Laboratory of Nutritional and Healthy Quality of Herbaceous Crop, Department of the Science of Agriculture, Food and Environment (SAFE) University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
2.
Laboratory of Predictive Microbiology, Department of the Science of Agriculture, Food and Environment (SAFE), University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
Received:
24 March 2017
Accepted:
25 May 2017
Published:
07 June 2017
Due to the increase in both human population growth and environmental pressure, it is necessary to raise agricultural productivity without enhancing environmental footprint. Within this context, soil inoculation with PGPB (Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria) may be considered a promising tool of integrated management systems. In particular, PGPB may improve plant growth either directly, by facilitating resource use or modulating plant hormone levels, or indirectly by decreasing the inhibitory effects of various pathogenic agents. PGPB comprise different functional and taxonomic groups of bacteria like Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Rhizobium and others. Their ability to either mobilize mineral or organic bound nutrients from the pedosphere or to fix atmospheric N2 and make it available to the plants, is a crucial feature in their application. In literature some data are available on the use of commercial PGPB, while less efforts have been made on the study of the effect of autochthonous PGPB isolated from soils on sustainability of cropping systems; thus a literature survey on these aspects was carried out with special focus on wheat, a staple food for a large part of world population. In particular, the main topic of this review is the potential of PGPB to enhance use efficiency of agro-environmental resources focusing on the interaction PGPB-wheat for improving nitrogen use efficiency.
Citation: Nilde Antonella Di Benedetto, Maria Rosaria Corbo, Daniela Campaniello, Mariagrazia Pia Cataldi, Antonio Bevilacqua, Milena Sinigaglia, Zina Flagella. The role of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in improving nitrogen use efficiency for sustainable crop production: a focus on wheat[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 413-434. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.413
Related Papers:
[1]
Nur Raihan Abdullah, Faez Sharif, Nur Hafizah Azizan, Ismail Fitri Mohd Hafidz, Sugenendran Supramani, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar .
Pellet diameter of Ganoderma lucidum in a repeated-batch fermentation for the trio total production of biomass-exopolysaccharide-endopolysaccharide and its anti-oral cancer beta-glucan response. AIMS Microbiology, 2020, 6(4): 379-400.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2020023
[2]
Ahmed Houari, Patrick Di Martino .
Polysaccharide-hydrolysing enzymes enhance the in vitro cleaning efficiency of Nanofiltration membranes. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 368-378.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.368
[3]
Vakhtang V. Dzhavakhiya, Elena V. Glagoleva, Veronika V. Savelyeva, Natalia V. Statsyuk, Maksim I. Kartashov, Tatiana M. Voinova, Alla V. Sergeeva .
New bacitracin-resistant nisin-producing strain of Lactococcus lactis and its physiological characterization. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 608-621.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.608
[4]
Joseph O. Falkinham .
Mycobacterium avium complex: Adherence as a way of life. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(3): 428-438.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.428
[5]
Ananya Mukherjee, Puja Bhattacharjee, Rituparna Das, Arundhati Pal, Amal K. Paul .
Endophytic bacteria with plant growth promoting abilities from Ophioglossum reticulatum L.. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 596-612.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.596
[6]
Zoya Samoilova, Alexey Tyulenev, Nadezhda Muzyka, Galina Smirnova, Oleg Oktyabrsky .
Tannic and gallic acids alter redox-parameters of the medium and modulate biofilm formation. AIMS Microbiology, 2019, 5(4): 379-392.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.4.379
[7]
Javier Fernández, Sául Redondo-Blanco, Elisa M. Miguélez, Claudio J. Villar, Alfonso Clemente, Felipe Lombó .
Healthy effects of prebiotics and their metabolites against intestinal diseases and colorectal cancer. AIMS Microbiology, 2015, 1(1): 48-71.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2015.1.48
[8]
Thomas Bintsis .
Lactic acid bacteria as starter cultures: An update in their metabolism and genetics. AIMS Microbiology, 2018, 4(4): 665-684.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.4.665
[9]
Yen Thi Ngoc Phan, Minh Thuy Tang, Tu Thi Minh Tran, Van Huu Nguyen, Trang Hien Nguyen, Takeshi Tsuruta, Naoki Nishino .
Diversity of lactic acid bacteria in vegetable-based and meat-based fermented foods produced in the central region of Vietnam. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(1): 61-70.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.1.61
[10]
Garmasheva I .
Isolation and characterization of lactic acid bacteria from Ukrainiantraditional dairy products. AIMS Microbiology, 2016, 2(3): 372-387.
doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2016.3.372
Abstract
Due to the increase in both human population growth and environmental pressure, it is necessary to raise agricultural productivity without enhancing environmental footprint. Within this context, soil inoculation with PGPB (Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria) may be considered a promising tool of integrated management systems. In particular, PGPB may improve plant growth either directly, by facilitating resource use or modulating plant hormone levels, or indirectly by decreasing the inhibitory effects of various pathogenic agents. PGPB comprise different functional and taxonomic groups of bacteria like Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Rhizobium and others. Their ability to either mobilize mineral or organic bound nutrients from the pedosphere or to fix atmospheric N2 and make it available to the plants, is a crucial feature in their application. In literature some data are available on the use of commercial PGPB, while less efforts have been made on the study of the effect of autochthonous PGPB isolated from soils on sustainability of cropping systems; thus a literature survey on these aspects was carried out with special focus on wheat, a staple food for a large part of world population. In particular, the main topic of this review is the potential of PGPB to enhance use efficiency of agro-environmental resources focusing on the interaction PGPB-wheat for improving nitrogen use efficiency.
1.
Background
The population of cancer survivors in the US is on the rise [1]. In 2019, about 17 million cancer survivors were documented in the US, with this number projected to exceed 22 million by 2030 [2]. The increasing cancer survival rates can be largely attributed to advances in screening, early diagnoses, and treatment of cancers as well as a growing and aging US population [2],[3]. Approximately 45% of cancer survivors are alive 10 years or more after diagnosis, which implies that a significant proportion of this population is exposed to the physical, emotional and psychological trauma that accompanies their condition, together with the long-term adverse effects of cancer therapy such as radiotherapy [1]. This phase is understandably associated with a tendency to seek health information in order to allay the fears and concerns associated with the diagnosis of cancer for both the patient and their caregivers [4].
Most cancer patients tend to seek health information beyond that provided by their physician [5]. Regardless of patients' satisfaction with their physician, they may seek additional health information from other available sources [5]. Nearly 50% of Americans and over 60% of cancer survivors seek cancer-related information from at least one source [6] to allay the anxiety, economic and psychological effect associated with a cancer diagnosis. In addition, the source and volume of health information readily accessible to patients has increased in recent times due to advances in technology and media [6]. Media (including print, radio, tv, and internet) and interpersonal communication, including healthcare providers, are notable sources of health information. Recently, the internet is by far the most common source of adult information among the various media sources in the US [6]. While cancer survivors are more likely to seek health information from their healthcare providers, they overwhelmingly resort to the internet as their first point of call even before their healthcare providers [7]. Media use has especially positive effects on individuals who do not engage much in interpersonal communication [8]. This means that individuals with low levels of interpersonal communication, who are less likely to engage in healthy lifestyle behaviors, may have a higher likelihood of living more healthy lives by information they get from media sources like the internet and television [8].
Previous research has been conducted using nationally representative data and differences in health information seeking behaviors among cancer survivors are well documented. These differences have been shown to be distributed along racial, demographic and socioeconomic lines. Relative to health information seeking from healthcare providers, survivors seeking health information from the internet have been found to be younger and more educated [7]. A different study also found that cancer survivors who used the internet were more likely to be male, younger, and have a higher level of education [9]. Furthermore, factors such as age, gender, level of education and having a regular health provider have been reported to determine survivors' health information seeking. Older patients and females were reported to be more likely to seek health information while the less educated and those with a regular health provider were less likely to do the same [6].
Previous studies have explored the factors associated with seeking health information among cancer survivors by comparing seekers to non-seekers. However, no recent study has specifically considered factors that affect health information seeking via the media and interpersonal communication compared to not seeking health information. Furthermore, associated factors have not been looked at among cancer survivors seeking information from these specific sources to examine how these differ from factors among those without a cancer diagnosis. This study aims to examine the factors associated with different sources of health information among cancer survivors compared to individuals without a cancer history using a nationally representative sample of adults participating in the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Understanding factors that predict health information seeking through these different sources will improve health communication interventions and focus them towards groups of survivors that will benefit most from them.
2.
Methods
2.1. Data
Participants included in this study were respondents of the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). HINTS is a nationally representative probability cross-sectional study of adults aged 18 or older in the civilian, non-institutionalized population of the United States. It assesses the trends in understanding, usage, and access to health-related information. HINTS collects data about the use of health-related and cancer-related information. Since the same algorithm was used to generate final weights across all the cycles, we appended the cycles and used their associated weights. Our data analyses were based on data from 20,365 respondents from HINTS 4, cycles 1–4 (2011–2014) and HINTS 5, cycles 1–2 (2017–2018). HINTS-FDA, cycles 1–2 (2015–2017) were excluded from this study because the question about a cancer history was not asked. Further information on the survey development, methodology and design have been published previously [3],[6],[7]. HINTS questionnaires, data, and reports are available online at http://hints.cancer.gov.
2.2. Measures
2.2.1. Cancer survivorship status
Cancer survivorship was defined using the National Cancer Institute's Office of Cancer Survivorship (OCS) definition and states that “An individual is considered a cancer survivor from the time of cancer diagnosis through the balance of his or her life” [10]. Participants in the HINTS survey were asked the question: “Have you ever been diagnosed as having cancer?” to which response options were “Yes” or “No”. Respondents who answered “Yes” were included in our study and are referred to as “Cancer Survivors” throughout this paper. Respondents who answered “No” were included and stratified analyses were performed by cancer survivorship status.
2.2.2. Study outcome
The main outcome assessed in this study was the source of health information both among cancer survivors and those without a cancer history. To arrive at this outcome, two sequential survey questions were used. First, respondents were asked “Have you ever looked for information about health or medical topics from any source?” to which response options were “Yes” or “No”. Respondents who answered “Yes” were then asked: “The most recent time you looked for information about health or medical topics, where did you go first?” Responses of books, brochures, pamphlets, internet, library, magazines, and newspapers were classified as seekers of health information through media. Our choice of classification was informed by a previous study [11]. Respondents who indicated that they obtained health information from cancer organizations, family, friends/co-workers, doctor/healthcare provider, telephone information number and alternative practitioners were classified as seekers of health information through interpersonal communication. Participants who marked that they have never looked for medical or health information from any source were classified as non-seekers.
2.2.3. Sociodemographic and participant characteristics
Based on previous literature, sociodemographic and participant characteristics assessed in this paper include age (<50, 50–64 years and ≥65 years); gender (Male and Female); race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanics and non-Hispanic other); education (high school degree or less, some college degree or more); time since diagnosis (≤5years, >5 years); employment status (unemployed, employed and retired); income (<50,000); marital status (single, married/living as married, divorced/separated, widowed); having a regular healthcare provider (participants were asked the question “Not including psychiatrists and other mental health professionals, is there a particular doctor, nurse or other health professionals that you see most often?” to which responses were “Yes” or “No”); health insurance coverage (categorized as “Yes” or “No”); general health status (fair/poor, good, excellent/very good); and cancer type (breast, cervical, prostate, colon, rectal, melanoma, other types and more than one type). All cancer type information collected with the questionnaire was included in our study. To improve the power, categories were created for “other cancer types” and “more than one cancer type”. “Other types” category included bladder cancer, bone cancer, endometrial cancer, head and neck cancer, leukemia/blood cancer, liver cancer, lung cancer, lymphoma (Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's), oral cancer, ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer, pharyngeal cancer, renal cancer, stomach cancer and other—specify. Those identified as having non-melanoma skin cancers were excluded from the study.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
Analyses were performed using Stata IC 15.1 [12] which accounted for survey sampling weights and the complex sampling design used in HINTS. The study population was made up of 20,365 participants; this included 2412 cancer survivors defined as anyone with a previous history of cancer, who responded to the HINTS survey questionnaire between 2011–2014 and 2017–2018. The other 17,953 were classified as participants without a cancer history. Percentages and confidence intervals were reported based on weighted proportions and thus, results are representative of the population with the characteristics. Covariates with missing data were handled using multiple imputations under the assumption that the data are missing at random [13],[14]. We assessed potential multicollinearity within the covariates using the variance inflation factor (VIF), a measure of the correlation between pairs of variables. The mean VIF in our regression model was 1.87 suggesting that there was no multicollinearity between the variables in the model. A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the factors associated with sources of health information sought, stratified by cancer survivorship status. Statistical significance was determined using a 2-sided p-value < 0.05 based on Wald test for all comparisons.
3.
Results
Overall, 2412 cancer survivors and 17,953 participants without a cancer history were included in all analyses. The weighted population size of cancer survivors was 15,562,875 while weighted population of those without a cancer history was 218,523,682. Assessment of sociodemographic characteristics of cancer survivors and those without a history of cancer separately, showed that majority of respondents from both groups were female, non-Hispanic white, earning less than $50,000, married with a regular healthcare provider, health insurance coverage and at least some college education. However, while a greater proportion of cancer survivors were 65 years or older, retired, and reported their general health as good, those without a cancer history were mostly younger than 50, employed and reported their general health as excellent or very good (Table 1). Furthermore, though in different proportions, both groups generally first sought health information from the internet. 30.4% of cancer survivors first sought information from their healthcare provider while only 21.6% of respondents without a history of cancer did same (Figure 1).
Table 1.
Characteristics of Participants by Survivorship Status using HINTS 4 Cycles 1–4 (2011–2014) and HINTS 5 Cycles 1–2 (2017–2018).
History of Cancer (n = 2412)
No History of Cancer (n = 17,953)
wt%
95% CI
wt%
95% CI
Gender
Male
38.1
36.1
40.0
39.6
38.9
40.3
Female
61.9
60.0
63.9
60.4
59.7
61.1
Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White
71.0
69.0
73.0
59.4
58.7
60.2
Non-Hispanic Black
13.0
11.6
14.4
16.2
15.6
16.7
Hispanic
10.3
9.0
11.6
16.5
15.9
17.0
Non-Hispanic Other
5.7
4.7
6.7
7.9
7.5
8.3
Age
<50 years
11.4
10.1
12.8
40.0
39.3
40.7
50–64 years
31.5
29.6
33.4
34.3
33.6
35.0
≥65 years
57.1
55.1
59.1
25.7
25.1
26.4
Education
High School or less
33.8
31.9
35.7
28.8
28.1
29.4
Some College or more
66.2
64.3
68.1
71.2
70.6
71.9
Time since diagnosis
≤5 years
35.2
33.2
37.2
-
-
-
>5 years
64.8
62.8
66.8
-
-
-
Employment Status
Unemployed
19.2
17.6
20.9
20.7
20.1
21.3
Employed
29.5
27.6
31.4
54.9
54.2
55.7
Retired
51.3
49.2
53.3
24.4
23.7
25.0
Income
<$50,000
58.2
56.2
60.2
52.0
51.2
52.7
≥$50,000
41.8
39.8
43.8
48.0
47.3
48.8
Marital Status
Single
9.3
8.1
10.5
18.4
17.9
19.0
Married/Living as married
50.9
48.8
52.9
52.9
52.2
53.7
Divorced/Separated
21.1
19.5
22.8
19.0
18.4
19.6
Widowed
18.7
17.2
20.3
9.6
9.2
10.1
HealthCare Provider
Yes
84.4
82.9
85.9
67.7
67.0
68.4
No
15.6
14.1
17.1
32.3
31.6
33.0
General Health
Fair/Poor
26.8
25.0
28.6
15.9
15.3
16.4
Good
37.6
35.6
39.5
36.0
35.3
36.7
Excellent/Very good
35.6
33.7
37.6
48.1
47.4
48.8
Cancer type
Breast
20.2
18.6
21.8
-
-
-
Cervical
8.2
7.1
9.3
-
-
-
Prostate
13.3
11.9
14.7
-
-
-
Colon
5.7
4.7
6.6
-
-
-
Rectal
0.5
0.2
0.8
-
-
-
Melanoma
5.9
4.9
6.8
-
-
-
Other
24.3
22.6
26.1
-
-
-
More than one type
21.9
20.3
23.6
-
-
-
Health Insurance
Yes
94.7
93.8
95.6
89.1
88.6
89.5
No
5.3
4.4
6.2
10.9
10.5
11.4
Information Sources
Interpersonal Communication
26.1
24.2
28.1
17.0
16.4
17.6
Media
52.7
50.6
54.8
60.9
60.1
61.6
Non-User
21.2
19.5
22.9
22.1
21.4
22.8
Wt = weighted percentage; CI = confidence interval.
Before adjusting for sociodemographic variables and other covariates among cancer survivors, race/ethnicity, age, level of education, income, marital status, having a regular healthcare provider, general health status and cancer type were all associated with sources of health information sought. Compared to non-Hispanic whites (NHWs), Hispanics had lower odds of seeking health information from the media relative to non-seekers (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.29–0.82). Survivors 65 years or older were more likely to seek health information first by interpersonal communication relative to non-seekers (OR: 1.95; 95% CI: 1.02–3.73). Also, a lower level of education was associated with lower odds of health information seeking in cancer survivors either through interpersonal communication or media. Comparing survivors who sought information from the media to non-seekers, media information seekers were more likely to earn $50,000 or more, report very good or excellent health relative to fair/poor health and have higher odds of reporting colon cancer rather than breast cancer. Furthermore, media seekers were less likely to be widowed rather than single when compared to non-seekers. Both health information seekers through the media and interpersonal communication had higher odds of having a regular healthcare provider. (Supplemental Table 1) Among participants without a cancer history, race/ethnicity, age, gender, level of education, employment status, income, marital status, health insurance, having a regular healthcare provider and general health status were associated with seeking health information. Relative to NHWs, non-Hispanic blacks (NHBs), Hispanics and non-Hispanic other (NHO) categories were less likely to seek health information from either media or interpersonal communication compared to non-seekers (Supplemental Table 2).
After adjusting for all possible confounders, the factors associated with sources of health information sought by cancer survivors were age, gender, level of education, income, marital status and having a regular healthcare provider. Compared to cancer survivors aged less than 50 years, those aged ≥65years were 2.8 times more likely to seek this information through interpersonal communication (aOR: 2.80; 95% CI: 1.15–6.82). Cancer survivors with educational levels at or lower than high school education were less likely to seek health information through interpersonal communication (aOR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.38–0.86) or the media (aOR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.23–0.51) compared to non-seekers of health information. In addition, males were 39% less likely to seek health information from the media (aOR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38–0.99) while those earning $50,000 or more were more likely to (aOR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.16–2.89). While survivors with a regular health provider had significantly higher odds of seeking health information via interpersonal communication (aOR: 1.92; 95% CI: 1.09–3.38), those who were widowed had lower odds of seeking health information from either interpersonal communication (aOR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.13–0.60) or the media (aOR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.13–0.69) (Table 2).
Table 2.
Weighted, adjusted multinomial logistic regression model predicting factors associated with sources of health information seeking of cancer survivors using HINTS 4 Cycles 1–4 (2011–2014) and HINTS 5 Cycles 1–2 (2017–2018).
Interpersonal Communication Vs Non-Users
Mass Media Vs Non-Users
aOR
CI
aOR
CI
Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White
1.00
1.00
Non-Hispanic Black
1.16
0.61
2.23
0.73
0.38
1.42
Hispanic
1.01
0.47
2.17
0.81
0.43
1.54
Non-Hispanic Other
2.28
0.89
5.86
0.98
0.43
2.24
Time Since diagnosis
≤5 years
1.00
1.00
>5 years
1.21
0.81
1.82
1.43
0.94
2.17
Age
<50 years
1.00
1.00
50–64 years
2.25
0.97
5.21
1.53
0.72
3.24
≥65 years
2.80
1.15
6.82
0.97
0.42
2.23
Gender
Female
1.00
1.00
Male
0.68
0.41
1.12
0.61
0.38
0.99
Education Level
Some College or more
1.00
1.00
High School or less
0.57
0.38
0.86
0.35
0.23
0.51
Employment Status
Unemployed
1.00
1.00
Employed
0.59
0.30
1.17
0.71
0.37
1.37
Retired
0.60
0.32
1.13
0.99
0.56
1.73
Income
< $50,000
1.00
1.00
$50,000 or more
1.06
0.64
1.75
1.83
1.16
2.89
Marital Status
Single
1.00
1.00
Married/Living as married
0.50
0.24
1.02
0.65
0.30
1.37
Divorced
0.45
0.20
1.03
0.66
0.30
1.44
Widowed
0.28
0.13
0.60
0.30
0.13
0.69
Health Insurance
No
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.19
0.33
4.22
0.93
0.26
3.31
Regular provider
No
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.92
1.09
3.38
1.74
0.99
3.06
General health
Fair/Poor
1.00
1.00
Good
0.94
0.59
1.48
0.83
0.54
1.28
Excellent/Very good
1.12
0.68
1.83
1.28
0.82
2.00
Cancer type
Breast Cancer
1.00
1.00
Cervical Cancer
0.63
0.25
1.60
0.63
0.27
1.51
Prostate Cancer
1.15
0.52
2.56
0.80
0.37
1.76
Colon Cancer
0.78
0.29
2.11
0.51
0.22
1.22
Rectal Cancer
3.26
0.25
41.86
6.79
0.68
67.83
Melanoma
0.79
0.29
2.14
0.80
0.33
1.93
Other types
0.72
0.38
1.40
0.72
0.38
1.35
More than one type
1.03
0.50
2.15
0.67
0.33
1.38
aOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI = confidence interval; Model adjusted for race/ethnicity, time since cancer diagnosis, age, gender, educational level, employment status, income, marital status, health insurance, having a regular healthcare provider, general health status and cancer type.
Among participants without a history of cancer, the factors associated with sources of health information sought first were race/ethnicity, age, gender, level of education, income, marital status and having a regular healthcare provider. Compared to NHWs, NHBs (aOR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.44–0.66), Hispanics (aOR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.41–0.60) and NHO (aOR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.40–0.72) categories were significantly less likely to seek health information from the media. While males and those with education levels at or lower than high school had lower odds of seeking health information using either interpersonal communication or the media, those with a regular health provider had higher odds of seeking health information from both sources relative to non-seekers. Participants 65 or older were less likely to seek information from the media (aOR: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.41–0.67) while those 50 to 64 years were more likely to seek information through interpersonal communication (aOR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.00–1.56). Those who were married had higher odds of seeking information from the media (aOR: 1.27; 95% CI: 1.05–1.54) while those who were widowed had lower odds of doing same (aOR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.45–0.78). In addition, earning an income of $50,000 or higher was associated with seeking information from media sources (aOR: 1.72; 95% CI: 1.41–2.10) (Table 3).
Table 3.
Weighted, adjusted multinomial logistic regression model predicting factors associated with sources of health information seeking of participants without a history of cancer using HINTS 4 cycles 1–4 and HINTS 5 cycles 1–2 (2011–2018).
Interpersonal Communication Vs Non-Users
Mass Media Vs Non-Users
OR
CI
OR
CI
Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White
1.00
1.00
Non-Hispanic Black
0.90
0.70
1.16
0.54
0.44
0.66
Hispanic
0.85
0.67
1.09
0.49
0.41
0.60
Non-Hispanic Other
0.87
0.62
1.21
0.54
0.40
0.72
Age
<50 years
1.00
1.00
50–64 years
1.25
1.00
1.56
0.85
0.72
1.01
≥65 years
1.28
0.98
1.67
0.52
0.41
0.67
Gender
Female
Male
0.66
0.55
0.80
0.53
0.46
0.61
Education Level
Some College or more
1.00
1.00
High School or less
0.62
0.51
0.76
0.29
0.25
0.35
Employment Status
Unemployed
1.00
1.00
Employed
0.80
0.63
1.03
1.02
0.82
1.28
Retired
0.91
0.70
1.19
1.05
0.81
1.36
Income
<$50,000
1.00
1.00
$50,000 or more
1.16
0.92
1.47
1.72
1.41
2.10
Marital Status
Single
1.00
1.00
Married/Living as married
1.28
0.99
1.65
1.27
1.05
1.54
Divorced
0.87
0.66
1.15
0.95
0.76
1.18
Widowed
0.91
0.67
1.23
0.60
0.45
0.78
Health Insurance
No
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.20
0.88
1.63
0.96
0.77
1.21
Regular provider
No
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.84
1.50
2.26
1.46
1.24
1.72
General health
Fair/Poor
1.00
1.00
Good
0.93
0.73
1.19
1.12
0.90
1.38
Excellent/Very good
0.81
0.62
1.06
0.99
0.79
1.23
aOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI = confidence interval; Model adjusted for race/ethnicity, age, gender, educational level, employment status, income, marital status, health insurance, having a regular healthcare provider and general health status
Findings of the index study indicate that health information seeking behaviors are prevalent among cancer survivors, with about 80% of cancer survivors reporting that they had sought health information from several sources. Remarkably, a majority of cancer survivors report seeking health information from the internet before considering other sources, with only 30% of the population first consulting their healthcare provider for health information. Our findings are in contrast to an earlier study where a majority of cancer survivors reported first consulting their health providers for health information [4]. The results were similar among participants without a history of cancer as about the same proportion seek health information from several sources with majority reporting the use of media as their first source of health information. This is to be expected because of the availability of various media sources, especially the internet, and its easy accessibility for searches before an appointment with a health care provider can be scheduled. However, a smaller proportion of cancer survivors were found to seek health information from the internet compared to non-cancer participants and this may be due to the frequent consultations and hospital encounters that cancer survivors typically have. Our study provides more up-to-date information and is suggestive of changing patterns of health information seeking behaviors among cancer survivors. These findings are largely corroborated by recent literature that point to the internet as a predominant and primary source of health information in this population [6],[15],[16].
In both cancer survivors and participants without a cancer history, regardless of the source of information, respondents who had an education at the level of high school or less were significantly less likely to seek health information. This is in line with other studies reporting this finding among respondents in the general US population. [17]–[20] Our study shows that this also holds true for cancer survivors, further emphasizing the role of education in health information seeking behaviors. In addition, we found that male cancer survivors are less likely to seek health information from the media while males without a cancer history are less likely to seek health information through media or interpersonal communication. The literature has already established that men are less likely to seek health care than women and this negatively impacts their health. [6],[21],[22] The finding that they also do not readily seek health information potentially worsens the problem and exposes the need for educational interventions focused on this population regardless of survivorship status. Not seeking healthcare or health information may leave them oblivious of the state of their health and increase their risk of developing ailments they are largely unaware of until the disease has significantly progressed.
Among cancer survivors, respondents who identified as widowed were less likely to seek health information whether through interpersonal communication or the media. Also, survivors 65 years or older were more likely to seek health information through interpersonal communication. This suggests that these key sociodemographic factors are pervasive in their relationship with health information seeking behaviors among cancer survivors. Our study findings are supported by other studies that have found age and marital status to be associated with health information seeking behaviors. [6],[23] Adjei Boakye et al found that among participants without a cancer diagnosis, identifying as widowed was associated with a lower likelihood of seeking out health information. Our study has been able to identify that within this population, widows are less likely to seek health information from the media (including the internet) but do not have any lower likelihood of seeking information through interpersonal communication [6]. On the other hand, widowed cancer survivors were less likely to seek health information from any source, in contrast to findings in the literature [6]. Previous studies have reported that widows have a higher risk of mortality, are more likely to have poorer health and have higher healthcare utilization than those who are married [24]–[26]. This, coupled with a past cancer diagnosis, suggests that they have more health issues than their average married counterparts and need to be more active in seeking out health information to improve their health. This population ought to be specifically targeted to improve their health information seeking behaviors.
Individuals who earned $50,000 and above were more likely to obtain health information from media sources regardless of cancer survivorship status. Given the expected absence of socioeconomic barriers in this population, it is plausible that this group has a decent amount of exposure to media tools. This may have boosted their self-perceived efficacy in obtaining health information from the pertinent media sources. On the other hand, though race/ethnicity was identified as a factor affecting health information seeking through the media in respondents without a cancer diagnosis, these racial differences were not seen in cancer survivors. This may be explained by the dynamics of cancer treatment and engagement with the healthcare system leading to more enlightenment of cancer survivors about the need for health information regardless of their race/ethnicity. Survivors who reported having a regular healthcare provider were more likely to first seek health information through interpersonal communication. Conversely, those without a cancer diagnosis who had a regular healthcare provider were more likely to seek health information from both sources. This finding may be explained by the results of a study which showed that most cancer survivors first consulted the internet for health information even though a majority preferred to obtain health information from their health care provider first [7]. Cancer diagnosis is undoubtedly stressful and may help build trust between the survivor and their healthcare provider so that though they consult the internet, they still seek health information through interpersonal communication to validate their experiences.
Cancer survivors are predisposed to developing several comorbidities/comorbid conditions [27], as well as additional cancers [28]–[30], hence it is crucial that they obtain quality and accurate health information. Most cancer patients have co-morbid conditions with long term sequelae and associated care, cutting across multiple disciplines. This is usually accompanied by an array of continuous laboratory monitoring, work-up, diagnostics as well as complex procedures and medications for their management. Having the right source of health information may increase the chances that patients would comply with their management plan and get optimal care. Additionally, our study reveals that about a fifth of cancer survivors do not seek any source of health information. This is worrisome as it may have potential impact in the management and clinical outcomes of this group of cancer survivors. While health information sources are readily available through various channels, this finding further emphasizes the need for focused interventions to ensure that non-seekers are reached with the right information they need to improve their health outcomes. Findings of the present study identify sources of health information that can potentially be leveraged toward ensuring cancer survivors are exposed to accurate health information. They also point to some other sources whose potentials are not being utilized maximally. For example, cancer organizations have been shown to be very useful in the dissemination of cancer-related health information, as well as support for cancer survivors [31],[32] however our study revealed that less than 5% of cancer survivors rely on this as a source of health information. This calls for increased efforts toward activities that empower cancer support organizations.
Given that cancer survivors have frequent routine clinical encounters with their healthcare providers, every clinic visit should be maximized to ensure that the right information is provided, and a system for the continuous provision of health information is initiated. For example, the use of interactive mobile health program and automated messaging emanating from health providers could help disseminate and reinforce the right information that is relevant to patients at every stage of their management or direct them to verified sites where the right information could be sourced. Previous studies have shown that most patients are receptive to electronic communication with their healthcare providers [33],[34]. However, further studies could evaluate the impact of this strategy in bridging the gap in cancer survivors, particularly among those that are non-seekers of health information.
5.
Strengths and limitations
Our study has several strengths. First, our findings are derived from pooling several years of the HINTS data, which boosts overall sample size and ensures for a more robust analysis and precise findings. More so, pooling data across time provides an indication of what practices have been more predominant within the period in question. In addition, HINTS data is representative of the non-institutionalized US population and so our findings are generalizable. Nonetheless, this study is not without limitations. Chief among these is the issue of low response rates to the HINTS. However, rigorous sampling techniques and weighting procedures were applied by HINTS investigators to account for this low response rate, hence limiting the potential for resultant bias. Regardless, our study still has the potential for recall bias. HINTS data is based on a cross-sectional study design, and as such, causal inferences cannot be made from our analysis. Therefore, longitudinal studies that demonstrate a temporal sequence and account for changes in health seeking behavior over time is crucial. Furthermore, cancer organizations as a source of health information could have been further explained. From the dataset used, it was difficult to tell whether this included cancer organizational websites or if those who used these websites identified as internet seekers, thus causing them to be categorized as media seekers. Cancer organizations provide information through multiple sources, but this was not captured in the data with potential overlap in health information channels. In any case, it is still important to highlight that cancer organizations put out valuable information which should be utilized to the uttermost by the cancer survivor population.
In conclusion, our study generated findings that predict health information seeking behaviors through the media and interpersonal communication both in cancer survivors and in individuals without a cancer diagnosis. We also found that less than 5% of cancer survivors seek health information from cancer organizations. Activities that improve the visibility of cancer organizations among cancer-surviving populations should be enhanced to help cancer survivors take advantage of the vast amount of health information available from these sources. In addition, 21% of cancer survivors do not seek health information from any source while socioeconomic status, age, and gender were identified as important correlates of health information source choice among cancer survivors in the US. We also compared the findings among cancer survivors to those without a cancer diagnosis. These factors may be useful in guiding health communication interventions aimed at various groups of cancer surviving populations to ensure that they improve their health seeking behaviors.
References
[1]
Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, et al. (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327: 812–818.
[2]
de Souza R, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2015) Plant growth-promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38: 401–419. doi: 10.1590/S1415-475738420150053
[3]
Adesemoye AO, Torbert HA, Kloepper JW (2009) Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria allow reduced application rates of chemical fertilizers. Microb Ecol 58: 921–929. doi: 10.1007/s00248-009-9531-y
[4]
FAO (2009) How to Feed the World in 2050. Rome, Italy, Food and Agriculture Organization.
[5]
FAO (2014) 19 December Rome. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ news/story/ en/item/273303/icode.
[6]
Troccoli A, Borrelli GM, De Vita P, et al. (2000) Durum wheat quality: a multidisciplinary concept. J Cereal Sci 32: 99–113.
[7]
Hatfield JL, Sauer TJ, Prueger JH (2001) Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency: a review. Agron J 93: 271–280. doi: 10.2134/agronj2001.932271x
[8]
Cormier F, Foulkes J, Randhirel B, et al. (2016) Breeding for increased nitrogen-use efficiency: a review for wheat (T. Aestivum L.). Plant Breeding 135: 255–278. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12371
[9]
Hirel B, Tétu T, Lea PJ, et al. (2011) Improving nitrogen use efficiency in crops for sustainable agriculture. Sustainability 3: 1452–1485. doi: 10.3390/su3091452
[10]
Singh B, Ryan J (2015) Managing fertilizers to enhance soil health, In: International Fertilizer Industry Association, Paris, France, 1–24.
[11]
Ahemad M, Kibret M (2014) Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting Rhizobacteria: current perspective. J King Saud Univ Sci 26: 1–20.
[12]
Powell N, Ji X, Ravash R, et al. (2012) Yield stability for cereals in a changing climate. Funct Plant Biol 39: 539–552.
[13]
Semenov MA, Shewry PR (2011) Modelling predicts that heat stress, not drought, will increase vulnerability of wheat in Europe. Sci Rep 1: 66.
[14]
FAOSTAT Database Collections (Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/.
[15]
Canfield DE, Glazer AN, Falkowski PG (2010) The evolution and future of earth's nitrogen cycle. Science 330: 192–196. doi: 10.1126/science.1186120
[16]
Snyder CS, Bruulsema TW, Jensen TL, et al. (2009) Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects. Agric Ecosyst Environ 133: 247–266.
[17]
Chen JH (2006) The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or biofertilizer for crop growth and soil fertility. International Workshop on Sustained Management of the Soil-Rhizosphere System for Efficient Crop Production and Fertilizer Use 16: 20.
[18]
Gill HK, Garg H (2014) Pesticides: Environmental impacts and management strategies, In: Marcelo L, Editor, Pesticides-Toxic aspects, CC BY, 187–230.
[19]
Aktar W, Sengupta D, Chowdhury A (2009) Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: their benefits and hazards. Interdisc Toxicol 2: 1–12. doi: 10.2478/v10102-009-0001-7
[20]
Saharan BS, Nehra V (2011) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: a critical review. Life Sci Med Res 21: 1–30.
[21]
Walker TS, Bais HP, Grotewold E, et al. (2003) Root exudation and rhizosphere biology. Plant Physiol 132: 44–51. doi: 10.1104/pp.102.019661
[22]
Ortiz-Castro R, Contreras-Cornejo HA, Macías-Rodríguez L, et al. (2009) The role of microbial signals in plant growth and development. Plant Signal Behav 4: 701–712. doi: 10.4161/psb.4.8.9047
[23]
Dimkpa C, Wein T, Folkard A (2009) Plant-Rhizobacteria interactions alleviate abiotic stress conditions..Plant Cell Environ 32: 1682–1694. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02028.x
Leigh GJ (2002) Nitrogen fixation at the millennium, London: Elsevier Science.
[26]
Lucas-Garcia JA, Probanza A, Ramos B, et al. (2004) Effects of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobateria (PGPRs) on the biological nitrose fixation, nodulation and growth of Lupinus albus I. cv. Multolupa. Eng Life Sci 4: 71–77. doi: 10.1002/elsc.200400013
[27]
Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28: 1327–1350. doi: 10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9
[28]
Tabatabaei S, Ehsanzadeh P, Etesami H, et al. (2016) Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) producing Pseudomonas isolates inhibit seed germination and α amylase activity in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L.). Spain J Agric Res 14: e0802. doi: 10.5424/sjar/2016141-8859
[29]
Beneduzi A, Ambrosini A, Passaglia LMP (2012) Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR): their potential as antagonists and biocontrol agents. Genet Mol Biol 35: 1044–1051. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572012000600020
[30]
Kundan R, Pant G, Jadon N, et al. (2015) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria: mechanism and current prospective. J Fertil Pestic 6: 2.
[31]
Oteino N, Lalli RD, Kiwanuka S, et al. (2015) Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front Microbiol 6: 745.
[32]
Haas D, Keel C (2003) Regulation of antibiotic production in root colonizing Pseudomonas spp. and relevance for biological control of plant disease. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41: 117–153.
[33]
Peñalver R, López MM (1999) Cocolonization of the rhizosphere by pathogenic Agrobacterium strains and non pathogenic strains K84 and K1026, used for crown gall biocontrol. Appl Environ Microb 65: 1936–1940.
[34]
Okon Y, Labandera-Gonzales CA (1994) Agronomic applications of Azospirillum: an evaluation of 20 years worldwide field inoculation. Soil Biol Biochem 26: 1591–1601. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(94)90311-5
[35]
Naiman AD, Latrónico A, García de Salamone IE (2009) Inoculation of wheat with Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens: impact on the production and culturable rhizosphere microflora. Eur J Soil Biol 45: 44–51. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.11.001
[36]
Piccinin GG, Dan LGM, Braccini ALE, et al. (2011) Agronomic efficiency of Azospirillum brasilense in physiological parameters and yield components in wheat crop. J Agron 10: 132–135. doi: 10.3923/ja.2011.132.135
[37]
Namvar A, Khandan T (2013) Response of wheat to mineral nitrogen fertilizer and biofertilizer (Azotobacter sp. and Azospirillum sp.) inoculation under different levels of weed interference. Ekologija 59: 85–94.
[38]
Amiri A, Rafiee M (2013) Effect of soil inoculation with Azospirillum and Azotobacter bacteria on nitrogen use efficiency and agronomic characteristics of corn. Ann Biol Res 4: 77–79.
[39]
Amanullah A, Kurd A, Khan S, et al. (2012) Biofertilizer-a possible substitute of fertilizers in production of wheat variety zardana in balochistan. Pakistan J Agric Res 25: 44–49.
[40]
Saia S, Rappa V, Ruisi P, et al. (2015) Soil inoculation with symbiotic microorganisms promotes plant growth and nutrient transporter genes expression in durum wheat. Front Plant Sci 6: 815.
[41]
Vessey JK (2003) Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255: 571–586. doi: 10.1023/A:1026037216893
[42]
Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, Thys A, et al. (1999) Phytostimulatory effect of Azospirillum brasilense wild type and mutant strains altered in IAA production on wheat. Plant Soil 212: 155–164.
[43]
Pereyra MA, Ballesteros FM, Creus CM, et al. (2009) Seedlings growth promotion by Azospirillum brasilense under normal and drought conditions remains unaltered in Tebuconazole-treated wheat seeds. Eur J Soil Biol 45: 20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.09.015
[44]
Meena KK, Kumar M, Kalyuzhnaya MG, et al. (2012) Epiphytic pink-pigmented methylotrophic bacteria enhance germination and seedling growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum) by producing phyto-hormone. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 101: 777–786. doi: 10.1007/s10482-011-9692-9
[45]
García de Salamone IE, Funes JM, Di Salvo LP, et al. (2012) Inoculation of paddy rice with Azospirillum brasilense and Pseudomonas fluorescens: impact of plant genotypes on rhizosphere microbial communities and field crop production. Appl Soil Ecol 61: 196–204. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2011.12.012
[46]
Ferreira AS, Pires RR, Rabelo PG, et al. (2013) Applied soil ecology implications of Azospirillum brasilense inoculation and nutrient addition on maize in soils of the Brazilian Cerrado under greenhouse and field conditions. Appl Soil Ecol 72: 103–108. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.05.020
[47]
Majeed A, Abbasi MK, Hameed S, et al. (2015) Isolation and characterization of Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria from wheat rhizosphere and their effect on plant growth promotion. Front Microbiol 6: 198.
[48]
Hassan TU, Bano A (2016) Biofertilizer: a novel formulation for improving wheat growth, physiology and yield. Pak J Bot 48: 2233–2241.
[49]
Charousová I, Medo J, Halenárová E, et al. (2016) Effect of fertilization on biological activity of community of soil Streptomycetes. J Cent Eur Agr 17: 1134–1149. doi: 10.5513/JCEA01/17.4.1822
[50]
Hao T, Chen S (2017) Colonization of wheat, maize and cucumber by Paenibacillus Polymyxa Wly78. PloS One 12: e0169980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169980
[51]
Veresoglou SD, Menexes G (2010) Impact of inoculation with Azospirillum spp. on growth properties and seed yield of wheat: a meta-analysis of studies in the ISI Web of Science from 1981 to 2008. Plant Soil 337: 469–480.
[52]
Pérez-Montano F, Alías-Villegas C, Bellogín RA, et al. (2014) Plant growth promotion in cereal and leguminous agricultural important plants: From microorganism capacities to crop production. Microbiol Res 169: 325–336. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.011
[53]
Piccinin GG, Braccini ALE, Dan LGM, et al. (2013) Efficiency of seed inoculation with Azospirillum brasilense on agronomic characteristics and yield of wheat. Ind Crops Prod 43: 393–397. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.07.052
[54]
Hungria M, Campo RJ, Souza EM, et al. (2010) Inoculation with selected strains of Azospirillum brasilense and A. lipoferum improves yields of maize and wheat in Brazil. Plant Soil 331: 413–425.
[55]
Díaz-Zorita M, Fernández-Canigia MV (2009) Field performance of a liquid formulation of Azospirillum brasilense on dryland wheat productivity. Eur J Soil Biol 45: 3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2008.07.001
[56]
Spaepen S, Dobbelaere S, Croonenborghs A, et al. (2008) Effects of Azospirillum brasilense indole-3-acetic acid production on inoculated wheat plants. Plant Soil 312: 15–23. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9560-1
[57]
Available from: https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/plantsciences/research/durum.
[58]
Colla G, Rouphael Y, Bonini P, et al. (2015) Coating seeds with endophytic fungi enhances growth, nutrient uptake, yield and grain quality of winter wheat. Int J Plant Prod 9: 171–190.
[59]
Di Benedetto NA, Campaniello D, Bevilacqua A, et al. (2016) Characterization of autochthonous plant growth promoting bacteria in relation to durum wheat nitrogen use efficiency, In: Proceedings of Plant Biology Europe Congress EPSO/FESPB, Prague Czech Republic, 26–30.
[60]
Baffoni L, Gaggia F, Dalanaj N, et al. (2015) Microbial inoculants for the biocontrol of Fusarium spp. in durum wheat. BMC Microbiol 15: 242. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0573-7
[61]
Mnasri N, Chennaoui C, Gargouri S, et al. (2017) Efficacy of some rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria in vitro and as seed coating for the control of Fusarium culmorum infecting durum wheat in Tunisia. Eur J Plant Pathol 147: 501–515. doi: 10.1007/s10658-016-1018-3
[62]
Indiragandhi P, Anandham R, Madhaiyan M, et al. (2008) Characterization of plant growth-promoting traits of bacteria isolated from larval guts of diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). Curr Microbiol 56: 327–333. doi: 10.1007/s00284-007-9086-4
[63]
Xu G, Fan X, Miller T (2012) Plant nitrogen assimilation and use efficiency. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63: 153–182.
[64]
Han J, Shi J, Zeng L, et al. (2017) Impacts of continuous excessive fertilization on soil potential nitrification activity and nitrifying microbial community dynamics in greenhouse system. J Soils Sediments 17: 471–480. doi: 10.1007/s11368-016-1525-z
[65]
Shaw LJ, Nicol GW, Smith Z, et al. (2006) Nitrosospira spp. can produce nitrous oxide via a nitrifier denitrification pathway. Environ Microbiol 8: 214–222.
[66]
Xia W, Zhang C, Zeng X, et al. (2011) Autotrophic growth of nitrifying community in an agricultural soil. ISME J 5: 1226–1236. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.5
[67]
Wang YF, Gu JD (2014) Effects of allylthiourea, salinity, and pH on ammonia/ammonium-oxidizing prokaryotes in mangrove sediment incubated in laboratory microcosms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98: 3257–3274. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5399-3
[68]
Shen JP, Zhang LM, Zhu YG, et al. (2008) Abundance and composition of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria and ammonia-oxidizing archaea communities of an alkaline sandy loam. Environ Microbiol 10: 1601–1611. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01578.x
[69]
Xiao R, Chen B, Liu Y, et al. (2014) Higher abundance of ammonia oxidizing archaea than ammonia oxidizing bacteria and their communities in Tibetan alpine meadow soils under long-term nitrogen fertilization. Geomicrobiol J 31: 597–604. doi: 10.1080/01490451.2013.875298
[70]
Nicol GW, Leininger S, Schleper C, et al. (2008) The influence of soil pH on the diversity, abundance and transcriptional activity of ammonia oxidizing archaea and bacteria. Environ Microbiol 10: 2966–2978.
[71]
Ai C, Liang GQ, Sun JW, et al. (2013) Different roles of rhizosphere effect and long-term fertilization in the activity and community structure of ammonia oxidizers in a calcareous fluvoaquic soil. Soil Biol Biochem 57: 30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.08.003
[72]
Erguder TH, Boon N, Wittebolle L, et al. (2009) Environmental factors shaping the ecological niches of ammonia oxidizing archaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev 33: 855–869. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00179.x
[73]
O'Sullivan CA, Wakelin SA, Fillery IR, et al. (2013) Factors affecting ammonia-oxidising microorganisms and potential nitrification rates in southern Australian agricultural soils. Soil Res 51: 240–252. doi: 10.1071/SR13039
[74]
Mokhele B, Zhan X, Yang G, et al. (2012) Review: Nitrogen assimilation in crop plants and its affecting factors. Can J Plant Sci 92: 399–405. doi: 10.4141/cjps2011-135
[75]
Kant S, Bi YM, Rothstein SJ (2011) Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency. J Exp Bot 62: 1499–1509. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq297
[76]
Wickert S, Marcondes J, Lemos MV, et al. (2007) Nitrogen assimilation in citrus based on CitEST data mining. Genet Mol Biol 30: 810–818. doi: 10.1590/S1415-47572007000500009
[77]
Kaiser WM, Planchet E, Rümer S (2011) Nitrate reductase and nitric oxide, In: Foyer CH, Zhang H, Editors, Annual Plant Reviews, Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants in the Post-genomic Era, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 127–146.
[78]
Boisson M, Mondon K, Torney V, et al. (2005) Partial sequences of nitrogen metabolism genes in hexaploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 110: 932–940. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1913-4
[79]
Sakakibara Y, Kimura H, Iwamura A, et al. (2012) A new structural insight into differential interaction of cyanobacterial and plant ferredoxins with nitrite reductase as revealed by NMR and X-ray crystallographic studies. J Biochem 151: 483–492. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvs028
[80]
Lea PJ, Miflin BJ (2011) Nitrogen assimilation and its relevance to crop improvement, In: Zhang H, Editor, Annual Plant Reviews, Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants in the Post-genomic Era, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 1–40.
[81]
Hawkins HJ, George H (2001) Reduces 15N-nitrogen transport through arbuscular hyphae to Triticum aestivum L supplied with ammonium vs. nitrate nutrition. Ann Bot 87: 303–311. doi: 10.1006/anbo.2000.1305
[82]
Mantelin S, Touraine B (2004) Plant growth promoting bacteria and nitrate availability: impacts on root development and nitrate uptake. J Exp Bot 394: 27–34.
[83]
Cacco G, Attina E, Gelsomino A, et al. (2000) Effect of nitrate and humic substances of different molecular size on kinetic parameters of nitrate uptake in wheat seedlings. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163: 313–320. doi: 10.1002/1522-2624(200006)163:3<313::AID-JPLN313>3.0.CO;2-U
[84]
Abenavoli MR, De Santis CD, Sidari M, et al. (2001) Influence of coumarin on the net nitrate uptake in durum wheat. New Phytol 150: 619–627. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00119.x
[85]
Bloom AJ, Burger M, Kimball BA, et al. (2014) Nitrate assimilation is inhibited by elevated CO2 in field grown wheat. Nat Clim Chang 4: 477–480.
[86]
Good AG, Shrawat AK, Muench, DG (2004) Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production? Trends Plant Sci 9: 597–605.
[87]
Fageria NK, Baligar VC, Li YC (2008) The role of nutrient efficient plants in improving crop yields in the twenty first century. J Plant Nutr 31: 1121–1157. doi: 10.1080/01904160802116068
[88]
Giuliani MM, Giuzio L, De Caro A, et al. (2011a) Relationships between nitrogen utilization and grain technological quality in durum wheat. I. Nitrogen translocation and nitrogen use efficiency for protein. Agron J 103: 1487–1494.
[89]
Giuliani MM, Giuzio L, De Caro A, et al. (2011b) Relationships between nitrogen utilization and grain technological quality in durum wheat. II. Grain yield and quality. Agron J 103: 1668–1675.
[90]
Wu H, Haig T, Pratley J, et al. (2001) Allelochemicals in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): cultivar difference in the exudation of phenolic acids. J Agric Food Chem 49: 3742–3745.
[91]
Germida J, Siciliano S (2001) Taxonomic diversity of bacteria associated with the roots of modern, recent and ancient wheat cultivars. Biol Fertil Soils 33: 410–415. doi: 10.1007/s003740100343
[92]
Cheng W, Johnson DW, Fu S (2003) Rhizosphere effects on decomposition. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67: 1418–1427. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2003.1418
[93]
Hsu SF, Buckley DH (2009) Evidence for the functional significance of diazotroph community structure in soil. ISME J 3: 124–136. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.82
[94]
Nelson DR, Mele PM (2006) The impact of crop residue amendments and lime on microbial community structure and nitrogenfixing bacteria in the wheat rhizosphere. Soil Res 44: 319–329. doi: 10.1071/SR06022
[95]
Venieraki A, Dimou M, Pergalis P, et al. (2011) The genetic diversity of culturable nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the rhizosphere of wheat. Microb Ecol 61: 277–285. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9747-x
[96]
Behl RK, Ruppel S, Kothe E, et al. (2012) Wheat × Azotobacter × VA Mycorrhiza interactions towards plant nutrition and growth-a review. J Appl Bot Food Qual 81: 95–109.
[97]
Neiverth A, Delai S, Garcia DM, et al. (2014) Performance of different wheat genotypes inoculated with the plant growth promoting bacterium Herbaspirillum seropedicae. Eur J Soil Biol 64: 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2014.07.001
[98]
Perin L, Martínez-Aguilar L, Castro-González R, et al. (2006) Diazotrophic Burkholderia species associated with field-grown maize and sugarcane. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 3103–3110. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3103-3110.2006
[99]
Reardon CL, Gollany HT, Wuest SB (2014) Diazotroph community structure and abundance in wheat-fallow and wheat-pea crop rotations. Soil Biol Biochem 69: 406–412. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.10.038
[100]
Coelho MRR, Marriel IE, Jenkins SN, et al. (2009) Molecular detection and quantification of nifH gene sequences in the rhizosphere of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) sown with two levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Appl Soil Ecol 42: 48–53. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.01.010
[101]
Christiansen-Weniger C, Groneman AF, van Veen JA (1992) Associative N2 fixation and root exudation of organic acids from wheat cultivars of different aluminium tolerance. Plant Soil 139: 167–174. doi: 10.1007/BF00009307
[102]
Manske GGB, Behl RK, Luttger AB, et al. (2000) Enhancement of mycorrhizal infection, nutrient efficiency and plant growth by Azotobacter in wheat: evidence of varietal effects, In: Narula N, Editors, Azotobacter in Sustainable Agriculture, New Delhi: CBS Publishers, 136-147.
[103]
Combes-Meynet E, Pothier JF, Moënne-Loccoz Y, et al. (2011) The Pseudomonas secondary metabolite 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol is a signal inducing rhizoplane expression of Azospirillum genes involved in plant-growth promotion. Mol Plant Microbe In 24: 271–284.
[104]
Baldani JI, Baldani VLD (2005) History on the biological nitrogen fixation research in graminaceous plants: special emphasis on the Brazilian experience. An Acad Bras Ciênc 77: 549–579. doi: 10.1590/S0001-37652005000300014
[105]
Cassán F, Perrig D, Sgroy V, et al. (2009) Azospirillum brasilense Az39 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum E109, inoculated singly or in combination, promote seed germination and early seedling growth in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.). Eur J Soil Biol 45: 28–35.
[106]
Moubayidin L, Di Mambro R, Sabatini S (2009) Cytokinin-auxin crosstalk. Trends Plant Sci 14: 557–562. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.06.010
[107]
Cohen AC, Bottini R, Piccoli PN (2008) Azospirillum brasilense Sp 245 produces ABA in chemically-defined culture medium and increases ABA content in arabidopsis plants. Plant Growth Regul 54: 97–103.
[108]
Upadhyay SK, Singh DP, Saikia R (2009) Genetic diversity of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria isolated from rhizospheric soil of wheat under saline condition. Curr Microbiol 59: 489–496. doi: 10.1007/s00284-009-9464-1
[109]
Graham JH, Linderman RG (1980) Ethylene production by ectomycorrhizal fungi, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. pini, and by aseptically synthesized ectomycorrhizae and Fusarium-infected Douglas-fir roots. Can J Microbiol 26: 1340–1347.
[110]
Prigent-Combaret C, Blaha D, Pothier JF, et al. (2008) Physical organization and phylogenetic analysis of acdR as leucine-responsive regulator of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene acdS in phytobeneficial Azospirillum lipoferum 4B and other Proteobacteria. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65: 202–219. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00474.x
[111]
Bertrand H, Plassard C, Pinochet X, et al. (2000) Stimulation of the ionic transport system in Brassica napus by a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium (Achromobacter sp.). Can J Microbiol 46: 229–236. doi: 10.1139/cjm-46-3-229
[112]
Mantelin S, Desbrosses G, Larcher M, et al. (2006) Nitrate-dependent control of root architecture and N nutrition are altered by a plant growth-promoting Phyllobacterium sp. Planta 223: 591–603. doi: 10.1007/s00425-005-0106-y
This article has been cited by:
1.
Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Hassimi Abu Hasan, Henriette Stokbro Jensen, Anita Klaus, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Performance of wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum mycelium in treating synthetic sewage loading using batch bioreactor,
2019,
9,
2045-2322,
10.1038/s41598-019-52493-y
2.
Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Hanis H. Harith, Muhamad Hafiz Abd Rahim, Zul Ilham, Neil Rowan, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Performance of mycelial biomass and exopolysaccharide from Malaysian Ganoderma lucidum for the fungivore red hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) in Zebrafish embryo,
2020,
17,
23525134,
100322,
10.1016/j.aqrep.2020.100322
3.
Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Yeong Hui-Yin, Zul Ilham, Jo-Shu Chang, Sugenendran Supramani, Phang Siew-Moi,
Optimisation of biomass and lipid production of a tropical thraustochytrid Aurantiochytrium sp. UMACC-T023 in submerged-liquid fermentation for large-scale biodiesel production,
2020,
23,
18788181,
101496,
10.1016/j.bcab.2020.101496
4.
Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Norfaizah Mahmud, Zul Ilham, Nur Kusaira Khairul Ikram, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
In-depth spectral characterization of antioxidative (1,3)-β-D-glucan from the mycelium of an identified tiger milk mushroom Lignosus rhinocerus strain ABI in a stirred-tank bioreactor,
2020,
23,
18788181,
101455,
10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101455
5.
Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Jaganath Puvanen Thiran, Janathu Ferdaus Pajaru Rahman, Grema Yerima, Kumeera Subramaniam, Neil Rowan,
Investigations on the use of exopolysaccharide derived from mycelial extract of Ganoderma lucidum as functional feed ingredient for aquaculture-farmed red hybrid Tilapia (Oreochromis sp.),
2021,
3,
26668335,
100018,
10.1016/j.fufo.2021.100018
6.
Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Norhidayah Mohd Taufek, Grema Yerima, Janathu Rahman, Jaganath P. Thiran, Kumeera Subramaniam, Vikineswary Sabaratnam,
Effect of bioreactor-grown biomass from Ganoderma lucidum mycelium on growth performance and physiological response of red hybrid tilapia (Oreochromis sp.) for sustainable aquaculture,
2020,
1879-4238,
10.1007/s13165-020-00303-5
7.
Saeideh Ahmadifar, syed Mohsen Hosseini, Ebrahim Mohammadi Goltapeh, Akbar Jahedi,
Optimal method for production of mycelia biomass of Ganoderma lucidum in sugarcane molasses,
2020,
9,
2251-9270,
1,
10.29252/pps.9.1.1
8.
Nurul Amirah Hassan, Sugenendran Supramani, Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Anita Klaus, Zul Ilham, Wei-Hsin Chen, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Efficient biomass-exopolysaccharide production from an identified wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum strain BGF4A1 mycelium in a controlled submerged fermentation,
2019,
21,
18788181,
101305,
10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101305
9.
Anita Klaus, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Biljana Nikolić, Stefana Cvetković, Jovana Vunduk,
Pink oyster mushroom Pleurotus flabellatus mycelium produced by an airlift bioreactor—the evidence of potent in vitro biological activities,
2021,
37,
0959-3993,
10.1007/s11274-020-02980-6
10.
Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Neil Rowan,
Use of Zebrafish Embryo Assay to Evaluate Toxicity and Safety of Bioreactor-Grown Exopolysaccharides and Endopolysaccharides from European Ganoderma applanatum Mycelium for Future Aquaculture Applications,
2021,
22,
1422-0067,
1675,
10.3390/ijms22041675
11.
Silambarasi Mooralitharan, Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Teh Sabariah Binti Abd Manan, Hassimi Abu Hasan, Henriette S. Jensen, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar,
Optimization of mycoremediation treatment for the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia nitrogen (AN) removal from domestic effluent using wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum (WSGL),
2021,
0944-1344,
10.1007/s11356-021-12686-3
12.
Jovana Vunduk, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Shaiful Azuar Mohamad, Nur Hafizati Abd Halim, Ahmad Zainuri Mohd Dzomir, Željko Žižak, Anita Klaus,
Polysaccharides of Pleurotus flabellatus strain Mynuk produced by submerged fermentation as a promising novel tool against adhesion and biofilm formation of foodborne pathogens,
2019,
112,
00236438,
108221,
10.1016/j.lwt.2019.05.119
13.
Z Ilham, M R A Mansor,
Optimized Conversion of Nyamplung Seeds Oil to Biodiesel Using Box-Behnken Response Surface Methodology (RSM),
2020,
877,
1757-899X,
012029,
10.1088/1757-899X/877/1/012029
14.
Fátima R. Viceconte, Marina L. Diaz, Daniela S. Soresi, Ileana B. Lencinas, Alicia Carrera, María Inés Prat, María Soledad Vela Gurovic,
Ganoderma sessile is a fast polysaccharide producer among Ganoderma species,
2021,
0027-5514,
1,
10.1080/00275514.2020.1870255
15.
Liping Liu, Jie Feng, Kun Gao, Shuai Zhou, Mengqiu Yan, Chuanhong Tang, Jing Zhou, Yanfang Liu, Jingsong Zhang,
Influence of carbon and nitrogen sources on structural features and immunomodulatory activity of exopolysaccharides from Ganoderma lucidum,
2022,
119,
13595113,
96,
10.1016/j.procbio.2022.05.016
16.
Arman Hamza, Shreya Ghanekar, Devarai Santhosh Kumar,
Current trends in health-promoting potential and biomaterial applications of edible mushrooms for human wellness,
2023,
51,
22124292,
102290,
10.1016/j.fbio.2022.102290
17.
Besek Mariam Mohamad Jahis, Zul Ilham, Sugenendran Supramani, Mohamad Nor Azzimi Sohedein, Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim, Suraini Abd-Aziz, Neil Rowan, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Ganodiesel: A New Biodiesel Feedstock from Biomass of the Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum,
2022,
14,
2071-1050,
10764,
10.3390/su141710764
18.
Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Nur Raihan Abdullah, Neil Rowan,
In vivo toxicity of bioreactor-grown biomass and exopolysaccharides from Malaysian tiger milk mushroom mycelium for potential future health applications,
2021,
11,
2045-2322,
10.1038/s41598-021-02486-7
19.
Rahayu Ahmad, Srivani Sellathoroe, Ehwan Ngadi, Tengku Shafazila Tengku Saharuddin, Iffah Izzati Zakaria, Suguna Selvakumaran, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Isolation, identification, cultivation and determination of antimicrobial β-glucan from a wild-termite mushroom Termitomyces heimii RFES 230662,
2021,
37,
18788181,
102187,
10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102187
20.
Z. M. Hanafiah, W. H. M. Wan Mohtar, H. A. Hasan, H. S. Jensen, A. Klaus, S. Sharil, W. A. A. Q. I. Wan-Mohtar,
Ability of Ganoderma lucidum mycelial pellets to remove ammonia and organic matter from domestic wastewater,
2022,
19,
1735-1472,
7307,
10.1007/s13762-021-03633-3
21.
Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Enhancing Biomass-Exopolysaccharides Production of Lignosus rhinocerus in a High-Scale Stirred-Tank Bioreactor and Its Potential Lipid as Bioenergy,
2023,
16,
1996-1073,
2330,
10.3390/en16052330
22.
Sugenendran Supramani, Nur Ardiyana Rejab, Zul Ilham, Rahayu Ahmad, Pau-Loke Show, Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Performance of Biomass and Exopolysaccharide Production from the Medicinal Mushroom Ganoderma lucidum in a New Fabricated Air-L-Shaped Bioreactor (ALSB),
2023,
11,
2227-9717,
670,
10.3390/pr11030670
23.
Joshini Pillai Balamurugan, Sugenendran Supramani, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Zul Ilham, Anita Klaus, Nur Kusaira Khairul Ikram, Rahayu Ahmad, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Efficient biomass-endopolysaccharide production from an identified wild-Serbian Ganoderma applanatum strain BGS6Ap mycelium in a controlled submerged fermentation,
2021,
37,
18788181,
102166,
10.1016/j.bcab.2021.102166
24.
Alireza Tajik, Hamid Reza Samadlouie, Amir Salek Farrokhi, Amir Ghasemi,
Optimization of chemical conditions for metabolites production by Ganoderma lucidum using response surface methodology and investigation of antimicrobial as well as anticancer activities,
2024,
14,
1664-302X,
10.3389/fmicb.2023.1280405
25.
Jianying Huang, Tao Liu, Yimin Zhang, Pengcheng Hu,
Comparative study of microwave-assisted and hydrothermal hydroxyapatite synthesis from neutralization slag: Optimization, energy, and adsorption,
2024,
50,
02728842,
42157,
10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.08.059
26.
Arman Hamza, Ankit Mylarapu, K. Vijay Krishna, Devarai Santhosh Kumar,
An insight into the nutritional and medicinal value of edible mushrooms: A natural treasury for human health,
2024,
381,
01681656,
86,
10.1016/j.jbiotec.2023.12.014
27.
Lina Dávila Giraldo, Paula Villanueva Baez, Cristian Zambrano Forero, Walter Murillo Arango,
Production, Extraction, and Solubilization of Exopolysaccharides Using Submerged Cultures of Agaricomycetes,
2023,
13,
2331-8325,
10.21769/BioProtoc.4841
28.
Arman Hamza, Abdul Khalad, Devarai Santhosh Kumar,
Enhanced production of mycelium biomass and exopolysaccharides of Pleurotus ostreatus by integrating response surface methodology and artificial neural network,
2024,
399,
09608524,
130577,
10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130577
29.
Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Ammar Radzi Azmi, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Fabrizio Olivito, Giovanni Golemme, Zul Ilham, Adi Ainurzaman Jamaludin, Nadzmin Razali, Sarina Abdul Halim-Lim, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar,
Water Quality Assessment and Decolourisation of Contaminated Ex-Mining Lake Water Using Bioreactor Dye-Eating Fungus (BioDeF) System: A Real Case Study,
2024,
12,
2305-6304,
60,
10.3390/toxics12010060
30.
Khalid Sayed, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Teh Sabariah Binti Abd Manan, Sarah Athirah Binti Mohamad Sharif,
Simultaneous enhanced removal of pharmaceuticals and hormone from wastewaters using series combinations of ultra-violet irradiation, bioremediation, and adsorption technologies,
2024,
57,
22147144,
104589,
10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104589
31.
Teik Chee Lim, Zul Ilham, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Production of Ganodiesel from the biomass of Ganoderma lucidum in air-L-shaped bioreactor (ALSB),
2024,
10,
24058440,
e35170,
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35170
32.
Niketan Deshmukh, Lakshmi Bhaskaran,
Optimization of cultural and nutritional conditions to enhance mycelial biomass of Cordyceps militaris using statistical approach,
2024,
55,
1517-8382,
235,
10.1007/s42770-023-01222-9
33.
Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar, Aziza Sultana Bithi, Rosiah Rohani, Antonius Indarto, Zaher Mundher Yaseen, Suraya Sharil, Teh Sabariah Binti Abdul Manan,
Removal of pharmaceutical compounds and toxicology study in wastewater using Malaysian fungal Ganoderma lucidum,
2024,
358,
00456535,
142209,
10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142209
34.
Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Anggita Rahmi Hafsari, Malini Elango, Zul Ilham, Febri Doni, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Yusufjon Gafforov, Yong Jie Wong, Khairul Nizam Abdul Maulud, Nor Hidayah Ismail, Mohd Yusmiaidil Putera Mohd Yusof, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Removal of cyanobacterial harmful algal blooms (HABs) from contaminated local park lake using Ganoderma lucidum mycelial pellets,
2025,
11,
24058440,
e41205,
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41205
35.
Zarimah Mohd Hanafiah, Wan Hanna Melini Wan Mohtar, Noureddine El Messaoudi, Youssef Miyah, Ali Maged, Salah Knani, Besma Graba, Yusufjon Gafforov, Wan Abd Al Qadr Imad Wan-Mohtar,
Wastewater treatment using Ganoderma species via ganoremediation bioreactor: A comprehensive review,
2025,
2589014X,
102105,
10.1016/j.biteb.2025.102105
36.
Fangcheng Hu, Yonggang Fang, Zahid Khan, Lianxi Xing,
Optimization of triterpenoids biosynthesis in Athelia termitophila as a source of natural products,
2025,
15,
2191-0855,
10.1186/s13568-025-01840-6
37.
Waraporn Apiwatanapiwat, Phornphimon Janchai, Pilanee Vaithanomsat, Antika Boondaeng, Jiraporn Meelaksana, Chanaporn Trakunjae, Rattaket Choeyklin, Natthawut Wiriyathanawudhiwong, Hataitip Nimitkeatkai, Amnat Jarerat,
Production of polysaccharide, triterpenoid, and phenolic compounds in antler-type Ganoderma sichuanense grown with fruit peels supplementation in liquid culture,
2025,
5,
2731-4286,
10.1007/s44187-025-00451-1
Nilde Antonella Di Benedetto, Maria Rosaria Corbo, Daniela Campaniello, Mariagrazia Pia Cataldi, Antonio Bevilacqua, Milena Sinigaglia, Zina Flagella. The role of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in improving nitrogen use efficiency for sustainable crop production: a focus on wheat[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 413-434. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.413
Nilde Antonella Di Benedetto, Maria Rosaria Corbo, Daniela Campaniello, Mariagrazia Pia Cataldi, Antonio Bevilacqua, Milena Sinigaglia, Zina Flagella. The role of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in improving nitrogen use efficiency for sustainable crop production: a focus on wheat[J]. AIMS Microbiology, 2017, 3(3): 413-434. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.413
Table 2.
Weighted, adjusted multinomial logistic regression model predicting factors associated with sources of health information seeking of cancer survivors using HINTS 4 Cycles 1–4 (2011–2014) and HINTS 5 Cycles 1–2 (2017–2018).
Interpersonal Communication Vs Non-Users
Mass Media Vs Non-Users
aOR
CI
aOR
CI
Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White
1.00
1.00
Non-Hispanic Black
1.16
0.61
2.23
0.73
0.38
1.42
Hispanic
1.01
0.47
2.17
0.81
0.43
1.54
Non-Hispanic Other
2.28
0.89
5.86
0.98
0.43
2.24
Time Since diagnosis
≤5 years
1.00
1.00
>5 years
1.21
0.81
1.82
1.43
0.94
2.17
Age
<50 years
1.00
1.00
50–64 years
2.25
0.97
5.21
1.53
0.72
3.24
≥65 years
2.80
1.15
6.82
0.97
0.42
2.23
Gender
Female
1.00
1.00
Male
0.68
0.41
1.12
0.61
0.38
0.99
Education Level
Some College or more
1.00
1.00
High School or less
0.57
0.38
0.86
0.35
0.23
0.51
Employment Status
Unemployed
1.00
1.00
Employed
0.59
0.30
1.17
0.71
0.37
1.37
Retired
0.60
0.32
1.13
0.99
0.56
1.73
Income
< $50,000
1.00
1.00
$50,000 or more
1.06
0.64
1.75
1.83
1.16
2.89
Marital Status
Single
1.00
1.00
Married/Living as married
0.50
0.24
1.02
0.65
0.30
1.37
Divorced
0.45
0.20
1.03
0.66
0.30
1.44
Widowed
0.28
0.13
0.60
0.30
0.13
0.69
Health Insurance
No
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.19
0.33
4.22
0.93
0.26
3.31
Regular provider
No
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.92
1.09
3.38
1.74
0.99
3.06
General health
Fair/Poor
1.00
1.00
Good
0.94
0.59
1.48
0.83
0.54
1.28
Excellent/Very good
1.12
0.68
1.83
1.28
0.82
2.00
Cancer type
Breast Cancer
1.00
1.00
Cervical Cancer
0.63
0.25
1.60
0.63
0.27
1.51
Prostate Cancer
1.15
0.52
2.56
0.80
0.37
1.76
Colon Cancer
0.78
0.29
2.11
0.51
0.22
1.22
Rectal Cancer
3.26
0.25
41.86
6.79
0.68
67.83
Melanoma
0.79
0.29
2.14
0.80
0.33
1.93
Other types
0.72
0.38
1.40
0.72
0.38
1.35
More than one type
1.03
0.50
2.15
0.67
0.33
1.38
aOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI = confidence interval; Model adjusted for race/ethnicity, time since cancer diagnosis, age, gender, educational level, employment status, income, marital status, health insurance, having a regular healthcare provider, general health status and cancer type.
Table 3.
Weighted, adjusted multinomial logistic regression model predicting factors associated with sources of health information seeking of participants without a history of cancer using HINTS 4 cycles 1–4 and HINTS 5 cycles 1–2 (2011–2018).
Interpersonal Communication Vs Non-Users
Mass Media Vs Non-Users
OR
CI
OR
CI
Race/Ethnicity
Non-Hispanic White
1.00
1.00
Non-Hispanic Black
0.90
0.70
1.16
0.54
0.44
0.66
Hispanic
0.85
0.67
1.09
0.49
0.41
0.60
Non-Hispanic Other
0.87
0.62
1.21
0.54
0.40
0.72
Age
<50 years
1.00
1.00
50–64 years
1.25
1.00
1.56
0.85
0.72
1.01
≥65 years
1.28
0.98
1.67
0.52
0.41
0.67
Gender
Female
Male
0.66
0.55
0.80
0.53
0.46
0.61
Education Level
Some College or more
1.00
1.00
High School or less
0.62
0.51
0.76
0.29
0.25
0.35
Employment Status
Unemployed
1.00
1.00
Employed
0.80
0.63
1.03
1.02
0.82
1.28
Retired
0.91
0.70
1.19
1.05
0.81
1.36
Income
<$50,000
1.00
1.00
$50,000 or more
1.16
0.92
1.47
1.72
1.41
2.10
Marital Status
Single
1.00
1.00
Married/Living as married
1.28
0.99
1.65
1.27
1.05
1.54
Divorced
0.87
0.66
1.15
0.95
0.76
1.18
Widowed
0.91
0.67
1.23
0.60
0.45
0.78
Health Insurance
No
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.20
0.88
1.63
0.96
0.77
1.21
Regular provider
No
1.00
1.00
Yes
1.84
1.50
2.26
1.46
1.24
1.72
General health
Fair/Poor
1.00
1.00
Good
0.93
0.73
1.19
1.12
0.90
1.38
Excellent/Very good
0.81
0.62
1.06
0.99
0.79
1.23
aOR = Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI = confidence interval; Model adjusted for race/ethnicity, age, gender, educational level, employment status, income, marital status, health insurance, having a regular healthcare provider and general health status
Figure 1. Percentage change in greenhouse gas emissions by agricultural source from 2004 to 2014 (data recovered from FAOSTAT [14] and modelled by the authors)
Figure 2. The major biological nitrogen pathways, that play a crucial role in transformation of fertilizing nitrogen in agricultural system (Some data were recovered by Canfield et al. [15]; the figure was an original work of the authors of this paper)