On optimization of substrate removal in a bioreactor with wall attached and suspended bacteria

  • Received: 01 February 2013 Accepted: 29 June 2018 Published: 01 June 2014
  • MSC : Primary: 92D25; Secondary: 49N90.

  • We investigate the question of optimal substrate removal in a biofilm reactor with concurrent suspended growth, both with respect to the amount of substrate removed and with respect to treatment process duration. The water to be treated is fed externally from a buffer vessel to the treatment reactor. In the two-objective optimal control problem, the flow rate between the vessels is selected as the control variable.The treatment reactor is modelled by a system of three ordinary differential equations in which a two-point boundary value problem is embedded. The solution of the associated singular optimal control problem in the class of measurable functions is impractical to determine and infeasible to implement in real reactors. Instead, we solve the simpler problem to optimize reactor performance in the class of off-on functions, a choice that is motivated by the underlying biological process. These control functions start with an initial no-flow period and then switch to a constant flow rate until the buffer vessel is empty. We approximate the Pareto Front numerically and study the behaviour of the system and its dependence on reactor and initial data.Overall, the modest potential of control strategies to improve reactor performance is found to be primarily due to an initial transient period in which the bacteria have to adapt to the environmental conditions in the reactor, i.e. depends heavily on the initial state of the dynamic system. In applications, the initial state, however, is often unknown and therefore the efficiency of reactor optimization, compared to the uncontrolled system with constant flow rate, is limited.

    Citation: Alma Mašić, Hermann J. Eberl. On optimization of substrate removal in a bioreactor with wall attached and suspended bacteria[J]. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(5): 1139-1166. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.1139

    Related Papers:

    [1] Donna J. Cedio-Fengya, John G. Stevens . Mathematical modeling of biowall reactors for in-situ groundwater treatment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2006, 3(4): 615-634. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2006.3.615
    [2] Andrés Donoso-Bravo, Pedro Gajardo, Matthieu Sebbah, Diego Vicencio . Comparison of performance in an anaerobic digestion process: one-reactor vs two-reactor configurations. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2019, 16(4): 2447-2465. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2019122
    [3] Fabiana Russo, Alberto Tenore, Maria Rosaria Mattei, Luigi Frunzo . Multiscale modelling of the start-up process of anammox-based granular reactors. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2022, 19(10): 10374-10406. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2022486
    [4] Mudassar Imran, Hal L. Smith . A model of optimal dosing of antibiotic treatment in biofilm. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2014, 11(3): 547-571. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2014.11.547
    [5] Alejandro Rincón, Fredy E. Hoyos, Gloria Restrepo . Global stability of a continuous bioreactor model under persistent variation of the dilution rate. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(2): 3396-3424. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023160
    [6] Vincenzo Luongo, Maria Rosaria Mattei, Luigi Frunzo, Berardino D'Acunto, Kunal Gupta, Shankararaman Chellam, Nick Cogan . A transient biological fouling model for constant flux microfiltration. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2023, 20(1): 1274-1296. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2023058
    [7] Agustín Gabriel Yabo, Jean-Baptiste Caillau, Jean-Luc Gouzé . Optimal bacterial resource allocation: metabolite production in continuous bioreactors. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2020, 17(6): 7074-7100. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020364
    [8] Nikodem J. Poplawski, Abbas Shirinifard, Maciej Swat, James A. Glazier . Simulation of single-species bacterial-biofilm growth using the Glazier-Graner-Hogeweg model and the CompuCell3D modeling environment. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2008, 5(2): 355-388. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2008.5.355
    [9] Fadoua El Moustaid, Amina Eladdadi, Lafras Uys . Modeling bacterial attachment to surfaces as an early stage of biofilm development. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2013, 10(3): 821-842. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2013.10.821
    [10] Robert Stephen Cantrell, Brian Coomes, Yifan Sha . A tridiagonal patch model of bacteria inhabiting a Nanofabricated landscape. Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering, 2017, 14(4): 953-973. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2017050
  • We investigate the question of optimal substrate removal in a biofilm reactor with concurrent suspended growth, both with respect to the amount of substrate removed and with respect to treatment process duration. The water to be treated is fed externally from a buffer vessel to the treatment reactor. In the two-objective optimal control problem, the flow rate between the vessels is selected as the control variable.The treatment reactor is modelled by a system of three ordinary differential equations in which a two-point boundary value problem is embedded. The solution of the associated singular optimal control problem in the class of measurable functions is impractical to determine and infeasible to implement in real reactors. Instead, we solve the simpler problem to optimize reactor performance in the class of off-on functions, a choice that is motivated by the underlying biological process. These control functions start with an initial no-flow period and then switch to a constant flow rate until the buffer vessel is empty. We approximate the Pareto Front numerically and study the behaviour of the system and its dependence on reactor and initial data.Overall, the modest potential of control strategies to improve reactor performance is found to be primarily due to an initial transient period in which the bacteria have to adapt to the environmental conditions in the reactor, i.e. depends heavily on the initial state of the dynamic system. In applications, the initial state, however, is often unknown and therefore the efficiency of reactor optimization, compared to the uncontrolled system with constant flow rate, is limited.


    [1] Math. Biosc. Eng., 9 (2012), 215-239.
    [2] Appl. Math. Comp., 218 (2011), 1484-1494.
    [3] in Structured Population Models in Biology and Epidemiology, Lecture Notes in Math., 1936, Springer, Berlin, 2008, 265-302.
    [4] Microb. Ecol., 41 (2001), 210-221.
    [5] SIAM series Adv. Design and Control, Philadelphia, 2010.
    [6] 3rd edition, Chelsea Publ, 1968.
    [7] Bull. Math. Biol., 75 (2013), 94-123.
    [8] 2nd edition, MIT Press, 2001.
    [9] Springer-Verlag New York Inc, 1975.
    [10] Infect. Immun., 39 (1983), 686-703.
    [11] Automatica, 47 (2011), 1764-1769.
    [12] BSB Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig, 1990.
    [13] J. Control Sci. Eng. Article, 2010 (2010), 1-10.
    [14] Optim. Contr. Appl. Met., 32 (2010), 298-312.
    [15] Separ. Sci. Technol., 47 (2012), 647-653.
    [16] 2nd edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.
    [17] Proceedings WEFTEC Session, (2004), 296-318.
    [18] J. Math. Biol., 47, (2003), 137-152.
    [19] J. Dent. Res., 89 (2010), 205-218.
    [20] Bull. Math. Biol., 74 (2012), 2917-2934.
    [21] CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2007.
    [22] Bull. Math. Biol., 74 (2012), 1001-1026.
    [23] Bull. Math. Biol., 76 (2014), 27-58.
    [24] accessed on January 18, 2013.
    [25] Optim. Control Appl. Meth., 20 (1999), 145-164.
    [26] Water Sci. Technol., 41 (2000), 509-512.
    [27] Wiley, New York, 1962.
    [28] McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.
    [29] Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol., 2 (2003), 213-224.
    [30] Elissar Global, Monterey, CA, 2007.
    [31] Math. Comput. Simulat., 60 (2002), 475-486.
    [32] SIAM J. Appl. Math., 61 (2000), 567-595.
    [33] SIAM J. Appl. Math., 70 (2010), 3175-3202.
    [34] IWA Publishing, London, 2007.
    [35] 7th ed., Springer, 2000.
    [36] Scientific and Technical Report No.18, IWA Publishing, 2006.
    [37] Systems & Control: Foundations & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston, 1994.
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Harry J. Gaebler, Hermann J. Eberl, 2018, Chapter 32, 978-3-319-99718-6, 351, 10.1007/978-3-319-99719-3_32
    2. Alma Mašić, Sriniketh Srinivasan, Julien Billeter, Dominique Bonvin, Kris Villez, Shape constrained splines as transparent black-box models for bioprocess modeling, 2017, 99, 00981354, 96, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2016.12.017
    3. Maryam Ghasemi, Sheng Chang, Sivabal Sivaloganathan, Modeling and simulation study of simultaneous nitrification–denitrification in membrane aerated bioreactor, 2023, 668, 03767388, 121210, 10.1016/j.memsci.2022.121210
    4. Maryam Ghasemi, Sheng Chang, Sivabal Sivaloganathan, Exploring Aeration Strategies for Enhanced Simultaneous Nitrification and Denitrification in Membrane Aerated Bioreactors: A Computational Approach, 2024, 86, 0092-8240, 10.1007/s11538-024-01343-8
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2014 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(3116) PDF downloads(493) Cited by(4)

Article outline

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog