Citation: Liming Chen, Ziqing Du, Yong Tan. Sustainable exchange rates in China: Is there the heterogeneous effect of economic policy uncertainty?[J]. Green Finance, 2019, 1(4): 346-363. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.4.346
[1] | Siming Liu, Mengxin Wang, Yong Tan . Stabilizing inflation expectations in China: Does economic policy uncertainty matter?. Green Finance, 2019, 1(4): 429-441. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.4.429 |
[2] | Samuel Asante Gyamerah, Clement Asare . A critical review of the impact of uncertainties on green bonds. Green Finance, 2024, 6(1): 78-91. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024004 |
[3] | Hao Dong, Yue Liu, Jiaqi Chang . The heterogeneous linkage of economic policy uncertainty and oil return risks. Green Finance, 2019, 1(1): 46-66. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.1.46 |
[4] | Md Qamruzzaman . Do international capital flows, institutional quality matter for innovation output: the mediating role of economic policy uncertainty. Green Finance, 2021, 3(3): 351-382. doi: 10.3934/GF.2021018 |
[5] | Larissa M. Batrancea, Anca Nichita, Horia Tulai, Mircea-Iosif Rus, Ema Speranta Masca . Fueling economies through credit and industrial activities. A way of financing sustainable economic development in Brazil. Green Finance, 2025, 7(1): 24-39. doi: 10.3934/GF.20250002 |
[6] | Yangyang Cheng, Zhenhuan Xu . Fiscal policy promotes corporate green credit: Experience from the construction of energy conservation and emission reduction demonstration cities in China. Green Finance, 2024, 6(1): 1-23. doi: 10.3934/GF.2024001 |
[7] | Manrui Xu, Khaldoon Albitar, Zhenghui Li . Does corporate financialization affect EVA? Early evidence from China. Green Finance, 2020, 2(4): 392-408. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020021 |
[8] | Muzzammil Wasim Syed, Ji Zu Li, Muhammad Junaid, Muhammad Ziaullah . Relationship between human resource management practices, relationship commitment and sustainable performance. Green Finance, 2020, 2(3): 227-242. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020013 |
[9] | Xueying Xu, Peng Hou, Yue Liu . The impact of heterogeneous environmental regulations on the technology innovation of urban green energy: a study based on the panel threshold model. Green Finance, 2022, 4(1): 115-136. doi: 10.3934/GF.2022006 |
[10] | Rui M. Pereira, Alfredo M. Pereira . Financing a renewable energy feed-in tariff with a tax on carbon dioxide emissions: A dynamic multi-sector general equilibrium analysis for Portugal. Green Finance, 2019, 1(3): 279-296. doi: 10.3934/GF.2019.3.279 |
The journey of pregnancy has been described as one laden with uncertainties for many women. Many mothers and especially first time mothers are overwhelmed by the gamut of information available to them aimed at helping them cope with the changes in their bodies and also help prepare them for their new roles as mothers. The internet has been described as a common tool used to source for information in the developed world [1,2,3,4,5]. In a study carried out by Bert at al., 95% of pregnant women in Italy accessed the internet for information regarding their health [6]. A similar study in Sweden found that 84% of women also utilized the internet for information [7].
However in low-resource settings where the access to the internet is not readily available, women are compelled to seek other sources for information apart from the internet. Paradoxically, many of these settings also have deeply ingrained cultural norms and practices, some of which may have potential harm [8,9,10,11]. Women in developing countries often seek information from older family and community members [12,13,14]. The information is usually being passed on from one generation to the other; unfortunately often without any scientific proof of benefit.
A variety of cultural practices used by Nigerian women have been reported in literature. Igberase et al. reported seeking for permission to attend antenatal care (ANC) and insertion of harmful herbs in the vagina to ensure safe delivery [15]. The practice of "gishiri cut" done in some parts of Nigeria to enlarge the vagina during delivery has also been widely reported [16,17,18]. Culture inclined nutritional aversions have also been reported. For instance, among the Yoruba ethnic group of southwest Nigeria, pregnant women avoid foods such as egg yolk, snail, antelope and cane rat meat among others, to prevent neonatal jaundice and congenital malformations [19].
Lefeber at al. have also reported some traditional practices in South Africa where pregnant women were prevented from sleeping during daylight in pregnancy, eating snail and drinking iced water in order to prevent prolonged labor [20]. They also reported pregnant women were asked to avoid plaiting of hair with the belief that it causes knot in the umbilical cord and that they were also admonished to avoid sexual intercourse during third trimester in order to avoid "sperm-coated" baby at delivery [20].
Amongst other cultural practices in pregnant women in our environment, the use of safety pin (Figure 1) on garments or under garments is a common occurrence. This practice has been passed on from one generation to the other. Safety pin is a variation of regular pin which includes a simple spring mechanism with a clasp and a guard to cover the sharp point. They are commonly used to fasten pieces of fabrics or clothing together. In the context of the Nigerian society, its use in pregnant women has been attributed to a lot of cultural beliefs including protection of the fetus from evil spirits and helping to ensure safe delivery [21,22]. There are potential harmful effects that might be associated with its use on garments in pregnancy. Although, no complication arising from its use related to pregnancy has been documented in literature, accidental pin injuries have been known to be associated with infection, bleeding, skin abscess, scarring and dermatitis among others [23]. Accidental ingestion of safety pins by children, found in the home environment has also been extensively reported [24,25,26].
In spite of the potentially harmful risks, safety pin use on garments is still a commonly encountered traditional practice in our pregnant women. In view of the paucity of literature on the use of safety pin, our study aims to determine the proportion of women who engage in the use of safety pin on garments during pregnancy and also their sources of information on safety pin use. We will also be exploring the association between safety pin use on garments in the context of predictor variables such as education, religion, age, tribe and occupation as found in literature.
Data for this study was obtained from a cross sectional descriptive study among 419 pregnant women at Ladoke Akintola University Teaching Hospital (LTH), Ogbomoso, Nigeria between 1st April and 30th June, 2014. Women presenting for antenatal visits at LTH were approached for participation during the study period.
The data collection instrument was a structured questionnaire in English language which was self-administered by the individuals who could read and write in English language. For individuals who could not read and write, trained Research assistants who could speak the three main local languages administered the questionnaires. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 16 multi-item questions grouped into 4 sections. Section A consisted of questions that assessed socio-demographic status, section B sought relevant information about obstetric characteristics, Section C inquired about the attitude and practice of use of safety pin on garments in pregnancy including other cultural practices and Section D probed into risky behavior that may potentiate harmful effect of use of safety pin in pregnancy. The questionnaire was pre-tested among pregnant women at a Primary Heath Care Centre, Ogbomoso. Afterwards, questions which were deemed ambiguous were re-phrased and expunged as appropriate. The questionnaires were administered after the health educational talk by the Nurses, just before the patients were seen by their Physicians.
The consent of the participants was sought verbally during the health talk at the counseling sessions during the visits. The questionnaires were also introduced with a request for consent and freedom of participation was duly emphasized to the women. The women that did not consent to participate in the study were in no way discriminated against with regards to medical treatment of their conditions.
Use of safety pin was the main dependent variable assessed in this study. Participants answered "yes" or "no" to the question asking whether or not they use safety pin on their garments. For the independent variables, women were asked to state their age, religion, educational status, tribe, occupation and obstetric factors such as parity, number of living children and previous history of pregnancy losses. For individuals who answered "yes" to safety pin use, they were asked to state their source of information for safety pin use and also whether they had experienced any harmful effect with its use. Lastly all women, regardless of whether or not they use safety pin on their garments or under garments were asked for a history of any other cultural practice related to pregnancy.
Approval for the study was gotten from LTH ethical review committee. The data collected were analyzed with Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 17. Means and standard deviation were calculated for quantitative variables and differences among groups were assessed using Pearson chi-square tests. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
The mean age of respondents was 29.5 ± 5.7 and age ranged between 16-45 years. Majority of respondents 54.2% (n = 227) attested to using safety pin in the index pregnancy. Majority of the participants were in age bracket 26-35 years. About one-third (n = 142) of the participants were between ages 26 and 30. More than two-thirds, 70.5% (n = 294) were Christians. Majority of the respondents were of the Yoruba ethnic group (86.3%, n = 360) and had a tertiary level of education (57.3%, n = 240), Table 1 below shows the socio-demographic characteristics and the relationship between socio-demographic status and safety pin use on garments in pregnancy. There was a statistically significant association between religion and educational status and safety pin use. Traditional religion worshippers were more likely while Christians were less likely to use a safety pin during pregnancy (χ2 = 11.20; p = 0.011). Pregnant women with a secondary level of education were more likely to use a safety pin whereas women with a tertiary level of education were least likely to use a safety pin during pregnancy (χ2 = 30.95; p = 0.001). Age, tribe and occupation did not have a statistically significant relationship.
Variables | USE of Safety Pin in Pregnancy | Chi square (χ2) | P value | |
YES (n = 227) | NO (n = 192) | |||
Age group 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 ≥41 |
19 (65.5%) 46 (60.5%) 73 (51.4%) 53 (47.3%) 25 (56.8%) 11 (68.8%) |
10 (34.5%) 30 (39.5%) 69 (48.6%) 59 (52.7%) 19 (43.2%) 5 (31.2%) |
6.79 | 0.24 |
Religion Christianity Islam Traditional Others |
145 (49.3%) 65 (55.8%) 13 (81.2%) 4 (66.7%) |
149 (50.7%) 38 (47.2%) 3 (18.8%) 2 (33.3%) |
11.20 | 0.01 * |
Educational Status None Primary/Arabic Secondary Tertiary |
19 (59.4%) 17 (53.1%) 72 (62.6%) 119 (49.6%) |
13 (40.6%) 15 (46.9%) 43 (37.4%) 121 (50.4%) |
30.95 | 0.001 * |
Tribe Yoruba Ibo Hausa/Fulani Others |
187 (51.9%) 21 (65.6%) 11 (68.8%) 8 (72.7%) |
173 (48.1%) 11 (34.4%) 5 (31.2%) 3 (27.3%) |
5.64 | 0.23 |
Occupation Semi-skilled Skilled Unskilled |
99 (52.9%) 107 (53.0%) 21 (70.0%) |
88 (47.1%) 95 (47.0%) 9 (30.0%) |
3.26 | 0.20 |
* Statistical significant at p < 0.05. |
The source of information on use of safety pin on garments or under garments in pregnancy is depicted in Figure 2 below. Majority 78% (n = 177) reported obtaining information from their relations (Grandmother, Mother-in-law, Mother and Aunt), 14.1% (n = 32) from religion homes (Churches, Mosques and Tradition religion homes) and 4.8% (n = 11) from other pregnant women.
Nulliparous women were more likely to use safety pins on their garments or under garments compared with primiparous and multiparous women. However there was no demonstrable statistical relationship between parity and safety pin use. Similarly, there was no statistically significant relationship between previous pregnancies and number of living children and the use of safety pin in pregnancy. This is further illustrated in Table 2 below.
Variables | Use of Safety Pin in Pregnancy | Chi square (χ2) | P value | |
YES (n = 227) | NO (n = 192) | |||
Parity Nulliparous Primiparous Multiparous |
32 (60.4%) 75 (53.2%) 120 (53.3%) |
21 (39.6%) 66 (46.8%) 105 (46.7%) |
0.94 | 0.63 |
Previous Miscarriages 0 1 2 ≥3 |
168 (55.4%) 45 (50.6%) 11 (52.4%) 3 (50.0%) |
135 (44.6%) 44 (49.4%) 10 (47.6%) 3 (50.0%) |
2.75 | 0.74 |
Living child/children 0 1 2-4 ≥5 |
65 (57.0%) 72 (49.7%) 88 (56.1%) 2 (66.7%) |
49 (43.0%) 73 (50.3%) 69 (43.9%) 1 (33.3%) |
1.98 | 0.58 |
Figure 3 shows the reasons offered for using safety pin on garments or undergarments in pregnancy. 56.8% (n = 129) reported using safety pins to protect them against demons, 19.8% (n = 45) to used it to protect their unborn child against demons, while the remaining 23.4% (n = 53) have no particular reason for using it. In terms of frequency of use, 56.4% (n = 128) use it always, 39.2% (n = 89) use it often and 4.4% (n = 10) use a safety pin on their garments or undergarments occasionally. Almost all participants, 91.5% (n=208) participants had had needle prick/pierce, 45.2% (n = 103) had had a needle prick/pierce at least once while 46.3% (n = 105) had had at least two needle prick/pierce on the hand or abdomen. A safety pin pierce or prick in this context is an accidental sharp, painful sensation experienced when the pointed end of the safety pin comes into contact with the skin.
Table 3 shows other cultural practices reported by the pregnant women. Over half, 51.1% (n = 214) do not go out on sunny days to protect against demons and wizards; 48.6% (n = 180) do not eat snails to prevent their unborn child from been "sluggish"; 44.9% (n = 188) do not drink iced or cold water to avert convulsion in the unborn child. Other reported cultural practices include no salt intake, avoidance of fried plantain and eating of catfish.
Cultural practice/believes | % (N) |
Not going out in sunny day | 51.1% (n = 214) |
No eating of snail | 48.6% (n = 180) |
No drinking of ice or cold water | 44.9% (n = 188) |
No salt intake | 10.5% (n = 44) |
No eating of fried plantain | 15.8% (n = 66) |
No eating of catfish | 10.3% (n = 43) |
Our findings from the study suggest that religion and educational status are associated with safety pin use on garments or undergarments in pregnancy in Ogbomosho town southwest Nigeria, although in complex ways. Traditional religion worshippers were more likely and Christians were less likely to utilize a safety pin. Safety pin use was however not associated with age, tribe, occupation and maternal characteristics such as parity, previous miscarriages and number of living children.
In the current sample, safety pin use was high with 54.2% women reporting its use. While no previous studies have reported the prevalence of its use during pregnancy, it is a common practice particularly in communities with deep cultural values. Its use has been extensively reported in various parts of Nigeria [27,28]. Also, Barragan et al and Torres and Sawyer in their qualitative interviews reported its extensive use in the Mexican population [21,22]. However, it should be noted that this study was carried out at a University Teaching hospital located in a town with a relatively highly educated population. This was reflected by our demographic results in Table 1, where over 57% of the study participants reported having a tertiary education. Thus, the actual prevalence of safety pin use during pregnancy in the overall population might be higher.
Not surprisingly we found out that women who were traditional worshippers were more likely to use safety pin on their garments or undergarments during pregnancy compared with non-traditional religion worshippers. This finding is in tandem with many other findings and published work describing a relationship between traditional worshippers and deep-rooted cultural beliefs, as they are sometimes seen as custodians of culture [29,30,31]. We further add to the body of knowledge on this relationship between religious beliefs and cultural practices.
Our study also elicited an interesting relationship between safety pin use and educational status. Although women with a tertiary level of education were the least likely to use a safety pin, we were surprised to find out that women with a secondary level of education were more likely to use a safety pin on their garments or undergarments, than women with no education and also women with a primary level of education. This is contrary to what an extensive body of literature reports and to the popular notion that the higher the education the more likely an individual will be able to make binding decisions on their own health and also dispel cultural practices [19,32,33,34,35,36]. Although, this was a descriptive, self-reported study which has its own limitations, there might also be some inherent relationship between safety pin use and education which could be further delineated by further research.
Several reasons have been attributed to the motivation behind the use of safety pin in pregnancy which was also reflected in this study. A large percentage of women, approximately 57% claimed that it helps prevent against demons. Other reasons for use included; for the protection of the unborn child, obeying instructions to use and some had no particular reasons for using it. The latter group is particularly a reflection of the influence of traditional and religious beliefs in our society with their potential effects on pregnant women. Something similar has been exemplified among the Sorsoguenos tribe of Philippines, in the study carried out by Ocbian [37]. In this study, Ocbian reported that pregnant women are encouraged to be happy with the belief that the mood/state of mind can have an effect on the baby [37]. In this tribe, pregnant women are also restricted from wearing necklace and are prohibited from watching an eclipse since it is believed to cause stillbirth [37].
The influence of family cannot also be overemphasized as a source of information in our environment. Amongst respondents' grandmothers, mothers and in-laws were reported as being their sources of information. Other sources include friends, religious homes (churches, mosques and shrines) and co-pregnant women. This is similar to the findings in the study by Jimenez in which grandmothers were found to be the source of oral histories and narrations to their children and grandchildren [38]. In this study, 78% of pregnant women who used a safety pin on their garments or undergarments had the source of information from their grandmothers, mother in laws, mothers and aunts.
Finally the importance of culturally appropriate care is an important issue in the context of safety pin use in pregnancy and might also be applicable to many other topics related to maternal health. While some cultural practices might be harmful or potentially harmful, not all are bad and it is very important to help the people preserve their way of life. Leininger in her paper described three important tenets of cultural care including cultural maintenance, negotiation and restructuring [39]. Health care providers should be trained to avoid being judgmental about such cultural practices. Rather women must be educated on how correctly it could be worn to prevent inherent harmful effects. There is a need to be able accommodate everyone's beliefs in the healthcare setting to that permitted by ethical and moral standards.
As our population is now becoming ethnically and racially diverse, health care providers must recognize the need to provide culturally acceptable and appropriate care to the populace. Providers who understand the cultural norms, values, beliefs and practices of patients are more likely to be able to provide culturally acceptable care which will subsequently translate to opportunities for health promotion, wellness, health maintenance, and disease and injury prevention.
With the very high burden of maternal morbidity and mortality that Nigeria is currently plagued with, many women undergo the journey of pregnancy with trepidation, relying on cultural beliefs and practices as "interventions" to answer and solve pregnancy related issues.
Health care workers must work together with patients and their families irrespective of their cultural beliefs and values to provide cultural relevant care. This can be achieved through good communication skills and respect for lifestyles, behaviors and customs in order to achieve trusting relationships. Lastly, there is a need to establish community and hospital based strategies that address potential cultural harmful practices while promoting culturally appropriate healthcare services.
We are grateful to all our patients who consented to participate in this study and our Antenatal Nurses and Mid-wives for their encouragement and support in the conduct of this study.
The authors declare no conflict of interest in this work
[1] |
Aastveit K, Natvik GJ, Sola S (2017) Economic uncertainty and the influence of monetary policy. J Int Money Financ 76: 50-67. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.05.003 doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.05.003
![]() |
[2] |
Akar C, Çiçek S (2015) "New" monetary policy instruments and the exchange rate volatility. Empir 43: 141-165. doi:10.1007/s10663-015-9298-y doi: 10.1007/s10663-015-9298-y
![]() |
[3] |
Ames M, Bagnarosa G, Peters GW (2017) Violations of uncovered interest rate parity and international exchange rate dependences. J Int Money Financ 73: 162-187. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.01.002 doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.01.002
![]() |
[4] |
Arghyrou MG, Pourpourides P (2016) Inflation announcements and asymmetric exchange rate responses. J Int Financ Markets Inst Money 40: 80-84. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2015.07.002 doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2015.07.002
![]() |
[5] |
Arouri M, Estay C, Rault C, et al. (2016) Economic policy uncertainty and stock markets: Long-run evidence from the US. Financ Res Lett 18: 136-141. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2016.04.011 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.04.011
![]() |
[6] |
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Aftab M (2017) On the asymmetric effects of the exchange rate volatility on trade flows: New evidence from US-Malaysia trade at the industry level. Econ Model 63: 86-103. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2017.02.004 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.02.004
![]() |
[7] |
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Aftab M (2018) Asymmetric effects of exchange rate changes on the Malaysia-China commodity trade. Econ Syst 42: 470-486. doi:10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.11.004 doi: 10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.11.004
![]() |
[8] |
Bahmani-Oskooee M, Saha S (2019) On the effects of policy uncertainty on stock prices: an asymmetric analysis. Quant Financ Econ 3: 412-424. doi:10.3934/qfe.2019.2.412 doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.2.412
![]() |
[9] |
Balcilar M, Gupta R, Kim WJ, et al. (2019) The role of economic policy uncertainties in predicting stock returns and their volatility for Hong Kong, Malaysia and South Korea. Int Rev Econ Financ 59: 150-163. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2018.08.016 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2018.08.016
![]() |
[10] | Balcilar M, Gupta R, Kyei C, et al. (2016) Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Predict Exchange Rate Returns and Volatility? Evidence from a Nonparametric Causality-in-Quantiles Test. Open Econ Rev 27: 229-250. doi:10.1007/s11079-016-9388-x |
[11] |
Bao L, Zhao G, Jin Z (2018) A new equilibrium trading model with asymmetric information. Quant Financ Econ 2: 217-229. doi:10.3934/qfe.2018.1.217 doi: 10.3934/QFE.2018.1.217
![]() |
[12] |
Bartsch Z (2019) Economic policy uncertainty and dollar-pound exchange rate return volatility. J Int Money Financ 98: 102067. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102067 doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2019.102067
![]() |
[13] |
Beckmann J, Czudaj R (2017) Exchange rate expectations and economic policy uncertainty. Eur J Polit Econ 47: 148-162. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2016.06.003
![]() |
[14] |
Bray M (1981) Futures trading, rational expectations, and the efficient markets hypothesis. Econometrica J Econometric Society, 575-596. doi: 10.2307/1911513 doi: 10.2307/1911513
![]() |
[15] |
Brogaard J, Detzel A (2015) The Asset-Pricing Implications of Government Economic Policy Uncertainty. Manage Sci 61: 3-18. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2044 doi: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.2044
![]() |
[16] |
Caggiano G, Castelnuovo E, Figueres JM (2017) Economic policy uncertainty and unemployment in the United States: A nonlinear approach. Econ Lett 151: 31-34. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.12.002
![]() |
[17] |
Caselli FG (2019) China's rise, asymmetric trade shocks and exchange rate regimes. Rev Int Econ 27: 1-35. doi:10.1111/roie.12353 doi: 10.1111/roie.12353
![]() |
[18] | Cebula RJ, Boylan R (2019) Uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of Federal Reserve monetary policies over time in the U.S.: an exploratory empirical assessment. Quant Financ Econ 3: 244-256. doi:10.3934/qfe.2019.2.244 |
[19] | Chen L, Du Z, Hu Z (2019) Impact of economic policy uncertainty on the exchange rate volatility of China. Financ Res Lett. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2019.08.014 |
[20] | Cheung YW, Chinn MD, Qian X (2015) China-US trade flow behavior: the implications of alternative exchange rate measures and trade classifications. Rev World Econ152: 43-67. doi:10.1007/s10290-015-0232-y |
[21] |
Christou C, Gupta R, Hassapis C (2017) Does economic policy uncertainty forecast real housing returns in a panel of OECD countries? A Bayesian approach. Q Rev Econ Financ 65: 50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2017.01.002
![]() |
[22] | Dávalos J (2018) Trade openness effects on informality and the real exchange rate channel. Appl Econ Lett 26: 506-510. doi:10.1080/13504851.2018.1486982 |
[23] |
de Mendonca HF, Tiberto BP (2017) Effect of credibility and exchange rate pass-through on inflation: An assessment for developing countries. Int Rev Econ Financ 50: 196-244. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2017.03.027 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2017.03.027
![]() |
[24] |
Dimitriou D, Kenourgios D, Simos T (2017) Financial crises, exchange rate linkages and uncovered interest parity: Evidence from G7 markets. Econ Model 66: 112-120. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2017.06.003 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.06.003
![]() |
[25] |
Engel C (2016) Exchange Rates, Interest Rates, and the Risk Premium. Am Econ Rev 106: 436-474. doi:10.1257/aer.20121365 doi: 10.1257/aer.20121365
![]() |
[26] | Engle III RF, Ito T, Lin WL (1988) Meteor showers or heat waves? Heteroskedastic intra-daily volatility in the foreign exchange market. National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA. |
[27] |
Fang L, Chen B, Yu H, et al. (2018) The importance of global economic policy uncertainty in predicting gold futures market volatility: A GARCH-MIDAS approach. J Futures Mark 38: 413-422. doi:10.1002/fut.21897 doi: 10.1002/fut.21897
![]() |
[28] |
Gantman ER, Dabós MP (2017) International trade and factor productivity as determinants of the real effective exchange rate. Appl Econ Lett 25: 331-334. doi:10.1080/13504851.2017.1321829 doi: 10.1080/13504851.2017.1321829
![]() |
[29] |
Huang Z, Liao G, Li Z (2019) Loaning scale and government subsidy for promoting green innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 144: 148-156, doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.04.023
![]() |
[30] | Hurley DT, Papanikolaou N (2018) An Investigation of China-U.S. Bilateral Trade and Exchange Rate Changes Using the Autoregressive Distributed Lag Model. Econ Pap J Appl Econ Policy 37: 162-179. doi:10.1111/1759-3441.12206 |
[31] |
Jones PM, Olson E (2013) The time-varying correlation between uncertainty, output, and inflation: Evidence from a DCC-GARCH model. Econ Lett 118: 33-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.012 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.09.012
![]() |
[32] |
Kido Y (2016) On the link between the US economic policy uncertainty and exchange rates. Econ Lett 144: 49-52. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2016.04.022 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2016.04.022
![]() |
[33] |
Ko JH, Lee CM (2015) International economic policy uncertainty and stock prices: Wavelet approach. Econ Lett 134: 118-122. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.07.012 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.07.012
![]() |
[34] |
Koenker R, Bassett G (1978) Regression quantiles. Econometrica 46: 33-50. doi: 10.2307/1913643 doi: 10.2307/1913643
![]() |
[35] |
Krol R (2014) Economic Policy Uncertainty and The exchange rate volatility. Int Financ 17: 241-256. doi:10.1111/infi.12049 doi: 10.1111/infi.12049
![]() |
[36] |
Lartey EKK (2017) Fdi, Sectoral Output And Real Exchange Rate Dynamics Under Financial Openness. Bull Econ Res 69: 384-394. doi:10.1111/boer.12075 doi: 10.1111/boer.12075
![]() |
[37] | Lee KS, Werner RA (2018) Reconsidering Monetary Policy: An Empirical Examination of the Relationship Between Interest Rates and Nominal GDP Growth in the U.S., U.K., Germany and Japan. Ecol Econ 146: 26-34. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.013 |
[38] |
Li XM, Peng L (2017) US economic policy uncertainty and co-movements between Chinese and US stock markets. Econ Model 61: 27-39. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.019 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.11.019
![]() |
[39] |
Li XM, Zhang B, Gao R (2015) Economic policy uncertainty shocks and stock-bond correlations: Evidence from the US market. Econ Lett 132: 91-96. doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.013 doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2015.04.013
![]() |
[40] |
Li Z, Dong H, Huang Z, et al. (2018) Asymmetric Effects on Risks of Virtual Financial Assets (VFAs) in different regimes: A Case of Bitcoin. Quant Financ Econ 2: 860-883. doi:10.3934/qfe.2018.4.860 doi: 10.3934/QFE.2018.4.860
![]() |
[41] |
Li Z, Dong H, Huang Z, et al. (2019) Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Environmental Performance. Sustainability 11: 3538. doi:10.3390/su11133538 doi: 10.3390/su11133538
![]() |
[42] | Li ZZ, Xiong DP, Daniela L, et al. (2019) HOW DOES ECONOMIC POLICY UNCERTAINTY EFFECT SIGNALING EXCHANGE RATE IN JAPAN? Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 53. doi:10.24818/18423264/53.1.19.09 |
[43] |
Li ZH, Liao GK, Wang ZZ, et al. (2018) Green loan and subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. J Clean Prod 187: 421-431. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.066 doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.066
![]() |
[44] |
Liao G, Li Z, Du Z, et al. (2019) The Heterogeneous Interconnections between Supply or Demand Side and Oil Risks. Energies 12: 2226. doi:10.3390/en12112226 doi: 10.3390/en12112226
![]() |
[45] |
Liu L, Zhang T (2015) Economic policy uncertainty and stock market volatility. Financ Res Lett 15: 99-105. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2015.08.009 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2015.08.009
![]() |
[46] |
Liu LX, Shu H, Wei KCJ (2017) The impacts of political uncertainty on asset prices: Evidence from the Bo scandal in China. J Financ Econ 125: 286-310. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.05.011 doi: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2017.05.011
![]() |
[47] |
Mueller P, Tahbaz-Salehi A, Vedolin A (2017) Exchange Rates and Monetary Policy Uncertainty. J Financ 72: 1213-1252. doi:10.1111/jofi.12499 doi: 10.1111/jofi.12499
![]() |
[48] | Narayan S, Nguyen TT (2016) Does the trade gravity model depend on trading partners? Some evidence from Vietnam and her 54 trading partners. Int Rev Econ Financ 41: 220-237. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2015.08.010 |
[49] |
Özmen MU, Yılmaz E (2017) Co-movement of exchange rates with interest rate differential, risk premium and FED policy in "fragile economies". Emerg Mark Rev 33: 173-188. doi:10.1016/j.ememar.2017.10.007 doi: 10.1016/j.ememar.2017.10.007
![]() |
[50] |
Patton AJ (2010) Modelling Asymmetric Exchange Rate Dependence. Int Econ Rev 47: 527-556. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00387.x doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2354.2006.00387.x
![]() |
[51] |
Phan DHB, Sharma SS, Tran VT (2018) Can economic policy uncertainty predict stock returns? Global evidence. J Int Financ Mark Inst Money 55: 134-150. doi:10.1016/j.intfin.2018.04.004 doi: 10.1016/j.intfin.2018.04.004
![]() |
[52] |
Qin F, Zhang J, Zhang Z (2018) RMB Exchange Rates and Volatility Spillover across Financial Markets in China and Japan. Risks 6: 120. doi:10.3390/risks6040120 doi: 10.3390/risks6040120
![]() |
[53] | Rodrik D (2008) The real exchange rate and economic growth. Brook Pap Econ Act 39: 365-412. |
[54] |
Rofael D, Hosni R (2015) Modeling Exchange Rate Dynamics in Egypt: Observed and Unobserved Volatility. Modern Econ 06: 65-80. doi:10.4236/me.2015.61006 doi: 10.4236/me.2015.61006
![]() |
[55] |
Santana-Gallego M, Perez-Rodriguez JV (2019) International trade, exchange rate regimes, and financial crises. North Am J Econ Financ 47: 85-95. doi:10.1016/j.najef.2018.11.009 doi: 10.1016/j.najef.2018.11.009
![]() |
[56] |
Scheffel EM (2016) Accounting for the political uncertainty factor. J Appl Econom 31: 1048-1064. doi: 10.1002/jae.2455
![]() |
[57] |
Shahzad SJH, Raza N, Balcilar M, et al. (2017) Can economic policy uncertainty and investors sentiment predict commodities returns and volatility? Resour Policy 53: 208-218. doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.06.010 doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2017.06.010
![]() |
[58] |
Stauvermann PJ, Kumar RR, Shahzad SJH, et al. (2018) Effect of tourism on economic growth of Sri Lanka: accounting for capital per worker, exchange rate and structural breaks. Econ Change Restructuring 51: 49-68. doi:10.1007/s10644-016-9198-6 doi: 10.1007/s10644-016-9198-6
![]() |
[59] |
Sun X, Yao X, Wang J (2017) Dynamic interaction between economic policy uncertainty and financial stress: A multi-scale correlation framework. Financ Res Lett 21: 214-221. doi:10.1016/j.frl.2016.12.010 doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2016.12.010
![]() |
[60] |
Orlowski LT, Sywak M (2019) Wavering interactions between commodity futures prices and us dollar exchange rates. Quant Financ Econs 3: 221-243. doi:10.3934/qfe.2019.2.221 doi: 10.3934/QFE.2019.2.221
![]() |
[61] |
Tamakoshi G, Hamori S (2014) Co-movements among major European exchange rates: A multivariate time-varying asymmetric approach. Int Rev Econ Financ 31: 105-113. doi:10.1016/j.iref.2014.01.016 doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2014.01.016
![]() |
[62] |
Tervala J (2019) US monetary policy and China's exchange rate policy during the great recession. Int J Financ Econ 24: 113-130. doi:10.1002/ijfe.1652 doi: 10.1002/ijfe.1652
![]() |
[63] |
Tsai IC (2017) The source of global stock market risk: A viewpoint of economic policy uncertainty. Econ Model 60: 122-131. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2016.09.002 doi: 10.1016/j.econmod.2016.09.002
![]() |
[64] |
Wang Y, Zhang B, Diao X, et al. (2015) Commodity price changes and the predictability of economic policy uncertainty. Econ Lett 127: 39-42. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2014.12.030
![]() |
[65] |
Yang G, Gu Q (2016) Effects of exchange rate variations on bilateral trade with a vehicle currency: Evidence from China and Singapore. J Int Money Financ 68: 50-73. doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.06.010 doi: 10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.06.010
![]() |
[66] |
Yu YD (2018) The Long-Drawn Process of reform of the Exchange Rate Regime and the Evolution of China's Exchange Rate Policy. China Econ J 11: 284-300. doi:10.1080/17538963.2018.1512542 doi: 10.1080/17538963.2018.1512542
![]() |
[67] | Li ZZ, De-Ping X, Lavinia Daniela M, et al. (2019) How Does Economic Policy Uncertainty Effect Signaling Exchange Rate in Japan? Econ Comput Econ Cybern Stud Res 53: 141-156. doi:10.24818/18423264/53.1.19.09 |
1. | Hugo Bottemanne, Morgane Charron, Lucie Joly, Croyances périnatales : mécanismes neurocognitifs et spécificités culturelles, 2022, 50, 24687189, 542, 10.1016/j.gofs.2022.03.001 |
Variables | USE of Safety Pin in Pregnancy | Chi square (χ2) | P value | |
YES (n = 227) | NO (n = 192) | |||
Age group 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 ≥41 |
19 (65.5%) 46 (60.5%) 73 (51.4%) 53 (47.3%) 25 (56.8%) 11 (68.8%) |
10 (34.5%) 30 (39.5%) 69 (48.6%) 59 (52.7%) 19 (43.2%) 5 (31.2%) |
6.79 | 0.24 |
Religion Christianity Islam Traditional Others |
145 (49.3%) 65 (55.8%) 13 (81.2%) 4 (66.7%) |
149 (50.7%) 38 (47.2%) 3 (18.8%) 2 (33.3%) |
11.20 | 0.01 * |
Educational Status None Primary/Arabic Secondary Tertiary |
19 (59.4%) 17 (53.1%) 72 (62.6%) 119 (49.6%) |
13 (40.6%) 15 (46.9%) 43 (37.4%) 121 (50.4%) |
30.95 | 0.001 * |
Tribe Yoruba Ibo Hausa/Fulani Others |
187 (51.9%) 21 (65.6%) 11 (68.8%) 8 (72.7%) |
173 (48.1%) 11 (34.4%) 5 (31.2%) 3 (27.3%) |
5.64 | 0.23 |
Occupation Semi-skilled Skilled Unskilled |
99 (52.9%) 107 (53.0%) 21 (70.0%) |
88 (47.1%) 95 (47.0%) 9 (30.0%) |
3.26 | 0.20 |
* Statistical significant at p < 0.05. |
Variables | Use of Safety Pin in Pregnancy | Chi square (χ2) | P value | |
YES (n = 227) | NO (n = 192) | |||
Parity Nulliparous Primiparous Multiparous |
32 (60.4%) 75 (53.2%) 120 (53.3%) |
21 (39.6%) 66 (46.8%) 105 (46.7%) |
0.94 | 0.63 |
Previous Miscarriages 0 1 2 ≥3 |
168 (55.4%) 45 (50.6%) 11 (52.4%) 3 (50.0%) |
135 (44.6%) 44 (49.4%) 10 (47.6%) 3 (50.0%) |
2.75 | 0.74 |
Living child/children 0 1 2-4 ≥5 |
65 (57.0%) 72 (49.7%) 88 (56.1%) 2 (66.7%) |
49 (43.0%) 73 (50.3%) 69 (43.9%) 1 (33.3%) |
1.98 | 0.58 |
Cultural practice/believes | % (N) |
Not going out in sunny day | 51.1% (n = 214) |
No eating of snail | 48.6% (n = 180) |
No drinking of ice or cold water | 44.9% (n = 188) |
No salt intake | 10.5% (n = 44) |
No eating of fried plantain | 15.8% (n = 66) |
No eating of catfish | 10.3% (n = 43) |
Variables | USE of Safety Pin in Pregnancy | Chi square (χ2) | P value | |
YES (n = 227) | NO (n = 192) | |||
Age group 16-20 21-25 26-30 31-35 36-40 ≥41 |
19 (65.5%) 46 (60.5%) 73 (51.4%) 53 (47.3%) 25 (56.8%) 11 (68.8%) |
10 (34.5%) 30 (39.5%) 69 (48.6%) 59 (52.7%) 19 (43.2%) 5 (31.2%) |
6.79 | 0.24 |
Religion Christianity Islam Traditional Others |
145 (49.3%) 65 (55.8%) 13 (81.2%) 4 (66.7%) |
149 (50.7%) 38 (47.2%) 3 (18.8%) 2 (33.3%) |
11.20 | 0.01 * |
Educational Status None Primary/Arabic Secondary Tertiary |
19 (59.4%) 17 (53.1%) 72 (62.6%) 119 (49.6%) |
13 (40.6%) 15 (46.9%) 43 (37.4%) 121 (50.4%) |
30.95 | 0.001 * |
Tribe Yoruba Ibo Hausa/Fulani Others |
187 (51.9%) 21 (65.6%) 11 (68.8%) 8 (72.7%) |
173 (48.1%) 11 (34.4%) 5 (31.2%) 3 (27.3%) |
5.64 | 0.23 |
Occupation Semi-skilled Skilled Unskilled |
99 (52.9%) 107 (53.0%) 21 (70.0%) |
88 (47.1%) 95 (47.0%) 9 (30.0%) |
3.26 | 0.20 |
* Statistical significant at p < 0.05. |
Variables | Use of Safety Pin in Pregnancy | Chi square (χ2) | P value | |
YES (n = 227) | NO (n = 192) | |||
Parity Nulliparous Primiparous Multiparous |
32 (60.4%) 75 (53.2%) 120 (53.3%) |
21 (39.6%) 66 (46.8%) 105 (46.7%) |
0.94 | 0.63 |
Previous Miscarriages 0 1 2 ≥3 |
168 (55.4%) 45 (50.6%) 11 (52.4%) 3 (50.0%) |
135 (44.6%) 44 (49.4%) 10 (47.6%) 3 (50.0%) |
2.75 | 0.74 |
Living child/children 0 1 2-4 ≥5 |
65 (57.0%) 72 (49.7%) 88 (56.1%) 2 (66.7%) |
49 (43.0%) 73 (50.3%) 69 (43.9%) 1 (33.3%) |
1.98 | 0.58 |
Cultural practice/believes | % (N) |
Not going out in sunny day | 51.1% (n = 214) |
No eating of snail | 48.6% (n = 180) |
No drinking of ice or cold water | 44.9% (n = 188) |
No salt intake | 10.5% (n = 44) |
No eating of fried plantain | 15.8% (n = 66) |
No eating of catfish | 10.3% (n = 43) |