Citation: Arivazhagan Anbu, Sakthivel Kumarasamy, Barani Balan Natesan. Lipschitz stability of an inverse problem for the Kawahara equation with damping[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 4529-4545. doi: 10.3934/math.2020291
[1] | Zeliha Korpinar, Mustafa Inc, Dumitru Baleanu . On the fractional model of Fokker-Planck equations with two different operator. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 236-248. doi: 10.3934/math.2020015 |
[2] | Zihang Cai, Chao Jiang, Yuzhu Lei, Zuhan Liu . Global classical solution of the fractional Nernst-Planck-Poisson-Navier- Stokes system in R3. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17359-17385. doi: 10.3934/math.2024844 |
[3] | Shu-Nan Li, Bing-Yang Cao . Anomalies of Lévy-based thermal transport from the Lévy-Fokker-Planck equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 6868-6881. doi: 10.3934/math.2021402 |
[4] | Hassan Khan, Umar Farooq, Fairouz Tchier, Qasim Khan, Gurpreet Singh, Poom Kumam, Kanokwan Sitthithakerngkiet . The analytical analysis of fractional order Fokker-Planck equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 11919-11941. doi: 10.3934/math.2022665 |
[5] | Yan Ren, Yan Cheng, Yuzhen Chai, Ping Guo . Dynamics and density function of a HTLV-1 model with latent infection and Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(12): 36444-36469. doi: 10.3934/math.20241728 |
[6] | Shuqi Tang, Chunhua Li . Decay estimates for Schrödinger systems with time-dependent potentials in 2D. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 19656-19676. doi: 10.3934/math.20231002 |
[7] | Ying He, Bo Bi . Threshold dynamics and density function of a stochastic cholera transmission model. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(8): 21918-21939. doi: 10.3934/math.20241065 |
[8] | Jingen Yang, Zhong Zhao, Xinyu Song . Statistical property analysis for a stochastic chemostat model with degenerate diffusion. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(1): 1757-1769. doi: 10.3934/math.2023090 |
[9] | Wen Wang, Yang Zhang . Global regularity to the 3D Cauchy problem of inhomogeneous magnetic Bénard equations with vacuum. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 18528-18545. doi: 10.3934/math.2023942 |
[10] | Sen Ming, Jiayi Du, Yaxian Ma . The Cauchy problem for coupled system of the generalized Camassa-Holm equations. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(8): 14738-14755. doi: 10.3934/math.2022810 |
In this paper, we are concerned on the Cauchy problem to a nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation as follows
{∂tF+v⋅∇xF=ρ∇v⋅(∇vF+vF),F(0,x,v)=F0(x,v), | (1.1) |
where the nonnegative unknown functions F(t,x,v) is the distribution function of particles with position x=(x1,x2,x3)∈R3 and velocity v=(v1,v2,v3)∈R3 at time t≥0, and the density ρ(t,x) is defined as ρ=∫R3Fdv.
In statistical mechanics, nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation is a partial differential equation which describes the Brownian motion of particles. This equation illustrates the evolution of particle probability density function with velocity, time and space position under the influence of resistance or random force. This equation is also widely used in various fields such as plasma physics, astrophysics, nonlinear hydrodynamics, theory of electronic circuitry and laser arrays, population dynamics, human movement sciences and marketing.
The global equilibrium for the nonlinear Fokker-Planck Eq (1.1) is the normalized global Maxwellian
μ=μ(v)=(2π)−32e−|v|22. |
Therefore, we can define the perturbation f=f(t,x,v) by
F(t,x,v)=μ+μ12f(t,x,v), |
then the Cauchy problem (1.1) of the nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation is reformulated as
{∂tf+v⋅∇xf=ρLf,ρ=1+∫R3μ12fdv,f(0,x,v)=f0(x,v)=μ−12(F0(x,v)−μ), | (1.2) |
where the linear Fokker-Planck operator L is given by
Lf=μ−12∇v⋅(μ∇v(μ−12f))=Δvf+14(6−|v|2)f. | (1.3) |
Let us define the velocity orthogonal projection
P:L2(R3v)→Span{μ12, viμ12(1≤i≤3)}. |
For any given function f(t,x,v)∈L2(R3v), one has
Pf=a(t,x)μ12+b(t,x)⋅vμ12, | (1.4) |
with
a=∫R3μ12fdv,b=∫R3v⋅μ12fdv. | (1.5) |
Then by the macro-micro decomposition introduced in [9], we get the decomposition of solutions f(t,x,v) of the nonlinear Fokker-Planck Eq (1.1) as follows
f(t,x,v)=Pf(t,x,v)+{I−P}f(t,x,v), | (1.6) |
where I denotes the identity operator, Pf and {I−P}f are called the macroscopic and the microscopic component of f(t,x,v), respectively.
Before the statement of main result, we need list some notations used in this paper.
● A≲B means that there is a constant C>0 such that A≤CB. A∼B means A≲B and B≲A.
● For a multi-index α=(α1,α2,α3), the length of α is |α|=α1+α2+α3. We denote ∂α=∂αx=∂α1x1∂α2x2∂α3x3 and use ∂i to denote ∂xi for each i=1,2,3.
● For any function f and g, denote the inner product and norm as follows
⟨f,g⟩:=∫R3fgdv,|f|2L2v=∫R3f2dv,|f|2ν:=|f|2L2ν=∫R3(|∇vf|2+ν(v)|f|2)dv where ν(v):=1+|v|2,‖f‖2ν:=∫R3|f|2νdx=∫R3∫R3(|∇vf|2+ν(v)|f|2)dvdx,‖f‖2:=‖f‖2L2(R3x×R3v) or ‖a‖2:=‖a‖2L2(R3x). |
● Denoting the function spaces HNxL2v and HNxL2ν with the norm as
‖f‖2HNxL2v=∑|α|≤N‖∂αxf‖2,‖f‖2HNxL2ν=∑|α|≤N‖∂αxf‖2ν. |
The basic properties of the linearized Fokker-Planck operator L in (1.3) can be referred in [3,6,7,10,15] as follows
⟨f,Lg⟩=⟨Lf,g⟩,KerL=Span{μ12},L(vμ12)=−vμ12, | (1.7) |
and the Fokker-Planck operator L is coercive in the sense that there is a positive constant λ0 such that
−⟨f,Lf⟩=∫R3|∇vf+v2f|2dv≥λ0|{I−P}f|2ν+|b|2. | (1.8) |
There are a lot of results about the global existence and large time behavior of solutions to the Fokker-Planck type equation. Such as for the Fokker-Planck-Boltzmann equation, DiPerna and Lions [4] first obtained the renormalized solution and established global existence for the Cauchy problem with large data. Li and Matsumura [12] proved that the strong solution for initial data near an absolute Maxwellian exist globally in time and tends asymptotically in the L∞y(L1ξ)-norm to another time dependent self-similar Maxwellian in large time. The global existence and temporal decay estimates of classical solutions are established based on the nonlinear energy method developed in [9] under Grad's angular cut-off in [17] and without cut-off in [16], respectively.
As for the Vlasov-Poisson-Fokker-Planck equation, Duan and liu [6] obtained the time-periodic small-amplitude solution in the three dimensional whole space by Serrin's method. Hwang and Jang [10], Wang [18] obtained the global existence and the time decay of the solution. For the problem (1.1), the global existence is proved by combining uniform-in-time energy estimates and the decay rates of the solution is obtained by using the precise spectral analysis of the linearized Fokker-Planck operator as well as the energy method in [13]. Interested readers can refer to the references [2,7,8,12,14,19] for more related details.
For the nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation, Imbert and Mouhot [11] obtained the Hölder continuity by De Giorgi and Moser argument together with the averaging lemma. Liao et al.[13] deduced the global existence of the Cauchy problem to the equation based on the energy estimates and the decay rates of the solutions by using the precise spectral analysis of the linearized Fokker-Planck operator in Sobolev space HNx,N≥4. Also the new difficulty caused by the nonlinear term was resolved by additional tailored weighted-in-v energy estimates suitable for Fokker-Planck operators. However, in this paper, we find that we can deal with the difficult by using the definition of the linearized Fokker-Planck operator L in (1.3) which is not necessary to estimate the dissipation ‖Lg‖2HNxL2v.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we give the main result of this paper. In Section 3, we deduce the microscopic and macroscopic dissipation by a refined energy method, respectively. Section 4 is devoted to close the a priori estimate, then the proof of main theorem is completed based on the continuation argument.
Now we define the energy norm and the corresponding dissipation rate norm, respectively, by
E(t)∼∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2, | (2.1) |
D(t)∼∑|α|≤2(‖∂αx{I−P}f‖2ν+‖∂αxb‖2)+∑|α|≤1‖∂αx∇xa‖2. | (2.2) |
With the above preparation in hand, our main result can be stated as follows.
Theorem 2.1. Assume there exist a sufficiently small positive constant ϵ0 such that F0(x,v)=μ+μ12f0(x,v)≥0 satisfies E(0)≤ϵ0, then the Cauchy problem (1.2) admits a unique global solution f(t,x,v) satisfying F(t,x,v)=μ+μ12f(t,x,v)≥0, and it holds that
E(t)+∫t0D(s)ds≤E(0), | (2.3) |
for any t>0. In particular, we have the global energy estimate
supt≥0‖f(t)‖H2xL2v≤‖f0‖H2xL2v. |
Remark 2.1. ● Compared with the integer Sobolev space H4x used in [13], the regularity assumption on the initial data in H2x is weaker by virtue of the Sobolev embedding in Lemma 3.1, especially the estimate of L6(R3).
● In order to overcome the difficulty from the nonlinear term, the authors in [13] need to estimate the dissipation ‖Lg‖2HNxL2v. However, it seems to be not necessary for our estimates.
In this section, we will derive the energy estimates for the nonlinear Fokker-Planck equation. The first part is concerned on the estimates of the microscopic dissipation and the second part is about the estimates of macroscopic dissipation by the macroscopic equations similar as [13]. We need list the following lemma about Sobolev inequalities which are very important to obtain the corresponding energy estimates.
Lemma 3.1. (See [1,5].) Let u∈H2(R3), then there is a constant C>0 such that
● ‖u‖L∞≤C‖∇u‖12‖∇2u‖12≤C‖∇u‖H1,
● ‖u‖L6≤C‖∇u‖,
● ‖u‖Lq≤C‖u‖H1, 2≤q≤6.
Firstly, we need the estimates of the microscopic dissipation for the solution f in (1.2).
Lemma 3.2. It holds that
12ddt∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2+λ0∑|α|≤2‖∂αx{I−P}f‖2ν+∑|α|≤2‖∂αxb‖2≲E12(t)D(t), | (3.1) |
for any t>0.
Proof. Step 1. α=0. Multiply (1.2)1 by f and integrate over R3v×R3x to obtain
12ddt∫R3∫R3f2dvdx−∫R3∫R3fLfdvdx=∫R3∫R3afLfdvdx. | (3.2) |
By using (1.5) and (1.7), we have
⟨LPf,f⟩=⟨L(aμ12),f⟩+⟨L(b⋅vμ12),f⟩=a⟨L(μ12),f⟩+b⟨L(vμ12),f⟩=−b⟨vμ12,f⟩=−|b|2. | (3.3) |
Similarly, we can get
⟨L{I−P}f,f⟩=⟨L{I−P}f,{I−P}f⟩+⟨L{I−P}f,Pf⟩=⟨L{I−P}f,{I−P}f⟩+⟨LPf,{I−P}f⟩=⟨L{I−P}f,{I−P}f⟩. | (3.4) |
Therefore, by (3.3) and (3.4) and the definition of L (1.3), we can obtain
⟨Lf,f⟩=⟨LPf,f⟩+⟨L{I−P}f,f⟩=⟨L{I−P}f,{I−P}f⟩−|b|2=⟨Δv{I−P}f,{I−P}f⟩+32⟨{I−P}f,{I−P}f⟩−⟨|v|2{I−P}f,{I−P}f⟩−|b|2=−|∇v{I−P}f|2L2v+32|{I−P}f|2L2v−|v{I−P}f|2L2v−|b|2, |
where we have used the integration by parts of v, i.e.,
⟨Δv{I−P}f,{I−P}f⟩=−⟨∇v{I−P}f,∇v{I−P}f⟩=−|∇v{I−P}f|2L2v. |
Consequently,
|⟨Lf,f⟩|=|∇v{I−P}f|2L2v+32|{I−P}f|2L2v+|v{I−P}f|2L2v+|b|2≤C(|{I−P}f|2ν+|b|2). |
Furthermore, Sobolev embedding in Lemma 3.1 yields
|∫R3∫R3afLfdvdx|≤∫R3|a||⟨f,Lf⟩|dx≲∫R3|a|(|{I−P}f|2ν+|b|2)dx≤‖a‖2L∞x(‖{I−P}f‖2ν+‖b‖2)≲‖∇xa‖H1xD(t)≲E12(t)D(t). |
Therefore, from (3.2) we have
12ddt‖f‖2+λ0‖{I−P}f‖2ν+‖b‖2≲E12(t)D(t). |
Step 2. 1≤|α|≤2. Taking ∂αx of (1.2)1 yields
∂t∂αxf+v⋅∇x∂αxf=L∂αxf+∂αx(aLf), | (3.5) |
Multiply above equation by ∂αxf and integrate over R3v×R3x to get
12ddt∫R3∫R3|∂αxf|2dvdx−∫R3∫R3∂αxfL(∂αxf)dvdx=∫R3∫R3∑|β|≤|α|Cβα∂α−βxaL(∂βxf)(∂αxf)dvdx. | (3.6) |
Case 1. β=0. The estimates of the last term in above equation is as follows by the definition of L (1.3):
∫R3∫R3∂αxaLf∂αxfdvdx=∫R3∫R3∂αxa(Δvf+14(6−|v|2)f)∂αxfdvdx=∫R3∫R3∂αxaΔvf∂αxfdvdx⏟J1+32∫R3∫R3∂αxaf∂αxfdvdx⏟J2−∫R3∫R3∂αxa|v|2f∂αxfdvdx⏟J3. | (3.7) |
Using the integration by parts of v, Hölder inequality and Sobolev embedding in Lemma 3.1 to get
|J1|=|∫R3∫R3∂αxa∇vf∂αx∇vfdvdx|≤∫R3|∂αxa||∇vf|L2v|∂αx∇vf|L2vdx≤‖∂αxa‖L2x‖∇vf‖L∞xL2v‖∂αx∇vf‖L2xL2v≲‖∂αxa‖L2x‖∇x∇vf‖H1xL2v‖∂αx∇vf‖L2xL2v≲E12(t)D(t), | (3.8) |
where we have used
‖∇x∇vf‖H1xL2v≲‖∇x∇vPf‖H1xL2v+‖∇x∇v{I−P}f‖H1xL2v≲‖∇xa‖H1x+‖∇xb‖H1x+‖∇x{I−P}f‖H1xL2ν≲D12(t), |
‖∂αx∇vf‖L2xL2v≲‖∂αx∇vPf‖L2xL2v+‖∂αx∇v{I−P}f‖L2xL2v≲‖∂αxa‖L2x+‖∂αxb‖L2x+‖∂αx{I−P}f‖L2xL2ν≲D12(t). |
Similarly, we can easily get
|J2|≲E12(t)D(t),|J3|≲E12(t)D(t). |
Case 2. β=1. The estimates of the last term in (3.6):
∫R3∫R3∂α−βxaL(∂βxf)(∂αxf)dvdx=∫R3∫R3∂α−βxaΔv∂βxf∂αxfdvdx⏟J4+32∫R3∫R3∂α−βxa∂βxf∂αxfdvdx⏟J5−∫R3∫R3∂α−βxa|v|2∂βxf∂αxfdvdx⏟J6. | (3.9) |
Using the similar techniques to estimate J1, we have
|J4|=|∫R3∫R3∂α−βxa∂βx∇vf∂αx∇vfdvdx|≤∫R3|∂α−βxa||∂βx∇vf|L2v|∂αx∇vf|L2vdx≤‖∂α−βxa‖L3x‖∂βx∇vf‖L6xL2v‖∂αx∇vf‖L2xL2v≲‖∂α−βxa‖H1x‖∇x∂βx∇vf‖L2xL2v‖∂αx∇vf‖L2xL2v≲E12(t)D(t). | (3.10) |
Similarly, we can easily get
|J5|≲E12(t)D(t),|J6|≲E12(t)D(t). |
Case 3. β=α. It holds that
∫R3∫R3aL(∂αxf)(∂αxf)dvdx=∫R3∫R3aΔv∂αxf∂αxfdvdx⏟J7+32∫R3∫R3a∂αxf∂αxfdvdx⏟J8−∫R3∫R3a|v|2∂αxf∂αxfdvdx⏟J9 | (3.11) |
Using the similar techniques to estimate J1, we have
|J7|=|∫R3∫R3a∂αx∇vf∂αx∇vfdvdx|≤∫R3|a||∂αx∇vf|L2v|∂αx∇vf|L2vdx≲‖a‖L∞x‖∂αx∇vf‖L2xL2v‖∂αx∇vf‖L2xL2v≲‖∇xa‖H1x‖∂αx∇vf‖2L2xL2v≲E12(t)D(t). | (3.12) |
Similarly, we can easily get
|J8|≲E12(t)D(t),|J9|≲E12(t)D(t). |
Take the summation over 1≤|α|≤2 to get
12ddt∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2+λ0∑|α|≤2‖∂αx{I−P}f‖2ν+∑|α|≤2‖∂αxb‖2≲E12(t)D(t). |
Thus we complete the proof of Lemma 3.2.
Now we give the estimate of the macroscopic component a by the macroscopic equations.
Lemma 3.3. It holds that
ddt∑|α|≤1∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx+∑|α|≤1‖∇x∂αxa‖2≲∑|α|≤1‖∇x∂αxb‖2+∑|α|≤1‖∇x∂αx{I−P}f‖2+∑|α|≤1‖∂αxb‖2+E12(t)D(t). | (3.13) |
Proof. Firstly, multiplying (1.2)1 by μ12 and vμ12 respectively, then integrating with respect to v over R3 to obtain
∂ta+∇x⋅b=0, | (3.14) |
and
∂tb+∇xa+∇x⋅⟨v⊗vμ12,{I−P}f⟩+(a+1)b=0. | (3.15) |
Secondly, taking ∂αx of (3.15) for |α|≤1 to get
∂αx∂tb+∇x∂αxa+∇x⋅⟨v⊗vμ12,∂αx{I−P}f⟩+∂αx(ab)+∂αxb=0. |
Multiply the above equation by ∇x∂αxa and integrate with respect to x to obtain
‖∇x∂αxa‖2=−∫R3∂αx∂tb∇x∂αxadx−∫R3∇x⋅⟨v⊗vμ12,∂αx{I−P}f⟩∇x∂αxadx−∫R3∂αx(ab)∇x∂αxadx−∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx. | (3.16) |
Using (3.14) to get
∫R3∂αx∂tb∇x∂αxadx=ddt∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx−∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αx∂tadx=ddt∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx−‖∇x∂αxb‖2. | (3.17) |
By Young's inequality, we have
|∫R3∇x⋅⟨v⊗vμ12,∂αx{I−P}f⟩∇x∂αxadx|≲∫R3|∇x∂αx{I−P}f|L2v|∇x∂αxa|dx≲η‖∇x∂αxa‖2+Cη‖∇x∂αx{I−P}f‖2, | (3.18) |
and
|∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx|≲η‖∇x∂αxa‖2+Cη‖∂αxb‖2, | (3.19) |
where η>0 is a sufficiently small universal constant and Cη>0. Using Sobolev embedding in Lemma 3.1 to derive
|∫R3∂αxab∇x∂αxadx|≲‖∂αxa‖L2x‖b‖L∞x‖∇x∂αxa‖L2x≲‖∂αxa‖L2x‖∇xb‖H1x‖∇x∂αxa‖L2x≲E12(t)D(t), |
and
|∫R3a∂αxb∇x∂αxadx|≲‖a‖L∞x‖∂αxb‖L2x‖∇x∂αxa‖L2x≲‖∇xa‖H1x‖∂αxb‖L2x‖∇x∂αxa‖L2x≲E12(t)D(t). |
Thus we can obtain
|∫R3∂αx(ab)∇x∂αxadx|=|∫R3(∂αxab+a∂αxb)∇x∂αxadx|≤∫R3|∂αxa||b||∇x∂αxa|dx+∫R3|a||∂αxb||∇x∂αxa|dx≲E12(t)D(t). | (3.20) |
Combining (3.17)–(3.20) with (3.16) to derive, for |α|≤1
ddt∑|α|≤1∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx+∑|α|≤1‖∇x∂αxa‖2≲∑|α|≤1‖∇x∂αxb‖2+∑|α|≤1‖∇x∂αx{I−P}f‖2+∑|α|≤1‖∂αxb‖2+E12(t)D(t), |
where we take η>0 sufficiently small enough. Thus the proof of Lemma 3.3 is completed.
This section is devoted to proving our main result based on the continuation argument. First, we need to close the a priori estimate.
Proposition 4.1. There is a small positive constant M>0 such that if
sup0≤t≤TE(f(t))≤M |
for any 0<T<∞, then it holds that
ddtE(t)+D(t)≤0. | (4.1) |
Proof. Taking the linear combination (3.1)+κ×(3.13) with κ>0 sufficiently small to get
ddt(∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2+κ∑|α|≤1∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx)+κ∑|α|≤1‖∇x∂αxa‖2+λ0∑|α|≤2‖∂αx{I−P}f‖2ν+∑|α|≤2‖∂αxb‖2≲E12(t)D(t). | (4.2) |
Noticing that
∑|α|≤1|∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx|≤12∑|α|≤1[‖∂αxb‖2+‖∇x∂αxa‖2]≤∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2, |
then we have
−κ∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2≤κ∑|α|≤1∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx≤κ∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2, |
i.e.,
(1−κ)∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2≤∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2+κ∑|α|≤1∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx≤(1+κ)∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2. |
Consequently, let κ>0 be small enough, it holds
∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2+κ∑|α|≤1∫R3∂αxb∇x∂αxadx∼∑|α|≤2‖∂αxf‖2∼E(t). |
By (4.2) and the definition of D(t) (2.2), it derives to
ddtE(t)+D(t)≲E12(t)D(t). |
Finally, choosing M>0 to be small enough, then the desired estimate (4.1) is obtained.
Proof of Theorem 2.1. Firstly, the local-in-time existence and uniqueness of the solutions to the Cauchy problem (1.2) can be established by performing the standard arguments as in [13]. To extend the local solution into the global one, we can deduce that
E(t)+∫t0D(s)ds≤E(0), |
from (4.1) in Proposition 4.1 by virtue of the smallness assumption on E(0). Combining this with the local existence, the global existence of solution and uniqueness follows immediately from the standard continuity argument. This completes the proof of the global existence and the uniform estimate of Theorem 2.1.
This paper proves the global existence to the Cauchy problem on a nonlinear Fokker- Planck equation near Maxwellian with small-amplitude initial data by a refined nonlinear energy method. And the regularity assumption on the initial data is much weaker by virtue of the Sobolev embedding inequalities.
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for providing useful comments and suggestions which help to strengthen the manuscript.
The research of Xingang Zhang is supported by the Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province of China under contracts 23A520027, 23A520038 and Key Scientific and Technological Research Projects in Henan Province under contracts 222102320369. The corresponding author is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under contracts 12026263, Research ability cultivation fund of Hubei University of Arts and Science (2020kypytd006), the Project of Hubei University of Arts and Science (XK2021022), the Humanities and Social Science Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (17YJC630084), the Hubei Provincial Department of Education (B2021211).
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
[1] |
F. D. Araruna, R. A. Capistrano-Filho, G. Doronin, Energy decay for the modified Kawahara equation posed in a bounded domain, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 385 (2012), 743-756. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2011.07.003
![]() |
[2] | L. Baudouin, E. Cerpa, E. Crepeau, et al. On the determination of the principal coefficient from boundary measurements in a KdV equation, J. Inverse Ill-Posed Probl., 22 (2013), 819-845. |
[3] |
L. Baudouin, E. Cerpa, E. Crepeau, et al. Lipschitz stability in an inverse problem for the KuramotoSivashinsky equation, Appl. Anal., 92 (2013), 2084-2102. doi: 10.1080/00036811.2012.716589
![]() |
[4] | A. L. Bukhgeim, M. V. Klibanov, Uniqueness in the large class of multidimensional inverse problems, Sov. Math. Dokl., 24 (1981), 244-247. |
[5] |
A. L. Bukhgeim, Carleman estimates for Volterra operators and uniqueness of inverse problems, Siberian Math. J., 25 (1984), 43-50. doi: 10.1007/BF00969507
![]() |
[6] |
R. A. Capistrano-Filho, A. F. Pazoto, L. Rosier, Internal controllability for the Korteweg-de Vries equation on a bounded domain, ESAIM: COCV, 21 (2015), 1076-1107. doi: 10.1051/cocv/2014059
![]() |
[7] |
M. Chen, Internal controllability of the Kawahara equation on a bounded domain, Nonlinear Anal., 185 (2019), 356-373. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2019.03.016
![]() |
[8] | O. Glass, S. Guerrero, On the controllability of the fifth-order Korteweg-de Vries equation, Ann. I. H. Poincaré - AN., 26 (2009), 2181-2209. |
[9] |
P. Gao, A new global Carleman estimate for the one-dimensional Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation and applications to exact controllability to the trajectories and an inverse problem, Nonlinear Anal., 117 (2015), 133-147. doi: 10.1016/j.na.2015.01.015
![]() |
[10] |
P. Gao, Global Carleman Estimate for the Kawahara equation and its applications, Commun. Pure Appl. Anal., 17 (2018), 1853-1874. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018088
![]() |
[11] |
O. Yu. Imanuvilov, M. Yamamoto, Lipschitz stability in inverse problems by the Carleman estimates, Inverse Probl., 14 (1998), 1229-1245. doi: 10.1088/0266-5611/14/5/009
![]() |
[12] |
T. Kawahara, Oscillatory solitary waves in dispersive media, J. Phys. Soc. Japan, 33 (1972), 260-264. doi: 10.1143/JPSJ.33.260
![]() |
[13] |
P. G. Meléndez, Lipschitz stability in an inverse problem for the mian coefficient of a KuramotoSivashinsky type equation, J. Math. Anal. Appl., 408 (2013), 275-290. doi: 10.1016/j.jmaa.2013.05.050
![]() |
[14] | M. Renardy, B. Rogers, An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, New York Inc, 2004. |
[15] |
C. F. Vasconcellos, P. N. Da Silva, Stabilization of the Kawahara Equation with localized damping, ESAIM: COCV, 17 (2011), 102-116. doi: 10.1051/cocv/2009041
![]() |
[16] | M. Yamamoto, Carleman estimates for parabolic equations and applications, Inverse Probl., 25 (2009), 123013. |