Loading [MathJax]/jax/output/SVG/jax.js
Review

Small hydrophobic viral proteins involved in intercellular movement of diverse plant virus genomes

  • Received: 23 July 2020 Accepted: 13 September 2020 Published: 21 September 2020
  • Most plant viruses code for movement proteins (MPs) targeting plasmodesmata to enable cell-to-cell and systemic spread in infected plants. Small membrane-embedded MPs have been first identified in two viral transport gene modules, triple gene block (TGB) coding for an RNA-binding helicase TGB1 and two small hydrophobic proteins TGB2 and TGB3 and double gene block (DGB) encoding two small polypeptides representing an RNA-binding protein and a membrane protein. These findings indicated that movement gene modules composed of two or more cistrons may encode the nucleic acid-binding protein and at least one membrane-bound movement protein. The same rule was revealed for small DNA-containing plant viruses, namely, viruses belonging to genus Mastrevirus (family Geminiviridae) and the family Nanoviridae. In multi-component transport modules the nucleic acid-binding MP can be viral capsid protein(s), as in RNA-containing viruses of the families Closteroviridae and Potyviridae. However, membrane proteins are always found among MPs of these multicomponent viral transport systems. Moreover, it was found that small membrane MPs encoded by many viruses can be involved in coupling viral replication and cell-to-cell movement. Currently, the studies of evolutionary origin and functioning of small membrane MPs is regarded as an important pre-requisite for understanding of the evolution of the existing plant virus transport systems. This paper represents the first comprehensive review which describes the whole diversity of small membrane MPs and presents the current views on their role in plant virus movement.

    Citation: Sergey Y. Morozov, Andrey G. Solovyev. Small hydrophobic viral proteins involved in intercellular movement of diverse plant virus genomes[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(3): 305-329. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020019

    Related Papers:

    [1] Kenneth H. Karlsen, Süleyman Ulusoy . On a hyperbolic Keller-Segel system with degenerate nonlinear fractional diffusion. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11(1): 181-201. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.181
    [2] José Antonio Carrillo, Yingping Peng, Aneta Wróblewska-Kamińska . Relative entropy method for the relaxation limit of hydrodynamic models. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2020, 15(3): 369-387. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020023
    [3] Piotr Biler, Grzegorz Karch, Jacek Zienkiewicz . Morrey spaces norms and criteria for blowup in chemotaxis models. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2016, 11(2): 239-250. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2016.11.239
    [4] Panpan Xu, Yongbin Ge, Lin Zhang . High-order finite difference approximation of the Keller-Segel model with additional self- and cross-diffusion terms and a logistic source. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(4): 1471-1492. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023065
    [5] Steinar Evje, Kenneth H. Karlsen . Hyperbolic-elliptic models for well-reservoir flow. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1(4): 639-673. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.639
    [6] Raul Borsche, Axel Klar, T. N. Ha Pham . Nonlinear flux-limited models for chemotaxis on networks. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(3): 381-401. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017017
    [7] Avner Friedman . PDE problems arising in mathematical biology. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2012, 7(4): 691-703. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2012.7.691
    [8] Hirotada Honda . Global-in-time solution and stability of Kuramoto-Sakaguchi equation under non-local Coupling. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2017, 12(1): 25-57. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2017002
    [9] Caihong Gu, Yanbin Tang . Global solution to the Cauchy problem of fractional drift diffusion system with power-law nonlinearity. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2023, 18(1): 109-139. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2023005
    [10] Stefan Berres, Ricardo Ruiz-Baier, Hartmut Schwandt, Elmer M. Tory . An adaptive finite-volume method for a model of two-phase pedestrian flow. Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2011, 6(3): 401-423. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2011.6.401
  • Most plant viruses code for movement proteins (MPs) targeting plasmodesmata to enable cell-to-cell and systemic spread in infected plants. Small membrane-embedded MPs have been first identified in two viral transport gene modules, triple gene block (TGB) coding for an RNA-binding helicase TGB1 and two small hydrophobic proteins TGB2 and TGB3 and double gene block (DGB) encoding two small polypeptides representing an RNA-binding protein and a membrane protein. These findings indicated that movement gene modules composed of two or more cistrons may encode the nucleic acid-binding protein and at least one membrane-bound movement protein. The same rule was revealed for small DNA-containing plant viruses, namely, viruses belonging to genus Mastrevirus (family Geminiviridae) and the family Nanoviridae. In multi-component transport modules the nucleic acid-binding MP can be viral capsid protein(s), as in RNA-containing viruses of the families Closteroviridae and Potyviridae. However, membrane proteins are always found among MPs of these multicomponent viral transport systems. Moreover, it was found that small membrane MPs encoded by many viruses can be involved in coupling viral replication and cell-to-cell movement. Currently, the studies of evolutionary origin and functioning of small membrane MPs is regarded as an important pre-requisite for understanding of the evolution of the existing plant virus transport systems. This paper represents the first comprehensive review which describes the whole diversity of small membrane MPs and presents the current views on their role in plant virus movement.


    Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a contagious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The virus was first identified in Wuhan, China, in December 2019, and it quickly spread to other parts of mainland China and many other countries [1][6]. Due to the rapid spread of the virus with consequences worldwide, the World Health Organization (WHO) declared a public health emergency of international concern on January 30, 2020, and a pandemic on March 11, 2020 [7],[8]. The transmission of COVID-19 has become a global health threat. As of April 17, 2020, there was a total of 2,230,439 COVID-19 cases reported worldwide, with 150,810 deaths and 564,210 recovered cases [9]. According to the WHO's COVID-19 global report, over 21.2 million people had been infected with the virus as of August 16, 2020, with over 761,779 deaths [10]. Moreover, till October 14, 2021, more than 239,426,728 cases of infection and at least 4,878,373 deaths have been confirmed in Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, Oceania, South America and Antarctica. This has become one of the deadliest pandemics in history according to the Center for Systems Science and Engineering (CSSE) at Johns Hopkins University (JHU) [11].

    Studying and analyzing complex infectious disease models are difficult tasks and require some computational tools and mathematical approaches. In systems biology, mathematical presentations and computational simulations are effective tools and will help further understanding and future predictions about model dynamics. The models of COVID-19 are complicated, and they are required some mathematical tools to improve interventions and healthcare strategies. Recently, several studies about COVID-19 were suggested based on mathematical tools and computational simulations to understand this pandemic and its control approaches. In [12][14], the SEIR model was modified by several researchers to understand the impacts of social distancing, rapid testing, vaccination and contaminated objects in controlling the spread of COVID-19. One of the most important key elements in the spreading of COVID-19 is the basic reproduction number (also called basic reproductive ratio). This quantity, denoted by R0, represents the number of secondary infections induced by a single primary infection in a population where everyone is susceptible [15]. According to developed techniques of mathematical epidemiology models, R0 plays an important role for understanding epidemiological ideas and identifying key critical parameters for such models, and R0 may have different values for reported cases of coronavirus. According to a published study, the basic reproduction number was computed using incidence data in the city of Jakarta from March 3, 2020, to May 10, 2020. The median value of R0 was about 1.75 during the first interval. After the rigorous social distancing implemented, this value was about 1.22. In addition, the basic reproduction number has been calculated for different infectious disease models. Consequently, this quantity was calculated for a mathematical model of the CD8+ T-cell response to human T cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type I (HTLV-I) infection, given in [16].

    According to published studies given in [14],[17],[18], the concept of sensitivity analysis has been presented to detect model sensitive parameters, including local sensitivities for each model state with respect to model parameters. Such sensitivities are computed by using three different methods: non-normalization, half-normalization and full-normalization. Accordingly, there was another method of sensitivity analysis given in [19]. They suggested the partial rank correlation coefficient (PRCC) technique to determine how the glioma-immune model output is affected by changes in specific parameter values.

    Optimal control analysis is another effective method to identify the model critical parameters and to suggest control strategies. This technique has been used with the COVID-19 pandemic for deriving control policies. Recently, this technique has been used to find some control strategies for the COVID-19 pandemic in Indonesia, given in [20]. Then, there was a study about mathematical modeling with optimal control analysis for the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic with a case study of Brazil and cost-effectiveness; this was given in [21]. More recently, there was another approach that suggested a mathematical model with optimal control to highlight the negative impact of quarantine on diabetic people, with cost-effectiveness, presented in [22]. The reader can also find more relevant works about different approaches and mathematical models of the COVID-19 pandemic and its control strategies in [23][29].

    Although there are many mathematical models that have been suggested for prediction of the COVID-19 pandemic, such models can be further improved and analyzed in terms of real data. Calculating the basic reproduction number with local sensitivities can improve the model outcomes further. An issue that has not been considered enough is elasticity of basic reproduction number with respect to model parameters. This helps us to identify the most critical model parameters in spreading this disease. Another issue of modeling such phenomena is validating the model results. Therefore, comparing the model predictions with real data can also indicate the accuracy and reliability of such models.

    Estimating the model initial parameters for the suggested SEIR model is an important step forward in this study compared to the other existing studies about the confirmed cases of COVID-19 in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Therefore, we suggest the Metropolis–Hastings (MH) algorithm to estimate such model parameters, and then we use them in computational simulations. Such estimated parameters can also provide a good agreement between the model results and the daily infected cases. Another novelty here is the data collection of COVID-19 infected cases in the area that provides the future predictions and interventions. Accordingly, we have collected the daily confirmed cases of COVID-19 from January 10, 2021, to March 22, 2021. The collected real data here give us a great understanding about this disease in the area and suggested more interventions and strategies to control this pandemic. Interestingly, identifying the critical model parameters based on sensitivity and elasticity methods becomes another novelty for the suggested SEIR model.

    This paper has some contributions. The main contribution is suggesting the simplified SEIR model for COVID-19 disease to predict the spreading of the disease in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. We use this model to compare the model results and the daily infected cases more easily and correctly. Another contribution here is identifying the model critical parameters. Consequently, we suggest the local sensitivity methods to calculate the model sensitivities between the model variables and parameters. Additionally, the elasticity between the basic reproduction number, R0, and model parameters are also calculated and helps to identify the key critical parameters in spreading this disease.

    The organization of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we construct the SEIR model based on our assumptions and model transmissions. Using the next generation matrix, we derive the formula of the basic reproduction number, calculate the elasticity between R0 and model parameters and show the model local sensitivities based on the estimated values, as discussed in Section 3. We perform our computational model simulations of daily infected cases in Section 4. Finally, some conclusions and suggestions are given in Section 5.

    Many infectious disease models have been suggested to understand the transmission rates of COVID-19. The SEIR model has been commonly applied in many infectious diseases. This model consists of four compartments, namely, susceptible S(t), exposed E(t), infected I(t) and recovered R(t) individuals. Several authors modified the SEIR model for studying the transmission of pathogens. Among them, in [30], a modified SEIR model was used to describe the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic within local regions in Japan. It was also used for the Ebola epidemic occurring in the West African nations of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone [31]. In this paper, we use the SEIR model for COVID-19 disease that describes the spreading of COVID-19 in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. Accordingly, we develop the previously published work given in [32], and we add a parameter that shows a rate of recovery of the individuals from the exposed class. The model network of SEIR shown in Figure 1 includes various compartments with their transmissions. The model compartments and transmission rates are defined in Table 1.

    Figure 1.  The SEIR model network of the COVID-19 pandemic that includes model populations with their reaction rates.

    The chemical reactions of the model can be expressed as follows:

    nullΛS,  SµSnull,  SβSINE,EµEnull,  EαER,  EkEI,IγER,  IµInull,  RµRnull.
    µµµµ

    Furthermore, all parameters and initial states with their biological meanings are shown in Table 1. We use the concepts of standard chemical kinetics and the mass action law to derive a system of non–linear ordinary differential equations [33],[34]. Then, the system of nonlinear ordinary differential equations takes the following form:

    dSdt=ΛβSINµS,dEdt=βSINkEαEµE,dIdt=kEγIµI,dRdt=αE+γIµR,

    with non-negative initial conditions S(0) = S0 > 0, E(0) = E0 > 0, I(0) = I0 > 0, R(0) = R0 ≥ 0. All parameters are defined as contact rates between individual categories.

    Table 1.  The model reaction constants and initial individuals for the SEIR model with their biological meanings.
    Symbol Biological definition
    S(0) Initial susceptible individuals
    E(0) Initial exposed individuals
    I(0) Initial symptomatic infected individuals
    R(0) Initial recovered individuals
    β Infection rate
    Λ Recruitment rate
    k Transition rate of exposed individuals to the infected class
    α Transition rate of exposed individuals to the recovered class
    γ Natural recovery rate
    µ Natural death rate

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    Infectious disease models cannot be well understood only by biological techniques. Model analysis techniques and computational simulations can serve a great role in predicting and analyzing the model dynamics and identifying critical model parameters. Recently, some techniques of model analysis have been applied such as sensitivity and elasticity methods. They are useful tools to determine which variable or parameter is sensitive to a specific condition [12],[17],[18]. Calculating the basic reproduction numbers at the equilibrium points can also provide a great environment to discuss infectious disease models more widely and accurately [13],[14]. Here, in this study, we focus on three important techniques of model analysis: basic reproduction numbers, local sensitivity and elasticity methods. More details about the suggested techniques are discussed in the following sections.

    In epidemiology, the next-generation matrix is used to derive the basic reproduction number for a compartmental model of the spread of infectious disease. This method was proposed by Diekmann et al. (1990) [35] and van den Driessche and Watmough (2002) [36]. One of the most important parameters for epidemiological models is the basic reproduction number [37]. Using Equation 2, we can easily derive R0 at an equilibrium point E0. The suggested model here includes two infected states, E and I, and two uninfected states, S and R. Let X be a vector of infected classes and Y be a vector of uninfected classes. They are shown below:

    X=[EI],  Y=[SR].

    To find equilibrium points for the model, let us set the right-hand side of Equation 2 equal to zero. Then, the equilibrium points are obtained. The first equilibrium is the COVID-19-free equilibrium point, which is represented by

    E0=(Λµ,0,0,0).

    The second type of equilibrium is called the endemic equilibrium point. It is given below:

    E*=(S,E,I,R),

    where S,E,I,R are positive and defined as follows:

    S=Nβk(k+α+µ)(γ+µ+d),  E=βkΛµN(k+α+µ)(γ+µ+d)βk(k+α+µ),I=βkΛµN(k+α+µ)(γ+µ+d)β(k+α+µ)(γ+µ+d),  R=αE+γIµ.

    Using the next generation method, we have the vector functions

    M(S,E,I,R)=[βSIN0],G(S,E,I,R)=[(k+α+µ)E kE+(γ+µ)I].

    Then, the Jacobian matrices for M, G at E0 are given below:

    H=[M(S,E,I,R)(E,I)](Λµ,0,0,0)=[0βΛ µN00],W=[G(S,E,I,R)(E,I)](Λµ,0,0,0)=[(k+α+µ)0k(γ+µ)].

    Since W is a non-singular matrix, W−1 can be calculated:

    W1=1(k+α+µ)(γ+µ)[(γ+µ)0k(k+α+µ)].

    Therefore, the basic reproduction number is the spectral radius of HW−1. Thus, the basic reproduction number for Equation 2 is

    R0=βkΛµN(k+α+µ)(γ+µ).

    The concept of elasticity for infectious disease models has an effective role in determining the sensitivity between R0 and the model parameters. For calculating such coefficients, the following main formula is used:

    ΓR0ω=R0ω*ωR0,

    where ω is the set of all parameters. Using Equation 5, we can calculate the elasticity index of R0 for each model parameter. They are given below:

    ΓR0Λ=R0Λ*ΛR0=1,ΓR0k=R0k*kR0=(α+µ)(k+α+µ),ΓR0α=R0α*αR0=α(k+α+µ),ΓR0γ=R0γ*γR0=γ(γ+µ),ΓR0β=R0β*βR0=1,ΓR0µ=R0µ*µR0=(1+µ(k+α+µ)+µ(γ+µ)).

    Using the estimated parameters, we can compute the model elasticity; see Table 2.

    Table 2.  Elasticity values of R0 regarding model parameters.
    Parameter ΓR0ω
    Λ 1
    k 0.14039612
    α −0.403487536
    γ −0.9996225141
    β 1
    µ −1.0004274882

     | Show Table
    DownLoad: CSV

    The results given in Table 2 show the positive and negative signs for the model elasticity. These give us the direct or indirect relations between R0 and the model parameters. For example, this coefficient is positive for the set of parameters {Λ, k, β}. This means that when these parameters, {Λ, k, β}, are increased, the value of R0 is also increased, and this virus spreads further. On the other hand, the signs of {γ, α, µ} are negative. This means that the value of the basic reproduction number can be reduced by increasing such parameters. Interestingly, β is the most significant positive parameter that can be utilized to reduce R0. For example, if the value of β is decreased by 10%, then the basic reproduction number will be reduced to R0 = 0.52886708. Furthermore, reducing the contact rate between individuals can impact the number of infected people from the disease.

    The concept of local sensitivity analysis is another step forward for studying infection disease models and identifying the model critical elements. This is simply used for determining the sensitivity of each model species with respect to the model parameters. This method was recently considered in [14],[17],[18],[38]. Assume that there are p compartments (yi for i = 1,2,...,p) and q parameters (bj for j = 1,2,...,q) in an infectious disease model. The model balanced equations are represented by the following system of differential equations:

    dyidt=fi(y,b),

    where yp,bq. The model sensitivities can be computed with three different techniques: non normalizations, half normalizations and full normalizations.

    The full-normalization sensitivities are given as follows:

    Syibj=bjyi dyidbj.

    The half-normalization sensitivities are defined as follows:

    Syibj=1yidyidbj.

    The non-normalization sensitivities can be expressed as follows:

    Syibj=dyidbj,

    where Syibj stands for sensitivity for each variable yi with respect to each parameter bj. We apply the idea of local sensitivity for the proposed COVID-19 model (Equation 2). The model initial populations are S0 = 6 × 106, E0 = 105.26, I0 = 1027 and R0 = 1027, and the model estimated parameters are α = 0.23, k = 0.34, γ = 0.08, β = 0.17, µ = 0.00003, and Λ = 182.46. They are used in computational simulations using SimBiology Toolbox for MATLAB. The results provide a wide range of means of identifying the key critical model parameters. According to the non-normalization technique, susceptible individuals, S, are very sensitive to the natural death, µ. This is clearly shown in Figure 2a. In addition, all model states are also sensitive to these parameters: {β, α, γ} (see Figure 2b). This means that natural death rate, infection rate, natural recovery rate and transition rate between exposed individuals and recovered individuals have a great impact on the model populations, while the rate of natural birth has less impact on the model states. In addition, using the half-normalization method shows that the most sensitive parameter for all model states is the natural death µ. In addition, the exposed and infected individuals are also very sensitive to the set of parameters {β, γ}; see Figure 3. According to the full-normalization technique shown in Figure 4, the model parameters {Λ, µ} are the less critical model parameters, whereas the remaining model parameters are the most sensitive parameters. Interestingly, all model results here provide a wide range of means of studying such models biologically and give more suggestions. This is because identifying critical model parameters helps us to further model improvements and suggest control strategies and vaccination programs.

    Figure 2.  Local sensitivity analysis using non-normalization technique given in Equation 7 for proposed model (Equation 2) using MATLAB: (a) calculating the local sensitivity of all model variables and model parameters, (b) calculating the local sensitivity of all model variables and model parameters excluding µ.
    Figure 3.  Local sensitivity analysis using half-normalization technique given in Equation 8 for proposed model (Equation 2) using MATLAB. This calculation includes all model variables and model parameters.
    Figure 4.  Local sensitivity analysis using full-normalization technique given in Equation 9 for proposed model (Equation 2) using MATLAB: (a) calculating the local sensitivity of all model variables and model parameters, (b) calculating the local sensitivity of all model variables and model parameters excluding β.

    Computational techniques are effective tools and frequently required to analyze some complex infectious disease models. The estimated parameter values and initial populations are obtained from the real data in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq given in the Appendices. The model estimated parameters are α = 0.23, k = 0.34, γ = 0.08, β = 0.17, µ = 0.00003, Λ = 182.46, and the model initial variables are S0 = 6 × 106, E0 = 105.26, I0 = 1027, R0 = 1027. Using System Biology Toolbox (SBedit) in MATLAB, we determine the numerical approximate solutions of the model (Equation 2); see Figures 5 and 6. Numerical simulations are calculated in two-dimensional planes. All model computational results here are very interesting and provide some biological aspects. Firstly, it can be seen that Figure 5 shows the model dynamics of susceptible, exposed, asymptomatic infected and recovered people. We have noticed that the number of healthy people decreases gradually and becomes stable after 500 days, while the dynamics of recovered people increases and then becomes more flat after 500 days as well. Then, from 200 to 600 days, the numbers of exposed and infected individuals change dramatically. More interestingly, Figure 6 shows the comparison of total populations between the real data cases shown in Table 3 and the model equations given in Equation 2. For example, the total populations of infected people for the model equations and real data are given in Figure 6a. Then, Figure 6b shows the total populations of recovered individuals for model equations and real data. The results show good agreement between the real data and the model results. Finally, it is clear that our model results are fitted for the confirmed cases in Kurdistan. This means that the suggested model here can further be used to predict and give more control strategies.

    Figure 5.  Computational simulations here show the total populations for susceptible, exposed, asymptomatic infected and recovered people in MATLAB using initial populations S0 = 6 × 106, E0 = 105.26, I0 = 1027, R0 = 1027 and estimated parameters α = 0.23, k = 0.34, γ = 0.08, β = 0.17, µ = 0.00003, Λ = 182.46.
    Figure 6.  Numerical results here show the comparison between model results given in Equation 2 and real data of confirmed cases for the COVID-19 pandemic in the Kurdistan Region, Iraq, given in Table 3: (a) the total population of infected people, (b) the total population of recovered people.

    Control strategies and preventions for the COVID-19 pandemic may not be well understood only by healthcare techniques and biological concepts. Mathematical models and computational simulations have been widely used for further improvements and identifying the model critical parameters. Therefore, identifying such parameters becomes an issue that can be further studied, and more techniques can be proposed. Sensitivity of model parameters helps international efforts to suggest more control strategies and preventions. Accordingly, the suggested SEIR model in this study plays an effective role in identifying the model critical elements using elasticity and sensitivity of R0. Thus, the model sensitivities were calculated using three different techniques: non normalizations, half normalizations, and full normalizations. The results showed that the most effective parameters for spreading this disease are contact rate among people, transition rate from exposed class to the infected class and natural recovery rate. Interestingly, identifying the model critical parameters here will help to suggest further interventions and control strategies in the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. The suggested SEIR model can be further developed and can have added more transmission rates between model states. For example, the vaccination compartment with its contact rates can be added to the model. This helps to study this disease more widely and accurately. Further techniques of model analysis such as optimal control will also be applied to the model to find more control strategies.


    Acknowledgments



    The authors are grateful for the funding received from the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (grant 20-04-00456).

    Conflict of Interest



    The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

    Author Contributions



    Both authors have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

    [1] Yadav SR, Yan D, Sevilem I, et al. (2014) Plasmodesmata-mediated intercellular signaling during plant growth and development. Front Plant Sci 5: 44. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00044
    [2] Knox K, Wang P, Kriechbaumer V, et al. (2015) Putting the squeeze on plasmodesmata: a role for reticulons in primary Plasmodesmata formation. Plant Physiol 168: 1563-1572. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00668
    [3] Tilsner J, Nicolas W, Rosado A, et al. (2016) Staying tight: plasmodesmal membrane contact sites and the control of cell-to-cell connectivity in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 67: 337-364. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111840
    [4] Han X, Huang LJ, Feng D, et al. (2019) Plasmodesmata-related structural and functional proteins: the long sought-after secrets of a cytoplasmic channel in plant cell walls. Int J Mol Sci 20: 2946. doi: 10.3390/ijms20122946
    [5] Dorokhov YL, Ershova NM, Sheshukova EV, et al. (2019) Plasmodesmata conductivity regulation: a mechanistic model. Plants (Basel) 8: 595. doi: 10.3390/plants8120595
    [6] Pankratenko AV, Atabekova AK, Morozov SY, et al. (2020) Membrane contacts in plasmodesmata: structural components and their functions. Biochemistry (Moscow) 85: 531-544. doi: 10.1134/S0006297920050028
    [7] Levy A, Tilsner J (2020) Creating contacts between replication and movement at plasmodesmata–a role for membrane contact sites in plant virus infections? Front Plant Sci 11: 862. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00862
    [8] Sager RE, Lee JY (2018) Plasmodesmata at a glance. J Cell Sci 131: jcs209346. doi: 10.1242/jcs.209346
    [9] Pitzalis N, Heinlein M (2017) The roles of membranes and associated cytoskeleton in plant virus replication and cell-to-cell movement. J Exp Bot 69: 117-132. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx334
    [10] Petit JD, Li ZP, Nicolas WJ, et al. (2020) Dare to change, the dynamics behind plasmodesmata-mediated cell-to-cell communication. Curr Opin Plant Biol 53: 80-89. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.10.009
    [11] Reagan BC, Burch-Smith TM (2020) Viruses reveal the secrets of plasmodesmal cell biology. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 33: 26-39. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-07-19-0212-FI
    [12] Heinlein M (2015) Plant virus replication and movement. Virology 480: 657-671. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.01.025
    [13] Lee J-Y (2015) Plasmodesmata: A signaling hub at the cellular boundary. Curr Opin Plant Biol 27: 133-140. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.06.019
    [14] Peiró A, Martínez-Gil L, Tamborero S, et al. (2014) The Tobacco mosaic virus movement protein associates with but does not integrate into biological membranes. J Virol 88: 3016-3026. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03648-13
    [15] Ishikawa K, Tamura K, Fukao Y, et al. (2020) Structural and functional relationships between plasmodesmata and plant endoplasmic reticulum-plasma membrane contact sites consisting of three synaptotagmins. New Phytol 226: 798-808. doi: 10.1111/nph.16391
    [16] Kitagawa M, Jackson D (2017) Plasmodesmata-mediated cell-to-cell communication in the shoot apical meristem: how stem cells talk. Plants (Basel) 6: 12. doi: 10.3390/plants6010012
    [17] Reagan BC, Ganusova EE, Fernandez JC, et al. (2018) RNA on the move: The plasmodesmata perspective. Plant Sci Int J Exp Plant Biol 275: 1-10.
    [18] Navarro JA, Sanchez-Navarro JA, Pallas V (2019) Key checkpoints in the movement of plant viruses through the host. Advances in Virus Research London: Academic Press, 1-64.
    [19] Atabekov JG, Morozov SY (1979) Translation of plant virus messenger RNAs. Adv Virus Res 25: 1-91. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60568-0
    [20] Atabekov JG, Dorokhov YL (1984) Plant virus-specific transport function and resistance of plants to viruses. Adv Virus Res 29: 313-364. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60412-1
    [21] Atabekov JG, Taliansky ME (1990) Expression of a plant virus-coded transport function by different viral genomes. Adv Virus Res 38: 201-248. doi: 10.1016/S0065-3527(08)60863-5
    [22] Deom CM, Lapidot M, Beachy RN (1992) Plant virus movement proteins. Cell 69: 221-224. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90403-Y
    [23] Leonard DA, Zaitlin M (1982) A temperature-sensitive strain of tobacco mosaic virus defective in cell-to-cell movement generates an altered viral-coded protein. Virology 117: 416-424. doi: 10.1016/0042-6822(82)90480-9
    [24] Takamatsu N, Ohno T, Meshi T, et al. (1983) Molecular cloning and nucleotide sequence of the 30K and the coat protein cistron of TMV (tomato strain) genome. Nucleic Acids Res 11: 3767-3778. doi: 10.1093/nar/11.11.3767
    [25] Meshi T, Watanabe Y, Saito T, et al. (1987) Function of the 30 kd protein of tobacco mosaic virus: involvement in cell-to-cell movement and dispensability for replication. EMBO J 6: 2557-2563. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1987.tb02544.x
    [26] Deom CM, Oliver MJ, Beachy RN (1987) The 30-kilodalton gene product of tobacco mosaic virus potentiates virus movement. Science 237: 389-394. doi: 10.1126/science.237.4813.389
    [27] Kumar D, Kumar R, Hyun TK, et al. (2015) Cell-to-cell movement of viruses via plasmodesmata. J Plant Res 128: 37-47. doi: 10.1007/s10265-014-0683-6
    [28] Ueki S, Citovsky V (2014) Plasmodesmata-associated proteins: can we see the whole elephant? Plant Signal Behav 9: e27899. doi: 10.4161/psb.27899
    [29] Yuan C, Lazarowitz SG, Citovsky V (2018) The plasmodesmal localization signal of TMV MP is recognized by plant synaptotagmin SYTA. mBio 9: e01314-e01318. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01314-18
    [30] Mushegian AR, Elena SF (2015) Evolution of plant virus movement proteins from the 30K superfamily and of their homologs integrated in plant genomes. Virology 476: 304-315. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2014.12.012
    [31] den Hollander PW, Kieper SN, Borst JW, et al. (2016) The role of plasmodesma-located proteins in tubule-guided virus transport is limited to the plasmodesmata. Arch Virol 161: 2431-2440. doi: 10.1007/s00705-016-2936-2
    [32] Belval L, Marmonier A, Schmitt-Keichinger C, et al. (2019) From a movement-deficient grapevine fanleaf virus to the identification of a new viral determinant of nematode transmission. Viruses 11: 1146. doi: 10.3390/v11121146
    [33] Schoelz JE, Leisner S (2017) Setting up shop: The formation and function of the viral factories of cauliflower mosaic virus. Front Plant Sci 8: 1832. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01832
    [34] Rodriguez A, Angel CA, Lutz L, et al. (2014) Association of the P6 protein of Cauliflower mosaic virus with plasmodesmata and plasmodesmal proteins. Plant Physiol 166: 1345-1358. doi: 10.1104/pp.114.249250
    [35] Schoelz JE, Angel CA, Nelson RS, et al. (2016) A model for intracellular movement of Cauliflower mosaic virus: the concept of the mobile virion factory. J Exp Bot 67: 2039-2048. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv520
    [36] Hohn T (2013) Plant pararetroviruses: interactions of cauliflower mosaic virus with plants and insects. Curr Opin Virol 3: 629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2013.08.014
    [37] Geldreich A, Haas G, Kubina J, et al. (2017) Formation of large viroplasms and virulence of Cauliflower mosaic virus in turnip plants depend on the N-terminal EKI sequence of viral protein TAV. PLoS One 12: e0189062. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189062
    [38] Li JT, Yeh YC, Yeh SD, et al. (2011) Complete genomic sequence of watermelon bud necrosis virus. Arch Virol 156: 359-362. doi: 10.1007/s00705-010-0881-z
    [39] Borniego MB, Karlin D, Peña EJ, et al. (2016) Bioinformatic and mutational analysis of ophiovirus movement proteins, belonging to the 30K superfamily. Virology 498: 172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2016.08.027
    [40] Margaria P, Anderson CT, Turina M, et al. (2016) Identification of Ourmiavirus 30K movement protein amino acid residues involved in symptomatology, viral movement, subcellular localization and tubule formation. Mol Plant Pathol 17: 1063-1079. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12348
    [41] Robles Luna G, Peña EJ, Borniego MB, et al. (2018) Citrus psorosis virus movement protein contains an aspartic protease required for autocleavage and the formation of tubule-like structures at plasmodesmata. J Virol 92: e00355-18. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00355-18
    [42] Grangeon R, Jiang J, Wan J, et al. (2013) 6K2-induced vesicles can move cell to cell during turnip mosaic virus infection. Front Microbiol 4: 351. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00351
    [43] Revers F, García JA (2015) Molecular biology of potyviruses. Adv Virus Res 92: 101-109. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2014.11.006
    [44] Movahed N, Patarroyo C, Sun J, et al. (2017) Cylindrical inclusion protein of turnip mosaic virus serves as a docking point for the intercellular movement of viral replication vesicles. Plant Physiol 175: 1732-1744. doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01484
    [45] Bak A, Folimonova SY (2015) The conundrum of a unique protein encoded by citrus tristeza virus that is dispensable for infection of most hosts yet shows characteristics of a viral movement protein. Virology 485: 86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.07.005
    [46] Qiao W, Medina V, Kuo YW, et al. (2018) A distinct, non-virion plant virus movement protein encoded by a crinivirus essential for systemic infection. mBio 9: e02230-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02230-18
    [47] Dolja VV, Kreuze JF, Valkonen JP (2006) Comparative and functional genomics of closteroviruses. Virus Res 117: 38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.02.002
    [48] Dolja VV, Koonin EV (2013) The closterovirus-derived gene expression and RNA interference vectors as tools for research and plant biotechnology. Front Microbiol 4: 83. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00083
    [49] Morozov SY, Lukasheva LI, Chernov BK, et al. (1987) Nucleotide sequence of the open reading frames adjacent to the coat protein cistron in potato virus X genome. FEBS Lett 213: 438-442. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(87)81538-7
    [50] Morozov S, Dolja VV, Atabekov JG (1989) Probable reassortment of genomic elements among elongated RNA-containing plant viruses. J Mol Evol 29: 52-62. doi: 10.1007/BF02106181
    [51] Hull R (2002) Plant to plant movement. Plant Virology London: Academic Press, 669-751.
    [52] Morozov SY, Solovyev AG (2003) Triple gene block: modular design of a multi-functional machine for plant virus movement. J Gen Virol 84: 1351-1366. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.18922-0
    [53] Genoves A, Navarro JA, Pallas V (2006) Functional analysis of the five melon necrotic spot virus genome-encoded proteins. J Gen Virol 87: 2371-2380. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81793-0
    [54] Verchot-Lubicz J, Torrance L, Solovyev AG, et al. (2010) Varied movement strategies employed by triple gene block-encoding viruses. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23: 1231-1247. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-04-10-0086
    [55] Solovyev AG, Kalinina NO, Morozov SY (2012) Recent advances in research of plant virus movement mediated by triple gene block. Front Plant Sci 3: 276. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00276
    [56] Liou MR, Hu CC, Chou YL, et al. (2015) Viral elements and host cellular proteins in intercellular movement of Bamboo mosaic virus. Curr Opin Virol 12: 99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2015.04.005
    [57] Navarro JA, Pallás V (2017) An update on the intracellular and intercellular trafficking of carmoviruses. Front Plant Sci 8: 1801. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01801
    [58] Lazareva EA, Lezzhov AA, Komarova TV, et al. (2017) A novel block of plant virus movement genes. Mol Plant Pathol 18: 611-624. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12418
    [59] Mäkinen K, Hafrén A (2014) Intracellular coordination of potyviral RNA functions in infection. Front Plant Sci 5: 110. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00110
    [60] Ivanov KI, Eskelin K, Lõhmus A, et al. (2014) Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying potyvirus infection. J Gen Virol 95: 1415-1429. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.064220-0
    [61] Olspert A, Carr JP, Firth AE (2016) Mutational analysis of the Potyviridae transcriptional slippage site utilized for expression of the P3N-PIPO and P1N-PISPO proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 44: 7618-7629. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw441
    [62] Valli AA, Gallo A, Rodamilans B, et al. (2018) The HCPro from the Potyviridae family: An enviable multitasking Helper Component that every virus would like to have. Mol Plant Pathol 19: 744-763. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12553
    [63] Shen WT, Wang MQ, Yan P, et al. (2010) Protein interaction matrix of Papaya ringspot virus type P based on a yeast two-hybrid system. Acta Virol 54: 49-54. doi: 10.4149/av_2010_01_49
    [64] Gibbs AJ, Hajizadeh M, Ohshima K, et al. (2020) The potyviruses: an evolutionary synthesis is emerging. Viruses 12: 132. doi: 10.3390/v12020132
    [65] Shen W, Shi Y, Dai Z, et al. (2020) The RNA-dependent rna polymerase nib of potyviruses plays multifunctional, contrasting roles during viral infection. Viruses 12: 77. doi: 10.3390/v12010077
    [66] den Boon JA, Ahlquist P (2010) Organelle-like membrane compartmentalization of positive-strand RNA virus replication factories. Annu Rev Microbiol 64: 241-256. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134012
    [67] Laliberté JF, Zheng H (2014) Viral manipulation of plant host membranes. Annu Rev Virol 1: 237-259. doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-031413-085532
    [68] Paul D, Bartenschlager R (2013) Architecture and biogenesis of plus-strand RNA virus replication factories. World J Virol 2: 32-48. doi: 10.5501/wjv.v2.i2.32
    [69] Gushchin VA, Solovyev AG, Erokhina TN, et al. (2013) Beet yellows virus replicase and replicative compartments: parallels with other RNA viruses. Front Microbiol 4: 38. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00038
    [70] Jin X, Cao X, Wang X, et al. (2018) Three-dimensional architecture and biogenesis of membrane structures associated with plant virus replication. Front Plant Sci 9: 57. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00057
    [71] Wolff G, Melia CE, Snijder EJ, et al. (2020) Double-membrane vesicles as platforms for viral replication. Trends Microbiol 11.
    [72] Chai M, Wu X, Liu J, et al. (2020) P3N-PIPO interacts with P3 via the shared N-Terminal domain to recruit viral replication vesicles for cell-to-cell movement. J Virol 94: e01898-19. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01898-19
    [73] Daròs JA, Schaad MC, Carrington JC (1999) Functional analysis of the interaction between VPg-proteinase (NIa) and RNA polymerase (NIb) of tobacco etch potyvirus, using conditional and suppressor mutants. J Virol 73: 8732-8740. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.10.8732-8740.1999
    [74] Wei T, Wang A (2008) Biogenesis of cytoplasmic membranous vesicles for plant potyvirus replication occurs at endoplasmic reticulum exit sites in a COPI- and COPII-dependent manner. J Virol 82: 12252-12264. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01329-08
    [75] Jiang J, Patarroyo C, Garcia Cabanillas D, et al. (2015) The vesicle-forming 6K2 protein of turnip mosaic virus interacts with the COPII coatomer Sec24a for viral systemic infection. J Virol 89: 6695-6710. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00503-15
    [76] Movahed N, Sun J, Vali H, et al. (2019) A host ER fusogen is recruited by Turnip Mosaic Virus for maturation of viral replication vesicles. Plant Physiol 179: 507-518. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01342
    [77] Cui H, Wang A (2016) Plum pox virus 6K1 protein is required for viral replication and targets the viral replication complex at the early stage of infection. J Virol 90: 5119-5131. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00024-16
    [78] Geng C, Yan ZY, Cheng DJ, et al. (2017) Tobacco vein banding mosaic virus 6K2 Protein Hijacks NbPsbO1 for Virus Replication. Sci Rep 7: 43455. doi: 10.1038/srep43455
    [79] Wei T, Zhang C, Hong J, et al. (2010) Formation of complexes at plasmodesmata for potyvirus intercellular movement is mediated by the viral protein P3N-PIPO. PLoS Pathog 6: e1000962. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000962
    [80] Wan J, Cabanillas DG, Zheng H, et al. (2015) Turnip mosaic virus moves systemically through both phloem and xylem as membrane-associated complexes. Plant Physiol 167: 1374-1388. doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00097
    [81] Wu G, Cui X, Chen H, et al. (2018) Dynamin-like proteins of endocytosis in plants are coopted by potyviruses to enhance virus infection. J Virol 92: e01320-18.
    [82] Lerich A, Langhans M, Sturm S, et al. (2011) Is the 6 kDa tobacco etch viral protein a bona fide ERES marker? J Exp Bot 62: 5013-5023. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err200
    [83] Cui X, Lu L, Wang Y, et al. (2018) The interaction of soybean reticulon homology domain protein (GmRHP) with Soybean mosaic virus encoded P3 contributes to the viral infection. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 495: 2105-2110. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.043
    [84] Cabanillas DG, Jiang J, Movahed N, et al. (2018) Turnip nosaic virus uses the SNARE protein VTI11 in an unconventional route for replication vesicle trafficking. Plant Cell 30: 2594-2615. doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00281
    [85] Cheng G, Dong M, Xu Q, et al. (2017) Dissecting the molecular mechanism of the subcellular localization and cell-to-cell movement of the sugarcane mosaic virus P3N-PIPO. Sci Rep 7: 9868. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10497-6
    [86] Sorel M, Garcia JA, German-Retana S (2014) The Potyviridae cylindrical inclusion helicase: a key multipartner and multifunctional protein. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 27: 215-226. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-11-13-0333-CR
    [87] Chen T, Ji D, Tian S (2018) Variable-angle epifluorescence microscopy characterizes protein dynamics in the vicinity of plasma membrane in plant cells. BMC Plant Biol 18: 43. doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1246-0
    [88] Huang D, Sun Y, Ma Z, et al. (2019) Salicylic acid-mediated plasmodesmal closure via Remorin-dependent lipid organization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116: 21274-21284. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911892116
    [89] Jaillais Y, Ott T (2020) The nanoscale organization of the plasma membrane and its importance in signaling: a proteolipid perspective. Plant Physiol 182: 1682-1696. doi: 10.1104/pp.19.01349
    [90] Cheng G, Yang Z, Zhang H, et al. (2020) Remorin interacting with PCaP1 impairs Turnip mosaic virus intercellular movement but is antagonised by VPg. New Phytol 225: 2122-2139. doi: 10.1111/nph.16285
    [91] Spetz C, Valkonen JP (2004) Potyviral 6K2 protein long-distance movement and symptom-induction functions are independent and host-specific. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17: 502-510. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.5.502
    [92] Wan J, Laliberté JF (2015) Membrane-associated virus replication complexes locate to plant conducting tubes. Plant Signal Behav 10: e1042639. doi: 10.1080/15592324.2015.1042639
    [93] González R, Wu B, Li X, et al. (2019) Mutagenesis scanning uncovers evolutionary constraints on tobacco etch potyvirus membrane-associated 6K2 protein. Genome Biol Evol 11: 1207-1222. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz069
    [94] Zhang L, Shang J, Jia Q, et al. (2019) The complete genome sequence of wild tomato mosaic virus isolated from Solanum nigrum reveals recombination in the P1 cistron. Arch Virol 164: 903-906. doi: 10.1007/s00705-019-04146-8
    [95] Lõhmus A, Varjosalo M, Mäkinen K (2016) Protein composition of 6K2-induced membrane structures formed during Potato virus A infection. Mol Plant Pathol 17: 943-958. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12341
    [96] Mueller BK, Subramaniam S, Senes A (2014) A frequent, GxxxG-mediated, transmembrane association motif is optimized for the formation of interhelical Cα-H hydrogen bonds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: E888-895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319944111
    [97] Teese MG, Langosch D (2015) Role of GxxxG motifs in transmembrane domain interactions. Biochemistry 54: 5125-5135. doi: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00495
    [98] Anderson SM, Mueller BK, Lange EJ, et al. (2017) Combination of Cα-H hydrogen bonds and Van der Waals packing modulates the stability of gxxxg-mediated dimers in membranes. J Am Chem Soc 139: 15774-15783. doi: 10.1021/jacs.7b07505
    [99] Fink A., Sal-Man N., Gerber D, et al. (2012) Transmembrane domains interactions within the membrane milieu: principles, advances and challenges. Biochim Biophys Acta 1818: 974-983. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2011.11.029
    [100] Hu J, Rapoport TA (2016) Fusion of the endoplasmic reticulum by membrane-bound GTPases. Semin Cell Dev Biol 60: 105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2016.06.001
    [101] Dolja VV, Kreuze JF, Valkonen JP (2006) Comparative and functional genomics of closteroviruses. Virus Res 117: 38-51. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.02.002
    [102] Kiss ZA, Medina V, Falk BW (2013) Crinivirus replication and host interactions. Front Microbiol 4: 99.
    [103] Agranovsky AA (2016) Closteroviruses: molecular biology, evolution and interactions with cells. Plant viruses: evolution and management Singapore: Springer, 231-252. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-1406-2_14
    [104] Folimonova SY (2020) Citrus tristeza virus: A large RNA virus with complex biology turned into a valuable tool for crop protection. PLoS Pathog 16: e1008416. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008416
    [105] Candresse T, Fuchs M (2020) Closteroviridae. eLS .
    [106] Saberi A, Gulyaeva AA, Brubacher JL, et al. (2018) A planarian nidovirus expands the limits of RNA genome size. PLoS Pathog 14: e1007314. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1007314
    [107] Dolja VV, Haldeman R, Robertson NL, et al. (1994) Distinct functions of capsid protein in assembly and movement of tobacco etch potyvirus in plants. EMBO J 13: 1482-1491. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06403.x
    [108] Kreuze JF, Savenkov EI, Valkonen JP (2002) Complete genome sequence and analyses of the subgenomic RNAs of sweet potato chlorotic stunt virus reveal several new features for the genus Crinivirus. J Virol 76: 9260-9270. doi: 10.1128/JVI.76.18.9260-9270.2002
    [109] Ling KS, Zhu HY, Gonsalves D (2004) Complete nucleotide sequence and genome organization of Grapevine leafroll-associated virus 3, type member of the genus Ampelovirus. J Gen Virol 85: 2099-2102. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.80007-0
    [110] Dolja VV, Koonin EV (2013) The closterovirus-derived gene expression and RNA interference vectors as tools for research and plant biotechnology. Front Microbiol 4: 83. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00083
    [111] Dolja VV (2003) Beet yellows virus: the importance of being different. Mol Plant Pathol 4: 91-98. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2003.00154.x
    [112] Solovyev AG, Makarov VV (2016) Helical capsids of plant viruses: architecture with structural lability. J Gen Virol 97: 1739-1754. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000524
    [113] Medina V, Peremyslov VV, Hagiwara Y, et al. (1999) Subcellular localization of the HSP70-homolog encoded by beet yellows closterovirus. Virology 260: 173-181. doi: 10.1006/viro.1999.9807
    [114] Peremyslov VV, Pan YW, Dolja VV (2004) Movement protein of a closterovirus is a type III integral transmembrane protein localized to the endoplasmic reticulum. J Virol 78: 3704-3709. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.7.3704-3709.2004
    [115] Qiao W, Medina V, Falk BW (2017) Inspirations on virus replication and cell-to-cell movement from studies examining the cytopathology induced by lettuce infectious yellows virus in plant cells. Front Plant Sci 8: 1672. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01672
    [116] Qiao W, Helpio EL, Falk BW (2018) Two crinivirus-conserved small proteins, P5 and P9, are indispensable for efficient lettuce infectious yellows virus infectivity in plants. Viruses 10: 459. doi: 10.3390/v10090459
    [117] Bak A, Folimonova SY (2015) The conundrum of a unique protein encoded by citrus tristeza virus that is dispensable for infection of most hosts yet shows characteristics of a viral movement protein. Virology 485: 86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2015.07.005
    [118] Wei Y, Shi Y, Han X, et al. (2019) Identification of cucurbit chlorotic yellows virus P4.9 as a possible movement protein. Virol J 16: 82. doi: 10.1186/s12985-019-1192-y
    [119] Livieratos IC, Eliasco E, Müller G, et al. (2004) Analysis of the RNA of Potato yellow vein virus: evidence for a tripartite genome and conserved 3′-terminal structures among members of the genus Crinivirus. J Gen Virol 85: 2065-2075. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.79910-0
    [120] Ruiz L, Simón A, García C, et al. (2018) First natural crossover recombination between two distinct species of the family Closteroviridae leads to the emergence of a new disease. PLoS One 13: e0198228. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198228
    [121] Hadad L, Luria N, Smith E, et al. (2019) Lettuce chlorosis virus disease: a new threat to cannabis production. Viruses 11: 802. doi: 10.3390/v11090802
    [122] Martelli GP, Adams MJ, Kreuze JF, et al. (2007) Family Flexiviridae: a case study in virion and genome plasticity. Annu Rev Phytopathol 45: 73-100. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094401
    [123] Morozov SY, Agranovsky AA (2020) Alphaflexiviruses (Alphaflexiviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [124] Kreuze JF, Vaira AM, Menzel W, et al. (2020) ICTV virus taxonomy profile: AlphaflexiviridaeJ Gen Virol 101: 699-700. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.001436
    [125] Atsumi G, Tomita R, Yamashita T, et al. (2015) A novel virus transmitted through pollination causes ring-spot disease on gentian (Gentiana triflora) ovaries. J Gen Virol 96: 431-439. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.071498-0
    [126] Savenkov EI (2020) Pomoviruses (Virgaviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [127] Jiang Z, Yang M, Zhang Y, et al. (2020) Hordeiviruses (Virgaviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [128] Niehl A, Liebe S, Varrelmann M, et al. (2020) Benyviruses (Benyviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [129] Lezzhov AA, Gushchin VA, Lazareva EA, et al. (2015) Translation of the shallot virus X TGB3 gene depends on non-AUG initiation and leaky scanning. J Gen Virol 96: 3159-3164. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000248
    [130] Lozano I, Leiva AM, Jimenez J, et al. (2017) Resolution of cassava-infecting alphaflexiviruses: Molecular and biological characterization of a novel group of potexviruses lacking the TGB3 gene. Virus Res 241: 53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2017.03.019
    [131] Solovyev AG, Morozov SY (2017) Non-replicative integral membrane proteins encoded by plant alpha-like viruses: emergence of diverse orphan orfs and movement protein genes. Front Plant Sci 8: 1820. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01820
    [132] Morozov SY, Solovyev AG (2015) Phylogenetic relationship of some ‘accessory’ helicases of plant positive-stranded RNA viruses: toward understanding the evolution of triple gene block. Front Microbiol 6: 508. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00508
    [133] Tamai A, Meshi T (2001) Cell-to-cell movement of potato virus X: the role of p12 and p8 encoded by the second and third open reading frames of the triple gene block. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14: 1158-1167. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.10.1158
    [134] Lim HS, Vaira AM, Bae H, et al. (2010) Mutation of a chloroplast-targeting signal in Alternanthera mosaic virus TGB3 impairs cell-to-cell movement and eliminates long-distance virus movement. J Gen Virol 91: 2102-2115. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.019448-0
    [135] Morozov SY, Solovyev AG (2012) Did silencing suppression counter-defensive strategy contribute to origin and evolution of the triple gene block coding for plant virus movement proteins? Front Plant Sci 3: 136. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2012.00136
    [136] Lim HS, Bragg JN, Ganesan U, et al. (2009) Subcellular localization of the barley stripe mosaic virus triple gene block proteins. J Virol 83: 9432-9448. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00739-09
    [137] Schepetilnikov MV, Solovyev AG, Gorshkova EN, et al. (2008) Intracellular targeting of a hordeiviral membrane spanning movement protein: sequence requirements and involvement of an unconventional mechanism. J Virol 82: 1284-1293. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01164-07
    [138] Zamyatnin AA, Solovyev AG, Savenkov EI, et al. (2004) Transient coexpression of individual genes encoded by the triple gene block of potato mop-top virus reveals requirements for TGBp1 trafficking. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17: 921-930. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.8.921
    [139] Ju HJ, Brown JE, Ye CM, et al. (2007) Mutations in the central domain of potato virus X TGBp2 eliminate granular vesicles and virus cell-to-cell trafficking. J Virol 81: 1899-1911. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02009-06
    [140] Bamunusinghe D, Hemenway CL, Nelson RS, et al. (2009) Analysis of potato virus X replicase and TGBp3 subcellular locations. Virology 393: 272-285. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.08.002
    [141] Tilsner J, Linnik O, Louveaux M, et al. (2013) Replication and trafficking of a plant virus are coupled at the entrances of plasmodesmata. J Cell Biol 201: 981-995. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201304003
    [142] Park MR, Jeong RD, Kim KH (2014) Understanding the intracellular trafficking and intercellular transport of potexviruses in their host plants. Front Plant Sci 5: a60.
    [143] Wu X, Liu J, Chai M, et al. (2019) The Potato virus X TGBp2 protein plays dual functional roles in viral replication and movement. J Virol 93: e01635-18.
    [144] Chou YL, Hung YJ, Tseng YH, et al. (2013) The stable association of virion with the triple-gene-block protein 3-based complex of Bamboo mosaic virus. PLoS Pathog 9: e1003405. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003405
    [145] Linnik O, Liesche J, Tilsner J, et al. (2013) Unraveling the structure of viral replication complexes at super-resolution. Front Plant Sci 4: 6. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00006
    [146] Boevink P, Oparka KJ (2005) Virus-host interactions during movement processes. Plant Physiol 138: 1815-1821. doi: 10.1104/pp.105.066761
    [147] Karpova OV, Zayakina OV, Arkhipenko MV, et al. (2006) Potato virus X RNA-mediated assembly of single-tailed ternary ‘coat protein-RNA-movement protein’ complexes. J Gen Virol 87: 2731-2740. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81993-0
    [148] Arkhipenko MV, Nikitin NA, Donchenko EK, et al. (2017) Translational cross-activation of Potexviruses virion genomic RNAs. Acta Naturae 9: 52-57. doi: 10.32607/20758251-2017-9-4-52-57
    [149] Kalinina NO, Rakitina DV, Solovyev AG, et al. (2002) RNA helicase activity of the plant virus movement proteins encoded by the first gene of the triple gene block. Virology 296: 321-329. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1328
    [150] Leshchiner AD, Minina EA, Rakitina DV, et al. (2008) Oligomerization of the potato virus X 25-kD movement protein. Biochemistry (Moscow) 73: 50-55. doi: 10.1134/S0006297908010070
    [151] Howard AR, Heppler ML, Ju HJ, et al. (2004) Potato virus X TGBp1 induces plasmodesmata gating and moves between cells in several host species whereas CP moves only in N. benthamiana leaves. Virology 328: 185-197. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2004.06.039
    [152] Lough TJ, Netzler NE, Emerson SJ, et al. (2000) Cell-to-cell movement of potexviruses: evidence for a ribonucleoprotein complex involving the coat protein and first triple gene block protein. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 13: 962-974. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.9.962
    [153] Bayne EH, Rakitina DV, Morozov SY, et al. (2005) Cell-to-cell movement of potato potexvirus X is dependent on suppression of RNA silencing. Plant J 44: 471-482. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02539.x
    [154] Voinnet O, Lederer C, Baulcombe DC (2000) A viral movement protein prevents spread of the gene silencing signal in Nicotiana benthamiana. Cell 103: 157-167. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00095-7
    [155] Lim HS, Vaira AM, Reinsel MD, et al. (2010) Pathogenicity of Alternanthera mosaic virus is affected by determinants in RNA-dependent RNA polymerase and by reduced efficacy of silencing suppression in a movement-competent TGB1. J Gen Virol 91: 277-287. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.014977-0
    [156] Senshu H, Ozeki J, Komatsu K, et al. (2009) Variability in the level of RNA silencing suppression caused by triple gene block protein 1 (TGBp1) from various potexviruses during infection. J Gen Virol 90: 1014-1024. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.008243-0
    [157] Tilsner J, Cowan GH, Roberts AG, et al. (2010) Plasmodesmal targeting and intercellular movement of potato mop-top pomovirus is mediated by a membrane anchored tyrosine-based motif on the lumenal side of the endoplasmic reticulum and the C-terminal transmembrane domain in the TGB3 movement protein. Virology 402: 41-51. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2010.03.008
    [158] Torrance L, Wright KM, Crutzen F, et al. (2011) Unusual features of pomoviral RNA movement. Front Microbiol 2: 259. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00259
    [159] Jackson AO, Lim HS, Bragg J, et al. (2009) Hordeivirus replication, movement, and pathogenesis. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47: 385-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080508-081733
    [160] Hipper C, Brault V, Ziegler-Graff V, et al. (2013) Viral and cellular factors involved in phloem transport of plant viruses. Front Plant Sci 4: a154. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00154
    [161] Makarov VV, Makarova SS, Makhotenko AV, et al. (2015) In vitro properties of hordeivirus TGB1 protein forming ribonucleoprotein complexes. J Gen Virol 96: 3422-3431. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000252
    [162] Shemyakina EA, Solovyev AG, Leonova OG, et al. (2011) The role of microtubule association in plasmodesmal targeting of potato mop-top virus movement protein TGBp1. Open Virol J 5: 1-11. doi: 10.2174/1874357901105010001
    [163] Wright KM, Cowan GH, Lukhovitskaya NI, et al. (2010) The N-terminal domain of PMTV TGB1 movement protein is required for nucleolar localization, microtubule association, and long-distance movement. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 23: 1486-1497. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-05-10-0105
    [164] Chiba S, Hleibieh K, Delbianco A, et al. (2013) The benyvirus RNA silencing suppressor is essential for long-distance movement, requires both zinc-finger and NoLS basic residues but not a nucleolar localization for its silencing-suppression activity. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 26: 168-181. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-12-0142-R
    [165] Gilmer D, Ratti C (2017) ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Benyviridae. J Gen Virol 98: 1571-1572. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000864
    [166] Randles JW, Rohde W (1990) Nicotiana velutina mosaic virus: evidence for a bipartite genome comprising 3 kb and 8 kb RNAs. J Gen Virol 71: 1019-1027. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-71-5-1019
    [167] Melzer MJ, Sether DM, Borth WB, et al. (2012) Characterization of a virus infecting Citrus volkameriana with citrus leprosis-like symptoms. Phytopathology 102: 122-127. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-11-0013
    [168] Lazareva EA, Lezzhov AA, Golyshev SA, et al. (2017) Similarities in intracellular transport of plant viral movement proteins BMB2 and TGB3. J Gen Virol 98: 2379-2391. doi: 10.1099/jgv.0.000914
    [169] Nunes MRT, Contreras-Gutierrez MA, Guzman H, et al. (2017) Genetic characterization, molecular epidemiology, and phylogenetic relationships of insect-specific viruses in the taxon Negevirus. Virology 504: 152-167. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2017.01.022
    [170] Genovés A, Navarro J, Pallás V (2006) Functional analysis of the five melon necrotic spot virus genome-encoded proteins. J Gen Virol 87: 2371-2380. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.81793-0
    [171] Martínez-Turiño S, Hernández C (2011) A membrane-associated movement protein of Pelargonium flower break virus shows RNA-binding activity and contains a biologically relevant leucine zipper-like motif. Virology 413: 310-319. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.03.001
    [172] Li WZ, Qu F, Morris TJ (1998) Cell-to-cell movement of turnip crinkle virus is controlled by two small open reading frames that function in trans. Virology 244: 405-416. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9125
    [173] White KA (2020) Tombusvirus-Like Viruses (Tombusviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [174] Vilar M, Esteve V, Pallás V, et al. (2001) Structural properties of carnation mottle virus p7 movement protein and its RNA-binding domain. J Biol Chem 276: 18122-18129. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100706200
    [175] Vilar M, Saurí A, Marcos JF, et al. (2005) Transient structural ordering of the RNA-binding domain of carnation mottle virus p7 movement protein modulates nucleic acid binding. Chembiochem 6: 1391-1396. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200400451
    [176] Navarro JA, Serra-Soriano M, Corachán-Valencia L, et al. (2020) A conserved motif in three viral movement proteins from different genera is required for host factor recruitment and cell-to-cell movement. Sci Rep 10: 4758. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61741-5
    [177] Genoves A, Navarro JA, Pallas V (2009) A self-interacting carmovirus movement protein plays a role in binding of viral RNA during the cell-to-cell movement and shows an actin cytoskeleton dependent location in cell periphery. Virology 395: 133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.08.042
    [178] Serra-Soriano M, Pallás V, Navarro JA (2014) A model for transport of a viral membrane protein through the early secretory pathway: minimal sequence and endoplasmic reticulum lateral mobility requirements. Plant J 77: 863-879. doi: 10.1111/tpj.12435
    [179] Martínez-Gil L, Saurí A, Vilar M, et al. (2007) Membrane insertion and topology of the p7B movement protein of Melon Necrotic Spot Virus (MNSV). Virology 367: 348-357. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2007.06.006
    [180] Genoves A, Navarro JA, Pallas V (2010) The intra- and intercellular movement of Melon necrotic spot virus (MNSV) depends on an active secretory pathway. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 23: 263-272. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-23-3-0263
    [181] Sauri A, Saksena S, Salgado J, et al. (2005) Double-spanning plant viral movement protein integration into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane is signal recognition particle-dependent, translocon-mediated, and concerted. J Biol Chem 280: 25907-25912. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M412476200
    [182] Genovés A, Pallas V, Navarro J (2011) Contribution of topology determinants of a viral movement protein to its membrane association, intracellular traffic and viral cell-to-cell movement. J Virol 85: 7797-7809. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02465-10
    [183] Thekke-Veetil T, Ho T, Postman JD, et al. (2018) A virus in american blackcurrant (Ribes americanum) with distinct genome features reshapes classification in the TymoviralesViruses 10: 406. doi: 10.3390/v10080406
    [184] Miller WA, Jackson J, Feng Y (2015) Cis- and trans-regulation of luteovirus gene expression by the 3′ end of the viral genome. Virus Res 206: 37-45. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2015.03.009
    [185] Ali M, Hameed S, Tahir M (2014) Luteovirus: insights into pathogenicity. Arch Virol 159: 2853-2860. doi: 10.1007/s00705-014-2172-6
    [186] Domier LL (2020) Luteoviruses (Luteoviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [187] Garcia-Ruiz H, Holste NM, LaTourrette K (2020) Poleroviruses (Luteoviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [188] Firth AE, Brierley I (2012) Non-canonical translation in RNA viruses. J Gen Virol 93: 1385-1409. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.042499-0
    [189] Smirnova E, Firth AE, Miller WA, et al. (2015) Discovery of a small non-AUG-initiated ORF in poleroviruses and luteoviruses that is required for long-distance movement. PLoS Pathog 11: e1004868. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004868
    [190] Zhang XY, Zhao TY, Li YY, et al. (2018) The conserved proline18 in the polerovirus p3a is important for brassica yellows virus systemic infection. Front. Microbiol 9: 613. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00613
    [191] Li S, Su X, Luo X, et al. (2020) First evidence showing that Pepper vein yellows virus P4 protein is a movement protein. BMC Microbiol 20: 72. doi: 10.1186/s12866-020-01758-y
    [192] DeBlasio SL, Xu Y, Johnson RS, et al. (2018) The interaction dynamics of two potato leafroll virus movement proteins affects their localization to the outer membranes of mitochondria and plastids. Viruses 10: 585. doi: 10.3390/v10110585
    [193] Gutierrez C (2000) Geminiviruses and the plant cell cycle. Plant Mol Biol 43: 763-772. doi: 10.1023/A:1006462028363
    [194] Gronenborn B (2004) Nanoviruses: genome organisation and protein function. Vet Microbiol 98: 103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2003.10.015
    [195] Krupovic M, Varsani A, Kazlauskas D, et al. (2020) Cressdnaviricota: a virus phylum unifying seven families of rep-encoding viruses with single-stranded, circular DNA genomes. J Virol 94: e00582-20. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00582-20
    [196] Zhao L, Rosario K, Breitbart M, et al. (2019) Eukaryotic circular rep-encoding single-stranded dna (cress dna) viruses: ubiquitous viruses with small genomes and a diverse host range. Adv Virus Res 103: 71-133. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.10.001
    [197] Martin DP, Monjane AL (2020) Maize Streak Virus (Geminiviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [198] Navas-Castillo J, Fiallo-Olivé E (2020) Geminiviruses (Geminiviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [199] Vetten HJ, Gronenborn B (2020) Nanoviruses (Nanoviridae). Ref Module Life Sci .
    [200] Hanley-Bowdoin L, Bejarano ER, Robertson D, et al. (2013) Geminiviruses: masters at redirecting and reprogramming plant processes. Nat Rev Microbiol 11: 777-788. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3117
    [201] Jeske H (2009) Geminiviruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 331: 185-226.
    [202] Fondong VN (2013) Geminivirus protein structure and function. Mol Plant Pathol 14: 635-649. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12032
    [203] Katul L, Maiss E, Morozov SY, et al. (1997) Analysis of six DNA components of the faba bean necrotic yellows virus genome and their structural affinity to related plant virus genomes. Virology 233: 247-259. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8611
    [204] Wanitchakorn R, Hafner GJ, Harding RM, et al. (2000) Functional analysis of proteins encoded by banana bunchy top virus DNA-4 to -6. J Gen Virol 81: 299-306. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-81-1-299
    [205] Grigoras I, Vetten HJ, Commandeur U, et al. (2018) Nanovirus DNA-N encodes a protein mandatory for aphid transmission. Virology 522: 281-291. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2018.07.001
    [206] Krenz B, Schiessl I, Greiner E, et al. (2017) Analyses of pea necrotic yellow dwarf virus-encoded proteins. Virus Genes 53: 454-463. doi: 10.1007/s11262-017-1439-x
    [207] Lazareva EA, Lezzhov AA, Chergintsev DA, et al. (2020) Reticulon-like properties of a plant virus-encoded movement protein. New Phytol in press.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Jürgen Sprekels, Asymptotic analysis of a tumor growth model with fractional operators, 2020, 120, 18758576, 41, 10.3233/ASY-191578
    2. Pierluigi Colli, Gianni Gilardi, Jürgen Sprekels, A Distributed Control Problem for a Fractional Tumor Growth Model, 2019, 7, 2227-7390, 792, 10.3390/math7090792
    3. Jinlong Wei, Jinqiao Duan, Guangying Lv, Kinetic Solutions for Nonlocal Scalar Conservation Laws, 2018, 50, 0036-1410, 1521, 10.1137/16M108687X
    4. Gerardo Huaroto, Wladimir Neves, Solvability of the fractional hyperbolic Keller–Segel system, 2023, 74, 14681218, 103957, 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2023.103957
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(6887) PDF downloads(207) Cited by(17)

Figures and Tables

Figures(2)  /  Tables(1)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog