. (2010) Hippocampal CA1 apical neuropil atrophy in mild Alzheimer disease visualized with 7-T MRI. Neurology 75: 1381-1387. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f736a1 ![]() |
[14] |
Barazany D, Assaf Y (2012) Visualization of cortical lamination patterns with magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 22: 2016-2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr277 ![]() |
[15] |
Deng M, Yu R, Wang L, et al. (2016) Learning-based 3T brain MRI segmentation with guidance from 7T MRI labeling. Med Phys 43. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4967487 ![]() |
[16] | Cheng PW, Chiueh TD, Chen JH (2021) A high temporal/spatial resolution neuro-architecture study of rodent brain by wideband echo planar imaging. Sci Rep 11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98132-3 |
[17] |
Yoo PE, John SE, Farquharson S, et al. (2018) 7T-fMRI: Faster temporal resolution yields optimal BOLD sensitivity for functional network imaging specifically at high spatial resolution. NeuroImage 164: 214-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.002 ![]() |
[18] | Das N, Ren J, Spence J, et al. (2021) Phosphate Brain Energy Metabolism and Cognition in Alzheimer's Disease: A Spectroscopy Study Using Whole-Brain Volume-Coil 31Phosphorus Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 7Tesla. Front Neurosci 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.641739 |
[19] |
Dusek P, Dezortova M, Wuerfel J (2013) Imaging of Iron. Int Rev Neurobiol 110: 195-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-410502-7.00010-7 ![]() |
[20] |
Kim S, Lee Y, Jeon CY, et al. (2020) Quantitative magnetic susceptibility assessed by 7T magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer's disease caused by streptozotocin administration. Quant Imag Med Surg 10: 789-797. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims.2020.02.08 ![]() |
[21] |
Pohmann R, Speck O, Scheffler K (2016) Signal-to-noise ratio and MR tissue parameters in human brain imaging at 3, 7, and 9.4 tesla using current receive coil arrays. Magn Reson Med 75: 801-809. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.25677 ![]() |
[22] |
Uludağ K, Müller-Bierl B, Uğurbil K (2009) An integrative model for neuronal activity-induced signal changes for gradient and spin echo functional imaging. Neuroimage 48: 150-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.05.051 ![]() |
[23] |
Hazra A, Gu F, Aulakh A, et al. (2013) Inhibitory neuron and hippocampal circuit dysfunction in an aged mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. PloS One 8: e64318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064318 ![]() |
[24] | Chen C, Ma X, Wei J, et al. (2022) Early impairment of cortical circuit plasticity and connectivity in the 5XFAD Alzheimer's disease mouse model. Transl Psychiat 12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-02132-4 |
[25] |
Yang J, Huber L, Yu Y, et al. (2021) Linking cortical circuit models to human cognition with laminar fMRI. Neurosci Biobehav R 128: 467-478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.005 ![]() |
[26] |
Korte N, Nortley R, Attwell D (2020) Cerebral blood flow decrease as an early pathological mechanism in Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol 140: 793-810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-020-02215-w ![]() |
[27] |
Kashyap S, Ivanov D, Havlicek M, et al. (2021) Sub-millimetre resolution laminar fMRI using Arterial Spin Labelling in humans at 7 T. PloS One 16: e0250504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250504 ![]() |
[28] |
Shao X, Guo F, Shou Q, et al. (2021) Laminar perfusion imaging with zoomed arterial spin labeling at 7 Tesla. NeuroImage 245: 118724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118724 ![]() |
[29] |
Rutland JW, Delman BN, Gill CM, et al. (2020) Emerging Use of Ultra-High-Field 7T MRI in the Study of Intracranial Vascularity: State of the Field and Future Directions. Am J Neuroradiol 41: 2-9. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6344 ![]() |
[30] |
Zong F, Du J, Deng X, et al. (2021) Fast Diffusion Kurtosis Mapping of Human Brain at 7 Tesla With Hybrid Principal Component Analyses. IEEE Access 9: 107965-107975. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3100546 ![]() |
[31] |
Chu X, Wu P, Yan H, et al. (2022) Comparison of brain microstructure alterations on diffusion kurtosis imaging among Alzheimer's disease, mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal individuals. Front Aging Neurosci 14: 919143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.919143 ![]() |
[32] |
McKiernan EF, O'Brien JT (2017) 7T MRI for neurodegenerative dementias in vivo: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurol Neurosur Ps 88: 564-574. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2016-315022 ![]() |
[33] |
Giuliano A, Donatelli G, Cosottini M, et al. (2017) Hippocampal subfields at ultra high field MRI: An overview of segmentation and measurement methods. Hippocampus 27: 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22717 ![]() |
[34] |
Kenkhuis B, Jonkman LE, Bulk M, et al. (2019) 7T MRI allows detection of disturbed cortical lamination of the medial temporal lobe in patients with Alzheimer's disease. NeuroImage Clin 21: 101665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101665 ![]() |
[35] |
Ferreira D, Pereira JB, Volpe G, et al. (2019) Subtypes of Alzheimer's Disease Display Distinct Network Abnormalities Extending Beyond Their Pattern of Brain Atrophy. Front Neuro 10: 524. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00524 ![]() |
[36] |
Boutet C, Chupin M, Lehéricy S, et al. (2014) Detection of volume loss in hippocampal layers in Alzheimer's disease using 7 T MRI: a feasibility study. NeuroImage Clin 5: 341-348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.011 ![]() |
[37] |
Balchandani P, Naidich TP (2015) Ultra-High-Field MR Neuroimaging. Am J Neuroradiol 36: 1204-1215. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4180 ![]() |
[38] |
Riphagen JM, Schmiedek L, Gronenschild EHBM, et al. (2020) Associations between pattern separation and hippocampal subfield structure and function vary along the lifespan: A 7 T imaging study. Sci Rep 10: 7572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-64595-z ![]() |
[39] |
Kamsu JM, Constans JM, Lamberton F, et al. (2013) Structural layers of ex vivo rat hippocampus at 7T MRI. PloS One 8: e76135. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076135 ![]() |
[40] |
Yin JX, Turner GH, Lin HJ, et al. (2011) Deficits in spatial learning and memory is associated with hippocampal volume loss in aged apolipoprotein E4 mice. J Alzheimers Dis 27: 89-98. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2011-110479 ![]() |
[41] |
Zhou X, Huang J, Pan S, et al. (2016) Neurodegeneration-Like Pathological and Behavioral Changes in an AAV9-Mediated p25 Overexpression Mouse Model. J Alzheimers Dis 53: 843-855. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160191 ![]() |
[42] |
Wisse LEM, Biessels GJ, Heringa SM, et al. (2014) Hippocampal subfield volumes at 7T in early Alzheimer's disease and normal aging. Neurobiol Aging 35: 2039-2045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.02.021 ![]() |
[43] |
Blom K, Koek HL, Zwartbol MHT, et al. (2020) Vascular Risk Factors of Hippocampal Subfield Volumes in Persons without Dementia: The Medea 7T Study. J Alzheimers Dis 77: 1223-1239. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200159 ![]() |
[44] | Chen Y, Chen T, Hou R (2022) Locus coeruleus in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease: A systematic review. Alzh Dement 8: e12257. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12257 |
[45] |
Priovoulos N, Jacobs HIL, Ivanov D, et al. (2018) High-resolution in vivo imaging of human locus coeruleus by magnetization transfer MRI at 3T and 7T. NeuroImage 168: 427-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.07.045 ![]() |
[46] |
Tuzzi E, Balla DZ, Loureiro JRA, et al. (2020) Ultra-High Field MRI in Alzheimer's Disease: Effective Transverse Relaxation Rate and Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping of Human Brain In Vivo and Ex Vivo compared to Histology. J Alzheimers Dis 73: 1481-1499. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-190424 ![]() |
[47] |
van Rooden S, Versluis MJ, Liem MK, et al. (2014) Cortical phase changes in Alzheimer's disease at 7T MRI: a novel imaging marker. Alzheimers Dement 10: e19-e26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2013.02.002 ![]() |
[48] |
Cai K, Tain R, Das S, et al. (2015) The feasibility of quantitative MRI of perivascular spaces at 7T. J Neurosci Meth 256: 151-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.09.001 ![]() |
[49] |
van Rooden S, Doan NT, Versluis MJ, et al. (2015) 7T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging reveals cortical phase differences between early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 36: 20-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.07.006 ![]() |
[50] |
van Rooden S, Buijs M, van Vliet ME, et al. (2016) Cortical phase changes measured using 7-T MRI in subjects with subjective cognitive impairment, and their association with cognitive function. NMR Biomed 29: 1289-1294. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3248 ![]() |
[51] |
van Bergen JM, Li X, Hua J, et al. (2016) Colocalization of cerebral iron with Amyloid beta in Mild Cognitive Impairment. Sci Rep 6: 35514. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35514 ![]() |
[52] |
Nakada T, Matsuzawa H, Igarashi H, et al. (2008) In vivo visualization of senile-plaque-like pathology in Alzheimer's disease patients by MR microscopy on a 7T system. J Neuroimaging 18: 125-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6569.2007.00179.x ![]() |
[53] |
Bulk M, Abdelmoula WM, Nabuurs RJA, et al. (2018) Postmortem MRI and histology demonstrate differential iron accumulation and cortical myelin organization in early- and late-onset Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Aging 62: 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.10.017 ![]() |
[54] |
Zeineh MM, Chen Y, Kitzler HH, et al. (2015) Activated iron-containing microglia in the human hippocampus identified by magnetic resonance imaging in Alzheimer disease. Neurobiol Aging 36: 2483-2500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.05.022 ![]() |
[55] |
van Rooden S, Goos JD, van Opstal AM, et al. (2014) Increased number of microinfarcts in Alzheimer disease at 7-T MR imaging. Radiology 270: 205-211. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130743 ![]() |
[56] |
Rowe CC, Villemagne VL (2011) Brain amyloid imaging. J Nucl Med 52: 1733-1740. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.076315 ![]() |
[57] |
Schreiner SJ, Liu X, Gietl AF, et al. (2014) Regional Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) at 7 Tesla correlates with amyloid beta in hippocampus and brainstem of cognitively normal elderly subjects. Front Aging Neurosci 6: 240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2014.00240 ![]() |
[58] |
van Veluw SJ, Zwanenburg JJ, Rozemuller AJ, et al. (2015) The spectrum of MR detectable cortical microinfarcts: a classification study with 7-tesla postmortem MRI and histopathology. J Cerebr Blood F Met 35: 676-683. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2014.258 ![]() |
[59] |
Conijn MM, Geerlings MI, Biessels GJ, et al. (2011) Cerebral microbleeds on MR imaging: comparison between 1.5 and 7T. Am J Neuroradiol 32: 1043-1049. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2450 ![]() |
[60] |
Brundel M, Heringa SM, de Bresser J, et al. (2012) High prevalence of cerebral microbleeds at 7Tesla MRI in patients with early Alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis 31: 259-263. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2012-120364 ![]() |
[61] |
van Veluw SJ, Biessels GJ, Klijn CJ, et al. (2016) Heterogeneous histopathology of cortical microbleeds in cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Neurology 86: 867-871. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000002419 ![]() |
[62] |
Ni J, Auriel E, Martinez-Ramirez S, et al. (2015) Cortical localization of microbleeds in cerebral amyloid angiopathy: an ultra high-field 7T MRI study. J Alzheimers Dis 43: 1325-1330. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-140864 ![]() |
[63] | Hütter BO, Altmeppen J, Kraff O, et al. (2020) Higher sensitivity for traumatic cerebral microbleeds at 7 T ultra-high field MRI: is it clinically significant for the acute state of the patients and later quality of life?. Ther Adv Neurol Diso 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286420911295 |
[64] |
Uğurbil K, Adriany G, Andersen P, et al. (2003) Ultrahigh field magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Imaging 21: 1263-1281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.027 ![]() |
[65] |
Terpstra M, Cheong I, Lyu T, et al. (2016) Test-retest reproducibility of neurochemical profiles with short-echo, single-voxel MR spectroscopy at 3T and 7T. Magn Reson Med 76: 1083-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.26022 ![]() |
[66] |
McKay J, Tkáč I (2016) Quantitative in vivo neurochemical profiling in humans: where are we now?. Int J Epidemiol 45: 1339-50. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyw235 ![]() |
[67] |
Qin L, Gao J (2021) New avenues for functional neuroimaging: ultra-high field MRI and OPM-MEG. Psychoradiology 1: 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1093/psyrad/kkab014 ![]() |
[68] |
Haeger A, Bottlaender M, Lagarde J, et al. (2021) What can 7T sodium MRI tell us about cellular energy depletion and neurotransmission in Alzheimer's disease?. Alzheimers 17: 1843-1854. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12501 ![]() |
[69] |
Oeltzschner G, Wijtenburg SA, Mikkelsen M, et al. (2019) Neurometabolites and associations with cognitive deficits in mild cognitive impairment: a magnetic resonance spectroscopy study at 7 Tesla. Neurobiol Aging 73: 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2018.09.027 ![]() |
[70] |
Quevenco FC, Schreiner SJ, Preti MG, et al. (2019) GABA and glutamate moderate beta-amyloid related functional connectivity in cognitively unimpaired old-aged adults. NeuroImage Clin 22: 101776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101776 ![]() |
[71] |
Henning A, Fuchs A, Murdoch JB (2009) Slice-selective FID acquisition, localized by outer volume suppression (FIDLOVS) for (1)H-MRSI of the human brain at 7 T with minimal signal loss. NMR Biomed 22: 683-696. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1366 ![]() |
[72] |
Haris M, Nath K, Cai K, et al. (2013) Imaging of glutamate neurotransmitter alterations in Alzheimer's disease. NMR Biomed 26: 386-391. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.2875 ![]() |
[73] | Cember ATJ, Nanga RPR, Reddy R (2022) Glutamate-weighted CEST (gluCEST) imaging for mapping neurometabolism: An update on the state of the art and emerging findings from in vivo applications. NMR Biomed e4780. [Advance online publication]. https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4780 |
[74] |
Crescenzi R, DeBrosse C, Nanga RP, et al. (2017) Longitudinal imaging reveals subhippocampal dynamics in glutamate levels associated with histopathologic events in a mouse model of tauopathy and healthy mice. Hippocampus 27: 285-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.22693 ![]() |
[75] |
Crescenzi R, DeBrosse C, Nanga RP, et al. (2014) In vivo measurement of glutamate loss is associated with synapse loss in a mouse model of tauopathy. NeuroImage 101: 185-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.067 ![]() |
[76] |
Haris M, Cai K, Singh A, et al. (2011) In vivo mapping of brain myo-inositol. NeuroImage 54: 2079-2085. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.017 ![]() |
[77] |
Marjańska M, McCarten JR, Hodges JS, et al. (2019) Distinctive Neurochemistry in Alzheimer's Disease via 7 T In Vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. J Alzheimers Dis 68: 559-569. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180861 ![]() |
[78] |
Zenaro E, Piacentino G, Constantin G (2017) The blood-brain barrier in Alzheimer's disease. Neurobiol Dis 107: 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2016.07.007 ![]() |
[79] |
Rezai-Zadeh K, Gate D, Szekely CA, et al. (2009) Can peripheral leukocytes be used as Alzheimer's disease biomarkers?. Expert Rev Neurother 9: 1623-1633. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.09.118 ![]() |
[80] |
Robbins M, Clayton E, Kaminski Schierle GS (2021) Synaptic tau: A pathological or physiological phenomenon?. Acta Neuropathol Commun 9: 149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-021-01246-y ![]() |
[81] |
Šišková Z, Justus D, Kaneko H, et al. (2014) Dendritic structural degeneration is functionally linked to cellular hyperexcitability in a mouse model of alzheimer's disease. Neuron 84: 1023-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.024 ![]() |
[82] |
Palop JJ, Mucke L (2016) Network abnormalities and interneuron dysfunction in Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 17: 777-792. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.141 ![]() |
[83] |
Shaaban CE, Aizenstein HJ, Jorgensen DR, et al. (2017) In Vivo Imaging of Venous Side Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease in Older Adults: An MRI Method at 7T. Am J Neuroradiol 38: 1923-1928. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5327 ![]() |
[84] |
Poduslo JF, Wengenack TM, Curran GL, et al. (2002) Molecular targeting of Alzheimer's amyloid plaques for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Neurobiol Dis 11: 315-329. https://doi.org/10.1006/nbdi.2002.0550 ![]() |
[85] |
Arachchige ASPM (2023) Transitioning from PET/MR to trimodal neuroimaging: why not cover the temporal dimension with EEG?. AIMS Neurosci 10: 1-4. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2023001 ![]() |
[86] |
Duyn JH (2012) The future of ultra-high field MRI and fMRI for study of the human brain. NeuroImage 62: 1241-1248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.065 ![]() |
[87] |
Biagi L, Cosottini M, Tosetti M (2017) 7 T MR: from basic research to human applications. High Field Brain MRI . Cham: Springer 373-83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44174-0_23 ![]() |
[88] |
Ali R, Goubran M, Choudhri O, et al. (2015) Seven-Tesla MRI and neuroimaging biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease. Neurosurg Focus 39: E4. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.9.FOCUS15326 ![]() |
[89] |
van Gemert J, Brink W, Webb A, et al. (2019) High-permittivity pad design tool for 7T neuroimaging and 3T body imaging. Magn Reson Med 81: 3370-3378. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27629 ![]() |
[90] |
Uwano I, Kudo K, Yamashita F, et al. (2014) Intensity inhomogeneity correction for magnetic resonance imaging of human brain at 7T. Med Phys 41: 022302. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4860954 ![]() |
[91] |
Truong TK, Chakeres DW, Beversdorf DQ, et al. (2006) Effects of static and radiofrequency magnetic field inhomogeneity in ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 24: 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2005.09.013 ![]() |
[92] |
Trattnig S, Springer E, Bogner W, et al. (2018) Key clinical benefits of neuroimaging at 7T. NeuroImage 168: 477-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.031 ![]() |
[93] |
van Gelderen P, de Zwart JA, Starewicz P, et al. (2007) Real-time shimming to compensate for respiration-induced B0 fluctuations. Magn Reson Med 57: 362-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.211369 ![]() |
[94] |
Versluis MJ, Peeters JM, van Rooden S, et al. (2010) Origin and reduction of motion and f0 artifacts in high resolution T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: application in Alzheimer's disease patients. NeuroImage 51: 1082-1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.048 ![]() |
[95] | Perera Molligoda Arachchige AS (2023) Neuroimaging with PET/MR: moving beyond 3T in preclinical systems, when for clinical practice?. Clin Trans Imaging (Springer) . Advance online publication |
[96] |
Yuan Y, Gu ZX, Wei WS (2009) Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography, single-photon emission tomography, and structural MR imaging for prediction of rapid conversion to Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis. Am J Neuroradiol 30: 404-410. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1357 ![]() |
[97] |
Perera Molligoda Arachchige AS (2021) What must be done in case of a dense collection?. Radiol Med 126: 1657-1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-021-01426-9 ![]() |
[98] | Verma Y, Ramesh S, Perera Molligoda Arachchige AS (2023) 7 T Versus 3 T in the Diagnosis of Small Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Reply to Radojewski et al. Clin Neuroradiol . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01321-y |
1. | Julie Clutterbuck, Jiakun Liu, Preface to the Special Issue: Nonlinear PDEs and geometric analysis – Dedicated to Neil Trudinger on the occasion of his 80th birthday, 2023, 5, 2640-3501, 1, 10.3934/mine.2023095 |