Research article

Mixed lump and soliton solutions for a generalized (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation

  • Received: 11 October 2019 Accepted: 14 December 2019 Published: 15 January 2020
  • MSC : 35Q51, 35Q53, 37K40

  • Under investigation is a generalized (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation which can be used to describe nonlinear wave propagation in dissipative media. Via the bilinear transformation method, the mixed lump and soliton solutions are obtained for the equation. The asymptotic behavior of the mixed solutions are analyzed. Furthermore, the fusion and fission behaviors of the lump and soliton are observed for the first time. The lump and soliton can merge into a whole soliton over time, or, on the contrary, the soliton may differentiate into a lump and a new soliton. During the processes, the amplitude of the lump will greatly vary, while the amplitude of the soliton will change slightly.

    Citation: Yu-Lan Ma, Bang-Qing Li. Mixed lump and soliton solutions for a generalized (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(2): 1162-1176. doi: 10.3934/math.2020080

    Related Papers:

    [1] Boyu Wang . A splitting lattice Boltzmann scheme for (2+1)-dimensional soliton solutions of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 28071-28089. doi: 10.3934/math.20231436
    [2] Zhe Ji, Yifan Nie, Lingfei Li, Yingying Xie, Mancang Wang . Rational solutions of an extended (2+1)-dimensional Camassa-Holm- Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in liquid drop. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(2): 3163-3184. doi: 10.3934/math.2023162
    [3] Abeer S. Khalifa, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Niveen M. Badra, Jalil Manafian, Khaled H. Mahmoud, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, Wafaa B. Rabie . Derivation of some solitary wave solutions for the (3+1)- dimensional pKP-BKP equation via the IME tanh function method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(10): 27704-27720. doi: 10.3934/math.20241345
    [4] Wafaa B. Rabie, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Taher A. Nofal, Soliman Alkhatib . Wave solutions for the (3+1)-dimensional fractional Boussinesq-KP-type equation using the modified extended direct algebraic method. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 31882-31897. doi: 10.3934/math.20241532
    [5] Junjie Li, Gurpreet Singh, Onur Alp İlhan, Jalil Manafian, Yusif S. Gasimov . Modulational instability, multiple Exp-function method, SIVP, solitary and cross-kink solutions for the generalized KP equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(7): 7555-7584. doi: 10.3934/math.2021441
    [6] Weaam Alhejaili, Mohammed. K. Elboree, Abdelraheem M. Aly . A symbolic computation approach and its application to the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in two (3+1)-dimensional extensions. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(11): 20085-20104. doi: 10.3934/math.20221099
    [7] Gulnur Yel, Haci Mehmet Baskonus, Wei Gao . New dark-bright soliton in the shallow water wave model. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(4): 4027-4044. doi: 10.3934/math.2020259
    [8] Jianhong Zhuang, Yaqing Liu, Ping Zhuang . Variety interaction solutions comprising lump solitons for the (2+1)-dimensional Caudrey-Dodd-Gibbon-Kotera-Sawada equation. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(5): 5370-5386. doi: 10.3934/math.2021316
    [9] Cheng Chen . Hyperbolic function solutions of time-fractional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation with variable-coefficients. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(6): 10378-10386. doi: 10.3934/math.2022578
    [10] Saleh Mousa Alzahrani, Talal Alzahrani . Multiple solitons with bifurcations, lump waves, M-shaped and interaction solitons of three component generalized (3+1)-dimensional Breaking soliton system. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(8): 17803-17826. doi: 10.3934/math.2023908
  • Under investigation is a generalized (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation which can be used to describe nonlinear wave propagation in dissipative media. Via the bilinear transformation method, the mixed lump and soliton solutions are obtained for the equation. The asymptotic behavior of the mixed solutions are analyzed. Furthermore, the fusion and fission behaviors of the lump and soliton are observed for the first time. The lump and soliton can merge into a whole soliton over time, or, on the contrary, the soliton may differentiate into a lump and a new soliton. During the processes, the amplitude of the lump will greatly vary, while the amplitude of the soliton will change slightly.


    As we know, nonlinearity is a large class of essential phenomena of the world, and the soliton theory plays a critical part in nonlinear science [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Lump, sometimes called as rogue wave, is a special form of solitons, which has been observed in the deep ocean [13,14], water wave experiments in tank [15,16], and optical fibers experiments [17]. Lump is generally localized for space and time variables, and has a bigger amplitude being several times than ones of its surrounding waves. Lump would be harmful, disastrous, and even destructive for some nonlinear systems, such as ocean and water engineering. But lump may be used to amplify signals in other systems, such as in ferrite magnetic materials and optical fibers. It is significant to predict and find where and when it appears and disappears. The research on the lump solution has drawn more and more attention [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36].

    Interaction behaviors between solitons are meaningful in physic and its applications, because they will affect the wave propagation, such as elastic and non-elastic collisions [9,37,38,39,40], nonlinear superposition effects [41,42], fusion and fission phenomena [43,44].

    In this work, we investigate a generalized (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, which reads

    (ut+6uux+uxxx)x+α(uyy+uzz)=0, (1.1)

    where u stands for a normalized physical quantity depending on spatial variable (x,y,z) and temporal variable t, and α is a equation parameter.

    Equation (1.1) was initially considered to model the nonlinear wave propagations in dissipative media [45,46,47]. When α<0, Eq. (1.1) is called as KPI-type equation, and when α>0, Eq. (1.1) is called as KPII-type equation. Because of the importance in theory and application, Eq. (1.1) has been extensively investigated by various methods. In Ref. [48], the integrability and Painlevé test was discussed, and the one-soliton and two-soliton solutions and four classes of specific three-soliton solutions were explicitly presented to Eq. (1.1) with α=±3. In Ref. [49], analytical breather solution was obtained via the bilinear transformation method for Eq. (1.1) with α=1. Then, rogue wave solution was attained as a long wave homoclinic limit of the breathers. In Refs. [50,51], the traveling wave solutions were discussed to Eq. (1.1) with α=3. However, novel fusion and fission dynamics of mixed lump and soliton solution has not been reported for the equation (1.1) so far.

    Recently, a method was proposed to calculate the lump solution by extending the bilinear method [52,53,54,55,56]. Its key idea is to construct proper polynomial functions in the bilinear form. We obtain the mixed lump and soliton solutions of Eq. (1.1) with α<0 via the method. Furthermore, the fusion and fission behaviors between the lump and soliton are first observed.

    In this section, we will give the following theorem derived from the bilinear theory.

    Theorem 1. The bilinear form of Eq. (1.1) is

    [DxDt+6u0D2x+D4x+α(D2y+D2z)](ff)=0, (2.1)

    where D is the bilinear operator defined in Ref. [57] (also see Refs. [40,41]).

    Proof. Firstly, we are able to introduce a transformation to Eq. (1.1) as

    u=u0+2(lnf)xx, (2.2)

    where f>0 is a real function of x,y,z and t, u0 is an arbitrary real constant.

    From (2.2), it is seen that

    ut=2(lnf)xxt,ux=2(lnf)xxx,uxxx=2(lnf)xxxxx,uyy=2(lnf)xxyy,uzz=2(lnf)xxzz. (2.3)

    Substituting (2.2) and (2.3) into Eq. (1.1) and integrating once with respect to x and letting the integral constant be zero, it follows

    (lnf)xxt+6u0(lnf)xxx+12(lnf)xx(lnf)xxx+(lnf)xxxxx+α[(lnf)xyy+(lnf)xzz]=0. (2.4)

    Integrating once again with respect to x and letting the integral constant be zero, it yields

    (lnf)xt+6u0(lnf)xx+6(lnf)xx(lnf)xx+(lnf)xxxx+α[(lnf)yy+(lnf)zz]=0. (2.5)

    Noticing that

    (lnf)xt=12DxDt(ff)f2,6u0(lnf)xx=6u02D2x(ff)f2, (2.6)
    (lnf)xxxx+6(lnf)xx(lnf)xx=12D4x(ff)f2, (2.7)
    (lnf)yy=12D2y(ff)f2,(lnf)zz=12D2z(ff)f2, (2.8)

    and substituting (2.6)-(2.8) into Eq. (2.5), we find Eq. (2.5) is right. Thus, the Theorem 1 is proved.

    In this section, we first obtain the lump solution for Eq. (1.1) from the bilinear form (2.1). Then the mixed lump and soliton solutions will be attained.

    According to the idea in Refs. [52,53], we set f in the bilinear form (2.1) as

    f=h0+ξ21+ξ22, (3.1)

    where ξi=aix+biy+ciz+dit,i=1,2.

    Substituting (3.1) into (2.1), collecting the terms with the same power of (ξ21ξ22),ξ1ξ2,ξ01ξ02, and letting their coefficients be zero, we get a set of equations. When a21+a220 and (a1b2a2b1)2+(a1c2a2c1)20, we have

    {d1=6u0a1+αa21+a22[a1(b22+c22b21c21)2a2(b1b2+c1c2)],d2=6u0a2αa21+a22[a2(b22+c22b21c21)+2a1(b1b2+c1c2)],h0=3(a21+a22)3α[(a1b2a2b1)2+(a1c2a2c1)2],α<0. (3.2)

    Therefore, the lump solution of Eq. (1.1) can be obtained as follow

    u(x,y,z,t)=u0+4[h0(a21+a22)+(a22a21)(ξ21ξ22)4a1a2ξ1ξ2](h0+ξ21+ξ22)2, (3.3)

    where ξi=aix+biy+ciz+dit,i=1,2.

    We give the plots of the solution (3.3) in six coordinates, namely, the x-y-u, the x-z-u, the y-z-u, the x-t-u, the y-t-u and the z-t-u coordinates (see Figure 1). The lump wave is localized in all the spaces and time directions. In fact, for the solution (3.3), it is seen to prove

    limx,y,z,t±u(x,y,z,t)=u0.
    Figure 1.  The plots of the lump solution (3.3) in different coordinates. The parameter settings are as follows: u0=0.2,a1=1.0,a2=0.2,b1=1.0,b2=1.9,c1=1.2,c2=1.3,α=0.3, (a) the x-y-u coordinate with z=t=0; (b) the x-z-u coordinate with y=t=0; (c) the y-z-u coordinate with x=t=0; (d) the x-t-u coordinate with y=z=0; (d) the y-t-u coordinate with x=z=0; (f) the z-t-u coordinate with x=y=0.

    We set f in the bilinear form (2.1) as

    f=h0+ξ21+ξ22+eξ3, (3.4)

    where ξi=aix+biy+ciz+dit, ai,bi,ci and di(i=1,2,3) are constants to be determined later.

    Substituting (3.4) into (2.1), collecting the terms with the same power of (ξ21+ξ22)eξ3, ξ21ξ22,ξ1ξ2,ξ1eξ3, ξ2eξ3,eξ3 and ξ01ξ02, and letting their coefficients be zero, we get a set of equations. Solving this set of equations will yields two sets of solutions with respect to ai,bi,ci,di(i=1,2,3) and h0 as follows

    Case I:

    {a1=a3=(1)j4α3(b22+c22),j=0,1,a2=0,b1=b3=b0,c1=c3=c0,d1=6u0a1+αa1(b22+c22b2c2),d2=2αa1(bb2+cc2),d3=6u0a1a31α(b2+c2)a1,h0=1, (3.5)

    Case II:

    {a1=(1)j4αc23b2(b22+c22),j=0,1,a2=0,a3=ba1c,b1=c1=c0,b3=c3=b0,d1=6u0a1+αa1(b22+c222b2),d2=2αca1(b2+c2),d3=6u0ba1c(ba1c)32αbca1,h0=c2b2, (3.6)

    where b0,c0 are arbitrary real constants, b2 and c2 are arbitrary real constants and satisfy b22+c220.

    Thus, we are able to obtain two mixed solutions for Eq. (1.1) corresponding to (3.5) and (3.6), respectively,

    u1(x,y,z,t)=u0+2α(b22+c22)3(22(ξ21ξ22)+3eξ34ξ1eξ3+(ξ21+ξ22)eξ3)(h0+ξ21+ξ22+eξ3)2, (3.7)

    with ξi=aix+biy+ciz+dit, ai,bi,ci and di(i=1,2,3) are given by (3.5), and

    u2(x,y,z,t)=u0+2αc2(b22+c22)3b2(2c2b22(ξ21ξ22)+3eξ34bcξ1eξ3+b2c2(ξ21+ξ22)eξ3)(h0+ξ21+ξ22+eξ3)2, (3.8)

    ξi=aix+biy+ciz+dit, h0 ai,bi,ci and di(i=1,2,3) are given by (3.6).

    The mixed lump and soliton solutions (3.7) and (3.8) involve exponential function and rational function, which mathematically represents lump and soliton, respectively. In Figure 2, the plots of the solution (3.7) are figured in all the six coordinates.

    Figure 2.  The plots of the mixed lump and soliton solution (3.7) in different coordinates. The parameter settings are as follows: u0=0.2,a2=0,b=0.2,b2=0.8,c=1,c2=1.2,h0=1,α=0.5, (a) the x-y-u coordinate with z=t=0; (b) the x-z-u coordinate with y=t=0; (c) the y-z-u coordinate with x=t=0; (d) the x-t-u coordinate with y=z=0; (d) the y-t-u coordinate with x=z=0; (f) the z-t-u coordinate with x=y=0.

    Remark: The mixed lump and soliton solutions (3.7) and (3.8) are also named as lump-kink solutions.

    Asymptoticity is an important concept that depicts the global characteristics of a system [58,59]. We take the solution (3.7) under t as the example to discuss the asymptotic behavior of the mixed solutions.

    When (x,y,z)(x0,y0,z0), t+ and d3>0 to (3.7), we are able to derive

    (h0+ξ21+ξ22+eξ3)2=O((eξ3)2),
    (22(ξ21ξ22)+3eξ34ξ1eξ3+(ξ21+ξ22)eξ3)=O((ξ21+ξ22)eξ3).

    Thereby, we have

    limt+(ξ21+ξ22)eξ3e2ξ3=limt+(ξ21+ξ22)eξ3=0.

    When (x,y,z)(x0,y0,z0), t+ and d3<0, we can derive

    (h0+ξ21+ξ22+eξ3)2=O((ξ21+ξ22)2),
    (22(ξ21ξ22)+3eξ34ξ1eξ3+(ξ21+ξ22)eξ3)=O((ξ21+ξ22)2).

    Thus, we know

    limt+O(ξ21+ξ22)O((ξ21+ξ22)2)=0.

    Consequently, the mixed solution (3.7) will lead

    limu1(x,y,z,t)(x,y,z)(x0,y0,z0),t+=u0+2α(b22+c22)3O(ξ21+ξ22)O((ξ21+ξ22)2)=u0. (3.9)

    Similarly, we have

    limu1(x,y,z,t)(x,y,z)(x0,y0,z0),t=u0. (3.10)

    Thereby, it is seen that

    limu1(x,y,z,t)(x,y,z)(x0,y0,z0),t=limu2(x,y,z,t)(x,y,z)(x0,y0,z0),t=u0. (3.11)

    Besides, the solitons, involved in the mixed solutions, are global. This feature is different from one of the lump. We give graphically the asymptotic feature of the solitons. In Figure 3, the solitons will hold its profile, and its amplitude will tend to a stable value which is determined by the settings.

    Figure 3.  The asymptotic behavior of the mixed solution over time. The plots are given by the mixed solution (3.7). The settings are as follows: y=z=0,α=0.5,u0=0.2,j=0,b=0.6,b2=2,c=0.6,c2=3, and different t.

    Without loss of generality, we just discuss the fusion and fission dynamics of the mixed solutions (3.7) and (3.8) with z=0 in the x-y-u coordinate.

    We first unearth the fusion behavior between the lump and soliton for the equation (1.1). By setting z=0,α=0.5,u0=0.2,j=0,b=0.6,b2=2,c=1 and c2=2.5 in the mixed solution (3.7), and letting the time variable t vary from t=10 to t=5, we are able to observe the fusion between the lump and soliton over time. A series of plots are given to demonstrate the fusion behavior (see Figure 4). In detail, the lump and soliton all move from the negative to the positive direction of the x-axis during the process. As t=10, the lump and soliton are completely separated. As t varies form 10 to 0, they are gradually approach. At t=0, the lump and soliton are together, but their amplitudes are greatly different. With the further increase of time, their amplitudes are getting closer and closer until the lump and soliton completely merge into a soliton.

    Figure 4.  The fusion behavior between the lump and soliton over time. The plots are given by the mixed solution (3.7). The settings are as follows: z=0,α=0.5,u0=0.2,j=0,b=0.6,b2=2,c=1,c2=2.5, the other parameters are determined by (3.5), and different t: (a) t=10; (b) t=5; (c) t=2.5; (d) t=0; (e) t=2.5; (f) t=5.

    In addition, during the fusion process between the lump and soliton, it is very clear that the amplitude of the lump obviously decreases (from about 20 to 3). However, the amplitude of the soliton gradually increases. It means that the energy of the lump is transmitted into the soliton. The amplitude evolution of the soliton is illustrated in Figure 5.

    Figure 5.  The amplitude evolution of the soliton over time. The plots are given by the mixed solution (3.7). The settings are as follows: y=25,z=0,α=0.5,u0=0.2,j=0,b=0.6,b2=2,c=1,c2=2.5, and different t.

    The behavior corresponding to the fusion is fission. Now, we investigate the fission behavior between the lump and soliton via the mixed solution (3.8) by a similar way used in the previous subsection.

    By z=0,α=0.5,u0=0.2,j=0,b=1,b2=1,c=0.2 and c2=1 in the mixed solution (3.8), and letting the time variable t vary from t=1 to t=1, we are able to observe the fission behavior over time at the seven values (t=1,0.5,0.25,0,0.25 and 0.5, respectively). During the process, the lump is gradually separated from the soliton, and are thrown farther and farther away. Simultaneously, the amplitude of the lump increases rapidly, and the amplitude of the soliton decreases gradually. More details can be found in Figures 6 and 7.

    Figure 6.  The fission behavior between the lump and soliton over time. The plots are given by the mixed solution (3.8). The settings are as follows: z=0,α=0.5,u0=0.2,j=0,b=1,b2=1,c=0.2,c2=1, the other parameters are determined by (3.6), and different t: (a) t=1; (b) t=0.5; (c) t=0.25; (d) t=0; (e) t=0.25; (f) t=0.5.
    Figure 7.  The amplitude evolution of the soliton over time. The plots are given by the mixed solution (3.8). The settings are as follows: y=10,z=0,α=0.5,u0=0.2,j=0,b=1,b2=1,c=0.2,c2=1, and different t.

    The (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation (1.1) is widely used to depict the nonlinear wave propagation in diverse dissipative media. The lump and soliton are two classical types of nonlinear waves. In this work, the main attention is focused on the mixed lump and soliton solutions and their dynamics for the equation.

    Starting from the bilinear transformation of the equation (1.1), through properly constructing the polynomial functions in the bilinear forms, the lump solution was first obtained, then two mixed lump and soliton solutions were constructed under the equation parameter α<0. The mixed solutions are fundamental for the further study of the interaction behaviors between the lump and soliton.

    Based on the mixed solutions, the asymptotic behavior of the mixed solutions are analyzed. Furthermore, novel fusion and fission behaviors between the lump and soliton were observed for the first time. The lump and soliton can merge into a whole soliton, or, on the contrary, the soliton may be differentiated into a lump and a new soliton. During the processes, the amplitude of the lump will greatly vary, while the amplitude of the soliton will change slightly. Considering the importance of the lump and soliton in physics and its applications, these new observations are valuable to increase understanding of the equation and can be used to explain interesting interaction phenomena between different nonlinear waves.

    This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant number (61702020), Beijing Natural Science Foundation grant number (4172013) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation-Haidian Primitive Innovation Joint Fund grant number (L182007).

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this paper.



    [1] G. Whitham, Linear and nonlinear waves, Wiley, New York, 1974.
    [2] G. Eilenberger, Solitons, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1983.
    [3] S. Burger, K. Bongs, S. Dettmer, et al. Dark solitons in Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett., 83 (1999), 5198-5201. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5198
    [4] K. E. Strecker, G. G. Partridge, A. G. Truscott, et al. Formation and propagation of matter-wave soliton trains, Nature, 417 (2002), 150-153. doi: 10.1038/nature747
    [5] L. Khaykovich, F. Schreck, G. Ferrari, et al. Formation of a matter-wave bright soliton, Science, 296 (2002), 290-1293.
    [6] B. Kibler, J. Fatome, C. Finot, et al. The Peregrine soliton in nonlinear fibre optics, Nat. Phys., 6 (2010), 790-795. doi: 10.1038/nphys1740
    [7] B. Q. Li, Y. L. Ma, J. Z. Sun, The interaction processes of the N-soliton solutions for an extended generalization of Vakhnenko equation, Appl. Math. Comput., 216 (2010), 3522-3535.
    [8] A. M. Wazwaz, Multiple soliton solutions and multiple complex soliton solutions for two distionct Boussinesq equations, Nonlinear Dyn., 85 (2016), 731-737. doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-2718-0
    [9] L. Liu, B. Tian, H. P. Chai, et al. Certain bright soliton interactions of the Sasa-Satsuma equation in a monomode optical fiber, Phys. Rev. E, 95 (2017), 032202.
    [10] Q. M. Huang, Y. T. Gao, S. L. Jia, et al. Bilinear Backlund transformation, soliton and periodic wave solutions for a (3+1)-dimensional variable-coefficient generalized shallow water wave equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 87 (2017), 2529-2540. doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-3209-z
    [11] Y. L. Ma, Interaction and energy transition between the breather and rogue wave for a generalized nonlinear Schrödinger system with two higher-order dispersion operators in optical fibers, Nonlinear Dyn., 97 (2019), 95-105.
    [12] B. Q. Li, Y. L. Ma, The wrinkle-like N-solitons for the thermophoretic motion equation through graphene sheets, Physica A, 494 (2018), 169-174. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2017.12.014
    [13] E. Pelinovsky, C. Kharif, Extreme Ocean Waves, Springer, Berlin, 2008.
    [14] A. R. Osborne, Nonlinear ocean waves, Academic Press, New York, 2009.
    [15] A. Chabchoub, N. Hoffmann, H. Branger, et al. Experiments on wind-perturbed rogue wave hydrodynamics using the Peregrine breather model, Phys. Fluids, 25 (2013), 101704.
    [16] A. Lechuga, Rogue waves in a wave tank: experiments and modeling, Nat. Hazards Earth Sys. Sci., 13 (2013), 2951-2955. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-2951-2013
    [17] M. Närhi, B. Wetzel, C. Billet, et al. Real-time measurements of spontaneous breathers and rogue wave events in optical fibre modulation instability, Nat. Commun., 7 (2016), 13675.
    [18] D. R. Solli, C. Ropers, B. Jalali, Active control of rogue waves for stimulated supercontinuum generation, Phys. Rev. Lett., 101 (2008), 233902.
    [19] Y. V. Bludov, V. V. Konotop, N. Akhmediev, Matter rogue waves, Phys. Rev. A, 80 (2009), 033610.
    [20] Z. Y. Yan, V. V. Konotop, N. Akhmediev, Three-dimensional rogue waves in nonstationary parabolic potentials, Phys. Rev. E, 82 (2010), 036610.
    [21] A. Chabchoub, N. P. Hoffmann, N. Akhmediev, Rogue wave observation in a water wave tank, Phys. Rev. Lett., 106 (2011), 204502.
    [22] H. Bailung, S. K. Sharma, Y. Nakamura, Observation of peregrine solitons in a multicomponent plasma with negative ions, Phys. Rev. Lett., 107 (2011), 255005.
    [23] B. L. Guo, L. M. Ling, Rogue wave, breathers and bright-dark-rogue solutions for the coupled Schrödinger equations, Chin. Phys. Lett., 28 (2011), 110202.
    [24] B. L. Guo, L. M. Ling, Q. P. Liu, Nonlinear Schrödinger equation: Generalized Darboux transformation and rogue wave solutions, Phys. Rev. E, 85 (2012), 026607.
    [25] Y. Ohta, J. K. Yang, Dynamics of rogue waves in the Davey-Stewartson II equation, J. Phys. A, 46 (2013), 105202.
    [26] Z. Y. Ma, S. H. Ma, Analytical solutions and rogue waves in (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Chinese Phys. B, 21 (2012), 030507.
    [27] J. S. He, H. R. Zhang, L. H. Wang, et al. Generating mechanism for higher-order rogue waves, Phys. Rev. E, 87 (2013), 052914.
    [28] J. S. He, S. W. Xu, K. Porsezian, et al. Rogue wave triggered at a critical frequency of a nonlinear resonant medium, Phys. Rev. E, 93 (2016), 062201.
    [29] Y. Zhang, H. H. Dong, X. E. Zhang, et al. Rational solutions and lump solutions to the generalized (3+1)-dimensional shallow water-like equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 73 (2017), 246-252. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.11.009
    [30] Y. H. Yin, W. X. Ma, J. G. Liu, et al. Diversity of exact solutions to a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation and its reduction, Comput. Math. Appl., 76 (2018), 1275-1283. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2018.06.020
    [31] H. N. Xu, W. Y. Ruan, Y. Zhang, et al. Multi-exponential wave solutions to two extended Jimbo-Miwa equations and the resonance behavior, Appl. Math. Lett., 99 (2020), 105976.
    [32] C. J. Wang, Spatiotemporal deformation of lump solution to (2+1)-dimensional KdV equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 84 (2016), 697-702. doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-2519-x
    [33] C. J. Wang, H. Fang, X. X. Tang, State transition of lump-type waves for the (2+1)-dimensional generalized KdV equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 95 (2019), 2943-2961. doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-04733-5
    [34] Z. L. Zhao, L. C. He, Multiple lump solutions of the (3+1)-dimensional potential Yu-Toda-Sasa-Fukuyama equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 95 (2019), 114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2019.03.031
    [35] Z. L. Zhao, L. C. He, Y. B. Gao, Rogue wave and multiple lump solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional Benjamin-Ono equation in fluid mechanics, Complexity, 2019 (2019), 8249635.
    [36] Z. L. Zhao, B. Han, Residual symmetry, Backlund transformation and CRE solvability of a (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear system, Nonlinear Dyn., 94 (2018), 461-474. doi: 10.1007/s11071-018-4371-2
    [37] Y. F. Hua, B. L. Guo, W. X. Ma, et al. Interaction behavior associated with a generalized (2+1)-dimensional Hirota bilinear equation for nonlinear waves, Appl. Math. Model., 74 (2019), 184-198. doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.04.044
    [38] C. J. Wang, Z. D. Dai, C. F. Liu, Interaction between kink solitary wave and rogue wave for (2+1)-dimensional Burgers equation, Mediterr. J. Math., 13 (2016), 1087-1098. doi: 10.1007/s00009-015-0528-0
    [39] J. C. Chen, Z. Y. Ma, Consistent Riccati expansion solvability and soliton-cnoidal wave interaction solution of a (2+1)-dimensional Korteweg-de Vries equation, Appl. Math. Lett., 64 (2017), 87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2016.08.016
    [40] B. Q. Li, Y. L. Ma, L. P. Mo, et al. The N-loop soliton solutions for (2+1)-dimensional Vakhnenko equation, Comput. Math. Appl., 74 (2017), 504-512. doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2017.04.036
    [41] B. Q. Li, Y. L. Ma, T. M. Yang, The oscillating collisions between the three solitons for a dual-mode fiber coupler system, Superlattice Microst., 110 (2017), 126-132. doi: 10.1016/j.spmi.2017.08.054
    [42] B. Q. Li, Y. L. Ma, Solitons resonant behavior for a waveguide directional coupler system in optical fibers, Opt. Quant. Electron., 50 (2018), 270.
    [43] S. Wang, X. Y. Tang, S. Y. Lou, Soliton fission and fusion: Burgers equation and Sharma-Tasso-Olver equation, Chaos Solitons Fractals, 21 (2004), 231-239. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2003.10.014
    [44] W. T. Zhu, S. H. Ma, J. P. Fang, et al. Fusion, fission, and annihilation of complex waves for the (2+1)-dimensional generalized Calogero-Bogoyavlenskii-Schiffsystem, Chinese Phys. B, 23 (2014), 060505.
    [45] M. J. Ablowitz, H. Segur, On the evolution of packets of water waves, J. Fluid. Mech., 92 (1979), 691-715. doi: 10.1017/S0022112079000835
    [46] E. Infeld, G. Rowlands, 3 dimensional stability of Korteweg-de Vries waves and solitons, Acta Phys. Pol. A, 56 (1979), 329-332. doi: 10.1063/1.32091
    [47] E. A. Kuznetsov, S. K. Turitsyn, Two- and three-dimensional solitons in weakly dispersive media, J. Exp. Theor. Phys., 55 (1982), 844-847.
    [48] W. X. Ma, Comment on the 3+1 dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 16 (2011), 2663-2666. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2010.10.003
    [49] C. Qian, J. G. Rao, Y. B. Liu, et al. Rogue waves in the three-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, Chinese Phys. Lett., 33 (2016), 110201.
    [50] M. Khalfallah, New exact traveling wave solutions of the (3+1) dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP) equation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 14 (2009), 1169-1175. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2007.11.010
    [51] D. I. Sinelshchikov, Comment on: New exact traveling wave solutions of the (3 + 1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili (KP) equation, Commun. Nonlinear Sci., 15 (2010), 3235-3236. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2009.11.028
    [52] W. X. Ma, Lump solutions to the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, Phys. Lett. A, 379 (2015), 1975-1978. doi: 10.1016/j.physleta.2015.06.061
    [53] W. X. Ma, Z. Y. Qin, X. Lu, Lump solutions to dimensionally reduced -gKP and -gBKP equations, Nonlinear Dyn., 84 (2016), 923-931. doi: 10.1007/s11071-015-2539-6
    [54] X. Lu, W. X. Ma, Study of lump dynamics based on a dimensionally reduced Hirota bilinear equation, Nonlinear Dyn., 85 (2016), 1217-1222. doi: 10.1007/s11071-016-2755-8
    [55] W. X. Ma, Abundant lumps and their interaction solutions of (3+1)-dimensional linear PDEs, J. Geom. Phys., 133 (2018), 10-16. doi: 10.1016/j.geomphys.2018.07.003
    [56] H. Q. Sun, A. H. Chen, Lump and lump kink solutions of the (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo-Miwa and two extended Jimbo-Miwa equations, Appl. Math. Lett., 68 (2017), 55-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2016.12.008
    [57] R. Hirota, The direct method in soliton theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
    [58] D. S. Wang, B. L. Guo, X. L. Wang, Long-time asymptotics of the focusing Kundu-Eckhaus equation with nonzero boundary conditions, J. Differ. Equations, 266 (2019), 5209-5253. doi: 10.1016/j.jde.2018.10.053
    [59] D. S. Wang, X. L. Wang, Long-time asymptotics and the bright N-soliton solutions of the Kundu-Eckhaus equation via the Riemann-Hilbert approach, Nonlinear Anal-Real, 41 (2018), 334-361. doi: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2017.10.014
  • This article has been cited by:

    1. Syed Tahir Raza Rizvi, Muhammad Younis, Dumitru Baleanu, Hadiqa Iqbal, Lump and rogue wave solutions for the Broer-Kaup-Kupershmidt system, 2020, 68, 05779073, 19, 10.1016/j.cjph.2020.09.004
    2. Yuxin Qin, Yinping Liu, Multiwave Interaction Solutions for a (3+1)-dimensional generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation, 2021, 05779073, 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.03.001
    3. Wen-Xiu Ma, M.S. Osman, Saima Arshed, Nauman Raza, H.M. Srivastava, Different analytical approaches for finding novel optical solitons in the single-mode fibers, 2021, 05779073, 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.01.015
    4. Yu-Lan Ma, Propagation patterns of pump and Stokes breathers of the transient stimulated Raman scattering system in gas-filled hollow-core crystal fibers, 2020, 220, 00304026, 165195, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.165195
    5. Dipankar Kumar, Choonkil Park, Nishat Tamanna, Gour Chandra Paul, M.S. Osman, Dynamics of two-mode Sawada-Kotera equation: Mathematical and graphical analysis of its dual-wave solutions, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103581, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103581
    6. Yu-Lan Ma, Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Bang-Qing Li, A new (3+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation and its integrability, multiple-solitons, breathers and lump waves, 2021, 03784754, 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.012
    7. Yu-Lan Ma, Lump wave phase transition for the (2+1)-dimensional Heisenberg ferromagnetic spin chain equation, 2021, 231, 00304026, 166505, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166505
    8. K. El-Rashidy, Aly R. Seadawy, Saad Althobaiti, M.M. Makhlouf, Multiwave, Kinky breathers and multi-peak soliton solutions for the nonlinear Hirota dynamical system, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103678, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103678
    9. Wen-Yang Guan, Optical rogue waves for a three-component coupled transient stimulated Raman scattering system, 2020, 207, 00304026, 164464, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2020.164464
    10. Lingfei Li, Yingying Xie, Mancang Wang, Characteristics of the interaction behavior between solitons in (2+1)-dimensional Caudrey–Dodd–Gibbon–Kotera–Sawada equation, 2020, 19, 22113797, 103697, 10.1016/j.rinp.2020.103697
    11. Elsayed M.E. Zayed, Mohamed E.M. Alngar, Anjan Biswas, Yakup Yıldırım, Salam Khan, Abdullah K. Alzahrani, Milivoj R. Belic, Cubic–quartic optical soliton perturbation in polarization-preserving fibers with Fokas–Lenells equation, 2021, 234, 00304026, 166543, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.166543
    12. M. K. Elboree, Vitaly Volpert, Studying Lump solutions, Rogue wave solutions and dynamical interaction for new model generating from lax pair, 2020, 15, 0973-5348, 67, 10.1051/mmnp/2020029
    13. Run-Fa Zhang, Sudao Bilige, Jian-Guo Liu, Mingchu Li, Bright-dark solitons and interaction phenomenon for p-gBKP equation by using bilinear neural network method, 2020, 96, 1402-4896, 025224, 10.1088/1402-4896/abd3c3
    14. Zhigang Yao, Huayong Xie, Hui Jie, Laurent Raymond, Mixed Rational Lump-Solitary Wave Solutions to an Extended (2+1)-Dimensional KdV Equation, 2021, 2021, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2021/5563309
    15. Gaizhu Qu, Xiaorui Hu, Zhengwu Miao, Shoufeng Shen, Mengmeng Wang, Soliton molecules and abundant interaction solutions of a general high-order Burgers equation, 2021, 23, 22113797, 104052, 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104052
    16. Hemonta Kumar Barman, M. Ali Akbar, M.S. Osman, Kottakkaran Sooppy Nisar, M. Zakarya, Abdel-Haleem Abdel-Aty, Hichem Eleuch, Solutions to the Konopelchenko-Dubrovsky equation and the Landau-Ginzburg-Higgs equation via the generalized Kudryashov technique, 2021, 22113797, 104092, 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104092
    17. Yu-Lan Ma, Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Bang-Qing Li, New extended Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation: multiple soliton solutions, breather, lump and interaction solutions, 2021, 0924-090X, 10.1007/s11071-021-06357-8
    18. Bo Ren, Mohammad Mirzazadeh, Characteristics of the Soliton Molecule and Lump Solution in the 2 + 1 -Dimensional Higher-Order Boussinesq Equation, 2021, 2021, 1687-9139, 1, 10.1155/2021/5545984
    19. Bang-Qing Li, Wen-Yang Guan, Symmetry breaking breathers and their phase transitions in a coupled optical fiber system, 2021, 53, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-021-02879-y
    20. M. Ali Akbar, Lanre Akinyemi, Shao-Wen Yao, Adil Jhangeer, Hadi Rezazadeh, Mostafa M.A. Khater, Hijaz Ahmad, Mustafa Inc, Soliton solutions to the Boussinesq equation through sine-Gordon method and Kudryashov method, 2021, 22113797, 104228, 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104228
    21. Sachin Kumar, Brij Mohan, A study of multi-soliton solutions, breather, lumps, and their interactions for kadomtsev-petviashvili equation with variable time coeffcient using hirota method, 2021, 96, 0031-8949, 125255, 10.1088/1402-4896/ac3879
    22. Bang-Qing Li, Hybrid breather and rogue wave solution for a (2 + 1)-dimensional ferromagnetic spin chain system with variable coefficients, 2022, 99, 0020-7160, 506, 10.1080/00207160.2021.1922678
    23. Onur Alp Ilhan, Sadiq Taha Abdulazeez, Jalil Manafian, Hooshmand Azizi, Subhiya M. Zeynalli, Multiple rogue and soliton wave solutions to the generalized Konopelchenko–Dubrovsky–Kaup–Kupershmidt equation arising in fluid mechanics and plasma physics, 2021, 35, 0217-9849, 2150383, 10.1142/S0217984921503838
    24. Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Naisa S. Alatawi, Wedad Albalawi, S. A. El-Tantawy, Painlevé analysis for a new (3 +1 )-dimensional KP equation: Multiple-soliton and lump solutions, 2022, 140, 0295-5075, 52002, 10.1209/0295-5075/aca49f
    25. Sachin Kumar, Dharmendra Kumar, Analytical soliton solutions to the generalized (3+1)-dimensional shallow water wave equation, 2022, 36, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984921505400
    26. Emmanuel Kengne, WuMing Liu, 2022, Chapter 8, 978-981-19-6743-6, 289, 10.1007/978-981-19-6744-3_8
    27. Muhammad Imran Asjad, Nayab Munawar, Foroud parvaneh, Taseer Muhammad, Ahmed A. Hamoud, Homan Emadifar, Faraidun K. Hamasalh, Hooshmand Azizi, Masoumeh Khademi, Traveling wave solutions to the Boussinesq equation via Sardar sub-equation technique, 2022, 7, 2473-6988, 11134, 10.3934/math.2022623
    28. Yeşim Sağlam Özkan, Aly R. Seadawy, Emrullah Yaşar, Multi-wave, breather and interaction solutions to (3+1) dimensional Vakhnenko–Parkes equation arising at propagation of high-frequency waves in a relaxing medium, 2021, 15, 1658-3655, 666, 10.1080/16583655.2021.1999053
    29. Xindi Shen, Jalil Manafian, Meng Jiang, Onur Alp Ilhan, Shafik S. Shafik, Muhaned Zaidi, Abundant wave solutions for generalized Hietarinta equation with Hirota’s bilinear operator, 2022, 36, 0217-9849, 10.1142/S0217984922500324
    30. Lingfei Li, Yingying Xie, Yongsheng Yan, Mancang Wang, A new extended (2+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation with N-solitons, periodic solutions, rogue waves, breathers and lump waves, 2022, 39, 22113797, 105678, 10.1016/j.rinp.2022.105678
    31. Handenur Esen, Aydin Secer, Muslum Ozisik, Mustafa Bayram, Soliton solutions to the nonlinear higher dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation through the new Kudryashov’s technique, 2022, 97, 0031-8949, 115104, 10.1088/1402-4896/ac98e4
    32. Santanu Saha Ray, Shailendra Singh, New various multisoliton kink‐type solutions of the (1 + 1)‐dimensional Mikhailov–Novikov–Wang equation, 2021, 44, 0170-4214, 14690, 10.1002/mma.7736
    33. Emmanuel Kengne, Boris A. Malomed, WuMing Liu, Phase engineering of chirped rogue waves in Bose–Einstein condensates with a variable scattering length in an expulsive potential, 2021, 103, 10075704, 105983, 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105983
    34. Cong-Cong Hu, Bo Tian, Qi-Xing Qu, Dan-Yu Yang, The higher-order and multi-lump waves for a (3+1)-dimensional generalized variable-coefficient shallow water wave equation in a fluid, 2022, 77, 05779073, 1755, 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.10.022
    35. Manar S. Ahmed, Afaf A.S. Zaghrout, Hamdy M. Ahmed, Travelling wave solutions for the doubly dispersive equation using improved modified extended tanh-function method, 2022, 61, 11100168, 7987, 10.1016/j.aej.2022.01.057
    36. S. T. R. Rizvi, Aly R. Seadawy, K. Ali, M. A. Ashraf, Saeed Althubiti, Multiple lump and interaction solutions for fifth-order variable coefficient nonlinear-Schrödinger dynamical equation, 2022, 54, 0306-8919, 10.1007/s11082-022-03532-y
    37. Bo Ren, Ji Lin, The integrability of a (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear wave equation: Painlevé property, multi-order breathers, multi-order lumps and hybrid solutions, 2023, 117, 01652125, 103110, 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2022.103110
    38. Yu-Lan Ma, Abdul-Majid Wazwaz, Bang-Qing Li, Novel bifurcation solitons for an extended Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation in fluids, 2021, 413, 03759601, 127585, 10.1016/j.physleta.2021.127585
    39. Hajar F. Ismael, Tukur Abdulkadir Sulaiman, Harivan R. Nabi, Nehad Ali Shah, Thongchai Botmart, Multiple soliton, M-lump and interaction solutions to the (3+1)-dimensional soliton equation, 2023, 45, 22113797, 106220, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106220
    40. Shao-Wen Yao, Asim Zafar, Aalia Urooj, Benish Tariq, Muhammad Shakeel, Mustafa Inc, Novel solutions to the coupled KdV equations and the coupled system of variant Boussinesq equations, 2023, 45, 22113797, 106249, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106249
    41. Bo Ren, Peng-Cheng Chu, Dynamics of D’Alembert wave and soliton molecule for a (2+1)-dimensional generalized breaking soliton equation, 2021, 74, 05779073, 296, 10.1016/j.cjph.2021.07.025
    42. Bang-Qing Li, Yu-Lan Ma, Oscillation rogue waves for the Kraenkel–Manna–Merle system in ferrites, 2021, 537, 03048853, 168182, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.168182
    43. Aissa Boukarou, Kaddour Guerbati, Khaled Zennir, Mohammad Alnegga, Gevrey regularity for the generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili I (gKP-I) equation, 2021, 6, 2473-6988, 10037, 10.3934/math.2021583
    44. Mehdi Jafari, Somayesadat Mahdion, Ali Akgül, Sayed M. Eldin, New conservation laws of the Boussinesq and generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equations via homotopy operator, 2023, 47, 22113797, 106369, 10.1016/j.rinp.2023.106369
    45. R. Ravichandran, K. Manikandan, Soliton dynamics in (2+1) dimensional Heisenberg spin chain with Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction in nanowire systems, 2024, 316, 00304026, 172052, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2024.172052
    46. Handenur Esen, Ismail Onder, Aydin Secer, Mustafa Bayram, On soliton solutions for higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation with cubic-quintic-septic law, 2023, 0219-8878, 10.1142/S0219887824500373
    47. Lirong Huang, A local Palais-Smale condition and existence of solitary waves for a class of nonhomogeneous generalized Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 14180, 10.3934/math.2023725
    48. Nguyen Minh Tuan, Sanoe Koonprasert, Sekson Sirisubtawee, Phayung Meesad, The bilinear neural network method for solving Benney–Luke equation, 2024, 10, 26668181, 100682, 10.1016/j.padiff.2024.100682
    49. Saad Althobaiti, Ali Althobaiti, Analytical solutions of the extended Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation in nonlinear media, 2023, 21, 2391-5471, 10.1515/phys-2023-0106
    50. Saima Noor, Azzh Saad Alshehry, Asfandyar Khan, Imran Khan, Analysis of soliton phenomena in (2+1)-dimensional Nizhnik-Novikov-Veselov model via a modified analytical technique, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 28120, 10.3934/math.20231439
    51. Ali Althobaiti, Novel wave solutions for the sixth-order Boussinesq equation arising in nonlinear lattice dynamics, 2024, 9, 2473-6988, 30972, 10.3934/math.20241494
    52. Muslum Ozisik, Aydin Secer, Mustafa Bayram, Abdullahi Yusuf, Tukur Abdulkadir Sulaiman, Soliton solutions of the (2+1)-dimensional Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation via two different integration schemes, 2023, 37, 0217-9792, 10.1142/S0217979223502120
    53. Muhammad Ahtisham Ilyas, Ahmad Javid, Breathers, Soliton and Hybrid Solutions for generalized (2+1) dimensional Soliton Equation, 2023, 293, 00304026, 171405, 10.1016/j.ijleo.2023.171405
    54. Saima Noor, Azzh Saad Alshehry, Asfandyar Khan, Imran Khan, Analysis of soliton phenomena in (2+1)-dimensional Nizhnik-Novikov-Veselov model via a modified analytical technique, 2023, 8, 2473-6988, 28120, 10.3934/math.20221439
    55. Hong-Yang Guan, Jian-Guo Liu, Propagation of lump-type waves in nonlinear shallow water wave, 2023, 20, 1551-0018, 19553, 10.3934/mbe.2023866
    56. Bang-Qing Li, Yu-Lan Ma, Influences of damping, perturbation and variable coefficient on an extended nonlinear Gardner model, 2024, 90, 05779073, 209, 10.1016/j.cjph.2024.05.031
    57. T. Umar, K. Hosseini, B. Kaymakamzade, Salah Boulaaras, M.S. Osman, Hirota D-operator forms, multiple soliton waves, and other nonlinear patterns of a 2D generalized Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation, 2024, 108, 11100168, 999, 10.1016/j.aej.2024.09.070
    58. N. Hemnath, Sandip Saha, Awani Bhushan, The non-autonomous perturbed potential Kadomtsev–Petviashvili equation: its integrability, kinky-quasiperiodic, kink-like breather, lump-kink solutions with mixed backgrounds, 2024, 0020-7160, 1, 10.1080/00207160.2024.2435017
  • Reader Comments
  • © 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Metrics

Article views(5771) PDF downloads(660) Cited by(58)

Figures and Tables

Figures(7)

Other Articles By Authors

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return

Catalog