Export file:


  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text


  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Putting psychology into telerehabilitation: Coping planning as an example for how to integrate behavior change techniques into clinical practice

1 Department of Natural Sciences, Health Psychology, Medical School Berlin, Berlin, Germany
2 Center for Hip Health and Mobility, Vancouver, Canada
3 Department of Family Practice, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
4 School of Psychology, The University of Adelaide, South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
5 Department of Education and Psychology, Health Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
6 Department of Psychology & Methods, Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
7 SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Wroclaw, Poland

Special Issues: Telerehabilitation for Adults and Older Adults

Background: Behavioral interventions based on psychological theory can facilitate continued recovery after discharge from cardiac or orthopedic rehabilitation. For example, health professionals can encourage patients to engage in coping planning to support the maintenance of physical activity. Telephone-based interviews or web-based interventions are two promising delivery modes to provide such after-care services from a distance (telerehabilitation). However, previous evaluations of such behavioral interventions lack a detailed description of the specific content, and its connection to psychosocial antecedents and health outcomes. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to (i) describe the content of user-specified coping plans. Second, we aimed to identify (ii) coping plan characteristics associated with health outcomes post-rehabilitation and (iii) socio-demographic and psychosocial variables associated with coping plan characteristics. Methods: This was a secondary analysis from a larger behavioral intervention study, using remote delivery modes, within orthopedic and cardiac rehabilitation. Two raters evaluated the content, quality and number of coping plans from 231 participants. Physical activity and quality of life (health outcomes) were measured via self-reports at the end of rehabilitation and six months after discharge. We used linear regression analyses to examine the relationship between plan characteristics and health outcomes. Results: Content analyses of participants’ coping plans emphasized that physical barriers such as pain or other health limitations presented major obstacles for engagement in physical activity post-rehabilitation. The most frequently identified external barriers to physical activity were workload, family obligations or bad weather. There was a statistically significant difference in quality of life and physical activity for participants who formulated highly instrumental coping plans (higher quality of life and activity) compared with participants with coping plans of lower quality (lower quality of life and activity). The number of plans (quantity) was not related with outcomes. Conclusion: Generating coping plans can be a useful theory-based approach for inclusion in telerehabilitation to facilitate the maintenance of physical activity and quality of life. It is important to encourage adults and older adults to engage in coping planning and, specifically, to formulate strategies that support tenacious plan pursuit.
  Article Metrics


1. Fisher EB, Fitzgibbon ML, Glasgow RE, et al. (2011) Behavior matters. Am J Prev Med 40: e15–e30.    

2. Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Schwarzer R (2006) Adoption and maintenance of physical activity: Planning interventions in young, middle-aged, and older adults. Psychol Health 21: 145–163.    

3. Janssen V, De Gucht V, van Exel H, et al. (2014) A self-regulation lifestyle program for post-cardiac rehabilitation patients has long-term effects on exercise adherence. J Behav Med 37: 308–321.    

4. Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R (2006) Action plans and coping plans for physical exercise: A longitudinal intervention study in cardiac rehabilitation. Brit J Health Psych 11: 23–37.    

5. Sniehotta FF, Schwarzer R, Scholz U, et al. (2005) Action planning and coping planning for long-term lifestyle change: theory and assessment. Eur J Soc Psychol 35: 565–576.    

6. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ Open 337: 1655.

7. Gourlan M, Bernard P, Bortolon C, et al. (2016) Efficacy of theory-based interventions to promote physical activity. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Health Psychol Rev 10: 50–66.

8. Prestwich A, Kenworthy J, Conner M (2017) Health behavior change: Theories, methods and interventions. Abingdon: Routledge.

9. Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A, Ziegelmann JP, et al. (2008) Social-cognitive predictors of physical exercise adherence: Three longitudinal studies in rehabilitation. Health Psychol 27: 54–63.    

10. Rothman AJ (2000) Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychol 19: 64–69.    

11. Kwasnicka D, Dombrowski SU, White M, et al. (2016) Theoretical explanations for maintenance of behaviour change: A systematic review of behaviour theories. Health Psychol Rev 10: 277–296.    

12. Gollwitzer PM (1999) Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. Am Psychol 54: 493.    

13. Schwarzer KR (2016) Coping planning as an intervention component: A commentary. Psychol Health 31: 903.    

14. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. (2013) The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: Building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med 46: 81–95.    

15. French DP, Olander EK, Chisholm A, et al. (2014) Which behaviour change techniques are most effective at increasing older adults' self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour? A systematic review. Ann Behav Med 48: 225–234.    

16. Williams S, French D (2011) What are the most effective intervention techniques for changing physical activity self-efficacy and physical activity behaviour-and are they the same? Health Educ Res 26: 308–322.    

17. Inauen J, Mosler HJ (2016) Mechanisms of behavioural maintenance: Long-term effects of theory-based interventions to promote safe water consumption. Psychol Health 31: 166–183.    

18. Inauen J, Stocker A, Scholz U (2018) Why and for whom may coping planning have adverse effects? A moderated mediation analysis. Appl Psychol, 10.

19. Kwasnicka D, Presseau J, White M, et al. (2013) Does planning how to cope with anticipated barriers facilitate health-related behaviour change? A systematic review. Health Psychol Rev 7: 129–145.    

20. Evers A, Klusmann V, Ziegelmann JP, et al. (2012) Long-term adherence to a physical activity intervention: The role of telephone-assisted vs. self-administered coping plans and strategy use. Psychol Health 27: 784–797.

21. van Osch L, Lechner L, Reubsaet A, et al. (2010) From theory to practice: An explorative study into the instrumentality and specificity of implementation intentions. Psychol Health 25: 351–364.    

22. Bellg AJ, Borrelli B, Resnick B, et al. (2004) Enhancing treatment fidelity in health behavior change studies: Best practices and recommendations from the NIH Behavior Change Consortium. Health Psychol 23: 443–451.

23. Wiedemann AU, Lippke S, Reuter T, et al. (2011) The more the better? The number of plans predicts health behaviour change. Appl Psychol 3: 87–106.

24. Krämer L, Fuchs R (2010) Barrieren und Barrierenmanagement im Prozess der Sportteilnahme. Eur J Health Psychol 18: 170–182.

25. Fleig L, Lippke S, Pomp S, et al. (2011) Intervention effects of exercise self-regulation on physical exercise and eating fruits and vegetables: a longitudinal study in orthopedic and cardiac rehabilitation. Prev Med 53: 182–187.    

26. Fleig L, Pomp S, Schwarzer R, et al. (2013) Promoting exercise maintenance: How interventions with booster sessions improve long-term rehabilitation outcomes. Rehab Psychol 58: 323–333.    

27. Godin G, Shephard R (1985) A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 10: 141–146.

28. Plotnikoff RC, Lippke S, Reinbold-Matthews M, et al. (2007) Assessing the validity of a stage measure on physical activity in a population-based sample of individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 11: 73–91.    

29. Ellert U, Lampert T, Ravens-Sieberer U (2005) Messung der gesundheitsbezogenen Lebensqualität mit dem SF-8. Bundesgesundheitsbla 48: 1330–1337.

30. Lippke S, Fleig L, Pomp S, et al. (2010) Validity of a stage algorithm for physical activity in participants recruited from orthopedic and cardiac rehabilitation clinics. Rehabil Psychol 55: 398–408.    

31. Gale NK, Heath G, Cameron E, et al. (2013) Using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research. BMC Med Res Meth 13: 117.    

32. Enders CK, Bandalos DL (2001) The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Struct Equ Model 8: 430–457.    

33. Gold MS, Bentler PM (2000) Treatments of missing data: A Monte Carlo comparison of RBHDI, iterative stochastic regression imputation, and expectation-maximization. Struct Equ Model 7: 319–355.    

34. Korsch S, Herbold D, Wiezoreck M, et al. (2016) Förderfaktoren, Barrieren und Barrierenmanagement zur Umsetzung gesundheitsförderlicher Verhaltensweisen von Rehabilitanden mit chronischem Rückenschmerz: Eine qualitative Analyse. Rehabilitation 55: 210–216.

35. Miller DT, Ross M (1975) Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychol Bull 82: 213–225.    

36. Brandtstädter J (2009) Goal pursuit and goal adjustment: Self-regulation and intentional self-development in changing developmental contexts. Adv Life Course Res 14: 52–62.    

37. Brandtstädter J, Renner G (1990) Tenacious goal pursuit and flexible goal adjustment: Explication and age-related analysis of assimilative and accommodative strategies of coping. Psychol Aging 5: 58.    

38. Rothermund K (2006) Hanging on and letting go in the pursuit of health goals: Psychological mechanisms to cope with a regulatory dilemma. Self-regulation Health Behav, 217–241.

39. Keller J, Fleig L, Hohl DH, et al. (2017) Which characteristics of planning matter? Individual and dyadic physical activity plans and their effects on plan enactment. Soc Sci Med 189: 53–62.

© 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved