Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Improvement in montreal cognitive assessment score following three-week pain rehabilitation program

1 Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA
2 Department of Pain Medicines, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA

topic section: Pain management

Aim: To demonstrate improvement in cognitive function following a 3-week Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program. Methods: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was performed at initial evaluation and on dismissal day of the program. Results: The patient had chronic, non-cancer lower back pain for over 15 years for which patient had myriad of treatments. Patient was directed to Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program as a last resort treatment. The patient had moderate cognitive impairment when he joined the program (MoCA score of 17/30) that dramatically improved into the normal cognitive range by the end of the program (MoCA score of 26/30). Conclusions: Improvement in MoCA score was demonstrated after completion of the Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Rehabilitation Program, which is the first demonstrated case.
  Article Metrics

Keywords chronic pain; cognitive impairment; interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation; case report

Citation: Joann E. Bolton, Elke Lacayo, Svetlana Kurklinsky, Christopher D. Sletten. Improvement in montreal cognitive assessment score following three-week pain rehabilitation program. AIMS Medical Science, 2019, 6(3): 201-209. doi: 10.3934/medsci.2019.3.201


  • 1. Steglitz J, Buscemi J, Ferguson MJ (2012) The future of pain research, education, and treatment: A summary of the IOM report "Relieving pain in America: A blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research". Transl Behav Med 2: 6–8.    
  • 2. Latina R, De Marinis MG, Giordano F, et al. (2019) Epidemiology of chronic pain in the Latium region, Italy: A cross-sectional study on the clinical characteristics of patients attending pain clinics. Pain Manag Nurs 20: 373–281.    
  • 3. Guy GP, Zhang K, Bohm MK, et al. (2017) Vital signs: Changes in opioid prescribing in the United States, 2006–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66: 697–704.    
  • 4. Lee M, Silverman SM, Hansen H, et al. (2011) A comprehensive review of opioid-induced hyperalgesia. Pain Physician 14: 145–161.
  • 5. Chu LF, Angst MS, Clark D (2008) Opioid-induced hyperalgesia in humans: Molecular mechanisms and clinical considerations. Clin J Pain 24: 479–496.    
  • 6. Volkow ND, McLellan TA (2011) Curtailing diversion and abuse of opioid analgesics without jeopardizing pain treatment. JAMA 305: 1346–1347.    
  • 7. Von Korff M, Kolodny A, Deyo RA, et al. (2011) Long-term opioid therapy reconsidered. Ann Intern Med 155: 325–328.    
  • 8. Sullivan MD, Von Korff M, Banta-Green C, et al. (2010) Problems and concerns of patients receiving chronic opioid therapy for chronic non-cancer pain. Pain 149: 345–353.    
  • 9. CDC (2017) Wide-ranging online data for epidemiologic research. Atlanta, GA: CDC, National Center for Health Statistics.
  • 10. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R (2016) CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain-United States, 2016. MMWR Recommendations and reports: Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports 65: 1–49.
  • 11. Vivolo-Kantor AM, Seth PR, Gladden M, et al. (2018) Vital signs: Trends in emergency department visits for suspected opioid overdoses-United States, July 2016–September 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 67: 279–285.    
  • 12. Goodman CW, Brett AS (2017) Gabapentin and pregabalin for pain-is increased prescribing a cause for concern? New Engl J Med 377: 411–414.    
  • 13. Stanos S (2012) Focused review of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation programs for chronic pain management. Curr Pain Headache R 16: 147–152.    
  • 14. Schatman ME (2015) The American chronic pain crisis and the media: about time to get it right? J Pain Res 8: 885–887.
  • 15. Gatchel RJ, McGeary DD, McGeary CA, et al. (2014) Interdisciplinary chronic pain management: past, present, and future. Am Psychol 69: 119–130.    
  • 16. Ferreira KS, Oliver GZ, Thomaz DC, et al. (2016) Cognitive deficits in chronic pain patients, in a brief screening test, are independent of comorbidities and medication use. Arq Neuro-psiquiat 74: 361–366.    
  • 17. Sjogren P, Christrup LL, Petersen MA, et al. (2005) Neuropsychological assessment of chronic non-malignant pain patients treated in a multidisciplinary pain centre. Eur J Pain 9: 453–462.    
  • 18. Nadar MS, Jasem Z, Manee FS (2016) The Cognitive Functions in Adults with Chronic Pain: A Comparative Study. Pain Res Manag 2016: 5719380.
  • 19. Moore DJ, Keogh E, Eccleston C (2012) The interruptive effect of pain on attention. Q J Exp Psychol 65: 565–586.    
  • 20. Marco CA, Mann D, Rasp J, et al. (2018) Effects of opioid medications on cognitive skills among Emergency Department patients. Am J Emerg Med 36: 1009–1013.    
  • 21. Copersino ML, Schretlen DJ, Fitzmaurice GM, et al. (2012) Effects of cognitive impairment on substance abuse treatment attendance: predictive validation of a brief cognitive screening measure. Am J Drug Alcoh Abuse 38: 246–250.    
  • 22. Snyder D (1992) Pain: Clinical manual for nursing practice. Cancer Nurs 15: 211–212.
  • 23. Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, et al. (2001) Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 94: 149–158.    
  • 24. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30: 473–483.
  • 25. Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al. (1993) SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston, MA The Health Institute, New England Medical Center.
  • 26. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE (1993) The MOS 36-Item short-form health survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 31: 247–263.
  • 27. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psych Meas 1: 385–401.    
  • 28. Sullivan MJL, Thorn B, Haythornthwaite JA, et al. (2001) Theoretical perspectives on the relation between catastrophizing and pain. Clin J Pain 17: 52–64.    
  • 29. Sullivan MJL, Bishop SR, Pivik J (1995) The pain catastrophizing scale: Development and validation. Psychol Assessment 4: 524–553.
  • 30. Sullivan MJL (2009) The pain catastrophizing scale-user manual. Available from: https://sullivan-painresearch.mcgill.ca/pdf/pcs/PCSManual_English.pdf
  • 31. Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, et al. (2004) The Canadian occupational performance measure: A research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther 71: 210–222.    
  • 32. McColl MA, Law M, Baptiste S, et al. (2005) Targeted applications of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Can J Occup Ther 72: 298–300.    
  • 33. Larsen AE, Carlsson G (2012) Utility of the Canadian occupational performance measure as an admission and outcome measure in interdisciplinary community-based geriatric rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther 19: 204–213.    
  • 34. McColl MA, Paterson M, Davies D, et al. (2000) Validity and community utility of the Canadian occupational performance measure. Can J Occup Ther 67: 22–30.    
  • 35. Cooper KH (1968) A means of assessing maximal oxygen intake. Correlation between field and treadmill testing. JAMA 203: 201–204.
  • 36. Enright PL, McBurnie MA, Bittner V, et al. (2003) The 6-min walk test-A quick measure of functional status in elderly adults. Chest 123: 387–398.    
  • 37. Sletten CD, Kurklinsky S, Chinburapa V, et al. (2015) Economic analysis of a comprehensive pain rehabilitation program: a collaboration between Florida Blue and Mayo Clinic Florida. Pain Med 16: 898–904.    
  • 38. Kurklinsky S, Perez RB, Lacayo ER, et al. (2016) The efficacy of interdisciplinary rehabilitation for improving function in people with chronic pain. Pain Res Treat 2016: 7217684.
  • 39. Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, et al. (2006) Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 54: 743–749.    
  • 40. Angst F, Aeschlimann A, Stucki G (2001) Smallest detectable and minimal clinically important differences of rehabilitation intervention with their implications for required sample sizes using WOMAC and SF-36 quality of life measurement instruments in patients with osteoarthritis of the lower extremities. Arthritis Rheum 45: 384–391.    
  • 41. Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE (2001) Using the SF-36 with older adults: A cross-sectional community-based survey. Age Ageing 30: 337–343.    
  • 42. Townsend CO, Kerkvliet JL, Bruce BK, et al. (2008) A longitudinal study of the efficacy of a comprehensive pain rehabilitation program with opioid withdrawal: comparison of treatment outcomes based on opioid use status at admission. Pain 140: 177–189.    
  • 43. Darchuk KM, Townsend CO, Rome JD, et al. (2010) Longitudinal treatment outcomes for geriatric patients with chronic non-cancer pain at an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program. Pain Med 11: 1352–1364.    


Reader Comments

your name: *   your email: *  

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved