Compound | NITR-I, g/L | NITR-II, g/L | Compound | NITR-I, g/L | NITR-II, g/L |
(NH4)2SO4 | 2 | 0 | FeSO4 · 7H2O | 0.4 | 0.03 |
NaNO3 | 0 | 0.006 | CaCO3 | 5.0 | 1 |
K2HPO4 | 1 | 1 | CaCl2 | 0 | 0.3 |
MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 | 0.1 | Agar* | 15 | 15 |
NaCl | 2 | 0.3 |
Removal of nitrogen from wastewaters (WW) represents a global problem. The low nitrification rate during WW treatment is often caused by ecotoxicity. This problem is attributed mostly to the industrial WW. Our study was focused on the testing of industrial WW and activated sludge (AS) with the aim to reveal the abundance of nitrifiers and increase their biomass, thus, providing the additional step, i.e., bioaugmentation, within the technological process of WW treatment. Plating of AS on the selective solidified media designated for the 1st and 2nd nitrification stages, resulted in the shift in bacterial community structure with dominated Alcaligenaceae and Alcanivorax for the 1st stage, and Alcanivorax-for the 2nd stage of nitrification, respectively. Incubation of AS in the presence of real WW and selective nitrification broth resulted in a considerable increase (one or two magnitudes in the presence of the 1st and 2nd stage nitrification broth, respectively) of culturable nitrifiers after 5 days incubation under aerated conditions. The obtained data provide with evidence about a possibility to strengthen the role of heterotrophic nitrifiers in the treatment of industrial WW, where toxicity obstacles inhibited nitrification under conventional conditions.
Citation: Mārtiņš Kalniņš, Andrejs Bērziņš, Dita Gudrā, Kaspars Megnis, Dāvids Fridmanis, Pavel Danilko, Olga Muter. Selective enrichment of heterotrophic nitrifiers Alcaligenaceae and Alcanivorax spp. from industrial wastewaters[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 32-42. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020002
[1] | Mojtaba Moosavian, Mina Moradzadeh, Ataollah Ghadiri, Morteza Saki . Isolation and Identification of Legionella spp. in environmental water sources based on macrophage infectivity potentiator (mip) gene sequencing in southwest Iran. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 223-231. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.223 |
[2] | Larissa Y. Waré, Augustini P. Nikièma, Jean C. Meile, Saïdou Kaboré, Angélique Fontana, Noël Durand, Didier Montet, Nicolas Barro . Microbiological safety of flours used in follow up for infant formulas produced in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(2): 347-361. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.2.347 |
[3] | Thomas Bintsis . Foodborne pathogens. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 529-563. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.529 |
[4] | Smita H. Panda, Jyothsna Khanna Goli, Sushrirekha Das, NakulanandaMohanty . Production, optimization and probiotic characterization of potential lactic acid bacteria producing siderophores. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 88-107. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.88 |
[5] | Andrea Gärtner, Jutta Wiese, Johannes F. Imhoff . Diversity of Micromonospora strains from the deep Mediterranean Sea and their potential to produce bioactive compounds. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(2): 205-221. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.2.205 |
[6] | Ariel J. Santiago, Maria L. Burgos-Garay, Leila Kartforosh, Mustafa Mazher, Rodney M. Donlan . Bacteriophage treatment of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in a multispecies biofilm: a potential biocontrol strategy for healthcare facilities. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(1): 43-63. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020003 |
[7] | Nikolina-Alexandra Xaxiri, Eleni Nikouli, Panagiotis Berillis, Konstantinos Ar. Kormas . Bacterial biofilm development during experimental degradation of Melicertus kerathurus exoskeleton in seawater. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 397-412. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.397 |
[8] | Vakhtang V. Dzhavakhiya, Elena V. Glagoleva, Veronika V. Savelyeva, Natalia V. Statsyuk, Maksim I. Kartashov, Tatiana M. Voinova, Alla V. Sergeeva . New bacitracin-resistant nisin-producing strain of Lactococcus lactis and its physiological characterization. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 608-621. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.608 |
[9] | Garmasheva I . Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from Ukrainiantraditional dairy products. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 372-387. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.372 |
[10] | Matthew E. Bechard, Payam Farahani, Dina Greene, Anna Pham, Andrew Orry, Madeline E. Rasche . Purification, kinetic characterization, and site-directed mutagenesis of Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus RFAP Synthase Produced in Escherichia coli. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(3): 186-204. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.3.186 |
Removal of nitrogen from wastewaters (WW) represents a global problem. The low nitrification rate during WW treatment is often caused by ecotoxicity. This problem is attributed mostly to the industrial WW. Our study was focused on the testing of industrial WW and activated sludge (AS) with the aim to reveal the abundance of nitrifiers and increase their biomass, thus, providing the additional step, i.e., bioaugmentation, within the technological process of WW treatment. Plating of AS on the selective solidified media designated for the 1st and 2nd nitrification stages, resulted in the shift in bacterial community structure with dominated Alcaligenaceae and Alcanivorax for the 1st stage, and Alcanivorax-for the 2nd stage of nitrification, respectively. Incubation of AS in the presence of real WW and selective nitrification broth resulted in a considerable increase (one or two magnitudes in the presence of the 1st and 2nd stage nitrification broth, respectively) of culturable nitrifiers after 5 days incubation under aerated conditions. The obtained data provide with evidence about a possibility to strengthen the role of heterotrophic nitrifiers in the treatment of industrial WW, where toxicity obstacles inhibited nitrification under conventional conditions.
Nitrification processes in soil and aquatic environments play an important role in N-cycle, and is strongly dependent on various factors, e.g., soil matrix, water status, aeration, temperature, pH, microbial community structure and others [1],[2]. Nitrification in recirculation aquaculture systems reduces concentrations of NH4+ and NH3, which are critical since these are highly toxic for fish [3]. Optimization of the treatment of agro-based industrial effluents also needs to focus on the nitrification rate, which in turn, allows reducing a hydraulic retention time [4]. Furthermore, poor nitrification in municipal wastewater (WW) treatment plants represents a serious problem leading to inefficient WW treatment [5].
Nitrification mainly involved two phylogenetically unrelated groups of autotrophic bacteria, i.e., ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) and nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB). Besides, heterotrophic nitrifying and oxygen tolerant denitrifying bacteria may substantially contribute to the convertion of nitrogen [6],[7].
Meta-analysis of literature data showed that nitrification is a log-linear function of N mineralization, increasing rapidly at low mineralization rates but changing only slightly at high mineralization rates [8]. Different feed C/N ratios in wastewater treatment processes may substantially change the efficiency of nitrification and denitrification. Thus, application of feed C/N ratios of 2.7, 4.2 and 5.6 in a continuous-flow microaerobic moving bed biofilm bioreactor showed C/N ratio of 4.2 to be the most efficient [9].
Heavy metals are known to influence the nitrification process in conventional AS systems, while inhibition effects are dependent on the metal oxidation state and other physicochemical conditions [10]–[13].
One of the powerfull tools for maintaining the nitrification activity in soils and aquatic environments is the bioaugmentation with nitrifiers [14]–[16]. A great diversity of microorganisms takes part in the N-cycle, e.g., denitrifying fungi, nitrifying archaea, anammox bacteria, aerobic denitrifying bacteria and heterotrophic nitrifying microorganisms [17].
In the study with conventional AS, the bioaugmentation of AS with nitrifying AS obtained from a pilot plant performing full nitritation under stable conditions (6 % dw) resulted in significantly faster achieving the partial nitrification, compared with the non-bioaugmented AS [18]. Mannucci et al. [19] reported that bioaugmentation with nitrifiers of membrane bioreactors was efficient, while depended on the temperature and other operating conditions in seeding and seeded reactors. Nitrification bioaugmentation with sidestream granules with Nitrosomonas as a dominant genus, instead of flocculent biomass was suggested by [20]. Sludge aerobic granulation resulted in AOB enrichment and the reduction of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOB) in granules, which is highly favorable to a stable partial nitrification operation [21].
However, bioaugmentation strongly influences the microbial community, that might affect the nitrification kinetics, due to the unequal and asynchronous increase of the ammonia uptake rate [22]. The possible side effects of bioaugmentation should be strongly controlled by optimization of the amount and physiological activity of the microbial biomass seeded, as well as technological scheme, which determines the stages and frequency of bioaugmentation.
For further development of this approach, a search for new efficient consortia of nitrifiers derived from the local site and, hence, competitive in the certain microbial communities, would be highly acknowledged. In our study, it was hypothesized that the enrichment of AS in the selective broth could reveal the abundance of nitrifiers and increase their biomass, thus, providing the additional step within the technological process, e.g., WW treatment, soil remediation and other environmental bioprocesses.
The aim of this study was to stimulate the growth of nitrifiers in the AS from the WWTP, which is operated at chemical industry. The chemical plant produces resins, drying accelerators, plasticizers, organic synthetic products, azo initiators and others. The low nitrification rate at these WWTP is caused by the presence of toxic compounds. Selective pressure of broth and aeration conditions were expected to determine the bacterial taxa in the AS, which have a potential for stimulating the nitrification process in case of bioaugmentation.
The AS and WW have been sampled at JSC BIOLARS. The WW had the following physico-chemical characteristics: chemical oxygen demand (COD) 900 ÷ 1100 mg/L; biological oxygen demand (BOD5) 350 ÷ 380 mg/L; Ntot 60 ÷ 80 mg/L; Ptot 6 ÷ 8 mg/L. The dry weight (dw) of AS samples was 2.8 %. Samples were stored at 4 °C until their use in laboratory experiments.
Three glass 500 mL bottles with a connected aeration system were sterilized and filled with 130 mL filtered WW, 50 mL AS, 20 mL 10x stock solution of NITR-I or NITR-II (Table 1). In the control bottle, 20 mL deionized sterile water were added. The WW with AS and medium were continuously aerated during 10 days, afterwards, during 7 days the incubation was performed with a periodical shaking, i.e., twice daily. Incubation was performed at 23 °C.
Compound | NITR-I, g/L | NITR-II, g/L | Compound | NITR-I, g/L | NITR-II, g/L |
(NH4)2SO4 | 2 | 0 | FeSO4 · 7H2O | 0.4 | 0.03 |
NaNO3 | 0 | 0.006 | CaCO3 | 5.0 | 1 |
K2HPO4 | 1 | 1 | CaCl2 | 0 | 0.3 |
MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 | 0.1 | Agar* | 15 | 15 |
NaCl | 2 | 0.3 |
*Agar was added only to solidified media for CFU counting.
For enumeration of the colony forming units (CFU) in AS, the following media were used: Standard Method Agar (StMA, BD, USA) for the total count of aerobic heterotrophic bacteria; selective media for enumeration of nitrifiers responsible for the 1st and 2nd stages of nitrification, i.e., NITR-I and NITR-II, respectively (Table 1). The microdilution plating method was used, i.e., decimal dilutions of samples were prepared in 0.85 % NaCl in microplates, afterwards 10-µL droplets from each dilution were plated on solidified media [23] The number of CFU was determined after incubation at 30 °C for 48h (StMA) and 96h (NITR-I and NITR-II).
Dehydrogenase (DHA) assay was applied for visualization of CFUs on NITR-I and NITR-II media. The reaction mixture (40 mg INT(2-p-iodo-3-nitrophenyl-5-phenyltetrazolium), 10 mg glucose in 20 mL of 0.25M TRIS) was applied on the surface of the solidified medium with colonies [24]. The color of colonies turned purple after 20 min incubation, as a result of INT reduction to iodonitrophenylformazan [25] (Figure S1).
DNA was extracted using FastDNA SPIN Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, USA). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of 16S rRNA V3-4 region was performed employing Probio_Uni_F and Probio_Uni_R [26] primers tagged with 10-11bp unique barcode labels along with the adapter sequence. PCR reaction was carried out using Phusion Hot Start II DNA Polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and GeneAmp® PCR System 9700 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) according to manufacturers' guidelines. Thermal conditions of the PCR reaction were set as follows: 98 °C for 30 seconds, 35 cycles of 98 °C for 10 seconds, 67 °C for 15 seconds, 72 °C for 15 seconds with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 minutes. PCR products were purified using NucleoMag® NGS Clean-Up and Size Select Kit (Macherey-Nagel, Germany). The quality and quantity of amplicons were assessed using Agilent High Sensitivity DNA kit and Agilent 2100 BioAnalyzer (Agilent Technologies, USA). Samples were diluted to 12 pM and pooled. Samples were sequenced on Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine sequencing platform employing Ion PGM™ Hi-Q™ View OT2 kit (Life Technologies, USA) for template generation and Ion PGM™ Hi-Q™ View Sequencing kit (Life Technologies, USA) on Ion 318 v2 chip (Life Technologies, USA).
Sequencing data analysis was carried out using QIIME version 1.8.0 and UPARSE pipeline version 7.0.1001 to quality-filter and cluster 16S rRNA amplicon sequences [27]. Sequences with the mean sequence quality score > 20 passed the quality control. Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) were built at 97 % sequence identity with UCLUST algorithm [28]. Taxonomic assignment to the lowest possible rank was performed with RDP (Wang et al., 2007), using the Greengenes [29] (http://greengenes.secondgenome.com) reference dataset (gg_otus-13_8 release). Alpha diversity metric Shannon index was calculated within the QIIME environment.
Preliminary testing of nitrification activity in the WW indicated to the relatively low activity of nitrifiers, particularly shown by a potential ammonium oxidation assay (data not shown). This problem could be associated with abundance of toxic compounds in WW. The primary task of this study was to reveal the microorganisms in AS with nitrification potential, which afterwards could serve for bioaugmentation of this WWTP.
Composition of bacterial community in the intact AS showed a relatively high diversity, comparing with enriched samples NITR-I and NITR-II, with Shannon diversity indexes of 7.7, 5.3 and 4.5, respectively (Table S1). At the phylum level the intact AS consisted of Firmicutes (34%), Proteobacteria (30%), Actinobacteria (15%), Bacteroidetes (10%) and others, which were represented with a relative abundance below 10% (Figure 1A). These data corraborate with other studies, which reported about the dominance of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Verrucomicrobia phyla at municipal WWTP [30].
Incubation of AS in NITR-I and NITR-II resulted in a considerable dominance of Proteobacteria with relative abundance of 88% and 85%, respectively (Figure 1A). After incubation in NITR-I, Proteobacteria at class level was represented mostly by Gammaproteobacteria (37%) and Betaproteobacteria (41%), while after incubation in NITR-II – by Gammaproteobacteria (67%) (Figure 1B). At order level it was shown, that Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria were represented by Burkholderiales and Oceanospirillales, respectively (Figure 1C). In turn, at genus level–Alcaligenaceae (genus was not recognized) and Alcanivorax, respectively (Figure 1D).
Typical AOB in WW are known to be Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira species [30],[31]. However, in the high strength industrial WW containing enhanced concentrations of ammonia as well as other toxic compounds, these typical nitrifiers do not survive [32]. On the other hand, there is a probability that the bias could be introduced during the bioinformatic analysis as the public sequence databases are still under development and contain various errors, thus inducing inaccurate results regarding to the assignment of individual OTUs [33],[34]. In this manner portion of typical AOB related sequences might be assigned to other taxonomical branch based on sequence homology as described previously (Ye et al., 2011). Another possible loss of data resolution might arise due to misassignment to OTUs, which contain only a few sequences. However, the occurrence of this type of error is low, since, during the data analysis, low abundance sequences are discarded from further processing [35].
In the study with municipal WW, nitrification rate of the AS increased with increasing O2, whereas denitrification occurred mainly in the anoxic zones [36]. Although the treatment of AS in the membrane reactor under low dissolved oxygen level also resulted in a sustained effective simultaneous nitrification/denitrification [37].
In turn, heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification, which occur simultaneously, have the following mechanisms: NH4+→NH2OH→NO2−→NO3− and NO3−→NO2−→N2O→N2 [38],[39]. It was shown that Acinetobacter calcoaceticus isolated from a membrane bioreactor, converted NH4+ to N2 under aerobic conditions during heterotrophic growth. Nitrate reductase and nitrite reductase activity were not detectable in this reaction mixture. Authors suggested the nitrogen removal under tested conditions may occur via a hydroxylamine intermediate instead of nitrite [40].
As reported by [41], among the dominant taxa responsible for the heterotrophic denitrification processes in WW were Burkholderiadaceae, Comamonadaceae, Alcaligenaceae. Our data indicated that the conditions for the 1st nitrification stage (NITR-I) were the most preferable for Alcaligenaceae, where its relative abundance reached 37 %, while in the presence of NITR-II it was only 2% (Figure 2D). According to literature data, Alcaligenaceae are capable of nitrification and denitrification, thus, providing a possible advantage in biological WW system [6]. The presence of nitrous oxide reductase gene confirmed the presence of oxygen-tolerant denitrification system in these bacteria. Heterotrophic nitrification of ammonia by Alcaligenes sp. into nitrite is supposed to occur via formation of hydroxyl amine, which is oxidized to nitrous oxide using oxygen or nitrite as electron acceptor [6]. Alcaligenes faecalis was shown to be efficient heterotrophic nitrifier and aerobic denitrifier in a high-strength ammonium WW, where 40% and 60% of ammonium were converted to N2 gas and cell mass, respectively [42]. Excess biomass of Alcaligenaceae produced during WW treatment process was suggested to apply in agriculture. Alcaligenes faecalis showed antagonistic behaviour to plant pathogens [43].
Another important taxa, i.e., Alcanivorax spp., in our study was notably developed under selective pressure of NITR-I and NITR-II, compared to the control, i.e., 32%, 61% and <1%, respectively (Figure 2D). As was reported in literature, these bacterial species are known to reduce nitrate to nitrite. For example, Alcanivorax has been isolated from the deep-sea sediment and characterized as halophilic, aerobic, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming, catalase- and oxidase-positive motile rods, growing on a restricted spectrum of organic compounds, including some organic acids and alkanes [44]. Alcanivorax bear the alkane monooxygenase (alkB) gene encoding the Alk enzyme, and, hence, attract a great attention in terms of treatment for oil-polluted WW [45]. Nakano et al. [46] reported that Alcanivorax spp. was isolated from organically enriched marine sediments, and dominated in the bacterial consortia responsible for nitrogen removal.
Incubation of AS in the liquid phase with different composition was expected to change the amount of culturable microorganisms in AS. The data on CFU counts for nitrifiers of the 1st and 2nd stages, as well as “total” aerobic heterotrophic bacteria are presented in Fig.2. The number of CFU obtained on StMA showed, that aeration stimulated the proliferation of the heterotrophs in the control and NITR-I bottles during the first 10 days from 7.0*106 up to 5.1*107 and 4.0*107 CFU/mL, respectively (Figure 2C). Interestinlgy, the CFU counts on the selective media (NITR-I and NITR-II) was found to be higher than on StMA, which reached 109 magnitude in the bottles amended with NITR-I and NITR-II broth after 5 days incubation. In particular, this maximum of CFU count was obtained in the both, i.e., NITR-I and NITR-II bottles for the 1st stage nitrifiers, while for the 2nd stage nitrifiers surprisingly the bottle NITR-I was found as the more favourable among three types of liquid media (Figure 2B). The initial pH values in the control, NITR-I and NITR-II bottles were 4.71; 7.61 and 8.53, respectively. After 17 days incubation, the pH level gradually increased to 8.30; 8.42 and 9.11, respectively.
The data obtained in this experiment, indicated that complex interrelations between physicochemical characteristics of real WW, composition of nutrient amendments, as well as physiological activity of nitrifiers and other microorganisms (derived from AS), resulted in dynamic changes upon incubation. The mechanisms of these changes are hardly understood and needs to be studied in further experiments.
Plating of AS on the selective solidified media designated for the 1st and 2nd nitrification stages, resulted in the shift in bacterial community structure with dominated Alcaligenaceae and Alcanivorax for the 1st stage, and Alcanivorax - for the 2nd stage of nitrification, respectively. These Proteobacteria are known to be heterotrophic nitrifiers and could be used for stimulation of nitrogen removal from WW by means of bioaugmentation.
Incubation of AS in the presence of real WW and selective nitrification broth resulted in a considerable increase (one and two magnitudes in the presence of NITR-I and NITR-II, respectively) of culturable nitrifiers after 5 days incubation under aerated conditions. The obtained data provide with evidence about a possibility to strengthen the role of heterotrophic nitrifiers in the treatment of industrial WW, where toxicity obstacles inhibited nitrification under conventional conditions.
[1] |
Sahrawat KL (2008) Factors affecting nitrification in soils. Commun Soil Sci Plan 39: 1436-1446. doi: 10.1080/00103620802004235
![]() |
[2] | Stein LY (2014) Heterotrophic nitrification and nitrifier denitrification. Nitrification . |
[3] | Thymann A (2013) The co-existence of heterotrophs and nitrifiers in nitrifying biofilm a study on the relationship between heterotrophic and nitrifying bacteria in a marine environment. Available from: https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/57744106/THE_CO-EXISTENCE_OF_HETEROTROPHS_AND_NITRIFIERS_IN_NITRIFYING_BIOFILM.pdf. |
[4] |
Onyla CO, Uyub AM, Akunna JC, et al. (2001) Increasing the fertilizer value of palm oil mill sludge: Bioaugmentation in nitrification. Water Sci Technol 44: 157-162. doi: 10.2166/wst.2001.0608
![]() |
[5] |
Elmerich C (2002) Nitrification and denitrification in the activated sludge process. Res Microbiol 153: 253. doi: 10.1016/S0923-2508(02)01315-3
![]() |
[6] |
Velusamy K, Krishnani KK (2013) Heterotrophic nitrifying and oxygen tolerant denitrifying bacteria from greenwater system of coastal aquaculture. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 169: 1978-1992. doi: 10.1007/s12010-013-0109-2
![]() |
[7] |
Ge S, Wang S, Yang X, et al. (2015) Detection of nitrifiers and evaluation of partial nitrification for wastewater treatment: a review. Chemosphere 140: 85-98. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.02.004
![]() |
[8] |
Booth MS, Stark JM, Rastetter E (2005) Controls on nitrogen cycling in terrestrial ecosystems: A synthetic analysis of literature data. Ecol Monogr 75: 139-157. doi: 10.1890/04-0988
![]() |
[9] |
Iannacone F, Di Capua F, Granata F, et al. (2019) Effect of carbon-to-nitrogen ratio on simultaneous nitrification denitrification and phosphorus removal in a microaerobic moving bed biofilm reactor. J Environ Manage 250: 109518. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109518
![]() |
[10] |
Hu Z, Chandran K, Grasso D, et al. (2004) Comparison of nitrification inhibition by metals in batch and continuous flow reactors. Water Res 38: 3949-3959. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.06.025
![]() |
[11] |
You SJ, Tsai YP, Huang RY (2009) Effect of heavy metals on nitrification performance in different activated sludge processes. J Hazard Mater 165: 987-994. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.112
![]() |
[12] |
Papirio S, Zou G, Ylinen A, et al. (2014) Effect of arsenic on nitrification of simulated mining water. Bioresour Technol 164: 149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.04.072
![]() |
[13] |
di Biase A, et al. (2020) Ammonia, thiocyanate, and cyanate removal in an aerobic up-flow submerged attached growth reactor treating gold mine wastewater. Chemosphere 243: 125395. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125395
![]() |
[14] |
Tang HL, Chen H (2015) Nitrification at full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants: Evaluation of inhibition and bioaugmentation of nitrifiers. Bioresour Technol 190: 76-81. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.063
![]() |
[15] |
Parker D, Wanner J (2007) Review of methods for improving nitrification through bioaugmentation. Water Pract 1: 1-16. doi: 10.2175/193317707X256964
![]() |
[16] | Zimmerman RA, Bradshaw AT, Richard D (2004) Acclimation of nitrifiers for activated sludge treatment: a bench scale evaluation. Water Intell Online 3. |
[17] |
Hayatsu M, Tago K, Saito M (2008) Various players in the nitrogen cycle: Diversity and functions of the microorganisms involved in nitrification and denitrification. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 54: 33-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-0765.2007.00195.x
![]() |
[18] |
Bartrolí A, Carrera J, Pérez J (2011) Bioaugmentation as a tool for improving the start-up and stability of a pilot-scale partial nitrification biofilm airlift reactor. Bioresour Technol 102: 4370-4375. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.084
![]() |
[19] |
Mannucci A, Munz G, Mori G, et al. (2015) Modeling bioaugmentation with nitrifiers in membrane bioreactors. Water Sci Technol 71: 15-21. doi: 10.2166/wst.2014.456
![]() |
[20] |
Figdore BA, Stensel HD, Winkler MKH, et al. (2018) Comparison of different aerobic granular sludge types for activated sludge nitrification bioaugmentation potential. Bioresour Technol 251: 189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.004
![]() |
[21] |
Li AJ, Li XY, Yu HQ (2013) Aerobic sludge granulation facilitated by activated carbon for partial nitrification treatment of ammonia-rich wastewater. Chem Eng J 218: 253-259. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.12.044
![]() |
[22] | Yu L, Peng D, Pan R (2012) Shifts in nitrification kinetics and microbial community during bioaugmentation of activated sludge with nitrifiers enriched on sludge reject water. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012: 691894. |
[23] |
Pfeltz RF, Schmidt JL, Wilkinson BJ (2001) A microdilution plating method for population analysis of antibiotic-resistant staphylococci. Microb Drug Resist 7: 289-295. doi: 10.1089/10766290152652846
![]() |
[24] | Kalnins MO (2019) Application of enzyme activity assay for an improved enumeration of culturable nitrifiers. Environ Exp Biol 17: 49. |
[25] |
Camiña F, Trasar-Cepeda C, Gil-Sotres F, et al. (1998) Measurement of dehydrogenase activity in acid soils rich in organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 30: 1005-1011. doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00010-8
![]() |
[26] |
Milani C, Hevia A, Foroni E, et al. (2013) Assessing the fecal mcrobiota: an optimized ion torrent 16S rRNA gene-based analysis protocol. PLoS One 8: e68739. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068739
![]() |
[27] |
Pylro VS, Roesch LFW, Morais DK, et al. (2014) Data analysis for 16S microbial profiling from different benchtop sequencing platforms. J Microbiol Methods 107: 30-37. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2014.08.018
![]() |
[28] |
Edgar RC (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460-2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
![]() |
[29] |
DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, et al. (2006) Greengenes, a chimera-checked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 72: 5069-5072. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03006-05
![]() |
[30] |
Yu K, Zhang T (2012) Metagenomic and metatranscriptomic analysis of microbial community structure and gene expression of activated sludge. PLoS One 7: e38183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038183
![]() |
[31] |
Wang X, Wen X, Criddle C, et al. (2010) Community analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge of eight wastewater treatment systems. J Environ Sci 22: 627-634. doi: 10.1016/S1001-0742(09)60155-8
![]() |
[32] |
Grunditz C, Dalhammar G (2001) Development of nitrification inhibition assays using pure cultures of Nitrosomonas and Nitrobacter. Water Res 35: 433-440. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00312-2
![]() |
[33] |
Ye L, Shao MF, Zhang T, et al. (2011) Analysis of the bacterial community in a laboratory-scale nitrification reactor and a wastewater treatment plant by 454-pyrosequencing. Water Res 45: 4390-4398. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2011.05.028
![]() |
[34] |
Pollock J, Glendinning L, Wisedchanwet T, et al. (2018) The madness of microbiome: Attempting to find consensus ‘best practice’ for 16S microbiome studies. Appl Environ Microbiol 84: e02627-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02627-17
![]() |
[35] | Hornung BVH, Zwittink RD, Kuijper EJ (2019) Issues and current standards of controls in microbiome research. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 95: fiz045. |
[36] |
Satoh H, Nakamura Y, Ono H, et al. (2003) Effect of oxygen concentration on nitrification and denitrification in single activated sludge flocs. Biotechnol Bioeng 83: 604-607. doi: 10.1002/bit.10717
![]() |
[37] |
Hocaoglu SM, Insel G, Cokgor UU, et al. (2011) Effect of low dissolved oxygen on simultaneous nitrification and denitrification in a membrane bioreactor treating black water. Bioresour Technol 102: 4333-4340. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.096
![]() |
[38] | Chen Q, Ni J (2012) Ammonium removal by Agrobacterium sp. LAD9 capable of heterotrophic nitrification-aerobic denitrification. J Biosci Bioeng 102: 4333-4340. |
[39] |
Ren YX, Yang L, Liang X (2014) The characteristics of a novel heterotrophic nitrifying and aerobic denitrifying bacterium, Acinetobacter junii YB. Bioresour Technol 171: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.058
![]() |
[40] |
Zhao B, He YL, Hughes J, et al. (2010) Heterotrophic nitrogen removal by a newly isolated Acinetobacter calcoaceticus HNR. Bioresour Technol 101: 5194-5200. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.02.043
![]() |
[41] |
Sotres A, Cerrillo M, Viñas M, et al. (2016) Nitrogen removal in a two-chambered microbial fuel cell: Establishment of a nitrifying-denitrifying microbial community on an intermittent aerated cathode. Chem Eng J 284: 905-916. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.08.100
![]() |
[42] | Shoda M (2017) Heterotrophic nitrification and aerobic denitrification by Alcaligenes faecalis No. 4. Nitrification and Denitrification . |
[43] |
Honda N, Hirai M, Ano T, et al. (1999) Control of tomato damping-off caused by Rhizoctonia solani by the heterotrophic nitrifier Alcaligenes faecalis and its product, hydroxylamine. Japanese J Phytopathol 65: 153-162. doi: 10.3186/jjphytopath.65.153
![]() |
[44] |
Liu C, Shao Z (2005) Alcanivorax dieselolei sp. nov., a novel alkane-degrading bacterium isolated from sea water and deep-sea sediment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55: 1181-1186. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63443-0
![]() |
[45] |
Li H, Wang X, Mu B, et al. (2013) Molecular detection, quantification and distribution of alkane-degrading bacteria in production water from low temperature oilfields. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 76: 49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2012.06.007
![]() |
[46] |
Nakano M, Shimizu Y, Okumura H, et al. (2008) Construction of a consortium comprising ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and denitrifying bacteria isolated from marine sediment. Biocontrol Sci 13: 73-89. doi: 10.4265/bio.13.73
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1. | Daniel L. Forwood, Devin B. Holman, Sarah J. Meale, Alex V. Chaves, Ensiled Mixed Vegetables Enriched Carbohydrate Metabolism in Heterofermentative Lactic Acid Bacteria, 2022, 8, 2311-5637, 699, 10.3390/fermentation8120699 | |
2. | Dong-Hyun Kim, Hyun-Sik Yun, Young-Saeng Kim, Jong-Guk Kim, Pollutant-Removing Biofilter Strains Associated with High Ammonia and Hydrogen Sulfide Removal Rate in a Livestock Wastewater Treatment Facility, 2021, 13, 2071-1050, 7358, 10.3390/su13137358 | |
3. | Jing Zhou, Yong Kong, Mengmeng Wu, Fengyue Shu, Haijun Wang, Shuonan Ma, Yan Li, Erik Jeppesen, Effects of Nitrogen Input on Community Structure of the Denitrifying Bacteria with Nitrous Oxide Reductase Gene (nosZ I): a Long-Term Pond Experiment, 2023, 85, 0095-3628, 454, 10.1007/s00248-022-01971-4 | |
4. | Eshetu Janka, Sabin Pathak, Alireza Rasti, Sandeep Gyawali, Shuai Wang, Simultaneous Heterotrophic Nitrification and Aerobic Denitrification of Water after Sludge Dewatering in Two Sequential Moving Bed Biofilm Reactors (MBBR), 2022, 19, 1660-4601, 1841, 10.3390/ijerph19031841 | |
5. | Beverly E. Flood, Deon C. Louw, Anja K. Van der Plas, Jake V. Bailey, John M. Senko, Giant sulfur bacteria (Beggiatoaceae) from sediments underlying the Benguela upwelling system host diverse microbiomes, 2021, 16, 1932-6203, e0258124, 10.1371/journal.pone.0258124 | |
6. | Pascal Otto, Mozhdeh Alipoursarbani, Daniel Torrent, Adriel Latorre-Pérez, Thomas Paust, Alfred Albert, Christian Abendroth, Microbiome Characterization after Aerobic Digestate Reactivation of Anaerobically Digested Sewage Sludge, 2023, 9, 2311-5637, 471, 10.3390/fermentation9050471 |
Compound | NITR-I, g/L | NITR-II, g/L | Compound | NITR-I, g/L | NITR-II, g/L |
(NH4)2SO4 | 2 | 0 | FeSO4 · 7H2O | 0.4 | 0.03 |
NaNO3 | 0 | 0.006 | CaCO3 | 5.0 | 1 |
K2HPO4 | 1 | 1 | CaCl2 | 0 | 0.3 |
MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 | 0.1 | Agar* | 15 | 15 |
NaCl | 2 | 0.3 |
*Agar was added only to solidified media for CFU counting.
Compound | NITR-I, g/L | NITR-II, g/L | Compound | NITR-I, g/L | NITR-II, g/L |
(NH4)2SO4 | 2 | 0 | FeSO4 · 7H2O | 0.4 | 0.03 |
NaNO3 | 0 | 0.006 | CaCO3 | 5.0 | 1 |
K2HPO4 | 1 | 1 | CaCl2 | 0 | 0.3 |
MgSO4·7H2O | 0.5 | 0.1 | Agar* | 15 | 15 |
NaCl | 2 | 0.3 |