
Citation: Elif Dalyan. Open book decompositions of links of quotient surface singularities and support genus problem[J]. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(1): 54-78. doi: 10.3934/math.2020005
[1] | Jonathan D. Evans, Morgan L. Evans . Stress boundary layers for the Giesekus fluid at the static contact line in extrudate swell. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(11): 32921-32944. doi: 10.3934/math.20241575 |
[2] | Nadia Alluhaibi . Circular surfaces and singularities in Euclidean 3-space $ \mathbb{E}^{3} $. AIMS Mathematics, 2022, 7(7): 12671-12688. doi: 10.3934/math.2022701 |
[3] | Xinfeng Liang, Lingling Zhao . Bi-Lie n-derivations on triangular rings. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(7): 15411-15426. doi: 10.3934/math.2023787 |
[4] | Alexander Bruno . Five new methods of celestial mechanics. AIMS Mathematics, 2020, 5(5): 5309-5319. doi: 10.3934/math.2020340 |
[5] | Masatomo Takahashi, Haiou Yu . On generalised framed surfaces in the Euclidean space. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(7): 17716-17742. doi: 10.3934/math.2024861 |
[6] | Haiming Liu, Jiajing Miao . Geometric invariants and focal surfaces of spacelike curves in de Sitter space from a caustic viewpoint. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(4): 3177-3204. doi: 10.3934/math.2021192 |
[7] | Shakir Ali, Amal S. Alali, Sharifah K. Said Husain, Vaishali Varshney . Symmetric $ n $-derivations on prime ideals with applications. AIMS Mathematics, 2023, 8(11): 27573-27588. doi: 10.3934/math.20231410 |
[8] | Moin A. Ansari, Ali N. A. Koam, Azeem Haider . Intersection soft ideals and their quotients on KU-algebras. AIMS Mathematics, 2021, 6(11): 12077-12084. doi: 10.3934/math.2021700 |
[9] | Yan Xu, Bing Fang, Fengchun Lei . On $ H' $-splittings of a handlebody. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(9): 24385-24393. doi: 10.3934/math.20241187 |
[10] | A. A. Abdel-Salam, M. I. Elashiry, M. Khalifa Saad . Tubular surface generated by a curve lying on a regular surface and its characterizations. AIMS Mathematics, 2024, 9(5): 12170-12187. doi: 10.3934/math.2024594 |
The purpose of this paper is to construct the Milnor open book decompositions of the links of quotient surface singularities supporting the unique Milnor fillable contact structure. By the work of Bhupal–Altınok [1] and by Nemethi–Tosun [15], the page-genus of our Milnor open book is minimal among all Milnor open books supporting the same contact structure, i.e. it gives the Milnor genus. In [4], it is shown that for some examples of rational surface singularities Milnor genus is not equal to the support genus. However, if we restrict ourself to quotient surface singularities, the question whether the Milnor genus is equal to the support genus for the canonical contact structure is still unknown. For most cases of the quotient surface singularities, we provide planar Milnor open books, so that for these types the Milnor genus is equal to the support genus. In all remaining cases, the Milnor genus turns out to be one. Hence, the support genus of the corresponding contact structure is at most one. We are able to show that for some of these quotient surface singularities the Milnor genus is equal to the support genus, which is one.
Our main result is the following theorem.
Theorem 1. The unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of the quotient surface singularities has support genus one for each singularities of the following types:
● Tetrahedral part (i) where b=2 (cf. Figure 3).
● Octahedral part (i) where b=2(cf. Figure 4).
● Icosahedral part (i) and (ii) where b=2. (cf. Figure 5).
The support genus is zero for singularities of the following types:
● Cyclic (cf. Figure 1).
● Dihedral, b>2 (cf. Figure 2).
● Tetrahedral, b>2 (cf. Figure 3).
● Octahedral, b>2 (cf. Figure 4).
● Icosahedral, b>2 (cf. Figure 5).
For the remaining cases, the corresponding contact structures have support genus at most one.
Remark 2. There are several other constructions of open books for plumbed circle bundles (see [7,8,10,18].) We follow the algorithm given in [2], which is a generalization of the construction given in [8]. They built horizantal open books in [8]. These open books coincides with Gay's construction in which Gay uses 4-dimensional symplectic handle attachments to get the open book decompositions on plumbings of circle bundles. In [18], he obtained planar (genus zero) open books by using Legendrian realization for certain plumbing trees and in [10] they extended the methods in [18] for more general cases.
Remark 3. For icosahedral singularity of part (i) where b=2, that is E8 singularity, by Theorem 1.2 of [9], the contact structure cannot be supported by a planar open book decomposition. This was the first known non planar example. For tetrahedral singularity of part (i) where b=2, namely E6, octahedral singularity of part (i) where b=2, E7, and icosahedral singularity of part (ii) where b=2, these all rational homology spheres, one can adapt the Proof of Theorem 1.2 in [9] and deduce that these cannot be planar. In Proof of Theorem 1.1, we explicitly write and show that the corresponding symplectic fillings cannot be embedded in connected sum of n copies of ¯CP2.
We study the quotient singularities C2/G, where G is a finite subetaoup of GL(2,C). Brieskorn [6] described the possible minimal resolutions for these singularities, by using earlier result of Prill [17]. These singularities are classified into five groups, namely cyclic quotient singularities, dihedral singularities, tetrahedral singularities, octahedral singularities and icosahedral singularities. We give the minimal resolution graphs of these singularities, and use it in our proof. The reader is referred to [3] for more details.
● Cyclic Quotient Singularities: An,q, where 0<q<n and gcd(n,q)=1. The minimal resolution graph of An,q is given in Figure 1, where bi are defined by the continued fraction
nq=[b1,b2,…,br]=b1−1b2−1⋱−1br |
with bi≥2 for all i.
● Dihedral Quotient Singularities: The minimal resolution graph of a dihedral quotient singularity is given in Figure 2, where b≥2 and bi≥2.
● Tetrahedral Singularities: The minimal resolution graph of a tetrahedral singularity is given in Figure 3, where b≥2.
● Octahedral Quotient Singularities: The minimal resolution graph of a octahedral quotient singularity is of the form given in Figure 4, where b≥2.
● Icosahedral Quotient Singularities: The minimal resolution graph of a icosahedral quotient singularity is of the form given in Figure 5, where b≥2.
The mapping class group MCG(Σ) of a compact connected orientable surface Σ is defined as the group of isotopy classes of orientation–preserving self–diffeomorphisms of Σ, where diffeomorphisms and isotopies of Σ are assumed to be the identity on the boundary. The group MCG(Σ) is generated by Dehn twists.
We need the following torus relations. These relations can be obtained from the well known one–holed torus relation by using the lantern and braid relations. The reader is referred to [12] for the details. For the curves in the relations see the appropriate picture in Figure 6.
One–holed torus relation is
tδ=(tαtβ)6. | (2.1) |
Two–holed torus relation is
tδ1tδ2=(tα1tα2tβ)4, | (2.2) |
or by using braid relations, equivalently we can write
tδ1tδ2=(tα1tα2tα2tβ)3, | (2.3) |
or
tδ1tδ2=(tα1tα2tβtα2tα2tβ)2. | (2.4) |
Three–holed torus relation is
tδ1tδ2tδ3=(tα1tα2tα3tβ)3. | (2.5) |
or
tδ1tδ2tδ3=(tα1tα3tβtα2tα3tβ)2, | (2.6) |
Four–holed torus relation is
tδ1tδ2tδ3tδ4=(tα1tα3tβtα2tα4tβ)2. | (2.7) |
The next theorem was proved by C. Bonatti and L. Paris (c.f [5], Theorem 3.6). It will be useful for us in writing the roots of elements in the mapping class group of a torus with boundary.
Theorem 4. If Σ is a torus with non-empty boundary components, then each element f in MCG(Σ) has at most one m-root up to conjugation for all m≥1.
We write the minimal page-genus Milnor open book decompositions of the links of the quotient surface singularities with the help of the minimal resolution graphs given in Section 2. We will give a recipe for the construction of these open books. The reader is referred to [2] for a detailed explanation.
Let Γ be one of the graphs given in Section 2. The intersection matrix I(Γ) of Γ is the negative definite symmetric matrix defined as follows: First label the vertices of Γ as A1,A2,…,Aq. We index the vertices of the graph starting from left to right and then index the bottom vertex if exists. The (i,i) entry of I(Γ) is the weight associated to Ai. For i≠j, the (i,j) entry is defined as 1 (resp. 0) if Ai is connected (resp. not connected) to Aj.
In order to construct our open book, we first find 1×q integer matrices m_=[m1m2⋯mq] and n_=[n1n2⋯nq] satisfying
I(Γ)m_t=−n_t. | (3.1) |
We choose m_ in such a way that mi are the smallest possible positive integers so that ni≥0 for all i. Here, m_t denotes the transpose of the matrix m_.
The page Σ of the open book associated to m_ and n_ satisfying the equality (3.1) is a union of the following pieces: A collection of surfaces Fi, for i=1,…,q; annuli Uit, for i=1,…,q, t=1,…,ni; and a collection of annuli Ui,jl, l=1,…,gcd(mi,mj) for each pair (i,j) with 1≤i<j≤q such that (Ai,Aj)∈E, where E denotes the set of edges of the graph Γ.
We determine the surface Fi as follows: For the vertex Ai with valency vi, Fi is an mi–cover of the sphere with vi+ni boundary components. The genus g(Fi) of Fi is determined by the followings: If ni>0 then the surface Fi is connected and
2−2g(Fi)−∑(Ai,Aj)∈Egcd(mi,mj)−ni=mi(2−vi−ni), | (3.2) |
from which we obtain
g(Fi)=1+mi(vi+ni−2)−∑(Ai,Aj)∈Egcd(mi,mj)−ni2. | (3.3) |
If ni=0 then Fi has di=gcd({mi}∪{mj|(Ai,Aj)∈E}) connected components and the genus of these components Fsi, s=1,…,di is calculated as
g(Fsi)=1+(mi/di)(vi−2)−∑(Ai,Aj)∈Egcd(mi,mj)/di2. | (3.4) |
The number of boundary components of Fi is
ni+∑(Ai,Aj)∈Egcd(mi,mj). |
After gluing those surfaces according to the graph Γ, we end up with the page Σ of the open book decomposition.
For a simple closed curve a on an oriented surface, let us denote by ta the right Dehn twist about a. In order to find the monodromy ϕ of the open book decomposition, we first find the monodromy restricted to the annuli Uit and Ui,jl's which make up the page Σ together with the surfaces Fi's. The monodromy ϕ restricted to the annulus Uit is given by
(ϕ|Uit)mi=tδit, |
for i=1,…,N, where δit is the core circle of Uit and, hence, it is parallel to the boundary components of the page Σ. The monodromy restricted to annulus Ui,jl is given by
(ϕ|Ui,jl)mimj/gcd(mi,mj)=tcj−1, |
where cj−1 is the core of the annulus Ui,jl. We glue these diffeomorphisms to get the monodromy ϕ:Σ→Σ of the open book decomposition.
Let us now construct the open book explicitly for all types of singularities.
In this section we give the whole list of Milnor open book decompositions supporting the corresponding unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the links of quotient surface singularities.
We start by investigating the cyclic quotient singularities. We construct the Milnor open book supporting the unique Milnor fillable contact structure by following the construction steps explained in the previous section. This is the easiest part and the open books turned to be planar.
Proposition 5. (Cyclic quotient singularities) The unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of a cyclic quotient surface singularity is supported by a planar open book decomposition with N=b1+b2+⋯+br−2(r−1) boundary components. The monodromy of the open book is
ϕ=(tδ11⋯tδ1b1−1)⋯(tδi1⋯tδibi−2)⋯(tδr1⋯tδrbr−1)(tc1⋯tcr−1), |
where i=2,…,r−1.
Proof. The intersection matrix I(Γ) of the cyclic quotient surface singularity is
[−b110⋯0001−b21⋯00001−b3⋯000⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮000⋯1−br−11000⋯01−br]. |
Consider the r-tuple of integers m_=(1,1,…,1), which gives the fundamental cycle of the resolution (We see m_ as a matrix). Then we find that n1=b1−1,nr=br−1 and ni=bi−2 for i=2,3,…,r−1. The page Σ of the open book associated to m_ consists of the following pieces. A collection of surfaces Fi, annuli Uit for each binding component of the open book and a collection of annuli Ui,jl connecting the surfaces Fi and Fj. Notice that the equations (3.3) and (3.4) become the same in both cases ni>0 and ni=0. By using either of these equations, we find that g(Fi)=0 for all i. The number of boundary components of Fi is ni+∑(Ai,Aj)∈Egcd(mi,mj). It follows that each Fi is a sphere with bi boundary components.
Next, we glue the annuli to the Fi's. For each 1≤i≤r−1, glue the annulus Ui,i+11 to Fi and Fi+1 to get a connected surface (cf. Figure 7). There are ni annuli Uit which are not used to plumb the surfaces Fi. They will give the binding components of the open book. As seen in Figure 7, the page Σ is a sphere with N boundary components, where
N=n1+n2+⋯+nr=b1+b2+⋯+br−2(r−1). |
In order to find the monodromy ϕ, we only need to find ϕ|Uit and ϕ|Ui,jl. We know that (ϕ|Uit)mi=tδit, for i=1,…,N, where δit are the core circles of Uit. We find that the monodromy restricted to each annulus Ui,jl is given by (ϕ|Ui,jl)mimj/gcd(mi,mj)=tcj−1, where cj−1 is the core of the annulus Ui,jl (cf. Figure 7). Since mi=1, we have
● ϕ|U1j=tδ1j for j=1,…,b1−1,
● ϕ|Uij=tδij for i=2,…,r−1 and j=1,…,bi−2,
● ϕ|Urj=tδrj for j=1,…,br−1, and
● ϕ|Ui,i+11=tci for i=1,…,r−1.
By gluing these maps, we find that the monodromy is
ϕ=(tδ11⋯tδ1b1−1)⋯(tδi1⋯tδibi−2)⋯(tδr1⋯tδrbr−1)(tc1⋯tcr−1), |
where i=2,…,r−1.
First, we consider the dihedral quotient surface singularity. If b1=b2=⋯=br−1=b=2, then the singularity is a simple surface singularity. In [2], Bhupal computes the open book decomposition: The page of the open book is a one–holed torus (cf. Figure 8) and the monodromy is (tαtβ)3(tα)r−2. In the following proposition, we assume that the surface singularity is not simple.
Proposition 6. (Dihedral quotient singularities) If b>2 then the unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of the dihedral quotient surface singularity is supported by a planar open book decomposition with N=b1+b2+⋯+br−1+b−2r+1 boundary components. The monodromy of the open book is
ϕ=T1T2⋯Tr−1Tr(tδr+11)2(tδr+21)2(tc1⋯tcr−1). |
If b=br−1=br−2=⋯=bk+1=2 and bk>2 for some 1≤k≤r−1, then the unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of the dihedral quotient surface singularity is supported by an open book of genus one. The number of boundary components is N=b1+b2+⋯+bk−2k+1. The monodromy is given by
ϕ={(tδ11tδ12⋯tδ1b1−2)(tα1tα2tβ)2,ifr=2 (hencek=1)T1T2⋯Tk−1Wk(tc1⋯tck−1)(tα1tα2tβ)2(tα2)r−(k+1),ifr>2. |
Here,
● T1=tδ11⋯tδ1b1−1,
● Ti=tδi1⋯tδibi−2, i=2,…,r−1.
● Tr=tδr1⋯tδrb−3, and
● Wk=tδk1⋯tδkbk−3.
Proof. We construct the open book by following the steps explained in Section 3.
Suppose first that b>2. Let m_=(1,…,1). From the equation (3.1), we get n_=(b1−1,b2−2,…,br−1−2,b−3,1,1). For each vertex Ai of the graph with valency vi, we take a sphere Si with vi+ni boundary components. Since mi=1, Si=Fi in the notation of Section 3. For each edge E of the graph connecting the vertices Ai and Aj, we glue an annulus connecting the spheres Si and Sj. We then glue ni annuli to the sphere Si. The resulting surface is a page of the open book and is a sphere with N=n1+⋯+nr+2=b1+b2+⋯+br−1+b−2r+1 boundary components (cf. Figure 9). For the monodromy, we have the diffeomorphisms below, gluing them we find the monodromy of the open book.
In Section 3, it is explained that (ϕ|Uit)mi=tδit, for i=1,…,N, where δit are the core circles of Uit. We find that the monodromy restricted to each annulus Ui,jl is given by (ϕ|Ui,jl)mimj/gcd(mi,mj)=tcj−1, where cj−1 is the core of the annulus Ui,jl. Then we have
● ϕ|U1j=tδ1j for j=1,…,b1−1,
● ϕ|Uij=tδij for i=2,…,r−1 and j=1,…,bi−2,
● ϕ|Urj=tδrj for j=1,…,b−3,
● ϕ|Ur+11=tδr+11,
● ϕ|Ur+21=tδr+21, and
● ϕ|Ui,i+11=tci for i=1,…,r+1.
The curve cr is isotopic to the curve δr+11 and the curve cr+1 is isotiopic to the curve δr+21, and gluing the maps above we can easily get the monodromy.
ϕ=(tδ11⋯tδ1b1−1)⋯(tδi1⋯tδibi−2)⋯(tδr1⋯tδrb−3)(tδr+11)2(tδr+21)2(tc1⋯tcr−1), |
where i=2,…,r−1.
ϕ=T1T2⋯Tr−1Tr(tδr+11)2(tδr+21)2(tc1⋯tcr−1). |
Suppose now that b=2. We consider two cases:
Case 1: r=2. In this case by taking m_=(1,2,1,1), we find from equation (3.1) that n_=(b1−2,1,0,0). It follows from the construction that the page of the open book is a torus with b1−1 boundary components (cf. Figure 10). For the monodromy, there are the diffeomorphisms of the annuli U21, U1i and U1,21 given by
(ϕ|U21)2=tδ21,
(ϕ|U1,21)2=tc1, and
(ϕ|U1i)=tδ1i, for i=1,2,…,b1−2.
By using the two-holed torus relation (2.2) for the torus bounded by c1 and δ21, and by Theorem 2.1, the monodromy is found to be
ϕ=((ϕ|U11)(ϕ|U12)⋯(ϕ|U1b1−2))((ϕ|U21)(ϕ|U1,21))=(tδ11tδ12⋯tδ1b1−2)(tα1tα2tβ)2. |
Case 2: r>2. We divide this case into two subcases: k=r−1 and k<r−1.
Suppose first that k=r−1, so that br−1>2. In this case we take
m_=(1,1,…,1,1,2,1,1) |
so that all mi=1 but mr=2. We easily find from equation (3.1) that
n_=(b1−1,b2−2,b3−2,…,br−2−2,br−1−3,1,0,0). |
It follows that the page of the open book is a torus; the number of boundary components is N=b1+b2+⋯+br−1−2r+3 (cf. Figure 11). The monodromy is
T1T2⋯Tr−2Wr−1(tc1⋯tcr−2)(tα1tα2tβ)2. |
Suppose now that k<r−1. Taking mi=1 for 1≤i≤k, mj=2 for k+1≤j≤r, mr+1=mr+2=1, so that
m_=(1,1,…,1,2,…,2,2,1,1), |
we find
n_=(b1−1,b2−2,b3−2,…,bk−1−2,bk−3,1,0,…,0). |
It follows again from the construction in Section 3 that the page of the open book is a torus with N=b1+b2+⋯+bk−2k+1 boundary components (cf. Figure 12). For the monodromy, we glue the following maps:
ϕ|U1j=tδ1j, j=1,…,b1−1,
ϕ|Uij=tδij, i=2,…,k−1 and j=1,…,bi−2,
ϕ|Ukj=tδkj for j=1,…,bk−3,
ϕ|Ui,i+11=tci, i=1,…,k−1,
(ϕ|Uk,k+11)2=tck,
(ϕ|Uk+11)2=tδk+11,
(ϕ|Ui,i+1j)2=tci, i=k+1,…,r−1 and j=1,2.
In this case, for i=k+1,…,r−1 the curves ci are isotopic to α2. By the two–holed torus relation (2.2) for the torus with boundary ck and δk+11 and by Theorem 2.1, we get the monodromy to be
T1T2⋯Tk−1Wk(tc1⋯tck−1)(tα1tα2tβ)2(tα2)r−(k+1). |
In this subsection, we investigate the tetrahedral quotient singularities. We write explicitly the Milnor open book decomposition supporting the unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of a tetrahedral quotient singularity.
Proposition 7. (Tetrahedral quotient singularities) The unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of a tetrahedral quotient singularity is supported by a planar open book decomposition (resp. a genus-1 open book decomposition) if b>2 (resp. b=2). The number N of boundary components of the page and the monodromy ϕ are given as follows (cf. Figure 13 and Figure 14): For b>2
(N,ϕ)={(b, (tδ11)3(tδ31⋯tδ3b−3)(tδ51)3(tδ61)2),in the case(i)(b+1, tδ11tδ12(tδ21⋯tδ2b−3)(tδ41)3(tδ51)2tc1),in the case(ii)(b+2, tδ11tδ12(tδ21⋯tδ2b−3)tδ31tδ32(tδ41)2tc1tc2),in the case(iii) |
and for b=2
(N,ϕ)={(1, (tαtβ)4),in the case(i)(2, tδ11(tα1tα2tβtα1tα2tβtα2)),in the case(ii)(3, tδ11tδ31(tα1tα3tβtα2tα3tβ)),in the case(iii). |
Proof. Case 1: b>2. We analyze each case.
(i) Following the steps in the construction given in Section 3, we choose m_=(1,1,1,1,1,1). From the equation (3.1) we find n_=(1,0,b−3,0,1,1). Since mi=1 for all i, the surface Fi at the vertex Ai is a sphere with vi+ni boundary components. We connect these spheres Fi and Fj with an annulus if the vertices Ai and Aj are connected by an edge. It follows that the page of the open book is a sphere with n1+⋯+n6=b boundary components (cf. Figure 13(i)). The monodromy ϕ restricted to each annuli is given as
● ϕ|U11=tδ11,
● ϕ|U3j=tδ3j, for j=1,…,b−3,
● ϕ|U51=tδ51,
● ϕ|U61=tδ61,
● ϕ|Ui,i+11=tci, for i=1,…,4, and
● ϕ|U3,61=tc5.
Note that the curves c1 and c2 are isotopic to δ11, c3 and c4 are isotopic to δ51, and c5 is isotopic to δ61. From this we find that
ϕ=(tδ11)3(tδ31⋯tδ3b−3)(tδ51)3(tδ61)2. |
(ii) Choosing m_=(1,1,1,1,1) gives n_=(2,b−3,0,1,1). Following the construction above we easily get the desired open book (cf. Figure 13(ii)).
(iii) Taking m_=(1,1,1,1) gives n_=(2,b−3,2,1). The rest of the proof is the same as the case (i) (cf. Figure 13(iii)).
Case 2: b=2. Again we investigate each of the three cases.
This type of singularity has a graph Γ given in Figure 3. For each vertex Ai of Γ, there is a sphere with vi+ni boundary components, where vi is the valency of the vertex Ai and ni is calculated from equation (3.1).
(i) Choosing m_=(1,2,3,2,1,2) gives n_=(0,0,0,0,0,1). To construct the page, we plumb the surfaces Fi, according to the graph Γ. The surface Fi is the mi–cover of the sphere with vi+ni boundary components. The number of boundary components of Fi is
ni+∑(Ai,Aj)∈Egcd(mi,mj)=ni+vi. |
Hence the surface F1 is a sphere with one boundary component, F2 is a sphere with two boundary components, F3 is a torus with three boundary components, F4 is a sphere with two boundary components, F5 is sphere with one boundary component, and F6 is sphere with two boundary components.
The page of the open book is constructed by connecting these surfaces with an annulus according to the graph Γ (cf. Figure 14(i)). Thus the page is a one–holed torus. The monodromy can easily be calculated by gluing the monodromy restricted to the annuli U3,61 and U61.
ϕ=(ϕ|U3,61)(ϕ|U61). |
From Section 3, we have
● (ϕ|U3,61)6=tc5, and
● (ϕ|U61)2=tδ61.
Since the curves c5 and δ61 are isotopic, we may write
ϕ3=((ϕ|U3,61)(ϕ|U61))3
=(tδ61)2
=(tαtβ)12,
by using the once-punctured torus relation (2.1). By Theorem 2.1, we find
ϕ=(tαtβ)4. |
(ii) We take m_=(1,2,2,1,1) and get n_=(1,0,1,0,0). It follows that the page of the open book is a torus with two boundary components (cf. Figure 14(ii)). The monodromy can easily be calculated.
(iii) Choosing m_=(1,2,1,1) gives n_=(1,1,1,0). Then the page of the open book is a torus with three boundary components (cf. Figure 14(iii)). The monodromy is found to be as stated.
In the proposition below, we construct the Milnor open book decomposition supporting the unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of an octahedral quotient singularity.
Proposition 8. (Octahedral quotient singularities) The unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of an octahedral quotient singularity is supported by a planar open book decomposition if b>2 and a genus-1 open book decomposition if b=2. The number N of boundary components of the page and the monodromy ϕ are given as follows (cf. Figure 4): For b>2
(N,ϕ)={(b, (tδ11)4(tδ41⋯tδ4b−3)(tδ61)3(tδ71)2(tδ61)2),in the case(i)(b+1, (tδ11)4(tδ41⋯tδ4b−3)tδ51tδ52(tδ61)2tc1),in the case(ii)(b+2, tδ11tδ12(tδ21⋯tδ2b−3)tδ31tδ32(tδ41)2tc1tc2),in the case(iii)(b+3, tδ11tδ12tδ13(tδ21⋯tδ2b−3)(tδ41)3(tδ51)2tc1),in the case(iv) |
and for b=2
(N,ϕ)={(1, tβ(tαtβ)4),in the case(i)(2, tδ2(tα1tα2(tα1tα2tβ)2),in the case(ii)(3, tδ1tδ2(tα1tα2tβtα1tα2tβtα2)),in the case(iii)(4, tδ1tδ2tδ4(tα1tα3tβtα2tα3tβ)),in the case(iv). |
Proof. Case 1: b>2.
(i) We choose m_=(1,1,1,1,1,1,1) from which we find n_=(1,0,0,b−3,0,1,1). Since mi=1 for all i, the surface Fi at the vertex Ai is a sphere with vi+ni boundary components. We connect these spheres Fi and Fj with an annulus if the vertices Ai and Aj are connected by an edge. It follows that the page of the open book is a sphere with n1+⋯+n7=b boundary components (cf. Figure 15(i)). The monodromy ϕ restricted to each annuli is given as
● ϕ|U11=tδ11,
● ϕ|U4j=tδ4j, for j=1,…,b−3,
● ϕ|U61=tδ61,
● ϕ|U71=tδ71,
● ϕ|Ui,i+11=tci, for i=1,…,5, and
● ϕ|U4,71=tc6.
The curves c1, c2 and c3 are isotopic to δ11, c3 and c4 are isotopic to δ61, and c6 is isotopic to δ61. From this we find that
ϕ=(tδ11)4(tδ41⋯tδ4b−3)(tδ61)3(tδ71)2. |
Similarly, in order to construct the Milnor open books in part (ii),(iii) and (iv), we choose m_ and n_ as in the table below. Following the construction steps, one can easily get the open book stated in Proposition 4.4.
Part | m_ | n_ |
(ii) | (1,1,1,1,1,1) | (1,0,0,b−3,2,1) |
(iii) | (1,1,1,1,1) | (3,b−3,0,1,1) |
(iv) | (1,1,1,1) | (3,b−3,2,1) |
Case 2: b=2. Again we investigate each of the four cases.
This type of singularity has a graph Γ given in Figure 4. For each vertex Ai of Γ, there is a sphere with vi+ni boundary components, where vi is the valency of the vertex Ai and ni is calculated from equation (3.1).
(i) Choosing m_=(1,2,3,4,3,2,2) gives n_=(0,0,0,0,0,1,0). To construct the page, we plumb the surfaces Fi, according to the graph Γ. The surface Fi is the mi–cover of the sphere with vi+ni boundary components. There are ni+vi boundary components of the surface Fi. Hence, the surfaces F1 and F7 are spheres with one boundary component. F2, F3, F5 and F6 are spheres with two boundary components and F3 is a torus with three boundary components. The page of the open book is constructed by connecting these surfaces with an annulus according to the graph Γ (cf. Figure 16(i)). Thus the page is a one–holed torus. The monodromy can easily be calculated by gluing the monodromy restricted to the annuli U4,51, U5,61 and U61.
ϕ=(ϕ|U4,51)(ϕ|U5,61)(ϕ|U61). |
From the calculations of Section 3,
● (ϕ|U4,51)12=tc4,
● (ϕ|U3,61)6=tc5, and
● (ϕ|U61)2=tδ61.
Since the curves c4, c5 and δ61 are isotopic, we may write
ϕ4=((ϕ|U4,51)(ϕ|U5,61)(ϕ|U61))4
=(tδ61)3.
By using the once-punctured torus relation (2.1),
ϕ4=((tαtβ)6)3.
Using the braid relations we may write
ϕ4=(tβ(tαtβ))4)4.
Using Theorem 2.1, we obtain the monodromy as
ϕ=tβ(tαtβ)4.
In order to prove the rest of the proposition, we take m_ and n_ as in the table below. Then following the construction steps, braid relations and Theorem 2.1 one can get Milnor open book given in Proposition 4.4.
Part | m_ | n_ |
(ii) | (1,2,2,2,1,1) | (0,1,0,0,1,0) |
(iii) | (1,2,2,1,1) | (2,0,1,0,0) |
(iv) | (1,2,1,1) | (2,1,1,0) |
In this part, we write the Milnor open book decomposition supporting the unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of an icosahedral quotient singularity. Notice that for b=2, (i) is the E8 singularity, and its open book decomposition is constructed in [2], and [11]. We simplify the construction of [2], and write it for the completeness of the paper.
Proposition 9. (Icosahedral quotient singularities) The unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of an icosahedral quotient singularity is supported by a planar open book decomposition if b>2 and a genus-1 open book decomposition if b=2. The number N of boundary components of the page and the monodromy ϕ are given as follows (cf. Figure 5): For b>2
(N,ϕ)={(b, (tδ11)5(tδ51⋯tδ5b−3)(tδ71)3(tδ81)2),in the case(i)(b+1, (tδ11tδ12(tδ31⋯tδ3b−3)(tδ51)3(tδ61)2(tc1)2),in the case(ii)(b+2, (tδ11)5(tδ51⋯tδ5b−3)tδ61tδ62(tδ71)2tc1),in the case(iii)(b+1, (tδ11)2tδ21(tδ31⋯tδ3b−3)(tδ51)3(tδ61)2tc1),in the case(iv)(b+2, tδ11tδ12(tδ31⋯tδ3b−3)tδ41tδ42(tδ51)2(tc1)2tc2),in the case(v)(b+3, tδ11tδ12tδ13tδ14(tδ21⋯tδ2b−3)(tδ41)3(tδ51)2tc1),in the case(vi)(b+2, (tδ11)2tδ21(tδ31⋯tδ3b−3)tδ41tδ42(tδ51)2tc1tc2),in the case(vii)(b+4, tδ11tδ12tδ13tδ14(tδ21⋯tδ2b−3)tδ31tδ31(tδ41)2tc1tc2),in the case(viii) |
and for b=2
(N,ϕ)={(1, (tαtβ)5),in the case(i)(2, tδ1(tα1(tα2)2tβ)2),in the case(ii)(2, tδ2tα1tα2(tα1tα2tβtα1tα2tβtα2)),in the case(iii)(2, (tδ1)2(tα1tα2tβtα1tα2tβtα2)),in the case(iv)(4, tδ1tδ3(tα1tα2tα3tβtα2tα3tβ)),in the case(v)(4, tδ1tδ2(tα1tα2tβtα1tα2tβtα2)),in the case(vi)(3, (tδ1)2tδ3(tα1tα3tβtα2tα3tβ)),in the case(vii)(5, tδ1tδ2tδ3tδ5(tα1tα3tβtα2tα3tβ)),in the case(viii). |
Proof. Case 1: b>2.
(i) Following the steps in the construction of the open book, choosing m_=(1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1), we get n_=(1,0,0,0,b−3,0,1,1). Since mi=1 for all i, the surface Fi at the vertex Ai is a sphere with vi+ni boundary components. We connect these spheres Fi and Fj with an annulus if the vertices Ai and Aj are connected by an edge. It follows that the page of the open book is a sphere with b boundary components (cf. Figure 17(i)). The monodromy of the open book is calculated by gluing the maps below:
ϕ=(ϕ|U11)(ϕ|U1,21⋯ϕ|U6,71)(ϕ|U71)(ϕ|U81)(ϕ|U5,81)(ϕ|U51⋯ϕ|U5b−3). |
The monodromy ϕ restricted to each of these annuli is given by
● ϕ|U11=tδ11,
● ϕ|U5j=tδ5j, for j=1,…,b−3,
● ϕ|U71=tδ71,
● ϕ|U81=tδ81,
● ϕ|Ui,i+11=tci, for i=1,…,6, and
● ϕ|U5,81=tc7.
Note that the curves c1, c2, c3, c4 are isotopic to δ11; c5, c6 are isotopic to δ71; and c7 is isotopic to δ81. Hence the monodromy is
ϕ=(tδ11)5(tδ71)3(tδ81)2(tδ51⋯tδ5b−3). |
In order to prove the other parts, we follow the construction steps given in Section 3. Taking m_ and n_ as in the table below, one can get the desired open book.
Part | m_ | n_ |
(ii) | (1,1,1,1,1,1) | (2,0,b−3,0,1,1) |
(iii) | (1,1,1,1,1,1,1) | (1,0,0,0,b−3,2,1) |
(iv) | (1,1,1,1,1,1) | (1,1,b−3,0,1,1) |
(v) | (1,1,1,1,1) | (2,0,b−3,2,1) |
(vi) | (1,1,1,1,1) | (4,b−3,0,1,1) |
(vii) | (1,1,1,1,1) | (1,1,b−3,2,1) |
(viii) | (1,1,1,1) | (4,b−3,2,1) |
Case 2: b=2.
(i) The intersection matrix I(Γ) of this singularity is
[−210000001−210000001−210000001−210000001−210100001−210000001−200000100−2]. |
In this case, we take m_=(2,3,4,5,6,4,2,3). From equation (3.1), we find that n_=(1,0,0,0,0,0,0,0). The page Σ of the open book associated to m_ is a torus with two boundary components, built up as the union of five spheres with two boundary components, two spheres with one boundary component, a torus with three boundary components and eight annuli (see Figure 18(i)). The monodromy restricted to each annulus is computed to be
● (ϕ|U11)2=tδ11,
● (ϕ|U1,21)6=tc1,
● (ϕ|U2,31)12=tc2,
● (ϕ|U3,41)20=tc3,
● (ϕ|U4,51)30=tc4.
We get the monodromy ϕ of the open book by gluing these maps:
ϕ=(ϕ|U11)(ϕ|U1,21)(ϕ|U2,31)(ϕ|U3,41)(ϕ|U4,51). |
The curves c1, c2, c3 and c4 are isotopic to δ11, and by using the above five equations, we may write
(ϕ)6=((ϕ|U11)(ϕ|U1,21)(ϕ|U2,31)(ϕ|U61)(ϕ|U3,61))6=(tδ11)5. |
Using the one–holed torus relation (2.1), we obtain
(ϕ)6=(tδ11)5=(tαtβ)30. |
It follows now from Theorem 2.1 that the monodromy ϕ of the open book is
ϕ=(tαtβ)5. |
The rest of the proof is same as the part (i). Choosing m_ and n_ as in table below, gives the open book decomposition stated in Proposition 4.5.
Part | m_ | n_ |
(ii) | (1,2,3,2,1,2) | (1,0,0,0,0,1) |
(iii) | (1,2,2,2,2,1,1) | (0,1,0,0,0,1,0) |
(iv) | (1,1,2,2,1,1) | (1,0,0,1,0,0) |
(v) | (1,2,2,1,1) | (1,1,0,1,0) |
(vi) | (1,2,2,1,1) | (3,0,1,0,0) |
(vii) | (1,1,2,1,1) | (1,0,1,1,0) |
(viii) | (1,2,1,1) | (3,1,1,0) |
In Section 4 we have found the Milnor open book decompositions on the links of quotient surface singularities supporting the natural contact structure. Hence, we are able to say the following: The Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of a cyclic quotient surface singularity is supported by a planar open book (cf. Proposition 5). Similarly, the natural contact structure on the links of other singularities in the case b>2 are all supported by planar open books (cf. Propositions 6-7-8-9). Therefore, the support genus is the same as Milnor genus, which is zero, for these types.
In order to prove Theorem 1, we show that the unique Milnor fillable contact structure on the link of the quotient surface singularity cannot be supported by a planar open book for the following singularities: tetrahedral part (i) for b=2; octahedral part (i) for b=2, icosahedral part (i) and (ii) for b=2. These singularities have Milnor genus-1 open book decompositions, as shown in Section 4. Therefore, the Milnor genus is equal to the support genus for these types.
If X is a symplectic filling of a contact 3-manifold (M,ξ) and ξ is supported by a planar open book, then X can be embedded in #n¯CP2, connected sum of n copies of ¯CP2 by (the proof of) Theorem 1.2 of [9]. Hence, in order to show that the support genus of a symplectically fillable contact structure is positive, it suffices to show that their symplectic fillings cannot be embedded in #n¯CP2.
Let v1,v2,v3,v4 be the standard generators of the intersection lattice (Z4,D4) shown in Figure 19, vertices having self-intersection −2, and e1,…,en be the standard generators of (Zn,Dn=⊕n⟨−1⟩) diagonal intersection lattice with self-intersection −1. By Lemma 3.1 in [13] (see also the proof of Theorem 4.2 in [14]), there exists only one, up to composing with an automorphism of (Zn,Dn), isometric embedding from (Z4,D4) to (Zn,Dn), which sends v1 to e1+e2, v2 to −e2+e3, v3 to −e1+e4 and v4 to −e2−e3. The proof follows from the fact that, each vi has self-intersection −2, so that the image of vi under an isometric embedding must be of the form ej+ek. From the intersection form of D4, one can only get the above embedding (up to sign changes and permutations of generators of (Zn,Dn)).
Let L be any intersection lattice containing the sublattice with vertices v1,…,v6 as shown in Figure 20, where v1,v2,v3,v4 have self-intersection −2. We prove for any n≥1, there exists no isometric embedding from L into (Zn,Dn).
Suppose there exists such an isometric embedding φ. By the above discussion, we may assume that
● φ(v1)=e1+e2,
● φ(v2)=−e2+e3,
● φ(v3)=−e1+e4, and
● φ(v4)=−e2−e3.
From the intersection form of L one can see, that v5 has an intersection with v4. On the otherhand v5 does not intersect v2. Then one can get the equalities below:
1=φ(v5⋅v4)=φ(v5)⋅φ(v4)=φ(v5)⋅(−e2−e3) and
0=φ(v5⋅v2)=φ(v5)⋅φ(v2)=φ(v5)⋅(−e2+e3).
Hence we obtain
1=φ(v5)⋅(−2e2),
which is impossible.
Therefore, if one considers the intersection lattice L as stated above and the natural contact structure on the link of that plumbing, then its symplectic filling cannot be embedded in #n¯CP2. So that contact structure cannot be supported by a planar open book decomposition. Therefore the unique Milnor fillable contact structures on the links of quotient surface singularities of tetrahedral part (i) for b=2; octahedral part (i) for b=2, icosahedral part (i) and (ii) for b=2 cannot be supported by planar open book decompositions. These contact structures have support genus one. For the remaining cases, we constructed minimal page-genus Milnor open books, and the pages are all genus one surfaces. Hence, we conclude that support genus is at most one for the corresponding contact structures.
Remark 10. This method we used above, to prove the contact structures cannot be supported by planar open book decompositions, can be used to prove for some other symplectically fillable contact structures on different types of singularities/plumbings.
Remark 11. Quotient surface singularities are rational surface singularities and the links of rational surface singularities are L-spaces. Hence we cannot use the obstructions in [16] for being supported by a planar open book decomposition.
Remark 12. In this paper, we only investigate the Milnor open book decompositions supporting the canonical contact structure on the links of quotient surface singularities and the relation between the Milnor genus and the support genus. The relation between the binding number and support norm for this type of singularities could be understood with help of these Milnor open book decompositions.
This paper is a part of my Ph.D. thesis [19] at Middle East Technical University. Special thanks to Kaoru Ono for proposing this question, to András Stipsicz, Mohan Bhupal and Mustafa Korkmaz for their helpful comments.
The author declares that there is no conflicts of interest in this paper.
[1] |
S. Altınok, M. Bhupal, Minimum page-genus of Milnor open books on links of rational surface singularities, Contemp. Math., 475 (2008), 1-10. doi: 10.1090/conm/475/09272
![]() |
[2] |
M. Bhupal, Open books decompositions of links of simple surface singularities, Int. J. Math., 20 (2009), 1527-1545. doi: 10.1142/S0129167X09005868
![]() |
[3] |
M. Bhupal, K. Ono, Symplectic fillings of links of quotient surface singularities, Nagoya Math. J., 207 (2012), 1-45. doi: 10.1017/S0027763000022297
![]() |
[4] |
M. Bhupal, B. Ozbagci, Milnor open books of links of some rational surface singularities, Pac. J. Math., 254 (2011), 47-65. doi: 10.2140/pjm.2011.254.47
![]() |
[5] |
C. Bonatti, L. Paris, Roots in the mapping class groups, P. London Math. Soc., 98 (2009), 471-503. doi: 10.1112/plms/pdn036
![]() |
[6] |
E. Brieskorn, Rationale singularitäten komplexer flächen, Invent. Math., 4 (1968), 336-358. doi: 10.1007/BF01425318
![]() |
[7] | D. T. Gay, Open books and configurations of symplectic surfaces, Alg. & Geo. Top., 3 (2003), 569-586. |
[8] |
T. Etgü, B. Ozbagci, Explicit Horizantal Open Books on some plumbings, Int. J. Math., 17 (2006), 1013-1031. doi: 10.1142/S0129167X06003801
![]() |
[9] | J. Etnyre, Planar open book decompositions and contact structures, Int. Math. Res. Notices, 79 (2004), 4255-4267. |
[10] | J. Etnyre, B. Ozbagci, Open books and plumbings, Int. Math. Res. Notices, 2006 (2006), 1-17. |
[11] |
J. Etnyre, B. Ozbagci, Invariants of contact structures from open book decompositions, Trans. AMS., 360 (2008), 3133-3151. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-08-04459-0
![]() |
[12] |
M. Korkmaz, B. Ozbagci, On sections of elliptic fibrations, Michigan Math. J., 56 (2008), 77-87. doi: 10.1307/mmj/1213972398
![]() |
[13] | P. Lisca. On symplectic fillings of 3-manifolds, Turk. J. Math., 23 (1999), 151-159. |
[14] | P. Lisca, A. Stipsicz. Ozsvath-Szabo invariants and tight contact three-manifolds I, Geom. Topol., 8 (2004), 925-945. |
[15] | A. Némethi, M. Tosun, Invariants of open books of links of surface singularities, Stud. Sci. Math. Hung., 48 (2011), 135-144. |
[16] | P. Ozsváth, A. Stipsicz, Z. Szabo, Planar open books and Floer homology, Int. Math. Res. Notices, 54 (2005), 3385-3401. |
[17] |
D. Prill, Local classification of quotients of complex manifolds by discontinous groups, Duke Math. J., 34 (1967), 375-386. doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-67-03441-2
![]() |
[18] | S. Schönenberger, Planar open books and symplectic fillings, PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 2005. |
[19] | E. Yılmaz, Open book decompositions of links of quotient surface singularities, PhD dissertation, Middle East Technical University, 2009. |