Research article Special Issues

Theory of partial agonist activity of steroid hormones

  • Received: 30 January 2015 Accepted: 07 April 2015 Published: 15 April 2015
  • The different amounts of residual partial agonist activity (PAA) of antisteroids under assorted conditions have long been useful in clinical applications but remain largely unexplained. Not only does a given antagonist often afford unequal induction for multiple genes in the same cell but also the activity of the same antisteroid with the same gene changes with variations in concentration of numerous cofactors. Using glucocorticoid receptors as a model system,we have recently succeeded in constructing from first principles a theory that accurately describes how cofactors can modulate the ability of agonist steroids to regulate both gene induction and gene repression. We now extend this framework to the actions of antisteroids in gene induction. The theory shows why changes in PAA cannot be explained simply by differences in ligand affinity for receptor and requires action at a second step or site in the overall sequence of reactions. The theory also provides a method for locating the position of this second site,relative to a concentration limited step (CLS),which is a previously identified step in glucocorticoid-regulated transactivation that always occurs at the same position in the overall sequence of events of gene induction. Finally,the theory predicts that classes of antagonist ligands may be grouped on the basis of their maximal PAA with excess added cofactor and that the members of each class differ by how they act at the same step in the overall gene induction process. Thus,this theory now makes it possible to predict how different cofactors modulate antisteroid PAA,which should be invaluable in developing more selective antagonists.

    Citation: Carson C. Chow, Karen M. Ong, Benjamin Kagan, S. Stoney Simons Jr.. Theory of partial agonist activity of steroid hormones[J]. AIMS Molecular Science, 2015, 2(2): 101-123. doi: 10.3934/molsci.2015.2.101

    Related Papers:

    [1] Kazuo Sano . Intelligence and global bias in the stock market. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2023, 3(2): 184-195. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2023011
    [2] Aihua Li, Qinyan Wei, Yong Shi, Zhidong Liu . Research on stock price prediction from a data fusion perspective. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2023, 3(3): 230-250. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2023014
    [3] Jin Zeng, Yijia Zhang, Yun Yin, Peter G Moffatt . The effect of the Covid pandemic on stock market volatility: Separating initial impact from time-to-recovery. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2024, 4(4): 531-547. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2024022
    [4] Bilal Ahmed Memon, Hongxing Yao . Correlation structure networks of stock market during terrorism: evidence from Pakistan. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2021, 1(2): 117-140. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2021007
    [5] Zimei Huang, Zhenghui Li . What reflects investor sentiment? Empirical evidence from China. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2021, 1(3): 235-252. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2021013
    [6] Nurun Najwa Bahari, Hafizah Bahaludin, Munira Ismail, Fatimah Abdul Razak . Network, correlation, and community structure of the financial sector of Bursa Malaysia before, during, and after COVID-19. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2024, 4(3): 362-387. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2024016
    [7] Deniz Sevinç . Volatility spillovers among MIST stock markets. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2022, 2(2): 80-95. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2022004
    [8] Kuo-Shing Chen . Interlinkages between Bitcoin, green financial assets, oil, and emerging stock markets. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2024, 4(1): 160-187. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2024006
    [9] Yi Chen, Zhehao Huang . Measuring the effects of investor attention on China's stock returns. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2021, 1(4): 327-344. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2021018
    [10] Alejandro Rodriguez Dominguez, Om Hari Yadav . A causal interactions indicator between two time series using extreme variations in the first eigenvalue of lagged correlation matrices. Data Science in Finance and Economics, 2024, 4(3): 422-445. doi: 10.3934/DSFE.2024018
  • The different amounts of residual partial agonist activity (PAA) of antisteroids under assorted conditions have long been useful in clinical applications but remain largely unexplained. Not only does a given antagonist often afford unequal induction for multiple genes in the same cell but also the activity of the same antisteroid with the same gene changes with variations in concentration of numerous cofactors. Using glucocorticoid receptors as a model system,we have recently succeeded in constructing from first principles a theory that accurately describes how cofactors can modulate the ability of agonist steroids to regulate both gene induction and gene repression. We now extend this framework to the actions of antisteroids in gene induction. The theory shows why changes in PAA cannot be explained simply by differences in ligand affinity for receptor and requires action at a second step or site in the overall sequence of reactions. The theory also provides a method for locating the position of this second site,relative to a concentration limited step (CLS),which is a previously identified step in glucocorticoid-regulated transactivation that always occurs at the same position in the overall sequence of events of gene induction. Finally,the theory predicts that classes of antagonist ligands may be grouped on the basis of their maximal PAA with excess added cofactor and that the members of each class differ by how they act at the same step in the overall gene induction process. Thus,this theory now makes it possible to predict how different cofactors modulate antisteroid PAA,which should be invaluable in developing more selective antagonists.


    Mathematical models of physics, chemistry, ecology, physiology, psychology, engineering and social sciences have been governed by differential equation and difference equation. With the development of computers, compared with continuous-time model, discrete-time models described by difference equations are better formulated and analyzed in the past decades. Recently laser model has vast application in medical sciences, industries, highly security areas in army [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. Laser, whose basic principal lies on the Einstein theory of light proposed in 1916, is a device that produces intense beam of monochromatic and coherent light. Since then it is developed by Gordon Gould in 1957. In 1960, the first working ruby laser was invented by Theodore Maiman. Laser light is coherent, highly directional and monochromatic which makes it different from ordinary light. The working principle of laser is based on the spontaneous absorption, spontaneous emission, stimulated emission, and population inversion are essential for the laser formation. The readers can refer to [8,9,10]. For instance, Hakin [11] proposed a simple continuous-time laser model in 1983. Khan and Sharif [12] proposed a discrete-time laser model and studied extensively dynamical properties about fixed points, the existence of prime period and periodic points, and transcritical bifurcation of a one-dimensional discrete-time laser model in $ R^+ $.

    In fact, the identification of the parameters of the model is usually based on statistical method, starting from data experimentally obtained and on the choice of some method adapted to the identification. These models, even the classic deterministic approach, are subjected to inaccuracies (fuzzy uncertainty) that can be caused by the nature of the state variables, by parameters as coefficients of the model and by initial conditions. In fact, fuzzy difference equation is generation of difference equation whose parameters or the initial values are fuzzy numbers, and its solutions are sequences of fuzzy numbers. It has been used to model a dynamical systems under possibility uncertainty. Due to the applicability of fuzzy difference equation for the analysis of phenomena where imprecision is inherent, this class of difference equation is a very important topic from theoretical point of view and also its applications. Recently there has been an increasing interest in the study of fuzzy difference equations (see [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]).

    In this paper, by virtue of the theory of fuzzy sets, we consider the following discrete-time laser model with fuzzy uncertainty parameters and initial conditions.

    $ xn+1=Axn+BxnCxn+H,n=0,1,,
    $
    (1.1)

    where $ x_n $ is the number of laser photon at the $ n $th time, $ A, B, C, H $ and the initial value $ x_0 $ are positive fuzzy numbers.

    The main aim of this work is to study the existence of positive solutions of discrete-time laser model (1.1). Furthermore, according to a generation of division (g-division) of fuzzy numbers, we derive some conditions so that every positive solution of discrete-time laser model (1.1) is bounded. Finally, under some conditions we prove that discrete-time laser model (1.1) has a fixed point $ 0 $ which is asymptotically stable, and a unique positive fixed point $ x $.

    Firstly, we give the following definitions and lemma needed in the sequel.

    Definition 2.1.[26] $ u: R\rightarrow [0, 1] $ is said to be a fuzzy number if it satisfies conditions (i)–(iv) written below:

    (i) $ u $ is normal, i. e., there exists an $ x\in R $ such that $ u(x) = 1 $;

    (ii) $ u $ is fuzzy convex, i. e., for all $ t\in[0, 1] $ and $ x_1, x_2\in R $ such that

    $ u(tx_1+(1-t)x_2)\geq\min\{u(x_1), u(x_2)\}; $

    (iii) $ u $ is upper semicontinuous;

    (iv) The support of $ u $, $ \mbox{supp}u = \overline{\bigcup_{\alpha\in(0, 1]}[u]^{\alpha}} = \overline{\{x:u(x) > 0\}} $ is compact.

    For $ \alpha\in(0, 1] $, the $ \alpha- $cuts of fuzzy number $ u $ is $ [u]^\alpha = \{x\in R: u(x)\geq\alpha\} $ and for $ \alpha = 0 $, the support of $ u $ is defined as $ \mbox{supp}u = [u]^0 = \overline{\{x\in R|u(x) > 0\}} $.

    A fuzzy number can also be described by a parametric form.

    Definition 2.2. [26] A fuzzy number $ u $ in a parametric form is a pair $ (u_l, u_r) $ of functions $ u_l, u_r, 0\le \alpha\le 1 $, which satisfies the following requirements:

    (i) $ u_l(\alpha) $ is a bounded monotonic increasing left continuous function,

    (ii) $ u_r(\alpha) $ is a bounded monotonic decreasing left continuous function,

    (iii) $ u_l(\alpha)\le u_r(\alpha), 0\le \alpha\le 1. $

    A crisp (real) number $ x $ is simply represented by $ (u_l(\alpha), u_r(\alpha)) = (x, x), 0\le \alpha\le 1. $ The fuzzy number space $ \{(u_l(\alpha), u_r(\alpha))\} $ becomes a convex cone $ E^1 $ which could be embedded isomorphically and isometrically into a Banach space (see [26]).

    Definition 2.3.[26] The distance between two arbitrary fuzzy numbers $ u $ and $ v $ is defined as follows:

    $ D(u,v)=supα[0,1]max{|ul,αvl,α|,|ur,αvr,α|}.
    $
    (2.1)

    It is clear that $ (E^1, D) $ is a complete metric space.

    Definition 2.4.[26] Let $ u = (u_l(\alpha), u_r(\alpha)), v = (v_l(\alpha), v_r(\alpha))\in E^1, 0\le \alpha\le 1, $ and $ k\in R. $ Then

    (i) $ u = v $ iff $ u_l(\alpha) = v_l(\alpha), u_r(\alpha) = v_r(\alpha) $,

    (ii) $ u+v = (u_l(\alpha)+v_l(\alpha), u_r(\alpha)+v_r(\alpha)) $,

    (iii) $ u-v = (u_l(\alpha)-v_r(\alpha), u_r(\alpha)-v_l(\alpha)) $,

    (iv) $ ku = \left\{ (kul(α),kur(α)),k0;(kur(α),kul(α)),k<0,

    \right. $

    (v) $ uv = (\min\{u_l(\alpha)v_l(\alpha), u_l(\alpha)v_r(\alpha), u_r(\alpha)v_l(\alpha), u_r(\alpha)v_r(\alpha)\}, \max\{u_l(\alpha)v_l(\alpha), u_l(\alpha)v_r(\alpha), u_r(\alpha)v_l(\alpha), u_r(\alpha)v_r(\alpha)\}) $.

    Definition 2.5. [27] Suppose that $ u, v\in E^1 $ have $ \alpha $-cuts $ [u]^\alpha = [u_{l, \alpha}, u_{r, \alpha}], [v]^\alpha = [v_{l, \alpha}, v_{r, \alpha}] $, with $ 0\notin [v]^\alpha, \forall\alpha\in[0, 1] $. The generation of division (g-division) $ \div_g $ is the operation that calculates the fuzzy number $ s = u\div_g v $ having level cuts $ [s]^\alpha = [s_{l, \alpha}, s_{r, \alpha}] $(here $ {[u]^\alpha}^{-1} = [1/u_{r, \alpha}, 1/u_{l, \alpha}] $) defined by

    $ [s]α=[u]α÷g[v]α{(i)[u]α=[v]α[s]α,or(ii)[v]α=[u]α[s]α1
    $
    (2.2)

    provided that $ s $ is a proper fuzzy number $ s_{l, \alpha} $ is nondecreasing, $ s_{r, \alpha} $ is nonincreasing, $ s_{l, 1}\le s_{r, 1} $.

    Remark 2.1. According to [27], in this paper the fuzzy number is positive, if $ u\div_g v = s\in E^1 $ exists, then the following two cases are possible

    Case I. if $ u_{l, \alpha}v_{r, \alpha}\le u_{r, \alpha}v_{l, \alpha}, \forall\alpha\in[0, 1], $ then $ s_{l, \alpha} = \frac{u_{l, \alpha}}{v_{l, \alpha}}, s_{r, \alpha} = \frac{u_{r, \alpha}}{v_{r, \alpha}}, $

    Case II. if $ u_{l, \alpha}v_{r, \alpha}\ge u_{r, \alpha}v_{l, \alpha}, \forall\alpha\in[0, 1], $ then $ s_{l, \alpha} = \frac{u_{r, \alpha}}{v_{r, \alpha}}, s_{r, \alpha} = \frac{u_{l, \alpha}}{v_{l, \alpha}}. $

    Definition 2.6. [26] A triangular fuzzy number (TFN) denoted by $ A $ is defined as $ (a, b, c) $ where the membership function

    $ A(x) = \left\{ 0,xa;xaba,axb;1,x=b;cxcb,bxc;0,xc.
    \right. $

    The $ \alpha- $cuts of $ A = (a, b, c) $ are described by $ [A]^\alpha = \{x\in R: A(x)\ge \alpha\} = [a+\alpha(b-a), c-\alpha(c-b)] = [A_{l, \alpha}, A_{r, \alpha}] $, $ \alpha\in[0, 1] $, it is clear that $ [A]^\alpha $ are closed interval. A fuzzy number $ A $ is positive if $ \mbox{supp} A\subset(0, \infty). $

    The following proposition is fundamental since it characterizes a fuzzy set through the $ \alpha $-levels.

    Proposition 2.1.[26] If $ \{A^\alpha: \alpha\in[0, 1]\} $ is a compact, convex and not empty subset family of $ R^n $ such that

    (i) $ \overline{\bigcup A^\alpha}\subset A^0. $

    (ii) $ A^{\alpha_2}\subset A^{\alpha_1} $ if $ \alpha_1\le\alpha_2. $

    (iii) $ A^\alpha = \bigcap_{k\ge 1}A^{\alpha_k} $ if $ \alpha_k\uparrow\alpha > 0. $

    Then there is $ u\in E^n (E^n $ denotes $ n $ dimensional fuzzy number space) such that $ [u]^\alpha = A^\alpha $ for all $ \alpha\in(0, 1] $ and $ [u]^0 = \overline{\bigcup_{0 < \alpha\le 1}A^\alpha}\subset A^0. $

    The fuzzy analog of the boundedness and persistence (see [15,16]) is as follows:

    Definition 2.7. A sequence of positive fuzzy numbers $ (x_n) $ is persistence (resp. bounded) if there exists a positive real number $ M $ (resp. $ N $) such that

    $ \mbox{supp}\ x_n\subset[M, \infty) (\mbox{resp}.\ \mbox{supp}\ x_n\subset(0, N]), n = 1, 2, \cdots, $

    A sequence of positive fuzzy numbers $ (x_n) $ is bounded and persistence if there exist positive real numbers $ M, N > 0 $ such that

    $ \mbox{supp}\ x_n\subset[M, N], n = 1, 2, \cdots. $

    A sequence of positive fuzzy numbers $ (x_n), n = 1, 2, \cdots $, is an unbounded if the norm $ \|x_n\|, n = 1, 2, \cdots, $ is an unbounded sequence.

    Definition 2.8. $ x_n $ is a positive solution of (1.1) if $ (x_n) $ is a sequence of positive fuzzy numbers which satisfies (1.1). A positive fuzzy number $ x $ is called a positive equilibrium of (1.1) if

    $ x = Ax+\frac{Bx}{Cx+H}. $

    Let $ (x_n) $ be a sequence of positive fuzzy numbers and $ x $ is a positive fuzzy number, $ x_n \rightarrow x $ as $ n\rightarrow\infty $ if $ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}D(x_n, x) = 0 $.

    Lemma 2.1. [26] Let $ f: R^+\times R^+\times R^+\times R^+\rightarrow R^+ $ be continuous, $ A, B, C, D $ are fuzzy numbers. Then

    $ [f(A,B,C,D)]α=f([A]α,[B]α,[C]α,[D]α),  α(0,1].
    $
    (2.3)

    Firstly we give the existence of positive solutions of discrete-time laser model with fuzzy environment.

    Theorem 3.1. Let parameters $ A, B, C, H $ and initial value $ x_0 $ of discrete-time laser model be fuzzy numbers. Then, for any positive fuzzy number $ x_0 $, there exists a unique positive solution $ x_n $ of discrete-time laser model with initial conditions $ x_0 $.

    Proof. The proof is similar to those of Proposition 2.1 [25]. So we omit the proof of Theorem 3.1.

    Noting Remark 2.1, taking $ \alpha $-cuts, one of the following two cases holds

    Case I

    $ [xn+1]α=[Ln+1,α,Rn+1,α]=[Al,αLn,α+Bl,αLn,αCl,αLn,α+Hl,α,Ar,αRn,α+Br,αRn,αCr,αRn,α+Hr,α]
    $
    (3.1)

    Case II

    $ [xn+1]α=[Ln+1,α,Rn+1,α]=[Al,αLn,α+Br,αRn,αCr,αRn,α+Hr,α,Ar,αRn,α+Bl,αLn,αCl,αLn,α+Hl,α]
    $
    (3.2)

    To study the dynamical behavior of the positive solutions of discrete-time laser model (1.1), according to Definition 2.5, we consider two cases.

    First, if Case I holds true, we need the following lemma.

    Lemma 3.1. Consider the following difference equation

    $ yn+1=ayn+byncyn+h,  n=0,1,,
    $
    (3.3)

    where $ a\in(0, 1), b, c, h\in(0, +\infty), y_0\in(0, +\infty) $, then the following statements are true:

    (i) Every positive solution of (3.3) satisfies

    $ 0<ynbc(1a)+y0.
    $
    (3.4)

    (ii) The equation has a fixed point $ y^* = 0 $ if $ b\le (1-a)h. $

    (iii) The equation has two fixed points $ y^* = 0, y^* = \frac{b}{c(1-a)}-\frac{h}{c} $ if $ b > (1-a)h $.

    Proof. (i) Let $ y_n $ be a positive solution of (3.3). It follows from (3.3) that, for $ n\ge 0, $

    $ 0 \lt y_{n+1} = ay_n+\frac{by_n}{cy_n+h}\le ay_n+\frac{b}{c}. $

    From which we have

    $ 0 \lt y_n\le\frac{b}{c(1-a)}+\left(y_0-\frac{b}{c(1-a)}\right)a^{n+1}\le\frac{b}{c(1-a)}+y_0. $

    This completes the proof of (i).

    If $ y^* $ is fixed point of (3.3), i.e., $ y_n = y^*. $ So from (3.3), we have

    $ y=ay+bycy+h.
    $
    (3.5)

    After some manipulation, from (3.5), we can get

    $ y=0,  y=bc(1a)hc.
    $
    (3.6)

    From (3.3), we can summarized the existence of fixed points as follows

    (ii) If $ b < h(1-a) $, then $ y^* = \frac{b}{c(1-a)}-\frac{h}{c} $ is not a positive number. And hence if $ b\le h(1-a) $ then (3.3) has a fixed point $ y^* = 0 $.

    (iii) If $ b > h(1-a) $, then $ y^* = \frac{b}{c(1-a)}-\frac{h}{c} $ is a positive number. And hence if $ b > h(1-a) $ then (3.3) has two fixed points $ y^* = 0, y^* = \frac{b}{c(1-a)}-\frac{h}{c} $.

    Proposition 3.1. The following statements hold true

    (i) The fixed point $ y^* = 0 $ of (3.3) is stable if $ b < (1-a)h $.

    (ii) The fixed point $ y^* = 0 $ of (3.3) is unstable if $ b > (1-a)h $.

    (iii) The fixed point $ y^* = 0 $ of (3.3) is non-hyperbolic if $ b = (1-a)h $.

    Proof. From (3.3), let

    $ f(y):=ay+bycy+h
    $
    (3.7)

    From (3.7), it follows that

    $ f(y)=a+bh(cy+h)2
    $
    (3.8)

    From (3.8), it can get

    $ |f(y)|y=0|=|a+bh|
    $
    (3.9)

    Therefore from (3.9), it can conclude that $ y^* = 0 $ is stable if $ b < (1-a)h $, unstable if $ b > (1-a)h $, non-hyperbolic if $ b = (1-a)h $.

    Proposition 3.2. The fixed point $ y^* = \frac{b}{c(1-a)}-\frac{h}{c} $ of (3.3) is globally asymptotically stable if $ b > (1-a)h $.

    Proof. From (3.8), it can get

    $ |f(y)|y=bc(1a)hc|=|a+h(1a)2b|.
    $
    (3.10)

    Therefore from (3.10), it can conclude that, if $ a+\frac{h(1-a)^2}{b} < 1 $, i.e., $ b > (1-a)h $ then the fixed point $ y^* = \frac{b}{c(1-a)}-\frac{h}{c} $ is stable.

    On the other hand, it follows from (3.4) that $ (y_n) $ is bounded. And from (3.8), we have $ f'(y) > 0 $. Namely $ (y_n) $ is monotone increasing. So we have

    $ limnyn=y=bc(1a)hc.
    $
    (3.11)

    Therefore the fixed point $ y^* = \frac{b}{c(1-a)}-\frac{h}{c} $ is globally asymptotically stable.

    Proposition 3.3. The fixed point $ y^* = 0 $ of (3.3) is globally asymptotically stable if $ b < (1-a)h $.

    Proof. From (3.3), we can get that

    $ yn+1(a+bh)yn
    $
    (3.12)

    From (3.12), it follows that

    $ y1(a+bh)y0y2(a+bh)2y0yn(a+bh)ny0
    $
    (3.13)

    Since $ b < (1-a)h $, then $ \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}y_n = 0 $. Therefore the fixed point $ y^* = 0 $ of (3.3) is globally asymptotically stable.

    Theorem 3.2. Consider discrete-time laser model (1.1), where $ A, B, C, H $ and initial value $ x_0 $ are positive fuzzy numbers. There exists positive number $ N_A $, $ \forall \alpha\in(0, 1] $, $ A_{r, \alpha} < N_A < 1 $. If

    $ Bl,αLn,αBr,αRn,αCl,αLn,α+Hl,αCr,αRn,α+Hr,α,α(0,1].
    $
    (3.14)

    and

    $ Bl,α<Hl,α(1Al,α),   Br,α<Hr,α(1Ar,α),  α(0,1].
    $
    (3.15)

    Then (1.1) has a fixed point $ x^* = 0 $ which is globally asymptotically stable.

    Proof. Since $ A, B, C, H $ are positive fuzzy numbers and (3.14) holds true, taking $ \alpha $-cuts of model (1.1) on both sides, we can have the following difference equation system with parameters

    $ Ln+1,α=Al,αLn,α+Bl,αLn,αCl,αLn,α+Hl,α,  Rn+1,α=Ar,αRn,α+Br,αRn,αCr,αRn,α+Hr,α.
    $
    (3.16)

    Since (3.15) holds true, using Proposition 3.2, we can get

    $ limnLn,α=0,  limnRn,α=0.
    $
    (3.17)

    On the other hand, let $ x_n = x^* $, where $ [x_n]^\alpha = [L_{n, \alpha}, R_{n, \alpha}] = [L_\alpha, R_\alpha] = [x^*]^\alpha, \alpha\in(0, 1] $, be the fixed point of (1.1). From (3.16), one can get

    $ Lα=Al,αLα+Bl,αLαCl,αLα+Hl,α,  Rα=Ar,αRα+Br,αRαCr,αRα+Hr,α.
    $
    (3.18)

    Since (3.15) is satisfied, from (3.16), it follows that

    $ Lα=0,  Rα=0, limnD(xn,x)=limnsupα(0,1]{max{|Ln,αLα|,|Rn,αRα|}}=0.
    $
    (3.19)

    Therefore, by virtue of Proposition 3.3, the fixed point $ x^* = 0 $ is globally asymptotically stable.

    Theorem 3.3. Consider discrete-time laser model (1.1), where $ A, B, C, H $ and initial value $ x_0 $ are positive fuzzy numbers, there exists positive number $ N_A $, $ \forall \alpha\in(0, 1] $, $ A_{r, \alpha} < N_A < 1 $. If (3.14) holds true, and

    $ Bl,α>Hl,α(1Al,α),   Br,α>Hr,α(1Ar,α),  α(0,1],
    $
    (3.20)

    then the following statements are true.

    (i) Every positive solution of (1.1) is bounded.

    (ii) Equation (1.1) has a unique positive fixed point $ x^* $ which is asymptotically stable.

    Proof. (i) Since $ A, B, C, H $ and $ x_0 $ are positive fuzzy numbers, there exist positive constants $ M_A, N_A, M_B, $ $ N_B, M_C, N_C, M_H, N_H, M_0, N_0 $ such that

    $ {[A]α=[Al,α,Ar,α]¯α(0,1][Al,α,Ar,α][MA,NA][B]α=[Bl,α,Br,α]¯α(0,1][Bl,α,Br,α][MB,NB][C]α=[Cl,α,Cr,α]¯α(0,1][Cl,α,Cr,α][MC,NC][H]α=[Hl,α,Hr,α]¯α(0,1][Hl,α,Hr,α][MH,NH][x0]α=[L0,α,R0,α]¯α(0,1][L0,α,R0,α][M0,N0]
    $
    (3.21)

    Using (i) of Lemma 3.1, we can get that

    $ 0<LnBl,αCl,α(1Al,α)+L0,α,  0<RnBr,αCr,α(1Ar,α)+R0,α.
    $
    (3.22)

    From (3.21) and (3.22), we have that for $ \alpha\in(0, 1] $

    $ [Ln,α,Rn,α][0,N], n1.
    $
    (3.23)

    where $ N = \frac{N_B}{M_C(1-N_A)}+N_0. $ From (3.22), we have for $ n\ge 1, \bigcup_{\alpha\in(0, 1]}[L_{n, \alpha}, R_{n, \alpha}]\subset (0, N] $, so $ \overline{\bigcup_{\alpha\in(0, 1]}[L_{n, \alpha}, R_{n, \alpha}]}\subset (0, N]. $ Thus the proof of (i) is completed.

    (ii) We consider system (3.18), then the positive solution of (3.18) is given by

    $ Lα=Bl,αCl,α(1Al,α)Hl,αCl,α, Rα=Br,αCr,α(1Ar,α)Hr,αCr,α,α(0,1].
    $
    (3.24)

    Let $ x_n $ be a positive solution of (1.1) such that $ [x_n]^\alpha = [L_{n, \alpha}, R_{n, \alpha}], \alpha\in(0, 1], n = 0, 1, 2, \cdots. $ Then applying Proposition 3.2 to system (3.16), we have

    $ limnLn,α=Lα,   limnRn,α=Rα
    $
    (3.25)

    From (3.23) and (3.25), we have, for $ 0 < \alpha_1 < \alpha_2 < 1, $

    $ 0<Lα1Lα2Rα2Rα1.
    $
    (3.26)

    Since $ A_{l, \alpha}, A_{r, \alpha}, B_{l, \alpha}, B_{r, \alpha}, C_{l, \alpha}, C_{r, \alpha}, H_{l, \alpha}, H_{r, \alpha} $ are left continuous. It follows from (3.24) that $ L_\alpha, R_\alpha $ are also left continuous.

    From (3.21) and (3.24), it follows that

    $ c=MBNC(1MA)NHMCLαRαNBMA(1NA)MHNC=d.
    $
    (3.27)

    Therefore (3.27) implies that $ [L_\alpha, R_\alpha]\subset[c, d], $ and so $ \bigcup_{\alpha\in(0, 1]}[L_\alpha, R_\alpha]\subset[c, d]. $ It is clear that

    $ α(0,1][Lα,Rα] is  compact and α(0,1][Lα,Rα](0,).
    $
    (3.28)

    So from Definition 2.2, (3.24), (3.26), (3.28) and since $ L_\alpha, R_\alpha, \alpha\in(0, 1] $ determine a fuzzy number $ x^* $ such that

    $ x=Ax+BxCx+H,  [x]α=[Lα,Rα], α(0,1].
    $
    (3.29)

    Suppose that there exists another positive fixed point $ \bar{x} $ of (1.1), then there exist functions $ \overline{L}_\alpha, \overline{R}_\alpha: (0, 1)\rightarrow(0, \infty) $ such that

    $ \bar{x} = A\bar{x}+\frac{B\bar{x}}{C\bar{x}+H}, \ \ [x]^\alpha = [\overline{L}_\alpha, \overline{R}_\alpha], \ \alpha\in(0, 1]. $

    From which we have

    $ \overline{L}_{\alpha} = A_{l, \alpha}\overline{L}_{\alpha}+\frac{B_{l, \alpha}\overline{L}_{\alpha}}{C_{l, \alpha}\overline{L}_{\alpha}+H_{l, \alpha}}, \ \ \overline{R}_{\alpha} = A_{r, \alpha}\overline{R}_{\alpha}+\frac{B_{r, \alpha}\overline{R}_{\alpha}}{C_{r, \alpha}\overline{R}_{\alpha}+H_{r, \alpha}}. $

    So $ \overline{L}_\alpha = L_\alpha, \overline{R}_\alpha = R_\alpha, \alpha\in(0, 1] $. Hence $ \bar{x} = x^* $, namely $ x^* $ is a unique positive fixed point of (1.1).

    From (3.25), we have

    $ limnD(xn,x)=limnsupα(0,1]max{|Ln,αLα|,|Rn,αRα|}=0.
    $
    (3.30)

    Namely, every positive solution $ x_n $ of (1.1) converges the unique fixed point $ x^* $ with respect to $ D $ as $ n\rightarrow\infty. $ Applying Proposition 3.2, it can obtain that the positive fixed point $ x^* $ is globally asymptotically stable.

    Secondly, if Case II holds true, it follows that for $ n\in\{0, 1, 2, \cdots\}, \alpha\in(0, 1] $

    $ Ln+1,α=Al,αLn,α+Br,αRn,αCr,αRn,α+Hr,α,  Rn+1,α==Ar,αRn,α+Bl,αLn,αCl,αLn,α+Hl,α
    $
    (3.31)

    We need the following lemma.

    Lemma 3.2. Consider the system of difference equations

    $ yn+1=a1yn+b2znc2zn+h2,  zn+1=a2zn+b1ync1yn+h1,  n=0,1,,
    $
    (3.32)

    where $ a_i\in(0, 1), b_i, c_i, h_i\in(0, +\infty) (i = 1, 2), y_0, z_0\in(0, +\infty) $. If

    $ a1+a2<1.
    $
    (3.33)

    and

    $ b1b2>h1h2(1a1)(1a2).
    $
    (3.34)

    Then the following statements are true.

    (i) Every positive solution $ (y_n, z_n) $ of (3.32) satisfy

    $ 0<ynb2(1a1)c2+y0,   0<znb1(1a2)c1+z0.
    $
    (3.35)

    (ii) System (3.32) has fixed point $ (y, z) = (0, 0) $ which is asymptotically stable.

    (iii) System (3.32) has a unique fixed point

    $ y=(1a2)Kb1c2+h2c1(1a2),z=(1a1)Kb2c1+h1c2(1a1),
    $
    (3.36)

    where $ K = \frac{b_1b_2-h_1h_2(1-a_1)(1-a_2)}{(1-a_1)(1-a_2)}. $

    Proof. (i) Let $ (y_n, z_n) $ be a positive solution of (3.32). It follows from (3.32) that, for $ n\ge 0 $,

    $ 0 \lt y_{n+1} = a_1y_n+\frac{b_2z_n}{c_2z_n+h_2}\le a_1y_n+\frac{b_2}{c_2}, \ \ 0 \lt z_{n+1} = a_2z_n+\frac{b_1y_n}{c_1y_n+h_1}\le a_2z_n+\frac{b_1}{c_1}. $

    From which, we have

    $ \left\{ 0<ynb2c2(1a1)+(y0b2c2(1a1))an1b2c2(1a1)+y00<znb1c1(1a2)+(z0b1c1(1a2))an2b1c1(1a2)+z0.
    \right. $

    This completes the proof of (i).

    (ii) It is clear that $ (0, 0) $ is a fixed point of (3.32). We can obtain that the linearized system of (3.32) about the fixed point $ (0, 0) $ is

    $ Xn+1=D1Xn,
    $
    (3.37)

    where $ X_n = (x_n, y_n)^T $ and

    $ D_1 = \left( a1b2c2b1h1a2
    \right). $

    Thus the characteristic equation of (3.37) is

    $ λ2(a1+a2)λ+a1a2b1b2h1h2=0.
    $
    (3.38)

    Since (3.33) and (3.34) hold true, we have

    $ a1+a2+a1a2b1b2h1h2<a1+q2+a1a2(1a1)(1a2)<1
    $
    (3.39)

    By virtue of Theorem 1.3.7 [28], we obtain that the fixed point $ (0, 0) $ is asymptotically stable.

    (iii) Let $ (y_n, z_n) = (y, z) $ be fixed point of (3.32). We consider the following system

    $ y=a1y+b1zc1z+h1,   z=a2z+b2yc2y+h2.
    $
    (3.40)

    It is clear that the positive fixed point $ (y, z) $ can be written by (3.36).

    Theorem 3.4. Consider the difference Eq (1.1), where $ A, B, C, H $ are positive fuzzy numbers. There exists positive number $ N_A, \forall \alpha\in(0, 1], A_{r, \alpha} < N_A < 1. $ If

    $ Bl,αLn,αBr,αRn,αCl,αLn,α+Hl,αCr,αRn,α+Hr,α,α(0,1],
    $
    (3.41)
    $ Al,α+Ar,α<1,α(0,1],
    $
    (3.42)

    and

    $ Bl,αBr,α>Hl,αHr,α(1Al,α)(1Ar,α),α(0,1].
    $
    (3.43)

    Then the following statements are true

    (i) Every positive solution of (1.1) is bounded.

    (ii) The Eq (1.1) has a fixed point $ 0 $ which is globally asymptotically stable.

    (iii) The Eq (1.1) has a unique positive fixed point $ x $ such that

    $ [x]^\alpha = [L_\alpha, R_\alpha], \ L_\alpha = \frac{(1-A_{r, \alpha})K_\alpha}{B_{l, \alpha}C_{r, \alpha}+H_{r, \alpha}C_{l, \alpha}(1-A_{r, \alpha})}, R_\alpha = \frac{(1-A_{l, \alpha})K_\alpha}{B_{r, \alpha}C_{l, \alpha}+H_{l, \alpha}C_{r, \alpha}(1-A_{l, \alpha})}, $

    where

    $ Kα=Bl,αBr,αHl,αHr,α(1Al,α)(1Ar,α)(1Al,α)(1Ar,α).
    $
    (3.44)

    Proof. (i) Let $ x_n $ be a positive solution of (1.1). Applying (i) of Lemma 3.2, we have

    $ 0<LnBr,α(1Al,α)Cr,α+L0,α,  0<RnBl,α(1Ar,α)Cl,α+R0,α.
    $
    (3.45)

    Next, the proof is similar to (i) of Theorem 3.3. So we omit it.

    (ii) The proof is similar to those of Theorem 3.2. We omit it.

    (iii) Let $ x_n = x $ be a fixed point of (1.1), then

    $ x=Ax+BxCx+H.
    $
    (3.46)

    Taking $ \alpha $-cuts on both sides of (3.46), since (3.41) holds true, one gets the following system

    $ Lα=Al,αLα+Br,αRαCr,αRα+Hr,α,  Rα=Ar,αRα+Bl,αLαCl,αLα+Hl,α,  α(0,1].
    $
    (3.47)

    From which we obtain that

    $ Lα=(1Ar,α)KαBl,αCr,α+Hr,αCl,α(1Ar,α),Rα=(1Al,α)KαBr,αCl,α+Hl,αCr,α(1Al,α),
    $
    (3.48)

    Next, we can show that $ L_\alpha, R_\alpha $ constitute a positive fuzzy number $ x $ such that $ [x]^\alpha = [L_\alpha, R_\alpha], \alpha\in(0, 1]. $ The proof is similar to (ii) of Theorem 3.3. We omit it.

    Remark 3.1. In dynamical system model, the parameters of model derived from statistic data with vagueness or uncertainty. It corresponds to reality to use fuzzy parameters in dynamical system model. Compared with classic discrete time laser model, the solution of discrete time fuzzy laser model is within a range of value (approximate value), which are taken into account fuzzy uncertainties. Furthermore the global asymptotic behaviour of discrete time laser model are obtained in fuzzy context. The results obtained is generation of discrete time Beverton-Holt population model with fuzzy environment [25].

    In this section, we give two numerical examples to verify the effectiveness of theoretic results obtained.

    Example 4.1. Consider the following fuzzy discrete time laser model

    $ xn+1=Axn+BxnCxn+H, n=0,1,,
    $
    (4.1)

    we take $ A, B, C, H $ and the initial values $ x_0 $ such that

    $ A(x)={10x4,0.4x0.510x+6,0.5x0.6,B(x)={5x4,0.8x15x+6,1x1.2
    $
    (4.2)
    $ C(x)={2x2,1x1.52x+4,1.5x2,H(x)={2x6,3x3.52x+8,3.5x4
    $
    (4.3)
    $ x0(x)={x6,6x7x+8,7x8
    $
    (4.4)

    From (4.2), we get

    $ [A]α=[0.4+110α,0.6110α], [B]α=[0.8+15α,1.215α], α(0,1].
    $
    (4.5)

    From (4.3) and (4.4), we get

    $ [C]α=[1+12α,212α],  [H]α=[3+12α,412α],[x0]α=[6+α,8α], α(0,1].
    $
    (4.6)

    Therefore, it follows that

    $ ¯α(0,1][A]α=[0.4,0.6], ¯α(0,1][B]α=[0.8,1.2], ¯α(0,1][C]α=[1,2],¯α(0,1][H]α=[3,4].¯α(0,1][x0]α=[6,8].
    $
    (4.7)

    From (4.1), it results in a coupled system of difference equations with parameter $ \alpha, $

    $ Ln+1,α=Al,αLn,α+Bl,αLn,αCl,αLn,α+Hl,α,  Rn+1,α=Ar,αRn,α+Br,αRn,αCr,αRn,α+Hr,α, α(0,1].
    $
    (4.8)

    Therefore, it is clear that $ A_{r, \alpha} < 1, \forall\alpha\in(0, 1], $ (3.14) and (3.15) hold true. so from Theorem 3.2, we have that every positive solution $ x_n $ of Eq (4.1) is bounded In addition, from Theorem 3.2, Eq (4.1) has a fixed point $ 0 $. Moreover every positive solution $ x_n $ of Eq (4.1) converges the fixed point $ 0 $ with respect to $ D $ as $ n\rightarrow \infty. $ (see Figures 13).

    Figure 1.  The Dynamics of system (4.8).
    Figure 2.  The solution of system (4.8) at $ \alpha = 0 $ and $ \alpha = 0.25 $.
    Figure 3.  The solution of system (4.8) at $ \alpha = 0.75 $ and $ \alpha = 1 $.

    Example 4.2. Consider the following fuzzy discrete time laser model (4.1). where $ A, C, H $ and the initial values $ x_0 $ are same as Example 4.1.

    $ B(x)={x2,2x3x+4,3x4
    $
    (4.9)

    From (4.9), we get

    $ [B]α=[2+α,4α],
    $
    (4.10)

    Therefore, it follows that

    $ ¯α(0,1][B]α=[2,4],α(0,1].
    $
    (4.11)

    It is clear that (3.20) is satisfied, so from Theorem 3.3, Eq (4.1) has a unique positive equilibrium $ \overline{x} = (0.341, 1.667, 3) $. Moreover every positive solution $ x_n $ of Eq (4.1) converges the unique equilibrium $ \overline{x} $ with respect to $ D $ as $ n\rightarrow \infty. $ (see Figures 46)

    Figure 4.  The Dynamics of system (4.8).
    Figure 5.  The solution of system (4.8) at $ \alpha = 0 $ and $ \alpha = 0.25 $.
    Figure 6.  The solution of system (4.8) at $ \alpha = 0.75 $ and $ \alpha = 1 $.

    In this work, according to a generalization of division (g-division) of fuzzy number, we study the fuzzy discrete time laser model $ x_{n+1} = Ax_n+\frac{Bx_{n}}{Cx_{n}+H} $. The existence of positive solution and qualitative behavior to (1.1) are investigated. The main results are as follows

    (i) Under Case I, the positive solution is bounded if $ B_{l, \alpha} < H_{l, \alpha}(1-A_{l, \alpha}), B_{r, \alpha} < H_{r, \alpha}(1-A_{r, \alpha}), \alpha\in(0, 1] $. Moreover system (1.1) has a fixed point $ 0 $ which is globally asymptotically stable. Otherwise, if $ B_{l, \alpha}\ge H_{l, \alpha}(1-A_{l, \alpha}), B_{r, \alpha}\ge H_{r, \alpha}(1-A_{r, \alpha}), \alpha\in(0, 1] $. Then system (1.1) has a unique positive fixed point $ x^* $ which is asymptotically stable.

    (ii) Under Case II, if $ A_{l, \alpha}+A_{r, \alpha} < 1 $ and $ B_{l, \alpha}B_{r, \alpha} > H_{l, \alpha}H_{r, \alpha}(1-A_{l, \alpha})(1-A_{r, \alpha}), \alpha\in(0, 1] $, then the positive solution is bounded. Moreover system (1.1) has a unique positive fixed point $ x $ and fixed point $ 0 $ which is global asymptotically stable.

    The authors would like to thank the Editor and the anonymous Reviewers for their helpful comments and valuable suggestions to improve the paper. The work is partially supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (11761018), Scientific Research Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Department of Science and Technology([2020]1Y008, [2019]1051), Priority Projects of Science Foundation at Guizhou University of Finance and Economics (2018XZD02), and Scientific Climbing Programme of Xiamen University of Technology(XPDKQ20021).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

    [1] Zajchowski DA,Kauser K,Zhu D,et al. (2000) Identification of selective estrogen receptor modulators by their gene expression fingerprints. J Biol Chem 275: 15885-15894. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M909865199
    [2] Simons Jr. SS (2003) The importance of being varied in steroid receptor transactivation. TIPS 24: 253-259.
    [3] Johnson AB,O'Malley BW (2012) Steroid receptor coactivators 1,2,and 3: Critical regulators of nuclear receptor activity and steroid receptor modulator (SRM)-based cancer therapy. Mol Cell Endocrinol 348: 430-439. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2011.04.021
    [4] Shang Y,Brown M (2002) Molecular determinants for the tissue specificity of SERMs. Science 295: 2465-2468. doi: 10.1126/science.1068537
    [5] Zalachoras I,Houtman R,Atucha E,et al. (2013) Differential targeting of brain stress circuits with a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 7910-7915. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219411110
    [6] MacGregor JI,Jordan VC (1998) Basic guide to the mechanisms of antiestrogen action. Pharmacol Rev 50: 151-196.
    [7] Ojasoo T,Dore J-C,Gilbert J,Raynaud J-P (1988) Binding of steroids to the progestin and glucocorticoid receptors analyzed by correspondence analysis. J Med Chem 31: 1160-1169. doi: 10.1021/jm00401a015
    [8] Szapary D,Xu M,Simons Jr. SS (1996) Induction properties of a transiently transfected glucocorticoid-responsive gene vary with glucocorticoid receptor concentration. J Biol Chem 271: 30576-30582. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.48.30576
    [9] Wang Q,Blackford Jr. JA,Song L-N,et al. (2004) Equilibrium interactions of corepressors and coactivators modulate the properties of agonist and antagonist complexes of glucocorticoid receptors. Mol Endocrinol 18: 1376-1395. doi: 10.1210/me.2003-0421
    [10] Simons Jr. SS,Edwards DP,Kumar R (2014) Minireview: dynamic structures of nuclear hormone receptors: new promises and challenges. Mol Endocrinol 28: 173-182. doi: 10.1210/me.2013-1334
    [11] Simons Jr. SS (2008) What goes on behind closed doors: physiological versus pharmacological steroid hormone actions. Bioessays 30: 744-756. doi: 10.1002/bies.20792
    [12] Cho S,Blackford Jr. JA,Simons Jr. SS (2005) Role of activation function domain 1,DNA binding,and coactivator in the expression of partial agonist activity of glucocorticoid receptor complexes. Biochemistry 44: 3547-3561. doi: 10.1021/bi048777i
    [13] Cho S,Kagan BL,Blackford Jr. JA,et al. (2005) Glucocorticoid receptor ligand binding domain is sufficient for the modulation of glucocorticoid induction properties by homologous receptors,coactivator transcription intermediary factor 2,and Ubc9. Mol Endo 19: 290-311. doi: 10.1210/me.2004-0134
    [14] Raynaud JP,Bouton MM,Ojasoo T (1980) The use of interaction kinetics to distinguish potential antagonists from agonists. TIPS 324-327.
    [15] Sistare FD,Hager GL,Simons Jr. SS (1987) Mechanism of dexamethasone 21-mesylate antiglucocorticoid action: I. Receptor-antiglucocorticoid complexes do not competitively inhibit receptor-glucocorticoid complex activation of gene transcription in vivo. Mol Endocrinol 1: 648-658.
    [16] Miller PA,Simons Jr. SS (1988) Comparison of glucocorticoid receptors in two rat hepatoma cell lines with different sensitivities to glucocorticoids and antiglucocorticoids. Endocrinology 122: 2990-2998. doi: 10.1210/endo-122-6-2990
    [17] Nagy L,Schwabe JW (2004) Mechanism of the nuclear receptor molecular switch. Trends Biochem Sci 29: 317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2004.04.006
    [18] Szapary D,Huang Y,Simons Jr. SS (1999) Opposing effects of corepressor and coactivators in determining the dose-response curve of agonists,and residual agonist activity of antagonists,for glucocorticoid receptor regulated gene expression. Mol Endocrinol 13: 2108-2121. doi: 10.1210/mend.13.12.0384
    [19] Shiau AK,Barstad D,Radek JT,et al. (2002) Structural characterization of a subtype-selective ligand reveals a novel mode of estrogen receptor antagonism. Nat Struct Biol 9: 359-364.
    [20] Tao Y-G,Xu Y,Xu HE,et al. (2008) Mutations of glucocorticoid receptor differentially affect AF2 domain activity in a steroid-selective manner to alter the potency and efficacy of gene induction and repression. Biochemistry 47: 7648-7662. doi: 10.1021/bi800472w
    [21] Lee G-S,Simons Jr. SS (2011) Ligand binding domain mutations of glucocorticoid receptor selectively modify effects with,but not binding of,cofactors. Biochemistry 50: 356-366. doi: 10.1021/bi101792d
    [22] Ong KM,Blackford Jr. JA,Kagan BL,et al. (2010) A theoretical framework for gene induction and experimental comparisons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 7107-7112. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911095107
    [23] Dougherty EJ,Guo C,Simons Jr. SS,et al. (2012) Deducing the temporal order of cofactor function in ligand-regulated gene transcription: theory and experimental verification. PLoS ONE 7: e30225.
    [24] Blackford Jr. JA,Guo C,Zhu R,et al. (2012) Identification of Location and Kinetically Defined Mechanism of Cofactors and Reporter Genes in the Cascade of Steroid-regulated Transactivation. J Biol Chem 287: 40982-40995. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.414805
    [25] Luo M,Lu X,Zhu R,et al. (2013) A Conserved Protein Motif Is Required for Full Modulatory Activity of Negative Elongation Factor Subunits NELF-A and NELF-B in Modifying Glucocorticoid Receptor-regulated Gene Induction Properties. J Biol Chem 288: 34055-34072. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.512426
    [26] Zhang Z,Sun Y,Cho Y-W,et al. (2013) PA1: a new competitive decelerator acting at more than one step to impede glucocorticoid receptor-mediated transactivation. J Biol Chem 288: 42-58. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.427740
    [27] Zhu R,Lu X,Pradhan M,et al. (2014) A kinase-independent activity of Cdk9 modulates glucocorticoid receptor-mediated gene induction. Biochemistry 53: 1753-1767. doi: 10.1021/bi5000178
    [28] Chow CC,Finn KK,Storchan GB,L et al. (2015) Kinetically-defined component actions in gene repression. PLoS Comput Biol 11: e1004122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004122
    [29] Perissi V,Rosenfeld MG (2005) Controlling nuclear receptors: the circular logic of cofactor cycles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 542-554. doi: 10.1038/nrm1680
    [30] Pons M,Simons Jr. SS (1981) Facile,high yield synthesis of spiro C-17-steroidal oxetan-3'-ones. J Org Chem 46: 3262-3264. doi: 10.1021/jo00329a024
    [31] Kaul S,Blackford Jr. JA,Chen J,et al. (2000) Properties of the glucocorticoid modulatory element binding proteins GMEB-1 and -2: potential new modifiers of glucocorticoid receptor transactivation and members of the family of KDWK proteins. Mol Endocrinol 14: 1010-1027. doi: 10.1210/mend.14.7.0494
    [32] He Y,Simons Jr. SS (2007) STAMP: a novel predicted factor assisting TIF2 actions in glucocorticoid receptor-mediated induction and repression. Mol Cell Biol 27: 1467-1485. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01360-06
    [33] Kaul S,Blackford Jr. JA,Cho S,et al. (2002) Ubc9 is a novel modulator of the induction properties of glucocorticoid receptors. J Biol Chem 277: 12541-12549. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112330200
    [34] Simons Jr. SS,Thompson EB (1981) Dexamethasone 21-mesylate: an affinity label of glucocorticoid receptors from rat hepatoma tissue culture cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 3541-3545. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3541
    [35] Stromstedt P-E,Berkenstam A,Jornvall H,et al. (1990) Radiosequence analysis of the human progestin receptor charged with [3H]promegestone. A comparison with the glucocorticoid receptor. J Biol Chem 265: 12973-12977.
    [36] Luo M,Simons Jr. SS (2009) Modulation of glucocorticoid receptor induction properties by cofactors in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Hum Immunol 70: 785-789. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.07.029
    [37] Blackford Jr. JA,Brimacombe KR,Dougherty EJ,et al. (2014) Modulators of glucocorticoid receptor activity identified by a new high-throughput screening assay. Mol Endocrinol 28: 1194-1206. doi: 10.1210/me.2014-1069
    [38] Simons Jr. SS,Kumar R (2013) Variable steroid receptor responses: Intrinsically disordered AF1 is the key. Mol Cell Endocrinol 376: 81-84. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2013.06.007
    [39] Kim Y,Sun Y,Chow C,et al. (2006) Effects of acetylation,polymerase phosphorylation,and DNA unwinding in glucocorticoid receptor transactivation. J Steroid Biochem Molec Biol 100: 3-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.03.003
    [40] Giannoukos G,Szapary D,Smith CL,et al. (2001) New antiprogestins with partial agonist activity: potential selective progesterone receptor modulators (SPRMs) and probes for receptor- and coregulator-induced changes in progesterone receptor induction properties. Mol Endocrinol 15: 255-270. doi: 10.1210/mend.15.2.0596
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Ali Zia, Abdelwahed Khamis, James Nichols, Usman Bashir Tayab, Zeeshan Hayder, Vivien Rolland, Eric Stone, Lars Petersson, Topological deep learning: a review of an emerging paradigm, 2024, 57, 1573-7462, 10.1007/s10462-024-10710-9
    2. Zisheng Ouyang, Zhen Chen, Xuewei Zhou, Zhongzhe Ouyang, Imported risk in global financial markets: Evidence from cross-market connectedness, 2025, 10629408, 102374, 10.1016/j.najef.2025.102374
    3. Yue Liu, Lichang Zhang, Pierre Failler, Zirui Wang, The Dynamic Evolution of Agricultural Trade Network Structures and Its Influencing Factors: Evidence from Global Soybean Trade, 2025, 13, 2079-8954, 279, 10.3390/systems13040279
    4. Mohosin Islam Palash, Samia Rahman Misty, Mohammad Shafiul Alam, 2024, Automated Recognition of Harmonic Patterns in Candlestick Chart: A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches, 979-8-3315-1909-4, 551, 10.1109/ICCIT64611.2024.11022580
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2015 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5614) PDF downloads(1079) Cited by(5)

Figures and Tables

Figures(3)  /  Tables(4)

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog