Research article Special Issues

Code Red: Explaining Average Age of Death in the City of Hamilton

  • Received: 02 June 2015 Accepted: 12 November 2015 Published: 17 December 2015
  • The aim of this study is to identify the underlying factors that explain the average age of death in the City of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, as identified in the Code Red Series of articles that were published in the city's local newspaper in 2010. Using a combination of data from the Canadian Census, the Government of Ontario and the Canadian Institute for Health Information, factor analysis was performed yielding three factors relating to poverty, working class, and health and aging. In a regression analysis these factors account for 42% of the total variability in the average ages of death observed at the census tract level of geography within the city.

    Citation: Patrick F. DeLuca, Pavlos S. Kanaroglou. Code Red: Explaining Average Age of Death in the City of Hamilton[J]. AIMS Public Health, 2015, 2(4): 730-745. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2015.4.730

    Related Papers:

    [1] Nguyen Thi Hong Tuyen, Truong Quang Dat, Huynh Thi Hong Nhung . Prevalence of depressive symptoms and its related factors among students at Tra Vinh University, Vietnam in 2018. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(3): 307-319. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.3.307
    [2] Anne W Taylor, Zumin Shi, Eleonora Dal Grande, Creina Stockley . The Relationship between Alcohol Consumption and other Risk Factors Assessed Using An Ongoing Population-based Surveillance System. AIMS Public Health, 2016, 3(4): 985-1002. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2016.4.985
    [3] Anne W Taylor, Bridgette M Bewick, Qing Ling, Valentina V Kirzhanova, Paulo Alterwain, Eleonora Dal Grande, Graeme Tucker, Alfred B Makanjuola . Clusters of alcohol abstainers and drinkers incorporating motives against drinking: a random survey of 18 to 34 year olds in four cities in four different continents. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(1): 15-33. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.1.15
    [4] Walid El Ansari, Khalid A Khalil, Derrick Ssewanyana, Christiane Stock . Behavioral risk factor clusters among university students at nine universities in Libya. AIMS Public Health, 2018, 5(3): 296-311. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2018.3.296
    [5] Nguyen Thanh Ha, Le Thi Thu Ha, Luu Quoc Toan . Knowledge, Attitude, Frequency and Level of Consumption Regarding Non-alcoholic Carbonated Soft Drinks among Students from Two High Schools in Hanoi, Vietnam in 2015. AIMS Public Health, 2017, 4(1): 62-77. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2017.1.62
    [6] Kassidy C Colton, Stephanie A Godleski, Joseph S Baschnagel, Rebecca J Houston, Shine M DeHarder . Alcohol use during the COVID-19 pandemic: gender, parenthood, intimate partner violence, and stress. AIMS Public Health, 2023, 10(2): 360-377. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2023027
    [7] Eduardo Sánchez-Sánchez, Nuria Trujillo-Garrido, Jara Díaz-Jimenez, Alejandro García-García, Miguel A Rosety, Manuel Bandez, Manuel Rosety-Rodriguez, Francisco J Ordonez, Ignacio Rosety, Antonio J Diaz . Attitudes and consumption habits of energy drinks among adolescents and young adults in a Spanish population. AIMS Public Health, 2025, 12(1): 16-32. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2025002
    [8] Maria Antoniou, Evangelos C. Fradelos, Theano Roumeliotaki, Foteini Malli, Emmanouil, K. Symvoulakis, Dimitrios Papagiannis . Assessing mental resilience with individual and lifestyle determinants among nursing students: An observational study from Greece. AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 947-962. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024049
    [9] Seyedeh Fatemeh Ghafari, Jamileh Mahdizadeh, Ali Valinejadi, Esmaeil Mehraeen, Ali Mohammadpour, Hamid Bouraghi, Mehdi Kahouei . Iranian physicians’ expectations of telemedicine development and implementation infrastructures in teaching hospitals. AIMS Public Health, 2019, 6(4): 514-522. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2019.4.514
    [10] Jorge de Andrés-Sánchez, Francesc Valls-Fonayet, Anna Sánchez-Aragón, Inma Pastor-Gosálbez, Angel Belzunegui-Eraso . Explanatory factors of polydrug use in mid-late teens and the relevance of information sources: Correlational and configurational assessment in Tarragona (Spain). AIMS Public Health, 2024, 11(3): 773-802. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024039
  • The aim of this study is to identify the underlying factors that explain the average age of death in the City of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, as identified in the Code Red Series of articles that were published in the city's local newspaper in 2010. Using a combination of data from the Canadian Census, the Government of Ontario and the Canadian Institute for Health Information, factor analysis was performed yielding three factors relating to poverty, working class, and health and aging. In a regression analysis these factors account for 42% of the total variability in the average ages of death observed at the census tract level of geography within the city.


    In 2016, mortality resulting from alcohol consumption was higher than that caused by diseases such as tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS and diabetes. 3 million deaths (5.3% of all deaths) worldwide and 132.6 million disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)—i.e. 5.1% of all DALYs in that year caused by alcohol consuming [1]. Studies on the economic outcomes of alcohol consumption have shown that the costs of lost productivity and the associated criminal costs accounted for more than 1% of countries' GDP [2]. The consumption of alcohol and the complexity of its side effects have made the monitoring of rate and pattern of alcohol consumption as a key part of health policy [3].

    Alcoholic beverages are the most common substances in all age groups over 15, and their misuse is classified as harmful to health. In a 2013 ranking of the top 25 leading health risk factors in the world, alcohol was in the 6th place [4]. In various countries, alcohol consumption has been recognized as one of the students' behaviors [5]. University students report exciting and invigorating experiences throughout their university lives. These experiences are linked with stressful times due to academic work load, competition among peers and pressure to succeed [6].

    Drinking alcohol increases the risk of wide range of social harms to students. There are numerous reports of links between alcohol and tobacco consumption, absenteeism, academic failure, extending the education and still being incomplete, high-risk sexual behaviors, and violence among students [7][10]. Alcohol consumption may also continue in the post-school years and may show its consequences as dependency, poor performance at work, and inability to find a job [5].

    There are several factors associated with alcohol consumption among students including demographic characteristics such as age and gender; socioeconomic status including income and parents' education level; lifestyle factors such as personal health, physical activity, nutritional information and perceived quality of life, social activities and study related stress; factors related to cultural and ethnic differences; alcohol consumption by parents; family relationships; peer pressure; stress in the educational environment; and even genetics [9],[11][15].

    Although alcohol prevalence is generally lower in Muslim countries than in non-Muslim countries, its contribution to the national burden of health cannot be ignored [5]. Due to the prohibition of alcohol consumption in Islam, information on alcohol consumption among students is limited, and the pattern of alcohol consumption in these countries differs greatly from the pattern in non-Islamic countries [6].

    In various studies, the rate of alcohol consumption among Iranian adolescents and students has been reported 2–68%. These rates showed a consumption level higher than the normal level of society, and they also proved that the consumption level could be variable in different locations and groups [3]. Knowing the prevalence and the factors associated with alcohol abuse among students can be an important step in initiating preventive measures. Therefore, regarding the above-mentioned issues and the importance of this issue, the present study aimed to determine the status of alcohol consumption and its related factors among students of higher education centers in one of the north-eastern cities of Iran in 2017.

    It was a cross-sectional descriptive-analytical study which was conducted in 2017. The study population consisted of 668 students from seven higher education centers. The samples were selected through stratified random sampling. After obtaining the necessary permissions, the list of students in each higher education center was obtained and then according to the number of students, a proportion of the total sample size was assigned to each center. After defining a number for each student, students were selected from each center using simple random sampling per calculated quota. If a student did not wish to participate in the study or was not available at the sampling time, a substitution would be made by simple random sampling. Data collecting tool was a researcher-made questionnaire. In this study, considering the cultural conditions of Iran, any history of alcohol use in lifetime was defined as “alcohol consumption” In order to prepare the questionnaire, after reviewing the literature and consulting with experts in this field, a question bank was designed. Then after merging, omitting and editing the questions, a draft questionnaire was sent to 10 experts to determine the content validity. After collecting the experts' opinions, the questionnaire was distributed among 100 samples, and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha test (Cronbach's alpha was 0.839 after omission of dissimilar questions). The questionnaire consisted of three sections and 36 questions which included 16 questions about demographic information, 12 questions about pattern of alcohol consumption, and 8 questions about the factors affecting alcohol consumption. The appearance of questionnaire was designed to reassure the subjects of confidentiality, in a way that information was not readable from the cover. Data were collected by a trained questioner. Ethical considerations, in addition to the written form, were re-informed to the participants. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics (centrality and dispersion indices) and analytical statistics (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, independent-samples and paired-samples T-test, ANOVA, Chi-square test) at the significant level of P < 0.05. In this regard STATA software, version 13, was used. Due to the prohibition of alcohol consumption in Iran, any alcohol drinking in this study is considered as abuse.

    The mean age of subjects was 24.78 years. 49.05% of them were male and the rest were female. Their mean grade point average (GPA) was 15.78 (out of 20) at the time of the survey and the average household size was 5.12. 6.46% of students were associate students, 77.76% were undergraduate, 14.03% were getting their masters and 1.73% were PhD students. In terms of marital status, 69.88% were single, 28.36% were married, and 1.75% were in other status (divorced and widowed). 54.45% of the students were indigenous and 45.54% were non-indigenous (Table 1).

    44.36% of the subjects lived in their homes with their parents; 28.12% lived in dormitories; 10.67% lived lonely on their own; and 16.84% lived in other conditions. In terms of father's education, 48.48% of the fathers were illiterate; 18.56% had elementary education; 18.40% had secondary school education, 31.20% had high school diploma, and 27.36% had higher education. In terms of mother's education, 49.7% of the mothers were illiterate; 23.61% had elementary education; 17.42% had secondary school education; 34.36% had high school diploma; and 17.10% had higher education. 19.63% of students had history of tobacco consumption, while 13.77% reported that there was an alcoholic in their family, and 27.20% reported that one of their friends was an alcoholic. 55.37% of students stated their awareness of alcohol was high and very high. The satisfaction with the city in which they were studying was very high in 38.38% of students, in 34.75% was high, in 23.85% was moderate, and it was low and very low in the rest of subjects. In terms of university satisfaction, 13.67% were very highly satisfied, 24.48% were highly, 38.19% were moderately, 12.87% were little and 10.17% were very little satisfied. Regarding their satisfaction with their academic major, 20.25% were very highly satisfied, 19.77% were highly satisfied, 30.53% were moderately satisfied, and the rest were little or very little satisfied (Table 2).

    Table 1.  Relationship between demographic variables and alcohol consumption history among students of studied higher education centers in 2017.
    Variable Alcohol consumption history
    Total subjects (668 subjects) P-value
    Yes (92 subjects) No (576 subjects)
    Age Mean ± S.D 23.92 ± 4.5 24.58 ± 6.5 24.48 ± 6.3 0.001
    GPA from 20 Mean ± S.D 15.15 ± 2.3 15.88 ± 2.2 15.78 ± 1.85 0.025
    Household size Mean ± S.D 4.91 ± 1.5 5.13 ± 1.71 5.09 ± 1.7 0.433
    Birth order Mean ± S.D 2.24 ± 1.4 2.62 ± 1.70 2.57 ± 1.7 0.843
    Gender Male 72 (77.41) 265 (44.61) 342 (49.05) 0.001
    Female 21 (22.58) 329 (55.38) 350 (50.94)
    Education level Associate 6 (6.652) 35 (6.45) 41 (6.46) 0.591
    Undergraduate 75 (81.52) 418 (77.12) 493 (77.76)
    Postgraduate 11 (11.95) 78 (81.52) 89 (14.03)
    PhD 0 11 (11.95) 11 (1.73)
    Academic major Medical sciences 14 (15.21) 51 (8.70) 65 (9.58) 0.235
    Humanities 32 (34.95) 239 (40.78) 272 (39.97)
    Mathematics & Engineering 34 (36.95) 221 (37.00) 255 (37.61)
    other 12 (13.04) 75 (12.79) 87 (12.83)
    Marital status Single 69 (75.00) 409 (69.08) 478 (69.88) 0.069
    Married 19 (20.65) 175 (29.56) 194 (28.36)
    Other 4 (4.34) 8 (1.35) 12 (1.75)
    Residential place Indigenous 41 (44.65) 326 (56.01) 367 (54.45) 0.027
    Non-indigenous 51 (55.43) 326 (43.98) 307 (45.54)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    92 students (13.77%) had a history of alcohol consumption and 55.6% of them still continued to drink alcohol. The mean age of starting alcohol consumption among students was 18.8 years. 77.41% of alcohol user students were male, 75% were single, 55.43% were non-indigenous, and 74.46% had history of smoking. 43.33% of alcohol consumers lived with their parents, and 55.55% had no personal income and their parents paid their education fees. 81.52% of them were undergraduates, and 36.95% of them were majoring in mathematics and engineering. 50% and 84.33% of alcohol consumer had history of alcohol consumption by family members and friends, respectively. 42.52% of consumer students reported moderate satisfaction with university; and 34.88% had very high level of satisfaction with the city; and 31.39% had very little satisfaction with their academic major (Tables 1 and 2).

    Table 2.  Relationship between social and behavioral variables and alcohol consumption history among students of studied higher education centers in 2017.
    Variable Alcohol consumption history
    Total subjects (668 subjects) P-value
    Yes (92 subjects) No (576 subjects)
    Residence With parents 39 (43/33) 256 (44/52) 295 (44/36) 0.000
    Dormitory 19 (21/11) 168 (29/21) 187 (28/12)
    By his own 24 (26/66) 47 (8/17) 71 (10/67)
    Other 8 (8/88) 104 (8/17) 112 (10/67)
    Income source In person 35 (38/88) 137 (28/82) 172 (25/86) 0.009
    Parents 50 (55/55) 404 (38/88) 454 (68/27)
    Other 5 (5/55) 34 (5/91) 39 (5/86)
    Father's education Illiterate 6 (6/81) 22 (4/09) 28 (4/48) 0.143
    Primary school 11 (12/5) 105 (19/55) 116 (18/56)
    Secondary school 28 (31/81) 103 (19/18) 115 (18/40)
    High school 28 (31/81) 167 (31/09) 195 (31/20)
    Higher education 31 (35/22) 140 (31/09) 171 (27/36)
    Mother's education Illiterate 8 (9/30) 38 (7/19) 46 (7/49) 0.266
    Primary school 18 (20/93) 127 (24/05) 145 (23/61)
    Secondary school 9 (10/46) 98 (18/56) 107 (17/42)
    High school 32 (37/20) 179 (33/90) 211 (34/36)
    Higher education 19 (22/09) 86 (16/28) 105 (17/10)
    Smoking history Yes 70 (74/46) 70 (11/30) 140 (19/63) 0.000
    No 24 (25/53) 549 (83/75) 573 (80/36)
    Alcohol abuse in family Yes 40 (50/00) 33 (7/33) 73 (13/77) 0.000
    No 33 (41/25) 351 (78/00) 384 (72/45)
    Don't know 7 (8/75) 66 (14/66) 73 (13/77)
    Alcohol abuse by friends Yes 70 (84/33) 81 (17/16) 151 (27/20) 0.000
    No 4 (4/83) 231 (48/94) 235 (42/34)
    Don't know 9 (10/84) 160 (33/89) 169 (30/45)
    Knowledge about alcohol Too much 42 (49/41) 137 (25/46) 179 (28/73) 0.000
    Much 23 (27/05) 143 (26/57) 166 (26/64)
    Moderate 17 (20/00) 205 (38/10) 222 (35/63)
    Little 1 (1/17) 38 (7/06) 39 (6/26)
    Very little 2 (2/35) 15 (2/78) 17 (2/72)
    Satisfaction with the city Very high 30 (34/88) 194 (35/46) 224 (35/38) 0.001
    High 23 (26/74) 197 (36/01) 220 (34/75)
    Moderate 22 (25/58) 129 (23/58) 151 (23/85)
    Little 2 (2/32) 16 (2/92) 18 (2/84)
    Very little 9 (10/46) 11 (2/01) 20 (3/15)
    Satisfaction with the university Very high 8 (9/19) 78 (14/39) 86 (13/67) 0.096
    High 17 (19/54) 137 (25/27) 1544 (24/48)
    Moderate 37 (42/52) 207 (38/19) 244 (38/79)
    Little 10 (11/45) 71 (13/09) 81 (12/87)
    Very little 15 (17/24) 49 (9/04) 64 (10/17)
    Satisfaction with the academic major Very high 11 (12/79) 117 (21/42) 128 (20/25) 0.001
    High 12 (13/95) 113 (20/69) 125 (19/77)
    Moderate 25 (29/06) 168 (30/76) 193 (30/53)
    Little 11 (12/79) 73 (13/36) 84 (13/29)
    Very little 27 (31/39) 75 (13/73) 102 (16/13)

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    There was a significant inverse association between alcohol consumption and age; in a way that alcohol consumption was lower in the older age groups (p = 0.001). Besides, alcohol consumption was more common in students with lower GPA (p = 0.025). The history of alcohol consumption was significantly higher in male (p = 0.001) and non-indigenous students (p = 0.027) (Table 1).

    Alcohol consumption was significantly higher among subjects who lived in their own homes (p = 0.000). Alcohol consumption was higher among students whose parents paid their education fees (p = 0.009). Moreover, there was a significant direct relationship between smoking history and alcohol consumption (p = 0.000). Subjects whose friends or family members had history of alcohol abuse reported significantly more alcohol consumption (p = 0.000). Furthermore, alcohol consumption history was more seen in students who were more satisfied with the city or their academic major (p = 0.001) (Table 2).

    There was no significant relationship between alcohol consumption and household size, birth order, educational level, academic major, marital status, parental education, and university satisfaction (Tables 1 and 2).

    The percentage of students in this study reporting a history of alcohol consumption was 13.77%. This was in line with the findings of Motevalian et al. (2015) study, which ranged 6.7–20% in different age groups of students at Tehran University of Medical Sciences [16]. However, this figure was more than the findings of some other Iranian researchers, such as Abbasi-Ghahramanloo et al. (2015), Rezahosseini et al. (2014), and Mardani et al. (2012), respectively, who reported the prevalence of alcohol abuse among medical students in Iran 6.9%, in Rafsanjan 5.7%, and in Bandar Abbas Azad University 9.9%. The figure was also more than the findings from other countries researchers, such as Al-Ameri et al. (2016) and Almousavi (2014), respectively from Baghdad and Karbala with 9.7% and 2%, and Ruisoto et al. (2016) from Ecuador with 8.7%. On the other hand, this figure was less than the findings of other researchers in other countries who investigated the history of alcohol abuse in students, including the studies of Pillai et al. (2014) from Nitte University in Karnataka, India with 26.4%, Al-Mousavi et al. (2009) from Iraq with nearly 30%, Seipone et al. (2013) from Molepolole University in Botswana with 58.4%, Cherian et al. (2014), Kyei and Ramagona (2013) from South Africa with 72.5% and 65%, respectively, and Zadarko et al. (2018) from the European Carpathian region countries (Poland, Slovenia, Ukraine and Romania) with 80% [17][27]. The findings of the present study indicated a high level of alcohol consumption among the students of higher education centers in the studied city compared to the students of universities in other parts of the country, despite the illegal and unauthorized consumption of alcohol in Iran. These differences could be due to various factors such as sample size, research method, mostly non-indigenous students, cultural and social conditions of the city, etc. Moreover, cultural, social, legal, and religious differences could justify the differences to other countries, including those that had a consumption level higher than Iran.

    Investigating the relationship between gender and alcohol consumption in the present study showed that alcohol consumption was higher among male students. This finding was consistent with the findings of some Iranian researchers, including Motevalian et al. (2015), Mardani et al. (2012), Sohrabi et al. (2012), Abbasi-Ghahramanloo et al. (2015), Rezahosseini et al. (2014); and it was also consistent with the findings of researchers from other countries, including Wilsnack et al. (2009) from England, Schulte et al. (2005) from USA, Ruisoto et al. (2016) from Ecuador, Mphele et al. (2013) from Botswana, Rawa Jaafar and et al. (2016) from Iraq, and Ghandour et al. (2014) from Lebanon [7],[19],[21],[24],[28][31]. This has led some studies to consider the male gender as a risk factor for alcohol abuse. Religious factors and social behaviors could have been involved; nevertheless, there were some exceptions, for example, in a country like the United States, there was no gender difference in alcohol abuse among Muslims [21]. Perhaps it was due to the origin of individuals and adaptation of them to the community in which they live.

    In the present study, the association between age and alcohol abuse among students was significant. This was in line with a study by Mohammadkhani (2012) [31]. But it was different from the findings of Sohrabi et al. (2012) study [28], although Sohrabi's study was conducted in the high school students group, which could justify the difference.

    In this study, the age of drinking onset among students was 18.8 years, which was in line with the findings of Sohrabi et al. (2012), who reported the age of drinking onset at 18 years [28]; while it was not consistent with the results of Mohammadkhani's study, which reported the age of drinking onset at 14 years [31]. However, since the study was conducted among high school students, this difference could be attributed to the difference between the target groups. In the study of Al-Ameri et al. (2016) in Iraq, the highest alcohol consumption among students was reported in the age group of 20 to 24 years. Sanchez-Ramirez et al. (2017) also reported the hazardous age of drinking in Canada and Australia from 18 to 24 years old. This age range was reported by Bendtsen et al. (2011) in Sweden from 18 to 29 years [19],[32],[33]. However, it seems that there is a high level of alcohol consumption in the age of 18–29. Being non-indigenous could affect different aspects of students' physical and mental health due to being apart from family and lifestyle changes. In the present study, non-indigenous students reported more alcohol abuse. But Sohrabi et al. (2012) study on the public university students showed a different status [28]. However, it should be noted that more than half of the alcohol-consuming students in the present study (55.43%) were non-indigenous and lived apart from their families in various forms (dormitory, living lonely on their own, living with relatives, etc.). Students' lives away from their families could be a risk factor for alcohol abuse. This was also seen in the findings of Al-Mousavi et al. (2009) from Iraq, Ghandour et al. (2014) from Lebanon, Abbasi-Ghahramanloo et al. (2015), as well as Rezahosseini et al. (2014) both from Iran [17],[18],[20],[30].

    Findings of the present study clearly showed that there was a reverse association between alcohol consumption and GPA. These findings were consistent with those of Ghaderi et al. (2014) and Ansari et al. (2007) [34],[35]. The relationship between high-risk behaviors and GPA could be bilateral. Both high-risk behaviors such as alcohol consumption or substance abuse could impair educational attainments, and both academic failure and lowered GPA could increase the risk of high-risk behaviors. Various studies have been conducted for many years worldwide about the multiple effects of tobacco consumption on health. Smoking can be a prelude to many health risk behaviors and illegal drug abuse. One thing to note in recent years is that these two substances (cigarettes and alcohol) can synergistically cause various diseases [36],[37]. In the present study, there was a direct relationship between alcohol consumption and smoking. These findings were similar to those of Ansari et al. (2007) and Mohammadkhani (2012) [31],[35].

    History of substance or alcohol consumption among friends or family members could change the attitude and increase the desire and access to consume. Being accepted into peer groups has been a strong motivation for adolescents and young people to abuse alcohol or substance. This was confirmed by the findings of the present study. Findings of the present study, like the studies by Mohammadkhani (2012) and Mardani et al. (2012), showed that alcohol consumption by friends and family members could be a risk factor for students' alcohol abuse [27],[31].

    In the present study, there was a significant relationship between students' satisfaction with their academic major, the city in which they studied and alcohol consumption. These findings were in contrast to the findings of the study by Murphy et al. (2005), conducted on students in the United States. No significant difference was found between alcohol consumption and academic satisfaction in male and female students; however, there was a significant association between social satisfaction and alcohol consumption in male students, while no significant association was found in female students [38]. In Murphy et al. (2005) study, Alfonso's and Pavot's quality of life questionnaires were used; whereas, in the present study, considering the numerous variables, questioning was performed in just two parts to examine student's satisfaction with city and academic major.

    In the present study, there was no significant relationship between marital status and history of alcohol Consumption , which was not consistent with the findings of Mardani et al. (2012) study that showed a significant relationship between alcohol and substance abuse and being single [27]. Perhaps the difference in the number of higher education centers in both studies justified this difference, for example, Mardani's research was conducted in just one university, but the present study was conducted in 7 universities with more discipline diversity and different educational conditions.

    Moreover, there was no significant difference between the education level and alcohol consumption in the present study. This was different from the findings of Ghaderi et al. study (2014) in Jiroft [34], in which postgraduate students reported more alcohol consumption. Differences in geographic characteristics and differences in accessibility could account for this difference in results.

    One of the limitations of the present study was that some centers were not interested in cooperating in running the project, but with numerous follow-ups and explaining the importance of the issue and the confidentiality of the information, they were satisfied with the cooperation.

    The research findings exhibited that alcohol consumption was relatively higher than expected in the students of higher education centers in comparison with the other similar studies among Iranian students, and also several variables including; being non-indigenous, student's income source, smoking history, history of alcohol abuse by family and friends, and dissatisfaction with the academic major were shown to be involved in this process. Providing necessary training on the risks of alcohol consumption, precision in choosing the academic major, and selecting indigenous students can be effective in preventing and reducing alcohol consumption.

    [1] Evans, R. G., Stoddart, G. L. (1994). Producing health, consuming health care. In: R. G. Evans, L. M. Bare, R. T. Marmor (Eds.), Why are some people healthy and others not? New York: Aldine De Gruyer, 27-64.
    [2] Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealthy societies: The afflictions of inequality. London: Routledge.
    [3] Public Health Agency of Canada. What determines health? 2003. Available from: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ph-sp/determinants/index-eng.php#key_determinants.
    [4] Attomaki, A, Martikainen, P, Rahkonen, O, and Lahelma, E (2014). Household income and health problems during a period of labour-market change and widening income inequalities - a study among the Finnish population between 1987 and 2007. Social Sci & Med, 100: 84-92.
    [5] Chiavegatto Filho, A and Kawachi, I (2015). Income inequality is associated with adolescent fertility in Brazil: a longitudinal multilevel analysis of 5,565 municipalities. BMC Public Health, 15:103. doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1369-2
    [6] Lynch, J, Smith, GD, Harper, S, et al., (2004). Is income inequality a determinant of population health? Part 1. A systematic review. Milbank Q. 82(1): 5-99.
    [7] Prag, P, Mills, M and Wittek, R (2014). Income and income inequality as social determinants of health: do social comparisons play a role. Europ Sociol Rev, 30(2): 218-229. doi: 10.1093/esr/jct035
    [8] Uphoff, EP, Cabieses, B, Wright, J, Pickett, KE (2015). International prevalence rates of asthma and allergy are associated with income inequality. J Allergy Clinic Immun. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.01.037
    [9] Williams, JAR and Rosenstock, L (2015). Squeezing blood from a stone: how income inequality affects the health of the American workforce. Am J Public Health, 105(4): 616-621. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302424
    [10] Ross, NA, Wolfson, MC, Dunn, JR, Berthelot, JM, Kaplan, GA and Lynch, JW (2000). Relation between income inequality and mortality in Canada and the United States: cross sectional assessment using census data and vital statistics. BMJ, 2000; 320:898.
    [11] Piketty, T (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Belknap Press.
    [12] Wilkinson, RG, and Pickett, KE (2006). Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. Social Sci & Med, 62(7): 1768 - 1784.
    [13] Luginaah, I., Jerrett, M., Elliott, S., Eyles, J., Parizeau, K., Birch, S., et al. (2001). Health profiles of Hamilton: Spatial characterisation of neighbourhoods for health investigations. Geo J, 53: 135-147.
    [14] Buzzelli, M., Jerrett, M., Burnett, R., & Finkelstein, N. (2003). Spatiotemporal perspectives on air pollution and environmental justice in Hamilton, Canada, 1985-1996. Anna Ass Am Geog, 93(3): 557-573. doi: 10.1111/1467-8306.9303003
    [15] Finkelstein, M. M., Jerrett, M., DeLuca, P., Finkelstein, N., Verma, D. K., Chapman, K., et al. (2003). Relation between income, air pollution and mortality: A cohort study. Ca Med Ass J, 169(5): 397-402.
    [16] Wilson, K., Eyles, J., Elliott, S., & Keller-Olaman, S. (2009). Health in Hamilton neighbourhoods: Exploring the determinants of health at the local level. Health Place, 15: 374-382. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.07.002
    [17] Law, M., Wilson, K., Eyles, J., Elliott, S., Jerrett, M., Moffat, T., et al. (2005). Meeting health need, accessing health care: The role of neighbourhood. Health Place, 11: 367-377. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.05.004
    [18] Veenstra, G., Luginaah, I., Wakefield, S., Birch, S., Eyles, J., & Elliott, S. (2005). Who you know, where you live: Social capital, neighbourhood and health. Social Sci & Med, 60: 2799-2818.
    [19] Latham, J and Moffatt, T (2007). Determinants of variation in food cost and availability in two socioeconomically contrasting neighbourhoods of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Health Place, 13(1): 273-287. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2006.01.006
    [20] Buist, Steve (2010) Code Red: Where You Live Affects Your Health (Special Report). The Hamilton, Spectator Available from: http://thespec-codered.com/?page_id=8
    [21] DeLuca, PF, Buist, S, Johnston, N (2012). Engaging Communities in Health System Change - The Code Red Project in Hamilton, Canada. Social Indic Res, 108(2):317-327. doi: 10.1007/s11205-012-0068-y
    [22] Suhr, D (2005). Principal Component Analysis vs Exploratory Factor Analysis. In SAS Institute Inc. 2005. Proceedings of the Thirtieth Annual SAS® Users Group International Conference. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Available from: http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi30/203-30.pdf
    [23] Anselin L., 1995: Local indicators of spatial association LISA. Geog. Anal, 27: 94-115.
    [24] Bomlitz, LJ and Brezis, M. 2008. Misrepresentation of health risks by mass media. J Public Health, 30(2): 202-204.
    [25] Hayes, M, Ross, IE, Gasher, M, Gutstein, D, Dunn, JR, and Hackett, RA. 2007. Telling stories: Newsmedia, health literacy and public policy in Canada. Social Sci & Med, 64, 1842-1852.
    [26] Gasher, M, Hayes, M, Hackett, R, Gutstein, D, Ross, I and Dunn J. 2007. Spreading the new: social determinants of health reportage in Canadian daily newspapers. Ca J Com, 32:557-574.
    [27] Pampalon, R., Hamel, D., Gamache, P., & Raymond, G. (2009). A deprivation index for health planning in Canada. Chronic Disease Ca, 29(4): 178-191.
    [28] Eaton, WW and Muntaner, C. (1999) Socioeconomic Stratification and Mental Disorder. In: Horowitz, HA and Scheid, TL, S Mental Health, New York: Cambridge University Press, 277-277.
    [29] Burns, JK. Poverty, inequality and a political economy of mental health. E Psych Sci, 24(2): 107-113.
    [30] CMHA, Poverty and Mental Illness, 2007.Available from: http://ontario.cmha.ca/public_policy/poverty-and-mental-illness/#.VWTH6s9VhBc
    [31] DeVoe, JE, Baez, A, Angier, H, Krois, L, Edlund, C, Carney, PA. (2007). Insurance plus access does not equal health care: typology of barriers to health care access for low-income families. Anna Fam Med, 5(6): 511-518. doi: 10.1370/afm.748
    [32] CMA, Health care in Canada: What Makes Us Sick? Canadian Medical Association Town Hall Project, July 2013. Available from: https://www.cma.ca/Assets/assets-library/document/fr/advocacy/What-makes-us-sick_en.pdf#search=What%20Makes%20Us%20Sick
    [33] Wilton, R (2004). Putting policy into practice? Poverty and people with serious mental illness. Social Sci & Med, 58(1): 25-39.
    [34] Wakefield, S., and McMullan, C. 2005. Healing in Places of Decline: (Re)Imagining Everyday Landscapes in Hamilton, Ontario. Health & Place 11(4): 299-312.
    [35] Stanger-Ross, J and Ross, HS. 2012. Placing the poor: the ecology of poverty in postwar urban Canada. J Ca Stu, 46(1): 213-240.
    [36] City of Hamilton, Neighbourhood Action Strategy, 2015. Available from: http://preview.hamilton.ca/city-initiatives/strategies-actions/neighbourhood-action-strategy
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Tandin Dorji, Peeradone Srichan, Tawatchai Apidechkul, Rachanee Sunsern, Wipob Suttana, Factors associated with different forms of alcohol use behaviors among college students in Bhutan: a cross-sectional study, 2020, 15, 1747-597X, 10.1186/s13011-020-00315-0
    2. Neda Soleimanvandiazar, Salah Eddin Karimi, Mahboobeh Kamali, Marziyeh Moradi, Leila Janani, Saeed Ghanbari, Azadeh Mottaghi, Mojtaba Piri, Leila Ghalichi, Marzieh Nojomi, Current and life-time alcohol consumption in Iranian students: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2022, 1465-9891, 1, 10.1080/14659891.2022.2114386
    3. Amirhosein Khakbaz, Mehrnaz Ahmadi, Shayesteh Haghighi, Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice Regarding the Prevention of Gastric Cancer Among Medical Science Students, 2023, 13, 2322-3758, 10.5812/jjcdc-137599
    4. Yuraporn Sahasakul, Nantakan Amonsusawat, Phenphop Phansuea, Lifestyles, Food Consumption Frequencies, and Eating Behaviors among Three Main Disciplines of Undergraduate Students during the Early COVID-19 Outbreak in Thailand, 2023, 15, 2072-6643, 2765, 10.3390/nu15122765
    5. Sarah Kadhim Abbood, Ali Mohammed Abd Alridha, Karrar Mohammed Al-Gburi, Noorulhuda Ali Mohsin, Afnan Saud Ismael, Ahmed Basim Ali, Ali Talib Salih, Prevalence and Epidemiological Characteristics Associated with Hookah Smoking and Alcohol Consumption among Medical Students in Najaf, Iraq, 2023, 20, 1812-156X, 143, 10.4103/MJBL.MJBL_313_22
    6. Mansoor Kodori, Sajjad Khosravi, Nadia Oroomiei, Maryam Abdoli, Morteza Ali Moradi, Tahereh Fani, Leili Abedi Gheshlaghi, Relationship between attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder and substance use among college students in southeastern Iran, 2023, 1465-9891, 1, 10.1080/14659891.2023.2293768
    7. Arezoo Sarmad, Dilan Ahmadzadeh, Mohammad Bazyar, Kamran Malekan, Zahra Malekan, Reza Pakzad, Age- and sex-standardized prevalence of alcohol consumption and its determinants in the western region of Iran, Ilam: a cross-sectional study, 2024, 24, 1471-2458, 10.1186/s12889-024-21087-3
    8. Mahsa Janati, Nouzar Nakhaee, Ali Karamoozian, Somayeh Alizadeh, Mostafa Yazdani, Hamid Sharifi, Abedin Iranpour, Iranian university students’ alcohol-related knowledge, attitude, and practice questionnaire (ISKAP alcohol Q): development and psychometric properties, 2025, 13, 2050-7283, 10.1186/s40359-025-02665-5
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(9281) PDF downloads(1341) Cited by(3)

Figures and Tables

Figures(6)  /  Tables(3)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog