Export file:

Format

  • RIS(for EndNote,Reference Manager,ProCite)
  • BibTex
  • Text

Content

  • Citation Only
  • Citation and Abstract

Tape surfaces characterization with persistence images

1 PIMM & ESI Group International Chair, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, 151 boulevard de l‘Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
2 PIMM, Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, 151 boulevard de l‘Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
3 ESI-CEU International Chair, Universidad Cardenal Herrera-CEU, San Bartolome 55, 46115 Alfara del Patriarca, Valencia, Spain
4 Universite de Pau et des Pays de l‘Adour, E2S UPPA, CNRS, IPREM, Pau, France

Topical Section: Thin films, surfaces and interfaces

The aim of this paper is to leverage the main surface topological descriptors to classify tape surface profiles, through the modelling of the evolution of the degree of intimate contact along the consolidation of pre-impregnated preforms associated to a composite forming process. It is well-known at an experimental level that the consolidation degree strongly depends on the surface characteristics (roughness). In particular, same process parameters applied to different surfaces produce very different degrees of intimate contact. It allows us to think that the surface topology plays an important role along this process. However, solving the physics-based models for simulating the roughness squeezing occurring at the tapes interface represents a computational effort incompatible with online process control purposes. An alternative approach consists of taking a population of different tapes, with different surfaces, and simulating the consolidation for evaluating for each one the progression of the degree of intimate contact –DIC– while compressing the heated tapes, until reaching its final value at the end of the compression. The final goal is creating a regression able to assign a final value of the DIC to any surface, enabling online process control. The main issue of such an approach is the rough surface description, that is, the most precise and compact way of describing it from some appropriate parameters easy to extract experimentally, to be included in the just referred regression. In the present paper we consider a novel, powerful and very promising technique based on the topological data analysis –TDA– that considers an adequate metrics to describe, compare and classify rough surfaces.
  Figure/Table
  Supplementary
  Article Metrics

References

1. Chinesta F, Leygue A, Bognet B, et al. (2014) First steps towards an advanced simulation of composites manufacturing by automated tape placement. Int J Mater Form 7: 81-92.    

2. Chinesta F, Ammar A, Cueto E (2010) Recent advances and new challenges in the use of the Proper Generalized Decomposition for solving multidimensional models. Arch Comput Method Eng 17: 327-350.    

3. Chinesta F, Ladeveze P, Cueto E (2011) A short review in model order reduction based on Proper Generalized Decomposition. Arch Comput Method Eng 18: 395-404.    

4. Chinesta F, Keunings R, Leygue A (2014) The Proper Generalized Decomposition for Advanced Numerical Simulations: A primer, Springer-Cham.

5. Chinesta F, Ladeveze P (2014) Separated Representations and PGD Based Model Reduction: Fundamentals and Applications, Springer-Verlag.

6. Falcó A, Nouy A (2012) Proper generalized decomposition for nonlinear convex problems in tensor banach spaces. Numer Math 121: 503-530.    

7. Chinesta F, Leygue A, Bordeu F, et al. (2013) Parametric PGD based computational vademecum for efficient design, optimization and control. Arch Comput Method Eng 20: 31-59.    

8. Falcó A, Montés N, Chinesta F, et al. (2018) On the existence of a progressive variational vademecum based in the proper generalized decomposition for a class of elliptic parametrised problems. J Comput Appl Math 330: 1093-1107.    

9. Leon A, Argerich C, Barasinski A, et al. (2018) Effects of material and process parameters on in-situ consolidation. Int J Mater Form 12: 491-503.

10. Argerich C, Ruben I, Leon A, et al. (2018) Tape surface characterization and classification in automated tape placement processability: Modeling and numerical analysis. AIMS Mater Sci 5: 870-888.    

11. Rabadan R, Blumberg AJ (2020) Topological Data Analysis For Genomics And Evolution, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

12. Oudot SY (2010) Persistence theory: From quiver representation to data analysis, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 209.

13. Chazal F, Michel B (2017) An introduction to topological data analysis: fundamental and practical aspects for data scientists. arXiv 1710.04019.

14. Carlsson G (2009) Topology and data. Bull Amer Math Soc 46: 255-308.    

15. Leon A, Barasinski A, Nadal E, et al. (2015) High-resolution thermal analysis at thermoplastic pre-impregnated composite interfaces. Compos Interface 22: 767-777.    

16. Leon A, Barasinski A, Chinesta F (2017) Microstructural analysis of pre-impreganted tapes consolidation. Int J Mater Form 10: 369-378.    

17. Yang F, Pitchumani R (2001) A fractal cantor set based description of interlaminar contact evolution during thermoplastic composites processing. J Mater Sci 36: 4661-4671.    

18. Levy A, Heider D, Tierney J, et al. (2014) Inter-layer thermal contact resistance evolution with the degree of intimate contact in the processing of thermoplastic composite laminates. J Compos Mater 48: 491-503.    

19. Krishnapriyan AS, Haranczyk M, Morozov D (2020) Robust topological descriptors for machine learning prediction of guest adsorption in nanoporous materials. arXiv 2001.05972.

20. Carlsson G, Zomorodian A, Colling A, et al. (2004) Persistence barcodes for shapes. Avaliable from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/SGP/SGP04/127-138.

21. Saul N, Tralie C (2019) Scikit-TDA: topological data analysis for python.

22. Adams H, Chepushtanova S, Kirby M, et al. (2017) Persistence images: A stable vector representation of persistent homology. J Mach Learn Res 18: 218-252.

23. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, et al. (2011) Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. arXiv1201.0490v4.

24. Argerich C, Ruben I, Leon A, et al. (2019) Code2Vect: An efficient heterogenous data classifier and nonlinear regression technique. CR Mecanique 347: 754-761.    

© 2020 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licese (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)

Download full text in PDF

Export Citation

Article outline

Show full outline
Copyright © AIMS Press All Rights Reserved