Environmental sustainability plays a crucial role in influencing policy actions and people's behavior. The 2030 Agenda highlights the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which can be achieved through tourism, particularly in its most sustainable form, such as ecotourism. Ecotourism provides an ideal platform for experimenting with new lifestyles oriented towards sustainability and well-being. Additionally, ecotourism emphasizes territorial identities, particularly through the promotion of food and wine, which can contribute to the creation of sustainable tourism areas. Food quality production serves as evidence of the attention paid by producers to the sustainability of territories and a lifestyle that prioritizes well-being. European citizens are increasingly recognizing the environment as a resource for good living. In Italy, agritourism, which includes activities offered by 25 certified quality agricultural producers, is becoming increasingly popular among tourists. Within this context, sustainability can be experienced through tourism, which offers an opportunity to live differently. This paper examines two Italian regions (Tuscany and Apulia) where farmhouse, food and tourism (FFST) areas have been successfully implemented as a form of sustainable tourism. The study demonstrates that FFST areas can be defined using spatial analysis, and then can become a model for sustainable tourism development. In conclusion, environmental sustainability holds ethical significance and can be achieved through tourism, specifically through ecotourism and FFST areas, which enable tourists to experience sustainable lifestyles while emphasizing territorial identities.
Citation: Fabrizio Antolini, Francesco Giovanni Truglia. Using farmhouse and food to enforce a tourism sustainable development model: empirical evidence from Italy[J]. National Accounting Review, 2023, 5(2): 159-173. doi: 10.3934/NAR.2023010
[1] | Ibtissem Chaib, Scheherazed Dakhmouche-Djekrif, Leila Bennamoun, Tahar Nouadri . Extracellular enzymes producing yeasts study: cost-effective production of α-amylase by a newly isolated thermophilic yeast Geotrichum candidum PO27. AIMS Microbiology, 2024, 10(1): 83-106. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2024006 |
[2] | Rungaroon Waditee-Sirisattha, Hakuto Kageyama, Teruhiro Takabe . Halophilic microorganism resources and their applications in industrial and environmental biotechnology. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(1): 42-54. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.1.42 |
[3] | Vijayakumar Somalinga, Emily Foss, Amy M. Grunden . Biochemical characterization of a psychrophilic and halotolerant α–carbonic anhydrase from a deep-sea bacterium, Photobacterium profundum. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(3): 540-553. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023028 |
[4] | Jhuma Biswas, Amal K. Paul . Optimization of factors influencing exopolysaccharide production by Halomonas xianhensis SUR308 under batch culture. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 564-579. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.564 |
[5] | Amina Manni, Abdelkarim Filali-Maltouf . Diversity and bioprospecting for industrial hydrolytic enzymes of microbial communities isolated from deserted areas of south-east Morocco. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(1): 5-25. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022002 |
[6] | Pontsho Patricia Twala, Alfred Mitema, Cindy Baburam, Naser Aliye Feto . Breakthroughs in the discovery and use of different peroxidase isoforms of microbial origin. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 330-349. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020020 |
[7] | Hafidh Shofwan Maajid, Nurliyani Nurliyani, Widodo Widodo . Exopolysaccharide production in fermented milk using Lactobacillus casei strains AP and AG. AIMS Microbiology, 2022, 8(2): 138-152. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2022012 |
[8] | Denisse Galarza–Verkovitch, Onur Turak, Jutta Wiese, Tanja Rahn, Ute Hentschel, Erik Borchert . Bioprospecting for polyesterase activity relevant for PET degradation in marine Enterobacterales isolates. AIMS Microbiology, 2023, 9(3): 518-539. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2023027 |
[9] | Camilo Muñoz, Fernando G. Fermoso, Mariella Rivas, Juan M. Gonzalez . Hydrolytic enzyme activity enhanced by Barium supplementation. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(4): 402-411. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.4.402 |
[10] | Nikolina-Alexandra Xaxiri, Eleni Nikouli, Panagiotis Berillis, Konstantinos Ar. Kormas . Bacterial biofilm development during experimental degradation of Melicertus kerathurus exoskeleton in seawater. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 397-412. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.397 |
Environmental sustainability plays a crucial role in influencing policy actions and people's behavior. The 2030 Agenda highlights the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which can be achieved through tourism, particularly in its most sustainable form, such as ecotourism. Ecotourism provides an ideal platform for experimenting with new lifestyles oriented towards sustainability and well-being. Additionally, ecotourism emphasizes territorial identities, particularly through the promotion of food and wine, which can contribute to the creation of sustainable tourism areas. Food quality production serves as evidence of the attention paid by producers to the sustainability of territories and a lifestyle that prioritizes well-being. European citizens are increasingly recognizing the environment as a resource for good living. In Italy, agritourism, which includes activities offered by 25 certified quality agricultural producers, is becoming increasingly popular among tourists. Within this context, sustainability can be experienced through tourism, which offers an opportunity to live differently. This paper examines two Italian regions (Tuscany and Apulia) where farmhouse, food and tourism (FFST) areas have been successfully implemented as a form of sustainable tourism. The study demonstrates that FFST areas can be defined using spatial analysis, and then can become a model for sustainable tourism development. In conclusion, environmental sustainability holds ethical significance and can be achieved through tourism, specifically through ecotourism and FFST areas, which enable tourists to experience sustainable lifestyles while emphasizing territorial identities.
The search for new enzymes endowed with novel activities and enhanced stability continues to be a desirable pursuit in enzyme research. This is fuelled by industrial requirements and necessity of enzymatic interventions in new and challenging bioprocesses. Industrial applications of enzymes necessitate them to be stable under harsh operational conditions. In this context, enzymes from extremophiles are often useful because they withstand and carry out catalysis under extreme physiological conditions. Extremophiles are therefore perceived as an excellent source of novel enzymes possessing inherent ability to function under extreme conditions [1,2,3,4,5](Zhang and Kim 2010).
Halophiles, a class among extremophiles, have the unique ability to thrive in environments rich in salt. The word halophile is derived from the Greek, meaning “salt loving”. They are salt-loving organisms found in all three domains of life: Archaea, Bacteria and Eukarya. Halophiles have been mostly isolated and characterized from the habitat like saline water, saline soil, salt lakes, soda lakes, salted foods and salterns [6,7]. Their metabolic and physiological activities are therefore adapted to function under high salt conditions. Research on halophiles has gained considerable attention because of their potential usefulness in food industries, biodegradation of toxic pollutants, as a source of organic osmotic stabilizers, bioplastics, enzymes and bacteriorhodopsin [8,9,10,11,12].
Their enzymes possess unique features to exhibit high activity and stability in saline environment [13,14,15]. In general, halophilic enzymes are active at salt concentrations ranging from 0.2 M to 5.2 M and have been documented to be better catalysts for peptide synthesis, enhanced oil recovery and hypersaline waste treatment, wherein normal enzymes may not function optimally or may even get denatured [10,16].
Hydrolases from halophiles have been of particular interest in recent years [14,17]. Many of them have been investigated in details and characterized as novel biocatalyst. The present review summarizes the halophilic hydrolases in general and encompasses the α-amylases in particular. Halophilic α-amylases have been less studied so far but hold tremendous potential for the production of oligosaccharides, which are high in demand as prebiotics. They have the ability to catalyze reaction in high salt/ organic solvents, which favors oligosaccharide synthesis much better as compared to mesophilic amylases [18,19].
Enzymes from halophiles are stable in presence of high concentrations of salt. They perform the same function as their non-halophilic counterparts but in presence of high salt concentrations. The potential of halophilic enzymes has been extensively reviewed [10,20,21,22,23]. Some of their interesting attributes include: (i) optimum activity and stability at high salt concentrations, (ii) protective role of salt in maintaining the structure, (iii) higher resistance towards denaturation, and (iv) ability to catalyze in low water or non-aqueous medium [20,24,25]. One of the distinct points of halophilic enzymes is reports of highly reversible refolding from denaturations in some cases, such as beta-lactamase, nucleoside diphosphate kinase and Kocuria varians α-amylase [25,26,27]. High reversibility was caused by high solubility of halophilic proteins due to the “highly acidic properties/ non-aggregative characteristics” of them, even under denatured conditions.
Halophilic enzymes appear quite promising for industrial applications involving high salt or hypersaline conditions. Some interesting properties have been reported in amylases, proteases, nucleases, cellulases, chitinases, xylanases, esterases and lipases from halophiles. These have been mainly studied from the genera Haloarcula, Haloferax, Halobacterium, Micrococcus, Bacillus, Halobacillus and Halothermothrix. Their industrial properties are summarized in Table 1.
Enzymes | Microorganism(s) | Characteristics/ prospective applications | Reference(s) |
Alcohol dehydrogenase | Haloferax volcanii | Solvent stable | [28] |
Alkaline phosphatases | Halomonas sp. 593 | Phosphomonoesters hydrolysis over broad salt range | [29] |
α-Amylases | Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Salt, alkali, temperature solvent and surfactant stable | [30] |
Exiguobacterium sp. | Solvent stable and bakery industry | [31] | |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Solvent stable and maltooligosaccharide synthesis | [19] | |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Detergents formulation | [32] | |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Starch hydrolysis | [33] | |
Cellulases | Aspergillus terreus UniMAP AA-6 | Ionic liquid tolerant and saccharification of lignocelluloses | [34] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Salt and solvent stable | [35] | |
Marinobacter sp. MSI032 | Stable at alkaline pH | [36] | |
Chitinases | Planococcus rifitoensis strain M2-26 | Salt and heat stable | [37] |
Esterases | Haloarcula marismortui | Alkaline and salt stable | [38] |
β-Galactosidase | Halorubrum lacusprofundi | Salt and solvent stable | [39] |
Haloferax alicantei | Salt stable | [40] | |
Lipases | Haloarcula sp. G41 | Solvent tolerant and biodiesel production | [41] |
Marinobacter lipolyticus SM19 | Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) production and solvent stable | [42] | |
Salicola strain IC10 | Alkaline and salt stable | [43] | |
Nucleases | Bacillus sp. | Alkaline, salt and thermal stable | [44] |
Micrococcus varians | Alkaline and salt stable | [45] | |
Proteases | Bacillus sp. EMB9 | Solvent stable and detergent formulations | [46] |
Geomicrobium sp. EMB2 | Solvent stable and detergent formulations | [47] | |
Halobacterium sp. | Alkaline, salt stable and used in fish sauce preparation | [48] | |
Halobacterium halobium | Solvent stable and used for peptide synthesis | [16] | |
Xylanases | Gracilibacillus sp. TSCPVG | Halo-acid-alkali-thermo-stable | [49] |
Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum NTOU1 | Salt stable | [50] | |
Halophilic bacterium CL8 | pH, salt and heat stable | [51] |
It is quite apparent that they are stable under a variety of extreme conditions. These are therefore recommended as catalysts of choice for applications in (i) hypersaline waste treatment (ii) peptide synthesis (iii) detergents (iv) textile industry (v) pharmaceuticals and (vi) food [10,52,53].
α-Amylase (E.C. 3.2.1.1, 1, 4-α-D-glucan glucanohydrolase) catalyzes hydrolysis of α-1, 4-glycosidic linkages in starch and related polysaccharides. They are endolytic enzymes, products of which are of varying glucose length with retention of α-anomeric configuration. α-Amylases are an important class of industrial enzymes, finding widescale applications in food, textile, paper, detergent, analytical chemistry, beverage and pharmaceutical industry. Demand for α-amylase is projected to increase further in the coming years due to its use in diverse industrial sectors [54,55,56,57,58].
α-Amylase is part of family 13 (GH-13) of the glycoside hydrolase. They share certain common characteristics such as (i) catalytic domain is formed by (β/α)8 or TIM barrel, (ii) catalytic triad consists of one glutamatic acid and two aspartatic acid residues and (iii) presence of four conserved sequences involved in catalysis and substrate binding [56,59].
α-Amylase from wide range of sources with distinct characteristics are available. Yet search continues for novel α-amylase to increase the realm of processes where it can be used. In this context, isolation and screening of extremophilic organisms for α-amylase of desired trait is a contemporary research area. The use of halophilic α-amylase in bioprocesses presents the advantage to obtain optimal activities at high salt concentrations. Halophilic α-amylases also might be particularly resistant to organic solvents because they function under conditions where water activity is low.
Amylases are normally constitutive enzymes. Surprisingly, very few α-amylases have been studied from halophilic sources. The prominent among these are Natronococcus amylolyticus [60], Halomonas meridiana [61], Halothermothrix orenii [62], Haloferax mediterranei [63], Nesterenkonia sp. strain F [33] and Marinobacter sp. EMB8 [64].
Good and Hartman, screened about ten halophiles as early as 1970, for amylase activity. They reported Halobacterium salinarum (formerly Halobacterium halobium), to be the best producer [65]. Later Onishi [66] isolated amylase producing moderate halophilic Micrococcus from unrefined solar salt. An amylase producing Acinetobacter sp. strain was isolated by the same group from sea-sands [67].
Amylase producing halophiles have been isolated during screening and isolation of hydrolase producers from differentecosystems. In one such study, amylase producers represented by the genus Salinivibrio, Bacillus and Halomonas were isolated from hypersaline environments in south Spain [68]. Hundred seventy seven amylase producing halophilic strains were isolated from Howz Soltan Lake, Iran. Amylase producers were mainly Gram-positive rods followed by Gram-negative rods and Gram-positive cocci. They belonged to Halobacillus, Gracilibacillus, Thalassobacillus, Oceanobacillus and Halomonas genus [69]. Starch hydrolyzing bacteria, majority of which belonged to genus Bacillus and could tolerate upto 10% (w/v) sodium chloride (NaCl) concentration have been isolated from Ethiopian soda lakes [70]. Similar culture dependent diversity studies on halophiles for hydrolase producers have been done from Tuzkoy salt mine, Turkey [71], deep-sea sediments of the Southern Okinawa Trough [72], Tunisian Solar Saltern [73], Atacama Desert, Chile [74] and Argentinean salterns [75].
There are relatively fewer studies on halophilic amylase producing actinomycetes and fungi. In a biodiversity study on actinomycetes from salt lakes in Hami, China, out of total sixty three isolates, forty seven were halophilic actinomycetes. Amylase was the predominant hydrolase produced by forty six strains [76]. During another screening, sixty eight amylase producing marine actinomycetes were isolated from the Bay of Bengal, India [77]. Table 2 summarizes the major amylase producing halophiles reported so far, along with the place of their isolation.
Isolate | Location | Reference(s) |
Micrococcus | Unrefined solar salt, Japan | [66] |
Natronococcus amylolyticus | Lake Magadi, Kenya | [60] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Saline habitat of Spain | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | Commercially available French solar salt | [78] |
Haloarcula hispanica | Solar saltern in Spain | [79] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | Hypersaline Lake Urmia, Iran | [80] |
Halomonas meridiana | Antarctic saline lakes | [61] |
Bacillus dipsosauri | Nasal cavity of a desert iguana | [81] |
Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 | Saline soil, Iran | [82] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | Soil samples, India | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Solar evaporated saltern pond, India | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Aran-Bidgol Lake, Iran | [33] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Saline soil of Yuncheng Salt Lake, China | [85] |
Pseudoalteromonas spp. | Persian Gulf, Iran | [86] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Kozhikode, India | [87] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Wadi An Natrun, Egypt. | [30] |
It is apparent that Spain, Iran and China have been prominent locations for isolation of amylase producinghalophiles.In the Indian context, Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK from soil samples of salt-manufacturing industry, Chennai [83]; Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 from the solar evaporated saltern pond, Tuticorin [84]; Streptomyces sp. D1 [88] and Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 [32] from coastal regions of Goa and Mumbai; Marinobacter sp. EMB8 from Kozhikode and Halobacillus sp. EMB14 from Gujarat [87] and fungal amylase from Mucor sp. associated with marine sponge from Havelock Island, Andaman Sea [89] have been the major reports.
Production study and further characterization of very few halophilic amylases have been carried out. In some cases production optimization was carried out while in many others skipping this further purification and other studies were done. Comparing production level in these studies is difficult as different assay methods and unit definitions have been used. Table 3 summarizes the production of amylase from halophiles in broth medium.
Halophilic isolates | Production level | Comments | Reference(s) |
Micrococcus sp. | 90.0 U/mL | Starch acts as inducer; glucose represses production; no production in absence of salt (NaCl) | [66] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | 0.12 U/mL | No production in absence of starch; glucose at 0.1% concentration inhibited production | [90] |
Halobacterium halobium | 1.84 U/mL | Soluble starch (1%, w/v) was best carbon source; 1% (w/v) peptone was best among nitrogen sources; 0.1 mM ZnSO4 stimulated production | [91] |
Micrococcus sp. 4 | 1.2 U/mL | Production in presence of starch, dextrin and wheat bran; no production in absence of salt | [92] |
Halomonas meridiana | Not specified | No production in absence of starch; glucose acts as repressor; production starts in stationary phase reaching maximum in exponential phase | [61] |
Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 | 3.2 U/mL | Enzyme constitutively expressed; dextrin was best carbon source; no production in absence of salt; maximum production in presence of 15% (w/v) Na2SO4 | [82] |
Haloferax mediterranei | 0.50 U/mL | Optimum production in presence of ammonium acetate and soluble starch | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | 4.56 U/mL | Production in medium containing 1.0% soluble starch and 4.3 M NaCl | [78] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | 0.59 U/mL | Production best induced by dextrin followed by soluble starch; yeast extract in combination with tryptone resulted better production; 0.2% CaCl2 stimulated production | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP101 | 4.7 U/mL | Maximum production in presence of rice flour; tryptone was best nitrogen source; 50 mM CaCl2 increased production by 29% | [84] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | 0.7 U/mL | Maximum production with wheat starch; production in presence of glucose also; peptone best nitrogen source; Production was growth independent reaching maximum in mid exponential phase | [80] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | 48.0 U/mL | Production was inducible; maximum was obtained with starch as carbon and casein enzyme hydrolysate as nitrogen source | [64] |
α-Amylase production levels in halophiles are generally low and very few studies have been done where many factors have been optimized to increase it. Carbon sources, nitrogen sources, salts and metal ions effects have been commonly investigated for amylase production. In halophiles, amylase production is usually growth dependent starting in exponential phase and reaching maximum in stationary phase [64]. An exception to this was observed in case of Halorubrum xinjiangense amylase production, which was growth independent starting in early exponential phase and reaching maximum in mid of this phase [80]. Amylase production was also growth independent for marine actinomycetes Streptomyces sp. D1 [88].
Amylases from halophiles are mainly inducible. They get expressed in presence of suitable carbon sources such as starch, dextrin and maltose. Contrary to this, the amylase of Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 was constitutively expressed [82]. Glucose acted as a repressor for production in several studies such as Micrococcus sp. [66], Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 [90], Halomonas meridiana [61] and Marinobacter sp. EMB8 [64]. Among inducers starch is best and supported better amylase production in case of Halobacterium salinarum (formerlyHalobacterium halobium) [91], Halomonas meridiana [61] and Marinobacter sp. EMB8 [64], while for Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 [82] and Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK [83] dextrin gave the best result.
Effect of nitrogen sources on amylase production among halophiles has not been much investigated. Peptone has been suggested to support better production, in case of Halobacterium salinarum (formerlyHalobacterium halobium) [91] and Halorubrum xinjiangense [80]. Yeast extract at 8.3 g/L was optimum for production by Rhodothermus marinus ITI 990 [93]. Combination of yeast extract and tryptone worked best for production in case of Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK. In this study tryptone, peptone and urea failed to induce production and there was no growth in absence of organic nitrogen source [83]. Amylase production by Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP101 was best in presence of tryptone while ammonium choride and urea did not back up production [84]. Casein enzyme hydrolysate at 1% (w/v) concentration was found to be best for amylase production by Marinobacter sp. EMB8 [64]. Thus no single nitrogen source may be termed as universally good.
Salt is vital for the growth of halophiles, so in most of the cases growth as well as amylase production diminishes in absence of salt. Sodium chloride is the preferred salt for growth and amylase production. Optimum concentration of salt varies from 5-25% (w/v) for maximum production. Optimized salt concentrations in some of production studies were 5% (w/v) NaCl for Halomonas meridiana [61]; 10% (w/v) NaCl for Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK [83]; 20% (w/v) NaCl or 15% (w/v) KCl for Chromohalobacter sp.TVSP101 [84]; 25% (w/v) NaCl for Halobacterium halobium [91]. Sodium sulphate and potassium chloride are suggested to be an alternate replacement and better for amylase production by Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 [82] and Bacillus dipsosauri [81] respectively. In Micrococcus sp. 4 though, amylase production was induced by other salts such as sodium nitrate, sodium sulphate and potassium nitrate but maximum production was attained with 1 M sodium chloride containing medium [92].
Divalent metal ions have shown stimulatory effect on amylase production in halophiles. Production by Bacillus sp. strainTSCVKK was enhanced by 0.2% (w/v) CaCl2 [83]. Presence of 50 mM CaCl2 increased the production by 29% in case of Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP101 [84]. Addition of zinc sulphate (0.1 mM) not only stimulated amylase production but also decreased the time for maximum production from 10 to 5 days for Halobacterium halobium [91]. In case of Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 sodium arsenate served as best metal ion source, while copper sulfate decreased and lead nitrate failed to induce any change [82].
The effect of above factors has not been investigated much for amylase production in halophiles. Halobacillus sp. produced maximum amylase at pH 7.8, temperature 30 °C and aeration rate of 200 rpm [82]. In Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK amylase production was maximum at 30 °C and pH 8.0 [83]. For Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP101 optimum conditions were pH 9.0 and 37 °C [84]. Maximum α-amylase production was observed at pH 7.0-7.5, 35 °C and shaking speed of 200 rpm in case of Marinobacter sp. EMB8 [64]. In general, a slightly alkaline pH and a temperature range of about 30-37 °C supports amylase production.
There have been very limited studies on the purification and characterization of halophilic amylases. The reason for this could be that halophilic strains produce rather very low amounts of α-amylase, as evident from the production data in the previous section. The purification strategies and characteristics of amylase from various halophiles are compiled in Table 4. A combination of chromatographic matrices has been used in multistep for halophilic amylase purification. The purification methods used suggest that there is no generic protocol for obtaining purified amylase. They are monomeric proteins with molecular weight mostly in the range of 50-100 kDa. Compared to other halophilic amylases Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 has a lower molecular mass of 31 kDa [85].
Halophiles | Purification procedure | Fold purification and recovery | Characteristics | Additional properties | Reference |
Acinetobacter sp. | Glycogen-complex formation, DEAE-Sephadex A-50 and Sephadex G-200 gel filtration chromatography | - | Mw amylase I 55 kDa and amylase II 65 kDa; pHopt 7.0 in 0.2-0.6 M NaCl or KCl; Topt 50-55 °C | Activity lost by dialysis against water | [67] |
Micrococcus halobius | Glycogen-complex formation, diethylaminoethyl-cellulose and Bio-Gel P-200 gel filtration chromatography | 474; 47% | Mw 89 kDa; pHopt 6.5-7.5; Topt 50-55 °C; Saltopt 0.25 M NaCl or 0.75 M KCl | Dialysis against distilled water and EDTA leads to complete loss of activity; Calcium ions provided stability | [94] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | Ethanol precipitation, hydroxylapatite, butyl Sepharose 4B and Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration chromatography | 2,000; 10% | Mw 74 kDa; pHopt 8.7; Topt 55 °C; Saltopt 2.5 M NaCl | Starch stabilized amylase; Inhibition by N-bromosuccinimide | [90] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Hydroxylapatite, Sepharose-4B, DEAE-cellulose and Sephadex-G50 chromatography | 48; 1.8% | Mw 58 kDa; pHopt 7.0-8.0; Topt 50-60 °C; Saltopt 3 M NaCl; Salt stability 2-4 M NaCl | EDTA resulted in irreversible loss of activity; Activation by calcium chloride | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | Centriprep, Phenyl C-650 toyopearl and Sephadex G-100 chromatography | 34; 17% | Mw 70 kDa; pHopt 7.0; Topt 50 °C; Saltopt 4.3 M NaCl | Organic solvent tolerant; Activity not observed at low salt concentration | [78] |
Haloarcula hispanica | Ultrafiltration, β-cyclodextrin-sepharose chromatography | - | Mw 50 kDa; pHopt 6.5; Topt 50 °C; Saltopt 4-5 M NaCl | Activity loss in absence of salt is reversible; calcium ions support catalysis | [79] |
Rhodothermus marinus | Ammonium sulfate precipitation, Q-Sepharose ion-exchange, Superdex-200 gel filtration chromatography and preparative native page | - | Mw 66 kDa; pHopt 6.0; Topt 80 °C; Saltopt 0.5 M NaCl; Active in 0-4.0 M NaCl | Amylolytic and transferase activity; Magnesium ions increased activity by 15% | [95] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Ultrafiltration, ethanol precipitation, hydrophobic interaction chromatography on Butyl Sepharose 4B and Sephacryl S-200 chromatography | - | Mw amylase I 72 kDa and amylase II 62 kDa; pHopt 9.0; Topt 65 °C; active in 0-20% (w/v) NaCl; Km 125 and 166 mM; Vmax 5.88 and 5.0 U/mg, respectively | Active over broad salt concentration | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Ethanol precipitation, Q-Sepharose anion exchange and Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration chromatography | 10.8; 6.4% | Mw 100 kDa; pHopt 7.5; Topt 45 °C; Saltopt 0.5 M NaCl; Active in 0-4.0 M NaCl; Km 4.5 mg/mL and Vmax 1.18 mg/mL/min | Detergent and surfactant stable; Inhibited by EDTA | [33] |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Ammonium sulphate precipitation, Sephadex G-75, DEAE-Sephadex, insoluble corn starch and sephacryl S-400 chromatography | 39.01; 25.27% | Mw 66 kDa; pHopt 11.0; pH stability 8.0-12.0; Topt 55 °C; Saltopt 11% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 7-17% (w/v) NaCl | Stable in various surfactants, commercial detergents and oxidising agents; Activated by calcium ions | [32] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Ammonium sulfate precipitation, Q-Sepharose ion exchange and Sephacryl S-100 chromatography | 6.4; 14.9% | Mw 31 kDa; pHopt 9.0; pH stability 6.0-12.0; Topt 70 °C; Temperature stability 30-90 °C; Saltopt 10% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 0-20% (w/v) NaCl | Active and stable in hydrophobic solvents; Calcium ions enhanced activity | [85] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Ultrafiltration, DEAE cellulose and Sephadex G-75 chromatography | 76; 52% | Mw 72 kDa; pHopt 7.0; pH stability 6.0-11.0; Topt 45 °C; T1/2 80 minutes at 80 °C; Saltopt 1% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 3-20% (w/v) NaCl; Km 4.6 mg/mL and Vmax 1.3 mg/mL/min | Stable in organic solvents and surfactants; Activity unaffected by calcium ions | [19] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | Ethanol precipitation and starch-affinity chromatography | 119; 56% | Mw 60 kDa; pHopt 8.5; Topt 70 °C; Saltopt 4 M NaCl or 4.5 M KCl; Km 3.8 mg/mL and Vmax 12.4 U/mg | Stable in SDS, detergents and a range of organic solvents | [80] |
Aspergillus gracilis | Ammonium sulfate precipitation and Sephadex G-100 gel filtration chromatography | 6; 47% | Mw 35 kDa; pHopt 5.0; Topt 60 °C; Saltopt 30% (w/v) NaCl; Km 6.33 mg/mL and Vmax 8.36 U/mg | Active in presence of inhibitors | [96] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Ethanol precipitation, anion exchange on Q-sepharose FF and SuperdexTM 75 gel filtration chromatography | 4.5; 15.4% | Mw 50 kDa; pHopt 8.0; Topt 54 °C; Saltopt 1.9 M NaCl | Stable in organic solvents, surfactants and oxidising agents | [30] |
In some cases two amylases were obtained after purification. For instance, two halotolerant extracellular amylases have been purified from Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 by ultrafiltration, ethanol precipitation, hydrophobic interaction chromatography on Butyl Sepharose 4B and Sephacryl S-200 size exclusion chromatography. They were designated as amylase I and amylase II having molecular mass of 72 and 62 kDa respectively. Both had maximum activity at pH 9.0 and temperature 65 °C. They showed activity in 0-20% (w/v) NaCl and even at 30% NaCl concentration 50% activity was retained. In absence of NaCl, amylase I was more stable compared to amylase II [84]. Acinetobacter sp. was the first halophilic amylase to be purified and characterized. Purification process employing Glycogen-complex formation, DEAE-Sephadex A-50 chromatography and Sephadex G-200 gel filtration led to two pure amylases namely, amylase I and amylase II of molecular masses 55 kDa and 65 kDa respectively. Both enzymes had pH optima at 7.0 in 0.2-0.6 M NaCl or KCl. The maximum activity was observed at 50-55 °C [67].
Salt is an important additive, modulating activity and stability of halophilic α-amylase. Salt requirement is more in cases of archaea as compared to bacteria. Archaeal amylase from Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 loses its activity irreversibly at low salt concentration, therefore 2.5 M NaCl concentration was maintained throughout the purification process. Optimum 2.5 M NaCl is required for its activity and stability. No activity is detectable below 1.0 M NaCl and less than 20% activity is recordable at 5.0 M and above. KCl, RbCl and CsCl at higher concentration could replace NaCl for optimum activity. Complete loss of activity was observed below 1.3 M NaCl whereas; at higher salt concentration it was quite stable with retention of 70% activity at 4.4 M NaCl. In presence of 0.5% soluble starch, amylase was completely stable from 2.1 to 3.6 M NaCl concentration [90]. The amylase from Haloferax mediterranei was stable in the salt range of 2-4 M NaCl with maximum activity at 3 M NaCl [63]. Similar to other haloarchaeal amylases, Haloarcula hispanica amylase also worked well at high salt concentrations with optimum activity at 4-5 M NaCl. Interestingly, it was active even at lower salt concentrations and showed 30% activity even in absence of NaCl. Activity loss in absence of salt is reversible as it was recovered as soon as optimum salt concentration was restored [79].
Among bacteria, Rhodothermus marinus was active in 0-4.0 M NaCl, optimum being 0.5 M NaCl [95]. Extracellular amylase from Nesterenkonia sp. strain F was active in 0-4.0 M NaCl with optimum at 0.5 M. It was stable in 1 to 4 M NaCl [33].
Their pH optima were mostly in the neutral range and some of them showed better activity at alkaline pH. A few of them showed better activity and stability at higher temperature. Micrococcus halobius amylase showed optimum activity at 50-55 °C and at pH 6.5. The enzyme was stable in the pH range of 6.5 to 7.5 [94]. Amylase from Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 has pH optimum of 8.7 with good stability in the pH range of 6.0-8.6. The activity declined sharply in acidic range. Maximum amylase activity is attained at 55 °C, although 50% of activity is lost at this temperature [90]. Extracellular amylolytic enzyme from Rhodothermus marinus showed maximum activity at pH 6.0 and was highly thermostable with temperature optima at 80 °C. At 80 °C and 85 °C, it had a half-life of 73.7 and 16.7 minutes respectively [95]. Amylase from Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 haloalkaliphilic marine actinomycetes was alkaline in nature with optimum pH at 11.0 and stability in buffers of pH 8.0 to 12.0. It was quite heat stable and maximum activity was shown at 55 °C [32]. A haloalkaline and thermostable amylase with stability in the temperature range (30-90 °C), pH range (6.0-12.0), and NaCl concentrations (0-20%) has been reported from Thalassobacillus sp. LY18, while optimum activity was at pH 9.0, 70 °C and 10% (w/v) NaCl [85].
α-Amylases are metalloenzymes, well-known to contain calcium ion. Similar behavior has also been observed in case of halophiles. Calcium ions acted as activator for α-amylase in some studies and dialysis against ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) has resulted in loss of activity. Mercury ions are potent inhibitor for this class of amylase. Micrococcus halobius amylase activity was completely lost against dialysis with distilled water and 0.01 M EDTAin 24 and 8 h respectively. It could not be restored by dialysis against CaCl2. The enzyme was dependent on calcium ions for stability [94]. Addition of EDTA resulted in irreversible loss of amylase activity of Haloferax mediterranei. Among bivalents, magnesium chloride acted as an inhibitor, while calcium chloride activated the enzyme [63]. Calcium seems to support the catalysis of Haloarcula hispanica amylase. Presence of calcium ions in assay mixture enhanced activity, optimum being 2 mM CaCl2. In absence of calcium ions, the activity is considerably reduced. EDTA treatment caused complete loss of activity, which was restored by the addition of calcium ions thus confirming its role in the enzyme activity [79]. Calcium ions activated the amylase from Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 to greater extent. Other divalent metal ions such as Mg2+, Mn2+, Co2+ and Cu2+ also led to increase in activity but to a lesser extent as compared to calcium. Activity was inhibited by Hg2+, Zn2+ and Fe3+ ions. Incubation with EDTA caused decrease in amylase activity confirming the role of calcium ions in catalysis [32]. Calcium ions enhanced activity while mercury inhibited it in case of Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 amylase. Other metal ions did not have any significant effect on activity. EDTA inhibited activity significantly confirming amylase to be a metalloenzyme [85].
α-Amylases are endolytic enzymes and show preferential activity on starch. Among halophiles, favored substrate is starch though they are active on amylose, amylopectin and glycogen. They do not use cyclodextrin and pullulan as substrate. Haloarcula hispanica [79], Marinobacter sp. EMB8 [19] and Halorubrum xinjiangense [80] amylase was active on starch, amylose, amylopectin and glycogen but no activity was detected towards pullulan and β-cyclodextrin.
In some cases the properties of crude amylases have been studied without any attempt to purify it e.g. Halomonas meridiana, Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2, Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK. Crude H. meridiana amylase showed maximum activity at pH 7.0, temperature 37 °C and 10% (w/v) NaCl concentration. It was more active in alkaline pH range. Maltose and maltotriose were formed as major end products after starch hydrolysis by this enzyme [61]. Optimum assay conditions for Halobacillus sp. amylase were pH 7.5 to 8.5, 50 °C and 5% NaCl [82]. Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK amylase was partially purified by acetone precipitation and was optimally active at pH 7.5, 55 ºC and 10% NaCl concentration. This amylase did not show activity in the absence of salt and was stable in various surfactants and detergents [83].
Stability in presence of organic solvents has been observed as a generic feature for enzymes from halophiles [87]. This is because of the fact that presence of salts decreases the water activity of medium; the same effect is caused by organic solvents. So, it is hypothesized that if the enzyme is stable under presence of salts, it will also be stable in organic solvents. Organic solvent stability of α-amylase from halophiles is reported in some studies. Haloarcula sp. strain S-1, a halophilic archaea isolated from a commercial French solar salt has been described to produce an organic solvent tolerant extracellular amylase. The activity and stability of enzyme was maintained in various organic solvents such as n-decane, n-nonane, n-octane, xylene, styrene, toluene, benzene and chloroform. However, the activity is lost in presence of hydrophilic solvents [78]. As a useful feature, Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 amylase showed activity and stability in hydrophobic solvents of log Pow ≥2.13 [85]. Marinobacter sp. EMB8 α-amylase exhibited stability in 25% (v/v) concentration of DCM (dichloromethane), benzene, toluene, hexane, cyclohexane and decane up to 24 h. The enzyme was effectively utilized for maltooligosaccharide synthesis in presence of solvents [19]. Halorubrum xinjiangense amylase was stable in a range of organic solvents and as a unique feature was able to hydrolyze raw starches in aqueous/ hexadecane two phase system [80]. Organic solvent tolerant amylases from halophiles have also been reported from Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 [31] and Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 [30].
Halophiles inhabit environments of various extreme conditions in addition to salts. Such circumstances can be extremes of pH, temperature and pressure. It can be said that they live in polyextreme situations. Their metabolic machinery and enzymes are stable and functional under these conditions. Similar property of activity and stability under polyextreme conditions viz. increased salt concentration, high pH, elevated temperature, presence of organic solvents, detergents and surfactants has been exhibited in some reports of α-amylase from halophiles. α-Amylase from Marinobacter sp. EMB8 was stable up to 20% NaCl (w/v) as well as in broad pH range of 6.0-11.0. It showed considerable thermal stability with half-life of 80 minutes at 80 °C. In addition to the above, it was stable in various organic solvents, detergents and surfactants [19]. A haloalkaline thermally stable extracellular amylase from haloarchaea H. xinjiangense was stable in SDS, detergents and a range of organic solvents [80]. Analogous polyextremophilic performance was given away by Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 amylase having additional pullulanase activity. Enzyme showed stability in salts, high pH, elevated temperature, organic solvents, surfactants and oxidizing agents [30].
Evidently, the halophilic enzymes have typical enzymatic properties with additional polyextremities viz. salt requirement for activity and stability, alkaline inclination and resistance to unfolding even with high concentration of chaotropic reagents. This raises interest in their structure and adaptive features at molecular level. The nucleotide sequence, cloning and overexpression of halophilic enzymes have been studied only scantly. E. coli does not serve well as suitable host for halophilic protein expression, although attempted in few cases. The lack of NaCl/ KCl/ osmolytes in the cytoplasm of E. coli (being mesophilic), may affect the correct folding of translated nascent protein. Albeit, the Haloferax volcanii has been a successful host in quite many cases of halophiles. The progress on the molecular characterization of halophilic amylase, available so far is compiled in Table 5.
Donor | Vector | Host | Characteristics | Reference |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | pANAM121 | Haloferax volcanii | α-Amylase gene was of 1512 bp with signal peptide of 43 amino acids; The activity of recombinant amylase was over 100 times higher than that of native Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | [97] |
pWL102 | ||||
Halomonas meridiana | pML122/123 | Halomonas elongata; E. coli | Amylase protein (AmyH) contained a high content of acidic amino acids as well as the four highly conserved regions in amylases; First 20 codons of the amylase precursor protein constituted signal peptide | [98] |
pVK102 | ||||
pMJC21-28 | ||||
Halothermothrix orenii | pSK5A6 | E. coli strain TOP10 | α-Amylase gene was of 1545 bp encoding signal peptide of 25 amino acid and a 490 amino acid mature protein; Over 90% | [62] |
pTrcHisB | activity was observed at high salt concentration | |||
pTH5A6 | ||||
Kocuria varians | pTAF | E. coli BL21 (DE3) | The kva gene of 2211 bp codes 736 amino acids residue protein; presence of starch binding domain (SBD) enables the enzyme to hydrolyse raw starches | [27] |
Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 | pET-AmyH-sp. pET-32a | E. coli BL21 (trxB) | The 1545 bp ORF encodes 514 amino acid protein; Amylase was highly stable in presence of organic solvents | [31] |
Haloarcula japonica | pET-21b pWL102 | Haloarcula japonica | The ORF of 1989 nucleotides encodes an intracellular α-amylase of 663 amino acids; It shows high activity on soluble starch, amylose and amylopectin | [99] |
Escherichia coli JM109 | pSE380 | E. coli XL10-Gold | A halophilic α-amylase was obtained from a non-halophilic microorganism and retains activity in high salt concentrations | [100] |
Zunongwangia profunda | pGEX-6P-1 | E. coli | Gene of 1785 bp encodes an α-amylase of 594 amino acids; A cold active and salt stable amylase | [101] |
DH5α; E. coli BL21 (DE3) |
The first report of α-amylase gene cloning and overexpression from archaea Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 came in the year 1994 by Kobayashi et al. [97]. Though amylase was purified and characterized previously [90]. Amylase was expressed in Haloferax volcanii with correct cleavage of signal peptide. The heterologous protein expression was growth associated and enhanced by presence of starch in medium. Purified expressed protein showed properties similar to native. The α-amylase gene of Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 was sequenced and showed an open reading frame of 1,512 base pairs [97]. Extracellular amylase from moderate halophile H. meridiana was characterized by Coronado et al. [61]. The H. meridiana was the first moderate halophile α-amylase gene to be cloned. The α-amylase gene amyH was sequenced and showed high degree of homology with amylase from Alteromonas haloplanktis. Further in this study thermostable α-amylase from Bacillus licheniformis were expressed in H. meridiana and H. elongata. This established that moderately halophilic bacteria can be used as cell factories for heterologous protein expression [98].
Haloarcula japonica is an extremely halophilic archaea whose genome sequence has been determined recently. A cytoplasmic α-amylase gene malA was identified from genome sequence and was subsequently cloned and expressed. The His-tagged expressed amylase was purified by Ni-affinity column. The amylase was of 663 amino acid residues and the catalytic domain showed homology to GH13 family. Amylase showed optimum activity at pH 6.5, 45 °C with 2.6 M NaCl. The enzyme activity spans over broad salt range, viz. about 83% and 95% activity in 0.6 and 4.2 M NaCl respectively. It was unaffected by calcium ions and EDTA. Examination of primary protein sequence revealed that calcium binding residues were replaced by other amino acids, thus the amylase activity was calcium-independent [99]. The study on Escherichia coli JM109 was unique in sense that for the first time a halophilic α-amylase was reported from a non-halophilic bacteria. This α-amylase (EAMY) gene was expressed in E. coli XL10-Gold cells and later purified and characterized. Amylase showed maximum activity at pH 7.0, temperature 55 °C in 2 M NaCl. It is activated in presence of NaCl. With specific activity of about 1,087 U/mg, it is quite superior over typical halophilic amylases. The Km and Kcat are represented as 4.3 mg/mL and 825/s respectively [100]. Halophilic α-amylase with psychrophilic character has been reported from Zunongwangia profunda. The recombinant amylase exhibited maximum activity at 35 °C and retained 39% activity even at 0 °C [101]. Cold active α-amylase with salt tolerance property has investigated in detail from Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis (formerly Alteromonas haloplanctis) [102,103].
α-Amylase from bacterial halophiles have shown properties and phylogenetic similarity with amylase of eukaryotic origin. Amylase from Halomonas meridiana exhibited substantial homology with amylase from insects and mammals and was a member of family 13 of glycosyl hydrolase. It contained four conserved regions found in this class of enzyme. Amino acids involved in catalysis, substrate, calcium ion and chloride ion binding were also conserved [98]. Kocuria varians amylase catalytic domain (468 amino acids) showed similarity with human salivary and the porcine pancreatic α-amylases with presence of four conserved regions of amylase family. It is inhibited by proteinaceous inhibitor from S. nitrosporeus. This amylase inhibitor acts on animal amylases, whilst ineffective on B. subtilis α-amylase [27]. Bioinformatic analysis of Marinobacter α-amylase revealed its phylogenetic closeness with mammals. Other members of halophilic Gammaproteobacteria such as Halomonas meridiana, Kocuria varians and Nesterenkonia sp. strain F also clustered with animal α-amylase. Marinobacter and other halophilic α-amylase having sequence similarity with mammals showed existence of N-terminal signature sequence [104]. Previous study has revealed that presence of eukaryotic α-amylase domain among bacteria results from horizontal gene transfer [105].
An additional property demonstrating similarity between halophilic and mammalian α-amylase is chloride activation. Chloride ions play a vital role in activating numerous α-amylases and similar property is encountered in mammalian amylase, such as human salivary amylase. Chloride ions are reported to act as allosteric activator in case of human as well as halophilic α-amylases such as Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis. Binding of chloride ions lead to interaction with catalytic residues and ultimately activation of α-amylase activity [106,107]. Chloride activation was encountered in halophilic amylase of Marinobacter sp. EMB8. It was also activated with other anions of similar size to chloride such as acetate, nitrate and azide [64]. Bromide and iodide ions which are of comparable size to chloride ions also acted as activators but to a lesser extent. Analogous performance was also demonstrated by Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 amylase. Among the various anions, activity was best in citrate followed by chloride and acetate, while no activity was detected in NaF, NaBr, and NaClO4 [90].
Normally high concentrations of salt result in precipitation of proteins due to salting out effect. On account of differential amino acid composition and their precise structural orientation halophilic proteins maintain their solubility, structural integrity and activity in high salt environment. They comprise of high proportion of acidic amino acids compared to their non-halophilic counterpart [20,108,109]. Presence of acidic aspartic and glutamic amino acids on surface helps in binding to water dipoles. This enables proteins of halophiles in maintaining essential water molecules and neutralizes their surface charge to make them soluble even under high salt conditions [110]. Apart from excess acidic amino acids, halophilic proteins have low lysine content, increased small hydrophobic amino acids instead of large hydrophobic residues and increased number of salt bridges [111]. Parallel pattern is also observed in α-amylase from halophiles. Amino acid composition of Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 amylase revealed high frequency of glutamic acid or glutamine and glycine. Lysine, serine and threonine content were low. The study thus indicated role of acidic residues in activity and stability [90]. Amylase from Halomonas meridiana too exhibited typical halophilic inclination viz. high content of acidic amino acids, lower number of basic amino acids and lower pI [98]. Likewise Kocuria varians amylase showed surplus of acidic amino acids over basic and had lower pI of 3.97 [27]. Marinobacter α-amylase characteristics were also similar with greater proportion of acidic amino acids, low lysine content and excess of small hydrophobic amino acids as compared to larger ones [104]. On the contrary Halothermothrix orenii amylase did not demonstrate surplus of acidic amino acids [62].
There is a lack of structural studies on halophilic amylase to ascertain basis of stability under multitude of harsh conditions. Report on Marinobacter sp. EMB8 α-amylase established the role of salt in proper folding and structure maintenance. Solvent stability of α-amylase was established by structural studies demonstrating preserved tertiary structure in presence of hydrophobic solvents [104]. Loss of structure with decrease in fluorescence intensity in absence of salt was also encountered for α-amylase of Haloarcula hispanica [79]. The non-availability of three dimensional structures restricts our understanding about structure-function relationship of halophilic α-amylases. Three dimensional structure of halophilic α-amylase has been deduced only in case of Halothermothrix orenii [112]. M. algicola α-amylase 3D structure was modelled using Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis α-amylase as a template. Presence of a higher proportion of acidic residues on α-amylase surface imparts stability in saline environment [104]. The three dimensional structure of α-amylase from halophilic archaea is not available. To understand the haloadaptation mechanism in archaea structural modeling of Haloarcula marismortui, Haloarcula hispanica and Halalkalicoccus jeotgali α-amylase were done. The haloarchaeal α-amylases have increased proportion of coil forming region as compared to helix formation. Further, excess acidic amino acids, low hydrophobicity, augmented salt bridges and diminished hydrophobic interaction on the surface provide them stability at increased salt concentrations [113].
α-Amylase is one among the top selling industrial enzymes. Whereas, mesophilic α-amylases have been widely used in diverse sectors like food, detergent, textile and pharmaceuticals [54,114]. Halophilic amylases have been least explored, even though they offer advantage of working better towards saline samples, due to their activity and stability in presence of varying concentrations of salt. Other features of industrial importance encountered in this class of amylases are stability in alkaline pH, high temperature and low water activity (presence of organic solvents) conditions.
One of the major applications of α-amylases has been in starch saccharification to yield maltooligosaccharides (MOS) of varying glucose units. MOS are used in food and pharmaceuticals. In this context, halophilic amylases have a good potential for effective starch hydrolysis and generation of various type of MOS. Table 6 summarizes starch hydrolysis products formed by various halophilic amylases.
Source of α-amylase | Hydrolysis products | Reference(s) |
Halobacterium halobium | Maltose, maltotriose and glucose | [65] |
Micrococcus halobius | Maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose and small amount of glucose | [94] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | Maltotriose with lesser amount of maltose and glucose | [90] |
Halomonas meridiana | Maltose and maltotriose | [61] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Maltose and lesser amount of maltohexaose | [63] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | Glucose, maltose and higher molecular weight MOS | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Maltotetraose, maltotriose, maltose and glucose | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Maltose, maltotriose and maltotetraose | [33] |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Maltose, glucose and maltotriose | [32] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Maltose and maltotriose | [85] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Maltose, maltotriose and maltotetraose | [19] |
Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 | Maltotriose and maltopentaose along with various MOS | [31] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Maltose and maltotriose | [30] |
In one report on immobilization, Marinobacter sp. EMB8 amylase immobilized on silica nanoparticle demonstratedbetter starch hydrolysis compared to free enzyme [64]. Other then hydrolysis of soluble starches, raw starch hydrolyzing capability has been shown in halophilic amylase from Nesterenkonia sp. strain F [33] and Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 [30]. Halorubrum xinjiangense also showed this property as it was able to hydrolyse raw starches in aqueous/ hexadecane two phase system [80]. Raw starch hydrolysis saves energy as heating process employed for starch solubilisation is energy intensive.
Alkaline α-amylases are used in detergent formulations. Among halophilic sources Streptomyces sp. D1 [88], Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK [83] and Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 [32] α-amylases have been marked for detergent application. These halophilic amylases showed compatibility with commercial detergents, surfactants and oxidising agents.
Stability and activity at high temperatures desired for starch liquefaction have been observed in many halophilic amylases. α-Amylase from hyperthermophilic bacteriumThermotoga maritima showed maximum activity at 90 °C on α -1, 4-linked carbohydrates [115]. Rhodothermus marinus amylase can be used for production of branched oligosaccharides at high temperature and salinity [95]. Cold active amylase from Psychromonas antarcticus and Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis could prove beneficial for bioprocessing of starch at low temperature [103,116].
Since saline environment has low water activity, stability in non-aqueous medium has been observed among many halophilic enzymes. Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 α-amylase was the first report of halophilic α-amylaseshowing stability in presence of n-decane, n-octane, xylene, toluene, benzene and chloroform [78]. Later, organic solvent stability was seen in amylases from Nesterenkonia sp. strain F [117], Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 [85], Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 [31] and Halorubrum xinjiangense [80]. Enzymes active in organic sovents/ low water activity are required in many biotransformation processes. In recent years, halophilic amylases have been envisaged to be uniquely suitable for bioremediation of hypersaline wastes containing starch and organic solvents. Polyextremophilic α-Amylase from Aspergillus gracilis showed potential for application in the bioremediation of saline and low water activity effluents. The performance of enzyme in synthetic waste water remediation was better as compared to the commercial one at higher salt concentrations [96].
α-Amylases among halophiles have mostly been reported from bacteria and archaea. They are highlighted as efficient catalysts under high salt, alkaline pH and in presence of organic solvents. The polyextremophilic characteristics make halophilic α-amylases as prospective entrant for starch hydrolysis, food and bioremediation applications. The new directions in their research are envisaged as (i) metagenomic approach to investigate the α-amylases from non-culturable halophiles will add to existing repository. (ii) Their adaptive structural features yet to be completely comprehended will enable better functional understanding of such enzymes.
The financial support by the Department of Biotechnology (Government of India) is gratefully acknowledged. Author SK is grateful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India, for Research Fellowship.
All authors declare no known conflict of interest.
[1] | Antolini F (2013) Conti patrimoniali, beni culturali ed informazione statistica: le criticità nella loro compilazione. Riv Stat Uff 2: 51–70. |
[2] | Antolini F, Giusti A, Grassini L (2017) Attrattività dei Territori e flussi turistici: l'importanza di una corretta programmazione settoriale. |
[3] | Antolini F, Truglia FG (2019) Conference Paper at Statistics for health and well-being, Ecotourism and food geographical areas, in Book of Abstract Brescia. |
[4] | Arbia G (1989) Spatial data Configuration in Statistical Analysis of regional Economic and Related Problems, Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2395-9 |
[5] | Argyle M (1996) The social psychology of leisure, Penguin. |
[6] | Bailey TC, Gatrell AC (1995) Interactive spatial data Analysis. Ecology 22. |
[7] | Boots B, Getis A (1988) Point Pattern Analysis. Available from: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article = 1013 & context = rri-web-book. |
[8] |
Boyne S, Hall D, Fiona W (2003) Policy, Support and Promotion for Food-Related Tourism Initiatives. J Travel Tour Mark 14: 131–154. https://doi.org/10.1300/J073v14n03_08 doi: 10.1300/J073v14n03_08
![]() |
[9] | Chainey S, Reid S, Stuart N (2002) When is a hotspot a hotspot? A procedure for creating statistically robust hotspot maps of crime. |
[10] |
Cohen MJ (2005) Sustainable consumption in national context: an introduction to the special issue. Sustain: Sci Pract Policy 1: 22–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2005.11907962 doi: 10.1080/15487733.2005.11907962
![]() |
[11] | Coltman MM (1989) Introduction to Travel and Tourism: An International Approach, Van Nostrand Reinhold. |
[12] |
Cronin L (1990) A strategy for tourism and sustainable developments. World Leisure Recreat 32: 12–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10261133.1990.10559117 doi: 10.1080/10261133.1990.10559117
![]() |
[13] | Diggle PJ (1983) Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns, Academic Press, London. |
[14] | European Commission (2009) Regulation No 1221/2009 on the voluntary participation by organizations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS), Bruxelles. |
[15] | European Commission (2010) Regulation No 66/2010 on the EU Ecolabel, Bruxelles. |
[16] | European Commission (2017) Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment, Special Eurobarometer 468. |
[17] | European Commission (2019) Ecolabel Products. Retrieved January 15, 2020. Available from: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/. |
[18] |
Everett S, Aitchison C (2008) The role of food tourism in sustaining regional identity: A case study of Cornwall, South West England. J Sustain Tour 16: 150–167. https://doi.org/10.2167/jost696.0 doi: 10.2167/jost696.0
![]() |
[19] |
Fennell DA (2001) A Content Analysis of Ecotourism Definitions. Curr Issues Tour 4: 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500108667896 doi: 10.1080/13683500108667896
![]() |
[20] | Gheorghe G, Tudorache P, Nistoreanu P (2014) Gastronomic tourism, a new trend for contemporary tourism. Cactus Tourism J 9: 12–21. |
[21] | Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. |
[22] | Hall CM, Mitchell R (2007) Gastronomic tourism: Comparing food and wine tourism experiences. In: Novelli, M., Niche tourism, Routledge, 87–102. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080492926 |
[23] | Hall CM, Sharples E, Mitchell R, et al. (2003) Food Tourism Around the World: Development, Management and Markets, Butterworth-Heinemann. |
[24] |
Hills P, Argyle M (1998) Positive moods derived from leisure and their relationship to happiness and personality. Pers Individ Differ 25: 523–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00082-8 doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00082-8
![]() |
[25] |
Horng JS, Tsai CT (2011) Culinary tourism strategic development: An Asia-Pacific perspective. Int J Tour Res 14: 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/jtr.834 doi: 10.1002/jtr.834
![]() |
[26] |
Hunter C (1997) Sustainable Tourism as an adaptive paradigm. Ann Tour Res 24: 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00036-4 doi: 10.1016/S0160-7383(97)00036-4
![]() |
[27] |
Ignatov E, Smith S (2006) Segmenting Canadian culinary tourists. Curr Issues Tour 9: 235–255. https://doi.org/10.2167/cit/229.0 doi: 10.2167/cit/229.0
![]() |
[28] |
Jones C, Munday M, Roberts A (2003) Regional Tourism Satellite Accounts: A Useful Policy Tool? Urban Stud 40: 2777–2794. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098032000146894 doi: 10.1080/0042098032000146894
![]() |
[29] |
Kivela J, Crotts JC (2006) Tourism and Gastronomy: Gastronomy's Influence on How Tourists Experience a Destination. J Hosp Tour Res 30: 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348006286797 doi: 10.1177/1096348006286797
![]() |
[30] |
Kontogeorgopoulos N (1999) Sustainable tourism or sustainable development? Financial crisis, ecotourism, and the 'Amazing Thailand' campaign. Curr Issues Tour 2: 316–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13683509908667859 doi: 10.1080/13683509908667859
![]() |
[31] |
Lane B (1994a) What is rural tourism? J Sustain Tour 2: 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669589409510680 doi: 10.1080/09669589409510680
![]() |
[32] |
Lane B (1994b) Sustainable rural tourism strategies: A tool for development and conservation. J Sustain Tour 2: 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669589409510687 doi: 10.1080/09669589409510687
![]() |
[33] | Levine N (2004) CrimeStat Ⅲ: a spatial statistic program for the analysis of crime incident locations. |
[34] |
Lewin K (1939) Field theory and experiment in social psychology: Concepts and methods. Am J Sociol 44: 868–896. https://doi.org/10.1086/218177 doi: 10.1086/218177
![]() |
[35] |
Li W, Zhang Q, Liu C, et al. (2006) Tourism's impacts on natural resources: a positive case from China. Environ Manage 38: 572–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-004-0299-z doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0299-z
![]() |
[36] |
Liu Z (2003) Sustainable Tourism Development: A Critique. J Sustain Tour 11: 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580308667216 doi: 10.1080/09669580308667216
![]() |
[37] |
Lo MC, Chin CH, Law FY (2019) Tourists' perspectives on hard and soft services toward rural tourism destination competitiveness: Community support as a moderator. Tour Hosp Res 19: 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358417715677 doi: 10.1177/1467358417715677
![]() |
[38] | Garau G, Mandras G, Schirru L (2011) A Statistical Information System supporting Environmental Policies. Available from: https://crenos.unica.it/crenos/sites/default/files/WP11-22.pdf. |
[39] | Mandras G, Garau G (2015) Economy-wide rebound effects from an increase in efficiency in the use of energy: the Italian cas. |
[40] |
McKercher B, Okumus F, Okumus B (2008) Food Tourism as a Viable Market Segment: It's All How You Cook the Numbers! J Travel Tour Mark 25: 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548400802402404 doi: 10.1080/10548400802402404
![]() |
[41] |
Pforr C (2001) Concepts of Sustainable Development, Sustainable Tourism, and Ecotourism: Definitions, Principles, and Linkages. Scand J Hosp Tour 1: 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250127788 doi: 10.1080/15022250127788
![]() |
[42] |
Richard G (2015) Evolving gastronomic experiences: from food to foodies to foodscapes. J Gastron Tour 1: 5–17. https://doi.org/10.3727/216929715X14298190828796 doi: 10.3727/216929715X14298190828796
![]() |
[43] |
Ripley BD (1976) The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes. J Appl Probab 13: 255–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/3212829 doi: 10.2307/3212829
![]() |
[44] |
Woodside G (2005) Testing theory of Planned versus realized tourism behaviour. Ann Tour Res 32: 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2004.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.annals.2004.07.012
![]() |
[45] |
Sharpley R (2000) Tourism and Sustainable Development: Exploring the Theoretical Divide. J Sustain Tour 8: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669580008667346 doi: 10.1080/09669580008667346
![]() |
[46] | The International Ecotourism Society (TIES) (2015) TIES Announces Ecotourism Principles Revision. Available from: https://ecotourism.org/news/ties-announces-ecotourism-principles-revision/. |
[47] | UNWTO (2005) Making Tourism more sustainable (MST)—A guide for policy makers. |
[48] | UNWTO (2018) Measuring Sustainable Tourism: A call for Action—Report of the 6th International Conference on Tourism Statistics, Manila, Philippines. https://doi.org/10.18111/9789284418954 |
[49] | Uskul A, Oishi S (2018) Socioeconomic environment and human psychology: Social, ecological, and cultural perspectives, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190492908.001.0001 |
[50] | Wilbanks TJ (2007) Sustainable Development in Geographic Perspective. |
1. | Shubhrima Ghosh, Sumit Kumar, Sunil Kumar Khare, 2019, Chapter 4, 978-3-030-18974-7, 65, 10.1007/978-3-030-18975-4_4 | |
2. | Maksim Sysoev, Stefan W. Grötzinger, Dominik Renn, Jörg Eppinger, Magnus Rueping, Ram Karan, Bioprospecting of Novel Extremozymes From Prokaryotes—The Advent of Culture-Independent Methods, 2021, 12, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2021.630013 | |
3. | Bhakti B. Salgaonkar, Divya T. Sawant, Saranya Harinarayanan, Judith M. Bragança, Alpha-amylase Production by Extremely Halophilic ArchaeonHalococcusStrain GUVSC8, 2019, 00389056, 1800018, 10.1002/star.201800018 | |
4. | Sumit Kumar, Sunil K. Khare, 2021, 9780128002179, 59, 10.1016/B978-0-12-800217-9.00004-6 | |
5. | Aparna Singh, Anil K. Singh, Haloarchaea: worth exploring for their biotechnological potential, 2017, 39, 0141-5492, 1793, 10.1007/s10529-017-2434-y | |
6. | Han Huang, Yun Lin, Guozeng Wang, Juan Lin, Gene cloning, expression and biochemical characterization of a new multi-domain, halotolerant and SDS-resistant alkaline pullulanase from Alkalibacterium sp. SL3, 2020, 96, 13595113, 1, 10.1016/j.procbio.2020.05.019 | |
7. | Salma Mukhtar, Samina Mehnaz, Muhammad Sajjad Mirza, Kauser Abdulla Malik, Isolation and characterization of bacteria associated with the rhizosphere of halophytes (Salsola stocksii and Atriplex amnicola) for production of hydrolytic enzymes, 2019, 50, 1517-8382, 85, 10.1007/s42770-019-00044-y | |
8. | Priyanka V. Shirodkar, Usha Devi Muraleedharan, Samir Damare, Seshagiri Raghukumar, A Mesohaline Thraustochytrid Produces Extremely Halophilic Alpha-Amylases, 2020, 22, 1436-2228, 403, 10.1007/s10126-020-09960-9 | |
9. | Patricia Gómez-Villegas, Javier Vigara, Rosa León, Characterization of the Microbial Population Inhabiting a Solar Saltern Pond of the Odiel Marshlands (SW Spain), 2018, 16, 1660-3397, 332, 10.3390/md16090332 | |
10. | Ehab A. Beltagy, Ahmed Abouelwafa, Khouloud M. Barakat, Bioethanol production from immobilized amylase produced by marine Aspergillus flavus AUMC10636, 2022, 48, 16874285, 325, 10.1016/j.ejar.2022.02.003 | |
11. | Nastaran Solat, Mohammad Shafiei, A novel pH and thermo-tolerant halophilic alpha-amylase from moderate halophile Nesterenkonia sp. strain F: gene analysis, molecular cloning, heterologous expression and biochemical characterization, 2021, 203, 0302-8933, 3641, 10.1007/s00203-021-02359-7 | |
12. | Saba Ghattavi, Ahmad Homaei, Marine enzymes: Classification and application in various industries, 2023, 230, 01418130, 123136, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123136 | |
13. | P. Contreras, C. Oviedo, Potential and future perspectives of thraustochytrids in bioremediation, 2023, 20, 1735-1472, 4483, 10.1007/s13762-022-04740-5 | |
14. | Aysegul Mutlu-Ingok, Derya Kahveci, Funda Karbancioglu-Guler, Beraat Ozcelik, 2022, 9780128229453, 197, 10.1016/B978-0-12-822945-3.00012-9 | |
15. | Carmen Pire Galiana, José María Miralles-Robledillo, Eric Bernabeu, Nadia Harfi, Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa, 2022, 9780323902748, 249, 10.1016/B978-0-323-90274-8.00003-4 | |
16. | Matan Masasa, Ariel Kushmaro, Helena Chernova, Nadav Shashar, Lior Guttman, Emily Weinert, Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes of a Novel Halotolerant Alkalihalobacillus Species for Hydrolysis of Starch and Other Algal Polysaccharides , 2022, 10, 2165-0497, 10.1128/spectrum.01078-22 | |
17. | Jamseel Moopantakath, Madangchanok Imchen, Ranjith Kumavath, Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa, Ubiquitousness of Haloferax and Carotenoid Producing Genes in Arabian Sea Coastal Biosystems of India, 2021, 19, 1660-3397, 442, 10.3390/md19080442 | |
18. | Jamseel Moopantakath, Madangchanok Imchen, V. T. Anju, Siddhardha Busi, Madhu Dyavaiah, Rosa María Martínez-Espinosa, Ranjith Kumavath, Bioactive molecules from haloarchaea: Scope and prospects for industrial and therapeutic applications, 2023, 14, 1664-302X, 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1113540 | |
19. | Ellie Ashcroft, Jose Munoz-Munoz, A review of the principles and biotechnological applications of glycoside hydrolases from extreme environments, 2024, 259, 01418130, 129227, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129227 | |
20. | Baliram Gurunath Rathod, Srinija Pandala, Venkata Giridhar Poosarla, A Novel Halo-Acid-Alkali-Tolerant and Surfactant Stable Amylase Secreted from Halophile Bacillus siamensis F2 and Its Application in Waste Valorization by Bioethanol Production and Food Industry, 2023, 195, 0273-2289, 4775, 10.1007/s12010-023-04559-x | |
21. | Prathamesh P. Shetgaonkar, A. Bharath Reddy, Tareeka Sonawane, Vinothkannan Ravichandran, Renitta Jobby, 2024, Chapter 9, 978-3-031-55031-7, 203, 10.1007/978-3-031-55032-4_9 | |
22. | Jincheng Li, Sen Liu, Chenjie Yang, Nemat O. Keyhani, Huili Pu, Longbin Lin, Xiaoxia Li, Peisong Jia, Dongmei Wu, Jieming Pan, Philip C. Stevenson, G Mandela Fernández-Grandon, Liaoyuan Zhang, Yuxi Chen, Xiayu Guan, Junzhi Qiu, Characterization of an α-Amylase from the Honeybee Chalk Brood Pathogen Ascosphaera apis, 2023, 9, 2309-608X, 1082, 10.3390/jof9111082 | |
23. | Tolulope Joshua Ashaolu, Tanu Malik, Rakhi Soni, Miguel A. Prieto, Seid Mahdi Jafari, Extremophilic Microorganisms as a Source of Emerging Enzymes for the Food Industry: A Review, 2025, 13, 2048-7177, 10.1002/fsn3.4540 | |
24. | Maryam Yavari-Bafghi, Mohammad Ali Amoozegar, Pharmaceutical applications of halophilic enzymes, 2025, 11, 24058440, e42754, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42754 |
Enzymes | Microorganism(s) | Characteristics/ prospective applications | Reference(s) |
Alcohol dehydrogenase | Haloferax volcanii | Solvent stable | [28] |
Alkaline phosphatases | Halomonas sp. 593 | Phosphomonoesters hydrolysis over broad salt range | [29] |
α-Amylases | Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Salt, alkali, temperature solvent and surfactant stable | [30] |
Exiguobacterium sp. | Solvent stable and bakery industry | [31] | |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Solvent stable and maltooligosaccharide synthesis | [19] | |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Detergents formulation | [32] | |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Starch hydrolysis | [33] | |
Cellulases | Aspergillus terreus UniMAP AA-6 | Ionic liquid tolerant and saccharification of lignocelluloses | [34] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Salt and solvent stable | [35] | |
Marinobacter sp. MSI032 | Stable at alkaline pH | [36] | |
Chitinases | Planococcus rifitoensis strain M2-26 | Salt and heat stable | [37] |
Esterases | Haloarcula marismortui | Alkaline and salt stable | [38] |
β-Galactosidase | Halorubrum lacusprofundi | Salt and solvent stable | [39] |
Haloferax alicantei | Salt stable | [40] | |
Lipases | Haloarcula sp. G41 | Solvent tolerant and biodiesel production | [41] |
Marinobacter lipolyticus SM19 | Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) production and solvent stable | [42] | |
Salicola strain IC10 | Alkaline and salt stable | [43] | |
Nucleases | Bacillus sp. | Alkaline, salt and thermal stable | [44] |
Micrococcus varians | Alkaline and salt stable | [45] | |
Proteases | Bacillus sp. EMB9 | Solvent stable and detergent formulations | [46] |
Geomicrobium sp. EMB2 | Solvent stable and detergent formulations | [47] | |
Halobacterium sp. | Alkaline, salt stable and used in fish sauce preparation | [48] | |
Halobacterium halobium | Solvent stable and used for peptide synthesis | [16] | |
Xylanases | Gracilibacillus sp. TSCPVG | Halo-acid-alkali-thermo-stable | [49] |
Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum NTOU1 | Salt stable | [50] | |
Halophilic bacterium CL8 | pH, salt and heat stable | [51] |
Isolate | Location | Reference(s) |
Micrococcus | Unrefined solar salt, Japan | [66] |
Natronococcus amylolyticus | Lake Magadi, Kenya | [60] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Saline habitat of Spain | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | Commercially available French solar salt | [78] |
Haloarcula hispanica | Solar saltern in Spain | [79] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | Hypersaline Lake Urmia, Iran | [80] |
Halomonas meridiana | Antarctic saline lakes | [61] |
Bacillus dipsosauri | Nasal cavity of a desert iguana | [81] |
Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 | Saline soil, Iran | [82] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | Soil samples, India | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Solar evaporated saltern pond, India | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Aran-Bidgol Lake, Iran | [33] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Saline soil of Yuncheng Salt Lake, China | [85] |
Pseudoalteromonas spp. | Persian Gulf, Iran | [86] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Kozhikode, India | [87] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Wadi An Natrun, Egypt. | [30] |
Halophilic isolates | Production level | Comments | Reference(s) |
Micrococcus sp. | 90.0 U/mL | Starch acts as inducer; glucose represses production; no production in absence of salt (NaCl) | [66] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | 0.12 U/mL | No production in absence of starch; glucose at 0.1% concentration inhibited production | [90] |
Halobacterium halobium | 1.84 U/mL | Soluble starch (1%, w/v) was best carbon source; 1% (w/v) peptone was best among nitrogen sources; 0.1 mM ZnSO4 stimulated production | [91] |
Micrococcus sp. 4 | 1.2 U/mL | Production in presence of starch, dextrin and wheat bran; no production in absence of salt | [92] |
Halomonas meridiana | Not specified | No production in absence of starch; glucose acts as repressor; production starts in stationary phase reaching maximum in exponential phase | [61] |
Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 | 3.2 U/mL | Enzyme constitutively expressed; dextrin was best carbon source; no production in absence of salt; maximum production in presence of 15% (w/v) Na2SO4 | [82] |
Haloferax mediterranei | 0.50 U/mL | Optimum production in presence of ammonium acetate and soluble starch | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | 4.56 U/mL | Production in medium containing 1.0% soluble starch and 4.3 M NaCl | [78] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | 0.59 U/mL | Production best induced by dextrin followed by soluble starch; yeast extract in combination with tryptone resulted better production; 0.2% CaCl2 stimulated production | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP101 | 4.7 U/mL | Maximum production in presence of rice flour; tryptone was best nitrogen source; 50 mM CaCl2 increased production by 29% | [84] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | 0.7 U/mL | Maximum production with wheat starch; production in presence of glucose also; peptone best nitrogen source; Production was growth independent reaching maximum in mid exponential phase | [80] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | 48.0 U/mL | Production was inducible; maximum was obtained with starch as carbon and casein enzyme hydrolysate as nitrogen source | [64] |
Halophiles | Purification procedure | Fold purification and recovery | Characteristics | Additional properties | Reference |
Acinetobacter sp. | Glycogen-complex formation, DEAE-Sephadex A-50 and Sephadex G-200 gel filtration chromatography | - | Mw amylase I 55 kDa and amylase II 65 kDa; pHopt 7.0 in 0.2-0.6 M NaCl or KCl; Topt 50-55 °C | Activity lost by dialysis against water | [67] |
Micrococcus halobius | Glycogen-complex formation, diethylaminoethyl-cellulose and Bio-Gel P-200 gel filtration chromatography | 474; 47% | Mw 89 kDa; pHopt 6.5-7.5; Topt 50-55 °C; Saltopt 0.25 M NaCl or 0.75 M KCl | Dialysis against distilled water and EDTA leads to complete loss of activity; Calcium ions provided stability | [94] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | Ethanol precipitation, hydroxylapatite, butyl Sepharose 4B and Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration chromatography | 2,000; 10% | Mw 74 kDa; pHopt 8.7; Topt 55 °C; Saltopt 2.5 M NaCl | Starch stabilized amylase; Inhibition by N-bromosuccinimide | [90] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Hydroxylapatite, Sepharose-4B, DEAE-cellulose and Sephadex-G50 chromatography | 48; 1.8% | Mw 58 kDa; pHopt 7.0-8.0; Topt 50-60 °C; Saltopt 3 M NaCl; Salt stability 2-4 M NaCl | EDTA resulted in irreversible loss of activity; Activation by calcium chloride | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | Centriprep, Phenyl C-650 toyopearl and Sephadex G-100 chromatography | 34; 17% | Mw 70 kDa; pHopt 7.0; Topt 50 °C; Saltopt 4.3 M NaCl | Organic solvent tolerant; Activity not observed at low salt concentration | [78] |
Haloarcula hispanica | Ultrafiltration, β-cyclodextrin-sepharose chromatography | - | Mw 50 kDa; pHopt 6.5; Topt 50 °C; Saltopt 4-5 M NaCl | Activity loss in absence of salt is reversible; calcium ions support catalysis | [79] |
Rhodothermus marinus | Ammonium sulfate precipitation, Q-Sepharose ion-exchange, Superdex-200 gel filtration chromatography and preparative native page | - | Mw 66 kDa; pHopt 6.0; Topt 80 °C; Saltopt 0.5 M NaCl; Active in 0-4.0 M NaCl | Amylolytic and transferase activity; Magnesium ions increased activity by 15% | [95] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Ultrafiltration, ethanol precipitation, hydrophobic interaction chromatography on Butyl Sepharose 4B and Sephacryl S-200 chromatography | - | Mw amylase I 72 kDa and amylase II 62 kDa; pHopt 9.0; Topt 65 °C; active in 0-20% (w/v) NaCl; Km 125 and 166 mM; Vmax 5.88 and 5.0 U/mg, respectively | Active over broad salt concentration | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Ethanol precipitation, Q-Sepharose anion exchange and Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration chromatography | 10.8; 6.4% | Mw 100 kDa; pHopt 7.5; Topt 45 °C; Saltopt 0.5 M NaCl; Active in 0-4.0 M NaCl; Km 4.5 mg/mL and Vmax 1.18 mg/mL/min | Detergent and surfactant stable; Inhibited by EDTA | [33] |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Ammonium sulphate precipitation, Sephadex G-75, DEAE-Sephadex, insoluble corn starch and sephacryl S-400 chromatography | 39.01; 25.27% | Mw 66 kDa; pHopt 11.0; pH stability 8.0-12.0; Topt 55 °C; Saltopt 11% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 7-17% (w/v) NaCl | Stable in various surfactants, commercial detergents and oxidising agents; Activated by calcium ions | [32] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Ammonium sulfate precipitation, Q-Sepharose ion exchange and Sephacryl S-100 chromatography | 6.4; 14.9% | Mw 31 kDa; pHopt 9.0; pH stability 6.0-12.0; Topt 70 °C; Temperature stability 30-90 °C; Saltopt 10% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 0-20% (w/v) NaCl | Active and stable in hydrophobic solvents; Calcium ions enhanced activity | [85] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Ultrafiltration, DEAE cellulose and Sephadex G-75 chromatography | 76; 52% | Mw 72 kDa; pHopt 7.0; pH stability 6.0-11.0; Topt 45 °C; T1/2 80 minutes at 80 °C; Saltopt 1% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 3-20% (w/v) NaCl; Km 4.6 mg/mL and Vmax 1.3 mg/mL/min | Stable in organic solvents and surfactants; Activity unaffected by calcium ions | [19] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | Ethanol precipitation and starch-affinity chromatography | 119; 56% | Mw 60 kDa; pHopt 8.5; Topt 70 °C; Saltopt 4 M NaCl or 4.5 M KCl; Km 3.8 mg/mL and Vmax 12.4 U/mg | Stable in SDS, detergents and a range of organic solvents | [80] |
Aspergillus gracilis | Ammonium sulfate precipitation and Sephadex G-100 gel filtration chromatography | 6; 47% | Mw 35 kDa; pHopt 5.0; Topt 60 °C; Saltopt 30% (w/v) NaCl; Km 6.33 mg/mL and Vmax 8.36 U/mg | Active in presence of inhibitors | [96] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Ethanol precipitation, anion exchange on Q-sepharose FF and SuperdexTM 75 gel filtration chromatography | 4.5; 15.4% | Mw 50 kDa; pHopt 8.0; Topt 54 °C; Saltopt 1.9 M NaCl | Stable in organic solvents, surfactants and oxidising agents | [30] |
Donor | Vector | Host | Characteristics | Reference |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | pANAM121 | Haloferax volcanii | α-Amylase gene was of 1512 bp with signal peptide of 43 amino acids; The activity of recombinant amylase was over 100 times higher than that of native Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | [97] |
pWL102 | ||||
Halomonas meridiana | pML122/123 | Halomonas elongata; E. coli | Amylase protein (AmyH) contained a high content of acidic amino acids as well as the four highly conserved regions in amylases; First 20 codons of the amylase precursor protein constituted signal peptide | [98] |
pVK102 | ||||
pMJC21-28 | ||||
Halothermothrix orenii | pSK5A6 | E. coli strain TOP10 | α-Amylase gene was of 1545 bp encoding signal peptide of 25 amino acid and a 490 amino acid mature protein; Over 90% | [62] |
pTrcHisB | activity was observed at high salt concentration | |||
pTH5A6 | ||||
Kocuria varians | pTAF | E. coli BL21 (DE3) | The kva gene of 2211 bp codes 736 amino acids residue protein; presence of starch binding domain (SBD) enables the enzyme to hydrolyse raw starches | [27] |
Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 | pET-AmyH-sp. pET-32a | E. coli BL21 (trxB) | The 1545 bp ORF encodes 514 amino acid protein; Amylase was highly stable in presence of organic solvents | [31] |
Haloarcula japonica | pET-21b pWL102 | Haloarcula japonica | The ORF of 1989 nucleotides encodes an intracellular α-amylase of 663 amino acids; It shows high activity on soluble starch, amylose and amylopectin | [99] |
Escherichia coli JM109 | pSE380 | E. coli XL10-Gold | A halophilic α-amylase was obtained from a non-halophilic microorganism and retains activity in high salt concentrations | [100] |
Zunongwangia profunda | pGEX-6P-1 | E. coli | Gene of 1785 bp encodes an α-amylase of 594 amino acids; A cold active and salt stable amylase | [101] |
DH5α; E. coli BL21 (DE3) |
Source of α-amylase | Hydrolysis products | Reference(s) |
Halobacterium halobium | Maltose, maltotriose and glucose | [65] |
Micrococcus halobius | Maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose and small amount of glucose | [94] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | Maltotriose with lesser amount of maltose and glucose | [90] |
Halomonas meridiana | Maltose and maltotriose | [61] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Maltose and lesser amount of maltohexaose | [63] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | Glucose, maltose and higher molecular weight MOS | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Maltotetraose, maltotriose, maltose and glucose | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Maltose, maltotriose and maltotetraose | [33] |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Maltose, glucose and maltotriose | [32] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Maltose and maltotriose | [85] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Maltose, maltotriose and maltotetraose | [19] |
Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 | Maltotriose and maltopentaose along with various MOS | [31] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Maltose and maltotriose | [30] |
Enzymes | Microorganism(s) | Characteristics/ prospective applications | Reference(s) |
Alcohol dehydrogenase | Haloferax volcanii | Solvent stable | [28] |
Alkaline phosphatases | Halomonas sp. 593 | Phosphomonoesters hydrolysis over broad salt range | [29] |
α-Amylases | Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Salt, alkali, temperature solvent and surfactant stable | [30] |
Exiguobacterium sp. | Solvent stable and bakery industry | [31] | |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Solvent stable and maltooligosaccharide synthesis | [19] | |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Detergents formulation | [32] | |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Starch hydrolysis | [33] | |
Cellulases | Aspergillus terreus UniMAP AA-6 | Ionic liquid tolerant and saccharification of lignocelluloses | [34] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Salt and solvent stable | [35] | |
Marinobacter sp. MSI032 | Stable at alkaline pH | [36] | |
Chitinases | Planococcus rifitoensis strain M2-26 | Salt and heat stable | [37] |
Esterases | Haloarcula marismortui | Alkaline and salt stable | [38] |
β-Galactosidase | Halorubrum lacusprofundi | Salt and solvent stable | [39] |
Haloferax alicantei | Salt stable | [40] | |
Lipases | Haloarcula sp. G41 | Solvent tolerant and biodiesel production | [41] |
Marinobacter lipolyticus SM19 | Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) production and solvent stable | [42] | |
Salicola strain IC10 | Alkaline and salt stable | [43] | |
Nucleases | Bacillus sp. | Alkaline, salt and thermal stable | [44] |
Micrococcus varians | Alkaline and salt stable | [45] | |
Proteases | Bacillus sp. EMB9 | Solvent stable and detergent formulations | [46] |
Geomicrobium sp. EMB2 | Solvent stable and detergent formulations | [47] | |
Halobacterium sp. | Alkaline, salt stable and used in fish sauce preparation | [48] | |
Halobacterium halobium | Solvent stable and used for peptide synthesis | [16] | |
Xylanases | Gracilibacillus sp. TSCPVG | Halo-acid-alkali-thermo-stable | [49] |
Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum NTOU1 | Salt stable | [50] | |
Halophilic bacterium CL8 | pH, salt and heat stable | [51] |
Isolate | Location | Reference(s) |
Micrococcus | Unrefined solar salt, Japan | [66] |
Natronococcus amylolyticus | Lake Magadi, Kenya | [60] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Saline habitat of Spain | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | Commercially available French solar salt | [78] |
Haloarcula hispanica | Solar saltern in Spain | [79] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | Hypersaline Lake Urmia, Iran | [80] |
Halomonas meridiana | Antarctic saline lakes | [61] |
Bacillus dipsosauri | Nasal cavity of a desert iguana | [81] |
Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 | Saline soil, Iran | [82] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | Soil samples, India | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Solar evaporated saltern pond, India | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Aran-Bidgol Lake, Iran | [33] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Saline soil of Yuncheng Salt Lake, China | [85] |
Pseudoalteromonas spp. | Persian Gulf, Iran | [86] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Kozhikode, India | [87] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Wadi An Natrun, Egypt. | [30] |
Halophilic isolates | Production level | Comments | Reference(s) |
Micrococcus sp. | 90.0 U/mL | Starch acts as inducer; glucose represses production; no production in absence of salt (NaCl) | [66] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | 0.12 U/mL | No production in absence of starch; glucose at 0.1% concentration inhibited production | [90] |
Halobacterium halobium | 1.84 U/mL | Soluble starch (1%, w/v) was best carbon source; 1% (w/v) peptone was best among nitrogen sources; 0.1 mM ZnSO4 stimulated production | [91] |
Micrococcus sp. 4 | 1.2 U/mL | Production in presence of starch, dextrin and wheat bran; no production in absence of salt | [92] |
Halomonas meridiana | Not specified | No production in absence of starch; glucose acts as repressor; production starts in stationary phase reaching maximum in exponential phase | [61] |
Halobacillus sp. strain MA-2 | 3.2 U/mL | Enzyme constitutively expressed; dextrin was best carbon source; no production in absence of salt; maximum production in presence of 15% (w/v) Na2SO4 | [82] |
Haloferax mediterranei | 0.50 U/mL | Optimum production in presence of ammonium acetate and soluble starch | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | 4.56 U/mL | Production in medium containing 1.0% soluble starch and 4.3 M NaCl | [78] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | 0.59 U/mL | Production best induced by dextrin followed by soluble starch; yeast extract in combination with tryptone resulted better production; 0.2% CaCl2 stimulated production | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP101 | 4.7 U/mL | Maximum production in presence of rice flour; tryptone was best nitrogen source; 50 mM CaCl2 increased production by 29% | [84] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | 0.7 U/mL | Maximum production with wheat starch; production in presence of glucose also; peptone best nitrogen source; Production was growth independent reaching maximum in mid exponential phase | [80] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | 48.0 U/mL | Production was inducible; maximum was obtained with starch as carbon and casein enzyme hydrolysate as nitrogen source | [64] |
Halophiles | Purification procedure | Fold purification and recovery | Characteristics | Additional properties | Reference |
Acinetobacter sp. | Glycogen-complex formation, DEAE-Sephadex A-50 and Sephadex G-200 gel filtration chromatography | - | Mw amylase I 55 kDa and amylase II 65 kDa; pHopt 7.0 in 0.2-0.6 M NaCl or KCl; Topt 50-55 °C | Activity lost by dialysis against water | [67] |
Micrococcus halobius | Glycogen-complex formation, diethylaminoethyl-cellulose and Bio-Gel P-200 gel filtration chromatography | 474; 47% | Mw 89 kDa; pHopt 6.5-7.5; Topt 50-55 °C; Saltopt 0.25 M NaCl or 0.75 M KCl | Dialysis against distilled water and EDTA leads to complete loss of activity; Calcium ions provided stability | [94] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | Ethanol precipitation, hydroxylapatite, butyl Sepharose 4B and Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration chromatography | 2,000; 10% | Mw 74 kDa; pHopt 8.7; Topt 55 °C; Saltopt 2.5 M NaCl | Starch stabilized amylase; Inhibition by N-bromosuccinimide | [90] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Hydroxylapatite, Sepharose-4B, DEAE-cellulose and Sephadex-G50 chromatography | 48; 1.8% | Mw 58 kDa; pHopt 7.0-8.0; Topt 50-60 °C; Saltopt 3 M NaCl; Salt stability 2-4 M NaCl | EDTA resulted in irreversible loss of activity; Activation by calcium chloride | [63] |
Haloarcula sp. strain S-1 | Centriprep, Phenyl C-650 toyopearl and Sephadex G-100 chromatography | 34; 17% | Mw 70 kDa; pHopt 7.0; Topt 50 °C; Saltopt 4.3 M NaCl | Organic solvent tolerant; Activity not observed at low salt concentration | [78] |
Haloarcula hispanica | Ultrafiltration, β-cyclodextrin-sepharose chromatography | - | Mw 50 kDa; pHopt 6.5; Topt 50 °C; Saltopt 4-5 M NaCl | Activity loss in absence of salt is reversible; calcium ions support catalysis | [79] |
Rhodothermus marinus | Ammonium sulfate precipitation, Q-Sepharose ion-exchange, Superdex-200 gel filtration chromatography and preparative native page | - | Mw 66 kDa; pHopt 6.0; Topt 80 °C; Saltopt 0.5 M NaCl; Active in 0-4.0 M NaCl | Amylolytic and transferase activity; Magnesium ions increased activity by 15% | [95] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Ultrafiltration, ethanol precipitation, hydrophobic interaction chromatography on Butyl Sepharose 4B and Sephacryl S-200 chromatography | - | Mw amylase I 72 kDa and amylase II 62 kDa; pHopt 9.0; Topt 65 °C; active in 0-20% (w/v) NaCl; Km 125 and 166 mM; Vmax 5.88 and 5.0 U/mg, respectively | Active over broad salt concentration | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Ethanol precipitation, Q-Sepharose anion exchange and Sephacryl S-200 gel filtration chromatography | 10.8; 6.4% | Mw 100 kDa; pHopt 7.5; Topt 45 °C; Saltopt 0.5 M NaCl; Active in 0-4.0 M NaCl; Km 4.5 mg/mL and Vmax 1.18 mg/mL/min | Detergent and surfactant stable; Inhibited by EDTA | [33] |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Ammonium sulphate precipitation, Sephadex G-75, DEAE-Sephadex, insoluble corn starch and sephacryl S-400 chromatography | 39.01; 25.27% | Mw 66 kDa; pHopt 11.0; pH stability 8.0-12.0; Topt 55 °C; Saltopt 11% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 7-17% (w/v) NaCl | Stable in various surfactants, commercial detergents and oxidising agents; Activated by calcium ions | [32] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Ammonium sulfate precipitation, Q-Sepharose ion exchange and Sephacryl S-100 chromatography | 6.4; 14.9% | Mw 31 kDa; pHopt 9.0; pH stability 6.0-12.0; Topt 70 °C; Temperature stability 30-90 °C; Saltopt 10% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 0-20% (w/v) NaCl | Active and stable in hydrophobic solvents; Calcium ions enhanced activity | [85] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Ultrafiltration, DEAE cellulose and Sephadex G-75 chromatography | 76; 52% | Mw 72 kDa; pHopt 7.0; pH stability 6.0-11.0; Topt 45 °C; T1/2 80 minutes at 80 °C; Saltopt 1% (w/v) NaCl; Salt stability 3-20% (w/v) NaCl; Km 4.6 mg/mL and Vmax 1.3 mg/mL/min | Stable in organic solvents and surfactants; Activity unaffected by calcium ions | [19] |
Halorubrum xinjiangense | Ethanol precipitation and starch-affinity chromatography | 119; 56% | Mw 60 kDa; pHopt 8.5; Topt 70 °C; Saltopt 4 M NaCl or 4.5 M KCl; Km 3.8 mg/mL and Vmax 12.4 U/mg | Stable in SDS, detergents and a range of organic solvents | [80] |
Aspergillus gracilis | Ammonium sulfate precipitation and Sephadex G-100 gel filtration chromatography | 6; 47% | Mw 35 kDa; pHopt 5.0; Topt 60 °C; Saltopt 30% (w/v) NaCl; Km 6.33 mg/mL and Vmax 8.36 U/mg | Active in presence of inhibitors | [96] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Ethanol precipitation, anion exchange on Q-sepharose FF and SuperdexTM 75 gel filtration chromatography | 4.5; 15.4% | Mw 50 kDa; pHopt 8.0; Topt 54 °C; Saltopt 1.9 M NaCl | Stable in organic solvents, surfactants and oxidising agents | [30] |
Donor | Vector | Host | Characteristics | Reference |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | pANAM121 | Haloferax volcanii | α-Amylase gene was of 1512 bp with signal peptide of 43 amino acids; The activity of recombinant amylase was over 100 times higher than that of native Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | [97] |
pWL102 | ||||
Halomonas meridiana | pML122/123 | Halomonas elongata; E. coli | Amylase protein (AmyH) contained a high content of acidic amino acids as well as the four highly conserved regions in amylases; First 20 codons of the amylase precursor protein constituted signal peptide | [98] |
pVK102 | ||||
pMJC21-28 | ||||
Halothermothrix orenii | pSK5A6 | E. coli strain TOP10 | α-Amylase gene was of 1545 bp encoding signal peptide of 25 amino acid and a 490 amino acid mature protein; Over 90% | [62] |
pTrcHisB | activity was observed at high salt concentration | |||
pTH5A6 | ||||
Kocuria varians | pTAF | E. coli BL21 (DE3) | The kva gene of 2211 bp codes 736 amino acids residue protein; presence of starch binding domain (SBD) enables the enzyme to hydrolyse raw starches | [27] |
Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 | pET-AmyH-sp. pET-32a | E. coli BL21 (trxB) | The 1545 bp ORF encodes 514 amino acid protein; Amylase was highly stable in presence of organic solvents | [31] |
Haloarcula japonica | pET-21b pWL102 | Haloarcula japonica | The ORF of 1989 nucleotides encodes an intracellular α-amylase of 663 amino acids; It shows high activity on soluble starch, amylose and amylopectin | [99] |
Escherichia coli JM109 | pSE380 | E. coli XL10-Gold | A halophilic α-amylase was obtained from a non-halophilic microorganism and retains activity in high salt concentrations | [100] |
Zunongwangia profunda | pGEX-6P-1 | E. coli | Gene of 1785 bp encodes an α-amylase of 594 amino acids; A cold active and salt stable amylase | [101] |
DH5α; E. coli BL21 (DE3) |
Source of α-amylase | Hydrolysis products | Reference(s) |
Halobacterium halobium | Maltose, maltotriose and glucose | [65] |
Micrococcus halobius | Maltose, maltotriose, maltotetraose and small amount of glucose | [94] |
Natronococcus sp. strain Ah-36 | Maltotriose with lesser amount of maltose and glucose | [90] |
Halomonas meridiana | Maltose and maltotriose | [61] |
Haloferax mediterranei | Maltose and lesser amount of maltohexaose | [63] |
Bacillus sp. strain TSCVKK | Glucose, maltose and higher molecular weight MOS | [83] |
Chromohalobacter sp. TVSP 101 | Maltotetraose, maltotriose, maltose and glucose | [84] |
Nesterenkonia sp. strain F | Maltose, maltotriose and maltotetraose | [33] |
Saccharopolyspora sp. A9 | Maltose, glucose and maltotriose | [32] |
Thalassobacillus sp. LY18 | Maltose and maltotriose | [85] |
Marinobacter sp. EMB8 | Maltose, maltotriose and maltotetraose | [19] |
Exiguobacterium sp. DAU5 | Maltotriose and maltopentaose along with various MOS | [31] |
Amphibacillus sp. NM-Ra2 | Maltose and maltotriose | [30] |